IONQ

wallstreetsimps

Quantum Computers IONQ RGTI

SurveyIllustrious738

IONQ

Peterd90

I am betting on space (RKLB), Gene editing, (DNA,MRNA), quantum (IONQ,MSF,HON)and hydrogen (HDRO)

1TalefromTheCryptos

I had like $6,000 in $10 IONQ July calls I broke even on a few weeks ago. I can't even imagine thinking how much I'd be down if I held them. I'm probably never going to buy options again unless it's a $30 lotto ticket.

1TalefromTheCryptos

When's IONQ gonna squeeze all those short sellers nuts.

LifeguardFearless439

IONQ its a company thats one of the leaders in quantum computing. It’s currently unprofitable but its making breakthroughs in the sector and i am willing to bet on that sector for the next 5 to 10 years.

freemytaco69

IONQ - not a penny stock but way undervalued and quantum computing will be the future. Good opportunity to buy at the moment

ub3rm3nsch

I dumped everything but QBTS. [Here](https://seekingalpha.com/article/4682647-ionq-dont-buy-the-wrong-qubit-technology) is why I dumped IONQ. RGTI has been on a steady decline this year, and they seem to be a long way away from profitability. ARQQ has seen a massive sell off by institutional investors. Everything I'm reading about QBTS makes me think that, outside of IBM, it has the best chance of success. They recently claimed Quantum Supremacy on their last earnings call, and their earnings growth, and instituonal ownership, are both big green flags.

MtTime420

$QBTS, $RGTI, $ARQQ, even $IONQ dipping to around $8 premarket - all these stocks can’t seem to break out of their pretty finite range. But if you day trade all of them offer small gains.

_RAPTORMAN_

80% sure bout IONQ doing that

KwisatzHaterach

So lately anytime I make a good play and start thinking I’m a hot shit trader I just jump over to my long term screen and admire my IONQ 130 share investment that I bought at 10.90 and re-ground myself.

CouldBeSolidAdvice

get your azz in gear, get into energy... NEE, OXY, Eversource, Enphase.... get into the Russel, pick up every russel you can find (stash cash)...... get into quantum computing (only thing gonna save us from AI) IONQ... get into space... LUNR cheap again at $5 IIPR instead of tilray

1TalefromTheCryptos

Anyone else load up on that IONQ dip?

accruedainterest

What happens to IONQ if it declares bankruptcy?

treeofwisdumb

To answer the question: "Is there any information you have that I don't, that would be a reason not to buy this stock?". No. Probably not. But possibly if you have either 1) Flawed rationale behind your investing. 2) Underestimated the risk you're taking Note: My research is shallow. I have positions in IONQ (representing very small % of overall holdings). **Let's start with 1) Flawed rationale behind your investing.** The fact that you are basing decisions off of what moves institutions / hedge funds / insiders investors are making is flawed because different types of investors have different goals. An **insider** for example, might be simply liquidfying some funds for their new mansion. Or liquidfying their shares for diversivication. A **hedge fund**, might be investing as a small risk that wouldn't even phase them if they lost a million dollars tomorrow becuase they have positions in 10,000 other things with more dependable hopes. An **institution** might be investing for growth of the industry as a whole. If QC becomes viable as a whole, many hardware or services companies stand to benefit, for example. But **YOU**, the **dumb money retail investor**, you should be focusing on housing and feeding yourself and your family and having a cushion for retirment. You should be mindful of that goal and how it differs from the incentives of other investors. **Second, let's address if you might be 2) Underestimating the risk you're taking** Quantum computing market worth is short of a billion today, but forecasted for hundreds of billions by 2030. This is appetizing, but this is portioned into a market of only hardware, but services, software and other players. **a) there's risk in sharehold of the** ***trapped ion*** **approach** Of the hardware focused invesments, there are presently at least 10 approaches in QC. Whether *superconducting* QC, *photonic* QC, *neutral atoms* QC, *quantum dots* QC, *color center* QC, *topological* QC, or ***trapped ion*** QC (IONQ) ......... or ***any new technology or approach*** might be best is still undecided! This is the nature of an emerging market. **b) there's risk in IONQ capturing considerable sharehold of the** ***trapped ion*** **market** Let's ASSUME trapped ion computers become a commercially advantageuous approach. Even then, there is heavy competition from many private companies like Microsoft, Honeywell (Quantinuum), IBM, Google, etc. Like IONQ, many of these companies have partnerships with leading research universities. While IONQ is solidly postioned with its own research university contracts and clientele, there is no predicitng who might emerge as the leader in this field. Internationally, you have these setups. Korea, UK, US. They are all aggressivley researching the same QC use cases. Regularly in the press, trapped ion technology by IBM and Honeywell (Quantinuum = fromed from merger Honeywell + Cambridge Quantum) have published promise of major breakthroughs. Who is to say some other private company does not succeed in a way that renders IONQ obsolete? This company is not profitable. And it has no guarantees to be. That alone is a reason for some to avoid investing. While my research is shallow, qualitative, and probably all information you already have, I wanted to share my perspective that this investment in a single stock for a company still in its R&D phases in a market that itself is still in its R&D phases would limit this investment to a speculative play at best compared to other investments you have at hand as an individual investor. Still, here's to hoping it pays off!

