BTC

South-Monitor-1589

Actually the amount of BTC coming to the market is constantly slowing down

Actual_Pattern_265

They'll create BTC derivative products that you'll buy (or your government, or your employer, etc.). This will also diversify BTC exposure (offloading risk, reducing volatility, etc.), while they accumulate the underlying asset. This isn't anything new. It happens in almost all asset classes, some of which have WAY worse ownership concentration than BTC and do just fine. You'll also notice that there is MASSIVE institutional / retail exposure to Gold while most have zero physical holdings / vaults - ask yourself how that happens.

Django_McFly

Dorsey was willing to fuck the payment app over for years, just to promote Bitcoin maximalism. Dorsey fucked his company just to be a BTC maxi. I don't think Saylor would do that. Strategy is arguably doing better now than it ever was as a pure business intelligence company.

obolli

Yeah, though, as the builder of this, I have been looking at this for a really long time, Longs were underwater for so many months, there was not a single green day (mainly because a few large whales held on). This is literally the first time I see longs in profit as a whole (almost gone again now though). Shorts have always used lower leverage indirectly, longs tend to go all in, shorts use a percentage, so even with 20x leverage they usually only risk a small portion of their account and won't get liquidated until BTC would pump 100% or more

AutoModerator

Post is by: AdAncient6591 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rpvg1o/crypto_market_intelligence_march_10_2026/ The digital asset sector is witnessing a high-velocity rebound this morning as global risk appetite returns to the market. After a period of intense volatility and a brief descent toward $65,000, Bitcoin (BTC) has reclaimed the $70,000 threshold. This recovery is largely attributed to stabilizing geopolitical sentiments and a cooling of the recent oil price surge that had previously stoked global inflation fears. Institutional confidence remains a primary driver, evidenced by massive "buy the dip" accumulations from major investment firms totaling billions in value. ​Solana (SOL) continues to exhibit some of the strongest fundamental metrics in the industry. While currently trading in a consolidated range between $82 and $87, the network has handled over 1.9 billion transactions in the last 30 days. Institutional adoption for SOL remains robust, with dedicated ETFs adding over $21 million in assets this month alone. As the fastest-growing network for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, Solana is positioning itself as the primary infrastructure for enterprise-grade deployment in 2026. ​Ethereum (ETH) is currently in a high-tension defense of the $2,000 psychological support level. While immediate price action shows a tightening coil, 24-hour volume has reached $22.4 billion, signaling that the sell-side momentum is exhausting. Analysts are closely watching the $2,050 resistance; a sustained break above this mark could ignite a broader altcoin recovery. ​The macro landscape for March remains focused on the U.S. CPI data release scheduled for tomorrow, March 11, which will likely serve as the next major catalyst for market direction. ​Thank you for your time, Thomas Harrison founder of festive official brand *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Rare_Rich6713

BTC controls everything, many entered ETH because of DeFi but now you can stake BTC through the likes of Babylon while your BTC stays native. So why do we need eth?

AutoModerator

Post is by: Cute-Dirt-5915 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/ComplianceOps/comments/1rpu9cb/hot_take_wallet_screening_is_compliance_theater/ FATF's new stablecoin report: 84% of illicit crypto transaction volume in 2025 ran through stablecoins, mostly P2P between unhosted wallets. no VASP in the middle. Every crypto compliance stack i've worked with was built around the opposite assumption, exchange-to-exchange flows, withdrawal screening, travel rule between VASPs, and chain analytics weighted toward BTC. P2P stablecoin transfers between self-custodied wallets fall through basically all of it. I've got an exam in Q2. "we screen known bad wallets" feels increasingly thin when the examiner has clearly read the same FATF report and knows where the volume actually is. Regulators aren't going to wait for the tooling to catch up, they're going to ask what you're doing about the gap right now. There isn't a clean answer yet but "we screen exchanges" isn't it anymore. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

bankrollbystander

a lot of bullish arguments around Bitcoin come from the supply dynamics tied to the Bitcoin Halving, which historically reduced new BTC entering the market. some investors also believe increasing institutional access and accumulation could tighten available supply over time. however, macro factors like interest rates and decisions by policymakers such as Jerome Powell can still heavily influence market sentiment. So while the long-term thesis can be bullish, short-term price movements are still unpredictable.

