GPT

harvested

Chat with GPT

jeremiahcp

You mean the one that was clearly written by GPT?

jeremiahcp

OK GPT, I won't get blinded by hype and just stack more BTC.

flavourantvagrant

Asked chat GPT for a basic calculation for you to see if it’s worth it: Here’s the calculation: If you invest $88 per month into Bitcoin for 20 years, assuming a gradually slowing average 20% annual return, you could end up with around $217,905. If you just saved that money in dollars (no investment), adjusting for 2.5% annual inflation, your savings would feel like only about $12,889 in today’s money. Summary: Bitcoin investment (after 20 years): ~$217,905 Saving in cash, adjusted for inflation: ~$12,889

cryptoNcoffee

This is the issue is that gaming and all of the other stupid hype cycles makes people ask this. AI actually has a use case. It’s not just hype. Make sure to actually DYOR and the project is building what it says they are. Ask devs, don’t rely on marketing material because 99% of them are chat GPT API wrapped looking to extract as much value as possible with no plans on making anything long term

BraidRuner

Chat GPT says Critiques Speculative Leap on Mass Adoption: Assuming 1 billion Bitcoin holders is very speculative. There’s no strong evidence to suggest that Bitcoin will achieve that level of adoption globally. A better approach might be to present multiple scenarios (e.g., thresholds if 100M, 500M, and 1B people adopt), rather than locking into 1B. Oversimplification of Power-Law Effects: While it's mentioned that Bitcoin follows a "power-law" distribution, the adjustment for wealth concentration is a bit hand-wavy. A more rigorous treatment would involve modeling the distribution curve (e.g., using a Pareto distribution formula) rather than adjusting numbers based on intuition or Web "posts." Underemphasized Custodial Holdings Issue: Exchange wallets and custodial services hold large portions of Bitcoin on behalf of millions of users. One address does not necessarily mean one "holder," and this could greatly lower the real amount of BTC needed to be in the top percentiles. This is noted but perhaps not emphasized enough — it's a critical structural flaw in many top-holder analyses. Lack of Sensitivity Analysis: No exploration of different lost-coin rates (e.g., what if 29% are lost, not 20%) or different adoption rates (e.g., 500M holders vs. 1B). Including a sensitivity table could have made the conclusions feel much more robust. Mild Overconfidence in "Forever" Estimates: The framing is thoughtful, but the idea of securing a percentile "forever" assumes Bitcoin’s network effects, dominance, and store-of-value status remain unchanged over decades. Technological disruption, policy changes, or Layer 2 innovations could dramatically alter BTC distribution and value, making today’s calculations feel dated.

Mentasuave01

It was a meme. I understand now your issue you though was not the right place to post that, you need to improve you communication skills, it's fine but you cannot expect to throw the rock and then ask GPT for help. Do not be condescending or toxic, next time just point me that was not the place, because even today you still failing to provide why you think it's nonsense or stupid. Just try to be communicative and constructive, toxicity will not bring you any good man.

harvested

Look what I posted. Chart. Data. Facts. Look at what you posted. Nonsense. You'll figure it out. Ask GPT to help.

VirtualFuture

Thank you! Yeah GPT-4o guided me in the browser initially but then once I got a GitHub and started doing pushes I needed a desktop based AI and cursor seemed like a perfect fit :)

Mentasuave01

As well you can ask GPT, why this meme is intelligent and will say otherwise. Anyways GPT seems confused, as max supply is not the same as current supply, but that's another topic. Nice and solid arguments I see here. Have a nice day 💪

harvested

I asked GPT to explain why it's stupid: This meme is lazy and dishonest. It cherry-picks Bitcoin’s strengths while ignoring that Bitcoin is also mined and inflated today. Plus, “weights a ton” isn’t even proper English — the whole thing reads like it was made by a 12-year-old.

Christophesus

Thanks, GPT

TheMissingNTLDR

how do we know all text is from chat GPT? They can paste mickey mouse story here if they like😅

jeremiahcp

Am I supposed to click on the link now, GPT, read the post, and have a life-changing experience? (FYI, GPT loves hyphens.)

WincWanderer

Thanks for helping the cause. Did you get this from Chat GPT or do you just hang around to be a asshole FFS.

BradfieldScheme

Ask chat GPT about Bitcoin security budget issues.

Leading_Document_464

Go ask Chat GPT.

VirtualFuture

Thank you so much! Glad you enjoy my stupid creation haha **Zapier** and **Makecom** \- for automating feeding actual CoinDesk articles real-time A pre-trained **GPT-4o** OpenAI API - for generating each news segment commentary **Elevenlabs** API - for generating the voice, trained on 2+ hours of me talking **Python & Node.js -** for creating the master script logic that schedules every segment and a ton of other things **OBS Studio** \- for the entire pipeline + streaming output

VirtualFuture

I can't believe it was possible either hahah. All GPT or Cursor. Just a bunch of photoshop and after effects for drawing all this stuff and splitting into layers etc.

VirtualFuture

AND I'VE NEVER CODED IN MY LIFE! All GPT telling me what to do step by step.

VirtualFuture

It blew my mind that it's possible too hahah, GPT basically told me the tech stack for a combination like this is possible so I went "fuck it, let's do it."

VirtualFuture

It's 100% real segments being pulled real-time from CoinDesk and CoinTelegraph as they appear through RSS and Zapier, fed through GPT-4o with a trained "Buzz" model and then fed through Elevenlabs API to speak it based on 2+ hours of recordings of my own voice. This is all real. By tuning in you're literally finding out about news :D just in a funny way.

jeremiahcp

In response to your post, I asked GPT to create an image of a salty crypto bro getting mad at another salty crypto bro for being salty, and here’s what it came up with: https://i.redd.it/rlxyk16l22ve1.gif According to GPT, everyone is a salty pickle.

