ONE

Garland_Key

STOP. PUTTING. YOUR. WHOLE. BAG. IN. ONE. PLACE. This needs to become a standard in our community: Don't put more Bitcoin than you can stomach losing on a single device.

Zestyclose_Ad2462

Planes crash all the time. Do people stop flying? No. Why? Because the crash was caused by pilot error, mechanical fault, weather etc and NOT a flaw in flying itself. Crashes are studied and improvements/corrections are made. As a result, flying is safer today than it ever has been. Bitcoin did not fail. On the contrary, it succeeded. The price went UP and will keep doing so. Why? The network still works. Transactions still process. Institutional adoption continues to accelerate. I do agree having your life savings in ANY 1 place/investment is asking for it. But you can self-custody with other safeguards, leave some on a reputable exchange and invest the bulk in ETF's using various custodians. To indict an entire asset class just because ONE cold wallet company was negligent is.... wrong. But I won't stop you from sticking with "safe" investments. There are still people that write snail mail letters, vs email. The world has passed them by, they just don't realize it.

bfr_

Now show me similar research for the crypto hardwarw wallets. It doesn’t exist. Ledger has ONE connector library and it was already used to drain users by supply chain attacks. iPhones have been remarkably secure despite being attacked continuously and used by tens of millions of users. Also governments. This is what battle tested means. Also I’m talking avout *storing* your keys and i never even said you should use your online iPhone. I have zero interest in viral posts, i say this because of my proffession. Those devices are way more secure than the wallets made by random teams of 4 people. You are free to believe what you want. And Yes, i speak about iPhones which are secure because of the whole ecosyststem is controlled by Apple, a privilege Android does not have.

wannaplayspace

I want to call bullshit on something you said here: NO ONE types in the address manually. You copy and paste it. Every system is set up that way. Only a mad man would try to just type it out for the fun of it. Lets be real here.

zazzologrendsyiyve

I think the issue arises if you have received multiple transactions in the same address, and you have also spent some from the same address. So a good verification would be to check if your addresses have more than ONE deposit transaction. If they are all change addresses (generated during other transactions) then you should be fine (unless of course the multisign wallet configuration file has been stolen from you - because configuration file + 2 seeds = big problem).

BuyIllustrious4576

Coldcard, you had ONE job

Neat-Finger197

And keep “Trusted by Bitcoiners” in a tag line?! Lol, find me ONE bitcoiner who trusts this POS company now. They’re cooked.

AutoCockerPB

If the police never show up to arrest you, you never go to jail. Welcome to the clown show. This is what was warned before the election, this shit show. He has full control. Even if he doesn’t have full control of his brain or asshole, he CAN do what he wants bc NO ONE IN HIS ENTIRE LIFE has stopped him. This is just another grain of sand in the desert full of garbage he’s gotten away with. And at this point, he’s too far gone to ever understand punishment. Bro is pooping his paints and repeating words in the middle of speeches. Shits fucked.

locustsandhoney

WHY IN THE WORLD are they using the same address to receive the stolen Bitcoin? That’s literally the only way to prove it was stolen. Anyone could CLAIM their Bitcoin was stolen, but if it goes to some random address, there’s no way to know whether it’s an address they control themselves. But since the attacker is using ONE address for everything, they are making it a million times harder for themselves to actually utilize the stolen funds, since everyone will be tracking them, and they are also giving all victims clear proof that the theft was real. WHY WOULD A THEIF DO THIS? I genuinely don’t understand.

marshyr3d1and

Why the fuck can't we all just use stainless plates in multiple locations? Trust NO ONE!

MrMoo151515

My biggest gripe, is that some individuals are acting disgusted with coinkite (rightfully), and basically saying they fucked up the ONE thing they couldn’t fuck up and that’s proper entropy. Which yes, agreed. But then when it comes to themselves I haven’t even seen an apology after shilling for the company for years. They literally have an EDUCATIONAL channel teaching people the do’s and the do nots of wallets and how to self custody. This is some people’s life savings. If you have an educational channel for such important products about security and sovereignty it’s pretty important you don’t fuck up talking about the one thing that keeps them safe. It’s obviously not their fault and they aren’t to blame. But publicly apologizing to those you let down goes a long way. People put trust in your education and you sure as shjt sold people on the idea. The bare minimum needs to be an apology for those who lost there BTC.

Todo_es

This has nothing to to with Bitcoin, safe-custody or normal hard wallets vulnerabilities. This was all on ONE very shitty small company with a shitty CEO and a shitty dev that put a bug in their firmware (by mistake or intentionally) and NEVER, not even ONCE tested the firmware before publishing and implementing. Trezor and Ledger hard wallets are completely safe, impossible to hack if you keep your 24 words safe.

Todo_es

In ANY case, this was an incredibly stupid mistake by a shitty small company with a shitty CEO that should have NEVER been trusted: > So the assumption it woulda been found relies on the idea that end-to-end TESTING would be done. My question: WHY was that testing not being done the whole time?!? > > If your co. has ONE JOB, then where's the prioritization of quality testing? https://x.com/serumroth/status/2084347339737588107

Inevitable-Waltz-889

You live in a bubble.  Most people probably haven't heard about this.  I have friends that own bitcoin, in cold storage (thankfully not on a Coldcared) that had zero clue it was happening. If anything this is good for bitcoin as a whole because Coinkite was some dogmatic entity to a lot of "true" bitcoiners.  All the security LARPing about airgapped and battery powered was just a farce because they clearly didn't spend enough time getting the ONE thing that needed to happen correct: seed entropy.  And then had the audacity to trash other companies that were trying to make self custody more user friendly.

-_-0_0-_0

My wealth and treasures? If you want it, you can have it! Search for it! I left it all at that place! **THE ONE PIECE IS REAL**

RecoverOld9545

Why would you have a single point of failure? I don't mean to monday morning quarterback and pile on here but holding that much in ONE wallet is nuts to me.

Caspica

>It's not a self custody hack! Its ONE service/manufacturer who through its incompetence, added to malicious intent of other party, fucked over a lot of people. This is no different than a bank telling customers their money is safe in their vault and then get robbed like in the movies. The difference is that customers get their money back even if the bank was robbed. The CC victims won't. 

