BCH

EndSmugnorance

The fact this is still a discussion frustrates me. If BTC had adopted big blocks in 2017, we *would* actually see adoption with low transaction fees. But nooo we’re still debating whether Bitcoin can be used as a *currency* because greedy small-blockers won. 🙄 BCH should have been Bitcoin.

Bagmasterflash

Trade BCH with nearly any pair you would want to on bchbull.com. 100% on chain. 100% as anonymous as you want to be.

benditbackwards

Isn't this a really old debate?? Why should I care now?? Anyone want some BCH?? :)

ReliantToker

What happens to BCH when individuals can no longer afford to run nodes?

CryptCranker0808

> The inflation bug was found long before that unless you’re talking about something else? The original inflation bug (integer underflow) was July, 2010. The BTC inflation bug found by the BCH dev was found in 2018, first put in place by a 2016 code change.

Own_Condition_4686

BitCoin at Home (BCH)

CryptCranker0808

Don't forget the periods in 2009 where almost no blocks were produced for hours (the network was dependent on Satoshi), the six hour fork rollback in 2010, the time when Bitfury alone controlled more than 50% of the hash power, or the inflation bug present for two years in 2016 found by a BCH dev. Bitcoin has had issues like all coins.

EndSmugnorance

BCH is this easy (assuming the merchant accepts BCH) But BTC maxis still refuse to accept larger blocksize & 0-conf matters.

bpg2001bpg

>BCH is a better alternative in every way.  Temu Bitcoin?

wraithoffaith

My bet is on BCH, DOT and ADA. BCH is the safest bet tho and the other two are more risk more reward.

GentlemenHODL

>BCH is a better alternative in every way. It's still amazes me that all these years later you are still alive and breathing. How regarded you must be.

roctac

LN broken and doesn't work. On top of that L1 fees are stupid high and clogged up. BCH is a better alternative in every way.

DangerHighVoltage111

Some of this is developed on BCH some on otherchains. Nothing from your examples is done on BTC. Isn't that strange? The Trilemma isn't a fixed thing. The 1MB block of 2009 is the 100mb block of today. Which mean the trilemma, even if true, might not be met if adoption is not faster than technical advancements. Sorry for the butchered links but reddit is censoring dictator. Search for these to find the article. - @mtrycz/how-my-rpi4-handles-1m-tx-blocks-ad8c4c94 - @mtrycz/how-my-rpi4-handles-mining-1gb-blocks-e5d09d83 __Yet BTC does absolutely nothing to scale its base layer.__ In fact they are working on spamming it more, see the current debate. Isn't that strange... The trilemma, like LN were red herrings to allow them to cripple the base layer which also shifted the narrative away from p2p cash to NgU and subsequently stifled adoption a p2p cash. Imagine where we would be if BTC had allowed reasonable blocksize increase and this hadn't happened: https://i.imgur.com/Mua26Ic.jpeg Imagine if all that brain drain hadn't happend and BTC were allowed to continue adoption as p2p cash. You would be able to pay your games on steam with BTC for 8 years by now.

DangerHighVoltage111

Hard forks are freedom. You cannot get away from a captured chain without a hardfork. BCH hardforked multiple times since 2017 with little problems. The times it chainsplit was exactly when egomaniacs threatened to destroy the chain. Better split from that manipulating, abusing ex instead of sticking with them to keep the piece....

powerform1

Honestly, you've done a good job at trying to diversify. Nowadays though I think BTC only is the best strat. ETH as the #2 really hasn't seen a lot of growth in the long term if we're looking at previous performance. All other coins are gambles. Sell all and just put into BTC or if you'd like BCH 5 - 10%, even then you're probably still better off going 100% Bitcoin. The gov will soon be coming after your in Bitcoin so please just stack as much as you can. Also read the Bitcoin Standard, you will then understand how much your holdings will be worth in the long term. Hope this helps.

longonbtc

Roger Ver actually didn't go to prison. He entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department to resolve federal charges against him. He simply had to pay the IRS almost $50 million in back taxes, penalties, and interest and the case was closed. Other than that, you're correct. Some of the bcashers paid as much as 0.3 BTC for each single BCH after the chain split. The bcashers need to keep tricking more newbies into believing that BCH is the real Bitcoin and get them to buy their heavy BCH bags.

longonbtc

They wanted Bitcoin Cash to be Bitcoin and they wanted the ticker symbol for Bitcoin Cash to be BTC. That's why you'll often see them over there claiming that BCH is the real Bitcoin and BTC is the fork. But all they managed to get was the r/btc subreddit and that's only because Roger Ver purchased that subreddit from the person that created it. Then he filled it with his own moderators and that subreddit has been used to promote BCH and spread misinformation & propaganda about bitcoin ever since.