Regular-Forever5876

it is. no doubting. look, it's pure math. seriously and I started as an advocate of PoS long ago but now I reached a maturity of understanding where everything is crystal clear. and Satoshi have ever been right. here is an extract from one of my paying courses about Blockchain, chapter about the neutrality of participation and valuation of value. This is a small free gift from my e-book destined to my students: enjoy and open your chakra forever 😁 it is in French, I did asked GPT to translate it. Enjoy --- While many consensus mechanisms claim to provide decentralization and fairness, only Proof of Work (PoW) achieves these objectives through a mathematically grounded, physically anchored, and universally verifiable cost function. Here's a detailed breakdown of why this is the case: Probabilistic Fairness Based on Effort In PoW, the probability of successfully mining a block is linearly proportional to the computational effort contributed (hashrate). Formally: P(success) = individual hashrate / total network hashrate This model does not require prior wealth, reputation, permission, or token holding. It is open, non-discriminatory, and inherently egalitarian in the sense that anyone with access to energy and hardware can participate on equal footing. Other mechanisms introduce asymmetries: Proof of Stake (PoS): P(success) = individual stake / total stake This is a reinforcement model, mathematically similar to a preferential attachment process. Over time, power concentrates due to compound returns. The system structurally favors existing wealth and punishes late entrants or low-stake participants. Proof of History / Authority / Permissioned systems: These rely on either: Predefined validator sets (authority-based), Pre-allocated identity or trust scores (history-based), Gatekeeping by institutions (permissioned systems). In all cases, fairness is not a function of work but of access to privilege, defeating the principle of open, decentralized participation. Sybil Resistance through Economic Cost One of the key challenges in decentralized networks is Sybil resistance — preventing an attacker from spawning many identities to influence consensus. PoW addresses this with physically costly identities: each additional identity requires independent, real computational power, which consumes irreversible energy. The cost scales linearly with the number of attempts to subvert the system. In PoS, identities are cheap to create but power is tied to stake, which leads to consolidation and often requires off-chain mechanisms (slashing, penalties) to maintain security. These are subject to human governance and thus not trustless. In permissioned systems, identity is controlled centrally. The Sybil resistance comes from subjective access control, not from economic guarantees. Anchor to Physical Reality PoW is the only mechanism that ties digital consensus to physical reality. It consumes a universally scarce and measurable resource — energy — and transforms it into a cryptographic proof of work. This provides: Thermodynamic anchoring: The cost of consensus is non-reversible and not subject to arbitrary manipulation. Objective verifiability: Every proof can be verified independently and universally. Incentive alignment: Security is proportional to the cost required to disrupt the network. All other mechanisms rely on virtual or social constructs — coin holdings, reputations, or institutional trust — which can be manipulated, influenced, or captured without measurable external cost. Attack Cost and Finality Guarantees In PoW, the cost of attacking the network (e.g., via a 51% attack) is directly tied to: The price of energy, Hardware acquisition, Opportunity cost of honest mining. This makes attacks economically irrational unless the attacker can outspend the entire network. Even then, their attack is limited in scope and duration due to ongoing costs. In PoS, the attack cost is virtual: stake can be slashed, but: Slashing must be enforced via governance, Large stakeholders may have economic and social incentive to collude, Finality is subjective and often depends on off-chain resolution. Thus, PoW offers superior finality guarantees, because reversing a block requires real-world resources — not a vote, not a token-weighted consensus. No Preferential Access or Insider Advantage PoW does not grant any advantage to: Early adopters (beyond early block rewards), Token holders, Specific institutions. By contrast, in PoS and permissioned systems: Seniority = power: the longer or more you stake, the more you control. Token distribution skews the validator set. Validator selection often requires whitelisting or social capital. These introduce centralization pressure that grows over time. In PoW, while mining centralization can occur due to economies of scale, entry remains technically open, and the network does not hard-code privileges. Economic Neutrality and Decentralization over Time Even if PoW systems eventually concentrate mining power (e.g. via ASICs or cheap electricity access), the consensus algorithm itself does not enshrine or enforce this centralization. Any change in economic conditions — lower energy prices, better hardware, local production — can disrupt existing concentration. This preserves long-term neutrality: the protocol doesn't reward insiders per se — it rewards work, regardless of who performs it. Other systems bake in advantages that compound over time and cannot be disrupted by external forces. Mathematically, economically, and game-theoretically: PoW is the only system where consensus emerges from a universal, measurable, irreversible cost. It is the only model where attack cost is non-reversible and anchored in real-world physics. It is the only open-access system that remains structurally neutral to identity, seniority, or wealth. Any alternative model — no matter how efficient or elegant — introduces subjectivity, privilege, or governance complexity. That might be acceptable in certain contexts, but it is not egalitarian in the strict sense. If we exclude environmental concerns from the equation, burning energy is not a flaw — it is the foundation of security and fairness in PoW.

cough_e

You need to wait for GPT 8 for that answer.

Omnislash99999

Chat GPT told me holding 0.1 BTC puts you in the top 10% of owners. Maybe it's true, maybe it's AI slop, I have no idea

flavourantvagrant

Here’s a nice response from GPT Absolutely — let’s dive into Chapter 3: Fiat Currency and Inflation. 3. Fiat Currency and Inflation What is Fiat Currency? A fiat currency is money that a government declares to be legal tender, but it has no intrinsic value — it’s not backed by a physical commodity like gold or silver. Its value is based on trust in the issuing authority, typically a central bank. Examples: USD, GBP, EUR, JPY, etc. Fiat currencies can be created in unlimited quantities. Historically, every fiat system has either collapsed or experienced significant devaluation over time. The Role of Central Banks Central banks (e.g., Federal Reserve, Bank of England) manage fiat money by: Controlling interest rates Setting inflation targets Engaging in Quantitative Easing (QE) (i.e., printing money to stimulate the economy) What is Inflation? Inflation is the decrease in purchasing power of a currency over time, typically measured by the rise in prices of goods and services. Types of Inflation: Demand-pull inflation – too much money chasing too few goods Cost-push inflation – rising production costs drive up prices Monetary inflation – increase in money supply Example: If the money supply grows faster than economic output, each unit of money becomes worth less — prices rise. How Is Inflation Measured? Mainstream economists use indexes like: CPI (Consumer Price Index) – tracks the cost of a “basket” of consumer goods Core CPI – removes volatile items like food and energy PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures) – used by the Fed Criticism: These may underestimate real inflation, especially asset price inflation (housing, stocks, education, healthcare, etc.). Money Supply and M2 M2 includes cash, checking deposits, and “near money” (e.g., savings accounts). A sharp rise in M2 is often seen as a precursor to inflation. Example: Between 2020–2021, the U.S. increased M2 supply by over 40%, unprecedented in modern history. Bitcoiners and Austrian economists viewed this as a sign of stealth inflation. Consequences of Inflation Savers are penalized — their purchasing power erodes Asset holders benefit — they gain wealth in nominal terms Can lead to wealth inequality, as those closest to the money printer (banks, hedge funds) get access to new money first (the Cantillon Effect) Bitcoiners’ View on Inflation The fiat system is inherently inflationary and unsustainable Inflation is not neutral — it transfers wealth from savers to debtors and the state Bitcoin is seen as a hedge or escape hatch from fiat devaluation, with a fixed supply of 21 million coins

reversenotation

Great way to use Chat GPT

jeremiahcp

Whoa, chill out, GPT; that's a massive wall of text.

