BCH

Basic_Sector8501

I pay with crypto as much as possible and if speed is the concern I use litecoin or BCH.  Sometimes Stellar or the lightning network.  Speed is not really an issue anymore.  Solana is also fast af and cheap to send, not my first choice though, its slightly centralized.  I never use ripple because it is completely centralized. Still not sure how they beat the SEC security debacle. 

mrjune2040

Ffs, the team was NOT split in half. And if BCH had the ‘potential for growth’ it would have….grown. But it’s downtrended against BTC for EIGHT YEARS.

YogurtCloset3335

Don't listen to the Maxi ETF guys. Buy XMR and BCH, you'll thank me later. If you don't trust it just put in $100.

Bagmasterflash

BCH is thriving in its own part of the world. When the fork happened BTC chose to integrate with the tradfi system. We are all seeing the results of that. BTC is being set up to be the money of choice to usher the world away from the failing dollar. There is a lot of value in that. However with that choice BTC gave up any possibility of being innovative or supporting an economy outside of our current one that is leading society down a dark path. BCH continues the original intent of Bitcoin being a bootstrapped parallel economy and society that cures the world of the current issues pertaining to tradfi. BCH has been able to continue to innovate in this new economy where BTC has struggled, (OP_Return Wars). I encourage everyone to check out sites like www.bchbull.com (for trading) www.moria.money (stablecoin) www.cauldron.quest (tokenization) These the site form the foundation for a new brand of world finance that cannot be easily gamed by TPTB.

Alaska_Engineer

BCH ATH was a little over 4000, but it was very brief. I got about 2250 each for mine.

textoro

For me, BTC is also the most important one, but I'm just curious because the fork for BCH was huge compared with others; the team was split almost in half, which is why I'm interested in whether it still has some potential for growth, or it will be forgotten and take a place on the shelves of history

Darkpriest667

BCH is the only one that's held up over time. It's currently in the 600ish USD range. It's ATH was around 1500, that's when BTC was 20,000. BTC is now 125000 and BCH is only half its ATH. Take that for what you will. I don't own it, but I'm a crazy maximalist and didn't move with the fork.

Illustrious_Ant_9242

BCH works rather well for payments. BTG et cetera will end up getting dumped but some people apparentöy buy that shit

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is advancing its codebase with upgrades focused on smart contracts, DeFi, and scalability. Key developments include VM Limits and BigInt CHIPs for enhanced arithmetic precision, Knuth Node upgrades for UTXO efficiency, and CashTokens ecosystem expansion. BCH's roadmap includes faster block times and protocol standardization, aiming to attract institutional-grade DeFi and developers. Recent ETF filings and technical momentum signal bullish prospects, though security risks and regulatory delays pose challenges. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet highlights developments in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem for October 5, 2025. Key updates include the bugs.cash FundMe campaign to sustain its BCH faucet, BCH Guru Events and ParityUSD dApp launches in Q4, and the release of the bch-connect React library for wallet integration. Additionally, a StarCraft II tournament with a $365 prize pool is scheduled for October 11. Rising interest in BCH ETFs and Spanish translations of BCH Bullet articles aim to expand BCH adoption globally. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

I_c_u_p

It's crazy to hear Doge in the non-shit category, a few years ago it was the mascot of shitcoins. You're not wrong either, it's crushing coins I used to think were legit like BCH, XLM, LTC

Consistent_Plan_4430

I've been buying BCH 😆🙃

andys811

Surely by that logic BCH is more similar? Although I will agree that they are still both very similar

DangerHighVoltage111

No you can't. BTC got crippled and only has the throughput for a tiny fraction of the population and if banks start to use it you will be priced out and will not get a transaction mined ever again. > That will never happen with bch becuase no one uses it, it doesnt have value and never will That's what they said about Bitcoin in the beginning, too🤷‍♂️. There is a good reason why BTC won't p2p cash, but there is no reason why BCH cannot gain the same value.

MiserableOutside9335

This is certainly plausible, but I think there will be winners and losers in the altcoin space so yes while altcoins as a WHOLE may gain ground on BTC, how do you pick the winners and avoid the losers? For example, if you can underwrite BTC to a 15% CAGR (I think this is realistic) and I would put those odds at around 60%. Now how do you underwrite alts which may do a 50% CAGR but could also trend towards 0? The alts of previous cycles like BCH, LTC, Uniswap, Flying Rainbow Kitten, have not come close to reclaiming their previous ATH and seem to have lost steam in terms of their following. ETH has stayed strong relative to other alts but there is a small chance it becomes challenged by SOL or ADA, etc. There could also be 100 new alts that attract attention (some memes like SPX6900 or 401JK are already doing this). There is a very low chance BTC is supplanted in its role. So I guess what I'm saying is it makes more sense to buy BTC. Now if all you have is $20,000 USD and you want to achieve "Lambo/F you" money, fine maybe go all in on fartcoin. But if you have $10,000,000 USD and you want to diversify a little bit away from your existing holdings of SP500, properties, Gold, overseas stocks, etc. I think a 5-10% exposure to BTC makes a lot more sense.