Fritzbox5000

Especially the second point is important. Fewer nodes means centralisation by few big companies who can afford to run such nodes. There is no plausible answer by big blockers to this problem so far imo. While BCH enthusiasts assume a conspiracy by small blockers to push bitcoin to layer 2 solutions with possible kyc threats, I think that the market just had more demand of BTC as SoV. It's still the better solution compared to big blocks with node/audit centralisation.

Thomas5020

r/btc is mostly a bitcoin cash subreddit. You \*can\* talk about whatever you want, but if you don't think BCH is the best thing since sliced bread you'll probably get downvoted.

Fritzbox5000

I'm undecided as well. I listened to both arguments and both seem plausible to a certain degree. If you increase the block size, transactions will get faster, but a node will increase in size as well. This increase will be so huge, according to BTC maximalists, that only large companies could afford to run such a big node, leading to centralisation. If you keep the block size, transactions become slow and you rely on L2 third party technologies like the Lightning Network to buy a coffee instantly, which also means centralisation. So Bitcoin itself becomes rather a store of value, the digital gold, rather than a P2P cash system. There are some upgrades like SegWit to improve transaction speed and still, it's a problem which cannot be solved without a second layer. I still tend to favour BTC over BCH since I don't see a big problem in using the Lightning Network similar to PayPal to do smaller transactions and use the main layer for bigger transactions. An increase of the block size and hence the reduction of verification nodes in the hands of big companies are a much bigger threat than the Lightning Network, because it would put the Proof of Work aspect in danger, at least imo. I don't think that an increase in Bitcoin above 21 million would ever happen. It is one of the flagship properties of Bitcoin and investors would immediately sell their Bitcoin if such news would even circulate. Yes, it is code which can be forked and in fact, BCH and BTV are actually hard forks, but the "original" BTC still exists, because the owners of BTC don't have any interest in such changes. It's still a difficult topic nonetheless.

Fritzbox5000

I watched a German Bitcoin video about the block size matter. The argument was that an increase of the block size would increase the size of a single node from 500gb to such an astronomical size that only big companies could run such a node, resulting in fewer nodes for verification and hence centralisation. On the other hand, longer transactions (like in the current state of Bitcoin) would make a third party like the Lightning Network necessary to make smaller payments like buying a coffee. A third party, however, violates the P2P character of Bitcoin envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto. As far as I know, BCH, BSV and the Lightning Network were all created around 2017, after the Block Size War, to tackle the problem of slow transactions. What is your opinion on the topic?

Slick424

The fundamental problem isn't the size of a block, but the fact that a hard fork is required to change it. The ultimate power of the hard fork and how it is governed is still an open question today. There is a great risk in opening that door without having it well guarded 1. Egomaniacs create their own forks and call it the true bitcoin, which happened right after the creation of BCH with BSV (Bitcoin "Satoshi Vision") 2. Powerful interest groups pushing for changes to benefit themselves. z.B.: Miners demanding the removal of the halving cycles.

uncapchad

yeah GPU mining with an ordinary laptop is very unlikely to be profitable. Take a look at GRIN, it does need it's own mining hardware (the iPollo G1 Mini is around $400) and GRIN's price is fairly constant. Other POWS such as XLM, BCH, DGB, LTC, DOGE you'd need more expensive mining equipment. Although very old coins they often make one or two significant moves in a bull-run so they're good to have in reserve

AutoModerator

Post is by: Bcom_Mod and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/bitcoin_com/comments/1s1a9jj/regulatory_clarity_just_dropped_btc_is_ranging_at/ Something worth thinking about after this week's SEC/CFTC guidance: one of the biggest reasons businesses have dragged their feet on accepting crypto payments isn't technical. It's legal uncertainty. If nobody could agree on whether the token you're accepting is a commodity or a security or something else entirely, why would a small business owner touch it? That excuse just got a lot weaker. With most tokens now officially outside securities classification and under cleaner CFTC oversight, the compliance conversation for merchants gets dramatically simpler. "We accept Bitcoin" no longer needs three paragraphs of legal caveats attached to it. The tools to actually do this have existed for a while too. The [Bitcoin.com Checkout app](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bitcoin.checkout) has been sitting on the Play Store letting merchants accept BTC, BCH, ETH and stablecoins directly at point of sale. No custodian, no middleman, settlements straight to your wallet. The tech side has never really been the bottleneck. The bottleneck has always been "what happens to us legally if we do this." That question got a cleaner answer this week than it's had in ten years. Broader merchant adoption has been "just around the corner" since 2014 so I'm not going to sit here and call it. But the combination of regulatory clarity, a maturing stablecoin infrastructure, and a global wartime moment that reminded everyone what borderless money actually does. If that doesn't move the needle, nothing will. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Illustrious-Boss9356

