BTC

Prestigious_Mine_321

This distribution chart is a masterclass in cycle psychology. It’s fascinating to see how asset concentration shifts right before major macro resets. I’ve been running these BTC distribution numbers against the 1929 and 2000 wealth concentration metrics for my latest research, and the historical overlap is honestly spooky. We’re definitely seeing the 'Everything Bubble' dynamics play out in real-time here. Just shared the full raw data comparison and the 1929 charts on my sub for anyone who wants to see the macro side of this

Majestic-Tadpole8458

EMP attack or quantum computing may bring BTC to near zero however someone will always buy the dip.

southwestern_swamp

only underwater by about $12k per BTC. or 19%.

davidmthekidd

Last cycle they claimed BTC had pornography and other illicit data on the block chain and that caused a msssive drop . Every cycle there's a scare tactic to shame people off.

aaaanoon

BTC - "The only real project because it's popular"

msg-tinsha

Yeah, BTC is volatile AF, no argument there 😂 We’re definitely not treating it like a diaper fund — more like long-term HODL for the kids’ future freedom. Bought some early-ish, so we’re chilling on that front. Love that you’re already teaching your kids to invest though — that’s huge! They’re gonna thank you big time when they realize dad made them buy those few bucks of BTC lol. Appreciate the wisdom, man.

zuilli

If you want to send bitcoin between wallet just do it, sending and receiving btc is the basic functionality of any wallet program. If you're talking about turning your BTC into fiat and vice versa then you need a decentralized exchange like bisq.

Opposite_Cold8616

Congrats on the new family... but if you want stability, BTC probably isn't the right platform for you, unless you already bought in super cheap. I taught my kids to invest and they bought a few dollars worth of BTC from me, now they're learning the meaning of a risk-on asset lol.

CriticalCobraz

Makes sense to have a lower Doller-Cost-Average. MS also bought BTC for $40M recently

Shot-Structure-1274

MSTR is a company that buys BTC, that's not institutional investment, it's a single company that buys the asset. Do some institutions own MSTR? Yes, but the big financial institutions refuse to own crypto assets.

ThePugz

I’m buying their BTC. Thank them for me! A very large percentage of the recent drop was precipitated by morons maxing out their leverage on BTC to buy more BTC. (There’s a reason they tell you not to do that.) Once the market started correcting from its all time highs it massively corrected due to all of the over leveraging. This over leverage both artificially inflated the price too high on the way up but then led to over correcting downward due to all of the leveraged clowns losing both their own BTC PLUS all the BTC they bought on leverage when the margin calls got triggered.

laughncow

yes just like t he internet of the 90s on a few will make. BTC maybe ETH. all the rest will end up like [pets.com](http://pets.com) or something. You will only have one Google and Amazon. AI will use crypto. 99.9% of the coins will trend to zero.

AutoModerator

Post is by: jongolfpro and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rcpseh/the_btc_going_to_zero_narrative_is_ridiculous/ Bitcoin became a trillion dollar asset almost exactly 5 years ago. Today, after an almost 50% correction, it has a market cap of \~$1.33 trillion. The idea that BTC is going to zero is ridiculous. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

xaviemb

The real epiphany with Bitcoin is realizing it is not simply a place to store USD, but an alternative monetary system altogether. Most people begin by viewing it as a vehicle to park dollars and hopefully get more dollars later, only to gradually understand that its fixed supply and decentralized design make it structurally different from fiat. While the BTC price in USD can be chaotic in the short term due to sentiment and liquidity cycles, its long term thesis rests on monetary properties rather than short term exchange rate swings. Once that shift in perspective happens, pullbacks feel less threatening because a system built on credible scarcity and predictable issuance makes repeated all time highs over time feel structurally inevitable rather than speculative.

BlazingPalm

The “industry” should leave us. BTC will prevail, tho.

Financial_Vanilla_47

I know so what's your point I'm not arguing they are the same... I'm saying if most of the money flows is in MSTR compared to BTC that's very bad.

