XRP

clownahh

No. If anything LTC at $50 is a good place to buy. Id be more worried holding projects like XRP or even plain BTC at the moment. Both are still expensive in an economy that is not looking really good.

stefan_lago

XRP, LTC, XLM, LINK and SC (Siacoin).

kieran_n

It's been years but I used to use XRP, I'm not saying it's currently the right answer

Mack_Mimsy

XRP is literally a business… a shit business at that with a shit coin to match

OkCommunication4589

Bitcoin and Ethereum as core. Then SOL, XRP and ADA to diversify

IAmMiddleChild

Brother you lost in the XRP sub lmao

ResidentChouder55

Que piensas de XRP? Un amigo esta comprando de esa crypto, no me ha dicho por que la compra, pero cuando investigas esa crypto no se ve tan prometedora

PuzzleheadedBell4057

BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, DOGE, LINK, ZEC, TAO, HYPE, NEAR. Cause I don't have a crystal ball.

AutoModerator

Post is by: WorriedPast2023 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xn4s4c/the_crypto_bull_market_thesis_why_the_bigger/ *May–November 2026* Over the last six months, we've witnessed something quite significant taking place across the cryptocurrency industry. While much of the market has remained obsessed with short-term price movements, inflation, interest rates and geopolitical uncertainty, something far more important has been developing beneath the surface. Traditional finance is steadily integrating blockchain technology into its existing infrastructure, institutional adoption is expanding, global liquidity remains a major consideration, and the foundations for a much larger digital financial economy are being established. I believe we're witnessing a structural transformation rather than simply another speculative cryptocurrency cycle. The most interesting part is that much of this progress has happened while financial conditions have remained relatively restrictive. High bond yields, persistent inflation and uncertainty surrounding central-bank policy have continued to create significant headwinds for risk assets. Yet institutional development has continued regardless. That tells me something important. The underlying technology and its potential applications are increasingly being taken seriously by organisations that previously had little interest in cryptocurrency. Bitcoin remains at the centre of this transformation. What started as an alternative monetary system is increasingly being incorporated into conventional investment portfolios. The expansion of regulated investment products, institutional custody and systematic Bitcoin allocations represents a fundamental change in how traditional finance approaches the asset. The introduction of investment funds combining conventional equities with Bitcoin exposure is particularly interesting. Rather than requiring investors to make a separate decision to purchase cryptocurrency, Bitcoin can become part of an established investment strategy. Over time, this could create a more consistent source of demand, particularly if institutional allocations increase and investment products attract sustained inflows. However, the distinction between offering Bitcoin exposure and actually generating new buying pressure remains important. New products create access, but their success ultimately depends on investors allocating capital. Ethereum is developing a somewhat different investment proposition. Its importance increasingly centres on tokenisation, smart contracts, stablecoins and the possibility of traditional financial assets operating through blockchain infrastructure. The financial industry is beginning to explore how securities, funds and other assets can be represented digitally, transferred more efficiently and integrated with programmable settlement systems. Ethereum's established ecosystem, developer infrastructure and institutional familiarity provide it with a meaningful position in this developing market. Solana is emerging as another serious contender. Its combination of transaction speed, relatively low costs and growing financial infrastructure has attracted attention from payment providers and institutions exploring tokenised assets. Recent demonstrations involving the transfer of tokenised securities on Solana illustrate how public blockchains could potentially support financial operations that have traditionally relied on slower, more fragmented systems. The significance isn't simply the speed of a transaction. It's the possibility of changing how financial assets are issued, administered, transferred and settled. If this technology moves beyond demonstrations into sustained commercial use, the implications for financial infrastructure could be substantial. Sui is also becoming increasingly interesting. Its development around payments, stablecoins and Bitcoin-backed financial products suggests an ambition to compete for institutional and consumer adoption rather than relying entirely on speculative trading activity. The proposed expansion of Bitcoin-backed lending infrastructure is particularly noteworthy because it explores how existing Bitcoin holdings could potentially be used within decentralised financial systems. That doesn't automatically translate into increased demand for SUI, and commitments to new financial infrastructure should never be confused with capital already deployed. Nevertheless, the direction of development is encouraging. XRP and the XRP Ledger have made meaningful progress in