PT

Secret_Nobody_405

Although I absolutely love your response, it’s brilliant, logical, and seriously aspirational; but death can strike any time well before we achieve FIRE. I have also made the career decision to choose a career that I can work easily work FT, switch to PT, and then Casual as I age. I used to always desire retiring early but after leaving the workforce for 2 years whilst studying I missed the culture, team and friendship from working. So my aim is to travel and do what I want now, with family and continue to work until I die 😎. My observations are that if you stop moving you die. I also have never met a 90 year old who retired at 40, I could be wrong though.

Zaytion_

Pendle PT-USD0++ 27March2025

redeembtc

The Summit starts at 12 pm PT https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow_VjnWlpJU

TinyAsk

The first thing you need to make sure of is that you don’t just sell and then throw the money away. How will this money continue to make you money? If you’re just going to have money after a few months because you’ve burned through it all, you’ve not helped yourself in the slightest. It’s easy to see you have money and just spend it. Use this desperation to take action on getting some income. Can you sell somethings like a car and get around via PT or cycling instead? Can you learn AI and build an app you can sell? Can you start working for Uber? Will the money you cash in be able to help you pay for something that will then result in money? Can you reach out for financial help or move in with someone to save money? The job market is horrific right now so don’t bank on some extra money riding you over until something comes along. Sadly it’s hustle hard time.

Imaginary_Roll3958

It's not even breaking below the previous high of 71k, it would be good for BTC to find support there, consolidate then launch to the next PT

MinimalGravitas

I think what you're kinda talking about is using the tech to solve human coordination failures. This is an idea that has been motivating quite a lot of the longer term crypto builders and enthusiasts for a long time, and for over 4 years has been broadly labeled 'Slaying Moloch'. 'Moloch' was a mythological god back in the bronze age whose followers sacrificed their children to it, and has become shorthand for the kind of net negative things (like *"polluting a river, tearing down a forest, or, say, displacing an entire population from their residences."*) that we end up doing, even though they objectively make things worse for everyone). Anyway, if you're interested then a really good place to start is this Bankless episode: https://youtu.be/903tHM4RA9k?si=j8ONN8ypPGxU5PT5 To be clear, this isn't a particular project or token that you should buy or whatever, but I got the vibe from your post that (unlike most people here) you were genuinely interested in the idea of using this technology to think of and build things to make the world better, and I think this video does a really good job of outlining one of the biggest problems that crypto has the capacity to solve, how do we avoid the 'Tragedy of the Commons', 'the Prisoner's Dilemma, etc etc. Once you've watched that, if you are still interested then one of the people interviewed, Kevin Owocki, has since gone on to found a movement called 'Green Pill'. They have a few books on the topic that you can read for free, a network that you can join, and perhaps most interestingly for you, a long running podcast series that interviews developers, philosophers, community leaders etc who are all working to build public goods. The first few episodes with people like Vitalik Buterin, Karl Floersch, Simona Pop, Glen Wyle are really great and so I would suggest starting at the beginning! https://greenpill.network/ So yea, not exactly what you were talking about, but I really think you will find some of that interesting. It's what kept me active crypto through the last bear market, and it's why I now spend a few days each year assessing and distributing funds to worthy causes through Optimism's Retroactive Public Goods Funding rounds as a Citizen; and through Octant's funding rounds and have probably donated more through Gitcoin's Quadratic Funding rounds than I have invested fiat into crypto. In my opinion, this kind of thing is how we actually 'win', not by chasing individual profits and fighting in zero-sum games, but by building a future that is actually better: https://mirror.xyz/minimalgravitas.eth/kbcy3Z4NAcmiECs_6PAI7xo0wIZXLtLtwIAmKRwuwow

GodEmperorOfArrakis

Bro go see PT 😅

KitchenTop1820

“There’s a new sucker born every minute.” PT Barnum

HeathersZen

PT Barnum’s dictum is renewed for a new generation of chumps.

muskelongated

Trading will begin for $HEADS and $TAILS on or after 9AM PT on 27 January, 2025 if liquidity conditions are met or we flip heads and tails at an even 1:1 ratio after ten attempts.

Knowledge775

Coinbits was marketed by a bunch of prominent bitcoiners last cycle including Saifedean. The app was billed as a round up service that also did DCA. It was great until their custodian went bankrupt. Strike and Swan were also using Prime Trust but switched a few days before PT filed bankruptcy. I didn’t lose that much. I had it set up that after accumulating .01 btc to send to cold storage. I paid my dummy tax of 600k sats.

