BCH

DrSpeckles

This article has nothing to do with Bitcoin Cripple (BTC) VS BCH. It’s about banks controlling their risk, both financial and regulatory risk when regulators find they have been facilitating money laundering etc. which they need to do. I support the idea of BCH, but not as a way of getting around AML regulations, sanction busting or other illegal activity. I live in a society, not as some kind of financial sovereign citizen.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet for November 23, 2025, highlights developments in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem. Key updates include the rising BCH average block size driven by increased routine usage and smart-contract activity from skynet.ar.io, a year-high network hashrate of ~6.76–7.23 EH/s, and mF International's plan to establish a BCH treasury with $500M funding. The BLAZE hackathon showcased projects like EventCollect.cash and USSD.cash. Other updates include Paytaca POS enhancements, Fulcrum v2.1.0 release, and Quantumroot's post-quantum vault launch on BCH's Chipnet. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

AZULDEFILER

BCH is up...

Short-Ideas010

Not for BCH.

DangerHighVoltage111

Enter Homer Meme: "Sir, BCH did not reach its old ATH, YET"

baIIern

"Sir, BCH did not reach its old ATH, it's worth 20% of that now. Maybe a smaller car would be suitable for you Sir?"

Short-Ideas010

It will be BCH.

SorryWerewolf4735

It's a choice that the decentralized community can make. They can continue on whichever fork they think is "right". They can completely fork the code to maintain the old blockchain. This happened with BTC/BCH. This happened with ETH hack. This happened with SIA miner fork. This happens all the time.

ShortSqueeze20k

Because BCH fulfills the original goal, global money.

ShortSqueeze20k

ALL? Why do you ignore BCH?

Short-Ideas010

BCH looks better for now. I'll stick with whole numbers for now.

Short-Ideas010

What's BCH doing?

Cryptizard

Yes, post-quantum signatures are available. They were standardized by NIST a year ago. There are two options: ML-DSA and SLH-DSA, based on modular lattices and hash functions, respectively. Both have much larger signature sizes than ECDSA, which is currently used by Bitcoin and many other blockchains. This is a problem for upgrading because it means that the block size has to increase dramatically in order to support the new signature schemes. If Bitcoin were updated to ML-DSA without changing the block size, only \~100 transactions would fit into a block compared to the current \~3000. And the last time people tried to increase the block size of the Bitcoin protocol, it was so hard to get consensus that it resulted in forking to a whole new coin (BCH). As to the abandoned coins that are vulnerable to quantum computers, I personally think it is a feature, not a flaw. I think of it like a public bounty for scientists and companies working on quantum computing. As long as a migration path is in place in advance so that people who do have control of their keys can upgrade, I believe it is perfectly fine for the old lost coins to be up for grabs.

reversenotation

What would the BCH market cap be at 150k

Apart-Apple-Red

>i know its in the gaussian channell, and below the 50w ma . Every bounce i can short I don't think you know anything. BCH is in green in weekly, monthly and yearly, while BTC is definitely above the price you mentioned and BTC is indeed going up! You seems to be rather confused imho.

Apart-Apple-Red

I don't know. My BCH keeps price nicely. And BCH is going up today. 🤷

Glittering_Pick_9738

At this rate BCH might reach 150k first before BTC. I would be laughing so hard.

DryMyBottom

how BCH is still around I will never understand

Lonsmrdr

I've been holding for the last 7 years. BCH IMO is the #1 coin that matters. It's the Bitcoin that unlike BTC that actually works!

Dapper_Grapefruit975

Time to become a BCH maxi?

Dragons_Potion

If you’re just trying to grab some BCH without the KYC headache, check P2P hubs that are still active. LocalMonero’s gone, yeah, but a lot of traders moved to [NoOnes](https://noones.com/) since it works pretty similar and has decent BCH liquidity. Just stick to high-rep sellers and you should be good.

RespectFront1321

“Across major L1 chains” leaves out BCH which is #12 on coinmarketcap and on-chain activity has been steadily growing.

vekypula

Checked the market a bit , except ZEC of course. BCH looks resilient. Could the next cabal narrative be that blackrock , saylor moon ,venezuela and everybody else bought the wrong bitcoin :)) That would be hillarious , but in line with the scam this market truly is

MinuteStreet172

If you are a sanctioned individual and I get cash from you, can that cash be linked directly to you? No? Because BTC is not cash. You're thinking maybe BCH and cashfusion

chance_waters

The market decides. Miners can fork to an unsupported network, like BCH, and they will be there alone.

