NEAR

AutoModerator

Post is by: Mr_Hodlerr and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1xvd1rb/bitcoin_is_on_its_sixth_red_week_in_a_row_ive_had/ Real money, real exchange fills, after all fees. Oct 22 to the Nov 12 close: * Holding the same cryptos: **-20.02%** * The AI: **-4.63%** **Week by week (holding vs the AI)** * Oct 21 to 25: -3.44% vs -1.05% * Oct 26 to Nov 1: -2.84% vs -0.76% * Nov 2 to 8: -7.77% vs -1.44% * Nov 9 to 12: -7.57% vs -1.45% **By crypto (held vs traded)** * BTC: -15.06% vs -3.54% * ETH: -18.38% vs -2.32% * SOL: -23.63% vs -2.96% * XRP: -23.76% vs 0.00% * XLM: -15.39% vs 0.00% * ZEC: -21.52% vs -11.27% * NEAR: -29.88% vs -18.04% **What this does and doesn't show** * It lost money every single week. It just lost a lot less. * Three weeks of a falling market say nothing about a rising one. In my tests on past years it finished behind plain holding in the strongest bull years. That's the trade: give up some of the top to skip most of the fall. * Today's drop isn't in these numbers yet. I'll add it in the comments after the close. * It can only trade. It has no withdrawal access, so funds stay in your own exchange account. Every trade goes into a public log that is sealed every hour and anchored in Bitcoin, so nobody can edit the record afterwards, me included: [https://botsfolio.com/track-record/real-money](https://botsfolio.com/track-record/real-money) Honest question: would you give up part of a bull run to cut drops like this by about three quarters? Curious where people here land. Disclosure: I build Botsfolio, an AI that trades inside the user's own exchange account. This fall is the first real test it has had. I'd rather show the whole record than a highlight. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

joecoolseq101

NEAR

Wise_Lion_9703

Holding BTC, NEAR and \~20% of portfolio actively traded by ai agents

PuzzleheadedBell4057

Equally BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, LINK, HYPE, ZEC, DOGE, TAO, NEAR.

Rude_Acanthaceae6584

Bitcoin is a store of value and has its place as the native currency of the internet. I own it but focus on alts that will be rails for the future of commerce (I think). So my bag is $ETH, $SOL, $TAO, $SUI, $VVV, $NEAR. Call me a shitcoiner but hey I like to experiment 🧪

Rich-Natural793

NEAR and btc

PuzzleheadedBell4057

BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, DOGE, LINK, ZEC, TAO, HYPE, NEAR. Cause I don't have a crystal ball.

TheVeloRebel

How will they stand out and attract demand? By clearly being the only chains that can make it possible. That's where 'Crypto agility' comes through IMO Only a few projects are built for that kind of witchcraft. 'The battle of the flexi chains' will come out as a narrative, mark my words!! Crypto agility is the actual differentiator in this dude, not just “we will support post-quantum someday. and the chickens won't come home to roost” Most major chains will hard-code signatures into consensus rules. Most of this shit requires soft/hard forks, multi-year coordination and arguments, wallet/exchange/custodian upgrades, and political fights over lost or abandoned coins. BTC has never been shy of a political uproar, neither will be others. That be the friction Bitcoin is navigating now with BIP-360, Coinbase and others are publicly prioritising flexi designs precisely cause rigid systems will fuck up migration. Complete nightmares if you just want to change something. Bitcoin will however succeed because its the biggest and only project with the most to lose IMO It affects the whole market. Google’s Cloud KMS work makes the same point outside crypto: they are shipping ML-DSA, SLH-DSA, ML-KEM (and hybrids), emphasising 'cryptographic agility' as the bedrock, targeting internal readiness milestones around 2028–2029. They are treating algorithm swaps as an engineering capability rather than a one-time protocol event. Projects that baked crypto agility in from the start that can treat new signature schemes as deployable bytecode/scripts rather than consensus changes. Or projects with audited SPHINCS+ (SLH-DSA family / FIPS 205) lock scripts on mainnet, with self-custodial wallets supporting (Quantum Purses) supporting it will bring this FUD to close....for now!! lol Even AI throws up a top 5 of Algorand, Nervos CKB, Quantum resistent Ledger, Sui and NEAR. SO I think people will be racing to get in that top 5 or crash and burn. PoW hashing itself is already outside the quantum threat model for signatures so It'll be wayyyy easier for those types of projects to adjust. Providing they jump the consensus hoops.

Escapement_Watch

because quantum proofing will be coming. SUI by 2027, SOL already testing quantum proof signatures LIVE in their testnet since DEC 2025, NEAR is pretty much already quantum proof but going further soon. etc etc. quantum proof is very easy. Plus if quantum becomes an issue traditional banks will be at risk as well. (banks are also racing to be quantum resistant) But remember when there is a BREAKTHROUGH in quantum tech right around the same time there will be a BREAKTHROUGH in quantum PROOFING. The tech grows together.

