See More StocksHome

CAGR

Show Trading View Graph

Mentions (24Hr)

0

0.00% Today

Reddit Posts

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Kroger the mogger earnings coming up

r/pennystocksSee Post

Nickel Inventories Continue to Drop. Price of Nickel Set to Rally on the back half of 2023.

r/RobinHoodPennyStocksSee Post

Verses AI has many catalysts that'll help it capitalize on the rapidly growing AI market (and a likely NASDAQ uplisting too) [DD on why I'm bullish on $VRSSF]:

r/pennystocksSee Post

Verses AI has many catalysts that'll help it capitalize on the rapidly growing AI market (and a likely NASDAQ uplisting too) so expect another run! [DD on why I'm even more bullish on $VRSSF]:

r/pennystocksSee Post

Enterprise Group (TSX: E, OTCQB : ETOLF) Earnings Exceeded Expectations And More to Come

r/stocksSee Post

Google(GOOG) DCF: AI

r/investingSee Post

VIG and VUG instead of VOO/VTI?

r/WallStreetbetsELITESee Post

Bull Thesis for Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (NYSE: RDY)

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

What the f@!# is going on with 3D printing? (Desktop Metal/Stratasys/Nano Dimension - The Next Industrial Revolution [Continued… May '23])

r/StockMarketSee Post

3 cheap Fintech Stocks to buy before the comeback.

r/optionsSee Post

Options Trading for Wealth Development

r/pennystocksSee Post

PredictMedix (CSE: PMED) (OTCQB: PMEDF) (FRA:3QP) Enters the Sport Medicine Business with AI Fitness Scanning

r/pennystocksSee Post

Enterprise Group, Inc. (TSX: E) (OTCQB: ETOLF) Delivers Impressive Result And A Robust Outlook

r/pennystocksSee Post

AI Enhanced AR Industry, WiMi Hologram Cloud Steady Pushes The Layout In 5G Application

r/pennystocksSee Post

AI Enhanced AR Industry, WiMi Hologram Cloud Steady Pushes The Layout In 5G Application

r/pennystocksSee Post

AI Enhanced AR Industry, WiMi Hologram Cloud Steady Pushes The Layout In 5G Application

r/pennystocksSee Post

AI Enhanced AR Industry, WiMi Hologram Cloud Steady Pushes The Layout In 5G Application

r/ShortsqueezeSee Post

Tupperware brands corp might be a buy, or not

r/StockMarketSee Post

Connective Wellness is Revolutionizing the Fitness Industry $PTON $GRMN $TRNR

r/pennystocksSee Post

Bull Factors and Risk Factors for $BIMI + Why I am Bullish

r/stocksSee Post

COLM Columbia Sportswear, overview and valuation

r/pennystocksSee Post

$TRNR is a Disruptive New Player in the Digital Fitness Industry

r/pennystocksSee Post

Why Predictmedix is a potential ten-bagger (CSE: PMED) (OTCQB: PMEDF) (FRA:3QP)

r/WallStreetbetsELITESee Post

Bull Thesis DD for $TRNR, Fresh NASDAQ Listee

r/WallstreetbetsnewSee Post

$TRNR is Looking Poised for a Bounceback after Post-IPO Slump

r/pennystocksSee Post

$CRTL with a remarkable OTC opening, skyrockets with a 15.5% spike

r/pennystocksSee Post

Usio ($USIO) shareholders have earned a 9.7% CAGR over the last three years.

r/pennystocksSee Post

$CRGE is stable telecom industry stock with 250% upside

r/pennystocksSee Post

Breaking barriers: Payments company expands focus on underserved communities

r/investingSee Post

Latest DD from draganfly, a solution provider of autonomous drones, data and more!

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Do fertilizers play a role in these increasing pollen allergies? Pharmaceutical companies can make exponential seasonal revenue.

r/stocksSee Post

Fidelity National Information Services ($FIS) will pay a larger dividend than last year at $0.52.

r/pennystocksSee Post

AVL on the rise due to energy transition politics! Let’s do this!

r/StockMarketSee Post

Is AVL getting hot?

r/stocksSee Post

Hindenburg's Argument: How At-the-Market Offerings Enabled Icahn Enterprises (IEP) to Entice Retail Investors with 15% Dividend Yield

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

🚀 YTD returns of 12.46% with Portfolio Visualizer, WSB! Let's Goooo! 🌙

r/WallstreetbetsnewSee Post

Ultimate DD of Hapbee, a digital wellbeing company and much more

r/pennystocksSee Post

3 Undervalued Small-cap Stocks With Impressive Upside Potential $E.TO $JOR $TK

r/stocksSee Post

Global Payments ($GPN) is paying out a dividend of $0.25.

r/pennystocksSee Post

Enterprise Group, Inc. (TSX: E) (OTCQB: ETOLF) Strong Financial Results In Q4 Point To A Promising Q1

r/WallStreetbetsELITESee Post

Ultimate DD on Hapbee, A digital wellness company and beyond

r/pennystocksSee Post

A Little DD about Hapbee, a digital wellbeing company and much more

r/pennystocksSee Post

$AGBA Strong sector with great upside potential.

r/ShortsqueezeSee Post

$SQ alert: Why Block Stock ($SQ) is a no-brainer pre-earnings buy

r/WallstreetbetsnewSee Post

Latest DD on Draganfly,a cutting-edge drone solutions, software, and AI systems that revolutionize how organizations can do business and service their stakeholders

r/stocksSee Post

Why Block ($SQ) stock is a no-brainer pre-earnings buy

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

LVMH the first European Company

r/pennystocksSee Post

Undervalued Tech Stock With War-Time Applications (CSE: CTTT) (OTC: CTTTF)

r/investingSee Post

2 approaches to allocation (20yo)

r/pennystocksSee Post

$SMFL Smart for Life Launches Proprietary New Line of High Protein Ice Cream

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Breaking Down Ark Invest's TSLA $2,000 Price Target

r/investingSee Post

Breaking Down Ark Invest's TSLA $2,000 Price Target

r/StockMarketSee Post

Breaking Down Ark Invest's TSLA $2,000 Price Target

r/stocksSee Post

Breaking Down Ark Invest's TSLA $2,000 Price Target

r/pennystocksSee Post

$CRGE is cornering the US market for EV charging infrastructure

r/WallStreetbetsELITESee Post

Latest DD from draganfly, a solution provider of autonomous drones, data and more!

r/pennystocksSee Post

Cerrado Gold Posts Record Q4 2022 Results and Guides to Strong 2023

r/pennystocksSee Post

Ultimate Draganfly DD

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

RUM Is The Next 100 Bagger - Snowball Time

r/smallstreetbetsSee Post

Relationship Set to Accelerate ADHC's Brands into the $59 Billion CBD Market~ RECENTLY RELEASED

r/pennystocksSee Post

Due Diligence Write-up: GNPX - Gem!

r/StockMarketSee Post

Is it time to buy Amazon stock?

r/ShortsqueezeSee Post

i3 Verticals ($IIIV) shareholders have earned a 4.3% CAGR over the last three years.

r/StockMarketSee Post

$NMTC On watch. Low float (8 Million) NASDAQ play. Beefy PR here from Thursday.

r/stocksSee Post

Beyond Meat stock analysis and valuation - A worthless company?

r/stocksSee Post

CURV: in-depth analysis, DD, and potential for short squeeze

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Bitcoin Compound Annual Growth Rate of 200%

r/investingSee Post

Analyzed S&P500 returns for almost last 100 years

r/investingSee Post

How do I breakdown the flaws with Structured Variable Annuities to my spouse?

r/smallstreetbetsSee Post

American Diversified Holdings Corporation (ADHC) Enters into a Comprehensive Alliance with Green Globe International Group Inc. (GGII), Hempacco (HPCO) and GGII Subsidiary Green Star Labs, Inc.

r/smallstreetbetsSee Post

Bullish on $VRSSF: Verses AI has great catalysts that can help it capitalize on the rapidly growing AI market so expect a run

r/pennystocksSee Post

$TREN - Trend Innovations Holding (TREN) Acquires Two Technologies in Multi-Billion Dollar Markets - AI Machine Learning & Digital Artworks Markets

r/WallStreetbetsELITESee Post

The Biotech Market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of just under 14% from 2022 to 2030, according to Willow Biosciences Inc. (WLLW.TO)

r/RobinHoodPennyStocksSee Post

The Biotech Market is predicted to grow at a CAGR of about 14% from 2022 to 2030, according to Willow Biosciences Inc. (WLLW.TO)

r/pennystocksSee Post

Verses AI has great catalysts that can help it capitalize on the rapidly growing AI market so expect a run [Why I’m bullish on $VRSSF]

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Cramer bearish on $PSNY

r/pennystocksSee Post

$NFTG is Readying for its Platform Launch So Expect a Run

r/StockMarketSee Post

Advice required

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Advice required for an upcoming investment comp.

r/RobinHoodPennyStocksSee Post

$AQST - Long-term high-risk, high-reward, pharma play w/ potential for +1000% return

r/pennystocksSee Post

$AQST - Long-term high-risk, high-reward, pharma play w/ potential for +1000% return

r/investingSee Post

AQST Huge Potential Keeps going Up

r/pennystocksSee Post

$NICH News today points to a bright future ahead In my opinion..

