BTC

itsmyfakeone

You musta bought a lot of shit then Only BTC is worth stacking, everything else is noise

WeddingPKM

How is it going well? BTC is down over that time frame.

quintavious_danilo

BTC entered its sideways phase. You won’t see any significant movement for the next couple of months.

LordJamPunt

It followed NQ and ES and BTC both up and down today bud…

LionRivr

$600/week. Jesus. Congratulations on the beginning. I hope you learn more than just watching price/volatility. I hope you explore the history of the current monetary system, and how BTC fits in today’s economy.

cowboy_shaman

I stopped looking after I didn’t swap more ETH to BTC at the 0.08 level. Now it just makes me sad. I have lost all faith in Ethereum and hope I can dump these bags

Timely-Fig2030

What's so special about the ETH/BTC ratio lately? I see a chart.

bytemute

BTC plunging with SPY step by step.

Minute-Lake-1819

I know most look at price, but my comment was purely about fundamentals. BTC,ETH,LTC and several others from the early days are showing on chain growth. Not death like one would expect if they were indeed worthless

QuitYuckingMyYum

Kraken has Buy with Kraken funds. $90 gets you $10k if BTC and if your long play goes up by 12% you get roughly $1,200 in BTC. So more or less betting

Original-Read-6475

You can tell how close the bottom is by how little comments are in the daily discussion. The daily is about as dead as when BTC crabbed in the 16K range in 2022.

tenor_tymir

BTC CEO just held a press conference saying that the beating is going to continue until morale improves.

know_what_I_think

Don't trade your BTC for alts

Sweaty_Guitar_4447

Nah, I think you’re seeing something real. ETH still follows BTC, but every bounce feels weaker lately. The ratio needs to show some actual strength before I’d call this just noise

Flindy

Fair the yield is low, but BTCfi yield is pretty low and definitely understand the risk averse view. Starknet has a proven track history with BTCfi and as a blockchain. Technology that built Starknet is reputable, some of our researchers also actively contribute towards Bitcoin's own roadmap development (in the field of quantum security): [https://github.com/avihu28/Quantum-Safe-Bitcoin-Transactions](https://github.com/avihu28/Quantum-Safe-Bitcoin-Transactions) BTCfi is necessarily about the supply yield, its usually utilised for its capital unlock so the borrowing side is quite handy for many that do want to free up capital, without selling exposure to BTC and additionally, the core announcement above is on the privacy side. This is an end to end private solution to supply and earn without exposure. We'll soon have fully private bridging into Starknet via Bitcoin, to make the entire journey confidential

AutoModerator

Post is by: CategoryEqual339 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1va5f31/anyone_else_noticing_the_ethbtc_ratio_behavior/ BTC pumps, ETH lags 36–48 hrs like usual, but the catch-up move is shrinking. Used to close 60% of BTC's gain, now barely 30%. ETF flows softer than expected, L2s pulling activity off mainnet, SOL still eating attention. Am I pattern-matching noise or is the ratio genuinely rolling over? What's your read going into Q3? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

abhicoinexpansion

That's a good point. Cashback cards seem like one of the most practical ways to accumulate small amounts of BTC over time. And yes, avoiding interest charges is key, otherwise the rewards lose their value.

abhicoinexpansion

Thanks for mentioning it. I'll look into how its BTC rewards compare with some of the other cashback options.

pretend_to_be_normal

Nexo.com Earn for interests on BTC

LionRivr

US doesn’t explicitly say this, but they recognize BTC and other digital assets can be used in lieu of dollars for global trade, which makes it harder for US to have more financial/economic control via tariffs and sanctions. US is trying to be first to have regulatory framework in attempt to be the “leader” in the space. They want countries to use USD “stablecoins”, which can be used to funnel foreign capital back into US treasury bonds which help the US government pay for government expenses. Essentially USD is f’d in the long term. And the only way out is to officially navigate this new crypto space.

