BTC

pretend_to_be_normal

In the past, I liked the concept of a bucket of different cryptos. But have a look of the chart of your favorite alt compared to BTCt: It usually looks like a disaster if you zoom out to max time. Unfortunately, this also seems to be true for ETH. I had hoped in the past, that ETH would be important for DeFi. But nowadays I am afraid of bugs found by AI or potential quantum computer threats. I have no better solution to this than only BTC in native Segwit addresses (bc1q) which are not resused. Any thoughts?

Equivalent_Menu_1096

No es tan raro si piensas en cómo funciona el modelo de negocio de los mineros. La mayoría ya aseguraron contratos de energía a largo plazo y venden futuros de BTC para cubrirse. Cuando el precio cae, los mineros ineficientes se van, pero los grandes se quedan con más cuota de hash y siguen operando con margen. El verdadero problema no es que minen más, es que el precio bajo mata a los pequeños mientras los pools se consolidan. ¿Alguien más ve esto como una señal de centralización silenciosa?

Equivalent_Menu_1096

Honestamente, me rendí hace tiempo con eso. Bitcoin es un termómetro, no un rival. He perdido más tiempo y plata intentando "ganarle" con altcoins que simplemente comprando y holdando BTC. Lo único que me funciona es tener un % pequeño en shitcoins para jugar, pero asumiendo que es casino, no inversión. ¿Alguien más siente que el estrés de buscar el próximo 10x no vale la pena comparado con dormir tranquilo?

Equivalent_Menu_1096

Honestly, I’ve been burned too many times trying to short BTC on lower timeframes. The macro picture might look tempting with that resistance level, but the liquidity grabs these days are insane. Last month I got stopped out on a similar setup when it ripped 2% in minutes on some random news. Are you hedging with anything or just going naked? Curious if you’re seeing any volume divergence to back it up.

liquid_at

Love those posts... BTC low will be Oct/Nov and then we will see 2 years of slow creeping up that will annoy people.

Objective-Street-957

All the money are flowing to the tech/AI, BTC might used to be sound money but Trump/Saylor/Wall St has ruined it for good.

Sure_Value2003

1 BTC = 2 BTC during the bear market. Few understand this

cammmtheemann

yeah, I get what you mean. A lot of crypto people act like the whole financial world begins and ends with BTC candles, which is obviously not true. AI stocks have been the main casino for a while now but that’s kind of my point too. Institutions don’t care about crypto culture or any of that. They just move money between risk assets. when AI gets too crowded, when valuations get stupid, or when liquidity changes, money starts looking for the next trade. maybe it’s not all going into crypto, sure. But crypto is absolutely one of the places that can catch that rotation. so I agree with you that people should watch the broader market. I wouldn’t write crypto off while it’s sitting in fear

siorge

exactly, we're close to the theoretical bottom of the 4y cycle, and everyone is calling crypto dead which, to me, starts to sound like a buying signal. I'll be accumulating BTC and solid coins from the summer until October at least. then we resume the moon mission (also, my wife's bday is on the exact theoretical bottom of the cycle, so I want to open a 40x long on BTC on that day and see where it takes me)

Life-View-1757

BTC is still king honestly. ETH is still around but the ecosystem is way bigger now than it was a few years ago.

CaffeineColonel

BTC was test program it'll be abandoned and something similar will be launched when making the move to crypto (or maybe already did) BtC will be worth in black market transactions only after that.

WishboneSudden2706

BTC = 37k - 41k is the real dip in 2026.

Known_Sympathy_4517

ETFs bleeding doesn't mean institutions stopped buying though. Most institutional buying happens off-exchange through OTC desks and you won't see those flows in real time. Plus when price drops like this, institutions often increase their DCA strategies while retail gets scared and sells The disconnect makes sense when you think about it - retail reacts to short term price action but institutions are playing longer timeline. They probably see current levels as discount compared to where they think BTC will be in 2-3 years. Meanwhile retail is looking at their portfolio down 15% this month and panicking

gordonfr_

Maxing BTC is already stupid (my opinion sorry). Leveraging this is should be a no-go for everybody who has something to loose. If BTC flies to the moon, I want to be on board the ship, but it is no stable path for wealth.

r0cket-b0i

Cycle wise the winter ends around first week of October, and a new bull cycle begins, we all know it - so is this double bottom, it still could be. I think the way BTC price chart looks so far adds extra fun factor to it, I would not want to bet it all on a lower lows in October I would say that there is too much alignment that we should see 39k and all that just like how there was too much expectations for 200k last year. I start now.