r/pennystocksSee Post

AQST Huge Potential

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Looking at Top Brazilian Stock Returns.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Insider Buying + Low Vol +Booze = Regarded DD Time

r/stocksSee Post

AQST Huge Potential. Mods if you delete this you’re missing a chance of a lifetime

r/investingSee Post

AQST Huge Potential. Nobody knows

r/StockMarketSee Post

AQST Huge Potential

r/pennystocksSee Post

AQST Huge Potential

r/ShortsqueezeSee Post

AQST Huge Potential and for Squeeze

r/pennystocksSee Post

Tinka Resources Production Moving Forward at Ayawilca (TSXV:TK) (OTCMKTS:TKRFF)

r/WallStreetbetsELITESee Post

Ultimate Draganfly DD

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Tesla, more downside to come?

r/pennystocksSee Post

Can Splash Group (SBEV) mirror the success stories of Monster Energy and Celsius Holdings?

r/pennystocksSee Post

$PBTS Recent dip into support has opened the door for a great entry point as chart shows a break above .105 could kick in breakout..news like this should grab your attention..

r/stocksSee Post

Singapore Airlines(C6L) DCF Analysis. Need advice and criticisms.

r/pennystocksSee Post

Predictmedix (CSE: PMED) (OTCQB: PMEDF) Tech Play With Significant Revenue and Scalability Goals

r/stocksSee Post

Singapore Airlines (C6L) DCF Analysis. Need Advice & Criticism.

r/stocksSee Post

Uber stock analysis and valuation - The disruptor

Mentions

r/stocksSee Comment

Well you can either take Tesla's word for it, or not. "We are planning to grow production as quickly as possible in alignment with the 50% CAGR target we began guiding to in early 2021. In some years we may grow faster and some we may grow slower, depending on a number of factors. For 2023, we expect to remain ahead of the long-term 50% CAGR with around 1.8 million cars for the year" So people are assuming 50% because that's what Tesla says they're going to achieve for 5 years

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Well, 1.31B in cash and no debt is excellent these days when interest rates are rising and will rise more. They cannot get caught in financial problems with banks, specially when we know they are closing unprofitable stores and cutting expenses while trying to find more revenue online. Their revenue wouldn't even be a miss if they didn't rise their inventory. Looking at YoY performance, company is doing very well, beating their previous performances. Their NFT in video games is still in preparation, new games with in-game purchases through unique NFT blockchain, gamers owning their shields, weapons, skins... which they can sell later when they stop playing a certain game, all these millions of transactions and company will have a small cut of each transaction. When it starts growing with new games integration, that would be a real game changer. Video games are huge market. Let me copy you this: "The Gaming Market size is estimated at USD 245.10 billion in 2023, and is expected to reach USD 376.08 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 8.94% during the forecast period (2023-2028)." That's a huge market. I am personally very bullish.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

If you overlook silicon carbide chips then clearly you hate money. A 33% CAGR is expected between now and 2030 , which surpasses CAGR for CPUs in 90s (20%)

Mentions:#CAGR
r/pennystocksSee Comment

Nickel is currently trading \~$9.50/lb. Recent drop in inventories could send nickel prices +50% by August. The global nickel market is experiencing a period of robust growth, with a projected value of $38.44 billion in 2023,reflecting an impressive compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.0% compared to the previous year. This surge is primarily fueled by the increased demand for stainless steel, driven by infrastructure developments in countries such as Australia and the Philippines. One Nickel story I've been following has a high-grade nickel sulphide deposit, in Quebec. with a historical resource.. Power Nickel (PNPN) (PNPNF). trades on the Toronto venture exchange + OTC markets **6 Facts on The Nickel Market & Power Nickel’s Nisk Flagship Asset:** 1. The global nickel market is projected to reach $38.44billion in 2023, driven by increased demand for stainless steel in countries like Australia and the Philippines. 2. Power Nickel Inc. (TSXV: PNPN) (OTCQB: PNPNF) is a Canadian exploration company focused on nickel, copper, gold, and battery metal prospects in Canada and Chile. 3. Quebec's favorable policies offer Power Nickel's NISK Nickel Sulfide project potential benefits of over $200 million, including tax credits for nickel mine construction and exploration incentives. 4. Power Nickel has a strong financial position, with a stock trading at approximately $0.24 per share and a market capitalization of $28.83million. The company secured C$5 million in financing for exploration and development activities. 5. The NISK Project, located in Quebec, is Power Nickel's flagship asset, aiming to establish a commercial nickel mine to meet the demand of the North American EV supply chain. 6. Promising results from the NISK Project, such as high-grade intersections in drill holes 25, 27, and 28, reinforce Power Nickel's potential in growing nickel, platinum/palladium resources. **CEO Terry Lynch stated** ***"Once again, Nisk is delivering very promising results. Hole 28 is a high-grade nickel hole with robust cobalt and PGM values.***

r/stocksSee Comment

Position = SPY or VOO position, at the start, of $500.00 In layman's terms: You decide you want to invest for the next 30 years, starting today. You put $500.00 into the SPY, by way of example, that is synonymous with your "position". The word "SPY" and the word "Position" are interchangeable, IE: My position is $500 of the SPY, or said another way, I have $500 worth of SPY. Every month, you put $500 more dollars into the "Position" aka the "SPY" for the next 30 years. At a 7% CAGR over 30 years, you will end up with the amount I mentioned in my previous post. Let me know if this helps.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

Verizon (VZ) is not the best Competitor (Peer) for argue a Short position in Netflix (NFLX) lol And Paramount (PARA), well...Forget it xD Its worst than VZ. If you want to argue your NFLX short position by mention Apple TV (AAPL) we can make a deep Financial Comparation here, on how both companies manage their business. **NFLX CAGR METRICS:** Revenues CAGR 3Y = +14,24% Revenues CAGR 5Y = +22% Revenues CAGR 10Y = +24,23% Net Income CAGR 3Y = +23,45% Net Income CAGR 5Y = +51,71% Net Income CAGR 10Y = +74,71% **VZ CAGR METICS:** Revenues CAGR 3Y = +1,21% Revenues CAGR 5Y = +1,66% Revenues CAGR 10Y = +1,68% Net Income CAGR 3Y = +5,49% Net Income CAGR 5Y = -6,72% Net Income CAGR 10Y = +37,58% Source: FinanceCharts and KoyFin https://preview.redd.it/j30dcluwtk4b1.jpeg?width=1149&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=4f4ae51749373a7bbec344168c920be49f9b686a

r/investingSee Comment

I dont think investors expectations should factor into it. They usually tend to be too optimistic. It depends on what you mean by "stop working". There's also so many indexes constructed in ways to go in every which way direction regardless of economic output. I dont think every generation can expect returns like we got wholly in equities for the past two decades, but I don't think chasing yield is the reason to index invest. If you really know industry, and finance, and accounting, and consumers, and skilled management, by all means take ownership in a profitable enterprises, rebalance, look for opportunities, pay attention to filings... A person can do NONE of that, and achive "market returns". Sure they may not be as great as our 12%-14% CAGR, but they will get 6% and the argument remains the same. The point is to save and accumulate wealth by purchasing productive assets that grow with the world economy because cash loses value on it's own. If not inflation it's opportunity cost. If not that it's the simple human desire for present consumption over future consumption. Certain index funds and trust units are such where the whole instrument is traded as a single security, which I don't think affects the underlying, but there is definitely a concern with so many mutual funds basketing the same stocks and having x stock on the s&p shopping list props the price up higher than an equal stock that's overlooked by not being included in an index. Over a long period of time whose to say there wont be heavy lobbying by corporations to get included into an index and enjoy the sweet inflow of ignorant money? Again, it's not an insult to say indexing/diversification is risk management for those who don't know what their doing...yeah people do NOT know what their doing lol its good advice to live your life, work and buy a slice of capitalism that in the long run will HAVE to favor a productive result = growth in wealth. Regarding what Charlie said, idk the context but lets assume theres a world index weighted fairly size or whatever, everyone investing into that world index isn't going to stop the world economy from growing? How does everybody investing reduce output? Sure everyone buying the same amount of the same all the time means that there is less opportunity, and share of that output is more expensive, but since everyone is benefitting from the same goods and service production where will the perpetual money come from to create a stock market bubble? If there are crashed it would be directly related to the economic cycle. There might be stuff I missed but I typed too much

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

[This is a really nice table of Small Cap Value versus the broader market during down-years](https://i.imgur.com/xIpUKyL.png). You'd think small cap value would be more at risk in bear markets, right? It has a lot of companies that are cyclical or leveraged (regional banks, small energy producers). They don't have the stability of well-established businesses or access to cheaper debt financing. And indeed as a general rule, they are more volatile stocks. *But*, there are many drawdowns where SCV not only beats but *crushes* the broader market. Look at 2000-2001, the Dot Com bust which initiated a decade of no returns for SPY. While the market lost 10% both years, SCV did 22% and 14%. Even in the Great Recession SCV did 4% better than the market. In 1981, SCV beat the market by 19% (oil-induced / Volker recession?) The worst relative performance of SCV was in 1990 (-22% for SCV vs -6% for market). I believe that was the S&L crisis plus a minor recession. Like I frequently post: > After Japan's bubble burst, from 1990 to 2019, total country returns were 2.36% CAGR, while SCV did 5.43%, value 7.96%. From August 1999 through July 2009, US SCV had 9.51% CAGR and US value 3.78%, and total market -0.19%. I think of SCV not only as a higher-risk/higher-reward segment for young investors looking to beat the market over a long time horizon, it also functions as a hedge against underperformance by the mega-caps. As in the post-Dot com era. If you are worried about a recession, or that there will be a correction in mega-tech, perhaps SCV is a segment for you. [I won't bore you all with the details, but more research here](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/y9xr61/theres_more_to_index_funds_and_stocks_than_vti/).