chance_waters

No, it isn't. They can fork the chain, in which case you still have your original BTC, which will remain supported. BCH existing doesn't erase BTC.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet highlights key updates in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem. The May 2026 Bitcoin Cash upgrade is now live on Chipnet, introducing advanced features like loops, functions, and Pay-2-Script, enhancing smart contracts and privacy systems. The BLAZE Hackathon has begun, offering $20,000 in rewards for developers. Paytaca teased a new stablecoin partnership, and ParityUSD released its rollout plan for a BCH-native stablecoin. BCH has shown resilience in the market, maintaining stability despite broader crypto volatility. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Legitimate_Cry_5194

With all due respect, you don't know what you are talking about. Yes, that's what i seriously want to say and you should listen to me because I'm in crypto way way earlier than you who you are in your first cycle. Crypto is here for 17 years pal, no crypto offered what it promised. Defi? Failure. Nft's? Failure. Valuations? Failure. Real world utility? Failure. BTC as a payment method? Failure. Hard forked, to follow the payment method utility quest, BCH. Failure. Do you think new technologies take something like a century to get adopted, are you technologically and historically that illiterate? May I ask you, since you believe in crypto and you see it differently than what it really is, a casino, what kind of real world utility you see crypto has or what kind of utility it will have in the future when it gets "adopted". Enlighten me.

Leithm

BCH did fork and is working just fine.

biba8163

It was obvious Altseasons were coming to an end. Every subsequent "cycle" BTC had diminished returns and Alt gains were more muted. In 2021, we didn't even have a broad Altseason. 2024/25 it was obvious that with BTC diminishing returns, Institutional involvement and ETFs that most Alts would be decimated. The total Alt marketcap has shrunk -40% since November 2021 and nobody knows where the money for Alts will come from since they can no longer depend on leeching off BTC. **2013** Weekly Alt Performance as BTC pushes towards $1K - LTC 150% - XRP 300% - Peercoin 270% - Namecoin 620% - Primecoin 670% - Novacoin 335% - Megacoin 1,400% https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20131126/ **2017** Weekly Alt Performance as BTC pushes towards $20K - ETH 60% - BCH 50% - XRP 200% - LTC 63% - ADA 340% https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20171218/ **2021** Weekly Alt Performance as BTC pushes towards $70K - ETH 11% - BNB 18% - SOL 22% - ADA 8% - XRP 18% https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20211108/

Chrysalis1111

51% attack would ultimately fail. The users of the network would switch to the true chain, ie the effect would cause a commotion that would last a week or two and then it's business as normal. In fact it already happened. BCH hard fork got a huge majority of miners to switch to BCH and we all know how it ended. Those billions would have been better invested into buying Bitcoin to start with.

stellarfirefly

\> Otherwise, there would already have been a hard fork or five throughout the history of the chain, like most other chains have chosen to do. August 2017 - BCH - forked at block 478,559 October 2017 - BTG - forked at block 491,407

perceptual01

BCH and ETC have entered the chat

baIIern

Since 2019, Bitcoin outperformed BCH by 1100% lmao. Didn't even reach its old ATH from like 2017. Always zoom out, people.

Alex09464367

And we all agree that 1 BTC is worth: XAU | 1.61 lb (gold pounds) XAG | 129.73 lb (silver pounds) ETH | Ξ30.15410005359301 (ethers) USD | $95743.16 (US dollars) CNY | ￥681201.52 (Chinese yuan) EUR | €82448.16 (euros) ARK | 323123.46342192 Ѧ (ARK) BCH | 194.50279849 BCH (bitcoin cash) ADA | 188036.108022 ADA (ada) FIL | 48412.85 FIL (FIL) LTC | Ł992.59 (litecoins) XRP | 41487.74 XRP (ripples) XTZ | 170604.932528 ꜩ (Tez) At time of writing

YogurtCloset3335

Why? You can't validate transactions with old inputs, and you can't query the chain. The BTC blockchain is 1TB, not that much. You can get a cheap 2TB drive for $100. BCH chain is much small.

YogurtCloset3335

>there's only one solution The final solution? That's what I think whenever I hear that phrase. And pruning for BTC nodes exists since 2016, nobody uses it. Today we live in a multi-coin world, Not a big deal. We don't need more solutions. >yet to see this fee market work the way blockstream envisioned Fee market is a nonsense terminology. It's like a "parking ticket market", people don't compete to pay fees. The reason fees went down is people moved to coins other than BTC for payments (economic theory behind this is "substitute goods"). Read back to 2017 Blocksize War posts, even BTC Maxies were using Litecoin and other shitcoins. Just not BCH, because using BCH would prove them wrong about scaling.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The article discusses the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies as a payment method, highlighting their increasing acceptance across various sectors like online stores, casinos, and hospitality. It identifies the five most popular cryptocurrencies for online payments: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Litecoin (LTC), and Bitcoin Cash (BCH). The article explains how cryptocurrency transactions work via blockchain and emphasizes the benefits of security, efficiency, and evolving regulations that make digital payments more accessible for consumers and businesses. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

stellarfirefly

At the minimum, I would consider all network hard forks to be at least a "hiccup". I wouldn't count the soft forks. But even if you consider only hard forks, then there were 4: Two in 2017 (BCH and BTG), one in 2018 (BSV), and one in 2020 (XEC).