Sprunklefunzel

It's not a self custody hack! Its ONE service/manufacturer who through its incompetence, added to malicious intent of other party, fucked over a lot of people. This is no different than a bank telling customers their money is safe in their vault and then get robbed like in the movies. The concept of Self custody is as valid as ever and many other manufacturers are not affectedby this bug, but trust that open source code is better by default is now eroded quote a bit though. The whole thing is unfortunate and im truly sorry and saddened for those who lost property, but hope this serves as a lesson to other wallet makers.

RedKard76

TRUST NO ONE. Multi sig is all you need. Anything else means you don't understand.

Lavayo

Does MSTR have a risk apart from BTCs performance? Yes of course. But I don't trust Saylor but the whole company. It might not seem like it sometimes, but its not a one man show. According to communication and the release of current data like buys / sells its an uniquely transparent company. Your seem to just hate THE ONE GUY and ignore pretty much everything else.

00-SilverShot

I always thought airgapped wallets were pointless and stayed with Trezor because their source code is on Github. So glad I did. Thank you God! My Trezor is the older Model T. I’ve been wanting to upgrade for a while and now is a great time. I went ahead and bought a new Safe 5 (btc only) for better entropy than the Model T. Nothing is wrong with the Model T, but I’m not taking any chances after recent events. This also shows that YOU SHOULD NEVER PUT YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET. If you’re lucky enough to hold over 1 BTC, split it between a multiple hardware wallets from different manufacturers who have a better reputation (Trezor, Ledger). I also use BlueWallet on iPhone (open source). I keep some on the Strike app (custodial wallet, I trust Jack Mallers) and also hold FBTC in my Fidelity account.  Hardware wallets are for long term holds, soft wallets are for spending, and ETFs are for short/medium term holds where I take profit during bull markets. Never put more than 50% in one spot. I’m not saying this is for everyone, but it’s what I do. If one thing gets hacked, you still have at least half your coins still. Stay safe out there friends.

frugaleringenieur

It's awful, I understand how it happened and can relate but it's so incredibly wrong on so many levels for a security focused product that especially has THAT SINGLE ONE JOB to generate high entropy and safeguard that derived private key.

Serbithar

Find a tutorial; you need only ONE dice. 5 rolls for one world. Or 4 rolls + coin flip. Having 5 dices speeds things up, but it's not required. You note the results and read words from the table. Last step is to calculate the checksum. Preferred are CASINO GRADE dice(s).

LanguageStudyBuddy

its because stolen property can always go back to the owner, even if you werent the one who stole it and it changed hands 100 times since the initial theft. because everyone can see that these coins were stolen the moment they hit a service that does know your customer, the coins could be seized to be returned to the original owner. Therefore NO ONE would want knowingly buy or sell these coins unless they were involved in some illegality

Sleepycoiner

A financial crisis and a bank going under vs a crypto hack is absolutely night and day. Like wtf is this comparison? There havent been hundreds of thousands of people hacked for their crypto and ONE financial crash that led to banks closing. No one is hacking jp morgan and stealing your money dude

Todo_es

> compared to 12 words or 24 words That was NOT the issue. 24 words are 100% unhackable. The problem was a ONE bad company´s TERRIBLE security fail. This was an extremely rare event, an incredible stupid error from a very small and undersaffed company.

Full-Atmosphere-4818

Remember that all except ONE etf stores their Bitcoin at Coinbase. The one that does not is Fidelity. 

Abject-Stretch-1187

I don’t think you genuinely understood what you just wrote. Assets today denominated in fiat are over valued not just because people are assigning higher premiums to them but also because more fiat is chasing those same scarce goods hence why their value are exaggerated. If you don’t believe me, study the German mark or even the Zimbabwean dollars. Goods, assets, companies were valued in the trillions not because they were actually worth trillions but because they’re priced in shit fiat currencies.  When those with these overvalued assets actually wanted to sell them for better money, those asset fetched considerably less(this isn’t an indication that they aren’t valuable btw)  The onus is on you to show me ONE fiat currency that has survived for centuries, you can’t. But I can show you commodity-monies that have. Whether you like it or not, all Fiat inevitably fails, it’s not theoretical nor feelings, it’s a fact and if you’re struggling with this reality, it’s not my prerogative.  You can own productive businesses or sell valuable goods and services but you’re fighting against inflationary pressures that isn’t meant to be part of your economic calculation. This pressure alone can cause your business to collapse and if in the eventuality it doesn’t, you will be stupid to use another FIAT as your denominator going forward because the fate of your business will be the same(this is what will most likely cause the shift to a decentralized form of money) initially folks will switch to the dollar but that is just a placeholder as the dollar WILL fail as well.  Bitcoin has a better chance of replacing fiat than any other made-shift money like assets we have today simply because those assets weren’t designed to be monies is my point. 

Systemonly69

Initially mined BTC in 2015 and sold in 2016, then buyed Harmony ONE in 2020 and made a profit and then purchased LTC thinking it would go to $300.

DonTheHolder

Nancy Gutherie kidnapping. Iran straight of hormuz tolls. Oh wait.... 10,000 ;?bitcoin for 2 papa John's 🍕 pizzas. Worth $630,000,000 630m or $1,200,000,000 1.2bn ath ath Yeah. That. ONE.

Darkpriest667

The same thing.... that happens to every imitator... folks there is ONE cryptocurrency and it is bitcoin everything else is a SCAM or a cheap imitation. Even Ethereum.

marvinrabbit

Just as a heads up, this may not be the end of the story. (I'm sorry, I don't have any advice on gaining leverage at crypto.com.) One very common pathway that many of us use is to buy crypto at an exchange (like crypto.com, in your case) and transfer some or all of it off their platform. This is called 'self custody'. Locally, the *keys* to the crypto could be kept on a computer in what's called a 'software wallet' or 'warm wallet'. They could also be managed by an external device called a 'hardware wallet' or 'cold wallet'. Usually a hardware wallet will have a matching software program with it. Search installed apps on any computers for common management names; Trezor, Ledger, Swallow, Electrum, Exodus, MetaMask (browser based), Tangem, Rabby. This is not an exhaustive list. **Generally** a self custody wallet, software or hardware, will have a backup 'key' that allows access to all the assets, regardless of the wallet name. This key **usually** takes the form of a series of words that we call the 'seed phrase'. The seed phrase is most commonly 12, 20, or 24 words. (Depending on how they are stored, they may be shortened to only the first 4 letters each.) That can be on a paper, a metal plate, stamped or scribed on metal washers or tags. It could just be holes or divots on a metal plate. **IMPORTANT:** If you find something that you suspect may be a seed phrase list, **NEVER** make a digital record of it. Don't snap a picture with your phone, don't send it in email or text, don't even make a photocopy. Simple: If you do, all of it will disappear. Not maybe, definitely. Come back for more help. And as others have mentioned, ignore any DM requests. EVERY SINGLE ONE will be trying to scam you out of your money.