Mentions:#SPY#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

SPYD since October 2015 is 7% annualized whereas SPY during same period is 12% CAGR. High dividend yielding stocks are often found in mature and stable industries that generate consistent cash flows. These companies may have slower growth prospects compared to companies in high-growth sectors that reinvest their earnings back into the business. In periods of strong market performance, high-growth companies may outperform dividend-paying stocks, leading to lower returns for the high dividend yield index. Add tax consideration and recent "buyback frenzies" and you are looking at SPY

r/investingSee Comment

Don't bank on past performance, obviously, but VTSMX (the oldest share class of the fund) [has had a CAGR of 9.61%](https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&timePeriod=4&startYear=1985&firstMonth=1&endYear=2023&lastMonth=12&calendarAligned=true&includeYTD=false&initialAmount=10000&annualOperation=0&annualAdjustment=0&inflationAdjusted=true&annualPercentage=0.0&frequency=4&rebalanceType=1&absoluteDeviation=5.0&relativeDeviation=25.0&leverageType=0&leverageRatio=0.0&debtAmount=0&debtInterest=0.0&maintenanceMargin=25.0&leveragedBenchmark=false&reinvestDividends=true&showYield=false&showFactors=false&factorModel=3&portfolioNames=false&portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&symbol1=VTSMX&allocation1_1=100) since 1993. And the total stock market's CAGR is [10.32%](https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-asset-class-allocation?s=y&mode=1&timePeriod=4&startYear=1972&firstMonth=1&endYear=2023&lastMonth=12&calendarAligned=true&includeYTD=false&initialAmount=10000&annualOperation=0&annualAdjustment=0&inflationAdjusted=true&annualPercentage=0.0&frequency=4&rebalanceType=1&absoluteDeviation=5.0&relativeDeviation=25.0&leverageType=0&leverageRatio=0.0&debtAmount=0&debtInterest=0.0&maintenanceMargin=25.0&leveragedBenchmark=false&portfolioNames=false&portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&asset1=TotalStockMarket&allocation1_1=100) since 1972. Inflation's a concern, sure, but you'd still get \~$200K at that return. It'd just be worth less.

Mentions:#VTSMX#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

Jeez I am sorry for the delay, got a little busy. Yeah likely should have provided more context initially, I was hoping to keep it just conversational but yeah. I think that all makes sense Sortino and CAGR sound appropriate and the new ratio could be a nice improvement, I will look into this. Regarding sample size, I’m not sure it’s number of trades so much as enough time to get through ( a portion of ) an economic cycle to view performance during different conditions. I believe from my GIPS research they do not calculate std deviation for use in risk ratio until after 3 years of performance is collected. I am inclined to do the same, as it would be great to even trend towards GIPS compliance proper, which I think has merit. One difficulty I am facing now, is despite wanting this more accurate representation of performance, I want to be able to list some metrics in the short term and still be able to market the strategies on the platform, which is also related to ensure it is monetized for the sake of the users running strategies. I thought displaying the on-platform metrics even prior to the 3 year mark, I could list with a ‘data confidence level’ type of value, low medium high/acceptable type of values. This would let users know hey be weary this data set is small still but here’s what we do know. The other mediation of this concern was to prompt the strategy owners to share historical transaction data, pulled directly from their brokerage so that we could calculate past performance even off of the platform. This would be tracked separately but still displayed to give investors a better understanding of new strategies before they jump in. There are obviously still risks involved in any of these scenarios but I believe it is a reasonable approach to running a successful auto trade system. I am curious any further thoughts regarding some of the user interactions with how they read and understand potential strategies to automate. Thanks a bunch though for your input thus far

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Sony. Crazy moats. 3rd biggest movie studio, 2nd biggest music company and fastest market share growth among the big 3, biggest gaming (console) hardware and software maker, by far the worlds biggest image sensor manufacturer (Apple’s sole image chip supplier), top 5 electronics maker and high end product mix… They’ll generate their market cap of $115B in operating income in the next fifteen years. They’ll generate their market cap less equity in around 8 years. Huge capex investments in image sensors more than half made. Music industry experiencing a massive net positive shift toward streaming with CAGR of high single digits for the foreseeable future. Low debt to EBIT ratio slightly below 1. Great balance sheet and great company.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

I choose PayPal too. My average cost per share $67.98, at the time of writing this. My intentions are to do a swing trade. There are many concerns around PayPal. Growth has slowed, and there's lots of competitors. It's Pay Later business could become a BIG issue. With that said, I believe PayPal is undervalued and due for a small pop. I feel it is transitioning from being a growth stock, to being a value stock. At that, it's undervalued at $62. Forward P/E is excellent, sitting around 12. Still has some growth in the bag, not much with the current outlook, but growth is growth. The online payment CAGR still stands at 10%. PayPal checkout is still very popular. I am European and personally use it all the time for eBay, and when buying things from most websites. I do not see it losing it's current success any time soon. Operating margins aren't terrible, but aren't as alluring as Visa or Mastercard. They have other product offerings that could offer plenty of growth, albeit at lower operating margins, Venmo and Braintree. They are consistent with stock buybacks and still have an ongoing program which is rarely mentioned, enough to buy up a considerable percentage of the current shares outstanding. Their balance sheet will improve as the cost of layoffs clear up. I think there is an argument to be had that PayPal is fair value at it's current price if you want 8-12% return in the coming years. I don't see it dipping hard below $60. My PT isn't too much higher than it's current price. I do not see it returning to $300 a share unless a miracle happens. It was so overvalued at $300 a share, I am surprised it managed to stay there so long. They already have like 400M active accounts, I don't know how they tricked shareholders into thinking they could maintain Covid growth.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

You have to Understand that **Sectors** like **Technology** is a **High PER Sector**...And some Stocks here (*Industry*) have a **High CAGR Price** (*Compound Annual Growth Rate*) = Constantly high PER https://preview.redd.it/g5wsgj0gpz2b1.jpeg?width=1525&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=b5c4527f009feda0cd0b3e4dff5a7a6ee89e0297

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

Pretty far away from good spot for Buy![img](emote|t5_2th52|8882) *MA 200 Weeks = Price CAGR* https://preview.redd.it/a2uzfiplfz2b1.jpeg?width=1523&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=0516f66571b6a932f88de816fd059437776eedd3

Mentions:#MA#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Reading all these arguments betting against Google makes me want to hold for a very long time... OP definitely shouldn't, though. To the AI doomsayers: why do you assume Google will do nothing if ChatGPT threatens search? Before it does, Google will put an equivalent product into search. Even if ChatGPT stole away some queries, it won't steal the valuable ones. Only a small fraction of queries to Google meaningfully contribute to their bottom line, and the ones that do are not ones ChatGPT can help with, e.g. "best price nikon z9". ChatGPT isn't going to bring you to a website to complete your purchase for that query, and this is where the ad dollars are spent. Are you worried about the decreased margins if the cost per query goes up due to AI? Well, maybe in the short run, but in the long run there is a long history of new computer technology getting exponentially cheaper as we figure out how to optimize it. Digital ad spend is projected to increase by \~8%/yr through 2030. And the elephant in the room that nobody seems to even be talking about: Google Cloud will probably be comparably as profitable as Search by \~2030. Math: 2022 Google Cloud revenue: 26.2B Estimated 2030 Cloud computing market size: 1.5T. Google market share: 10%. Est. Google Cloud Revenue 2030: 150B Growth CAGR needed to achieve this: 28% (less than Google Cloud has been growing) Amazon Web Services margin (why shouldn't Google eventually be as profitable as Amazon?): 29% Google Cloud estimated profit 2030: 43.5B Google profit before taxes today (Cloud contributes nothing to this): 71B Assume 8% growth on 71B: 131B Add anticipated Cloud profits: 174.5B Subtract estimated taxes (same effective tax rate): 146B Total number of shares: 13.16M Estimated EPS 2030: $11.09 Current P/E: 28.32 Estimated share price 2030: 314.07 Rate of return on today's stock price: 13%. Google's return since 2010: \~18%

Mentions:#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

Very interesting and not what I was expecting. That does put the problem in a whole new light. My overall opinion is still that it is pointless to benchmark strategies in a vacuum. In fact, it might be worse than pointless, as it might persuade a user to apply some strategy in the wrong market context and get results that don't come close to the benchmark. That said, if you set a very high sampling requirement, like at least 10,000 trades before you surface a benchmark value, to average out luck and market context variations, and stick to Sharpe Ratio (or Sortino Ratio might be better, since Sharpe treats downside risk as equal to upside risk) and CAGR (annualized TWR), that might be safe enough. I'd still put a warning banner over the benchmark that these values are not guarantees of future returns.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Find something that can grow at a 15% CAGR, hold it for about 20 years. Boom. 20 bagger. Hold it 25 years for a 40 bagger. 30 for an 80 bagger.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

NVDA's CY23 non-GAAP P/E is ~60 which, combined with a five-year earnings CAGR of 10% and significant margin leverage, is expensive but not insane for the potential opportunity. Maybe it's ~25% overvalued but this isn't TSLA at it's peak madness.

r/stocksSee Comment

Yes. But NVDA is. Their earnings are actually down 51% YoY. Their revenue is down 21% YoY. They’ll have to grow at a CAGR of 35% for 10 years to have a reasonable valuation. If you think that is reasonable or sustainable, I have some tulips to sell you.