ReliantToker

The event you are referencing from early May was a well-documented technical failure where a third-party pricing provider sent a corrupt data tick to Revolut's interface, causing the display to briefly flash to $0.02. There was zero corresponding price dislocation on actual primary liquidity venues like Coinbase, Kraken, or the CME. A retail app experiencing an API feed error is not proof of an evaporated global order book. While wash trading was prevalent in the unregulated offshore exchanges of 2017, the primary volume drivers of today's spot market are regulated Wall Street entities, CME futures, and spot ETF issuers. Highly audited institutions operating under SEC and CFTC oversight are not running illicit spoofing algorithms to fake their multi-billion dollar daily flows. Claiming that a sale of a "few dozen coins" permanently drops the market demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of capital markets arbitrage. Dumping 50 BTC at market might cause fractional slippage of a few basis points on a single, isolated exchange's order book for a matter of milliseconds. However, automated arbitrage instantly capitalizes on that inefficiency, buying the locally discounted asset and selling it on premium venues, to restore global price parity seamlessly. Where do you people even come up with this stuff?

OnChainReturns

The interesting part isn’t the 107 BTC. It’s that wallets inactive for 11 years suddenly moved and coordinated their actions. The burn is almost secondary to the question of *why now?*

Competitive-Fly4732

When you feel confident about throwing money into BTC, just keep going. Once the dip hits and you become fearful, STOP. Wait for a bit, skip one of your weekly/daily/monthly DCA targets, and just wait. Make up your mind, go on with your life, watch reputable YouTube channels that talk about BTC, and read The Bitcoin Standard. Once you feel more confident during the dip, start throwing money in again. It is not a joke. DCA cautiously.

gorgonfr

Thankfully BTC is a liquid asset. There are always buyers and sellers available. The price is determined by offer and demand.

Ced-Invest

This is the cleanest framing in the thread. Gold = hedge against uncertainty with a central-bank bid under it, BTC = proxy for liquidity expectations. They get lumped together but they answer two different questions. What made it click for me was looking at them by marketcap instead of price. Gold's total cap is still roughly 10x BTC even with both off their highs (gold \~$4,200, itself about 25% under its Jan top). So when BTC sells off on tightening expectations, it's not "the hedge failed," it's the liquidity proxy doing exactly what you'd expect when the curve starts pricing hikes instead of cuts. The recession test you mention is the real tell. In a genuine risk-off, the central-bank bid keeps gold standing while BTC reprices with the liquidity outlook. Same reason BTC's been tracking the Nasdaq at like 0.9 correlation lately, it's trading as the high-beta liquidity bet, not the safe haven. Curious where you'd put silver in that split, hedge or liquidity proxy?

Select_Aide_6548

Yeah, I'm a fan. Been into bitcoin since 2013. BTC is trading at $60k because it's trading at $60k. Even as a fan, I'd say it's foolish to say bitcoin "is" $250k in 2-3 years. You don't know that. I don't know that. We can guess/assume/hope for that. Unless your'e a seller today, but happy for low prices. I wish it would crash to $10k or below. I'm still in buy mode. The only reason I haven't bought another 10+ BTC is it's too damn hard to buy them with cash.

Select_Aide_6548

It would be almost impossible for him to start buying up a large supply of coins while also shaking weak hands and getting it cheaper. Unless he wanted to accumulate VERY slowly, each new % of BTC would cost way more than the first. He could get a big chunk from OTC at first, but that would dry up.

K42st

Microstrategy can buy huge amounts of BTC the price doesn’t move, if they sell 32 BTC the price won’t move it is a tiny amount and no one knows where they sold but the important part is they sold so someone bought. News matters but on its own it’s not going to do a lot, leverage is where you’ll find the price moves most it always has been and generally always will be, microstrategy buys will only show positive when liquid supply becomes tighter and that will take time.

CODE_HEIST

I would avoid building the trade around one surprise outcome. For crypto, the useful part is not guessing the exact decision; it is mapping the reaction. If the decision is risk-on but BTC fails to hold higher levels, that is information. If the decision is neutral but liquidity/risk appetite improves and BTC accepts above resistance, that is also information. Trade the conditions after the event, not the headline you hope for before it.

