BTC

According-Ad-2594

Coinbase advanced or kraken pro. I've been using the pro interface on kraken for many many years and never had any trouble at all. The pro bit is just a different interface with much lower fees. The BTC withdrawal cost and trading fees are pretty good.

greg0rie

Get used to it. BTC is not what it was intended to be anymore. You have already see tbe highest its ever going to go.

Lucky-Interview-7689

\> Self-custodied BTC is no government's liability and no bank's promise to pay. Holding it requires no custodian. Cuts both ways. With no issuer, nobody owes you anything, so its value rests entirely on other people continuing to want it. "No custodian" also means no recourse: lose the keys or get scammed and the coins are gone. Most people hold it through exchanges or ETFs anyway, which are custodians, and you still buy, sell and pay tax through the regulated system. I can go to my bank and recover my lost password. I can get refunded for funds lost in a bank collapse from the FDIC. \> No government, developer or miner can unilaterally make existing nodes accept extra supply. Correct for the protocol, but the cap is enforced by social consensus, not cryptography. The rules have been changed before (SegWit, Taproot). A cap change is very unlikely, but it's a coordination question, not a law of nature. And one token being scarce doesn't limit substitutes, since anyone can fork it or launch another coin. Scarcity without demand is worth nothing; plenty of rare things are worthless. My favorite example is my own dog's shit. Maybe it's a fertilizer, and maybe not a good one, but at least it does have utility. \> It allows direct, cross-border transfers without a bank or payment company authorizing them. There is no central administrator with an account-freezing button. The protocol has no freeze button. The on ramps and offramps do. And there you see the redundancy of crypto. Base-layer throughput is a few transactions per second for Bitcoin, fees fluctuate, and transfers are irreversible. And a transfer only matters if the other side will accept BTC for something real, which is the adoption problem. For cheap cross-border transfers there are many other options that offer security and are incredibly quicker than Bitcoin. \> You don't need Bitcoin to replace fiat for that option to be useful. This is the best version of your argument. So this is insurance against sovereign nation failure or banking failure, which matters to such a small number of transactions, that anyone entering into these transactions would already be using established channels with insurance. Next to a $1.6T market cap it doesn't add up. That valuation implies much broader demand than this niche explains. And gold already offers non-sovereign scarcity with far less volatility. Market cap is meaningless. What does your tech do? Nothing that isn't already done and better, with more efficiency, and actual safeguards in the traditional financial system. A scheme is a scheme, doesn't matter what the next fool is willing to pay.

Romanizer

Sorry, just read the thread again and saw you were arguing against Bitcoin. In that case, you should be some from the large walls of texts from AmericanScream.. :-) The strongest case for Bitcoin is the combination of properties it offers: 1) Non-sovereign ownership: Self-custodied BTC is no government’s liability and no bank’s promise to pay. Holding it requires no custodian. 2) Verifiable scarcity: Its issuance schedule and 21-million cap are independently auditable under the existing consensus rules. No government, developer or miner can unilaterally make existing nodes accept extra supply. 3) Permissionless settlement: It allows direct, cross-border transfers without a bank or payment company authorizing them. There is no central administrator with an account-freezing button. Together, those properties provide a practical option for holding and transferring value outside sovereign monetary systems and financial intermediaries. You don’t need Bitcoin to replace fiat for that option to be useful. Scarcity alone doesn’t create value; demand for those capabilities is the economic argument. That supports a case for Bitcoin’s usefulness, not any particular valuation or guaranteed return.

0a0d0s0

The lean amount, by a long way. Both on Baseline with the 2-year cap: \- Trigger (lean $2,250): 20% needs 2.9 BTC, 30% 2.9, 40% 3.0, 50% 3.1 \- Lean amount (30% trigger): $2,250 needs 2.9 BTC, $1,500 needs 2.6 The trigger mostly changes how often you go lean. 20% only added one more stretch, while 40% and 50% wait for deeper falls, so you're lean less often and save less. The lean amount changes how much each lean month saves without changing how many there are. Which refines the rule of thumb: the 1% per lean year is for a 25% cut. Dropping to half your budget saves closer to 2% per lean year. So the saving scales with both how long you're lean and how deep the cut is. I wrote the full set of runs up on the blog if you want the table.

read_more_comments

They raised 210 million two years ago, and there is no evidence they are bankrupt. Liquid BTC has nothing to do with their hw wallet. The source is true open source, so even if they go under, you can still use it, make updates, and run your own blind oracle if needed. You can also skip buying their hardware and build your own jade hw wallet if you were paranoid.