Mentions:#NVDA#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

My main money-making strategy is the Short Put Spread. I don’t trade volatility because I have no confidence in my ability to predict it. The odds always feel stacked against me. But with the Short Put Spread, I know how to make money. I can no more predict a peak or valley than anyone else can. I just rely on devastating or unexpected crashes in fundamentally strong companies, preferably trading below their lowest Wall Street price target and 5- or 10-year DCF fair value, and take advantage of high-IV. I build in a very large margin of safety into every trade, and use a large number of underlyings to spread out risk. The CAGR generated with this approach should exceed 30% even under conservative assumptions, for someone who knows waht they’re doing. Good Luck, Artem

Mentions:#DCF#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

> What are your thoughts and is there a better way that helps the viewer understand what this may mean if they implemented a given strategy for their own interests. What do you mean by "the viewer"? Is this for a youtube or tiktok video? > Loosely I believe for the comparison of strategies, you would compare time weighted rate of return, with a risk ratio such as sharpe and basically display all of this relative to a common benchmark. I think you need to take a step back and describe in more detail what you are trying to accomplish and why. All of the things you mentioned are possibilities, but whether one is better than another depends on what you are trying to do. In general, comparisons of actual trades are pretty pointless. There are so many variables and unknowns that go into options trades, that even if you could manage 1000 samples of A vs B, the comparison will not hold up to historical data or to the future. The market or interest rates or inflation could be radically different next year, changing the results of your A vs. B. The same criticism applies to historical studies based on backtesting, but at least the context for historical data is a known value, unlike the unknowns of the present or future. So I would suggest sticking with backtesting and don't waste your of "the viewers" time by comparing A vs. B in present/live trades. For comparison, here's a backtest that I think is a great example on (a) how to define the methodology, and (b) how to report the various metrics of comparison, like CAGR (for return rate) and Sharpe Ratio (for risk-adjusted return). This is just one of several backtests on the site: https://spintwig.com/spy-short-put-strategy-performance/

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Not all but most of legacy auto is likely fucked long term. Right now legacy car manufacturers off-set the losses of their EV divisions by selling profitable ICE vehicles. However, as the world transitions to EVs (1.2 million sold globally in 2017 - 10.6 million in 2022, 92% CAGR) will ICE vehicles be able to maintain their profitability? Will enough consumers still want to buy ICE cars 5 years from now? Every EV they sell at a loss steals a sale from a profitable ICE. Margins are already thin in the auto industry and if there’s a big shift in demand to EVs those margins that legacy manufacturers are counting on to prop up their EV segments will no longer be there. Further none of the legacy automakers have proven they can scale production of EVs. Scaling is incredibly difficult and legacy has billions invested in legacy plants and legacy engineers. Not to mention trying to unwind their dealership network. Legacy auto has a very slippery slope to climb and the majority won’t make it if past technological transitions are anything to go by

Mentions:#ICE#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

Good. The beginning of wisdom starts with critical thinking. Map-making is an imperfect metaphor, but since no one has ever been able to develop a successful mathematical model for the price of an equity with perfect predictive validity, a metaphor is about as good as anything to try to illustrate the probabilistic nature of the price of a security. Luck helps, but its opposite is far more common. I think that you're falling into the common trap of thinking that my map-making is an astrological approach to predicting the future. I'm neither practicing astrology nor trying to predict the future. What am I doing, then? When I make a map, I try to show a visual probability structure based on the recent past. This is only useful if the near future will resemble the recent past. Why should we believe that it will? Conceptually, that's a very difficult question to answer because of countless variables. From a practical perspective, though, it's hard to argue against something that has a provable statistical edge, regardless of one's theories about it. I'm testing my map against actual price action. Is there evidence of consolidation around major support or resistance lines? Is a trend line holding? Do putative reversal patterns lead to an actual reversal? What are the very few variables that actually *matter*? Within the very narrow scope of 0 DTE SPY trading, successful map-making will give you an edge. If price action violates your map, don't trade. You need to spend time observing, to test the (very temporary, but nonetheless exploitable) validity of your map. If the terrain lines up with your map long enough for you to make a profit, that's all that you need. No elaborate theories are needed. If the price action violates your map, abandon it and don't trade. Observe, try to understand, make another map, and wait for another day. Ultimately, your CAGR will reveal the truth. Do you have an edge, or not? If so, your CAGR had better be way above that of SPY, the benchmark. Please don't assume that I'm a 0 DTE scalper or gambler. I don't like short-term trades *at all*. But it would be foolish to ignore the result of someone I personally know, who is consistently profitable with 0 DTE SPY plays. She trades no more than $300 at a time, but has nonetheless managed to turn $2k into $30k in 55 days, through over 100 trades (depending on how you count, since she scales in and out sometimes, and those trades can be counted discretely or as a single trade). Also, I share your profound skepticism of TA. Edges are subtle and ephemeral. It's easy to falsely attribute (in all sincerity) one's success to a method, when, in truth (although one doesn't know it), one's real success derives from other factors. From my viewpoint, the situation is exactly as you describe. A trader can win, win, win, win, win, experience a single loss, and get wiped out. The art of successful trading relies on ephemeral, non-random price action that can be exploited using a method that generates some type of actionable probability map to indicate when to enter and when to exit. The Devil is in the details.

Mentions:#SPY#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

NVDA's CY23 non-GAAP P/E is ~60 which, combined with a five-year earnings CAGR of 10% and significant margin leverage, is expensive but not insane for the potential opportunity. Maybe it's ~25% overvalued but this isn't TSLA at it's peak madness.

r/stocksSee Comment

Let’s do the math. The CAGR of datacenter revenue was 51% without a blockbuster use case. We have now have that blockbuster use case. Gross margins are trending towards 70%. Datacenter TAM is $600B, for now there is no substitute for nvidia gpus for AI workloads. If AI is that important can nvidia garner 10-30% of that TAM, then you get $100B in Datacenter revenue, $20 eps, 20-25x earnings multiple. It’s just that easy.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/SPACsSee Comment

There is a revenue chart on page 6. $62 mil in 2021, $68 mil in 2022. The 19-22 CAGR of 48% is meaningless in this context, only 10% growth last year.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Over 10 years is the ridiculous part. You can do huge growth maybe 1-3 years, but over a decade? Also this is CAGR., they would need to nearly 10x their revenue today by year 10. What’s the TAM of the markets they are in?

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

I like how OP just generously slaps on 25% CAGR for NVDA, while admitting other leaders in their space did 15%. There’s a huge difference between the two numbers when you’re talking about compounded growth.

Mentions:#CAGR#NVDA
r/stocksSee Comment

To put things into perspective. That 10 dollars you put in would be 20 billion in 5 years if you could keep 43% up for 5 years. Its a BONKERS return. (10\*1.43\^60) For comparison these are the YEARLY returns of some of the best investors in the field. Warren Buffett: 19% CAGR over 50 years Seth Klarman: \~20% CAGR over 34 years Benjamin Graham: \~20% CAGR over 20 years Peter Lynch: 29% CAGR over 13 years So it is safe to say it was a lucky return, and unsustainable to keep up. 20% returns as these guys this 1.28% monthly. As someone else said in the comments, 0.6-0.8 are good plausible returns.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

CAGR

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

It's more than that (but yes, also fomo and stupidity) The growth is exponential. Thats what you are buying. Most companies that large revenue growth is slow APPL = 6% MSFT 7% NVDA 40%+ - Think CAGR

r/stocksSee Comment

Your guess as good as mine. Blowing up their guidance without having that in the pipeline would be nuts too. But a 60% Q/Q growth is coming from somewhere. And it's not personal computing. Prior estimates for AI Compute growth was around 20-30% CAGR. But these were all estimates from 2021 and 2022 I believe. Where we are today? Not sure.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Posted this before (90 days ago) and sharing again. AIP has been announced since then. I am very bullish on AIP and what it will do around LLMs. Also NDR is still a question. As someone who has a big core position for PLTR, is one of the Original contributors of the sub, this is my take. And in full transparency, if you are asking if you should buy into PLTR, I would stay away from it: 1. ⁠PLTR was a private company for a long time, operating as a tech company with a runaway to IPO. Because of this, over 2 decades worth employee stock was issued like a classic start up > ipo. As a result of this, there were MASSIVE amounts of stock based comp to hit the market. There are 2 camps of people with this: The first camp thinks the IPO only happened to give liquidity to all the former and current employees, and moving forward is really only going to be a liquidity tool for employees. The 2nd camp believes the IPO happened because they finally believe now is the time to scale and take the market. I personally do not believe it is a black or white choice. It is a mix of both 2. ⁠Most folks are investing in PLTR with the following thesis: Palantir Foundry (Commercial business) will become the default enterprise software PLATFORM for all major western companies and eventually all western companies. Palantir Gotham (Government) will be the defacto software solution for all Western Government institutes. 3. ⁠In addition to biz thesis, there is also a high rate of folks who invest because of Peter Thiel. Another subset really like the unique background of Karp and think he is uniquely positioned to be the leader of AI driven software due to his tech, law, and philosophy background. 4. ⁠Palantir bought about 10% of their commercial rev through shady spac deals. Most likely to hit their 30% CAGR guidance in the short term. They have since cancelled the SPAC program and their rev growth has taken a hit. 24% Rev growth in 22. Guiding for even lower in 2023. 5. ⁠Despite the declining rev, customer acquisition is still strong and continues to grow over 50% YoY in the US. It is not growing as strong in Government (as expected), and international commercial. 6. ⁠There is a larger question surrounding declining rev, increasing customer acquisition, and the launch of their new sales team. Many folks believe rev is a lagging customer acquisition and will continue to lag further as the sales team works to onboard folks at a lower cost. You either are going to believe PLTR has already tapped their market and big growth is over, or they have found away to enter new markets with a different sales strategy/biz model. Do not expect this to works its self out till 2025. 7. ⁠Palantir had a profitable Q due to a one off payment. Despite this, management is guiding for a profitable year in 2023. How they will get their, time will tell. 8. ⁠Palantir NDR has dropped from close to 130% to 115%. This is something very important to keep an eye on. This is such an important data point to follow as it will tell you if their new sales strategy is working and if their product is as powerful as they are claiming. All that being said, Palantir is a polarizing company and stock. As an investor since DPO and someone who has DCA'd every week through 2022, there are some major concerns in the numbers. There is also serious potential, as well. Whatever you do, do spend some time and look at the numbers. The NDR decline has spooked me a bit and it needs to reverse the decline and start climbing up for me to invest more. Lastly, if you want to make sure you have AI exposure, just buy Microsoft. It might not get the big gains of a small cap AI stock, but there is no scenario where Microsoft isnt a big player in AI.

