IFV
First Trust Dorsey Wright International Focus 5 ETF
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
MAGA promoting IFV so they can skip the swallowing and get trumps cum implanted right into their system.
IFV if you got dong-issues VIX up 30%
Cyber IFV's to take Greenland.
This made me all warm inside. Love the details too. At first I thought it was just Rheinmetall tanks and the rest the same jets, but after watching it 10 times because it fueled my EU supranationalism so nicely, I noticed that it has al different types of tanks, IFV’s, SPH’s and jets. Perfect!
Europe purchase half of all US defence exports. However Europe has domestic equivalents to almost everything the US produces. (Still a good few key things the US does best, stealth fighters, HARM missiles, patriot missiles spring to mind). However in a lot of other areas Europe has equivalents that match or exceed US stuff at cheaper prices. Production capacity is an issue. But if Europe starts heavily investing in domestic production, and perhaps collapses saturated markets into a few production lines (we don't need the current 20 different IFV designs, we need perhaps 3 produced in large numbers) we could domestically produce our own, while providing exports competition for the US. The US is really giving away its enviable position and the madness of the actions and it's damage to the US continues to add fuel to the evidence pile that the US president, and possibly wider government is a Russian asset.
Friendly remainder Greenland and Canada are members of NATO. USA has 1,4 milion soldiers rest of NATO has 2,2 milion. Rest of NATO holds superior number of tanks, IFV and artillery. USA is the most important individual member but the aliance is more powerfull.
artyllery still queen of battlefield. you still need IFV and tanks. rheinmetal creates intresting AD system. which can control every bullet shot indivually. meaning if drone swarm apperes. every bullet hit target. they named it Skynex
No, your first paragraph is absolutely incorrect. That's like saying tensile, torsion, and compression, are interchangeable. Metallurgy and physics don't work like that, objects break when pushed in one direction that wouldn't break them when pushed in the other direction. This isn't splitting hairs it's mathematics at its base. Your last statement assumes that we *have to* take a consumer vehicle into combat environments which is inherently untrue. Purpose-built vehicles work best for the military, that's why we give contracts to design properly built IFV's and don't take Lada's off the street like Russia.
Military grade steel is highly specialised and America needs to basically replace its tank and IFV fleets, and create an SPG then build a lot of it.
Femasys (FEMY) -91.21% all time. A womens health company working a product called FemaSeed, which would allow for the direct placement of sperm into a fallopian tube which seems to be about 4x times more successful than sperm placed in the uterus. It's success rate could be on par with IVF which is way more expensive. Could be a game changer in fertility treatments at a time when women are having kids later in life. Also, traditional IFV is becoming taboo in many US religious communities, but FemaSeed doesn't produce any extra fertilized eggs so it's kosher.
It’s all IFV, dude doesn’t fuck. I’d say pretty good chance they aren’t his.
A good chunk of those weapons were stock that was near EOL and a sunk cost that got transferred over into lend-lease. and likely to go to the scrap heap or bone-yard within the next 5 years .. eg Javelin missiles (FGM-148E) are almost 20 year old tech and were going to be made obsolete by the updates G version which has new launchers, missiles etc. Replacements for the Patriot missile system were meant to go into full rate production in 2023 Bradley IFV’s are in their last 5 years of production to be replaced by the XM30 Humvee’s getting replaced by JLTVs M777 artillery were slated to be replaced by HIMARS Etc
1. The longer the war goes on, the more territory and young men Ukraine will lose. Since the beginning of the conflict the average age of frontline troops has increased from 31 to 43 years. The average staffing level across some fronts was 35% as of January, that is unsustainable especially when considering that Russia added north of 400,000 contract (not conscript) troops last year and have Just begun to enjoy a real advantage in troop numbers. Now consider Ukraine's recent mobilisation efforts. Widespread corruption (although in general it has improved), Videos of dudes literally being punched into the back of vans and an attempt to legislate foreign based Ukrainians into active service. as of January 2023 there 50,000 new amputees. You have no idea what your talking about. 2. The Longer the war goes on, the more severe Ukraine's material disadvantage becomes. Russia is able to fire 8000 rounds of artillery a day, Ukraine only 2000 which is already above western production levels. Ukraine, produces no APC's, Tanks, IFV's or aircraft. Every new piece of equipment they have is donated not produced. Bradleys, Leopard 2's and Stryker's have to be shipped outside of Ukraine to be fixed because of a lack of expertise on these vehicles. Not to mention the fact western countries have failed to deliver 50% of what was promised. 3. Whilst it is true that Russia's airforce has been broadly absent during the war, that is changing. I.e. In there recently concluded offensive on Avdiivka they dropped 500+ FAB bombs in a week. They have consistently been able to fire 5+ Kinzhal, Kalibar and other long range stand off weapons a day. They aren't running out and are building roughly 150 a month according to available production and confirmed hit OSINT.
To be fair, if I could buy a Bradley IFV for cheap, I would too. Maybe an M113, but it's not my first choice.
Who exactly will fight wagners though? Cartel with their technicals and .50 cals? Even if US gives them ATGMs, they risk those things being fired against them. So Mexican army is just bunch of cartel members who are more accustomed to hurt civilians rather then professional mercs. Also, given USSR legacy in terms of conducting war, they have IFV specifically design to fight in the mountains. And something like BDM-4 can be airdropped. Securing it is not an issue. It’s about targeting the cartel leaders & money. Once the funding is secured the war will be going on for a long time.
