BackComments / Mentions
Immutable transactional records of cringeposting and unbased thought can now be
called out, on-chain, and linked to users' ENS domain and/or NFT-linked address
via twitter.
These milquetoast losers deserve to be bullied, and all it costs is $10 in
anonymized ETH.
See process below:
>1) screenshot cringepost and/or come up with appropriate roast/copypasta to
send to lefty "web3" loser of choice
>2) if you are sending a photo, host it on IPFS by following this tutorial:
https://medium.com/@angellopozo/uploading-an-image-to-ipfs-e1f65f039da4
>3) optional: create online persona to repost/link tx data so you can comment it
to the lefty on their social media platform of choice
>4) revel in your now-unlimited powers of cyberbullying, wait for the salt to
flow
Seriously - all it took was $7 to get this lefty loser to complain about some
bland copy-pasta. Imagine what would happen if she were flooded IPFS-hosted
screenshots of her stupidest opinions, random gore, or offensive personal
attacks in the form of comments on her ENS-linked account?
Let's test the limits of this immutable system of record that TNS has built, by
exploiting it to personally offend all of its founding team. The world needs to
harden the fuck up - let's see how far we can take this shit. EIP-3668: CCIP Read: Secure offchain data retrieval
>created 7/19/20
>last call 1/24/22
Minimising storage and transaction costs on Ethereum has driven contract authors
to adopt a variety of techniques for moving data offchain, including hashing,
recursive hashing (eg Merkle Trees/Tries) and L2 solutions. While each solution
has unique constraints and parameters, they all share in common the fact that
enough information is stored onchain to validate the externally stored data when
required.
Thus far, applications have tended to devise bespoke solutions rather than
trying to define a universal standard. This is practical - although inefficient
- when a single offchain data storage solution suffices, but rapidly becomes
impractical in a system where multiple end-users may wish to make use of
different data storage and availability solutions based on what suits their
needs.
By defining a common specification allowing smart contract to fetch data from
offchain, we facilitate writing clients that are entirely agnostic to the
storage solution being used, which enables new applications that can operate
without knowing about the underlying storage details of the contracts they
interact with.
Examples of this include:
>Interacting with ‘airdrop’ contracts that store a list of recipients offchain
in a merkle trie.
>Viewing token information for tokens stored on an L2 solution as if they were
native L1 tokens.
>Allowing delegation of data such as ENS domains to various L2 solutions,
without requiring clients to support each solution individually.
>Allowing contracts to proactively request external data to complete a call,
without requiring the caller to be aware of the details of that data.
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668
Thoughts anon? EIP-3668: CCIP Read: Secure offchain data retrieval
>created 7/19/20
>last call 1/24/22
Minimising storage and transaction costs on Ethereum has driven contract authors
to adopt a variety of techniques for moving data offchain, including hashing,
recursive hashing (eg Merkle Trees/Tries) and L2 solutions. While each solution
has unique constraints and parameters, they all share in common the fact that
enough information is stored onchain to validate the externally stored data when
required.
Thus far, applications have tended to devise bespoke solutions rather than
trying to define a universal standard. This is practical - although inefficient
- when a single offchain data storage solution suffices, but rapidly becomes
impractical in a system where multiple end-users may wish to make use of
different data storage and availability solutions based on what suits their
needs.
By defining a common specification allowing smart contract to fetch data from
offchain, we facilitate writing clients that are entirely agnostic to the
storage solution being used, which enables new applications that can operate
without knowing about the underlying storage details of the contracts they
interact with.
Examples of this include:
>Interacting with ‘airdrop’ contracts that store a list of recipients offchain
in a merkle trie.
>Viewing token information for tokens stored on an L2 solution as if they were
native L1 tokens.
>Allowing delegation of data such as ENS domains to various L2 solutions,
without requiring clients to support each solution individually.
>Allowing contracts to proactively request external data to complete a call,
without requiring the caller to be aware of the details of that data.
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668
https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/durin-secure-offchain-data-retrieval/6728 Imagine not knowing about Chainlink's only eKYC node that is about to launch:
Everest ID (ticker: ID). It's basically Chainlink 2.
