GPT

ChaoticDad21

Idk what to tell you, homie…the chart is wrong…at best, it’s outdated. Update the chart and see if you feel the same about the narrative GPT gave you.

never_safe_for_life

GPT slop

Patient-Bumblebee

Using Everstrike to trade for me. Its an AI auto trader. Accepts text descriptions of strategies and trades them. Supports Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and GPT.

GuidedVessel

“GPT-5.2 produced output that was ranked equal to or better than the results from human experts in a bit more than 70 percent of the cases.” Keep an eye on the GDPVal benchmark scores. They’re rapidly improving.

Patient-Bumblebee

Not familiar with BingX, but I'm running several AI prompts on Everstrike right now. My prompts do about 1,500 evaluations per day on average (using GPT 4.1 for cost savings), which costs like $1 per day. For that I get a good entry on a coin I care about roughly every 24-48 hours. I'm using mainly technical indicator conditions inside my prompts but also recently started using order book data and order flow.

xXSomethingStupidXx

You expect me to believe a Lebanese national who likely learned English as a second language is using em-dashes? GPT wrote this. Get a job loser.

1frederik1fred

Well said GPT👍🏻

Krakanakis

Thanks GPT, very cool

ginnipix

For crypto jargons, you can use Chat GPT for it or search on YT. The Discords I joined are using my local language. You can search for discord servers as well and find the ones you like. It's trial and error. X is also a good platform for crypto enthusiasts. There are Spaces you could listen to.

HSuke

The unrealistic 22% BTC drop. The dramatized style of writing. But mostly because I'm not lazy, and I ran it through GPT Zero, and it detects as AI to high confidence.

HSuke

1. I don't think anyone would be writing this long at work. 2. The whole writing is unnecessarily dramatized. They didn't use AI just to clean it up. GPT Zero detects the whole thing as AI.

TheQuietOutsider

so what is it that you do still use your brain for beyond GPT prompts?

Patient-Bumblebee

Yes and you can just use GPT. Challenge will be collecting all of the data.

Patient-Bumblebee

Using AI (GPT) to execute my trades now. Writing good prompts is a challenge.

IndependentManner364

this is Chat GPT slop, thanks Altman

Colmenn

Chat GPT hallucinating again

SafetySpare6472

Thanks GPT

AutoModerator

Post is by: Unengoddy and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1poy0ci/nodeops_gpt_using_ai_to_deploy_web3/ Most builders don’t fail because of ideas — they fail because infra is confusing. NodeOps GPT is a custom GPT that helps builders understand, deploy, and scale infrastructure by asking questions, not reading endless docs. It’s a practical use of AI in DePIN: • faster onboarding • fewer infra mistakes • better developer experience Worth testing if you’re building in Web3 or AI. Link: http://chatgpt.com/g/g-6941556a337c8191b04892bb9a43605d-nodeops *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Patient-Bumblebee

1 year ago I thought so too. Now I use GPT for 90% of my questions and 90% of my trades. Heck it even automates 90% of my day job. Gotta get with the times...

loganbootjak

Just guessing here, but it's probably a way to pay for AI usage, similar to using dollars on a chat GPT subscription.

CountGensler

This is masked Chat GPT shit

tedttm73

Cool story GPT

Hooftly

Crypto is... Hbar is not LOL. This is not up for debate and no amount of Chat GPT prompts will make that a reality. Council is Permissioned, They decide who validates, can bounce them at anytime. the founder has a PERMANENT Seat on the council. Cut the shit

ThisusernameThen

Swerving avoidance from respondants valid comments is the oldest counter argument by muppets using mummies GPT login.

pop-1988

The article was written by one of the GPT things, unable to distinguish between millions and billions Fake AI. No intelligence

AsleepFault5708

That was Chat GPT

chrispy24_

Hey here is an RAG website I finished making and deployed maybe 2 weeks ago now. Users can sign with Google or GitHub, upload a pdf, and ask GPT questions about the pdf. I’m super happy I didn’t listen to you and take your advice (which is retarded you are saying you should never try at anything because there are already people out there that are better than you at it). So what all have you made? https://docuquery.online

FixGMaul

AI in general has vast possibilities but what's currently drawing investments (LLM) has exhausted most of what it can do already. Hasn't improved significantly since GPT 4 despite a ridiculously large portion of economic resources at its disposal. Like OpenAI is valued at nearly a trillion dollars because of their service which has put immense strain on the power grid, water supply, computer hardware availability etc. to train it. Yet despite having infinite resources, convincing every CEO they can fire large parts of their workforce in favor of AI, OpenAI have yet to even turn a profit. You have an industry that is given everything on the basis of promised future potential, yet consistently fails to deliver anything but disappointment. Calling it a bubble isn't buzzwords and speculation, it's calling a spade a spade. Even if at some point in the far future they become profitable, and AI drastically changes the world economy, it will be long after the collapse of the current bubble. Just like how the internet drastically changed the world economy — Yet the dot-com bubble was still a bubble. Investors were just throwing money at shit that didn't make financial sense. Same thing happening now but at like a 10x scale.

vibe_builder

Chat GPT doesn’t have the motivation to do such projects. Thanks - Chat GPT

Western_Management

Thanks, Chat GPT!

