BTC

PeteyPab305

Was I saying something different? If you did actually buy and sell BTC by speculating bottoms and tops, your very lucky, because even if you had began buying using DCA on a weekly or bi-weekly basis you would still be in profit rn from 120k top all you have to do to prove that is see the calculator - [https://charts.bitbo.io/dca/](https://charts.bitbo.io/dca/) DCA proves that incrementally buying a high-beta asset through drawdowns yields a positive ROI. While a lump sum timed at major support yields a higher multiple, systematic accumulation removes timing risk and consistently works. I have accumulated BTC since 2019 strictly via scheduled buys rather than lump sums, which built a deep-profit position. Trimming was unnecessary in hindsight given ongoing currency debasement and persistent inflation.

supertutti

The news is that there's no news and the price of BTC is literally not tied anything at all

NFTY_GIFTY

Eventually pay off all debt with the exception of our 2.25% mortgage balance with a rolling series of very low leverage BTC loans that allow us to live as we wish until my wife and I are gone. With no children and as some of the youngest members of our extended family we will likely have no heirs and our BTC will be removed from circulation permanently as our way of contributing back to the community.

DePraelen

There's been one major use case that's been happening this year - Iran has been accepting their tolls for the Strait of Hormuz in Bitcoin. Which is why we've seen price spikes happen during the war as corporations buy large amounts of BTC to pay it. Regardless of what you think of the US or Iran, in a Machiavellian sense this is pretty true to the original vision of crypto. Allowing them to operate and defend themselves outside the financial hegemony of the greenback.

Deez1putz

70% BTC, 15% ETH, 5% Hype, 5% zcash, 5% the new meta for the cycle (hint: it doesn’t exist yet).

KateR_H0l1day

I was up a lot last year, but just sold some rewards weekly for about 9 months, about $300/wee. But, it dropped below my pivot point, so I started accumulating again, and selling/trading TradFi, buying Crypto related coins and ETF Crypto related dividends, as I need income too. 2025 I paid taxes, both Capital Gains and Income on approximately $250K. But, my total holdings right now are down substantially, however I hold substantially more assets now than I did a year ago. So, I’m just waiting for BTC to go back up, it obviously fluctuates wildly!

Escapement_Watch

BTC eth sol link hype

nbnicholas

Goal for me has always been to have 1 BTC. I have friends who cashed out everything and sunk everything (including careers) into BTC. I’m at around 55% of my goal. $20/day DCA and will just see what happens. Not putting enough in to hurt the family if it’s all gone one day, but hedging on if it does increase. I spend $20-30 USD in BTC a month.

renba7

When I can buy a house with my BTC I’m out. Also, if I run out of fiat.

ruck_my_life

In the not too distant future, there will be two types of people: Those with BTC and those who work for them.

connotatius

Not touching spot right now but still trade the volatility on libertex with a spot BTC CFD, no overnight swap so holding through the chop doesnt bleed me on fees

NorthvilleGolf

Probably 2x and then sell my original investment and let the remainder for at least a 10+ years, or $500k BTC, whichever comes first.

Serenaded

People are TRIPPING if they think elites and market makers aren't pricing this in. Just understand this. It is not an IF it is a WHEN. This is probably partly the reason behind the major pivot to Ethereum in the past year. I wouldn't touch BTC as an investment anymore. They have no way to quantum-proof without completely fking satoshi's vision, so you know this chain is going to be a 2010s thing and leave it at that.

azblazer007

BTC maybe a little ETH if feeling adventurous

AstroBoyWunder

BTC, CRV and a little ZEC. IYKYK.

CoinRabbitFinance

Hey! I would separate the asset from what you do with it. Holding ETH, putting ETH into an LP, and looping ETH as collateral may start with the same coin, but they create completely different workloads and failure points. CoinRabbit is a straightforward example of that distinction: someone can simply hold BTC, or use the same BTC as collateral for liquidity. The second choice adds LTV and loan terms to manage even though the underlying asset has not changed. So yes, taxes and tracking matter, but I would also count how many contracts, bridges, reward tokens, and liquidation conditions each strategy adds.

Dizzy-Ad-6352

BTC ETH and Zcash

JMAN1249

I see a drop for BTC coming back to make $65k and then a MASSIVE rebound. I think this most recent move is a psych out of the bull run and the rebound will be the true bull market

NoFapLawyer

This is horrifying BUT as the price of BTC rises, this will probably increase with even more sophisticated phishing thanks to AI generation.