another area: institutional custody, payments and the tokenisation of conventional financial products. The involvement of established banks, asset managers and financial infrastructure providers is important because these organisations operate within highly regulated environments. Their participation suggests blockchain-based settlement and asset administration are becoming legitimate subjects of institutional investment and development. The expansion of regulated custody services and tokenised money-market products represents tangible progress. However, I think it's essential to distinguish adoption of the XRP Ledger from demand for XRP itself. They are connected concepts, but not interchangeable. The same principle applies across the entire cryptocurrency industry. A blockchain can experience increasing adoption without necessarily producing an equivalent increase in the value of its native token. Token economics, transaction fees, supply, institutional holdings and actual network usage all matter. Stablecoins may prove to be one of the most important developments of this entire period. We're increasingly seeing them positioned as practical financial infrastructure rather than merely trading instruments. The attraction is understandable. Digital dollars can potentially move across borders, support programmable transactions and provide an alternative settlement mechanism for businesses and financial institutions. The involvement of major exchanges, payment providers and established financial companies suggests this market is gradually moving towards wider commercial adoption. If stablecoins become increasingly integrated into everyday payments, international transfers and institutional settlement, the blockchains supporting those transactions could benefit from greater network activity. Regulation is another major part of the thesis. For years, uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency classification, custody, taxation and market structure has discouraged institutional participation. Although progress remains uneven and some legislation is still unresolved, regulators are increasingly developing frameworks for digital assets, tokenised securities and stablecoin activity. This matters because institutions generally require legal certainty before committing substantial capital or integrating new infrastructure. Clearer rules could reduce operational uncertainty, improve access and encourage further investment. But proposals, regulatory guidance and enacted legislation are three very different things. A constructive announcement is not the same as a legally established framework, and neither automatically guarantees institutional adoption. Then we come to what I consider one of the most important factors of all: liquidity. The expansion of US M2 money supply has continued to provide support for the longer-term monetary thesis. Broad money growth matters because the availability of capital, credit conditions and investor appetite for risk all influence financial markets. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have historically shown sensitivity to changes in liquidity conditions, although that relationship is neither immediate nor guaranteed. The complication is that money supply can expand while interest rates and bond yields remain restrictive. We've seen precisely why that distinction matters. Higher Treasury yields increase the attractiveness of conventional fixed-income investments and can reduce demand for more speculative assets. A stronger dollar can also tighten global financial conditions, particularly for international borrowers and investors. This is why I continue to watch the US 10-year and 30-year Treasury yields so closely. A sustained decline in yields, combined with moderating inflation, softer economic data and a less restrictive Federal Reserve, could provide a considerably more supportive environment for cryptocurrency markets. The UK and broader global economy also matter, although I believe the United States remains the dominant influence on financial liquidity and risk sentiment. Global M2 deserves attention, but it must be measured consistently. Adding together monetary aggregates from different countries without properly accounting for currencies, definitions and reporting periods can produce misleading conclusions. What matters is whether broad liquidity is genuinely expanding across major economies and whether that expansion is beginning to influence financial conditions. There is also an increasingly interesting connection between cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence. AI agents are moving beyond basic conversational systems towards software capable of carrying out multi-step tasks, coordinating business processes and interacting with financial infrastructure. Large technology companies and financial institutions are reporting growing numbers of deployed agents, automated workflows and enterprise integrations. Some of these figures are impressive, although registered agents, active agents and successfully completed autonomous tasks are not the same measurement. The longer-term opportunity is that autonomous digital systems may require programmable payments, verifiable transactions and reliable settlement mechanisms. Blockchain technology could potentially provide some of that infrastructure. However, I wouldn't automatically assume

redditaws

Maybe 🤔 creating a networking that uses XRP to solve a problem may work.

