BTC

gordonfr_

Using BTC for payment could lead to horrible tax complexity.

WeddingPKM

BTC has indeed failed.

userxtrustno1

I think people should focus on BTC and not on Saylor, who is always trying to get attention.

LionRivr

“Infinite money glitch” works as long as: \- BTC continues to go up, long term \- Strategy can service all their debts Saylor flew too close to the sun in the bull market and did not prepare well enough to optimize during the bear market. If/when the next BTC bull market emerges in the next couple years, I imagine the sentiment will be different.

BestialitySurprise

The safest approach is to hold but if you're not selling when it's ridiculously high, you are missing out on a lot of return. A friend of mine is one of those hold forever kind of guys. And pointed out how he made 500% by holding over whatever time period. Then I pointed out that even if he had sold about halfway up one of the big runs and then bought somewhat near the bottom, he'd be up 2500%. Definitely hold during the uncertain times because BTC can go all over the place but that $100k+ price was already ridiculous and when it hit $125k I sold everything. I didn't have much though because at the time, I was only mining. Now I'm buying these dips and selling in the short runs; since it's a bear market, caution needs to be on the buying side more so than the selling. But after the economy has gone through this looming recession and people start getting back on their feet, it'll be buy and hold for sure.

KontoOficjalneMR

> The dude was never meant to be a hero of the crypto community Are we in different communities? Because people here were licking his balls and shouted over anyone who pointed out that this exactly will happen if BTC ever has a bull run.

Arcangelo_Frostwolf

You have worse problems than a debased currency with BTC. It is entirely speculative. It has taken decades for the USD to slowly lose purchasing power, BTC can drop 30% in just months. Put down the Kool-aid.

boringtired

I don’t understand why people care so much about MSTR. While it’s him stacking BTC, BTC does exist on its own fwiw.

Real-Technician831

Now they are insisting that MSTR was never about not selling BTC, and this is all normal. Cultists gonna cult.

Poopy_Krappenschitz

And It’s already a bloodbath. It’s about the news, not the sale. Blackrock sells tons of bitcoin everyday and it doesn’t swing Bitcoin that much. A week or two ago, everyone was saying he just got the approval to sell, but he wouldn’t actually sell. Then he sold 32 bitcoin to “test the water and show people that he could sell”. Selling $225 million dollars worth of bitcoin is something completely different. This is a pretty big deal. MSTR had a 76k avg BTC cost and they sold $225 million dollars worth at a 15k loss. If this was the right move for them right now, it’s because they had to sell some Bitcoin for financial reasons. Companies don’t sell their assets at a loss for fun. There is no way this news is anything but bad news.

FromOrionToUranus

Why would you want to rate BTC in dirty awful FIAT? Isn't the purpose of owning BTC a means in itself? Whats the point of backing it's value in USD, if it's the future of money?

Jogi1811

Is it sad that this describes my irl relationship and now I can't get out just like BTC?

lavastorm

>Strategy still owns 843,775 BTC, along with roughly $2.55 billion in cash reserves. The latest sale accounts for well under 1% of its holdings. This makes it one of the smallest adjustments the company has made since adopting its Bitcoin treasury strategy. .... >But the message is hard to miss. Strategy isn’t just buying Bitcoin anymore. It’s beginning to show how Bitcoin can function as capital inside a financial system, while still holding one of the largest corporate BTC positions in the world.

Lefties_TheWorst7331

Dump the shit coins and stick to BTC. The King of Crypto.

HSuke

Yes. That's their real strategy. I wish I were joking, but they literally said that during their 2026 Q1 meeting. It's because they're trying to maximize their **Bitcoin Per Share (BPS) KPI**: 1. Sell MSTR to buy BTC when Enterprise mNAV is high (> ~1.22) 1. Sell BTC to buy MSTR when Enterprise mNAV is low (< ~1.22) Their strategy is literally to **buy high and sell low.**: 1. BTC price is high -> MSTR price ratio is higher > mNAV is high -> sell MSTR to buy BTC 2. BTC price is low -> MSTR price ratio is lower > mNAV is low -> sell BTC to buy MSTR

tomzi9999

Does he still have kidneys? Does his mom still have kidneys? Does his wife's boyfriend still have kidneys? Then why sell BTC?