CapitalIncome845

There are no cryptocurrencies like BTC

Thankyouclouds

Yes this is exactly why. I know it sounds regarded but some of us have partners that are absolutely terrified of this crash and are applying unnecessary stress to us and pressure to sell. You don’t get any of that when BTC is 120k. And no, not gonna leave my partner or sell but I know BTC will go up again so this stress is just SO unnecessary. I also understand the concern because my retirement & Roth account (all IBIT) is sliced in half while partner’s half is sitting pretty in SPY.

altFINS_official

**A few things are keeping it from falling harder:** **Extreme Fear = contrarian support.** When sentiment gets this negative, leveraged shorts pile in, and that creates fuel for short squeezes. The $80M squeeze we saw recently is a perfect example. **Stablecoin sitting on the sidelines.** Huge stablecoin supply means dry powder is ready to redeploy. It's not buying yet, but it's there. **BTC dominance holding (\~56-58%).** Institutions rotate into BTC as a "safe" crypto when everything else is uncertain. It's acting more like digital gold than a risk asset right now. **The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.** Government-level endorsement that didn't exist in past cycles. It sets a psychological floor. **ETH's $2K level.** That's a key psychological support. Holding it keeps broader altcoin panic from spreading.

Suspicious-Case3861

I try not to ask these questions.... I fear however by the time it comes up properly will go up also.. It sucks. I'm saving for a house and I know just 100k BTC would do it. Right now.

Suspicious-Case3861

Literally everyone knows you never brag about BTC. My word this could still slide right down to 39k I'm ready emotionally

Realistic_Fee_00001

FYI BCH is doing just fine even in the FIAT department. Believe it or not, not everyone bought during the short timeframe of the forkwar. If the sound money revolution succeeds BCH early adopter will gain freedom and enough riches to never worry again. BTC/ FIAT maxis however will always have to worry if an exchange will not freeze their coins when they want to sell. 🤷‍♂️ >And where's your revolution? Well, you have to look at BCH for that :) > Nobody cares about BCH Ah, good old projection :)

Arch_Lending

Our rates are around **8.49–11.84%**, but many borrowers look at Bitcoin’s long-term growth. BTC has averaged roughly **\~45% CAGR over the past decade**. That’s why some prefer borrowing instead of selling. And if timing isn’t ideal, the loan can **roll over**, so you’re not forced to sell your BTC. And if you sell, you could also trigger **capital gains tax, typically 22-37%.**

mneymaker

BTC is one helluva drug

Realistic_Fee_00001

Why are BTC shills so mentally handicapped?

oopssomething

This has to be the weakest bearmarket since BTC excistance. Can't keep it under 70k too long and soon 100k will be the bottom.

NoodlesOnTuesday

APY is almost the last thing I'd look at. The number that actually matters is the LTV ratio and where the platform sets the liquidation threshold. Borrow at 50% LTV and they liquidate at 80%? You need a 60% BTC drop before you're in trouble. Liquidation at 65%? Much less room. In a volatile market, that gap is the difference between a useful tool and a wipeout. A few things I'd check before comparing rates: * Do they notify you and give time to top up before liquidating, or is it automatic and instant? * Is your BTC held in their custody, or verifiable on-chain? * What's their track record when markets move fast? FTX taught everyone that APY means nothing if the platform has issues. Once those boxes are checked, then compare rates. Optimising APY before liquidation mechanics is the wrong order. Cheers

TrustLordJesusChrist

99% of the BTC will have been mined at some point in 2035 according to Saylor. Does the math confirm this?

Realistic_Fee_00001

🤷‍♂️ Only for a tiny fraction of the population since the crippling. If any bank starts using it as "settlement" layer say your immutable tx goodbye. It is not mostly true, it is mostly false. In fact at any single day only 0.005% of the population can transact on BTC. if the top 1% make a single tx every 200 days no one else will. Now add Banks to the mix.... And no LN doesn't solve this, because people will not get onto LN self custodial either. If people understood just how crippled BTC is the whole crypto space would look very different.

Realistic_Fee_00001

> No it can be used for other stuff though, like paying for goods at certain businesses while getting discounts and sending to people all over the world. So you might want to actually look into that before saying that. BTC got hijacked and crippled to prohibit exactly that. With just 4 tps the use as MoE for payments is out of the question at any significant scale. Peter Todd additionally killed 0-conf meaning you should always wait at least 1 conf (10min) before accepting a payment. And no LN does not help, because people cannot get onto LN at scale with 4 tps either. That's why people say it got stripped of it's use case. Also the reason why Bitcoiners forked into Bitcoin Cash. It is the Bitcoin where you can actually achieve this.