KcolkNeb

it is NEAR time, babe!

KcolkNeb

then why NEAR and ZEC are printing >10% in GREEN candles?

jawni

haha no, that would be like HYPE, SOL, ZEC, PUMP, DRV, NEAR, CARDS, ORE, KMNO, etc.

XZanZer

TBA, I think privacy coins are not perfect for daily use because of the criminal things, I think NEAR's intent privacy way is neutral between 100% privacy with daily privacy, it can keep users' privacy transfer if the user didn't break the law. And when met serious hacker issues, the governors can vote to stop the dangerous behaviors

TheVeloRebel

Its not FUD just prepoaration for the narative of the 'Crypto Agility' era. Algo, sui, Nervos CKB, NEAR etc they are all getting to the point of looking like they will be less likely to fall. I do actulaly agree that the threat of BTC will propel the Quantum talk more aggressively because obviously it controls the market All these chains suddenly posting “we’re going PQ!!!” because the narrative flipped and they don’t wanna look slow, all the capable ones jumping too. It’s not pure FUD, it’s just the market finally admitting the risk is real enough that governments and big companies are actually prepping. You can’t keep calling it FUD forever when that happens. But most of them are still gonna eat shit on the migration. Hard forks, coordination problems, big signatures, slower everything, users have to move coins, drama. SPHINCS+ adopted chains will be big, those that already have on testnet or mainet . Chains will start bleeding from bad migrations, the ones that can switch clean get the flow. PQ shit bag coins should be positioned for this, BTC will get political soon I should imagine

Ok_Golf_6467

Haha damn, 4 months ago I was literally hovering my buy button over NEAR vs VIRTUALS. Wishing I had picked NEAR but I still think VIRTUALS is going to rip next due to the robotics division and "physical AI" being a new hot narrative

Feisty-Elderberry898

NEAR is looking pretty good

rebel_orientation

That link looks like the official docs for NEAR Intents, so I'd start there. If you're stuck on a specific step, post which part is giving you trouble and someone can point you in the right direction.

truecakesnake

NEAR is looking solid, already recovered nicely.

SpiritDonkey

Every dip gets eaten up like clockwork. Bottom steadily getting higher. Good feeling about NEAR this cycle and it’s still early. I’d buy more if I had the fiat.

digitalundergrad

NEAR in beast mode - already in quick recovery. My only alt that isn't massively in the red.

duc_one

Here is my AI answer: Algorand suffers primarily from heavy historical token supply inflation and a lack of aggressive supply-sink mechanisms to absorb selling pressure. While its tech is top-tier, retail capital in this market favors high-hype narratives—like NEAR's AI integration or ZEC's privacy tailwinds—over slow-moving enterprise deals. Because transaction fees are near-zero, the base layer captures very little economic value to drive organic token demand

FragrantVariation583

That domain is not an official NEAR Protocol site, it reads like a typical phishing page designed to drain your wallet when you connect MetaMask and sign a bridge transaction. Always verify bridge URLs from NEAR's official site or their verified GitHub before connecting anything, and if you already connected, revoke approvals and move your funds to a fresh wallet immediately.

Rich-Natural793

NEAR

Prior_Parsley3960

Since OP only posted a link: **Importance:** ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ — meaningful cross-chain infrastructure failure, but relatively contained financially and **not a compromise of the NEAR blockchain itself**. * **What happened:** NEAR Intents, NEAR's cross-chain swapping system, lost approximately **$3.8 million** after an attacker exploited a bug involving its **Omni deposit/withdrawal infrastructure and an Intents smart contract**. The team halted services, patched the contract-side vulnerability and promised full reimbursement. [The Block](https://www.theblock.co/news/ecosystems/2026-10-01-near-intents-halts-services-after-3-8-million-exploit-promises-full-compensation-417404?utm_source=chatgpt.com) * **How it worked:** The affected infrastructure holds assets deposited from other blockchains so NEAR Intents can execute cross-chain swaps. On-chain analysis indicates the attacker extracted roughly **$3.87M USDT from a BNB Chain vault in five withdrawals** over about six hours. This points to the cross-chain custody/authorization layer rather than NEAR's consensus or base blockchain. [Bitquery](https://bitquery.io/investigations/near-intents-hack?utm_source=chatgpt.com) * **Where the money went:** Investigators traced nearly all of it. Bitquery found roughly **76% converted into 34.69 BTC**, while about $802,000 reached KuCoin addresses. Remarkably, the attacker apparently routed about **$822,000 of the stolen assets back through NEAR Intents itself** while draining the system. [Bitquery](https://bitquery.io/investigations/near-intents-hack?utm_source=chatgpt.com) * **Containment:** Deposits and withdrawals across **11 connected networks** were temporarily suspended while fixes were deployed. Core service has since begun resuming, and NEAR Intents says users will be made whole. [The Block](https://www.theblock.co/news/ecosystems/2026-10-01-near-intents-halts-services-after-3-8-million-exploit-promises-full-compensation-417404?utm_source=chatgpt.com) * **Market reaction:** NEAR dropped roughly **7–9%** following disclosure. The timing is particularly awkward because the exploit occurred only two days after the launch of the first U.S. spot NEAR ETF, which highlighted NEAR Intents as an important part of the ecosystem. [BeInCrypto](https://beincrypto.com/near-intents-hacked-3-8-million/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) # Bottom line This looks much more like a **bridge/infrastructure exploit than a NEAR Protocol failure**. There is currently no evidence that NEAR's blockchain, consensus mechanism or native token itself was compromised. The forthcoming technical postmortem matters most: investigators know **where the money went**, but NEAR Intents has not yet fully explained **why apparently unauthorized withdrawal requests were accepted**. That distinction will determine whether this was a narrow implementation bug or evidence of a more fundamental weakness in its cross-chain architecture.

