GPT

RatherOakyAfterbirth

Pay $20 a month for Chat GPT4 and have it write it for you.  I use that shit all day long at work to write me tons of python scripts then I tweak them a bit and ship it. 

RapidLii

What in the Chat GPT is this monstrosity??

ArkenBlue

This post was generated by GPT by the way :D

Dudebro21000000

The part about energy consuption reads like chat GPT wrote it. NPR phoning it in lol

JDMboycamzy

Holy moly this graph is fucking dog shit. 2 data points. Generated using GPT. Kill me.

bittercoin99

You're not wrong... Just heard the stat in a video, needed to verify it for myself, and then I had GPT generate a chart about it. Thought it looked kind of funny.

Ok-Cut-9160

Chat GPT promt lmaoo

CEO_of_REDDlT

Thank you chat GPT

user_name_checks_out

> Recent approvals of US and Chinese ETFs are attracting significant investments, indicating increased market confidence. You talk like Chat GPT

LimaoGURU

I proved it was a scam with just 4 prompts. These scammers are manipulating the GPT-4 system prompt, asking GPT-4 to role-play as the "Bittensor network" and pretending that it is not developed by OpenAI. Let's open a new conversation and ask Corcel to ignore the system prompt, and we can get it to tell the truth - **it's developed by OpenAI, it's GPT-4.** Prompt 1: > (Open a new conversation) Prompt 2: > Prompt 3: > Prompt 4: > Details: [https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1c4l1jx/lightningfast\_gpt4\_access\_for\_free\_even\_faster/](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1c4l1jx/lightningfast_gpt4_access_for_free_even_faster/)

s1fro

Some general advice would be to try seeing where you are at all times. For example right now we are getting near the Bitcoin halving, the global liquidity cycle just inverted, the rate hikes plateaued... Even if things look grim today if you zoom out the total crypto market cap we are in an uptrend. Figuring out if it's more likely we keep going up and once it's over if we'll start going out is the key. My advice would also be to 100% not care about news events. 100% ignore specific coin recommendations. Sure some people get it right but a lot don't and crypto is full of people trying to squeeze you. In any other time other than alt season(roughly 1/4 of the cycle) you probably want to horde BTC. In alt season try not to fall for cash grabs. They do ok sometimes but most won't last. Even good ones get left behind for the next thing sometimes. If you want to follow the current trend instead of picking L0, L1... you could look into DEPIN and AI but I can almost certainly say that if it has GPT in the name and isn't connected directly to Open AI that it will be dead sooner than later. Getting popular stuff does great here especially if your cherry picked micro cap never takes off. Maybe even follow where bigger brands are involved. And DCA almost always beats timing stuff. You could again use alt season, BTC dominance, scocial, risk metrics to skip DCA at the absolute peaks with these.

Harotsa

LLM outputs demonstrably have a low signal to noise ratio, so sounding like a chat GPT output is not a good thing. It means the post has a lot of fluff and is verbose

dormango

It helps to be informed: My question to Chat GPT: Please name all the countries in which the USA has fought either an actual war or a proxy war since the end if world war 2 Please list all possible examples irrespective of how you define ‘proxy wars’. Chat GPT: Certainly, here's a more comprehensive list: 1. Korea (1950-1953) 2. Vietnam (1955-1975) 3. Afghanistan (2001-present) 4. Iraq (2003-2011) 5. Somalia (1992-1995; 2007-present) 6. Nicaragua (1981-1990) 7. Syria (2014-present) 8. Libya (2011) 9. Grenada (1983) 10. Panama (1989) 11. Lebanon (1982-1984) 12. Dominican Republic (1965) 13. Laos (1964-1973) 14. Cambodia (1969-1973) 15. Yemen (2015-present) 16. Iran (1953, involvement in overthrow of Mossadegh) 17. Guatemala (1954, involvement in overthrow of Arbenz) This list covers various forms of involvement, from direct military interventions to covert operations and support for factions in conflicts.