ddbbccoopper

Because almost every project is centralized, with developers and insiders retaining enormous amounts fo the tokens to dump on the market. That alone should raise serious red flags about their incentives and likely rug pull. What specific project are you referring to? With many of these projects, particularly those attempting to capitalize on the anticipated tokenization of real-world assets, is that the proprietary token being promoted by the developers often isn't necessary for the underlying technology to serve its advertised purpose. XRP, Canton Coin, and GLM don't need their respective tokens, even if certain implementations use them. The same broader argument applies to Solana, Cardano, Avalanche, and others. Their protocols may require native tokens for transaction fees, staking, or other functions, but what is required is minuscule compared to the speculative price to the point that it is basically nothing other than a marketing gimmick to argue that the use of the blockchain is somehow tied to the price of the speculative asset. Think about it. It can't. If the price to use the chain were to increase the price of the token and vice versa, users would simply move to a cheaper chain. Most of these coins rely on technobabble, unnecessary complexity, and deliberate obfuscation to convince newbies that technological utility automatically translates into investment value. Developers wrap straightforward concepts in jargon, introduce a token, assign it some manufactured utility, and then promote that token as though its value is inseparable from the success of the technology. Bitcoin, on the other hand, was created to solve a specific problem: decentralized, censorship-resistant money without a trusted intermediary. Its native asset is integral to that purpose.

msc1974

And 90% has already been replenished (from Binance): "Since our last update, the covered amount has risen from approximately 80% to 90%. All BTC, ETH, USDT, BNB, SOL, USDC, XRP, USD1, RLUSD and ZEC are fully backed at 100%. We'll keep purchasing the remaining assets through market and OTC channels until the covered amount reaches 100% for all tokens."

Ill-Bodybuilder9263

Shake out. Shake out XRP, ETH, they don't want retail owning these cryptos anymore 

a_dodo_stole_my_baby

According to on-chain tracking data from [TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/) and Arkham, the exploit began with the drainage of **233.46 million XRP** (worth approximately **$296 million**) from five Binance wallets on the XRP Ledger.

icallitadisaster

Don't XRP holders generally interpret everything as bullish?

autimod

XRP holders should quickly transfer it to Binance while they still can.

IAMDATRUESTREPAIRMAN

XRP schizos just finding any type of narrative to post

kgtrip

This can actually be like the hook for XRP: Hold XRP, your coins are safe with us! 😂

qazqaz45

“Stay away from XRP”

patricious

Oh no, my $56 dollars worth of XRP is done for 😥🤣🤣🤣

Skyobliwind

Still XRP Wallets are "suspended" so that legit users cannot payout their XRP. For "security reasons".

texfilmguy

That’s a helluva bottom signal. The end is over. Huge hack. I’ll wager some of my worthless XRP that this is a good sign.

petewondrstone

Damn, they didn’t want any XRP. Smdh

GabeDef

Even the thieves knew XRP is worthless.

omni_wisdumb

Anyone who's been around this space since even 2012/13 knows crypto has become nothing more than a digital casino being controlled by a relatively small group of firms, nations, banks, and companies. All stable coins are fully controlled by the energy that created them, same goes for pretty much every coin other than BTC (which also could theoretically be the case ). The space wants to hate or form conspiracies on banks and how the government or secret groups control them, but then they're cool with XRP and USDT and USDC and the coins (even ETH) that can be edited by their founders. Then there's the whole debate about Quantum and AI hacking and what not. There's also the point that, unlike your bank, most of these coins are unregulated and not backed by anything.

Skyobliwind

Well at least for XRP rhey already suspended withrawals...

JustStopppingBye

Remember when XRPers thought institutions would adopt XRPL as their primary ledger and use XRP for cross-border settlement at scale? 😂 Now every partnership gets spun as mass adoption. XRPL transaction fees are typically just 0.00001 XRP to prevent spam. Wop wop.

theusedcomputers

Because I didnt think you would post that if it were real. Is there a website that actually took XRP as payment?

Eastern-Chair2190

So they get the stamp but still can't take deposits or issue the stablecoin themselves. Feels like one of those moves that matters more on paper than in practice right now. The indirect XRP link is barely a thread, market barely twitched. Anyone know if this actually changes custody competition or is it just a compliance checkbox?