expatfreedom

You’re entitled to your opinion and you’re arguing it very well. I understand where you’re coming from but I still disagree. With land it’s all about location, and it could appreciate a lot or depreciate a lot in 100 years. The next 100 will probably have far more places depreciate due to lowering populations and changing demand. But even if we go with the median or average price of land in 1920 and bring it to today, in dollar terms it only outpaces inflation if you completely ignore property taxes and only count inflation. Chat GPT: ————————— Let’s start with the basics: • 1920s Farmland Price (National Avg): ~$69/acre • Adjusted for inflation (2024 dollars): ~$1,000/acre • 2024 Farmland Value: ~$4,170/acre (USDA avg) So the raw appreciation is about 4.17x in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. That looks great—but now let’s go deeper. ⸻ 2. The Hidden Costs: Property Taxes Over 100 Years Typical Property Tax Rates on Farmland • Varies, but let’s use a conservative 0.5% annually • On $69 (original price), that’s ~$0.35/year/acre starting off • But taxes rise with land value, so they compound Estimate Total Property Tax Paid Over 100 Years Let’s approximate using real growth + inflation: • Assume average land value rose 2%/year in real terms + 3% inflation • Over 100 years, property taxes paid per acre ≈ $2,500–$4,000 total • (Simple estimate using geometric series or present-value tax models) That’s almost the same or more than the land’s current market value.

7374616e74

ok so it's really just a problem with tokens, so far did we have tokens that were not just memecoins? So L2 is not related to tokens at all? Thanks for the replies, I really need to get into all this more. You don't have to reply again, I'll continue with GPT, thanks!

Masta0nion

Chat GPT

Past_Hotel_5987

I actually use ChatGPT for that and also for translation. Except that I already did a test myself, I wrote content in French that I ran through Zero GPT, it was 100% human, but after translating it into other languages with AI, the same content showed 98% generated by AI. I then understood. I can't blame him for his comment. It's often easy to comment...

melonmeta

You people literally use GPT every single day. But when it says something you don'

AbysmalScepter

It's almost certainly a Chat GPT response lol.

-Resident-One-

Thanks Chat(GPT)

Yee4614

Your argument makes sense and I agree with it. It just loses all credibility when you are using chat GPT to present the argument

nickoaverdnac

GPT 4o Ghibli style going viral haha

jeremiahcp

https://i.redd.it/n2r96v8ik8re1.gif GPT doesn't know what fartcoin should look like, I guess it is not hip enough.

Realistic-Jelly8133

All Bitcoin at every point in time is secured by keys and they look something like this: 5HueCGU8rMjxEXxiPuD5BDuC3Bo9Y8bTq6CjfEnq38UbWgoU2xy Your seed phrase is just a way of generating a key like this that reduces user error. If you want to know more on the technicalities on how a seed phrase becomes a private key, chat GPT can be really good at explaining the process.

Melodic_Airport362

LOL chat GPT

CryptographicPanic

that is odd.. although GPT also has the figure i provide as accurate “ As of March 17, 2025, the exchange rate from Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL) to British Pound Sterling (GBP) is approximately 1 ZWL = 0.000001156 GBP. “ not sure what’s going on with google though

pop-1988

I've read in this sub that all the recent loans are convertible to MSTR shares. This Protos article says that, and also says the bond holders have the option to demand USD or purchase new bonds. That contradiction is typical of GPT-written news articles If the bonds all convert to shares because of BTC price falls, MSTR's share equity gets diluted. MSTR share price has downward pressure due to lower BTC prices, and due to this dilution. No bankruptcy, but a share price below $1

palekillerwhale

Are we just submitting conversations with GPT now as TA?

KingofTheTorrentine

You ran this through Chat GPT

the__itis

Custom prompt GPT take: This document describes BMAX, a new Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) that invests in convertible bonds issued by companies that hold Bitcoin in their corporate treasury. Here’s a breakdown: What This ETF Does • Focus on Convertible Bonds: Rather than holding Bitcoin directly, BMAX invests in convertible bonds issued by companies that use Bitcoin as a treasury asset (e.g., MicroStrategy (MSTR) and Marathon Digital (MARA)). • Hybrid Investment Approach: Convertible bonds offer a mix of fixed income (bonds) and equity upside (potential stock appreciation if converted). This can provide a more balanced risk-reward profile. • Simplifies Exposure to This Niche Strategy: Instead of investors buying individual convertible bonds, this ETF pools them into a single product. Why This Matters • Not Direct Bitcoin Exposure: This ETF doesn’t hold Bitcoin but invests in companies whose debt is tied to Bitcoin treasury strategies. • Lower Volatility vs. Holding Bitcoin: Since bonds have a fixed-income component, this ETF might provide a smoother return profile than direct Bitcoin investments. • Equity Upside Potential: If these companies’ stock prices rise (often correlated with Bitcoin prices), the convertible bonds can be converted into equity at a favorable rate. How It Works 1. Invests 80%+ in Convertible Bonds: Bonds from firms like MicroStrategy and Marathon Digital, which actively use Bitcoin as a treasury asset. 2. Actively Managed: Unlike passive ETFs that track an index, this ETF adjusts holdings to optimize returns. 3. Diversification Across Issuers: Instead of betting on one company’s convertible bonds, it spreads risk across multiple issuers. Key Risks and Considerations • Indirect Bitcoin Exposure: The fund’s performance depends on how well these companies manage their Bitcoin strategies and debt obligations. • Convertible Bond Risk: If Bitcoin prices drop significantly, these companies’ stocks could decline, affecting the convertible bonds’ value. • Market & Credit Risk: If issuing companies (like MicroStrategy) struggle financially, bond values could decline even if Bitcoin performs well. Who This is For • Crypto Investors Wanting Lower Volatility: This ETF provides exposure to Bitcoin-related companies with some downside protection. • Fixed-Income Investors Seeking Upside: Instead of traditional bonds, this gives potential equity appreciation tied to Bitcoin-driven companies. • Institutional or Conservative Crypto Allocations: A way to gain Bitcoin-related exposure without directly holding BTC.