Sharrba

The sad part is we still have to go through the bank if we want cash for the BTC we sell. (I don’t sell) but I wonder about this someday…

TheresNoSecondBest

>When will you return BTC investing? Never stopped saving in bitcoin. Since under $100k, I'm even buying more aggressive. >Wars have worn down Bitcoin. Not really. I remember when the one in Ukraine "officially" started, four years ago. Bitcoin was at $40k. Currently sitting at $70k despite other wars. **Bitcoin was built for this scenario**. Investors in the middle east are buying bitcoin as an insurance because they can't trust anything else. >I also think it has deviated from its original purpose. Go and read the Bitcoin white paper. The original purpose is still the same. Just people realized Bitcoin can and will, do more than one thing.

RetiredAvocado

Depends on what their debts are. Sure they may have that BTC but also might be sitting on 2x that of bad loans.

theincognito66

I disagree. If anything, BTC is alluring because it isn't tied to a war machine. I'm glad to hold a currency that isn't responsible for dropping bombs on children.

Otherwise_Wave9374

Interesting angle. In situations like this I usually try to separate the story from the mechanics: do we have any recent confirmations on the BTC holdings (audited statements, wallet info, filings), and what does the float/liquidity look like on OTC if someone actually tried to build a position? If the BTC is real and accessible, the discount could be wild, but OTC can stay irrational for a long time. Not marketing related, but we have a quick checklist we use for evaluating these kinds of narratives vs fundamentals here: https://blog.promarkia.com/

GitGudGrammar

BTC wasn’t $61K yesterday or even the past week

baIIern

Why does a BCH propaganda paper show BTC in its thumbnail

DangerHighVoltage111

BTC got deliberately hijacked and crippled. They want even higher fees and killed 0-conf instant payments.

TheRadishBros

It doesn’t really matter why; AI agents are going to play a key role in investment strategy going forward, and they love BTC.

Dr-Lavish

Partially, but people in Iran or other places like say Africa, South America, they don't have access to paper BTC.

InfinityKaeron

Anything that has to do with buying BTC is a good strategy, even DCA during bull market. Anyone too scared to pull the trigger is a pussy.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Royal Government of Bhutan transferred 175 Bitcoin (BTC) worth $11.85 million on March 9, 2026, as recorded on the blockchain at 11:56:37 UTC. This transaction follows a recent transfer of 100 BTC by Bhutan, highlighting ongoing activity in their crypto treasury management. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

thesatdaddy

Good news is 1 BTC still equals 1 BTC

JakieofAllTrades

Take your profits and switch them to USDC. Buy the dip. BTC isn’t down anytime soon

jekpopulous2

ETH is way more secure but there’s also a very real reason that you can’t actually attack BTC with $16B. The hardware doesn’t exist. You can’t actually buy $16B worth the ASIC miners. The real problem is halvings and the fact that Bitcoin’s security budget gets lower every 4 years unless it rapidly increases in price.

rstonesPt

Synthetic BTC is the problem.

ThePugz

I use Coinbase so can choose to buy 0.00069420 BTC 🤣

Actual_Awareness7405

They serve different purposes tbh. BTC is the store of value play — institutions don't care about smart contracts, they care about the hardest monetary asset. ETH is the programmable layer. I run positions on both but treat them completely differently in my sizing. BTC is my core hold, ETH is where I'm more tactical

Routine-Coconut-3356

I only have BTC and ETH the rest I don’t understand

watch-nerd

4 days ago it was higher. Nothing to get excited about unless BTC can break 75k and hold it.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Animalverse and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://animalverse.social/community/p/35038/ LATEST: ⚡ Bhutan moved another 175 Bitcoin, worth $11.85 million, bringing its total BTC transfers for 2026 to roughly $42.5 million, according to Arkham Intelligence. https://animalverse.social/community/p/35038/ \#Bitcoin #BTC #Bhutan #CryptoNews #BTCNews #CryptoMarket #Blockchain #CryptoMoves #CryptoData #DigitalAssets *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Ok_Golf_6467

Most have gotten bored of watching their money bleed lol. I'm just accumulating BTC while my alts recover, hoping to stay ahead of the masses 🫠

Vegetable_Onion665

I'm moving BTC into this given the significant drop. I've got good sources informing me that they are very close to some institutional partnerships - they have the infrastructure in place it's a matetr of time: [https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/blackrock-names-crypto-tokenization-themes-153940674.html](https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/blackrock-names-crypto-tokenization-themes-153940674.html)