HSuke

If you want a **serious** answer, it's because they're trying to maximize their Bitcoin Per Share (BPS) KPI. 1. Sell MSTR to buy BTC when Enterprise mNAV is high (> ~1.22) 1. Sell BTC to buy MSTR when Enterprise mNAV is low (< ~1.22) Since mNAV is high whenever BTC price is high, and mNAV is low whenever BTC price is low, **they will be buying high and selling low.** That's their strategy. I wish I were joking, but they literally said that during their 2026 Q1 meeting.

Doritos707

My guy this is not a religion. BTC was BTC. BCH is a fork, a new chain that continues from the data of the old chain. But it is entirely a new chain. BCH is BCH Owners of BTC all got BTC still and BCH The pre-mining factor will never allow BCH to be pure You need to start a coin from scratch even if its BCH 2.0 but it needs to have no pre-mine

FromOrionToUranus

I'd say never.. So many years have passed and adoption is as far away now as it was at the start. BTC has been unable to secure itself as a currency or as a store of value or even as a viable transaction tool. BTC trading is nothing more than a casino propped up by people that either really believe in it or people that really want to make money off the backs of said believers. The concept is interesting but that's it.

alodiken

Haha exactly. BTC really does that to you.

ImagineDragnThseNutz

Debasement; **the action or process of reducing the quality or value of something** **The market is debasing BTC 😂 **

Runfasterbitch

If he is publicly saying he expects BTC to go lower, his entire strategy is now fucked. He is/was completely dependent upon a stable or rising BTC price, and the math simply doesn’t work for him if BTC continues to fall

ImagineDragnThseNutz

over the last 5 years BTC has barely outperformed the sp500 but with much more volatility and few catalysts for BTC going forward. If you think measuring opportunity cost is silly , Michael Saylor has a ton of BTC so sell you 😂

ARoundForEveryone

No BTC or ETH in sight. No kidding you're losing money and don't care. Alts are fine, but only as a secondary and more risky investment. You've assumed almost nothing but risk, and haven't even learned a lesson from it.

mcfreiz

I only own BTC and SOL which is what I would recommend in general. If I had a to pick one of those two, link

Sacredwisp

Email was invented in 1971. Internet businesses boomed in the dotcom bubble, almost 30 years later. Social media, which is somewhat of an extension of email, only became mainstream in the 2010s, 40 years later. Bitcoin is 17 years old. As much as I am a maxi, if there's one thing I've learned from paying attention to things in the last 5 or so years, it's that things always take longer than you think. Politics and culture move slowly. Realistically, I'd say we have a good 20 years before real mass adoption, where everybody owns it and understands it. It will be exposure to ETFs for retirement funds, then companies putting it as 1% of their balance sheets at first, then sovereign wealth funds chipping away at it, and some international trade being settled in it. Of course, by then, with increasing adoption and inflation, one BTC will likely be worth several million per coin, conservatively. We are still very, very early. Edit: 20 years is my personal base case. It might be 10. That would line up more with the fourth turning crowd, although I have a hard time believing that BTC could go from 0.1% of worldwide asset value to 10%+ in a decade. It might be 30. Either way, it's not in 5 years.

No-Wrap3568

Cypher rock X1- BTC only (the only one with non-kyc inheritance)

XofHelix

https://preview.redd.it/3z7vc0m88mbh1.jpeg?width=821&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfcab8fbf853de6a456d4ee5c3e201d45ac81601 Just buy BTC and be done with it

Poopy_Krappenschitz

It’s the news that matters, not the actual sale. Blackrock sells tons of BTC everyday and it doesn’t affect the market much.

