BTC

lobhater

I'm pretty naive but it's my understanding that all transactions on BTC's block chain are now seperate and not copied on luke's blockchain. So wouldn't 1 transfer on the BTC block chain confirmed to a good depth completely break any link between the two chains? This is just a thought exercise. Luke's chain is going to be near worthless I would wager and I'll never touch it. But just curious. Though I do really like the idea of making the transaction large so as not even being valid on the new chain. I think I'm going to do that for peace of mind and as a fuck you to them. I'm happily going to pay extra transaction fees to ensure it gets mined. Plus I haven't fired up sparrow for a long time so it'll be fun to dust it off

rgnet1

Same uninformed comments over and over. "Buy high, sell low, hyuk hyuk." Maybe just take two seconds to study something before you speak. Every single buy is right here: [https://www.strategy.com/ledger](https://www.strategy.com/ledger) Strategy's **bought over 175,000 BTC in 2026** and sold less than 9,000 BTC. The spread price of that is irrelevant. The sales were to prove Strategy won't default on its dividend-paying stock and will liquidate the minimum. Those tiny sales were an amazing move to change investor sentiment entirely. After the sales, STRC almost rocketed back to $100 par and I'm sure it contributes to bitcoin's price recovery, even if all the Treasury bond shenanigans are getting most of the credit.

Bahog_veesong

40k would definitely test the conviction, but that’s usually when the real believers start paying attention. And with more BTC utility being built, there’s more to watch than price alone.

Bahog_veesong

and the fact that people keep finding new ways to use it makes it even harder to count out. TBVs could unlock even more utility for BTC...

JellyfishStill2690

So true. These kids must be very new to BTC.

Savings-Leading4618

10 years ago, the subsidy was a pat in the back. And now the subsidy is 200k dollars. You pay bills with dollars. As long as the dollar price goes up, it will be fine. People like to not tall about dollars like it does not matter the BTC / USD price, but it does.

Bahog_veesong

some things adapt enough to outlive the narrative around them. BTC has already done that, and its growing utility could keep pushing it forward.

stheodore1974

I expect to be able to loan my BTC and get paid interest within a few years as it continues to mature. I hope to get passive income like that in time.

NewspaperOwn2765

I plan on using my money , yes. The concept of money is also an illusion. True wealth cannot be represented 1 to 1 with a piece of metal or a digital ledger. I think thats where a lot of bitcoiners go wrong , they really believe money is wealth ( it’s not , it’s a social construction that we are all playing with right now ). Without other people , there is no value . So yeah if my BTC maxi dreams come true Im going to put money into good stuff like green energy ⚡️ agriculture 👨‍🌾, art 🎸, and healthcare 🏥 Every maxi worth their satoshis should be investing in a better world because they and their kin or loved ones are going to have to live in the world.

MonitorWaste2127

Recommend the friend you don’t like to buy BTC.

Any_Carob3372

Charge 1/100th of a BTC per lay, and soon you will be a winner in all the categories

read_more_comments

He isn't. Price doesn't have to go up. Miners will stop as it becomes unprofitable. Now remaining miners get a little bit more of the proceeds in btc. Price of BTC doesn't have to increase.

HSuke

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/08/31/strategy-returns-to-bitcoin-buys-adding-usd370-million-worth-last-week He sold MSTR to buy BTC and buyback STRC

sylsau

Your Bitcoin may have a **credit score**. Not on Bitcoin. On the systems exchanges use to decide whether your coins are “safe” to accept. **One UTXO might look low-risk.** **Another might show:** * mixer exposure * sanctioned-wallet proximity * stolen-fund links * darknet history * unknown counterparties **Same Bitcoin protocol. Very different compliance reputation.** That means your BTC can be **100% valid on-chain**… …and still trigger a review when you deposit it to an exchange. **The scary part? There is no universal definition of “clean Bitcoin.”** Different analytics firms can score the same UTXO differently. So maybe the next step in self-custody isn’t just: **Protect your keys.** It’s: **Understand your UTXOs before an exchange does.**

