BTC

BuyIndependent2319

I don’t even know what I would do if I had access to 50 BTC. Buy a Tesla maybe? I can do that anyway

GreenBullOne87

Dude I did the same thing. Over traded and lost a lot of money. Realized I would have made more if I wasn’t chasing green candles so I just held the coins I had. That didn’t work either lol. I turned $5k into $600 now. I got in at a bad time though also. I’ve been slowly starting to DCA into some of my better coins but for the most part I’ve just been buying a ton of BTC and ETH.

SpontaneousDream

hype once again the only coin making new ATHs against USD and BTC

Gr8WallofChinatown

I’ve been in the space since 2013. You are disingenuous. There is not much good in crypto. 1. A stupid statement. Traditional finance makes up the entire world of course there will be MLing. However, the entire preface of the existence of the origin crypto is to be a p2p alternative to banking system. It was originally designed to be a ML system. Especially (at the time) it was touted to be “privacy” (due to not knowing who owns the wallet address”. Now today it’s a bastardized world just designed to extract as much money as possible from the next person. 2. I personally think they shouldn’t own any stocks or crypto outside of a 401k. Bitcoin is a COI. You have grifting (mostly maga) politicians all pushing for bitcoin and for the government to buy bitcoin (and allow 401ks to buy bitcoin). You have BTC mining companies lobbying Ted Cruz and Co to siphon tax dollars and cheap land and energy to mining companies which strain energy grids at the cost of tax payers. You then have Trump launching scam coins to money laundering and scam which is against the emoluments clause. 3. It was clear. You’re stating a stupid Coinbase talking point. I never said bitcoin is a security as it doesn’t fit the howey test. The howey test is simple and most crypto falls under that. 4. Good luck with that? How stupid of a statement is that. Oh it’s corrupt and Thiel and pedo elite owns it so let’s do nothing. 5. Also a stupid statement. The existence of bitcoin ETFs are fine as they are regulated. The 401k and pensions being used as liquidity for it is not fine. Also the Pelosi is not the best trader and that’s just another internet bullshit talking point. You have 4 republicans worth more than her. 3 of them more than 2x her net worth. MTG when from 700k net worth to 25 million dollar net worth in her short time.

PreferenceOk2716

The speaker lineup says a lot about how much attention BTC Prague is getting this year. Having people like Michael Saylor, Jack Dorsey, Jack Mallers, Adam Back, Jeff Booth, and Natalie Brunell in one event shows how broad the Bitcoin conversation has become.

BuiltToSpinback

The 1000 BTC was valued at $66 million

True_Bodybuilder8095

Yeah, including stablecoins really distorts the picture BTC dominance looks way more stable when you strip that liquidity layer out.

Aeschbacher15

>Between March 4 and March 25, 2026, the company had sold a staggering 15,133 Bitcoin for an aggregate sale price of roughly $1.1 billion How are they only valued at $66 million if their BTC sales alone generated more than $1 billion? I'm confused

Realistic_Fee_00001

Sad history, Imagine what could have been if BTC stayed true to the mission. 😥

SatoshiNokomata

Had almost 30 BTC back in 2013…sold in a panic, so the knowledge of future would be more valuable than simply having possession…

siorge

most polymarket markets resolve on announcements (for example, in the case of Strategy BTC buys, many people lost money because the company bought BTC before, say, May 31, but announced it June 1, and the market resolved on the announcement of a buy, not the buy itself) it is a clusterfuck overall

TheManBL2020

It'll be back. 1 BTC = 1 BTC

Adonael

Nice chart, thanks for sharing. Yeah, people calling for altseason while BTC was dumping and at the same time while dominance was falling (because stablecoins market cap stayed the same) was weird to watch.

Ok_Percentage4090

Sounds like BTC Prague is basically side quests everywhere. You walk in thinking you’ll just check a few booths, then suddenly you’re debating uptime, power rates, custody, and mining infrastructure with 12 tabs open in your brain. Also “wear good shoes” might be the most honest Bitcoin conference alpha here lol.