I actually own some BCH which I kept from the fork. As well as a tiny but of Cardano because I liked the idea of smart contracts on a UTXO-chain. But I'm eating shit on those pretty hard but it's ok because like 99% of my crypto is BTC.

bitcoincashautist

It doesn't! The contract system supports compact signatures until quantum day, migration to post-quantum later on, and signature aggregation. It can use smaller one-time signatures because BCH has L1 native tokens (since '23), so we can use account abstraction to have a pay-to-nft address, and owner can have a constant receiving address while still rotating his one-time keys on every spend: >While SLH‑DSA‑SHA2‑128s (SPHINCS+) signatures weigh in at 7,856 bytes, CashToken-based delegation and Bitcoin Cash's UTXO model allow Quantumroot to use LM-OTS signatures (RFC 8554) – improving quantum security, while also reducing signature sizes (2,180 bytes) and preventing on-chain privacy leaks. Since the fork, BCH has been busy upgrading, it now has L1 native tokens and Script VM to rival EVM, and adaptive blocksize limit algorithm.

Cryptizard

But it lowers the throughput of the network by 50x because of the increased signature sizes. The entire point of BCH forking from BTC was because they wanted a larger block size and more transactions per block. Moving to post-quantum signatures brings it back down to _fewer transactions per block than BTC_. So what is the point of BCH then?

bitcoincashautist

lol, BCH already has quantum resistance https://blog.bitjson.com/quantumroot/

onlyrelevantlyrics

95% of assets are not in crypto. The remaining 5% is 95% BTC. The remaining 5% is 95% ETH. The remaining 5% is 95% BCH. The remaining 5% is SOL and XRP. No other coin. Regular assets aren't structured like this as this was just a nonsense stacking method I decided on years ago.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Ok-Tumbleweed-2416 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rvnwac/crypto/ The BIP-110 debate looks like 2017 all over again, and the data already killed the proposal Bitcoin is back in a governance war. BIP-110 proposes a temporary soft-fork to limit arbitrary data on the blockchain. The stated goal is removing spam. The actual targets are Ordinals and Runes. Adam Back and Jameson Lopp are both publicly opposing it, arguing that once you show the world Bitcoin can be changed by pressuring a few entities, regulators will never stop trying. That is the real slippery slope, not block size. The technical case fell apart already. Developer Martin Habovstiak broadcasted a 66 KB image directly on-chain to prove the filter is trivially bypassed. You cannot stop data, you can only damage network integrity. We saw what happens when controversial consensus changes get forced through in 2017. BCH and BSV were the result. Splitting the community again at this stage of institutional adoption seems like the worst possible outcome. Do you think BIP-110 has any real chance of... *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Bitcoin Cash (BCH) community is organizing another BCH bank run on March 15, aiming to withdraw BCH from exchanges to on-chain wallets to expose naked shorting and liquidity risks. Additionally, 61 of 100 Layla NFTs have been sold as interest in the BLISS 2026 event grows. Paytaca has partnered with GBITS to integrate eLoad services into its app in the Philippines, and the beta release of Paytaca CLI offers programmable wallet access for automation and AI transactions. The BCH ecosystem continues to expand with events, partnerships, and technological advancements. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Galavanta

Have a look at alphasquared thats how I do PnL for btc, ETH, SOL ADA, DOT, BNB LINK... Just plug in deposits and it tracks everything with historical price DCA splits, sells, compounding. The key feature is it doesn’t just spit totals,it actually tells you market risk day by day so you know if your PnL is about to evaporate or not. Stops me from taking blind profits or just holding through dumb cycles. I dont really care about BCH or TRX but maybe some do. Ads would annoy me wouldn’t pay unless I could track everything portfolio-wide not just BTC. if it works like alphasquared risk + portfolio + history, people will use it. If it’s just wallet lookup and history math, most will stick to their own spreadsheets or what exchanges offer.