UC_DiscExchange

MSTR trade volume isn't equivalent to BTC trading volume

Financial_Vanilla_47

Yes professional analysis has historically given wide range of estimates from 10% to 40%... That's for Bitcoin LOST... 3% is just the supply that MSTR holds compared to ALL OF BTC in existence (including whatever is "lost")

kkjk00

What are you to say what BTC is? You are a no one, Satoshi himself said that in case of quantum we should hard fork and revert blocks, he didn't care for childish arguments, "I don't wanna move my coins". Do you realize how stupid you sound?

ferocious_swain

True no reason for BTC to exist at all anymore outside of some vaporware utility.

Rydog_78

You are wrong about Bitcoin on its most fundamental level. Bitcoin is fungible which means One Bitcoin is equivalent to and interchangeable with another, just like a dollar bill. While each coin's transaction history is traceable on the blockchain, they are designed to be equal in value and divisible. Bitcoin can be broken into smaller units called Satsohi’s. 100,00,000 Satoshi’s = 1 Bitcoin. Therefore there will only ever be 21 million BTC or 2,100,000,000,000,000 Satoshi’s ever in existence. 1 BTC in the US is equal 1 BTC in Japan. Truly a world’s first money. Bitcoin Ordinals (using the Taproot upgrade) allow individual satoshis to be "inscribed" with unique data, making those specific, rare units behave more like non-fungible tokens (NFTs). That is your only argument you really have about Bitcoin being used for arbitrary data. The delves into the Core vs Knots debate.

Party_Operation_9711

What store of value? It’s worth half of what it did in October 2025 and the person that owns the most of it says it could go down even further lmao. I own BTC but don’t be ridiculous

biba8163

Let me help with some financial literacy since you seem to be confused what real world financial products are and you show me how many of these products the "DeFi" meme narrative offers. **Real World Financial Products** - **Checking accounts** - for everyday daily activities for paying bills, debit cards, ATMs - **Savings accounts** - for storing money that is GUARANTEED by the government for up to $250K - **Certificates of Deposits** - GUARANTEED fixed interest. - **IRA** - Tax advantaged or 100% tax free (Roth) retirement accounts - **Brokerage accounts** - Access to investment products including stocks, bonds, REITS (Real Estate Investment Trusts) - **Personal Loans, Home Loans, Mortgages, Home Equity Loans, etc** - **Home Owners Insurance, Auto Insurance, Life Insurance, etc** - **Small Business Loans, Commercial Loans** **DEFI - Bullshit scam narrative from the Summer of 2020** - Essentially a Shitcoin Casino. Leveraged plays, trading shitcoin tokens, earning yield on shitcoin tokens by providing liquidity on shitcoin tokens which all drop 70%-99% when BTC goes into a bear market. NOT FINANCE in ANY WAY - Every player like, MakerDAO, AAVE, LINK etc, is COMPLETELY CENTRALIZED - There are NO real life financial products like life, home, health insurance, mortgages, home equity loans, car loans, personal loans without massive collateral, commercial loans, etc. Again, shitcoin trading, yield farming, etc. NOT FINANCE in ANY WAY - Then you slap some scamified metrics like TVL based on scam tokens locked up to make gullible fools believe real capital is locked up instead of vaporware scam tokens.

uamdarasulka

that's basically what the positioning data suggests whales are doing. rotating out of ETH into BTC. whether it plays out that way is the question.. but the money flow is pointing in that direction right now

Exact_Kitchen_922

Im right there with ya buddy!! Literally any extra cash has been going straight to BTC. People are crazy for selling right now...

uamdarasulka

macro is the wild card yeah. 45k would validate the short book completely. but until that happens you've still got $758M in BTC longs that haven't bailed — someone's betting the macro noise doesn't stick

vortexcortex21

"the strategy just keeps working" He is down a massive unrealised loss. "locked in cheap debt bought more BTC" Nothing about MSTRs strategy involves "cheap debt".

usedmattress85

Yes I’ve already corrected that overstatement. Not “always” as narratives can change. But “so far” and “right now”…. It could change and I would change my behaviour accordingly if that’s the case. But I see no sign of the pattern stopping at this point. BTC’s current dive is precisely on schedule.