AutoModerator

Post is by: Holywizy and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xgtu83/ripple_gets_final_occ_approval_for_its_national/ The OCC granted final approval for Ripple National Trust Bank on Oct 26, after conditional approval back in Dec 2025. What it can do: \- Manage the reserves behind RLUSD \- Act as collateral trustee for RLUSD holders \- Offer crypto custody What it can't do: \- Take deposits or offer FDIC-insured accounts. It's a trust bank, not a regular bank \- RLUSD is still issued by Standard Custody & Trust Company. The bank adds federal oversight of the reserves For XRP the effect is indirect at best. Early reaction was pretty muted. Big step for stablecoins or just a headline? Not financial advice. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

jekpopulous2

What’s impressive about XRP is that even with the thousands of new coins that have launched since 2017 it’s still the most useless one.

Renowned_Molecule

XRP ETFs are still in the green. Go look for yourself. 

Vandeskava

My god. XRP shills are still a thing?

Efficient_Range1156

XRP is an MLM cult and is the crypto most deserving of rugging to zero.

Dry-Pop-7635

Yes but XRP has billions in token unlocks, with one just happened recently. Don't touch XRP or ZEC tbh.

toniistheworst

Hmmmmm I wouldn't say you had almost no serious options, we just forgot about them because most (not all) of them got quite irrelevant. From the top of my head I can name a few already: Stellar, Monero, ZCash, Ethereum Classic, Dash, Litecoin, WAVES, Basic Attention Token etc etc. What's "serious" and what isn't is subjective of course, but back then pretty much every coin had something to offer. Some innovated in privacy, some in cheaper payments, others in transaction speed etc etc. I really don't think it was so easy to pick the right one. Much, much easier than now yes, but you still had hundreds of options. And all those I mentioned (they probably also were the popular ones since I know about them lol) only went down against Bitcoin overall. So I do think that XRP in that sense is quite an outlier. I also think it's trash and utterly useless, but I think you can acknowledge that it's impressive that it always stayed relevant, and you can see that in the performance. Would never buy it, but that's quite an achievement considering the whole altcoin market always got completely wiped during the Bitcoin bear markets and replaced by newer coins.

Electronic_Quote399

Thats one way to do it, and thats perfectly fine if you do. You just pointed to XRP as an outlier. Its not. You had like 5 serious options back then and just about every one of them has had greater gains than btc. Obviously you cant expect that from picking a random meme coin, but if your goals are bigger gains, you gotta choose one pr a couple alts. Point is, xrp isnt special. Xrp is trash now.

Electronic_Quote399

Well thats not really true either. Ether has done the same thing since 2016, roughly 200x. Most of the major coins today werent even released back in 2016. Solana has made the same move since 2020. And the other coins dont have about 40% of the supply controlled by executives, like XRP does.

toniistheworst

Not what I said. I said that XRP is worth the same amount of Bitcoin as 10 years ago. Hypothetically, let's say 1 XRP could buy you 0.1 Bitcoin 10 years ago. My point being that today, this ratio has not changed. This means XRP in the grand scheme of things kept up with Bitcoins performance yes, but not more.

Electronic_Quote399

I hate when people compare the token price of xrp to bitcoin, years ago. $1.30 bitcoin is not comparable in any way, shape or form to $1.30 XRP. XRP has been wildly successful already to reach even $1 or ATH. Good lord, look at the numbers, people. Market cap exists whether you deny it or not.