SkyEnvironmental7746

You can keep BTC

AutoModerator

Post is by: CaffeineComaMode and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1uoxs0u/july_1st_came_and_went_heres_whats_actually_left/ The dust is settling, out of the \~1,300 firms that operated in Europe before MiCA (up to 3,000 counting lighter national registrations), around 220 got licensed. Everyone else is winding down EU services, restricting features or sending you those important changes to your account emails. So instead of another thread arguing whether MiCA is good or bad, here's a practical map of what still works, by use case. Spot trading: Kraken, Coinbase, OKX, Bitstamp, Bitvavo, and Bitpanda all made it through. Liquidity on the majors is fine, and OKX and Coinbase have been running aggressive migration offers to absorb users from platforms that didn't make the cut. If you're just buying and holding majors, you've lost basically nothing. Derivatives and leverage: This is where it gets thin, MiCA doesn't cover derivatives - that's MiFID II, a separate license - and only a handful of platforms hold both, Kraken and Gemini among them. Retail leverage is capped at 2x. If you're a serious leverage trader, the honest answer is the regulated EU market no longer serves you. And sadly that's a policy choice Brussels made intentionally, not something any platform can fix. Earning yield and borrowing: The category MiCA hit hardest indirectly, since a lot of earn programs died with their platforms. What's left: Nexo came through with its MiCAR license and kept the full earn/borrow suite running - interest on idle crypto, credit lines against BTC/ETH without selling - and YouHodler cleared licensing on the lending side as well. If your strategy involves your crypto working for you rather than sitting still, this is now a two-or-three-platform conversation instead of a ten-platform one. Stablecoins: USDT is off regulated EU venues entirely - Tether refused MiCA's reserve requirements and walked. USDC and EURC inherited the market by default. If you're still holding USDT on a licensed exchange, most have moved it to sell-only; swap to USDC via a DEX if you want to keep stables on regulated rails. Self-custody: Completely untouched. MiCA regulates service providers, not you. Ledger, MetaMask, your own keys - all of it stays exactly as it was, and holding or trading anything peer-to-peer remains fully legal. If the shrinking regulated menu annoys you, this is the one exit no rulebook touches (at least for now). The overall picture: if your needs are simple, you're fine, arguably better protected than before. If your needs are sophisticated - leverage, exotic tokens, yield strategies - the menu shrank hard, and the platforms that did the compliance work early are inheriting everything. Consolidate accordingly and don't be the person still sitting on an unlicensed platform when the withdrawal queues get long. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Realistic_Fee_00001

You didn't get it. The same coins were BCH and BTC before the fork. Big blockers received small blockers coins and small blockers received Big Blockers coins. It's just your viewpoint. >how is BCH any different or better than BTG or BSV? I mean this question can only come from total ignorance. BCH is a working scaling Bitcoin with privacy, smart contracts, the fastest syncing node per MB and a lively community. BCH could manage the traffic of BTC, ETH and Doge together without any problem. >You are not even in line with reality any more while BTC is 1 TRILLION + , BCH is still under 5 billions. So what? BTC is worth more, so are military stocks worth more than solar stocks. I still rather invest in p2p cash than a captured controlled opposition. >This means that BTC OGs can spend a few billions each and every cycle to hinder BCH from ever seeing the light Yes, but BTC are peanuts against the dollar system. These guys can print trillions out of thin air. If Bitcoin as p2p cash system cannot win against this it was doomed from the beginning. Fortunately BCH does not need a higher price than BTC to win, it just needs people to use it.

ChangeNOW_Community

a common approach is DCA over time instead of trying to time BTC cycles, especially in high volatility phases

MathiasThomasII

Correct, which is why I just said it’s part of my portfolio because I’m young and there’s tremendous upside potential. It will not break my retirement, but it could make it happen sooner. Over the past 5-10 years BTC has wildly outperformed standard investment avenues. Granted there’s little to no history for BTC to predict, but that’s a truth as well. What historical patterns we do have, massive drawbacks are expected, it’s a volatile asset. However, that same history tells us, IF it rebounds, there’s decent likelihood it rebounds to 1.5x-2x previous highs. In 1-2 years BTC goes to $150k there isn’t another avenue you could’ve predicted better that also performed better of this 3-4 year turn. Measuring an outcome before a target is hit is just silly.