Medium_Historian_178

Pretty simple. BTC doesn’t care about the clarity act passing it doesn’t have feelings. Many financial broker types want it to pass to be able to clearly state (hence clarity) to their customers what crypto if any to invest in because most of crypto would then be legitimately considered digital commodities. Commodities like gold, baseball cards, comics, etc. The clarity act would increase adoption becuz grandma would consider it safe enough to invest in thus price of BTC will go up with increased adoption. Mostly everyone else is foaming at the mouth knowing that if adoption kicks off heavy. There are 6billion or so people in this world and only 21million BTC ever. So the rally alone would be pretty nice

I_argue_for_funsies

First owned was BTC... but that led to... BtcTalk mining forums where I built multiple Radeon 290x rigs to mine POW coins. I mined some of the earliest blocks of DOGE. Was a /r/Dogillionaire many times over. Still have my Josh Wise #98 shirt... Lost 10+ million doge and more than 300 LTC in the Moola/Mintpal exchange drama. Quadriga happened but lucky I had nothing in there... Then capitulated into Cryptsy in 2015 only to have Vern fuck me again in 2016. Multiple BTC and LTC gone again... In 2016 I was reignited by ETH and activated old shit coin wallets and dumped them all on Cryptopia (mostly Mintcoin lol). Ended up with double digit BTC. Bought a lot of Antshares. I still have a giant folder of wallet.dat files around that I have no idea what they are for. So many wallet app clones

Lavayo

People that were ready to sell their BTC at those prices largely already sold. That's the reason the bottom is forming (not in necessarily).

PuaKiele

I wanted to buy at 60k years ago. then i wanted to go all in at 100k over a year ago. I've been consistantly buying at 58k, wether it goes lower or higher. This is my accumulation and DCA time. I've been watching BTC since 2014. This price and everything lower is a steal.

nails4coffee

I bought BTC first because back then it was the only cryptocurrency.

DiskConfident5299

Litecoin. Then BTC because during that time all the alt coins could only be bought with BTC. Then I bought ADA. I fell for the hype and bought shit coin Colossus Coin (COLX). I had millions of those coins off chain on my old laptop. Spent at least $1k on those coins!!☹️😡

m0r0_on

A good way to loose your BTC

the_rhino22

There are credit cards that offer rewards paid in BTC. Like Coinbase’s AmEx. Just be sure to never carry a balance or it’ll completely negate the rewards

thesus_size

BTC to buy things on the darknet in 2013. I still hold the change!

BuyIndependent2319

50 BTC mined in 2009. Thought it was stupid and never really invested in it long term except I just recently I started buying 25 cents worth every hour. I guess it’s never too late to invest.

No_Success_4269

BTC, ETH, LTC in that order. I still have the history on Coinbase and I sometimes look at that history and those prices. August 2017.

EbrithilUmaroth

I'm curious what ever made you think Doge was worth anything? I knew all the way back in 2013 when it launched that it was nothing more than a BTC clone hoping to abuse meme culture to generate value out of nothing. It actually did much, much better than I ever expected it to.

EbrithilUmaroth

It offered fast and almost free transactions which seemed like magic at the time compared to BTC and ETHs extremely slow and expensive transactions.

EbrithilUmaroth

My introduction to crypto was being hired to build mining rigs around 2014. By that time BTC was already being mined via ASIC so you couldn't compete with GPUs and we had to mine other coins. Unfortunately 2014 was too early in the crypto space for much innovation to have happened yet so all those altcoins were basically just bitcoin clones that are dead nowadays.

c0horst

Bitcoin, 2020. I was never into purchasing crypto, when it was profitable to mine at home I'd run Nicehash to mine ETH and get paid in BTC. I then started mining ETH directly, as well as other mineable coins like RVN as I expanded my mining rig. When ETH went proof of stake I sold all crypto and all GPUs and never looked back. ETH killed my enthusiasm for crypto, lol.

Minute-Lake-1819

Never know. I think there is room in the market for several winners. Although it will be tough to argue against BTC as the best store of value crypto.

Minute-Lake-1819

Never know. I think there is room in the market for several winners. Although it will be tough to argue against BTC as the best store of value crypto.

Smile_lifeisgood

Darkcoin. Plus a ton of others. I took profits - not on every project, stuff like XCoin, Blackcoin, NXT just never seemed to take off. But I used a shotgun approach and ended up way ahead off of a little bit of money. I was convinced BTC was gonna be MySpace to some other project's Facebook. I was wrong. BTC was like Windows and the other projects were like OS/2 Warp, BeOS, FreeBSD, et al. Meaning that despite what I thought were superior white papers/projects in many ways BTC's name recognition was more important than anything when it comes to a speculative asset.