r/investingSee Comment

You're missing the point entirely. During the "2 years of sideways markets" we already returned 16% CAGR. You're doing the thing where you only look at index price ignoring dividends and DCA. I'm significantly up over those two years just passive investing as well, not "flat". Druckenmiller has a net worth of ~$7b and ~$2b of that is actively managed (check his family office holdings). The rest is passive investing, real estate and beta-neutral plays, not just pure stock picking, which is good for him because his family office has underperformed the S&P 500 since 2014. Buffett hasn't beaten the index for two decades despite picking stocks. Your champions are losing to passive investors. The fact you think funds go up because of fees is strange and makes me think you're grasping for straws. It seems like you fell into the classic investing trap of getting emotionally invested in a strategy and now you have to justify to yourself why you are losing rather than re-evaluating. Might as well go buy gamestop and claim it'll make you rich if you want to go that route.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

Historically speaking silver has not beaten gold at least. And over time it hasn't beaten the S&P 500. Silver has returned about 4.7% CAGR return since 1969-2023 while the S&P 500 has returned 7%. But there are periods where silver beats the market etc but It has been a worse investment than gold and the market over time. Compare yourself: [Silver Historical Prices](http://localhost:8081/calc/historical-silver-prices/) vs [S&P 500 Historical Returns](https://chooseinvesting.com/calc/historical-index-returns/)

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

The problem is math doesn't back up any of your points. Like, I checked the four time frames you would "wait to break even". Start with $10k and contribute 1% a month (DCA) 2000-2007 - 11.6% CAGR 1973-1980 - 15.65% CAGR 2007-2013 - 16.14% CAGR 2021-2023 - 16.81% CAGR Billionaires with a ton of money might be able to time the market (Buffett has barely broken even over the last two decades and Druckenmiller isn't buying individual stocks) but I seriously doubt the average person can. If you want to gamble go ahead, but people have been claiming passive investing is a bad idea/dead for what, 30 years now? Still seems fine to me.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

As a market maker all I can say is this won’t age well. I wouldn’t be doing any directional bets at his point in time. Who knows where the market will be — could be that everything is well and market rallies for years. Could also be that China-us tensions continue to get worse, hawkish fed sentiment persists etc etc and market just drifts sideways or down. Why not go long convexity? If you think the market is likely to move and you have some ability to hedge intraday/daily— maybe a butterfly or a straddle so you can collect on gamma/theta. If you really want to stay long you can buy a long date put as protection and buy slightly OTM short term calls. How you determine what moneyness calls to buy depends on the CAGR you are assuming for the model. Regardless — pls for the love of god don’t sell naked calls or puts. That kind of degeneracy is best left for wsb

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

The problem with most subscriptions of this type: 1- The data/recommendation/alert based on data might have a high profitability factor, let's say overall a return of 20% CAGR (pinch of salt). 2- This return is based on certain specific allocations, risk profile, and other factors 3- Since it is just an alert/recommendation end-user might not exercise the the correct allocation/risk and now you have the makings of a possible overall loss. One of the main reasons why succesful algo services don't allow human intervention there is too much bias.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

I said other forms of entertainments like TikTok or VR will affect the appeal of DPEP, because last 10years of CAGR didn’t had much competing entertainment.

Mentions:#VR#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

> I want to retire early but am afraid of having a bunch in stocks and/or bonds and suffering a major crash of some sort and not being able to weather a sustained stretch where I keep withdrawing 3%/yr to live off of. On 4.5M of capital? You'd have to try really hard to set up a portfolio that was so bad that you couldn't weather a recession that lasted 5 years. You could put half of the 4.5M into fixed annuities that paid you 2%/year and lose all the rest of it and still be fine. > As of the market now, I could sell SPY 1 yr CSPS way OTM (like 20+% off current price) for premiums in the range of $140k total. What does this part have to do with the previous part? **Any active trading**, not the least being risky options trading, would be more of a threat to your wealth than whatever you fear about major crashes or recessions. > I’m confident in thinking about this that it would underperform the market without a tremendous amount of luck. Correct. [Here's a covered call fund compared to SPY.](https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&timePeriod=2&startYear=1985&firstMonth=1&endYear=2023&lastMonth=12&calendarAligned=true&includeYTD=false&initialAmount=10000&annualOperation=0&annualAdjustment=0&inflationAdjusted=true&annualPercentage=0.0&frequency=4&rebalanceType=1&absoluteDeviation=5.0&relativeDeviation=25.0&leverageType=0&leverageRatio=0.0&debtAmount=0&debtInterest=0.0&maintenanceMargin=25.0&leveragedBenchmark=false&reinvestDividends=true&showYield=false&showFactors=false&factorModel=3&portfolioNames=false&portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&symbol1=SPY&allocation1_1=100&symbol2=XYLD&allocation2_2=100) SPY has twice the CAGR and about 50% more Sharpe Ratio than XYLD, even though the crash and financial turmoil of the pandemic years are included in that backtest. > But from an income and risk perspective, how stupid an idea is this? As stupid as any idea that *caps your upside on your equity market exposure*. The whole reason for having an equity market exposure is the unlimited upside and the tendency for large countries with GDP growth to express that growth through the equity market.

r/investingSee Comment

Your numbers are incorrect. VXUS was created in 2011. So we can't measure exactly. Since 2001, something approaching VTI had a \~500% total appreciation (4.86% real CAGR). Something approaching VXUS was \~267% (1.95 real CAGR). And if you're curious, SCV beat both with \~638% (6.01% real CAGR). Mid caps outperformed a US LCB by similar numbers. And this is with PE ratios significantly lower for small and mid caps. SP600/SP400 are at 60% of the PE of the SP500.

r/stocksSee Comment

Here are better questions; why should it go down? Is there devastating news derailing their industry’s business? Are they expected to make less money over 5+ years? Is their industry becoming obsolete? If no, what is the negative selection bias? They are clearly on the bleeding edge of tech. They invented the graphics card. They have a huge moat. If AI takes off, they will profit full stop. Until there is a reason to believe they are not doing well, why shouldn’t they go up? Because they are overvalued? Where in the stock market are companies equally valued when compared among sectors? Basic material stocks don’t command the same prices as industrials stocks even with comparable growth trajectories and evaluations. Is Amazon trading at a reasonable multiple? What about coca-cola, McDonald’s, or Walmart? Based on historical S&P 500 averages, the answer is no for all of them. But if the company isn’t going to go out of business, what is the likelihood you think you will make money overtime? Unlike many sectors, semiconductors have their futures mapped out 5+ years on their expansion trajectory. Currently, NVIDIA’s 10 year Avg CAGR is 20%+. What is your argument for why Nvidia is going to be dethroned, because until sentiment changes, their stock trajectory is going to continue with its growth inertia. We are going into an economic downturn that everyone believes will not last for an extended period of time. That means future projections are inconclusive, so the bet is I am getting in cheap on a 5 year retrospective scale given the businesses consistency. Additionally, keep in mind a subsection of the stock market is all short term momentum trading. It’s like betting on the weather, the best indication of tomorrow’s weather is what happened today.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

don't trade. invest. it's a lot more boring but a lot more profitable too. forget annual stats and look at decades-long stats. ignore everything except your actual CAGR on the base capital you invest. take $10k and if after one year of trading it's anything less than $10,500 after tax, quit trading and accept that you're one of the 97% of traders that aren't successful long term.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

> I spent a bunch of time backtesting different combinations of LETFs and bonds and the results look exceptional From 1955 to 1982, HFEA would have been basically flat, meanwhile regular S&P index fund would have 8.6% CAGR resulting in 9.2x the starting value. Since you are basically 150/150 stock/LTT, you are actually extremely overweight bonds and duration, exposing you to high duration risk. Since LETFs use swaps which use short term interest rates to leverage, you are also exposed to interest rate risk and the yield curve. An inverted yield curve for a long period will result in negative carry for your entire bond portion and underperformance in your stock portion. There is also a problem you cannot control or predict: volatility risk inherent in leveraged ETFs, which could be mitigated by choosing only index fund LETFs. So you will greatly underperform for a long time if 1) interest rates are high or increasing, 2) stock returns are low, or 3) volatility is high. You can also greatly outperform if 1) interest rates fall, 2) stock returns are high, or 3) volatility is low. Obviously the last 10 years up to the pandemic checked all 3 boxes of falling interest rates, higher than historical stock returns due to increasing valuations, and historically lower volatility, so LETFs did extremely well.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