AutoModerator

Post is by: sylsau and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://inbitcoinwetrust.substack.com/p/your-bitcoin-has-a-credit-score-now Your Bitcoin may have a **credit score**. Not on Bitcoin. On the systems exchanges use to decide whether your coins are “safe” to accept. **One UTXO might look low-risk.** **Another might show:** * mixer exposure * sanctioned-wallet proximity * stolen-fund links * darknet history * unknown counterparties **Same Bitcoin protocol. Very different compliance reputation.** That means your BTC can be **100% valid on-chain**… …and still trigger a review when you deposit it to an exchange. **The scary part? There is no universal definition of “clean Bitcoin.”** Different analytics firms can score the same UTXO differently. So maybe the next step in self-custody isn’t just: **Protect your keys.** It’s: **Understand your UTXOs before an exchange does.** I broke down the tools you can use, what they actually reveal, and how NOT to destroy your privacy while checking. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

tidder_mac

100% he’s a POS grifter and I low key hope BTC crashes so his company has to liquidate more. But holy fuck I love these videos they’re hilarious

opossum_cz

\> Additionally, the price of BTC must be high enough for miners to remain profitable. But this doesn't hold. The difficulty must be lower enough for minders to mine, price is irrelevant. You confuse what is cause and what is effect.

Tandittor

This is so silly, but also hilarious. I'll like to see the version when BTC dips 15% in the near future lol

lestairwellwit

Dear Mr. Saylor, Please stop with this AI... uh... stuff. It may be meant as entertainment, but it's looking like the same stuff coming out of The White House, the very same people that BTC is meant to protect us from.

HUT2Moon

Saylor is insane and not good at business. But his one bet has paid off — BTC has mostly gone up. He made it mostly with other people’s money. Reminds me a lot of Trump — terrible person, terrible businessman. But made one good bet over and over and everyone thinks he’s a genius (or did, at least). (For Trump it was NYC real estate).

Efficient_Range1156

It will make chads with BTC0.78125 feel incredible.

opossum_cz

\> Additionally, the price of BTC must be high enough for miners to remain profitable. What requires this?

Crankllp

Why would you trust him the whole point of his business model was that he could squeeze extra BTC from his trading strategy and it’s a failure. He sells low buys high. MSTR should never trade at a premium to its BTC holdings and possibly should trade at a negative to its holdings based on his performance

K_oSTheKunt

Supply and demand indicates that a lower supply, assuming demand doesn't change, begs a higher price. Additionally, the price of BTC must be high enough for miners to remain profitable. Thus, smaller rewards + higher mining difficulty (high cost of production) likely = higher price. Of course, who knows what the future holds.

chingysmeesez

I see Bitcoin replacing the need to trust monetary gatekeepers, not replacing every currency overnight. People can still price things however they want, but BTC gives anyone the option to hold and transfer scarce money without permission. If adoption keeps growing organically, the unit of account part can come later. To me, having that choice is already a huge win.

Dangerous_Sky6868

Take the 200 BTC. Immediately sell 150 of them.

Mindless_Bicycle5091

lol.. I just checked and they now bought back all the BTC they sold at lows for the higher prices now... good job michael.

Derek6785

Haha, then you’d better go buy one soon too; otherwise, you won’t be in charge of the household finances anymore 😂 But honestly, having a girlfriend who has one BTC means she’s pretty good at picking people—your eye for choosing someone is good too 😄

Freeloader_

I never got any BTC out of any fork never understood why

Justin7746

BTC has been adjusting steadily and hasn’t broken through the 78,500 resistance.

oyeanmols

Exactly, that’s the frustrating part. These apps make buying BTC easy but actually paying someone with it becomes a whole different process, especially once KYC kicks in. For a business, I’d rather use a proper gateway like Inxy that handles checkout and payouts without forcing everything through a consumer exchange.