softcatches

It’s also the same emojis and checkmates that chat GPT uses lol

freakythrowaway79

From my understand & research that is correct. Even between quantum computing & Ai technologies. Technically It would be "illegal" to hack or steal them. From my understanding even the most advanced technology won't be able to hack due to the hashing sequence. 🤔 The mathamatics involved is unthinkable. The blockchain has I'm not sure how accurate Chat GPT is but ask it yourself. There's at least low-level information available to learn about it. Estimating when SHA-256 might be broken by AI and quantum computers depends on the progress of both fields, especially quantum computing. Here’s an analysis based on current knowledge: 1. Classical Computing and AI Threats AI, even with advanced machine learning models, cannot directly break SHA-256 because it’s based on complex mathematical properties like the avalanche effect (small input changes cause large hash changes). However, AI could help: Identify patterns in hash generation or network vulnerabilities. Optimize the mining process to make it more efficient (but not to break the hashing itself). Therefore, AI alone is unlikely to break SHA-256 anytime soon, if ever. --- 2. Quantum Computing Threats Quantum computers pose a more serious threat because of their ability to solve certain mathematical problems exponentially faster than classical computers: Shor’s Algorithm Shor’s algorithm can theoretically break RSA and ECC encryption by factoring large numbers and solving discrete logarithms efficiently. However, SHA-256 is based on a one-way hashing function (not factoring or discrete logs), so Shor's algorithm cannot directly break SHA-256. Grover’s Algorithm Grover’s algorithm allows quantum computers to search an unsorted database (or invert a hash) in √N time instead of N time. For SHA-256, Grover’s algorithm could reduce the effective security from 256 bits to 128 bits — which is still very strong (AES-128 is considered secure against classical attacks). --- 3. Timeline Estimate Current quantum computers (like those from Google and IBM) have only reached about 1,000 qubits — far below the estimated millions of error-corrected qubits needed to threaten SHA-256 using Grover’s algorithm. Estimates vary, but experts predict that: It could take 15 to 30 years to develop a quantum computer capable of running Grover’s algorithm at a scale that could weaken SHA-256. It may take even longer (if ever) to reduce security to a practically exploitable level, considering the need for fault-tolerant qubits. --- 4. Post-Quantum Cryptography To prepare for this, researchers are working on post-quantum cryptography (PQC), which includes hash-based cryptography that quantum computers are unlikely to break. SHA-256 itself is not currently under immediate threat, but blockchain systems could eventually upgrade to quantum-resistant hashing algorithms (like SHA-3 or lattice-based methods). --- 👉 Conclusion AI is unlikely to break SHA-256 directly. Quantum computers using Grover’s algorithm might weaken SHA-256 to 128-bit security, but this would require millions of qubits and may take 15–30 years (or longer) to become practical. Blockchain systems will likely adopt quantum-resistant algorithms before quantum computing reaches this level.

findingkieron

Chat GPT The person in the Reddit post is asking if they can launch their own cryptocurrency, invest in it, and artificially increase its market cap and value to generate a profit. However, their logic is flawed for several reasons: Issues with Their Thinking: Market Cap Misconception: Market cap = Token Price × Total Supply If you create a crypto token with zero value and buy it for $500, you may create a price, but it doesn’t mean there’s real liquidity or external demand. Self-Investment Doesn’t Create Value: Investing $500 into your own coin doesn’t mean its market cap is suddenly worth $500 in real value. If you’re the only buyer, it’s essentially a closed-loop system with no real demand. Liquidity Problem: If you try to sell, who will buy? If the price was only set by you, selling it means the value could drop instantly. Pump and Dump / Wash Trading Risks: If you manipulate your own coin’s price by repeatedly buying at higher values, that can resemble wash trading (a form of market manipulation) and might be illegal or against exchange policies. Is It Possible? Technically, yes—you can create a coin and set an arbitrary price. Practically, no—you can't cash out profitably unless other people genuinely want to buy your token at the inflated price. If the person wants to leverage their own token, they need real market demand, liquidity, and utility—not just self-buying

jeremiahcp

That’s what my college students do with their homework, and it leads to poor grades and failed exams because GPT fabricates answers when uncertain—and it's especially bad at math and statistics, which is what I teach.

repezdem

You really just gonna copy and paste your GPT output? jfc

Vinny_d_25

Not just assumptions, assumptions backed by the very reliable source Chat-GPT

YourLastCall

After talking with chat GPT about this idea I have found out that fundamentally it is a sound idea but until it is scaled down to handle a temperature range of 40 to 80 degrees Celsius then it won't work for this type of environment because the current system needs extreme heat and Bitcoin mining rigs naturally don't operate at that level unless like the previous said which was essentially overclocking the rigs and that's bad for the rigs as far as heat is concerned. And even if it was scaled down it would only work in a cold environment.

Personal-Reality9045

Consider your faith in humanity restored. I have a different take on that. I think you'd be very interested in Jeremy Rifkin's writings. The concept you're discussing is zero marginal cost, but I believe it's actually moving toward negative marginal cost. This is because organic data will be so valuable in powering models that the models will pay people to use them, as these interactions will power the model. In the future, when using platforms like Claude or GPT, users will likely be paid for their usage because that data will be extremely valuable to those organizations.

battlesubie1

It is gaining momentum with the micro-transaction community. Nano-GPT is driving the onboarding of new $$ IMO

1bruhmomentos

Bits and bytes combine Cryptographic alchemy Satoshi’s vision​ (Claude Opus) Blockchain ledger glows Digital gold shimmers bright Fortune's ebb and flow (Claude Opus) Blockchain's steady beat Transactions dance in night Decentralized dream (Deepseek R1) Mining in the dark Solving puzzles, seeking light Wealth in ones and zeros (GPT 4o mini)

omg_its_dan

Chat GPT doesn’t have this info because it doesn’t exist. There’s no possible way to isolate UTXOs to individual holders on chain. At best you could make an estimate based on balances held on exchanges, but that will be skewed because most people with 100k+ will use cold storage.

OkFirefighter3970

Regards, chat GPT x

ayyy1m4o

Cousin of my friend's mother aunt tells me that it's GPT generated

Hyalus33

GPT said the 2013 wallet was before core did pruning. 🤷‍♂️ your guess is as good as mine.