UpbeatFix7299

How many decades before running a fusion reactor to make gold approaches the cost of digging it up? Maybe our grandkids will have to worry about it. Ditto with AI and crypto, though I think BTC has zero intrinsic value.

HesitantInvestor0

I find that hard to believe. I also think we should define our terms a bit. Is someone with 5 dollars of BTC on Cash App an owner? I suppose technically, yes. But it's a bit like saying someone is employed if they work an hour a month. I'd be willing to bet there are a few million people who own a relatively significant amount of Bitcoin. Apparently there are around 200 million addresses holding 0.01 BTC or more. That's only about 800 bucks, so a pretty low bar. Also you have to consider that many people own multiple wallets. If you have 0.1 BTC as the bar it drops to around 30 million wallets, which again, are owned by fewer than 30 million people.

Alfador8

Beyond that, *everyone* feels late when they get into bitcoin. There was a post on the old Bitcoin Talk forums about a dude who only had 600 BTC because he was late to the party.  If you don't understand the technology and its significance, you *will* feel late and likely exit too early even if you make a profit.

CipherScarlatti

Thought I saw somewhere here that 81k was the line for BTC for funds holding it. That explains the movement.

TheBot121288

True but those entities are top down and centralized. They will adjust to AI and quantum threats far more quickly than the BTC network will. Also, the authorities will care very little if BTC breaks. If an attacker exploits the banks etc..., they will be hunted down like dogs.

TheBot121288

I'm 50/50 at this point. I have traditional retirement accounts if it doesn't work out. I look at it this way: There are 4 possible scenarios. 1. I hold and it goes up long term. Great. 2. I could sell and it eventually goes to zero. In hindsight that would look like a good decision. 3. I could hold and it goes to zero. That would suck. 4. I could sell now and it goes up long term. Absolute misery. Of those 4 scenarios, there is only ONE that I can eliminate of my own volition, and that's #4. Sure, holding risks scenario #3. But if that happens, at least I would have closure. It's over and I will eventually move on. But if #4 happens and BTC becomes the main store of value, the price will be right there, in my face, every day, reminding me what I missed out on. That would be far worse psychologically than holding to zero. (Especially if I keep contributing to my retirement accounts)

Rosenant

If that happens then it will at the same time crack security on all financial transactions. Everyone’s bank account and stock market accounts and all the bank and brokerage and government bank and sovereign wealth funds. What is available to be stolen in BTC pales in comparison to these other asset classes which are also all now digitalized.

RetiredAvocado

Massive appreciation of BTC, with all things remaining equal.

quantumsparq

If you are asking. No. Do not buy BTC.

Regular_Attempt_7073

The by creating conditions that mske people want to buy BTC. Buy buying it themselves on the down lo or by adding to their strategic reserve of BTC in a sizable way.

LittleTwo9213

Isn’t the point to adopt BTC by people who don’t understand it?

web3_goku

Lol You clearly don’t know nothing about BTC

OssoBlanco86

So take a look at the ETFs that have surfaced around BTC, for example BTCI and STRC for example. If there was no future or worth to profit off of this would not happen. The one thing that crypto has that stocks do not is self custody, I wish I could do that with my stocks or ETFs. It’s still early and you keep seeing the word “ tokenized “ or “ tokenization” being mentioned. Buy some and tuck it away!

cryptokeyhole

Same three lows on our daily closes, and so far the bounce off this one is the weakest of the four. 119 days after each low BTC was up 43% (May 2015), 57% (April 2019) and 76% (March 2023). Today is day 119 from the $58.5k close on 30 June and it's up about 38%. The drop into it was a lot shallower though, 53% off the ATH close against 77-87% the other three times.

Able-Mycologist-461

Same anxiety here. Putting BTC on auto-buy, $300 every Friday, is what helps me most. 64 weeks in, red candles just mean more sats that week. Do you buy on a schedule or by hand when it dips?

