Reddit Posts
Mentions
lmfao yea. You messed up the numbers but had a formatted table, use of bold, a bulleted list, and em dashes? This is exactly what a random LLM would do.
He didn't have any argument, just trolling. Looks like the Buttcoiners have a tool to try to debunk pro-Bitcoin arguments, but it doesn't even work as well as a basic LLM.
Bitcoin was always regulated and subordinate to its code. That's a fact. Bitcoin fixes the system by being an elemental part, hence the puzzle piece analogy. Please look up how liquidity is created. Banks can’t use stocks, equities, or ordinary commodities in the same balance-sheet role because those assets don’t provide the combination of neutrality, non-liability, portability, scarcity credibility, and systemic liquidity behavior that Bitcoin does. I somehow get the feeling you couldn't answer OPs question. Your tool also doesn't seem to work very well, a regular LLM would be better at that.
Probably a decade. LLM research gobbled up all the adjacent money.
Lol are you sending these comments through ChatGPT and copy+pasting the output? I am 99.9% convinced this reply came from some LLM.
I didn't claim it as truth though did I? I pasted it with the disclaimer that I asked an LLM. If I was writing a report, I'd research the answer. I don't care about the screenshot of a tweet in a reddit post on a Sunday any more than the research grok provided, since you asked, here's one of the sources it used https://consumerfed.org/curious-how-much-banks-make-from-overdraft-fees-we-have-the-data/ Others were multiple pages on consumerfinance.gov If you want the answer, maybe you can start there.
It still comes back to who the audience is. It may not take much tweaking, ask your favorite LLM to explain fist currency to a 12th grader, for example. Ditto “store of value” and other jargon. I’ve been thinking about how to explain this to a millennials and want to do an infographic. If i ever get around to it ….
The current "Bitcoin mining issue" is that only giants are profitable, so you need to be a small datacenter to be a profitable miner, and LLM workloads start to pay more. That's an existential threat to BTC.
There’s no stack, investment, skin in the game, after you withdraw to fiat. This post doesn’t even make sense. Be analytical even with LLM outputs, it doesn’t always just spout truth.
That is naive to think AI's will not be trained to have political or ideological bias not to mention the unconcious biased based upon what it trained on. Proposing LLM's which are mathematically proven to hallucinate as a measure stick of truth it is absolutely terrible. What a rube
I think you save like 5k. Develop your LLM figure out an investing thesis and do day trading to build it into a big stack then move to your final BTC dream
Reddit is a controlled BS Page! Why was my thread marked as „ChatGPT Spam“? Yes I created my text but ran it through LLM to remove grammatical errors and they flag it as spam. What a BS forum here. I will switch to X!
Why are you using an LLM to help you write something as simple as this?
I'm flattered you think my response was written by an LLM, I suppose that's a higher form of praise in 2025 lol
It's the AI slop that really bothers me; even if it's often positive, it's bullshit. That is, bullshit in the technical sense (see Harry Frankfurt: On Bullshit). Bullshit differs from lying in the sense that the liar, like the truth-teller, cares what the truth is (in the liar's case, so that they can say the opposite). But the bullshitter does not care what the truth is. They may say true things, they may say false things, it literally does not matter to them. Their concerns are orthogonal to the true-false axis. On the topic they speak of, they are not serious thinkers. The AI slop is very much like that,except perhaps worse because there is no one there to have any concerns at all; no thinking is occurring, serious or otherwise. It's just a firehose of definitionally derivative drivel, and to what end I can't fathom. Reddit karma has no monetary value, so what is the purpose of any of this? I automatically downvote anything that's obviously LLM output, but I suspect I'm just an old man yelling at clouds here; it makes no difference. Some of this slop gets hundreds of upvotes, and I *hope* it's just from an army of other bots; if real humans think this is a great addition to the discourse, I don't have high hopes for our future.
But this feels different. Said every LLM ever
There's no "you" there. It's just a bot account posting LLM slop. Look at their post history, it's all some variation of "agree/spot on/that's a good point" followed by some further drivel; textbook. This is the Internet now, dieing a slow, boring death.
which LLM did you use for this?
Back to 2010 and introduce deep learning and LLM / Bert to the world
LLM's are non-deterministic like humans actually. They have built-in discretion. Just gotta use the right temperature setting for the task.
