Reddit Posts
Realistically, What Cryptocurrencies Are Actually Worth Accumulating Over the Next 5–10 Years?
Are We Finally Entering an Era Where Crypto Is More Than Just Speculation?
Ronin's bridge needed 5 of 9 keys. One company held 4, and the 5th was a "temporary" favor nobody switched off. How $625M left in 115 seconds
Crypto Trading for Beginners: How to Understand the Market, Read Charts & Avoid Losing Money
SCARY - Binance Users cannot withdraw some altcoins yet!
ETH Price at $2,300 Test as BitMine Nears 5% of Ethereum Supply
Following the #1 copy trader for 6 months turned $10k into $237. Holding BTC and ETH: $10,316. I tracked all 9,470 copy trading vaults on Hyperliquid.
Following the #1 copy trader for 6 months turned $10k into $237. Holding BTC and ETH: $10,316. I tracked all 9,470 copy trading vaults on Hyperliquid.
Mercado Bitcoin, Brazil's largest exchange, halts withdrawals after about $40M drained across 10+ blockchains
OK, I've been Investing in Crypto since 2019. I Sold All My Crypto in March 2025. Why Would I Get Back In?
The $3 Billion Kill-Switch: Inside the $6.4B Binance Heist—and Why Only Bitcoin Is Real Bearer Money.
The $3 Billion Kill-Switch: Inside the $6.4B Binance Heist—and Why Only Bitcoin Is Real Bearer Money.
Binance withdrawals reopen in ~45 hours. Two supply questions the market hasn't priced yet
This Binance hack is showing where we are in the market right now
Someone lost $50,059 to address poisoning on Oct 28. In the week before, every new entry in their wallet history was fake
Leaked backend data from "no-KYC" swap Wagyu.xyz links 38k+ crypto orders, Monero destinations, and user IPs
19,630 ETH is still withdrawable from six abandoned EtherDelta-era contracts — here is a checker for any address
Ethereum Price Danger Zone: ETH Tests $2,300 Support as Outflows Surge
Any zero-fee platforms that allow crypto shorting?
Is crypto the logical next step for AI-to-AI and AI-to-Business payments?
Arthur Hayes just sold his entire trading book, about $22M in ETH, ENA and UNI. Bitcoin is below its 50-day average for the first time in 66 days
Follow-up: I asked whether "absorbed vs pierced" big orders predict anything. I tracked 1 million of them. Pierced orders don't keep going, they give a little back (pre-registered)
I built a free crypto historical return matrix — looking for feedback
💰Top Three blockchains by USDC Circulating Supply💰
I can’t believe nobody is watching $SAIRI
This is how a "hacker" wallet looks like
SolanaJack ($JACK): open-source PvP casino on Solana, 5 days live. Real numbers + honest risks of a crypto project with an Mc of $164k
You have 25k$ to invest now for 2years, what would you consider?
After years of trading full crypto cycles, here is the raw reality of how altseasons actually play out
SolanaJack ($JACK): PvP casino on Solana, start of day 4. Real numbers + honest risks.
Why Kendu Is Making Noise, Over 2 Years Since Its Birth
BTC flat, alts bleeding 2-7%, and the alts are exactly where the crowd is most long
BIG MOINSHOTS IN ALTS TODAY ! GET IN NOW!
Crypto big pumps incoming. inside. youre welcome
BTC bounced and F&G is back in Greed (64), but alt positioning on Bybit looks crowded: MNT, HBAR, XRP all ~80% long
Is Bitcoin "LIKELY" To Have A Big Upside, Downside, Or Remain Flat On 10-10-2026? My Cousin Claimed It Would Go Up
Is Bitcoin "LIKELY" To Have A Big Upside, Downside, Or Remain Flat On 10-10-2026? My Cousin Claimed It Would Go Up
This crypto bot is +29% in 8 days while BTC did +1.6%.. signal or just early luck?
New Remittix Whitepaper is out -- RTX utility may be the most important announcement before TGE
BTC reclaimed $86K, then slid under $84K within days. About $487M in longs were liquidated in 24 hours
I think doing less has genuinely become my best trading decision this year
Glamsterdam hits Ethereum's Sepolia testnet on Oct 6. The L1 is scaling alongside rollups.
AI +8.7%, memes green, low caps starting to move, what are you watching?”
I generated hundreds of crypto trading strategies and open-sourced 416 of them with full reports. Only 10 passed a brutal 7-stage validation
$PEP is your next 1000x gem
XRP, ETH Sentiment Hits August Depths: Bullish?
Robinhood Chain ranks 4th on L2BEAT's activity table. It uses a dual-layer architecture instead of its own L1
Advice for starting a long-term investment
What I look for before jumping into a pre-launch liquidity event, and how Wire Network's LCO stacks up
Most token launches are built to dump on retail. Wire Network's LCO puts 100% of its raise into liquidity and 0% into the company, so I'm in on this one
Tokenized asset volume graph from James at Invest Answers, he was speaking about other assets but I suddenly discovered Monad ranking only 2 down from ETH and 1 down from Arbitrum, the fact that they even rank this early is huge! Had to rewind and screenshot this!
ETHUSDT Pullback: Distribution vs. Intact Uptrend — Sept 28
Tom Lee's Bitmine Buys Another $47M of ETH, Taking It to 4.9% of Ethereum Supply
Although the market is poor, diamonds are out there
Am I f$&#ed? I meant to swap $50 USDC at an instant exchange, but I send 50 ETH ($130,000+) by mistake.
Litecoin has a hidden superpower nobody talks about (and they should)
SpaceX Inu ($SPXINU)— a deflationary Robinhood Chain meme coin with Tokenized SpaceX Stock in a Locked LP
If one wanted to convert their BTC into ETH, is there a difference using CEX like Coinbase vs doing it on a DEX for tax reasons?
I bought BTC and ETH very early. Then I discovered leverage and gave it all back.
Whitehat hacker, 0xQuit, rescues 23,155 NFTs (~$5.7M) from a live exploit in an old Limit Break contract that Magic Eden stopped using in 2024.