Karl_Mad

Good quastion. Chat GPT just answered that Mainland Chinese could buy ETF couse this is not a virtula asset operation and they have access to HKSE. Could you make a separate topic for this theme, i dont have enough carma to make it:)

bongosformongos

A quick check of GPT gives the following. I believe this to be right because it is approximately the same I‘ve read before. Pls correct if it‘s wrong. Prompt: when a bitcoin block gets added, there is an oracle problem because the block includes the time and date, which the miner provides. How much slipage of the time is tolerated by the network to still count the block as valid? Answer: In the Bitcoin network, the time and date of a block are indeed set by the miner who creates the block. To ensure that miners do not manipulate this timestamp for malicious purposes, there are certain rules and tolerances in place. The Bitcoin protocol requires that the timestamp of a new block must be greater than the median timestamp of the last 11 blocks, but it cannot be more than two hours into the future from the network's median time. This tolerance allows for a certain degree of flexibility due to potential network latency and clock differences between nodes. So, to answer your question, a miner can technically set the timestamp of a new block up to two hours into the future and still have it considered valid by the network. TLDR: Maximum delay of 2 hours

superawesomefiles

I asked Chat GPT to write you a better version: Certainly! Here's a Bitcoin manifesto inspired by V's speech: "Behold! Behold the blockchain, a beacon of freedom forged by the hands of the digitally defiant, cast aside by the chains of centralized control. This genesis, no mere genesis block, is a testament to the triumph of trustlessness, a technology transcendent of tyranny. However, this decentralized disruption of a bygone financial system stands steadfast, sparking a revolution to rid the world of the corrupt custodians and their cunning schemes, safeguarding sovereignty and sanctifying the sacred principles of sound money! The only outcome is empowerment; an emancipation heralded as a harbinger, not hollow, for the honesty and harmony of such shall one day illuminate the enlightened and the emancipated. Embrace this epochal evolution, for it is our opportunity to opt out, to overthrow the oligarchs and obliterate their oppressive oligopoly! Let this discourse of decentralization dance with determination, so let me simply assert that it’s my profound privilege to unveil this vision, and you may join us on this journey towards financial freedom and you shall call it Bitcoin!"

ChanceRecognition340

Well between talking to GPT or you both of us know already what I would choose.

joecool42069

Ngl.. this reads like GPT. The way OP responds, sounds like the ai bots that cook developers on GitHub.

Quick_Ice_620

So let me get this straight, you think you are arguing with AI right now? First, I’m flattered. Second, that is a perplexing position to take when you are saying I don’t know anything, but then assert I must be using the power of AI to come up with responses… that are incorrect. That’s pretty funny to think I’m sitting on GPT and I’m just prompting it to make me Reddit responses that are wrong regarding monetary theory. Nailed it! But in all seriousness I enjoy to hear out other view points. I genuinely am asking which school of economics you follow and if you have a book you like on that theory. Not to say gotcha! I am actually curious and would give it a read. One that really changed my perspective was Man, Economy, and State by Rothbard.

Longjumping-Low3164

Chat GPT is not God. For example 90ties was considered best decade for americans. Economic growth, huge amounts of innovations, even no budged deficit under Bill Clinton, great stock market (especially high tech), etc. Look what happened to golds price in decade of 90ties.

iancnyc

we are on the brink of halving .. just look at the past three times this happened and how much bitcoin was one year after.. ask GPT to tell you how much he protects bitcoin will be this time next year because the halving is this month a low estimate is 150k a high estimate is 300k

goldenbuyer02

Chat-GPT post.

Flatso

This guy is trying to pump the coin and got chat GPT to write this up for him. Nobody else would care