Another data point: If you assume bigger companies are better, OEF (an ETF of the S&P 100) should outperform SPY, yeah? * OEF: 6.68% CAGR since 2001 * SPY: 7.29% CAGR since 2001 \[[source](https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&timePeriod=4&startYear=1985&firstMonth=1&endYear=2023&lastMonth=12&calendarAligned=true&includeYTD=false&initialAmount=10000&annualOperation=0&annualAdjustment=0&inflationAdjusted=true&annualPercentage=0.0&frequency=4&rebalanceType=1&absoluteDeviation=5.0&relativeDeviation=25.0&leverageType=0&leverageRatio=0.0&debtAmount=0&debtInterest=0.0&maintenanceMargin=25.0&leveragedBenchmark=false&reinvestDividends=true&showYield=false&showFactors=false&factorModel=3&portfolioNames=false&symbol1=SPY&allocation1_1=100&symbol2=oef&allocation2_2=100)\]

Mentions:#OEF#SPY#CAGR
r/StockMarketSee Comment

Looks like a great potential investment. Revenue increased 12.5% CAGR, and total debt decreased. Also looks like could be undervalued still by around 8%. One red flag is that looks like insiders like Maria Pasquale, Steven Stein and Vijay Iyengar have been selling so maybe something to watch for. [INCY Insights](https://verde.finance/stocks/INCY.NASDAQ)

Mentions:#CAGR#INCY
r/investingSee Comment

Here’s what happened when I VTI and chilled the last ten years. I posted this earlier this year, numbers are still roughly valid and are not time-weighted, because after setting up this core position, where VTI was 100% of my portfolio, I diversified with individual stocks, i.e. AAPL. —- Here is my own personal performance over ten years, to give you an idea what can be done: • ⁠⁠⁠Purchased VTI on 09/05/2013 at a cost basis of 86.05 • ⁠⁠Currently 200.96 That is a 125.53% total gain, and when including dividends, is a 8.95% CAGR. You can still do research and trading on a small part of your portfolio if you enjoy that, but the bulk of your portfolio should be in low cost indexes—the Boglehead way. Also consider owning investment real estate, as the most common small business in the U.S., for the tax deductions. Short term 6mo U.S. Treasury Bills yielding above 5% are also a terrific choice right now. Risk-free and guaranteed returns. Purchase with no fees from TreasuryDirect.gov. Minimum $100 investment.

r/investingSee Comment

For CEFs, key metrics include discount to NAV, yield, distribution types and proportions (ROC etc.), sectors, as well as underlying investment approach and fundamentals. For preferred stocks, key metrics include discount to par, yield, time to call date, yield structure (fixed to floating etc.), as well as sector and company fundamentals (insofar as they go to bankruptcy and non-cumulative non-payment risks). For REITs and BDCs, key metrics include distribution coverage and safety, yield, sector, debt load relative to sector, debt maturity, and type-specific fundamentals (e.g. AFFO). For other stocks, company fundamentals, history including CAGR, projected growth, yield, and distribution safety. For all, analyst coverage level and ratings; credit rating and financing availability; recessionary performance, charted against prior downturns; inflationary performance; taxation, including any foreign tax.

Mentions:#ROC#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

They’ve been growing that “minuscule” dividend at a 9% CAGR over the past 12 years. I’m getting a 5% yield on my original purchase price 10 years ago.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Make it 5 years and my answer is $REAX. They are a real estate brokerage with an automated back office, extremely low cost structure, and a very strong value proposition to real estate agents. Their low cost structure allows them to pay agents higher commission splits and offer other incentives (equity, referral income). Due to this, both agent growth and revenue have grown at a CAGR > 100%. They currently have ~0.4% market share and have a significantly better value proposition to agents than >95% of their competitors. I expect them to continue to compound their agent count and thus revenue at very high rates for a long time to come. I expect margins to improve as they scale and introduce higher margin segments (title, insurance, mortgage) into their revenue mix. See $EXPI historical margins to see how a similar brokerage model became profitable as they reached scale. For the real estate bears who will say that the real estate is heading off a cliff: I think you’re probably right. I just think in 5 years it won’t matter anymore.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

OK. After this year, all they'll need is 30% CAGR for 12 years. No sweat

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

I mean a cursory glance at their number shows that isn't true. Meta is run by one of the shrewdest business operators of our lifetime. Why do you think they've focused so much on open source? React has taken over from Google's angular, PyTorch has displaced Tensorflow, and if you've read the Google Moat paper, you know that the 13 billion parameter model built on LLAMA has achieved parity with 100 billion parameter Bard. They've done this to reduce opex and capex, compare this to Google, the other member of the dominant ad duopoly, and it clearly shows in their operating margins. Meta has consistently delivered >30-40% operating margins compared to Google's 20-30%. And this is including Metaverse spending! Meta has successfully monetized WhatsApp and is growing it at 40% CAGR. What's even more impressive is that as large as they are they are still growing MAUs. I've more than doubled my money in Meta and pulled out my initial investment for other opportunities but simply believing headlines without a reading of their numbers is just silly. Well, for me it creates great buying opportunities.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/optionsSee Comment

A gain of 0.75% in ten days, if compounded with the similar percentage gain and duration for one year, works out to a CAGR of 30.86%. That's okay, but given the risk you're taking on, you're really not getting much bang for your buck. The reward-to-risk ratio isn't great, and your analysis, while valuable, is a whole lot of work for such a tiny gain. Is it really worth it?

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

T has a CAGR of 2.39% over the last ten years, so even they have kept their head above water.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Interested in TREX, a lumber product company (mainly decks). I'm comparing all the metrics to UFPI and it seems like the exact same kind of company (although UFPI is more diversified in its products) but you pay 4-5 times the valuation. Comparing the statistics, with TREX always first and UFPI second. - Market cap: $5B vs $6B - Forward P/E: 37 vs 9 - P/S (trailing): 5.6 vs 0.55 - P/B: 11.9 vs 1.9 - 5 year Revenue CAGR: 14% vs 17% - 3 year EPS CAGR: 10% vs 50% - Net margin: 16.7% vs 7% [The only truly *winning* metric] - ROE: 30% vs 26% - 10 year price performance: 745% vs 549% - Debt: $250M vs $280M - Cash: $12M vs $460M - Net operating cash flow (TTM): $220M vs $1B - Dividend: 0% vs 1% - Shares outstanding over 5 years: -5% vs flat Seems to me that UFPI is just a much better deal at today's prices.

r/investingSee Comment

Yeah but I'm not seeing it as outperforming over the last 20 years. I see 8.85% CAGR for Gold April 2003-2023 I see 10.44% CAGR for S&P500 over the same time period. Let alone for the fact that it's cheaper to invest in the S&P500 than gold. Could be missing something though.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

I have a spreadsheet which I created specifically for use in recessionary periods, to help track dividend bargains. It makes use of GOOGLEFINANCE calls to look up historical and current market data, e.g. the price of a security. Special preferred stock criteria include discount to par and years to earliest redemption, as both figure into total expected annual returns. Special CEF criteria include discount to NAV and tax treatment of distributions. All are also compared to their price movements during a historic comparable downtrend and recovery, as well as any available analyst price target ranges together with quality ratings. Backtest data is linked and can provide historical CAGR per security. All of this is combined by formulas to give total estimated current discount, estimated forward yield, and estimated forward CAGR per security, and weighted sums of picked positions displays those estimates for the entire portfolio.

Mentions:#CEF#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Not to blow up your replies but something else to consider - right now legacy car manufacturers off-set the losses of their EV divisions by selling profitable ICE vehicles. However, as the world transitions to EVs (1.2 million sold globally in 2017 - 10.6 million in 2022, 92% CAGR) will ICE vehicles be able to maintain their profitability? Will enough consumers still want to buy ICE cars 5 years from now? Every EV they sell at a loss steals a sale from a profitable ICE. Margins are already thin in the auto industry and if there’s a big shift in demand to EVs those margins that legacy manufacturers are counting on to prop up their EV segments will no longer be there

Mentions:#ICE#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

*It is generally accepted that over time real-estate value grows by around 5% annually (let's ignore recent years where the value grew disproportionately, around 12% YoY).* That is not generally accepted. [If you look back to 1890 till now](http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/data.htm), housing prices have gone up a whopping 3.4% CAGR (nominal), or 0.6% CAGR (real). It's a fairly new phenomenon - since 2000 or so - that housing prices have any inflation-adjusted/real returns. Do real estate if you want - cheap government subsidized mortgages are great, and owning your own house has a lot of comfort value. Housing, though, historically, is not much of an investment.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

Of course we here on WSB aren’t buy and hold for years type. We’re in it for the fast bucks. Holding a stock (or etf in this case) is considered long term here ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271) while the evidence you referenced mentioned a differentiation in CAGR over an extended investing horizon (5 YEARS) due to vol decay, which indeed occurs with leveraged ETF’s, we here are speculators, like the great Jesse Livermore.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

I make money. I understand. Its proven that WSB forums promote stocks that lose money consistently. See quiver quantitative. WSB recommendations lose 34% CAGR. Its the only losing strategy that exists other than Cramer.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