lost_man_wants_soda

Short answer: No — Bitcoin wasn’t “sabotaged,” but the blocksize fight created that perception. Satoshi himself added the 1 MB block limit in 2010 as a temporary anti-spam measure. He talked about scaling, but never committed to massive on-chain throughput. When Bitcoin grew, two camps emerged: • Small-block (Core): Keep blocks small to preserve decentralization and security; scale with layers like Lightning. • Big-block (XT/Classic/Unlimited → BCH/BSV): Increase blocksize so Bitcoin can function as global on-chain cash. The political battle from 2015–2017 was intense, but it wasn’t sabotage — just competing visions in a decentralized system with no central authority. BTC chose to be a secure settlement layer. BCH and BSV forked to pursue on-chain scaling. So the chain wasn’t crippled; it simply followed the path preferred by the majority of developers, miners, and users, while those who disagreed created alternatives.

PriorLeast3932

I'm not even a maxi but I know the real answer unlike the other guys who will shill BCH and random altcoins. The point of BTC is not to make transactions or use it for trade. It's to buy and hold for years, decades at a time, so it doesn't need to scale for TPS. If you need fast transactions you transact on less secure layers (e.g. wrapped bitcoin on other chains) fast without bottlenecks. Bitcoin base layer is for long term savings, apps built on L2s are for trading.

FinancePorn

He needs to keep away from anything ECONOMIC & HEALTH, he will kill and rob 10's of million of Americans, which is ascension plan to turn the USA into a Dynastic Monarchy, with his dum dum kids, being in power forever.. he will steal as much of the treasury as he can to accomplish this. Its exactly the putin playbook.. to gut the middle class financially, then make them sick, and they will die off and leave the wealth to the monarch..OR he will have to do like his friends , start with mass arrests, and then mass murder. He has no idea how vulnerable crypto is ...I made and ICO, it took 8 guys 6 months to build it. WE canceled it do to jurisdiction. DONT BE FOOLED - 1) Etherum Netowork for example.. is crushed and cant process smart contracts without massive data pipes. IT took 2 weeks to submit, means that its way ove capacity and impossible to grow the ALT coin scene.. thus solana et al, which is another barrel of monkeys, with those 50k SOL requirements to be a node.. now those guys are billionaires, who can turn those networks off. 2) There are so many whales that can flip, you never know and thjere is nop logic behind the "CATASTROPHIC RUG PULL" which would be on the Network, put it this way, I think that if anyone put 100k bitcoin on the bid, it would crush the market at these prices. 3) now with many sovereign nations and investment funds.. they became too big to fail. If those entities back out, the marklets will implode. 4) Parasitic effect on USD, it will suck the M2 and most of the M1 out of our economy, there will be no way to control our money supply because we dont own the BCH network. LKet alone all the altcoin networks. Then theres thisw: I got honey potted and watched as they disabled my bio-metric security added, took my phone over with a VPN tunnel, and sen to thier binance account $35,000 +/- USDT. Nothing about crypto is goopd especially strategic decisions about our entire country. Mr. President.... C'mon.. go play golf and continue your hedonism, and leave us alone!

pop-1988

Don't be frightened. I'm having half my brain removed so I can regurgitate tired old BCH fanboy slogans from 2017 **Blockstream conspiracy!**

biba8163

You seem to be brand new > At 75% hash power for large blockers it's game over for the small blockers. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/61thjq/at_75_hash_power_for_large_blockers_its_game_over/ > BCH Hardfork & BTC Chain Death Spiral? https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7cie7e/bch_hardfork_btc_chain_death_spiral/ > Antpool, BTC.TOP, ViaBTC, BTC.COM and Bitcoin.com have the majority of the hashing power. Should they destroy the crippled 1MB chain? https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/77cwc8/antpool_btctop_viabtc_btccom_and_bitcoincom_have/ > Why didn't the promised hashrate switch happen to prevent the current EDA? https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7650o7/why_didnt_the_promised_hashrate_switch_happen_to/ > Why are blocks taking 8 hours.... https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/745wwf/why_are_blocks_taking_8_hours/ > BitcoinCash achieves over 60 blocks per hour. Yes, that's 1 block each minute. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/74fccr/bitcoincash_achieves_over_60_blocks_per_hour_yes/ > Is $BCH mining working the way it was intended? Miners seem to be colluding to manipulate EDA. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6wj5hd/is_bch_mining_working_the_way_it_was_intended/ > Let's admit EDA is a disaster and was improperly thought out. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6wetbw/lets_admit_eda_is_a_disaster_and_was_improperly/ > I had a thought. If the EDA allowed Bitcoin Cash to survive with minority hashrate, wouldn't that mean that anybody can create meaningless minority fork of Bitcoin Cash in the future and it can survive? https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7c65ao/i_had_a_thought_if_the_eda_allowed_bitcoin_cash/