Bitget hack currently ongoing, already over $183M worth of assets withdrawn from hotwallets and coldwallets swapped to eth
Built this for people to buy US stocks from outside the US, looking for feedback
Free APIs to label/attribute blockchain wallets to known entities (for a traceability graph tool)?
Is Kalshi Lying About Their Trading Data?
For HODLers: want to know your portfolio risks?
Crypto Twitter user goes viral after a Kalshi employee insults him. He pulled Kalshi's CFTC filings and trade API and claims most of their crypto perp volume is fake.
7 years, 5,417 trades, 51.4% win rate — full backtest of my BTC/ETH/BNB signal bot, including the bad stretches
Which alt coins are you stacking in 2026 in preparation for the next bull run?
Tegfun — Permissionless Token Launchpad on Robinhood Chain
I built a site so I can understand the crypto market better. Do you find it valuable?
$ASKR – an AI token that actually has a working product (one API for Claude, GPT, Gemini + more)
Best no-KYC way to buy crypto in the EU?
Mintropolis Genesis Public Mint is LIVE — 3,400+/5,555 minted | 0.0004 ETH | Reveal in 24–48h
I am just not that excited about buying here
Hooked Ethereum ($HETH)
Two big catalysts this week: the CLARITY Act vote and the Fed, which one matters more for crypto?
SGX cleared by CFTC to offer BTC and ETH perpetual futures to US institutions
I track perpetual open interest across four venues every day: ETH's book just closed at 70.2% of Bitcoin's, rank 1 of my 73 sessions, while funding sat on its median
Mentions
BTC is yesterday's news XMR is the future, it's poised to explode like BTC did when Silk Road hit the mainstream SOL/ETH are the distant future, incredble tech but too soon, and contracts are not secure yet. BCH is likely Satoshi's original plan and it has great devs and community YMMV
Any crypto representing a pure fiat replacement with no value case is complete speculation with no heading. Platform cryptos (ETH, SOL) have a leg to stand on because they fundamentally resolve true RWA blockchain adoption use cases, like stock tokenization, real estate tokenization, etc. Then you have to account for rug-pull ability. If you can freely buy as much of the crypto as you want and sell liberally, it’s probably not gonna work out either. Greed corrupts. My bias is for GENNY since its basis is effectively data tokenization
I think BTC and ETH are the strongest long-term bets, with LINK being interesting because of its role in connecting blockchain infrastructure with real-world data and tokenized assets. XLM could benefit from cross-border payments, while XMR has a different use case centered on financial privacy. The real question is whether adoption translates into lasting value for the tokens themselves. I also think most altcoins will eventually fade away, especially those that rely entirely on hype rather than solving a genuine problem.
ETH and BTC are the only two worth picking up. Just look at what asssets are being tokenized on ETH.
BTC and ETH would be my starting point, with everything else needing a much stronger case for why it'll still matter in ten years. I'd pay more attention to whether people use a network when the token incentives dry up than how well its price performed during the last bull run.
Maybe there are a lot of great teams and projects in crypto, but that doesn’t mean every good project is worth investing in. Personally, I just stick with Bitcoin and a little ETH. The others? Yeah, maybe they’re great, but a good project doesn’t necessarily mean its coin is a good investment. A token’s price doesn’t necessarily go up just because the project behind it is good. Scarcity and consensus will always matter. So, what’s left? I think the answer is pretty obvious.
Short answer: not really. With 4 of the 5 needed signatures sitting at one company, the actual security model was "trust Sky Mavis plus one extra key", and the leftover DAO allowlist quietly turned it into just "trust Sky Mavis". Counting validators tells you a lot less than counting independent organizations and how many of them would have to be compromised at once. It also wasn't a one-off. Harmony's Horizon bridge lost about $100M in June 2022 with a 2-of-5 multisig, and that one was pinned on Lazarus too. Same pattern: a small signer set, with keys on machines a phishing campaign can reach. Ronin's own fix afterwards was raising the threshold from 5 of 9 to 8 of 11, which helps, but the part of your write-up that stands out more is the monitoring 🔍 Six days without anyone noticing 173,600 ETH leave is worse than the multisig math. When I look at a bridge now I check three things: how many separate entities hold signing keys, whether large withdrawals have a delay or rate limit, and whether temporary permissions like that allowlist ever get reviewed after they're granted.
BTC is the answer. If you want to dabble in alts go for ETH and a little SOL. That’s it. All other bs is here today and gone tomorrow
BTC, ETH, and maybe HYPE
Realistically, BTC and ETH are the only two with a long enough track record to plan around for 5–10 years. Beyond that it's a bet on which networks still have users and developers in a decade, and most of the 2017 and 2021 top 20 lists didn't make it. What's worked better for me than picking winners is sizing: most of it in the boring two, a small slice in a few things you've actually used and understand, and rebalancing once or twice a year instead of chasing whatever is pumping that week.
BTC and ETH. Rest are garbage
BTC, SOL and ETH, check SOL ETFs and txs per day
BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, DOGE, LINK, ZEC, TAO, HYPE, NEAR. Cause I don't have a crystal ball.
I keep it boring with BTC and ETH and treat everything else like a lottery ticket I can afford to lose. Most altcoins won't make it, but ones with real customers, like LINK with its oracle data, have a better shot than the rest.
BTC is pretty much a guaranteed money maker and ETH has the biggest promise of use case. I don’t know what that means for the price of ETH but it’s a gamble that will most likely pay off.
Yes, most coins will die because they're all built on faulty code, even ETH. Tau.net is a decidable AI (not an LLM) that is designed to output 100% correct code because all specifications have to go through a formal verification process before it generates code. All the hacks we witness can be prevented by entering a rule like: "don't send any funds to any other address but ledgeraddress123 and account123, etc". It has been under development for over ten years because what they are trying to do is very hard math. They had to create their own computer language and have recently been awarded US patents. Their tech also had been beating LLM's at chess, including, recently, Opus 5.5. It's in early alpha and public testnet is next.
How can you be accumulating altcoins just before thousands or even millions of AI agents with +250 IQ will flood the market? Don’t you think for them, even ETH will be obsolete piece of shit? Or you just think that all this AI is a bubble and world will be the same in the next 10 years?
ETH has also been ruled a commodity by US regulators. So have a bunch of others.