DangerHighVoltage111

It's the BCH logo. There is a clear difference.

DangerHighVoltage111

Look at the chart since 2021. While LTCs "silver to gold" strategy didn't play out, real p2p coins like BCH and XMR are gaining. The market looks like it has shinies everywhere but that's just divide and conquer tactics. There are only a handful of sound, scaling p2p cash blockchains out there.

Realistic_Fee_00001

FYI BCH is doing just fine even in the FIAT department. Believe it or not, not everyone bought during the short timeframe of the forkwar. If the sound money revolution succeeds BCH early adopter will gain freedom and enough riches to never worry again. BTC/ FIAT maxis however will always have to worry if an exchange will not freeze their coins when they want to sell. 🤷‍♂️ >And where's your revolution? Well, you have to look at BCH for that :) > Nobody cares about BCH Ah, good old projection :)

baIIern

The new narrative just dropped. BCH isn't about becoming FIAT rich /s What's the point of holding X coins if you can't buy much with them? A loss is a loss. Unfortunately, economic value is measured in fiat currency.

baIIern

Why does a BCH propaganda paper show BTC in its thumbnail

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet highlights key updates in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem. Layla NFTs are selling fast with 59 of 100 sold ahead of BLISS 2026. The BCH-1 Hackcelerator Phase 2 concluded with 53 projects advancing and winners receiving rewards. FundMe campaigns are supporting BCH initiatives like podcasts, adoption tours, and developer tools. BCH adoption grows in Asia with TabbyPOS integrating BCH into physical terminals in Malaysia. Updates include OPTN Wallet enhancements and Knuth Node v0.76.0 preparing for the May 2026 BCH upgrade. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

St0uty

> <3s Even with we run with this figure (I'm sure many exchanges would wait for more confirmations before allowing you to access your funds but whatever), this is still much slower than nano at 350 milliseconds >BCH is much more secure than nano >BCH also has been attacked already and defended itself just fine The fact you wrote these two statements exactly after one another is... interesting. Meanwhile, nano has never been 51% attacked

Realistic_Fee_00001

>In the last 30 days: 50% of nano transactions were confirmed within 350ms. BCH is about 10 minutes according to my google search Well that's wrong like many things that people just take from crippled BTC and slap onto the working BCH. BCH continued and improved 0-conf. A payment tx is basically as fast as it takes to propagate through the network. >BCH is one of the smaller ones; I'd rather have my network not get 51% attacked, especially when championing its "security" It is not, BCH has one of the biggest hashrate and cost of attack. BCH is much more secure than nano. BCH also has been attacked already and defended itself just fine.

St0uty

>It's not faster In the last 30 days: 50% of nano transactions were confirmed within 350ms. BCH is about 10 minutes according to my google search >Yes, smaller ones and even they shrugged it off BCH is one of the smaller ones; I'd rather have my network not get 51% attacked, especially when claiming to desire "security"

St0uty

>Nano does not work better than BCH It is objectively faster and cheaper >no fees that pay for security There have been many documented 51% attacks on PoW networks

Realistic_Fee_00001

Because of the initial conditions, the branding and the soundness. Nano does not work better than BCH. The only "benefit" is a negative in my book, no fees that pay for security. BCH pools together many small fees to pay a large sum for the block security.

Realistic_Fee_00001

Crippled Small block Bitcoin. Don't drag the working Bitcoin, BCH, into this. No Big Blocker has connections to Epstein.

anymonero

Why not BCH2? It forked from BC2 3 days ago.

AD1AD

42 Layla NFTs left as tickets to the BCH BLISS conference this May in Ljubljana, Slovenia. https://www.bliss.cash/2026

LargeSnorlax

Everyone I know who has asked me about Bitcoin has done the same thing. They say "Bitcoin is too expensive, I bought BCH", "Bitcoin is too expensive, I bought LUNA". People said this to me when Bitcoin was $20k. $10k. $5k. $1k. Literally never changes.

