FT

MrBiscuits16

Currently there are too many restrictions. There was a FT Weekend article on it

kirovreported

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/s/u5LFHF2FT6

Nullius_123

Quite so. The FT has the full story here - https://www.ft.com/content/0bc35bea-8a7d-4e0e-9406-64b480e03631 (paywall). She had been tried for this before and was acquitted. It seems she was the gofer for the fraudster behind this scheme (who has vanished).

BHTAelitepwn

a quality newspaper like FT. They wrote an in-depth article but i can not share it sadly.

0x11u

From FT: It is notable that BlackRock-managed funds also backed Bankman-Fried’s FTX with venture capital funding just over a year before it collapsed. It was one of many top Wall Street and Silicon Valley names whose funding helped give FTX its veneer of legitimacy, although the size of these investments was relatively small. For all the talk of crypto’s “decentralised” structure and antagonism with “traditional finance”, it has often been big money managers pushing the gas.

john-larry

There is a non zero chance that these exchanges are insolvent and have been selling paper coins. This is a reoccurring theme in the crypto market. Even when people thought, the market had matured and this couldn’t happen anymore, FTX happened. Somehow people are inherently reluctant to thinking such things could be true. Look at Wirecard for example; FT posted multiple articles that showed that it was a fraud yet its stock still went up for month. Only when external auditors confirmed that the money was missing, it tanked. It’s the same things with exchanges. People will ignore the warning signs until it’s too late.

MarkEMarkEMarkE

Didn't realise it was paywalled. I don't have a subscription but could see it. Basically, it is a near positive opinion piece in the FT which must be a first.

BuffaloBrain884

It's called The Jacobi FT Wilshere Bitcoin ETF: https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/08/15/europes-first-spot-bitcoin-etf-lists-in-amsterdam/

jimmy_riddler_

Crickets on the FT regarding crypto

ZealousidealTap6595

Here we go again, as the hbar shit posts won't stop i won't either: 1) Anyone who thinks that the way to build a better financial system is to have a council of corporations and banks controlling the base layer needs to take a long hard look at themselves. 2) Hedera has been running for ages and about 99% of all transactions come from a single entity. It basically has no users. 3) The one company using the network only does so because their transactions are subsidized. They don't pay to use it. Occasionally their wallets run out of free funds and so they stop using Hedera, during which times the TPS drops by about 99%. 4) No one except the council members can run nodes, which means that no regular users can verify anything. The whole thing is based on 'trust us'. 5) The number of developers building on the network has dropped by over 1/3rd in just the last year. That is not a sign of a growing project. 6) Because no one is using Hedera, the only use for the token is 'staking', which unlike most PoS chains doesn't actually provide any security for the network and is very clearly just a way to tie up liquidity as the value is inflated away. 7) Here's an image I made yesterday of the chart of HBAR vs ETH. Spoilers, the trend is very clearly down only. https://i.imgur.com/VGsk1FT.png 8) The tokenomics suck Credit for point 1 to 7 goes to u/Minimalgravitas Since the "hbar is a gem people don't get it! "people think recycling posts is fine i can do the same.

Ur_mothers_keeper

It doesn't. People have been fetishizing this idea that you can NFT unique in game items and you can FT general tradeable items. How cool! I can sell the items I grinded out of loot boxes on an exchange for real money! Except that all these games are going to be able to delete your account, revoke your items, they won't be cross tradeable to other games... So the same shit as without blockchains involved but with the added comexity and cost. What does that tell you? It's just hype to shill you crap so you can be fleeced. There is no value in it whatsoever.

thelonliestcrowd

I asked the devs about the v3 pool being included in the lore drops awhile ago and this was their response: We currently have not found a solution for including V3 in the snapshot as of yet. If we find a suitable solution we'll update you as well! It's because all the ERC-1155 V3 FT are minted from the same contract, regardless of which pair it is (meaning tokens that aren't BitCone as well). Unlike V2 tokens, where each Pair is an individual contract on it's own, which allows you to easily verify the LP Token holders of specific pairs.