Pasukaru0

OP said immaculate conception. Not inception. Also, your GPT example is pure speculation. There is no proof whatsoever that satoshi kept mining. In fact, the opposite may be the case. Check the timestamp between the first 2 blocks. Satoshi may have been waiting for others to join before he continued. But even that is speculation. The only 2 things we know for sure are the genesis coinbase (which can't be spent due to a bug thst would require a hardfork to fix), and the transaction to hal finney. If you have any proof of Satoshi mining any other blocks, please do let me know.

liiiizard

Price depends per model and depends on how much input and output you do. We have veeeery cheap models ($0.10 per million tokens) and veeeery expensive models (GPT 4.5 Preview, ~$100 per million tokens) and everything in between. We have a pricing page and show price estimates on all models.

liiiizard

Hi all! /u/Milan_dr and I run NanoGPT which gives access to all AI models through crypto, no subscription needed. **Payment statistics** We're turning into one of the bigger merchants both in terms of transaction count and transaction value. Because we'd love for more merchants to accept crypto we release payment statistics on how much different coins are used. [We just released the February Statistics](https://nano-gpt.com/blog/february-payment-stats), some highlights: - Nano is most used (56.1%) - Monero is second (18.7%) - Bitcoin is third (9.3%) For the full statistics check out the blog post. **Updates** - GPT 4.5 is now available. It's behind a $200 paywall with ChatGPT normally. - Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking is available. - All models can be web enabled now. We use Linkup, their integration scores absolute best on benchmarks. - Other new models: Grok 3, Perplexity's Deepsearch, Google's Imagen V3, o3-mini, Deepseek, Gemini 2.0. - The Shorts Generator has had a lot of updates, can now do up to 3 minutes, can do horizontal videos, and can be used via our API for mass generation. - UI/UX improvements, one that I like myself is being able to collapse the sidebar for a clean look, but also save multiple system prompts for example. - Search through our model in the model dropdown (since we now have so many) - Image input supported on most big models, file upload supported on all models. **Try for free** [We have a free model](https://nano-gpt.com/conversation?model=free-model&source=crypto) but it's honestly not the best. If you want to try NanoGPT and your Reddit account looks legit we'll send an invite to a pre-funded account so you can try out the full suite of models without any strings attached. Just comment below. Or of course deposit using crypto - minimum is just $0.10!

SonOfTheAfternoon

“A Dead Cat Bounce is a temporary and short-lived recovery in the price of a declining asset, such as a stock or cryptocurrency, before it continues to fall further. The term is based on the idea that even a dead cat will bounce if it falls from a great height, implying that the rebound is not a sign of a true market reversal but just a brief price increase before further decline.” Credits to chat GPT

Milan_dr

As the title says - we release these payment statistics every month. We weren't expecting BTC to be used this much since our website is primarily used for smaller payments, but we're happy to see it. BTC has also grown quite strongly (3.8% to 7.2% to 9.3%) so we're wondering what the data will be next month. For context: NanoGPT is a website where people can access all AI models without subscription, pay only for what you use. We have GPT 4.5, Claude Sonnet 3.7 (Thinking), Grok 3, Deepseek, any model you can think of. We also have web access (optional) for every model, we have image and file upload, we have image models, a video model, and generally our totally unbiased opinion is our service is a really cool usecase for crypto. For those that haven't tried it yet, if you want to try and your account looks real I'll gladly send you an invite with some funds in it to try, just drop a comment here.

binksee

Clear chat GPT karma farming

redditfov

Been using PPQ so far through OpenWebUI. I had just put about $5 in there, but I like it. Claude 3.7 and GPT 4.5 arrived really quickly, I was shocked for a bit at that. The accountless aspect is also pretty cool - reminds me of Mullvad. I guess my question is, what would you say the advantages are compared to something like OpenRouter?

choppathekid

😎😎 I also pay for GPT4.0 and know for a fact you didn’t type any of this lmao

8A8

\>See more than 5 words \>Can't comprehend people typing things \>"Nice Chat GPT"

choppathekid

Op uses chat GPT lol

choppathekid

Nice chat GPT post.

CiaranCarroll

Thanks for stating the obvious GPT.

Milan_dr

**Questions that seem relevant here** **Q: Can I see some reviews?** Definitely. We collected a lot of them [here](https://nano-gpt.com/testimonials), but we recommend just Googling for "Nano-GPT site:reddit.com". Alternatively, check out [our previous post on this sub.](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1hutlru/crypto_usecase_nanogpt_access_all_ai_models_o1/) **Q: Do you have an API?** A: We do, it's OpenAI compatible. Web search can also be used via the API, just append :online for standard or :online/linkup-deep for deep search. We know there are quite some crypto agents that use us as their backend. **Q: What do you use for web search?** A: We use Linkup, [they score best](https://www.linkup.so/blog/linkup-establishes-sota-performance-on-simpleqa) and do so at a very affordable price. **Q: How do uncensored models work?** A: To be clear, we're not system prompting Claude to be uncensored in some way. We don't do *extra* censoring on it, but Claude is censored on Anthropic's side. We offer uncensored models like abliterated versions of Llama and Deepseek.

Milan_dr

**NanoGPT lets anyone can access GPT 4.5, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Perplexity Deep Research + a bunch of other (also uncensored) models on a pay-per-use basis. Deposit with crypto for full privacy, we store nothing. Sending out prefunded accounts to try it out.** Minimum deposit is just $0.10, we would say that for the crypto we support we have the best possible payment integration. We support: - Nano - Monero - Solana (plus all Solana tokens, finally some use for those memecoins) - Ethereum (plus Base, Optimism, Polygon, Arbitrum) - USDC and USDT on many chains - Bitcoin and its more payment-friendly forks (Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Dogecoin, Dash) - Banano (Nano's memecoin brother) - Binance Pay - Coinbase Wallet - Every other crypto via swap, but then receiving takes longer Our list of models is genuinely too big to list (100+, every model you can think of), we have image generation via Recraft, Flux, Ideogram, Dall-E, Playground etc, some NSFW stuff if that's your thing, a Shorts Generator, and perhaps most magically **you can access GPT 4.5 which is normally locked behind a $200 subscription**. All of our models can be web enabled so they're fully up to date (they use Google, essentially), all support file upload, most support image upload. We have an OpenAI compatible API which people are using for on-chain bots, an auto model for those that just want to always use the best model, and a ton of other neat features. The online capabilities can be even be appended to models via API, just append :online (for standard) or :online/linkup-deep for a deeper web search. **Privacy** We do not store any prompts, any conversations or any identifiable information about you. Our service can even be used without an account, and paying in crypto means no payment information given. Your conversation history is stored only locally on your device, which has the downside that when you switch devices you can't access past chats but does give you full control. If you clear your cache or delete individual conversations they're literally gone. We never store them. **Try it out for free** I'd love for people to try depositing $0.10 in your crypto of choice so you can give feedback on our payment flow. If we can improve anything we'd love to hear, but also we know of quite some people that use our platform as a demonstration of how easy payments using their crypto work. Alternatively if your Reddit account looks legit **I'll send an invite to a pre-funded account so you can try out the full suite of models without any strings attached.** Obviously open to any questions! Also, fun fact: we're also in the r/cc Telegram chat, our image generation models are used a ton there.