I am going to assume they aren't using returns with dividends reinvested ? YOu can do some basic backtesting with AOR, Ishares global 60/40 etf or VSMGX life strategy global 60/40 fund/. VSMGX has data for 38 years or so its a decent amount. According to portfolio visualizer the CAGR is 7.28%. If for some reason you don't want international you can back test with PF using US stocks and bonds , or you can use a fund like VBIAX, or the older vbinx, to back test. Thats using total stock instead of sp500 though. ​ You can look at 60% large cap/40% us bond market [here](https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-asset-class-allocation?s=y&mode=1&timePeriod=4&startYear=1972&firstMonth=1&endYear=2023&lastMonth=12&calendarAligned=true&includeYTD=false&initialAmount=10000&annualOperation=0&annualAdjustment=0&inflationAdjusted=true&annualPercentage=0.0&frequency=4&rebalanceType=1&absoluteDeviation=5.0&relativeDeviation=25.0&leverageType=0&leverageRatio=0.0&debtAmount=0&debtInterest=0.0&maintenanceMargin=25.0&leveragedBenchmark=false&portfolioNames=false&portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&asset1=LargeCapBlend&allocation1_1=60&asset2=TotalBond&allocation2_1=40) data only goes back to 1987 though. US large cap is probably a close enough approximation of sp500.

r/stocksSee Comment

It's not something you can or should do with any meaningful amount in your portfolio, but sometimes it can outperform, [like shorting LABU, LABD at -30% each rebalanced semi-annually](https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&timePeriod=4&startYear=1985&firstMonth=1&endYear=2023&lastMonth=12&calendarAligned=true&includeYTD=false&initialAmount=10000&annualOperation=0&annualAdjustment=0&inflationAdjusted=true&annualPercentage=0.0&frequency=4&rebalanceType=2&absoluteDeviation=5.0&relativeDeviation=25.0&leverageType=0&leverageRatio=0.0&debtAmount=0&debtInterest=0.0&maintenanceMargin=25.0&leveragedBenchmark=false&reinvestDividends=true&showYield=false&showFactors=false&factorModel=3&portfolioNames=false&portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&symbol1=LABU&allocation1_1=-30&symbol2=LABD&allocation2_1=-30&symbol3=CASHX&allocation3_1=-40&symbol4=SPY&allocation4_2=100) has better CAGR than SPY, with 0% net long when you rebalance.

r/stocksSee Comment

The problem is that even if phone sales slow or even decline, apple is becoming larger software, though its only gone from 17% of revenue in 2019 to 20% in 2022, its CAGR during this time was 20% and that means organic growth, excluding iPhones user growth would likely be around 5% annually. I mean Apple pay transaction volume is at 650B, half of PayPal and roughly the same as Zelle. Along with this, they just started HYSA partnership with Goldman Sachs, if they charge GS a 1% fee of the interest rate of 4.15%, thats 275M in revenue which is extremely high margin. I mean PayPal, lower growth is valued at 85B, so with Apple Pay growth prospects it alone is probably worth 50B. I mean this is their best example but it just shows how they can just supercharge product development in services and if they lose in certain products, atleast they take a cut of competitors revenue lol. I think overtime they are going to become a better version of the Microsoft model of providing a platform with any enterprise product that may be a little lower quality than alternatives, but are integrated into the Microsoft platform so are just easier to use, though I think Apple being apple to take a cut of competitors enhances this type of model among other aspects.

Mentions:#CAGR#GS
r/investingSee Comment

\*Anybody that has been investing for any serious amount of time, has made mistakes.\* Don't you know this is there internet buddy? Everyone has 200% CAGR and top or bottom ticks every play they make.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

by 2.5% CAGR since the TMFC inception.

Mentions:#CAGR#TMFC
r/investingSee Comment

> They run an ETF: TMFC which tracks their picks. Up 85% over five years. VOO is up 56%. since 2018, TMFC made 2.5% more CAGR than VOO.

r/investingSee Comment

Major player in a massive space with huge growth, valuable key differentiators, and few competitors (Akamai, Fastly, Cloudfront (Amazon). Essentially no competitors in the reverse proxy realm where they hold 75%+ market share. It would be fair to say 15-20% of all internet traffic is run through CloudFlare. i.e. they aren't going anywhere, the CDN market has a 20% CAGR, and they consistently launch new products that are first to market.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

* What's the historical CAGR of their tax-managed approach? If you can beat it with a traditional portfolio, obviously, that would be preferable. * The buzz on robo-managed tax-harvesting accounts is that they're designed for vendor lock-in, by fragmenting a portfolio over time in such a way that it becomes nigh-unmanageable by the client. It's just something to be aware of when making your choice.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

LOL, it's slowing at $500B/year. Only Walmart and Saudi Aramco are larger in terms of revenue, and if it continues on the 20.8% CAGR trajectory it has been on since 2019, it will make it beyond those two in a couple of years. What they need to do now is simply determine how to not spend as much money to deliver the revenue.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

A couple of years ago, the Fed was printing $120B/month. CAGR for Amazon since 2019 is 20.8%. That's pretty fucking good.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

Starting in 10/1992 when Fidelity launched their Japan fund (FJPNX) with $10,000, and adding $500/month through now gives you a CAGR of 13.89%/year. It gets killed by the S&P but people act like Japan is some worst case scenario but consistent investing still pays off https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio?s=y&timePeriod=4&startYear=1989&firstMonth=1&endYear=2023&lastMonth=12&calendarAligned=true&includeYTD=false&initialAmount=10000&annualOperation=1&annualAdjustment=500&inflationAdjusted=true&annualPercentage=0.0&frequency=2&rebalanceType=1&absoluteDeviation=5.0&relativeDeviation=25.0&leverageType=0&leverageRatio=0.0&debtAmount=0&debtInterest=0.0&maintenanceMargin=25.0&leveragedBenchmark=false&reinvestDividends=true&showYield=false&showFactors=false&factorModel=3&benchmark=VFINX&portfolioNames=false&portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&symbol1=FJPNX&allocation1_1=100

r/SPACsSee Comment

Bought some Jan 2014 $5 GETY Puts today on that non-binding buyout offer. I think Trillium Capital are full of hot air and lack the financial resources to close the offer. GETY is a garbage company that has seen EBITDA and Free Cash Flow steadily erode since going public. It's a pretty massive concern for a company with around 1.4B in debt to see FCF decline from $46.8M in Q4 2021 to just $20.6M in Q4 2022. Heavily leveraged companies like this with little to no revenue growth and declining profitability can see share price drop VERY quickly regardless of the nominally large topline revenue number (HLLY is a good example of this). To put things in perspective Shutterstock (SSTK) has far superior growth in both sales and EBITDA yet still trades at a discount to GETY by most financial metrics. Comps below are based on GETY at $6.60 per share. In my opinion GETY should trade at a similar EV to SSTK, which would value GETY around $2.50 per share. ​ ||GETY|SSTK| |:-|:-|:-| |Market Cap|$2.6B|$2.4B| |Net Cash|\-$1.37B|$0.03B| |Enterprise Value|$3.97B|$2.37B| |2022 Revenue|$926M|$828M| |Revenue CAGR (2018-2022)|3.3%|7.3%| |EV / 2022 Revenue|4.3|2.9| |2022 EBITDA|$304M|$218M| |EBITDA CAGR (2018-2022)|9.5%|20%| |EV / 2022 EBITDA|13|11| |EV / 2022 FCF|38|24| |Q4 2022 FCF Change YoY|\-56%|\-3%| |Q4 2022 EBITDA Change YoY|\-9%|49%| |Q4 2022 Revenue Change YoY|\-3%|6%|

r/investingSee Comment

Thanks for this! I've long decided on VOO (and QQQM) vs VUG. Now reconsidering adding either VUG or IWY--always wanted Top 50 (but never found said ETF with ER <0.20%). *Vanguard ETFs and recent 12-yr CAGR:* **VUG** (Growth) - 241; **ER 0.04%** **CAGR: 13.39%** Avg vol: 996K; $248 VOOG (S&P 500 Growth) - 232; ER 0.10% CAGR: 13.31% Avg vol: 116K; $232 VOO (S&P 500) - 506; ER 0.03% CAGR: 12.28% Avg vol: 3.8mil; $378 VV (Large-Cap) - 558; ER 0.04% CAGR: 12.14% Avg vol: 236K; $188 \--------------------------------------------------------- **IWY** (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth) - 200; **ER 0.20%** **CAGR: 14.85%** Avg vol: 326K; $138 IVW (iShares S&P 500 Growth) - 235; ER 0.18% CAGR: 13.26% Avg vol: 2mil; $64 \---------------------------------------------------------- Invesco QQQ (**QQQM**) - 100; ER 0.20% (**0.15%**) **CAGR: 16.93%** Avg vol: 59mil (1mil); $316 ($130)

r/StockMarketSee Comment

My summary for the company the platform is growing, boasts impressive revenue projections (25.2% CAGR over 5 years), undervalued, and operating in a highly competitive sector.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

> But those averages are a bunch of lies! Because I can invest 100$ dollars in something, and If i get 90% downfall in the first year and 100% up in the 2nd year I have an average return of 10% but I will be left with only 20$ a whooping 80% down my initial investment. This is why all returns use geometric averages (aka compound average annual return or CAGR), not arithmetic averages. The average return in your example is *not 10%*, it is **-55.3%**.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

“Men's Underwear Market is expected to reach US$ 65.3 Billion by 2033, growing at a 5.3% CAGR from 2023 to 2033 | Future Market Insights, Inc.” Calls on VSCO 🤡 https://finance.yahoo.com/news/mens-underwear-market-expected-reach-123000881.html

Mentions:#CAGR#VSCO
r/investingSee Comment

For that, I agree. The primary reason why it’s valued this high is the market pricing in aggressive growth. Well, with macro headwinds and other factors, their growth is slowing down dramatically. 50% CAGR growth story is at risk. I expect more like 25-30% growth annually which in turn makes their current PEG ratio expensive. They’re better valued at $120-$140 at most.