biba8163

> We are talking about transaction costs and blocksize. You seem to have reading comprehension issues. The topic actually was *"Difficulty Adjustment"* and of course you don't want to stick to the topic. And I know why. Satoshi had warned of the risks and things getting ugly for the minority version if there if there was a fork of Bitcoin hinting that haspower would follow the majority version of the chain and the minority version would die off. This was the design of Bitcoin During the 2017 split, BCH supporters kept pointing to this and saying they have all the hashpower and small block chain was designed to die off. After the hashpower followed BTC, BCH implemented the Emergency Difficulty Adjustment (EDA) to keep the BCH chain alive. The miners gamed the hell out of the system exploiting the coin hopping attack to scoop up cheap BCH in short amounts of time which resulted in wildly swinging erratic block times. BCH then implemented and then tweaked Difficulty Adjustment Algorithm (DAA) but still the result didn't miner behavior hopping back and forth between the chains, gaming the system. BCH is a Frankenstein chain kept alive by these difficulty adjustment algorithms as a money grab scheme by Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, Wright and Calvin Ayre and the network is a zombie chain of faked transactions under the guise of implementing the true vision of Satoshi. BCH forked out again into BSV to implement the truer vision of Satoshi (grab more money from even more naive and misguided investors). tldr; you got scammed.

biba8163

Now do *"How I got scammed by Roger Ver and Craig Wright into believing BCH was going to kill BTC and lost all my money"* Spoiler Alert: 8+ years later and BCH is -90% from 2017 prices when BTC is $100K and they are still think BCH has any relevancy. > Sold all my BTC for BCC. Thanks Viabtc for leading the way! https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6ovkbs/sold_all_my_btc_for_bcc_thanks_viabtc_for_leading/ > Just traded all of my BTC for BCH https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7on8d2/just_traded_all_of_my_btc_for_bch/ > Reminder: there won't be another chain split. There will be Bitcoin after the segwit2x, and BCC. BitcoinCore will die if they reject 2x blocks because they won't have hashpower or a difficulty reset to keep up. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6sxqxi/reminder_there_wont_be_another_chain_split_there/ > $9500 GDAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > HOLY FUCK ME,.......FLIPPENING IS HERE https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7kxxo7/9500_gdax/ > BTC will never hit $100,000. There just isn't the capacity. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7bok5c/despite_the_ill_will_btc_is_going_to_100000_and/

magus-21

>Man aren't you just a special kind of stupid&smug. >BCH 3 seconds with almost zero chance for a double spend (every day purchasing values). With double spend proof even saver than it ever was on BTC. I'm done with you, you lost your next chance. Good day. "Almost zero" is not good enough for a global payments system.

DangerHighVoltage111

Man aren't you just a special kind of stupid/smug. BCH 3 seconds with almost zero chance for a double spend (every day purchasing values). With double spend proof even saver than it ever was on BTC. I'm done with you, you lost your next chance. Good day.

DangerHighVoltage111

I agree but I have not heard of any successful double spend on BCH. If you have a source please share. In fact I have seen a clip of Sergej Kotliar stating that they made millions of zero conf transactions with maybe 1 double spend and that's even on BTC (before RBF or mandatory RBF).

MudNovel6548

Yeah, finding a good P2P platform for BCH can be tricky these days. LocalBitcoins shutting down left a gap, and not every remaining option supports BCH with solid liquidity. What I’ve seen people do is use non-custodial swap tools or aggregators that let you go from stablecoins or BTC directly into BCH, that way you skip the sketchier P2P side altogether. If you’re set on P2P, check regional Telegram groups or communities, but always use escrow and small test trades first, scams are way too common. If you’re exploring other non-custodial ways to swap into BCH, the Rubic subreddit has some useful posts about Rubic.Exchange and how it handles cross-chain swaps without needing centralized custody or KYC.

ihatearguingonline

Nothing really. Everything else is far behind. LTC, Dash, Zcash, BCH, etc. etc. are largely just forks of BTC with marginal improvements. They fundamentally cannot scale in the way that KAS can. Zcash has privacy stuff going on so that's cool but it'll always be a niche thing

baIIern

Haha. They can join BCH and others. I'll never buy a coffee with any of this

OhWiseWizard

There are 1 billion LINK tokens, no one can make more. What you're talking about would require a fork, much like Bitcoin which has been forked many times (you can argue BSV and BCH are just "more Bitcoin"). 300MM of those are still held by Chainlink Labs, but the infrastructure itself is decentralized. Regardless, this isn't a post about me educating people on Chainlink, so not sure why all the attempts to spread misinformation.