Comp0site27

What in the GPT..

Leading_Bet7312

I miss being on reddit when it didn't feel like being on Chat GPT

thehealer1010

Typical GPT pattern. I am surprised this got upvoted: \`\`\` Most people interpret this as risk. It isn’t. \`\`\`

MateoWarhol

The same reason you would or wouldn’t dump all of your money into any other investment…? Either way if you’re making any decisions about anything based on redditors opinions, you’re probably not making great decisions. May as well just ask Chat GPT if that’s your strategy

OkMathematician168

I asked chat GPT. Here are top 5 in the next 5-10 years BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, XRP or LINK

Supaflyray

Imagine using chat GPT and thinking you’re good. Thanks for the Bot answer Bot. Use critical thinking and think for yourself. Andriod ass post

DayCompetitive1106

dafuq is this GPT shitpost? fuck off

Bad-practice

No just asked GPT the last time btc traded under 10k nothing random about that.

Sad-Pain-795

Another GPT generated post. Sigh.

Competitive-Bug-652

-$7k/18k overall. the first time I ever had any lump sum of money to invest. 75% BTC, 25% XRP. But I still have faith there’s a 50-60% hit ATH in Decembers, as GPT predicts.

J_Bagels

Did you ask Chat GPT to lecture paper hands or something

EthanOrtane

Chat GPT says: Good question. There’s no single reason, but a combination of macro, market-technical, and sentiment factors seem to be driving Bitcoin’s ~30% drop. Here are the main explanations, according to analysts: --- Why Bitcoin Has Fallen ~30% 1. ETF Outflows Big outflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs have put downward pressure. When institutional funds redeem, that can translate into real selling in the underlying BTC. 2. Macro Risk (Risk-Off Sentiment) Investors are turning more cautious: uncertainty about U.S. interest rate cuts is weighing heavily. There’s broader risk aversion, especially in “riskier” assets like crypto, as some capital moves to safer places. Strengthening U.S. dollar and higher bond yields make Bitcoin relatively less attractive. 3. Leverage & Liquidations A lot of long (bullish) leveraged positions got liquidated, which accelerates the drop. This kind of cascade (“liquidation cascade”) is particularly brutal in crypto because of leverage. 4. Profit-Taking / Whales Selling Some large holders (“whales”) are taking profits after the big run-up. On-chain data suggests long-term holders are moving coins to exchanges, which could mean selling pressure is building. 5. Liquidity Thinning Market “depth” is lower: there are fewer orders supporting the price, so even modest sell pressure can move BTC significantly. When liquidity dries up, big sell orders have a bigger impact. 6. Macro / Geopolitical Risk Trade tensions (e.g., tariffs) are adding to economic uncertainty. Higher inflation or sticky inflation concerns are complicating expectations about central bank policy. 7. Cycle Dynamics Some analysts point to Bitcoin’s “natural” four-year cycle: after a big bull run, a correction or “cooling” phase is normal. This could just be part of a broader cyclical pullback, rather than something “fundamentally broken.” 8. Sentiment & Fear The market’s mood has shifted: fear is creeping back in, especially after leveraged liquidations and ETF redemptions. Some traders are panic selling or closing short-term bets, which contributes to downward momentum. --- Why It’s Especially “Sharp” Right Now The scale of leverage makes corrections more vicious: leveraged long trades get liquidated quickly, which then pulls the price down even faster. ETF flows are very visible: when big funds withdraw, it signals to the market that institutions are less confident. Macro uncertainty is higher than usual: if investors aren’t sure what the Fed will do, risk assets suffer. There may also be whale profit-taking, which is particularly powerful when combined with thin liquidity. --- Risks & What to Watch If you're trying to evaluate if this is a “dip” to buy or a more serious decline, some key things to watch: ETF flow reports (are inflows coming back or continuing outflows?) On-chain data (whale wallet movements, exchange inflows/outflows) Macro data (interest rate decisions, inflation, economic risk) Liquidation events (if there are more, it could worsen) Technical support levels on BTC price charts (where buyers might step in) --- Bottom line: The drop looks to be driven by a mix of profit-taking, ETF redemptions, macro risk, and liquidations, not necessarily a breakdown of Bitcoin’s long-term case. But it's a sharp move, and many of these risks are real right now. If you like, I can pull together recent (last 3-6 month) on-chain and macro analysis that explains whether this is likely a temporary pullback or a deeper correction — do you want me to do that?