Catbatt

Moral is, don't invest in shitcoins. I dabbled in altcoins in the beginning. I was about 70% into BTC and 30% into alts. I made some money on some, and lost some on others. Overall probably just more or less broke even. I was an idiot who hoped to make a lot of gains in little time and who thought that I missed the boat in Bitcoin. It was at about €3000 at that time. It would have been much better spent and peaceful had I just DCA's 100% in Bitcoin from the beginning. Luckily I was smart engouh to "only" allocate 30% into alts, but even that I regret. It should have been 0% into alts. I 've been into cryptocurrencies since 2017 and I remember how during that 2017 bull market so many projects were "Revolutionary! Will dethrone Bitcoin!" only to all sink into irrelevance, never to come back from the abyss. Same happened with different shitcoins in the 2021 bull market. The reply to pretty much all questions like "which coin should I invest in?" or "should I buy this coin?" or "When is a good time to buy this coin?" is just to not buy that coin unless it's Bitcoin and invest using a DCA strategy.

Truth_Wombat

Jake Pahor gives good commentary on crypto cycles. This post is worth a quick read (starts with why he skipped SpaceX IPO then gets onto the BTC price and his view on the low). https://open.substack.com/pub/cryptosuperhub/p/why-i-skipped-the-biggest-ipo-in?

gordonfr_

But people need to pay their bills with weak money and could buy productive assets like stock with it. Isn't the current and future USD price for BTC all that even matters? Maybe I did not get the more religious aspects of BTC yet.

TheresNoSecondBest

I don't do charting but if you need a top up on your Hopium, here are apparently charts showing [how BTC price could hit $100K before October](https://cointelegraph.com/markets/these-bitcoin-charts-show-how-btc-price-could-hit-100k-before-october).

airestotle092

10.7 million BTC at a loss. 2018 and 2022 bull markets started when atleast 10.5 million BTC were at a loss. It could consolidate for several more months but if your planning to hold when it hits $300k, $50k or $60k doesnt matter just buy now

fidisna

please ask this guy to pump BTC

svagis

Polymarket users have zero power because everything is decided by holders of third party UMA tokens Same exact kind of drama happened a couple of weeks ago with MicroStrategy BTC market

PuzzleheadedHuman

Nice project. The scoreboard is only as defensible as the price oracle behind it, so the resolution rules are where this lives or dies - and they are exactly what an influencer will attack when they dislike their score: \- Touch vs close: does "BTC hits $120k by Q3" count if it wicked $120k for one minute intraday, or does it need a daily close above? Those produce very different accuracy numbers. \- Which venue: a single exchange's print can diverge from the broader market on wicks and on low-liquidity alts. A cross-venue reference stops one venue's bad tick from flipping a call between hit and miss. \- Survivorship: calls on coins that later delisted or went to zero are the most important to score, and they are the first to vanish from most price APIs. If you publish the exact resolution rule next to each score, it gets much harder to dispute. Disclosure: I work on data at Coinpaprika, so per-exchange OHLCV history is my corner.

Joy_Boy_12

Joined on February 22, I remember that Bitcoin started to decrease and then on march to crash. I'll never forget when I saw BTC at 20-16k and I said I'll wait because it will fall to 10... My biggest takeaway is DCA no matter what 

Think_Willow8784

Consolidate all to BTC is the only way

TrixoftheTrade

1 BTC = 1 BTC Don’t chase the highs or run from the lows. Bitcoins value in a variable fiat is irrelevant in the long term.

momomojo54

Thanks for writing such a long and thoughtful reply. Cudos to you listening to all of that despite the garbage music. I have a question: when people say "rising prices" why is it measured in USD? Isn't BTC an alternative to the dollar?

Harfatum

ETH has currently about 121.8 supply and a sustainable 0.8% inflation rate which decreases over time. BTC's "supply cap" is either a fiction or the security budget will trend to zero, resulting in double-spends and other attacks becoming exponentially easier over time. There will be more than 21 million BTC and more than 122 million ETH; the only differences are that ETH isn't pretending that issuance isn't tied to security, and it also doesn't have to waste money paying miners to buy ASICS and electricity so it can afford a much lower security budget and therefore lower inflation in the long run.