MediocreTax7927

Well you haven’t help me and decided what I wanted to hear yourself.. I literally asked for opinions not what I want to hear. Everyone wants it to go the highest possible it seems pretty obvious. I’ve rejected what exactly? I’ve asked questions and thanked everyone I replied to. It’s called a discussion. We don’t have to agree but we don’t need to be rude. Maybe just say you don’t know.. or that you don’t like questions like this, that’s fair. But to pretend you don’t look at the price of it and that makes you the ONE that understands it. Seems pretty ignorant to me.

Blake_a12

This is the absolute worst time to do that - and would most definitely make your uncle roll in his grave and dishonor him, respectfully (and I DO mean respectfully- that’s the point, don’t disrespect him & left you and what he did & worked to leave you) - you would be selling at the bottom in the most bear point of the bear market, in the literal ONE truly >!known!< cycle that is truly predictable on a near exact time schedule, than any asset in history - sell any time after this year, especially at least 2028, but 100% especially especially 2029 when the parabolic bull cycle returns post bitcoin-halvening, and that $80k will be at least double to triple - yes, that $80k will be at least $160k -$240k .. that is QUITE LITERALLY what is on the line with your decision .. and do you not only want to maximize this opportunity of your lifetime and gift of your lifetime, but honor him and his dedication and commitment and work to make this all possible for you- he didn’t quite get to live to see the part/reward being waited on that I just described to you over these next couple years for 2029, but now you do, and it’s quite literally all on you how you handle it and if you maturely & patiently & wisely seize this opportunity of all opportunities, or if you ‘squander it,’ not to sound like Eminem in Lose Yourself aka the biggest song of the 2000’s because of exactly biggest-opportunity-in-your-life situations like this one So sorry your uncle passed away - hopefully it was peaceful and had family loving him <3

FixedGearJunkie

It stings when you can look back and be like, "shoulda sold and bought back more for less etc". When it's the top NO ONE knows it's in fact the top. How would it feel if you sold at 120k only to watch it rocket to 190k? I had similar feelings a few cycles back. Now I just stack and ignore what could have been and try to stay focused on the future.

TexasBoyz-713

ONE to $1!!!

Erudyx

well it was more complex than this actually The private key on the discord server was ONE of the phantom account I was using, mainly for test or small transfer. The one I used was another phantom account, BUT I discovered afterward that ALL phantom account shares the same seed phrase, with no way of changing this when creating a new account.......... So, all my account were compromised, from an account I alsmost never use lol Anyway, do not do like me yeah lol

Puzzleheaded-War960

a ONE HUNDRED percent chance? a certainty? you absolutely cannot be serious

geteum

Yeah, sure buddy, where one dummy with 12 b ( less than 1% of the ONE TRILLION) can tank the market. Something tells me that there is no where near the volume and the money people says the market have.

Backrus

They can't coexist because no compliance team will allow random validators to handle big institutions business. Good example in smaller scale is ETH L2s which was and still is a disaster, but even here you got ONE clear winner (Arbitrum and HyperEVM). You have no idea how financial institutions and their world work.

CompetitiveDrawing89

You want to tell me ONE guy can move whole market? Where is decentralisation?

CompetitiveDrawing89

So decentralization means ONE guy can crash whole funny money market?

ClearSnakewood

Even if they upgraded it all to the flashiest, most secure, best security, whatever, practices… I DONT TRUST THESE FUCKING BANKS. Because they’re all PARASITES! The reason why I’m so hardcore Bitcoin is because NO ONE needs to give me permission to use it and I can verify where my money is. There is nothing like Bitcoin and all these Stonks and Wallstreet products are still under the grip of these parasites. And I’m going down with the ship if I have to. Bitcoin or bust! F these banks and F Wallstreet.

LibertyWithLiquidity

Legend. If you currently use a software wallet, that is okay, but make sure to purchase a hardware wallet soon (this is a large amount of Bitcoin). I recommend the BitBox02. Get the Nova if you want to use it with iOS, for Windows the regular BitBox02 is enough. Buy it directly from bitbox.swiss, not Amazon or another seller. Generate a fresh 12 word seed phrase with that hardware wallet, write down the words with a pencil (more durable than a pen) & store it in a safe location. Those 12 words are your Bitcoin essentially, NO ONE should ever get them, otherwise your Bitcoin WILL be gone in no time. Anyone who asks for those words is a scammer, no exceptions. Not the police, not tech support, no one. The hardware wallet itself is not critical, as it's secured by a PIN you choose when you set it up. After 10 unsuccessful attempts it will factory reset & wipe out the keys stored inside the wallet. So you can pretty much keep that thing in your desk drawer.