randompartition

It silently made to [FT.com](https://FT.com) :)

amasterblaster

Its great that you find it a benefit, but many users disagree. Ive been working in fintech FT for 10 years, and I have found that the settlement is a major factor for adoption. I also get the feeling you are discussing to win.... "BTC settlement is slow, and that's why it sucks" (shows settlement is fast) "BTC settlement is fast, and that's why it sucks" So I'm not quite sure what your core hypothesis is. It is very hard to understand what your hypothesis is, so it comes across like you are contradicting yourself a little. Feel free to bet against the market!

lab-gone-wrong

Short, mostly right version: phishers are abusing CREATE2 protocol to create contracts with 2 wallet addresses where the first X and last X characters are the same, but the middle is different. These look the same in wallet provider interfaces because addresses are too long and get shortened to things like ABCDE ...X02FT, without all the characters in the middle. Then, through whatever phishing means necessary (often a bait airdrop), they get you to accept a contract from new address B (with no history) because it looks like address A (which will be pre-loaded with fake transactions to make it look like it's doing a giveaway/airdrop whatever). the contract asks for a benign sounding transaction permission consistent with an airdrop or giveaway, but the permission actually grants full control, and the contract drains your account. 

amasterblaster

As an engineer, BTC, ETH, MATIC, FIL. These are components I use to build things every day FT, so I am sure they will be around, and are growing. I basically invest in things I understand, that work pretty well. I'm a bit like Warren that way; If I use it, understand it, think it is good, and that others will see the same, I buy it.

DrRobertBottle

Looks at Franklin Templeton. They have $50MM under management. If they are charging 0.25% maintenance fee, that’s $125k a year in revenue. That doesn’t even pay one person salary, let alone the custody fees, legal liabilities, reporting requirements, etc. $125k is a rounding error for FT. It’s not even close to profitable. Even if they increase that by 10x that’s only 1.25MM a year. Or by 100x that’s $12.5M in revenue a year. Totally not worth it. So they won’t make it.

Administrative_Shake

Most of them are just bitter. FT, being the establishment parrots they are, have been calling for BTC to 0 for more than a decade now. Pay them no mind.

putin_on_some_pants

Good thing we all have FT subscriptions..

jawni

[OMG MOONs are pumping](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FT-PqMtacAE9Uuj?format=jpg&name=small)

Frogolocalypse

Just a measly 1% FT. Nothing too risky.

suidoc

This is actually not a FUD article. It’s more pro Bitcoin. Even FT seems to be changing their mindset. Just a little saddening to see articles are not getting sanity checked.

sogladatwork

FT is garbage 100% of the time.

roamer5303

FT just wants to spread FUD on Bitcoin, they don't care about the quality of the articles.

GTmalik

Yeah, meant 2020. Fuck FT though for real

PepeDeCorozal

This guy believes in the mythical Satoshi wallet and he writes for FT? People need to realize nobody knows shit about fuck, especially not the people in the media.

ZealousidealTap6595

1) Anyone who thinks that the way to build a better financial system is to have a council of corporations and banks controlling the base layer needs to take a long hard look at themselves. 2) Hedera has been running for ages and about 99% of all transactions come from a single entity. It basically has no users. 3) The one company using the network only does so because their transactions are subsidized. They don't pay to use it. Occasionally their wallets run out of free funds and so they stop using Hedera, during which times the TPS drops by about 99%. 4) No one except the council members can run nodes, which means that no regular users can verify anything. The whole thing is based on 'trust us'. 5) The number of developers building on the network has dropped by over 1/3rd in just the last year. That is not a sign of a growing project. 6) Because no one is using Hedera, the only use for the token is 'staking', which unlike most PoS chains doesn't actually provide any security for the network and is very clearly just a way to tie up liquidity as the value is inflated away. 7) Here's an image I made yesterday of the chart of HBAR vs ETH. Spoilers, the trend is very clearly down only. https://i.imgur.com/VGsk1FT.png 8) The tokenomics suck Credit for point 1 to 7 goes to

Dismal-Network-2973

that's not what he's saying lol. like they're totally not comparable technologies. like icp is like a decentralized aws. whereas you can build **on** hedera like a 'no code/low code' app in M$FT 365. hedera's a ledger to icp is internet.