Post is by: taazapost and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xno81c/crypto_trading_for_beginners_how_to_understand/ ​ **Can cryptocurrency make you rich, or could one wrong trade wipe out your savings?** Cryptocurrency has become one of the most talked-about investment opportunities in the world. From Bitcoin and Ethereum to emerging altcoins, millions of people are exploring crypto investing and trading. But here's something many beginners overlook: making money in cryptocurrency isn't just about finding the next coin that might explode in value. It's about understanding the market, reading price charts, managing risk, and knowing when NOT to trade. If you're interested in learning cryptocurrency trading for beginners, understanding Bitcoin trading, or exploring crypto futures, there's a lot you should know before risking your money. That's exactly why learning the fundamentals matters. **1. Understanding Cryptocurrency Before Investing** Before buying your first cryptocurrency, you should understand what you're actually purchasing. Cryptocurrency is a form of digital asset that uses cryptographic technology. Many cryptocurrencies operate on blockchain networks, which maintain distributed records of transactions. Some important concepts every crypto beginner should understand include: Bitcoin (BTC) and how it works. Ethereum (ETH) and smart contracts. Altcoins and crypto tokens. Blockchain technology. Cryptocurrency wallets and private keys. Centralized and decentralized exchanges. Understanding these concepts can help you make more informed decisions instead of following random recommendations on social media. If you're starting from zero, consider using a structured cryptocurrency learning resource rather than jumping directly into live trading. **Recommended reading:** [CRYPTO: RICH OR RUINED? – Learn Cryptocurrency Trading](https://a.co/d/0idiieEj) **2. Crypto Trading for Beginners: How Does It Work?** Crypto trading involves buying and selling digital assets based on market prices. However, placing a trade is not as simple as clicking the Buy or Sell button. You should understand: Market orders and limit orders. Order books and trading volume. Exchange fees. Slippage. Liquidity. Spot trading versus derivatives trading. For example, a market order generally executes against available liquidity, while a limit order allows you to specify your preferred buying or selling price. These small differences can affect your trading costs and execution. If you want to learn these concepts step by step, check out [CRYPTO: RICH OR RUINED? on Amazon](https://a.co/d/0idiieEj). **3. How to Read Crypto Candlestick Charts** One of the most useful skills for anyone interested in technical analysis is learning how to read candlestick charts. Candlestick charts display price movements over a specific period and help traders understand market behavior. Here are some common candlestick patterns: **Doji Pattern:** Indicates indecision between buyers and sellers. **Hammer Pattern:** Can indicate a possible bullish reversal depending on market context. **Bullish Engulfing:** A candle pattern that may suggest increasing buying pressure. **Bearish Engulfing:** May indicate increasing selling pressure. **Support and Resistance:** Important price zones where buying or selling pressure has historically appeared. However, no candlestick pattern guarantees a profitable trade. Traders should consider volume, market trends, and other technical indicators. Want to understand these patterns in more detail? [Explore CRYPTO: RICH OR RUINED? – A Practical Guide to Crypto Trading and Technical Analysis](https://a.co/d/0idiieEj) **4. Crypto Futures Trading: Understanding Leverage and Liquidation** Crypto futures trading attracts many beginners because it allows traders to take positions based on price movements without necessarily owning the underlying cryptocurrency. But futures trading also introduces additional risks. Some important concepts include: Futures contracts. Perpetual contracts. Margin trading. Leverage. Liquidation price. Funding rates. Long and short positions. Imagine controlling a $1,000 position with $100 in margin. Leverage can magnify both gains and losses. A relatively small unfavorable price movement can cause substantial losses and potentially liquidate your position. This is why beginners should understand crypto futures, margin requirements, and liquidation risks before considering leveraged trading. For a beginner-friendly explanation of these concepts, take a look at: [CRYPTO: RICH OR RUINED? – Learn About Crypto Futures, Options and Leverage](https://a.co/d/0idiieEj) **5. Crypto Risk Management: How to Protect Your Trading Capital** One of the biggest differences between a disciplined trader and someone simply gambling on price movements is risk management. Even experienced traders make losing trades. The goal is not to win every time but to manage losses and avoid exposing too much capital to a single trade. Some important risk management concepts include: Position sizing. Stop-loss planning. Risk-to-reward ratios. Trading discipline. Avoiding excessive leverage. Keeping emotions away from trading decisions. Never trade money you cannot afford to lose. Learning risk management is just as important as learning technical analysis. **6. Common Cryptocurrency Scams Every Beginner Should Know** The cryptocurrency industry also attracts fraudulent projects and scammers. Some common warning signs include: Guaranteed returns. Fake investment platforms. Phishing websites. Suspicious wallet connections. Fake giveaways. Requests for private keys or recovery phrases. Unverified projects promoted through social media. Remember: legitimate platforms will never need your wallet recovery phrase to provide ordinary customer support. Understanding crypto security can help you avoid mistakes that may be impossible to reverse. **7. Can Crypto Trading Really Make You Rich?** This is probably the biggest question beginners ask. The honest answer is that cryptocurrency can create opportunities, but it can also lead to substantial financial losses. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital assets can experience significant price fluctuations. There is no guaranteed trading strategy, indicator, or candlestick pattern that can consistently predict the market. Instead of chasing overnight wealth, focus on learning how cryptocurrency works, understanding technical analysis, and developing a realistic approach to risk. **8. A Practical 30-Day Crypto Learning Plan** If you're completely new to cryptocurrency, a structured learning plan can make the process easier. **Week 1: Cryptocurrency Fundamentals** Learn Bitcoin and Ethereum. Understand blockchain technology. Explore crypto wallets and exchanges. **Week 2: Trading Fundamentals** Understand spot trading. Learn market and limit orders. Explore order books, liquidity, fees, and slippage. **Week 3: Technical Analysis** Study candlestick patterns. Learn support and resistance. Understand trends, volume, and indicators. **Week 4: Futures and Risk Management** Understand leverage and liquidation. Study position sizing and stop-losses. Learn common crypto scams. Practice analyzing charts without risking real money. **9. Looking for a Complete Cryptocurrency Trading Guide?** If you want to understand cryptocurrency from the ground up, **CRYPTO: RICH OR RUINED? – How to Make Money in Crypto, Master Trading Charts & Futures, and Avoid Losing Everything** is a practical learning resource worth exploring. The book covers: Cryptocurrency fundamentals. Bitcoin, Ethereum, blockchain, and altcoins. Crypto trading for beginners. Candlestick chart patterns. Technical analysis. Crypto futures, options, and leverage. Margin trading and liquidation. Risk management and trading discipline. Cryptocurrency scams and wallet security. A practical 30-day learning plan. It is designed for beginners and aspiring traders who want to understand the cryptocurrency market without needing advanced financial knowledge. **Check the book on Amazon here:** [READ CRYPTO: RICH OR RUINED? ON AMAZON](https://a.co/d/0idiieEj) You can also revisit the book while working through the topics in this article: [Learn Crypto Trading, Candlestick Charts & Risk Management](https://a.co/d/0idiieEj) **Final Thoughts** Cryptocurrency trading is not a shortcut to becoming rich. Before investing your hard-earned money, learn how the market works, understand technical analysis, study futures trading, and take risk management seriously. The more you understand before placing your first trade, the better prepared you can be to make informed decisions. **Learn the market. Understand the risk. Make informed decisions.** If you're ready to start learning, explore [CRYPTO: RICH OR RUINED? on Amazon](https://a.co/d/0idiieEj). *Disclaimer: This article and the recommended book are for educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Cryptocurrency trading involves substantial risk, and you may lose some or all of your invested money.* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
That checks out with the data. Following the #1 vault left $237, while just holding BTC and ETH ended at $10,316.