DangerHighVoltage111

>Idk what to tell you, man. No one will ever give a shit about Bitcoin Cash. We will see, people said the same about it in 2010 when it was still called Bitcoin.🤷‍♂️ p2p cash is the solution to many of our current problems and BCH can provide it. >I do think Bitcoin will scale, mostly through custodians. Well then it doesn't scale. >I do see that as a problem That's good! >but it's still clearly the only one that has a chance of "winning" Being used custodial is not winning. It like saying a prisoner "won" his freedom by moving him to another cell. If you have to trust custodians again you lose all of Bitcoins features, yes even the SoV one. You need to have the majority in self custody and used p2p if you want to enjoy a better system. You know what happend to Gold, then gold backed fiat and then just fiat? Same will happen to BTC. >Every crypto has trade offs. Using custodians is not a tradeoff, it is capitulation. >The trade-off Bitcoin Cash has is that absolutely no one will ever give a fuck for it. We will see. You could join and help making this a false statement :)

LovelyDayHere

On Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and other blockchains with some form of adaptive block size or other dynamic capacity regulation, its does.

IWantToSayThisToo

When? I'll tell you exactly when: when they refused to increase the block size and BCH was forked. That's when all hopes of it being a currency died. 

jaimewarlock

They are just tokens. If you want a game that uses real value try out [Nythyria](http://Nythyria.com) which uses **Glitter** which is pegged directly to Bitcoin Cash (BCH). One **Glitter** is equal to one bit (100 Satoshis) whether buying or selling.

AnoAnoSaPwet

Depends entirely on utility. If the alt is not utilized appropriately, then it is just a shitcoin harnessing artificial value. Like governance/exchange tokens. Generally, LP trading pairs are used as profit generation to prevent impermanent loss, as a liquidity provider. I'd say to "some degree" they have value, but most network tokens are also shitcoins that hold artificial value if not properly utilized for transactions/smart contracts.  I would view capped supply, network tokens as fractionalized stock options, but only if the supply is finite (BTC/BCH/LTC). Inflation is practical for long-term network growth, but some examples such as Ripple/XRP/XLM or Cardano/ADA have had set limits of ridiculous proportions for years now, and they use that supply as a method to just print more money out of thin air, hence being a shitcoin of not much real value.  Burn mechanics are not enough on their own, unless there is enough transactions to justify the supply as deflationary (as well as consistent network demand to hold value), wherein which it will retain value against inflation, giving it value.  The vast majority of major networks I research, do not have finite supply, do not have adequate burn mechanics, have insufficient liquidity/demand, and not enough effort to retain network value against inflation.  The biggest thing that I look for in network tokens is: 1 - a fully circulating supply, with a capped supply limit (most PoW networks)  2 - adequate utility of their network token  3 - ability to scale to demand 4 - last but not least, decentralization factor (many of which networks do extremely poorly on)  Currently there is really not **anything** that hits all 4 notches, not even BTC. I'd refer cryptocurrencies as very similar to how the Gold Standard operated, if you have something of value, but it is not utilized appropriately for use, then it only has its own inherent value (what it is currently worth).  Since most popular networks have wiggle room in their supply caps, they are subjected to mass inflation (meaning they can offload the difference in inflation by unlocking more supply). It's only going to get worse when ETF/ETPs get approved large-scale, as "seemingly" infinite amounts of outstanding paper shares will be printed to *unofficially acquire* more supply.  I'd be more on the lookout for low supply capped crypto tech stock, than anything else, and there really isn't much of that going around this cycle. 

LovelyDayHere

> Fulcrum, a lightweight BCH indexer Fulcrum can be an SPV server for either Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Bitcoin (BTC), and Litecoin (LTC) data depending what full node you hook it up to. Its origins are on the Bitcoin Cash network, but it has grown.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet highlights recent developments in the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) ecosystem. Fulcrum, a lightweight BCH indexer, is gaining traction for its efficiency and reliability, adopted by wallets like Cake Wallet. Paytaca hosted a workshop teaching students to integrate BCH payments into games, promoting blockchain innovation. The BCH community plans another 'bank run' on October 1 to withdraw BCH from exchanges, exposing liquidity risks. Additionally, BCH-1 partners with the Blaze Hackathon to support developers, and BCH-Cockpit offers a fallback tool for accessing funds from Cauldron pools. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Consistent_Plan_4430

Why is BCH slept on?

longonbtc

Knots is basically just Core with some modifications that enable you to easily change settings. https://old.reddit.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/comments/1nf6ffl/why_choose_knots_over_core/ You should be aware of the history of the sole maintainer of Knots and the development process of Knots: https://blog.lopp.net/knot-a-serious-project/ And you should also be aware that the sole maintainer of Knots is considering hardforking off to create a permissioned version of Bitcoin that has a centralized committee that reviews transactions and has the power retrospectively alter the blockchain. He may not really do it but if he does, then he would have created another altcoin that forked off from Bitcoin like BCH.

