BTC

mcfreiz

I only have BTC and SOL at this point

kajunkennyg

People really believe this? BTC is nothing like it's form years ago when there was no kyc etc. I miss those days.

IAmSixNine

I see that stack and think, oh what error notes or cool serial numbers are in there? LOL then i think BTC.

Soggy_Stargazer

You and so many others. The real pisser is you found a BUNCH of free money, it just wasn't there yet. I mined, thought it was cool, and just sort of kept an eye on things. Tried GPU mining when it became a thing, then I bought some ASICs and validated that the mining calculators were pretty accurate, however if I had just plowed the $400 a month in electricity directly into BTC for the 2 and a half years I ran them I would have done better than breaking even and recouping the BTC I spent on the miners. I've no ragrets for any btc I have cashed in for lifestyle chits and being semi-retired before 50 doesn't suck.

Velvet_Samurai

I'm starting to wonder if I need to sell some BTC and buy a Vespa or two. I had no idea they were worth as much as a used car.

mrhappymillennial

Lol. I'm fire in my 30s. Still have 0.9 BTC. Want to get rid of it, but I can't sell to much in one year as that would trigger a higher marginal tax in my jurisdiction.

Dehyak

Well you don’t own BTC if you’re investing through an ETF. And if it’s with an ETF, it’s on a CEX. During the financial crisis, companies weren’t stealing peoples stocks. Self-custody is great, been doing it since 2018. But with self-custody, you can still get hacked (Coldcard), you can expose yourself through negligence or just bad practice, you can forget your password, lose your pass phrase. It’s all a risk, I still opt for self-custody. But buying an ETF through a CEX does look more and more attractive than custody imo. If my account says $0. I have numbers I can call

Rayjex

Remind me October 5th at 9am tomorrow is theoretical BTC low then next peak is September 2029

YogurtClosetThinnest

>There are bloomberg reports and other big finance companies who say BTC will reach half a mill by the end of 2030 I mean I got in on average probably 70k and I don't believe this at all lmao

CourtneyHffs

I’d recommend Trust Wallet for a general-purpose mobile wallet. It supports many networks and assets, including BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, USDT and USDC.

heisthemaincharacter

When BTC didn’t even break $60k on the Coldcard hack news, that should’ve been a sign. It was already down almost 50% from the $125k ATH. At some point you gotta just take a position lol.

deleted-_-alt

Without a mortgage what do you think I’m buying? Now I have both a house and BTC, kinda the goal in my opinion

loc710

There is no was someone is actually asking BTC or ETH 🤣

quintavious_danilo

I always thought BCH is a direct hard fork of BTC?

Rainforest413

Agree. Bank-managed money works because banks handle macro-level resource allocation, which backs up trust in their system. For crypto like BTC to have real, lasting value, it needs a similar layer of real-world resource integration. As long as crypto relies on traditional market infrastructure for real-world settlement, this friction isn't going away.

Darkstar_111

Problem when BTC drops 50%, it needs to go up by 100% to break even... unfair.

Scottex99

Lol, I’ve been long BTC since 2017, it’s not time for the victory lap yet, don’t go dumping and crying if we’re chopping around 60k again in a couple of weeks

hodler1992

This was not a question of luck, it was a strategy. I had more pain with the idea to miss out on buying cheap than to miss on another 10% discount. I bought .25 BTC which is much money for me. Already over 10% in unrealized profits. I will hodl for 10 years minimum as I am 100% sure 0.25 BTC will be MUCH more worth 2036 than it is today or in two years.

JealousMatch1228

Any update now? Leverage trading is too risky though but I guess 4x is okay for BTC. 57K is your floor, which is less likely to come first.

WealthyKyroYT

I think this is a fun idea , with potential but after BTC has just rallied i would 1. Wait for it to come down, it always does as a liquidity grab then enter 2. If you don’t wanna lose or miss out, only do 2x leverage or better yet, spot trading if you have already started i would consider taking some money off the table now and keeping a 2x leverage

TJack303

I remember my first time investing in BTC

BigNoseParody

Must be shorts as well. These last few days new wave of big shorts have been put through the grinder. They're expecting BTC to fall now, trying to desperately get their money back. Sadly big money is saying no, this is the new resistance level, you bettr get used to it.

cb10gauge

BTC doesnt care what you think.