SatoshiDegen

Nah, when everybody is this optimistic, and memes start flying, it’s inviting authentic SEC scrutiny. Just need a few rug pulls and some sob stories in the WSJ and FT…

PepeDeCorozal

The FT organization (which owns The Economist) is a snake with a forked tongue. Whatever they say is whatever benefits the globalist banksters.

PepeDeCorozal

"Hi there FT, nice globalist propaganda magazine you got there. Be a shame if it got Blackrocked."

PepeDeCorozal

The link is clean. I used archive.fo instead of archive.org because they don't get around the FT paywall anymore.

Mr_Eckert

Paywall, and FT isn't worth a single sat.

bert0ld0

Generally after that you have 7-14 days to prepare. We are past this point, considering btc was on the front page of FT few days ago, and around the same time mom called me saying btc was doing good. So make your calculations and play this smartly, I failed last time

gowithflow192

The best part of that article is the ignorance. The opening line says the crypto boom is over and most of the comments (FT subscribers) are completely ignorant to the benefits of crypto. This means we're still early!

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The given text does not contain relevant information for the article title "Financial Times (@FT)". Therefore, the summary is an empty string. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

lazarus_free

Such hypocrisy by the mainstream media. At least it seems the FT is starting to treat Bitcoin better Bitcoin price surges above $42,000 as rate cut bets fuel cross-asset rally - https://on.ft.com/3R8mgHJ via @FT

BrotherAmazing

Never acted like it was a “game changer”, 🤣 Guarantee you I am worth 10x what you’re worth unless you’re wealthy or have been a miser and working FT earning $200k/yr for the last 20+ years.

extrastone

I just did the work for everyone else: Block 147347 was likely was mined by OP Address: 12ebp477z1LZYn6r5z7hFDMHi13B9estVs is likely not his Address: 1FT4DqK8mvfRxXJJRi5Pkv5bd9EZyioQPM is likely his and now it is empty This kind of detective work is not difficult to do by hand once you get a feel for how the blockchain works. We should not be posting our addresses online unless they are to actually receive BTC from strangers. Addresses today are one time use for security purposes. Take a look at the details on mempool.space.

The_Mackery

You realize $100 per day is more than most people earn working a FT job, right? lol 😂 I used to be one of those people and I did what you suggested, I was broke, starving, ate dinner for breakfast and water for dinner for almost a month. I actually did see a nice return on my investment but my hospital bills after almost dying from malnourishment wiped out most my gains. Next time I decide to venture into crypto, I will do $100 a week but visit the food bank at least one time a week for bread and maybe some legumes so I don’t make the same mistake. This time, bean toast for breakfast, breakfast for dinner, and water for emergency only

the_far_yard

So, if years ago someone told me that Binance, FT, Terra, BlockFi, Celsius, 3 Arrows Cap, Gemini Trust - were run by fraudulent people, I would've still believed them except that I might invest lesser. lol.

NeverAware

Didn't they already announce that it will be in 2024? I don't see them approving the FT one today after pushing the Grayscale one to 2024. https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/11/15/sec-delays-decision-on-hashdex-bitcoin-spot-etf-application-grayscale-ether-futures-filing/

MinimalGravitas

1) Anyone who thinks that the way to build a better financial system is to have a council of corporations and banks controlling the base layer needs to take a long hard look at themselves. 2) Hedera has been running for ages and about 99% of all transactions come from a single entity. It basically has no users. 3) The one company using the network only does so because their transactions are subsidized. They don't pay to use it. Occasionally their wallets run out of free funds and so they stop using Hedera, during which times the TPS drops by about 99%. 4) No one except the council members can run nodes, which means that no regular users can verify anything. The whole thing is based on 'trust us'. 5) The number of developers building on the network has dropped by over 1/3rd in just the last year. That is not a sign of a growing project. 6) Because no one is using Hedera, the only use for the token is 'staking', which unlike most PoS chains doesn't actually provide any security for the network and is very clearly just a way to tie up liquidity as the value is inflated away. 7) Here's an image I made yesterday of the chart of HBAR vs ETH. Spoilers, the trend is very clearly down only. https://i.imgur.com/VGsk1FT.png