Western-Source710

Because BTC is the best for a reason

AmazingfurnitureCT

Everyday is a good day to buy BTC

AutoModerator

Post is by: poochietown and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rpkq4s/recommended_nonkyc_exchange/ Hi! I’m looking for a good non KYC crypto exchange because I want to change around 0.5 BTC to USDT without hassle. I’m mainly looking for a privacy focused swap places without a complicated process. Honestly I’m tired of all the docs and exchanges asking for your blood type etc. If you’ve used any non KYC exchanges recently, which ones would you recommend? I’d appreciate hearing real experiences. Thanks! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Sufficient-Award6291

Idk why you feel it's fake. Maybe it's how I wrote the content. Sincerely speaking, I did buy two BTC for my sons. Ngl I also buy a bit of stocks, not as much as BTC. I do sleep better after buying btc which is weird but true. If I buy more stocks, I can't sleep well at all. As I mentioned, I am no financial expert. I follow my gut feelings.

Odd-Fun-1482

The public won't give a shit about eth for a very very long time. Also, it's price is pretty damned capped given the cycles, while BTC is not. Eth is a very clear "get in, get out" asset since it has obvious entry/exit points.

Anneliese2282

Feels fake, IDK, why not buy stocks & a small BTC position?

ImJustBME

For the love of god, we are in the heart of hte bear market. You are going to lose so much value compared to BTC. Now is not the time.

Impossible-Weight852

That’s a lot of hopium baked into one post. Warsh is more hawkish than Powell. Halving is still a couple of years away, and each one results in lower returns than the previous. BTC isn’t the only asset with finite supply. There will never be a day that no one will ever want to sell their BTC. People will sell for all kinds of reasons—profit taking, paying bills, etc. I’m afraid you’ve been brainwashed by all the influencers and not capable of thinking critically.

Academic_Attorney996

Today, Saylor accumulates 17,994 BTC while Apple and Amazon sitting on sideline chewing their popcorn...haha. Saylor just bitchslap Apple and Amazon's faces..lol

Relative_Roof5361

The trick isnt that the loan is more profitable — it’s that selling has a hidden cost some people ignore: taxes. Depending on where you live, you’re handing 20-30% of your gains to the government the moment you sell. So to actually pocket $10k you need to sell way more than $10k worth of BTC. With a loan you’re paying interest, yeah, but if your long-term bet on BTC is right, those interest payments are nothing compared to the gains you would’ve killed by selling. And your position keeps compounding. That said, the risk is very real — if BTC dumps hard enough you get liquidated and that’s a much worse outcome than just selling. So it really only makes sense if you genuinely believe in BTC long term, not as a way to “win” short term.

Revolutionary-Cup78

ETH doesn't have the best tokenomics for holding, bitcoin does. If you don't have intention of using ETH or reselling mid term, there is little reason for getting it instead of BTC

PaulTheIV

ETH is the superior product. Bitcoin is like gold. Everyone likes it because everyone likes it. But it has no actual function, really. Ethereum is like oil. Less shiny than gold, but far more important and it would be far better to own a lot of it But Bitcoin believers and goldbugs don't like this statement, so it gets downvoted. Ethereum number goes up because of function and new innovation BTC number goes up because goldbugs are getting dumped on by the whales and governmental powers that be. It is purely greater fools theory.

LionDependent9194

Must we forget BTC to 1Milli?????

cogit2

This is the right answer. If the cost of production dictated price, pumpers wouldn't exist, they'd simply be lobbyists to make BTC more expensive to mine.

Ganonstonk

They also have their preferred instruments, the main one being STRC. The intent behind STRC is that it pays 11.5% interest, pegged to $100 so you skip the volatility of BTC while still being exposed. Some people would be happy to get 11% yearly and not worry about BTC dropping 50%. This way investors benefit from stability, where MSTR takes the money to buy BTC. Obviously, this is not dilutive, so the MSTR price per share increases. But Yes, you'd be right - they're betting on the idea that BTC will increase on average at greater than 11% per year. People who buy STRC are also assuming that BTC will succeed long term, otherwise yes, they won't be able to issue more to pay debts. Imagine if this was an Iranian company doing this - for example taking $100 in Iranian Rials, buying btc, then giving the investors 10% return. Then 6 months later their currency collapses (which it did). Now the company had "$100" in debt but that 100 dollars is worth a fraction of what it once was. So their $100 in debt is now basically non-existent because the currency is worthless. This is an extreme example, but highlights the same principles at play. Take money, provide stable returns, and pocket the difference as the currency loses value while you buy a harder asset that appreciates long term, ignoring short term volatility.

