Reddit Posts
‘MATIC can’t be compared to OP and ARB’, analyst weighs in
Does the latest Trezor Hack go further than they're telling us?
Newbie Guide to CheckTemplateVerify (OP_CTV) | BitcoinDocs
Bitcoin Filters Work By Default, and That's a Good Thing | To Filter Spam From Your Bitcoin Core Node, set “permitbaremultisig=0” & “datacarrier=0” in your Bitcoin.conf File | Use "blocksonly=1" to turn off your mempool entirely
Can someone confirm if the Taproot spend and tx signing explanation below is correct?
Day 3 after BTC spot ETF listing; not the market we expected?
The Bitcoin ETF news is massive, but no one is even talking about Bitcoin's BIGGEST Halving ever on 19 April 2024. GLTA!!!
All 11 bitcoin ETF tickers, for tomorrow. GLTA!!!
BitIDE - TapScript IDE with Local Testnet, Block Explorer and Custom Op Codes (OP_MUL on Mainnet P2TR!)
I'm trying to understand the exact mechanism of a UTXO spend...
UPDATE‼️! 9 Bitcoin ETF issuers have updated their applications today - which is the SEC's deadline for the first wave of Bitcoin ETF approvals... GLTA!!!
What happened to this sub? Have Moons doomed us?
How Victims get Phished through Reddit Forums, like this one!
Guys, My Portfolio Never Looked So Solid | BTC and ETH are the Big Guys | And, of course, Utility Coins, Meme Coins and Shit Coins
The first 2 sentences of the OP makes this hilarious imo
He lost his coins when hardware wallet spontaneously reset.
Polymer to use EigenLayer, the OP Stack and IBC to bring scalable and interoperable L2s to Ethereum
First blockchain Rick Roll incident? A tale about Cartesi, Espresso Rick Astley and Vienna OP
Mentions
OP: I’m worried about a fire or flood destroying my paper wallet. Riscten: talk to your doctor, you might have serious mental problems. Hahahahahahaha
The OP didnt say he was trying to promote bitcoin. Just that he had a jacket on that happens to be named after the alleged creator of bitcoin
You guys remember that chart that was posted here a week or so ago? The one that showed how much bitcoin banks, corporations, and wall street are accumulating versus retail? And how that chart showed that retail investors are being scared away while the rest of the guys stuff as much into their bags as possible? These posts are part of the reason why retail never wins. People like OP are made to believe that their "investment" is a rotten egg, and then people like OP get on Reddit to tell everyone else how much of a rotten egg they are carrying. Meanwhile those with real money and real buying power are stocking up as much as they can.
Are you familiar with meme coins? It’s not HBAR - it’s fun. And there are games and a great community around it. Some people like gaming money and tipping money and memes. What makes PEP a solid contribution to this thread is that it’s not some scammy token that can be rug-pulled. The devs mined their own stacks after launch, like everyone else. Holders are not overly concentrated, mining is a great way to stack some if you’re already mining Litecoin or Dogecoin, and it is positioned to 100x in the next bull run, because of all the reasons above. OP is asking about a trading/investment opportunity, and PEP fits the bill. It’s a throwback to early crypto - fun, decentralized, mineable, open-source.
OP is in such denial about the whole case, no use trying to give advice for the time being.
You might be, but the people telling OP to put it in an ETF, are not talking about a BTC ETF.
idk if bots are posting these or not but there really are a lot of threads about the “best” exchange. Good points, OP. Concise.
Nice try. post OP and the following comments.
They indeed love moving the goal posts. In the end, the 4 year cyclooors got their dump from 120k last October to 60k in February. Feel like the OP is kind of late to the short action..
I am sure OP was wrong about many predictions in the past. Of course we don't hear about those...
We actually don’t know. OP doesn’t know what they’re talking about, and you don’t either. No one can predict how it will behave. You may get lucky or they may get lucky, let’s find out!
Re-read the first paragraph of OP. He complains about traditional savings accounts, then jumps to crypto. Not difficult to infer that hes not investing in index funds for the kids. Regardless, i agree with you, hence why I personaly follow what I said above for my kid investments.
There's nothing really to hide but I guess it was automatically hidden since Reddit itself introduced privacy. OP is clearly a kid with low confidence.
Sure, OP can handle and gamble his money on that thesis as he wishes. But hes talking about the kids money. You dont gamble your kids money on a thesis you wish to be true. Again, most of the kids investment should be in something solid such as a low cost index ETF (sp500, world, etc). If he really must, allocate a small percentage to btc.
You say no one does, but then you say OP does. Make up your mind.