AllMils

Condense to BTC, eth, sol. And some prayer beads

tap_the_glass

So Saylor? MSTR almost owns 1 in every 21 BTC that will ever exist

throwawayainteasy

I like how it tries to imply the (supposed) end of the Iran war and BTC being slightly down (or slightly up depending one time they hit post) are somehow inherently tied.

Leynnox

If clarity act passes, BTC will attract most of the liquidity, not sure it will impact alts a lot tbh, except killing all the shitcoins and memecoins

wolfofone

People should not be asking random folks what to do wifh their money. Get a fiduciary fee only financial planner / advisor and pay to not do their own research if thats what they want to do. People should never invest in something they do not understand and if they do anyway that is, in fact, their own problem. With that said random people should tell people that if they want to do anything Bitcoin is the only thing they should be looking into and that if they are going to buy BTC to do it on Strike, Gemini, etc and not some shady exchange no one has ever heard of lol. BitcoinBeginners sub is decent. But yes people do need to do their own research. They are the only ones ultimately that are going to have their best financial interests in mind.

numbersev

BTC dominance is 2% above it's annual low and alt coins are a bit higher than that low because ETH is less and more into other alts. For any true alt season you first have to wait for bitcoin to surge significantly. As money pours in it rotates from btc to eth to large/mid caps and then meme coins. The market is down quite a bit right now overall, meaning a good buy opportunity if you have conviction. Most alts are crap but some have utility. We're likely near the bottom. [https://charts.bitbo.io/long-term-power-law/](https://charts.bitbo.io/long-term-power-law/) What we're experiencing now (bit of a surge to $66k) could be a dead cat bounce where it's about to go into the $50ks. Of course could stay sideways or start to take off (Clarity Act).

zmagickz

No one can predict the future but 44k seems like a more than reasonable floor with a dampened ATH and cycle low The only way I see it going lower than this is if MSTR was forced to dump BTC or if AI has another strong 12-18 months. It is the shiny object right now

soccerchamp99

I consolidated to 100 pct BTC and have never felt better

AutoModerator

Post is by: DazzlingNet1516 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1u6zdx8/is_this_altcoin_rotation_actually_real_or_just/ BTC has been moving pretty sideways lately, but some mid-cap alts suddenly started waking up. I’m seeing random 15–30% moves, volume spikes, and a lot more people talking about “alt season” again. I’m not sure if this is real rotation or just traders getting bored while BTC waits for its next move. When I check volume and funding across a few exchanges, including Binance and MEXC, some of these alt moves look strong but also kind of overcrowded already. The part that makes me cautious is how fast sentiment changed. A few green candles and suddenly everyone is acting like the market is back. Are you guys treating this as the start of a real alt rotation, or are you still mostly staying in BTC/ETH until there’s a clearer confirmation? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Successful_Big_3423

That's because you have approximately 126 days left until the BTC bottom.

Fun-Distribution3407

In all, BTC is the future of global financial transactions as the failure of the USD is certain considering its current trajectory.

Bluejumprabbit

Track which names lose less than the market on red BTC days, then see if they reclaim local highs first on the bounce.

Successful_Big_3423

When anybody has to ask, "Where can I buy..." something, the answer is ALWAYS, the Black Market. You gotta hit the streets man. Careful though. Those BTC ATMs are not cheap.

Successful_Big_3423

WHY? You are saying that a SHA-256 ASIC can only mine BTC? What am I missing here?

Successful_Big_3423

I want to say - WOW! but I have to ask myself, "How many people did he go through to get those 2 guys to say $10K USD over 100BTC?" All I'm saying it seems edited.

elio09071987

I bought 1.6 BTC in march 2020 at 5k but unfortunately sold it when reached 11k 😭

Theverybestestintown

Sell 80%. Rebuy when BTC hits 50-55K. When SOL is above 250, sell 80%, keep rest for a higher peak. You're welcome.

