MA

Kalaazam

200 week MA is more realistic, 20k would need a black swan event id say

bullett007

Price will go to the 200w MA which is approx $58k, find it's floor, then it's up from there. Buy all the way down, and all the way back up and your future self will thank you for it.

shitcanfly

What if it does. Imagine being at the 50MA 8 months ahead of schedule

duboilburner

My chart says we're still well enough above the 200 week. I show closer to $58k for that. Still have a ways to go. The cycles aren't getting as large a % gain peak to peak, and the troughs now go below the 200 WMA rather than it indicating the bottom. We went pretty decently below the 200 WMA at the end of 2022. Part of the maturing of the asset, I suppose. The up swings aren't as wild as they used to be and we can draw down under the 200 week MA.

gtwooh

Depends. At least to 200 MA which is current at 59.2k

OpticallyMosache

100% We used to say this was "earning your wings" But to be fair, this dump is happening faster than anything I remember experiencing Doesn't seem like we ever retraced to the 200W MA this soon in the bear

Inevitable-Kooky

Honestly, the best thing you can do is looking charts, i've been studying this thing seriously since for about 6 months and here's how I see it: Right now I believe bitcoin is in a bear market, not because of emotions of people or news or whatever it's something much more simple than that: The average price movement of the last 50 day is going down, The average price movement of the last 100 days is going down The average price movement of the last 200 days is going down. On charts it is called 50-100 or 200 day MA. Usually when all averages say it going down, well it is probably going down. So short term I expect the price to go down, not because I have a crystal ball, but more because it is the trend. It is not as random as people think. And yes bitcoin as historically followed a cycle of 3 year up and 1 year down, and right now we're roughly at the 3rd month of the down trend. Is it guarantee to repeat? No it is an observation it is not the truth. And I don't base any of my decisions on this honestly. If you take cycle as absolute truth, you’ll eventually get wrecked the day it stop working. For me, the most reliable thing is watching moving averages, volume and some others confluence, if buyers comes back I will see it in the chart. same things for sellers.

Tradewell3845

Some article I just read was talking about which no catalysts it can go to 200 MA in the mid-fifties, I don’t want to get flamed for having the wrong number. 72 k seems pretty low However, there’s a lot of room below $72,000. I never thought it would hit $1000 back in the day. But somewhere I heard something that has always whispered to me, “someday Bitcoin will be a million dollars. “ When I tried to buy it (under $2) , ETree acted like they were saving me from myself by refusing to buy it for me. I should have tried harder then. Now man I just can’t at these prices, but I admire the courage of those who would buy one today for 72k.

viberama977

The sooner the better. 200MA needs to be tested multiple times before the low is in.

shitcanfly

Yeah imagine reaching the 50 MA in the next week. Then something is truly broken

Ravynmagi

Eventually. We are still early in the bear market. But with all the aggressive selling the last few weeks, I suspect we will get some relief bounce before 60k, maybe around $68k. But I think $60k very likely, that's currently just a little above the 200 week MA and that always gets hit in the bear market.

BigDeezerrr

i see the 200 weekly MA commonly cited as a likely bottom if it keeps breaking. That's around $60k rn. Nobody knows for sure, but that's my likely scenario for a "bottom falls out" drop (and when I'll be heavily buying)

starbucksloverisbae

Benjamin Cowan would agree that BTC has a date with destiny. Destiny being 200 week MA.

ImJustBME

I ride with Ben Cowen. He says its likely going to touch the 200 MA like it does every post peak year. Im buying a little weekly but if it drops in teh 50's hopefully 40's im making big purchases and never looking back.

Kalaazam

Have a look at the 200 week MA and that is most likely your best bet

Kalaazam

200 MA is our destination at some point this year

shitcanfly

Pretty sure it sits at the 50 MA for a year. You got until later 2027

Spolveratore

I sold simply because btc always goes to the 200W MA... and tops in Q4 of post halving year... which it apparently did. So I DCA out of btc in summer 2025 and q4... Planning to re enter close to the 200W MA

Wolverine1850

200 weekly MA is $58k. We are not breaking lower than $50k outside of an apocalypse

djdimsim

I've crossed the line of "oh maybe this is isn't a bear market.." to "hurry up and dump to the 200w MA so I can go all in!"

djs1980

Broken down 100W MA so it's highly likely we see the 200W in the next 12months. Good time to stay interested and DCA.