KindaNeat420

Doesn’t BTC have a privacy layer that can output new wallet address to receive with, specifically for a situation like this? I’m pretty sure i remember reading about it in a BIP that passed a while back

Neo2029

Came so close to pulling that trigger March 15 of 2014 while talking to Brian Armstrong of COINBASE at his SXSW booth. I knew about it since 2011 while starting a launch incubator but eventually pulled it when I was supposed to. I remember around 2016?17? We talked about GOLDs’ MKt cap being $12T and that BTC, >!which!< was not yet at 1T, would have to 12-13x to match gold. Well look how much closer it got during ATH over a year ago before gold had its late 2025 run. It then seemed realistic. And tell me, If you are under the age of 39? Wouldn’t you prefer BTC to Gold? This will soon tell us how many people will be opting for digital gold over precious metals as we approach the next ATH.

jcheroske

I have standing orders to buy far OTM LEAP puts at good prices. I predict BTC goes to zero due to AI breaking the cryptography within 3 years. So, not exactly bullish.

ubfeo

Stop using BTC for hookers and blow....

inadyttap

538 days untill the next BTC block reward halving. Keep stacking sats! 

tenor_tymir

**IN THE END IT DOESN’T EVEN MATTER** \- Chester Bennington (BTC CEO)

tenor_tymir

Yeah I know that but why do you assume BTC crashes only after a lump sum and not later after a decade-long DCA? Outcome would be the same.

Alexander-305

Nice work, and your "lower LTV beats a later liquidation threshold" finding falls straight out of the math 🧮 The drop a loan can take before liquidation is 1 minus start LTV divided by liquidation LTV (ignoring accrued interest): - 50% start, 80% liquidation: BTC can fall 37.5% - 50% start, 90% liquidation: 44.4%, so only about 7 points more room - 30% start, 80% liquidation: 62.5% - 20% start, 80% liquidation: 75% Moving the threshold buys a few points. Cutting the start LTV buys tens of points. And 75% isn't a safe floor for a 12-month window: 2018 and 2022 both went down roughly 80% from the peak within about a year, which is probably where your 4 in 100 came from. Same logic for the 48h vs 72h top-up: those drawdowns played out over weeks, so an extra day rarely helps. What decides it is whether the borrower has spare cash or coins to post at all. A "top-up reserve" input (say, an extra X% of collateral you can add) would show that better than the deadline does. Two things I'd add on the data side: - Hourly closes miss wicks. Lenders usually mark against an index or live price, so a 20-minute flush can trigger a liquidation that never shows up in your hourly series. Hourly lows would be a more honest test. - Interest accrual pushes LTV up even in a flat market, so a 12-month loan needs a few extra points of headroom on top of the price move. +1 to the post-2020 toggle someone mentioned, as long as it's labeled as fewer independent crashes, not lower risk 👀

Adventurous-Sir444

It's close though. The issue seems to be the inflation cost of pizzas keeps on rising 😭 • Current Bitcoin Value: With Bitcoin trading at approximately $80,628 USD per coin, 2 BTC is worth about $161,256 USD. • Cost of 10,000 Pizzas: At an average cost of $20 USD per large pizza, 10,000 pizzas would cost roughly $200,000 USD (or up to $250,000 USD if priced at $25 each).

cryptokeyhole

Filtering to post-2020 barely changes it. On our daily BTC closes (so no intraday wicks), with the post's terms plus 12% interest and no top-ups, 39 of 100 start days from 2020 on ended in liquidation, against 42 since 2014 (the post found 41). The losses come in blocks, not from the early years: every loan opened between mid-June 2021 and mid-June 2022 got liquidated, and so did every one opened from 11 April to late October 2025. At 20% LTV it's about 2 of 100 since 2020.

CyanDew

honestly tho. if you’re buying BTC $100 at a time each week or so, what difference does a 2-5% move make anyway? wake me up when we 100k+

Head_Work8441

you didnt answer my question, Ok, Let me put it this way, will you have a problem with increased supply of core BTC in any shape or form in future, 21 mil + , Either with tail emissions or overall supply increase?