veskald

The per-asset table is the most interesting thing here, but careful with it: 94 trades across 10 coins is about 9 trades each. LINK at 71% and BTC at 20% is exactly what pure noise looks like at that sample size. If you cut the losers and keep the winners now, you will have fitted the portfolio to three months of noise, and the next three months will hand you a different top three. On the give back pattern - 76% of losing trades were green at some point is not automatically a bug. With a trailing stop that is normal: the same mechanism that gives back profit on losers is what lets winners run. The question is not "how do i stop giving back", its "what does the MFE distribution look like on winners vs losers". If losers reach the same max favourable excursion as winners before dying, no exit rule can separate them, because at the moment of decision they look identical. Thats a signal problem, not an exit problem, and it would explain why every exit change you tried made things worse or barely moved.

Lefties_TheWorst7331

I actually dont even buy MSTR.. I have like a whopping 2 shares. I do buy BTC itself, though. As well as IBIT, and BTCI. However, not MSTR. That doesn't change the mechanics behind the dilution workings of MSTR, though. MSTR *has* to be diluted or they're leaving money on the table..

No_Investigator3369

so if I have a biz, can I borrow off my BTC and then pay that loan back with biz proceeds and avoid extra taxes on my self w2 income? thought process is on paper let the BTC and biz grow but keep the extra cream off the top in the borrowed way and grow slow on paper.

No_Application_1579

BTC is over. Start selling guys before it's too late. 

Whatnam8

What happens to the BTC if you don’t and what you are suggesting happens, happens

LowerStranger9021

Those picking anything other than A don’t understand time value of money. Even if I think the long term perspectives for BTC are terrible, 200 BTC can be sold for around $15 million today. I can sell the BTC and invest at a very low risk rate of 3% (not unrealistic given US interest rates) and earn around $8,500 a week in interest.

Honu_Daze

Fidelity FINALLY allows for coin transfer - so IF you don’t want them to cold-storage your coins for you - you can transfer out of their custody & into your own. Which is brilliant, as it took them years to finally offer this. Originally you’d have to transfer to USD, but now you can directly export crypto coin(s). I know I go against the consensus here by holding my BTC at Fidelity - but it has given me peace of mind, as my concern is about seed phrases & how to store them (me memory is not what it used to be). I’d have to store them right along side a cold wallet in my safe (as I also rent & no where to permanently hide phrases etched onto some SS metal on property I don’t own).

thatoldtimerevision

$10,000,000 in cash, invested in a simple index fund you never think about again, would produce $15k a week in interest, and you world have the benefit of also having $10M already. You'd need about 19 years of 10k payments to even earn up to that $10M, but in the other case you already have it ... The 10k also gets less valuable every day due to inflation. The invested money would grow with inflation. 200 BTC could be sold for cash on day 1, and then you'd have $15M, which is even better. Wait a year to do that, and your taxes are about half what they would be on the two cash options. $10k a week is objectively the worst option by far.

unconventionalbook

Saylor breaking his 10-week pause to acquire another 4,603 BTC at an average price of $80,318 tells us everything we need to know about where institutional support sits right now. Strategy Inc. now controls a mind-boggling 845,050 BTC—which is roughly 4% of the total circulating supply that will ever exist.

fllthdcrb

> I can now move my BTC from B to C and I’m safe. Are you serious? If they replayed the first one, what makes you think they can't just as well replay the second one? And if that happens, what do you do then, huh? Yeah, you control your coins at C on both chains, but you'd still be just as vulnerable. Well, anyway, no one needs to worry about this unless they're just about to deal with them.

r_a_d_

You see… you miss the point completely. Let’s say i move my btc from A to B. They could replay that transaction also on bipcoin and move the same amount from A to B. That’s it… I still control the funds in both chains. I can now move my BTC from B to C and I’m safe. If I ever even need to care about bipcoin, I can issue a transaction on that chain from either A (if not replayed) or (B if replayed).

