API

Single_Mushroom9283

>So far I have looked into the big ones like CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko, but all of them do not include historic price data and require premium subscriptions. Hey, from the [CoinGecko API Pricing page](https://www.coingecko.com/en/api/pricing), the Demo API provides 1 year of historical daily and hourly data (Price, Mcap, etc) for free. It works for both aggregated data on CoinGecko and also onchain DEX data via GeckoTerminal. But you're right on [CMC API](https://coinmarketcap.com/api/pricing/), it doesn't provide historical data for free.

Fun-Information78

I’ve got a bot running on TRON that processes 50+ transactions daily, and manually freezing TRX to get energy just isn’t scalable anymore. It’s fine for occasional use, but for automation, it’s a nightmare. I’ve been searching for a way to automate energy top-ups without having to constantly monitor resource levels. Ideally, I’d love something with an API that integrates directly with my scripts. If anyone’s found a reliable solution for this kind of setup, I’d love to hear about it.

No_House_3367

1. Verify the wallet address Open Wasabi Wallet → create/copy a receiving address. - Make sure the address starts with \`bc1...\` (SegWit address). It’s recommended to generate a new address and test again. 2. Check the withdrawal amount- Ensure that the amount you want to withdraw is greater than the network fee requirement Generally, it should be at least 0.0001 BTCo initiate successfully. 3. Contact Cudo Miner support- Go to the \[Cudo Miner Support page\](https://www.cudominer.com/contact/) or join their Discord/Telegram community. Provide a screenshot of the error + your wallet address (do \*\*not\*\* share your private key!). - Mention the error “apiErrors.500” so they can check the backend logs. 4. Try using another withdrawal address- If Wasabi addresses are not supported, you can first withdraw to a mainstream wallet (such as Exodus, Electrum, or Trust Wallet) and then transfer from there to Wasabi. This is a common intermediate solution. 5. Wait for system fix- If it’s indeed a Cudo API issue, you may need to wait until their technical team resolves it.

sgtslaughterTV

I think the fastest API I've seen belongs to the website "cryptocompare," but if I'm being honest it also is not cheap.

AutoModerator

Post is by: NekkoBea and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1neke1h/looking_for_a_reliable_api_for_crypto_trading_in/ I’m experimenting with algorithmic trading bots. Most APIs I found are tied to Binance or Bybit, but they’re in USDT. Anyone know an INR API for spot trading? I’m experimenting with algorithmic trading bots. Most APIs I found are tied to Binance or Bybit, but they’re in USDT. Anyone know an INR API for spot trading? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

drunkenhealls22

So i wouldn't these are locks but this is what im looking at tonight. Avantis,mamo, (these three are tied to the guy who beat Elon as richest man...could be something?)UMA,API3,BAND and then im also looking at spark. I havent charted these and these are not my real investments. Just saying im a gambler and i hit when on what no one talks about so far this year

RefrigeratorLow1259

Based on the technical details provided and the architecture of Cardano wallets, you are correct: Cardano isn't specifically targeted by this exact attack. Here's why: No window.ethereum equivalent: The malicious code in this particular attack specifically targets the window.ethereum JavaScript object, which is an API standard for interacting with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Cardano wallets, which are built on a different architecture (e.g., UTxO, Haskell-based), do not use this object. Different development frameworks: The primary development libraries and toolchains for Cardano are often in languages like Haskell or Rust. While JavaScript SDKs like @cardano-sdk/wallet and cardano-wallet-js exist, they are not based on the EVM and do not use the window.ethereum object to interact with the blockchain. Therefore, the specific malicious payload that caused this recent panic would not affect a Cardano wallet. However, it is crucial to understand that Cardano wallets are not immune to supply-chain attacks in general. If a Cardano wallet developer were to use a different compromised library from npm, for example, it could be just as vulnerable. This incident serves as a stark reminder for all software wallets to vet their third-party dependencies rigorously.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; SwissBorg, a Swiss crypto wealth management platform, suffered a hack resulting in the theft of 193,000 Solana (SOL) tokens worth $41 million. The breach occurred due to a vulnerability in the API of its staking partner, Kiln. Only users of SwissBorg's Solana Earn program were affected, accounting for 1% of its customer base. SwissBorg pledged to reimburse affected users and is collaborating with agencies and exchanges for investigation. The company remains financially stable, and daily operations are unaffected. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Mission-Shoulder6279

Security Guardrails for UIGent Data isolation: Each service runs in isolated Docker containers with dedicated Redis databases (0/1) and PostgreSQL schemas, preventing cross-contamination between users' data flows. Credential management: API keys and tokens are never stored in generated code - they're injected at runtime through environment variables managed by the orchestrator service, with MinIO providing encrypted artifact storage. Read-only normalization: Forge only generates read-safe SDK wrappers and tool catalogs - it never directly executes against user APIs, that's handled by the sandboxed Atlas workers with resource limits (3GB RAM, timeout controls). Deterministic outputs: Content-addressable spec IDs ensure reproducible, auditable transformations - users can verify exactly what code was generated from their API docs. Zero-persistence execution: Atlas workers execute in ephemeral environments with ARQ job TTLs, ensuring sensitive data isn't retained beyond the immediate workflow execution.

Mission-Shoulder6279

Most basic example that comes to mind is our main demo with defi llama. They ahave a LOT of data and their API is not the simplest (nor is it written in the best way possible🤣) took us less than a day to fully agentify it and you can now process pretty complex requests through our demo that would take quite some time with the actual defi llama app or api. For example complex data dashboards, analytics, comparisons, even mini games We tried a prompt that gave us a snake game where u could play either as raydium or pumpswap and the speed of the snake was different in correlation to the change of volume over the past week

leaflavaplanetmoss

OP neglected to mention that Chainalysis traced the wallet address to having taken in or sent funds out to a mixer, two sanctioned exchanges, and a scam address, according to a later tweet I'm the same thread. The mixer and the scam address are less of a concern, but exposure to sanctioned entities is often a no-go, even indirectly, since routing your transfers through multiple hops is trivial. However, the project should really have screened for unsupportable exposure before having accepted any funds from the wallet by screening the wallet when it connected to the front end. However, since you could still technically call the smart contract directly and avoid the UI, it could use something like Chainlink to connect to a blockchain risk API like Chainalysis and have the smart contract execute the screening code directly. That would let the contract fail any transaction attempt from an unsupportable address.