Electronic_Quote399

You had me until you mentioned XRP

AItrainsoffme

Keep in mind XRP’s circ supply and frequent team mass dumping on any attracted liquidity makes XRP extremely emotionally difficult to hold.

toniistheworst

Alts always were struggling against Bitcoin over the long run. Pretty much every altcoin, when measured over the last 10 years, was outperformed by Bitcoin. Let that sink in, almost every single one. Which is why holding altcoins for longer periods of time has a 99,9% chance of being absolutely disastrous. The best case I can think of right now is XRP, since it's roughly worth the same amount of Bitcoin as 10 years ago, so about on par. But durably doing better than Bitcoin is something not a single altcoin has managed to pull off. Just to be clear: Do NOT invest in altcoins. They're not an investment, they're speculative assets and are only worth it on very rare, short-lasting occasions where they actually do outperform Bitcoin for a few months. But you know, good luck with catching that and not the endless bleeding that happens the other 99% of the time.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Vivid_Warning_9314 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xbfbam/advice_on_what_i_should_sell_and_keep/ So I'm looking at selling off a few of my crypto currencies. I currently have IQ, Ethereum, Sui, Chainlink, XRP and Solana. Can I get advice what I should keep and which ones I need to get rid of *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

frownface84

Nothing really. People have tried; that's why other chains like SOL, POLY & XRP exist. But they're not universally accepted. As competing chains & currencies die off only the top handful will survive. BTC and ETH will always survive but having to pay $3-4 to make a transaction means it'll never supplant fiat/bank transfers/credit cards etc. That was always a pipedream for the crypto community. If i go to the cafe and buy a cup of coffee for $5, i pay $5. I don't want to pay $5 + some unknown amount of fee between $1-$5 depending on how fast/likely i want my payment to go through. that's just nuts. When transacting large values; then a few dollars in gas is fine and NBD; but not for day to day transactions.

Tech72

This is why I use XRP. Fast, no bs gas thing. With the value almost like USDT

Trick_Actuary_2452

No, no eyes are on XRP.

Prahasaurus

You gotta admire the way he keeps this scam rolling along. Cardano, XRP... Just a testament to gullibility.

CipherScarlatti

I would love to see AMP suddenly find major growth to enrage XRP people. XRP people: "We're a bank! We're transactional!" AMP: "Hey look, major adaption. Look at that. A dollar. Neat. "

scott_in_ga

I'm short SUI, XRP, SOL and plan to ride this baby down to unforeseen levels. Bitcoin sub 10,000 will be a punch in the mouth to many

_PolyWasp_

If you're interested in a platform for building algos to trade BTC / ETH / XRP markets on PolyMarket check us out [polywasp.com](http://polywasp.com) \- no signup required to build and test bots for polymarket. Full support of crypto markets and combos, connects direct to Polymarket US account

Due-Candy-8929

Depends what kind of returns they want to see… wouldn’t be surprised to see alts like ETH XRP etc massively out perform BTC… and then smaller caps massively outperform them… $10k in an XRP that goes from $1.30 to $5 is better than $10k in BTC that goes from $81k to $250k. $10k in $0.08 HBAR that goes to $1 is better again Putting the full $25k in a HYSA and collecting 5% a year is safe but not necessarily better Even the SnP isn’t guaranteed - it might do 8-12% on average but there’s always a chance it will trend downward for years as well It seems dangerous buying metals after they have run hard as well Personally I much prefer to diversify

Due-Candy-8929

XRP ETH LINK LTC FLR XLM HBAR SOL SUI… QNT good as well but I don't have any

evnsbn

Oh ok, now that's a really nice question! Thank you. I guess Litecoin is like that high school sweetheart who never let me down, but eventually I grew up and met new people. Haha... ok, now let's get serious. I have great memories of using it with no hassles. Back then we didn't have too many options. You really got me thinking about this. Maybe that's why I still trust the project and what it stands for? Maybe because I trust Charlie Lee and like his personality and way of doing things? About tech: I don't need a hundred features to move money around. Just something that works. Lean and clean. But yeah, for my needs today, XRP does that faster and cheaper. So LTC is mostly just a project I'm fond of nowadays. I also respect Charlie Lee's decision to sell his LTC in 2017. I know it was controversial, but I appreciated his reasoning about conflicts of interest, and the fact that he stayed committed to the project afterward. About valuation: there's a difference between appreciating a coin for what it does and holding it as an investment. To me, crypto isn't just about price performance or fancy features. It's also about philosophy, utility, and trust. I think that's about it. Any thoughts?