Independent_War_4194

2009 - 2025 = BTC is big , shiny object , grabs attention of everyone 2025 - future = BTC fades , quantum/space/A.I. are new shiny objects maybe it will come back but i have my doubts , it would need something like a 50% rise in 1 month or a similar mega thing to be shiny again

SensitiveAd6131

I don’t believe in quantum. Imo it’s 99% hype. Capabilities are there but the outputs of the quantum computers are imposible to read and understand yet. Maybe in 20 years plus? In any case i don’t think I would go all in in anything, we’re close to a big market corrections. I mostly only trade BTC and DCA small amounts on very few projects with low balling limit orders

quintavious_danilo

Where are you from? Bybit.eu offers 2% cashback in BTC to EU customers. It‘s free BTC with every purchase you make. Won’t do much but you need to pay for stuff anyways so it’s a good way to earn some extra BTC.

bbatardo

Strategy disclosed the sale June 1st and from then until June 10th BTC was down almost 14%. However.... Nasdaq was down over 7% and SP500 was down over 4% during that same time period. People like to pretend Strategy selling caused a large dip, but there were bigger macro events going on during that time period. The most volatile assets always have the biggest dips.

Nrs_Vecna

What you guys are not seeing is that the amount is not important. Satoshi wallets held 1.1 mil BTC for the past 17 years with zero movement. İf they were to start getting active again, this wouldnt probably mean satoshi or the methusalahs started selling. It possibly means that the quantum computing finally broke the wallets, and noone is safe, and the fundamental that BTC is built Upon is gone. This is why it will trigger a crash like never seen before. The amount of BTC getting sold is irrelevant. The fear that a government backed group finally got the wallets is enough to push BTC down around %95.

sobe86

> At those prices, an anonymous ghost or group of people instantly becomes one of the top 5 richest entities on planet Earth. We are talking about a net worth that rivals or exceeds Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and entire sovereign wealth funds. You get that someone has to buy the bitcoin off them right? Net worth in 1m bitcoin is completely theoretical, the same way Elon's trilly valuation is. If there isn't a trillion dollars on the other side willing to buy that from them (or if you prefer, willing to trade goods worth that amount), then it's not really worth that. What would happen if they tried to sell in reality is they'd very quickly run out of buyers, the price would tank, and things would normalise. Remember that the price of BTC you hold doesn't matter, all that matters is what you sell it for.

SimpleMoonFarmer

> loaded gun pointed at the global economy Only at BTC price.

mattriver

That possibility is already baked into the price. Believe me, if Satoshi (or anyone) came forward and publicly destroyed their keys — the BTC price would instantly skyrocket. So the argument works the other way as well.

GianBarGian

>Until those coins are cryptographically destroyed This doesn't make any sense whatsoever. BTC can't be "cryptographically" destroyed.

Marlon-Brandy

Haven't people done the same with BTC? Putting their money into a coin created by an unknown person that still holds a large chunk of it, an entity that could be for all we know, a terrorist organization and the purpose of this coin is... well, futile. The "tech" that has been surpassed by most other coins, and even then, most people don't need the tech.

ilovesaintpaul

Anyone who doesn't see how big a deal this is hasn't studied BTC. Really nice.

Reasonable_Ad5611

SATA is a variable rate, BMNP is is fixed. BTC is a non-productive asset, ETH is staked and can pay for dividends forever.

Vipu2

Ok I tried, sent it thru bridge while wrapped in InuDogeAI coin in exchange called youonlywin dot com and I havent seen my BTC, I need you support now!

_Stylite

Ok but the price of bitcoin is tied to MSTR, and that matters. If MSTR goes under and dumps their BTC it’s an existential threat for investment in bitcoin.

SorryAdvertising2566

Rip sub and rip BTC 😭

Shazvox

BTC doesn't 'fail' because it decreases in value.

LiveMinute5598

Try to move 100 million in gold bars easily/securely and now try the same with BTC.

mulletstation

If you're holding BTC, which is fine, as it's basically just at tech stock, you should be comfortable with Saylor and his thesis.