Mission-Shoulder6279

Right now UI\_UI isn’t locked into a single giant model like Gemini or ChatGPT. Instead, it uses a hybrid setup: open-source foundation models (like LLaMA derivatives) fine-tuned for UI interaction, plus specialized tools like OCR, headless browsers, and Python runtimes inside the micro-VMs. That means the “AI” isn’t just a chatbot API — it’s an agent that can actually read a site, write code, and take actions. And because the stack is modular, the team can swap in stronger models as they evolve, without being tied to any one provider.

Mission-Shoulder6279

Awesome question — happy you’re here! Right now, UI\_UI runs as a dedicated platform — kind of like a command center where you give natural language instructions, and agents handle everything from web tasks to API calls inside secure micro‑VMs. But a browser extension is coming soon, too. That’ll let you bring agents directly into the websites you’re already using — so instead of switching platforms, you’ll be able to activate an agent *in context*, right on the page you’re on. As for personal authentication — UI\_UI handles that securely. You can pass API keys, connect wallets, or do one-time auth flows, and the agents will use those credentials inside the isolated VM just for your task. No data leaks, no re-use — just private, controlled execution.

My_Man_Tyrone

Kraken Pro with an API script but that isn't "easy"

whatwilly0ubuild

Cross-chain transaction debugging tools are absolutely terrible right now. I work at an engineering consultancy and we see this shit daily with our clients building DeFi protocols and wallet infrastructure. The current landscape is a mess of block explorers that don't talk to each other, transaction traces that stop at bridge contracts, and debugging workflows that require like 6 different tools just to figure out why a transaction failed across chains. Etherscan, Polygonscan, whatever, they're all isolated silos. What I really want is something that can trace a transaction from start to finish across multiple chains and show you the actual execution flow. Like if I bridge USDC from Ethereum to Polygon and something breaks, I want to see the entire path, not just fragments. The closest thing is Tenderly but it doesn't handle cross-chain scenarios well and their API is expensive as hell for production use. Another gap is real MEV monitoring for regular users. Sure, flashbots has dashboards for searchers but normal people getting rekt by sandwich attacks have no visibility into what happened. Our customers who build trading interfaces constantly ask about this. They want to show users when they got MEV'd and by how much, but there's no good API that covers all the different MEV types across chains. Portfolio tracking is oversaturated but they all suck at DeFi positions. They can handle basic token balances but try tracking your actual PnL from liquidity providing across multiple pools and protocols and they fall apart. The math gets complex with impermanent loss, reward tokens, and compounding, and most tools just give up or show wrong numbers. Smart contract testing and simulation tools are getting better but still pretty clunky. Most teams try to duct-tape these systems together with Foundry and some custom scripts but there's definitely room for something more integrated. Especially for testing upgrade scenarios and cross-protocol interactions. The one thing that's almost there but not quite is decent alerting infrastructure. You can set up basic price alerts everywhere but try setting up alerts for smart contract events, unusual transaction patterns, or governance proposals and you're back to building custom monitoring. Data pipelines, cryptography, and ML are unforgiving if you cut corners so whatever gets built needs to actually work reliably, not just look good in demos.

Yousif_Ahmed_1

Thank you so much for that extra detail. "Error while getting invoice" is a different issue than a 404, and it's very helpful to know. This sounds like a script or API error on the page itself, which confirms that the geo-blocking is likely the root cause (it's blocking the invoice data from loading, not the whole page). I know it's a lot to ask, but does using a VPN solve this specific error for you as well? That would confirm our theory. I truly appreciate you taking the time to troubleshoot this with me. It's frustrating that these technical barriers exist.

Steadbrisk

Hello!!! Thanks for the AMA. Not sure if this is possible on your side, but you’ve mentioned automatic API rewriting and site parsing as key features. Do you have plans to open-source your agent spec so that other developers and platforms can build compatible agents? By such, creating an open ecosystem rather than a closed one?

cmxhere

Hii, you mention about automatic rewriting and request enrichment to make messy data usable. So, I would just like to ask a question on what’s the most complex API or site your agents have successfully parsed and improved, and what was the outcome? any surprising or unexpected results you can point out?? Thanks.

RealVoldemort

Are you using your own AI model? Or using something like Gemini or chatgpt API?

AutoModerator

Post is by: js-psyll and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1n8j9fs/4_years_solo_grind_now_psyllcom_is_live/ Hey traders 👋 After 4 years of grinding solo (in the basement, of course), I finally launched [Psyll.com](http://Psyll.com) \- a platform for automated trading. I built everything myself from bots, execution system, backend and frontend to UI design, testing countless iterations, and finally deploying it live. Connect your exchange via API, run bots that send buy/sell signals, and always stay in control of your funds. Transparency is key – all bot handles and live stats are fully visible. Feedback, suggestions, or first impressions are very welcome! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Neat-Emu-8731

Imo, a unified crypto dashboard that actually works across all chains, CEX + DEX, NFTs, and DeFi in one place (without API/key nightmares) would be a game-changer. Most trackers either miss assets, lag on prices, or break when networks update. Something clean, real-time, and simple enough for normies but powerful enough for degens that’s the tool I wish existed.

Cosmo_EVA

Hi Greg. Thanks for your question. EVA’s model is designed to cover both sides: \- **B2B**: Our API is a major focus here, it’s already been adopted by 50+ projects that integrate EVA’s security layer directly into their products. That includes larger teams as well as plenty of solo devs \- **B2C**: Instinct (our trading bot) and Intel (our real-time scanner) are built for retail traders. Crypto is still first and foremost a trader’s playground, and if you can deliver real edge in that space, you can generate consistent revenue even in quieter market cycles. So while institutions and projects lean heavily on our API, Instinct and Intel are very much tailored for the retail crowd.

accountuser9000

Do you have an API for that dashboard? That's pretty awesome.

BigDreamsSmallWall3t

What are the specific upgrades being made in V2 of the API?