Grunblau

What I didn’t quite grasp is why BTC would plummet. I would have thought that it would see large inflows especially from anyone sitting on stable coins in DeFi.

slavikthedancer

\> nobody wants to spend an asset that is aggressively surging toward six figures on a cup of coffee or a meal when it could be worth 20% more next month Doesn't make sense. If someone so sure Bitcoin will grow so fast, he will exchange all his other "assets" to Bitcoin, especially the liquid fiat. But then, when he will want to take a coffee, he will have to spend BTC because it's the only ~~liquid asset~~ money he has at the moment. Or course, he may skip a coffee today, so to have two coffees tomorrow But that again is good for coffee sellers.

caploves1019

Welp, for starters.... Dump the shtcoins. Stick with the one and only Bitcoin BTC. The rest are scams.

xmrcache

XMR is definitely a lot more stable though.. Same with BTC.. ZEC is just pure gambling… was $50 a year ago you would have to be a straight degen/idiot to start putting money in now.

Crypto-Bets

In my opinion, XMR will probably continue to outperform ZEC longterm. XMR has had steady gains for its investors over the years, and I see that trend continuing. ZEC feels like more of a speculation bubble than hard currency like XMR/BTC. Crypto users don’t like spending ZEC either, I would be skeptical that ZEC can keep mooning.

-TrustyDwarf-

Well ANYcoin/BTC seems to go towards zero in the long run no matter if ZEC or XMR...

Lefties_TheWorst7331

BTC > all

poundsdpound

The news is one big BTC conspiracy

KrebsD88

Buy a house and enjoy the lottery If any BTC remains keep it for later Do not sell btc for travels and stupid shit like cars and nonsense spendings

Puzzleheaded_Shower4

You are absolutely correct… Did a bit more research - and at least in Russia’s case - the preferred method is a homegrown stable coin: A7A5. But the volumes are pretty monstrous - $98B last year. This doesn’t mean that BTC doesn’t figure somewhere along the chain of transactions - but if it does - its role is transitory.

BaldBear_13

Drop after removal of sanctions is a valid logic in general, but we do not know when (or if) any given war will end, and that even will likely be preceded by months of negotiations with ample news coverage, so price will start moving long before the sanctions drop. This also assumes that you know which of many cryptos they are using, and how. Stablecoins are a thing, and might be better for long-term storage. Even if you know it is BTC, then you need to know if they actually hold it, or just buy right before the transaction, and sell right after it, which will lead to some brief but unsustainable moves.

rgnet1

So some white hats ran the same scripts as the black hats and now have 50 BTC in a trust. Imagine being the real owner who hadn't yet moved those funds from a Coldcard generated address -- presumably because they haven't really been following news on it -- and now the btc is gone. I guess it's better news that the "good guys" have it, but you have to know to go ask them. Be curious to see how much money ever leaves the trust... and how long does it sit dormant before the trust claims abandonment.

Hfksnfgitndskfjridnf

lol sure dude. My original point was that BPS has decreased and that senior claims have increased since the STRC IPO. You’re the one who brought up something entirely irrelevant to what I was talking about originally so don’t give me that bs about not addressing your point. And you then start on about long time frame after asking about what’s happened in the last 24 days? Jeez, talk about being inconsistent. And no, STRC will never come near 1T. They could barely handle the Bitcoin volatility at 10 Billion, they certainly won’t be able to handle it on a significantly higher amount. Do the math, either STRC doesn’t grow much and they don’t increase BTC per share hardly at all, or they issue a ton of it and then the next BTC 50% crash they’re screwed. It’s a lot easier to raise a few Billion in a couple months compared to 10s of Billions. And even the few Billion they raised this time has led to significant shareholder value decay. You already have less BTC per share than before they started issuing STRC. That trend will continue, MSTR might end up with 1-2 million BTC but BTC per share will still be lower than it is now.

Fit-Corner-3987

BTC basically became a FedWatch chart for 15 minutes im more interested in whether 79k keeps getting absorbed once everyone stops reacting to the headline. thats a much nicer Moon trade than chasing the first dump

Hfksnfgitndskfjridnf

And how much BTC per share did they lose compared to 24 days ago? I thought it was you guys who wanted MSTR because they were increasing BTC per share overtime. It’s down 16.7% the last 3 months. Congrats, they sold a ton of BTC exposure to raise cash. STRC has been a disaster for MSTR.

Sawier

All BTC

Slay_Nation

I'm like 60% in BTC, 40% Index funds.