Romanizer

200w MA is already at $70k. Bitcoin being under the 200w MA usually means: sell everything you have, get as much of a loan you can and go all-in (no leverage).

whereismyface_ig

On our way to the 200 MA, little bull trap bounce after that, and then we go even lower than the 200 MA. Buying puts all the way down and switching to calls in or around October/Nov 2026

SwimOld5053

The 200W MA has been a reliable metric for bear lows so far. Currently it's sitting at 58K, which will obviously come slowly down a bit as the moving average moves donwards. A likely scenario is somewhere 55-58K for bear lows this year somewhere between summer and end of year. Just a note that last time the price did go way below 200W MA (to around 16K) while the MA was at 24K. Mostly driven by FTX event. But that's still 34% below the 200W MA. Something similar (crypto related or not) is definitely possible. If it were to happen again with the same figures, we would be looking at prices around 38K. Absolutely not given though, but nearing the 55-58K sounds more realistic/safe scenario if one wants to try time the bottom without missing it. Who knows though.

GhostEntropy

The 200 week MA is 57k. Many bitcoin bear markets have reached that level.

No-Surprise-9790

Weekly 200 MA is 57k

Smooth_Imagination

Moving very fast. On a saturday unusually high volume.  Looks like pure intentional manipulation.  I think its going to the 200 weekly MA at 69 to 70 but not straight away, its much too fast.  But I think at the 200, there will be a bounce as the MACD line looks like it might cross there assuming a few weeks. 

gtwooh

On the weekly: 69.3 is the 50% level, 200 MA is 58, Golden pocket is 52.1 to 55.8

hduynam99

riskₜ = 1 / (1 + exp(− (MDₜ + c) )) MDₜ = k ⋅ ((RSIₜ + RVIₜ)/200) ⋅ (ln(1 + Pₜ + ε) − ln(1 + MAₜ + ε)) MAₜ = rolling mean(Pₜ, ma_days) ε ≈ 10⁻⁶ here

xbriannova

Based on my analysis of Bitcoin prices, there is a rational argument for lower prices. For the lowest possible price, I use the 312 and 364 weeks moving average to estimate the value. Currently, those tools suggest a price of $42.4k to $48.2k, but that's assuming if prices crash immediately. Those values will keep increasing. If the MA trend continues constantly, it suggests a price of $52.2k to $59k. Of course, this is entirely theoretical. I might potentially ladder into Bitcoin as the price decreases to those level, just like how I laddered out of Bitcoin as its price surges towards $126k. And just like how I sold the rest of it close to those levels, I will buy a huge amount of BTC close to the bottom. There's more data, but I guess this is enough for now.

piggleii

200 W MA still a fair way away though.

beanbalance

>(BTW the weekly chart looks horrendous, check MA99) there it is, the MA99 (at least temporarily of course) broke in a dump just an hour later.

beanbalance

the problem is that BTC has failed at just about everything it was supposed to be and touted as. The store of value (that is why maxis have been pushing digital gold latelly: a safe haven in bad times) is just the last thing that is failing now (BTW the weekly chart looks horrendous, check MA99). again, what makes it a "digital gold" kind of store of value is that it performs in bad times. If we only go by the "but it pumped from 15 years ago!!!" then this is just the same like just about most shitcoin did. If we can equate BTC and let say DOGE (because BTC failed at everything else that it was suppose to be special) then BTC narrative is in a bad shape.

PatMu5tard

Weekly close below weekly 100MA 💀

_magician

Wait until it touches the 200MA

Revenantjuggernaut

What two indicators you speak of?! I definitely know how to utilize volume,MACD,vwap. It’s the MA numbers that confuse me to a point I mean obvisually it’s straightforward but like….