cucci_mane1

At BTC near $25k, mstr common share equity is worth near zero. But as btc approaches $40k, my guess is market will start panicking hard that mstr will need to liquidate hard. Btc may actually fall to $20-30k or below if shit hits fan with mstr

iwakan

There is no magic number where he goes bust (except maybe in the four digits or something). Instead it's about timing and funding. He has debt obligations, if he cannot raise the funds to pay that debt, when it matures, then he goes bust. Various amount mature at various times. The lower BTC goes the more likely it is that he cannot fund it, at least without massive realized losses by selling BTC, but again no one knows exactly when or how much.

unknowngloomth

BTC and alts aren't going to zero. Greed is baked into the human DNA.

bigshooTer39

BTC carried low caps up. They drop like a dress on prom night when BTC dips in bear market

kickinghyena

I will stop paying my taxes if the government spends them on BTC or any crypto not backed by a physical asset.

TrustInNumbers

MSTR selling bitcoin is good long term, they will crash and we will get rid of bad actors. A lot of people are avoiding BTC due to MSTR crash risk. Imagine how many new buyers we could get once MSTR is finally finished

TrustInNumbers

MSTR selling bitcoin is good long term, they will crash and we will get rid of bad actors. A lot of people are avoiding BTC due to MSTR crash risk. Imagine how many new buyers we could get once MSTR is finally finished

devCheckingIn

Yeah BTC actually pumped last week while they were selling. But this isn't too surprising since Saylor's sell was a pittance compared to the recent weekly ETF outflows. People still put too much emphasis on Saylor because they need to fan the FUD flames to keep the bear market going.

book4225

Wait did that cause the big and fast price reduction in BTC today from 63k to 61.5K?

unknowngloomth

History doesn't repeat itself. It rhymes. Saylor is the 21 century hunt brothers. Lmao. The oil billionaires who wrecked the U.S economy buying huge amount of silver coins. Though Saylor won't wreck the economy. But he will certainly hurt BTC. But it's good tho.

cucci_mane1

Serious question. What will happen if BTC drops to low $40k? Will mstr go bust at that point?

MadSL1m

Quick math check before the doom: 3,588 BTC is 0.4% of their 843,775 stack, and it covered the Q2 preferred dividends. The number that should actually worry people is the implied price, $216M / 3,588 is about $60.2k, against their $75.5k average basis. Selling below book to pay 8-12% fixed coupons is the exact loop the bears described. It's also now official policy, the June 29 "BTC Monetization Program" pre-authorizes more sales.

Relative-Slice-748

This micro strategy shit is a red herring. The BTC price is being affected by the federal reserve potentially putting interest rates up again. The reason it bounced last week is cos of negative jobs numbers, meaning the fed is less likely to increase rates into a slowing jobs market.

GentlemenHODL

>..if Bitcoin doesnt bounce up iirc Bitcoin may move in mysterious ways but strategy selling BTC is not mysterious. If they have to continuously do this for the next few years then I would expect BTC to react negatively. When such a large entity was bulk purchasing this was positive winds for traders reducing overall appetite to sell. With strategy selling it will do the opposite.

dan_dares

If Trump doesn't buy it up for the BTC reserve. I just have a feeling it's coming, like the bank bail-outs.

Dazzling-Material-79

If you just want a solid, low-stress setup, most people end up with something like Kraken or Coinbase for buying BTC. They’re pretty beginner-friendly, funding is usually smooth in Europe, and you’re not dealing with as many “advanced trading” distractions. Bitstamp is another quiet but reliable option if you want something a bit more old-school. Binance is still big for liquidity and lower fees, but it can feel a bit overwhelming if you’re not actively trading. It’s more of a “power user” exchange these days. For wallets, I’d really push self-custody if you’re planning to hold for more than a few weeks. A hardware wallet like Ledger or Trezor is the standard setup. You just buy, withdraw, and keep your seed phrase offline somewhere safe. If you want something simpler on mobile, BlueWallet is fine, but hardware still wins for long-term storage. Main thing people usually learn the hard way: exchanges are for buying/selling, not storing. Candora is something I’m keeping an eye on for later; once it launches, it will offer Anti-Spoof, which analyzes how order book liquidity changes over time to help distinguish stable liquidity from orders that keep appearing and disappearing.