Django_McFly

They didn't kill anything. XMR didn''t set new highs in 2021 bull. XNO didn''t set new highs in 2021 bull. BCH didn''t set new highs in 2021 bull. EOS didn''t set new highs in 2021 bull. XLM didn''t set new highs in 2021 bull. There's actually tons of tokens that saw their peak in the 2017 bull or earlier and have never recovered. Alt season has *NEVER* everything sets new highs. Alts did trade at elevated prices though. That totally happened. That's always been the reality of alt season. This one was no different. If it felt different, it's because you bought big bags of the new EOS. You picked up fat stacks of the new XNO. You thought ADA was the new ETH. Turns out it's the new XLM. For next cycle, by low and don't buy dogshit with no traction. If you actually use this stuff, it's not too tough to spot what's getting adoption and what's just blowing hot air and shedding users or TVL all over the place or is the same as everyone else but spinning it as grand revelations.

DrSpeckles

If you meant BCH then yes. BTC can’t do it.

longonbtc

That person has no idea what they're talking about. They are probably one of the few members of Craig's BSV cult. BSV is not the original Bitcoin and BTC is not a clone. BSV forked off from BCH and BCH forked off from Bitcoin.

nomoney110

I didn't notice that, but putting Solana on the same level as EHT is pretty wild. It's a difference like BTC to BCH.

Realistic_Fee_00001

BCH 🟢

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The article discusses a decentralized platform for trading real-world assets using fixed-term contracts without middlemen. Users can propose hedge contracts funded directly from their wallets, with BCH as collateral. The contracts mirror the USD price of assets like gold or silver, and payouts are determined by asset price changes at maturity. Liquidity providers act as counterparties, and cryptographically signed oracles enforce price feeds on-chain. The platform offers synthetic price exposure, not physical asset ownership, with low fees and flexible contract durations. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

DangerHighVoltage111

You can get some stable coin KYC free and then buy BCH I believe but I haven't used them in a while. Paytaca might also be an option.

NotFemWillBtw

I just had a look at coinex but couldn't see a way to beg BCH, is there something I'm missing? I'll try out haveno tomorrow though.

DangerHighVoltage111

We had a few but they all got shut down. You might try haveno.exchange And you can get BCH KYC free on Coinex.

Curius_pasxt

BCH have zksnark? Give me the link?

DangerHighVoltage111

BTC yes. BCH has the better mixers and will have additional privacy next may update. I believe even zK privacy.

RamoneBolivarSanchez

Zcash is a fork of Bitcoin and they already held they didn’t need to rotate. They just dump. Same with BCH or any other fork.

Conscious_7387

BCH Bitcoincash [https://minisatoshi.cash/](https://minisatoshi.cash/)

Suspicious-Skill1934

Why LTC and BCH compare those to BTC they are going to zero i dont get it. Just stick may be to one strong alt that you beleive

AutoModerator

Post is by: Just_Brief_7394 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1okqofh/i_think_it_doesnt_make_sense_to_invest_a_lot_of/ Hi!! I’ve been investing in crypto for **a year now**… Recently, I made a post here sharing my experience of being **completely confused** by so many projects, all of which seemed good… After a lot of reflection… I think I finally cleared my mind, and I wanted to share it with you to hear your thoughts… The **conclusion** I reached is that the only projects worth seriously investing in for the **long term are Bitcoin and Ethereum**… The rest of the projects (XRP, ADA, Kaspa, Velo, Stronghold, Zcash, BCH, LTC, Avalanche, TRX, etc…) I might at most invest **$200 in each** (maybe $1,000 in ADA and XRP)… Why? Because if any of these projects **don’t do a 500x in the long term, they’re basically a failure**. And if they do hit 500x, those **$200 would become $100,000**… If they only do 10x or 20x, it’s better to stick with **BTC and ETH for the long term and sleep peacefully**, because I’m sure these projects will grow at some point… What do you think? Does what I’m saying make sense? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Adrian-X

I just took a cursory look, the key holder moved BTC, BCH, XEC but did not move BSV XEC, BCH and BSV, have no relay protection so they should move together unless someone takes action to split them. Any idea why these coins were split and any chain analysis on those bitcoin forks?