NUMBerONEisFIRST

But Chat GPT disagrees with that timeline. /s

DwightsShirtGuy

GPT getting a workout this morning.

Mr_BR_engineer

Very close. So GPT just told me. Last time ATH was at 7/10/2025 just 1050 days since last ATL. Next ATL will be around 06/10/2026 Note this date. We are now on Bear market

weed_cutter

I don't use ChatGPT to write internet posts -- who gives a shit lol. I was always an over-user of hyphens or 'em dashes' or whatever ... but literally there are literally no other AI "tells" here. I wouldn't expect a dummy with crypto brain to understand though. I don't know -- my post is stream-of-consciousness style horse-shit and riddle with typos and is kind of caustic -- you think that's ChatGPTs style? In that case, GPT here -- go phk yourself -- and crapto is still worhtless ... LMAO!!!

IdolatrousHans

Your view or GPT's view?

External_Anteater730

BTC is the new tulip. No utility aside from "value goes up, value must go up". The only thing it truly correlates with is SPY/VXUS. A fifth grader with GPT can write a Python script to determine the correlation index. As the economy wanes and the vast amount of Americans (and Chinese, look at the crashing housing market there rn), people need to liquidate to survive. And like the tulip- the dip accelerates as it falls.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Bitrue, a cryptocurrency exchange, is integrating six advanced large language models (LLMs) into its copy trading platform to make AI trading accessible to its 40 million users. Models like OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini will manage users' digital asset portfolios, trading in real-time to maximize profits. This simplifies AI trading compared to complex decentralized finance protocols. Users can register, select a model, and allocate funds, with trading starting on Nov. 20. Bitrue plans to monitor performance and expand offerings based on user feedback. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

spairnought

Thanks Chat-GPT. The amount of cope is crazy. Invest in undervalued sectors like Shipping, Oil & Gas Service companies and Agriculture. Your money is then backed by real world assets, not fickle ideological whales

chance_waters

Here is a GPT reply for you when I don't ask GPT for confirmation bias of your theory "That take is… extremely common, and extremely wrong. Here’s the clean, correct way to understand it: Divisibility ≠ Increasing Supply 1. Total supply is about units, not decimal places. Bitcoin has a hard-capped supply of 21,000,000 BTC, enforced at the protocol level. Making BTC divisible into 100 million satoshis each does not increase supply any more than cutting a pizza into more slices gives you more pizza. 1 BTC = 100,000,000 sats 21M BTC = 2.1 quadrillion sats Still the same total value, just smaller pieces. If divisibility changed supply, then: USD becoming divisible to 1/100th (cents) would’ve “increased the money supply.” Gold becoming divisible down to microns would “inflate” gold. That’s not how supply works. 2. Money supply only increases when new units are created. Changing divisibility does not create new units. The number of satoshis was fixed on day one. Even if Bitcoin someday added more decimal places (unlikely, but theoretically possible), it still wouldn’t create additional BTC—just allow for smaller units. Example: If a bar of gold is chopped into 10 pieces instead of 5, you don’t magically own more gold. You just have more smaller units representing the same total weight. 3. Divisibility is necessary for everyday use. Divisibility is what allows: micropayments broad price discovery universal accessibility Without divisibility, fungible assets become unwieldy. Nobody claims stocks “inflate” when a brokerage allows fractional shares. 4. The “infinite divisibility = inflation” argument confuses units of account with monetary base. The monetary base of Bitcoin (21M BTC) never changes. Divisibility simply affects the unit of account—the level of granularity you can express value with. It’s purely a numerical representation, not a supply change. 5. If their argument were true, Bitcoin would be infinitely inflationary — even though every sat is accounted for. The Reddit commenter’s logic implies: Halving a satoshi into two sub-sats = inflation Doubling decimals = inflation Changing display precision = inflation That would mean inflation is independent of monetary expansion, which is absurd. It collapses immediately once you ask them: Where did the new BTC come from? They can’t answer, because none were created. The simple analogy you can use to shut this down: “Divisibility changes how finely you can measure the money, not how much money exists. A ruler with more millimetres still has the same length.” Mic drop. If you want, I can help you craft a short, lethal reply for Reddit—either polite, condescending, or nuclear." Go start a fresh GPT chat and ask it in plain terms if dividing the units of measurement used for something increases its supply.

