ONE

Jout92

The ultimate goal of crypto is to create a different money system. And the ONE future money needs is trust and security. And nothing beats Bitcoin in that regard. Nothing can attack Bitcoin, no person can change Bitcoin, no person can manipulate it except by expending a lot of resources and the entire point of PoW is that those resources will be more than what you will ultimately get out of it so you might as well spend those resources to become a good actor in the system. Bitcoin has those features, Ethereum does not. Which does not mean Ethereum is useless. I view Ethereum as second layer solution to Bitcoin. But think: What happens to Ethereum if the Dev team decides to fork it? What happens if they introduce a controversial feature? What happens I the Dev team dies? It doesn't have the universal, impersonal quality of Bitcoin, at least not to the same extent

ElegantBarracuda4278

Sadly, no. I’ve never had a charge back for a scam and they’ll still do it. I had the same line of questions to increase my spend limit for ONE DAY when I needed to electronically transfer money to pay for a Reno. It sucks.

nugymmer

So what? It's Bitcoin. The reputation is the NUMBER ONE priority. You fuck with the protocol and lock old users out, and deprive them of their coins, then guess what will happen? BTC might become a dinosaur, dead and long forgotten.

PrettyOwl7768

This might be better framing people often say bitcoin is two things the protocol, then BTC the token; bitcoin the protocol runs atop the internet even if your ham that signal is going to end up in a tcp/ip packet more or less what happens if the internet becomes just a stream (udp) that can fix errors? at the same time the value side (BTC) is just built into the packet header. now say there is a magic way to have this new protocol being 'living' itself for a lack of better words. so the vast majority of things bitcoin needs to solve is easy as a central data base; and since its 'living' it doesn't change unless it wants to change, aka immutably. the data is shared between all users every where as cryptographic hash and is backed up millions of times over between every one; no one person has all data, data is spread out in an algo that always allows recreation; this combines nodes and miners into one; the security is PoW, you have to allocate a small part of your machine to keep the network alive not by random number guessing but by just relaying and caching messages; this all stored in memory, so you shut your device down all data is lost, turn it on new data is propagated. the internet was invented in early 1800 - aka the telegraph: it discovered how to transfer INFORMATION at great distances nearly instantaneously bitcoin was invented in 2008: it discovered how to transfer VALUE at great distances nearly instantaneously Now say these two things just become ONE thing That thing would have to be an "immaculate conception" moment... so the question is what is the design of that? lots of metaphor's i know... try explaining bitcoin to somebody who never heard of bitcoin

mrestiaux

Read this very carefully… NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA WHAT BITCOIN PRICE WILL DO IN THE GENERAL SHORT TERM!

staywoakes1

Trump is a fucking legend the SOB really pulled this off in ONE DAY

rieglerp

I agree with you there; you can certainly have several books and distribute them across different locations, but that gets expensive. However, I would use this method as just ONE additional backup option anyway—there should be others. How you store the notes is highly individual - but you can also follow the methods people use to store their entire seed phrase,like steel plates, ...

rieglerp

Relying solely on memory is, in my opinion, dangerous and not a good idea. But as with everything, it's an additional option. There isn't one perfect solution - and mine isn't meant to be - I think everyone should choose what suits them best from the range of possibilities. And "my" solution is just meant to show ONE more possibility.

NeutralSpacerx

Bitcoin moves from cycle to cycle, creating a NEW BOTTOM that is SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN THE PREVIOUS ONE, and also NEW HIGH POINTS that are SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN THE PREVIOUS ONE. Therefore, Bitcoin's new bottom will not be lower than the previous one. This is just a line for those who dream of "buying BTC at 10,000" so they don't build unnecessary expectations. Next. The supply loss percentage has already surpassed its local high, when it fell from 72,000 to 50,000, but this is far from enough for a reversal. Historically, this figure should reach 40% profit / 60% loss. You also need to add the % of lost coins, and then you get 2/3 of the market in losses and 1/3 (≈30%) in profit. BTC's MVRV Realized Price is $56,000 (the average real price at which the entire market bought its bitcoins). ETFs will begin to suffer losses below this price. This is the most crucial link, controlling over 20-25% of all coins. Right now, speculators are mostly losing money. Statistically, our all-time bottom is a 75-85% drawdown from the highs. Since the current high cycle of $126,000, that's around $30,000 = 1 BTC. **Summing up all the data above, a global bottom could form between $56,000 and $30,000, as it did in 2022 (25-15,000), where everyone will be losing money, and there will be full or partial capitulation and depression among retailers, miners, whales, inflators, and funds.**

moonlight1648

Anyone looking for 2$ per day CAPITAL INVESTMENT 20K ONE TIME INVESTMENT 100% GENUINE EVERYTHING IS TRANSPARENT

WarthogMental843

He also couldve done the same in 2021 when it went from 3k to 61k-because he didn’t he managed to hold while it was at 126k. Nobody has a crystal ball, and if you think this time is THE ONE then I suggest you check out https://bitcoindeaths.com

kartik_garg11

I love that you highlighted the SILVER call, Ivan is the only influencer that I follow who is great at calling both crypto and precious metals also WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THAT HE IS FUNNY AF HAHAHA? love the daily streams

Express-Potential485

if they guys was any good he would take ONE LOOK at the zec/btc pair chart and realize that… yes…. bitcoin is getting replaced by zcash. its inevitable

jup1t3rr

Might change it to dump lol, so many people watching themselves get rich because of my 10 mins of spam and NO ONE reaches out ahahhahah Incredible. I truly hope you all pull it out and am happy for the profit you make from this.

Cautious-Lecture-858

?? He has missed every crypto prediction since he started making them back in 2018. Give me ONE single prediction target date and target price he has ever gotten right. I dare you.