002_timmy

*From EVA AI team-* Hey r/CryptoCurrency, I’m Cosmo, Co-Founder and Business Lead of EVA AI. EVA is building the security and trading layer for Web3, powered by our proprietary AI. We started 12 months ago with the belief that security in crypto shouldn’t be an afterthought, and we’ve been proving that ever since. Join me for an AMA Sept 1st-3rd right here in this thread, where I’ll be answering your questions on EVA’s products, growth, and what’s next. What I’m excited to talk about 🔶 Instinct: The Ferrari of Sniper Bots Instinct is EVA’s Pectra-native sniper and trading bot. We designed it to execute faster, cheaper, and safer than anything else on the market, and it does. Since launch it’s already processed millions in volume, with traders saving on gas, fees, and avoiding copy-traders thanks to Instinct’s built-in privacy. We’re about to roll it out to Base - and more chains are on the roadmap. 🔶 Tokenomics: Auto Buyback & Burn Every single Instinct transaction auto buybacks and burns $EVA. This creates constant deflation tied directly to real usage. Since our last check just two weeks ago, over 550,000 EVA has been burned, permanently removed from supply. The more Instinct grows, the stronger the deflationary flywheel becomes. 🔶 The EVA API Our API is already live and being used by 50+ integrations across ETH. It’s become a proof of concept that EVA’s AI security can scale across any tool, bot, or platform. With V2, we’re broadening the potential userbase even further and supercharging revenue, while giving partners a way to embed real security directly into their products. 🔶 Intel: Real-Time Protection + Advanced Analytics EVA Intel calls out scams and hidden risks before you get rugged. Our latest updates go further with advanced honeypot detection, smarter contract analysis, and real-time social metrics. On top of that, we’re about to launch APIv2, with 4 new endpoints for advanced analytics, giving users and partners deeper insights into liquidity, holder dynamics, whale activity, and market sentiment. 🔶 The Next Phase: Scaling EVA From Instinct to Intel to the API, everything we’ve built feeds into the same mission: making Web3 safer, faster, and more profitable for real users. Our new website (dropping soon) will tie it all together and tell the story of how each piece of EVA connects into the bigger ecosystem. —————- How to participate: Ask your questions below, anything goes: trading bots, security, revenue model, product roadmap, adoption. I’ll be live and answering questions beginning September 1st. Excited to dive in with you all and share more about how EVA is becoming the default security + trading layer for Web3.

PuzzleheadedHuman

I would try to go as far as possible with the CoinPaprika API, detailed here: docs.coinpaprika.com

Slow-Guide2909

Do you do API trading ? If not, which subReddits should I ask for a question regarding that ?

Eastern-Smell6565

Same here. CG jsut feels cleaner and less compromised. Their API alone is worth switching. It's simple, free, and actually works without all the CMC login/ads nonsense.

Mattie_Kadlec

I think that was an API outage or something like that. I remember reading similar stories. In any case, you can look into GRVT as well. They don't require KYC.

PubbaBean

I think people in general trust data from CoinGecko more than CMC these days anyways. So I guess the obvious choice for better data would be CoinGecko API.

myurtsever

You could use FreeBnk Pay—it supports recurring crypto (and stablecoin) payments with full API integration. [freebnk.io](http://freebnk.io)

HSuke

It's not just this sub. It's every sub ever since the API fees controversy. Where did everyone who left go?

only0555

For Crypto I use a script which lets me Trail SLs- Binance API mostly. Binance is my go to and also Mex is pretty neat too. According to my strategy I specify rules for SLs and as when there is a change the SLs change automatically in the system. Stocks are usually longer term beta for me. I use options to hedge then. And if it's a sideways movement- I use delta neutral strategies to get some theta. Options I do both for Crypto and Stocks: Let's talk crypto first- I always have my hedges in place so the maximum loss is always defined and along with another script Trailing my Hard SLs- Here my exits are both movement and time based. Crypto Options are not that mature. Especially because Delta tends to change a lot. Hence for Crypto Options it's mostly Hero Zero calls- Yes they work amazing if you know your winning rate and profitability quite well :)

italianwopper

Very likely I agree it's the API. I actually don't think it was a bot on gate; I think it has to do with the API I created. Although I set the permissions to not allow withdrawals. I suspect something has been compromised here imo. The only other thing it could be is that my logging details were somehow stolen off my device. But I have travelled through my browser history through every site over the past 2 months. I know every site I've visited, nothing else in my history. It's definitely not a phishing site. No friend or family has access or log in details. I've looked through signs on my device. I've run PowerShell searches, manually searched my event viewer. I've run a malware check nothing. No trojans either. I've run wireshark and am still monitoring my network, I don't see unusual IP's.

d0x77

There is no other possible way in the world to withdraw your money without any sort of verification other than API keys, that or gate just decided to pull them out (yeah unlikely). How does bots within gate work? Do you need to input your API keys anywhere or does it connect you through the bot using your credentials? Because my guess is gate encrypts the API keys before exposing them, thats the least security measure that they could do, but yeah API keys are the reason, im confident.

italianwopper

Yeah absolutely, I have never copied a bot or tried to use anyone else's. Hence why I decided to write my own script which I never fully completed anyway. Definitely sounds malicious to me. First time I've tried using API and I've been hacked. Sounds too coincidental. I was a fool for trying the API on my trading account. A user here said I should have had a second account, I agree with that. Hopefully someone else learns from my mistake.

italianwopper

I'm pressing on with the request for API logs. According to them, the back end verified the withdrawals as approved via 2fa, email code, funds password etc. Notifications sent as well. Although none received my end. No signs of access into my email, looking at the IP activity. No signs of any other mail missing, or read, or tampered with. Gate hasn't sent me proof of the notification emails, or the API logs. Hoping the police work with me in requesting that info.

italianwopper

The whole event occurred over about 1 and half hours. There were definitely manual trades made. I see your point here, as in an exploit by gaining front door access into the account, then manually selling the assets into usdt to withdraw. Otherwise an API exploit that runs it backdoor, would execute the events a lot quicker.

italianwopper

Yeah I def did not enable any withdrawals. The only permission it was given was to place a spot order. Altho, I think the API has something to do with it. It looks like the most obvious to me. Gate won't provide me the API logs, I have to request that through the authorities which I'll do. If it turns out to be an API compromise, then it's an issue on gate's side as the API was set by me to be restrictive. I suspect this is why they're being difficult and unsupportive with me. If it turns out to be a gate issue, it opens a rather large fucken can of worms.

d0x77

I have designed my own bot and im using api keys to place trades, so im in a very similar situation like yours, my only guess for this "stealthy" theft is that you had enabled withdrawals for api keys, and they got compromised by using the gate bot, there is nothing else i could think of considering you know all the scams and phishing links, and you do take precautions. There is no way someone can steal from a CEX, its very complicated, the only way to bypass all this is through API keys, check the permissions, im pretty sure withdrawals are enabled.