polyamerica

SOL, TAO, ZEC, NEAR, ENA, HYPE, and CC. Trust me bro……

Right_Strength2170

You are missing out big time if not on the NEAR train

Rude_Acanthaceae6584

$TAO, $VVV, $NEAR, $SUI, $SOL dca and holding my ETH NFTs. Ai trade is my strategy for the next few months.

Ok_Body_2830

I hold a wide (probably too wide) range of alts. In the past, I have made the mistake of round-tripping too many gains by holding out for higher prices before selling anything. So I made a concious effort of starting the ladder out process at more modest gains. E.g. Sell the first 10% chunk at 1.25-1.5 the price I bought. The past month or so I have hit the first rung of the ladder on a lot of the coins where I had a decent entry price. Sometimes 2 or 3 rungs if they have been on a real run (e.g. NEAR). If they go back down to my original entry price, I will top back up to my initial quantity and keep some modest profits from this mini-bull. If the next move is to continue upward, I will keep laddering out at a rate that allows me to take profits but keep some exposure to huge breakouts. So that is what I am doing right now in terms of active buying/selling. For the chunk of my portfolio in BTC, I am less concerned with taking short term profits. It's a more stable asset, so the short term profits would be a lot smaller percentage wise and I am perfectly comfortable holding it long term. So I am just hodling. I may buy a little more, particularly if prices go down. I have some ETH which is getting a similar treatment, and a little bit of BNB, SOL, and XRP which I am treating as midway between the stable asset and speculative altcoin.

Longjumping_Law_9712

people here saying altcoin season is dead, now look what will happen on NEAR and Injective once thier ETF got approved. also the recent Quant token surges to 300% in just 3 days after selected by CLEARING HOUSE to power its on-Chain Money Initiative, a network designed to let financial institutions clear and settle tokenized deposits. not all altcoin you hold skyrocket some of them will slowy die. and the recent meta for the upcoming bullrun is RWA, payments, AI

Right_Strength2170

NEAR, ENA, ZEC and UNI pump endlessly day after day

Backrus

Performance this year vs benchmarks (BTC and MSTR); performance since we started bull on August 24 (close above weekly ema50), whales' positioning, ETFs flows, and narrative simple enough that even average redditor can understand it (ZEC is privacy, although honeypot lol, but number goes up, but just use Monero, HYPE is basically better CBOE/RH, although for options there's DRV, LIT is the same so it's diversification, NEAR has been he best out of AI plays). Then again, alts shouldn't be more than 5% of your overall stock portfolio. Disclaimer: I've had those since 2025, so my cost basis is infinitely small. Still, every cycle worked like that - early winners just kept running and winning even more.

Backrus

Honestly, no point for quite some time. First of all, there's no such thing as "investing" in crypto - to invest in something, it has to have fundamental value. Tokens created in 15s (yes, it takes that long) don't have any fundamental value. You can argue BTC has some, but still, you're gambling on price appreciation without any logical reason. When IBIT options launched, BTC lost its ability to generate upside volatility (in January GVZ flipped BVIV, and BVIV chart alone is just sad). Without that, it's just another stock with market like returns and much bigger downside risk. So it's hard to find honest argument to have it in your portofolio on a risk-adjusted basis. Then again, if you have to hold something, do it with BTC - there are periods when it decorrelates from stocks (but over last 3 years it decorrelated from the upside lol). Since COVID dump / post 2021, stocks have better volatility, and better risk-adjusted returns (BTC has been the worst performing asset in the world on an absolute and risk-adjusted basis since IBIT options launched on November 19, 2024; although it might change with the start of new bull market on August 24). Not to mention all the investor protections in the world. If you still wanna gamba, this cycle has already decided its winners: HYPE, LIT, ZEC, NEAR.