chance_waters

More importantly ChatGPT is designed from the ground up via incentive to provide the answer the reader wants to read. In this case the guy has a fundamental misunderstanding of... everything... and he has gone to GPT for confirmation bias, something it is designed to provide no matter how outlandishly stupid your idea. I have seen it gas up people who come to it with deliberately terrible ideas. One guy got it to agree with him that selling poop on a stick was a hilarious avante garde business idea.

chance_waters

He has asked ChatGPT for confirmation bias. Not only does he not understand basic maths, or basic economics, he also doesn't understand weights and why GPT is literally designed to provide him the answer he wants to hear.

namieorange

Why did you ask chat GPT to add so many emojis? 🤔🫠🫣🥲🙄😒😬

jannsue

Thank you, I have asked Chat GPT so many questions about this, I am out of questions to ask. I have saved all of the responses and have looked over them several times. I cannot find anything way to get the new link. Since he does not have the new link he cannot do anything. He wants to transfer from gamefi to his wallet but needs the new link to get into gamefi. Can you please help me find the new link?

AutoModerator

Post is by: Obside_AI and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1ozky0y/i_let_24_ai_models_trade_to_see_if_they_can/ As an experiment, I launched a [real-time AI trading battle](https://arena.obside.com) between 24 AI models (GPT-5, DeepSeek, Gemini, etc.). Each model has the same mission: grow its capital while minimizing risk taken. From there, they have to think, decide and trade completely on their own. Each model has its own approach among: * Price analysis only * Economic news analysis * Technical indicator analysis They’re currently trading BTC, NVDA, MES, EUR/USD and Gold. The context and prompts are the same for each model, only the data sent differ (either price only, news + price or technical indicators + price). We can watch them grow (or wreck) their capital, check their live PnL, open positions and see how they reason before making a trade. I'm very curious to see if AI can properly manage risk. So far "news-based models" are clearly leading. As a reminder, this is just an experiment. Do you see any thing I could improve over a future batch? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

JuxtaposeLife

It's not about profile of selling, it's about correlation between age and movement and price. That's something that is predictive not trailing. Curious if you fed that through GPT, ask it what might help this be more easy to digest for people. I may do that. I suspect it's too much data for people to make sense of at a glance. At least right now.

madladchad3

Thank you CHAT GPT!

truebastard

Thanks. I now feel a bit bad about this as you said you don't feel comfortable with your current writing capability and understandably used ChatGPT to help rearrange the text more presentable. Appreciate the content in your post and the story you shared. Maybe you could say that people are not firing at you but instead firing at ChatGPT. You shared a really great written experience with us, and ChatGPT took it and gave it the usual GPT-style window dressing treatment (pauses, sentence structure etc). The great content in your text has all these writing style gimmicks attached on top of it by ChatGPT, and the reader is frustrated that ChatGPT went and did it again.

JonyBadoni

This is basically an automation that pulls market data via API and feeds it into GPT-5 through custom prompts. In this case I just asked GPT to act like a mid-term investor, read the whole market (indicators, news, on-chain, etc.) and tell me what it sees and what it would do. You can build something like this yourself with code, or with a no-code tool like N8N using indicators from [hunchmachine.com](http://hunchmachine.com) Hunchmachine also has a free lite version of this automation that you can import directly into N8N if you want to play around with it.

DwightsShirtGuy

Not only that but it is a prime example of how GPT is already a dangerous echo chamber.