DangerHighVoltage111

If you discount all the non sound PoS coins there really aren't many. BTC: doesn't scale Doge: a memecoin with high inflation. BCH: fixed supply, bitcoin blockchain, scales, smart transactions etc. LTC: BTC clone with a little bit more throughput, but with the same pitfalls as BTC: blocksizelimit and segwit. Monero: Good MoE contender, scales a little less good than BCH but has default privacy. 🤷‍♂️

Ninjanoel

if BCH can't be a success without highjacking the r/BTC subreddit, I hate dishonesty, which is what that is, so BCH should frizzle out and go away, everyone knows BCH is a joke. proof of work is dead.

DangerHighVoltage111

Nothing could be further from the truth and your BCH cannot be robbed despite what you are trying to tell here. https://bitcoincashpodcast.com/faqs/BCH-vs-BTC/is-low-hashrate-a-problem >AND BCH is as old and junk as Bitcoin, just with increased block size and stuff, That just shows that you have paid no attention and just dismisses it on the basis of maxi slander. New and fancy does not always mean better. If you think about it you will find, that our current FIAT system is basically an informal Proof of Stake system, where the ones with the money write the rules. PoS is not sound.

Ninjanoel

proof of stake is ONLY acceptable for Bitcoin, and Bitcoin is old and slow and expensive and not fit for purpose. BCH is a joke.

DangerHighVoltage111

>go away with your shilling of BCH, it's a failure. Absolutely not. >Proof of work is outdated and wasteful, and it's only acceptable for Bitcoin. Ironic since BTC is the one chain that is most wasteful. A single tx uses more power than most appliances don't use in a month. Imagine a blockchain that uses just seconds of a powered LED for each single transaction. PoW is the only way for a sound MoE because it has features that you cannot replicate with Proof of Stake. But that is a whole different discussion.

Ninjanoel

Proof of work should go away, BCH is a disaster waiting to happen. It's done, it has no security. if you haven't been robbed just because no one has bothered to open the unlocked front door, doesn't mean the unlocked door isn't a security hole. the moment BCH has any success it'll get 51% attacked by 3% of Bitcoin miners. AND BCH is as old and junk as Bitcoin, just with increased block size and stuff, there are 100x better cryptocurrency out there. I presume you don't want to know about those others cause you got a big bag of BCH you got to shill.

Ninjanoel

go away with your shilling of BCH, it's a failure. Proof of work is outdated and wasteful, and it's only acceptable for Bitcoin. BCH is trash, even if you make money from it, it's still trash.

DangerHighVoltage111

Why should I answer you honestly when you ask a stupid trick question. You could ask that for ANYTHING before it gains widespread adoption and dismiss it. I do most of my donations in BCH these days, but no supermarket around here accepts it yet. But you try to spin the argument that that is somehow BCHs fault. It is not. Bitcoin as p2p is the first money (and an experiment) if you can get a widespread MoE without state force. >Face it, no crypto is being used as peer to peer currency, nor will be. Maybe, maybe not. I'll keep spreading the word and ask merchants to accept it.

42069autist

First off. They said they aren’t here to give you advice on what to pick. Secondly. Neither am I However, I am doing quite well with my $BCH 342% gain and $DOGE with 112% gain. But I got in early for both of those. Holding for months now and Doge has not been back to my average since. BCH I have a bull thesis for. But I ain’t saying shit on here about it. For me and me alone. I know my target prices. Also, the whole apt market is down right now. They follow eth which is down from its 52 week high. All my other alt coins I hood are down with my $eth too. So calm down and hodl ffs

LargeSnorlax

Well, the ones from /r/btc are and always swarm this kind of thread, after so many years I've just ignored them in general, they believe in BCH which is fine and the blocksize debate played out ages ago The thing I don't get are the people (and the people upvoting them) who are mindlessly calling it a ponzi scheme. I doubt half of them have ever even *made a blockchain transaction*, let alone taken their assets off Coinbase, let alone done something with Bitcoin. "Biggest ponzi of the 21st century" - Says a guy with *zero* crypto history People don't even know what a Ponzi scheme *is*. Bitcoin is a payment mechanism. If its price went to $1 tomorrow it would still be a payment mechanism. People owning Bitcoin who want its price to go up don't make Bitcoin a Ponzi any more than people owning NVIDIA wanting its price to go up make NVIDIA a ponzi scheme. People owning Bitcoin doesn't mean they control it. The thread and Reddit in general are just full of nonsense.