Revenantjuggernaut

Whats dialing the numbers in mean??! Cuz I know for different coins BTC example they use different MA numbers

Revenantjuggernaut

I’ve seen for BTC they use different like 50 MA

toqchista4

# I built my own trading bot in Python I’ve been experimenting with automated scalping bots that focus on adaptability rather than static indicator signals. Instead of relying on fixed EMA/MA crosses or RSI 30/70 thresholds, the system adjusts parameters dynamically in real time. For example, in trending markets, RSI boundaries shift upward, allowing the bot to follow momentum more naturally. In non‑trending conditions, it reverts to a more static state but remains ready to adapt. Another key element is diversification. I run multiple bots with different profiles - some aggressive, some conservative, some focused on shorts, others on longs. They operate across different timeframes (1m, 3m, 5m, 15m) and use varied risk allocations. The idea is similar to hedge‑fund style portfolio diversification: when one profile struggles, another balances it out. The architecture is written in Python, around 5k lines, with persistence handled via JSON so the bots can recall state after downtime. Risk management is built in: each bot only uses a small fraction of capital, gradually laddering positions and adjusting older entries mathematically to improve exit probability. I’ve had this system running for over a year, including during volatile periods, and it has remained resilient. What I find most interesting is how the adaptive RSI logic and multi‑bot diversification interact — sometimes one bot closes early, while another rides the trend longer, creating a natural hedge. [video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLmMfpnGuK0): [bot's files](https://www.mediafire.com/file/38azm0o5h36ydfq/Trading_bot_Bybit_API.rar/file)

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is trading at $589.50, showing short-term downside momentum as it remains below its MA-20 and MA-50 but above the long-term MA-200 support at $557.38. Mixed momentum signals and oversold conditions suggest potential for a rebound. BCH is expected to trade between $570 and $620 in the coming week, with a 75% probability of price increase if it holds above $570 support. Key resistance is at $616.45, and breaking this level could lead to further gains. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

ADHD-Developer

Not necessarily, if it doesnt get down there u can wait for price to cross 50W MA upwards (2 week confirmation) and get back on the bull bus

ADHD-Developer

Its not about 4yr cycle.. i don’t actually follow that, i just follow fair price value .. you know what a moving average is ? Its an average price, 200 W MA is a large data set of 200 weeks of price movement, ide rather buy the average on the longterm than buying the top on short term.. thats it really

ADHD-Developer

200 W MA .. price always goes down their even on big instruments like S&P , buying and holding at a higher price is a scam

MemeyOreos

honestly respect the discipline. everyone fomoing into random levels while youre waiting for the 100 day MA is the difference between trading and gambling. if it holds there SEI usually follows BTC structure pretty clean too

Arijan101

Where in your post did you specify you were shorting? You wrote that the 100 day MA($90.5k) is a good buying spot to place a buy order.

Enough_Angle_7839

Good approach. Focusing on real support levels instead of reacting to every dip is exactly the right mindset. The 100-day MA around $90.5k is a logical decision zone. Either price shows clear acceptance there, or the market confirms weakness and moves toward the next major level at the 100-week MA near $87.2k. Leverage definitely plays a role too — too many early longs often just delay a proper move. There’s a useful breakdown of how current liquidation positioning could affect these levels here: [https://btcusa.com/liquidation-map-signals-potential-short-squeeze-in-bitcoin-and-ethereum/]() Risk management first, always.

Either_Junket6500

I don't look for one specific thing. BTC doesn't hold on moving averages like more stable instruments do, it can look like it's broken them only to reverse. Wick rejections are a good indicator when they happen. I usually switch to a lower time frame, like the 1h and try to buy when that's showing support/resistance as well. For example, this short I opened, I watched it test the 100 day moving average, switched to 1 hour chart, all the short term MAs crossed below the 100, it went cleanly below the 100 hourly MA and I sold. My stop loss above the peak and target was 50 day moving average. I closed a bit at $92k and I've closed the rest now, it was pretty close to my target and I don't want to chart watch today 😅 I've got some price and movement notifications set that'll tell me when to look out for my next trade.