MusicalBonsai

Good luck getting your assets back in BTC or whatever coin it was after it has gone up in value.

pablo_in_blood

The actual breached entity appears to be ShipMonk, so I imagine if you later purchased something else that was shipped with them the data could be connected. But I don’t see any reason your address would be auto-updated otherwise, I don’t think ShipMonk would be pulling account info from driver’s license databases or something. Also, assuming the main outcome of this breach will be phishing attempts (the risk/reward ratio of physically breaking into a home that bought a trezor several years ago on the off chance you can find the trezor along with the login on a piece of paper or whatever, or doing a wrench attack on someone who may or may not even have BTC any more, is just not there) if you practice general safety / best practices I would think you’d be OK.

Necessary_Pudding454

People don't know how difficu6is 0.01 BTC for third worlders

gamer1606

I don’t own any BTC directly but have 505 shares of $MSTR at 135 avg

G0D5M0N3Y

I dont see why anyone is even worried. Keep an eye if we make a higher high above 83k. If we dont its either going to double bottom or go lower. If it does make a higher high, just accumulate BTC on the pullbacks. Win win win either way.

flyflyflyfly66

You posting a weak post that BTC has moved a few %

goodnews_badnews_

So if clarity act doesn’t pass on Sept 15th do we see a dip in both BTC and $COIN immediately? Or already priced in and won’t move? Thinking $COIN might give back 10% of the 20% its run in the last month from August whitehouse meeting

ubermensch1001

For someone just getting into this space, I would say 100% BTC and lock in just over .1 in BTC in self custody. If you believe in the bullish narrative behind this, such an allocation could be substantial in the not too distant future. You could speculate on alts and make large shorter term gains, but for someone first entering locking in the sats would be the first priority.

Arsenal75

You know Iran has closed that strait. Perhaps they have received payment i BTC

Tall_Run_2814

BTC. Everything else can be replaced

Electronic-Rate5497

How many BTC do you need to make it on the board?

cozmicraven

Strangely, BTC shows high volatility.

capricon9

If Amazon cloud services fail, ICP would still be running. The BTC and ETH already on its chain would be safe. So ICP is a no brainer for me.

SafeMoonJeff

After almost 7 years in crypto, i learn the hard way that anything more than ETH & BTC is gambling.. That being said, I hold a little bit of Solana, Cardano, and Algorand, only successful alt buy was Solana at 8$ Cheers

KateR_H0l1day

12 different wallets, all of these are for different coin staking, one Ledger, which I wish I'd never bought,one CEX, which has several low $Value coins, and all my coins in a favourite list. For the most part, I just check the favourite list, and make decisions from there. And, of course I track all my Crypto ETF's in two portfolios, one tax free so far, and the other where I utilise for daily living. Essentially, I can look at BTC price and know where everything generally is, occasionally I get surprised though 😉 So, the easy answer to your question is, no,i have zero issues managing my various portfolios. But, I do this as a full time.e business!!

MichiganEngineExpo

Super weird story, please finish reading, it is too absurd and specific to be a scam: I saw a post where you suspected funds in an old Blockchain.info wallet, but there were none when logging in. I had a similar issue with an account I knew contained BTC, that didn't show them anymore. After 9 months of messaging with their support I actually recovered the funds myself, because their web interface is simply broken. That original thread is locked, though, so I can’t reply. I also can't DM you. So I searched for one of your most recent posts, which is this one. Main thing is: If there are funds that can be recovered, *there’s a quick and safe way to check using Blockchain.com itself (I’m not involved, don’t send me anything, no script to be run!)*, as described in a subparagraph here: https://github.com/serendipitouslyprosperous/blockchain-legacy-wallet-recovery Reply or DM if you have any questions - I will NEVER ask for any keys, files, seeds, scripts to be run, or anything else. I’m currently just trying to find people with a similar issue to help them solving this themselves, as well.