Despaciito

Omg look at NEAR

Rich-Natural793

btc , xrp NEAR

Rich-Natural793

“Near “is going great right now . I have some but mainly buying SVRN which is the stock that goes up in conjunction with NEAR . Bought in 20s and now it’s touching 52$ within a couple weeks . Maybe more upside ? I’m taking a bet

Despaciito

NEAR seems unstoppable

labajada

The end is NEAR

KidAmulet

Let's you and me come back to this comment in August 2027, when BTC is only up 3x (from $85k), and the others are up 6 to 10x and have much more adoption and use cases (which is already true). BTC legitimized the industry. It's work is done. Once the market realizes there are better digital assets, the crypto industry will be a lot better off and no longer a slave to BTC price action. Good thing is the decoupling already started this year with HYPE, ZEC, VVV, and NEAR price action while BTC was in a bear market.

Peturio

ZEC is the whole story here. It runs at about 150% annual volatility, more than twice SOL, so with 48% of the money it carries 72% of the risk and the four coins behave like 1.8 independent bets rather than four. The upside of that is real. In a one year simulation from current volatility and correlations with no trend assumed, 30% of paths double and the top 5% end above 7x. The other side is that the worst 5% lose 71% or more (BTC alone, 51%), five paths in six go through a 50% drawdown at some point, and one in three goes through 70%. This mix does not do moderate. Two things about ZEC the weights don't show. Over the last twelve months its correlation to SOL, NEAR and HYPE was 0.35 to 0.45, low for crypto, which is why the diversification ratio is a decent 1.19. Over the last 90 days that has flipped. ZEC's beta to BTC is now about 1.9, the highest in the book, so a 30% BTC drop today maps to ZEC −56%, NEAR −40%, HYPE −38%, SOL −35%, and the book −46%. The coin that diversified you last year is the one most sensitive to BTC right now. Replays on today's weights. The October 2025 to July 2026 bear, which cost BTC 51%, would have made this mix +47%, entirely because ZEC rose 152% inside that window while SOL fell 66% and NEAR 39%. The path still went to −22% first, in March. The June 2026 liquidation cascade cost 29% in five days and ZEC fell 33% in it, so in a fast deleveraging it does not hedge anything. The FTX window costs 41%, mostly SOL at −63% (HYPE did not exist yet and is filled in by beta). One number to distrust. Resample the last twelve months of actual daily moves and the median outcome is 14x. That is not a forecast, it is the 2025-26 ZEC rally dominating the sample, and what it tells you is that this book's entire track record is one event. Liquidity at retail size is a non-issue for all four, and a stock market shock on its own barely registers. As usual, there are model estimates under those assumptions, not advice.

Beginning-Stick6479

ZEC: 48% SOL: 33% NEAR 15% HYPE: 4% thanks!