Theverybestestintown

Lol at your confidence that it will go down to 60K "for sure" but not below 50K. I get that you have a PT there but it almost definitely will not happen unless there is extreme bearish news. This bullrun top will probably much higher than where we currently are, and it's possible BTC never gets anywhere closet to 60K again.

benditbackwards

was it PT Barnum who said.. a fool and his money are soon parted...sorry for your loss, hopefully a lesson learned.

Iblisy

I don't understand it either. I watched an interview he gave 2 weeks ago of him explaining it. https://youtu.be/R87vco0jHvo?si=APzYQmTB3xWCt8PT I think the way he explained it that his treasury company will hold partly bonds or something.

jpdoctor

>An expansion in the money supply is NOT the same as inflation. There are two types of inflation: Monetary inflation and price inflation. If you speak MV=PT, monetary inflation is increase in M, price inflation is increase in P. When people are talking about inflating a currency, it is monetary inflation, but often the word "monetary" is dropped because usually there is no confusion.

PXaZ

Yes, wages are sticky; right now, that tends to benefit employers who can slow-walk the raises that compensate for inflation. In a deflationary world, employer inaction would benefit the employees, which seems like a better default. Nominal GDP, perhaps, would stay fixed but not *real* GDP - see also the deflation which will make the same number of currency units be worth more in goods and services. On the flip side, if the economy shrinks (as in a recession) there would be compensatory inflation. A fixed money supply just means the inflation/deflation is a function of the ratio of currency to economic activity, IIUC - a constant factor that balances your MV=PT, like aMV=PT

wiredmagazine

Thanks for sharing this piece! Here's a snippet for readers: On the evening of November 19, art adviser Adam Biesk was finishing work at his California home when he overheard a conversation between his wife and son, who had just come downstairs. The son, a kid in his early teens, was saying he had made a ton of money on a cryptocurrency that he himself had created. Initially, Biesk ignored it. He knew that his son played around with crypto, but to have turned a small fortune before bedtime was too far-fetched. “We didn’t really believe it,” says Biesk. But when the phone started to ring off the hook and his wife was flooded with angry messages on Instagram, Biesk realized that his son was telling the truth—if not quite the full story. Earlier that evening, at 7:48 pm PT, Biesk’s son had [released into the wild](https://solscan.io/tx/4mhRTtkQZLF6CL7joHwWwWdaSLP38or5WfhVY6DtZC4vKG3je1sxrDUbNtr2gyTvMXHGTynEUPC6M1NpQF7mbS8d) 1 billion units of a new crypto coin, which he named Gen Z Quant. Simultaneously, he spent about $350 to purchase 51 million tokens, about 5 percent of the total supply, for himself.On the evening of November 19, art adviser Adam Biesk was finishing work at his California home when he overheard a conversation between his wife and son, who had just come downstairs. The son, a kid in his early teens, was saying he had made a ton of money on a cryptocurrency that he himself had created. # Full story: [https://www.wired.com/story/memecoin-kid-backlash/](https://www.wired.com/story/memecoin-kid-backlash/)

jaxsantiago

Hmm ok. Gemini was saying 9AM PT 5th Dec is 4PM AEDT 5th Dec, which is 1 hr from now.

GeminiLanding

~13 hours. It’s 8PM PT on 4th Dec, 2024 right now

jaxsantiago

CB: Mog to start trading at 9AM PT on 5th Dec, 2024. That's about 1 hr from now, is that right?

ExMachima

# AMA with Stellar Development Foundation - Thursday, December 5 @ 11:00AM PT | 2:00PM ET on r/Stellar Post your questions to the current discussion in r/stellar.

curious-b

Staked Ethena USD sUSDe is yielding over 20%. Pendle PT-USD0++-25Jun2024 has a 20% yield for ~7 months. Do your own due diligence on the risk levels of the protocols.

RandoMcrandersome

How’s that $100k PT looking 👀

Aniratack

Same in PT "é rir para não chorar"

LegendaryJohnny

Bought pretty heavy bag of ICP. All indicators overheating before massive upwarda movement. My PT is between $35-$80.