Days_End

> I'm curious how people are thinking about this cycle. If the stock market drops 15-20%, do you expect BTC to: **Drop harder?** I can't belive anyone honestly thinks anything otherwise. Maybe you could argue it could see a stronger faster recovery but even gold sell when there is that big of a drop people want pure cash.

pronebonedetector

buying more BTC on a daily basis

Educational_Cable405

Quick rundown of how these instant swap sites actually work, since people imagine some peer to peer magic. They're just custodians with their own liquidity and exchange accounts. You send USDC, it gets scored by a chain analysis API, and if the score is clean their hot wallet sends you BTC. If it's not clean, the funds sit on hold until you complete the exact KYC you were trying to avoid, and that's spelled out in basically every one of their terms of service. The 'no KYC' part really means 'no KYC unless our compliance vendor says otherwise'.

InfiniteWalrus1066

I think once quantum computing powered by AI takes hold, BTC's encryption will be broken and it'll all be worth £0 (20-30 years time?)

Competitive-Cry-6231

40 years = BTC will be forgotten about.

AnonInvest_DE_NL

Focus on BTC

nsbhq

You’ll feel this way for the next few years, then you’ll feel like a genius. With BTC at least, idk about every other coin.

fan_of_hakiksexydays

Futures are pumping, gold is pumping, dollar is dumping. New "peace agreement" announcement. A perfect opportunity for Bitcoin to rally and at least retake $70K. Meanwhile BTC's big rally with all this going on: $62k to $63K.

Educational_Cable405

There's a mechanical reason the 80% number keeps showing up. Most alts launch with low float and a huge fully diluted valuation, then spend the next two years unlocking tokens to VCs and the team every quarter. So even when the project executes fine, the price has to absorb a constant stream of fresh sell pressure that BTC simply doesn't have. The chart bleeding for months isn't the market rejecting the tech, it's the emission schedule doing exactly what the tokenomics page said it would.

Anonimo1sdfg

Creo que hoy hay opciones interesantes sin tener que recurrir a eso, por ejemplo el ETF BITU es como BTC x2 y tiene un costo anual de mantemiento del que se descuenta del precio de 1.89% aprox. Claro tiene sus riesgos estod instrumentos por lo general no invierten directamente en BTC usan derivados fianceñieros como futuros.

IShootWide

Lol. Bitcoin has the same exact value at $5K that it does at $60K. It does exactly the same thing. And now that every BTC treasury CxO agrees that it’ll never be used in transactions it’s value is essentially $0K. It. Does. Nothing. You’re buying vapor.

ReliantToker

​It is not a matter of fault, but rather a masterclass in capital markets arbitrage to exploit an archaic framework. If executing a mathematically negligible sale satisfies legacy credit rating requirements and unlocks billions to exponentially increase MSTR's overall BTC Yield, why would any rational investor let semantic pride block mathematical superiority?

herefromyoutube

Seriously question. Why invest in a company that invests in BTC when you can just invest in BTC

QuirkyGlove3326

I’m DCAing as usual. If it drops below a certain threshold, and I believe it will, then I will DCA at a faster pace. I have confidence BTC will retain and grow its value over time as fiat inflates. The basis of this confidence is the fact that billionaires, corporations, and countries have started stacking.

Rosenant

Right then they sold 36 and a week later bought 1550. Obviously they don’t really believe in BTC. Or do they? They dumped and pumped.

Sudden_9833

We are the change we want to see <3 BTC

Far_Tiger_2862

That’s an easy one, right back to 2010 and buy 1M Bitcoin at $0.00099 for $990 and sell it all when it hits ATH at $126,000 per BTC for a profit of $126,000,000,000

LionRivr

1. Have stable job & consistent income 2. Pay day-to-day and monthly bills 3. Service all your debt. 4. Contribute to 401k, ROTH or retirement accounts for free company match, tax benefits and S&P500 exposure. 5. Build emergency savings to cover unexpected life events and 6+ months of expenses in case you lose job. 6. Save some for hobbies/fun stuff 7. DCA weekly into BTC. DCA harder when it dips. 8. Do what it takes to increase your income over time. 9. Sleep well consistently. Get sunlight every day. Touch grass. Breathe fresh air. 10. Drink plenty of water. Eat whole foods. Don’t leave out red meat and eggs. 11. Move your body. Strength train. Build muscle. Mobility and injury-prevention exercises. 12. Nurture your relationships. Support your family, friends and community.

LionRivr

1) have a stable, consistent income 2) make sure you can cover monthly/day-to-day bills 3) make sure you can service all current debt 4) make sure to contribute to 401k and ROTH IRA or (other retirement account) if possible. Company match and tax benefits may be worth it. Have it allocated to S&P500. 5) build 6+ months of savings to cover expenses in case you lose your job. 6) DCA weekly into BTC without affecting your finances. Then for dips like this, increase your DCA amount by 1.5x or 2x This has worked for me for 9+ years.