Specialist_Plate6870

There is only and will ever be only ONE Bitcoin!!! 👑

AInception

The block reward incentivizes miners to mine BTC. If the reward is $100 then miners are incentivized to spend up to $99.99 mining for a profit. Except the block reward becomes $50 next halving. So miners are incentivized to spend up to $49.99 mining for a profit. Then the block reward becomes $25 next halving. So miners are incentivized to spend up to $24.99 mining for a profit. In 20 years the block reward is just 1% as much as it is today. So if BTC isn't worth 100X approx $100 trillion dollars then the INCENTIVE to mine will decrease. Miners will never spend $200 for a $100 reward. So then the difficulty decreases. And it makes it easier and cheaper to mine. And Bitcoin's security decreases. If the reward is $100 and miners are spending $100 on mining then to 51% the network you'd have to spend $101 on mining with a malicious intent. If the reward is $1 and miners are spending $1 on mining then to 51% the network you'd have to spend $1.01 on mining with a malicious intent. Do you get the picture? The difficulty doesn't even matter. What matters is how profitable Bitcoin is to mine, and that number is exponentially racing toward $0 due to the halving algorithm. Enter your paycheck into a calculator and type /2 and = ..Then type /2 and = ten more times. Does that help you understand the problem??? Bitcoin never faced this problem before because block rewards from the TEMPORARY miner subsidy were massive and BTC the asset still had loads of room to grow. They are becoming a tiny fraction of what they were 8 years ago in the next 8 years, and basically nil in 8 years after. Bitcoin needs to become worth ONE QUADRILLION DOLLARS in 20 years to MAINTAIN today's security budget. Are you delusional? This is so far removed from when BTC was worth $1M as an asset and still had 800% moves up regularly. >And if you don’t believe me, just look at the hash rate chart. We’ve even dipped recently. But again, guess what…the line has started going back up. The whole chart is exponentially increasing. It’s basically a vertical line pointing upwards. I wonder why that is. And this is happening during a time where the block reward is only 3.125 BTC. If you can produce 1 hash for $1 and Bitcoin is secured with $100 then its hashrate is 100. Okay?? A new ASIC comes out that produces 10 hashes for $1 but Bitcoin is still secured with $100, but now it has a 1000 hashrate. THE ACTUAL SECURITY HAS NOT CHANGED. It still costs 51% of the total input cost to 51% the network. Miners are not incentivized to run an ASIC at 10% power just because their new one produces 10X the hashrate. They always run them at 100% up to the point they are not making profit anymore. That is their whole business and incentive. Technology is always getting better and cheaper. The hashrate is a completely abstract number and does not reflect real security at all. It is a vibe check if anything, without knowing everyone's input energy cost and ASIC models it's entirely meaningless. >the decrease in difficulty actually increases the chances of the remaining miners discovering blocks…more blocks found per unit of hashpower… The problem comes when governments or Central banks or pissed off miners decide it's more profitable to turn their unprofitable ASICs on attacking Bitcoin at a loss for the sole purpose of disruption. Suppose they just opened a $10B short and that is the profitable move for them. Then the difficulty increases the same time it's already not profitable to mine, pushing even more honest miners offline. The lower the honest miner's profit rate is, the cheaper it becomes for the malicious entity to run this form of attack. And reminder, every honest miner's profit is trending toward $0 over an algorithm they cannot control which is OPs point that you have so arrogantly missed. If BTCs price is $200K in a decade its security will have been cut by 75%. The problem is unavoidable. Bitcoin core devs are already saying 2 more halvings until security necessarily takes a nosedive. 2 more and it's POW-memecoin status with 144-block wait times to have some probabilistic finality. I strongly recommend you DYOR with a calculator and divide your paycheck in half five or ten times and then tell me if it's still enough to pay your electric bill.

piggleii

ONE to $0.001! Because it's the ONE! There can be only ONE!

Equivalent-Ad-495

Yoyr gonna get spammed with scammers claiming they can recover it for you. NO ONE CAN. Its gone unfortunately. Figure how they stole it, change all passwords and add 2fa do a virus scan.

ryencool

Right? These are just people delusionally hoping they can get back in a sub 10k prices, so the 5k they have can go up when it hits 100k, 200k Atthis point ba ks, cou tries, and investment firms are elbows deep in bitcoin. Were talking about what happens if it hits these level for ONE company, when a drop like this would SIGNIFICANTLY upset world order, even with the current low adoption rate. If Bitcoin dropped to 20k, bad things would be happening, and that wont be allowed. IMHO it wont hit 4 digits ever again, mich less low 5s. Chances are we maybe see 50? Anything lower is just wishful thinking from the seriously uninformed.

I__G

bad advice TRUST NO ONE

WormCastings

Trade daily, average about 8usd a month in fees. Could just buy ONE sub for 4.99 a month and remove fees, but I dislike subscriptions.

LincolnEchoFour

I love watching bitcoin tank. A bunch of co-workers were advising me to buy last year when it was at 100k ish. I said, nah, everyone has the fever. Just like before the big beautiful recession of 2008. Everyone saying buy buy buy a house. It’s a fever. And when you see someone driving around in a bitcoin lambo, that’s ONE dude. There can only be so many. But hey, if it floats your boat, go ahead and buy. I didn’t and of course I’m glad I didn’t.

Cccmyr

Ahhh did you bad mouth acting tough act comment get deleted? How sad. Maybe learn some manners first before you comment. And yes you were wrong. It dipped far below 70k. And you stated it would never gonna happen and all the dummies were delusional. So stop with the bullshit like you know everything and time will tell what’s going to happen. Because again, NO ONE KNOWS.

biba8163

There is only ONE certainty in crypto > *This is crypto and nobody knows shit about fuck* > I KNOW THESE FOR AS FACTS: **(June 2023)** > - Most people in crypto lost money in the 2017/2018 bullrun > - Most people in crypto lost money in the 2020/21 bullrun > - Most people in crypto will lose money again in the next bullrun https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/14erovi/daily_general_discussion_june_21_2023_gmt0/jowy8wz/

_LetMeOutOfThisVan

Strategy would be out of business if btc drops 90% lol. At this point, they have every intention to sell. If btc shot back up tomorrow you think they wouldn’t sell a big portion of their portfolio? It’s not just sailors money and this experiment is clearly not going work long term. Everyone already knew this besides him. You also can’t refinance a debt in the amount that they would be facing even if btc drops 40% more much less 90% lol. NO ONE would take on that debt obligation. Btc is a speculative asset that at this point, has no commercial value whatsoever. You think a bank would refinance that debt? No they wouldn’t because the risk is stupid high and strategy has no assets to back the debt in the first place if btc drops to that level.

whataloadofoldshit_

Dorian is the ONE

MimisCastle

The TVL of Hbars mainnet isnt even $70 Million (its $58 Million as of today), thats ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE for a token with a $4 Billion Mcap, it shows that NO ONE is using or developing on the mainnet. Tron has a TVL of $4 Billion for example. Hbar is rank #53 for total amount of $$ stored on a mainnet. Most people dont even realize there are 53 mainnets, hell I didnt till right now.

Ninjaboi91

Holy fuck its only been ONE YEAR!?!?