Top_Mind9514

“API’s” are a huge security threat/risk

italianwopper

100% I think it was an API exploit yeah... that's all I can pin it down to. It's become an argument as to which side was breached my device or my account directly. Obviously I'll be put on me, the funds are gone and albeit the risk was my choice. I think I'll stick to trading on a local exchange if there must be trading. Gate is quick to take money but when you're funds are lost you're the last person they'd want to help.

BendNo2750

Hey dude, solid idea on using AI to spice up those password guesses! If the pass is English-based (like words, phrases from hints), here’s a quick take on scripting it with an AI API: Loop a script that hits an AI API for deets on keys/setup) with your hints as prompts. Something like: “Generate 50 creative English variations of [hint1] + [hint2], mix in numbers/symbols from 2015 era.” Then feed the output list into btcrecover or hashcat for testing.

Admirral

this is really cool! Are you pulling all data for analysis from DexScreener API or are you doing something that is solana specific? Do you have a GTM plan ready or in the works?

mohicanin

Not only in this sub. Whol Reddit is being created with AI to engage ppl, make then interract so they can charge bigger money from LLM companies for API access.... I see shitloads of posts where "ppl" are asking literally dumb questions, on which they coulda have found answers in google in no time... Time to completly move on to X

amanj41

Been an SDE for 7 years. And I can guarantee you it costs *literally* nothing to store rows on a blockchain (for a developer) once the data is loaded. I don’t know the total cost to load this dataset into Algo, granted. But if you want to dump data somewhere and expose an API to read from it there is go cost to the developer themselves once the data is loaded on the blockchain. Compared to hosting a DB in AWS, plus a lambda or EC2 or whatever to handle the queries. And if someone decides to DDOS your service for fun either you pay for the DDOS protection or get hit with a bigger bill. In any case, this just boils down to semantics. Yes blockchain is more costly and inefficient. But I’m just pointing out that blockchains subsidize the cost of storage once it’s loaded and the users of the data instead end up paying one way or another

Azzuro-x

You may ask Gate.io for assistance more precisely if their internal logs show login with your credentials + successful 2FA verification + verification sent to your email address and/or any API based connection attempt during the incident. For the login based scenario I only see two options for the missing verification email (1) they did not send it meaning their side was compromised or (2) someone has access to your emails, confirmed the access then deleted it.

metamorphosis

No worries. Good luck. It's highly unlikely your 3 layers of security got compromised or some sophisticated attack to take ownership of your OS/ machine is also highly unlikely....so it must have been exchange/bots/API related.

Azzuro-x

99% of the trades on the exchanges these days are performed by bots. They are safe to use with the proper API settings - assuming the given exchange enforces the rules (which is fairly easy to check with a test withdraw request if needed).

metamorphosis

Not familiar with gate exchange and if these bots are gate official bots or user bots? To narrow it down, does gate offer API activity log? Re: script. Did you implement your own gate API or downloaded a library ? Where from ? Either way, yeah it seems too coincidental. Check addresses to which funds are withdrawn too. Check their bubble map and activity. That can give some insights https://bubblemaps.io/

Azzuro-x

Have you enabled withdraw as well for the API key in question or only trading ?

god_damn_you_tiger

macOS user? If so, perhaps you were the victim of zero day attack that Apple patched 5 days ago. But 16k sounds too small to exploit, attack should have been really sophisticated and targeted. I lean towards API compromise here tbh

amanj41

Cheaper for who? Doesn’t get much cheaper for users to have a free public database with negligible transaction fees. Spinning up a DB in AWS and building a service with an API is more expensive singe ALGO is so cheap. I don’t think ALGO’s low fees are sustainable in the long run tho

HSuke

Depend on the platform. I often deal with platforms where the public module or API documentation doesn't exist, and the only way to get it is behind a customer login or vendor support. I've worked on many issues where I had to report bugs for their products. Microsoft is notorious for having incomplete documentation, especially for function parameters/arguments. A single function for Exchange or SPO can have 50 different parameters, 40 of which have either no documentation or bad documentation.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Sheri_on_reddit and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoTradingBot/comments/1mykw6k/crypto_trading_bot/ I just developed a bot, which gives minimum 5 percent and maximum 30 percent profit per month on a minimum deposit of $100. Profit was not consistent per month on historical data. Profit is after deducting platform fee, slippage. I backtested it on BTC 4 years old ( 2021-2025) data of 1 hour and 1 day candles ( 1.5 million data cells ). Fetched from multiple credible sites using api. I want to ask, if I want to perform live testing which platform is best kraken , Binance or some other ? I want test on fake USDT using API. I want to test network issues as well. Have any built this type of Bot before as well. I live in Sweden , and in Sweden Binance future is not allowed, but Future test API is allowed. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: Sheri_on_reddit and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoTradingBot/comments/1mykw6k/crypto_trading_bot/ I just developed a bot, which gives minimum 5 percent and maximum 30 percent profit per month on a minimum deposit of $100. Profit was not consistent per month on historical data. Profit is after deducting platform fee, slippage. I backtested it on BTC 4 years old ( 2021-2025) data of 1 hour and 1 day candles ( 1.5 million data cells ). Fetched from multiple credible sites using api. I want to ask, if I want to perform live testing which platform is best kraken , Binance or some other ? I want test on fake USDT using API. I want to test network issues as well. Have any built this type of Bot before as well. I live in Sweden , and in Sweden Binance future is not allowed, but Future test API is allowed. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

cali_dave

Just make a best effort and be prepared to explain your rationale to an IRS auditor. Take the highest/lowest/closing cost of the day you made the trade and use that as your cost basis. If you're a day trader, you should know how to keep track of that stuff. Don't rely on an exchange to track things for you. If you have timestamps of your transactions, you can query Coinbase's API to pull price data on a 1 minute time frame (if you need to get that granular).