Shelbadier

I'm expecting a bounce around 105k. If it drops below a hundred we're really entering a world of hurt . ZEC was a great recent play and BCH did handsomely. But retail (other than us) seems like an estranged cousin 

Effective_Map_2883

Hype and BCH doing relatively well. Still up over the last 7 days

DangerHighVoltage111

BCH had bots on twitter and reddit. They were heavily used, but API changes killed them. You can still send tips via the wallet paytaca's gift feature. There were different projects for tipping on twitch etc. But they all had the hen egg problem and eventually usage wasn't big enough.

CryptoAd007

How is BCH any better than LTC?

pop-1988

> more expensive BCH fans love to boast about low fees. A BCH block full of datacarrier transactions would cost 0.08BCH in fees. You're lucky the Ordinals guy isn't too bright

DomComm

Whenever the Democrats finally vote to open the government there are over 100 Crypto ETFs pending approval and it will create crypto as a whole new sector of the stock market. Every crypto with an ETF will then gain momentum especially the lower cap ones with limited supply like LTC and BCH

MinuteStreet172

Yeah, XMR, and also BCH are the way to go for an OG who isn't fantasizing of becoming rich and having a lambo, but who wants actual economic freedom and to fix the money, not suck their overlord's stuff in hopes for a reward.

MinuteStreet172

BTC is NOT what it meant to be. if any, BCH is the current version of bitcoin that still respects the white paper

MinuteStreet172

BTC is, not BCH.

pop-1988

The ability to store arbitrary data on the blockchain was not enabled by Taproot The ability to store arbitrary data on the blockchain has existed since the beginning, and still exists on all Bitcoin-like blockchains - BCH, BSV, LTC, DOGE For reasons explained in a bitcointalk thread, Satoshi implemented payment transactions as executable scripts. A payment script requires data push operators to store the pubkey or pubkey hash in the locking script, and to store the signature and pubkey on the unlocking script. A data push operator can not be constrained against storing arbitrary data The BIP444 proposal doesn't remove the ability to store arbitrary data on the Bitcoin blockchain. It only tweaks a couple of parameters. These tweaks are ineffective. They don't make it more difficult to post arbitrary data. They only change the methods Please remove the personal insults from your post. Debate the issue. Attacking the people only demonstrates that you're unwilling to understand and discuss

YogurtCloset3335

I'm up on BCH. Good gains this year and project has a lot of good devs who left BTC in disgust.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet highlights recent developments in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem. Key updates include the launch of the BCH Blaze hackathon with workshops and an introductory video, the upcoming BCH-1 Hackcelerator for developers, and the milestone of over 130,000 on-chain transactions by BCH Bull. Additionally, new stablecoin features were previewed, and CashToken Markets (Alpha) launched as a platform for exploring CashTokens. The community plans another BCH bank run on November 1 to promote on-chain wallets and expose liquidity risks. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Fitnessdoctor_7

I’ve learned that it’s devs and insiders who make most of that money - including YouTube chillers who get paid to do it. And if it’s very low market cap , 9 out of 10 won’t make the small guy money. If you are willing to be more patient, when it breaks $1-2 million mc you have a better chance at making money as more people start getting behind it and it starts to develop a community. I’m only sharing this info because of experience, not because I have anything to gain anywhere. I’m simply a middle street guy, not very computer savvy and only want to see the little guy prosper. You can take this info for what you want, but these may help you if you are patient as they are still relatively early but have potential to do good things. MANYU MIDAS BULLGOD XIAOBAI ZARD BOMET DOWGE SPX6900 BACHI BLUEY TFUEL THETA Here are some to take a look at and see if any appeal to you. I hope this helps. The narratives that will be popular in this bull run will be memes, DePIN, AI, RWA, even robotics. Older coins with strong it utility will do well also IMO I understand your frustration and I agree completely. I had to learn that those were the exceptions and the insiders are the ones who make the most gains. So I removed emotions and stuck to what I knew was right and combined patience and will see how it pays off moving forward. PS… some may laugh and insult but i recommend trying to get some BCH if you haven’t… and just hold it.

DrSpeckles

You are 100% correct. BTC can never be a currency. Store if value, investment vehicle yes, provided there are an endless supply of greater goods to buy it. Bitcoin on the other hand (BCH) could - it has all the attributes BTC maxis bang on about, plus it works for transactions. Beyond that there are a host of others. You are right that what’s missing is a safer environment. Even for people who use crypto regularly, you still have to check an insanely long address, do a test transaction, check the address again, do the final transaction, and pray, at least a little bit. Whereas if I want to pay someone here instantly I put their mobile number bet into my banking app, it confirms their name and bam, it’s in their account. That’s how easy it needs to be.

zeeblefritz

This will also have .1 of all Bitcoin hard forks. The most valuable is BCH.

GrixM

Short SUI, XRP, BCH, ADA

xte2

BTC forked BCH, any software can be forked, any user choose where to go and a fork or another will die or languish and one or another will thrive... That's the best a-posteriori vote.