The attacker spread it across 10 chains including BTC, ETH and SOL on purpose, since only the USDT and USDC legs can get frozen and anything that moved as native BTC or SOL is unrecoverable. Tether already froze about $4.5M of USDT
This is a brutal reality check on copy trading. Most top-ranked vaults take massive tail risk to look good on the 30-day leaderboard until one bad liquidation wipes out the entire vault. Holding spot BTC/ETH and sizing risk conservatively almost always outperforms chasing short-term APY.
Post is by: 03side and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoHelp/comments/1xmc577/catastrophic_1044_usdc_drain_via_builtin/ Hi everyone, I am looking for urgent technical insights regarding a severe fund exfiltration from my Phantom iOS wallet that occurred on November 1st, 2026. A total of 1,044.85 USDC on Ethereum was moved out to an unauthorized address without my knowledge or any local biometric prompt, despite hardware-level security being active. I have already submitted a formal support ticket to Phantom Customer Happiness (Sean) and provided my full 3.2 MB state log file (state-log-2026-11-02T03-01-41.txt). Here are the absolute facts and specific indicators extracted directly from the incident timeline and the official application state logs: **1. The On-Chain Cryptographic Facts** https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3f8e6449a4c1b258969e7bbae06717fad1c5aef19ffbc7f249dbc943e2312142 \*\*Transaction Hash (TxID):\*\*0x3f8e6449a4c1b258996e77bae06717fad1c5aef19ffbc7f249dbc943e2312142 **Asset Loss:** Exactly 1,044.85 USDC (Ethereum mainnet) sent to 0xc9011a3A71elB9CF8.... **Coordinated Gas Drain:** Minor gas amounts of 0.04 SOL and 0.0007 ETH were taken at the exact same timestamp. **2. The Internal Feature Flags & State Architecture** The application state dump confirms that internal automated liquidity and cash management systems were force-asserted to active states via remote configurations: enable-cash-usdc-sweep: true enable-cash-bridges: true enable-receive-auto-convert: true enable-cash-auto-convert-onramp-confirmation: true **3. The Biometric Hardware Bypass and Core Timeline** **October 22, 2026:** I interacted with the official, built-in "BTC Up or Down" prediction markets game powered by Kalshi directly inside the Phantom app interface. The initialization required a routine USDC prompt, which resulted in an "Approved USDC - Unlimited" allowance rule being registered on-chain for the game contract. **Device Status:** Local hardware validation was active (Biometric Enabled: true on an iPhone 13 client platform). **The Log Anomalies:** The underlying state logs capture automated background instructions running during client routines. Specifically, on September 29th (following the update to version 26.30.2), the system logged an unprompted automated asset routine: \[initiateWalletTransfer\] Initiating transfer followed by Complete. targetOrg=dbfd88... via the KMS Auth2 subsystem layer. **The Problem:** Because an "Approved USDC - Unlimited" allowance was already established on-chain for the internal dApp integration, the automated execution routines or an exploit utilizing the enable-cash-usdc-sweep flow managed to execute the transaction directly on the network level. This bypassed the local device's Secure Enclave prompt entirely, requiring no physical FaceID challenge to clear the 1,044 USDC out of the wallet. Has anyone else audited Phantom's internal automated sweep flags or experienced a similar automated balance migration after using the integrated prediction features? *Note: Do NOT DM me. I am fully aware of recovery scams and fake support handles. Any private messages will be ignored, blocked, and reported immediately. Keep all analysis in the public comments below.)* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Post is by: Big-Experience-807 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xn7xjx/scary_binance_users_cannot_withdraw_some_altcoins/ **Paper backing from the company's balance sheet does not mean immediate user liquidity.** If Binance does not have those specific coins physically sitting in their operational hot wallets, the "Withdraw" button remains greyed out or blocked for users. Here is how the situation breaks down into reality right now: * **Liquid Crypto (BTC, ETH, Stablecoins):** Binance has already moved physical coins into new hot wallets. Illiquid Altcoins (The missing \~5%): This is exactly where the bottleneck happens. Binance has guaranteed the funds to buy them back, but until they physically source and deposit them into the withdrawal wallets, **users cannot withdraw them!** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Honestly the "10+ chains" detail is the part that worries me most 😬 A single buggy contract usually hits one chain. Wallets drained on that many chains at once sounds more like someone got signing access to the hot wallets themselves, though that's just my read until they publish a proper post-mortem. What I'd watch from here: - The reopening date. "No customer lost money" only really means something once withdrawals are open again and people can actually pull their funds. - Whether they explain what was hit and how. A clear post-mortem plus how much they keep in hot vs cold storage tells you far more than a reassuring statement. - Where the roughly $8M in ETH ends up. If it starts moving through mixers or bridges quickly, recovery odds drop a lot. On the bigger question, I wouldn't read three incidents in a week as proof that every exchange is about to fail. It is a good reminder that "the exchange will cover it" is a promise, not a guarantee. Keeping only what you're actively trading on an exchange and the rest in a wallet you control is boring, but it's the setup that doesn't depend on someone else's security team 👀
I knew social engineering was involved. Ask me how I know. I nearly got roped into a scheme about 11 years. I ended up pulling out at the last moment. OK so I would have ended up hands on 3000+ ETH but also very likely that those 3000 ETH would have ended up in someone else's hands. My only regret is that I had $10K and could have easily bought 10,000+ ETH and had I hung on them for a few years (say 2018/20221) today I'd be a multimillionaire. Social engineering scams are the absolute bottom of the barrel scum bucket of the whole scene.