Normal_Ad4111

Let it begin. PT got his man in VP. Just wait till we default in 2025

HSuke

You're correct, but the reason is inaccurate. High tariffs lead to high inflation. That's a given. High inflation and high crypto prices are strongly correlated, but not as a direct cause-and-effect. They're actually the both effects of the same monetary policy. An economy with both Low interest rates and [QE | helicopter/stimulus money] increases the Money Velocity. This leads to both: * Inflation as people spend more * Higher money supply, which people invested heavily into crypto in 2020-2021 So increased inflation and higher crypto prices are correlated. **Quantity Theory of Money: MV = PT**

henryyoung42

This could not get any more bizarre - first a load of CSW court cases related to his claim he is SN, and soon a possible court case related to PT’s claim not to be … what a saga !

biigyellow

Can you please explain why? As a skeptic, I watched the documentary and found it pretty convincing. Everyone here is vehemently defending PT, but I’ve yet to see anyone give supporting evidence why he is NOT. The timelines are suspicious.

Specialist_Show_392

I don’t think SN is One person. I think it’s a fictive front runner with multiple person behind the alias. My guess is that PT and AB possibly along side a skilled coder is SN

nullc

Well not quite, Satoshi made a bit of an error: he said described the inputs and outputs being the same but the fees being different. That's just not possible. In 2010 the actual mechanics of how bitcoin worked weren't well understood by that many people as *none* of the explanatory text we'd use today except the whitepaper existed... It was totally ordinary for people, even fairly technical ones to assume bitcoin worked like "accounts per address", since thats how the wallet looked. So maybe a point could have been made that his understanding was atypically good for the time. But that point is thoroughly undermined by another piece of evidence that the video mentioned, the 2001 post where PT essentially describes the concept of turning hashcash into money via a graph of signatures, each owner signing their coin to the next. Because he'd previously had the idea, it seems likely that many details about bitcoin that people struggled with would have been instantly obvious to him.

-bit-thorny-

That's how assholes, believing any fake news that sounds "convincing" to their gullable dumbass shit for brains, ruin this world. PT for president. But he's not Satoshi.

VariousCommittee4276

We cant say PT is not SN. We can only say there is no evidence PT is SM.

pollox_troy

>Beyond the allegation related to PT being Satoshi, I think the thing the documentary got the most wrong is the motivations re blocksize. The docu basically only throws out the idea that the blocksize stuff was important for the immutability of Bitcoin's rules in the "if we change this than what else can be changed" sense-- though I think that view matters too. I think this lead Cullen down the path of giving Roger Ver's conspiracy theories more weight than they deserved, though he recontextualizes Ver's view in a way that is less nutty This is where he completely lost me in the documentary. Cullen tries to draw a line from Ver's conspiracy theory, through Peter Todd inventing the entire basis for it, to this somehow being presented as evidence that PT is Satoshi. Maybe something got lost in the edit but that leap made no sense to me whatsoever. Thanks for including the email, it's pretty telling he omitted the section on how dangerous the kind of baseless speculation he's engaging with can be.

68dot164dot57dot219

Don’t forget that teenage PT was invited to the list by Hal himself. Satoshi left many opportunities for alibis. This is obvious. Let’s see if PT will have a believable alibi.

68dot164dot57dot219

It was him. There is much much more evidence that somehow HBO didn’t present. 68.164.57.219 Peter Todd was invited to join the Blue Sky list by Hal Finney … in 2000! He wrote on Blue Sky list Sat, 10 Mar 2001 12:35:20 -0500 “ Personally I like the idea of hashcash if, and only if, it’s structured like a real currency as opposed to simply proof of work. In the real world you pay for resources used. In many cases this should also apply to P2P and other computer systems. Of course getting hashcash workable as a real currency is extremely difficult. I’ve thought of a scheme that would work (coins are signed by owner and can only be changed (signed to a different owner) by owner) except you need a decentralized “central” database of all the hashcash that’s been minted. Unworkable. !@#$ spend-twice problem. “ https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/bluesky/2001-03/msg00063.html Finny, Szabo, and Back all communicates for years with the “wizz kid” PT publicly and privately. Todd was a heavy freenet user. They know it’s him or did in case of Hal. There are many ways to prove you aren’t Satoshi. PT won’t be able to do that.