RetiredAvocado

Send BTC from any bitcoin wallet to any other bitcoin wallet. There is only one chain.

Brightyellowdoor

This sounds like it's worth cashing in an ETH position now and buying BTC. Or am I missing something.

usedmattress85

It’s could always be different and if it is I’ll definitely switch up the strategy. But until it’s proven different I’ll just keep doing what I’m doing. But yeah it’s definitely wise not to be married to one particular idea, BTC has a way of embarrassing us haha. Always better to react to what’s happening. If it pumps back above the 20 week moving averages I’ll buy back in

viseradius

Hand aufs Herz, benutzt die BTC wie echtes Geld oder nur als Anlage?

OneImportance4061

BTC is quite a bit easier to be controlled primarily by billionaires and institutions. And that is exactly what has happened. And it will continue to happen. Sure, a few w-2 retail investors and wage slaves will get lucky - just like with any other asset class but eventually generational wealth will have the lion's share of this asset just like with all the other assets.

NightFire45

They both matter though. Miners aren't going to secure the network with BTC at $20000 for an extended period.

NightFire45

That doesn't make it a good investment. You can believe in BTC but will anyone be all in at $1000? Also if it drops much more miners will start having issues which has already started.

Ok_Lake8089

Don't. If you bought BTC 5yrs ago you would be up ~15%...

GojoPojo

You’re not the first person to ask that and you won’t be the last. Everybody buys $BTC at the price they deserve 🤷‍♂️

BB63_Htown

I'm not watching whales. I simply ask AI once a week how the whale activity is looking. For the last few weeks whale activity has been increasingly accumulating large amounts of BTC while ETF outflows still cause a net outflow. Fear and greed at work. I think it's fun just to keep track and see what most likely causes ups and downs.

Zaitobu

If you haven't made any profit in three years you might not be cut out for this game bro. If you don't take profits when the market is euphoric and your barber is talking about BTC, when were you planning to? Don't get roundtripped guys sell when you are green especially, definitely if you are holding anything other than BTC.

ScholarPrize1335

BTC is no longer driven by individual speculation. It's driven by big money and big institutions and how do they justify holding a speculative asset with bond like yields for the last 5 years? No fund manager can eat the opportunity cost of having investments that don't perform for that long. Also IMO anyone with a investment license not at a hedge fund is violating their ethical duty to follow modern portfolio theory. BTC is nowhere near the efficient frontier. Especially when the non-fait competition has been golden.

Valuable_Charge_7106

Another steady accumulation move. When companies keep adding BTC during volatility, it signals long-term conviction. Supply keeps tightening — short term noise, long term impact

Wamby31686

people keep waiting for Saylor to blow up but the strategy just keeps working. locked in cheap debt bought more BTC. if institutions follow the same playbook supply gets real tight real fast. could be wrong tho

Shot-Structure-1274

What $80 billion? BTC ETF's are $59 billion and that's mostly high wealth retail, hedge funds and traders. Does Black Rock, Fidelity, Vanguard or other asset managers own crypto assets for their clients? NO.

Shot-Structure-1274

The costs of using the network are too expensive and slow. BTC is failed technology.

East-Wolf-2860

If it can break everything finance related then BTC is least of worries to world economy at only $1-2T. The bond market is worth about $130T. BTC is very valuable. But if bad actors with quantum want to break shit, go after the financial plumbing, rather than the store-of-value. In saying all this, breaking something like the bond market fucks everyone. It’s mutually assured destruction. I don’t know of a government that would want to do this. Too much economic interdependence.