EscortRSBoom

I am 100% sure, NO ONE can predict the future. The 4 year cycle is well in flow here, yet NO ONE was talking about it before it happened.

jphillips8648

THOMAS NICE TO MEET YOU. I'm John and I love fig newtons. BUT HOW MANY NEWTONS HAVE I TOUCHED SINCE THIS MORNING!? not. a. single.cookie. I'm abiding to a strict diet because my SO said I'm too fat! SO YOURS TRULY CAN EXPECT ONE OF TWO THINGS. no newton's until I lose some hard earned pounds, and maybe some newtons if i sneak them very quietly without being noticed.

BetweenUsToHold

I would say, if you have any money to spend, even a little bit, buy some for her with your own money (if you are still believing in Bitcoin enough to buy for yourself anyway). Give it to her as a gift. Tell her you're not comfortable with her investing her own money, because it's a total risk and everything could crash (as it just has) Let her look at what her tiny bit of gift Bitcoin does over time and ask her to look into things herself and then decide for herself. You don't want to be responsible for her losing some big sum of money. If she wants you to help her buy more (after she has looked into things herself with her little bit of gift Bitcoin to refer to, as she checks on how it fluctuates up and down), then insist that it only be what she honestly is willing to lose, or you won't help her. Because even though you are her son and she obviously totally trusts you, tell her that NO ONE knows for sure what will happen including you. Good luck. I feel for you.

dmigowski

Also there is not ONE bitcoin rate, it varies slightly per exchange. Also the buy and sell rates differ of course.

Tommygun194

1,000% a scam. Use your head. Did she enter any contests? NO ONE just randomly wins large amounts of money for no reason. #bringbackcommonsense

InvoluntaryEraser

Except it's all a gamble because no one (see: NO ONE) knows where the price will be tomorrow. The only time I would ever panic sell would be if someone, with proof, admitted to be Satoshi himself and was like "Guess what I sold everything, bitcoin is over". Otherwise, there is always a chance that it will rise again and you could be selling at the very bottom.

Medical-Molasses615

You seem to lack comprehension. A lot of people are selling. ONE person + ONE person+ ONE person etc etc. Every time ONE person sells there is downward pressure. His sale absolutely did contribute to the overall fall.

Horror-Badger9314

Not true. 2020 we had 50% down in just one week and a 35% down in ONE day

owa00

Why only catch ONE knife?

AutoModerator

Post is by: Own_Maize_9864 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1qvf1g8/how_much_are_you_influenced_by_celebrity/ Back in 2022: It was a hard year for crypto, aka "**crypto winter**", with more than $280 billion in value wiped out in just ONE day. Daily Blast Live has discussed the responsibility of celebs: Matt Damon, Gwyneth Paltrow, Tom Brady, Reese Witherspoon, Serena Williams and others have endorsed cryptocurrencies and urged fans to invest their money and then fans lose their money and asked the question same as title. Nowadays, nations and central banks are recognized cryptocurrencies means of global financial inclusion and payment: From Trump's policies, banks offer crypto-related services, etc,. but we may face another challenging year aka crypto winter ahead. So, if you bought at top due to Trump's hyped, how much they influenced you? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

NeighborhoodSkater

yeah clearly you are a pillar of wisom and insight. off ONE comment, you have have seen thru my character! I must know nothing at all, and the one who has everything said, uuhh, nothing at all. strange

AutoModerator

Post is by: MountainTrader_CO and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1qu9x4e/a_guide_on_how_i_build_profitable_trading/ For context, I've been a full time trader since 2017. I wrote this up in google docs to help structure it better. I’ve gotten the question - How do you even create a strategy, where do you start? I’ve built 9 trading strategies that offer a circular style of trading to maximize opportunities and utilize strategies that thrive in different conditions so that they can support the weaknesses of each other. Once I decoded Technical Analysis I was able to create the strongest strategies I use to-date. Let’s dive in. Here’s what’s needed for creating a strategy: 1. Technical Analysis conditions 2. Backtesting 3. Risk style Let’s break each down… Technical Analysis breaks down into 4 categories/components. 1. Price Action - candlesticks, smc, volume analysis, tape reading 2. Pattern Identification - classical chart patterns, elliott wave, harmonics, etc 3. Leading Indicators - fibonacci, channels, pitchforks (tools that project targets forward) 4. Lagging Indicators - rsi, ema’s, bb’s, obv, macd, etc. The best strategies leverage one tool from each category as they compliment each other best when creating strategies. For example: smc + elliott wave + fibonacci + rsi There are effective strategies that leverage just one component For example: SMC (smart money concepts) aka naked chart trading. The noisiest and worst strategies double up on tools in the same categories because they create similar signals around the same info rather than complimentary. Example: RSI + MACD(if using both lagging aspects of them) or Fibonacci + Channels. **Pros and Cons to fewer vs more components being used to create a strategy:** \- Fewer is easier to keep your actions consistent as there are less variables to use. This is best for traders starting out because consistency is more important than accuracy. \- More produces better precision, win rate and better R trades. The downside is it's more difficult to keep your actions consistent because you look at more variables. This type of trading requires emotional self mastery because your mind gets good at using technical analysis to justify your emotions. (fear causing you to look at another indicator). **Where to start:** Since price action is the foundation to all TA it’s best to understand what’s happening on a naked chart between buyers and sellers. Understanding the market mechanics such as market vs limit orders and liquidity should be step one for new traders and using a simple, bare bones strategy that makes consistency easiest. I’ll drop a post on my profile breaking down a SMC strategy using just order blocks and reversal candlesticks that works. I’ll share all the data, etc, just follow so you get notified when I release it. **Technical Analysis vs Trading Strategy** Traders mix this up all the time, they start trading their analysis rather than their strategy. Let's decipher the difference. Technical analysis is the ability to determine the different paths the market can take to go up or down. You’re using tools to predict where prices will go. This is what you see the most on YouTube - traders giving the analysis opinions, but not overlaying a strategy (long/short tool on tradingview). A trading strategy has to satisfy 4 components. 1. Entry 2. Stop loss 3. Exits 4. Risk management. Specific TA(technical analysis) conditions must be met that then satisfy telling you where to place the first 3 components. Your SL(stop loss) determines your position size and starting out keeping risk the same for every trade produces better consistency. Analysis is much easier to do than trading because if you mess up/get wrong any of the trading components in trading you mess up the entire trade. You could have the direction(analysis) right, but lose money because the SL was too tight, missed an entry, missed an exit, overrisked, etc. Creating a strategy involves being curious and playful - you’re backtesting different variables(inputs) and how it impacts your results(outputs). Example, if I place my entry at the bottom of an order block vs the top of an order block how does it impact my results? You find this out through backtesting. Let’s talk backtesting: The purpose of backtesting is to test your strategy over a sample size - the key here is having a large enough sample size. It’s not good enough to look at just 30 trades or even 100, the more the better because financial markets operate in the law of large numbers. Law of large numbers simply states the more times you flip a coin the closer you get to its “true probability”. We know flipping a coin has a 50/50 probability, but you might get 65% heads and 35% tails over 100 trades(variance). How many times do you have to flip it to get to 50%? It’s more than you think. The answer is 1,000 would put you roughly between 48-50%, 10,000 flips would give you a .01% variation from 50% give or take. There is no magic number, just understand you need a shit ton of trades to tell you the “true probability of your system”. I’ve found that 380 trades is a sweet spot, but if you only have 100 trades to work off of that’s better than just 30. Because of this most traders deal with Variance in real time trading. Variance is how much you deviate from this “true probability”. Lets say your strategy has a 60% win rate, variance is the short term performance where you might have 40% win rate over the last 10 trades, and then 70% over the next 10 trades thereafter. Meeting somewhere closer to 60% over time the more trades you take. This is important to understand for your psychology, otherwise it’s easier to quit if you don’t understand it and go on a losing streak. Lastly, let’s talk RISK. Beginners should just keep a fixed risk amount per trade and test different fixed amounts(0.5% or 1%) Advanced Traders can dig into more complex risk styles that involve a deeper level of self mastery, such as Martingage, reverse-martingale and Kelly Criterion/Fractional Kelly. My preference here is Fractional Kelly, but the swings impact your psychology more than a fixed risk style. **Let’s put it all together.** How do we create a strategy? Beginners: 1. Choose ONE component of technical analysis to operate in (I recommend price action) 2. Be curious and playful by choosing FIXED conditions that satisfy the 4 components of a trade (entry, stoploss, take profits, risk). 3. Backtest this combination of conditions (the strategy) 4. Adjust one TA variable at a time and retest to see how it impacts the results. 5. Choose your risk style (fixed is recommended for beginners) Advanced Traders: Change 1 and 5. Rest stays the same as above. 1. Choose FOUR components of technical analysis to operate in 5. Choose your risk style (fractional kelly criterion is an option now) You can also look into Martingale and Reverse-Martingale risk concepts. The next post I’ll do is on the SMC strategy for beginners and unprofitable traders to use. Follow so you don’t miss it and check out my other posts to see if they’ve answered a question you have. Feel free to drop the question in the comments below and I’ll get around to doing a post on the answer.  *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