ImagineDragnThseNutz

There is an outcome which is the opportunity cost of holding a failing asset. You might break even on a trade for a “neutral outcome” but miss a huge run up in another asset class (or less devaluing like BTC/USD)

longReshape40

It's a test of the waters to see how the market reacts versus that 32 BTC sale from earlier. It's a sizable amount this time but such trades can be arranged between institutions / OTC groups without much market impact. It's the news and the ripple effect that matter

minedreamer

why no BTC??

SkyEnvironmental7746

Since you understand QNT you realize you hold a scarce asset. And it’s utility stomps on BTC. Hold long term. Until $5000-$10000 or more.

Blade_Runner_69

I don't care. Take this trash to wallstretbets or other degen stocks and shares sub. I buy BTC and hold all the rest is noise.

Lavayo

True but that's a feature criminals can use because BTC does not discriminate. That specific feature you will find in lots of crypto currencies though.

SkyEnvironmental7746

That’s dead you can keep BTC

Silve96

Saylor sold 220M worth of BTC

gigasawblade

They buy with investors money so price in USD doesn't matter. BTC price measured in MSTR stocks matters, and from this pov they sold high. The question remains whether it is reasonable to investing in MSTR with the goal of getting more USD

Ordinary-One2597

Quantum computing is a threat to everything not just BTC the network will just Upgarde to quantum proof in a matter of a couple of weeks

ahhhaccountname

I guess I am confused because I thought if 1 chain that is different, then there is 2 different BTC. Even if .0000001% is rejected by bip110, now there is a chain that is different than core. That chain that is different will be missing what exactly? Would it be missing some BTC transfers? For instance. If someone transfers 1 BTC from A to B and bip110 rejected it but core didnt, would the result be that core has 1 BTC on B and bip110 has the 1 BTC on A?

tqlla3k

And this is why they started with 32BTC. It dropped pretty hard on the 32BTC sale, and this... it stings, but not as bad even though its 100x more sold.

cc99v

Personally cannot see how you’re gonna be in profit in 4 years on these. But clearly you’re very rich and losing 200k is nothing. Out of interest what made you choose these and not BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE.

Blockchainauditor

Tell me more about "kids". I assume you mean kids with their own smart phone and/or computer, who are savvy enough to set up a wallet and understand how to safely deal with their keys? How young do you think kids can really understand ... or have the opportunity to use ... BTC?

Crazy__Donkey

i bought a utility altcoin that had a really nice idea behind it, and was one of the earliest buyers. one day one of the devs emptied the pot. the owner managed to recover. as time passed i bought more and more (reached 2200$) it mooned 10X to about 23000$ and then crashed recovered to 10K and crashed again. crashed more i smoked hopeium crashed even more all this time the owner was active, had conference calls, showed progress. but no one was buying the utility itslef. at some point the dev started to spread and expend the project (i still belive it was in good faith) every withdraw from the pot was with complete transparency to the community, sometimes even provided invoices and show progress. at this point it was already 80-85% at loss, about 3 years in i stopped following. a year ago i swapped the remaining 129$ to BTCB. it was the week of ATH for BTC. now its about 80 USD. (have 5 more in BNB) didnt check my wallet since (until today) thats my wild crypto roller coaster ride

unknowngloomth

Who's ranting? I only replied your stupid maxi comment. Having a diversified portfolio using the barbell strategy is mathematically sound. I bet you don't even hold stocks, dude is probably so emotionally invested in BTC. Brutal. 💀

ADD-DDS

Buddy you should just liquidate this and buy high beta ai stocks right now. MRVL, WDC, VIAV. There are tons. You can probably make all this back in a couple weeks. If you’re dead set on crypto at least move into BTC and wait. It’s down 50%

WayfareAndWanderlust

Not even one sat worth of BTC lmao

Micha-Mich

The data suggest the oposite. He's either a complete fool not to see it, or a master baiter, luring people into the market before the final leg down, or soothing shareholders? I personaly feel he's just a permabul no matter what. BTC at $200 in 2027? Opportunity if a lifetime! Lol