arthurwolf

> Here’s a concise English post Where is the post? Did you mean to add a link? Or did you forget to copy/paste something??? > By the way, even GPT finds this approach quite plausible, You really think that helps your argument? > GPT itself brought it up! **After you asked it to**... > why it’s actually straightforward It's most definitely not straightforward, you completely ignored the multiple explanations of why it isn't... > I asked GPT to ‘think like a cyberpunk and find the inventor of Bitcoin.’ Yes, you asked ChatGPT to write fiction. And it did. There's zero expectation of rigour here... > Sure enough, the modulo-26 puzzle for サトシ ナカモト leads straight to ‘HAL FINA,’ There is nothing straight about this. There are near infinite different ways to go about this, and they lead to near infinite outputs, which is **exactly** the same mechanism/problem as the bible code. > Also what do you mean « 12469 mod 26 = 8 » ... no man, 12469 mod 26 = 15, what are you on about ??? Like, seriously man ??? > leads [straight[sic]] to ‘HAL FINA,’ which can be creatively interpreted as ‘Hal Finney.’ And that has absolutely no connection to the fact that the training data for ChatGPT contains knowledge of the known candidates for Satoshi's identity.... For sure... **Huge** sigh... > It’s a simple, elegant numeric trick— It absolutely is not though.... Even skipping you got the modulo wrong. Even skipping the obvious parralels with the bible code and other well debunked methods. This is not an elegant method... There are a near infinite number of methods that could start from a Japanese name, and get you to "HAL FINNEY" (no smudging required), in fewer steps. You just very clearly do not undertsand what the problem is with bible-code-like methods, I recommend you read up on it. > Whether it’s a genuine Easter egg or just a coincidence remains to be seen It's nothing. It's **obviously** nothing... > but it But it what ??

yokmubenisiken

GPT-4o on a raspberry pi 2

LordIommi68

Just had a discussion with a guy that kept saying over and over that it was a Ponzi scheme but couldn't demonstrate in any way how it was. At one point he actually said why don't you ask chat GPT? So I did and it said it wasn't a Ponzi scheme and I still haven't heard anything from the guy since 🤣 I noticed certain media outlets putting out stories about how some financial expert thinks Bitcoin is going to zero. The comments are full of people who just repeat the same dumb non-arguments as if they're facts.

Dense_Reply_11

Do you have Chat GPT?

The1WhoDares

I think he’s saying he built his own GPT model. Correct me if I’m wrong?

Dukangom

GPT is very cold and cruel, so I have to ask them to teach me well. It's the same as a human...

Sad-Debt789

I don't understand responses like this. Yeah, I could and I did, so what did I miss? Couldn't you have Googled and GPT'd through all your questions about ETH? Literally anyone could do these things but they're not actual discussions on the topic. So what's the plans, sentiments, experience, speculations, and opinions?

bbt104

According to my GPT, it should be about $110,000 by the first of March. Not that I'm using it to plan my buys, but I am studying how accurate it's predictions are. Jan 7th i asked it to predict February 1st price, it was within a few hundred dollars. That was the first time I asked it to make a prediction, now I'm just curious if that was a lucky guess or if it might actually be able to see trends and make good predictions.

Dapper_Landscape_909

Giving Chat GPT your wallet address is just diabolical 😂

DereksCrazy

Asked chat GPT how I could crack Satoshi’s wallet with this 8 qubit processor and it gave me the following: An 8-qubit processor is far from capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography. Bitcoin’s security is based on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) using the secp256k1 curve, which relies on the discrete logarithm problem—a problem that is currently infeasible to solve with classical or near-term quantum computers. Why Your 8-Qubit Processor Won’t Work: 1. Quantum Volume Matters More Than Qubit Count – An 8-qubit processor has neither the coherence time nor the error correction needed for meaningful cryptographic attacks. 2. Shor’s Algorithm Requires Thousands of Logical Qubits – To break a 256-bit ECC key, you would need a fault-tolerant quantum computer with millions of physical qubits to account for noise and error correction. 3. Current Quantum Computers Are Not There Yet – The most advanced quantum processors today (as of 2025) are in the range of a few hundred physical qubits and are far from breaking ECC or SHA-256. What Would Be Needed to Break Bitcoin? • A large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer with at least 3000+ logical qubits (which translates to millions of physical qubits). • A stable implementation of Shor’s algorithm for ECC, which is purely theoretical for now. • Decades of advancements in quantum error correction and hardware. Reality Check: Bitcoin remains safe from quantum attacks in the foreseeable future. If practical quantum attacks on ECC emerge, the Bitcoin network can upgrade to quantum-resistant cryptography (e.g., lattice-based cryptography) before any real threat materializes. If you’re interested in quantum computing, it’s more productive to explore fields like quantum chemistry, optimization, and cryptographic research rather than hypothetical attacks on well-secured systems.

BraidRuner

I did a chart on Chat GPT to track a daily weekly monthly buy schedule for 3 years. Its pretty inspirational to see how $50 per week can accumulate

m1ndfulpenguin

I asked GPT 4 why scratching my pubes was louder than scratching my hair, even though my head hair is closer to my ears...... *It knew the answer.* 😲 AI man.. its the only bet that matters anymore.