WealthyTuna

I don't get his strategy. At this point he owns both personally and please bliclt through his company around 860,000 BTC. Given that we know there is approximately 2 million BTC that will never move again, he owns around 4.8% of all BTC. I don't understand this I want to own it all mentality. You don't make money if you own the vast majority of it.

GrundleBlaster

Something something cycles and phase shifts. A single green candle doesn't draw buys for BTC, but rather a series of green candles that gather momentum.

TattooedCFO

I get that theory, but with quantum computing deployed across the BTC network, would that not also speed up the confirmation process to keep pace with mining execution?

Psilonemo

I think BTC would front run the break, as it always has. It has the highest beta. It will break first and by the most margin. Gold will as well, but the real question is not which will break first and more, it's which of them will recover all time highs and go on. Me personally, I'm buying both gold and cryptocurrencies that are pure commodities like bitcoin, xmr, xno (no smart contracts or complex service related tokens.) That's just me though. All of us here could be completely wrong and it could very well be that the next 4 years is going to be like the dotcom bust and everything will crash another 50\~70% from here as the mother of all crashes.

ramzreo

No that wouldn’t alter the timeline to the point of BTC going to $0 that’s a bit of a ridiculous claim! Some people put few thousands in at that time so technically speaking if someone would go back in time they’d most certainly do the same. There was literally a free faucet in 2010 giving out 5 free bitcoins a day and here we are. The only timeline shift would be you holding on to it and not selling. Bitcoin would continue to do its own thing and get massively adopted for the same reasons it did cause merely buying into it wasn’t changing the code or how it was built.

Liquidated4life

Bruh, it was a lot more than “half a dozen times”. Saylor’s been spouting the same schtick for years about never selling BTC and trying to own it all.

Snowman33001

On the 5yr, GLD is up 118.9%. BTC is up 77.37%. Yes, it’s bad timing for the chart. But that’s still what it is currently. People see that and get scared. They also saw $100,000 as a “big, scary number,” because of unit bias. If you don’t think it’s been rough, then we just disagree, and that’s fine.

Unlicensed_Uncle

Monopoly money weirdos use on silk road. Imagine those sickos just mailing drugs to each other for BTC....and now they own the world. Good for them. 

jb_in_jpn

Likely yes, but BTC - as an "inflation hedge" investment - is obviously where states are putting down their really big purchases. We can parse any number of edge cases, but then the conversation grinds to a halt.

MrNoodleIncident

That analogy doesn’t work. With a retail sale, you are getting the product (which has a defined value to you) at a cheaper price. The item itself doesn’t devalue. But I understand your broader point of expected future value with BTC.

Reefa513

Don't listen to this guy, that's why no one will remember his name. Go balls deep in periods of extreme fear. I did in 2022 10btc at 20k on home equity line of credit. Sold at 120k. Just bought back that 10 BTC last week at 60k.

Abject-Stretch-1187

This is just what a pump chaser would say. You weren’t saying this nonsense when BTC was up more than 600% in 4yrs 

Sea_Cardiologist_339

People that poured their life savings into BTC at 100k.

jb_in_jpn

We're talking about nation states buying BTC. They're not buying Monero or shitcoins - it's obvious what I meant.

EuphoricChallenge890

You shouldn’t need to sell. There are already products that can lend using BTC as collateral

Free_Entrance_6626

Because at 60k if you buy 1 BTC, you can buy 1.5 BTC at 40k... so the 500k becomes 750k potentially. Thats why it's important to time the bottom

el_rico_pavo_real

But that’s not what Bitcoin is about. All these other shiny toys are a reflection of fiat instability and manipulation. Peel back the layers of the AI CapEx and IPO mania and it’s obvious that BTC will be back with a swift vengeance. BTC is fundamentally sound.

TheRationalPaki

Nobody knows shit about BTC (which is also shit)

radiationholder

xrp is generally on the way down, it is an oscillator, like doge, it goes very high, and then goes down hard, eventually to go very high again generally all the alts this time around didn't do well with the BTC rise. We need to see if the next cycle is better, then the following cycle to really have an idea of what the real future of alts is like.

MSmithRD

The market is still reacting because a single company sold 32 BTC with a legit reason why and it had nothing to do with their confidence in BTC. We'll be seeing it happen for a while.