Ourcrypto_news

Looks like a packed session! Excited to hear insights on BCH developments, the Layla NFT, BIP-37 research, and what Kallisti & 00TATTS bring to the table. KennBosakLIVE always digs into **both tech and community updates**, so should be a good one.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Bitcoin Cash (BCH) community is organizing another BCH bank run on March 1, 2026, encouraging users to withdraw BCH from exchanges to on-chain wallets. This initiative aims to expose naked shorting and highlight liquidity risks, drawing parallels to the GME/WallStreetBets phenomenon. The event emphasizes the principle 'Not your keys, not your coins!' and seeks to raise awareness about the importance of self-custody in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

DangerHighVoltage111

> I'm answering because I made the same mistake last Sunday that I did in 2021: buying BCH at the top. That's on you. I buy BCH at the bottom and don't sell at the top. My net worth has increased significantly with BCH. >Agree. But for that to happen, 1,000,000 moving pieces must ALL fit into a working mechanism, AT THE SAME TIME. Only God himself can do that. In other words: BCH proliferation is not gonna happen during our lifetime. Challenge accepted. Nobody said this would be a walk in the park. >Once you're back to reality, you realize that a "better, sound monetary system" is just a pipe dream. Every revolution was. >What you CAN do, is to escape the rat race yourself, by becoming financially stable and independent. You can't. The time of lifechanging gains is over at BTC. And you still need all the custodians that control you. If they want they can take it all away. But they don't care if a few get rich, they care if you get free.

DangerHighVoltage111

Still just a price argument + more slander. >Usage (barely 15k daily txes on a busy day) Yes, this has been the pivot point for p2p cash since Bitcoins inception. The BTC slander didn't help. But giving up is not an option BCH works and is ready. >Being an inflation hedge (never reclaimed previous ATH) It works well for me, Hint: Not everyone bought in the small time frame of ATH. And again FIAT is secondary >Ownership decentralization (Top 100 addresses own 35%+ of the supply) It's better than most cryptos and only slightly worse than BTC, mostly because Maxis sold their BCH >Public endorsement (no IRL celebrity has ever mentioned BCH) Yeah no shit, everyone that did got brigaded. Sound money is too dangerous. This either works as bottom up revolution or it don't. Your are not telling everything new, you are just showing that you are an opportunist and not interested in a better system

the_rodent_incident

I should post the long-term BCH/BTC chart now, but too many people already did that already. I'm slandering BCH's price action, not the project itself. Project is solid. Community is battle hardened, as I've said before. BCH works and there's a few wallets available. But it SEVERELY lacks: - Usage (barely 15k daily txes on a busy day) - Being an inflation hedge (never reclaimed previous ATH) - Ownership decentralization (Top 100 addresses own 35%+ of the supply) - Public endorsement (no IRL celebrity has ever mentioned BCH)

the_rodent_incident

I'm answering because I made the same mistake last Sunday that I did in 2021: buying BCH at the top. So maybe it's better that I warn as many people possible not to make same mistake again. >BCH is the best chance for a better sound monetary system. Agree. But for that to happen, 1,000,000 moving pieces must ALL fit into a working mechanism, AT THE SAME TIME. Only God himself can do that. In other words: BCH proliferation is not gonna happen during our lifetime. Once you're back to reality, you realize that a "better, sound monetary system" is just a pipe dream. What you CAN do, is to escape the rat race yourself, by becoming financially stable and independent. BCH never managed to reclaim ANY of the previous ATHs, so I suppose it's just gonna spiral into nothingness. How it arrived back to Number 10, is nothing short of a miracle, though.

DangerHighVoltage111

BCH was once below LTC and has surpassed it now for over a year. It doesn't matter how hard you try to slander BCH. BCH is the best chance for a better sound monetary system. The community knows that and does not give up just because the FIAT value dropped a bit or because you slander it. Your efforts are futile.

DangerHighVoltage111

Why are you answering to a 1 month old thread? It doesn't matter. BCH is the best chance for a better sound monetary system. The community knows that and does not give up just because the FIAT value dropped a bit or because you slander it. Your efforts are futile.

the_rodent_incident

Sorry, it got rejected hard, and is now fighting to keep #11. Soon to drop below #15. Similar thing happens with every BTC / US Election 4-year cycle: BCH tries to get up, gets punched in the face, drops down. At some point it will be unable to get up, and that'll be the end. NANO path, drops below #300. And because BCH depends on PoW, it will be attacked by 2 dudes with a few antminers in their basement, just for fun.

the_rodent_incident

Lol, it's 2 weeks later now, and BCH is falling like a rock. https://i.redd.it/aljhbgtrwemg1.gif Here's a warning for newbies wondering how to trade BCH: # Whenever a BCH appreciation post appears, it's the 4-year top, and you should get rid of all your BCH long positions immediately. Unless you like losing everything. Let me repeat that again: >Whenever a BCH appreciation post appears, it's the 4-year top, and you should get rid of all your BCH long positions immediately. Unless you like losing everything. Also get rid of any BCH you own. Spot price is gonna get ugly very soon. Yes, I agree with what you say: BCH has been building for years, and improving. But the market does not value that. Development is strong, and BCH people are battle hardened. But simply being the best chain doesn't mean anything price-wise. BCH can be the best digital p2p cash, and still remain in $200 - $400 range indefinitely. That makes it not even an inflation hedge, but just Fiat 2.0 with a few extra steps. Even if you genuinely like and support BCH, selling it high, and buying low, is the best thing you can do for the price and the project. Don't be the sucker holding it to -99%.