Capital_F_u

Ahh man I'm banking on IONQ as well. I also strongly believe that quantum computing is the key to AGI/"iRobot" type of shit

WRHull

I have about $1000 on RGTI, $500 on QUBT and another $800 on IONQ with fingers crossed that quantum computing take off beyond academic applications. It might be what takes AI to the next level.

ub3rm3nsch

Honestly? $QBTS. They have claimed "quantum supremacy" (contrast this to just "quantum advantage"), and their sales seem to be doing very well. In my opinion, if their claims are true, this will revolutionize computing. They seem to have more attention from analysts than RGTI and IONQ, and their mixed shelf offering makes bullish that they themselves see a spike in the shareprice soon.

MannieOKelly

A couple of things . . First, IONQ just finished building a factory to produce their AQ-35 system, Forte Enterprise. No idea how that compares to what RGTI has, but in either case they have to find buyers to make money. Second, it's not clear how useful either RGTI's current systems (with which I am not familiar) or IONQ's current AQ-35 system are. IONQ's claim for an example application for their next-gen AQ-64 system promised for 2025 is pretty modest: they say it will be able to optimize airport gate management for a "small European airport." More ambitious applications like drug discovery or breaking current encryption keys are much farther away. And the set of problem classes where quantum machines are known to have a big performance advantage over conventional computers is still pretty limited. So significant commercial value of applying quantum computers is not current, and of uncertain size. Third, whether quantum computers will greatly speed up AI applications is still a big TBD. It sounds great--let's mash up two bit technologies and they'll be amazing--but no-one actually knows how to mash them up yet, or even if mashing them up is worth anything in terms of cost or capability.

_Badscat_406

Just to think SMCI was once trading at IONQs current prices.. I’m hopeful to see IONQ follow in that direction 🤝

Omega_proxy

What does this mean for IONQ? https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-computing-recharged-with-electromagnetic-ion-trap-innovation/

Velvetystardust

IONQ and NIO. Both in my roth🥲🥲

TurtleGamesxx

Bought some shares of IONQ at a peak and now I’m down close to 2 dollars on each… Hope it takes off soon™️

UrinaryButanohole

Quantum computers: IBM, google, IONQ and others are all already developing and it can potentially bring lots of changes to the market. I like IONQ because it has some good deals made already with US airforce, google and samsung.

GeemBlabbyBeem

The financials are not very good but I like IONQ

SurveyIllustrious738

IONQ is way ahead on building a Quantum Computer.