TheBigLR901

Using it to buy BTC. Banks love to hear that shit

kwijibokwijibo

Why would they have to go to the banks? That's retail investor thinking. That's what people do Companies have multiple ways to refinance which are more customisable for their needs - issuing equity, debt, or a whole range of other instruments in between There's nothing wrong with how MSTR is refinancing. The only weird thing is their BTC treasury model. But you think institutions like Allianz, a global insurance company, would buy $750mn of MSTR convertible notes if they were a Ponzi scheme? Do you think you, random redditor, really know better than some of the world's largest financial institutions? Pretty arrogant if so

nugymmer

So what? It's Bitcoin. The reputation is the NUMBER ONE priority. You fuck with the protocol and lock old users out, and deprive them of their coins, then guess what will happen? BTC might become a dinosaur, dead and long forgotten.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Ok-Tumbleweed-2416 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rpg04w/crypto/ BTC bounced 20% and everyone celebrated while $ETH quietly sits on the line that matters most Ethereum is at $1,987 testing an ascending trendline that defined every major bottom since 2019. Support held in 2020 and twice after the 2022 crash. Each bounce launched a rally. This is the fifth test. The problem is momentum. ETH underperformed Bitcoin all cycle, arriving at support weaker than ever. One analyst said ETH does not get a second chance here. If it holds, alt rotation begins. If it breaks, long-term bullish structure is gone. Do historical trendlines still matter when ETH lost its narrative to Solana and L2s? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

nugymmer

The aggressive approach will likely alienate some old BTC users, and then they'll never want anything to do with crypto again. You don't want that. Allow people to access old coins. The only ones who are concerned about inaccessible addresses becoming accessible again is down to greed. They want their BTC to be highly valued, and the only way to do that is to lock out old users by effectively destroying what they own. Like IOTA, and many other crypto coins, BTC is set to become another coin that forces users to transition. This is bad news for crypto, mark my words.

aaj094

If you tried to buy a billion worth of BTC on an exchange order book, you'd probably pay much more than what Saylor got through otc.

ReMeDyIII

I use AI's a lot for work, gaming (mostly game mods that support them, like Rimworld), and conversational AI's on front-ends like SillyTavern on a near daily basis. Having said that, I would never want to trust an AI with my money. I don't care if I'm leaving money on the table either; I'd rather just park it into a steady APY coin that compounds over time, or just throw it into BTC or something.

ChanceCash6708

On wich data do you set a buy order now on BTC???

AriesThef0x

Seems like game theory at this point. If their cost per coin is and average of 75k per coin at 738k coins, imagine how much in purchasing power it would really take to move that cost average in either direction. Seems to me if he is able to survive the next bear market or two he is poised to have perhaps the most asset rich company of all time through the 21rst century. Assuming BTC does what we expect it to and continue to grow and adapt.

Odd_Bar9513

I just bought another 0.1 BTC (plus some sats) right today.✊🏽

PsyOmega

> institutions never sell So the problem here is, institutions *can't* sell. Not at any rate that matters anyway. If they dump hard, they crash the market, and the value of the remaining holdings they have. On top of that, holding BTC is less a finance incentive and more of a power incentive. The largest holders of BTC will be tomorrows world powers. Nobody ever parts with power.

angelwolf71885

2140 not 2040 more then a century until the last BTC is mined

Azatis-

because he and few others will have more than 10-20% of total BTC in existence

bitski44

Great question and honestly, you're not wrong that lump sum beats DCA in a bull market in hindsight. The data backs that up. But here's the thing: nobody knows they're in a bull market until it's already happened. What I actually do is use the Bitcoin Power Law to guide when to be aggressive and when to stack cash. Right now BTC is \~47% below the Power Law fair value line. That's a screaming signal to ramp up buys, not just DCA your usual $100, but smash buy heavier. Then when price rips 30%+ above the fair value line? That's when I ease off Bitcoin buys and start stacking cash instead, building dry powder for the next time it dips below. So it's not pure DCA and it's not lump sum timing, it's DCA with conviction sizing based on where we are on the Power Law model. Below fair value = buy aggressively. Above fair value = stack cash for the next opportunity. The Power Law has held for 15+ years of Bitcoin data. It gives you a framework so you're not just blindly buying green candles every Monday or sitting on the sideline trying to catch the perfect dip. If you want to see where BTC sits on the Power Law right now, there is a free tool for exactly this: neversellyourbitcoin.com. It shows the current price vs. fair value and helps you decide when to stack sats vs. stack cash.