OliveLegitimate3236

2010 BTC users: \- Satoshi \- Hal Finney \- a few cryptographers \- a few open-source developers \- a bunch of libertarians \- computer science enthusiasts 2026 BTC update: \- ordinary people \- wealthy investors \- companies \- pension funds \- ETFs \- governments

dj_destroyer

I bought BTC first but quickly exchanged it for shitcoins like SIA, IOTA, NEO, NANO, Civic, etc. At the peak, I had about 3.3 BTC worth (on like $2000 invested) -- which crashed to basically nothing. I then made the mistake of selling all my shitcoins for BTC at the very bottom. They almost all recovered to near ATHs in 2021 which would have got me back close to 3 BTC. I learned my lesson and stacked BTC ever since so now I'm above 2 but less than 3. Probably invested something like $50k though, maybe more.

Common_Thought_828

IMO it's not a good idea to talk to anybody about BTC especially if you do self-custody...

Junglebook3

So the premise is that I risk my BTC due to a bridge hack, to get subsidized STRK to get 2% APY or whatever? The risk/reward makes zero sense here.

Upper-Media3769

Putting your BTC at risk for 2% APY on a windy blockchain audited by a company no one every heard of with a cheap ai logo? No, thank you.

caabiaahonda

Until BTC=BTC

Upper-Media3769

What's the point of this question? If the past would repeat always exactly we would all be rich with trading and sports bets. And what does it help you if people answer with 2 months, 3 months or 30 months? If your insecure about buying BTC then don't do it.

SkillzThatKillz10

I don’t think BTC will ever be used as currency like that. I’m on the digital gold train. You don’t see people buying things with gold for the same reason. I think stablecoins are the future, and maybe somehow backed by BTC like cash used to be backed by gold.

Lavayo

10/6/26. Thats the end of the bear market strictly by the 4y cycle. I don't actually think that will be the date. BUT if it is I was right. ;) And it has something going for it: Around that date, after the first bigger price jump up at the latest, evey damn BTC/Crypto influencer will flip bullish because the "bear market year" is over and we "should have" 1000+ days of upwards momentum. That clicks and sells and will in itself be worth something.

konhana

last time i sold half of my BTC, and it went up. So let me sell the rest now...

Minute-Lake-1819

I first heard of BTC in 2012, and heard about the faucet. Thought for sure it was a scam lol. Little did I know… 2017 really got me into studying crypto. It truly has the power to make everything more efficient if we let it.

Minute-Lake-1819

Oof. I remember the IOTA hype. There are several from that 2015-2017 era that are just gone now. At least cryptos like BTC and LTC are still growing on chain.

DangerHighVoltage111

> I don't see any tangible difference between LTC and BCH Not gonna lie, that's on you bro 😎😄. Just one example: BCH doesn't have a crippling Blocksize limit. And can dogma free take the best upgrade path as hard fork or soft fork. > LTC and BCH tbh, both hover around a similar market cap and occasionally swap positions, and both are marketed towards p2p transactions (neither one has significant uptake). LTC overtook BCH as "BTCs silver" when BCH was up against all the maxis selling. But since BCH overtook LTC again there was only a single short lasting time where LTC was above it. LTC mainly rides on the shame free transactional blockchain for maxis when the BTC blockchain is clogged. > LTC implemented it's privacy feature much earlier and has seen negligible usage, I don't see any reason why BCH would be different, As far as I followed that development it wasn't a well received implementation and I think I remember someone claimed they broke it already?!? But to be fair I'm not sure on that. >I don't see any reason why BCH would be different Because BCH was always privacy oriented and Cashfusion has been used for a while already. Now you can have scaling, zk-privacy and smart contracts on one Bitcoin chain.

GIGAbtcHodl

use it for farming and gains to acquire BTC

CategoryEqual339

Bro, don't make me remember 2021. I was rich and poor in the same year. I had like 3 BTC, all gone.

Systemonly69

Initially mined BTC in 2015 and sold in 2016, then buyed Harmony ONE in 2020 and made a profit and then purchased LTC thinking it would go to $300.

Sufficient_Fuel5269

First coins always tell the story of the cycle you entered. LTC/BTC is pure 2017: Minimalist Coinbase, FOMO and discovery. Today the gateway is memecoins and L1 of fashion. The pattern always changes, the essence does not.