Realistic_Fee_00001

Short answer: But it is a good indicator of the incentives working out right. Long answer: https://bitcoincashpodcast.com/faqs/BCH-vs-BTC/is-low-hashrate-a-problem When BCH gains more adoption the hashrate ratio will change and BCH will own more of the hashrate cake and become more secure.

Ninjanoel

a few percentage of Bitcoin's miners could completely destroy BCH. "But they haven't yet" is not the security guarantee I want from my money.

Realistic_Fee_00001

Who used YT in 2006? Or who used the internet in 1990? Almost nobody. Small blockers destroyed all the adoption BTC gained and BCH is starting basically fro scratch.

Realistic_Fee_00001

>Bitcoin is not a stock, is money. True for Bitcoin Cash BCH, not true for Bitcoin BTC anymore

TheRicFlairDrip

around 2016 when transactions became too expensive for BTC and it forked into BCH

theacerofspuds

For me it's more that he was incredibly opinionated and protective of BTC whenever anyone tried to question the mechanics. So the moment the BCH fork business started, he would absolutely have had something to say about it if he had still been alive.

Uranium_Donut_

Isn't solution #1 just BCH?

skr_replicator

I wonder when the halving doesn't make a dent, and the block rewards are pretty much just fees, what users will be willing to pay to the entire bitcoin's hashrate with just 1MB of transactions. I guess at that point bitcoin will have to pull BCH. And then the BCH crew will be mad because they did that first, lol.

baIIern

Yep, make a post about it and get downvoted by crypto bros who will tell you about tokenized wine bottles and hey that one year they paid a coffee with BCH in Vietnam and it was almost as fast as a debit card

SolidGaming44

BCH is solid one

CttCJim

The only time I've seen a threat hurt BTC is when BCH had that emergency difficulty adjustment crap that made it really easy to mine when nobody was mining so the miners kept jumping there and BTC slowed to a crawl.

lepurplehaze

Already done, BCH and BSV both "worthless" now same would happen to blackrock or whatever shitchain they will try to push, people would continue to use the real bitcoin.

badasimo

Ding ding ding! Bitcoin would become "bitcoin classic" or something and remain on its current blockchain, and the new fork everyone wants to use to increase the supply could try to take over the bitcoin name. Look at BCH for instance, that was the "old" version of BTC after a hard fork. Everyone who holds the original coin in this case, would also own the equivalent amount of the "old" and "new" versions unless there were specific conversions made in the new fork. So while 51% is technically the threshold, in order for the new version to maintain the value of the original it would really have to be a 90%+ market support not just with nodes but with holders, exchanges, etc, otherwise you risk the new coin not getting traction and the old version could remain dominant even with the nodes/miners switching.

biba8163

Remember when Tom Lee and Fundstrat were bullish on BSV because of their investment thesis that it was the enterprise data layer blockchain? **Beware of false prophets who get paid to shill and market crypto.** Tom Lee and Funstrat Analysis on March 2020 with BSV priced $309 (current value $25) > I think there are some really unique features that make BSV something that we want to pay attention to. One is really the high throughput for large block sizes,” he said. "It really does seem to be a burgeoning community as well for something that’s really been in the marketplace for about a year.” - Tom Lee https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0?t=984 > We think it's uniquely positioned you (BSV) in the market. We have to educate clients a lot on why this is a very differentiated value proposition for building an economy that allows for enterprise usage and building a data economy. We think it's a very important thing you are working on because folks misunderstand the application of the Metanet you are seeking to build. There is a problem with the internet that you are are addressing. The success of (Metanet) will be a key to making society as a whole better https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0 > Since its Nov 2018 launch, BSV is up 288% while BTC is up 85% and BCH is up 22%, as of Feb 13th, 2020 **Metanet: Beyond digital money, towards an on-chain internet** Genesis aims to position BSV blockchain as a universal server for hosting internet & application data | Internet | Metanet | Application | |:-----------|------------:|:------------:| | Chrome | Maxthon| BSV powered internet and blockchian browser | Gmail | Baemail| BSV powered peer-to-peer communication | Yelp | True Review| BSV powered reviews https://fundstrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BitcoinSV-Genesis-Update-2.18.2020-Finalv2.pdf