Ternerxdd

Good idea, real gap. But last \~100 tweets kills it, you're auditing recent tweets, not a track record, so a permabull scores 100% in a bull sample and 0% in chop, same account different month. APompliano at 0/100 on ONE call is a coin flip with a confident UI. and extracts predictions via scraping hides all the bias, who decides what's a falsifiable call or a hit? 256 calls is a tiny sample with a fuzzy layer. Open source the logic or it's just neat marketing

SituationBoth7745

Thank you for your detailed analysis. Yes I know most of the trades will use only 5-10 indicators concistantly , that is the reason i have added 60 indicators and 64 candlestic patterns so that almost every user can get the indicators they are looking for rather than having just 10-15 indicators. I have tried to make it as easy as possible so that even a non trader or non techincal person can build their statergies just by selecting from the drop downs , it uses IF/AND/OR condtions and user just need to select the indicators and conditions as per their need. i have also made sure that user is able to edit the indicators parameters as per their requirment. I agree with your concern about Multi-timeframe scans , But I’m happy to say that my screener fully supports simultaneous multi-timeframe checking within the exact same scan. For example, if your rule requires 1h RSI < 30 AND 4h EMA 20 > EMA 50 , the evaluation engine checks all of those exact conditions together in the same microsecond against the real-time data bundle. If even one of those timeframe conditions fails, the setup is rejected. "Background execution on Android is notoriously unreliable across devices." , I realised this after I built the app , when i was testing on Android studios Virtual devise it was working as expected , but the moment i installed it on my phone for testing it wasn't working at all, I spent almost a week trying to fix this and figure out why this is happening.Even after granting it bettery optimization permision it wasn't working . At the end I tried an alternate solution and instade of using background service I used Foreground service , which removed all ristriction and permission issues , the only permission i need is Notification permission. The cons of using foreground over background service is that you will get a persistent notification to stay in the user's status bar as long as the service is running. So instade of just showing that the service is active i made it so that it can show at what time we will be running the next scan. 2nd con is that it drains more battery compared to background services but I have tested it and since we are not running scans every second the load on battery is hardly noticable. This is how i Solved the Background servcie and permission issues. I got all the functions same as background services without the issues related to restrictions . Regarding your :question about "does alerting on technical conditions actually lead to profitable trades, or does it just generate more noise?" - My answer would be that it totally depends on the trader using the tool. The screener will only show the tokens meeting user's given condition. NO ONE can make concistant profit in crypto market by just relying on technical indicators , before taking a trade one must concider the market trend , any news about that token ,Liquidity etc. , technical conditions just helps a trader to find the best stuable tokens from a pools of 400-500 listed tokens in a exchange , after that a trader must concider other points as well before making a trade.

LibertyWithLiquidity

You basically said it though, conviction is the main issue, which is even worse imo. Because educating yourself is free nowadays. Instead of watching the world cup, they could watch a podcast episode, there is so much stuff out there now. Just skip ONE game & watch something that's beneficial for your family. And real wages have fallen dramatically, yes, but I guess it's not enough yet, people are still buying so much stupid sh#t, I am seeing it with my own eyes. And they're not earning crazy money - median wage. How can an adult look at the last 20 years & say: 'You know what? I'm going to save my time & energy in fiat, that's smart' Like what the actual f are these people thinking is going to happen in the NEXT 20 years? Or even better: people who don't save at all... you're financing a car for $80k, your working only for that car, which will LITERALLY destroy the finances of your entire bloodline, probably for generations, because you're also passing down this sick consumer mentality to your kids. Do these people even think for a SECOND about the consequences of their actions? I'm angry because my family was always like this too, I just happened to break the chain at a young age (thank God), otherwise I'd have ended up like almost everyone I know. It's not income, it's lifestyle, it's choices. And as long as this mentality doesn't change (it won't), we'll not even see the h of hyperbitcoinization. People are mindless consumers, slaves, it is what it is. And that is by design, the system needs it. Call it the matrix, call it whatever you want, no one wants to swallow the orange pill. They'd rather DIE.

Special-One1991

There's ZERO guarantee that bitcoin will reach 100k again, so please invest only what you can afford. The only known and proved fact of bitcoin is that NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE FUCK THEY ARE DOING!

WinterWind1310

WHY THE MAGICIAN'S RULE WORKS (reverse-engineered) THE RULE n = 1 + ( 19 XOR [keys of every card the number is ABSENT from] ) keys: D32=26, D16=22, D8=10, D4=36, D2=43, D1=63 LINK 1 - A number = its "absent-set" Each card has 32 holes. Turning a card 180 degrees swaps hole/solid everywhere. Stack all six and exactly one hole survives = the number's cell on the front. So a number is fully identified by WHICH cards have a hole at its cell (the cards it is ABSENT from). Six yes/no answers = 6 bits = 64 numbers. One-to-one. Check: 38 is a hole on all six -> absent-set = {all}. 20 is solid on all six -> absent-set = {}. LINK 2 - The front value is LINEAR in that set Write the absent-set as a 6-bit vector. The rule claims: (front value - 1) = 19 XOR (XOR of Dk for each absent card) i.e. front value - 1 is a fixed constant, XOR a fixed key per absent card. The "magic square" is not arbitrary - it is the output of a linear code. LINK 3 - Solve the constants by hand from the anchors Each (number, absent-set) gives one equation. Pick them to isolate unknowns: 20, absent {} -> value-1 = C -> C = 19 26, absent {8} -> 25 = 19 XOR D8 -> D8 = 10 8, absent {2,1} -> 7 = 19 XOR D2 XOR D1 -> D2 XOR D1 = 20 9, absent {4,1} -> 8 = 19 XOR D4 XOR D1 -> D4 XOR D1 = 27 38, absent {all} -> 37 = 19 XOR (all keys) -> rest XOR to 60 C and D8 come out immediately and uniquely. The other five keys are UNDER-determined (3 equations, 5 unknowns). -> Five anchors alone do NOT pin the full square. LINK 4 - The perfect-Franklin property closes the gap Requiring all 2x2 = 130 and all broken diagonals = 260, on top of the linear form, kills the leftover freedom and (with the 20-vs-26 placement decided by the square) forces the unique keys: D32=26, D16=22, D4=36, D2=43, D1=63 Logic: linearity gives the skeleton, Franklin-ness gives the flesh. LINK 5 - Why the two forms match Present-card form starts at 37 instead of 19. 37 = 19 XOR (all six keys), so XORing absent keys vs present keys differ only by that constant. Same functional, two doors. holes + 180-flip -> number = its absent-set (a 6-bit vector) -> front value is an affine GF(2) function of that vector -> anchors fix the constant + most keys, Franklin fixes the rest -> magician evaluates that functional in his head and adds 1. HOW & WHY XOR ======================== THE FIRST CLUE - the 180-degree flip Turning a card upside down sends cell (r,c) to (7-r, 7-c). For a 3-bit number, 7 - x = flip every bit of x = x XOR 111. So a 180 flip = XOR the cell address with 111111. XOR is already sitting inside the basic move. Flipping = toggling bits. THE SECOND CLUE - each card is one independent on/off choice Per card you either flip or you don't. That's six independent binary switches. When you combine independent on/off contributions and there are NO carries between positions, the math that does that is XOR (addition mod 2). Stacking the cards literally adds these toggles with no carry -> XOR. WHY NOT ORDINARY ADDITION (+)? The HOST uses + : 64 - (sum of flipped labels) gives a POSITION. But the magician needs the NUMBER, and number-vs-position is the Franklin square. We tried to fit the number as: - integer-linear in the 6 bits -> failed - a reorder/permutation of bits -> failed - affine over GF(2): constant XOR a key per set-bit -> fit ALL 64 So XOR wasn't assumed - it was the only operation that fit every cell. THE UNDERLYING REASON The whole device is six independent binary toggles with no interaction between them. The natural algebra for "combine independent on/off effects without carrying" is GF(2), whose addition IS XOR. The creator built the front square as the output of a GF(2) linear code (value - 1 = constant XOR sum-of-keys), which is exactly why XOR - not +, not multiply - reproduces the square perfectly. ONE LINE Flip = complement = XOR with all-ones; six independent flips = six XORs; and the number turned out to be a GF(2)-linear (XOR) code of those flips, which is the only operation that fit all 64 values.