Minute-Lake-1819

That’s a good point. I remember gifting people some LTC between 2018-2021 to give them their first crypto exposure. And making use of the BTC referral promos. Good times

ThatBCHGuy

Mine was BTC. Back when we had to use Dwolla :).

egej

this is exactly how i’m trading the BTC in my Voyager account.

NonVideBunt

BTC is trash

Bottle_and_Sell_it

Yo, I don’t know what you’ve just said, but I’ve heard other people say things using the same or similar words. I’m going to take it that you are possibly better informed than me regarding BTC, possibly not. But when you are potentially criticizing, potentially not, a fellow BTC Reddit commenter, I feel I should probably say something?(prob not). I’m not going to because I think also probably I shouldn’t, but you need (maybe not) to know I think I know what you’re possibly doing here. I’m ambivalent towards it, and felt the need to express that ambivalence (but what if people think I’m weird?)

SHIFT-OR-CAPS

The prize was 13.5 BTC. Not sure about the mix of GPUs used but most of them must be RTX 4090 and 5090. Requires a substantial investment to acquire 200 GPUs. Besides from that, must have cost a lot in electiricty bills too. Also need an efficient algorithm to take down problem of this magnitude, which he now has open sourced.

viklondon99

Actually, I only bought my first bit at $110,000!! Aug 2025. I watched a podcast by Peter McCormack who was interviewing Balaji Srinivasan - Collapse of the West. I really respect what Balaji says. I researched Bitcoin. Within 2 weeks I had decided to go all in. I started the process of selling my house. Now I am sitting on 90% cash, 10% btc. By October, I will be 95% BTC, 5% cash. I stopped working. I know how roughly how much I can get and how much I need to live. I didn't get in early. I just realised my biggest asset (house) was keeping me tied to this country and I am being penalised daily for it. Sell the house. Buy BTC. Escape into the sunset.

crunchyeyeball

for puzzle #135, looks like it was 13.5 BTC, moved yesterday: https://mempool.space/address/16RGFo6hjq9ym6Pj7N5H7L1NR1rVPJyw2v

Inevitable-Cat869

I was talking to a close friend about a personal problem...he roped BTC into the discussion. I told several times this has nothing to do with BTC. Lmao 🤣

Sookkhuii

just dcaing every BTC low and sometimes maybe ETH and when bull is really coming buy more major alts like SOL

Embarrassed_fly09

By 2050 BTC will be more than 1 mil imo

jojothehodler

In 2050, BTC will be on the Blockchain

LevelStationaryPlane

Bro social security is more of a gamble than BTC lmao.

twinters01

He is right lol BTC is gambling

quintavious_danilo

care to explain for a layman? What’s a BTC puzzle?

thinkingperson

The last time I tried a project that offered 14% APY in ETH and BTC, I got a 55% haircut within six months 😅

cyger

Maybe, though a dip to 50k or so is possible. The thing is, with all the money printing around the world, BTC could be much higher in few months, years.

hamjamham

Nothing magical about it. Where's there's money to be made, people will chase after it. There's never been such a large divergence between stocks & crypto. It'll catch up soon enough. Didn't say we're were going n a bull either, just that I think the bottom is in for BTC at least.

cyger

Yes, because the BTC I bought back in 2015/2016 did so well, I was able to diversify and go into stocks greatly over the last 2 years. Funny thing is, in 2016 I pulled my stock money and put it all into crypto, made great gains and paid a lot of bills. But the volatility is so painful, so glad I sold almost all my alts last fall.

ScrotusAmongus

Hardcore bitcoiners will sell everything for BTC and sleep in a tent in the woods with their seed phrase tattooed under their eyelids

_blockchainlife

Stay clear of alts. Only BTC. Expect continued ultra volatility with massive swings in both directions over the years. Set a date that’s out 20+ years and don’t touch it until then. Expect it to go to zero and don’t include it in any type of net worth or retirement plans. Will be either the smartest thing you’ve ever done or the dumbest.

MotanulScotishFold

Altcoin season can be seen only when BTC.D drop massively.

Topspeed_PT

This time won't be different! BTC 4y cyle is alive and well. Everything else is irrelevant.

hamjamham

So me interesting narratives coming out RE ai agents transacting with crypto. Personally, I think the bottom for BTC is in, a few more minor liqs on the horizon & then we start to climb out. Different macro conditions compared to the last bear cycle too. Think people waiting for October bottom will be wrong footed!

JimmySki6166

100% correct! Purchase BTC only, do not chase the hype that goes with alt coins. They have no use case and are worthless!