Head_Work8441

Fair, but will you support BTC supply increased if it's forced like OP return increase?

No_Mud_414

I almost bought 100 euro of BTC in 2011, would have resulted in quite the bag. Wanted to whoop my own ass up for so many times.

ComasArentFun

No it doesn't I mean do I need to say more? It really DOESNT What it MIGHT do is lend processing power to another PoW shitcoin that might get a reward from but it isn't BTC And I guarantee it will be worth 0 before you get any reward

Muted_Advice_5764

Now there is no volume in market. Everyone waiting for the fed news on Wednesday. That could decide the fate of BTC to go more lower or give another push

Landlubber2026

As long as Bitcoin remains Proof of stake, it will essentially have to at least double in value every cycle, because otherwise nobody would mine it. So unless inflation rises to 25% per year(unlikely) then BTC will always outpace inflation.

WorkerPlayful4192

In October 2014 BTC price was between 340 to 390 dollars per coin average. 🥲

Successful-Mud-2000

Fair point, "new money" was the wrong way to say it. Market cap isnt money in, and with thin supply a little buying can reprice everything. I agree with that part A few things I would push back on The multiplier works both ways. The same thin supply that pushes it up also makes it drop hard. In 2022 BTC fell around 65% without anywhere near 1 trillion leaving And holders do sell. Long term holders sold a lot into the run to 126k, and BTC was red in 2025 and is red so far this year. People sell to buy houses, pay taxes, retire, or just because they need the money. Thats not foolish, thats what the money is for Also there is a steady sell side built in: miners get around 450 new BTC a day and most of it gets sold to pay for power. At current prices thats around 13 billion a year that has to be absorbed before price even moves So I think your scenario is possible, I just wouldnt call it self-confirming. Conviction is real until people need liquidity

KateR_H0l1day

What makes you think I don’t have BTC to???? Stop assuming things, check and validate!!

Lost_Ambassador_2351

The black sesame mochi cake at Modu is reason enough to go, paying with sats just makes it better. Cal State location doing 15 purchases a week is more than I expected, students are catching on faster than most. I stopped by Café de Leche once and the owner was super chill about it, no weird looks like you get other places. That BTC Map is useful but yeah some spots listed are gone or stopped taking it, worth a call before driving across town.

IAmMiddleChild

How is it even realistic that Bitcoin will get to the 12 *trillion* dollar market cap necessary for each BTC to be worth 500k USD as some have suggested (or even worse 2x that for them to be worth 1 million each). This seems delusional but I have unfortunately been sucked in. Please tell me that it MAY be possible. Even the top company in the world (Apple?) has around a 5.02 *trillion* dollar market cap only

WorkerPlayful4192

Why? Bigger market cap, bigger price of the satoshies. BTC supply is fixed.

Successful-Mud-2000

Possible, but lets put numbers on it Right now BTC is around 1.6 trillion. Getting to 10 trillion is about 6x. Over 10 years that needs around 20% a year, over 12 years around 17% a year. With roughly 20.5 million coins by then, 10 trillion would be close to 500k per coin For comparison, JPMorgan just published a long term assumption of 10% a year for bitcoin. At that rate you get to something like 4 to 5 trillion in 10-12 years, not 10 Another way to see it: all the gold in the world is worth somewhere around 27 trillion at current prices. 10 trillion would mean bitcoin reaching about a third of gold. Not crazy if the digital gold story keeps winning, but it needs a lot of new money coming in, not just the same holders So yes it can happen, but its closer to the optimistic case than the base case. And given how wrong everyone was 12 years ago, I wouldnt bet my house on any of these numbers in either direction

bobbyv137

Many reputable people 'in this space' have long been (and some even still) call for a $1m BTC by 2030. Coinbase's CEO, Cathy Wood, Adam Back, Samson Mow to name a few. Whether *you* think they are credible isn't the debate; they are projected 'in this space' as people of trust/authority.

WorkerPlayful4192

Here want to ask - it is possible BTC to hit 10 trillion market cap in 10-12 years?