NOTAgainPal

What is ETH being used for? Or SOL ? Or XRP? How does high velocity trade work if AI cant directly access liquidity and payment infrastructure

Itchy_Exercise3343

The problem is all you guys who believe in these MOON SHOTS, especially on XRP, are going to be VERY dissappointed and might even lose a lot of money. This bad information is coming from Influencers like Jake Claver, Crypto Sensei, and others. Why would anyone take seriously these complete jackass's that refers to himself as the Crypto Sensei or a guy that looks like a used car salesman, on major financial information. There are so many Macro Ecomical factors involved right now that even the most experienced/educated financial person can NOT even come close to any accurate prediction. For one, do they know when this Iran conflict will come to an end which is the primary cause of our energy issues which directly affects the markets? NO! When they start using desperate maneauvers like the 589 BS. Wake up people!

BoringPrinciple2542

Take it or leave it but after seeing behind the curtains I would be VERY hesitant to hold XRP. Probably no immediate danger but that’s a house of cards built on hype and conmen. Can’t say where to put your money but if you keep much of it in XRP then have a stop-loss waiting.

DixonSteele17

Been wondering that myself. Anyone else holding QNT and XRP?

Patient-Process-2565

Absolutely solid for XRP army, face melting pump on its🚀🚀🚀🚀

thebaldmaniac

No one is paying in crypto through crypto cards though. It's just the card provider converting the crypto to fiat, keeping the spread and paying the merchant. Until merchants actually start taking BTC or ETH or XRP or whatever, no one is actually paying with crypto. It's just a off ramp to fiat with fewer steps.

d3r3k1449

Should have bought some then but who knew…well brk here did. Tho as for XRP while Starknet did 60% this past weekend alone it never really cracked $1.50 again and after liquidation Monday today it’s back to $1.34

Herosinahalfshell12

Why the hell would institutions adopt Ripple? Like to make transactions aren't there enough stable coins that are pegged in value while XRP is not?

AutoModerator

Post is by: EmbarrassedDingo9467 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1x29gyc/btc_bounced_and_fg_is_back_in_greed_64_but_alt/ Snapshot from Bybit perps this morning (\~07:50 UTC). Long % is by account (L/S ratio): \- MNT: 83% long \- HBAR: 80% long \- XRP: 79% long (L/S 3.81), funding +0.0021% \- JTO: 74% long \- ETH: 71% long (L/S 2.50), funding +0.0004% \- BTC: 63% long (L/S 1.70), funding -0.0011% What stands out to me: BTC bounced from \~80.4k to \~82.7k, but BTC funding is still slightly negative. So the crowd is long by headcount, but the money isn't paying up to hold it. On alts, positioning is much more one-sided than on BTC. Historically, when retail is this lopsided on alts while BTC funding stays flat, I've seen it resolve with a flush before continuation more often than not, but that's my experience, not a rule. Is anyone else seeing the same skew on other exchanges? Do you treat high long % as a contrarian signal or ignore it? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

ProfessionalAir104

Buy 1000 XRP

EmbarrassedToe7405

Most of my crypto exposure is in $ETH, with a smaller position in $BTC. I also hold a couple of higher-risk, high-upside plays in $XRP and $XLM

RadiantWarden

QRL being called quantum resistant does not mean it is guaranteed to be safe forever. It simply means the network uses cryptography that is not vulnerable to the same known quantum attacks that could eventually threaten Bitcoin, XRP, Ethereum, and other blockchains. If researchers develop a new quantum algorithm that can break the type of cryptography QRL uses, then QRL could become vulnerable too. So quantum resistant really means resistant to the quantum attacks we currently know about, not permanently unbreakable.