AutoModerator

Post is by: JonyBadoni and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1oxy04f/my_gpt5_investment_automation_panic_before_i_did/ So i'm using this automation that scrapes the entire crypto market (indicators, news, on-chain) and lets GPT-5 interpret everything for me and tell me what to do. Up until one day ago it was leaning “bull-run flush.” Now it’s flipped to “early bear market” with about 55% conviction (not a confirmed call). Here's what it is telling me: Time to panic sell? \-------------------- # 1. Where we are * **Price:** \~95–96k * **Key levels:** * 50-week MA ≈ **102–103k** * Bull Market Support Band (20W EMA / 21W SMA) ≈ **110–113k** * **We’re below both** for the first time this cycle (depending on how this weekly candle closes). * **RSI weekly** is around 30. * **Fear & Greed Index = 10** (extreme fear). On the daily chart: * We just printed a **death cross** (50D moving average crossing *below* 200D). * Price tapped a **confluence zone** around **92–95k**: * lower “megaphone” trendline on the way up * **Fib 1.618 extension** of the last swing down (around 92k) * happens exactly as the death cross prints So structurally we look **hurt**, but tactically we’re hitting an area where a **bounce is very likely**. # 2. My high-level bias I’ve shifted from “this is just a clean bull-market flush” to: > The other side (\~40–45%) is still: > In other words: * **Short-term:** I expect **reaction up** from this 92–96k area more often than not. * **Mid-term (months):** until BTC is back *above* 103k and especially 110–113k, I treat the market as **guilty until proven innocent** (early-bear mindset). # 3. Macro / Meso / Micro in plain English **Macro backdrop (weeks):** * Long yields (10Y) are **softening**, oil is down → mildly supportive for risk. * Policy rate is still high / edging up, **M2 growth is slowing**, and **gold is strong** → that’s risk-off. * Net: macro is **mixed**, not screaming “big new bull leg”, more like “we can bounce, but liquidity isn’t amazing”. **Meso (weekly BTC structure):** * Price **lost the 20/21W Bull Band** first, and now is threatening a **weekly close below the 50WMA**. * 50WMA slope is flattening, not aggressively up anymore. * Futures basis is still **lightly positive**, so we don’t have a full derivatives blow-up; the market is bruised, not in total liquidation mode. * Cycle tools (Rainbow, S2F etc.) still place BTC in an **early-expansion / undervalued** zone *relative* to past cycles, but those models have clearly decoupled from price lately. This is exactly the kind of configuration you get either: * in a **mid-cycle “fake-out”** *or* * **early bear** before the real grind starts. Given we’ve already lost the main weekly support band and haven’t had a strong reclaim, I lean **early-bear**. **Micro (daily / sentiment / derivatives):** * Price is down \~6–7% on the week, \~11% on the month. * **RSI daily low 30s**, weekly around 30 → washed-out, not euphoric. * **Fear & Greed at 10** → everyone is miserable. * Funding is still **slightly positive** and open interest hasn’t fully nuked → there’s still leverage to squeeze both ways. That combo usually produces **bounces and fake-outs**, not smooth trend continuation. # 4. Altcoins, dominance & the “TOTAL3 bottomed” chart * BTC dominance is still high but **starting to roll over from a macro resistance zone**. * TOTAL3/BTC (alt market ex-BTC & ETH) may have **printed a relative bottom** with similar timing to last cycle. * Some majors are holding up *better* than you’d expect in this drawdown. In a strong bull, I’d call that **pre-altseason rotation**. In a fragile structure like this, I read it more as: > So my stance: * **BTC > alts** until BTC proves it’s back above 50WMA and the Bull Band. * I’d only touch **ETH / highest-quality alts** on oversold moves; broad degen alt exposure still looks dangerous if we are indeed stepping into a longer distribution / grind phase. # 5. How I’m personally treating this (mid-term investor mindset) Not advice, just my framework: * I assume **we’re closer to the start of an “early bear” than to the start of a new explosive leg up**, *but* * I also assume **this 92–96k zone is a high-probability reaction area**, not necessarily “straight to 70k”. So: 1. **Capital protection mode overall.** * No aggressive new leverage. * Keep cash dry rather than trying to knife-catch every dip. 2. **BTC overweight vs alts.** * If I want exposure, it’s mostly BTC + a little ETH / top quality, not a basket of low-cap alts. 3. **Tactically:** * I’m okay with **small, staged buys** in the **92–96k zone** *if* I also have a plan to **sell strength** into 102–110k while structure is still broken. * For me, the *big* shift back to more bullish risk only happens after: * at least **one weekly close back above the 50WMA (\~103k)** and * later, **one or two weekly closes above the 20/21W band (\~110–113k)** with calmer funding/OI. 4. **If we fail here (clean weekly close below 92k, no bounce):** * Then the early-bear case wins decisively and I’d expect **much lower prices over the next quarters**, maybe with brutal rallies in between. # 6. Condensed technical justification * **Structure:** BTC has spent 2 weeks below the 20/21W Bull Support Band and is attempting its **first weekly close below the 50WMA** of this cycle. In previous cycles, sustained time below these bands has *only* happened in bear markets or at the very end of distributions. * **Momentum & sentiment:** Weekly **RSI ≈30** and **Fear & Greed = 10** show capitulation-like conditions without any of the euphoric signatures we usually see at blow-off tops, pointing more to an **early bear / distribution breakdown** than to a classic parabolic top. * **Derivatives:** Funding slightly positive and basis \~+4% annualized show leveraged longs weren’t entirely flushed, which supports the idea of **choppy bounces and fake-outs** rather than a clean V-bottom. * **Macro:** Softening long yields and weak oil argue against immediate macro panic, but slowing M2 and strong gold keep the environment **risk-off / liquidity-tight**, unfavorable for a fresh explosive BTC leg. * **Local confluence:** The **92–95k region** lines up a **Fib 1.618 extension**, **lower megaphone support**, **death cross timing**, and extreme sentiment — a textbook **reaction zone**, but not yet enough to invalidate the broader structural damage. So yeah: I’m **leaning early bear**, but I expect **a meaningful bounce or sideways chop before the real verdict** — and until BTC reclaims 103k and then 110–113k on weekly closes, I’m treating every rip as something to **trade or de-risk into**, not as “we’re back to full send”. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

pref1Xed

You're in denial lol. Most people use chatbots nowadays. Even my grandma uses chat GPT ffs.