jawni

NEAR is going to be the new less hated version of Tron, where it keeps going up and uninformed people just assume it's a scam rather than realizing heavy usage is driving the price gains.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Altruistic_Rule8916 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wmgdq6/today_crypto_analysis/ **Massive Green Day Across Crypto – BTC Back Above $85K, Alts Leading the Charge (Sept 21, 2026 Market Update)** What’s up everyone, Just checked the boards and it’s looking like a proper risk-on day. Broad-based green across the board with some serious outperformance from the alts. Here’s the snapshot from the major pairs (USDT): | Pair | Last Price | 24h Change | |------|------------|------------| | **BTC** | $85,989.52 | **+6.67%** | | **ETH** | $2,741.43 | **+6.20%** | | **SOL** | $118.56 | **+9.46%** | | **ZEC** | $1,530.95 | **+6.34%** | | **XRP** | $1.5014 | **+8.78%** | | **NEAR** | $4.111 | **+10.66%** | | **SUI** | $1.0458 | **+26.86%** | | **BNB** | $797.31 | **+5.78%** | # What’s driving the move today \- Bitcoin finally punched back above the psychological $85k level with solid volume (2.17B on the pair). After the choppy action we’ve seen recently, this feels like real buying pressure rather than just a short squeeze. \- Ethereum is keeping pace but lagging BTC slightly on percentage terms — classic mid-cycle behavior. \- The real fireworks are in the mid-caps and ecosystem plays. **SUI** is absolutely ripping (+26.86%), **NEAR** is up double digits, and **SOL** continues its strong relative performance. These aren’t random pumps — they’re the names that have been accumulating quietly for weeks. \- Even privacy plays like ZEC and the more traditional large-caps (XRP, BNB) are participating. Breadth is healthy. This looks like a classic “everything is green” session rather than a narrow BTC-only move. When you see SUI, NEAR, and SOL leading while BTC is also strong, it usually means risk appetite is returning. # Short-term technical read \- BTC reclaiming $85k with a strong daily candle is constructive. Next real resistance sits in the $88k–$90k zone. Support now flips to the previous breakdown area around $82–83k. \- SOL holding above $115–118 is key. A clean daily close above $120 would open the door for a run toward previous local highs. \- SUI’s move is extended on the daily, so some pullback/consolidation wouldn’t be surprising, but the strength of the trend is hard to ignore. # Medium-term outlook (next few weeks to months) I’m leaning bullish for the remainder of Q3 into Q4 2026 for a few reasons: 1. **Macro tailwinds** – Risk assets have been finding buyers on dips, and crypto is starting to catch a bid again. 2. **Relative strength in alts** – When SOL, SUI, and NEAR are leading, it usually means capital is rotating into higher-beta names rather than just parking in BTC. 3. **Structure** – Many of these charts have been compressing or building higher lows. A strong weekly close this week would confirm the shift from range-bound to trending. **Bull case**: BTC grinds toward $90k–$95k over the next 4–6 weeks while SOL and SUI continue to outperform. Altseason metrics start flashing properly. **Base case**: Continued chop with higher lows. BTC holds the $80–85k zone and we get rotational strength rather than a straight parabolic move. **Bear case** (lower probability right now): Failure to hold $82–83k on BTC and a sharp rotation back into stablecoins. Would need a clear catalyst. # Personal take Today feels like one of those sessions where the market is telling you the sellers are getting exhausted. The fact that even the more “forgotten” names (ZEC, NEAR) are participating is a healthy sign. I’m not chasing the SUI candle here, but I’m watching for pullbacks to add to higher-conviction names. Curious what everyone else is seeing. Are you treating this as a relief bounce or the start of something more sustained? Stay safe out there and manage risk. # #Crypto #Bitcoin #BTC #Ethereum #ETH #Solana #SOL #SUI #NEAR #XRP #BNB #CryptoMarket #Altcoins #Bullish *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

siorge

The fact no one has said NEAR yet is concerning. Because it is NEAR

liviughg

Maybe you had too much absinthe? Just throwing negative words backed by zero evidence is not the way. NEAR is the future and its price action is the evidence for its utility.

absinthiumxmr

Yes, and its compliancy layer is shit. [https://crypto-economy.com/589k-usdt-stuck-for-50-days-after-zodl-swap-zcash-holder-claims/](https://crypto-economy.com/589k-usdt-stuck-for-50-days-after-zodl-swap-zcash-holder-claims/) I'm sure NEAR will continue going up in the NEAR (see what I did there?) term. But it has functionally no reason for existing with its current model vs. centralized instant swaps, and will likely crash at some point.

Despaciito

NEAR is gearing up a new move. Did you buy the dip?

Traditional_Most105

If you want the safe way with less upside go BTC and ETH. If you want something with more upside then look on altcoins that are in the top 50 or top 100, make sure they are not memecoins, have a working project behind them, a trending narrative, good tokenomics and either put all your available money on one, or diversify and hold long term. For example some of my goins i will hold long term and dca on them are LINK, HBAR, TRAC, NEAR, TAO. I am not mentioning them to influence you. Do your own research. I dont know if its a good entry point now. But if youre gonna hold long term and dca on any coin you choose then it doesnt matter.

liviughg

**NEAR Intents has a layer of compliance indeed. This is not then chain to laundry money.**

absinthiumxmr

I think TAO has some potential. Don't own any personally but it is at least a respectable own. NEAR is a centralized piece of shit that has AML checks and freezes funds.

liviughg

You may chose between becoming one of those insufferable Bitcoin maxis or invest in AI crypto projects (NEAR, TAO, others). You decide

Garrett_CPAatCOS

Anyone else enjoying this NEAR pump?

RatherCynical

This is a stupid way to frame it. Crypto sources its funds from ordinary banks. People put their savings into DeFi because when banks pay 0-2%, NOT using DeFi is losing money to inflation. That's where all the ETH, DOT, ADA, AVAX, FTM, MATIC, NEAR, and every other NFT going crazy comes from. Without that money, no alt-season. Because we shifted regime from nearly 2 decades of 0-2% interest to a 4%+ interest regime, the death of alt-season happened in 2022. It's never about "crypto being a lifestyle". It's about the money valve getting firmly clamped shut

Ok_Dot4134

Look at AI plays for future. TAO being best and NEAR. If you want a totally Degen pick right now DRB launched on BASE. HYPE (if Trump actually gets it in USA).

msc1974

50% NEAR - 50% SOL As soon as you double your money (on either), take profit and move it over into BTC - Rinse and repeat. • Not financial advice :)

h4l

NEAR is also following Zcash, seems like a privacy move. Monero has been trending up separately too.

