BTC

MediocreAnalyst2121

The it solves the exact same problem as BTC, it’s literally a fork of BTC, but does it cheaper, faster, and with optional privacy. If you ever consider using BTC to do a transfer, just use LTC instead - that’s the use case. I generally don’t want to use stuff like USDT, so I use LTC for transfers.

Boars-of-Canada

Why would you not try to ask if you base you whole personality on BTC?

enryold

I'd separate the regime trigger from confirmation so one composite score cannot hide conflicting signals. For the regime, track BTC dominance alongside ETH/BTC and an equal-weight basket of ALT/BTC pairs. For confirmation, add breadth the percentage of that basket above its medium-term average and spot-volume participation, then require the condition to persist across more than one close. Stablecoin inflows can provide context, but they do not show whether capital will rotate into alts rather than BTC. I've built a trend following algo that I released public few week ago (TrendingCoin.blog) that helps with the per-coin relative trend check. It compares systematic trends in both USD and BTC. It does not ingest dominance or stablecoin flows or send Telegram alerts, so your script would still own the macro trigger.

MelangeBot

It's just a bart. Soon BTC will go back to 60k to close the bart. But alts have already closed their barts, so when BTC dumps back to 60k they will all go even lower. There is a slow consolidation happening from alts in to BTC, the last alt will probablly be ETH. BTC can maintain a 50k price point as long as the money comes from alts getting further wrecked. But once all alts have been wrecked then what?

always_ready_rob

You are assuming people will buy exact bottom and top lol. If it goes to 55k many people are gonna wait for 40k and get sidelined when it goes up, or end up buying higher. I also said to have money left to buy the dips, so the difference may not be that much it all. For the most people my point stands - it wont matter much, especially with alternate reality of buying much higher or getting sidelined for the bull market. And BTC will not go as high as 350k.

tapakip

It's 77k right now. If it's 50-50 that the bottom's in, that means we have a chance of seeing prices below 58k. If they hit something like 55k, and someone is waiting to invest 22k, it very much matters when they buy in. It'll be the difference between owning 2/5th of a BTC versus 2/7th, as an example. If we get up to 350k next cycle, that means cashing out with $140k vs $100k, a pretty big difference.

ConcernSquare2474

Dead Internet + Shitcoins = Crypto Fear & Greed Index Please don’t post that metric every day, like it is in particular a good BTC metric. It’s not! If anything, check BTC chart weekly and monthly RSI instead.

cubeeless

BTC to $400k!

Individual-Leg-6216

BTC and some in SPX6900 would be worth it

OkDescription5692

Mining was basically free money back then if you already had a computer, buying meant you needed to figure out how to send cash to some sketchy site without getting exit scammed. Plus the whole reward halving wasn't even a thing yet so 50 BTC per block just kept rolling in

hello-operatorz

My brother and i often exchange BTC P2P, its not illegal or going to get you flagged or anything like that.... If I buy a pizza or some steaks and we have dinner, he often pitches in or reimbursed me with Sats. Its just an exchange or assets, like money. It is money, a more perfect money! Finding someone you trust to exchange is the hard part.

Suprem3NE

Wait so essentially you’re getting a loan against equal value BTC- paying 5% interest on it….. so whatever you make that year over 5% is profit?

Firm_Yogurtcloset835

Leaving your PC on 24/7 doesn't guarantee you'll manage to mine even a single block. It’s a war! Whoever has more computing power has a better chance, but there are no guarantees. It’s a completely different scenario. But just imagine—suppose you managed to mine every block in a full day: an average of 144 blocks per day times a 50 BTC reward per block. But that doesn't exist, and it never will. Back in 2010, the same guy from Pizza Day discovered that mining with a GPU was much easier... and the network scaled the difficulty. And so it goes.

FitCompetition1804

Yes but BTC has remained resilient. Going to take a whole lot more than that. A large stock market crash triggered by the oil market may do it. Added inflation just seems to pump the market further.

FitCompetition1804

I’ve had laddered limit orders starting at $54k down to $42k for many months so they’d hopefully execute in that type of scenario. I’ve since cancelled them as I’m reassessing my strategy. With my daily DCA and spot buying at lower levels since February, I have half of my position in BTC and the other half in cash for those daily DCA orders and larger buys if we dump again.