arajajaja

its my third cycle actually and no i dont have any memes and i dont have any AI coins either i only hold eth, link and some API3 we had a meme season last year were retail got completely destroyed and no the vast majority of them is no where to be found the pump youve seen the last month is not driven by retail at all so you better prey they come back and pump worthless garbage

dirodvstw

Why the fuck is API3 down 4%???? Tf

AutoModerator

Post is by: Amazing-Sky-504 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1mx7wck/i_have_created_a_massive_crypto_backtesting/ I was trying to find high quality crypto datasets for backtesting and all the ones I found were very expensive or poor quality. So I decided to get all the data myself and build my own dataset. Anyway, I now have data going back to 2017 and around 3000 pairs. I'm thinking of selling it but not sure where should I start. I thought I'll start here. If this is not the right place for it, it would be very helpful if you could please let me know some good places. Here's how I'm thinking I'll sell: Single Pair data: $10 Top 200 Pairs: $50 All data (\~3000 pairs): $500 No subscription. No API. Just link for full data download in one go. Note: When I say pairs I mean like ETH/BTC pair or BTC/SOL pair etc. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

piggleii

Wow API3 is so cool. Wow. Wow.

prostykoks

Have you seen this insane move from API3? Tool i am building flagged the coin 6 times yesterday. Want to know more visit my profile.

Successful-Ad-5443

I’ve explained why the token price must rise so we’ll skip that. Enterprise chains failed because they were siloed. CCIP isn’t a “private chain” — it’s the neutral interoperability standard between public chains, private ledgers, custodians, and banks that allows money and messaging to be sent within the same workflow. That’s not something you can replace with just running your own server. There’s a reason why major banks like Jp Morgan and anz are completing proof of concepts. Yes, price feeds are many. Pyth, flare, band protocol we could go down the list. But the moat isn’t built around the cheapest option, when it comes to the level of institutions link are onboarding, the moat is based on reliability, reputation, and integration at scale. DTCC, SWIFT etc aren’t going to pull some free API feed off Yahoo Finance, they value resilience, uptime guarantees, decentralized validation, and legal/insurance frameworks. Competitors offer price feeds, link offers everything they need in one platform. That’s the moat. Again, I don’t care for current revenue. Eth was at 100b market cap earning peanuts for fees. I agree fees don’t justify LINK’s market cap today. But by your logic, Eths 100b valuation in 2018 was also unjustifiable. Your logic would have most likely faded the run to 500b. Both are SoV bets, ETH on computation, LINK on interoperability. Difference is ones narrative has already run and become mainstream, the others is just getting started. The fact you think it’s so easy to simply switch a legacy system that the entire financial world has been running on for the last 50 years is laughable. This is a technological shift that has been in the making for almost a decade now, swift and link have been working together since 2016. In finance, cheapest ≠ winner. Reliability and standards win. SWIFT isn’t cheap but banks still pay because it’s the universal standard. Once you’re the default, switching costs lock everyone in. LINK is positioning to be the SWIFT of interoperability, and I believe that’s why swift themselves are already testing and integrating it. That’s what I’m betting on. Only time will tell.

Successful-Ad-5443

I’ve explained why the token price must rise so we’ll skip that. Enterprise chains failed because they were siloed. CCIP isn’t a “private chain” — it’s the neutral interoperability standard between public chains, private ledgers, custodians, and banks that allows money and messaging to be sent within the same workflow. That’s not something you can replace with just running your own server. There’s a reason why major banks like Jp Morgan and anz are completing proof of concepts. Yes, price feeds are many. Pyth, flare, band protocol we could go down the list. But the moat isn’t built around the cheapest option, when it comes to the level of institutions link are onboarding, the moat is based on reliability, reputation, and integration at scale. DTCC, SWIFT etc aren’t going to pull some free API feed off Yahoo Finance, they value resilience, uptime guarantees, decentralized validation, and legal/insurance frameworks. Competitors offer price feeds, link offers everything they need in one platform. That’s the moat. Again, I don’t care for current revenue. Eth was at 100b market cap earning peanuts for fees. I agree fees don’t justify LINK’s market cap today. But by your logic, Eths 100b valuation in 2018 was also unjustifiable. Your logic would have most likely faded the run to 500b. Both are SoV bets, ETH on computation, LINK on interoperability. Difference is ones narrative has already run and become mainstream, the others is just getting started. The fact you think it’s so easy to simply switch a legacy system that the entire financial world has been running on for the last 50 years is laughable. This is a technological shift that has been in the making for almost a decade now, swift and link have been working together since 2016. In finance, cheapest ≠ winner. Reliability and standards win. SWIFT isn’t cheap but banks still pay because it’s the universal standard. Once you’re the default, switching costs lock everyone in. LINK is positioning to be the SWIFT of interoperability, and I believe that’s why swift themselves are already testing and integrating it. That’s what I’m betting on. Only time will tell.

earlyseven

Wow API3 exploded for a second there.

Key-Boat-7519

Engagement’s tanked because the sub outgrew the mod team and the API changes killed third-party tools, but you can still spark solid convo by timing posts during U.S. market hours and cross-posting to r/BitcoinBeginners, r/BitcoinMining, and r/CryptocurrencyTech. Niche subs crave new voices and the mods there are less trigger-happy. Keep posts data-backed-link mempool stats or on-chain graphs-so automod flags less often. I lean on UsePulse to spot when BTC mentions spike and push alerts to my Substack so followers know when a debate’s brewing; Launch Club AI quietly handles the comment templating so I don’t waste time rewriting the same TL;DR for each thread. So yeah, smart timing, proof-first content, and rotating among smaller subs can still pull real engagement even with today’s stricter rules.

Rich_Instruction_428

Its not based on eth it runs on all EVM chains and AVAX and SOL and CANTON etc etc. The token is used to pay for chainlink services called API calls. You want something done on LINK network you pay LINK. You're also calling it a chain its not a blockchain is an Oracle network with decentralised nodes. LINK is 80% of all Oracle market on all chains and wins no matter what L1 wins LINK over ETH all day.