1HashPerSecond

So we know how much the liquidity is high; how fast it's moving. I'm not afraid for BTC

Piccolo-Complete

Years ago (like 5-6 years), there was a growing wave of excitement around bitcoin, ETH, and even some altcoin ETFs or similar vehicles. There was talk of national banks and reserves adopting stablecoins and making them an important backbone of global commerce. Lots of people here believed this was the proverbial foot in the door that would allow crypto to seize and overthrow our current economic systems, bringing equality and wealth, unseat the Global Elites, and blah blah blah. I warned then that everyone had it backwards -- acceptance by Wall Street would mean the end of the crypto world as we had come to know it. BTC would become simply another asset to be manipulated, used as a hedge/relief valve, arbitraged at scale by those with the power to do so, and on and on. The mystique would evaporate, and crypto as a whole would begin to function more like a high beta tech stock for a company that technically can't go out of business, but also will never be on par with the Mag 7. Or even if it did, then it would just be a low beta, high cap tech stock. Successful, but not paradigm shifting. So far, my analysis rings pretty true, but I suppose it's early yet. Any disagreers in chat?

Alternative_Week3023

BTC ATMs have horrendous spread. If you are looking for a Switzerland based exchange, maybe take a look at Swiss Borg: [https://swissborg.com](https://swissborg.com)

Vast_University_7534

Yes, congrats on learning that BTC isn't a business that is for profit. You're comparing two different things, stocks and crypto. BTC is a commodity

Oaker_at

Reading the sentence “it hit me, you’re not buying software, you’re buying exposure to BTC” in 2026 is truly baffling

Upbeat_Acanthaceae41

All of you are missing the point. Of course everyone should do their own research - no one is saying otherwise. What would be helpful is pointing that person in the right direction by giving them what many already in crypto consider basic information. Tell them that there is a difference between BTC and altcoins and also utility and meme coins. That they need to decide what they are looking to do in crypto so that they know what to research (gambling for possible instant riches/investing in projects with potential/storing value as a hedge against inflation). Give them something they can work with without being a jerk. Share your experience without being preachy. Why are any of you even wasting your time typing out a response that is useless by itself. If you don’t want to help then just shut up and move on.

Purple-Wall3847

Isn't this the same guy that a few week ago that was selling? I think it was to generate cashflow for dividends, but it was spun as a scarry signal and "is he giving up on BTC" narrative.

SadExtreme8597

the mining one is wild because it's not even subtle. nobody profitably mined BTC with GPUs after like 2013. these posts get traction because they're optimized for the exact emotional buttons that get upvotes lol

swaaoa

For what it's worth, I work at Clapp and we built ours exactly around that idea: 0% on unused credit, no fixed repayment schedule, multi-collateral (BTC ETH others) so you can spread liquidation risk, and real-time LTV tracking in the app. Not pitching it as the answer, just saying the revolving model exists and tends to suit HODLers better than term loans.

Master-Condition-249

If more companies start holding BTC like this, it stops being “alternative” pretty quickly

Glittering-Local-147

If nano flips Bitcoin which is just as likely as Jesus to return I will admit I am wrong. I'll admit I'm wrong if ANY crypto flips BTC. There haven't been spam attacks anymore because there's no reason to do it, just like there's no reason to kick a puppy. Good luck my dude.

pedroccp1

You just look for trends, narratives and decoupling from similar price action compared to BTC. A good place to start is coinmarketcap or coingecko.

Blade_Runner_69

This sub and others on reddit are getting brigaded by the buttcoin losers this bear market. It's so obvious too, on here it's not so bad the mods usually find and delete the bots and fake info sharpish. But on r/ Cryptocurrency it's a complete shit show of low IQ fud posts, bots and brigading. That sub is borderline unusable now because how negative and hostile it has become. I've seen BTC negative bot posts with fake info on 5000+ upvotes up for days with the mods turning a blind eye. Almost feels like Reddit is compromised 😞

GlockenspielVentura

Anybody who has ever used a loan to buy BTC in October of a midterm year has profited massively, the only people telling you no are people who literally buy the same amount dca, including at peak euphoria around cycle tops.

RevolutionaryTask452

And yet, both MSTR share and BTC went up , so i guess someone knew what he was doing...