Doritos707

Nope. A person had to be holding BTC prior to the fork to receive BCH. BCH holders suddenly had both BTC and BCH, how is BCH any different or better than BTG or BSV? You are not even in line with reality any more while BTC is 1 TRILLION + , BCH is still under 5 billions. This means that BTC OGs can spend a few billions each and every cycle to hinder BCH from ever seeing the light

jondubb

Ask yourself this question: if there is a face or team behind these coins, what happens to the project if something happens to or between them? Crypto is gambling, and the only coin without a face is BTC.

unknowngloomth

I also hold BTC. You regarded lol. Wtf. Yeah. I will dump every alt heavily in the next euphoric bull run then buy another alts and during the bear. Rinse and repeat. I will dump BTC and then rebuy it. Last cycle. SOL and XRP outperformed BTC. But since you're so emotionally invested in BTC and missing out gains. Nvidia alone outperformed BTC despite BTC having all the enterprise aping such as microstrategy. BTC only did a 8.1x from its 2021 bottom to 2025 top. Lameeee

MrStarrrr

Finally did this a few years ago and exchanged all for the king and ETH. I’m regretting not dumping ETH for BTC at the time too. Meh.

Sad-March-2358

BTC dumping again

Affectionate_Tie3470

Announcement that Saylor sold 3588 BTC last week. At least wait until he's done selling his 20k btc until you consider buying.

FYATWB

This post is a nice reminder that nearly everyone should be holding 90%/95% BTC and 5%/10% ETH It's so sad to see people getting duped by scammers on youtube into buying garbage. Shitcoins like xrp may never recover, there are too many old bag holders waiting to dump on you.

SeriousGains

Mt. Gox is holding $2.2 Billion in BTC which will be distributed to creditors on October 31st, 2026. Seems to align very well with the cycles.

unknowngloomth

Because people aren't maxi like you they wanna make money? Also BTC isn't panacea it's down about 50% from its ATHs and it will drop even more. If you don't wanna see sharp decline stick with S&P?

thatjerkatwork

This is pretty much all I'm doing now after casting a wide net for years. BTC only from here on out.

Dazzyreil

Dont worry they can and will drop another 90% from here! Stick to BTC or Eth or so.. every coin is a shitcoin but the at least the big ones are less shit.

cyger

I bought some Trump the next morning and was up like 7X for a few hours. Then Melania coin was announced, and everything started tanking. I got out with like a 3x. I see this as the beginning of the end for most alt coins culminating with the 10/10 alt crash. Almost all other Memes were liquidated to buy Trump. I sold almost all my alts after 10/10 save for a Solona bag. Have been selling lots of BTC of the last 2 years in to AI plays. Now like 65% AI, 30 % BTC, 5 % SOL

xcommon

I call it "Schrodinger's Argument Against BTC": It's simultaneously: [\-Not private enough for business applications](https://youtu.be/ecIQLO0qgWc?si=45XihCpu4NKGcIQg) [\-So private that it's perfect for criminals](https://youtu.be/gAVqVQkCwzw?si=KpYD9UmVv9CIrUmK)

unknowngloomth

No amount of different strategies will change the human psychology, dude. It's bake into our DNA. People just hate losing money and people are patient. Think about it. The stock market has assets printing green candles. See people saying how much they wealth is growing just by holding and DCAing S&P. People like myself holding BTC is just holding an assets is down about 50% from its ATHs and it keeps going sideways. It's tough having a psychological fortitude to handle this. I personally hope that Saylor liquidate his BTC bags. I wanna see BTC at $8k all over again.

cyger

The diehards will say, it happens every 4 years right on schedule. Who knows. All I know is 100 to 150K BTC by Jan or Feb.

Bluebookrealtor

1 BTC per month

Calm_Egg4984

ETF outflows can indicate market sentiment changes. Historical data on similar outflows often shows varied responses in BTC price. Examining those patterns may provide insights. For research only, not financial advice.