Electronic_Quote399

XRP

AutoModerator

Post is by: Common-Journalist454 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wye36d/early_signal_unconfirmed_cftc_begins_federal/ **Affected:** Broad U.S. crypto market, potentially including XRP, HBAR, XLM, ADA, LINK, ETH and SOL **Confidence:** High-confidence early signal **What changed:** The CFTC published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for “Regulation CTX” and “Regulation CAM.” It considers: A new federally regulated “crypto asset market” category. A nationwide alternative to fragmented state licensing for platforms offering retail leveraged, margined or financed crypto transactions. Proof-of-reserves requirements for platforms holding pooled customer assets. Customer-fund segregation, market-surveillance and anti-manipulation protections. Intermediation through registered futures commission merchants. Clarification that delivery to a customer-controlled wallet within 28 days could qualify for the “actual delivery” exemption. This is a consultation, not an operative final rule. Comments are due within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. **Why it matters:** This could create the first tailored federal pathway for U.S. exchanges offering leveraged retail trading in qualifying digital commodities. It would not force ordinary spot exchanges to register, and it cannot replace comprehensive legislation covering the entire spot market. **Investment relevance:** A workable final framework could improve regulated access, institutional participation and U.S. liquidity for assets treated as commodities. However, proof-of-reserves, segregation and FCM requirements could raise operating costs and favor large established platforms. This is a market-structure signal, not an asset-specific buying signal. **Next catalyst:** Federal Register publication, the 60-day comment process, followed by an actual proposed rule and Commission vote. **Main downside/disconfirming evidence:** The CFTC could substantially revise or abandon the framework, face litigation over its statutory authority, or fail to finalize rules. Congressional legislation could also supersede it. **Primary sources:** [CFTC announcement](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9307-26)⁠ and [Chairman Selig’s detailed framework](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opaselig12)⁠. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

NewcastlePLchamps

I’d like to hear your logic on why XRP belongs down in B

Main_Elevator3837

You dont need to do a lot of research it's simple. Bet on compliance and institutional readiness. Its a long road because institutions move at a snails pace. ETH, ARB, XRP, XLM, HBAR, QUANT, ALGORAND, SOL, AVAX... Where ever you see the biggest corporations and institutional partnerships putting their weight is where the train is headed. Much the the chagrin of Reddit you dont need to understand the tech, just follow the money and the ones actively working to be compliant. It will take a few years.

discusking

ZBCN hasn’t been disappointing at all. Neither has XRP. Nor SHX.

AutoModerator

Post is by: XRPresso_io and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/XRPresso_io/comments/1wx554p/xrpresso_live_market_feed_is_now_on_telegram/ XRPresso’s Live Market channel just went live on Telegram under XRPressoCafe. If you want updates on the marketplace without keeping the site open, this is the feed. New activity on the platform can show up there as it happens — physical goods and services, NFT listings and auctions, launchpad drops, Featured/Promoted spots, Live rooms, and music offerings. One stream of actual inventory, with deep links back into XRPresso when you want to check something, message a seller, bid, mint, or buy. It’s meant as a live projection of what’s on the platform rather than a general promo channel. Cards show public info only (wallet-free), and the full checkout still happens on XRPresso itself, settled on the XRP Ledger with your keys staying in your wallet. Non-custodial, settles in seconds. List. Sell. Ship. Sip. Marketplace: xrpresso.io Telegram: XRPressoCafe *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

OBEACHIBIZA

XRP has it sewn up.

Radiant-Concern6391

3 months is Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. All 3 offer very limited downside risk with massive potential upside in my view. I’ve been here a while and don’t like to get exceptionally greedy going too far out the risk curve. Potentially a longer term hold with good upside is SUI. All these offer real world use today and should expand massively into the future

zzscrubzz

XRP is just one of a handful of tokens that are strongly positioned for exponential growth. It's not conspiracy at this point. You either see it or you don't.

its_witty

Man overdosed on XRP conspiracy theories It's a deep rabbit hole

thepowerlessbrunt

Brazil is a pretty interesting market for this. If XRP can move beyond the investment angle and actually get used for payments or settlement there, that would matter a lot more than another headline about market size.