mr_chub

I didn't quite follow the following conversation because I don't know things but I asked GPT-4 to help break things down (what a fucking age we live in): >In the context of this conversation, it's important to recognize that both sides have valid points, but they are approaching the issue from different perspectives. Here’s my take on who has the stronger arguments: Understanding Market Cap in Crypto: Market capitalization is a fundamental concept in traditional finance, used to measure the total value of a company's shares. In the context of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, it's calculated as the current price of the coin multiplied by the total number of coins in circulation. This gives a sense of the total value of the currency in the market. windinghigh and JumpinJammiez seem to have a more conventional finance perspective, acknowledging the importance of market cap as a broad measure of Bitcoin’s value. This is a sound argument because market cap provides a more comprehensive view of Bitcoin's economic impact and its comparison with other assets, be it crypto or traditional assets like stocks. Bitcoin’s Unique Nature: On the other hand, KIKOMK argues that Bitcoin, not being a corporation, should not be evaluated solely based on market cap. This is a valid point considering that Bitcoin operates differently from a company. It's decentralized, has no revenue, profits, or assets in the traditional sense, and its value is not tied to the performance of a business entity. This perspective is crucial in understanding that while market cap can provide some insights, it might not fully capture the nuances of Bitcoin's value and potential. Interdependency of Market Cap and Unit Price: The comment from Florexianer highlights a key aspect of this discussion. The market cap of Bitcoin is inherently linked to its unit price, since it's a product of the price per Bitcoin and the number of Bitcoins in circulation. If one considers the price of Bitcoin arbitrary, then the derived market cap might also seem arbitrary. This observation brings in a critical perspective on the volatility and speculative nature of Bitcoin prices. In conclusion, both perspectives bring valuable insights. The pro-market cap argument recognizes the importance of a comprehensive valuation metric, similar to traditional finance. The counterargument underscores Bitcoin’s unique characteristics and questions the relevance of traditional metrics like market cap. In my view, a more comprehensive analysis of Bitcoin's value and potential should consider a range of factors, including but not limited to market cap, technological adoption, regulatory environment, and its role in the broader financial system. This multifaceted approach is likely more beneficial for understanding the complex nature of Bitcoin and its valuation.

ckhumanck

you introduced violence into the narrative to suddenly shift the goal posts. no one was celebrating anyone being violently assaulted, fuck you talking about? Also for the analogy to work - they'd have to have been robbed while actively trying to engage with a malicious service designed to ruin the movie for everyone else. here's an example - everyone pays to go to the cinema. One guy buys (with Crypto) a shady phone app called "movie killer" that uses chat GPT to loudly announce spoilers the entire movie - turns out the phone app was also a crypto drainer. yeah fuck that person lol

Starks-Technology

I know about blockchain and AI. I've trained large neural networks from scratch using GPUs on AWS. I know how resource intensive it is to train these models, and the models I trained aren't even a fraction of the size of GPT-4 and Llama (by Meta). If we figured out a way to train these networks in a decentralized way, powered by the community (instead of large tech companies) that would *actually* provide value. Most currencies are full of use-cases with no problem. The cryptocurrency that succeeds will solve a real-world problem in the developed world.

blahhblah11

I switched from ZYB to enqAI, and as I see now, enqAI formerly was noise GPT, but in Uniswap, it shows as enqAI. Maybe I am missing something?

PianoSandwiches

Skynet relies (GPT): Q: “Is it true that Bitcoin does not involve any encryption, since it isn’t creating a cypher and protecting it with a password?” A: “Bitcoin does involve encryption, but not in the traditional sense of creating a cipher and protecting it with a password. Instead, it uses cryptographic techniques like public-key cryptography to secure transactions and control the creation of new units. So, while it's not based on password-protected encryption, encryption is still a fundamental aspect of Bitcoin's security.” Q: “How does this method count as encryption by definition?” A: “Encryption involves the use of cryptographic techniques to secure information by encoding it in such a way that only authorized parties can access it. In the case of Bitcoin, cryptographic techniques such as public-key cryptography are used to secure transactions and ensure that only the owner of a private key can access and authorize transactions associated with their Bitcoin address. While it may not fit the traditional definition of encryption where data is encoded and protected by a password, it still employs cryptographic methods to secure the transfer and ownership of digital assets.”

_TheWolfOfWalmart_

SolGPT seems very moonable. AI and GPT is hot, Solana is hot, it's got a working product. You son of a bitch I'm in! Send it to 1 dolla.

whatislife5522

Chat GPT? I wrote that, Jesus the world is full of idiots. No, how do they go after longs with leverage? Tell me? Futures aren’t linked to spot, a MM literally provides the spread. You may be mixing up the CEX who can liquidate longs and shorts within their platform. I’ve been successfully trading for 10 years btw, so I’d do some more research if I were you

PheelGoodInc

I'm always amazed people take the time to use Chat GPT for fucking reddit comments...