dosko1panda

That's just ONE of many reasons why crypto is a bad idea

Argyrus777

ONE! nothin wrong with me

j4_jjjj

Saylor bout to dilute....ONE MORE TIME!

Fit_Service8662

Silver dropped 30% in ONE DAY.

Week-Natural

I find it funny that you think anyone knows. NO ONE KNOWS. What you can get is people expressing their belief but that is as random as reading tea leaves. Probably best to ask from the Bitcoin critics, otherwise you get all the "to the moon energy" and you're not gonna make the right decision.

noviwu97

Some people never learn... how many of the "real & amazing tech" L1 from 2021 is practically a zombie now? People used to say the exact same thing to DOT, ATOM, XTZ, ADA, CRO, NEAR, FTM, ONE, etc

TheresNoSecondBest

Let me try mate although I still think you posted it as a satire. >It’s been like 15 years since Bitcoin launched and I still don’t understand what real, non-speculative problem crypto actually solved. There's your first mistake. You started the sentence about Bitcoin (the most decentralized monetary network in the world) and finished the sentence talking about crypto (a massive umbrella covering shitcoins, DeFi, NFTs, centralized exchanges, etc). >Every time I look into it, the use cases are: >• number go up That's not a use case, **number go up is just a fact**. The number isn't just the USD value it's the number of blocks, number of users, number of nodes, number of this sub subscribers, number of hashes per second, etc. >• “store of value” (except it crashes 60% every year) Bitcoin price never crashed 60℅ every year. It's usually over 60℅ down in ONE year out of four. >• “banking the unbanked” (except nobody actually uses it for daily payments) I do use Bitcoin for daily payments and I'm not even unbanked. Billions of people globally are unbanked. That's just a fact. Bitcoin is open to any of them. They don't have to use it, but they can if they wish. >• “decentralization” (except everything runs on a few centralized exchanges) Centralized exchanges AREN'T the Bitcoin network. >• NFTs (lol) Agreed, lol. Also, NOT the Bitcoin network. >• DeFi (which keeps collapsing in scams and exploits) Again, NOT the Bitcoin network. >• crime Crime is also NOT the Bitcoin network. Criminals can use Bitcoin. They also use cars, phones, cash, water, shoes, and the internet. Would you say the use case of a car or water is crime? Silly, isn't it. >• tax evasion Bitcoin being an open ledger makes it a really poor tool for tax evasion. Cash is much better for that. >• ransomware Very good tool for moving money from a stranger to another stranger. Some people would call it the perfect money. >• gambling with extra steps Why do you think people use extra steps? Because they are forbidden to use their own money in online casinos so they use something that actually works as permission less money. That's another example of perfect money. >And every actual mainstream use case people promised: >• faster payments r/TheLightingNetwork does that >• cheaper remittances Again, r/Thelightningnetwork. >• smart contracts replacing lawyers The LN is built on smart contracts. Also, r/RGB >• decentralized social media Nostr, bitchat. >• Web3 apps replacing Web2 Most of web3 is just scammers IMHO. >Either never happened or turned into worse versions of existing systems. Comparing apples and oranges, mate. If you're expecting nostr overtaking Instagram or reddit anytime soon, you're just naïve. >At this point it feels like crypto isn’t a technology anymore, it’s a speculative asset class with a tech aesthetic. Crypto is just a bunch of scammers, distinguish it from Bitcoin if you want to have a discussion about Bitcoin. >Like: >If you strip away: >• price charts >• hype cycles >• VCs >• influencers >• Telegram groups >• memes >• “we’re early” cope >What’s actually left? >A slow, expensive database that can’t be changed and burns electricity to agree on numbers. Money is just numbers. You don't have to have any. The life just gets much more difficult. >I’m not even anti-crypto. I am. >I just don’t get why people still act like mass adoption is “just around the corner” when every real-world attempt at using it keeps failing. I believe the adoption will keep going up. I don't think the mass adoption is just around the corner, though. >So what’s the actual killer app here? Magic internet money. Always has been. >Not future promises. >Not “in theory.” >Not “number go up.” >What concrete thing does crypto do better than existing systems today? Not crypto, Bitcoin. You already mentioned some use cases where Bitcoin is the preferred option like online gambling, banking the unbanked. Perhaps read the white paper, **Bitcoin is money nobody can duck with**. If you're happy with the existing systems, stick to them, **nobody is forcing you to use Bitcoin**.