Ramast

I can't relate but I want to! Any lady here with a 1+ BTC?

ir88ed

I mostly agree with that. Definitely agree with purchase repeatedly, as you can afford. I personally won't do the DCA out because I already have the biggest percent of my savings/retirement in dollar-denominated assets. This makes BTC attractive as an asset. Rather than DCA out when the market is high, I plan to just spend the bitcoin as needed, which ends up at kind of the same point and is hopefully more tax efficient.

DeadPhish-710

LTC has set lower lows against BTC for almost 15 years now. It is -94% since inception. The last halving had no positive effect on the price at all. It just kept on declining. If you go to the sub reddit and mention any of this, they will permanently ban you. No warning. No 3 day vacation. Permanently banned. Fuck LTC. Not even the founder holds that doge shit. He sold everything he had and spends his days enjoying his bitcoin millions wile anyone that has ever bought LTC lost out tremendously.

Ok-Lobster8940

BTC weight a lot, she must have been carrying them for some time to be able to lift this guy up.

johnnycabb_

BTC roller coaster ride 

Porcellanidae

The dont sell your BTC is more an anti daytrading movement, I suppose Dont sell to take profit in fiat. But use it to make your life easier in the real world by buying stuff with it (which mostly still means having to sell it for fiat first). 

hopelesslyhip

Makes me so nervous I have downsized that position. I'm turning into a BTC maxi

Onemoretimego1

If you invest half of it into BTC every week you will outperform every other pick on the list though. You just need to live long enough

privacymatterznow

Yeah they can buy BTC and withdraw it. Usually no tax on buying. I would suggest they withdraw to their own wallet as some exchanges abroad can be strict and want to make sure the self custody wallet belongs to the account holder. Then they send to your self custody wallet like trezor and it will be good. Its only a tax implication when you sell. Before you sell for USD just have a chat with a CPA to know how much to hold back for taxes. You can also go further and the relatives can ask an accountant in India. I am pretty sure the tax only comes into account when you sell somewhere. 

LiveSlay

so BTC's 21million hard cap doesn't matter at all for this "financial guru"?

Sixtus3319

Pozwala. Dlatego na BTC jest warstwa Lightening

hodler1992

Quantum computing is a) very far away from us. It's actually rather a theoretic thing that we just begin to understand and b) very expensive to operate. Last but not least it is even today possible to get wallets quantum proof. The issue is not even that - everyone can migrate and is save. The question that is unsolved yet is how to handle Satoshis Wallet? But I guess we have at least 20 years time to resolve this. It's a problem but it's nowhere the end of Bitcoin. And the blockchain itself is robust. Even if an attacker with quantum computer would be able to create longer chains - all he can do is to undo a payment which has been made by himself beforehand. And it would take lot of effort to do this. I think this would not be a issue at all as BTC is an developing ecosystem which can adopt to things like that

NoBrosCrypto

There are a number of reasons including validation of the thesis and the need for BTC to reach a market cap that becomes more stable. For those that were early, it takes a lot to invest in something that’s not proven in the market. Growing price and adoption are interlinked so number go up should correlate to increased adoption and vice versa. For BTC to ever be used as money at scale, it needs to reach a level where it finds price stability and for that to occur, the price and market cap must be much higher so that the volatility decreases. Right now nobody really wants to pay for something in Bitcoin when it could be equivalent to being the $20K pizza guy in the future with your coffee purchase…

trip1travel

Gift cards seem like a practical middle ground, especially if they let you spend exactly what you need without keeping a separate balance. Curious to hear how many people here actually use them regularly versus paying directly with BTC. Have you tried to plan a trip with crypto?