SurveyIllustrious738

IONQ - quantum computing play. See Defiance CEO interview on CNBC. If you have missed the NVDIA train, you don't want to miss IONQ.

Pavvl___

$IONQ betting on it becoming the microsoft of quantum AI.

frinklestine

IONQ

tanukiparts

My theory is AI > Weight Loss > Quantum. AI will no longer be top of mind come May when Novo Nordisk has their earnings and demonstrates the global demand for semaglutide products. They now have insurance coverage for everything... NVIDIA now has a quantum simulator, so even they're recognizing that QC represents an entirely new market. Products like Palantir's AIP have demonstrated the robust power and utility of AI beyond Generative AI, but are there problems and industries that would benefit greatly from QC? Most likely-- and probably at a much lower cost, considering that one "unit" of Foundry is [$100k/month on AWS](https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-a5m5xespbqyci), and D-Wave's entire annual revenue was $8.8M. Can companies like NVIDIA produce similar technology? Probably, but why not just buy D-Wave or IonQ instead? Do I understand anything about QC? Nope-- but someone is buying their products. Positions: PLTR, NVO, QBTS, IONQ

skkoct

add QCOM TSM ADI OUST IONQ ASX

theXJlife

IONQ squeezy next week

elysiumplain

$IONQ has some potential to hit 10.50+ today. Might be a solid weekly call.

Swimming_Pea_7195

I’m not really sure I know big names are in quantum computing like Microsoft and IBM obviously but I’m watching IONQ seems like they maybe the ones to benefit the most. Also AI benefits from both of these, 10-20 years I can see all these working in tandem maybe even sooner

Abject_Specific_2820

I’ve been slowly adding RGTI and IONQ in my Roth for months. Too boring to play with in my trade account quite yet.

1TalefromTheCryptos

My IONQ calls need to print big

north5943

I’m stuck between IONQ, RGTI, and QBTS

Pavvl___

$IONQ

Swizerlan

$IONQ

karotro

IONQ

Perfect_Tangelo

IONQ will be my ten bagger and make me a millionaire or will make me bust.

CalabreseAlsatian

IONQ and RGTI. Very cheap and I can wait a few decades to see if they’ll pay off.

Professional_Menu408

QBTS QUICK IONQ RGTI…..because of AI the quantum computing field is rapidly expanding. And Quantum computers will replace the computers we know. One of them or all will be bought out by the big names.

Crunchieeagle

It does explain however like in biology the missing link in how photosynthesis works but I did a PhD in branch of chemistry that applies the principles and equations of quantum mechanics to the study of molecules. So your own conclusion is wrong. It could give me much more power than AI if it can produce theories that AI cannot explain now as API chat is like an intelligent 16 writing an essay. It is not going to put out theories that has different probabilities as to which one could be right or not. Just think of it like you are doing in economics, If Quantum Learning is based of lots of data and more probability based outcomes it could be massive AI is still based on microchips to feeds it hunger. It has a limit. But if AI is powerful enough to actually process Quantum computing then those doing both or at least the latter will be a huge transformation AI is short term but has accelerated. QL is at the start , and for the longer term, as both will become even bigger if quantum Artificial Intelligence came together But I don't have the knowledge to know what to invest in, as I am not an economist's. I guess as IONQ and Hyundai are doing both together to try and catch Tesla up who are very undervalued short term as they are the other one that technology actually is working and progressing. I'd may go there

Gloomy_Type3612

It is difficult to answer "what does this mean" questions. It could mean absolutely nothing, it could mean everything. The distinct spin of the Dirac electron could, I suppose, improve understanding of errors and map out a better way to identify and mitigate them. We can't see under the hood and know everything that these companies are doing, but my guess is that it doesn't have much meaning at all for IONQ. MAYBE it could have some meaning for superconducting modalities. IONQ have always left the door open to pivot modalities as the data comes in, but things are progressing well enough with ion traps (and their cousin, the neutral atom) that I just don't see them ever switching to a dead tech like giant clunky dilution refrigerators. They would have to run into some enormous insurmountable barrier for that to happen, and if it does, it's past time to bail on them. The road is getting clearer for ion traps though, so I don't have that concern.