KlearCat

> It is not easy to proof that no L1 will ever scale Did you even read my last comment? I literally said the following: "I never said one couldn't be made. I said there is no current one today." It appears you aren't really reading/comprehending what I'm writing at all. > . Youtube started with 480p/30fps if anyone would have required them to stream 4k or bust than you wouldn't have the YT of today that streams 4k to millions of people. Same thing you could say about bitcoin right now. > Scaling is not an on/off thing. It's a kicking the can a bit further down thing. Exactly applicable to bitcoin today. > No matter what BTC does, BCH will always have one more dimension to scale and therefore will always scale better than BTC. I don't see your point here. > Fuck my life 🙄🙄🙄 Why am I even arguing with brick walls. You might start by actually reading what I'm writing. And considering bitcoin is the same price as a $20 credit card transaction fee today (and happens in 10 minutes, not 1-3 days), I would say it's not a high fee at all.

biba8163

> Saving is a foreign concept to you, I see. No idea why you would want to hold BTC then. Bragging rights? > Either way, BCH makes fiat and BTC obsolete. Earn, hold, spend, replace. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/1mtb1fb/comment/n9i12lg/ Ah, it's always easy to spot the BCashies who got convinced by Roger Ver and Craig Wright that BCH was going to kill BTC. They traded their stacks of BTC for BCH at absurd prices. Even after BCH tanked they were convinced the market would eventually go with low fee BCH as the real Bitcoin, it was only a matter of time. 8+ years later and BCH is -90% from 2017 prices when BTC is $100K and they are still think BCH has any relevancy. Sorry for your losses. > Sold all my BTC for BCC. Thanks Viabtc for leading the way! https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6ovkbs/sold_all_my_btc_for_bcc_thanks_viabtc_for_leading/ > Just traded all of my BTC for BCH https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7on8d2/just_traded_all_of_my_btc_for_bch/ > Reminder: there won't be another chain split. There will be Bitcoin after the segwit2x, and BCC. BitcoinCore will die if they reject 2x blocks because they won't have hashpower or a difficulty reset to keep up. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6sxqxi/reminder_there_wont_be_another_chain_split_there/ > $9500 GDAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > HOLY FUCK ME,.......FLIPPENING IS HERE https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7kxxo7/9500_gdax/ > Despite the ill will, BTC is going to $100,000, and why this is good for BCH > BTC will never hit $100,000. There just isn't the capacity. https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7bok5c/despite_the_ill_will_btc_is_going_to_100000_and/

Realistic_Fee_00001

> So it's ridiculous to claim that because a payment system can't handle every transaction for every single person in world in a cheap/timely manner that it has failed. Man you guys are fucking Pea brains. It is easy to proof that every L2 will be crippled by BTCs crippled L1. It is not easy to proof that no L1 will ever scale. Two completely different difficulties of proof. Of course all core developers could suddenly fall over dead and be replaced with ones with integrity that suddenly scale BTC against the dogmas and propaganda the community ate up, but how likely is that? It is way less likely than disillusioned Maxis, first secretly, than openly defect to the working Bitcoin. >Only 10%? Then BCH is a failure in your eyes. No, because unlike you I'm not a pea brain. Youtube started with 480p/30fps if anyone would have required them to stream 4k or bust than you wouldn't have the YT of today that streams 4k to millions of people. Scaling is not an on/off thing. It's a kicking the can a bit further down thing. Here, let me put it this way: No matter what BTC does, BCH will always have one more dimension to scale and therefore will always scale better than BTC. >I wouldn't call bitcoin fees high today. Fuck my life 🙄🙄🙄 Why am I even arguing with brick walls.

KlearCat

> Of course you would not know what falsification or proof is. You cannot falsify your statement because you cannot check all the possibilities. There might be new math in 1 year or 100 years that make it trivial. I never said one couldn't be made. I said there is no current one today. So it's ridiculous to claim that because a payment system can't handle every transaction for every single person in world in a cheap/timely manner that it has failed. Which you do claim about bitcoin. > The point is, BCH does scale to around 10% of the current needs for worldwide adoption. That is vastly more (~1000 times) than BTC/LN and increases with advances in technology so is likely enough for the next decade of adoption even without any improvement. Only 10%? Then BCH is a failure in your eyes. > The don't fear a second custodial banking network, they don't care if what they control is called Dollar or Bitcoin. They fear the freedom to transact. Who is "they"? > Which is a problem in itself, because BTC is designed as a high fee chain and if fees don't pick up then the security budget will decline. You can't have both but Maxis like to tip toe this argument like standing on two hot plates. There is obviously a point where the security of bitcoin becomes compromised by lower miner demand. But that doesn't mean if there is lower miner demand we automatically hit that point. I wouldn't call bitcoin fees high today. And temporary spikes in fees are just that....temporary. Once again, bitcoin doesn't need to be the best for every transaction at every moment in time. > Of course you don't. You have shown time and time again that you do not grasp the problem. I do grasp the issue. I just don't have a problem with using L2 for small transactions.