biba8163

**BSV is down -92% since Tom Lee and FundStrat shilled it to death** and wrote paper outlining why it is such a great investment that they believe will continue to outperform the market because it has utility as the enterprise data layer blockchain. Tom Lee and Funstrat Analysis on March 2020 with BSV priced $309 (current value $25) > I think there are some really unique features that make BSV something that we want to pay attention to. One is really the high throughput for large block sizes,” he said. "It really does seem to be a burgeoning community as well for something that’s really been in the marketplace for about a year.” - Tom Lee https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0?t=984 > We think it's uniquely positioned you (BSV) in the market. We have to educate clients a lot on why this is a very differentiated value proposition for building an economy that allows for enterprise usage and building a data economy. We think it's a very important thing you are working on because folks misunderstand the application of the Metanet you are seeking to build. There is a problem with the internet that you are are addressing. The success of (Metanet) will be a key to making society as a whole better https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0 > Since its Nov 2018 launch, BSV is up 288% while BTC is up 85% and BCH is up 22%, as of Feb 13th, 2020 **Metanet: Beyond digital money, towards an on-chain internet** Genesis aims to position BSV blockchain as a universal server for hosting internet & application data | Internet | Metanet | Application | |:-----------|------------:|:------------:| | Chrome | Maxthon| BSV powered internet and blockchian browser | Gmail | Baemail| BSV powered peer-to-peer communication | Yelp | True Review| BSV powered reviews https://fundstrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BitcoinSV-Genesis-Update-2.18.2020-Finalv2.pdf

DangerHighVoltage111

Only for chains that do not scale. Try BCH.

northcasewhite

2017 had lots of fud. China banning exchanges, the BCH fork, segwit2x, USAF etc.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The BCH Bullet for Sunday, September 21, 2025, highlights key developments in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem. Episode 161 of The Bitcoin Cash Podcast discusses BCH advancements with Jason Dreyzehner, focusing on Functions, Quantumroot, and STARKs. The SLP Foundation has rebranded as BCH-1 to boost BCH-native products and connect projects with capital. Paytaca hosted a blockchain workshop at Western Leyte College, empowering students with hands-on blockchain experience. Additionally, BCH has shown positive performance against Ethereum and Bitcoin over the past month. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

whisperedstate

BitConnect, EOS, Iota, DASH, NEM, NEO, LTC, BCH, what do these coins have in common?

lovebitcoin

Hope BCH will surpass ETH + BNB in market cap sooner than expected.

DangerHighVoltage111

I agree. But in my opinion the worst is behind BCH, it has been steadily building and growing since 2021. I really hope we see more adoption pockets like we saw on BTC with Bitcoin Beach etc. But this time with working p2p cash.

Ancient-Stock-3261

Cool to see BCH getting more stablecoin traction, but the real test is liquidity + adoption - without that, it’s just another ticker on DefiLama. I’ve watched plenty of “new coins” fade fast because folks chased hype over fundamentals. With the right strategy, though, plays like this can be positioned smartly instead of blindly.

Bagmasterflash

BCH does it better than all

Django_McFly

**You** will not see an alt season if you think we haven't had one so far. You bought the wrong alts. SOL has gone from $10 to $250. HYPE went from $3 to almost $60. They aren't alone. In 2021, EOS, XMR, BCH, XNO and a shit ton of others were never able to get back to their 2017 high. You bought the 2025 remix of those tokens if you think there hadn't been an alt season and there may not be one. Dog shit can't hide from the charts. I'm sorry to inform you, but that's what you own. You thought they were gems. They're EOS 2.0. I hope you were trading them and bought low. They aren't long term hodls.

DangerHighVoltage111

Dude I answered your question then you started hating. I've proven nothing but that BCH has smart contracts and people are building on it. The rest is in your head. Over and out.

QuickDaikon1

BCH aims to reduce a monotheistic approach by design, but it needs to work on some interoperability similar to COSMOS SDK modules, which should be a long-term plan for the DeFi future on BCH. They already took a similar approach in privacy

DangerHighVoltage111

counterboy12: Nobody builds smart contracts on BCH me: Shows what smart contracts are being built on BCH counterboy12: No, not like this! Haters gonna hate 🤷‍♂️

QuickDaikon1

BCH is a better scalable programmable money, though ETH doesn’t scale without L2s

Jonathan_pratt

Good question — and it’s been asked a lot since Bitcoin’s early days. The short answer is: anyone can copy Bitcoin’s code (that’s how forks like BCH, BSV, etc. exist). What you can’t copy is the network effect — the miners, the nodes, the liquidity, the trust, the 15 years of uptime, and the belief that Bitcoin is the “hardest” money. It’s kind of like trying to clone the internet. You could copy the tech, but you can’t copy the adoption and security that’s already there. Bitcoin’s value isn’t just in the code — it’s in the consensus. That’s what makes it unique. So yeah, copies exist, but they don’t compete on the same level. BTC has already won the “hard money” race.