TrueRead1435

This is basically the Bitcoin cycle 😂 Every time you think we’re finally out of the loop, somehow we end up right back where we started. Are we ever actually breaking the cycle, or is this just how BTC works?

DimensionPrize8168

BTC is like that game Returnal, and I've died around 50 times in that crash.

Sea-Push5285

So tell me, what is the actual link between a chain’s development (SOL/ETH) and its coin price going up? What is their true purpose beyond paying transaction fees? When a chain hits all-time highs across various metrics, how does that performance actually convert into value for token holders? If you use SOL or ETH as collateral to borrow money, the liquidation risk is exceptionally high because they can easily lose 70% of their value within a single year. Staking is essentially just supply dilution—if staking rewards were paid out in USDT, I’d view it differently. Besides collateral and fee payments, why else would anyone buy SOL or ETH? Cut the boilerplate talk about "infrastructure." The Solana chain is a great venue for transferring funds and tokenizing assets, but I can use the network without holding a massive stack of SOL. If you look at it honestly, aren't people just buying SOL, waiting for it to pump to $300, and dumping it onto the next person? The same goes for ETH. BTC has absolute scarcity—something that has never truly existed in human history—which is why it holds value. Meanwhile, SOL and ETH are minted every single day. Furthermore, just pull up a weekly (1W) chart or higher. A real growth asset shouldn't have a chart as ugly as SOL, ETH, or the rest of the crypto market. Look at the charts of actual revenue-generating growth stocks like GOOGL, AAPL, META, or even KO—*that* is what a real growth asset looks like. In reality, SOL and ETH are just trading in a massive range: SOL between $8 and $290+, ETH between $1,400 and $4,900. It’s been six years and they still can't break out of this range, which is terrible. Sure, you can still turn a profit by buying at the bottom of the range and selling on the way up to the peak, but isn't that just buying and waiting to dump it on someone dumber than you?

Hqjjciy6sJr

BTC: Come on buy or sell so that I can make my next move to your opposite

Ashistrash121

I failed to get into BTC early because of articles like this one... You aren't fooling me this time... I would rather be exposed to a "scam" which keeps appreciating in value for almost 20 years now than to keep my net worth in an actual scan that has been depreciating in value ever since it was invented...

-rosslyn26-

Lo prenderei come segnale di minimo se fosse stato lui a venirti a dire brutte cose su BTC. Se lo interroghi tu vale poco.

Kurosaki56843

BTC, ETH, SOL, NEXO, XRP - only solid ones

blaivas007

Follow Pareto principle to manage the portfolio. Avoid shitcoins and stick to the big 3. Use GLI, 50W MA, RSI, Fear and Greed index and BTC.D to gauge the public perception and make the decision of whether to buy, sell, or sit on hands. Only make financial decisions on Mondays, and only follow the weekly charts.

lexicon_riot

It doesn't need more use cases, but it needs more adoption of its existing use cases.  Mainly that means more use as a payment network. IMO the holy grail will be stealth BTC payments. That being a system in which you can spend BTC in aanner that interoperates with any traditional fiat rail. Square is giving us a taste of this so far. You can spend BTC over lightning, and a square merchant will accept the payment, receive fiat, and never know or care you used BTC. PlebQR is based in Thailand, and let's you fulfill a fiat QR payment request with BTC, basically through a p2p exchange where another user pays your fiat bill and receives your BTC. Once this basic concept proliferates more, there will be zero convenience cost for Bitcoiners to spend it. You can easily get paid and spend in BTC, and you won't have to bother with finding BTC merchants or asking "do you accept Bitcoin?" This is how Bitcoin hits the next phase of growth, to sustain a floor well into the six figures. If Bitcoin advocates have the ability to live fully on a BTC standard, things will really start to pick up. I also think stablecoin payments long term are huge for BTC. Not only because stables can operate natively on lightning, but because psychologically it moves people closer to how BTC payment UX feels. Governments will push stablecoin adoption to subsidize demand for US treasuries but it long term plays into our hands.