nullc

The most interesting thing is one they did mention but essentially glossed: In 2001 as a 15 year old Petertodd posted [in a thread with Hal and Adam](https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/bluesky/2001-03/msg00063.html) a description of turning hashcash into currency by having a public graph of transactions, each one signing ownership to the next. I don't believe any proposed digital currency system prior to that point had that structure, Chaum's system had coins signing over ownership to other coins but the signatures were only seen by a private server. Hal's ~2004 RPOW still used a private server, but outsourced the coin ownership information to untrusted hardware by keeping only a merkle root over the data-- due to the resource limits of the trusted hardware device. So even it didn't go so far as to just have the public validate the transaction graph. Of course, this part of Bitcoin isn't the big innovation, it's arguably obvious. Petertodd's post did at least explicitly mention the remaining problem "the damn spent-twice problem": I don't think it should be considered evidence that Petertodd is Satoshi, but he may well have influenced Satoshi in his design of Bitcoin. A common problem for journalists and others who analyze events after the fact is reversing cause and effect. "Wet roads cause rain". In any case, it was surprising to *me* when I saw it and I think it's interesting if not for the reasons the docu would have cared about -- it didn't make me think PT was Satoshi even briefly, but it did strike me that the "evidence" used to claim other people are Satoshi is truly pathetic. Not mentioned is IIRC a public mailing list post a bit before bitcoin's announcement where PT is again advocating hashcash as a way to create a digital currency and I think asking if anyone was working on it. I don't have the link handy, but I'm sure someone will turn it up. Again, I see that as more "Digital currency interested guy is still interested in digital currency", but I was almost surprised that the docu didn't present that as Satoshi looking for potential collaborators before deciding to be anonymous. And I found it interesting, again, as an example of the kind of evidence you might expect to exist for Satoshi that just doesn't exist for the fakes-- but it's also the kind of evidence that you'd expect to exist for other early Bitcoin tech people. I'm also aware of stuff like that for other early Bitcoin tech people who thankfully are never accused of being Satoshi.

nullc

It's a cute point, but you are reading it that way because you've been primed by the video. That very "statement of fact" approach is extremely typical for petertodd-- myself too. The documentary makes a point about PT being very familiar with that message, but I believe the reason for it is because I had dug it up in relation to the lawsuits against us by Wright (basically exploring the history of the early bitcoin involvement of his targets)... and in spite of a dozen people looking at stuff like that and discussing it, none of us saw that message as suggesting anything like Petertodd being Satoshi. To quote another bitcoin developer friend on the documentary: "though that "of course, to be specific" sort of language is so petertodd that it makes me read it in his voice". I mean, like kudos to the author for finding someone where there are at least coincidences-- the bar from prior accusations is so low that it's negative rather than zero: In the past media has been happy to run with stories about people with extremely significant evidence against the claim. In this case there are a few coincidences. None of them were new to me-- there are even a few they didn't mention (or did but hardly gave attention to, including the most interesting). But that's something you should expect for some of the early technical people around Bitcoin.

SmoothGoing

No. PT is definitely not SN.

kapitolkapitol

Is honestly complex, I am not tech savvy enough to explain, but asking a crypto assistant I use based on chatGPT it told me this It allows users to split yield-bearing assets into two parts: the principal token (PT) and the yield token (YT). This provides flexibility and opens up new opportunities compared to traditional staking. Key Advantages: - Tokenized Future Yield: Users can trade future yield separately from their principal, unlocking liquidity and flexibility not available with standard staking. - Trading Opportunities: Pendle's AMM lets users trade yield tokens, offering potential to maximize returns depending on market conditions. - Risk Management: You can hedge against interest rate changes by buying or selling future yield. APY Comparison: While Pendle can sometimes offer higher APY than traditional staking, this isn’t guaranteed. Returns depend on the market demand for yield tokens, allowing for immediate returns by selling future yield. It's more than just earning higher APY; it’s about flexible strategies and potentially optimizing returns in various market conditions. In short, Pendle provides more flexibility and opportunity for yield optimization compared to standard staking, but also comes with added complexity and risk. --- This summary emphasizes the flexibility and advantages of Pendle without overcomplicating the explanation.

aKeshaKe

PT one gazillion dollars! C'mon it's getting ridiculous. Print print print print money...

HiRiSkReWarD

I’m heavy into BTC (7figs) roughly 20% of my NW. Here is the one that crosses my mind often. If everyone knows and thinks the same thing that BTC will Peak ballpark end of ‘25 doesn’t it seem too good to be true??? I’m a believer do think it will appreciate % wise over the long term and we will see $100k sooner than later but some of these PTs over the next 5-10-20 years of $1m to $13m seems off the chart. Man, hope they are correct even on the lowest PT of $200k. GL2ALL

tobyredogre

>!Sshh, We all know this place is a counter-indicator. Let the TDS ladies and bots go wild! !< Well guess what? Me and my wife are going to vote KAMALA to cancel out our vote, and my wife's live-in PT's vote!