Basic_Cod4200

Discordo.  O BTC pode ser destruído da noite para o dia bastando que algum país alcance a tecnologia necessária. Computadores quânticos estão nesse momento em desenvolvimento e serão capazes de quebrar qualquer tipo de criptografia e sistema de segurança. Não é uma questão de SE mas sim QUANDO.  E quando acontecer, vai haver uma fuga de liquidez da BTC e das altcoins como nunca antes, com inúmeras exchanges quebrando e bloqueando checkouts.  Os maiores patrocinadores de liquidez do BTC hoje não são pessoas comuns, mas sim empresas de especulação, grupos de investimento, bancos e entidades governamentais. O BTC foi institucionalizado e você não entendeu o que isso significa, significa que o mercado financeiro-fiduciário já absorveu o BTC e o controla através de especulação.  Sem contar que com a volatilidade alta, o BTC é inútil como moeda de negociação, negociar exige o mínimo de estabilidade de valor, e será cada vez mais caro manter o ecossistema eficiente em termos de energia.  E sim, é uma pirâmide, mesmo que não tenha sido essa a intenção.  E não, não é confiável, o "golpe de sorte" da BTC foi a adoção repentina e talvez estratégica por parte das elites financeiras e criminosas do Ocidente.  Mas uma hora, vai a zero, seja porque alguém quebrou e hackeou esse cofre dos tolos, seja porque se tornou economicamente inviável e caro de se manter em contextos de crise sistêmica.  Ouro e terras continuam sendo os melhores investimentos de médio e longo prazo e que sempre irão valorizar, com risco praticamente zero. 

0xZennite

The halving schedule really is one of the most elegant pieces of monetary design ever created. 114 years for the last million BTC puts into perspective just how front-loaded the distribution was — and why early adoption mattered so much. It's also a good reminder that scarcity is already baked in

Complete_Oven_9651

102 BTC is literally noise compared to $1.8B in weekly inflows. Institutional demand is absorbing these small dumps like it’s nothing.

smafiler

My 2027 self is already yelling at my current self for not buying more BTC right now. To the moon

TheRadishBros

Test it yourself— if you ask an AI about the kind of portfolio it would recommend to maximise growth and diversification over the next 30 years, they will almost certainly include BTC as part of that portfolio. They do when I asked, anyway.

Wikilicious

You can run BTC inside ETH… freeing up your solar panels to power your home instead of making a single transaction.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Empery Digital sold 102 BTC for $7.3 million to fund share buybacks amid pressure from activist shareholders ATG Capital and Tice P. Brown. This move contrasts with broader corporate treasury trends, which saw $1.28 billion in net Bitcoin inflows during the week, led by Strategy's acquisition of 17,994 BTC. Empery’s decision to sell Bitcoin reflects internal tensions, with competing director nominations for its 2026 annual meeting. The company still holds 3,562 BTC, allowing flexibility for future strategies. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

dj_destroyer

Which is good they're not loaning it out. Perhaps when BTC matures or they obtain more, they can start thinking about things like that but I almost guarantee Strategy is lining up to be the world's first Bitcoin bank.

Calm-Professional103

BTC and ETH are two different concepts. If you’re into DeFi, ETH is King. I hold both for different reasons.  Also, if BTC price action is dampening, which coin is likely to be the « new BTC »?

UC_DiscExchange

Their premium is the inclusion of fees for OTC trade. Coinbase isn't just going to facilitate 10's of thousands of BTC for nothing. They don't necessarily have to, but they do include fees in their average purchase price.

piggleii

Saylor somehow managed to accumulate over a billion worth of BTC at over 70k despite price spending most of its time in the 60s.

Flamboiant_Canadian

Tbh, there's nothing superior about either of them. BTC is slow and so is Ethereum. They were revolutionary like a decade ago, but neither of them have really advanced that much since then. I haven't even heard of any new groundbreaking cryptography this cycle? It's just buying the same old shit and expecting it to just go up in value because it always did?  Anything that is doing anything, isn't worth fuck all. 

AriesThef0x

No, here’s why. I was very happy to buy @35k 5-3 years ago. For me that time has passed, I want to see the price stay nice and resilient over the bear market here, I’m hoping no lower than 50k. As we are getting lower relative highs, I want to see higher relative lows. One of the reasons I store my money in BTC is because after a certain period, I want to see that impressive return % of previous cycles calcified underneath the cycles bottom. If you’re buying consistently over the bear market, you’ll be getting in on the relative lows. But also you’ll be accumulating a nice stack. At a certain point, I don’t want to see the entirety of my holdings worth -75% just so I can get more sats per $ on my next purchase. As my time in the market increases, I want to see past purchases value safeguarded.