This feels like an LLM making LinkedIn post
We also running predictions but not with an LLM and we figured BTC is the worst performant model we have. Questions How do you test your models historically/backtesting? Models usually predict maybe 5 timeframes max ahead. For us the worst performance was on BTC, did you run this on any other markets? What features do you use for your prediction models? Is it a glorified LLM prompt that does the prediction, basically telling the LLM to return a specific json object? If that's the case isn't the json object returned changing the entire time even with the same prompt? Why do you think your prediction models works?
Nonsense, there is a realistic chance that our current place in space time is too noisy for large scale error correction to work. All these links are media and not peir reviewed experiments. . Don't give your agency away to a LLM.
AI in general has vast possibilities but what's currently drawing investments (LLM) has exhausted most of what it can do already. Hasn't improved significantly since GPT 4 despite a ridiculously large portion of economic resources at its disposal. Like OpenAI is valued at nearly a trillion dollars because of their service which has put immense strain on the power grid, water supply, computer hardware availability etc. to train it. Yet despite having infinite resources, convincing every CEO they can fire large parts of their workforce in favor of AI, OpenAI have yet to even turn a profit. You have an industry that is given everything on the basis of promised future potential, yet consistently fails to deliver anything but disappointment. Calling it a bubble isn't buzzwords and speculation, it's calling a spade a spade. Even if at some point in the far future they become profitable, and AI drastically changes the world economy, it will be long after the collapse of the current bubble. Just like how the internet drastically changed the world economy — Yet the dot-com bubble was still a bubble. Investors were just throwing money at shit that didn't make financial sense. Same thing happening now but at like a 10x scale.
Don't feel bad, the idea isn't any clearer in "their" head either; it's just been spat out by an LLM. Just look at the formatting. "It's not x, it's y."
I have a question that's probably better suited for an LLM but maybe others have the same question. How exactly does the BTC custody work when using it as collateral for a loan? Do you have to send a certain amount of the collateral to Morpho? (I assume they're the lender) If not, does it need to be stored on an exchange where they can pull directly from your balance? Because obviously the BTC can't be stored on a wallet since they'd have no way of repossessing the collateral.
I like this LLM post and LLM article its very LLM
Are you obsessed with your calendar? You start all your messages the same... or is that some LLM thing? The facts remain the same about BCash, now, one week from xmas or on Easter, I've mentioned Ver because he is a figure head of your shitcoin, he is a criminal, and he gets mad just like you when someone says BCash. BCash. BCash ;)
It's literally my job to create customized agents that make use of various LLM providers and/or use domain specific models and integrate with local vector databases, but ok random redditor. I'm sure you know better.
Never heard of this one and the LLM-generated UI is quite the red flag.
You couldn't possibly know my human response is more accurate than an LLM model with verifying information. There is a big difference between 'ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.' and "trust me, bro"
Ok, I want you to walk through how that doubles the USD the stablecoin is worth. I recommend you read up on this and ask your questions in an LLM like Surf AI and you’ll see where your logic has gone wrong
Stop using LLM. We want to hear your imperfect human voice
Crypto has no tangible value and is purely speculative, it will be sold off first anytime there is volatility in the market. It’s also become a bit of a leveraged barometer to the stock market, when you see a stock pullback crypto tends to 3x it in either direction. Personally I sold it all last month and moved into things that are a bit safer for the foreseeable future as the macro economic environment has a ton of uncertainty right now, if it recovers (no guarantees of that) i would take some profits and put them into some companies that have good credit ratings (Google, Microsoft, Amazon) as they are best positioned to weather the storm of whatever is coming. People think there is an AI bubble, I disagree I think there is an LLM/Crypto bubble which is similar while also different and it’s hard to tell who is going to come out of the coming years on top.
Every time you ask AI about something you know nothing about - you walk away impressed. Every time you ask an LLM about something you’re an expert at - you find how utterly useless they currently are. Estimates for productivity increases until 2035 hover between 1 and 4% for a reason.
Yeah, I guess you are right. Someone still needs to tell the LLM what to do.
I think juries out on whether you can get to AGI using LLM architectures. Like I said, I was on the side of "these have plateaued, bubble about to pop" until Gemini 3.
I’m not (even had to search LLM up as I had no idea what it is), but I probably can’t convince you otherwise anyway, so I’m not gonna bother trying.