NYIslanders22

Michael Saylor. PT Barnum. ?

NYIslanders22

PT Barnum ?

Designer-Beginning16

Cause we live in an echo chamber BTC bubble 🫧 talking to ourselves. Unless the price predictions come to fruition, then “normies” will notice. But until then, they are just price predictions that fuel narratives with the price at $60k, the only reality that matters ($250k-$1M PT exist only in some bitcoiners dreams).

IndustrialPuppetTwo

PT Barnum was right.

viewmodeonly

Bull shit mods removed this video I posted for NO REASON. [This video single handedly demolished any Bitcoin energy or environment FUD.](https://youtu.be/VdgW3drkjQ4?si=PT3XOScJbE_rMyan) Daniel Battan, never heard of him but he's now my BTC good for the environment go to guy. Give this a listen and share it!

CatharticWail

He learned a thing or to from PT. Barnum. I say go for it. A fool and his money are soon parted.

trek_p_wild

I don't know if it's for regulatory reasons, a vetting process, or they just don't like the volatility of new or low cap cryptos. They can be very high risk, especially if using leverage. I prefer Phemex. It's user friendly, they have a mock trading platform that's great to practice trades without using real money, and unlike many other exchanges, you can use it as a US citizen. I think their PT token will do well in the next couple of years. But if there's specific crypto's you want, you have to see what exchanges it's on. I like one called Vaiot (VAI). It's not available on Phemex but it is on Bingx or I could buy it from a place like Uniswap but that has high gas fees and it's more difficult to get fiat money in. If there's a crypto you want to buy, you can look it up on Coin gecko and it will show where it's listed.

lostrapt

I would put about 50% in rETH and the other 50% in PT-eETH in pendle or equivalent trying to get the highest yield on staked or restaked ethereum

V0LK3

This [post ](https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/s/9PT3yuBOP5) helped explain for me.

tilac

For context I put in 20 ETH at the end on Jan so the numbers aren't the same today. Not everyone can risk 20 ETH and at the time I shouldn't have, but you can math it from my numbers to yours. Etherfi gave me an airdrop of 1140 ETHFI ($5300 today) for season 1. I expect Season 2 to be 20% of that but just guessing. Etherfi still gives me \~3% for restaking and soon EigenLayer restaking will be added to that. On Pendle I split between PT-eETH for fixed yield and it matures June 29 for +1.2 ETH or so but no Etherfi points. The other half went into the LP and I got about 0.7 ETH from that so far plus about 20 PENDLE tokens but also 2x Etherfi points. Both Pendle options were about 30% APR when I got it but the LP is around 11% now. Again, the PT-eETH was fixed rate no points. LP double points but the rate is lower today. Altogether maybe 2 ETH in 5 months and $5300 in airdrop. . Swell L2 is still unknown but I keep generating all my previous yields and they claim to airdrop 1% supply for every project that launches on the L2 and there's 5 or 6 projects so far. Before that I had it all sitting in LIDO stETH. Compared to LIDO it's been really good. Ship might have sailed on Etherfi airdrop fantasies but Pendle is still cooking.

tilac

I'm currently 3 layers deep, 4 if you count ETH as level one. ETH -> EtherFi eETH -> Pendle PT-eETH -> Deposit PT-eETH into Swell L2 So far the rewards have been incredible. When it all starts unravel and the end of the bull it's going to be a disaster. I'll probably go back to vanilla ETH this summer, hope it's not too late.

AssistTechnical6556

There is a hearing today at 9am PT. The judge continues to demand Evolve/Lineage to unfreeze accounts. He said he welcomes us to come to today's hearing and potentially voice the impact: When: 9am PT Where: [https://cacb.zoomgov.com/j/1615832082](https://cacb.zoomgov.com/j/1615832082) PW: 207441

JamesJosephMeeker

Ah Boomer, the hallmark insult of just the unoriginal children I described. Are you going to tell me to touch grass next? Maybe head over to the autism discord channel and get a few more insults to throw. I don't even like the Elon, I think he's a smart version of PT Barnum. However I can at least respect that he's accomplished things. Unlike the generation who considers him the far right bogeyman and checks under their futon for him before they go to sleep. Not unlike Hannity. He's a blowhard who needs an oil change but in one year he makes more than you and you 9 richest friends will in their life. Like them or not, Elon and Hannity already won life.  No-one likes a hater.