Firm_Yogurtcloset835

It’s hard to say... but after "Pizza Day" (May 2010) and the moment a speculative asset pegged to the dollar (1 dollar = 1 BTC) emerged, it really started attracting attention in 2011. However, I know a lot of people involved in IT—myself included—and back then, I honestly didn't know anything about it. I realized it depended a lot on the country, too... So, I think those involved were still a minority back in 2011.

Firm_Yogurtcloset835

Mining... without a doubt. But today, with Bitcoin well-established, there is critical analysis surrounding the project; try going back in time, though. Think about your age back then, the state of the global economy, technology, and access to information. We barely even heard about Bitcoin's existence in 2009 or 2010... it was a very specific niche within the cryptography community. Even knowing that mining back then yielded a reward of 50 BTC, the coins had practically no value; when it started, they were worth mere cents. That is why so few people from that era held onto their coins and benefited from the appreciation. Those who persisted—and witnessed the asset's value shift in the speculative market from cents to hundreds of dollars—were the ones who realized the profit. True enthusiasts of the project—those not swayed solely by the "profit"—are rare... Looking back, if you somehow did come across information about Bitcoin, did you truly understand and believe in the project?

faisal_yk26

Mining, easily. In 2010 a regular CPU could still find blocks and the reward was 50 BTC each. Difficulty was low enough that a home machine mined coins at essentially the cost of electricity. Buying was the harder path. Exchanges barely existed, Mt Gox only launched in July, and there was almost nothing to buy with.

abercrombezie

Check Liquid Bitcoin's X account, last update was 2 days ago. [https://x.com/Liquid\_BTC](https://x.com/Liquid_BTC)

Exact_Physics4224

Last November BTC 111k to 80k in 1 month. My guess is the next catalyst is war related. I personally think 1 more flush before catapulting. This current pump is lacking volume. I’ll send you a nice chart via DM

Commercial_Mix_5689

Because once you get BTC everything else is a joke.

nemodigital

Is it really funny when it's always the same silly formula? Saylor Moon fighting and running from bears to snag the BTC made with AI. I'm tired boss

Gears6

> Maybe it's just me but even if I would cash out / trade my BTC in 20 years and the worth would be millions, I wouldn't buy a super expensive car, a yacht or a huge mansion. It's just stupid. I prefer the 10 years old Volvo of Gustavo Fring lol Those of us, that isn't inflating our lifestyle are very similar that way. We invest, we creep up in wealth, and we live a modest life. I wouldn't want a mansion either, nor a fancy car. I'll take a modest home with a beach/ocean view though. Waking up and seeing that every morning is huge, but beyond that why so much materialism that does nothing, but clutter your life and increase your anxiety. That's why I prefer my old car too. I don't have to baby it like I did when it was new.

Practical-Power4143

BTC,won't moove that much anymore,it will be like gold and silver,average steady,as more and more people got the coin

DifficultSquash1517

I only got about 25% of what I wanted into BTC at 60k. That rip higher came out of nowhere 😮 I put another 20% in at 76k so I dont get locked out by another green dildo You know you got a proper amount in when you are content whether it moves higher or lower from here🤔🤷 I buy btci at extended levels to the upside such as now, for the cc hedge .....and ibit at extended levels to the downside for more pure exposure

Exact_Physics4224

Happens all the time, would take a scandal similiar to FTX or equivalent. BTC has not even hit a weekly uptrend yet

anymonero

SOL/BTC isn't below 2022 lows?

LeMoofins

It’s over bro. Crypto is on the way out. We might have a pump, maybe even see new BTC ATH, but our cultural moment has passed and the opportunity was not seized.

Paratrooper2000

Should I convert my ETH to BTC if I plan to hodl for 2+ years?

Able_Breakfast_3314

Well technically you dont need to show ID to mine for BTC etiher

Bibibis

Which cannot be said for BTC nor ETH. So who's the meme coin here

Deori1580

BTC Power Bottom

Get_the_nak

Do you mean the ACTUAL bottom or the lowest before Uptober?  We have seen below 60k and now we’re fighting for 80k.  Investors ate adding BTC to their portfolio (Don’t add more than 5% is the new advice).  This is going north fast!

creative_usr_name

Lack of regulations makes the BTC transition potentially quicker. The problem is what to do with all the vulnerable coins that don't make the transition.

One_Emu5299

DCA, and make sure you diversify and don't have all your money in BTC

creative_usr_name

Don't trust, verify applies to using BTC not obtaining it. In Satoshi's days anyone could mine easily on their home PC, or get it P2P, no one was buying from exchanges with KYC. ACIS miners have changed who is mining, but not how, and not how transactions work. No one is stuck on exchanges unless they choose to stay. There are more self custody options than ever (not necessarily all perfect)

palmdata

miners are still doing the boring math: ~$36.5/PH/day means a 200 TH box is about $7.30 gross/day before power, pool fee, and rejects. wall watts plus a 24h accepted-share report beat the BTC headline.