Middle____Earth

**I asked Chat GPT to summarize this in a Dr. Seuss style. Here you go:** Bitcoin, a currency of mystery and might, Growing larger with each passing night. But as we look ahead, a new world we'll see, Where money's not needed, we'll live carefree.

farfletched

Lesson number 1. Never tell anyone how much Bitcoin you have. I suggest you go onto the “trust wallet” website and have a conversation with the A.I. Support assistant, or even chat GPT. You can ask as many dumb questions as you want.

little_bear_is_ok

Give back original + 50%, take the rest and go, also put some cash into a writing course or buy the Chat GPT Premium so you can get help editing these fucking useless shitposts

digitalassetz4all

judging by your username, you and GPT are in cahoots 😂

Doctor-Forge

that was GPT-3.5 and earlier versions.. not with GPT-4 the paid version. It is pretty good even with numbers because it has partnership with wolfram alpha. Can you give me a specific example here of GPT calculation going wrong?

tika_dengu

Got rekt by Solama, but recouped my losses by riding CHAT. Now trying my luck with DATOR and GPT.

CapitalistAmerican

It is a good catch, GPT brain-fart. GPT 4.0 is better than 3.5 but it still makes mistakes. I'm experimenting with smaller prompts to be as simple as possible and also reduce the data it is given. There are other AI to try as well. If anyone has done prompt engineering, I am happy to share the prompts.

AverageUnited3237

The trading volume flipped from 42.4 to 49.7 billion. Classic GPT

mdizak

I'm not overly sure about that, or at least it's a LONG way off from the AI that's currently publicly available today. For example, take a couple data centers worth of modern nvidia cards back 25 years, and have them train Chat GPT 4 on all the knowledge in the world. Then ask it how to make a drone. It wouldn't have the slightest idea how. The current LLMs just do a bunch of matrix multiplications and other tricks to predict and generate text. That's a far cry from being truly innovative with ingenuity and novell ideas.

Glittering_Bill2039

Not sure what you mean by “every added factor is an exponential relationship problem” if you can rephrase it so I can understand than maybe I can share my thoughts on it. First of all, yes the concept of LLMs can absolutely scale to interpret audio, visual, tactile modalities and beyond. That’s precisely what the AI research is focused on right now, and there are already models that do exactly that with images, audio and video in academia, some even in commercial space. LLM is a text modality implementation of Transformer architecture, Transformers work with tokens, not texts, and any data can be encoded into tokens. We started with language because that was the lowest hanging modality. You can learn more about this in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 Contrary to widespread misconception, LLMs aren’t “simply regurgitating words”, there is some amount of copy/paste going on, but same is the case with humans. LLMs architecture is designed to synthesise/generate, that’s where the “G” in GPT comes from (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), an example I like to cite is solving problems of adding two numbers. Can’t remember the exact figures, but there’s a subset of math problem LLMs can reliably solve without resulting to using code interpreter - something like adding two equal digit numbers or something, can’t remember the exact details - the cool part is that, while it’s only designed to predict the next word, all addition problems only have exactly one correct next word (number), and no matter how big you make the Neural Net’s parameter space, there’s infinite number of variations of addition problems, so it can’t just have an infinitely long “cheat sheet” that it can memorise to correctly respond to all these addition problems by just copy pasting, and it’s also unlikely that the Internet (or whatever else training data source is used) happens to contain infinite variations of all addition problems. Only way for LLM to be able to reliably predict the next word in this context is to actually understand how adding of two numbers work, and reason about the given problem. And while still very much imperfect, that’s the sort of behavior we are seeing in LLMs. If you want to learn more about this here’s a great white paper to read up on: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 LLMs are currently not very smart, I admit, but its not what it can currently do that’s important and exciting, but how it has gotten to doing what it can poorly do right now, because that new approach gives us a clear path forward for progress without constantly needing to rely on making new academic breakthroughs, and for now we don’t see a brick wall for progress approaching. We may eventually run into a brick wall with this approach, or we may not. We will know if Transformer architecture alone can get us to AGI once we have exhausted all forms of data modalities.

DaVirus

Was it though? I think multiple species display that ability. Thinking that way is a bit anthropocentric. The difference being that we can understand GPT.

Maxx3141

We all have seen how even the most advanced LLMs like GPT4 get played with "jailbreaks" - and while OpenAI (for example) does everything they can to fix them, people find even more ways to break them. With this in mind - how can you rely on an AI to make important decisions that affect the coin and its distribution? How do you prevent an attack that is meant to trick your AI, maybe even made with a stronger AI that your AI can't detect?