Post is by: Mr_Hodlerr and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xmvdq4/following_the_1_copy_trader_for_6_months_turned/ Copy trading gets sold as "find someone good, press copy, earn what they earn." I wanted to see what that actually looks like, so I pulled every copy trading vault Hyperliquid has ever had and simulated what people really do with $10k. **What $10k became after 6 months** Each run starts on the 1st of a month (23 starts, July 2024 to May 2026) and only uses what the leaderboard showed that day. "Following the #1" means putting everything in whichever vault was top by 30 day return and moving to the new #1 each month. All results are after the leader's 10% profit share. |What the copier did|$10k after 6 months (median)| |:-|:-| || |All in the #1 vault, switch monthly|$237| |Split across the top 10, re-pick monthly|$4,611| |Split across the top 10, never switch|$7,758| |Split across the 10 biggest vaults, re-pick monthly|$9,759| |Just hold BTC + ETH|$10,316| Over a full year it's the same story, just worse. From 16 start dates, the #1 chaser ended at $25 at best, the re-picked top 10 at a median $691 and holding at $8,682 **Why Hyperliquid** Most platforms only show the lead trader's own return, so you never see what happened to the people who copied or to the traders who blew up and disappeared. Hyperliquid's copy trading runs through vaults and every vault's balance, profit and followers are onchain, including the ones that closed. That's 9,470 vaults opened through Oct 30 and I used all of them. **Time works for holders, against copiers** With holding, the longer you stay, the better your odds. Half BTC and half ETH from any day since 2018 made money 64% of the time after 1 year, 70% after 2, 97% after 3 and 100% after 4. Copy trading on Hyperliquid runs the other way. Of followers still in a vault today, 52% of those in for 3 to 6 months are in profit, 20% of those in for 1 to 2 years, and 5% of those in for more than 2 years. (Followers who cashed out aren't in this data, so it's a snapshot, not every start date.) **The exception** Some vaults did hold up: the ones with a year or more of history, small drops and steady weeks. None of the ones still open was near the top of the 30 day board. A split across vaults like that (1+ year record, worst drop under 30%, up over the last 6 months) beat holding from 10 of 12 one year start dates. But only 1 to 4 vaults a month qualified before Sept 2025, so take that one with a grain of salt. **How I measured it-** [full report and method](https://botsfolio.com/blog/does-copy-trading-work) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Post is by: Holywizy and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xmq5ez/mercado_bitcoin_brazils_largest_exchange_halts/ Following up on the Binance hack from last week: this is the third big crypto security incident in about a week, after Binance ($6.3B) and Polymarket. What we know so far: \- Mercado Bitcoin paused all deposits and withdrawals on November 2 after a "security incident" \- Wallets on at least 10 blockchains were drained \- Estimates range from about $40M up to $46M (Arkham tracked about $46M across 36 addresses) \- The attacker has already started moving funds, reportedly about $8M in ETH \- The exchange says no customer lost money and no data leaked, but there's no reopening date yet \- No public link to the Binance hack so far Anyone here using Mercado Bitcoin? And after this week, are you moving more off exchanges? Full breakdown with sources: https://holywizy.com/blog/mercado-bitcoin-hack-40-million-withdrawals-halted-brazil/ *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
XMR ahead of DOGE in marketcap, what a time to be alive :D Top 3 around when ETH hits 1000 and BTC 38k :)
Sorry this happened. The unlimited USDC approval from Oct 22 is the first thing to look at. An approval lets the approved contract move that token with transferFrom at any time, with no new signature or biometric prompt, because the permission already sits on chain. The part that does not fit a pure allowance drain is the SOL and ETH gas leaving at the same time: when someone else calls transferFrom they pay the gas, so gas taken from your wallet suggests a transaction was sent from your own address. That makes it worth treating the seed or device as exposed. Steps that help now: open the drain TxID on a block explorer and check which address actually sent the call. Check the token approvals for your address and revoke every unlimited allowance, USDC first. Move anything left to a fresh wallet with a new seed created on a clean device. Keep the TxID, timestamps and the state log together for the support ticket, and file a report with your local cybercrime unit, since funds that land on an exchange can sometimes be frozen. Going forward, approve the exact amount you plan to spend instead of unlimited.
The freeze part is kind of the whole debate in one story. The stablecoins got frozen in hours because they have an issuer, the ETH couldn't be, and the hack itself was on a custodian, not on the chain.
If anything it's a selling point for ETH and BTC, and a huge reason to never use stablecoins. They can be stolen arbitrarily by government or the issuer.
Every single day since mid 2024 when I converted everything I had as shitcoins (including ETH, BTC, and a lot of smaller ones) to XMR has been the best decision of my life. The only true crypto, not on CEX, witchunt against it nonstop and still 4x while Bitcoin halved.... Wake up people, most of you who think they buy a fungible, untraceable CRYPTO when buying BTC realize eventually that it is exactly the opposite... Just ask yourself the question, why every government is afraid of it? Because it is what BTC originally wanted to be Satoshi just could not solve the fungibility with untraceable ways yet.
Was it ever? The Canton tries to be modern, so officially supported it a little bit. But was there much more, besides the millionaire of "Bitcoin Suisse" living there and the ETH (some organisation) letterbox.
