Reddit Posts
Cosmos IBC(Inter-blockchain communication) how close is to reaching interpretability with other chains
Mentions
I’m always carrying a Glock on me when I’m home. And a ruger LCP on my ankle at work If someone breaks in for my Crypto there’s gonna be shootout cause I will defend myself If it goes badly for me then they still can’t get my crypto cause it’s in a safe
If you regularly carry a firearm you get pretty good at spotting firearms under clothing. Dude in blue had a Ruger LCP carried appendix under his belly.
Can you look at LCP 0xd92606118ea92d5004dB58d041A4766F9Aa901B7 tell me what u think?
😂 >As described in the original whitepaper [10], the minimum overlap requirement was originally believed to be roughly 20% of the UNL. An independent analysis later suggested the correct bound was instead roughly > 40% [1]. **Given this confusion, our goal in this work is to give a clear and detailed explanation of XRP LCP and derive the necessary conditions on UNL overlap for consistency and liveness...We re-evaluate the two prior overlap results and provide a single corrected bound which is partway between the bounds of [10] and [1]. We also show that under a more general fault model which was not considered in the original whitepaper but is canonically used in the research literature, the minimum overlap is actually roughly > 90% of the UNL.** For secondary highlighting "**We also show that under a more general fault model which was not considered in the original whitepaper but is canonically used in the research literature**" You are truly something else.
>it isnt and maybe use the correct terms then? Sometimes I assume things are common sense. Even Ripple academic papers refer to it as *the* UNL. I also assumed it was common sense that decentralization is in regards to the actual state of consensus, not just some arbitrary list of nodes that may not be part of any meaningful consensus validation. >Depending on certain consistency and liveness conditions this is and isnt true, the OG whitepaper from 2013 (XRP LCP) by shwartz discusses 1/5th or 20% overlap and IIRC there were some papers in 2015 maybe 2016 testing this theory and coming to the conclusion of depending on requirements 2/5 or 40% overlap is sufficient. The OG paper but basically stated to be incorrect. Beyond that, the paper written by Ethan clearly stated that it was using metrics canonically accepted by academic research. >Me a single validator doing this has no affect on the greater health of the network. You alone in isolation isn't really the point. Obviously what matters is the generalized fault tolerance for the network as a whole.
>Of course I'm referring to the dUNL, because that's practically all of consensus. it isnt and maybe use the correct terms then? because otherwise I have to guess at what you're trying to saying and it muddies the waters of this discussion. >Technically, the XRPL requires more than 90% overlap in all trusted nodes. Depending on certain consistency and liveness conditions this is and isnt true, the OG whitepaper from 2013 (XRP LCP) by shwartz discusses 1/5th or 20% overlap and IIRC there were some papers in 2015 maybe 2016 testing this theory and coming to the conclusion of depending on requirements 2/5 or 40% overlap is sufficient. Im well aware of Ripples own Documents claiming 90% but this again is under different consistency and liveness conditions. In general from my experience Ive found the 41% overlap is all I have required in order to maintain consensus, otherwise I start forking and making "testnets" by myself essentially. > So I'd hope you're not straying from the UNL, even a minor deviation puts the network at risk. Me a single validator doing this has no affect on the greater health of the network.
Personally have no experience with the 43 so I can’t comment on that As for sigs I’ve only shot the P226 and I loved it I have a ruger LCP380 for my conceal carry at work and the 19 is for carry outside of work