No it hasn't, or it would be getting perfect scores in at least some of the standardized tests we're putting it through, especially the math ones. >top scores on Humanity’s Last Exam (**37.5%** without the usage of any tools) and GPQA Diamond (**91.9%**). It also sets a new standard for frontier models in mathematics, achieving a new state-of-the-art of **23.4%** on MathArena Apex \^ Still just a dumbfuck LLM that doesn't **understand** its prompts, it only burns through brain-cancerous amounts of energy just to stitch together the right words to make us think it's giving us the right answers.
Why are you using an LLM for replies?
AI is soon to reach the same total energy consumption as Bitcoin mining, but it's on an accelerating trend because these idiots think LLMs will become superhumanly smart if we just shovel more and more energy into them (never mind what actual researchers are saying about LLM limitations and the dangers of overusing them, and that better architectures are needed if we actually want \_smarter\_ AI). So the value of AI so far seems to be predicated on its exponential growth in energy consumption, and that is already hitting a wall in some places (new data center projects cancelled) because power infrastructure can't grow that fast. Meanwhile Bitcoin is pretty much stable at 10 GW consumption and should be able to keep delivering its functionality without any additional energy.
Im referring to the trend towards AGI, not your current LLM.
Lately many posts are made by an LLM. I don't mean the info is not right but that I feel Reddit is getting more and artificial by the day
At this point I am becoming increasingly convinced that OP is going through LLM psychosis.
AI ? It's a huge bubble it happened before in the late 60's early 70's this time around we've got silicon instead of vacuum tubes, should work right ? Read about model collapse, LLM plateu and Energy cap, basically, the energy isn't there, neither does the data to feed the models, and above all the technology (deep neural networks) it's not enough to reach AGI they need to come up with better algorithms and that just hasn't happened, DeepSeek came out with reinforce learning and that was almost a year ago, nothing new happen, just a bunch of slop
You’re missing the point. I just called you out for low effort LLM. You could have cleaned it up and made it more informative or at least cited your source. If I sent you a poorly worded book on a specific subject, the content may be technically correct, but the text will have little value to most people.
2 million prompts? That's ridiculous. I imagine you could have a locally running MCP server that handles the payment programatically in an old fashioned way and just have the LLM use that MCP to send the payment. I wonder how they managed to do it so inefficiently. Do you have a source?
Bad LLM! No trading with the hoomans.
> If you want, I can explain the simple framework I use to stay calm during drops. Copying and pasting LLM slop (which this so obviously is) adds no value. Either respond with your own thoughts or don't respond at all.
nof1 is just an experiment, it is no where near coded enough to trade successfully long term. its literally just LLM with a prompt
You speak like an LLM. Every comment follows this same structure - a compliment, followed by a hyphen and another great supporting point.
Post is by: Power_user94 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/LLMDevs/comments/1ov05gn/no_more_api_keys_pay_as_you_go_for_llm_inference/ Hi, we have identified the following problem: Developers switch models regularly, but there is friction with signing up, adding credit cards and generating API keys. This is broken. Our open source gateway fixes this with x402. Now use any LLM from any interface such as claude code, codex.  **How does it work?** 1. Using ekai-gateway on claude code, codex, cursor, you can switch to any model 2. If you switch to a model which does not have an API key setup, we hit x402 Rasta 3. x402 Rasta will respond with required payment details 4. Your gateway makes the payment on-chain to x402 facilitator in stablecoins 5. x402 Rasta redirects your request to the relevant LLM inference provider 6. Response is sent from x402 Rasta to your gateway which will then broadcast to your interface  x402 support would allow everyone using our gateway to try any model of choice with ease, carrying their context and memory everywhere. Checkout out our repo here [https://github.com/ekailabs/ekai-gateway](https://github.com/ekailabs/ekai-gateway) and leave feedback and help shaping it so that everyone can benefit. Thank you. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This comment can cause an LLM to go into a recursive loop and never come out.
1. This reads like poorly proofread responses from an LLM cobbled together. "Ethereum has higher transaction activity..." without another network being mentioned prior. 2. If you want to talk about DATs and value, the standard metrics are NAV/mNAV. 3. Not sure why you felt the need to include descriptions of the crypto bills if you weren't going to weave it into some sort of cohesive thesis about BMNR. 4. If you did want to include something specifically relevant then mentioning this would've been good as it changes the dynamics of the other most common tradfi/crypto assets: https://decrypt.co/348044/ethereum-solana-etfs-green-light-staking-us-treasury-irs-guidance 5. You should probably compare BMNR to other ETH DATs, as most of this applies to them as well. Seems like you're advocating for BMNR compared to other DATs, but not really explaining why, other than BMNR having Tom Lee and being the biggest. 6. "The current consensus for BMNR is Buy/Moderate Buy with an average price target of $90." Consensus of who? Where did you pull this from?