DangerHighVoltage111

I agree, but to me this is not random, it was planned and executed. Censorship and social engineering pathed the way to cripple BTC and the crippling in itself than lead to a narrative change away from p2p cash and in the end to "custodial is fine for payments" The 2021 crowd never heard the original message. The thing is, BTC cannot be a sound SoV without being p2p cash. If you can't use or even transfer your BTC p2p/self custodial than the custodian is in full control of the value of your stack. But few understand this. XMR is great but has two major flaws which are the reason why I support BCH over XMR. First, ASIC resistance is not a good feature. It makes you vulnerable to a massive pile of dormant computing power. Second, default privacy doesn't scale very well. If you get over the Ver/Jihan thing you should take a second look at BCH, you will find the early Bitcoin vibe there.

Wild_Leading8863

Many have tried and the most successful I believe is bitcoin cash (BCH). The most difficult part will be convincing the millions of people familiar with bitcoin and crypto that the “new bitcoin” is something worth looking into.

ButterflySecret6780

He bought less than 1% of a Bitcoin cash which is less than 6$ so it’s likely he doesn’t meet the minimum threshold for selling plus I’m sure there’s fees for selling but yeah I agree buying BCH is pointless I’d rather buy USDC and collect 4.5%PA.

Iitaps_Missiciv

I never said it was Bitcoin. And from what I understand, it's more like an iou promise that venmo gives anyways, so I don't actually have BTC or BCH

Paddy_Powers

So you tried to sell barely over €4 of BCH! Hell, I probably wouldn't allow anything less than €10 worth, so I think they are right.

blaziken8x

That's like 6 bucks worth of crypto, probably the fees to sell are higher than that. Also, I hope you know that you don't have BTC that's BCH. BTC: [https://www.coinbase.com/price/bitcoin](https://www.coinbase.com/price/bitcoin) BCH: [https://www.coinbase.com/price/bitcoin-cash](https://www.coinbase.com/price/bitcoin-cash)

LetWaltCook

It's probably because the fees to sell BCH are not being shown. You probably don't have enough to cover the fees. BTW, I do not have Venmo, but I understand how Crypto works.... kind of. I also would never touch crypto from Paypal/Venmo until all the kinks are worked out.

sirjethr0

first mistake was buying BCH (unless you didn't, then different mistake)

nameless_pattern

That same incentive to go along with misbehaving would prevent anybody from fighting too much. Otherwise you end up being Bitcoin Cash (BCH). Bitcoin core v28-29 changes storage size which was one of the big things in the block size debates that they said just had to be whatever the previous magic number was and now it's changing. So I guess it wasn't so sacred and I guess Bitcoin core could just decide to change it at any point even though it *had* to be what it was before according to core. Both it changing on the whims of those controlling groups and it not changing at all and becoming increasingly obsolete to those groups benefits cuz they're the ones for collecting the fees from layer twos, are undesirable outcomes IMO 

_Jimmy_Rustler

BCH has a $12 billion marketcap so I wouldn't say the market rejected it.

LargeSnorlax

Person you're responding to is trying to argue BCH here, so it's not really worth responding further. The ethos of /r/btc is that Bitcoin bad, BCH good and you're not going to get a proper argument here. BCH works fine for what it is, a minority Bitcoin fork. Contrary people can use it all they want, but it was firmly rejected as the dominant chain years ago for valid reasons listed above.

Teamduncan021

We already had BCH and bsv and market kinda rejected it. I know it doesn't answer your question. But someone already tried better btc, and market doesn't trust it.  Elon also tried to make doge the better btc. And lead to nowhere 

DangerHighVoltage111

No, that is a misconception. BCH is a fork not a new chain. Before 2017 BCH was simply called Bitcoin. It is the same chain it is the same community that forked it (part of it). https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/block/0

DangerHighVoltage111

No, that is a misconception. BCH is a fork not a new chain. Before 2017 BCH was simply called Bitcoin. It is the same chain it is the same community that forked it (part of it). https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/block/0

LovelyDayHere

The original invention escaped the stranglehold of its hijackers in 2017. It's now living free under a new name and ticker: Bitcoin Cash (BCH).

DangerHighVoltage111

For that you need throughput. You need people to make actual p2p transactions. That's why you should use and promote BCH, it's the Bitcoin with enough throughput.

Perfect-Sir5660

The only alt that has gone home (regression band) this year is Etherium. Honestly not confident many alts will hit ATHs. Personally, I would only invest in BCH, ETH, SOL, and XRP.