VirtualDream117

Did you submit API reading?

DaskMusic

BTC and ETH are natively integrated into the ic network along with others like Solana, which gives BTC fully onchain smart contract abilities without the need for bridges, wrapping of tokens and 3rd party oracles since it enables any integrated asset native web2 API calls. Chainlink does have some competition and it is not the only one. Crypto would not collapse without chainlink or icp for that matter. BTC will likely always survive.

Ur_mothers_keeper

They won't wash out. They'll continue to diverge in interesting ways. Every single parameter you're using from the API to make decisions squares the number of possible outcomes. You're creating a chaotic system and trying it in different environments. Thanks for this BTW, it helped me understand something interesting I hadn't really thought of before.

EarningsPal

The API power. Infrastructure for any application to be a bank app.

dca-bot

The whole idea started over 6 years ago. I wanted to use DCA and build a quick and dirty script to execute it daily via API on my favourite exchange. I guess it was like 10$ per day. I talked with some friends about it. Some wanted to use the same script since back then no exchange was offering DCA. So I added a database to manage multiple "clients". One friend then said: "Yo why not scale the order size depending on market conditions, you could maximize your stack". That was the moment I digged deeper and created the multiplier engine. Over the years I tweaked it, using feedback and data driven development. Early this year we added a self service interface and invited more friends to use it. So in total I pay like 50$ for the hosting per month but invested many hundred working hours. Serving around 25 clients.

AskMeIfImAnOrange

Devve. You won't have heard of it (yet), but it is a permissioned chain specifically designed for Enterprise. It ticks the boxes that prevents most chains from being fully utilised by big money because of privacy, security, regulatory issues, etc. The chain is live and has been developed in stealth the last 9 years. They have not marketed it yet, they will begin when their partnerships start being announced - beginning Q4 this year. Basically, companies can spin up shards customised to their specific needs. Each shard operates essentially as a standalone blockchain, but multiple can be easily connected to work together e.g. you operate in multiple territories that have different regulatory requirements, or you want to scale up TPS as necessary. With this this system TPS is essentially infinitely scalable. Connection to the shard is via API, so incredibly easy for Enterprise to integrate. All of this will be offered as part of a Blockchain-as-a-service system. Similar to AWS but for blockchain. Anti-fraud, theft and loss protections are built in at the consensus level (and are patented) - things which are essential for Tradfi. Swaps also occur at consensus so no risky smart contracts are needed for trading. And they can occur while the user maintains full custody. Essentially combining the best features of current CEX'es and DEX'es For their first, big, on-chain project, they have partnered with one of the largest Tradfi enterprises in the world to create an exchange combining crypto and RWA capabilities. Instant swaps with self-custody. The partner will be revealed Q4 along with the launch of the exchange. Expect Bloomberg, CNBC, Fox, etc coverage. That is how big the partner is and how important this project will be to Tradfi. This is not a monolithic, permissionless blockchain. It won't satisfy the desires of the anti-government crypto users. What it will do is allow the really big Enterprise money to start using blockchain in ways that are practical to their requirements, not the other way round.

UnsersGottaGo

Each system only words as well as their weakest link. When someone chooses trust an exchange, they take on all the risks of their OPSEC, without being able to verify it: - Exchange hack or rug pull - Malicious or negligent employee - Compromised web server, API, or login gateway - Missed security patches on their systems - Your devices always connected to the internet for logins - Seizure by exchange management or government order - Restrictions on where and how much you can send - KYC data collection and permanent records of ownership, amounts, and transaction history - Uncertain privacy future — you don’t know if they’ll sell your data later or leak it Every one of these has been talked about or experienced first-hand in this subreddit. the exchange-truster is betting they’ll stay solvent, secure, and honest — and they won’t know they’re wrong until it’s too late. By contrast, self-custody means you bet on yourself - your own discipline, planning and secrecy. - You must protect your seed phase from loss, theft, or damage. - you must maintain plausible deniability - having no evidence of bitcoin at all, maintaining fiat idenity, use of duress wallets and passphrases (see: Coldcard) - You must do your own inheritance planning, or the keys die with you. - Avoid physical coercion - don't feed or go near situations where someone can force you to hand over your keys. - maintain secure backups without revealing locations - practicing flying low so you blend in like all the other worker drones until one day you decide to Opt Out. The best choice between exchange custody and self custody is which risk you're more confident in managing - theirs, or yours.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; CoinMarketCap provides live global cryptocurrency market data through its API, offering real-time metrics such as total market capitalization, Bitcoin dominance, and 24-hour trading volume. Users can access this data via the /v1/global-metrics/quotes/latest API endpoint, with options to convert market quotes into various fiat or cryptocurrency symbols. Historical data is also available through the /v1/global-metrics/quotes/historical endpoint. The API is available on several plans, including Basic, Hobbyist, Startup, Standard, Professional, and Enterprise. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

g-m-f

Yours as well btw ;) But that's just a Reddit thing. Doesn't necessarily have to do with porn at all. I think the moment you posted or commented anything in a 18+ sub your profile gets marked as such. And remember when many normal subs switched to 18+ as a protest against the third party API ban? I think since then most profiles are 18+ now.

JewelTamexJuno

\- Pumpfun Creator \- Volume Bot \- X trackers + AI API (use my own LLM) \- Good RPC \- New Traders Alert Bot \- Sniper Bot (optional)

aeeravsar

my bad, it is not actually multisig but Tron's account permissions feature. most of the wallets out there don't display such information, so all you get when withdrawing funds is a raw API response saying you don't have the permissions to withdraw. I don't know if they can make this scheme for ERC-20.

gaintozz

what about the KYC requirement for >$10k USD sums due to API outage. Decentralized in name.

Timstertimster

because if history is any indication, the companies that physically implement these ZK proofs do so very lazily by first storing the unencrypted data in a database before sending it to the ZK proof API. then some douche with a laptop of said database backup file lets it get out by writing their password on a post it note and going on a 4 hour lunch.

torkildj

CoinGate – Lets customers pay in fiat (credit card, bank transfer, etc.) and allows businesses to receive payouts in Bitcoin. Offers plugins for major e-commerce platforms and API support. NOWPayments – A flexible gateway that supports fiat payments and converts them into crypto for the business. Offers automatic conversion, fiat checkout options, and crypto settlements. CryptoProcessing – Tailored for large businesses and exchanges. Supports fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat flows with real-time conversion, risk management tools, and settlement in Bitcoin. B2BinPay – Enterprise-grade solution that accepts fiat and crypto payments, settles in crypto (including Bitcoin), and provides advanced merchant tools and API integration.