Taxi-Shinawat

Okay let me know your thoughts about BTC when you come back from the shitter

junkhead_7

>Crypto can survive without ETH, I'm not sure it can survive without BTC. God, I don't really know... the Ethereum blockchain was the first one hosting stablecoins, and I think the crypto space wouldn't be the same without USDT/USDC. So I don't really know if crypto could survive without ETH.

ubermensch1001

I bought up aggressively in the 60k range, even was scooping up in the 50k range as well. However, I kept some cash in reserve for a possible slightly lower low or at least a revisit to the low 60ks. It's great to see the crypto market get some life in it again, but the reality is that this looks like a poor time to be making some big moves. The bears who shorted BTC got absolutely wrecked, but those buying back in thinking the bear market is officially over and that it's game on may also be setting themselves up for some pain in the not too distant future. Patience

Fantastic-Habit3993

At which BTC rate will it get liquidated ? Just asking because it's quite proable that a correction will come before it goes up more.

sheeeeeeeeei

as soon as you sell you will wanna buy BTC back.

d30_v1Nd1c3

Go touch grass and when you’re done and had some time off the internet, buy more BTC.

Noels_Nose

BTC dont need to do shit dude. The lion does not concern himself with lines on a chart.

CharacterStrategy598

Even this recent pump while impressive for a week puts Bitcoin on parity with the SPY. Both SPY and BTC were at 630 and 63000 respectively 6 months ago and are at 770 and 77000 now.

stillonyourmind

The game theory angle is interesting because stealing BTC only works if there's still something valuable to steal, and gamdom shows how much crypto value depends on trust.

No-Stuff-7046

Scared money was the money you didn’t put in when it seemed like BTC was in a downtrend. This is more like fomo and 4x leverage on fomo is called stupidity. Best of luck to you, you’ll need it.

soks86

You would open a short futures position then close it if the price goes down. Buy BTC with the proceeds.

jabs09

Mstr or BTC in cold wallet which is better ?

AirFrierMachine

Its a common scam for crypto noobies. The wallet pulls the public price from some random website without realizing that the trading volume is literally $0. When you decide to "cash in" your fake coins for BTC it'll require you to pay some ETH/bTC/SOL transfee fees to get it. You pay the transfer/transaction fee to "sell" it and nobody ends up buying it because it has zero volume. It's just a scam to get you to pay some transfer fee that they keep, leaving you with nothing

CipherScarlatti

BTC sees Op's post and crashes immediately out of spite.

beklog

BTC: Don't tell me what to do, I do what I want.

_RonPaulWasRight_

"There are bloomberg reports and other big finance companies who say BTC will reach half a mill by the end of 2030." Well, my gosh, if bloomberg said it....it must be true.

Sea-Push5285

Honestly, other than BTC and a few coins that actually provide some form of value retention for holders, like HYPE, I think most other coins have no real value. Yes, that includes ETH, SOL, and BNB. You buy them because you hope the price goes up so you can eventually dump them on someone else at a higher price. These coins don't really do anything other than pay transaction fees on their respective chains. Some people will argue that crypto is more volatile and therefore offers more upside than stocks. That just tells me they haven't traded small-cap stocks. Tickers like USAR, SMCI, and plenty of others can easily move 10% in a single day. On the weekly chart, swings of 50–70% over just 3–4 weeks are completely normal. The important difference is that these companies are actually running businesses. They have real assets, financial statements, revenues, expenses, and accounting records. With crypto? The growth of a chain doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the price of its token. The Solana chain can keep hitting all-time highs across various metrics while SOL still dumps for 10 consecutive months without a meaningful recovery. ETH can do the same. I genuinely don't understand what people who invest in altcoins like AVAX, Litecoin, Cardano, etc. are thinking. Honestly, they'd probably have a much better chance of eventually breaking even if they traded small-cap stocks instead. At least there is an actual business underneath. I'd put their chances of recovering their money at 1,000x higher than with those garbage coins. I can at least understand SOL, ETH, and BNB because they're large caps with a history of recovering after major drawdowns. But even investing in those is pretty risky, because there is ultimately nothing underneath them that provides a real fundamental floor for the price. **In conclusion, unless we're talking about BTC or tokens with a clear mechanism for preserving or returning value to holders, investing in crypto feels largely pointless compared to other asset classes.** >

plumpyplummy

Dang it I'm getting so close, I meants BTC damn it! https://preview.redd.it/2jjvfto4w8lh1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4310c80778a0609ba48abc3a4e5cc3fcfadb04de

cutegirlyx

The forks share the DNA, but they don't share BTC's liquidity, trust or adoption. Gamdom sits in another lane entirely, which kinda proves crypto has grown into a bunch of different niches.