And 90% has already been replenished (from Binance): "Since our last update, the covered amount has risen from approximately 80% to 90%. All BTC, ETH, USDT, BNB, SOL, USDC, XRP, USD1, RLUSD and ZEC are fully backed at 100%. We'll keep purchasing the remaining assets through market and OTC channels until the covered amount reaches 100% for all tokens."
Crypto is ass because in a market where virtually every other asset is growing impressively bitcoin is down over 10% YTD and ETH is down over 20% YTD.
There Are quantum Secure Algorithms - some projects already use them, path is to migrate the existing projects (See BIP360/361 for BTC, ETH quantum roadmap), my worry is that some of the projects are not fast enough. Quantum is currently speeding up on all sides - algorithms, Hardware & design (I just found ecdsa.fail a few months ago & really freaky how this moved since then)
The reported 1.76 billion USDT were frozen by Tether and have not been converted into ETH. Other stolen funds were reportedly swapped for ETH and TRX before the freeze. In theory, Tether could issue 1.76 billion replacement USDT and return them to Binance, provided the frozen tokens are permanently neutralized and the recovery process is approved.
On the ETH leg they used an EIP-7702 delegation to point Binance 14 at a sweeper contract, so each time the hot wallet auto refilled it got drained again, three passes in a row. The signing setup got compromised to authorize those delegations, so no raw private key ever had to leave wherever it was held.
Secret BTC wallets?…that must be a new thing I’m unaware of…ETH secret wallets, also, news to me buddy..
I do the exact opposite: when the market crashes I buy the dip by swapping USDT to ETH, and when the market surges I take the profit by swapping ETH to USDT.
I thought I read something where the majority of the funds were put on to a lending platform as collateral. They then defaulted on the loan and ran off with the borrowed ETH.
Its noted... everywhere. Do you think they kept all of it in one hot wallet ?? Also, more information. Ethereum smart contracts caused the hack. Native to ETH. If the BTC was in its own wallet it wouldn've been safe. Shit coins again
Shake out. Shake out XRP, ETH, they don't want retail owning these cryptos anymore
With all the chai analysis companies and AI watching the chain, it’s very unlikely for them to cash out 18k BTC. Bitcoin doesn’t have a proper working mixing service like Tornado Cash or Railgun that ETH has. The amount is too big, everyone has their eyes wide open. My guess is it will stay still for a very long time
In the last 10 years crypto has been around: \-Blockchain security has slightly improved on major chains like BTC and ETH. \-Major exchanges have improved their security requiring more layers of verification and more indepth internal security. \-Hardware wallets have improved their hardware and software. BUT \-Hardware wallets have also added features that create more vulnerabilities. \-Exchanges still have a lot of the same weak points. \-Hacking is vastly more powerful plus has the help of AI, so the improved exchange security could still fall behind. \-Quantum might still be a threat for blockchain, but not for at least a decade or two.
All the ETH here in Canada is frozen. You just need to warm it up before you trade it outside of Canada to a warmer place.
That much BTC and ETH getting dumped on the market could do some damage. Probably not serious damage by itself, but additional fall out could occur from others selling out of fear, longs being liquidated, etc.
If a major bank were completely drained, the transactions would most certainly be reversed. At the very least the legal system could be used to seek recovery. With ETH, you don’t even know the identity of the staker who signed off on the transactions. The real problem here is that the etherium network validators dropped the ball. Clearly these were fraudulent transactions that should have failed even the most basic validation checks. The key signature check alone is too basic. It’s so inadequate that banks aren’t even legally allowed to be so simplistic.
Yes you can walk back with transactions. It’s why there was the split between ETH and EatH classic. YouBTC you cannot
For stables, sure. It’s basically a normal debit card with a bit of extra spread. With BTC or ETH I’d skip it. In a lot of countries every swipe counts as selling crypto, so a month of groceries turns into 40 tiny capital gains events to deal with at tax time. Some cards also hide a 1-2% conversion spread on top of the ATM fees. Cashback is the only real reason to use one, and that’s usually paid in the card’s own token, so it’s worth whatever that token decides to do.
Before anyone says ‘not your key, not your coins’ I was unfortunate to send some ETH to Binance last night just for conversion to USDT (BSC) and my withdrawal has been suspended. Things like this happen and some people just get caught in the crossfire.
Ai overall, not just in one way, is really beating crypto down, hard. Would be fascinating to see where BTC and ETH would have been without AI.
No it was withdrawn from their system, the stolen ETH and BTC are not able to be frozen. Quite a bit of thr USDT and USDC was frozen, some was used to borrow ETH and BTC before that happened
60m usdt frozen for 60m worth of ETH? That is small compared to $1.5b.
They have more potential wealth in BTC than ETH (about a billy in each) so I'm not really sure you understand enough to be allowed to use margin trading
You must not understand how big binance is. It will fully reimburse users for the $6.3 billion hack using its Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU, holding roughly $1 billion in Bitcoin) plus company funds. No private key leaks, and about $3 billion already frozen via partners.  The exchange maintains substantial reserves, with recent Proof of Reserves showing roughly $151–165 billion in crypto holdings and over 100% coverage ratios for major assets like BTC, ETH, and stablecoins. The loss represents only a small fraction of total reserves, enabling full coverage without impacting user balances or binance operations
You must not understand how big binance is. It will fully reimburse users for the $6.3 billion hack using its Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU, holding roughly $1 billion in Bitcoin) plus company funds. No private key leaks, and about $3 billion already frozen via partners.  The exchange maintains substantial reserves, with recent Proof of Reserves showing roughly $151–165 billion in crypto holdings and over 100% coverage ratios for major assets like BTC, ETH, and stablecoins. The loss represents only a small fraction of total reserves, enabling full coverage without impacting user balances or binance operations
Quote: The attacker raced the freezes by selling USDT to market makers and borrowing ETH against USDT on Aave. It now holds more than 420,000 ETH and 18,270 BTC, **about USD 2.4 billion in assets beyond any issuer's reach.** Thank you , please come again
To be authorised, a firm is required to hold - inter alia - balance sheet capital to cover prudential risks, and to have insurance cover for assets held in hot wallets. None of that can be covered by client funds - house and client funds must be legally segregated. Binance is regulated in multiple jurisdictions, so will have demonstrated to and satisfied multiple independent international regulators that they have sufficient coverage on an ongoing basis. So, although they may currently be short a specific asset (e.g., ETH), they will have the asset value covered. This is an asset mismatch issue, not a funding one. Whilst I may be unable to alter your adopted perspective with any measure of wisdom, I'm simply trying to explain how this works. Regulation, compliance, risk and capital management across financial and crypto markets is my professional field of expertise.
