EMR

OLFRNDS

That's a fair question and this has been good and reasonable discussion. To answer that, I think that the dangers posed by AI in the hands of someone we know will misuse it to their advantage is significantly more worrisome than the idea of government officials slowing down the progress of AI advancement. I say this mostly because governments can't really slow the progress or implementation of AI for a few reasons. 1: The majority of the major AI players are already American companies. NVIDIA, Microsoft, Google, Tesla, FB, etc... 2: The nature of AI advancement is based on data consumptions. LLM and generative AI progress based on the data they have access to. The growth of their modeling is basically unstoppable at this point. They are being developed and fed data by the same companies that control the internet and digital data in general. 3: The government can write laws around ethics and privacy. They can't stop AI innovation. They would have needed to do that long ago. Technology is a space where the government has minimal ability to control. My industry for example has a similar scenario with EMR (electronic medical records). They don't tell us how to safeguard things. They don't tell us we have to use certain tools. They don't define our data policies. They have CMS who can audit your environment and determine if you have privacy issues. If you do, you then have to remediate and prove that you have implemented safety measures to avoid future occurrences. But they don't limit or dictate how we do that or what innovations we use within our own tools to solve the problem.