Stingers and javelins aren't anti-ship missiles. >If a large-scale war broke out with China, within about one week the United States would run out of so-called long-range anti-ship missiles, a vital weapon in any engagement with China The point this is making is that countries don't store enough ammo to wage continuous warfare. US never did have enough ammo for a protracted war with China, and then the war in Ukraine did not consume any of that ammo, nor did it add any ammo, leaving the US in the same state. The reasoning for this is that producing ammo that will not get used means that the ammo immediately begins deteriorating, while the cash is sunk and unable to be used for other purposes. As such, many countries outside the warsaw pact have opted to store only a short-term supply of ammo, and instead counting on scaling their supply chain to provide the continuing flow of ammo. **The unscaled supply chain is obviously insufficient to feed the massive consumption rate of open warfare**, however the expectation is that a war-footing supply chain will produce enough. For example, the supply chain to manufacture consumer luxury vehicles is likely to be co-opted to machine parts for jeeps, IFV parts, shell-casings, etc. However, **staying on a war-footing supply chain when there is no open warfare creates obvious complaints about the inefficiency**. This is why we're not currently going through ad campaigns asking americans to cultivate "victory gardens" so that we can send more food to the troops (victory gardens being another example of war economy pivoting). However, the point remains that if we want to avoid being caught off-guard, supply chain needs to scale/pivot according to need. For example: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-invokes-defense-production-act-printed-circuit-board-production-2023-03-27/ That's the US invoking the defense production act to scale up domestic supply of circuit boards to manufacture key components for navigation/guidance systems to protect our needs in the short and long term.
I guess I'd be cautiously long. True, there's lots of potential with Leopard refurbs and possibly replacement orders, but there's a lot of political risk in the German defense industry. There's a lot of dysfunction in the German military's organization, and some countries are taking a hard look at alternatives after the whole Ukraine tank debacle. Rheinmetall's future orders are going to depend heavily on Germany's perceived diplomatic reliability, which doesn't look amazing right now. You've also got really good competitors in their space right. The Swedes are producing CV90, which is essentially the best IFV out there and competes with Marder; PzH 2000 is a great artillery system, but you've also got Caesar, Arrow, and Krab; Poland operates Leopard, but chose to move forward with Abrams and K2. So basically, I'd say they're going to make money in a world of increased European defense spending, but there are barriers to them really dominating the market.
60 M2 Bradleys, 50 CV90, 30 AMX-10 RC, 100 Leopard 2 tanks, 200 Senator APC, 100 Marder IFV. This will do incredible amount of damage. Consider a simple fact that M2 is an IFV and took out more Russian tanks vs M1 MBT.
Gotta love how these analysis always focus on 'the West' weakness and rarely point out 80% inflation in Turkey, Russia-Turkey proxy war in Northern Karabach, brewing economic/social issues in China, dying Russian economy with incapable military & draft issues, China not providing any meaningful support to Russia but words of partnership, no pipelines infrastructure to China, Russia's strategic doctrine emphasising relationship with EU/Germany, China-Russia being on opposite sides in India-Chinese rivalry and so on and so forth. Won't also mention that Russia is getting bled dry with sanctions and Russian military fails to advance in 6 months of combat facing have loses a only fraction of Western armament/intel, without any sophisticated weapons involved such as aircraft, cruise missiles, medium/long range air defence or even contemporary tanks/IFV. Stingers are only MANPADS goddammit, but these analysts know nothing else hence they parrot it's supposed importance. Similarly they think West is divided, oh boy they think BRICS or TRICKS are a lasting alliance based on mutual trust. Good joke. Really makes you question the validity of the research hence the large disclaimer it's not presented as such.
China relies on export to the US as much as the US relies on import of goods from China. It’s a two way street. Nobody has America level money to buy goods. These chips were restricted for military reasons. Modern military equipment, from missiles to torpedoes to guided rocket artillery to aircraft carriers to MBT to IFV to aircraft itself to any kind of guided ordnance, all of this equipment requires the type of chip the government blocked the sale of. Without reliable chips, you are prone to serious error, and without any chips at all you are incapable of making modern equipment capable of taking on other modern militaries. Take Russia for example. Without the chips, their anti-aircraft systems can not recognize their own aircraft. As such, Russia ended up regularly shooting down its own aircraft over Ukraine. In the end they have almost completely stopped using aircraft in Ukraine at all. This large advantage of aircraft over their adversary Ukraine is completely negated. That’s just an example. I imagine the US military would absolutely demolish a military that lacks these chips, because these chips allow for a level of coordination in your military necessary to fight modern war. Tldr: America is attempting to neuter the Chinese military’s capacity to grow and obtain equipment capable of fight the US military, by way of cutting access to important chips.
Yeah that's kind of what I'm thinking. And if you look at today's price action the vast majority of the downs came from what looks like algorithmic shorting and pre-market probably related to the SEC filing for the ATM offering. During the market the stock did nothing but grind up really. It was kind of a nice channel to watch. Yeah I sold some CC's today but I made some f****** money too doing it during the IFV crush. I'll be out of those by next week when I expect to see any kind of real price action. Are we in the dip before the rip fellow regards?
He impregnates through IFV. He probably doesn’t fuck.
IFV stands for infantry fighting vehicle you TARD
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: IFV. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
Well, we know Biden won't. Corn pop will come up by the time he's halfway through issuing the order, and if he has to press a button himself, he'll probably be looking for it by the coffee machine. Granted, I know just enough about US nuclear security that a nuclear button right next to the brew button isn't out of the question. We are talking about a country that's lost nuclear weapons and leaves tanks/IFV's unlocked and fuelled up on bases.