No_Community7021

Way less accessible than a traditional bank and it hurts me admitting it. Not everyone can take care of their own money as security goes in crypto. BTC is not general public friendly and I hope never becomes a currency because it would lose all it's appeal and also you'd potentially buy a sandwich for 0.0001BTC in January and I'm August it may cost you 0.001BTC. The digital euro coming some time in 29-30 is the future of currencies in my opinion; if you could reconcile both things...

warrenboofit42069

What I’m getting at is, at what point do you choose to stop taking fiat and converting it to BTC and turn around to use the BTC to experience life? For me, it’s going to be a down payment on a vacation home sometime in the next 5-20 years and I’ll be passing 0.25 BTC to each kid.

hodler1992

It is. I get to talk about BTC quite often with friends or colleagues and 9 out of 10 are still laughing at me thinking this is a low IQ gamble. I wish they could see things happen but no

New_Manner_1826

It is about getting assets with rising value and instead rent until you can buy a house in a place right for you for cash. Anton Kriel talks about REIT, thinking outside of the sheep mentality. Look at the trends, 200 day moving averages. If you bought BTC 10 years ago you would be up 10 000 %, SPY 10 years ago you would be up 260 %, AAPL 1000 %, XBI 150 %, HG1! 180 %..

KongenAfKobenhavn

Why invest in a product you don’t understand? BTC can NEVER be used to buy and sell groceries or anything like that. The technology simply doesn’t allow that amount of transactions and speed that would require. Other crypto can do that.

oxxoMind

Proves that BTC is still very very early

warrenboofit42069

But will you use that value in a way that physically benefits your life between now and death (I.e convert to fiat if buying/selling in BTC isn’t mainstream yet), transfer it to your next of kin, or just keep staring at a chart and number on a screen and call that your “value” til you die?

JayGatsby1881

1 BTC is about to be able to buy a house in the next bull run, probably.

CompetitiveAppeal663

I have an exit strategy…..I’m 50M and in great health, but want to actually use my BTC in my lifetime. I have kids and pay for (most of) their college, and will help them with weddings and first home purchases, but I am not concerned with “generational wealth” or even leaving them a big chunk of money when I am dead and they are old. My strategy is a “skim waterfall” triggered by price. BTC hits $250k, I sell 15% of my stack and spend that money on whatever “extras” I want above and beyond my normal retirement savings. When it hits $400k, sell another 25% of what is left after the first sale. At $700k, sell another 35% of what is left. At $1M sell another 45%. I will end up dying with some BTC since I will never sell 100%, but I will also feel like I have used it to change my life. I also have a backup rule that says if these upper targets don’t hit by the time I am 65 (in 15 years) I reevaluate numbers and see if I sell sooner or not at all. This entire plan is to try to set hard rules to take the emotion out of it while actually using the BTC to change my life in meaningful ways.

Brave_Ad9059

Nie mam go na sprzedaż. Nie trzymam go z myślą o szybkim zarobku, lecz jako plan B na wypadek załamania systemu finansowego – choć mam świadomość, że za mojego życia wcale nie musi do tego dojść. ​To moja ochrona na scenariusz, w którym waluty FIAT zaczną tracić siłę nabywczą w takim tempie, że rynek zacznie od nich uciekać. ​Jeśli odejdę, nie wykorzystawszy tych środków, moje BTC przepadną razem ze mną. Będzie to mój mały wkład w całą społeczność – w końcu utracone monety tylko zwiększają wartość reszty.

richardto4321

If BTC were to hit $10M in our lifetime, that means it has become a huge mainstream success and it would be better to use it as collateral to buy things rather than sell it and pay a big tax bill.

xuncx

I’m not a billionaire but thanks for the compliment. I just don’t understand the upside of investing so little. Even if btc breaks $150k OP will still have less than $500 and then you have to consider fees. There is a thing called. If it was my last $200 and change I’d use that money to invest in myself to make me more money. BTC is great don’t get me wrong but it’s not gonna all of a sudden go parabolic to $1M. Even if it did OP would would still only have $3k which isn’t life changing. They could make $3k much easier.

nassauboy9

I have some on an exchange and the reason is if wanted to convert to some cash for a toy or bill or another investment which I did a little last week With the 40 trillion debt and governments going to be wanting money I'm feeling less easy. I have always been a not your keys but now I'm thinking about how relatively easy it is to send BTC to an exchange and is it worth keep there. I mean RULES CHANGE. I think I just convinced myself.