jd999g

OK SO I KNOW NO ONE CAN AGREE ON IF THINGS ARE A SCAM OR NOT IN CRYPTO BUT I SWEAR I HAVE A GOOD ONE FOR YOU. I REALLY DO. influencer: George Platform: Cryptosrus George historically has not been a chiller. He had over a decade in the business, his youtube channel until his recent project was just giving crypto news and insite. And has a decent following while being respected in the crypto industry. Last September he has a family and got into playing clash Royale. He decided to start a meme coin(his first time making a coin) Its called $CLASH or georgeplaysclashroyal It went big fast, in the first 3 weeks got 6000 holders. And grew it by having Clash Royal Tournaments. Some decent amount of prizes, and spectator prizes. Prizes are given out in Sol to keep people from selling and running hurting the coins price. He refuses airdrop this helps protect the coins from random sell offs even though it helps the holder counts. He had prizes for the top holders. Also a trip to Vegas. They have a large treasure well almost 500k due to an nft sale. This stableizes the value when people sell. Only 1 billion coins. No one owns a majority top 10 holders at 27% Look at the movement as opposed to the rest of the market. Its always near the top. AND TODAY IT PUMPED!!!! NEWS---- A new stage of this coin starts Thursday morning today. They are introducing a project called Clash Picks. Its s prediction market like polymarket. It is easier to use and also the only one that one can use to try out for free. The entire Clash community is excited and we have hopes for a HUGE pump again today. George had an original goal of a 10m market cap that he broke in no time. He set his 2nd goal at a Billion. For the next upcoming months George is going to all the crypto conventions he can to demo the projects. He has a booth in some. I know haters will be haters, and people are going to say rug pull. But im convinced he will not do that. He will not ruin his 10 to 20 year career he's had in the industry for a project that was started the right way. I recommend people look into him. Watch his YouTube and his georgeplaysclashroyal YouTube and find all the links there. Have an ordinary day everyone!!

uses_irony_correctly

Give ONE example of someone losing ownership of a unique digital asset because a database was compromised.

Argyrus777

I missed the opportunity to receive double what I send. It was a ONE TIME OFFER

Low_Date1078

Buy at least ONE bitcoin while you can… just one, not 10k 🤦🏻‍♂️

SameWeekend13

Sadly Harmony ONE should have done the same and relaunched with a better project. But they went down with the ship.

SkW85

People and their predictions. Nothing more the opinions. Because? NO ONE KNOWS.

Ambitious-Detail-603

Same day Saudi Arabia open there stock market u know Invesco/ vanguard gonna buy up the thing ARAMCO THE ONE TO INVEST IN:TADAWUL: 2222. Price:25.24 SAR IN POUNDS:£4.42 4.42*100=£442

Ambitious-Detail-603

Same day Saudi Arabia open there stock market u know Invesco/ vanguard gonna buy up the thing ARAMCO THE ONE TO INVEST IN:TADAWUL: 2222.   Price:25.24 SAR IN POUNDS:£4.42  4.42*100=£442

International-Map278

The problem is... Government can make you quit owning it within a second. All they have to do is tax it once, tax for you to live, tax for you to sell, tax for you to rent, tax when you don't occupy, tax when you have more than 2 properties...as soon as they decide your land shouldn't be yours anymore, it is gone. I'd o believe that ONE property of your own should be a thing, but investing it for the long run...I guess we came a little late for this dance.

derbyfan1

You are essentially asking if anyone as a crystal ball. NO-ONE, with the exception of NO-ONE knows sh... about f... Leave price action alone and study fundamentals.

FckCombatPencil686

The odds of actually guessing a seed phrase are so astronomically huge, that the human mind can't fathom it. 1 in 12+ octillion. There are over 12 octillion possible combinations.  You have better odds of randomly selecting one specific grain of sand from a beach, then doing it again with every beach on Earth, then doing it again with Earth-sized planets made entirely of sand... about 50 times over. Or like if I asked you to pick a specific random star in the observable universe, then being you being right, then you guessing right 12 million more times in a row. A monkey randomly typing Shakespeare is more likely than this. Getting 38 people in a room where ALL of them share the same birthday (including year)... times a trillion. 38 Trillion people with the same birthday. If every atom in the observable universe (≈10^80 atoms) bought a lottery ticket, and only ONE ticket won, and you'd still have better odds than 1 in 12 octillion.

MoneyBreath5975

It's all an illusion. NO ONE holds for that long.

SameWeekend13

Case in point Harmony ONE, or might i say Harmony DONE.

2xfun

There’s only ONE TA that works flawlessly: 1) price action will explode if you sell ( specially if you sell everything) 2) price action will turn bearish when you sell ( massively if you buy a lot ) I have spoken.

fogmock

Nope, it's not ONE number.

DoingItForEli

I remember when I put so much money into Harmony ONE, totally convinced of its authenticity etc. I'll never forget the night I sold it all. It pumped back up a bit and I was finally in profit so I told myself to just go ahead and switch that all over to bitcoin, and if it turns out I'm right and the project takes off, I'll buy back in since I was in profit, no harm no foul. Well it TANKED. I wish I had offloaded LOTS of stuff that night, not just harmony one. Looking back at how much my portfolio was valued at IN BITCOIN at the time (but not in cash) I'm kicking myself. My port now would buy about half of the bitcoin I could have at that time, and the vast majority of it is bitcoin, almost 90% now. Everything else fizzled but btc is what took off. In terms of raw USD, I'm in profit, waay in profit in fact. But if I had just from the start bought and DCA'd bitcoin only, I'd probably have 3 bitcoin honestly. I've wasted so much opportunity, but in my mind it's not so painful since, I could technically pull out today and walk away with profit, even adjusted for inflation, all because there was still that little voice in my head that told me to buy as much bitcoin as I did years ago.

abigguynamedsugar

Total exaggeration, we didn’t have multiple spikes in that range, maybe ONE to 94k and right back down within hours

jwz9904

check out ONE

DoingItForEli

Think of what it means to be called dead too. Remember Harmony ONE? That's not going to be on this list, and yet it's deader than dog shit. Anyone with half a brain can see that. It was run into the ground. Their website is still up, they still pretend it's a legitimate project. So this number is likely VASTLY under reported.

steeveperry

Babe, you know you can collect SS—AN INSURANCE PROGRAM—without ever having to work, right? Like all the autistic kids you undoubtedly pump out—they’ll get SS because they’re so disabled by you and your wives funky genes. That’s just ONE major difference.