GoCharting

I'd strongly suggest taking a look at us - **GoCharting (gocharting.com)**. In terms of **pure value for money**, it's hard to beat for BTC perps: 1. **Web-based & Smooth:** Runs right in the browser (no heavy desktop app or GPU strain), but still streams sub-second tick data directly from Binance, Bybit, and Coinbase. 2. **Full Order Flow Suite:** Gives you proper footprint/cluster charts, bid/ask imbalances, CVD, volume profile/POC, and delta bars. 3. **Price:** Significantly cheaper than running desktop add-ons or heavy subscriptions, plus they have a generous free tier if you just want to test out how the charts feel first.

CommunityCommon1732

I'm all in on BTC long term, but my casino stack is... separate stablecoins,Keeps gambling volatility from touching my core hold

Galavanta

LINK's tech is solid but price action has been frustrating for years, your not wrong there. the thing is "big future potential" applies to like half the top 50 and most of them bleed against BTC over full cycles. If you're gonna do it, at least scale your entries based on where risk actually sits instead of going heavy all at once. I track LINK risk on alphasquared and it helps me size positions without the emotional guesswork. Right now alts in general are in a weird spot where adoption metrics and price are completely disconnected, so patience matters more than conviction here.

Mohowl_

I wasn't clear. I meant best case for BTC is he doubles his money in 3-4 years. There are better options through good stock investments for that time horizon that would most likely wipe the floor with 'only' a 100% increase in four years.

WorldlyCaramel3793

I'm currently DCAing into BTC, and it's been going well so far. This is already my second year since I started last year.

master-beast-72

The pause isn't surprising if you understand how the funding mechanism actually works. Strategy buys BTC by issuing ATM equity offerings and convertible bonds — they raise capital first, then buy. If they're not buying, it usually means they're either between capital raises or the ATM offering is exhausted for the current tranche. The "propping up the market" narrative is mostly reddit canon at this point. Their purchases are large for a single entity but they're small relative to daily BTC volume on the major exchanges. The price impact per buy is real but it's not structural support in the way people describe. The chart between their announcement days and price action has never shown a consistent pattern. What's actually interesting about five weeks of no buying is what the capital allocation decision reveals. If they genuinely believed $65k was undervalued relative to their average cost basis (~$75k), you'd expect them to be raising and buying aggressively right now. The pause either means they think the price goes lower, or they're constrained by available capital, or management's confidence in the thesis has quietly shifted. The $75k average cost is the problem. They're underwater at current prices and every week they don't buy is a week they can't lower the average cost through DCA. Meanwhile the convertible note holders have coverage concerns. The strategy only fully works if BTC keeps going up from here.

Unable_Variation_836

BroadcasTheNet invitation for sale $500 [https://t0rrentinvites.com/showthread.php?tid=491](https://t0rrentinvites.com/showthread.php?tid=491) Payment: LTC or BTC GOOGLE HANGOUTS ( Email ) >>> [theseller.ti@gmail.com](mailto:theseller.ti@gmail.com) Discord: theseller.ti Telegram: [https://t.me/T0rrentinvites](https://t.me/T0rrentinvites) Telegram: u/T0rrentinvites \----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Art Of Misdirection \[ AOM \] invitation for sale $500 [https://t0rrentinvites.com/showthread.php?tid=537](https://t0rrentinvites.com/showthread.php?tid=537) Payment: LTC or BTC GOOGLE HANGOUTS ( Email ) >>> [theseller.ti@gmail.com](mailto:theseller.ti@gmail.com) Discord: theseller.ti Telegram: [https://t.me/T0rrentinvites](https://t.me/T0rrentinvites) Telegram: u/T0rrentinvites

master-beast-72

The core concept is solid — price-triggered automations fill a real gap for people who don't want to watch charts all day. A few honest thoughts: The fixed percentage trigger (5% dip, 8% surge) is the weakest part of the idea. In a high-volatility regime, those levels get hit constantly and your automations fire too often. In a low-vol sideways market, nothing triggers at all. Volatility-adjusted thresholds — anchoring to something like ATR rather than absolute percentage — would make the triggers much more meaningful across different market conditions. The "trigger → action" model is only as useful as the action types you support. If the only action is a notification, it's a slightly nicer alert app. If you can integrate with exchange APIs to actually execute limit orders or DCA buys on trigger, that's a meaningfully different tool. What actions does it support right now? The Bitcoin-only scope is either a feature or a limitation depending on your target user. For BTC-only holders it's clean. For anyone running a multi-asset book, they'd want the same logic applied to ETH, SOL, etc. without needing separate tools. Two things that would immediately improve it: (1) backtesting view so users can see how their rule would have fired historically, and (2) a way to set cooldown periods so a 5% dip doesn't trigger 8 times during a single crash. What's the data source for the price feed?