Relentlessbetz

Should have spent more buying BTC in 2016 then going out and partying with women. Could have stacked hard and then party hard with women lol.

NoBrosCrypto

I want to hold until BTC gets to a price where I can sell half to retire all debt and keep the other half for generational wealth.

Dismal-Loan-4215

I think it depends on how much BTC you have. If you have a large amount, suddenly selling it off isn't a good thing.

Dismal-Loan-4215

In reality, BTC is currently only fluctuating between 77-81k.

alrightyfine

Woman don’t hold BTC. I guarantee with my life

No_Champion2428

BTC will remain forever

circumcisingaban

the mods literally delete any post that isnt "HURR DURR BTC TO MOON"

Lefties_TheWorst7331

It's necessary for them to dilute.. the share price will stagnate alongside BTC price whether they do or not. So.. dilute and put more cash on the balance sheet.

SeaworthinessSad7300

He is the worst thing for BTC for many reasons

rachelgreen10

LMFAO, I have 3 BTC at this point and my bf has none.

udontnoumi

I put my bet here, next month BTC will going down under 60k again. Prob 58K

NMoney007

They have been supporting STRC their dividend coins for the last month or so. They need STRC to be trading close to $100 so they can sell more to then start buying more BTC. Lets see what gets announced tomorrow.

kakumero

If you restored the same electrum seed in electrum, it should recreate the same wallet and the BTC should still arrive. Just dont restore an electrum native seed as BIP39. They can use the same word list, but the seed format and derivation rules are different and can produce completely distinct addresses

LowerStranger9021

Isn’t that the same as sell what is already owned by that company? Honestly the number of people in this community that don’t understand basic concepts is shocking. If you are long 840,000+ BTC you can’t be short BTC until you sell one more BTC then you already own.

Pretend-Olive-5497

BTC crash to 48-52k or lower by Oct/nov Blood in the streets, max pain !!! Same every cycle

ivanx90

Really appreciate you actually reading through the code, this is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping for. The gradient booster idea makes sense in theory but yeah, like you said, not enough data at 2h resolution to train anything reliable right now. Filed away for later if we ever get more history. The per-asset thing hit hardest though, went and checked it right after reading your comment. Same exact strategy across 10 coins on the 2H bot, 3 months of data: LINK 71% winrate, +0.71 ADA 70% winrate, +0.59 SOL 50% winrate, +0.07 BNB 50% winrate, -0.64 DOGE 42% winrate, -0.76 NEAR 43% winrate, -1.86 XRP 29% winrate, -1.07 AVAX 27% winrate, -1.52 BTC 20% winrate, -0.94 ETH 30% winrate, -2.19 Basically confirms exactly what you guessed without even seeing the numbers. One model, wildly different results per coin. Feels like the next real thing to dig into rather than more exit tuning. Volatility-adaptive stops instead of fixed thresholds lines up with something we found digging into MFE/MAE research before posting here (Chandelier exit type stuff), so good to hear it independently from someone who actually trades this way. You're right on the order book too, we're doing a REST snapshot via fetch_order_book, not a real delta stream, and yeah the main loop is just sleeping 60s between polls. Both accurate, both would be a real infra upgrade, just not sure yet if that's the bottleneck or if it's the per-asset thing above. Probably worth doing eventually either way. Maker vs taker on exit is a good point for whenever this goes live, but it's all paper trading right now so no real fills happening yet, nothing to optimize there for the moment. Thanks again, this was way more useful than I expected when I posted.