JustSomeChillDud

The reason ? Is not about BTC is about the blockchain and the possibilities of it. Governments will eventually use it not because is better for their citizens but because is better for controlling the citizens. Btc to some extend is what holds everything together and is the only actual decentralized coin because all the other have actually a face and name of a person behind it. People said the sane about internet back in the day, for what will I read the newspaper online if I get it in my door every morning? That was the thinking process of many people back when internet first started. But some few understood the possibilities of it. BTC will reach 200k is inevitable

I-always-argue

Huge sells today and even then BTC resists. Dropped to 64k and recovered, took another blow that didn't dip as low and is also recovering from that 

mrjune2040

Imo it's an inefficient business model. Your cost basis is in USD (or another fiat currency) and yes you're going to need to work with a payments processor to take the BTC and then convert it straight into fiat, because you sure as heck don't want to be on the hook for the original cost basis if BTC takes a dump. And as a middleman your margins are probably going to be pretty small, allow a few percent for payment and conversion. And you'll still need to be compliant, as will your clients– 'discreet' doesn't avoid reporting obligations. A legit payments processor will probably do AML from time to time and you're on the hook in terms of paper trail.

agent__orange

Your numbers are outdated, the current required number of physical qubits to break BTC might be as low as 100K

BB63_Htown

Not random, just the ones to watch. Clean Spark looks pretty solid with their massive cash reserves and large BTC holdings. They are bleeding cash though with them taking a massive loss in Q4-'25. Most recently they indicated they did not intend to reduce their Bitcoin holdings, but things could always change. I'm still buying. IREN is another, but they have adopted a sell-on-mine approach. Minimal holdings with little left to dump. I don't believe the Tarrifs have affected this much but the tariffs plus Bitdeer liquidating together is most likely responsible for the sudden drop. I'm not worrying about any of it. Just fun to see a decent sized drop and buy more. I'm in it for at least another four or five years. The whales are steadily accumulating while ETF outflows still out number inflows. Fear and greed index is currently at 5!

TheresNoSecondBest

The files are just noise. We had so much noise here before and I'm expecting this to be the case in the future too. Bitcoin is an open source software. The network is open to everyone. Have bad people been involved or used it? The same can be told about gold or the USD. >what exactly is BTC is trying to solve? Personal sovereignty. Financial freedom where nobody is censored. Leveling the field for the unbanked. Getting everyone to stick to the same rules.

rocket_beer

Look… I’m not saying dude in the shop *would* have intimate BTC knowledge… but it still applies not right of us to assume he wouldn’t know about it. For that reason, I wouldn’t give out my seed phrase to anyone!

AnusMistakus

ETH has so much selling pressure / open sell requests it has no chance of pumping, but BTC might surprise to the upside

kjbaran

I called the drop 8 days before it happened; completely banned before bed. BTC is an Epstein class grift.

Bigshift-2034

BTC is here to stay, you might not see a reason for it, and it’s completely irrelevant what I think or what you think. You can watch it from sideline or get some and let it ride for 10 years.

Clean_Difficulty_225

BTC is conceptually basically worthless long-term. It was supported during the macroeconomic bull market over the last \~17 years, but now that we're entering into a global macroeconomic bear market, speculative risk-assets like BTC are being liquidated first. This doesn't even get into the Epstein ties which are being revealed more and more with the DOJ's releases, and the overall fraud in entities like Tether, Coinbase, etc. BTC is a ticking time bomb, it selling off is inevitable, it's not an if but when. If it could experience \~80% draw downs during bull markets, how low can it go during a bear market?

Shazvox

I think the bear market survives the selling of 187,6 BTC...

Mixture_Practical

Eso de meter todo en una cripto como bitcoin no es rentable, ya que otras crecen a mejores tasas de rendimiento. Incluso hace unos días mientras todas caían arrastradas por bitcoin unas pocas subían y dieron buen rendimiento. Una buena cartera debe tener BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, TAO (ligada a IA), LINK, XRP, DOGE, PEPE y la que medio alto rendimiento mientras todas caían XMR.