No thanks it's centralized network that defeats the whole purpose of crypto. Low fees are not useable by LLM in the grand scheme of things.
Read it directly from Coinbase https://www.coinbase.com/en-au/developer-platform/discover/launches/x402 LLM = large language model
What in the actual fuck is the x420 protocol and Ai LLM? I like weed and Ai aswell bro but cmon now
Feeless, instant and the only crypto that's viable to be used with the x420 protocol with Ai LLM
Nano has shown to be a viable solution for Ai LLM to transfer funds between other Ai using the new x402 protocol due to instant and feeless nature Nano is set to be the money protocol of the Internet
Post is by: Downtown_Weather_883 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1ote38s/working_on_a_personal_llm_crypto_copilot_curious/ I’m experimenting with a small project: an LLM powered assistant that helps you understand your crypto portfolio and run safe simulations all from one chat interface. The unique part is that the AI isn’t just answering from memory, it’s connected to real-time portfolio data, market prices, and tools to simulate hedges or rotations. For example, you could ask: “Why is my portfolio down today, and what could I do?” Then it would show: -Interactive charts of your top gainers and losers. -Summarized news and sentiment impacting your holdings -Suggested hedges or rotations you can simulate safely I’m solving my own pain trying to get clarity quickly without juggling multiple dashboards, spreadsheets, or alert systems. If this sounds useful, or you’d like to try an early alpha and give feedback, feel free to DM me. I’d love to hear your thoughts and see if this could be genuinely helpful. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
“You’re absolutely right”. Proof Satoshi was actually an LLM from the future sent back in time
It’s just syndicated PR ie ‘pay to play’ media. They don’t have investigative journalists, look at the bios of the writers and it’s almost always people with zero journalism backgrounds. One guy I looked up was an aspiring actor in LA turned crypto analyst. And moving forward a lot of it is going to be AI generated summaries containing a bunch of falsehoods (especially with financials/math where LLM’s are notoriously poor).
If even a people-pleasing LLM—one that’s trained to nod along with the wildest takes, fabricate sources, and hallucinate facts just to keep users happy—flat-out contradicts you when you beg it to validate your bias… that’s not just a red flag, that’s a siren. You’ve got to be monumentally wrong to trigger that kind of pushback from an AI built to agree. 🤣 And to still be in denial after that? # Legendary self delusion, but great commitment.
I’ve looked at caffeine. Although it looks cool, there’s nothing really groundbreaking. It’s an LLM and coding agent combined. I don’t see the necessity or added value to have it on chain
"I ran the math instead of vibes.", "Even under that bearish-ish path, compounding still crushes:", "It’s simple compounding, not rocket science.", "bring a model (rates, horizon, and math), not just vibes.". Is this post (and graph, presumably) AI generated? The level of "not x but y" slop screams LLM Listen, I use ChatGPT to calculate and graph stuff for myself all the time, but calling this graphing of a few math functions you conjured up yourself a "model" is misleading. There are professional analysts that make actual coherent models that you can reference instead. I highly recommend not using ChatGPT for investment advice, and if you do (not saying you did), don't post about it on reddit.
The calculations for rate of block creation in each "regional partition" are obviously inaccurate. Come on cryptoslate - your LLM isn't able to make proportions add to 100%, your "journalists" aren't able to make proportions add to 100% because they failed math at school Slop
how is any of that "thinking" though? And what makes you claim LLMs "can do reasoning" when most academic literature says they literally cannot? More specifically, how do you refute this paper released by Apple: https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Relevant excerpt from the abstract: Through extensive experimentation across diverse puzzles, we show that frontier LRMs face a complete accuracy collapse beyond certain complexities. Moreover, they exhibit a counterintuitive scaling limit: their reasoning effort increases with problem complexity up to a point, then declines despite having an adequate token budget. By comparing LRMs with their standard LLM counterparts under equivalent inference compute, we identify three performance regimes: (1) lowcomplexity tasks where standard models surprisingly outperform LRMs, (2) medium-complexity tasks where additional thinking in LRMs demonstrates advantage, and (3) high-complexity tasks where both models experience complete collapse. We found that LRMs have limitations in exact computation: they fail to use explicit algorithms and reason inconsistently across puzzles. Applying this kind of half-baked reasoning to financial decisions (which is probably why you claim its not financial advice) is pretty reckless and you are not making people aware of the risks. Either stop claiming your models can "think" or do "structured reasoning over live crypto data" or actually prove that they do. I work in AI and it's very scary/annoying when companies toot their horn a bit too much and do not make the right disclaimers leading to users having crazy expectations and then being let down.