Visible-Structure-86

If you’re looking at “new coins,” I’d zoom out and ask: Is the token just inflation + marketing… Or does it actually do something structurally different? One project worth studying from a design perspective is RTRx (Reflectr) because of its Cascade system. Here’s what Cascade actually allows you to do: 1️⃣ Choose Your Base Rewards (Layer 1) Holding RTRx lets you select 1 or 2 reward assets out of 7 options (BTC, XRP, SOL, ADA, BCH + curated DeFi tokens). You’re not locked into a single emissions token — you choose exposure. 2️⃣ Provide Liquidity Without Losing Holder Rewards (Layer 2) Normally when you LP a token, you stop earning reflections. With Cascade, LP providers still receive Layer 1 rewards. So your capital can: • Sit in LP • Earn pool incentives • Still collect chosen base rewards That’s stacked yield instead of trade-offs. 3️⃣ Earn DEX Fees (Layer 3) Since it’s standard PancakeSwap-style liquidity, you also collect trading fees directly from volume. So Cascade lets you: • Earn BTC/XRP/SOL/etc while holding • Earn those same rewards while LPing • Earn pool-specific rewards • Earn DEX trading fees • Compound rewards like BCH back into the pool to increase position size There are currently 11 live Cascade pools, including BCH recently added. The interesting part is that volatility increases volume → which increases fee flow → which increases reward throughput. It’s not designed as a pump token. It’s designed as a liquidity engine. If you’re evaluating newer projects, it’s at least an interesting case study in capital efficiency and layered incentives. Do your own research — but structurally, it’s different from most “new coin” launches

Visible-Structure-86

If you’re looking at newer projects, I’d focus less on hype narratives and more on structure. One project worth researching is RTRx (Reflectr). It’s not trying to be the next meme cycle — it’s built around liquidity architecture. What makes it different: • Holders choose 1 or 2 rewards from 7 options (BTC, XRP, SOL, ADA, BCH + curated DeFi tokens) • If you provide LP, you still earn holder rewards • On top of that, you earn DEX trading fees (PancakeSwap etc.) So instead of “hold or farm,” it stacks both. They currently have 11 Cascade pools live, and BCH was recently added. You can compound earned BCH back into the pool, which creates an interesting reinforcement loop. It’s more of a capital-efficiency play than a hype play. Not financial advice — just something structurally different that’s worth digging into if you’re evaluating new designs.

the_rodent_incident

Still... If he kept majority of his net worth in BCH, he's rekt big time.

the_rodent_incident

Ah, yes, he was an OG big blocker. Now I feel sorry for him. Imagine having like 100 BTC, and getting additional 100 BCH after the fork. He must've felt super smart, and probably converted his 100 BTC into like 500 BCH. Fast forward 9 years later: he has like 600 BCH, which are worth $260K. Had he kept his 100 BTC, now he'd have like ... >6 million? Big blockers are morally right, yes. Their story is true. Their intents are noble. But they'll forever stay poor. BCH never reached an ATH, and keeps dropping lower year by year.

Alarming_Present_401

BCH developing a quantum vault technology

Alarming_Present_401

BCH

reversenotation

"nobody is talking about BCH, why is that?" Then how do you explain the quotation marks?

baIIern

You'll probably be down again in no time. Zoom out and watch BCH die over the years. The market has chosen the real BTC and you should begin to deal with it

Alarming_Present_401

Care to explain? I recently listened to all the history of btc and learned quite a lot about BCH

Alarming_Present_401

Get into BCH this things going parabolic over the next 6 months as BTC dies a slow death for no practical use

Alarming_Present_401

I actually used to be a btc maxi but after everything recently I’ve done quite a lot of research into BCH and it’s definitely worth holding a decent bag of it. It’s the OG bitcoin

Glittering_Pick_9738

I bought both (more BTC though, BCH is my second bag).

Alarming_Present_401

BCH is cheaper and is actually the better technology I’m loading up on it now as the flippening begins!