Vegetaman916

"Useful" cryptocurrencies don't generate the kind of ROI that memecoins can. The entire point to crypto, whether launching it or trading it, is to generate profits. And the best method would have the least amount of effort and investment risk to it. If PT Barnum were around... Creating a token, pamping it, and then pulling the rug was one of the best ways to achieve maximum profit with minimum effort/investment. Sure, it victimized a lot of people, but so did Johnson & Johnsons Baby Powder, Purdue Pharma's Oxycontin, and... almost every other endeavor in big business, from Fossil Fuels destroying the planet to Raytheon making an "environmentally friendly" missile to kill people with. That is how it works. And it is why some people are rich and other people are not.

SeemedGood

They exist because PT Barnum was right.

NastyStreetRat

Show me your Casio PT80 and maybe i'll trust you.

Able_Praline_7085

That’s my problem. Buying at higher prices and missing the actual spikes up it does. Then buying in higher and getting hit with the liquidity grabs after the volatility happened. I was trading 2-5 coins at a time and it was safe to do so. Now I can barely trade a .1-.25 for the same results. Sheesh. Regrets for sure. So now I’m just DCA. I believe 140k is next PT.

RoastedPeanuts1812

I’ve been swinging MSTR calls through BTC attempts at breaking 69k. If we did through 70k my PT was 72k for the week. I think we can see that or 74k by 9:30 now. I’ve been burned too many times holding through ATH pushes into sell offs so will offload majority position at open.

IndependentCup9571

sort of. topped at 150. might be a while before it reaches the PT.

XL_Jockstrap

And also as long as they successfully compete against others for limited internship spots, land a prestigious internship and successfully compete against others in landing a scarce number of jobs with the useful degree. Engineering, CS, etc aren't guarantees of return on investment anymore. Nothing is, aside from some health fields, like nursing, PT, OT, etc. But most of those (except nursing), you have to leverage a useful/relevant degree + internships + good GPA + decent GRE + other extracurriculars to compete with others for a limited number of spots at whatever graduate program. The trades are where it's at now.

anax4096

or real estate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-PT9vw2F28

guestn47

Of course, but if you print your seed phrase on paper and somebody finds it, you are screwed. But if you print encrypted wallet on paper, which looks like this for example (this is new empty wallet I just created): 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 it is useless unless someone has password for it.

jps_

The short answer is no. The longer answer is because of how ChatGPT works. Ultimately, it essentially makes things up as it goes. Specifically, it starts with a string of words and then picks the most probable next word ("G" for Generative, in **G**PT). It does this based on keeping track of the probabilities of leading and trailing context in a string of words ("T" for Transformer in GP**T**), asks the question "what word most likely comes next?", and then spits it out. These probabilities are calculated by analyzing strings of trillions of words that came before and after each other in content made by millions of people in many languages ("P" for "Pre-trained"). Thus, ChatGPT is a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer AI model arranged to be conversational (you write something, and that starts the context, it generates words based on this context, one after another until it comes to the most likely stopping point, and that's its response. Your question and its response and your response become the context for its next answer... and so on. If you carry on the conversation long enough you will see that it starts to forget early parts of the conversation, because its backward context is limited. Thus, ChatGPT literally just makes things up. However, because it uses perfect vocabulary for the context, and the process is pretty much how humans also pick the next word they say, this statistical stream-of-probability babble is often indistinguishable from expertise. What you have is the answer to a question on blockchain to a parrot with Vitalik's vocabulary. For what it's worth.

flomoloko

Sneakers and Crypto.. Could it be more PT Barnum.. You gonna tell me this guy will be running the country from a decked out customized BOP facility next?

Negative-Bunch-6656

https://imgur.com/a/jSMX6PT

HiRiSkReWarD

Clarification $500k+++ Per BTC is my PT…Own Little over 3. 1st Buy was $47k than $17k $22k and recently last month $36500. Ave Cost is BP $36k. Going to add 2 more get to 5.

Chonjae

rsETH. Fixed income is 30% (you can also just buy PT), and liquidity providers for rsETH are getting 22% + kelp + eigen points

vAPORrrBOI

Just sell 2 of them at a reasonable PT and hold the last one on the houses money. Greed and FOMO is not where it’s at. Love your statement!

jonezsodaz

Who is more honest then Jpm I mean would PT Barnum lie to you?