SeemedGood

Gold was the ultimate form of money for most of recorded human history, and money is very useful. The reason that it has the value which it does now is because of its historical use as money, and to a significant extent it’s price reflects a market-implied probability that it will be used as such again (for good reason). BTC, on the other hand, has no such history and has had a near zero probability of becoming money since the Blockstream hostile takeover.

Sparky90032

Eth has a unlimited supply 👎🏾 BTC is a scarce asset, limited and has always gone up

daydreamxoxx

I think BTC has separated itself because liquidity, trust and network effects are really hard to copy. Gamdom is more on the gambling side, but the broader crypto ecosystem keeps branching into different use cases.

OrangePillar

If you look at the price chart ETH/BTC since 2021, you will do the opposite.

ShortBusConquistador

Keep it all in BTC and forget it's there until you need it. Stop looking at the prices. A crash doesn't mean anything if you don't sell.

Huntingtonbeach88

Spot on. It’s a strong anti-BTC troll page now! Losers

cowboy_shaman

Depends on your meaning of long term. Eth has technically been in a 5 year downtrend vs BTC

heartglowxx

BTC's first mover advantage is hard to ignore. Gamdom is a completely different part of the crypto ecosystem, but it shows how much the space has expanded beyond just holding coins.

RemarkableWitness649

Bros hoping and praying BTC hits a new all time high in October 😭

TheGreatCryptopo

ETH. Close second BTC.

Lasatra_

I still have 20% in EThH, would you move it all to BTC at this point.. I've been untouching alts and I really only want those 2 or all in on BTC

pizz44

I’m not saying the quantum-computing argument should be ignored. Quite the opposite — I think it’s a legitimate long-term risk that Bitcoin holders should be paying attention to. But if I were looking at BTC with a **10+ year investment horizon**, I personally wouldn’t sell solely because of the quantum argument. The question for me isn't really *“Can quantum computers eventually threaten Bitcoin?”* I think the answer to that is potentially yes. The more important question is: **“Can Bitcoin upgrade its cryptography before quantum computers become capable of exploiting the existing system?”** Those are two very different questions. Bitcoin developers aren't ignoring this. There are already proposals being discussed around post-quantum protection, including **BIP-360 and BIP-361**. That doesn't mean Bitcoin has solved the problem — far from it. These are still works in progress, and there are some pretty significant technical and governance questions that need to be worked out. But that's exactly why I'd rather **monitor the development than panic-sell based on a prediction about when quantum computing becomes practical.** If I were holding BTC for 10+ years, I'd add **“Bitcoin quantum readiness”** to my annual investment checklist. I'd be watching: • BIP-360/BIP-361 development • Post-quantum signature proposals • Bitcoin Core implementation • Consensus around migrating vulnerable coins • Wallet/exchange/custodian support • Actual progress in cryptographically relevant quantum computing Two places I'd recommend anyone interested in this topic bookmark: [Bitcoin BIPs GitHub repository](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips?utm_source=chatgpt.com) [Delving Bitcoin developer forum](https://delvingbitcoin.org/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) I'd personally become much more concerned if we got to a point where **quantum computing was advancing faster than Bitcoin's ability to implement and adopt a quantum-resistant solution.** That's the risk I'd be watching. Until then, I view quantum computing as **a legitimate risk to monitor, not an automatic reason to sell.** And obviously, that's just my personal investment framework — not financial advice.

Demitre_Gold

Prioritize taking some profits and securing reliable income while keeping a smaller BTC position for the long term. No need to time the perfect top.

pinkechox

The scary scenario isn't simply BTC dumping, it's a successful attack making people question whether the system can actually protect funds. That's a much bigger problem than normal market volatility, and I'd put something like Gamdom in a completely different bucket since that's gambling risk rather than a protocol-level security risk.

LateToTheParty2k21

Fee's are driven by usage. High fees reduce micro Transactions, to slow down congestion when the network is busy. It's supply and demand logic just on chain. If as you describe that fee's are so high, why would someone use BTC over a wire transfer or any other kind of settlement like stable coin.