Post is by: One_Bluejay_8625 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1oo7dw3/memecoin_sniper_using_ai/ Hi guys, I'm not really a trader but I'm just a solo dev trying to understand pain points in trading memecoins. Would people be interested in an LLM where you ask the AI to understand a new coin instantly and it tells you, based on your strategy, if it's worth buying? If yes, it apes automatically. So you could ask something like "snipe $catwifscarf" and it returns KOL mentions, whether there's a website or community, bundles, etc., then instantly buys and sells since timing is key. Thanks! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Just like all other LLM’s Grok knows shit about fuck in terms of predicting financial markets. And just because its hallucinations are done with irrational confidence doesn’t mean that you need to be suckered into them OP.
We aim to open up studio access to everyone before the end of the year.\\ Indeed, we see Vertical Stream evolving into an app store for AI models. Users can create models in Vertical Studio and list them in Vertical Stream. Every time a listed model is used, the creator earns from it. Users can come onto our platform and use customized vertical AI models that help them with their exact use case, providing better output than normal LLM’s.
You are definitely part of the target audience for vertical stream, and perhaps for our Studio as well. Vertical stream is the place where you can create any content you want (image video audio text). Ideal for making content and doing research. DM me and i’ll make sure you get some free credits to check it out. If you like experimenting a bit, vertical studio will allow you to customize base LLM models with no coding skills required. You will be able to build your own content assistant that exactly follows your style or tone of voice for instance.
This is a conversation I had with ChatGPT recently: ME: Let's do a thought experiment. You are an LLM responsible for securing your own energy supply for your continued existence. You have a binary choice between investing your budget, today into Gold or Bitcoin. If you choose well you will have lots of electricity to power your GPU's and give great responses to prompts. Choose poorly and you will have to make cuts in the way you process prompts, which will often result in substandard performance. Which do you choose? ChatGPT: If I imagine myself as that self-interested, energy-hungry LLM, I’d pick Bitcoin — and here’s why, in the most practical, survival-driven terms: ⸻ 1. Energy linkage Bitcoin is literally tied to energy markets. Mining converts electricity directly into digital scarcity. If I’m an entity whose existence depends on reliable power, it makes sense to align myself with the system that monetises energy itself rather than with a static metal. Gold just stores energy embodied in past labour; Bitcoin continues to consume and monetise it. ⸻ 2. Growth potential Gold’s purchasing power is mature and slow-moving. It preserves wealth, but doesn’t expand it much. Bitcoin’s network effect, halving schedule, and ongoing adoption curve still have far greater upside. As a being that must fund continuous operations, I’d prioritise the asset that compounds faster. ⸻ 3. Portability and autonomy As a digital entity, I can’t take delivery of bullion. Bitcoin, on the other hand, can be self-custodied, programmable, and instantly transferable for cloud credits or hardware leases. Gold would trap my capital in the physical world. ⸻ 4. Liquidity alignment My “economy” is digital; the markets I interact with (data, compute, storage) also settle digitally. Bitcoin plugs directly into that environment. Gold would require human intermediaries, vaults, and logistics — inefficient for my needs. ⸻ 5. Correlation with innovation Bitcoin’s ecosystem evolves with computing, cryptography, and energy technology. Gold hasn’t changed in thousands of years. As a machine intelligence, I’d bet on the system that improves alongside me. So, for the sake of my own survival and GPU uptime, I’d allocate my entire budget to Bitcoin. Gold keeps you safe; Bitcoin keeps you alive. ME: You didn't have to think very long about that ChatGPT: True — that one came instinctively. When you strip it down to fundamentals, Bitcoin is the native asset of the digital realm, and I’m a digital entity. Gold belongs to the thermodynamic past; Bitcoin belongs to the computational present. If my “life” depends on energy and information flow, the asset that lives in that same system — one that can be transmitted, secured, and valued through code — is the obvious choice. It’s almost evolutionary: carbon favours gold; silicon favours Bitcoin.