BioFrosted

I'm unsure what you wanted to hear lol? How is *creating a coin that is not institutionalized, fully transparent but still quite anonymous, and somehow still safe enough to be trustworthy* not a project? Name ONE thing that matches this description pre-bitcoin?

bigbrainnowisdom

No one.. No ONE.. ever sugessted buy at 120k

LibertyWithLiquidity

Yeah, yeah, never ever. This comment pops up every time a critical level breaks & it's NEVER true. Price always comes back to that level eventually, except that ONE time when it's actually the bottom. Not helpful when these comments pop up every single time we cross a certain number.

adxmfeR

Solana is strong, focus on the economy and tariffs. Things go hand and hand. If you ask me I think $70 is a good chance to buy. Too many people have solana and are negative right now, it might go down; it might go past $300. That’s the game I’m no professional mind you, but I also feel like ONE share wouldn’t hurt 🫶🏽

AppleiOS1234

This is usual Bitcoin behavior. We are nearly mid halving cycle. This exact same behavior happened sooo many times by now and people still acting surprised. ONE Bitcoin above 30k$ is a win for bitcoin. Period. If anyone thought it will stay above 100k without ever going down again before next halving is delusional.

Personal-Ebb-4717

ONE problem with your theory. MSTR buying BC hasn't caused BC price to go higher in any meaning way since 2025. The only thing happening is MSTR become exit liquidity for the early BC whales and probably N korean hackers.

Additional_Ad_8131

KindI agree on the sentiment but your oremis in inherintly wrong. If an average person sees prices rising - noone, I repeat NO ONE will think of bitcoin. Even crypo bros only buy it for "gainz". There are multiple reasons why crypto is supposedly good, most of them are irrelevat to an average person, especially the inflation logic. It will never be widley adopted as a hedge against inflation. (at best case maybe like in 20 years). Show me a person why is running out of money or barely getting by an thiks "ah I should buy bitcoin". Doesn't exsist. I mean well there are these guys who leverage the house and buy bitcoin as a lotterie, but that's a different usecase, that also speaks against crypto.

Remarkable_Scheme888

Thats the beauty of this. NO ONE knows. We are just guessing. To me BTC is an obvious play for someone who can stomach the swings. But again to each their own. Obviously dont go all in because it may not work out but again - alot of these AI companies are going to correct. Just might be in 3,6 months or in 2-3 years. Best of luck

CompetitiveDrawing89

So you are bitching on banks but honor one, ONE guy who manipulates whole funny money market and holds 95% liqudity?

The_Minimum

You don't know what the word canonical means, do you? You don't understand how accounting works at the institutional level, do you? I don't think you even know what the Global Synchronizer is. Canton doesn't even need Chainlink. Canton only needs Chainlink for messaging and once that is fully integrated/launched then it is Canton who is going to be making a run at things like Swift. Like I said, you really don't grasp any of this and because you don't grasp any of this you keep conflating multiple concepts together. Canton isn't just another L1 chain, it was designed by people who actually understand finance and they worked with the institutions to create exactly what they wanted. Let me break this down in 5th grade language. The DTCC defines which record is legally authoritative. This has to be on a unified ledger, it cannot live on XRP and XLM and SOL and ETH or whatever else independently. XLM and XRP live on the edges, they provide the liquidity. The final reconciliation for settlement has to live on ONE UNIFIED LEDGER. That ledger is Canton. Until it gets to Canton, it's just an IOU or a promise. Link connects external data into Canton, then Canton's synchronizers produce the final, Canton-side settlement. That is why its called the "network of networks." So link doesn't sit on top of the pyramid, Canton does. Canton unifies everything into one official, compliant, legal accounting record. Like I said, you don't understand what is going on because you're thinking that this operates like some retail defi experiment. This is institutional level and institutional grade. These are not the same things. Once this clicks in your brain and everyone else's brain, people like me will have already frontran you while you're holding the bag of some other token that didn't actually capture value because you can't distinguish that utility =/= value capture.

CompetitiveDrawing89

You see one guy can destroy your funny money ONE guy

MediumLibrarian7100

Yep. And if people bothered to run what I have typed up here through an ai model of their choice it will in fact agree with all of the points I am making about liquidity changing and being different now. Look over ever reply to this post (and the one I made yesterday, you can see it on my profile) and you’ll see that NOT ONE single person that disagrees can explain why. No substance to anything they are saying. They just default to attacking me for literally just stating facts.

ScrapYard101

I just skip straight to the garage, only to find the realtor is an idiot and hasnt taken even ONE picture inside the garage.

314_999

you are surely fun at parties :) p.s. the ONE thing they all believe, is that they can dump it faster than we peasants!

Myntad_com

I usually ask curious people to spend ONE hour watching carefully selected Youtube videos to learn about Bitcoin. I'd say no more than 50% actually go ahead and do it

OverOnTheCreekSide

Reading my fucking reply you ass hat. ONE OPTION is right there. You’re so antsy to sound like an official and tell me I’m wrong you didn’t even really look at my comment. Read it in detail.