Todo_es

1. There is only ONE Bitcoin. 2. Bitcoin doesn't discriminate, it is for EVERYONE.

Expensive-Tea-4194

I'm invested in Bitcoin and I don't have faith in it. I see "zoom out"... Uhh yeah, it doesn't look that good when I zoom out. People \*do\* still mock Bitcoin. And if you invest all your money into Bitcoin, you are a fool. I have a mixed bag with investments. Always diversify. Truth is, Bitcoin may just not work out. It's obviously heavily manipulated. Why invest in Bitcoin when Bitcoin was at an all-time high, and all it took was ONE tweet from President Trump to completely crash Bitcoin? Remember that? It hasn't recovered from that. All it took was one tweet. It's very hard to put my faith into something so sensitive. If a tweet can crash Bitcoin, then I'm not convinced Bitcoin is a good investment. Just because it has been in the past doesn't mean it'll continue to be one.

pet2pet1993

When lead Monero developer Fluffypony had left Monero many years ago due to pressure by FBI-related authorities, Monero itself continued to advance, that show a robust decentralised nature of Monero community. Today Fluffypony is back with his brand new project Tari, closely related to Monero: they can be even merge-mined together. Unlike Monero, ZCash is a heavily centralised dictatorship authority with core developers driven strictly by a narrow group of venture investors. So you can see the severe price manipulation on ZCash and its listing on many centralised exchanges despite ZCash is declared “privacy coin”. IT IS NOT ONE.

CapableFix9201

All thanks to "Project 2026" .. All it took was ONE announcement that we were uniting against the feminists and the market took right off :)

Xajneb

Exactly, it was seen from miles away that this would hppen. Most early adopters were buying bitcoin because they believed it would become an integral part of global finance, the adoption theory. Where the saying, we are still early comes from. There was always a roadmap. It's now run by institutional money, but it doesn't mean it is run by ONE or a few big money players. It's now a massive pool of an ever growing number of big players and therefore it is the exact same thing as when it was only held and traded by retail small money. Small money could buy lots of btc back then, the same amount is now bought by institutions, it just scaled.

oak1337

Let's get our definitions correct first. **Decentralization has to do with equally distributed power.** Power is decentralized or centralized. Distributed or concentrated. **Permissioning is about who can participate in validation.** Though to be clear, on Hedera they are more technically "consensus nodes", not "validator nodes". This is because the full group of Hedera nodes comes to leaderless consensus and participates in every transaction equally **(decentralization of power)**. This makes your "voting" analogy above even funnier. Every node has equal weight in the virtual voting of the hashgraph. This is not the case on Ethereum. Ethereum uses a Block Leader, where ONE person **(centralization of power)** is the "king" of that block that validates the transactions in whatever order they choose. Because there is a leader, they can see your transaction in the mempool and intentionally put their own transaction in front of yours (Frontrunning/MEV). This steals billions of dollars from regular users every year. Why would I want a system where the a couple wealthy leaders are allowed to rob me in broad daylight? I’d rather have a system where the math makes it physically impossible for anyone to cut in line. No one can reorder transactions. Fair. You say "anyone can validate the network", but that's not really true is it? It's a different kind of barrier to entry. An economic one. At current prices of ETH and hardware, it's well over $100k if someone just wanted to "join validation" and participate. For 99.9% of the world's population, $100k+ is not "accessible." So it is also a gated community, like Hedera, but a different kind. Hedera's council members are known and accountable corporations, but Ethereum's validators are a "landed group " of anonymous early adopters and whales. Maybe you're right, "anyone can join", **but only a few matter.** You brushed it off rather easily before, but Ethereum’s Nakamoto Coefficient is currently 2. This means that if Lido and Coinbase (the two largest staking entities) colluded, they could control the chain. TWO players. **Centralized power, even though it's permissionless.** **That kind of "decentralization" is purely psychological.** This means after your $100k investment, running a node with 32 ETH in a sea of millions of validators gives you something like 0.00001% of the power (refer above to your voting analogy - this is the same thing as having zero vote). It is "decentralization theater." It makes the user feel like a participant, but they have zero actual influence over consensus or the King Block Leader. So the question is, are you going to spend $100k+ just so you can "verify the chain yourself"? Cause that's all it's good for. And while we're talking about it, you don't need to be a consensus node on Hedera to "verify the chain". Anyone can run a Mirror Node. You don't need permission from the Council. A Mirror Node receives the state of the ledger and allows you to verify that every transaction is legitimate and that the math adds up. You don't need to write to the ledger (Validate) to audit the ledger (Verify). You can prove the Council is being honest without being on the Council. That said though, Hedera is midway though implementing Block Nodes, Block Streams, and Dynamic Address Book. All will be done in 2026. These are all the precursors for permissionless, it's listed next on the "Hedera roadmap". Hedera adds nodes/shards as TPS capacity is needed. When the 10k+ TPS throttle is reaching it's limit, it's time to add more. Add scale, add nodes. It's inevitable if Hedera needs to scale. So the only "maybe" at this point is how much TPS Hedera can capture. Then a permissionless shard can be created and there will be no more FUD left on Hedera. To use your voting analogy one last time: Ethereum is like a country where "anyone can vote", but it costs a $100,000 poll tax to enter the booth, and two giant corporations own 51% of the total ballots anyway. Hedera is currently a constitutional republic where the 39 'governors' are public, rivals to one another, and physically unable to cheat the count because of the math. I’ll take the one where the math prevents the theft every time.

No_Knee3385

1. Don't take advice from us random on any social media platform, esp reddit 2. Don't accept DMs, they are ALWAYS scammers (you likely got a few) 3. Start off buying Bitcoin and Ethereum on Coinbase or an exchange available to you that is vetted and trusted for many years 4. Slowly learn about how to go onchain and if you do, start with a small amount 5. NEVER share your private keys or phrases, with NO ONE, even if you get a call or email from some wallet or exchange you use.

nugymmer

You cannot base alt season on the movements of ONE token. What bullshit is this?

mreJ

That seems like a lot of BTC for a short time to be in ONE address. Is this accurate?