Puzzleheaded_Pop6366

Thank you. I appreciate you taking the time to reply. Now, a question way out of my league. What if anything does this mean for IONQ? [https://www.sciencealert.com/light-speed-electrons-discovered-moving-in-4-dimensions-for-the-first-time](https://www.sciencealert.com/light-speed-electrons-discovered-moving-in-4-dimensions-for-the-first-time)

Oh51Melly

Keep going IONQ 🙏🏽

morecoffeemore

Why did d-wave lose something like 90% of its value in about half a year? Other pure quantum public companies ( Rigetti and IONQ) didn't crash like D-wave, so why did d-wave and not the other 2? [D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Stock Price, News, Quote & History - Yahoo Finance](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/QBTS/?guccounter=1)

morecoffeemore

Why did d-wave lose something like 90% of its value in about half a yea? Also I'm looking at the chart of D-wave - I would've expected higher volume to drive such a loss and am confused, because the volume didn't go up. What am I missing? Other pure quantum public companies ( Rigetti and IONQ) didn't crash like D-wave, so why did d-wave and not the other 2? [D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Stock Price, News, Quote & History - Yahoo Finance](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/QBTS/?guccounter=1)

1TalefromTheCryptos

IONQ

HerrJemine123

Tell that to the people who got fucked with IONQ

No_Dirt2059

>IONQ my 6700 xt works fine

1TalefromTheCryptos

Holy crap that IONQ cup and handle looks so sexy

comicallylargefoot

$IONQ

1TalefromTheCryptos

IONQ

1TalefromTheCryptos

IONQ 1 month cup and handle looking wicked.

1TalefromTheCryptos

Anyone playing RGTI earnings? Pump and dump to $3 like IONQ before the call?

tonez13

What's the play behind IONQ

1TalefromTheCryptos

IONQ

1TalefromTheCryptos

I hope my IONQ calls print today 🤞

1TalefromTheCryptos

I hope my IONQ calls print 🤞

HerrJemine123

Quantum computing is a megatrend...but fuck, I got burned badly with IONQ

Oh51Melly

I’m going in on $10c 7/19 IONQ tomorrow. It has quantum in the bio which sounds nice and fancy and futuristic so I’m finna blow it and just sit tight for a few weeks.

Puzzleheaded_Pop6366

Wallstreet doesn't buy the "future" it buys the next 1-2 years. Get back to me when IONQ is the next 1-2 years....