gad_E

Constructive input, Edge Lord. People get scammed all the time through their traditional bank accounts. When the majority of headlines claim that accounts were "hacked", it's just a more dramatic & fear mongering way of saying that some noob got tricked into handing over their passphrase or private address. It's almost impossible to penetrate a wallet through brute force alone, and unlike traditional bank accounts, they don't require thousands of employees or overhead for brick and mortar locations in order to operate. It's exponentially more difficult to crack a crypto wallet. Trying to crack a BTC wallet would require spending more money on the electricity powering the hacking device than you'd ever gain from succeeding. It would actually require more energy than we have in our entire solar system. As long as humanity exists, social engineering will always be problem. Blockchain won't eliminate it, but to act like it's not vastly superior is just a low information/intelligence point of view. If you're a total moron or don't care to learn about it, then stick to your traditional bank with their earlier withdrawal penalties & ridiculous overdraft fees. If you don't mind sacrificing FDIC protection just to get central banks and governments out of your transactions, then make the switch. There are plenty of centralized crypto exchanges that function similar to traditional banks, but they also have DeFi platforms that puts governance in the hands of the people - like it damn well should be. Want easier, more seamless access? Keep your money in a custodial wallet on centralized exchange. Want to go rogue & keep your money in an air-gapped, non-custodial cold wallet? You can do that too. Blockchain is for sure the future. Fewer employees, less overhead, user governance, higher security...amongst other things. It's definitely not perfect by any means, but it's still better than anything else before it. Have more of an open mind about it. You sound like the fox who'd rather claim that the hard-to-reach grapes are probably gross rather than admit he can't jump high enough to taste them.

KateR_H0l1day

I've lots of Alt's and a couple of memes coins, very small amount of ETH just for fees! Plenty of BTC & it's derivatives, MSTR/ASST/STRC/SATA/MSTY/BTCI/XXI/MTPLF/GNS. But that's just me. 🙄

JakobBowser

I agree eth and sol are probably the only two projects in crypto that have potential, but they are dependent on BTC continuing to go up over time. Im comfortable with my level of research but thanks, just trying to help OP not get scammed with the 99% of garbage that is crypto

Victorio_01

I hold BTC, PEARL and USELESS. BTC because … PEARL because despite the hate, AI seems to be here to stay. And USELESS because I believe it really represents what memes coins r. Just my opinion btw.

Reach_Beyond

100% OP bought BTC

lenissius14

Yeah, not saying it should go down always, I'm talking more about longer boring consolidation phases when in a clearly bear market or crash (the ones you know are not going to allow the asset to reach it's ATH in a "long" time whether is BTC or a stock)

KateR_H0l1day

And we never had a High before the Halving, but we did this cycle, plus we never had ETF's before this cycle but now we do! Therefore, it's difficult for me to believe it's acting exactly the same as the previous cycles to this one 🙄 But, it's certainly going through the same cycle pattern, but just not exactly like before. However, I'm definitely not saying it won't go down again! Plus, the US administration is having a huge affect on the, which they've never had to this effect before. Additionally, we've never had a new player in the market place that soaks up capital like AI does. Last time anything effected the markets that much was Crypto itself!! Therefore, there's an awful lot of things that are pulling and shoving the cycle one way or another 😉 I'd be quite shocked if the cycle played out exactly the same as the early three cycles. And I haven't even mentioned the advent of BTC-TC's and their effects 🙄

iGenie

I bought some BTC, so the price dropped. Sorry.

Febos

A lot of people learned or bought BTC because of gaming. There was a big exchange made for gold from World of Warcraft game. I heard about it from Second life. Wasting my years there actually made a positive life change.

Designer-Beginning16

You missed the bottom? Sidelined? Not enough BTC? Buying back higher?

Salsatime117

Ya for me that’s why I keep it simple. Tax tracking in the US for crypto can be very annoying to be honest. So I stick to the big boys like BTC and ETH as low effort solid investments. For the “lottery ticket” higher potential gains, I stick with SPX6900. The whole basis behind this coin is to just buy and hold. DCA. Stop trading and just believe in something. I just see time and time again, trading memes and rotating alts not only will result in failure for 95% of people, but it creates sticky tax situations that become hard to navigate. Buying an asset and holding is what I’ve found to be the most successful strategy over all these years of doing it. Ya it’s not quick gains but it’s more rewarding in the end and more fruitful. Hope that helps!

Aromatic_Dig_5631

My 2 year old son got 7k of BTC too. It was 5.5k when I bought at 63k a couple of months ago. My plan is to sell at 180k$ for a 3x. Will repeat this every 4 years if BTC still exists and the pattern stays this simple. So it should be 15k this cycle. 45k next when he is 6years old. 135k when he is 10. 400k when he is 14. 1.2Million when he is 18. Then I will kick his ass out and tell him to go and buy his own appartment.

derondigital

Wrong, there are actually crypto with Utility. BTC is the king, don't get me wrong. But trust me, if you decide to get deep into crypto, you will realize there is actually more to it. SOL is great, ETH is great. Just to name two, these tokens has utility and DApps on their blockchain that allows you to make greater investments and receive way better yields than a bank with stable coins such as USDC. You got to do some more research but yes, I love BTC and it's great for investing.