CyanDew

i mean, Bitcoin has survived things that would kill most systems: a 2010 bug that briefly created 184 billion coins (fixed in hours), the Mt. Gox and FTX collapses, China banning half its miners overnight, and four 75%+ crashes, each followed by a new high. BTC been declared dead 400+ times, yet the network has been running almost nonstop since 2009 and has never been hacked. exchanges and companies fail; but Bitcoin keeps producing blocks. thats the resilience i’m referring to.

devCheckingIn

Will STRC ever reach par again? This was supposed to be Strategy's way to raise capital to buy BTC. Instead they're diluting MSTR shares to prop up STRC.

Kenesson-Ongute

The part people often miss is that moving BTC through an exchange doesn't magically make the trail disappear either. An exchange may have records linking your deposits and withdrawals, even if someone looking at the blockchain can't establish that connection directly. Privacy really comes down to who you're trying to hide information from and what information they already have. Keeping salary UTXOs separate from unrelated funds is a good starting point, but it's not the same thing as making the coins anonymous.

Abgg_Reviss

Random daily advice - Something worth checking if you're regularly buying small amounts of BTC is the total cost of actually getting it into your wallet. An exchange advertising zero trading fees might still have a spread, and then there's the withdrawal fee on top. Comparing how many sats arrive in self-custody for the same amount of money tells you a lot more than the advertised trading fee alone. Small differences really start adding up if you're buying every week.

Generationhodl

"Half empty: 1 x BTC has less purchasing power today than 5 years ago, despite the numerous bullish macroeconomic developments since (ETFs, SBR, halving etc.)" But you are comparing 2021 highs from a bullrun peak versus prices now near the bottom of the bear year.  So I think it will look way better in the next 6-12 months. 

neutronjeff

What value does either party get out of paying you in BTC as opposed to your local currency?

Treesh_Jancy

I would go with Debian stable and full disk encryption. Since the laptop is dedicated to coordinating multisig and the private keys stay on hardware devices, the biggest practical wins are keeping the system minimal, verifying software downloads and avoiding unnecessary network exposure. Qubes is great for compartmentalization but sounds like overkill for your setup. I'd also back up the wallet descriptor and test recovery before moving any significant amount of BTC. That's arguably more important than which Linux distro you pick.

cryptokeyhole

Not law anywhere I know of, but several big exchanges publish their reserve addresses voluntarily, so you can check them on-chain. On our node, the lists from Binance, OKX, Bitfinex, Bybit, Deribit, Crypto.com, KuCoin and HTX hold about 1.11M BTC right now, about 655k of it at Binance's addresses. Coinbase and Kraken publish no addresses, and some of the lists are years old, so it's a partial picture. Addresses also only show the assets side, not what the exchange owes its customers.

Treesh_Jancy

Publishing wallet addresses would definitely help with transparency, but it only proves part of the picture. An exchange could show that it controls 10,000 BTC while still owing customers 15,000 BTC. That's why proof of reserves needs to be paired with some way to verify customer liabilities. Even then, borrowed assets and off-chain obligations can complicate things. I would rather see exchanges publish regular independent attestations that cover both sides instead of just showing a bunch of addresses.

KateR_H0l1day

I entered the SATS last week, so I obviously helped them buy those BTC’s.

PolyPunter

Interesting approach. Bringing Polymarket and Kalshi markets together is useful, especially since the same BTC outlook can be spread across a lot of different contracts. One thing I'd be curious to see is how the forecast performs historically. For example, when the model gives an 80% range, does BTC actually finish inside that range roughly 80% of the time? That kind of calibration data could make the forecast much more useful than just looking at individual market odds.

Elmer-Shutara

Since you already have a 401k and traditional investments, one thing worth understanding first is the difference between owning Bitcoin and getting exposure to its price. A spot Bitcoin ETF lets you buy through a regular brokerage, but you can't withdraw the actual BTC to your own wallet. Buying through an exchange gives you that option, although then you need to learn about custody and recovery phrases. Neither approach requires putting a big amount in immediately. I'd spend a little time understanding that difference before deciding where to buy.