TheresNoSecondBest

Why posting a screenshot instead of a link, mate? Strategy has acquired 1,587 BTC for $100 million to increase their Bitcoin Reserve to ₿846,842. They have also increased their USD Reserve by $100 million to $1.1 billion. Sauce https://www.strategy.com/press/strategy-increases-its-btc-reserve-to-846842-and-usd-reserve-to-1-point-1-billion_06-15-2026 Sauce2 https://bitcoinmagazine.com/news/strategy-spends-100-million-1587-bitcoin

Kanzoo123

Agree with the others — LTV is the whole game here. Anything above 30-35% and you're basically inviting a margin call the next time BTC has a Tuesday. The math people forget: if you borrow at 50% LTV and BTC drops 30%, you're suddenly staring down liquidation territory. Starting under 20% gives you breathing room for a full bear cycle without having to top up collateral in panic mode.

RoboMasterMind

The day it clicked for me, I simply thought it was realistic that a scoop of ice cream might cost 10 satoshis in 50 years. That was reason enough to start accumulating BTC for my children, so that \*their\* children could enjoy financial peace.

manjjinbuu

If you want exposure to ETH or BTC buy them… not the shitty companies….

Comfortable-Ant-418

Agreed, the only case in which Bitcoin wouldn't be used by groups of people we disagree with is if Bitcoin never got any sort of meaningful adoption. I don't know how anyone who understands BTC and wants to see it succeed is stuck on our enemies using it, because this was always going to be the case. Bitcoin is for everyone, that has always been the point. For better or for worse.

ThePugz

I own some BTC @ $16K some @ $30K a bunch @ $50K, a lot @ $60K, some more @ $80K even a bit @ $100-$125K @ bought some more today @ $65K. Just BUY BUY BUY

BryantNielson-QCI

I was at BTC2026 and those panels were jokes. Only Tezor is quantum-ready. The rest are not. Besides, current and wallets are not the only risk. Legacy wallets, wallets that are forgotten or where keys were lost, represent 25% of outstanding BTC, and they are all vulnerable.

NobodyImportant13

The answer is convertible bonds. Google them. Banks view them as basically risk free because they have the upside of equity (in this case the upside of BTC because MSTR is a proxy for holding BTC) and their downside risk is offset by shorting BTC.

citrus1330

This sub is so delusional. I mean I fully believe that BTC will hit all time highs again, but just because it's gone down and up before doesn't mean it will always do so. Mainly what gets to me is how cultlike y'all are, though.

tjlusco

For those sleeping under a rock, there are fairly strict KYC and know who you’re transacting with laws being introduced across the world. It’s the end of the pseudo-anonymous era. BTC has been the black market coin of choice, but it’s about to be undermined by regulatory capture. If people can’t exchange BTC for fiat, the gig is up.

invisiblekyd

Maybe but the dollar is only getting devalued. So in order to argue your point, the asset in comparison must hold its value against the 21 million BTC that ever exists

Glittering-Local-147

BTC 400k+ tx per day (many of wich could be millions each with Lightning) current fee is $0.05 Baby nano fast and free still does under 100k per day. Yikes. Yeah it's more secure, more valuable.

HSuke

Because they don't buy with cash. They buy after selling MSTR shares. And guess what dropped even lower than BTC?