Sea-Environment-5938

Solid take. Too many people confuse a red candle with a "crash" and jump into leverage before price even finds real support. Watching the 100D MA and waiting for confirmation and setting a stop below is way more disciplined than trying to catch every dip. Curious what you’re using for confirmation volume, wick rejection, or a reclaim/close above the MA?

StopBitchinStartLivn

If the chart surfs the 10-20 I will not necessarily use it as a setup. I’ll use it as an indicator of longer term trends but I’m looking for further acceptance as well. I currently only trade US stocks that already have momentum, not necessarily speculative cryptocurrency. For my trades I’ll risk 1% portfolio (I may even decrease to 0.75% here) and base my position size on an appropriate support level / stop loss if there is one applicable. If trades are successful I trail my profit on a rising 10MA or 20MA if the stock is more volatile

Either_Junket6500

I'm currently shorting. *Queue gasps, mocking and warnings* 😂 The 50 and 100 daily moving averages have both moved below the 200 and the recent daily peak faltered at the 100 day moving average. I'm not saying it's going to crash, or keep going down, but I'll be watching closely if it gets to the 50MA. It's a high reward to risk ratio trade.

Glittering-Health889

Low percentage above the 200 day MA signals washout, not guaranteed upside, polymarket pricing usually reflects that alts are a conditional trade

ButtBooties

Remember bois, don't FOMO, stick to your plan. However, if you see BTC break above the 50 week MA \~102k, consider throwing your plan out the window.

Ok-Cardiologist2945

Still too high compare to 100MA and 200MA

SaltySn0w

It's over dude, if in any best case imaginable we could make some sort of double top. But propably not! Small pump into 100sh maybe and the market rolls over. We have Gaussian channels turning read on multiple time frames, we got a incredible bearish divergence in the RSI, we gut CMU turner red on the 2 Month, we got a 2 day death cross 200/50 MA, Stochastic RSI 1 Month is super low, 2 month turned sharply down. See you at the next bottom in a few month collecting Bitcoins

WEM-BenjaminGrahammy

You’re absolutely right: In a BTC bull (e.g., 150k/200k/1M+), fixed BTC principal could echo this—USD payments rise faster than house value, eroding equity monthly. Borrower “owes more” in dollars despite paying down, risking underwater scenarios (house worth $500k but payments hit $10k/mo). No one rationally sticks with that without hedging. It flips the crises (strong BTC appreciating vs. weak local fiat), but outcome could be similar: “financial suicide” for unhedged borrowers, plus higher default risk for lenders if collateral lags. But key differences/mitigations in this BDM setup: • 365-day MA smoothing: Lags rapid spikes (unlike instant CHF shocks), so payments rise gradually—time to hedge/refinance/exit. • 0% interest vs. usury: Total repaid is fixed BTC (no compounding doubles/triples like 7% fiat loans). Appreciation “replaces” interest, but only bites in bulls—and for BTC maxis, it’s a feature: borrow “cheap” early BTC, repay in inflated USD while holding BTC to hedge. • Borrower bet: Yes, it’s betting BTC stays stable/declines relative to house/income (or you hedge aggressively). Not for fiat-only folks; suits those viewing BTC as superior money. • Shared risk: Lender bears bear markets (payments drop), borrower bulls—but collateral (house) gives lender recovery option. It’s not mass-market safe—definitely riskier than stable fiat loans, and could worsen “burden” in hyper-bulls without caps/floors on MA adjustments or BTC collars. The anti-usury goal is ethical lending via BTC’s strength, but your point nails why it needs strong hedges/default protections to avoid crisis repeats.

WEM-BenjaminGrahammy

A lender could buy BTC, hold it, and get full appreciation with zero credit risk or hassle. That’s often the simplest play. But this Bitcoin-denominated mortgage (BDM) appeals to lenders who want to: • Deploy capital productively now (e.g., help someone buy a house today) instead of waiting. • Earn a return tied to BTC’s growth while providing real utility (liquidity to borrowers). • Use the house as collateral for protection—if default happens, foreclose and sell the property to recover value. • Avoid explicit interest (riba) for ethical/religious reasons, while still benefiting from BTC’s historical appreciation vs. USD (in bull/base scenarios, lenders see big USD profits from the fixed BTC principal repayments). It’s not risk-free (credit/default risk exists), but the collateral + MA smoothing make it more balanced than pure spot lending. Many prefer passive HODLing, but for those wanting to lend ethically without charging interest, this bridges the gap.