MinimalGravitas

I tried to engage you sensibly when you jumped in to talk about SNARKs and Statelessness but it is very clear that all you wanted was some reason to defend your dying shitcoin by attacking something you had never even heard of, let alone understood. > You shit on Hedera yet you bring nothing Well I made you something, https://i.imgur.com/VGsk1FT.png

Elephant810

Yes! This is why people who claim that an ETF can ruin bitcoin are delusional. The supply is fixed so there is only so much for them to buy and hold. Look at Microstrategy, for instance… they have been buying hard before any sort of regulatory clarity for institutions and they haven’t even been able to get 1 percent of supply. Once there is regulatory clarity the cost of buying incrementally will cause bitcoin to go up a lot.. Most bitcoin that will ever be mined is being hodled hard or lost forever. In reality there is less than 2 million to mine and conservatively speaking 5 million lost forever. Miners are collectively holding less than 1 percent of supply. Once the flood gates open, whose selling to blackrock, fidelity, FT, and other big institutions? The miners? Sure. The speculators? Sure. Whales? Maybe some. Hodlers? Not a chance. Point is btw the big money managers there will only be so much they can buy before sending then price to the moon. My two cents…

madgeese

Makes me want to start a new crypto project. “Big Mac Coin” (BMC)…. To acquire BMC, you must first deposit (send in the mail) your physical coin to my PO Box and in return “I PROMISE” to issue either a FT (BMC) or an NFT of a Big Mac (hand drawn by me) Other great ideas to come.

SnooStrawberries7995

Here the link for the site https://www.uif.gob.sv/ It's called UIF Unidad Investigación Financiera from the FGR loosely translated to Financial Investigation Unit from the D.A. Office. Here's FAQs about the law: https://www.uif.gob.sv/preguntas-operaciones-reguladas/ 3.¿Qué se entiende por operaciones reguladas en otros medios? Spanish: Respuesta: Se entenderá por “otro medio” cualquier título valor que no sea en papel moneda o metálica, tales como cheques, pagos con tarjetas de crédito y débito y bitcoin (Artículo 51, Inciso 2do, número 3, Instructivo para la Prevención, Detección y Control de LDA/FT/FPADM) (Art, Ley Bitcoin). English: 3.What is meant by regulated operations in other media? Answer: “Other means” will be understood as any valuable instrument that is not in paper money or metal, such as checks, payments with credit and debit cards and bitcoin (Article 51, Section 2, number 3, Instructions for Prevention, Detection and Control of LDA/FT/FPADM) (Art, Bitcoin Law

thesavagepotatoe

Don’t forget the FT. They love to be anti BTC.

MrSpaceKook

The recent AMA is a good place to start: https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/173kcfl/nervos_nation_community_ama_and_the_nervos/ Some very exciting developments are coming down the pipe, not to mention the first halving next month. Open Transaction: an extensible transaction format that allows attaching any attribute to the transaction. It divides transaction construction into multiple small steps, each with a different modularized solution. A modular Open Transaction ecosystem could expand the possibilities for CKB DApps while lowering the barrier to development. Kuai: the highest priority right now is lowering the difficulty barrier for developing in L1. In this context Kuai is a framework/tool to create universal applications like .bit. You can think of it as a kind of hardhat on Ethereum which is a highly used framework for developing applications. JoyID + CoTA: JoyID is a wallet that makes use of account abstraction and Passkey. CoTA is an FT and NFT token standard that makes use of merkle trees. In short, with 32 bytes you can have hundreds and thousands of assets. Axon: a high-performance sidechain framework (Appchain, one app, one chain) Khalani: the first Universal Liquidity Protocol designed from the ground up for the interoperable blockchains And lastly Payment Channels being developed by Perun

swap_catz

So a bunch of people on FriendTech were monetizing their posts and traffic and you all basically mocked us calling it a ponzi. FT's vision is very clear to direct funds to you, but you all just circlejerked donuts and moons. Now you have to give your kids IOUs for Christmas, while I'm still earning FT points. I hope all of you have a real introspection into conviction on your shitcoins. Instead of attacking others with valid theses, you all need to do more research on your own.

arthur_fissure

there is a cryptocurrency section on the FT

Yautja69

I have seen an obscur Crypto Company, something on the lines of FT... something...X They were looking for *backdoor* developers

Medfried

They just forked FT and didn't even do a good job man. 😂

Ben_Dover1234

That’s what I thought. Usually when I read articles similar to this they fail to mention *why* crypto is bad, simply that it is. Very disappointed to see the FT publish such an opinionated article with very little backing it up.