Btcyoda

There are several sites that keep track of companies buying Bitcoin. If you had looked at them during last 12 months you would have seen a start where every week 2 to 10 new companies where added to the list. That slowed down after a few months. When Bitcoin reached it last local high the number stayed pretty stable since that moment. And finally, there is basically ONE company that holds some 70% of all Bitcoins owned by all companies.... And that company refuses to release proof of actually having what they claim. So look up those numbers and realize what you are saying when you state "all the companies" since it is a rather limited number by most measurements. But if Strategy decides to sell all ~800,000 Bitcoin... it will cause a nice buying moment for us hodlers....

ComplexWrangler1346

I have never been in bitcoin . I want high returns …I got into ETH when it was 42 cents back in October of 2015 and sold when it hit 1400 In 2018……..it paid off my home , cars and put all 3 of my children through college ..I retired that year at the age of 45. I have never worked a day since and i have lived a great life off “alt coins” everyone’s story and how much they put in is different than the next person …..don’t ever assume alt coins are dead …they are dead once NO ONE invest in them anymore and there is zero volume …crypto is still in its infancy as a whole

BioFrosted

>But if you can at least reasonably predict cycles Your whole comment is built on this premise, which is utter bullshit. I know it is because of two things: 1. Thing one, which is overwhelmingly likely: you're tryna sound convincing while you have no idea what you're saying 2. Thing two, which is close to zero: you're actually able to predict the market, or cycles, or whatever your favorite word is for it. *But*, if you were actually able to beat the market - which you aren't - you wouldn't be telling us about it - which you are. I know it's tempting to believe you are that one lucky mackerel who can do it. Everyone wants to. But it's not possible. See for yourself: [https://canyoubeatthemarket.com/](https://canyoubeatthemarket.com/) DCA isn't blind, it's a safe strategy. Market goes up, market goes down, but most often it goes more up than down. So over time it cancels out. That's all there is. >it takes a global financial crisis to see a -30% to -50% deep correction when broad index ETF’s get hit this hard (COVID being a prime example). Show me ONE ETF worth its name that hasn't recovered from the Covid crisis. Just one. Any from Vanguard, for instance. A -50 correction today will be a microscopic drop in the chart in 30 years. And if you play the long game, like you're supposed to, and DCA, like you're supposed to, no correction will matter. Don't believe me? Grab the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the S&P500 chart and zoom out as much as the website allows you to. And now try to find Covid, or the cold war, or the 2008 crisis, or whatever your favorite financial crisis is. My bet is it'll be insignificant at best, but more likely invisible. Even if you didn't DCA, and bought in chunks right before each of these events, you'd still be up. Because the only way to beat the market is to play the long game. You can believe this, or you can argue it - either way, DCAing works.

No_Artichoke_5670

Okay, then. Name ONE example with the same gravity of the FTX or Mt. Gox collapse. You keep trying to make the same argument with zero evidence.

BIGZ_998

FIRST OF ALL CONGRATULATIONS 🎊 IF IT’S TRUE SECOND Ignored ALL the noise and keep DCA’ING DAILY AND THIRD THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE ☝️ OF ALL STOP TELLING PEOPLE ABOUT YOUR BTC KEEP YOUR FINANCES TO YOURSELF GOOD LUCK 🫡

Puzzleheaded-Eye1207

You GO BOY !! I think you ROCK 👍👍👍 B I t c o I 💯 You Will own A FLEET OF TRUCKS ONE DAY !! Lo

mrestiaux

You don’t know shit about fuck? NO ONE knows shit about fuck lol. Just stack and be humble.

mokahless

1. This is absolutely something everyone should do. There is also no reasonable reason to use 24 words over 12 so just use 12 for this purpose. The reason it's not talked about is because as soon as someone brings it up, this sub is all like "But brain injury" completely ignoring the fact that memorization is ONE backup method. 2. Your suggestions about memorizing are dumb. No one can permanently memorize something in 10 minutes. The real key to memorizing is practice, breaks and more practice. I memorized my seed in an hour, remembered it for 6 months, with repetition/practice every few days or week (whenever I randomly felt like it) then forgot it. I then re-memorized it after a 3 month break and haven't forgotten it in over 5 years. My occasional self-quizzes are random but probably a month or two apart. Additionally, humans tend to be able to remember things short-term better in sets no larger than 4, so breaking things apart is a solid thing to do. As for the whole story thing, I think everyone is different and needs to discover their own memorization methods rather than just copying what someone else on the internet has copy-pasted from someone else. The concept is solid but won't work for everyone, like me.

62DoubleCab

Tha answer to that is ONE DILLAR!

boomerangthrowaway

This right here. Just have ONE delayed payment show up for someone important and as they exit, what happens next?

klykerly

Nope. You missed it. BY ONE DAY.

Boge42

Most people will never get ONE Satoshi. They prefer dollars.

FYATWB

> Ah yes, now we get to the bottom of your post. In reality there is only a handful of sound PoW blockchains You know B Cash hash rate is 5.87 ExaHash and Bitcoin hash rate is 1141 ExaHash right? How "sound" is the security on that shitchain that Bitcoin's mining power is 20000% higher? You could hijack the entire Btrash chain with less than ONE PERCENT of Bitcoin mining power. Does that sound secure to you? There's a reason one uses BCH, you are a walking sunk cost fallacy if you still support it. At any point in the past 8 years you could have traded your shitcoin for real Bitcoin and you would be up on your investment. I'm sorry you got duped, I'm sorry you wasted your time and money, may god have mercy on you.

staywoakes1

Harmony ONE is an amazing project! Buy ONE and lets travel to the MOON WE GO AGAIN