Mentions:#CAGR#PEG
r/stocksSee Comment

they all will experience the same. their CAGR is based off a lower base. If you took Fords Electric market their CAGR is the same or higher. ICE manufacturers don't have Tesla margins at the moment because they are stuck in the old dealer model. But the electric future will allow them to finally get rid of dealerships and increase their margins like Tesla. Also more volume will allow for better margins, once they start scaling. there's literally nothing special about Tesla that the other manufacturers can't and won't eventually copy, and in some case do even better. Financially they will be similar eventually. how do you not see that?

Mentions:#CAGR#ICE
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

I thought TSLA was supposed to have a CAGR of 50% for the next 15 years. What happened?

Mentions:#TSLA#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

Another rich Boomer telling people how to get that big bad 7% CAGR that makes Boomers cum.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

$TSLA 1Q Adj EPS 85C, EST. 86C 1Q REV. $23.33B, EST. $23.35B Expects to Remain Ahead of L-T 50% CAGR on Production Still see full year production: 1.80M VEHICLES, EST. 1.84M Cybertruck on track to begin production this year.

Mentions:#TSLA#CAGR
r/StockMarketSee Comment

This is a dumb post. Given your numbers, as listed P/S (SHOP) 12.3 3Y CAGR (SHOP) 25% P/S (TECH) 1.5 3Y CAGR (TECH) 15% We get the following 3Y forward P/S numbers 3YFWD P/S (SHOP) = 6.3 3YFWD P/S (TECH) = 1.0 Your figures argue confidently and inarguably that SHOP is overvalued, which your analysis confidently and inarguably contradicts. Take a nap, skip the coffee tomorrow and please enroll in accounting courses before you hurt yourself or others. Thank you.

r/stocksSee Comment

The utility application is nice, but let me point out that VPU from 2004 to today (as far back as I could go) had a CAGR of 8.76% vs. SPY's 9.05%, and lower standard deviation. I added the airline ETF JETS to the mix, and it went back to 2015. Then VPU had CAGR 9.8%, SPY 11.6%, and JETS -3.3% (lol). /u/absoluteunitvolcker

r/stocksSee Comment

Marine shipping is generally considered very low growth. P/E ratios are generally reflective of how investors think of a company's growth prospects. You're willing to pay more now if you know that earnings will grow considerably in the future. Shipping has an expected CAGR of under 2%. You're getting what you pay for now and in the foreseeable future.

Mentions:#CAGR

The global wellness industry is estimated to be worth $4.2 trillion (and growing). Consumers around the world invest in products that claim to promote wellness, from performance supplements to nootropics to sleep aids. Sleep aids generated $69.5 billion in revenue in 2017 and analysts say the industry is on track to hit $101.9 billion by 2023. The rapidly growing global wearable technology market is estimated at $32.7 billion in 2019 (by Grand View Research) with a CAGR of 15.9% from 2020 to 2027. Sleeplessness Is an Emerging Global Epidemic A good night’s sleep is becoming increasingly out of reach for many people. According to StudyFinds.org, “a OnePoll study of 2,000 Americans finds four in 10 people (41%) are up all night due to ‘next day anxiety’ — fearing the uncertainty of what tomorrow will bring. Nearly two-thirds of Americans (62%) struggle to fall asleep each night.”Hapbee is patented, technology that delivers the molecular magnetic signature of compounds like caffeine, nicotine, melatonin, CBD … to control wellness digitally and on command.Hapbee’s electromagnetic signal technology means that consumers don’t have to ingest chemicals to experience a desired feeling. Hapbee is a digital wellness technology company that aims to help people take control of how they sleep, perform and feel. Hapbee's digital wellness library of Blends and Routines utilizes patented ultra-low radio frequency energy (ulRFE®), designed to help optimize users' sleep, productivity, recovery, and downtime. Some important press releases worthy of note for those interested: https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/hapbee-signs-mou-with-locomobi-world-for-development-of-driver-safety-application-822070979.html https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/hapbee-receives-positive-product-feedback-from-professional-athletes-as-stimulant-free-solution-for-sleep-and-recovery-840078710.html https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hapbee-launches-smart-sleep-integration-with-oura-ring-301723319.html

Mentions:#CAGR
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

Yeah, but how long was she sitting on those cards? CAGR probably lower.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

Because they make *far* more money than S&P500 investors. The '13%' return of the S&P500 is a 97 year average. If you adjust for inflation the real return hasbn \~3% CAGR with \*most\* of the real growth between 2009-2020.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

I have no idea what you mean by immediately. You can see CAGR (annual return) whether it’s in a portfolio or by individual asset class. Without need to set anything up?

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

spx - raised dividends for 50 years and had great growth Ashtead - over the last 15 years had a 33% dividend CAGR

Mentions:#CAGR
r/StockMarketSee Comment

Well, what I’ve learned is the S&P did indeed compound at an average of 8% CAGR. Hence my comment to OP. I respect your opinions btw, just giving my input and reasoning and hopefully it helps

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

No you’re talking about CAGR. Not the same as simply “setting and forgetting” as I alluded to. Two entirely different things my guy

Mentions:#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

Right, no worries. There actually aren't that many higher-yield ones with a decent CAGR, though there are a few.

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

The only reason Tesla benefits more than say, Ford, GM, VW, or Hyundai, is because... 1: Tesla uses cells (mostly) made in the USA. 2: Tesla makes their vehicles in the USA. MachE is made in Mexico, Hyundai EVs are made in SK, and I don't know if VW is making EVs in the US yet or still importing them from the EU. 3: When you get money per vehicle sold, it helps to sell the most vehicles. Tesla does. They also have better price controls and simply have a profitable EV business. By comparison, Ford loses money with each MachE sold. I expect somewhere between 1.8-1.9mm units this year. 1.85mm would be a 35% growth over 2022. Considering this though... Tesla made 500k vehicles in 2022 and then said they expect (long term) CAGR of 50% YoY for the next several years. So look at the chart of how that looks. &#x200B; |Year|Assumed flat CAGR|Actual| |:-|:-|:-| |2020|500,000|NA| |2021|750,000|930,000| |2022|1,125,000|1,370,000| |2023|1,688,000|1.8-1.9mm Estimate| |2024|2,531,000|| So yea, they're already ahead of their targets. And Giga Berlin is both ramping the existing plan as well as building new construction phases. Giga Austin is ramping and building whole new assembly lines. And Giga Mexico was announced and should be operational making a whole new generation of low cost vehicle within the next 24 months.

Mentions:#GM#CAGR#NA
r/stocksSee Comment

Nice write up. I did my DD a few weeks ago. - they bought a lot of bonds in 2022 and 2021. These bonds hold an unrealized loss. - They are using a 5 year CAGR metric but if you compare the current financials with 2022, you can see that the growth is slowing quite rapidly. - they have no moat. They are using an network that is built by others. - strong competition. - many Users don't hold a balance on their account because they are scared that PayPal blocks them without a reason. See paypal sub - less customer funds means less investment possibilities. - high interest rate - slowing ecnomy - less transactions. - They also bought a lot of shares during the covid bull run -

Mentions:#CAGR
r/stocksSee Comment

Unity (U). VR and AR industries have a huge forecasted CAGR and U enables lots of that. They’re the Microsoft of the late 90s. https://youtu.be/d_AP3SGMxxM

Mentions:#VR#CAGR#AP
r/investingSee Comment

The adjusted PE basically accounts for factors like stock-based compensation which is not a cash expense, but is recorded as such on an income statement. Quote from Paypal's latest investor update: *"Estimated non-GAAP amounts for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023 reflect adjustments of approximately $2.0 billion, including estimated stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes of approximately $1.7 billion and an estimated restructuring charge of approximately $100 million"* With tech growth stocks, you have a lot more stock-based compensation so it's better to look at the adjusted PE ratio. GAAP accounting is good, but it's not really made for tech or subscription-based businesses. That's when it's usually a good idea to use adjusted PE ratio. The adjustments also get checked by the SEC and companies will get in trouble if they try to skew things too much. However, sometimes companies will try to sneak other charges in there. Like here, Paypal is adding $100 million of restructuring charges which is a bit iffy, I must admit, but it's not that big a part of the $2 billion so I've glossed over it. Free cash flow (FCF) also adds back stock-based compensation so that can be used to get a better idea, too. Generally speaking, I tend to look at both since they should be more or less moving in tandem. Big spikes or drops in earnings which are not also shown in FCF usually point to some extraordinary items recorded on the income statement. When it comes to earnings, management expects adjusted EPS to grow \~18% in FY23 which seems in line with what we've been seeing historically, I think. CAGR since 2013 is \~11% so this is actually pretty good for Paypal. Analysts expect revenue to grow by only 7% this year, but the year after it's expected to speed up to 9%. In comparison, EPS and revenue growth expectations for VISA for 2023 are 13.1% and 10.2% so they're not that different, but Paypal is cheaper. Obviously, these are just expectations and will probably change since we're still in April. Hope that makes sense and clarifies my analysis a little bit :)

Mentions:#FCF#CAGR
r/investingSee Comment

I see 12.28% CAGR for VOO on portfolio visualizer. Vanguard has it at 13.30% I can't imagine one month of performance could make up the difference , weird. I also should add according to morningstar , ivv/voo/spy are all practically the same since voo inception 9/9/2010

Mentions:#CAGR#VOO
r/pennystocksSee Comment

The global nickel market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 5.6% from 2021 to 2030, while the copper market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 6.5% from 2021 to 2026. Sama Resources Inc. is a Canadian-based mineral exploration company with a portfolio of nickel, copper, and gold projects in West Africa and Canada.

Mentions:#CAGR