PrettyOwl7768

also add this \--- "isn't that unfair? rich people buy more machines and earn more?"   yes. same as bitcoin — more money, more ASICs, more BTC. there's no system where capital doesn't help. the question is what the capital buys.   bitcoin: capital buys machines that guess random numbers. the network gets nothing from the work. more miners don't make bitcoin faster. here: capital buys machines that relay, cache, and store for everyone. more machines = faster network, more redundancy, more storage. your greed makes the network better for everybody. there's no block reward. no mining. no lottery. the release schedule splits equally between every participating machine on the network. you don't earn by winning — you earn by showing up. one machine in your bedroom earns the same as one machine in a datacenter. buy 10,000 machines? you earn 10,000 shares — but you're also running 10,000 relay nodes that everyone benefits from. "so what stops someone spinning up 10,000 VMs instead of buying 10,000 machines?" the kernel runs ring 0 — it IS the operating system. it can detect virtualization (hardware flags, timing, direct device access). VMs get nothing. you need real bare metal. and even if you could fake it, each node still has to actually do the work — relay traffic, cache data, serve queries. 10,000 VMs on one box share one NIC and one disk. you can set how much of your machine's resources go to the network. the ceiling is your actual hardware. fake 10,000 identities on one machine and each one has 1/10,000th the resources — peers stop routing to nodes that can't keep up. the attack costs real hardware either way. participation is the only thing that matters.

PrettyOwl7768

This might be better framing people often say bitcoin is two things the protocol, then BTC the token; bitcoin the protocol runs atop the internet even if your ham that signal is going to end up in a tcp/ip packet more or less what happens if the internet becomes just a stream (udp) that can fix errors? at the same time the value side (BTC) is just built into the packet header. now say there is a magic way to have this new protocol being 'living' itself for a lack of better words. so the vast majority of things bitcoin needs to solve is easy as a central data base; and since its 'living' it doesn't change unless it wants to change, aka immutably. the data is shared between all users every where as cryptographic hash and is backed up millions of times over between every one; no one person has all data, data is spread out in an algo that always allows recreation; this combines nodes and miners into one; the security is PoW, you have to allocate a small part of your machine to keep the network alive not by random number guessing but by just relaying and caching messages; this all stored in memory, so you shut your device down all data is lost, turn it on new data is propagated. the internet was invented in early 1800 - aka the telegraph: it discovered how to transfer INFORMATION at great distances nearly instantaneously bitcoin was invented in 2008: it discovered how to transfer VALUE at great distances nearly instantaneously Now say these two things just become ONE thing That thing would have to be an "immaculate conception" moment... so the question is what is the design of that? lots of metaphor's i know... try explaining bitcoin to somebody who never heard of bitcoin

cubeeless

BTC to $400k!

Turbulent-Ask-3302

SQUARE ROOT (ln(ETH x (1+yield)) - ln(BTC/32)) Do the math. It will set you free. ETH is cheap relative to BTC right now. Buy it up.

Previous-Piano-6108

Yes, we can all currently time the market. BTC is down 50% from the ATH, easy! Will it drop lower? Maybe! Still got a great price

pfftlolbrolollmao

Anything can happen, sure. But one thing that can't happen is that someone can go back in time and invent a crypto currency before BTC. BTCs biggest draw is the security it has. It has never been hacked, and it has been tried and tested. BTC isn't in the lead because it's better. It's in the lead because it was first. And when it comes to people and money, they want security over anything else. The best case for security is time. Unless people find a way to hack BTC, it will be on top. The lay person will never care about the intricate differences of a coin. The lay person doesn't have a clue how the regular economy works, never mind crypto. It's us, the nerds of crypto that care about how fast it is. Or how anonymous it is or whatever. imo, the chances of another coin beating crypto is slim to none. In another 20-30 years, most other cryptos will cease to exist, and we'll be left with BTC. It's the safest.

BainTrain55

BTC 200 WMA is around 58k. It has never fallen more than a couple percent at most below its line. So 45k seems incredibly unlikely.