LTP-N

Main difference is the 24hr volume: * MOON =$18K * ETH = $20B * BTC = $40B

Montana-Safari7

And ETH down 60% and BTC down 50%. Such is crypto.

LTP-N

Do you know the price BTC needs to be for him to be liquidated? Do you know if he CAN even be liquidated?

Idontknowmyoldpass

I want to keep the idea that my private key my coins at all costs. Let me lose my coins if I'm dumb or something. But someone deciding for me what my coins should do is not what BTC is.

DocInABox33

So just ignore the other part… convenient. Fundamentalist diehards always fail to see the PRACTICALITY of outcomes not the metrics are most important. Are we there yet where everything is priced in BTC? No. If 25% of supply is stolen and price crashes… will that make the world more likely to price everything in BTC? Be reasonable but again you seem to want to cut your nose off in spite of your face

Financial_Vanilla_47

It's not actually a buyer of last resort... It's just transferring potential gains to a centralized stock this helping to limit and prevent any outperformance that it was historically known for. The only thing that would happen in a "last resort" would be a forced liquidation by Strategy which, if it happens around the levels they say it would have to happen (8k), this corresponds to an undeniable long term failure of BTC and selling millions of BTC at that level would not be the blessing you think it is.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Mission-Stomach-3751 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rckjgp/new_15_global_tariff_structure_a_hidden_macro/ The global tariff rate just moved to 15%. On the surface, that’s just a trade headline. Under the surface, the structure matters more. The largest “discounted” treatment appears to be going to countries actively reducing US Treasury exposure — China, Brazil, India. Meanwhile, traditional debt buyers like Japan and the UK are facing higher relative pressure. That signals a broader macro recalibration. And markets hate recalibration. When major economies start adjusting trade agreements and treasury positioning at the same time, liquidity usually tightens before it expands. For risk assets, that matters. Bitcoin thrives on expanding liquidity and policy clarity. This setup suggests neither in the short term. If Europe and Japan respond defensively, volatility likely increases. The question isn’t whether BTC survives long term. It’s whether global liquidity contracts first. Are we underpricing the macro risk here? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Mediocre-Shirt-6586

Rational move. Those alts are just bleeding out your Sharpe ratio at this point. The real issue is the lack of a risk model. I stopped HODLing through 90% drops by auto-scaling position weight(Wt) based on volatility targeting. Got a plan if BTC drops 40% before hitting 130k, or just hoping for the best?

Idontknowmyoldpass

In fact bitcoin is stable when used as a currency. 1 BTC = 1 BTC. What you are referring to is exchanging it not as a currency but as a commodity which is not what it was suppose to be according to the white paper.

Financial_Vanilla_47

I agree. I've watched wave after wave of suckers thinking any mention of downside is a "buy signal" and watched them get rekt repeatedly... Not over the course of a few weeks or months... I'm talking about the entire cycle... This cycle was NOT the same as previous cycles in fact if you are objective about it this cycle was the first one to confirm a terminal market cap until proven otherwise... You can't oscillate against an inflating dollar and think you're onto something that's just straight stupidity... You can't bet on a 10x when a whole cycle showed you that hasn't happened and the charts actually suggests continuous downside... In the entire cycle, BTC under permed gold and oscillated (at best) against it, while the rest of the market underpformerd almost any decent asset and oscillated against a devalued dollar, meaning ue it did indeed lose real value over an entire 4 year cycle... This is a confirmed pattern and would need to break ATH in market cap to be invalidated, but I'm sure Maxis and Moon Boys don't understand that it's possible for their little theories to have already been invalidated on multiple fronts.

JMoon33

> BTC will always Anyone who says something like that, no matter if they're invested or not in BTC, show how ignorant they are. We can't say ''BTC will always...'' which is why nobody with a brain is 100% all in on BTC.