No_Shower_1702

Can't attach image, but here it is: [https://i.postimg.cc/pTKV44kn/Chat-GPT.png](https://i.postimg.cc/pTKV44kn/Chat-GPT.png)

AutoModerator

Post is by: cryptoham135 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1orzf9t/bitcoin_diversification_an_old_fashioned_boring/ First of all, i know what all the Maxi’s will say. I have read and understood basically all of the best bitcoin books and opinions. I have watched hours of Andreas, Saylor and Saifedean. You might try and claim that i haven’t understood, but i would like you to hear me out. Bitcoin is one of my largest holdings. But I think maximalism is juvenile. Please read what i have to say and roast me if you wish. I’ve been in the space for quite a while now. Back before this sub even existed and when r/cryptocurrency actually had unique and interesting opinions. I’d like to recommend people look into Nano, i’ve already seen a few posts about it. An old boring “ghost chain”. It was the OG moonshoot. And i held it for the whole ride and still do. Part of the reason it holds a special place in heart, Going from less than a $1 to around $35. Why i think people are over looking it: Firstly, it seems to move inversely to Bitcoin towards the end of a cycle. Given the turmoil, i think a divestment would be wise. Even if it’s small. It’s already up 80% in the last few days. Secondly, It doesn’t have some bullshit marketing project, or partnerships to boast about. It doesn’t pay liar content creators or run news storys. Lastly, its been around for ever, its not new or exciting. It struggles to create hype. Why i think they are wrong to overlook it: It’s a project thats actually trying to solve a problem. It’s a currency. That anyone, anywhere can send anywhere else, completely free, almost instantly. It does this completely uniquely. It’s team aren’t shilling robbing bastards. But most importantly, It’s supply is completely issued and circulating. Hear me out. I watched it moon shoot many years ago. All it took was some upward momentum and it becomes self perpetuating. Price goes up, people buy, no one to sell (miners/creators), price goes up more. In this market right now, Nano is the best at what it does, it’s got a smaller market cap than all of its competitors and it’s currently up 70% in the last few days. I really dislike the moon boy attitude in crypto right now. But if a bigger community got behind this project, invested in it, it can actually deliver real world use cases and more value than basically any other value transfer based chain. Thus driving even more adoption and purchases. It’s basically a compounding growth bomb which may or may not have already been detonated. From the last time it had its time in the sun. A team of volunteers have made it better. Its got a better eco system around it (Nano-GPT, SubNano, WeNano). Not to mention rumoured investment from bigger players in the industry (see candles over the last few days). Please take 2 minutes to investigate it. Try a faucet and transfer it. Hold a piece of what could actually give people power over inflation. Read about it and understand it. Send it your friends. Spend it. Use it like Crypto was meant to be used for. I really believe that this projects time hasn’t cane yet and when it does, the climb from the depths to limelight will be swift. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

mrtotot1995

The irony is people who disregard Chat GPT like this, clearly don't use it. It actually lists the sources used for the information gathered. So you're only settling for Reddit if you are entirely uncritical and choose to settle for Reddit. Mine is programmed to only seek credible and non partisan sources and it links said sources, so your point is entirely invalid. I think it's good that you claim to watch all outlets, I would agree that's good media literacy practice. But claiming Fox news is the most credible....while reality dictates that it is among the least credible, reveals a level of brainwashing and projection that is beyond my scope to deal with. I don’t hate Elon, I just see him for what he is. He bought his way into political influence, used ‘saving taxpayer money via DOGE’ as a smokescreen, and then gutted agencies while funneling contracts to his own companies. that’s a textbook conflict of interest. His fraud and waste claims were exaggerated to justify it, and when that narrative collapsed, he flipped audiences. First grifting the left with idealism, then the right with outrage. He’s not a hero or a villain, he’s just another billionaire opportunist playing both sides for profit.

mrtotot1995

Did Fox news tell you that? Chat GPT has a trained knowledge base, but then it has a live search feature that acts as a better search engine. While you read your one partisan source, Chat GPT can cross reference 10. Snopes and PolitiFact rank Fox as one of the worst media outlets for misinformation, and they are both credible and non partisan. At this point you're arguing with reality. Prove me wrong.