Jack_William_

All fair points on risk management. Anyone borrowing should model downside scenarios and have a repayment plan that doesn't depend on BTC price. But the platform I used is non-custodial which is a key difference. My Bitcoin never left my wallet or went to a company holding it on my behalf. That removes the counterparty risk entirely. "CoinRabbit holds your Bitcoin for you". That's a different risk profile on top of the market risk you already mentioned.

master-beast-72

The Saylor comparison is apt but there's one structural difference that makes the ETH version more interesting from a network perspective: if Bitmine stakes that ETH, they're not just a price-concentrated holder, they become a significant validator. 5% of staked ETH is meaningful. Current staking participation is around 27-28% of supply, so 5% of total supply translates to roughly 18% of the staking pool if they stake it all. That's in range to start influencing things like block proposal rates and MEV extraction patterns. It doesn't give them consensus finality power (you need 33%+ to threaten liveness), but it's enough to matter. The no-debt point from r/euro347 is the key variable. MSTR's vulnerability isn't the BTC concentration, it's the convertible note structure — if BTC craters, they can't service debt and have to sell into a falling market. Bitmine without debt just sits through a drawdown. The house of cards analogy only applies if there's leverage behind the position. The real question is what they actually do with the ETH. Buy and hold on the balance sheet is one thing. Stake it, run validators, and participate in MEV supply chains is a fundamentally different entity.

magniankh

BTC is functionally a ponzischeme and not much more. It's only job is to make money for you by getting newer people to buy into the same system.  The entire global economy would need to suffer a catastrophic breakdown leading to an entirely new world order for traditional fiat currency to be left behind. That may or may not happen, but BTC isn't backed by anything just like fiat currency. 

augustaye

all you have to do is follow one rule when it comes to friendship and BTC: don't be "that guy"

master-beast-72

The "slippery" part is deliberate and has gotten more sophisticated over time. Retail often assumes whale tracking via on-chain analytics gives a clear picture of what large holders are doing. The reality is that any whale worth tracking has almost certainly adapted their behavior to account for exactly this kind of surveillance. **How sophisticated whales obscure their positions**: 1. **Wallet fragmentation**: Rather than holding 10,000 BTC in one wallet, they hold 100 BTC across 100 wallets. Any individual wallet looks like a mid-sized holder. The clustering analysis tools (Nansen, Arkham) try to correlate these via common-input-ownership heuristics and transaction timing, but sophisticated holders intentionally break these patterns. 2. **OTC desks**: Major moves often don't happen on-chain at all. A whale selling $50M of ETH likely uses a prime broker or OTC desk (Cumberland, Galaxy, B2C2) who sources buyers privately and settles via exchange internal transfer. Whale Alert never sees it. 3. **Cross-chain movement**: Moving assets through bridges and then back can break on-chain traceability for casual observers. The origin wallet and destination wallet are unlinked unless you do full bridge-hop analysis. The practical implication for retail: "whale alert" signals are mostly noise. A large transfer to an exchange address could be a sale, an OTC delivery, a custody transfer, or just reorganizing wallets. The signal-to-noise ratio for interpreting individual large transactions is terrible. What actually works better is tracking *aggregate* exchange flows (total exchange inflows/outflows over 24-48h) rather than individual whale transactions.