b1mm3rl1f3

CZ recently said that millionaires won't be able to afford 1 full BTC due to extreme supply limits. 95.6% of the total BTC supply is already mined and available. Yet the final 4.4% is not expected until 2140. That last 4.4% will take more than a century, all while governments keep printing money. Raging multi year bull market incoming

olive_oil_lover_

While studying computer engineering, I thought a lot about what could be done with blockchain technology. However, in a world where centralized systems are so widely accepted, I realized that blockchain technology is almost never the easiest or most functional solution to any problem. But BTC diverged from this and turned into an investment diversification tool. Most likely, this wasn't Satoshi's original goal, but if this hadn't happened, we would never have seen these valuations. What I mean is, just as we haven't found one in the last 10 years, we most likely won't find a new use case that will take BTC's value to a whole new level from now on, either. However, we don't actually need to find new use cases. After all, what has multiplied BTC's value up to this point hasn't been the discovery of new applications. It was people gradually realizing its potential as an investment over time. Going forward, the exact same thing is what will continue to multiply BTC's value.

Ok-Bread-7503

Hey, Here are a few of my thoughts reading the python code for the 2h model and strategia. Obviously take them with a grain of salt, as my suggestions are more likely to reflect not understanding the model than anything else. But maybe there's a nugget worth considering: \*Looks like you use a clustering score to decide whether to move on a trade. A naive cluster ignores interactions. Consider a gradient-booster (something like LightGBM), which would implement a treed approach to improve the understanding. ML like this, though, works best on a shitload of data, which you might not have at 2hr increments. \*You're also using the same model for the different assets. See if you have cross sectional success with some but not others. The models I use with the different assets are very different and kind of evolve weekly. \*Look up volatility adaptive multipliers and consider implementing that approach instead of the thresholds you're currently using. \*Are you using a snapshot L2 book? If so, use a websocket to get real-time flow of the deltas. Get their sequence numbers so you know if you missed any messages. And check out various order imbalance measures, as you definitely won't want to use the same OI measures for BTC as you would for some of the others. \*Do I understand you're having your poller sleep 60 seconds? Use websockets and asynchronous execution if you can. \*I'm not familiar with this exchange, but do you have to file taker/market orders? Perhaps use some maker orders as you exit your position.

JimmySki6166

The greatest asset one can purchase right now! I first purchased BTC at 12k, and it’s at 78k right now. It has never gone below the original price I paid. Generational wealth! Do your research on it!

Successful_Pin_2641

Sell now take profits and put in BTC

LowerStranger9021

I agree with you on this. But I understand the recent selling of BTC this summer to manage various obligations. The community didn’t like this fact being pointed out.

themindspeaks

I rarely do. And when I do, I withdraw through lighting channels, which provides a bit of anonymity about what my total wallet balance is and where my BTC ends up. So an exchange will only know how much I have approximately purchased at the exchange. Not my consolidated address or UTXO. The majority I purchase through Robosat. Which is all non KYC.

UnclePsilocybe

BTC was down in 1984. Like at 0

Lost_Anywhere_69

BTC $1,000,000 is no longer a pipe dream. It’s a reality. The real question now is what is the ceiling? Def not mil. Prolly not even basement in fiat. Something else entirely. The whole reason I got i to btc in the first place 1BTC=1BTC

hoopstar80

In 40 years BTC will still be mined. The question is cash or BTC/other assets.

BigDik6355

In my country a lot of people are "work optional" already by claiming benefits. No BTC needed.

No_Application_1579

To me it feels that BTC becomes a similar market to gold. It has more "religious" value than actual value.

LionRivr

BTC is increasingly becoming a global threat to central banking systems and private banking systems. First they ignored BTC. Then they laughed at BTC. Now they’re fighting BTC. Then BTC wins.

Known-Relief5228

Jim Cramer sold his BTC; that’s all you need to know.

Unlucky-Chicken2515

Definitely not against BTC or any crypto. But using BTC for everyday transactions is not the most effective way.