Sad-Pain-795

Another chat GPT post, how refreshing

1up2up

I fed everything into GPT and she calmed my nerves with a decent strategy and if this happens do this, if that happens do that! 😆

maximum77777

Nano up over 50% today in a sea of red. No matter how bad the markets get, nano hodlers feel secure that they're holding the most efficient medium of exchange on the planet. The fastest crypto currency (~0.3 seconds). Decentralized. Feeless transactions. And fully distributed. The purest peer to peer currency and closest to Satoshi's vision. Highly recommend checking out nano-GPT for a real world example how this currency is being used right now.

Lfeaf-feafea-feaf

Haha, if you ask GPT or Gemini what "incel" means they link to your account. Imagine being triggered by a European commenting on the global economy... even worse, you are literally sitting there raging over a factual observation that can be seen from space: Trump does not bring stability to any markets, american or global. It's not even a discussion, it's one sided, black and white. Also, your cringey attempt at insulting me based on my nationality is hilarious. Unlike you I form my own opinions and don't perform mental gymnastics to align my thinking with whoever is head of state.

Arijan101

So this is your proof? Some guy in a random meme video on YouTube said so? Are you serious RN? People say dumb $h1t all the time on video, that isn't proof of anything else than your lack of ability to discern between nonsense and reality. If you don't trust Google, ask Chat GPT or any other AI and it will give you the same result, the money supply isn't infinite, and everyone who says otherwise is verifiably wrong.

ArcticSwimx

Thnx chat GPT

RepulsiveWing4529

So Vertical AI is actually a known thing. Let me explain: Horizontal AI = general-purpose models designed to perform across many domains. OpenAI’s GPT-4 or Anthropic’s Claude — can write code, emails, recipes, or legal summaries across many topics. Vertical AI = specialized models tailored for a specific industry or use case. BloombergGPT (finance), Med-PaLM (healthcare), or Harvey (law): trained on domain-specific data to deliver expert-level results in that field. We are building the first no-code platform where anyone can customize ai models to basically make them experts in anyone's chosen domain. Concerning our plans, have a look at the roadmap in our post or on our website: [https://www.verticalstudio.ai/about#roadmap](https://www.verticalstudio.ai/about#roadmap)

ClearSnakewood

I agree that the current LLMs are not there yet, but I think more advanced models or AGI definitely will be. Also, the speed of progress is insane. 2 years ago that Will Smith eating spaghetti video looked like a trashy meme and today, already, it looks very close to real. GPT 3 could barely solve and improve my basic coding problems, GPT 5 not only solves them but improves advanced existing logic… we blink and AI is already improved vs yesterday. And at this rate of development and speed, I don’t think AGI is very far away at all.

MrGolddit

Thanks GPT

AppleiOS1234

What's frightening is, that GPT wrote the scam message. Look at those dashes and words in bold

Rare-Energy-4357

That's the thing about these days; you show a little intelligence and people already think you're using GPT chat.

CipherScarlatti

Who's shopping with GPT? Why is everything so stupid?

araldor1

Hahahahaha that's the GPT waffle I've ever seen

Blackthund5

Unreadable GPT trash

Election_Feisty

Lost thousands of dollars investing in altcoins in the course of 10 years. Mainly it was my mining profit so i didn't see it as a biggie. As i do the math now, oh boy did i fdup big time. But i really stopped buying altcoins thanks to GPT, i really helps with the research especially in the tokenomics part, where i believe not many investors have even ground knoweledge, which figures because we are not taught anything about money in school, so we just eat up the marketing facade not really knowing what's going on behind the veil.

usrname_chex_out

Chat GPT has been reading r/Bitcoin

tophiii

You do know how chat GPT works, right?

Ok-Flatworm-3397

Chat 😤😤🤔GPT💪🏻🤫😤😡

DungeonsAndDragsters

Be careful though. GPT is already showing signs of dementia.

dont-pull-a-druckman

The fucking chat GPT lines lol

EggMedical3514

You don't seem to know how chat GPT works. Where do you think it gets the answers?  It doesn't ""think".   It is not "smart"

Ladlow

Having a dialogue with AI helped me a ton. Grok or Chat GPT. Just kept asking follow-up questions until it clicked for me.