What an intelligent and well thought out post. Well done OP.
You're getting off topic, lol. The OP asked for crypto advice, not a lesson on traditional finance. If he wanted a bank, he wouldn't be here. Self-custody is about owning the asset, not just renting access to it.
OP, BTC will go down, look at the stats
OP is the emotional crowd he is trying to mock lmao
> seeing it follow power law so perfectly is pretty mind-blowing You know you're looking at a table of **estimates** ... that is, guesses ... right? And that OP posted this without any attribution to a source? And that it's literally not possible to know how many people hold a certain amount of Bitcoin? Does it blow your mind that whomever created the table adjusted the numbers to make it "perfect"?
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP has no post history in /r/personalfinance and is karma farming. Re-posting the same old tired style of posts and comments here in this thread.
OP didn't say 30K a year in repairs/maintenance, I bet it's in the course of the 10 years…
The subreddit being talked about recommends the standard allotment of index funds, bonds, etc. If OP had suggested putting 10% in BTC and other higher volatility assets as a way to help boost overall portfolio performance without adding too much risk, there probably would have been no issue. But given that it's a subreddit for financially illiterate individuals, recommending 50% BTC is antithetical to their goals of helping people make good financial decisions often with very few assets.
My comment is valid. You don't need to white knight for OP. Let them cook.
why does it feel like all the comments in this thread, including OP, are AI generated,
"The less you depend, the more you can choose". OP was never pretending to have *zero* dependence on the outside world. Stop being disingenuous.
There is a big dip every 4 years. It's hard to miss... One thing I don't think the OP doesn't understand is that the price going up has driven adoption. When I first bought I thought what if it became the global reserve currency, or just another currency, the limited supply means the price would be guaranteed to rise (when demand builds) and it would go up by a crazy amount as there are only 21m Bitcoin possible. That is why I bought. When the price goes up it gets in the news and more people become aware and adopt (mainly for speculation). Sure some people used it on Silk Road and the OGs and people with an interest in cryptography, economics or libertarianism may buy it but that is a very limited pool. Bitcoin solved the Byzantine Generals Problem, double spend and reversibility but who in the ral world (apart from those mentioned above) would give a flying Fu3k about that? The reason it took off was speculation. Without a fixed supply there is no speculation, no reason to hold, it gets used on Silk Road, Silk Road gets shut down people forget about Bitcoin. So the price going up is good. Without it we don't get adoption. The price will slow down as we have seen every cycle until it just becomes an inflation proof currency everyone uses.
Don’t waste your time replying to this post. The OP will send a private message asking something and then bait you into looking out the “magic solution” he has.
What? Just because OP is skeptical doesn’t mean they are “clueless” and need to “do some reading.” Knowledge does not equal belief. You can read religious texts and not believe in god, right?
I think the OP meant the bulls have to ride the momentum and have no excuse to not keep pushing the price up. Though honestly even if we push the price toward 80k-82k the downward structure still remains intact and would just form a lower high.
Layer 2 is ok. Lightning is helping people in countries where they need it, and it will continue to do so. OP is explaining something like: “tampons provide no value, what are they even for?” It’s ok if it is not for you, other people find it legitimately useful, you can buy gold, S&P-500, or treasuries if you like that more.
I know all about DCA in regards to btc ive been doing it a while. I was specifically asking around traditional stocks and also asking the person above, not OP.
Interesting, but OP specified Australia.
OP says what we would do if we started over. I've already completed several challenges and have accumulated several payouts, which means I have buy orders every time the price drops by 5k in BTC in anticipation of the next halving.
Correct. You can do it for practically free if you wait a few mins. But was offering OP the frictionless (same exp) swap time on superbridge.
I wouldn't be that harsh. I think OP was just trying to say how important it is to buy such drop ranges.
I’m sorry to state the uncomfortable truth but people are not victims of credit card debt and banks and predatory loans. OP literally does not understand the concept of spending less than you make. Most people are bad at controlling their impulses.
OP self reporting their intelligence with that line
>good entry points This is still trading and timing the market mentality. OP said the opposite of this. They said they avoid the stress by *not* doing this. Buy & hold is not concerned with entry points. You buy as much as you're able to & as often as you're able to.
"Young person"... That is the most complimentary thing I received in Reddit for a while... I know you didn't mean it as such, but still... Nor am I responsible for your beliefs, all of which you want to project onto everyone else who is not you. I am not the OP, but I still managed to amass much more than stated in the post, even during Covid. That's when sats were really cheap. Of course, you say that you will not be responding because life is too short. I know this tactic... but can you do it? I am really curious. Thank you, I really have a great life. Meanwhile, I will be hodling the multiples of 0.5 or 0.05 or 0.005, whichever you like. Maybe I made a decimal error.