MSmithRD

If you are buying and holding and confident that BTC will hit 500K in the next 5-10 years, then it's easy. Doesn't matter if it's the absolute bottom. It might go lower, but if you buy at 60k and then it drops to 40k, what does it matter if in 5-10 years it's gonna be 500k anyway. The only downside if those are your beliefs is that had you bought lower you could have owned more when you did buy. Otherwise, you're all good. I bought at a bunch of prices including 118k and I have no regrets/cares because I feel confident I'll get my money back and more in the near future.

ANIAT444

I sent BTC Brisbane > New York via lightning in 6 seconds.

Own_Tomatillo_1369

If you can make way more money in this bull market, why stay with an asset at ~35% down last 12 months? AI replaced BTC for many and they made big gains.

BostonFishGolf

Invest only what you can afford to lose and tell yourself you’re supporting your conviction and future self. Also, find a way to save money. Like if you buy $100 of BTC, skip the next two times you woulda eaten out.

Dehyak

Did exactly what it did 4 years ago, to the month. BTC does what BTC wants

69-Kishaaq1

If BTC goes to 2$ I would!

Public-Cut5571

That's serendipity... A fortunate accident... Now hodl the 1 BTC till it reach $1M USD or hold it forever and use it as collateral to borrow against it in the future and U don't pay tax...

MisterD2112

BTC will hit $400k in 2031.

zenethics

First, it seems more likely than not that BTC at 1m per coin is coming soon. Second, dollars are pretend, and BTC can still be a bad investment if it hits 1m per coin and a gallon of milk is 500 bucks and the S&P is trading at 75,000. Just be careful with the dollars part in the analysis. A million sounds great but what matters most is what that million will buy when BTC hits the number. Goes for the upside too; BTC could be trading at 30 million. Is that good? Who knows. A price measured in future dollars is a moving target and doesn't mean anything unless you also specify how many new dollars we've printed between now and then.

PeeOnDusk

BTC is our only hope. But wait. Bloomberg gets richer if we buy 🌽

Dependent-Stuff-8982

She's gonna fuck up the clarity act. BTC wealth finances her, she will say anything to promote it but the real poltical win is Defi.

polymath_uk

I've never sold in 10 years. But I have my own analysis software which has upper and lower trend lines that each cycle has touched briefly. Except for the current bear where it's dropped eell below, and for the first time over BTC entire history. Even I'm nervous this time. 

MF_Price

Where did you find cheap BTC and what was the price, $45k?

EndSmugnorance

Then why did you say ‘crypto’ instead of ‘BTC’ ?

Gosat

Sell your dollars for BTC you mean?

JamesScotlandBruce

Say 2500 a month. That's 30k a year. So you'll be paying an extra 45 a year for that additional 0.15%. I wouldn't stress about swapping if you're somewhere that you're happy with. That's a millisecond worth in BTC time. 😀 Get it though. No point in paying more than you have to. But equally a lot to be said for the devil you know.

Minimal_Gains

Ik weet het niet wat het wordt met BTC. We gaan het wel zien. Maar zelf heb ik een minder goed gevoel dan ik in de vorige bearmarkt had, ondanks dat de koers nu vele malen hoger is. Maar nogmaals we gaan het zien, mijn gevoel heeft ook wel eens ongelijk.

TapThatYak

You could consider buying BTC 2x perpetuals. What ever risk you can stomach would set the liquidation price based on your account total and margin requirement.

Drumroll-PH

Nobody really knows if BTC hits $150K or $200K this year, and I've learned to be careful with price targets because markets love proving people wrong. If it does make a big move higher, I'd expect the biggest drivers to be continued ETF inflows, favorable macro conditions, and more institutional and corporate adoption rather than any single catalyst. The utility and infrastructure side matters too, but large pools of capital entering the market tend to have the biggest impact on price.

MeanderingMantis

Im confident in it being a retirement saving, rather than a 10 year quick turn over. It could drop, stay the same, or rocket. But money is worth less each year sat in a bank, and the value of BTC is at the end of the day partially influenced by the decreasing purchasing power of currencies

zkrooky

Looking at the full BTC life chart I say the bottom will be around $35K-40K, then it'll probably go to $160K or something.