WEM-BenjaminGrahammy

Thanks for the solid critique—fair points all around. 1. Lender could just buy BTC instead?Totally valid—no credit risk if you HODL. But this setup lets the lender deploy capital now (fund a house purchase) while still capturing BTC appreciation through fixed BTC principal repayments. It’s productive lending vs. passive holding, with the house as real collateral for default protection. 2. Borrower defaults anyway?Default risk exists in every mortgage, but the 365-day MA smooths volatility so payments don’t spike wildly like spot BTC would. In bull runs, payments rise gradually (and borrowers can hedge with BTC). In bears, payments drop—burden shifts to lender. Still 0% added cost vs. traditional 6-7% mortgages that double/triple the principal over time. 3. Pricing borrowers out / favoring savers?The goal is flipping the script: BTC’s expected appreciation becomes the lender’s return without explicit interest/usury. Borrowers get true 0% cost access to capital; lenders get compensated by BTC’s growth (historically strong vs USD). In a pure BTC future, it’s just wallet-to-wallet with no riba at all. It’s not perfect—needs legal/tax work and risk modeling—but it’s a bridge idea to make lending halal/ethical (I’m not Muslim btw) while leveraging BTC’s properties. House collateral helps on credit risk. Does that shift the view at all, or still a non-starter for you?

ardus666

What's the current 200w MA?

-irx

There is no timeframe for you question, the markets are chaotic and unpredictable. But we will probably test the 21MA in the next 1-3 weeks. We also should see if the latest run up is impulsive or corrective. These only gives some more probability that we are in a bear market or not, Once we go below 75k then we can say with very high probability that it's the bear market.

MaMu_1701

Sorry. 50 week MA.

MaMu_1701

Not out of the woods yet. Hold your horses. Retest of 50MA rally very common in early bull. If we pass 50MA without major rejection however…

FastVideo9700

How do I find out 200 MA?

ADHD-Developer

Sell everything and buy back when btc is at 200 week MA. Simple and profitable

-irx

Bear market is not confirmed. If we can't climb above 21 weekly MA (which is around 100k currently) or if we go below april low (75k), then we can start talking about bear market.

Th3onib

Were technically still in a bull run, altho we are at the end of it, BTC has liquidity around 108k, so we might pump there n then that's it. The way you know when the next bull run is, go to BTC on monthly time frame, take your % ruler tool, and spread it from the top to -77% and the next run will be after we bottom around 40-30k. I suggest learning basic technical analysis, you do not need to spend any money, there is enough free info out there , learn about MA EMA SMA cross overs on big time frames then go back in time on the chart to see what happens when crosses happen. Good luck

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Chainlink (LINK) has broken its 21-day moving average for the first time since summer, signaling potential upward momentum for altcoins in the next 2-3 months. Analyst Michael van de Poppe highlights this as a positive development, with historical data suggesting similar MA breaks often precede 20-50% rallies in altcoins. However, sustained growth depends on Bitcoin stabilizing above key levels, as altcoin strength remains fragile without a Bitcoin breakout. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Smooth_Imagination

Yeah it still happens all the way down to lower timeframes, the 50 and 200 MA and EMA levels are common ones that affect short term movements.  Liquiquidity sweeps will naturally mirror so you have both largely agreeing. 

Smooth_Imagination

If you pay attention to key moving averages on higher time frames you can see BTC is actually testing the 50 SMA.  It wasnt simply liquidity sweeping, price movements test price level hypotheses - in this recent periods case "is BTC worth the valie at a key MA?". It gets there and if the market says yes, it breaks and hold above flipping resistance to support, then it tests the next key level as determined by various methods used by significant numbers of traders. If the hypothesis "is BTC worth this much?"is rejected it retests recent lower support. Momentum may carry it below that, then the hypothesis is asked again, abd it will tend to revent back. Once it rejects a lower price the higher hypothesis will be retested. Momentum also plays a role in the shorter time frames.  Look at the 50 MA on the daily chart, everything is now clear. 