Alarming_Present_401

Anyone else buying BCH now instead of BTC?

Mantis-Prawn

What happened to the times that 1 BTC was 1 BCH

EarningsPal

Because LINK is a token, not a coin. Coins have a premium over tokens for some reason. Best guess: 1. Fair distribution 2. lost units 3. Time units are held, including lost units 4. utility to operate a system, transaction requirement 5. scarcity component, arguably more difficult to expand the supply (validators vs Multisig) See DOGE, BCH, LTC as examples. How they remain top 25 has to be because of at least something in this list.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet for February 22, 2026, highlights key updates in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem. Layla NFTs for BLISS 2026 are selling quickly, with 48 of 100 sold. Episode 175 of the Bitcoin Cash Podcast features Tone Vays discussing the Bitcoin civil wars and blocksize history. BCH hashrate surged after a BTC difficulty adjustment, reducing block times to ~6:51. Over 45 teams are building on BCH-1 Phase 2, and CashMint activity is growing with NFT minting and auctions. Paytaca v0.23.1 launched with DEX integration and multisig beta, while UTXO-Z v0.3.0 introduced major improvements. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Dry-Stranger-5590

Wrong. This is not my comment but it describes it perfectly. “Suppose I have 2BCH (or BTC) in one UTXO, and you have 2BCH in one UTXO. Your coins are “dirty”, as you put it, while mine are not. Now you send me 2BCH, and I move all 4 of my BCH into a hardware wallet, consolidating the two UTXOs into one UTXO. I then send you 2BCH back. Which BCH do you have, dirty or clean, or one dirty and one clean? How do you know? You can trace how money moves around by reading the ledger, but it’s just a number. It’s fungible property removes the uniqueness of a coin.”

rankinrez

With the BCH split my wallet keys from before then remain usable on both chains. When BTC forks to no longer support transactions to be sent from “legacy” addresses that won’t be the case. It’s a bad look to suddenly declare a huge chunk of the money in existence is now invalid. Flies in the face of the original concept imo.

rgnet1

What is impossible? Either core or a fork will adopt a quantum resistant standard that the largest market accepts and that is bitcoin from that point forward. Any fragmentation is really no different than what we’ve seen in the BCH splinter (fraction of a percent market cap) and the entire industry of alt coins that think they can do bitcoin better. What makes this different to any other feature introduction that bitcoin’s had in its history?

FrankSlipHelp

>There is just only 1 the original version of crypto. And it’s called BCH

baIIern

That's right but did you hear that BCH is the real Bitcoin and in the future people will realize and who has diamond hands will be rich? /s

baIIern

Man muss sich nur die Charts ansehen und realisieren, dass BTC offiziell gewonnen hat und BCH langsam dahinsiecht. Wer das nicht sieht, der ist gehirngewaschen

gucciman333

You yourself might be a decent guy but this has been going on for 8 years. Certain cryptos are unfairly permabanned from here. When posts of those cryptos start to go viral mods will delete the post. Example BCH. I could name mods but it wouldn’t help.

AutoModerator

Post is by: AdNeither7084 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rag7o8/skrill_sold_my_bch_to_wrong_address/ I deposited BCH to my [crypto.com](http://crypto.com) wallet but I accidentally put my [crypto.com](http://crypto.com) wallet BTC address. Upon trying to recover, it has gone to a completely random address. [crypto.com](http://crypto.com) are saying they cant help as they dont manage the address it has been deposited to. However I did not instruct Skrill to deposit it to that address. What can I do? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Bitcoin Cash (BCH) focuses on on-chain scaling to improve transaction capacity while balancing decentralization and security. Using the Adaptive Blocksize Limit Algorithm (ABLA), BCH adjusts block sizes based on demand, starting at a 32 MB floor and scaling up automatically. This approach enables higher throughput compared to fixed limits, supported by UTXO parallelism and network optimizations. While BCH's scalability strategy offers low fees and simplicity, achieving Visa-level throughput may require Layer 2 solutions alongside continued infrastructure improvements. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

baIIern

Not surprisingly, r/BTC told you to buy BCH. This place has been taken over by Bitcoin Cash cultists. Waste of time there ;) r/Bitcoin can help best, I suppose.

CallAParamedic

See also: BCH shills the past month on r/btc

DangerHighVoltage111

🎯 In the future there will likely be L2s on BCH for specific use cases. But neither of them will use LN tech. LN was designed as single payment channel. For this it works with the promotion to "payment network" and the need for liquidity routing the trouble started.