MaximumStudent1839

> how do y'all monitor which ones to buy? This market is run by bipolar funds/whales. In most categories, there is hardly any consistency in what gets pumped, other than some PnD group decided to corner the supply of one token and then decide to push the narrative of that one coin. I vividly remember all the "loud" VCs and funds telling everyone to buy tokens by the "DCF (discounted cash flow)" model. They were obnoxious and retarded in their arguments, telling everyone that L1 tokens with 100X revenue multiples are all going to zero. Guess what they are now doing? They are shilling everyone to pump a launchpad token with a revenue multiple north of 100X. Yep, they just decided today the "DCF" meta doesn't matter anymore, it is all narrative trade again. Why? They have cornered the token supply to pump it on a low-volume push. They tell us, privacy is NUMBA ONE. They pump a dead coin for multiple years because they cornered the supply instead of pumping the OG Monero.

BacchusAndHamsa

You are funny using plural. So let's see, ONE case in NYC where the victim DIDN'T give his password and escaped. So, total BTC value stolen in USA, $0.00 You get a story wrong and then imagine multiple instances happened. Such ignorance indeed.

vatai

And I'm sorry, but you're also VERY wrong on this: \> the higher your chances of guessing the correct string, yes. This helps secure the network against attacks. This = having a higher chance of guessing = having more compute IN ONE PLACE actually makes it less secure, i.e. if you'd control a mine which has the compute capacity larger than the rest of the compute on the network, you'd have full control of everything that happens on the blockchain, which is the exact opposite of secure. Security comes from btc being distributed (among independent parties) and verification being O(1) compared to the (super?)-exponential cost of finding a valid hash.

fistfucker07

Yeah. Sorry for making YOU be ACCURATE. Because NO ONE GIVES A SHIT that the tokens are coming out of escrow. That’s literally the point. If ripple held them all, you’d complain they hold them all. If they sold them all, You’d complain they sold them all too fast. If they let the entire market know exactly what they’re doing, SOMEHOW they have still done the wrong thing in your eyes. Tell me you’re an uneducated paid bot without telling me you’re a bot.

fistfucker07

They sell an average of 300,000 tokens per month. With advanced notice. And preprogrammed release dates. Literally NO ONE is shocked at these monthly unlocks except bots. Every single actual HUMAN BEING realizes that XRP is a product. And RIPPLE is a company. And their fucking responsibility to their shareholders is to sell XRP. ONLY A PAID ATTACKER WOULD BE ABLE TO IGNORE REALITY HERE.

Elemental_Breakdown

I bought ONE share of Ibit, worst investment ever. I keep a little bit of btc, but not enough to warrant the cold storage which I have yet to figure out how to make it truly cold using a cell - Trezor) but you underestimate the laziness and/or stupidity of the humans. Public vs private keys, figuring out how not to overpay using maker and limit orders, staying scam free, again you are preaching to the choir but it's a helkuva lot easier for people to go buy a shiny piece of metal, wait a couple of years, and simply bring it to a dealer to double your money and feel like you made money. I know there's a lot more to be made in the same time and with zero hassle just by using kraken to buy low and sell high and have it dropped right in your bank but again, you underestimate the laziness and stupidity of a lot of people.

ironbit1

Harmony ONE. No recovery after the bridge hack. Oh, what about LUNA?

SafeMoonJeff

Harmony (ONE)

PlaneCat3427

Woah. I'm sorry for the way it's gone for you man. If it helps you feel better, I'm down about $24k from trading futures. Though I am not in debt.. This is something you learn slowly with tiny tiny trades if necessary, paper trading (alternatively), or with funny-money/disposable income. Not something you should allow to send you into debt, not something you should take loans for or borrow money for. The best thing you can do for yourself is to buy bitcoin or eth when it's really low - REALLY low - like it's been declining for 2 years kind of pricing. The bottom. And then have the patience to sell when the price is too good to pass up (don't "hope" for better, take the profit). Then wait and buy in 2 years after that when it's declined again. Rinse and repeat... That's what I did with TEL and XRP, and made good profit, which I unfortunately blew all of that profit on trading Futures in ONE NEWBIE MONTH. 💀 The emotions of seeing +$1k unPNL turn into -$6k on a reversal and swearing it would reverse-again really fucking gutted me. Revenge trades. I wish I never traded it right now too. But one day I'll figure it out even if I have to bank my paychecks and only trade $5 positions until I learn.

dlcx99

WTC, Luna, ONE, MATIC, DOT.. feels like anything I touch dies. Sorry

Darkpriest667

Gold is the same way and I have been saying this for decades, it's ONE reason I am a believer in BTC. you have to actually possess it with your keys and address proof or you can't say it exists. With Silver and Gold you can just own paper and "say" you have it. No you don't. I also have physical silver and gold in my safe.

biba8163

> DAOs are mostly a failure. DAOs are centralized governance bullshit scams with the facade of decentralization. This was obvious years ago but Crypto Bros are always slow to recognize scams. Some of my comments for well known DAOs from 3 years ago and 5 years ago show how these centralized bullshit scam people with the notion that they are decentralized when in reality when a handful of people or in these cases ONE person controls the whole DAO. MakerDAO: > One man, Rune Christensen controls the system, interest, fees, voting, etc. There are ELEVEN addresses that accounted for 98% of the voting for the protocol change for an "executive vote" used USDC. Eleven addresses control the entire protocol and a protocol change was voted in just...what 24 hrs? And most of those addresses are probably owned by a handful of people. On what planet is that decentralized? https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/fl68d4/crypto_collateralized_stable_coins_have_proven/fkxc40i/ Aragon: > AGP42 : Put differently: aside from one whale, AGP42 passes. The Aragon community overall voted for AGP42, but it was rejected with 69% of the vote because of one whale. > AGP37: 82% in favor of AGP37. 453k to 99k. But then the whale voted. So despite 83% of addresses voting in favor of AGP37, on the surface it appears to be a large defeat where 66% vote against. > AGP-35:: Here’s another case in point: Edgeware Lockdrop Proposal for Aragon..The 792k whale voted for this. Deduct the whale’s votes and you get 338k. Which means that this proposal was losing by about 15% at ~43% versus ~57% pre-whale. Then the vote went from losing decisively to winning by a massive landslide. So aside from the whale, the Aragon community voted against Edgeware lock drop participation https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/16qpy14/comment/k1zmjv5/

thinkingperson

30+ indicators. All we need is ONE that actually works. Lol

420B00tyWizard69

When my wife and I first started dating (like six years ago), we watched this random YouTube video together about a guy who makes mugs by hand. She got weirdly attached to one specific cup. Kept replaying it, talking about how much she loved it, the shape, the glaze, all of it. So when I was picking out one of our first gifts, I hunted the guy down and bought her that exact mug. Thought it was thoughtful, sentimental, whole nine yards. She loved it when I gave it to her. And then it disappeared off the face of the earth. For SIX YEARS I never saw her use it. Never saw it in the cupboard. Never saw it during moves, clean outs, nothing. I assumed it broke at some point and she just didn’t tell me because it was sentimental. Fast forward to this morning. Christmas. She hands me a gift. I open it. It’s the same mug. Not a similar mug. Not a replacement. THE SAME ONE. Apparently it’s been hiding untouched for six years, only to be regifted back to the guy who originally bought it.