Realistic_Fee_00001

>>It's bullshit because you cannot falsify your statement. >Just show me one that can do it Of course you would not know what falsification or proof is. You cannot falsify your statement because you cannot check all the possibilities. There might be new math in 1 year or 100 years that make it trivial. The point is, BCH does scale to around 10% of the current needs for worldwide adoption. That is vastly more than BTC/LN and increases with advances in technology so is likely enough for the next decade of adoption. >There are other L2's being worked on. Which all have the same problem: a crippled L1. >FIAT is controlled by govt/people and can be printed. Already those are properties that are not shared with bitcoin. If your BTCoins are held by custodians they can easily print and show you IOUs as they do now with FIAT. The power lies within custodial/non-custodial. That's why Bitcoin needs to scale or that's why they crippled it. The don't fear a second custodial banking network, they fear the freedom to transact. >I've already explained that's fine for many transactions. I don't care if my sandwich purchase is on a custodial platform. Of course you don't. You have shown time and time again that you do not grasp the problem. >>Whenever fees spike onchain becomes unusable and unreliable. >Which is brief and extremely rare. Which is a problem in itself, because BTC is designed as a high fee chain and if fees don't pick up then the security budget will decline. >Like I said, bitcoin doesn't need to be the best payment method for every person, every transaction, every single moment in time....to succeed. That is a fantasy. Nothing is like this. O Ye of little faith and little imagination.

Realistic_Fee_00001

https://old.reddit.com/user/DangerHighVoltage111/comments/1ne1qyt/ln_fails/ No, L2 scales the base layer if the base layer is so crippled that it would take decades just for people to open a single L2 channel. If you are interested in controlling your own money and the freedom to transact you would choose BCH because it is the working scaling Bitcoin. BCH doesn't need any L2 for a long time, but I'm sure there will be L2s in the future for different use cases. And they will work better, because the average joe will be able to get onto them cheap and self-custodial.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet for October 19, 2025, highlights key updates in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem. The BCH Blaze Hackathon schedule was announced, with weekly livestreams through November and hacking starting November 15. FundMe surpassed 1,000 BCH crowdfunded, showcasing community growth. The U.S. DOJ dismissed its case against Roger Ver, marking the end of a legal dispute. Bitcoin Core v30 sparked debate over OP_RETURN relay filter changes. Other updates include new campaigns, podcasts, and developments in BCH smart contracts and tools. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

henryf3

It is best to buy during crashes than DCA, let say you had 2k to invest in the last 4 months, with a average of 100k (or more) right now you would have 8% in earnings buying BTC, but if you had the money ready during the crash you could get up to 50% earnings in a couple days (that what I did buying ADA). Just think crypto is very expensive right now compared to 2 years ago, most of them for pure speculation, so if you already know the prices the big altcoins can reach (ADA, Solana, BCH) you can make more money than investing in BTC

aaroncu05

Yeah it was still a mix of the Wild West and the next era with Coinbase as a legit exchange and Bitmex for margin trading really taking hold. This was also during the BCH split from bitcoin which ran prices up. ETH was in its infancy. Scams everywhere as always, but there were stable coins etc finally. I still remember that run up. It was wild at the time. The crash was just inconceivable to most people but I remember some dudes posting some epic short positions like Flood on bitmex. I didn’t finally accept it was puking out and held on to hopium until we dropped below $10k and finally opened a short. There was not as much liquidity now and there were a few times this was exploited by whales

Realistic_Fee_00001

Onboard users faster than 4 per second. LN failed as a scaling solution. > Its BTC + monero + nano/kaspa + eth/solana but all on BTC. Everything is handled off-chain so its fast and efficient BCH has/is building this onchain.

DangerHighVoltage111

I don't understand why they are beating this dead horse. BTC does not work for payments anymore. If you want payments use Bitcoin Cash. Easy to implement, instant and reliable transactions. But you do not even need to implement it. You can send BCH via gift link just fine via Signal.

DangerHighVoltage111

You can check out what it was supposed to be on Bitcoin Cash. BCH payments are instant btw.

DangerHighVoltage111

Because it is neither. It is a gambling token. It should be p2p cash but got taken away by the hijackers. USE BCH 🟢

GentlemenHODL

Obligatory fuck Roger Ver, he can go cry himself to sleep. Hypocrite shit on BTC for years claiming BCH was superior but didn't even follow through on his own words, kept most of his stack in BTC. Eat shit Roger.