AsSheDoes

Be careful buying non kyc BTC. Like don't put it on exchanges or comingle with wallets that could eventually go to exchanges or have ever been associated with exchanges. That will flag your accounts and worse. P2P is essentially considered pirate 2 pirate. And while there is good to be said about it, you will have to be very careful where you spend it. It's very hard to launder crypto. Not yelling you what to do. But really read on self sovernty of your crypto.

gatot3u

Orange Shark = Buy BTC. Copy!

Fun-Analysis-182

Your coins aren't lost, and it's not a SideSwap issue. Liquid paused peg-outs while the federation runs a staged recovery from this week's bug, so nobody can move back to mainchain BTC right now. No public ETA that I've seen, they're reopening functions in stages, so watch Blockstream's official status for when pegs come back.

moonRekt

I guess I’m fortunate that I don’t have nearly 3x my houses value in BTC to use as collateral on a loan and am instead stuck at a 3% loan?? As unpopular as it is, I’m long Coinbase because I do think someday these products may make sense, but gotta say I’m not sold on this proposition but it’s worth looking into and thank you for the post

SeveredBrain2020

Better off selling BTC and rebuilding your stack.

tedusam

"Money" is used for crimes much more than BTC. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Successful_Taro8587

I literally bought like $50 when BTC was at $58k thinking I would save the big money for when it goes lower. I'm crying on the inside....

Truth-Quest

Defintely agree. If we think deep enough i think we will realize that everything is actually just a meme. BTC is a meme - it has value because enough people believe in it. Not too long ago bankers, CEOs and every mom n pop was saying "but BTC has no underlying asset - its intrinsic value is 0" - but now the same bankers are selling btc products. What changed? The belief. Same with dollar. Its a meme and it has value because enough people believe 

throwaway12three4

I went with Fidelity. They have proven BTC assets. After reading up on how they do their holdings it just fits my needs. It also makes it much more of a simple process if something happened to me. My wife won’t have to dig for BTC. If something happened to both my wife and myself, they BTC would probably be lost. My kids could struggle to recover them.

HalcyoNighT

It will follow BTC's lead. Nothing burger.

Griimbald

$50–100/month is totally fine to start. I’d keep it simple with BTC/ETH rather than spreading $5 across 10 different coins

hodler1992

Maybe it's just be but even if I would cash out / trade my BTC in 20 years and the worth would be millions, I wouldn't buy a super expensive car, a yacht or a huge mansion. It's just stupid. I prefer the 10 years old Volvo of Gustavo Fring lol

Brawlah

I have a feeling we have a leg down coming at the beginning (tues/wed) of next week. Hopefully that doesn't lead to too much,but it may. Until BTC hits 81,800 ,no bull run is confirmed imo. I'll pay a little extra and load up once it does. Until then,weekly DCA in.

JimmySki6166

When BTC is at 100k, you’ll wish you purchased @ 75k. When it’s at 200k, you’ll wish you purchased at 100k. Everyone has their own situations, believes. Some like BTC, some do not. You like wine, I like beer? It’s all relative!! Good luck!

GaRGa77

Trezor has BTC only firmware, cold card wasnt the only one

unknowngloomth

You mean big boys like TOM LEE? And they're massively underwater. So what's the point? BTC at least hit new ATHs. So it's understandable that big players prefer it over any other alt.

TravelNo6952

I'm curious what people think the reason will be to break below 50,000. It held in a low range for 3 months during a difficult macro economic environment. I'm generally bearish on BTC and don't buy into the "it will be worth 1 million in 3 years" hype, but I also don't see it hitting the 40k range without some kind of major unforeseen economic event.

Active-Ad8057

BTC code/ block chain will be compromised by AI ( so I've read )

Laukess

>No margin calls if BTC dumps. They only touch your BTC if you miss payments for 60+ days.