STRATEGY510

Again, show me ONE SINGLE CITATION of someone getting dinged by the IRS for this with crypto.

Visual_Building_1666

I had about 50 grand in my Roth IRAs to buy about 14 coins worth at 3500. But I needed a way to safely store them, that would be easy, and keep them growing in my Roth. I had real conviction that it would soon recover and get even past 20,000. I asked a friendly acquaintance who was a computer programmer to look into it for me, and said I would even pay him for his time to find me a solution. After 2 weeks, he basically gave up saying he doesn't know how to do it or if it can even be done. So, I gave up too. It wasn't until it climbed all the way back to 20 grand, that I looked into it again...and found GBTC/Greyscale. Literally putting ONE LETTER, the letter G before BTC/bitcoin was all I needed to do! Getting in at 3 and getting in at 20 is A LOT different! I'm not complaining...my friends and family STILL aren't in...but 20 to 120 is 6x my money, while 3 to 120 is 40x!!

FirstDavid

From a personal involvement point of view, look at someone like Saylor who used to say BTC was trash and now is an evangelist? What changed? Was he dumb before and suddenly smartened up? Or did he open a company that did ONE thing and so he does that thing. If BTC drops to zero, you think he personally goes bankrupt? Is homeless? Hardly. He'll just pivot. This is why calling it "smart" for a company to choose a simple strategy (buy ETH) and just do it is a misunderstanding. This isn't retail jumping in or even sovereign wealth funds managed by advisors making a strategic decision for their thousands of clients. I think it's just a company taking a bet on ETH. If it fails, the actual C-suite execs will be JUST fine.

Educational-Truth942

if you stacked since 5 years ago, you should be in pretty good financial shape when BTC was only at around $19-20k. i own multiple properties but do not enocourage you to do the same. What's the point when you can just stack sats!? then call your landlord to fix anything wrong. and car(s), is overrated, just buy something decent and functional, life is too short to spend your time to worry about a piece of metal that takes you to places. no ONE really cares about the car you drive when you are just a WORKER WORKING a slave job for someone else for a biweekly paycheck. if you still have extra cash, spend it on life experiences and share it with someone who is special to you!

WVBitcoinBoy

This question sadly misses the point of Bitcoin. I honestly don't think the point will ever be grasped seeing how this has gone over several halving periods. I think it was up to the cyberpunks and libertarians whom started the Bitcoin movement. All the normies-turned-"bitcoiners" entering now only to play the game of profits could actually be the ONE chink in Bitcoin's armor. It's only as good as humans allow it to be at the end of the day. If we don't believe in it as FREEDOM MONEY... it won't be. It will be an investment that banks, corporations and governments can run up and make "shit the bed" anytime they please and even control us like a CBDC via the KYC database. I'm very sad as class of 2010 to see the state that Bitcoin is in. Politics, banks, corporations swiping up the majority of it before the majority of HUMANS figured it out. Wait until AI agents get in on the game. When that happens, the corporations, governments and banks are going to look like chump change in the Bitcoin economy. AI will gobble up HUGEEEEE sums of Bitcoin to operate autonomously with each other. Anyway. Just airing out my grievances into the void reminiscing on the bittersweet beginnings of Bitcoin, what Satoshi engraved in the Genesis Block and how we were all excited that we had REAL money that creates a NEW system, not helped the old on hold on longer to torture all of the sheeple and milk them for every last thing they have. The prices of things are in such sorry shape right now. Ounces of gold costing $4,000 pieces of paper for an OUNCE. CLEARLY THE MONEY DIED A WHILE AGO. :|

Easik

Are you a bot or something? The fed is not raising rates and even confirmed during Q&A that NO ONE on the fed is expecting to raise rates in 2026 or 2027.

Ham_Coward

You can thank ONE PERSON for this.

AutoModerator

Post is by: SeaworthinessWeak862 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1pgjbno/next_week_could_be_one_of_the_most_explosive/ NEXT WEEK COULD BE ONE OF THE MOST EXPLOSIVE WEEKS IN CRYPTO HISTORY Market sentiment is accelerating, liquidity models are shifting upward, and multiple macroeconomic triggers are converging at the same time. When this level of alignment occurs, markets often enter major expansion phases. Here is what is coming — and why it is critical for the next crypto cycle: --- MONDAY — POTENTIAL QE SIGNALS Early economic indicators point toward the possibility of renewed Quantitative Easing. If confirmed, this would inject large-scale liquidity into the financial system. Crypto historically responds faster and stronger than traditional markets when liquidity increases, making this a major early-week catalyst. --- TUESDAY — POWELL’S SPEECH Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will deliver guidance that may set the tone for global markets. Any suggestion of stabilizing inflation, easing financial pressures, or improving economic momentum can immediately shift investor appetite toward high-growth assets, including crypto. His tone alone has moved markets in previous cycles. --- WEDNESDAY — FOMC RATE CUT DECISION This is the defining event of the week. A rate cut signals cheaper borrowing, increased circulation of capital, and renewed risk-taking across financial markets. Historically, crypto has posted some of its strongest rallies following a confirmed rate cut. --- THURSDAY — EXPECTED LIQUIDITY EXPANSION OF $10–15 BILLION If liquidity injections meet projections, the market will receive substantial fresh capital. Crypto responds aggressively to sudden liquidity inflows, often front-running traditional markets by weeks. --- FRIDAY — ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE NEW FED PRESIDENT A leadership change may introduce a more flexible, market-friendly policy environment. This could reinforce long-term bullish sentiment and support the start of a new cycle. --- IMPLICATIONS FOR CRYPTO The alignment of rate cuts, liquidity expansion, softening policy, and macro stability is rare. Historically, similar weeks have marked the beginning of powerful bull markets. Market structure, tightening charts, and rising liquidity all indicate that the next expansion phase may begin imminently. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

eliploit

Actually seems a little cheaper than advanced. When I did my last $100 buy I got more from Coinbase simple with ONE than I would’ve with advanced.