KwisatzHaterach

Told my family about IONQ yesterday. So naturally today it’s drilling to hades 🙄

Perfect_Tangelo

Disclosure: I am long IONQ at \~4000 shares at \~10.70 I like IonQ. Currently it is valued at \~$2 billion dollars. There's \~200,000,000 shares and share price has been bouncing between $10 and $12 for most of the past year. I think this has the potential to be a ten bagger if you are looking a decade out. It also has the potential to be worth nothing - it is a young company in a young industry. But with huge potential. These are just my own ruminations, and you should ultimately do your own DD and make your own financial decisions. IonQ is a Trapped Ion quantum computing company. There are a few different architectural avenues quantum computers have gone down. I believe that trapped ions will be the most commercially viable because of the energy requirements to run it (doesn't require super cooling) which also makes it more functional. One of the "drawbacks" of trapped ion is arguably the scalability of the systems, but here too there is a lot of promising advancements from IonQ where they have successfully done quantum networking. There are a bunch of research articles out there you can search up on the internet that go over the different types of quantum computer systems, the pros and cons of each, yada yada. All said - I think their technology platform is rock solid and commercially viable. They have moved from their proof-of-concept development phase into engineering, commercialization, and sales. They just opened a manufacturing and headquarters facility in Seattle, WA that will be their manufacturing hub. Some of their co-founders have recently departed from their positions. Some people thought initially this was a bad thing - I disagree. They are PhD researchers and their work is complete. They are going back to the universities to do research. The technology of IonQ is largely settled and proven, now the company is transitioning to engineers to create and scale the hardware and networks to make money. They are growing as a hardware, hosting, and technology company. They have contracts and projects with thought leaders in major industries already. They are working with Airbus, the US Air Force, Caterpillar, and others using their quantum computers for real world computing applications. Their QoQ and YoY bookings have been increasing, with over 100% revenue YoY increase. They have cloud space on all of the major cloud vendors: AWS, Azure, and Google. Today, you can connect to their compute using readily available libraries on the cloud. They also have their own hosted architecture that you can connect to. And they are selling on-prem racks with their next generation coming. They have exceeded their engineering milestones to date. Their most recent milestone they met by over 1 year, and are well on their way to #AQ 64 which in computing terms is insane. The federal government is also looking to pump many billions into quantum computing. IonQ being at the forefront of this and with their current headquarters in Maryland in the DC suburbs has very good positioning to be a beneficiary of federal largesse. The compute requirements for LLM and other AI algorithms is growing logarithmically to exponentially. Traditional computing can only go so far. Quantum computing can (and I think, will) do this next generation of computing resources exponentially better. With my long position, I am hoping I have found my Apple before it was Apple - Microsoft before it was Microsoft - Nvidia before it was Nvidia. I like the stock! Long.

MannieOKelly

Apparently the statistical part of ML that today uses lots of matrix math running on GPUs is subject to quantum speedup--I don't know the algorithms or techniques. IONQ's 2025 target product is a 64 "algorithmic qubit" (AQ) machine. As you likely know, qubit counts are hard to compare, since often the huge overhead of physical qubits required for error correction is what's mentioned. AQ's are a version of "logical qubits" actually performing computations, and IONQ seems to think that's enough to start being useful. Breaking encryption with Shor's algorithm is NOT "low-hanging fruit" in terms of quantum applications. (I am not any kind of quantum expert--just interested in the tech and its potential and trying to sort through as much as I can of what the experts write that's relevant to practical application. ).

MannieOKelly

(IONQ is my biggest mad-money bet. Also have a small bit of Rigetti.) There are a couple of layers of downside risk here: (1) will QC be able to create commercial value anytime soon (< 5 years); will IONQ be the winner or perhaps one of several winners vs. much bigger non-pure-play companies like IBM and MSFT, or a new company out of one of the several early-stage (academic) QC projects? So investing in (vs. just trading) IONQ is definitely very speculative. The positive case for IONQ is something like: 1. They are the best funded public pure-play QC company at present. So if they succeed the leverage could be huge; and they have enough funding to get to their PLANNED "commercially relevant product" without seeking more and thus diluting current stockholders. (Doesn't seem to be true of any other pure-play . . .) They also have a lot of IP. 2. They are focused on delivering a minimally commercially useful product in 2025 and have AFAIK set up the only factory to make that machine. "Minimally useful" means relatively easy problems, like speeding up ML. 3. They acknowledge that approaches other than their current one based on trapped ions may well come along, but they suggest that none of these is within less than several years of resulting in a commercially useful QC product for sale. And their plan is to have enough revenue, customers, and acquired product expertise by that time to move toward any superior tech that becomes more than experimental. 4. I see a growing consensus that QC's will not be standalone systems, but more like specialized co-processors integrated into conventional systems. So I like IONQ's focus on designing their systems for integration into the standard infrastructure of conventional data centers.

chespirito2

I own a decent amount of this. It's unclear the real effect that quantum computing will have. My friend has a phd in the subject, and actually that's who first turned me onto this company. That said he feels that his phd was mostly out of interest and that quantum computing is nowhere remotely ready for actual use. His current job is in industry and is unrelated to quantum computing. This is just a very long shot bet that something might occur here. Even if quantum ends up being big, there's no compelling reason that I'm aware of why IONQ would be a part of that. They very well might be, but there's a ton of research groups out there who may form new companies. Now for a short term play, sure that seems reasonable though its trajectory is hard to predict as there's no real use case for the technology. In their earnings announcement they make vague reference to using their systems one day for training generative AI models. I believe this to be bullshit and makes me more skeptical of them. I'm not planning on selling.