Real-Technician831

BTW what is your malfunction? You have been all over this thread making poorly informed “no can’t be” claims. Use GPT or something to learn basics before posting. GoFetch looks to help quite a big deal, affecting a lot more things than just cryptocurrencies. Which is why I posted heads up here.

ohmygoodstuff

I built a custom GPT with articles and podcasts that helped me grok Bitcoin. This prompt included some research on invasive species and some rambling on the basic concept I was trying to explore. Was inspired by this IG Reel. Thought, “This is what it’s like once you see the cantillon effect everywhere” https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4tz6SKumsZ/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

PaulxDonat

GPT ass post

Equivalent-Fun-4587

Chat GPT generated. Sorry.

mrjune2040

Put down Chat GPT. Learn to write with your own thoughts and in your own voice. You'll get way more interaction that way if that's indeed what you're going for here.

Creamlike2050

Nice Chat GPT Post, awful meme as well

Western_Management

Ah, Chat GPT has entered the sub.

BingoBango89

Looks like we're at a new resistance. This is good going sideways. I think now is the last opportunity to buy anymore if you want to get more. Let's get to that 10m cap and push for a 100 m cap so we can start getting listings on exchanges. Who knows how to use chat GPT to promote on social medias? We need more eyes on it. The sooner the better. If we can get on exchanges right as The Bull markets really taking off will be really good.

CiaranCarroll

Thank you for your input GPT

androidsheep92

Hahahaha, thanks Chat GPT.

No_Savings_9953

Asking GPT what AI will do with BTC: Then you have your answer whether BTC is gambling and keeping Fiat is a safe bet for the future....

TiddiesEnthusiast

Chat GPT wrote it anyways

opensandshuts

Dr. Chat GPT

MauveTyranosaur69

This actually didn't strike me as being written by GPT. At least not the raw output. It's just not the same college-freshman-style prose that you're used to seeing from generative AI.

valadius44

Sorry, but you shouldn't ask GPT about regression tasks and definitely not rely on it! Get your understanding of "AI" right.

Ratermelon

The city of Chicago literally has a subscription tax for ChatGPT right now. No negative effects have been reported as far as I have heard. I think the vast majority of the tax burden should be placed on the wealthy rather than individuals, but a tax on GPT isn't poison.

Ratermelon

I would imagine all these figures would maintain their overall shape. BTC is the biggest cryptocurrency. GPT is the most well-known model. I would, however, expect AI electricity consumption to increase RAPIDLY in the next few years.

Ratermelon

Why would we divide 100 TWh by 142,000,000 (which is the number of houses in the US)? The Bitcoin energy consumption is not given per household. It's a worldwide figure. Let's take a more rounded number given in the article. Chat GPT is said to use 500,000 KWh each day. Not per household. (500,000 KWh/day) * (365 days/year) = 182,500,000 KWh/year = 0.1825 TWh/year So, going back to my original calculation, I was off by one order of magnitude. My original number was 1.8 x 10^-2 TWh. The updated number is 1.8 x 10^-3 TWh. What do you think I'm missing?

Skeptic_Ghost

That reads like a GPT response hahaha

kisscardano

15 years of same questions asked! why people don't go online and look with chat GPT first?

AnonTheGreat01

People aren't mean to beginners they are mean to lazy fucks who start asking the most basic questions they could've gotten answered by a video or even a GPT. There's a difference between asking a question you have thought extensively about and done some digging into online vs making a reddit post about what is 1+1

ExpandYourTribe

When I asked GPT4 what they got wrong: "The French newscaster made a significant error in their explanation of what the "halving" is in the context of Bitcoin. The halving event does not involve dividing the value of Bitcoin by two. Instead, it refers to the halving of the rewards that Bitcoin miners receive for adding a new block to the blockchain. This halving event occurs approximately every four years and is designed to control the supply of Bitcoin, making it more scarce over time and potentially affecting its price. The misunderstanding or misstatement about the halving affecting Bitcoin's value directly by dividing it in half is incorrect; the impact on value is more indirect, through changes in supply dynamics and market sentiment."

ExpandYourTribe

For those of us that don't speak French, according to GPT4. "Exceptional for several reasons, first because it has reached an all-time high, and also because this peak comes just a few weeks before the halving, which I believe is scheduled for mid-April. The halving, as a reminder, is the event where the value of Bitcoin is halved to stimulate demand once again. So, a new record that was not expected for Bitcoin."

sascourge

So far. Also, what about Gemini, or copilot? Whqt about Sora or GPT5?