Orchimaruu

We use the XRP Ledger

stefan_lago

LTC, SC (Siacoin) and XRP

midnight4twenty

XRP - institutional money is flowing in , large collectives involved. ALGO- confirmed new institutional money on this , start small XLM- take a look buy on lows, more money is coming here too/. Good luck boys , I have a vacation I want to take. PUMP the hydros 😉

azdcaz

At least he’s smart enough to see that XRP is trash, maybe he’s on to something

JustStopppingBye

Yes it’s an exaggeration, it’s not even 10 years old yet. But I’m not surprised you answered me because you know XRP is a scam and blockchains are interchangeable because of chainlink. Maybe one day, xrp will be get the DTCC or Swift connection though chainlink

Ok_Body_2830

I hold a wide (probably too wide) range of alts. In the past, I have made the mistake of round-tripping too many gains by holding out for higher prices before selling anything. So I made a concious effort of starting the ladder out process at more modest gains. E.g. Sell the first 10% chunk at 1.25-1.5 the price I bought. The past month or so I have hit the first rung of the ladder on a lot of the coins where I had a decent entry price. Sometimes 2 or 3 rungs if they have been on a real run (e.g. NEAR). If they go back down to my original entry price, I will top back up to my initial quantity and keep some modest profits from this mini-bull. If the next move is to continue upward, I will keep laddering out at a rate that allows me to take profits but keep some exposure to huge breakouts. So that is what I am doing right now in terms of active buying/selling. For the chunk of my portfolio in BTC, I am less concerned with taking short term profits. It's a more stable asset, so the short term profits would be a lot smaller percentage wise and I am perfectly comfortable holding it long term. So I am just hodling. I may buy a little more, particularly if prices go down. I have some ETH which is getting a similar treatment, and a little bit of BNB, SOL, and XRP which I am treating as midway between the stable asset and speculative altcoin.

OBEACHIBIZA

XRP all the way

Apprehensive_Job8084

Well you made more money on this trade than XRP ever did, cash out buddy.

hoppeeness

I mean there are plenty. XRP, Canton, HBAR, AVAX, XLM…even things like chainlink which isn’t really a blockchain.

Radiant-Concern6391

XRP has my vote along with Ethereum and solana.

NewcastlePLchamps

Such a brain dead reason to lose hope in XRP

hoppeeness

Depends but XRP, Canton, HBAR, Quant and Avax seem to be doing a good job.

toddycoin

I wouldn't choose a coin just because the overall market feels more bullish. That's still basically trying to time the market. If I were researching the options, I'd first compare what each asset actually does, its liquidity, how volatile it has historically been, and how much of the €200 I'm genuinely comfortable losing. I'd also separate the decision to hold XRP from the decision about where to put new money rather than feeling like everything has to be moved at once. And honestly, if losing the €200 would bother you significantly, that's probably more important to think about than finding the “best” coin.

billybobbybrownbaby

Everyone here will either be a dick, try to make a little joke for some upvotes, or shill whatever coin they hold the most of. nobody here knows shit. if you want to stay in crypto and not “gamble” as you say then stick to BTC. If you still have an itch for alts then stuff that’s been around a while like ETH XRP XMR SOL etc…. but this is crypto it’s all gambling. anyone who says anything else is delusional

Forward-Air-2271

XRP, xlm, hbar

NHLBigFan

Are ETH and XRP considered as altcoins?

Money-Hawk266

XRP, always. Ripple is connected with the traditional banking industry like no other crypto company. They lean on their USD stablecoin for now, but they're finding more and more opportunities to run networks on their XRP.

jekpopulous2

After all these years XRP is still absolutely useless.

MikeWaz65

I don't hold any Bitcoin. I am stacking: XRP, XLM, HBAR, and XDC

Volgrand

None. I stick with my usual portfolio: BTC, eth, XRP and ADA. And I did bet for VELO, so I'll hold it until moon or dust (or a better investment comes by)

hoppeeness

I can’t find what DOGE actually does that is useful. That’s why I am asking. XRP is all over financial institutions documentation as well as govt docs.

whynotgo4itnow

Definitely solana, XRP, and Hbar . Also eth is definitely hitting 10k one day not to far in the future

Temporary-Cause730

For the same thing as XRP