DocInABox33

This doesn’t make sense the whole premise of BTC was freedom AND value store. The first block literally is a criticism of government printing money. Why does anyone care… because it DEVALUES the currency. So someone stealing 25% of supply and selling it causing a price crash literally defeats a critical objective of BTC: control of our financial freedom. The second mistake you made is equating a government with the will of the people. OP said if the nodes all agree… if there is consensus then that is the will of all BTC holders. Your comment is literally consistent with the saying “cut off your nose in spite of your face.” You’d let chaos and instability ensue just because of your perceived threat of government interference!

Financial_Vanilla_47

You're all pretty unintelligent if you don't realize a larger market share but a company like strategy is healthy for BTC... As it's percentage of total supply gets absorbed by Strategy what you have is the market cap of Bitcoin getting tied to these worthless stocks... So now it becomes more centralized and financialized and EASIER for delta neutral strategies to remove liquidity from the system without holding the underlying...

Abject-Stretch-1187

That’s because most people are wrong about BTC. The opportunity lies in that gap. Trust me, this level of incredulity and smogness will only continue even when BTC is at 1M a coin. 

PirateSKB

Strategy has acquired 592 BTC for ~$39.8 million at ~$67,286 per bitcoin. As of 2/22/2026, we hodl 717,722 $BTC acquired for ~$54.56 billion at ~$76,020 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRC -Michael Saylor https://x.com/saylor/status/2025919387283099870

perfectpaperpusher

Would Sol Sui and Avax be risky to you or you mean like the traditional BTC ETH is the only established

uamdarasulka

yeah the staking hedge angle is interesting actually. if you're running a large ETH staking position you're naturally long ETH, so shorting perps is just risk management not necessarily a directional bet. but $491M feels too large to be pure hedging.. that's a conviction size. and you're right about BTC, it's the first port of call when institutions want crypto exposure without the volatility of everything else.

crypto-indian

Good point 👍 I am investing in BTC(all time) and XMR(for privacy)

tppthrowaway6045

Small cap gain exemption or treatment like a foreign currency instead of property would make me more likely to spend BTC versus just holding. Imagine it would be similar for others as well.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Strategy Inc. has acquired an additional 592 bitcoins for approximately $39.8 million, bringing its total holdings to 717,722 BTC as of February 22, 2026. The average purchase price for the new acquisition was $67,286 per bitcoin. The company has spent a total of $54.56 billion on its bitcoin holdings, with an average cost of $76,020 per bitcoin. This marks Strategy's 100th disclosed bitcoin acquisition, reinforcing its position as one of the largest corporate holders of the cryptocurrency. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

gonats24

most alts from 2021 never came back tbh. BTC is the safer bet here

Party_Operation_9711

We are entering the phase of institutional adoption, certain alts will become extremely useful. BTC does not have utility like some of these alts do.

MarzNstarZ

ETH shorts at 7 to 1 is kinda insane. idk if it's institutions hedging staking exposure or genuine directional bets but $491M is a lot of confidence. BTC being the outlier makes sense though. big money always rotates there first when things get uncertain

SwissPrivateBanking

I would recommend going to a tax specialist and a regulated financial intermediary (specialized in crypto) who can create a KYC/AML report with supporting evidence BEFORE you cash-out. Most people think they don't have any proof but usually when asked questions people come up with ways of proving this type of situation happened. It's all about documenting that transaction.. Do you have any chat logs with the person who bought the BTC on your behalf? Any records of the cash exchange / BTC purchase from 2015?

ThrowRA-hamburger

most alts from 2021 never came back so being heavy in BTC and ETH isn't the worst position honestly. the reddit panic is noise but also... some of it isn't. idk your altcoin mix matters a lot here

GaryKlj

You should move the money to prediction markets. I'm betting all day long 15 min BTC prediction markets.