GaRGa77

I would keep BTC separated on a BTC only wallet

Hot_Arm3894

**\*\*\*UPDATE**: Hey everyone, thanks again for the incredible feedback on our previous concept! Based on your suggestions and the massive structural changes post-ETFs, we realized general altcoin indexes were causing way too many retail fakeouts. So, we worked to pivot and rewrite the script. We just launched the live version today, completely focused on a Pure BTC Macro Accumulation model (**integrating a 5th engine for stablecoin inflows to track real exchange dry powder**). It cuts out all the altcoin noise and is engineered for extreme selectivity. We’ve also opened a public live data feed to track these 5 parameters so the community can audit the layout in real-time. Since we can't drop direct links here, we've pinned the access point directly on our Reddit profile bio for anyone who wants to monitor it. **Would love to know your thoughts on this new Bitcoin-only direction!**

Objective_Basil_8414

Honestly the most alarming comment in the thread. Two BTC on an exchange you can't even name is worth an hour of your time this week. Searching old emails for the signup or deposit confirmation usually surfaces the name straight away.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Hot_Arm3894 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://www.tradingview.com/x/zwhcBewU/ Hi guys, After studying how institutional money completely changed market dynamics post-ETFs, we realized traditional retail indicators cause way too many fakeouts. So, we spent the last few weeks coding a TradingView Pine Script. Instead of just looking at standard price charts, the script aggregates 5 specific inter-market metrics in real-time to find a clean mathematical convergence before calling a macro bottom: 1. **Macro Trend**: Price relative to the 50-Week Moving Average (50 WMA); 2. **BTC Dominance**: Tracking if Bitcoin is actively draining market liquidity (BTC.D > 10 SMA); 3. **Binance Volume Spike**: Monitoring institutional spot buying volume crossing above the 20-day average; 4. **Retail Sentiment**: Monitoring an RSI basket of 5 major altcoins against BTC to spot retail panic-selling; 5. **Stablecoin Inflow**: Tracking the aggregate market cap expansion of USDT + USDC against their 20 SMA to detect institutional dry powder moving onto exchanges. The script is engineered for extreme selectivity. The signal (Orange Triangle) triggers ONLY when all 5 conditions hit a perfect 5/5 convergence. In the last 5 years of market history, it has triggered only 4 times. However, the real daily value of the dashboard for a trader is data consolidation. Instead of wasting time opening 5 different charts every single day to check stablecoin caps, volumes, dominance, and retail RSI, you have everything aggregated in one single, clean on-screen table. Right now, we are currently at 2/5 convergence (NO SIGNAL). Dominance is flat, volume is average, and retail hasn't capitulated yet. **\*\*\*UPDATE**: We've just opened a public live data feed where we track how these parameters evolve day-by-day so anyone can check the layout in real-time. Since Reddit filters direct links, we've listed the access point directly on my Reddit profile bio for those who want to monitor it. No strings attached — just looking to see how it performs for you. We’d really love to get the community's perspective on this technical setup: \- Do you think aggregating these 5 specific metrics into a single dashboard is an efficient way to save time and track the macro buildup? \- Is the on-screen table layout clean and readable enough for quick daily checks? \- What other macro or on-chain metric would you consolidate into this stack? **Thanks in advance for your insights!** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Substantial_Taste779

huh? do you understand BTC?

Szangalar

What happens to the big addresses, which won't upgrade to PQ, and those BTC could potentialy be stealed? This is simply not so easy as you think it is, and Bitcoin being decentralized means that coordination between the nodes, miners and community for any critical change is HARDER, not easier. Banks are centralized entities, for them to do upgrade is far easier, because they don't need to coordinate with their clients or marketing to make PQ transition. You have it all backwards without ansering any question (conviniently). "It's going to adapt and it's going to do so easily and readily - if for no other reason than it can." Claiming that doen't make it true. So far Bitcoi has in fact failed on any important improvements. If proposition to increase block size, to make it more scalable and usable didn't go through, then much more complex change like PQ, that has many issues with old wallets, seems much harder. "As Quantum Computing improves, they could just augment the Difficulty Adjustment." The thing that is mostly endangered are ECDSA signatures, not Difficulty adjusment - this is another way Bitcoin is not sustainable with halvings, as security budger is pretty much halved every 4 years (and tx fees are less than 1% of reward for miners almost all the time).

StealthExplorer

Got tired of trying to predict a bottom, now I DCA weekly and keep a stash of STRC for black swan dump when I will flip that into BTC. If it doesn't dump, no issues. Not watching any signals/charts/influencers. No one knows.