Salsatime117

I hold blue chips like BTC AND ETH, and the rest in SPX6900. Just everything about the tokenomics, community, holder stats, lack of insiders and KOLs resonated. The mission as well. SPX6900 feels like early BTC to me and I’ve been around in crypto since 2013. I never tell people what to buy. You should come to your own conclusions. But something to look in to if interested!

Maximum_Mastodon_960

Cypriot bank crisis when I was like 17 made me buy BTC and LTC for the first time. Made sense to me as the future of money. I'd say it makes less and less sense as time goes on.

Fix_The_Money

That non-kyc BTC might be worth a lot some day...

Androoboodro

“About **1.6 million BTC** were mined by the end of 2009 (Bitcoin launched January 3, 2009, with a 50 BTC reward per block).” “Worth noting though: “available to purchase” is a bit of a stretch for 2009 — there were no exchanges yet. The first known real-world bitcoin transaction pricing didn’t emerge until New Liberty Standard published the earliest exchange rates in October 2009, based purely on electricity cost of mining. Actual buying/selling was essentially peer-to-peer among a tiny group of early cryptography enthusiasts — the famous “10,000 BTC for two pizzas” purchase didn’t happen until May 2010.” Unless she had over 50% of all available BTC somehow, I’d say fake.

JakobBowser

BTC is investing, everything else is gambling

Vexom5

There is no brute force password algorithm for quantum computers, there is algorithms that will break the ciphers commonly used in TLS to send those passwords over the internet. However TLS is starting to be migrated to PQC. I have BTC and am a believer in crypto but the quantum risk is real and it’s harder to fix in a decentralized system then in a centralized one. We can fix it in time but we all need to start taking it seriously, and false info doesn’t help.

keralaindia

I own >1M BTC and it's entirely through IBIT and bitcoin ETFs. I'm the resident self custody hater. Doesn't serve me any purpose.

hodler1992

$7500 BTC $2500 SOL. Sell SOL at bull tops and hold BTC for 10-20 years.

Steel-Tempered

We've seen BTC go as high as $126K on 10/5/2025. It then dropped all the way to $57K on 6/30/2026. That's a $69K drop in 8 months. Then it climbed back up to $82K yesterday 9/3/2026. That's a $25K jump in 3 months. BTC is volatile. It also doesn't help that the current US government and leadership is batshit insane and doesn't seem to have any desire to stabilize the economy, so everything with investment right now is a gamble.

Appropriate_Ice_7507

I bought 75x leverage BTC 80k…margin call will be my most loyal caller

derondigital

i still don't get it, so the trust wallet you used was how you got scam. Because i stake my Solana from my cold wallet, and i've never lost any. You went wrong by not doing your own research. Also BTC cannot be stake, it's a proof of work network which mean it can only be mined. Not of proof of stake network.

CaptainK718

Well, if BTC goes to about $160,000 (2x) you’ll have made about $300. Minus 15% capital gains. So if all goes well, you could see yourself with a pretty sweet $255 in 2-3 years.

hodler1992

I believe we will see another 25% hike very soon and after that we won't see BTC below $70k again.

hodler1992

We will never see BTC below $70k mark my words

Davidoff90784

I still believe in it. Took BTC years to do what it did.

Hfksnfgitndskfjridnf

STRC is a senior obligation. There is 10 Billion of STRC outstanding. They have less BTC per share than they had prior to issuing any STRC at all. Last I checked 10 billion is more than 7.5 Billion, so I am correct. They have less BTC per share and more senior obligations than they had prior to STRC IPO.

Giuse_000

**BTC quando vede arrivare l’ordine di Saylor: 💀**

Roguecop

People trying to blame some economic indicator for this or other dumps are kidding themselves. The true answer one single whale (person or 'entity' dumping hundreds perhaps over a thousand of BTC on the market in less than a few seconds. These degenerate f\*\*ks make indicator trading extremely difficult as they shit all over support and resistant lines with these moves. This same sort of actitvity plagues SPCX as well, making me think the same billionaires are involved in both .