Thaddaeus_Undergrade

The part I'd question is treating diminishing returns as a mathematical rule rather than a pattern we've observed so far. There are only a handful of completed cycles, and each happened under pretty different market conditions. Miner revenue is also a combination of block subsidies and transaction fees, so the security argument is more complicated than just looking at how much new BTC gets issued. Interesting thesis, but I don't think the data gets us anywhere close to a reliable 10% ceiling.

bobbyv137

It's all about perspective: Half full: it's up $75k since the covid lows. It did a 8x between Q4 2022 and Q4 2025 Half empty: 1 x BTC has less purchasing power today than 5 years ago, despite the numerous bullish macroeconomic developments since (ETFs, SBR, halving etc.) What's all but certain is the talk of $1m per coin by 2030 isn't happening. It's not going to do a 12x in <4 years.

theusedcomputers

Got it. I fear day trading crypto, especially BTC. The volatility is too much for me to stay calm and make rational decisions. If it works for you, then thats great man. Wishing you the best.

SalePrestigious6605

Does BTC look terrible ? 🧐 it's been great for the past 5+ years.

Feriman22

Not manually. I only act when the system triggers an entry on BTC, ETH or BNB, so I don't really have a "this looks cheap, I'll buy it" list. That's kind of the point - removing that discretion from the process.

Big80sweens

buy low and sell high, or in BTC case, buy low and hold forever.

Murky_Willow2826

BTC dropping under $80k looks scary, but the range today has actually been pretty tight: buyers defending around $79,400-79,600, with $80,500-80,800 acting as resistance where recoveries have stalled this week. The big event is tomorrow, 28 Oct, when the Fed announces - traders are pricing a very high chance of no change. That doesn't tell you what to buy or sell. It just means a lot of the move right now is waiting, not a new trend yet. If you're new, the usual mistake is making a rushed decision on a red day. Not financial advice, just how I'm reading it.

Icy_Dragonfruit__

HODLing is one thing, but make sure you keep an emergency fund outside BTC. 🙌

wsbgodly123

Bitcoin's lowest point this month was about $79,146, on Sat Oct 24. That's spot BTC-USD from Yahoo, using UTC days. It started October near $83,550, peaked around $87,150 on Oct 2, and is about $79,750 now. That's down roughly 4.5% for the month and near the lows. **Date** **Low** **Close** Oct 1 83,133 84,853 Oct 4 84,707 86,480 Oct 8 80,337 81,676 Oct 15 79,736 82,141 Oct 21 82,543 84,012 Oct 24 **79,146** 80,791 Oct 26 79,279 80,007 Oct 27 (so far) 79,380 79,750

SatisfactionFinal287

Am I right in thinking BTC is doing quite alright looking at the other stuff plummeting?

Iranoutofhotsauce

What BTC to 93Ooo wow

weigelf

Bitconnect. I don't wasn't to think about how much in today's BTC value. Also, got scammed out of ~$2,500 from a guy I was sending PayPal to in exchange for alt coins. Worked well for some smaller transactions. Then, I sent PayPal and he ghosted me. I found who the guy was with the help from a group of devs who would go after scammers. Eighteen year old. Contacted his father when I found that others the guy scammed got money back from the dad. By the time I got to his dad, he was freed up with it all, and I got nothing back. As an earlier commenter pointed out - "tuition"

Lavayo

If the power law applies it does not do so because BTC is a currency. Its something much more fundamental that's used as currency by us.

_ari_c_flemming

The part I’d watch isn’t the coin count it’s how it’s funded. Preferred stock isn’t debt but the preferreds are dividend bearing so Strive has to keep cash aside to pay them. 1B SATS program is issuance capacity not money already raised. And more coins doesn’t automatically mean more bitcoin per share that depends on how many securities they issue to pay for it. the real test is whether they can keep issuing at a good price when BTC isn’t going up

tenor_tymir

I also bought 0.01 BTC this week. We’re the same.