Ben_Dover1234

Hi, I just read an article on the FT there discussing SBF, FTX and Martin Lewis’ new book on the matter. The entire article was VERY anti-crypto, including this last paragraph: The crypto world is one of Monopoly money, where dog coins invented as a joke can reach a “market cap” of almost $90bn, and in which digital receipts for pixelated images can sell for tens of millions of dollars. In this fake Monopoly world, money is little more than a bunch of numbers on a screen. And in that context, why does it matter if there was no $8bn there? There was never any “there” in crypto anyway. What are your thoughts on this?

_ships

I’m still waiting for the rug. I don’t trust FT, as the founders have been on other projects they’ve abandoned

arthur_fissure

the FT has good analysis also

arthur_fissure

it reminds me when you read the FT daily, everyday there are new reasons for the market being up or down but apparently it lasts only one day

mochi_ball223

Let's say you earn 2000 moons a month which is pretty doable (especially if FT), it's the equivalent of $554 USD. So any country will average income less than that would fit the bill right now (Colombia, Ecuador, Indonesia, Egypt, Vietnam, Philipines etc).

sick_boy_iko

"FT hacker" will all know who is behind these movements.

ajnsd619

[Here's the article link.](https://www.ft.com/content/83a14261-598d-4601-87fc-5dde528b33d0) The FT changed it from its original publication. They removed the professor's Bitcoin investigation piece. But I found [the source.](https://ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/bitcoin/2020-12-31-bitcoin-ponzi.html) This is a total hit piece. The Financial Times sells its name to the highest bidder. Here's a taste of the BS: *Stolfi’s fourth observation above that “the operators take away a large portion of the money” lumps together Madoff’s take and bitcoin miners’ revenues*

Homeless_72

My post got removed. It's been fun on FT. People with ambition really can make some valuable connections and get good leads. Most people are there for number go up though

Medfried

Just came across a GCR tweet from Nov, 2021 in which he predicted 3 things; A bubble (AI or FT?), Arrest if Bitboy by Oct 2023, followed by Bull run.. Now that first two have happened, It's Go time!

FattestLion

Elon could have bought FTX cheaper than Twitter and renamed it to ~~FT~~X by just removing two letters

jawni

That's literally not possible. You can't monetize accounts until the Twitter account owner makes a FT account linked to that Twitter. Maybe you're confusing FT with Friendzy?

timbulance

$379 $189 for 1 year. Stay one step ahead with the FT's award-winning journalism. Offer available here until Oct 22.

WineMakerBg

BCOIN (Jacobi FT Wilshere Bitcoin ETF) last volume shows 1212 shares were bought on Sep 1st. No other volume has been traded so far. Hope Black Rock has already convinced some/most of their clients to participate ...

Backwood20

Oh.. I was about to send all my funds to my favorite exchange: FT… oh wait..

thom_orrow

>Scott Chipolina is the FT's digital assets correspondent, covering cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology and decentralised finance. He is part of the London Markets team. Previous to a career in journalism, Scott worked in financial regulation at his home in Gibraltar, covering broad subject areas including banking, insurance and investment funds. Seems like Scott is based in London and is very much a real person.

Tasigur1

One of the main factors: "Since its inauguration, numerous decentralized protocols have found a home on Base, bolstered by many high-profile dApps. Yet, the flagship social application **Friend.Tech** is the primary engine driving its vibrant activity. Friend.Tech is an innovative application that allows users to link their Twitter accounts to their FT profiles, paving the way for social media monetization. Through this platform, users can craft unique keys for purchase or sale."