Boring-Video-5316

NEAR

Boring-Video-5316

invest in NEAR

ivanx90

Really appreciate you actually reading through the code, this is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping for. The gradient booster idea makes sense in theory but yeah, like you said, not enough data at 2h resolution to train anything reliable right now. Filed away for later if we ever get more history. The per-asset thing hit hardest though, went and checked it right after reading your comment. Same exact strategy across 10 coins on the 2H bot, 3 months of data: LINK 71% winrate, +0.71 ADA 70% winrate, +0.59 SOL 50% winrate, +0.07 BNB 50% winrate, -0.64 DOGE 42% winrate, -0.76 NEAR 43% winrate, -1.86 XRP 29% winrate, -1.07 AVAX 27% winrate, -1.52 BTC 20% winrate, -0.94 ETH 30% winrate, -2.19 Basically confirms exactly what you guessed without even seeing the numbers. One model, wildly different results per coin. Feels like the next real thing to dig into rather than more exit tuning. Volatility-adaptive stops instead of fixed thresholds lines up with something we found digging into MFE/MAE research before posting here (Chandelier exit type stuff), so good to hear it independently from someone who actually trades this way. You're right on the order book too, we're doing a REST snapshot via fetch_order_book, not a real delta stream, and yeah the main loop is just sleeping 60s between polls. Both accurate, both would be a real infra upgrade, just not sure yet if that's the bottleneck or if it's the per-asset thing above. Probably worth doing eventually either way. Maker vs taker on exit is a good point for whenever this goes live, but it's all paper trading right now so no real fills happening yet, nothing to optimize there for the moment. Thanks again, this was way more useful than I expected when I posted.

Fudge-Still

I haven't gotten into the other ones but man still really struggling with NEAR and Link too.

RedKe

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I feel like this topic can't really be discussed on subreddits dedicated to a single coin properly but I am interested in what fellow HBAR holders think of other coins. I will need to research LINK tokenomics more but I thought even if fiat or other tokens are used for payment those are ultimately exchanged for LINK which increases demand. Algorand used to be one of my top choices but over time I have dropped my interest in it. Although it is great tech it seems to have a poorly organized foundation, and the founder (Silvio Micali) is creating another chain for institutions so seems to have given up on Algorand gaining widespread adoption. NEAR, ICP, SUI, and Aptos seem to have some interesting tech and I hold a little of them in case they take off some day, but I also keep mostly investing in Hedera. I just wish Hedera showed more institutional adoption progress like Stellar, Canton, and ETH seem to be getting.

oak1337

I personally only hold HBAR. If I had to say others... BTC if you believe in the long term narrative. Started as "the new digital currency for the world", but switched to "digital gold" because it was too expensive and slow to transact. Therefore it's really turned into "hold, hope the next guy buys higher". LINK is connected everywhere which is good, but there's no real driver of coin price. The tokenomics are bad, since LINK can be completely circumvented for everything. Another very speculative one, but name recognition can drive price. Algorand is probably the best "traditional blockchain" tech out of the rest. ICP is also good tech, but it's niche. Stellar is getting traction, but has scalability issues. Canton also getting traction, but has God awful tokenomics. Quant is an interesting one, but not sure the total role it will play when things shake out. There's some other interesting ones like Ondo, Render, Bittensor, NEAR, etc... But that's probably where I'd stop. I don't have long term faith in (almost) any of them except Hedera. That's not to say money can't be made along the way.

LordDuhon

If you want to swap it to USDC, you can use NEAR Intents and end up paying like $2 in fees.

liviughg

TAO, NEAR, ICP and other AI crypto currencies are expected to outperform.

jawni

NEAR, ORE, CARDS, HYPE. I'd include SOL but it's already my biggest holding, but if I didn't have a lot, I'd be buying that too. Just buy the tokens with good fundamentals.

omgitsyogirt

Good list. One that's missing: Bitlendex. Worth adding to your research if custody architecture is a deciding factor for you. The key differentiator is how collateral is held. Rather than a single custodian holding your keys, it uses a 30-node MPC network - BitGo, Fireblocks, and NEAR validators running inside Trusted Execution Environments. No single entity can move your Bitcoin. Contracts are immutable, no single entity has access to your BTC. As for APRs, I managed to lock in a rate around 7%

aprx4

NEAR Intent is great for swapping with high volume without significant slippage. Although i have stopped using NEAR because Hyperliquid spot market has the coins i need. Yes i know HL is not truly decentralized, but it is great alternative to traditional CEX nonetheless.

Bradford203

INJ AR FIL GRT RENDER NEAR that's my 6

kitchenhack3r

Only decent response in this thread. VVV, HYPE, maybe NEAR or SUI are the only ones I’d be looking at now. The rest of the coins in this thread haven’t been hot since the last bull run.