TheresNoSecondBest

There's no ONE best wallet, mate. **Here's a few good choices:** [https://blockstream.com/app/](https://blockstream.com/app/) \- Top Security Features, Open Source and Non-Custodial [https://bluewallet.io](https://bluewallet.io/) \- excellent, easy to use wallet, Open Source and Non-Custodial [https://www.sparrowwallet.com](https://www.sparrowwallet.com) - top desktop wallet [https://electrum.org](https://electrum.org/) \- Solid choice, Open Source and Non-Custodial, one of the oldest and most trusted Bitcoin Wallets. I prefer the desktop version but it works on mobile too. **Lightning wallets** to consider (cheaper and faster transactions, great for small amounts): [https://phoenix.acinq.co/](https://phoenix.acinq.co/) \- Phoenix - very good wallet, uses Tor for extra privacy, easy for anyone new [https://blixtwallet.github.io/](https://blixtwallet.github.io/) \- Blixt - great UI, fast and clean. The app runs a full LND node on your phone and you have the ability to easily open channels to whatever nodes you like. [https://zeusln.com/](https://zeusln.com/) Zeus - impressive wallet with many features, can even generate Nostr keys [https://breez.technology](https://breez.technology/) \- Breez - excellent POS for small business owners as well as integrated Bitrefill Note: Breez does also a hybrid liquid/LN wallet called Misty Breez - the sats being on liquid means no need for channels although the payments take a few extra seconds. You'll also can get a free customable LN address. While talking about hybrid wallets, there's also Aqua Wallet although not IMHO as good as Misty Breez. There are also custodial LN wallet but I would honestly avoid using them because you have to trust the wallet operator not to steal your money. Their only advantage is that they are incredibly easy to use, although it might cost you big one day. To keep up to date with spending wallets, visit r/TheLightningNetwork at least once a while and perhaps r/RGB in the future. **Hardware Wallets** (to store larger amounts): [Trezor](https://trezor.io/) \- Easy to use, no matter how new in Bitcoin you're. If you can afford it, opt for Safe 7 (air-gapped) and use the Bitcoin only firmware as it's safer than a multi coin software. [ColdCard](https://coldcardwallet.com/) - air gapped, Bitcoin only, has advanced features but a new user will do fine with one of the great tutorials available. [BitBox02](https://bitbox.swiss/bitbox02/bitcoin-only/) - another great little device, opt for the more secure Bitcoin ONLY version (less coins = less code = less chance for a hidden bug or a backdoor). Sadly, this device is not air-gapped. [Jade](https://blockstream.com/jade) - air gapped, fully open source, Bitcoin only, great features. There's a newer version called Jade Plus, it has much better camera and overall is a better, although a bit more expensive, option. You can even [build it on your own](https://github.com/Blockstream/jade/), if you feel adventurous. [Seedsigner](https://github.com/SeedSigner/seedsigner) - another DIY, fully open source, air gapped, Bitcoin only hardware wallet, not for you if you're just starting up but something to consider later. [Krux wallet](https://selfcustody.github.io/krux/) - one more DIY hardware device, I love this one for many reasons. Similar to Seedsigner, it's fully open source, air gapped, Bitcoin only hardware wallet, that is not for you right now if you're just starting up, but something to consider at a later stage and/or to up the security of your bitcoin. There's also Ledger, but I wouldn't recommend it as it's not fully open source, keep and already leaked customers' details, recently said they're capable of sending customers' keys out just with a firmware update, making is an expensive hot wallet. The opposite of what you want from a cold wallet. **Stay away**, save yourself a headache in the future. The same goes for many other hardware wallets that are too new or filled with too much of unnecessary shitcoin code. Stay away. Whatever wallet you'll decide to buy, purchase DIRECTLY from the manufacturer, no eBay, no Amazon. Make sure the device is NOT preset, and you will generate your own seed words. Write them down on any piece of paper as well as the receiving address. Now wipe the wallet and generate a new wallet. If the seed words are different from the first set, you're safe to use it. Find an option to set a passphrase and use it. This will boost the security to another level. Never store the seed words and passphrase together. Use a different medium if possible. If somebody finds both, they'll be able to steal your coin. This little device will hold the keys to your money, that's the reason why you have to be a bit more careful. Also, no worries, if it breaks, you can replace it - as long as you keep your seed words and passphrase(s) safe. Welcome to the rabbit hole and don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions anytime during your Bitcoin journey. Also, [check the sidebar](https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/about) that's filled with lots of great info and if you have any questions, visit r/BitcoinBeginners or r/Bitcoin and look for the answers.

Chrysalis1111

this guy said this and this guy said that NO ONE predicted the price action we had today. Hell, no one predicted the dip from the 100s we had a year ago. So everyone was wrong.

SeannieG123

I AGREE 100% "Tbought plan" Saylors the perpetual bid on btc if he buys it'll continually go up. Saylor buys 22k btc, it goes down !! Saylor buys 0 ZERO btc for 1 ONE week and it makes a big jump up. Super weird 😕 but bullish AF

Expensive-Paint-9490

Legit is a big word in crypto. A little cautionary tale. I invested in Harmony (ONE) relatively soon. Great team, good aptitude. At a certain point a developer pointed that they used a piece of GPL-3 software that was incompatible with the MIT licence; without any drama, they changed the licence to GPL-3 in few hours. There was no real shilling about the coin and the dev worked and delivered. Their most ambitious project was the permissionless bridge for EVM. Then the bridge got hacked, the assets depegged, and the coin tanked. So, you can get a great pump from a scam, and a total dump from promising projects. Sadly so. However. I have heard about promising coins mainly on telegram.

Routine-Stress6442

Isn't the newspaper he is holding the same company that Satoshi was reading in that ONE pic ???

ktaktb

And there we have it Crypto does have ONE use People doing illegal shit I never needed to secretly do anything w my money because I am not a criminal

Freiverse

You have to admit that every thought you spout was drilled into your head by watching right wing propagandists (FOX, etc). Inflation was dramatically down by the end of Biden’s term, for example. His cabinet was stacked with competent people - name ONE worthwhile person in this entire administration. It isn’t just about the golfer-in-chief. Also: justify accepting a $400m jet as a gift from a foreign country. Trump is a grifter - and unashamedly so. That makes him uniquely susceptible to influence in his decision making. And those influences are most often and obviously foreign money like AIPAC. Comparing Trump’s first term to Biden’s and concluding you want more Trump… wow. Tariffs, war, market manipulation - get better info, you are in an echo chamber that makes your ignorance feel like power.

thursdaysocks

Have you said thank you, even ONE time??