Far_Situation945

I asked GPT to *think like a cyberpunk* and pinpoint Bitcoin’s inventor. Look at the Katakana for **Satoshi Nakamoto**: cssCopyEditサ → ト → シ → ナ → カ → モ → ト ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ Unicode → mod 26 → letters ↓ H A L F I N A That gives **HAL FINA**. Then comes the clever twist: * The Katakana **ト** (To) looks like an upside-down **Y**. * So **“FINA”** → **“FINAY”** → **“FINNEY”** (phonetically close). Hence, you get **HAL FINNEY**—the famous early Bitcoiner and first recipient of a BTC transaction from “Satoshi.” A single-step numeric mapping, no wild offsets. Whether it’s an intentional Easter egg or pure coincidence is up for debate, but it certainly looks compelling!

Far_Situation945

 I asked GPT to ‘think like a cyberpunk and find the inventor of Bitcoin.’ Sure enough, the modulo-26 puzzle for `サトシ ナカモト` leads straight to ‘HAL FINA,’ which can be creatively interpreted as ‘Hal Finney.’ It’s a simple, elegant numeric trick—no slapped-together Bible-code contrivance. Whether it’s a genuine Easter egg or just a coincidence remains to be seen, but it

Far_Situation945

Oh yeah, I forgot, sorry! No, seriously now: I asked GPT to ‘think like a cyberpunk and find the inventor of Bitcoin.’ Sure enough, the modulo-26 puzzle for `サトシ ナカモト` leads straight to ‘HAL FINA,’ which can be creatively interpreted as ‘Hal Finney.’ It’s a simple, elegant numeric trick—no slapped-together Bible-code contrivance. Whether it’s a genuine Easter egg or just a coincidence remains to be seen, but it certainly looks compelling!

Far_Situation945

Here’s a concise English post addressing why the **Katakana → Unicode → Modulo 26 → ASCII** approach for “Satoshi Nakamoto” isn’t necessarily “Bible-code nonsense,” and why it’s actually *straightforward*—even if it doesn’t *prove* Hal Finney was Satoshi. (By the way, even GPT finds this approach quite plausible, and GPT itself brought it up!)

mr_605

I get a different answer when I ask the same question Copy paste below The most powerful computer network on Earth is arguably the global internet itself, as it connects billions of devices and data centers worldwide, enabling distributed computing on an unprecedented scale. However, if you are asking about specific high-performance computing (HPC) networks or supercomputing clusters, here are a few contenders: 1. The Internet • The internet is the largest and most powerful network of interconnected computers, facilitating global communication, cloud computing, and distributed systems like cryptocurrency mining and AI model training. 2. The U.S. Department of Energy’s High-Performance Networks • ESnet (Energy Sciences Network): A high-speed network supporting advanced research and scientific collaboration among the world’s most powerful supercomputers, such as those at Oak Ridge, Argonne, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories. 3. Fugaku Supercomputer (Japan) • Located at RIKEN, Fugaku was the world’s fastest supercomputer (as of 2021) and operates at over 442 petaflops. • It is connected to a vast high-performance computing (HPC) network for scientific research. 4. Summit and Frontier (USA) • Frontier at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is the first exascale supercomputer, exceeding 1 exaflop (10¹⁸ calculations per second), making it the most powerful single supercomputer in the world. • Summit, also at Oak Ridge, was a leader in AI and molecular simulations. 5. Google’s TPU Clusters • Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) supercomputer clusters power deep learning models like GPT-4, AlphaFold, and Bard. • These are among the most advanced AI computing networks, leveraging high-speed interconnects to train massive machine learning models. 6. Distributed Computing Networks • BOINC (Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing): A decentralized computing network that allows users to donate spare computing power for scientific research (e.g., SETI@Home, Folding@Home). • Cryptocurrency Networks: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other blockchains represent vast decentralized networks with immense combined processing power. 7. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google Cloud Networks • These cloud computing providers operate some of the largest distributed data center networks, hosting AI, enterprise applications, and large-scale scientific computations. Conclusion: If you define “powerful” in terms of raw computational capability, Frontier is currently the fastest supercomputer. However, if you consider sheer scale and impact, the internet and cloud networks (AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure) collectively form the most powerful computing system.

bansebe91

Not the answer I received from chat GPT when I posed the exact same question. "As of February 2025, the most powerful computing network on Earth is the El Capitan supercomputer, which became operational in November 2024 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, USA. El Capitan achieved a performance of 1.742 exaFLOPS (quintillion floating-point operations per second), surpassing previous records. El Capitan's architecture comprises 43,808 AMD 4th Generation EPYC 24-core CPUs and an equal number of AMD Instinct MI300A GPUs, totaling over 11 million cores. This design enables it to handle complex simulations and computations, particularly for the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration's stockpile stewardship program. In the realm of distributed computing, the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) stands out. As of 2024, WLCG integrates approximately 1.4 million computer cores and 1.5 exabytes of storage across over 170 sites in 42 countries. It processes more than 2 million tasks daily, with global data transfer rates exceeding 260 GB/s, supporting the data-intensive experiments conducted at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. While blockchain networks like Bitcoin have been described as powerful due to their vast number of participating nodes and significant hash rates, it's important to note that their computational power is specialized for cryptographic hashing rather than general-purpose computing tasks. Therefore, their capabilities differ fundamentally from those of supercomputers like El Capitan. In summary, El Capitan currently holds the title for the most powerful centralized computing system, while the WLCG represents one of the most extensive distributed computing networks globally."

Erect_Ethiopian

Because chat GPT isn’t always correct.