Ben_Dover1234

I love the FT but always pass over their crypto news or articles as they are very opinionated. For example, when the FTX collapse happened, they saw that as a crypto problem and a crypto failing which it wasn't. It was a centralised company failing because of mismanagement and fraud, yet that didn't fit their agenda.

demigonvm

My speculation is the SEC will approve all Bitcoin ETFs together - hence why we have seen the big players file for spot $BTC ETFs. Grayscale has a head start. BlackRock, Fidelity and FT have the marketing & fund relationships to pull in big numbers. There will be blood! 🩸

hammerandanvilpro

My Broker is FT. Wondering what he’ll have to say on the subject if they get it approved. He had been 100% against crypto. Will report after my next meeting.

Clpunit

TLDR; FT: Magic internet money NFT: Colourfull internet images

strolls

If you live in Asia and want to buy exchange traded funds you typically buy US-listed ones - that's what was available to me via brokers in Singapore, at least. I don't think there's a retail drive for bitcoin ETFs in Europe as much as there is in the USA - the UK has equivalents of the 401k and ROTH (ISA and SIPP, can't remember which way around), but I think most EU countries are not as generous. I think in Germany life-insurance type products are more popular, or it's only types of funds that are tax-exempted like this, not individual stocks. I find a few news articles saying that the European ETF, Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF, was going to list in Amsterdam, but it is actually Guernsey regulated - ISIN GG00BMTPK874. That is far less reputable. Wall Street markets globally - Blackrock is one of the top 5 ETF providers in Europe, probably top 3. Once you can have crypto in your 401k then Wall Street will start pushing the idea that it's legitimate and it might be sound financial practice to allocate a small amount of your portfolio to it. Only then will the idea spread access the pond, IMO.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The first-ever spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) launched in Europe has been classified as an Article 8 fund by Jacobi Asset Management. Article 8 funds promote environmental and/or social characteristics. The Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF is the first Bitcoin ETF traded in Europe to have the European Union's environmental, social, and governance investing rules applied. The ETF is partially invested in renewable energy certificates (RECs) to make it "fully decarbonized." However, experts question whether the ETF can purchase enough RECs to offset the energy consumed by its Bitcoin assets. The ETF was launched on the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange and emphasizes its eco-friendly nature by using outside information to calculate the energy usage of the Bitcoin network and purchasing and "retiring" RECs. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Try our free crypto chatbot at https://chat.coinfeeds.io*

Elevatorisbest

FT Talon ultraviolet knife for CSGO

Bermoran

I just received this email. Anyone else???? FTX Withdrawals are available Dear Customer: You have been identified as an eligible client to begin withdrawing digital assets from your FTX account. Withdrawals will be dispatched in USD-C matched to the balance of digital assets held in your Wallet account at the time of the platform pause. You can now withdraw to an external ERC-20 wallet on a by clicking the Withdraw Now button below. Wallet account balances were calculated based on the digital assets held in your Wallet account at the time of the platform pause. If you initiated a trade, transfer, or withdrawal request after the platform pause, these transactions have been updated as displayed in the "Transaction History" section of the dashboard page in your account. Please note that, due to the high volume of requests, withdrawals may take 90 days or more to process once submitted. FTX will process withdrawals as quickly as possible while maintaining security protocols. You can check the status of your withdrawal request in the Transaction History section of your FTX account dashboard page upon connecting an ERC-20 wallet. Additionally, withdrawals are subject to any applicable third-party transaction fees and/or withdrawal fees, which are based on transaction processing costs and may be adjusted from time to time based on market conditions, as set forth in the FT Terms of Service. We appreciate your understanding and cooperation in following this process. If you have any questions or need further clarification, our customer support team is ready to assist you. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Withdraw Now Best regards, FTX

QuickLockCrypto

FT..what? They had SBF, and there is no coming back from that.

hquer

But what about: - NewFTX - FTX9000 - FTXForAll - FT-your-funds-went-eXtinct

GreedVault

Reddit r/cc and FT are in the same category, socialfi. I'm not sure about the shitposting part.

theekruger

You are right, it does take some time, but the sooner one starts the better imho. A couple thousand hours spent reading can even be achieved by FT students working 2 PT jobs as they can utilize commute time the same as I did. That can be 2-4 hours daily of reading. Plus there are lots of opportunities at school and at work to read a bit or listen to an audiobook.