I'm not going to make an ethnic stereotype about OP, but I have a feeling I could guess based on this post alone...
OP needs to run the question past his OWN attorney. OP is not the executor and the probate solicitor works for the executor and the estate.
OP must have a nice hole, good for them.
This is an extremely difficult question to answer at this point in the market. Most alts are at ATLs, whilst ETH and BTC are getting a pump. I think the main question you need to ask yourself is one thing: Would I be OK - not happy, obviously, but OK, if everything you listed above went to zero? It also depends on how much money you have in these coins - if it's your life savings that's one thing, if it's a small fraction of your portfolio that's another. What we don't realise as noobs when we get into these alts is that many will die and never recover. We hold them expecting most of them to retrace to previous ATHs, at least, without understanding that many never will. If we enter a new bull market, some will get a pump, a few will get a big pump, less still will find ATHs again, and many, many, wil just die, forever. Only you can answer the question of whether you should sell OP. If it was me, which it's not, assuming I didn't have massive amounts of money in them, I'd be holding at this point. We can go lower for sure, but we've gone so low at this point the bottom may conceivably be in.
What you’re describing is pseudo-anonymity. Because personhood identity isn’t even the point as it relates to OP’s question, it’s just one piece of the data-set of traceability. But all of this is semantics, for 99% of people who hold Bitcoin today, it’s highly likely that your real world identity can and will eventually be uncovered given enough data/time.
I feel like every answer OP gives is just increasing levels of BS mixed with words, like 'sports rights', that have no meaning and are designed to confuse or mislead. In a previous answer, it was "activation". Dude can't give a straight answer.
“Thankfully” for OP… but, for everybody else holding Bitcoin, it’s undoubtedly good that some private keys are permanently lost and never recovered due to death of the owner or any other reason. More dormant wallets -> more scarcity -> more demand -> higher market value.
People like you were much more plentiful and much louder 10 years ago. People who didn't listen to people like you and followed OP's advice did really bloody well on their non-real investments. Beating the S&P multiple times over. Having a doubt on your claims requires a healthy dose of self awareness, which people like you don't have. If you want to prove me wrong, tell me, what needs to happen for you to recognize Bitcoin as a "real investment"? If all the central banks around the world hold it, will this be enough? These are rhetorical questions for you, there's no answers to be expected from an ideologue. Prove me wrong.
Now everyone is gonna shill their favorite shitcoin and claim they're better than the ones the OP is holding. 😂
The OP is already the owner since the it is indicated in the will and already has access. There's no other legal hurdle for access.
OP is a bot trying relentlessly to scam people with some AI creative writing. We've reported it over and over.
$89 in about two hours? That ain’t shit; OP. I’ve made $8,900 in two hours with Bitcoin before.
Assuming the Bitcoin was transferred to a self-custody wallet, it only means that there's record of him giving it all away to a random address before he died. OP's dad willed him a cleaned out trading account and nothing more.
As long as the knowledge of it isn't tied in to probate. OP hasn't specified that part. Cause if it is, all transactions can be seen. All movements can be seen. All sales can be seen. All can be seen. Time and dates can be seen. Addresses are all online.
Well, it's more because the commenter failed to notice that all OP is trying to do is move ETH from L1 to Base, which doesn't even need a swap. The best suggestion should've been to use the native bridge on Superbridge.
OP is just trying to get ETH from L1 to Base. He didn't even need to use a swap. There's literally a native L1 contract that migrates ETH from L1 to base for ~$0.20 regardless of amount.
We’re not even close. Fear has us wanted to lock up peoples property? Yeah no way. Look how much fuss OP return caused. This is insane and no one even supports it. Except the guys who work for Q companies
OP hasn’t learned about opportunity cost yet. Mining can be profitable but it’s a lot of work to keep up with the tech to stay profitable. If you have lots of solar power and are near a grid, then you’re often better off just selling the power back to the grid than mining, and then buying bitcoin with the proceeds if that’s what you want to do. The place where solar meaningfully could change that equation is if there’s cheap land in the middle of nowhere that gets lots of sun. Then it might make sense to mine there with solar, but you typically need other infrastructure too, like cooling, water, and so on, not to mention building something to house the miners. People do it, but it’s a high up-front cost and then you’re in the mining profitability rat race, which isn’t really passive income
What if OP also has wrenches? Isn't anyone with a reasonably nice car and house a target for this?...as is the case for me, for example. I also have some BTC, I never broadcasted how much. But if someone comes on my property looking for trouble, that's what they'll find. Maybe OP also isn't scared
It's a rug and OP is the puller
Yes, OP has 0.1 bitcoin. Not half.