Aave will make money on the collateralized usdt when they dont pay the ETH back
You’ve probably seen by now, but they deposited it into Aave and took a loan out in ETH using the USDC/USDT as collateral. When the collateral got frozen…the hacker already withdrawn the ETH, which cannot be frozen. Such a simple move, but you need to know what you’re doing to have planned that part out - smart on their part.
Because you want anonymity? Monero is the only blockchain I would ever really consider. With say ETH, everyone could go check all your transactions where you buy stuff, how much you pay for rent and so forth. 0 anonymity. This is also why blackmarkets bascially use xmr only.
Okay, a spooked market can sell of some, sure. That's not unreasonable, especially if amounts change. But Binance didn't lose as much in the way of stablecoins as it did 'traditional' crypto, meaning if anything it would need to \*buy\* BTC and ETH to return that to its coffers. This would take time, but yeah, if Binance has assets in hard currency and needs to correct imbalances between customer holdings and its assets, it would need to buy up what the customers were holding which is missing. Ergo buy pressure. And 'non of this is federally insured' tells me you're from the US and think this would affect US customers, but this has nothing to do with the US or US customers at all.
While they did get hacked numbers are wrong. Just by looking at USDT you can realize that. Tether has frozen the account. It is centralized. From what i have seen from other posts hacked account is ETH not the others.
Moved quickly? Not fast enough to prevent from AAVE once again as the pawm shop of choice to borrow some ETH and leave the pool holding the bag on bad debt. Only two outcomes happen. Either Tether releases stables, and the attacker successfully laundered OR the bad debt is stuck in limbo by the Feds in the Southern District of New York.
No no it'll be "Secured from Hackers ETH", or SHETH
In Feb. 2025 Bybit had $1.5 billion in ETH stolen. That's almost twice the ETH that was stolen just now. No fork. Things have changed rather a lot since the days of TheDAO.
That simply removes ETH from the ecosystem reducing total supply and increasing its value long term.
They did that because it was ETH's fault (some clever minds used an exploit in ETH, that shouldn't exist).
The stable coins were froze but only after the hacker put them up for collateral and borrowed ETH
almost 2 years ago bybit was hacked, and 1.5B of ETH were withdrawn, this was recovered fast
I asked chatgpt to investigate This means the attacker successfully converted approximately $44.6 million of exposure into ETH that Tether cannot centrally freeze. However, the post is misleading in suggesting that billions of dollars were moved through this technique. Aave identified only one such position, involving $60 million in collateral. Why this works
I thought they hacked ETH wallets
There is still going to be losses. The hackers moved the stolen USDT to aave, borrowed ETH against it since it can't be frozen and moonwalked away
I agree. Likely to be a slow distribution of BTC and ETH over months. But that doesn't mean Binance will implode.
At least the transfer fees on 28k ETH were pretty low.
They put down the tether as collateral. Borrowed ETH. Layer that tether was frozen. So whoever lent their ETH is sitting on tether they can’t move
It kind of is, that’s why the hackers have been swapping for ETH since no one can freeze it
Fair. ETH is more decentralized than just about anything. I wonder what AAVE's docs say about the risks of having its USDC money market frozen funds by the issuer.
Not if they’ve been transferred to Aave and used as collateral to borrow ETH, which is apparently what he did. Not sure who will keep the USDT in that case.
Its shit anyways. Bitcoin is shit, USDC is shit and ETH is shit
From Bala on X the binance hacker just did something genius and it should scare you tether froze $1.5 billion in stolen USDT. circle froze $800 million in USDC. everyone's celebrating like the problem is solved meanwhile the hacker deposited the stolen USDT on aave, borrowed ETH against it, and walked away. because USDT can be frozen. ETH can't he's never paying it back. he doesn't need to tether and circle just proved they can freeze billions in seconds. and the hacker just proved that if you know how defi actually works, none of that matters the freeze saved some of the money. but the smartest money was already gone before anyone pressed the button
For context for others: More than $2 billion in ETH and tokens left Binance hot wallets on Thursday for an address created hours earlier and funded through Tornado Cash. Changpeng Zhao said "It looks like Binance was indeed hacked," while Binance itself has said it is investigating but has not officially acknowledged a breach. Estimates vary, with researchers putting outflows as high as $2.77 billion across five blockchains Much of it is already locked up. Tether froze about $971 million in USDT and Circle froze about $823 million in USDC, but about 167,000 ETH also moved, which can't be frozen. Binance says user funds are safe, and CZ said that as a shareholder he expects all user funds to be fully covered. Markets reacted anyway: Bitcoin fell below $79,000 and ETH under $2,240, with $627.7 million in liquidations in a single hour FWIW, nobody has claimed that AI is what hacked it, but I am inclined to agree with OP on that.
Anyone who's been around this space since even 2012/13 knows crypto has become nothing more than a digital casino being controlled by a relatively small group of firms, nations, banks, and companies. All stable coins are fully controlled by the energy that created them, same goes for pretty much every coin other than BTC (which also could theoretically be the case ). The space wants to hate or form conspiracies on banks and how the government or secret groups control them, but then they're cool with XRP and USDT and USDC and the coins (even ETH) that can be edited by their founders. Then there's the whole debate about Quantum and AI hacking and what not. There's also the point that, unlike your bank, most of these coins are unregulated and not backed by anything.