DrSpeckles

2 halves - BCH and KASPA holding most of it, then a bunch of trending small ones - those with “100x or zero “ potential. Things like SPX6900, Somnia, 401jk, Memecore. Probably won’t amount to anything, but small investments.

DangerHighVoltage111

Too little BCH.

hautdoge

More bitcoin and ditch LTC, ETC and BCH. Those are all irrelevant forks

YogurtCloset3335

mmkay so I guess I didn't buy BCH at $150 and sell at $600 then HODL4LYFE lol

DryMyBottom

and I thought BCH was an old thing 🙃

DangerHighVoltage111

>Over time, more groups (like institutions or countries) get interested Again not for infinity. >When people sell their Bitcoin for cars or houses, that Bitcoin doesn’t disappear, someone else now owns it But nothing guarantees you that that they will buy it for more than you bought it. >meeting waves of new demand Where do they come from? A second earth? What if people decide LTC or BCH is now the Store of Value? > The demand outpacing supply is what we’re experiencing and unless that changes that’s what we have to measure. That is exactly what I'm saying, you just assume the demand, which is wishful thinking. And even dangerous when that demand only comes from expecting to sell it for more later. >Again to my original post, this is hard to wrap our heads around because it’s hard to measure anything outside of fiat guard rails. This topic does not concern FIAT at all with the only exception that you have to sell your BTC for FIAT before you can use it because BTC will not a widely used MoE. Which means BTC can be replaced with every other asset with low or now growth. An asset with consistent burn would even be more scarce.

Local_Tangerine9532

What about BCH? It could really benefit from more exposure.

YogurtCloset3335

lol I guess you haven't looked at BCH price lately

Local_Tangerine9532

BCH would like a word

Django_McFly

If you think there hasn't been one, I hate to break it to you but we need to have a serious conversation about hose ADA, XNO, BCH, DOT, ATOM etc bags you've been holding on to for dear life.

Django_McFly

Y'all probably still thinking ADA is gonna turn it around any second now. You avoided *crap* like ETH, SOL, HYPE, etc and bought *real* tokens like DOT, XNO and BCH. Altseason has never meant that absolute dog shit sets new ATH. Especially when it's the garbage y'all buy. That ATOM is dead dawg. It's the new EOS. It ain't coming back.

Realistic_Fee_00001

Core is compromised, always was at least since 2015. Use BCH, this is why it exists.

LovelyDayHere

As of 2025-09-11 9AM __Precisely 0.00000000 BCH have been stolen by this attack.__ Although Bitcoin Cash users were specifically targeted by this malware, the lack of success of the attacker might be ascribed due to poor targeting which seems to have focused on Metamask wallets and code which includes the infected NPM packages. It seems such code is hardly used in BCH wallets or payment handling software, if at all, or BCH developers have taken sufficient steps in advance to protect their build processes against such vulnerabilities. Several Bitcoin Cash services and wallets responded quite quickly after the attack became known, to indicate that they had audited their code and were not affected. There is still a need to recognize from this attack, that building critical financial infrastructure on top of an NPM-based stack is hazardous, as shown by the multiple supply chain attacks against NPM packages over the last few years. BCH developers seem cognizant of these issues with NPM, and the need to carefully audit their dependencies included through open source code.

waxwingSlain_shadow

BCH hasn’t really moved in price since 2014.

CatatonicMan

BCH? Now that's a coin I haven't heard of in a long time.

biba8163

**BSV is down -92% since Tom Lee and FundStrat shilled it to death** and wrote paper outlining why it is such a great investment that they believe will continue to outperform the market. Tom Lee and Funstrat Analysis on March 2020 with BSV priced $309 (current value $25) > I think there are some really unique features that make BSV something that we want to pay attention to. One is really the high throughput for large block sizes,” he said. "It really does seem to be a burgeoning community as well for something that’s really been in the marketplace for about a year.” - Tom Lee https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0?t=984 > Calvin maybe we'll have you and Craig (Scammer Craig Wright) raise your hand https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0?t=1068 > We think it's uniquely positioned you (BSV) in the market. We have to educate clients a lot on why this is a very differentiated value proposition for building an economy that allows for enterprise usage and building a data economy. We think it's a very important thing you are working on because folks misunderstand the application of the Metanet you are seeking to build. There is a problem with the internet that you are are addressing. The success of (Metanet) will be a key to making society as a whole better https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0 > Since its Nov 2018 launch, BSV is up 288% while BTC is up 85% and BCH is up 22%, as of Feb 13th, 2020 **Metanet: Beyond digital money, towards an on-chain internet** Genesis aims to position BSV blockchain as a universal server for hosting internet & application data | Internet | Metanet | Application | |:-----------|------------:|:------------:| | Chrome | Maxthon| BSV powered internet and blockchian browser | Gmail | Baemail| BSV powered peer-to-peer communication | Yelp | True Review| BSV powered reviews https://fundstrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BitcoinSV-Genesis-Update-2.18.2020-Finalv2.pdf