Cold_Entertainer_851

That's an interesting perspective. What do you think will be the biggest catalyst for ETH in the next few years? Is it continued institutional buying, growth in on-chain applications, or other factors? I think ETH's fundamentals are indeed improving, but BTC's position as digital gold is also becoming increasingly solidified, and the two may play different roles in the future.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Foreign-Back-8676 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1v9lyd5/clarity_act_unpopular_opinion/ ​ Yes, it's already an exhausting act, but an unpopular opinion, in my view it will be passed only in the autumn I think the reason is the elections, and passing the act then will serve as a gift to influence certain things this way... And also if this happens in the summer, it feels like the passage of the act is already priced in, although $BTC might not grow significantly And what do you think, autumn or summer after all? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

arioch376

I just don't equate it to a moral imperative. If you don't do that I can't imagine participating in/owning/believing in the positive qualities of bitcoin will actually become a problem with family/friends, and if it does it sounds more like a them problem, likely for the same error you've made, they've made it a moral imperative, i.e. BTC is going to boil the oceans, so you're evil for participating. At the end of the day, even if you're a true believer, and you think BTC is the best and final form of money and may well change the world....At the end of the day it's still just money. Family and friends are more important. Act accordingly.

LurkerFromTheVoid

Another problem, that i seem to see, it's the Satoshi division of Bitcoin, it's hard to visualize prices in fractions of Bitcoin. Gemini Answer: You’ve zeroed in on a fundamental user-experience flaw that behavioral economists and software designers call **Unit Bias** and **Numeracy Friction**. Humans are notoriously bad at processing long strings of decimals. Expecting someone to buy a coffee for 0.00004500 BTC creates an immense amount of cognitive load. You spend more time counting zeros to make sure you aren't overpaying by a factor of ten than you do enjoying the coffee. Here is why this division problem creates such a massive barrier for Bitcoin as an everyday medium of exchange: ## 1. The Decimal Counting Nightmare When prices are expressed in small fractions of a whole unit, visual ambiguity skyrockets. | Item | Price in USD | Price in BTC (approx.) | Price in Satoshis ("Sats") | |---|---|---|---| | **Espresso** | $4.50 | 0.000047 BTC | 4,700 sats | | **Groceries** | $120.00 | 0.001250 BTC | 125,000 sats | | **New Laptop** | $1,500.00 | 0.015600 BTC | 1,560,000 sats | With fractions of BTC, the difference between 0.000047 and 0.00047 is one misplaced zero—a 900% calculation error. The human brain simply isn't wired to quickly differentiate numbers after three decimal places during rapid everyday transactions. ## 2. Unit Bias (The Psychology of Whole Numbers) Psychologically, people prefer owning and spending **whole units**. * **The "I Can't Afford It" Fallacy:** Many potential buyers still assume they have to buy *one full Bitcoin* to participate. Paying thousands of dollars for a fraction of a single unit feels unrewarding compared to buying thousands of cheap units of a penny stock or altcoin—even if the underlying math is identical. * **The "Sats Standard" Friction:** The Bitcoin community tried to solve this by moving to **Satoshis** (1 BTC = 100,000,000 sats). While 4,700 sats removes the decimals, it introduces a whole new problem: giant numbers that are detached from the mental price anchors people have built over a lifetime in dollar terms. ## 3. The Failure of "Unit of Account" For a currency to function smoothly, it must be a **Unit of Account**—a mental tape measure for economic value. When you see a $5 sandwich, your brain instantly compares it to every other $5 item you’ve ever bought. But because Bitcoin fluctuates constantly *and* requires decimal gymnastics, you have to run a two-step mental calculation: 1. **Convert fractions to Satoshis** (or parse the decimal string). 2. **Convert Satoshis to your local fiat currency** based on today’s live exchange rate. Until an asset can serve as a static, intuitive price tag in the physical world without requiring continuous mental conversions, it remains a speculative asset rather than an effortless currency.

logavulin16

Congrats. If your social credit or social score dips one day dips, your bank will seize your funds. You are missing the point of decentralization. Bank runs happen all the time, even in first world nations. Holding fiat currency in your bank will lose to crypto in every capacity. ROI,mobility, self custody… BTC has outperformed every major asset in the world including NVD for its entire lifespan. AI has had a great 3 year run. Its scalable runway is running ever shorter. Maybe this is your first bear market but your sentiment shows up in every successful market at the best possible times to buy

Althea520

Do not buy alt coins ever. BTC Maxi here. since 2017. Learned the hard way doing little side quests. Waste of money when I could of stocked more BTC.

Plane_Baby

We all get there at our own time. My advice, study it and gain conviction. You are coming at a good time, near the bottom (even if it drops more, you are still in a good spot). DCA, and continue learning about BTC. Look for ways to earn BTC (Fold, maybe Lolli) for free. When you start questioning UXTOs and self custody, that's when you are there because it is not about the dollars. 💪 Good luck and welcome aboard.