DangerHighVoltage111

> To make me move or rather try something you gotta bring something extraordinary to the table which it simply does not. A bitcoin started with the genesis block that: - actually scales - not compromised by epstein and old money - has smart contracts - will be quantum resistant this year. - has privacy - is one of the big four in adoption - Is sound PoW - best coin for payments. Instant, cheap, reliable. - Same SoV features as BTC idk man you know what they say about "Bitcoin" everyone will get it at the price they deserve. BCH is shaping up to be the greatest vindication arc in crypto.

DangerHighVoltage111

XD. Then use Atomic swaps between XMR and BCH. The point is, anger and propaganda clouds your judgment. Take a look, you will be surprised how BCH developed. Good Luck.

inShambles3749

No. Keep the usecase separated. XMR for privacy. Don't want or need the half-assed hybrid shit BCH or ZEC offers

Shibinator

Yes, most altcoins are absolute scams. But literally none of them ever were split off from the original Bitcoin UTXO set, no premine or other garbage just run by a passionate community of Bitcoiners, got dumped on for years, fell out of the Top 30 but then persisted for nearly 9 years on upgrades and then returned to the Top 10. Maybe BCH will rocket, maybe it won't, but pretending it's in the same category as every other premined garbage is just inaccurate.

Therighttodo

What I mean is: you’re treating CoinMarketCap rank as if it's a clean scorecard for "how LTC is doing" when it's a **relative** metric that's driven by what *other [millions](https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/number-of-cryptocurrencies-tracked/) of coins* do, not just by anything fundamental changing in Litecoin. A few points: - **Rank != absolute performance.** LTC can be flat/down modestly and still slide in rank if a handful of coins above/below it rip on narrative flows. That's not a "Litecoin broke" signal by itself, it's often just where the marginal speculation is going. - **Cherry-picking the winner is easy after the fact.** BCH massively outperforming over the last year is real, but that’s exactly how alt cycles behave: a few names do multiples while a lot of the complex moves together. One coin's surge doesn't automatically mean the others are failing, it means capital rotated hard into that theme. - **My original point stands:** if you overlay LTCUSD against a broad alts ex-BTC/stables benchmark, LTC has mostly been **moving with the alt market** since 2022, with some swings around it. So "market not impressed" is overstated. It's more like "LTC hasn’t been the leader" in this cycle.

RespectFront1321

How is, falling from position 15 exactly a year ago to 23 today, anchoring bias? A few alts are vastly outperforming it as well, such as BCH which was ranked 23rd (where LTC is today) a year ago but is now ranked #10.

This-Application9426

I just went through the exact same thing over 3.08 BTC & 3.08 BCH with them...was from when I mined back in 2014. I transferred it from a self-custody wallet to the exchange to sell some of it, and about 6 hours later, my account was locked with them demanding the KYC I had already done twice. That being said, after a few months of opening new tickets & filing complaints, I got all my crypto back & now in a Ledger. They definitely suck, but don't give up hope or fighting. You can get it back.

AD1AD

Doing your best to ignore and downplay BCH is a much more 2017 thing than talking about it

Educational_Speech58

LCC is a bull crapp a fork of Litcoin is nothing but BCH

NeighborhoodOutside9

What about BCH

Revolutionary-Cup78

The fool has reached critical mass. BTC is likely not going to continue being a fortune maker, but it is also near impossible for it to go that low. There would have to be a clear alternative to take its place as digital store of value, and currently all alternatives (including BCH) aren't the clear substitute

GeorgeOrrange

study the documentary Idiocracy by time traveler Mike Judge to understand how it gets ever easier to find ever greater fools many long term holders did exit this cycle and at least some switched to BCH and I would guess some moved to XMR.too the funniest(and most revolutionary) thing would be if everyone left institutions holding the bags for a change and BCH flips BTC at around 10k

fan_of_hakiksexydays

Don't let your hopium ruin you my friend. It's fine to have a little bit of money in BCH if you think something could still happen. Alts is a risky market for any alts. Even the ones that had great funramentals, didn't get the rallies they deserved. Sometimes not even the adoption they deserved. It's still a speculation-driven market.

fan_of_hakiksexydays

lol @ "upgrades" being nothing but just DeFi shit with very little for utility, that every other coin is doing to make it seem like they're making progress, but is just there for marketing. There would need to be some serious upgrading and more like forking for BCH to stop being a shitcoin.