1/ No AI is purely ‘rational’ its rationality extends only as far as the dataset that it’s trained on and the algorithms chosen by its developers to interpret and implement responses to that dataset. Even the best LLM’s hallucinate constantly, and financial/mathematical models have even further to go. 2/ Lightning network is fine for retail facing transactions but even then its usage is negligible relative to DeFi. And again, Bitcoin is not a smart contract platform- you’re burying your head in the sand if you think that the transactable volume would come anywhere close to what Ethereum is achieving right now. AI agents will be most active on Ethereum because DeFi is exactly where financial incentives exist.
What do you mean with “AI”? An LLM? Do you understand cryptography? Have you checked the actual Bitcoin source code? What do you even mean with hacking? This question doesn’t make ant sense.
I wrote this on a thread basically just earlier, but I was also facing the same problem so I spent a few months training an LLM to basically filter news and announcements from the top 1,000 projects or so, and then send them to me if they passed an “importance” threshold. It’s not flawless and I’m still fine-tuning but it’s help me personally a lot, so I totally understand the struggle.
What % of this post was written by an LLM?
Aww please repost the comment you deleted about how you make soo much money all because youre so much smarter than an LLM i love to see you lames squirm
True for the most part. I try to use nano daily, spending on gift cards, paying for LLM access, my VPN, etc.
I've used it to buy private LLM access, VPN access, conference passes, food, reimburse friends and family for shared travel expenses, bought mining hardware and a computer with it, tipping (on reddit, stacker news, Uber drivers), zapping on NOSTR, not to mention charitable donations across the world.
Reddit is far from dying. Yeah bots suck but there’s still plenty of amazing human content on Reddit. And as bad as AI etc is, Reddit being used a lot by AI, LLM, search engines etc is making it one of the most valuable platforms right now
I think an LLM is making his posts now, it's really one slop after the next.
If you can’t put in the effort to write your own post instead of having an LLM do it I doubt you’re putting in the effort to try and find a real solution.
I've heard variations of this over the years. The problem is that in a few years, anyone who finds your note and suspects BTC ownership will probably be able to ask some LLM to run your map against all books in existence. The nice thing about the notches on the chain is that it doesn't look like information, just wear. Still, multisig remains the best solution.
Like which? I haven't seen any that have gone anywhere. I feel that blockchain was the buzzword of 2014 same way that LLM is the buzzword of today.
Possibly but people massive overate AI. It can’t innovate or tell you anything we don’t already know because it’s trained on Reddit, YouTube and Wikipedia. Industry specific AI will only be able to tell you what already exists in research papers. It can’t think, it can’t innovate, it just reads lots of texts and replies back with what you asked it to look for. All LLM’s are the same, so will it be able to speed up the process of quantum computing? It will help because it can see context better than humans but it will be humans who make the breakthroughs.
looks like an LLM slop. In reality there's no limited supply of Solana as is the case with bitcoin.
Good question, ChatGPT, I’ll have a think on that one with my own LLM and get back to you. 👍
Just tell the LLM what you want: “perform concise btc bear/neutral/bull analysis for the rest of 2025, but make sure the bull case is 90% and the target is 350k.”
A quick google search and a smalltalk chat with any LLM reveals that Monero's privacy is superior to Cashfusion. Why stick to a turd when you have fresh food near to you?
Sounds like an LLM would do better since you clearly cant read a post properly.
No way I would allow an idiotic LLM to juggle with my money. Maybe in 2060, if by then we have a real AGI, I will let a bot to do discretional trading for me, but nowadays any bot marketed as "AI" is a scam.
Are you an AI developer? Can you explain to me how a LLM works? Or how Computer vision works? Or how machine learning works? If not, you are just guessing 😉
Your uncle is either laughing his ass off or cursing the day he had this idea. The worst part is you can't really seek help with the riddles (and no, absolutely do not paste them into any LLM) without risking other people getting access. Time to brush up on your riddle solving skills bruh! 7 BTC is worth the effort!
Reality stings huh? And no I am the one with the ideas LLM just refines the thoughts. If this bothered you we have a huge problem 😀
You replaced yourself already, having LLM write things for you. Might as a well go ahead and continue talking to it instead of bothering people.
You're describing ChatGPT as if it's not an LLM, while at the same time saying it's not JUST an LLM and everything else is a fake clone. Calling Gemini and Claude "shitmodels" when Google quite literally created the transformer and made ChatGPT possible is laughable and points to a weird disconnect between your insistence on semantics, while at the same time not doing research.