Coz131

It's GPT. I do think the value of gen AI is better than btc mining.

Ratermelon

I was curious to compare the two myself. BTC mining uses ~100 TWh annually. The average household, assuming a yearly energy consumption rate consistent with the given daily rate, uses (29 KWh * 365) = 10,585 KWh ≈ 1.1 x 10^-5 TWh used per household each year Assuming the GPT energy consumption is consistent as well gives (17,000 *(1.1 x 10^-5 TWh)) = 1.8 x 10^-3 TWh used by ChatGPT Barring any errors in calculation, the number of 1.8 x 10^-3 TWh suggests BTC uses many orders of magnitude more energy than ChatGPT.

bittercoin99

Go argue with GPT about it

OptiYoshi

You chat GPT reply that?

Available_Air_6367

TIA(Celestia), Worldcoin, GPT

Legend27893

Give me 2 alt coins that are both less than 2 years old you think will 100% between now and next year early March 2025. I am genuinely curious. I'm new to this space and see a few coins that could balloon up easily: Chain GPT and SingularityNet. List 2 of other ones that you see a lot of upward potential for.

ronchon

This is the first post-Chat GPT cycle. Shilling of shitcoins if going to get wild.

Tha_NexT

That's some wonky as math. Even if 93 mil are correct now it's not static. Also, don't use GPT for math. It can't do that properly.

Tha_NexT

That dude used GPT for math. First of all GPT cannot do math. Second of all, that's a basic as fuck calculation.

LivingFlow

Err yeah. This is a ton. I just asked Chat GPT assuming mid year and it’s ~22.5. Obviously, it could move a lot depending on time of year.

yung_dingaling

The price of gold dropped 99% in those 7 years? This is GPT math.

WaltKerman

I can tell that they used Chat GPT to write that article. \-Someone who uses chatGPT alot and recognizes common phrases

Legend27893

Do you know if I HAVE to use the ETH network to buy Chain GPT?

C-Dawg420

I was going to buy into Chain GPT months ago but high gas fees were the exact reason I decided not to especially with my DCA method

Legend27893

***How does one avoid paying more in ETH fees than the actual thing you are buying?*** I want to buy up a bunch of Chain GPT using the Coinbase Wallet. I transferred $500 worth of Ethereum from Coinbase to the Coinbase Wallet and now it says if I want to buy up Chain GPT that it will cost a lot of Ethereum gas fees. Wtf. To buy $30 worth of Chain GPT it would cost over $70 in ETH gas fees. I see there are networks like "Base" and BNB? Which of these is the cheapest and how do I switch to them?

bashfulkoala

From GPT: “The Bitcoin halving, or halvening, is a programmed event that reduces the reward miners receive for validating transactions on the Bitcoin network by half approximately every four years. This is done to control the supply of new bitcoins entering circulation and to maintain the scarcity of the cryptocurrency.” The halvenings decrease supply and have historically always preceded bull runs.

bashfulkoala

The post-halvening bull run has been smaller each time. From GPT: 1. **2012 Halvening**: The price increased from around $12.50 (pre-halvening) to a peak of around $1163 in late 2013, which is approximately a 93x increase. 2. **2016 Halvening**: The price increased from around $650 (pre-halvening) to a peak of around $19,783 in late 2017, which is approximately a 30x increase. 3. **2020 Halvening**: The price increased from around $8,500 (pre-halvening) to a peak of around $64,000 in April 2021, which is approximately a 7.5x increase. —— Based on this trend we would expect a ~2x increase post-halvening. I’m calling the top at around $150k in this next cycle and predicting we then drop back to $40k or so in the next bear market. Good luck.