Yo_ipitythefool

I got a PT Cruiser (Martha Stewart Limited Edition) ... what you got Homie? Yeah ... that's what I thought 😡

125Thailand

https://twitter.com/PT_888888/status/1747558410172952856?t=ACToD-eBI3XtyYXeZw6ghQ&s=19

Knowledge775

Swan also had a close call with using Prime Trust as their custodian earlier last year. PT blew up and is now bankrupt. Swan is still using some sketchy characters with connections to PT.

PCMcGee

Remember PT Barnum? He had a pretty ignominious quotation about human stupidity you might have heard of.

Background_Put_6713

Price Target. And sounds like a good plan. $150K would be nice. That's my PT as of this minute..

Substantial-Skill-76

Yes i have some. PT? Not sure what that means? Profit taking? If so, im not sure, but i'd be very happy with BTC at 100k. I want to take some out also for catching the bottom in 3 years or whenever it will be. I made some big losses a couple of years ago trading BTC and algo stuff, so i need to catch some of that back and maybe get into some profit.

Background_Put_6713

For sure. I must ask… 1. Do you own any BTC currently? 2. What’s your BTC PT for this epoch?

inducedconfusion

The specific token I’m talking about is PT, it’s phemex’s exchange token which just launched, so from here the APR will rapidly decrease as the circulation increases. Also used for exchange fees, so very similar to BNB and KCS. And what is Goal Seek? is it an outline I can find in excel and is it capable of factoring in the gas fees?

SirArthurPT

The "legal tender" misconception; "legal tender" is nothing but a poor choice of words in English, it doesn't even translate to "legal" anything in other languages; example in ES/PT "moneda/moeda de curso forzado/forçado" (forced course currency). The English choice of words made some people believe there's "illegal tender", when there's no such thing. The opposite of legal tender is volunteer trade. The real power of legal tender comes down to forcely settle debt. Eg. A owes $100 to B, both A and B are in the USA. If A wants to pay B with Bitcoin (or anything else than USD) and B refuses A still owes $100 to B, if A wants to pay in USD and B refuses A no longer owes anything to B because he can't be forced to settle in any other form of payment. This applies for Bitcoin, but would also apply to Euro, as Euro isn't USA legal tender, or the opposite, if they were Europeans that would apply for Dollars. If both parties agree to settle the debt in anything else than legal tender, then the debt is settled. "What if A pays in cocaine?" - from the debt perspective and taken B agreed, the debt is settled. However cocaine is an illegal good to hold and transact with, so both could be in trouble with law enforcement, but for what counts to debt settling, it is settled.

Laurensio_

What PT do u expect

tika_dengu

trading begins 14 Dec 9AM PT

Cocopoppyhead

It certainly looks like the paper wallet generator was compromised. So your funds are gone. The next step is to trace the funds and see if you can identify the culprit. &#x200B; **My advice:** 1. Copy the transaction ID & Recipient address, 2. Use a [block explorer like this one](https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/bc1qk0apdyltpmh5egly74sdn2thkxnrt6z3wasutk) and paste in either or both address 3. Begin tracing where the coins have gone to. list out all the addresses it may have passed through. 4. Use [Bitcoin Who's Who](https://www.bitcoinwhoswho.com/) to see if any of these addresses have been reported previously 5. If they have, you can click on **"Website Appearances/Public Sightings"**, this might help you find places like reddit where people have done their own investigations on the same address. 6. Google Search can be your friend, so click here to [search Clankapp on Google](https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fclankapp.com%2Fbitcoin%2Faddress%2F+&rlz=1C5CHFA_enPT994PT997&sxsrf=APwXEde2926DQ7cfVYnhvwA7sjXBBpdxmQ%3A1686307964150&ei=fASDZKG9CMvrgAa165OQCA&ved=0ahUKEwih67zZgrb_AhXLNcAKHbX1BIIQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fclankapp.com%2Fbitcoin%2Faddress%2F+&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQA0oECEEYAVCpAVipAWD3NmgCcAB4AIABMYgBMZIBATGYAQCgAQHAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp), then enter the recipient wallet address and press return. 7. If Clankapp have the address listed, they might identify an exchange it belongs to at the top of the page (next to the address) 8. If you identify an exchange, contact them right away with all these details and ask them to freeze the wallet. 9. This would be a good time to contact the police and put them in touch with the exchange.