ardus666

It will hit the 200w MA in August and start rising after October 2026.

thecryptoguide13

The 200-week MA is the ultimate historical floor, but the current institutional bid depth has likely shifted that baseline much higher for this ccle

Kalaazam

Actually best time to buy would be when we go back to the 200 week moving average and or below, which is around $67K right now. Thats my signal to buy in not because its October 2026, we might be down at the 200 week MA by then maybe or maybe not

VariatCA

That was a pretty monster green candle of fresh Longs that just single-handedly pushed it back over $88k https://imgur.com/a/woUM4MA That will surely piss off the shorters for the rest of the day, because it only took another 10 minutes for an extra $1 Billion in shorts to show up to bring it down to 87.6k. The fuckery is on full-display this morning lol, even with a green day yesterday and currently today for stocks, they're still trying *so hard* to allow BTC to follow suit.

Zealousideal_Rain_79

BTC has dipped below the 50-week MA before and quickly reclaimed it within days, that alone hasn’t ended cycles. What matters is context. Historically, once you’re past Q4 of the post-halving year and BTC fails to reclaim the 50-week MA, that’s when the cycle is effectively over. A brief dip with a fast recovery is not the same thing.

OnChainSpecter

BTC has dipped below the 50-week MA multiple times in past cycles without ending them. Context matters more than a single indicator.

ROUCHBEN

TA can be useful for context, but it’s never certainty. Levels like the 200 MA matter to traders, yet price often moves before confirmation. That’s why for most people, position sizing and DCA matter more than trying to time every move.

riscten

Isn't a golden cross when 50-day MA crosses above 200-day MA? 50 is still far below 200 rn.

SnooMachines7409

You're claiming that some UTXO sales from the last week are representative of market manipulation. Coin days destroyed (CDD 30 day MA) reached an all time high of 40 million at the end of November 2025. The last time CDD was this high was in Aug 2017. In fact, there have only been 2 times in the history of Bitcoin when CDD reached above 40 million. If that is not old coins being destroyed, what is causing CDD to spike? Also, in the Hodl wave charts, > 1 year age band coins have decreased from 12.2 to 11.6 million coins in the last 1 month. Show the UTXO age band from Nov 14-30, 2025. Not just last week.

Denniszi

I wouldnt call it that till it hits the MA (200) to confirm... Stay safe 👍🏻

piggleii

Should see some bids around the 85k mark which is close to the 100W MA. Let's see what kind of a bounce we get.

Substantial-Sea3046

for me, with MA50 broken need to retest the MA200, everything that happens in between concerns only intraday traders. there may be pumps, rebounds, and increases, but it will retest the MA200 before a new ATH, That is my conviction

BottomTimer_TunaFish

If your only indicator is 50-week MA, I have a desert oasis to sell to you in Antarctica. Both fundamental and technical analysis are required to analyze markets. Using only one TA metric leaves you vulnerable to confirmation bias by zooming in on what you want to happen.

Zealousideal_Rain_79

Nah man, no way we’re getting an altcoin season this cycle. Maybe in 2028 or 2029, but not now. BTC’s been under the 50-week MA for weeks, so the cycle’s basically done.

Zealousideal_Rain_79

Nah man, no way we’re getting an altcoin season this cycle. Maybe in 2028 or 2029, but not now. BTC’s been under the 50-week MA for weeks, so the cycle’s basically done.

CXavier4545

let’s break the 50 MA then maybe the trend turns bullish it’s struggling to even do that with all the good news

Ping0u

Look the MA200 if btc touch it B U Y !

Substantial-Sea3046

Maybe. We don’t know. But in trading a confirmed weekly MA50 broken mean direction near or under MA200 in trading...