To____A____

I am right there with you on the potential of this technology. I own some IONQ but have been wondering if QTUM ETF would be a better bet to capture the winners in this space. Curious if you have any thoughts.

regardedWSBettor

$IONQ believer here

Perfect_Tangelo

Disclosure: I am long IONQ at \~4000 shares at \~10.70 Also disclosure: I am focusing more on the "great price" side of the equation, with what I think is a great -young- company with lots of room for growth I like IonQ. Currently it is valued at \~$2 billion dollars. There's \~200,000,000 shares and share price has been bouncing between $10 and $12 for most of the past year. I think this has the potential to be a ten bagger if you are looking a decade out. It also has the potential to be worth nothing - it is a young company in a young industry. But with huge potential. These are just my own ruminations, and you should ultimately do your own DD and make your own financial decisions. IonQ is a Trapped Ion quantum computing company. There are a few different architectural avenues quantum computers have gone down. I believe that trapped ions will be the most commercially viable because of the energy requirements to run it (doesn't require super cooling) which also makes it more functional. One of the "drawbacks" of trapped ion is arguably the scalability of the systems, but here too there is a lot of promising advancements from IonQ where they have successfully done quantum networking. There are a bunch of research articles out there you can search up on the internet that go over the different types of quantum computer systems, the pros and cons of each, yada yada. All said - I think their technology platform is rock solid and commercially viable. They have moved from their proof-of-concept development phase into engineering, commercialization, and sales. They just opened a manufacturing and headquarters facility in Seattle, WA that will be their manufacturing hub. Some of their co-founders have recently departed from their positions. Some people thought initially this was a bad thing - I disagree. They are PhD researchers and their work is complete. They are going back to the universities to do research. The technology of IonQ is largely settled and proven, now the company is transitioning to engineers to create and scale the hardware and networks to make money. They are growing as a hardware, hosting, and technology company. They have contracts and projects with thought leaders in major industries already. They are working with Airbus, the US Air Force, Caterpillar, and others using their quantum computers for real world computing applications. Their QoQ and YoY bookings have been increasing, with over 100% revenue YoY increase. They have cloud space on all of the major cloud vendors: AWS, Azure, and Google. Today, you can connect to their compute using readily available libraries on the cloud. They also have their own hosted architecture that you can connect to. And they are selling on-prem racks with their next generation coming. They have exceeded their engineering milestones to date. Their most recent milestone they met by over 1 year, and are well on their way to #AQ 64 which in computing terms is insane. The federal government is also looking to pump many billions into quantum computing. IonQ being at the forefront of this and with their current headquarters in Maryland in the DC suburbs has very good positioning to be a beneficiary of federal largesse. The compute requirements for LLM and other AI algorithms is growing logarithmically to exponentially. Traditional computing can only go so far. Quantum computing can (and I think, will) do this next generation of computing resources exponentially better. With my long position, I am hoping I have found my Apple before it was Apple - Microsoft before it was Microsoft - Nvidia before it was Nvidia. I like the stock! Long.