Yeagerist15

Sure I agree that you usually will have a turnaround in 2-3 years, but you will also be bag holding for 2-3 years. I just gave you way more than 50 sample dates that would show you multiple years of being underwater. Current real life data points that aren’t 10+ years old. early bitcoin prices are not really relevant to this data. Would be akin to saying lump sum into Apple since it was smart to lump sum into apple in 1990. Those gains aren’t relevant Also the difference for stocks is, they aren’t typically dropping 50% quickly like Bitcoin. 20-50% flash drawdowns are expected in Bitcoin. Not really the case with your S&P 500. I mean we had a “crash” last year with the tariffs. Went from $609 to $555 over the course of a month (Feb to March). The day we had the tariffs we crashed to $500. That’s about 10%. About 17% from the overall peak. And then not even 3 months later was once again higher than $609.  You could have lumped summed at the peak and in 4 months been fine.  That doesn’t happen with Bitcoin. Sans anyone who bought a few weeks ago at sub 68, if you bought anytime between Oct 24, and now, you’d be in the red.  Lump sum lost. Don’t get me wrong I “lump” sum when we drop a lot. But I also fully expect that lump sum to lose value in the short term. DCA lets you capitalize on the volatility of BTC so you don’t blow your load and are left deeply bag holding for years  Obviously the correct choice is to lump sum and DCA heavy when we are in times like now and to adjust as price adjusts. I splurged at 63500. I still DCA, I’ll probably splurge a few more times under 70k. Won’t splurge at 120k. TIL 2030 I’ll splurge at 120k in that cycle 

pfftlolbrolollmao

Ethereum was hacked in 2016. The people that run ethereum changed the code to block the hack (the right thing to do). They can alter their code whenever they want. Meaning it has a security risk that BTC doesn't, the ability if humans to change and alter it. Humans are corruptible and cannot be trusted. Also it switched from being proof of stake to proof of work and when the switch happened the market didn't quiver. Made me think that it's propped up by people hoping to be rich rather than people actually believing in what it does.

FishermanWaste1268

He has all BTC Ross Ulbricht gave him for his pardon to wash.

will_get_downvoted7

I tried UEX US a few months ago mainly for BTC deposits and withdrawals. The deposit process was straightforward and confirmations worked like normal. Withdrawals also went through without issues, although the network fee was a bit higher than I expected. Overall the platform worked fine for basic Bitcoin transactions.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Ok_Security_1684 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/SaaS/comments/1rp98qm/built_a_free_realtime_crypto_terminal_after/ Hey everyone, I'll keep it honest: I built this partly out of frustration. I was trading Binance Futures and realized I was paying for 3-4 different platforms just to see the data I needed in one place. Coinglass for liquidation maps, HyBlock for order flow, LunarCrush for sentiment, Glassnode for on-chain... it adds up to $100-150/month easily, and half the time the UX is terrible. So I spent the last year building **CryptOn Forecast,** starting as a personal tool, ending up as something I figured I'd share. **What's free (no signup, no credit card):** * Live liquidation heatmap * Order book depth * CVD chart (Spot + Futures) * On-chain analytics (MVRV, SOPR, NVT, Realized Price) * Whale tracker * ETF institutional flows * Exchange netflow * Options flow (Put/Call ratio, max pain) * Volume spike scanner * Social sentiment * Correlation matrix * BTC rainbow chart + halving cycle tracker * A Bloomberg-terminal-style dashboard where you can pin any 6 panels Basically what I was paying for across multiple subscriptions, combined and free. **The paid part** is an AI trading bot that connects to your Binance Futures account via API (read + trade permissions only, no withdrawal access ever). It's non-custodial, your funds never leave your wallet. Pricing is performance-based, no monthly subscription. The bot has been live since 2022. 122+ days of tracked performance, $7M+ in trading volume. I know "98% win rate" sounds like a red flag and I get it so I show every single trade on the site, open and closed, in real time. You can verify on your own Binance account. **What I'm genuinely looking for feedback on:** * Does the free terminal actually feel useful or is it just noise? * Is the non-custodial angle convincing or does it still feel sketchy? * What would make you actually trust a bot enough to try it? Site is [cryptontradebot.com](http://cryptontradebot.com), be as harsh as you want, that's why I'm here. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

YUSoOffended

I am basically in the same headspace: I am not selling into fear, my BTC/ETH horizon is 10+ years, so the day-to-day drawdown is just noise. What keeps me sane is having a system: core stays core, although I'm currently stacking dry powder in USDC ready for real capitulation. I've parked my bags on Nexo and let them earn while I wait (BTC, ETH, SOL, some stables), then I can rotate that yield and the stables into buys when the market offers stupid prices.