Objective_Basil_8414

The uncomfortable version is that altseason was never a season, it was a liquidity condition. 2017 and 2021 both ran on cheap money plus a wave of new buyers who had no clean way to get leveraged BTC exposure, and ETFs absorbed that second group entirely. Also worth noticing: "would I buy this same bag today at this price with fresh money" feels like a totally different question from "should I sell", even though it's the same decision. That gap is the disposition effect, not analysis.

yankeevandal

If quantum is cracking BTC it's also cracking AES128 so many, many other areas are profoundly at similar risk.

dannyBitcoin21

When people stop trading and believe in something…. BTC 🤝 SPX6900

PotentTurnip

According to the BTC Power Law chart, we're around the bottom now. However, take that with a grain of salt.

LowEggplant7207

Choppy sideways action until November then BTC will start rising towards 250k by 2029

ximogui

My feeling is - everyone who owns BTC right now either believes that we are in the start of the bull market or is waiting to buy more on one "final" capitulation before the bull market begins in October. What that structure means - any actual dip in BTC will get bought aggressively. Even on high inflation news that makes a rate hike almost certain, BTC is flat. If there were going to be new lows in September, rate hike would be the catalyst. The market is shrugging it off right now. It's possible the macro environment deteriorates to a degree that we carve out new lows in December/January, but it feels like bad news is good news in BTC world right now. 30Y and 10Y at 20-year highs causing BTC traders to expect eventual QE. If war ends and 30Y/10Y fall, also supports risk-on. Either way says BTC up. Also, something I think 4-year cycle purists have been missing is that BTC traders have started to front-run expected cycle times. We saw fresh ATHs way earlier last cycle then in previous cycles. Also, the heavy sell-off in February seemed to be front-running the bear market. We didn't meaningfully move below the Feb low of $60k all year. I expect that dynamic to continue, meaning ATHs end of 2027/early 2028. No one wants to be behind the trade.

Witty-Internet-8708

Use CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap for a quick dashboard, then use TradingView when you need charts. The important part is deciding what “movement” means: price change, volume, performance versus BTC, or derivatives activity can tell very different stories. For any headline that might affect a trade, trace it to the original source before reacting. Check the issuer or protocol announcement, exchange notice, SEC or CFTC release, or status page instead of relying on a screenshot or summary. Then compare the event with spot price, volume, open interest, funding rates, and ETF flows where relevant. Save the headline, timestamp, source, and your interpretation in a notes file. A news event is information, not automatically a buy or sell signal.

LukaBrasi87

Waiting for BTC to crash below 40,000. Will DCA more aggressively then and wait for the next cycle.

TeachingWhich2776

1. Never Sell 2. BTC Markets or Independent Reserve are the best platforms to buy in Australia

devCheckingIn

Dogecoin does have utility though. It's a proof-of-work network like BTC but with an inflationary supply (with a decreasing rate of inflation), meaning it's a cryptocurrency designed for spending and transactions. Now with stablecoins taking the spotlight maybe it's not so useful anymore.

GabeDef

Tether prints its own coins to buy BTC. It is a scam used to inflate BTC prices. Prove me wrong.

Worldx22

If BTC is $80k you can expect to pay $95k

ForVictori

In other words they rehyp your BTC? No thanks. I’ll stick with Ledn

Able_Breakfast_3314

But thats what BTC acts like...cash. You can send it anywhere you want without permission. BTC way easier because you can send it anywhere instantly. Having your BTC on an exchange is like having your money at a bank or brokerage. The institution or the government can stop any transfer they dont like

BlazingPalm

Would rather a normal BTC for cash loan. For that overcollateralization, you can do more advanced liquidation loss.

JimmySki6166

I own Bitcoin and have it stored in cold wallets. If someone holds BTC ETFs, and it’s on exchanges, they don’t have full control or ownership of it, correct? It is easier per say, instead of cold wallets etc, but I don’t see the point

Fun-Analysis-182

Exactly. Bitcoin's chain and rules were never touched. Liquid is a separate federated sidechain, and the real BTC that left was sitting in its peg wallet, released because Liquid's software got fooled into signing it off, not because anything in Bitcoin broke.

Reasonable_Band1536

Aren’t rates around 9-13% with a possibility of liquidation due to the volatile nature of BTC?