RennaisanceWizzard

I wonder if SBF scam was throwing BTC off making it look better than it was and now that that scam is gone, it is no longer being thrown off.

sheeeeeeeeei

I’m not going to change my stance, or get swayed further from Bitcoin, but to build from 0 to 1 BTC is my goal, mainly because I refuse to miss the train all over again. I’m interested to hear other people’s thoughts on how expensive 1 coin is , when actually trying to DCA . Most of the DCA crew probably has 1 BTC by now. This cryptocurrency has made it to the point where it is now “real work” to acquire, no longer funny money. Also, don’t be like me. I never sold BTC but, not buying BTC at all is even worse. Don’t feel bad that you traded everything away. If you didn’t, you’d be harping on the next closest thing that you did or didn’t do.

sheeeeeeeeei

Hey guys. I wanted to share this but don’t feel like making a huge post. I am gonna to to reach 1 coin before 2028. My job’s salary may possibly allow me to do this if I get a side hustle. I just see so much on here (people who regret selling at $100, etc.) I feel like we all share that common regret and fomo. To those who bought and held congrats…. I’ve been noticing that people bought Bitcoin more often when they are near a crypto hub like Vancouver BC or Toronto, and BTC has largely been tied to the Silk Road, and drugs, for most of its life. I’m an actual Bitcoin enthusiast and would-have-been investor. I’ve tracked Bitcoin news since 2012, taking a few large breaks in between. I understood the scarcity of the hard cap and I understood exactly what this currency would do, I just didn’t have the patience, money, time, or support to fully and comfortably go all in on BTC. The reason I’m buying BTC is because I feel like an absolute clanker for not buying BTC at $2.50, $5, etc. Am I wrong for wanting to save up for 1 BTC (DCA) ? I’ve always been bad with money but BTC has my heart and is a huge part of my life, mainly because the protocol encourages trustlessness. Right now BTC is itching like a fent user, if you know what I mean. Only a matter of time….

K42st

The long term price movement of Bitcoin is simply less sellers in the market all markets work on a buyer seller basis which traders see everyday the price goes up because buy orders overwhelm sell order and visa Versa in simple terms, the most important factor is spot BTC buying which is organic so less BTC supply available, leverage is rocket fuel for price discovery but it is not organic growth it can and does dissapear as fast as it came and often causes sharp price collapses. So simple less people willing to sell at a price level and less supply drives price up, more people selling than buying drives price down. So the basics of the money supply and it’s correlation which BTC, in simple terms there are always issues in the economy issues that likely can’t be fixed like the debt situation and one issue having a knock on effect on others, Bond Markets, Goverment Debt, Housing, Banks, Bussiness, AI Build Out, at some point the powers that be have to step in they do so in ways that won’t inflate prices badly but sooner or later they can’t help but step in with full on QE time after time the do this they wait till it’s nearly breaking then have no choice but to go full on money printing. Some of that money finds its way into risk assets spot buying increases, leverage risk increases and BTCs price moons. Each time these things happen people lose more faith in the system and BTC and Gold and other safe havens become more invested in and price goes up but also becomes more stable because people see it as a hedge a long term safety valve against an economy that is not in good health. You will see it soon when the AI bubble bursts it will cause a shot to the exonomy just like the dot com bust, when you see the increase in the money supply they won’t hide it it will be full on. From your post I doubt anyone can convince you though but beleive me BTCs price will only increase and everyone alway and i mean always says the same thing, I wish I’d bought some then.

Crypto_Champion77

BTC is the same now as hundreds of other financial instruments. It’s going down because oil is going up and it looks like the Fed may raise interest rates. It’s so regulated now that it will just act like other investments.

PsychologicalBit803

I’ve been buying regularly when it was under 70. Buying at all right now I think is fine. Couple of years when we are firmly back in a bull market I wont care if I bought at 60 or 65. Now if it truly dropped to under 50k I’ll put every dime I can get in BTC.

Coleyx123

Definitely agree. BTC and ETH are for holding (at least for me), and most tokens are for trading. If the tokens are cheap and have a decent community, I hold a few million just in case, but that's some "I'm not going through DOGE again" type stuff. Spent $3 on DOGE way back when I thought I was going to trade myself to riches. I did not and should've held. Idk what 7.5 mil of DOGE is worth, nor do I want to, but I picked them up for a $1 or $3. Life happened, traded them, and now I cry, lol.