Gakman55

BTC is going much lower!

Beginning_Juice_4296

everyone caught on about the BTC cycle thinking it was going to bottom in October so whales said SIKEEEEEE

vattenj

In 2133, all the banks has moved to quantum resistant protocols, BTC stayed with the original ECDSA, and there is no single quantum computer in world can crack it! That is the myth about Quantum computer As for the mining, future quantum miners might require billions of investment, but they consume very little power, so the mining is mostly moved to a group of large data centers with quantum miners running at near 0k temperature, instead of a group of mining pools. The profit is still high for the miners, but majority could not afford the miner itself

cubeeless

BTC to 400k!

MikeAndTheNiceGuys

I imagine it wasn’t streamed online. I’d get home and transfer that BTC immediately

Potatotornado20

Fees will be very high because the price to send a single BTC worth $10M will be very high. And it's good if there is less usage on the main chain anyway because it can't support it. There will be layer 2's on top like Lightning Network, and others not even created yet, for retail to use.

Interesting_Loss_907

You’ll hear input from many people with different opinions, but they’re just that: opinions. None of us know where the BTC market price will go tomorrow, or next week, next month or next year. I own Bitcoin. Decent amount of it. But not because I think I know where the market price will be next week or next month. I own it because I believe in censorship-resistant money. I believe in it as an open-source, permission-less. Distributed P2P network, and as a currency that’s durable, divisible, portable, fungible & scarce.

dylan6091

If you believe in the long term success of Bitcoin, then we can assume eventually the price will recover and surpass its prior ATH. Starting a short position 50% below ATH on an asset as volatile as BTC just doesn't sound smart. Like at all.

severact

How about zcash? That is basically a fork of Bitcoin - even keeping the same 21m Max coins - but with a privacy layer bolted on. It is definitely not in a long term down trend against BTC.

Rich_Signal_1512

Your instinct is already pretty solid here. BTC and ETH aren't really competing for the same job, which is probably why the choice feels harder than it should. BTC is basically built to be the "buy it and leave it" asset, fixed supply, longest track record, nothing you really need to keep tabs on. If low-stress and long-term is genuinely the goal, that's exactly the profile it's built for. ETH is a different kind of bet. You're not just holding it hoping the price goes up, you're holding a stake in whatever gets built on top of it, DeFi, NFTs, real-world asset tokenisation, most of it settles back to Ethereum in some way. That's the utility edge you're picking up on. The trade-off is it's a more complex asset with more moving parts, and it can be staked if you want it actually doing something rather than just sitting there, worth looking into if "leave it there" is still the plan. Since you're already holding BTC from a good entry, adding ETH isn't really an either/or decision, it's just not putting all your eggs in a single basket. A lot of people who want simplicity end up somewhere around 70/30 or 60/40 BTC/ETH for exactly that reason, not because one's objectively better. Only thing I'd genuinely flag: don't let "set and forget" turn into "forget it exists." Doesn't need to be active management, but even checking in once a year is worth doing. Good luck with it.

Kevkillerke

Fees will not be high if there's not much usage. And people use BTC as a store of value.

mountain_drifter

2012, that gives this post 14 years of experience and the sauce is: trust me bro, BTC more likely to go up or down than sideways. moon soon Nice

kingo86

At 0.25 BTC for 7.8 ETH, is that good value then?

Wasabi_Hammurabi1

Because people are fucking broke and they want it to go lower so they can get more when it goes up. People hate their fucking jobs, they hate their student debt, they hate having people who depend on them and they probably also hate their lives. People are broke and they are only able to put enough in at any given time. "Keep buying more over time". Yeah, we get that but shit takes time dude. BTC is a rich gets richer thing. I really need it to drop to the low to mid 40s if I am going to celebrate.

kingo86

Up 57% against BTC after 10 years... https://preview.redd.it/njf8nvw147lh1.png?width=1978&format=png&auto=webp&s=23726789e2cacc2eb56368195faf6af6678b6464

Ok-Yak-1495

For peace of mind, long-term BTC is better.

Educational-Ice1443

Why not use it as collateral if you need fiat? This is common in securities backed lending when investors need cash. Borrow from your BTC, while it keeps growing in value and pay it back at a lower rate than the growth of BTC (in theory, depends on when you borrow).