E92_isaiah

Buying BTC before maxing your Roth is a terrible idea. I do have more BTC than is in my Roth, but if you can’t afford both maxing the Roth first is the best investment

Miserable-Corner-163

return back to the same position where i buy BTC 58k

rtech50

And everyone could still have 1 BTC each

Realistic_Fee_00001

Every holder of BCH got free BTC 🤷‍♂️

Internet_is_tough

You are listening to the people that never buy in bear markets, always calling for lower targets. They will be the first ones to go all in at the new all time high. We are in the clearest possible DCA zone. Don't read trash and don't think, just accumulate. 85% of BTC is already in long term holders hands on chain, an all time high. The window is closing they've done most of the accumulating already.

supermanal

BTC should be fine, Trump can’t influence it much. The Trump Coin was a scam.

AdSea1923

I strongly disagree that it will be cracked in 3-4 years. I feel it is a similar story to fusion..that is also coming in 10-20 years... There are many bottlenecks that are needed to be taken care of before BTC is broken by quantum... And it doesn't even affect the BIP wallets. The only time when a BTC pubkey is exposed is during this 10 minute while mining. So I would say real banks and governmental databases are sooner at risk than Bitcoin.

bongosformongos

Level 9 requires you to mine 52.43M BTC. You can mine hundreds or thousands of BTC/s. Sure this isn't just any other idle game with the $ symbol exchanged for BTC? Cause that makes no sense.

IndustryMaximum83

So Aptos is a “major” blockchain? Compared to what, the memecoins and shitcoins? Theres BTC, ETH, XMR, and everything else, and the everything else has been a carousel of promises, pump-and-dumps, manufactured hype, and failure for the last decade or so.

HaikuHaiku

Usually we see BTC decline by around 75% from its ATH. Currently, we have only seen a 55% decline, so theoretically, it could easily drop to $31,000. But, that's just reading tealeaves, of course.

Jogi1811

With DCA it takes the emotion out of the equation for me. Payday = set amount alloted to BTC purchase. Set and wait till around October of 2029. To compound my gains I'm not purchasing Bitcoin directly and decided to go with MSTE where the last ATH put MSTE at $19.xx. Currently trading at $2.xx. As the cycle continues I will see how things shape by the end of the cycle. Will post earnings then.

moviemaker2

To clarify what the other commenter said, since there is some nuance. There are two main ways you interact with your seed phrase. 1) recording it non-electronically when it is created by a wallet. (either a hardware or software wallet) 2) entering it into your wallet. (either hardware or software) A more precise way of saying it is that you never enter the seed phrase into a non-wallet internet connected device. Your seed phrase is generated when you initially set up a wallet. The wallet app or device will tell you to write the seed phrase down on paper or some other durable medium, making sure that it is never digitized. \[stainless steel plates recommended\] No notes app, no password manager, no encrypted cloud drive, no encrypted hard drive, no digital photos of it. It will then make you verify that you did this - most (or maybe all) make you enter in the seed phrase again to confirm you did this. Entering it into the wallet itself is the only time it is ever entered into a device. (hardware wallets are often air-gapped so this is inherently not a security concern, and software wallets are trusted because you got them from the App Store on an iPhone, or you verified the PGP signature of your download on your Mac or PC running the latest security updates. This is not a universally accepted rule, but I consider using a wallet on an Android device the same as putting your seed phrase on a billboard in Times Square) The OP \*copied\* the seed phrase from Cake wallet, which is a form of storing it digitally outside of the wallet, albeit temporarily. \[I'm honestly surprised a phone wallet even lets you do this, but it strongly warns you not to do that before you actually do\]. The proper procedure, which even the wallet app will tell you, for transferring from one wallet to another is to again, write down the seed phrase (if you ignored the first instruction to have already written it down in a safe place already) then enter it directly into the second wallet. I don't think I've ever had more than a few hundred dollars worth of BTC in a software only wallet, even with all the recommended precautions.

CryptoHodlingMoron

It's 33% lower than where we are now. If we were to hit 40k, everyone will be saying 25k. People pick October because historically it has been a positive month for BTC. Only in 2014, 2018, and 2025 was October a red month. These same people seem to ignore that historically July has also been a green month, only breaking from this trend in 2014, 2016, 2019 and 2023.

DailyUpsAndDowns

I only buy with money I put aside specially for crypto and then only at the right price. A few things have to line up for that. Including being awake or not blinking. Blink twice and BTC will be back to 60k. Don't sweat this mate.