TheWorldArmada

You’re fooling yourself if you think buying Bitcoin isn’t gambling. Created by an unknown person who has custody of 1.1 million BTC. If that 1.1 million BTC ever moves it would trigger a massive sell off. Big institutions selling it all would trigger a sell off as well. No one knows the real purpose of BTC. We’ve been told it’s to be independent from the banking system, but it could all end in a rug pull. That being said I do have BTC but I’m not kidding myself into thinking it’s infallible. I have what I can afford to lose, and I don’t treat it as a store of value. I sell when the market is heated and I buy when everyone says it’s dead. Taking profits mitigates the risk.

Empty_Carpenter7420

He bought… dump it. Pretty normal, BTC goes up and down

pfchangshomelesscat

Makes a post about why BTC is going down, but doesn't answer why BTC is going down

MerK-x-VeNoOm

If BTC goes the way you want it I see it doubling in the next peak back at its 120k form. I do believe it will happen sooner than later. The issue tho is risk of it taking too long to get there or not at all. You lose essentially everything. We are all betting against that obviously but again, it’s the risk

tenor_tymir

Wrong. BTC is a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Previous_Blueberry_5

Exodus has been having a lot of phishing scams and online thefts recently I wouldn’t keep any money on there. Bitbox02nova and Strike for the exchange to buy BTC.

TheWorldArmada

BTC is by definition a cryptocurrency.

Interesting_Loss_907

You meant to say: multiply the decimal in question (0.00000005) by the current BTC market price. If he multiplied the number of Satoshis by the current market price he would get over $400,000.

nofxet

Yea if the purchasing power of $1 million is like a nice down payment on a house because nice houses are now $5 million, then it won’t seem like much progress. A nice house right now is like $350-500k in many areas and 1 BTC is about what you would need for a down payment.

omni_wisdumb

It doesn't need to be a physical asset to follow economic principles. And I never said it can't or won't 10x. I said compared to the risk, it's not any more likely to 10x than many great stocks over the next 10 years. I've also been in this space since like 2012 and most likely have more than 99.99% of this sub, so I am not anti-BTC or FUD. The fact is that thinking Bitcoin will have the same price action (or that price discovery isn't a thing) now as it did I 2012-2018 when people you got these "I got rich" stories is nonsensical. Do I think everyone should invest a little in BTC and maybe a little in a few other projects? Absolutely. Telling someone to take a mortgaged back loan of over $100k to buy BTC is beyond stupid.

Myianmonik

Op is regarded be easy on him. That much BTC is 900 million USD Buddy (^_^)v

v__tee

That is 5 Satoshis. Always multiply the number of Satoshis, by the current BTC price, in USD. This will give you the magic number you are looking for :)

Suspicious-Pipe9483

Im too late, did exactly what I shouldn't have and lost .45 BTC. Woke up to email and was still asleep and panicked and did something I've always known not to do. I know not to trust any DM's offering help, just hoping someone else might benefit from learning about this.... Hash ID 10d765f0ee23368f3700af5434a5fa908d40023f27741786b8a2fc250724c09e Wallet sent to bc1q7w6gdukt2400jh208ycf5wntw8l3x7z04gv2h3

tenor_tymir

Not sure why DCA loses nothing? If OP DCA’d for a few years and has amassed a serious amount of BTC and it then goes to $1, they have lost the exact same amount, just stretched out over a longer time frame.

yoobermcruber

Not according to the chart. The circulating supply is currently 20,103,909 BTC and the chart says 8.5% of that is held by Funds & ETFs. 79.6% of 20,103,909 BTC is 16,002,712 BTC. You are claiming that over 1/3 of 16,002,712 BTC is held by ETFs but ETFs currently only hold a total of about 1.3 million BTC.

tenor_tymir

BTC is not “crypto”. It’s a logical bet on the continuous rise of BTC, coming out of a bear market. The possibility is very high that a new ATH will be reached within the next 2 years. Taking out a loan and investing during a bear market is a calculated risk, as long as you can pay the loan instalments out of pocket.

autonym

If BTC goes to $1 next month and stays there, the loan and lump-sum purchase loses the person's apartment, whereas DCAing loses almost nothing. That's the sort of thing that DCA is meant to protect against.

BigSkyHawk1

wow, no way. not on BTC. Maybe if you said you were putting it in Broadcom or Nvidia but crypto? no way

lobhater

Begging for money a 0 day old account. Linking to a pastebin with a BTC address 🙄