90Skill10Luck

Nano’s architecture (the Block Lattice) focuses on individual account chains. While this allows for low latency, its sustained throughput is significantly lower than modern high-performance networks like Solana, Sui, Kaspa or Aptos, which are designed to handle thousands of transactions per second. Because Nano lacks traditional transaction fees, it has historically been susceptible to spam attacks. ​A "best" payment network often requires more than just speed and zero fees; it requires utility, integrations, and liquidity. Near-Zero Costs: Networks like Solana, Sui, Kaspa and NEAR offer transaction costs that are fractions of a cent (often $< $0.001). For most practical, everyday purposes, these costs are effectively negligible while offering significantly higher ecosystem utility, wider exchange support, and more robust developer environments. The security and consensus of the network rely on a set of nodes designated as "Principal Representatives." because there is no direct financial incentive (like mining rewards or staking yields) for running a node, the long-term sustainability of maintaining a sufficiently decentralized and high-performing network of nodes is an unproven economic model compared to incentive-based systems.

unknowngloomth

TAO and NEAR. Both of them are massively down from ATHs. Very unlikely that another leg will happen to these shitcoins.

Physical-Title-9442

I said this at 70k that there werent enough people whining about btc yet, so it must go lower. THE BOTTOM IS NEAR. 53k

Hot-Efficiency7190

It's obviously HYPE. Maybe NEAR does well too with AI play. For most tokens the time to buy them was 2023 and sell in the last cycle. The next time to buy will be this autumn/winter and sell in 2029. A few will break above the cycle trend.

VollcommNCS

And he explained it. But of course you ignored any explanation given and just smugly think you're smarter than someone like Zooko. Hey, maybe you are, but I doubt it. He deleted it because of people like you interpreting it your own way and not listening to the explanation behind it. It was bad phrasing, admittedly, and should have been followed up immediately with the explanation, which would have avoided this conversation entirely. The explanation is that when criminals try to offramp, they are likely going to have to use a transparent address. Transparent addresses being an option are currently necessary for Zcash to be listed on CEXs in order for exchanges to comply with current laws. Criminals can still take advantage of the privacy, they'll just need to get creative when trying to offramp. Users can swap shielded Zcash for anything supported by NEAR Intents. Users can send shielded Zcash peer-to-peer Users can spend shielded Zcash at certain merchants through the Flexa payments integration. More merchants coming but US legislation is slowing down the roll out. Criminals can take advantage of all of these features if that's something that you're interested in. What else do you want from a privacy coin? Optional shielding is a feature, not a bug. Don't like the idea of it being transparent? Then leave it shielded.

Lord_Gudda

Watching NEAR, HYPE, & FET pumping the last 2 weeks is the so irrational in this bear market.

colemusic1

Sorry dude, AI boom is not going anywhere. Have you noticed while BTC, ETH and other majors lately, that AI-narrative tokens had been ripping prior to this huge flush today? RENDER, NEAR, AKT, TAO, FET. There’s a good reason. Semiconductors. They’re in a literal insane expansion right now and edge AI in particular is a long term extremely demanded category within it. I know some might think this is just a short term narrative phase of AI, and while it typically goes in cycles? I don’t see that happening anytime soon. There’s an absolutely enormous supply shock which is why tech stocks are going parabolic. NVDA is officially the biggest company in the world. It IS a semiconductor stock/company, with computing in AI. It’s the biggest weighting in S&P 500, NASDAQ, BGBL, Vanguard (VGS), SMH… basically almost everything. It’s not going anywhere anytime soon.

zeroboundss

This is from a shitcoin page I follow on Tg: >NEAR is another top performer coin in our portfolio so far this year. Key developments that make us bullish NEAR for 2026: >1. Near Intents: This AI-driven transaction tool abstracts away complex execution steps. Since its Q1 2025 launch, it has processed over $20 billion across 25 million+ swaps. >2. Privacy first AI Infrastructure: The IronClaw framework provides confidential inference, allowing AI agents to perform corporate tasks securely without exposing sensitive data, credentials, or activity. >3. Reduced Inflation: As of October 2025, the annual inflation rate was halved from 5% to 2.5% >Bullish NEAR. Chart looks good. It's being shilled as a blue chip with strong fundamentals and good PMF because it combines privacy and AI.

kers2000

HYPE, ZEC, NEAR and ICP are showing extreme resilience. I think the revenue, privacy and AI narratives are the only ones that will print this summer.

LiquidityCompass

That's a valid use case. But it's still a case for decentralized AI, not necessarily for the NEAR token itself.

Confident_Hunter7506

NEAR intents is how ZCASH gets moved around. ZCASH is on a great run and NEAR is benefitting

LiquidityCompass

AI becoming successful and NEAR becoming successful are two completely different bets. A lot of investors seem to assume they're the same thing.

antistupidsociety

Now show it compared to HYPE, ZEC, NEAR over the past year lol

Lord_Gudda

Any thoughts on why HYPE, XLM, HBAR, NEAR and FET are pumping? Is it just because of the AI narrative in the stock market?