Boon_Rebu

I got downvoted, but he literally just bought 1550 BTC days after selling just 32 BTC creating a price drop. Price if he had bought before crashing the price: 1550 BTC x 77,135 = 119,559,250 New cost of purchase after causing the price crash: 1550 BTC x 65,332 = 101,264,600

vulnid

You are allowed to purchase BTC whenever you want

LogicalBichon

BTC's reasonable price is $300 but that didn't stop it from going up

__redruM

BTC, who knows, but equities are looking good, but you keep buying gold if it makes your little goldbug heart warm. At the end of 2024 gold hit an ATH of $2600. And that’s a reasonable if high price for gold. Nothing fundamentally changed to get it over $5400, and between Tariff Taco and the Supreme Court simply canceling the Tariff power, the support for gold over $2600 is gone. I mean we’re at war and inflation is over 4%, gold should be going up, but because it’s way, way, overvalued, it’s out of it’s lane. And the price is falling. But keep buying those glittery heavy bags.

icantgiveyou

If all levels of wealth today were measured in BTC you get about 4-5 mil per coin. Maybe 7 accounting for lost one.

oopssomething

Now that the Iran war is over and markets are recovering, what is still worth to buy besided BTC?

69-Kishaaq1

What if BTC heads down to zero? Would it dig itself backup? In how many years?

Affectionate_Ad_8483

Historically, BTC just tanks with everything else.

Perfect-Emu3027

Who knows what purchasing power you'll have with 1 BTC? It's possible the dollar or other world currencies will cease to exist. Anything is possible on this beautiful planet 🤯

ubermensch1001

The one million threshold is probably not as far off as many people think. We are in the early stages of accumulation by both tradfi and governments, including the U.S government. By the 2028 halving, less than 2 years from now, there will be roughly 650k BTC remaining to be mined and by 2032 this drops to about 320k. Within this time frame, you will see widespread adoption by tradfi institutions and the major governments of the world will have actively been accumulating. If the U.S government passes ARMA and begins accumulation for the BTC reserve, you will for sure see other nation states doing something similar. In addition to this, there are already U.S states that are either actively accumulating, Texas, or in the process of passing legislation to start BTC reserves. Again, you will all see this play out within the next 2 to maybe 3 BTC halvings. Now, factor all of what I mentioned above with the fact that most BTC is already being held by wallets that are clearly looking to lock these assets into cold storage for the long term. This means that there is a dwindling supply available to an ever growing pool of demand. What's insane is that we aren't even specifically discussing Microstrategy either, which has effectively captured the bond market by offering a BTC product with fixed yield. Within the next 2-3 years we will see a new all time high. However, I do NOT expect this to take decades before we see the 7 figure milestone. There is so much that has changed since 2022 and previous cycles that I do believe we are not going to see this play out as before.

shosuko

Sort of. BTC can be a reserve, but liquidity is a problem. The larger your position the more at-risk you are to liquidity and fluctuating markets. Even if we presume BTC will trend up over time it is quite obvious watching it charts that a 20-50% swing is not uncommon. If we put an amount of funds into BTC that was significant as a nation it would be very difficult to access these funds. This would be a LOOOONG bet we're talking like 10+ years before any realization. It also opens us to a unique risk. BTC has shown strength in the long term vs other crypto, but it still has wild price swings and ultimately its value is based on the interest and investments of the userbase. If a new crypto comes out or something changes that displaces BTC from the market that valuation can drop to a real 0. Like think about it - even if gold went to 0 we'd still have gold and could do something with it. If BTC drops to zero that means the servers / miners are turned off and the system just shuts down...

valcyclovir

https://preview.redd.it/zhlwdd8a7p6h1.png?width=570&format=png&auto=webp&s=2f83adb942fdf54d326a850ad6783619b1e3987a I'm all in on TRAC, it outperformed every other AI coins, BTC and ETH and has never ever had inflation, generates real revenue from real world companies and are more active than ever. It's my only holding left, if it goes to shit I'm out of crypto.

account009988

Don’t buy alts. BTC/ETH only, nothing else ever

rechtim

and everyone said Saylor was ruining BTC with this 'Strategy' and here Blackrock goes copying his homework. Blackrock only does stuff that makes sense. This is insanely bullish for the long term

CODE_HEIST

Price targets are less useful than the conditions needed to sustain them. For BTC to push toward 150k or 200k, I would want liquidity improving, ETF flows staying positive, leverage not overheating, and spot demand leading perps. If the move is mostly funding and hype, it can unwind fast. I would rather track market structure and flows than anchor on one headline target.

CODE_HEIST

I would not treat it as rotation by default. In a real equity correction, BTC often trades like a liquidity-sensitive risk asset first, even if the long-term story is different. The useful framework is conditions: if yields/liquidity improve while equities cool, BTC can hold up. If everything is de-risking and dollar/liquidity pressure rises, BTC probably gets hit too. Have a plan for both instead of one macro story.