Cool-Bath874

Yup. Correct. And people saying “just another day”, yes of course it’s just another day where BTC will fluctuate a couple percent without anything more than intraday volatility, but there’s days like today where there is a genuine reason for an algorithmic selloff

Cool-Bath874

Oil futures applied a bit more to high beta stocks (semi’s and other high growth tech stocks) more than it does to crypto. This morning was a sudden DXY surge that led to BTC dropping my instantaneously. CL1! Is actually down -1.87% today

ATLienZ777

Just BTC doing BTC things

Terry_cheng

Appreciate you checking the terms yourself! Exactly—that 0.003 BTC (or equivalent token value) per day compounds so fast that it completely devours the entire balance before you even notice. It's daylight robbery disguised as an inactivity fee Notice how quiet they are? Not a single official word or defense. They know they can't justify this. Underneath all their 'legal and regulated' corporate branding, this is plain, daylight robber

AdrianRamirez0

Yes, absolutely getting a hardware wallet is mandatory if you treat BTC as your 401k. **Not your keys, not your coins.** Keeping your retirement savings on Cash App leaves you completely at the mercy of their terms of service algorithm.

0xrpl

$BTC just got flushed from $81.4k down to 79k. Reason: monster jobs report just dropped (+162k vs 53k expected) + $1.6B liquidations. Rate-hike fears back on. This is the classic shakeout. Dip buyers already loading. Rebound incoming.

Hfksnfgitndskfjridnf

Yes, they have 10 Billion in STRC and only 6 billion in cash + 1.5 debt retired. So they have more senior obligations now and less BTC per share than before launching STRC. Thats what happens when you issue STRC to buy BTC at 80k and then dilute at 60k to build a cash reserve. It’s also why using their new mNAV doesn’t tell you the whole story, its not really accretive just because it’s above 1. Since senior claims stay fixed in dollar terms, when Bitcoin tanks, MSTR tanks more yet mNAV can stay the same. And it’s pretty obvious that issuing shares when MSTR has tanked more than BTC is worse than if they issued shares when MSTR has gone up more than BTC even if both are at the same mNAV. This is another reason why STRC is a bad product for MSTR shareholders. It’s more likely to be at par when BTC is up big so they are basically buying the top every time. But they have to pay the dividend every 2 weeks regardless, even when BTC is down. It structurally makes them a top buyer and bottom seller. If they have to pay 12% and keep 2-3 years of cash reserve it can still be a net negative for shareholders even if BTC compounds 30% a year over the long term because the volatility eats away at that spread difference.

Ok-Leather3937

Yeah, PayPal is fine for buying BTC, but it gets clunky when you actually need to move crypto outside their ecosystem for business payments. We ended up looking at Inxy for the gateway side because it supports external-wallet payouts, hosted checkout, and USDT/USDC with the KYC/AML stuff built in rather than trying to force a consumer wallet into a payment stack.

UroborosJose

Sure good luck with that day The day you go in a grocery store and see prices in BTC not euros or dollars You pull your wallet The guy accept a transfer directly in satoshis not passing by Mastercard that day you guys had won Meanwhile I’m not a believer because nobody is accepting as a currency!

FreshPitch6026

BTC actually makes the world a better place lol.

KrazyKreutz

let me ask u a question: If it had went up to 85k would you have sold there?, if not then just relax and wait? because then there really is no difference in 79k and 85k, aside from the psycologic difference. If you planned to hold for a decent amount of time, it really don't matter. 82k is probably a pretty nice price for a BTC in 1-2 years.. Just my guess.

CannonBurt

**Imagine a future where only 0.011 BTC exists in the entire world. Everything else loses 99.99999999% of its value, while your 0.01 BTC becomes the most valuable asset on the planet. That tiny piece of Bitcoin could make you the richest person on Earth.** **At that point, your hometown wouldn’t even need asphalt roads — they’d be paving streets with bricks instead.**

No-Masterpiece2246

BTC maximalists are the worst with this. They give you the sales pitch for BTC or regurgitate some Saylor nonsense, and if you push back or ask any questions, they'll tell you "have fun staying poor" or whatever.

Ambitious_Stock2571

BTC has a lot of potential I would hold if I could afford it I have some mining stocks that are in the toilet

DaSnitch

Where is the guy that sold BTC to buy SPCX ? (add Bogdanof meme)

Porcellanidae

Some guy named Crypto-Chris put it on Youtube with the title: " Bitcoin Meme | Saving Private Ryan | FREE $20 BTC see description"

Lavayo

My point stands too. BTC will always be traded by people that care about those short term factors. Even if this percentage shrinks to 0.1%, the total change in fiat will still increase. Hopefully.