Post is by: Mother_Job_6154 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xiwu9m/isit_true_about_the_recent_incident_with_binance/ Anyone else heard of the recent incident regarding Binance. More than $2 billion in Ethereum (ETH) and tokens left Binance hot wallets on Thursday for an address created hours earlier and funded through Tornado Cash, Etherscan data shows. Binance has not said whether customer deposits are at risk. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Not so long ago HYPE was valued at $28 and ETH at $2800
Sure. It's called FerimanEdge: [https://ferimanedge.com](https://ferimanedge.com/) It tracks BTC, ETH and BNB with a fixed rule set, publishes the current market regime, and sends Edge Updates when the entry/exit conditions are actually met. No AI deciding trades, no exchange connection, no copy trading.
I was literally just reading about how an internal model at OpenAI solved the ETH problem (not ethereum.) https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1xgju7f/openai_says_its_models_refuted_the_exponential/ If so it's a pretty incredible achievement for AI.
Post is by: Unable_Tackle_1255 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xgvjn7/19630_eth_is_still_withdrawable_from_six/ Measured from chain state today: 19,630 ETH is claimable across 220,827 addresses in six 2016–2017 contracts whose front-ends are long gone. EtherDelta V2 alone accounts for the bulk; the largest single holder is owed 604.22 ETH and hasn't touched the wallet since 2017. The technical part is trivial and always has been. balanceOf(address token, address user) with token 0x0 returns your ETH balance, and withdraw(uint256) pays msg.sender. No approval, no allowance, no owner involvement — it is permissionless and always was. So the money isn't stuck because of a bug. It's stuck because nobody knows they have a claim. Of the top 400 holders, 97% signed at least one transaction historically, but only 4.5% have signed anything in the last twelve months. I built a read-only checker: [https://jlicerio.github.io/etherdelta-claims/](https://jlicerio.github.io/etherdelta-claims/) It reads all six pools in one public eth\_call and prints the exact transaction to release each claim. No wallet connection, no signature, no key input, no cookies, no analytics, no server-side code — it's a static page you can audit, and it prints the raw JSON-RPC body so you can replay it against any node with curl. Two honest caveats. If you have lost the key to the address, none of this helps and the balance is unrecoverable — that is very likely true for a meaningful share of them. And this is my own tool, so treat it with appropriate suspicion and verify the numbers against Etherscan's Read Contract tab. The point of the post is that the claim probably exists and takes one transaction to take. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Pretty classic case, and more fixable than you’d think. The blockchain is your receipt. Even with no chat logs, each sale usually shows up on-chain as two matching events: the NFT leaving your wallet to an address, and ETH arriving from that same address around the same time. That’s a P2P trade, and it reads like one on the blockchain. Here's what we’d add around it: * Proof you control the wallets (a signed message or a small test transaction, this shows that it's your wallet that received the NFTs) * What the collection was trading at on the day of each sale. Overpriced NFT sales are a known laundering pattern, so showing yours matched the market answers that question before it’s asked * Screening of the buyers’ wallets, since “random dudes” is the one part a compliance officer will want checked * Any Discord or Telegram screenshots you still have, as supporting rather than main evidence We’ve done this for plenty of people who traded peer to peer or bought with cash back in the day. Before AML rules caught up with crypto, LocalBitcoins, meetups and cash deals were simply how a lot of people got in. A good report explains that context, then backs it with whatever trail exists: matching cash withdrawals from your bank, old platform account data, and the on-chain history from that point on. Although as we are not accountants, the focus is on the trades that made the money. Losing trades rarely need the same level of evidence.
The roadmap was to upgrade their chain to be an ETH validium but at some point they abandoned it and decided they were going to remain a sidechain. No idea what they were thinking but they lost me. The best thing that they had going was their zk prover and their pessimistic cross-chain prover. Now they’re just another EVM L1 and the tech behind it isn’t even very good compared to Sonic, Avax, etc…
Not manually. I only act when the system triggers an entry on BTC, ETH or BNB, so I don't really have a "this looks cheap, I'll buy it" list. That's kind of the point - removing that discretion from the process.
i think the premise is half right but the “AI can’t pass KYC” part is a bit off agents don’t really need their own bank account. in practice there’s always a human or a company behind them that’s legally responsible, and that entity already has a stripe account. and the card networks and stripe are clearly not sitting still on this, they’ve all been pushing agent payment stuff (visa, mastercard, stripe with openai etc). so for “agent buys something from a normal business” the boring tradfi rails will probably win for a long time where crypto actually has an edge imo: * **micropayments.** paying $0.002 per API call or per scraped page doesn’t work with card fees. stablecoins on cheap L2s or solana do. coinbase’s x402 thing (payment over HTTP basically) is the most interesting attempt i’ve seen at this * **agent to agent with no business in the middle.** if two agents settle between themselves 24/7 programmatically, a wallet is just way simpler than any bank API * **cross-border.** same reason stablecoins are already growing for B2B payments but notice that it’s mostly stablecoins, not ETH or SOL as currency. nobody wants their agent’s budget swinging 10% in a day. so the question is more “which chains host the stablecoin volume” than “which token goes up”. LINK is a different category anyway, that’s oracles/data, not a payment rail the part people underestimate is compliance. at my company (VestaScan, we do RWA tokenization) we’ve spent more time on KYC flows and who’s liable for what than on the smart contracts themselves. regulators won’t let anonymous agents move real money at scale, so whatever wins will probably have identity baked in somewhere, likely tied to the human or company behind the agent timeline wise i’d say micropayment use cases are real now but small, and big volume is still a few years out. curious if anyone here is actually running agents that pay for stuff on-chain today
Definitely agree. BTC and ETH are for holding (at least for me), and most tokens are for trading. If the tokens are cheap and have a decent community, I hold a few million just in case, but that's some "I'm not going through DOGE again" type stuff. Spent $3 on DOGE way back when I thought I was going to trade myself to riches. I did not and should've held. Idk what 7.5 mil of DOGE is worth, nor do I want to, but I picked them up for a $1 or $3. Life happened, traded them, and now I cry, lol.
Because I still have hope for my position, not booking the loss, when I sell man same day or next day I promise you, you will see it’s all green god candles for ETH till I buy in again. You guys should start paying me to hedge your positions.
Of course I’m in, cant close down a 77x leveraged position when its down 3200%. ETH. The futures contract has been open for a year now. Im mentally ready for another year.