AlligatorHater22

So this is my entrance to BTC. I'm kinda glad it took such a hit and I genuinely thought I missed the boat on this. I've dropped £2k in so far. I intend to keep PCA buying up to £10k might go as far as £20k.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Only_Country4276 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1rci9om/non_kyc_exchanges_with_real_liquidity/ I have been trying to find a centralized exchange that does not require full identity verification for basic trading but still offers strong liquidity across major pairs. Most of the well known platforms either require full KYC upfront or have started tightening restrictoins, which makes things a bit more complicated. My main concern is order book depth. It is easy to find smaller exchanges that advertise privacy, but once you actually place a meaningful order the slippage becomes noticeable. I trade mostly major like BTC and ETH, but I also rotate into mid cap alts when there is momentum, so consistent liquidity across more than just the top two pairs matters to me. I am not looking to move to a DEX at the moment. I understand the advantages there but for my style of trading I still prefer the speed and interface of a centralized platform. What I am trying to figure out is whether there are any non KYC options that can realisticaly handle larger position sizes without wide spreads or execution issues. If anyone here is trading decent volume on a non KYC centralized exchange and feels confident about liquidity and withdrawals, i would appreciate hearing your experience. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Sparky14715

Other cycles didn’t have the Epstein files proving that Epstein was involved heavily with the developers. That’s not even touching the fact that it’s a dinosaur that takes 20 minutes to close a transaction. BTC is dead. Stop being delusional. It will always be known as a pedo coin from now on. Right or wrong

Sparky14715

BTC? Oh, you mean Pedo coin.

Sparky14715

Saw the Jeffrey Epstein file release showing he was heavily involved with a developers has nothing to do with the recent price drop? Really going to ignore the elephant in the room? It will forever be known as a pedo coin. Right or wrong. Not to mention it’s a dinosaur and can’t do what is needed of modern Blockchain. Nobody wants to wait 20 minutes for a transaction to close. BTC is dead. It will slowly suck another trillion out of the market.

MtGloomy0420

They said that nobody would use expensive graphics cards back in 2015 when $NVDA was $3 too. $BTC has been dead at least 25 times in its history. I’m definitely buying more now! ;)

Sparky14715

BTC is dead. Nobody is going to wait 20 minutes for a transaction to close. And it will forever be known as a pedo coin after the last Epstein file release. Buckle up buttercup BTC is going to give up another trillion in market cap in the next year.

Sparky14715

BTC is dead. Will forever be known as the pedo coin. Right or wrong. Not to mention all the other issues it has like 20 minutes to close a transaction. Once bitcoin is worthless the markets will heal.

Cryptizard

Right. But there are hundreds of billions of dollars of BTC right now with their public keys on the chain.

Sparky14715

Once BTC is done slowly dying the rest of the crypto market will pump. Privacy coins will be the next bitcoin. That’s what crypto was supposed to be.

electriccomputermilk

Are you shorting BTC then? If so convinced have you put your money where your mouth is? Nobody knows exactly what BTC will be worth, but let’s be real…BTC will never be at 0. Way too many holders are going to hold on and it will never get to 0. That I’m convinced on.

Sparky14715

BTC is a shit coin. It’s a dinosaur. Nobody wants to wait 20 minutes for a transaction of clothes. And now that we know that Epstein connection nobody wants to be involved with a pedo coin. I guess when they said years ago when we find out who was behind bitcoin it will drop to zero. Only privacy coins will dominate crypto 10 years from now.

Sparky14715

Nah. Just BTC. Aka pedo coin. It will suck another trillion out of the market before things stabilize. Monero will be the next BTC. Privacy coins in general will rule crypto a decade from now.

AmazingfurnitureCT

If you thinks it’s going to ATH’s what difference is $66k or $50k. What if it never drops and you miss the boat. DCA BTC every single day and chill.

Calm-Professional103

Not surprising. ETH is really the only crypto that can be used as liquidity when repositioning for a BTC bounce. Shitcoins don’t even get to partiipate. 

Spirited-Tie8758

the talking points for BTC vary by the day