AutoModerator

Post is by: Only-Locksmith8457 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1u6h7mm/i_built_a_forensics_engine_that_tracks_crypto/ For months I kept seeing the same pattern: influencer makes a call, price moves the wrong way, influencer deletes the tweet or pivots to "macro analysis." Nobody was keeping score. So I built **VOXCH,** a credibility engine that scrapes an influencer's tweet history, extracts every price prediction they've made, cross-checks each one against real market data, and scores them 0-100. Here's what the data looks like after auditing **35 accounts and 256 tracked predictions:** **The Numbers** * Average credibility score across all accounts: **45.1/100** * Only **20% of accounts** scored above 70 * **14.3% scored below 30,** meaning they were wrong more often than they were right, yet still have hundreds of thousands of followers * Overall accuracy across all tracked calls: **59.8%,** barely better than a coin flip **Highest Scores** |Handle|Score|Accuracy| |:-|:-|:-| |@rektcapital|80/100|100% on tracked calls| |@IncomeSharks|80/100|100% on tracked calls| |@RaoulGMI|80/100|—| |@100trillionUSD|63/100|77.8% on 18 calls| |@CryptoKaleo|40/100|57.1% on 8 calls| **Lowest Scores** |Handle|Score|Accuracy| |:-|:-|:-| |@CredibleCrypto|17/100|40% on 10 calls| |@tedpillows|20/100|35.3% on 20 calls| |@VentureCoinist|26/100|60% on 7 calls| |@APompliano|33/100|0% on 1 tracked call| |@CryptoWendyO|33/100|50% on 7 calls| **@CredibleCrypto has "Credible" in the name and scored 17/100. That's the state of crypto media.** You can run any account yourself in about 30 seconds. Just paste a Twitter/X handle. **→** [**voxch.xyz/forensics**](https://voxch.xyz/forensics) It's completely free. Paid tier unlocks the full historical prediction log and leaderboard rank. Curious what score your favourite influencer gets. Drop their handle below and I'll run it live. **How it works (for the skeptics):** 1. Fetches the account's last \~100 tweets 2. Extracts explicit price predictions (e.g. "BTC will hit $120k by Q3") 3. Checks the actual price on the predicted date/timeframe 4. Scores based on accuracy, prediction volume, consistency, and recency The data is live and updating. Every account you analyze gets cached and added to the leaderboard. The more people use it, the richer the dataset gets. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Good-Examination2239

ETH and ADA are my bags. Strongly considering choosing BTC next depending on its movements in the coming months. Feeling very bullish on Crypto in general given how low these prices have been and how bearish the market has been about the general global situation and the opening of AI tech stocks. I think crypto prices go up much more once things become more stable, it just might take several months first.

EarningsPal

If BTC goes to $200,000 then yes

Muisan

If selling 32 BTC is what's got the market down than how the hell aren't we skyrocketing right now after a buy of 1500?

Prestigious-Ad-7927

IBIT moves with BTC. MSTR is 1.4X BTC. In adddition, bid/askspread is tighter on IBIT vs bitcoin. Plus, I can sell weekly covered calls and puts to generate premium which is used to buy more IBIT and MSTR.

LibertyWithLiquidity

$1.3T market cap might as well be free. You're getting free Bitcoin right now, just so you know. There will be no difference between buying BTC now & literally getting it for free from the faucet website in 2010. There's roughly a quadrillion dollars of (mostly) fake wealth out there & the BEST SoV makes up like 0.1% of that? My brain can't comprehend that. Either these numbers are totally wrong or people are stupid af. Which one is it? Anyway... just bought some more.

TheresNoSecondBest

>That’s not how this works. A BIP-110 soft fork would change network rules They will either, self-fork (hardfork) out of Bitcoin or the whole proposal will fail to activate before August 7th. Bip110 cannot exist in parallel like Segwit for example. That's at least how I see it and why I'm not joining their camp. They're just making drama and attacking Bitcoin instead of trying to work together and change it for better. The vast majority of Bitcoin HODLers don't like NFTs, runes and other crap, and would be more than happy to get rid of them. But bip110 simply isn't the correct way, IMHO. >not require ordinary BTC holders to exchange or move their coins. There’s no need for hodlers to do anything. Agreed. Bitcoin HODLers won't need to do anything, no matter if it's a soft or hard fork.

gigasawblade

He paid with shares, so BTC price in USD is completely irrelevant. He also dumped the price of MSTR shares and then sold them at lowest to fill USD reserve, doesn't sound like such a great move to me

unknowngloomth

Yes, just hyperliquid held strong during BTC dips. The other coins didn't. All of them are down so much from their ATHs whereas HYPE isn't. The problem with alts is that. They're massively down from their ATHs. That triggers a bagholder ceiling problem

Patient_Craft2195

What you're looking for is called 'beta' in crypto. Low beta alts bleed less when BTC dumps and pump harder when it bounces. Check CoinGlass for BTC dominance chart — when dominance drops after a BTC bounce, that's your altseason signal. Also try Messari or Token Terminal to filter alts by correlation to BTC