CJ-2QT

Thank god for IONQ, I was down 90% this week and averaged down for a nice multi bagger at the top

throwawaymyalias

Oh, and one other thing about IONQ: An executive at DELL just joined the IONQ Board of Directors: [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ionq-appoints-dell-technologies-bill-210500926.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ionq-appoints-dell-technologies-bill-210500926.html) The quantum computing sector is about to see a major bounce...

throwawaymyalias

I've been posting about the next hype trade, which is going to be the quantum computing (QC) sector, as it ties in directly to the future needs of AI. IONQ is the market cap leader, and the stock currently trades at a mere $2.5B market cap. I first posted about IONQ when it was trading at $10 earlier this week. Today it's $12+. IONQ is going to at minimum $50 in the near-term, though, because even at $50 the total market cap of the company will be a mere $10B. The QC sector is soon going to be getting a lot of attention, as again it ties into the future needs of AI.

KwisatzHaterach

Holy fuc IONQ you beautiful bitch make mama proud 🥲printing!!!!!

oknowwhat6

IONQ

throwawaymyalias

IONQ - quantum computing stock, which ties in directly to the needs of AI. IONQ is going to $50.

KwisatzHaterach

IONQ is going to spaaaaace!!

1TalefromTheCryptos

Apple should partner with IONQ.

throwawaymyalias

Quantum computing (QC) will be the next sector to be hyped, as QC ties directly into the future needs of the AI sector. I posted about IONQ a couple of days ago when it was below $10, and today it hit $11 on heavy volume. QC will soon be on everyone's radar, and when it happens IONQ will already be trading at $50. And at $50, IONQ market cap will be a mere $10B. There is a LOT of upside left on IONQ....

CJ-2QT

I should have averaged down on my IONQ calls this week... up 200% today but still down 30%

CJ-2QT

IONQ

G1gl1orononim1con

😂 my bad, I was thinking MNMD but had just seen IONQ killing it too. I think I fixed it.

HarlaWaide

IONQ is back, baby!

G1gl1orononim1con

IONQ 🧠🍄💰🧠🍄💰🧠🍄💰🧠🍄💰💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽

throwawaymyalias

IONQ will soon again be trading well north of $20. And even at $20 - a double from here - the entire market cap would be a mere $4B. Buying IONQ now is like buying NVDA in 2022 when NVDA was trading at a mere $50.

ylli101

I’m buying IONQ 1/2026 35c for fun. They are pretty cheap and have a decent amount of OI so other people must have the same idea 

throwawaymyalias

Quantum computing (QC) is the next sector that will go parabolic, as it ties directly into the future needs of AI. IONQ is the market cap leader, and buying IONQ today is similar to buying NVDA in 2020 when NVDA traded at $50. (And how many people back then said NVDA would never trade anywhere near just $500...?) IONQ current price: $10. Market cap: a mere $2B.

fortunenofame

IONQ

Hularuns

I disagree. If IBM, GOOGL, MSFT, LMT, etc. spun off their QC departments you'd see what a small fish IONQ is.

throwawaymyalias

Patience. Buying IONQ now at $10 is like buying NVDA a year ago.

throwawaymyalias

Quantum computing (QC) is the next sector that will go parabolic, as it ties in directly with the needs of AI. IONQ is the market cap leader, and I expect it will soon be trading multiples higher on QC sector media hype. IONQ current price: $10.

throwawaymyalias

Quantum computing (QC) is the next sector that will go parabolic, as it ties in directly with the needs of AI. IONQ is the market cap leader, and I expect it will soon be trading multiples higher on QC sector media hype. IONQ current price: $10.

ronthegr8

Quantum computing stocks like IONQ, RGTI, QBTS.

LivingITMoney

Next bubble will be quantum computers $IONQ

dallasjeremy76

Going long on ARKF, AMKR, APLD, IONQ, and UMC Data Centers, Quantum Physics, and Chip Manufacturers These are all at entry level positions poised for bigs gains in the year(s) ahead.

Uwswim5

IONQ

CaptainMyanmar

Excited to see what IONQ does this week

Speirsy3

They days to cover are low, if it happens if will happen quick, you may not be able even to capitalize on it, it may happen after hours and then tank before open, something similar that happened to IONQ and BYND last earnings