DifficultSquash1517

Anyone who's been in BTC for multiple cycles has seen this play out over and over again Is the fomo bull trap.... Once this local high has exhausted all buyers, we're going to go back down for a while 🤷 If only markets were that easy to think that we're now in a bull market and just buy and you're going to make a lot of money. Just DCA and chill

hodler1992

What most people don't realize is that only a very small number of BTC is circulating as many are in hands of people who might never sell. Then there's a huge number of forever gone coins. Let the US buy one million BTC what do you think will trigger this? Supply could be very small very soon. And to convince Hodler so sell you only can adjust the price as there never can be new BTC. That's only a theory, obviously. But anyway I'm 100% certain that is never wrong to buy BTC as long as you can hold it for at least 10 years.

b1mm3rl1f3

Standard Chartered predicts $500K Bitcoin by 2030, but ETH will outperform BTC over the coming years on a percentage basis

hodler1992

That's the point. We are thinking in terms and numbers related the "old world". I believe AI will mean such an important change to the world just as evolving from an agricultural society to the industrial age. Or horse wagons and cars. With such new technologies the global economy made always multiple x. AI will lead to the same. And then suddenly 1 billion per BTC is nothing crazy anymore. If the global liquidity does a 3x and BTC will be 5% of all value - we are already within dozens of million's per BTC.

richardto4321

You might be the biggest BTC bull I've ever seen. Lol. But good for you if you've been in BTC for awhile. It's likely served you well so far.

sssssssssssssss5s

Demand for BTC has to increase for the price to go up. In 20 years, you think there will be enough demand for it to be in the billions?

Interesting_Loss_907

You said it yourself OP. Some think it will fail. Others think it will succeed. “Everyone’s” outlook on BTC’s future spans the realm of opinions. Personally, I find it impressive that an asset that traded for less than $0.01 just 16 years ago is worth > $75 000 today. But there will always be naysayers who pronounce it “dead” during any market correction or bear market era. So what exactly did you hope to achieve with this question?

hodler1992

I don't think Bitcoin will vanish in the future. Call me super optimistic (I am) but personally speaking I think BTC will be within 10 years worth millions and In 20 years even billions. Based on the fact that global economy will rise with AI and BTC will have a larger share within in.

unpdigital

why would you do that? BTC is the one free and 1st coin. Stock exchanges have performed bette than BTC.

Dehyak

BTC is just another investment to me. Maybe in some remote areas or where people don’t have a banking system it’s good. Or if you’re sending large amounts of money and want to avoid the time and/or fees. That’s about it. My grocery story doesn’t accept it, my utilities can’t be paid with it, my mortgage can’t be paid with it. Work can’t pay me in it. BTC as a money, nah I’m good. Gimme really money and I’ll buy BTC to sell later for a profit

MooseLoot

Why would I have heard of somebody who is bad at BTC security? What would I learn from studying this person?

Designer-Beginning16

They were told by their crypto TA gurus that BTC would bottom in the $40ks, and they believed it like sheeps.

blaziken8x

stick to your original decision and leave the BTC alone

Bright-Umpire7530

BTC only needs to stay scarce and secure. Alts actually need a reason for people to keep using them. ETH has that ecosystem but for coins like LTC surviving isnt the same as staying relevant

_CryptoChromatic_

https://preview.redd.it/r7z30sank6lh1.png?width=1587&format=png&auto=webp&s=41a0e57d89be7ac0c4764f27b9233aadc9521ee5 Got the fall from 80k to 59k and reversal 😉 **BTC Levels (9th,may)** Price is hovering just above $80k and its likely a break below targeting $59K, Price opening below $59K is possibly going down for $35K An opening above $108 is likely heading for $146K Bulltards awaiting an oping above $80K *see you on the other side*.

Ok_Golf_6467

ISM is in expansion after 5 years of contraction lol. Alts followed this while BTC did it's own thing

opensandshuts

What time range are you looking at? That's most important when considering "top performers". I did analysis here that shows that XMR and LINK were the first movers in this run up. SOL, HYPE, hell..even BTC were trailing XMR and LINK [https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1vuvs2c/analyzing\_the\_recent\_run\_leaders\_vs\_followers/](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1vuvs2c/analyzing_the_recent_run_leaders_vs_followers/)