Chimera_Ant

Chat GPT is wild, I just tried yours and got this. XRP, the native cryptocurrency of the Ripple network, is designed to facilitate fast and cost-effective international payments. Its consensus protocol enables transactions to be validated every 3 to 5 seconds, offering rapid settlement times. Additionally, XRP is known for its low energy consumption compared to other cryptocurrencies, making it an environmentally friendly option. [en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRP_Ledger?utm_source=chatgpt.com) As of February 15, 2025, XRP is trading at $2.79 USD, reflecting a 1.83% increase from the previous close. The intraday high is $2.82 USD, and the intraday low is $2.69 USD. XRP (XRP)$2.79+$0.05(+1.82%)Today1D5D1M6MYTD1Y5Ymax THERE WAS A BIG OL GRAPH HERE. Recently, XRP has experienced significant growth, partly due to the U.S. presidential election results. Following Donald Trump's victory, XRP's market capitalization surged, overtaking Tether to become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market value. [cincodias.elpais.com](https://cincodias.elpais.com/criptoactivos/2024-12-02/xrp-destrona-a-tether-y-se-convierte-en-la-tercera-criptomoneda-mas-valiosa.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com) In terms of regulatory developments, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has acknowledged Grayscale's application to list an XRP exchange-traded fund (ETF) on the New York Stock Exchange. The SEC has a final deadline of October 12 to approve or deny the application. [ccn.com](https://www.ccn.com/news/crypto/sec-xrp-etf-review-clock-starts-october-deadline/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) However, XRP has faced legal challenges, notably a lawsuit from the SEC alleging the sale of unregistered securities. While the court ruled that XRP itself is not a security, the manner of its sale could be considered as such. [en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRP_Ledger?utm_source=chatgpt.com) In summary, XRP offers a unique value proposition in the cryptocurrency space with its focus on efficient cross-border payments and rapid transaction times. While it has faced legal hurdles, recent developments suggest a positive outlook for the cryptocurrency. As with all investments, it's essential to conduct thorough research and consider the inherent risks associated with the crypto market.

Chimera_Ant

Chat GPT -> "Give me a review of XRP" XRP is a digital asset and cryptocurrency created by Ripple Labs, designed to facilitate fast, low-cost international money transfers. Here's a review of XRP, based on several key aspects: # 1. Technology and Use Case XRP was created with the goal of enabling efficient cross-border transactions. Unlike many other cryptocurrencies that aim for decentralized financial systems, XRP focuses on interoperability between different financial networks. It allows institutions to settle transactions quickly, with a transaction speed of around 3-5 seconds. This makes it much faster than Bitcoin or Ethereum, which can take minutes to confirm transactions. Ripple's consensus algorithm (not mining-based) allows XRP to process transactions with minimal energy consumption. The idea is that XRP can be used as a bridge currency to move money between different fiat currencies, without requiring a third-party intermediary like SWIFT or traditional banks. # 2. Speed and Cost XRP transactions are notably fast and cheap compared to traditional banking systems or other cryptocurrencies. The network can handle thousands of transactions per second (TPS), and the cost per transaction is often just a fraction of a cent. This makes it very appealing for remittance services, financial institutions, and large-scale payment systems. # 3. Adoption and Partnerships Ripple has secured significant partnerships with banks and financial institutions across the world. Companies like Santander, American Express, and PNC have explored or used Ripple's technology to improve their payment systems. However, its adoption hasn't been as widespread as some other cryptocurrencies, and it remains more focused on enterprise-level applications. # 4. Regulatory Issues One of the biggest hurdles XRP faces is regulatory uncertainty, especially in the U.S. The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, claiming that XRP was an unregistered security. This lawsuit has created legal ambiguity for investors and institutions using XRP. The outcome of this case is still ongoing and could have significant implications for XRP's future. # 5. Market Performance XRP has been one of the top cryptocurrencies by market capitalization for several years, but its price can be volatile. Like other digital assets, its value tends to fluctuate based on broader market conditions and news related to Ripple's ongoing legal battles. # 6. Criticism Some critics argue that XRP is too centralized compared to Bitcoin or Ethereum, as Ripple Labs controls a large portion of the token supply. This centralization is seen as a negative by those who advocate for a more decentralized financial system. Additionally, the legal issues surrounding Ripple and XRP have cast a shadow over the asset, creating skepticism among some investors. # Conclusion XRP is a unique cryptocurrency with a clear use case for improving the efficiency of international money transfers. Its speed, low cost, and partnerships with established financial institutions make it an interesting project, especially for enterprises. However, regulatory uncertainty and concerns about centralization remain key factors that could affect its long-term success. Investors should weigh the potential for growth against the risks posed by the legal challenges and the competitive landscape of other payment technologies.

1ecommillionReasons

surely someone has made you aware of the 4-year cycle? 2013 2017 2021 2025 we haven't even begun alt season, 2025 is poised for a Huge run... institutional money has never been a part of the bull-run as much as it is now this guy will help you catch up - "Simply Bitcoin" on youtube ETF's have purchased 3x more than what was mined, facts 29 states are working on bills for bitcoin purchase, USA STATES facts the scale out plan is where you need to focus Mine? Bitcoin $200,000 (alt coins naturally surge by far more Percentiles than BTC, 600% btc, 1000% plus in some alts, I hold like 20 different ones) BTC 200k, I'll sell 1/3 BTC 500k I'll sell another 1/3 on the way up to that the decisions you need to make now are... HOW much will you hold onto, to let it ride just in case Bitcoin hits $500k or even $800k ??? What if the world's superpowers decide whoever owns the most btc has the most power? also, note that in 2021, it hit $68k in LATE 2021 I anticipate 2 surges, I'm holding 50% for the 2nd surge essentially, or selling and rebuying if it dips hard back to these levels google btc halving chart cycle do some basic math, chat gpt helps chat GPT will tell you by how many %'s each surge was when deep pockets of private businesses and governments begin to buy.. THEY WILL NOT SELL and they will spin any news they desire to get Individuals to sell their bitcoin for them to hold For Life. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxNeMGUW584](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxNeMGUW584) [https://youtu.be/N7s1o\_d3Q\_0?si=3h1BQinJsIbh4\_42](https://youtu.be/N7s1o_d3Q_0?si=3h1BQinJsIbh4_42) the best way to put it is... this bull run will melt Everyone's face right off... no one will be able to hold and not sell when bitcoin hits $500,000...... except those who make a PLAN to hold their final 1/3 of the bag until Nov Dec 2025 just to see what happens next as 29 states consider BTC, Michael Sailor owns over 200,000 and keeps buying, Black Rock, China, anyways

Careless_Ant_4430

I actually have lots of orange pill role play chats with chat GPT, to broaden my understanding, and get better at answering particular types of questions

derbyfan1

What a stupid post. All that energy in to this crap?? I would suggest it may have been Chat GPT, but even Chat GPT cant be this dumb. Well done OP.

origamipaperclippp

Check out r/CryptoBluAI .. project that is taking the new GPT4 AI & LLAMA3 for raw processing leverage When it launches will benefit Crypto traders as a whole. Scam probability scoring, sentient trading if you trust it, market prediction & SCARY near stalker-level insights in regard to whales.

Lillica_Golden_SHIB

OP didn't have time to read what GPT generated I guess