biba8163

Yup, Tom Lee was paid to promote and market BSV and he's being paid to do the same for ETH. Tom Lee and Funstrat Analysis on March 2020 with BSV priced $309 (current value $25) > I think there are some really unique features that make BSV something that we want to pay attention to. One is really the high throughput for large block sizes,” he said. "It really does seem to be a burgeoning community as well for something that’s really been in the marketplace for about a year.” - Tom Lee https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0?t=984 > Calvin maybe we'll have you and Craig (Scammer Craig Wright) raise your hand https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0?t=1068 > We think it's uniquely positioned you (BSV) in the market. We have to educate clients a lot on why this is a very differentiated value proposition for building an economy that allows for enterprise usage and building a data economy. We think it's a very important thing you are working on because folks misunderstand the application of the Metanet you are seeking to build. There is a problem with the internet that you are are addressing. The success of (Metanet) will be a key to making society as a whole better https://youtu.be/xGmjRCXZxI0 > Since its Nov 2018 launch, BSV is up 288% while BTC is up 85% and BCH is up 22%, as of Feb 13th, 2020 **Metanet: Beyond digital money, towards an on-chain internet** Genesis aims to position BSV blockchain as a universal server for hosting internet & application data | Internet | Metanet | Application | |:-----------|------------:|:------------:| | Chrome | Maxthon| BSV powered internet and blockchian browser | Gmail | Baemail| BSV powered peer-to-peer communication | Yelp | True Review| BSV powered reviews https://fundstrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BitcoinSV-Genesis-Update-2.18.2020-Finalv2.pdf

biba8163

8 years ago, noobs like you were falling for the tech meme calling Bitcoin a slow dinosaur, not scalable, losing dominance on the way to becoming irrelevant. EVERY SINGLE tech meme shitcoin gullible people mentioned here were better than BTC has lost money over 8 years or underpeformed BTC. > - In 20 years Bitcoin will be to crypto what AOL is now to the internet. > - Lol—try 3-5 years. > - I think 20 months tops > - 20 yrs? Think 2. > - It' ll happen sooner. The world turns faster constantly. Bitcoin is like a fat, slow dinosaur > - Agreed. Could be months. The space is wide open for competition. Could def see ETH and BCH taking the crown. > - Someday people will think that it'd ridiculous to pay fees and wait time to transfer money and they will buy IOTA > - Companies will not bet on a burning piece of garbage like Bitcoin, and whatever they pick will win. I guarantee it. See: Bosch/IOTA. > - Hmm your comment has made me think of possibly splitting my portfolio four ways - ETH, IOTA, XRP, REQ. > - The sad fact is there are coins from 4 years ago that are better than Bitcoin, we don't even need new projects to take leaps forward. > - Tl;dr I think your bitcoins are going to be about as valuable as your 20 hours of free internet CDs from AOL > - In 2017 alone, Ethereum, Iota, Ripple, Vertcoin, Monero and Litecoin have all made big moves in terms of tech and adoption. What will 2018 bring? 2019? Will Bitcoin still lumber into 2020? > https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7kval4/in_20_years_bitcoin_will_be_to_crypto_what_aol_is/

DangerHighVoltage111

>And there we are again. BTC is BCH's only competitor & adversary. Hey you are the one in a BCH topic starting to bash BCH. The nerve of Maxis sometimes... > https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-btc-bch.html#alltime > > The crypto world is bigger than these two assets. Feel free to toggle in some others at the bottom of this graph. Nice graph! Can you read it? Here let me help: 2009 - 2017 BTC exponential growth that was sabotaged by the blocksize limit 2017-2023 BTC's true throughput: ~300k per day 2023++ Wizard guys found out they can stuff data into the Segwit space AND even get a discount for it. These transactions are smaller in vBytes than monetary tx so a few more fit into the block. __BUT__ you can't really see how interested people are in BTC tx, because the blocksize limit is so low, that BTC basically always has full blocks. To see the interest in BTC tx you have to look at the memepool and BTC fees. And both are at an all time low. Just a few weeks ago there were actually a few block that weren't completely full for the first time.

MichaelAischmann

And there we are again. BTC is BCH's only competitor & adversary. Bashing it is the sport, even with wrong arguments. [https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-btc-bch.html#alltime](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-btc-bch.html#alltime) The crypto world is bigger than these two assets. Feel free to toggle in some others at the bottom of this graph.