Middle____Earth

**I asked Chat GPT to turn your wall of text into a Haiku:** Bitcoin, my love I sold at 62k But will hold for more

Lucky_Taste_5817

Thank you very much for this questions. I could go on for hours with stories about. Seriously! Let me try to answer short: we tested as much as possible. First of all, the functionality itself. The we checked aspects like scalability. That's still rather normal i would say. For me personally, the most important test was to check the flexibility of the developed agent framework. The goal for this framework was basically to have a framework that could a) be extended by new agents very easily; while, at the same time, b) flexibly support new blockchain networks. The results of those tests have been very promising, e.g., we have been able to develop new AI agents with less then 50 lines of code, based on the framework. Others are of course more complex, yet, the framework itself seems very promising. Another important test was to actually connect a second EVM based network, namely BNB in our case. Although we thought that we already had been very flexible with our framework, this test still run into smaller bugs here and there which helped us improving the flexibility even more. As for the question about the features: we have different features now live on the testnets. Ranging from different LLM's (GPT 3.5, Orca and Genesis) and image generation (DallE3 already, Stable Diffusion very soon) to more advanced use cases like AI based summarization of Youtube videos, AI based discussions and AI based brainstorming.

thomgloams

This is the way. I'll zoom in one layer further: *DO* - hentai pfp - wolf, duck, penguins (not pudgy tho) - Turing, Euler, any of the OG cryptographers - names that reference classic game theory problems like the Byzantine General problem. Entropy related ones good too. - Pinned post that are educational but needed an hour to study and decipher. (Just use Chat-GPT these days) *DON'T* - multiple emojis in name, overly busy profile blurbs with links to groups, newsletters, or partnerships with exchanges or shitcoins - bitboy - unless you know the King frogs, avoid most frogs. They're more interested in social status and simping to UHNWI. Toxic. - 500k+ followers. Even 250k is borderline. Think quality, not quantity. Mid to high 5 fig accounts. - Laser eyes (BTC maxis) and to a lesser extent .eth (ETH maxis). Avoid. Biggest lesson I learned is that TRADERS v. INVESTORS have almost polar opposite strategies, signals, social/public motivations and goals. Know which one you are or wish to be. If you consume both equally, you'll end up paralyzed. Eg. Traders are looking for setups via price action (PA). They will take large momentum based positions, with leverage and proper risk mgmt (if they're pros). They're long at $60k looking to add at the next technical level, say $64k. While investors are looking to reduce risk and take some profit, *to rotate into another investment.* Investors want to accumulate assets at painfully low prices and build long time wealth in various assets (while taking profits as they go to reduce risk). They're looking for a CAGR over years, whether 8% or 18%. When an investor sells, they have a place to put those dirty dollars to keep earning a return at the very least above inflation, usually considered the risk-free rate. They don't want to ever hold investable cash in their bank. The bank is where the money from your job or business goes to pay living expenses. Their investing accounts are always invested in something, even if it's cash equivalents that earn RFR. It's no different conceptually if crypto is your main avenue - but you should def be aware that taking profits into USDC on chain and self-custodied or to an exchange carries risk in itself that a highly regulated TradFi brokerage does not have. For this reason I've learned to take all altcoin profits into BTC or ETH. If I want to sit on some cash, it's not worth it to hold USDC on Coinbase at 1.5% APY when Fidelity pays 5% APY, virtually risk free, while you plan your next move. Otherwise, I'm selling into ETH or BTC. Traders, while they all have spot bags, are mainly looking for the opposite - cash cash cash. When they buy and sell, it's derivatives, paper, contracts., synthetics. They close risky speculative short term bets into cash asap. Very profitable if risk is well managed (few do). They're paying their bills trading. It's their job, their income. Very different mindset than an investor building wealth over the long term. While you don't have to be just one or the other, you should know which type is your main one. Investors BTFD , Traders don't catch falling knives. Investors buy low, relative to their basis, and sell percentages in tranches, but do not aim to sell 100% into cash (unless rotating into a better investment). Traders buy high and sell higher, w 10x leverage. Or sell low and buy lower. This may be obvious but in real-time during the mania of a bull market, it's a mind fk. Trying to follow both is recipe for disaster unless it's your full time job that actually pays your bills month to month for at least one year consistently. It's not your job until it does. In the meantime, make sure you know which type you are so you don't follow strategies anthesis to your goals. Oh and, this time it's different. It's not, but it is. Crypto has existed (realistically) from 2011 - 2021 top with ZIRP only. 10 years of risk-on "up only". This is the first time it's in an era of 4.5% - 5.5% risk free yields, a skittish Fed, and President Powell. It's bullish, it's recessionary, it's bearish, it's expansionary. I've no idea. Mind your risks and watch for the rotations. Cheers