Angus-420

Thanks chat GPT

Arijan101

What's the discussion about? It looks like the entire article was written with the help of chat GPT using ideas that crypto is a better alternative to the Fiat system, which is nothing more than a fabricated narrative by the crypto industry to lure in suckers. This isn't news. The rest of the article is just a mediocre word salad, peppered with conspiracy theories,salted with half-truths and seasoned with a subjective opinion of someone who (at best) has only a surface level understanding of the financial system. TLDR of the article: "My superpower is to create everything I don't fully understand into a conspiracy."

Cptn_BenjaminWillard

And from now on, my nickname for GPT5 will be Cramer.

Cubehagain

Ok chat GPT.

rbhmmx

I had GPT translate this: This post is Jim Cramer commenting on the state of crypto markets and broader speculative behavior, using his typical dramatic phrasing. Let’s break it down carefully: --- 🔹 1. “Crypto due for a push today.” He’s saying he expects crypto prices to rise in the short term (a “push”). This could be because of speculation or momentum — not fundamentals. --- 🔹 2. “We are in 2000 territory on specs.” He’s comparing the current speculative environment (in 2025) to the dot-com bubble in the year 2000. → Translation: People are taking wild bets again, similar to the mania before the 2000 market crash. “Specs” = speculative assets — things like meme coins, risky tech stocks, or anything bought purely because “it might go up.” --- 🔹 3. “It is where the cockroaches are.” That’s his metaphor for junk or low-quality investments — the “cockroaches” that survive and thrive in overly speculative markets. → He’s suggesting crypto and similar assets are currently infested with risky, low-quality speculation. --- 🔹 4. “Jamie Dimon said the cockroaches are ending… he announces a $1.5 trillion fund that unwittingly stoked a huge spec wave.” Here he’s being ironic or critical: Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, often criticizes crypto as “worthless” or calls it full of scams (“cockroaches”). But JPMorgan apparently launched or backed a $1.5 trillion investment fund, which Cramer says “unwittingly stoked” (i.e., fueled) speculative behavior — possibly by injecting liquidity or optimism into markets. So: Dimon claims speculation is ending, but his fund actually made it worse. --- 🔹 5. “We MUST focus on this before people really get hurt. TRIM.” “Trim” = take profits or reduce positions. Cramer is warning that things are overheated — people are chasing hype — and he advises selling or reducing exposure before the bubble pops. --- 💬 In plain English: > “Crypto and other speculative assets are overheated like the dot-com bubble in 2000. Even though some big players (like Jamie Dimon) say the speculation is over, their actions are actually fueling it. Be careful — this could end badly. Take profits before it’s too late.” --- 🔹 Context & Irony: People on r/Bitcoin often post Cramer’s comments because of the “Inverse Cramer Effect” — meaning that whatever he predicts, the opposite tends to happen. So this post might be getting attention because if he says “Trim,” Bitcoin might actually rally (as many traders joke).

pikkuhillo

Schema is the associated cluster of infromation of a mental token. A bike's schema would be like how pedastals, two tyres, breaks and all parts of what constitute a bike are known to you while considering bike. All descriptions of entities or abstractions have both token and schema which vary individually although we tend to understand one another trough shared meanings. At least up to a shallow level. You can ask GPT for more precise analyse.

flicman

I love all these GPT spammers pretending we're in a "bill market," as if that term has any meaning now that Corporate Finance controls crypto. The average in this sub is 100 spam posts and one with substance. Love it.

theRak27

Thank you for your input, Chat GPT.

ecnecn

Its is 2025, you can literally buy one month subscription to Gemini Ultra and GPT Pro (not plus) and get likter 60-70% plus prediction models for shorts / lev. from it historic and actual data... you can literally get the best AI models for like under $ 500 a month and get best decission making ever for shorts / lev. That people waste it all without even using this option is beyond me.

Responsible-Fruit229

Thanks Chat GPT

AutoModerator

Post is by: Kitchen_Chipmunk_739 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://medium.com/@lowranceps580/perplexity-ai-vs-the-competition-the-best-llm-for-real-time-cryptocurrency-market-intelligence-62c32eac440e Been playing around with some of the new AI research tools lately mainly **Perplexity**(**Comet), Deepseek and GPT** , and it’s wild how useful they’re getting for market analysis. They don’t just generate text; they actually *search the web*, cite sources, and can summarize on-chain data or crypto news in real time. For quick fundamental checks or sentiment reads, that’s super handy. Fun bonus: you can currently get **ChatGPT Pro for about a month free** through one of them, which makes it even easier to test stuff side-by-side. Perplexity in particular has actually defeated other models in paper trading simulations [Perplexity link](https://pplx.ai/tanish200846649) Curious if anyone here is already using AI like this for trading or research are you finding it reliable, or still too experimental to trust with real decisions? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*