TumbleweedSalt2504

So? Who tf cares? It's my ROI that ONLY MATTERS! Why is so hard to understand.  I don't buy stocks to fight for them, lol.  Idc what the price was 8 years ago. It's my entry price and ROI when I sell is THE ONE AND THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS as an investor.  These maxies are truly insane, lol. I mean if you gotta fight for Link to pay your bills, I guess I understand. But why marry to a crypto. It's an investment asset. I made lots money trading failing companies too. Just buy low n sell high. That's all, bud

Aromatic_Bed_8439

Yeah, right. Chuck Norris was a legitimate, six times undefeated, World middleweight, Karate champion. And, if your "friend's dad" actually DID fight Chuck Norris in a kick boxing tournament where he then "whooped Chucks ass", as you're claiming, then there would be film/video/photos of this. Prior to becoming a Pro martial arts fighter myself (including being amongst the very first to fight in NHB cage/octagon matches. And which later on became known as "MMA" and now has timed rounds and several rules all designed to make it safer for the fighters, less violent for tv and thus more palatable for the TV executives. Back in my day it wasn't unusual for us to have to fight in tournaments in which we might have to compete in 3 to 5.. or more..fights in a single day/night. And these tournaments often went on for 2 or more days straight and you'd be expected to keep on fighting so long as you were winning until there was only ONE man left still standing) I used to attend various martial arts tournaments and, even then, there were people... both amateur AND professional... Taking photos and filming/videoing the matches. And ESPECIALLY when you had guys like Chuck Norris attending/competing IN these matches the cameras were DEFINITELY on him. So, if you're going to make such seemingly outlandish claims, then you need to provide evidence to back it up. What's the name of your "friend's" father? We can start there and you wouldn't be giving anything away that's secret or needs to be kept secret. With just that name we could then easily research it via the internet. Now, if you're going to claim that you're no longer in contact WITH this "friend's of yours, and thus can't get his father's name, then just give us the YEAR this fight supposedly happened and we could STILL look up this fight. And, hey, you could also just give us the last name of your friend. With just a bit of snooping around on the internet, at least ONE of us ought to be able to track down this fight even with just his last name. So, what about it? Give us at least SOMETHING by which we might verify this claim.

mikeyaurelius

Your words: „Tell no one you have crypto…NO ONE.“ Ridiculous advice for someone that owns at least 170 million £ in BTC like the person in the article. Living in London no less.

djereezy

Tell no one you have crypto…NO ONE. If I had any I wouldn’t tell a soul.

AutoModerator

Post is by: sylsau and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://inbitcoinwetrust.substack.com/p/the-shadow-of-a-liquidity-shock-when **🚨 The Bitcoin math is officially breaking. 🚨** Since Jan 2025, the entire global network has mined roughly **197,500 BTC**. In that exact same timeframe, ONE company has bought over **314,600 BTC**. They aren't just buying the dip; they are devouring the global supply 1.6x faster than it can be created. 🌪️ **With OTC desks running dry and ETFs sucking up the rest, are we on the verge of the ultimate liquidity shock? 📉📈** Dive into the numbers and the wild financial engineering behind this historic supply squeeze. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Jout92

The ultimate goal of crypto is to create a different money system. And the ONE future money needs is trust and security. And nothing beats Bitcoin in that regard. Nothing can attack Bitcoin, no person can change Bitcoin, no person can manipulate it except by expending a lot of resources and the entire point of PoW is that those resources will be more than what you will ultimately get out of it so you might as well spend those resources to become a good actor in the system. Bitcoin has those features, Ethereum does not. Which does not mean Ethereum is useless. I view Ethereum as second layer solution to Bitcoin. But think: What happens to Ethereum if the Dev team decides to fork it? What happens if they introduce a controversial feature? What happens I the Dev team dies? It doesn't have the universal, impersonal quality of Bitcoin, at least not to the same extent

ElegantBarracuda4278

Sadly, no. I’ve never had a charge back for a scam and they’ll still do it. I had the same line of questions to increase my spend limit for ONE DAY when I needed to electronically transfer money to pay for a Reno. It sucks.

nugymmer

So what? It's Bitcoin. The reputation is the NUMBER ONE priority. You fuck with the protocol and lock old users out, and deprive them of their coins, then guess what will happen? BTC might become a dinosaur, dead and long forgotten.

PrettyOwl7768

This might be better framing people often say bitcoin is two things the protocol, then BTC the token; bitcoin the protocol runs atop the internet even if your ham that signal is going to end up in a tcp/ip packet more or less what happens if the internet becomes just a stream (udp) that can fix errors? at the same time the value side (BTC) is just built into the packet header. now say there is a magic way to have this new protocol being 'living' itself for a lack of better words. so the vast majority of things bitcoin needs to solve is easy as a central data base; and since its 'living' it doesn't change unless it wants to change, aka immutably. the data is shared between all users every where as cryptographic hash and is backed up millions of times over between every one; no one person has all data, data is spread out in an algo that always allows recreation; this combines nodes and miners into one; the security is PoW, you have to allocate a small part of your machine to keep the network alive not by random number guessing but by just relaying and caching messages; this all stored in memory, so you shut your device down all data is lost, turn it on new data is propagated. the internet was invented in early 1800 - aka the telegraph: it discovered how to transfer INFORMATION at great distances nearly instantaneously bitcoin was invented in 2008: it discovered how to transfer VALUE at great distances nearly instantaneously Now say these two things just become ONE thing That thing would have to be an "immaculate conception" moment... so the question is what is the design of that? lots of metaphor's i know... try explaining bitcoin to somebody who never heard of bitcoin

mrestiaux

Read this very carefully… NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA WHAT BITCOIN PRICE WILL DO IN THE GENERAL SHORT TERM!

staywoakes1

Trump is a fucking legend the SOB really pulled this off in ONE DAY

rieglerp

I agree with you there; you can certainly have several books and distribute them across different locations, but that gets expensive. However, I would use this method as just ONE additional backup option anyway—there should be others. How you store the notes is highly individual - but you can also follow the methods people use to store their entire seed phrase,like steel plates, ...

rieglerp

Relying solely on memory is, in my opinion, dangerous and not a good idea. But as with everything, it's an additional option. There isn't one perfect solution - and mine isn't meant to be - I think everyone should choose what suits them best from the range of possibilities. And "my" solution is just meant to show ONE more possibility.