You can already try out their wallet with your biometrics. This is the future
and you get to profit from your own enslavement. Go to the ID2020 website, click
on the Programs tab and you'll find Everest.
35m mc + Gates & Rockefeller foundation, Microsoft, and Klaus Schwab behind it.
Partnered with Oracle. Do some research on what ID2020 is and their background.
Ocean protocol and FTX integration is imminent, read what their CEO posted a few
days ago.
Take part in the NWO and join the citadel. Make it stack is 50K, sui 10K.
VFA license secured, the only other crypto coin that has it is CRO (crypto.com,
mcap is 14B)
Bonus: it's the KYC solution ENS will be using soon
https://medium.com/the-ethereum-name-service/everest-creates-on-chain-
directory-of-kyc-and-humanness-with-ens-name-ever-eth-c22a94edacdb
Bonus 2: ex Estonian president is on board https://twitter.com/altemark/status
/1477453113497903109
And nice stuff to read.
https://twitter.com/jos12olson/status/1360880264340074500?s=21
https://twitter.com/rafi_0x/status/1359569867377106945?s=21
Now you know. There is so much more to say about ID, and I'll tell you all about
it. Don’t cry when you missed Everest ID at under 35M mc on Uniswap. DYOR is
really easy and interesting, you will understand a lot of things. I want to reflect on the past year and the demoralization campaign.
No one is paying attention to the treasury.
The dumps have brought us down but have stopped for more than a month now.
People complained about the dumps putting pressure on the price but it was
necessary for the team to scale and build their runway for long term planning.
The circulating supply has increased by ~120 millions tokens since 2017. At a
DCA sell-off price of 20 dollars that's 2.4 billions, the actual DCA is likely
lower and some of the supply went to nodes and partners or OTC desks, and a lot
of that supply is just in intermediary wallets that haven't hit exchanges yet,
but we can imagine that they have secured at least 1B in their treasury.
Considering their cornerstone role in the entire defi space, we also have to
assume that their treasury is full of partner tokens that have also appreciated,
and is being used to generate yield. A good example of this is how Chainlink
Labs was one of the entities that profited the most from the ENS airdrop.
1 billion treasury, that's fucking huge and gives them enough runway to keep
operating without further massive sell-offs for quite a while.
1 billion is enough to pay 300 employees 300k salaries for more than 10 years.
Look at what Matic pulled to keep dominance on the scalability market, multiple
acquisitions.
You think Chainlink will let anything compete with CCIP? They'll just buyout top
teams and poach top talent.
And they still have 60% of the supply. Dozens of billions today but by the time
they'll need to resume sell-offs, this supply will be worth hundreds of
billions. This is an investment in the future.
By 2025, CL will have +1000 employees, monopolies on multiple market use cases,
acquired other teams. It will outlast any bear market.
Phase 1 was price feeds - operating at a loss, but integrated everywhere
Phase 2 is CCIP - leveraging integrations for high value capture
Phase 3 will be staking - value flowing to token it seems to me that this trend has already outlived itself, because of the
underlings in TiK ToK.
It's time to look for some projects, which will be really used, like it was with
Trust Wallet, remember how token TWT took off?
I was looking for something similar, I only found WallStreetNinja - an analogue
of Trust Wallet, but sort of completely independent - that is, they use Internet
Computer, ENS, Pocket Network, and so on.
What do you think, smart, or another scam?
>ws dot ninja >What is HNS?
Handshake is a decentralized, permissionless naming protocol where every peer is
validating and in charge of managing the root DNS naming zone with the goal of
creating an alternative to existing Certificate Authorities and naming systems.
>Why is this important?
Names on the internet (top level domains, social networking handles, etc.)
ultimately rely upon centralized actors with full control over a system which
are relied upon to be honest, as they are vulnerable to hacking, censorship, and
corruption. Even ENS falls prey to being controlled by limited authorizers.
>What does HNS plan to do?
Handshake aims to experiment with new ways the internet can be more secure,
resilient, and socially useful with a peer-to-peer system validated by the
network's participants.
Now mind you BTC was also an experiment at first jus sayin'
I gave you a little bit of info. DYOR see who is behind the project, see the
potential, and youll thank me anon. Shake it with me baby, as we daisy chain our
way to the moon.