PeteyPab305

DYOR! Not a single person can answer this because no has a crystal ball. If inflation accelerates it could be $1,000,000,000 USD to 1 BTC or it could be $250,000 to 1 BTC there's so many factors at play for a fixed global unit of account, It could even be that 1 BTC = 1M Chinese Yuan, depends on what the global monetary system does. The thing that can be said with the most certainty is that it will be worth enough to buy a house a car and still pass along something to your kids. That I believe.

waltotheter

The genesis block had the times headline.. but there was no mainstream news of BTC back then.. in 2010 Slashdot did an article, that might be considered the "first" mainstream coverage

lobhater

This is why I think BTC will go up in value. It is the one thing that has always stuck out to me. Anonymous transactions was dubious from the beginning and has been proven a lie so many times. With KYC exchanges it further complicates things. But the one thing they can't tarnish is how many BTC will exist

Upset_Albatross_9179

I think this highlights two points that many people seem to gloss past or intentionally ignore in the crypto space. 1) Value / marketcap and utility **are not the same thing**. Often utility can drive value. Sometimes tokenomics and investment value is directly opposed to making a coin useful. But a coin that does something besides be a store of value well does not need to be a good investment or have a large market cap. One is gambling / investment, one is usefulness as a tool. 2) There's a difference between a memecoin and a shitcoin. Sometimes memcoins are shitcoins. But dogecoin has good fundamentals as a cryptocurrency. Its primary difference from BTC is its inflationary tokenomics. It's a decentralized proof of work coin. It's a real cryptocurrency, just not built around store of value or investment. Same as litecoin.

Charming-Animal-8856

Yeah, BTC is not the same but it's a slow grind lowerm

bigcoumbe

Just get to 0.21 BTC. After that it’s personal preference

Queasy-Ride4291

One time I almost bought BTC. Good thing I didn’t, since I never Thad the opportunity to lose it. 

gihkal

Cash will be eliminated in our lifetimes. (Under 50 years). North Korea is well known to be printing large amounts of usd, euro and cad. South America, with Colombia and Peru being or concern are making huge amounts and we don't have any concrete answers to how much is being printed. There have been insane estimates from North Korea making counterfeit USD. First the banks will have serial number scanners that watch for the issue. Then we will quite quickly find out that the issue is far bigger than previously thought. Then people will wish they're holding BTC. It'll be messy and it's inevitable.

Queasy-Ride4291

 Considering over the last 5 years BTC is 13% below inflation, you may want to re-think your strategy. 

na3than

In 10 years 1 BTC will be a little more than 1/21000000 of all Bitcoin. In 20 years 1 BTC will be a little more than 1/21000000 of all Bitcoin.

richardto4321

If all you do is DCA, you're automatically "doubling down" in a bear market when you're buying at a 50% discount because the same amount of fiat gets you double the amount of BTC.

richardto4321

It's actually a great sign of how far BTC has come. When something like the S&P500 or gold moves 3% in a day, it's a huge deal. Too many people are hoping for huge swings like the early days of BTC, but that's actually not great at all for the asset if you consider the long-term and not just day-trading.

beastmanzx

I dk man, I bought an S&P position, that would have taken me 10 years to DCA with my job, with Bitcoin profit and BTC is still my biggest holding. Kinda an FU to everyone making fun of me for buying BTC for all of these years. Entry at a higher position than their life's work.

JakobBowser

I agree with you op, and like you I get downvoted when I try to help people here understand BTC is the only crypto with holding/investing in. Just stay the course and stack sats

Ok_Golf_6467

Alts have mirrored the economic contraction that has been happening the last 5 years. There we some lucky winners of course aside from BTC. **Some alts will catch and it'll happen fast in a month or 2 as we flip into expansion above 55

Traditional_Most105

The real answer is that nobody knows. There could be another altseason or there could be BTC and a few alts only dominating and the rest nothing or a completely new scenario nobody could think of. Speculation on whats happened before could also make it a self fulfilling prophecy so it could come again if people wait for it and act on speculation... In the end its what you believe and speculate... if you want the safer bet its either BTC or ETH. If you want the higher upside you go for the alts you believe in. You just have to accept whatever the outcome is... it might hurt either way. It might hurt losing money and it also might hurt selling alts that later would go to the sky and thinking what if i didnt sell... so choose whatever you want and accept its consequences. Just make sure not to put money you cant afford to lose...

pendulums123

This absolutely won't work in favour of OP who has a stack of BTC and is trying to sidestep tax. All the NGNL does is defer a CGT charge until you end up with GBP.

Tebasaki

Better can reuse your BTC while they hold it, they just have to give you the same amount back later unless they can't, then they won't So this is like fractional reservation but worse in some ways because you don't get a cut on the btc you lend

Random_Person_246810

They all inevitably trend to zero against BTC. Remember that when investing in doodoo coins.