AutoModerator

Post is by: Constant_Ad1368 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1pj4y4e/btc_soon_90k/ Wouldn’t be surprised if BTC moves towards 90K retracting yesterday’s move. It looks a bit shaky. Usually when a pump like this halts we see a complete retrace. Took the previous highs around 94K and went back inside the range, suggesting that stops were hunted. Price also faked out and closed above the 4H 200MA and then closed back in and rejected it. Also, when price usually has such a pump before a major event we are likely to see that pump retrace. Too many confluences/confirmations to ignore such a move. Triple highs also forming on 4H time frame which shows price action weakening. Let’s see *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

pwnknight

Its not mixed signals. We know from past cycles we will atleast see a bounce back to 50 W MA after we crashed under it. It will either get rejected and go deeper into a bear market or break and close above showing the cycle theory is dead. Let's wait and see.

dalepo

going back to the 50w MA and obliterate all bears

CanadianCompSciGuy

I am stunned by the number of people who think this is the bottom. That it can only go up from here. The 200 week MA doesn't mean shit. Before you do something like that, you need to ensure you have the proper foundation. Do you have a stable job? If you lost your job tomorrow, are you able to survive for 1 year being jobless? Do you have a safety net? Enough cash on hand to pay for the shit life is going to throw at you? Car repair of at least 4k? Health issue? etc. How much disposable income to you have each month after the 320 Euro loan repayment? Are you debt free? If not, for fucks sake, go pay that off before taking on more debt.

FlatBlackMatte

No way btc visiting the 200 MA, objective truth directional right there lol… Get ready..

Substantial-Sea3046

No QE, MA50 weekly broken, fed cut rate the 11th ( sell the news ), PERFECT wickoff started in april, and a lot of people telling "this time it's different"... under 90k no need to wait, just make a DCA

InFLIRTation

Yeah things are changing. People like to use 50 week MA as confirmation of bear market. But our 50week is like 105k a 20% decline to trigger ir. Prior cycles you need 40% plus declines to touch it

kexpi

i'd assume it had to be SMA, like 50 or 200 day MA

Substantial-Sea3046

I'm concern about MA50 cross and MA200 rebounce or lost , like on stock, the rest is just noise, especially since we are not in QE... and I also don’t forget that QE arrives during a storm in the markets. No storm actually...

AutoModerator

Post is by: NightDJ_Rex and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1pffr3b/am_i_crazy_or_do_crypto_alert_apps_all_kinda_suck/ So i day trade crypto and i'm constantly missing moves because i can't sit and stare at charts all day (shocking, i have a life lol) I've tried like 5 different alert apps and they all have issues: Tradingview - alerts cost $15-60/month which is insane for literally just getting a notification. The free version gives you like 3 alerts which is useless Coinbase - only does price alerts. Cool but i want MA crosses and RSI stuff Crypto Alert - honestly not bad but it's buggy af on my phone and notifications are delayed sometimes Blockfolio - rip Binance app - works but only for binance obviously, and the alerts are super basic Maybe i'm just picky but i feel like there should be something simple that just: * Lets me set custom alerts (MA crossovers, RSI levels, whatever) * Sends instant push notifications * Doesn't cost $60/month * Actually works reliably Like i don't need charts or news or a social network. Just tell me when btc's 9 ema crosses the 21 on the 5min chart lmao Am i missing something obvious? What do you guys use? Been thinking about just building my own at this point but idk if that's dumb Edit: Not trying to promote anything just genuinely asking what people use. If there's already a good solution i'm an idiot and will use that instead *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

pwnknight

We usually go back up to the 50 W MA which is at 102k then continue to drop like all past bear markets. If it breaks past and uses as support the bull run is back

L00PYLL0YD

Damn, that is clever. We cannot access River in the UK, therefore use Strike. Hopefully they implement a similar feature with the 7 day MA, although I do allocate my funds to my DCA amount (Also hourly) as per my budgeting with wages etc, but did increase my hourly recently as BTC took a dump, to captivate on the sale sats. I did like though that Strike have recently added the ability to change the amount without resetting the fee timer. (It used to reset the fees when you changed the DCA amount).

Substantial-Sea3046

MA50 cross cycle? It’s happen also on stock market... I don’t know why everyone tell "this time it’s different" lol

pwnknight

Actually like all past cycles a bounce back to the 50 W MA happened like were seeing now. Btc needs to break 102k and not be rejected to invalidate the 4 year cycle theory.