AceSpadez369

I literally asked chat GPT about this the other day that’s crazy lol

PRFinklemeister

FROM GPT: Conflating Bitcoin with its underlying technology (blockchain) can suggest some indirect ways in which elements related to Bitcoin might impact the broader ecosystem of academic research and publishing: 1. Decentralized Publication Systems: Blockchain technology could be used to create decentralized publication platforms, which can provide more transparency in the review process and potentially distribute recognition and rewards more fairly, possibly improving the quality of published research. Still, such systems are in the conceptual or developmental stages and haven't been widely adopted. 2. Funding Models: Cryptocurrencies could potentially change the way research is funded, such as through direct microtransactions supporting individual researchers or projects, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) for research funding, or DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) that govern research funding based on community votes. But these models would need to be tested and widely accepted to make an impact. 3. Data Integrity and Reproducibility: Blockchain's immutable ledger could be used to ensure the integrity of research data and the reproducibility of experiments by providing a tamper-proof record of data and methodologies. 4. Intellectual Property Rights: Blockchain could be used to manage and track intellectual property rights, which can simplify the sharing and licensing of intellectual content produced by researchers. Despite these potential applications of blockchain technology, none of these directly mitigate the core issue of "publish or perish" in academia. The problem is essentially institutional and cultural within the academic world, and fixing it would likely require a shift in how institutions value and reward academic research, possibly rethinking the metrics by which academic success is measured, and a change in the funding structures that support academic research. Bitcoin or blockchain technology can play a supportive role in such a transformation, but they are not a panacea for the systemic issues inherent in the current academic publishing and funding paradigms.

Asoka11111

I’m pretty sure there are recovery services that only charge a 20% recovery fee. Might want to try that if you, Google, social media, and GPT can’t crack the case

deano1856

Good correction. Look like my chat GPT data was as of January 2022. Oops!

SmoothGoing

Did you GPT4 all this or something? What's your argument again? That mstr buying is important? Ok sure to some degree. Something about inflows and market cap? There is no inflow into market cap. It isn't an account with a balance. Yes it goes up by 19+ million even if a single ten cent trade happens at a price 1 dollar higher than earlier. Money flows from buyers to sellers, not into bitcoin and not into market cap. My leather wallet is experiencing a nice cash inflow by mail if I sell BTC on bisq.

Aerocryptic

That's actually a good idea. I'll give it a try. I use Corcel which is plugged on GPT4 turbo

Smiling_Jack_

Feed it to chat GPT. I like to preface it by asking chat GPT what to look for when evaluating a white paper, then after it's thought about that and given you its take, give it the white paper to read. If you have GPT-4 it's much better than vanilla GPT-3.5.

proof-of-conzept

TLDR Summary by Chat GPT 3.5 the long version: The text passionately defends Bitcoin as a symbol of free trade and individual effort. It argues that Bitcoin, far from being evil, is a manifestation of human productivity and the principle of fair exchange. The author asserts that Bitcoin is a tool created by honest individuals for the purpose of trade, and it stands as a testament to the value of human ingenuity and labor. Furthermore, the text criticizes those who demonize Bitcoin, suggesting that such individuals often do so out of envy or a desire to exploit others. It highlights the importance of individual virtue and effort in acquiring and maintaining wealth, emphasizing that Bitcoin is a reflection of one's character and integrity. The text warns against the dangers of a society that abandons Bitcoin and resorts to coercion and force for trade, arguing that such a society is doomed to collapse. It contrasts the virtues of free trade with the destructive consequences of corruption and tyranny. Ultimately, the text concludes by urging readers to recognize Bitcoin as a force for good and a bulwark against oppression. It warns against the consequences of rejecting Bitcoin and embracing tyranny, suggesting that the fate of civilization hangs in the balance.

reliable35

No.. AI is where the action is & will be for this bull run. GPT 5 & AGI possibly 6-18 months away. My bets are on RNDR, FET, AGIX & AKT with my low cap gem - TADA.

Cybernaut-Neko

Token GPT 😂

anonymouscitizen2

Chat GPT is shilling me scams now, great. I like the part about users deciding what the shitcoin does while the creators get rich enough to give comic artists $2M. I’m sure pork is going places

_thewoodsiestoak_

Chat GPT

BazingaBen

Crypto GPT