Milan_dr

*TLDR [NanoGPT](https://nano-gpt.com/) offers private access to every AI model you can think of. No subscription, pay only for what you use, text, image, video. No account needed. Reply for an invite, or deposit as little as $0.10 to try it out..* # Why is this relevant for me? If you want to use the top AI models (like o3-pro, Grok and Veo 3) but don't want a $200 subscription, we're the place to go. If you want to use the top AI models but don't like the idea of linking your name, personal details and credit card to the prompts you do, we're the place to go. If you want to use uncensored models, we're the place to go. If you care about crypto being actually used, we're probably a place you want to check out and give a try. ## Improvements - **Account deletion is now a lot easier**. This used to be manual which frankly, not great. You can now easily do it from Settings and optionally provide a reason for deletion, but there's no need to do so. - **Open source model mode**: toggle open source mode in [Settings](https://nano-gpt.com/settings) and all closed source text models will be hidden from the options. For all of the open source models that we offer we do NOT run them directly through the provider, because many of the best open source models are Chinese and frankly we understand that distrust. We use no-log providers and are largely moving to TEE. - **TEE models**: we have a [blog up on this here](https://nano-gpt.com/blog/trusted-execution-environments-and-confidential-ai-on-nanogpt). They are the most private way to use open-source models online. We have a TEE category where the models are verifiably run through Trusted Execution Environments. For the newly added Qwen, Kimi, and GLM (see below) we also run them through a provider that claims TEE, but we have not been able to fully verify that yet so they're not shown in the TEE category yet. Deepseek V3 for example can be run through TEE. - **Price decreases**: for video and image models we should now be pretty much the cheapest or close to the cheapest provider for all of them. If you're running text models via API we match the price of the direct providers or beat it, so let's say ChatGPT costs $5 per mln tokens directly through OpenAI, we now charge $5 per mln tokens via API ourselves as well. For many of the open-source models we're cheaper than any publicly available option. For anyone that wants to build AI into their application/website - deposit anonymously, don't create an account, yet get the same or lower prices than at providers that want your credit card. ## New models **Text models:** - Grok 4. - Vercel v0 models. Very useful for frontend development, especially next.js/Vercel applications. We're the only ones that offer this as far as we know. - [Study mode](https://x.com/NanoGPTcom/status/1951290272064627038)! ChatGPT with a custom instruction designed to help you learn through guided discovery rather than providing direct answers. - Qwen 3 Coder, Qwen 3 235b a22b instruct + thinking. - Kimi K2 (also via Groq for super-speedy inference). - GLM 4.5. - Step 3 **Video models**: - Veo 3 image to video - Veo 3 fast (cheaper), text to video and image to video - Wan 2.2 (full, 5b and Turbo). Cheapest version here costs just $0.05 per video and has surprisingly good quality. - PixVerse 4.5 - Vidu Q1 - Face swap video - Longstories The prices on our video models have also been much decreased. Using them directly via the website or via API we should now be the lowest or one of the lowest priced providers for all of them. We now also do automatic refunds for failed generations. **Image models** I'd love to list them all, but it's genuinely too many. We added about 30, the biggest ones are Flux Krea, Hidream Edit E1.1, and Higgsfield Soul. Also face swap, which is quite fun to do. Prices for our image models have also all been dropped. That's all - happy to answer questions, and would mostly be happy if this inspires some other merchants to also start accepting crypto.

severin_dfinity

Of course the web2 API is still an issue, but you can get around that by talking to multiple data providers and establishing consensus. If you're interested, have a look here: [https://internetcomputer.org/https-outcalls](https://internetcomputer.org/https-outcalls) It first shows how ICP can do web2 requests from the chain itself, and also how you can us multiple web2 sources to get reliable data on-chain (in this case exchange rates). Of course there's some limits (e.g. 10 exchanges could collaborate to fake data), but every system requires some trust assumptions

Decent_Taro_2358

It is. But you can pay a mule to buy Apple Developer, pay the 99$ and release an app with some malicious code. I doubt Apple will find a hidden API call that sends your private key to a server. Your app gets removed, the mule gets the blame and you walk away with 8 Bitcoins.

RepulsiveWing4529

In Studio, you will be able to customize your model through fine-tuning, adding vector DBs, or smart system prompts (or combination of all 3!).  After that, you can: 1. Use it privately 2. Plug it into an external app through our API 3. Or list it on Vertical Stream. If listed, others can use your model, and you earn 85% of the revenue it generates. This enables free market dynamics on our platform, rewarding those who build quality models.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The article from CoinGlass provides historical performance data for Bitcoin, including its quarterly, monthly, and weekly returns. It offers insights into Bitcoin's price performance over various time frames, allowing users to analyze trends and patterns in Bitcoin's market behavior. The platform also provides tools and resources such as a mobile app, API, and charts for a comprehensive user experience in tracking cryptocurrency performance. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Miserable_Twist1

I’m not familiar with how ICP works but the oracle problem can’t be solved. It’s like if someone says they’ve invented something that violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It just can’t happen. If the information is not natively on the chain, it must be added, if it must be added, then there is someone or something that adds it. That thing that is adding the information onto the network must be trusted. For example, who manages the API in your example? Who updates the thing that updates the api? If it’s a sensor checking the weather in Istanbul for your corn futures contract, can someone manipulate the sensor? These are all subject to manipulation, which means you can’t have a trustless or anonymous system. You need actors with reputations that can guarantee information is correct who are liable for failures, so you can sue them if the thing messes up. At that point we are back to square one, companies and institutions are being trusted to manage the data anyways, they can run the smart contracts themselves without needing a blockchain. The only thing you can do with a completely anonymous system is swap unbacked cryptocurrencies and tokens with each other, which is a tiny sliver of what defi was promising. The moment you introduce tokenized assets or external data, you can’t do the whole trustless/anonymous thing, and therefore there is no point to using a blockchain. The exception to this is the 3D printer analogy, for small actors trying to create something on their own with what they can easily get at hand, it makes sense because you can set these things up on the cheap, but the operating costs are substantially higher, at scale it will never be able to compete. Basically good for prototyping financial products.