_g4nja_

ausser du hast NEAR gekauft.

Warm_Pressure_3977

There was actually a small ALT cycle around April 2024 and little in 2025. I don't think it's the ALT cycle that was the issue but more the drop that followed. Most Alts are down 90%. Will they come back? Honestly, I agree with you and say no. Meme crazy is done. Retail has been burned. Useful projects - ETH, SOL - which both have issues, NEAR, and others in top 100 - possibly but even some of them will vanish. BTC will be fine. True, alt run in in earlier cycles was during QE not QT. Rates are higher, everything costs more and lots of macro uncertainity. If that goes away, can we run? Sure. Too bad it won't be for a long time.

GeoSystemsDeveloper

**Daily crypto TL;DR – May 27, 2026:** * ⚠️ The Crypto Fear and Greed Index sits at 30, reflecting "Fear" in investor sentiment. * ⚠️ US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced over $1 billion in outflows, intensifying selling pressure. * ⚠️ Fresh US attacks in Iran stalled peace talks, pushing oil prices up and fostering a risk-off environment. * ⚠️ The broader crypto market saw over $100 billion lost in hours; Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana are down. * 🚀 NEAR Protocol surged 15% in 24 hours, bucking market trends due to AI-native architecture news. *News summary from the* [*HODLings app*](https://www.geosystemsdev.com/products/hodlings/)*.*

wancruz

Ive got TAO and NEAR too!

Ok_Golf_6467

It's coming for sure. I just went risk on and got a nice bag of Virtuals Protocol. TAO and NEAR are obviously good too! BTC is still bearish but AI is doing a mini run right now

blkbxxx

Funny, I was having the same feeling and then rotated out of eth into Zcash last year and I’m up 3x. There are plenty of opportunities to catch every year in crypto if you are fairly active and staying up to date on X (memes 2024-last year, privacy and AI adjacent this year). For instance NEAR is probably going to make many people rich this year.

RoninTrdr

Just got 30% on NEAR

SpiritDonkey

Didn’t think I’d be breaking even on NEAR this year, or ever… but here we are 🎉

FriendsMade_MeDoIt

Trying to time the “sell now buy back lower” move is where a lot of people get wrecked honestly. I’ve done it before and watched the coin randomly pump right after I sold because BTC sneezed green for a day. If you still believe in NEAR long term and you’re only 10 cents off your average, I’d probably think more about whether you actually need the cash or just want the feeling of making an active move. Sometimes holding is less stressful than trying to outplay every swing.

GeoSystemsDeveloper

**Daily crypto TL;DR – May 23, 2026** * ⚠️ The total crypto market cap declined 2.4-2.6% on May 23, pulling BTC and ETH down amid broader risk-off sentiment. * ⚠️ Federal Reserve's cautious stance and persistent inflation keep US yields high, pressuring crypto market liquidity. * 🚀 Altcoins like HYPE, NEAR, and ONDO surged significantly, driven by protocol upgrades, AI narratives, and RWA tokenization. * ℹ️ The Fear & Greed Index is at 40 (Neutral), but high BTC social comment ratios historically suggest a short-term price pullback. *News summary from the* [*HODLings app*](https://www.geosystemsdev.com/products/hodlings/)*.*

Open_Ideal_525

BTC, STX, SxT, RED, NEAR, TAO

FutureAvenir

This shit is being astroturfed to high hell. Everytime I see a post about NEAR my scam detector goes wild.

GeoSystemsDeveloper

**Daily crypto TL;DR:** * ⚠️ BTC & ETH dipped slightly, with the Fear & Greed Index at 28. * ⚠️ Bitcoin & Ethereum spot ETFs saw continued net outflows on May 21. * 🚀 US-Iran peace talks show progress, potentially easing global risk. * 🚀 US executive order and Clarity Act boost bank crypto adoption. * ℹ️ Select altcoins like NEAR, HYPE, MNT, and WLD rallied. *News summary from the* [*HODLings app*](https://www.geosystemsdev.com/products/hodlings/)*.*

FileElectronic8563

honestly didn't expect NEAR to be this quietly based — intents doing $5B in volume in just a few months is wild. the agent economy angle makes it even more interesting 👀

CrossPuffs

Bankless published an analysis on NEAR recently: [https://www.bankless.com/read/nears-intents-and-ai-bets-fuel-revival](https://www.bankless.com/read/nears-intents-and-ai-bets-fuel-revival)

No-Slide3465

That's an interesting list but I would remove $QUBIC, $TAO, $SUI, $ONDO, $PENDLE, $RENDER, and $NEAR.

SnooSprouts4116

NEAR!!!

Zealousideal-Ad7773

NEAR