Winter-Newspaper-281

Binance stole FT's girlfriend

bigstew6

FT has a history of hyper fixating on companies they don’t like..

Silence-Samurai8357

At this point I am quite convinced that FT has some kind feud with Binance

Silence-Samurai8357

FT.com is anti-Binance at this point

nacockerspaniel

Don't tell [FT.com](https://FT.com) about that.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Europe's first Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) has been launched by Jacobi Asset Management. The Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF is now live on Euronext Amsterdam, trading under the ticker BCOIN. The fund charges a 1.5% annual management fee and aims to provide institutional investors with a simple, secure, and transparent way to access Bitcoin while addressing their sustainability requirements. It is also the first decarbonized digital asset fund compliant with Article 8 of the European Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). The fund has partnered with Zumo to implement a verifiable Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) solution, allowing investors to deal in Bitcoin while meeting their Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) objectives. The launch of this ETF puts European investors ahead of their American counterparts, as the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has repeatedly rejected or postponed Bitcoin ETF applications. However, there is renewed hope for a Bitcoin ETF in the US, as new applications have been submitted to the SEC by BlackRock, Fidelity, Valkyrie, and Invesco, among others. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Try our free crypto chatbot at https://chat.coinfeeds.io*

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Europe’s first spot bitcoin ETF, the Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF, is launching on Euronext Amsterdam. The ETF is green-friendly and aligns with the EU's sustainable finance guidelines. It has been over a year since the originally planned debut of the ETF. The fund includes a verifiable Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) developed in collaboration with Zumo. The ETF's custodial duties are handled by Fidelity Digital Assets, and market making is done by Flow Traders. The fund's reference is the FT Wilshire Bitcoin Blended Price Index. This spot bitcoin ETF allows investors to tap into bitcoin's price without directly buying or handling the cryptocurrency. Europe is moving ahead of the US in opening up bitcoin investing for institutional investors. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Try our free crypto chatbot at https://chat.coinfeeds.io*

QuickLockCrypto

That doesn't look right without the "FT" in there.

martymartinator


Shiratori-3

Better not be the FT X change

Shiratori-3

Better not be the FT X change

surfnsets

My prediction and I am 99.9% right most of the time, the price of moons is going to pancake flat like a cardiac patient with no pulse right after and deep dives off a 300FT cliff.

DrinkMoreCodeMore

Can we ban the FT from being able to get posted here?

fortune

**From reporter Chloe Taylor:** Coinbase’s CEO said a demand from U.S. officials to cease trading all assets except Bitcoin would have spelled the end of the cryptocurrency industry as we know it. In an interview published Monday by the Financial Times, Brian Armstrong, CEO of cryptocurrency exchange platform Coinbase, revealed the SEC suggested his company make the change while the agency prepared to sue the firm for allegedly operating as an unregistered broker. Had Coinbase complied with the SEC’s request, it would have delisted every one of the more than 200 tokens it offers, apart from Bitcoin—the world’s most traded cryptocurrency. This would have set a precedent that meant most American crypto firms would have been left operating illegally unless they registered with the SEC, according to the FT. “We really didn’t have a choice at that point, delisting every asset other than Bitcoin, which by the way is not what the law says, would have essentially meant the end of the crypto industry in the U.S.,” Armstrong told the publication of Coinbase’s decision to reject the SEC’s request.

nachtraum

> The SEC told the FT its enforcement division did not make formal requests for “companies to delist crypto assets.” no "formal" request. The SEC is criminal.

spamohh

JUST IN: The SEC asked Coinbase, $COIN, to halt trading in all cryptocurrencies other than bitcoin before launching legal action against the Nasdaq-listed company last month for failing to register as a broker, per FT.

thom_orrow

In unrelated news, Wendy’s is hiring PT/FT for the graveyard shift.

filthybusstop

>you think FT or forbes is going to write an article because some shitposters on the internet can now change their name's colour or they can post a .gif? I think you're mistaking Moons for Reddit coins. By the way, why would forbes talk about meme coins? Because they do.