_Schizo_

Flexa API https://flexa.co/payments

DaskMusic

There are solutions to the oracle problem if you look. For example, the icp network does not need oracles to talk to web2 API, it also uses a reverse gas model so no user gas fees, and has native bitcoin integration, so no need for bridges. It's essentially a protocol for a distributed compute platform that glues a number of blockchains together like ETH, BTC, SOl using chain key fusion with everything fully onchain. Factor in utopia for private enterprise features explains why Hbar partnered with dfinity. Is dfinity still hated though in this sub ?

6biz

Algo-trader on crypto, so yeah, using API and trading on Binance. Python for: market analysis, backtesting, documenting, portfolio analysis, risk management, and of course - trading. Deployed on Railway and Northflank + some services run on GitHub Actions. Front and analytics - Node/Express and React - Next.js Don’t know about better trading conditions, but for algo-trading there hardly any other ways to do it reasonably for retail and even businesses. On Binance my trading volumes are big enough not to be a “Regular” account holder, so there’s indeed some reduction in Maker and Taker fees, but anyone can get to those volumes that give you some dicsounts. As for those asking how hard to make a bot - it’s actually very easy, especially nowadays with AI, hard part is making sure that bastard can make money and not lose too much too fast.

CuriousGeorge22_02

Don't you need some sort of external interface to access the API and use it?

Odd_Pen_1041

I see so the bot can sometimes literally make a wrong trade or sum? When i start trading with the bot i get the API key?

Odd_Pen_1041

Never done anything related to API trading, how hard is it to make a bot?

reZZZ22

The Coinbase Email I received had this in its email. Wallet type: Trezor Metallic Status: Setup in progress Estimated completion: Within 24 hours Once the integration is complete, you will be able to manage your digital assets directly from your cold wallet interface using the Ledger API.

wynmead

I realize that. But you if you are processing thousands of combinations how does that work quickly? Is there an API one would use?

Humphrey-B-Bear

So it's a competitor to Stripe with less API fiddling. Perhaps the Trojan horse here is that PAYPAL just entered the stablecoin business.

Odd_Lengthiness_2175

As a general rule, you have to track your cost basis yourself. There's a number of services that do it now if you plug in all your API keys and wallets. Coinbase will issue a 1099-B, but your cost basis will only be accurate if your funds never left the exchange or you manually enter it for funds transferred in. If you buy an ETF like IBIT on Fidelity (or whatever your favorite broker is), it will be tracked like any other stock.

Cosmo_EVA

Hey Gobrrr. Thanks for the thoughtful questions. **1. How are you different from other VPN/antivirus projects that ended up failing or rugging?** Great point to raise. Just to clarify, the VPN is an optional add-on to Sentinel, not our core product. We’re not a “VPN project”, we’re a **security protocol** at our core and our flagship offering is the **EVA API,** integrated across 50+ partners. Just today, we announced a new integration with **Quantum Foundation**. To be honest, I don’t think there’s another startup you can fairly compare us to. Especially not at this mc, with this level of adoption, recurring revenue, and an ecosystem this robust. **2. How can I be sure your tools are safe and not doing anything shady in the background?** Totally valid concern, especially in crypto. None of our products require wallet connections, seed phrases, or access to your private keys. We designed them with user safety as the priority. We’re a security protocol...if our tools weren’t secure, we wouldn’t exist. And so far, that trust has helped us scale quickly and form strong partnerships. **3. Does Sentinel store or share any of my data?** No. You log in via your Chrome account, and that’s it. We don’t ask for, collect, or store any personal data**.** **4. What’s the benefit of holding $EVA?** $EVA is deflationary by design. Every single trade made through Instinct (our newly launched sniper bot) automatically buys back and burns $EVA. We're two days post-launch and over **$50K worth of $EVA has already been burned**, directly from revenue. As you know, burns increase scarcity with every transaction and, as volume grows, so does the demand, kicking off a flywheel that makes holding $EVA more valuable over time.

Extiint_EVA

Thank you for your question! 1. EVA is adopted in the space. We could perhaps discuss metrics, but it's worth noting that the underlying technology powering our extension is the same one we offer to other projects integrating our product via API. We are not focused exclusively on security, our product suite spans a broad range of web3 experiences. This includes trading (which is currently gaining significant traction), external API hooks, the extension you mentioned, a specialized security token detection tool, and a strong revenue stream as a company 2. Different services implement different levels of security. If you're referring specifically to our browser extension available on the Google Marketplace, it's a zero-risk product. We've designed it so that we don't collect, store, or use any user data. Sentinel runs entirely locally in the browser. Google also has a rigorous review process, every single update must be reviewed and approved. Being a security-oriented product, we must provide extensive proof that no external code is executed. Along with KYB proofs of course. 3.The only case where we store any data is related solely to the VPN (you need to turn it on yourself). In this case, we retain visited links and IP addresses for up to 30 days, standard industry practice, and actually a security measure. Not storing this kind of data would invite bad actors. Other than that, we store absolutely nothing. In fact, we don’t even use password credentials, all authentication is handled via Google Login. All of this is also in our privacy policy 4.EVA has several utility use cases: * A portion of our revenue (from partners who pay monthly for API-based security services) is used to buy back EVA tokens, effectively redistributing value to token holders. * We also recently launched a trading bot that has been performing exceptionally well. 100% of the bot’s revenue is used to buy back and burn EVA, making the token deflationary. You can check our chart — you’ll see hundreds of small EVA buys over the last few days. Each buy corresponds to a transaction executed by a user, triggering a buy-and-burn event for EVA.

Hanzieoo

You can run a asic with only one hashboard for 1kw. They can also ramp down via firmware. But I think the min on my Antminer S19 is 2kw. Full power is 3.2kw. I use Home assistant to turn it on and off when solar is available and then when the house overheats and it sucks hot air back in it overheats, this is when the firmware kicks in a d reduce the power. I use Luxor firmware and I think you can API into it with ramping signals.