Bitcoin: stay humble OP: 🤑 🥳 🤳👀🦸🤸🕺
Well, OP is a seabass, so he is fish. Thus he will own somewhere between 50 and 100 BTC.
I get it OP… These things to an extent exist and folks are avidly saying that, but it’s your project and if this is what you want to do this go for it. You need a niche to separate yourself from these other platforms, I’m sure you can figure it out. Wish you luck.
I will never understand this mentality. Happy for OP if true. Security issues are captain obvious serious here.
Kinda phatetic tbh after 8 years. I went from 30k to 8.4 milion. OP fooled himself by not selling tops.
You’re an idiot! I’m completely against DCA and I am pointing out the stupidity of the OP. Now I need to deal with you too! Fuck you! DCA is a pussy way to invest.
OP sales tomorrow to buy a mechanical pencil
Ok, so what is your contribution here OP?
Why I think OP is gay. See they talk about bears and hurdles and crossing certain price targets, that’s just straight up gay. And then they talk about bears changing stance past 85k, which isn’t true because the bears will be going off historical decade long charts. See the bears aren’t going to change stance now because why would you bet against a cycle that has played out since to date? The odds aren’t worth the risk, and also that would just be gay. Think about it, gays bears are gonna be gay no matter what, I’m even a gay right now even though I hate to admit it. Too many retail bulls think they have it all figured out. Might as well enter short. I’ll see all you gay arse bears at sub 60k. Sincerely, a gay bear.
SUI, OP, LINK. Just looking into these 3 for now
Which part of "stay humble and stack sats" didn't OP understand?
Those who just DCA since 2013 and dont study the charts dont know what they're talking about. OP likely doesnt even know what a dead cat bounce is.
Can confirm no issues with 2 different credit union accounts. Which is hilarious, since historically credit unions are much more conservative with everything, since they’re non-profit cooperatives interested in member wellbeing, not a giant corporation willing to take risks to make profits. Big banks are doing whatever they can to hurt and/or slow Coinbase’s (and other similar companies) growth and expansion. They want people to keep their money in bank accounts so the bank can use it themselves to make money. They don’t want you to keep anything in Coinbase instead. It’s why they’re fighting stablecoin yield tooth-and-nail. OP, this has nothing to do with the safety of the transaction. I’d close the account and go somewhere that isn’t blatantly using your savings for their own political agenda.
OP doesn't believe in BTC's cycles.
Not if you’re 12, which is the case of OP
Hey OP, sorry to be the one to tell you this but 10 years ago was 2016, not 2012
More probably I will decide July, worst case October to November. In case you wonder why I sell, OP just gave the signal, posts like these are top signals. For those who knows.
More general than bitcoin -- when sentiment bottoms, price usually has already done so or will. OP is right that people always wait too long, waiting for the "one last big flush" that has almost always happened. Then they're worried they missed the entry and do nothing.
OP, we’re in the same boat. Also class of 2025 here. I’ve learned so much in the last year. Keep stacking!
Idk using past patterns to try and predict something that's essentially never happened before doesn't seem like very sound logic to me. I've been in this almost as long as you OP and really the only thing I've learned to be certain is that the whales control the market and we're all just along for the ride. So just buckle in and enjoy 🙂
Are you really bad at math or just incredibly unrealistic at what price Bitcoin will be at in 2050? The OP will need 2-3 Bitcoin to hit their goals if it reaches a million dollars. To have say $3 million at 0.5 BTC it would need to hit 6 million. Good luck...
OP what was wrong with the thousands of answers on the hundreds of other posts that asked the same question? The math is simple dude. You will need at least 1 Bitcoin to hit million dollars if it goes to a million dollars (that is a big if).
OP is getting downvoted, but I do believe that quantum computing poses a massive risk to blockchain technology and potentially the future of crypto. We're not there YET, but in 10 years for e.g. if we hit that point, everything could fall apart.
OP is asking what differentiates bitcoin not from fiat, but from shitcoins that also have a supply cap. And the answer is the same, read a book.
Read the hourglass proposal linked in the OP.
Thank u OP, this is really nice metrics, I checked Xlayer actually, and kind of surprised to see that data looks good https://preview.redd.it/ed047k77rovg1.jpeg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cab6d6b1c5b846b9ca24ab20dd680188cc47dd24
OP doesn't know what he's taking about. Public addresses are revealed, but those are hashes of public keys and are QC resistant. Public keys were used prior to 2013, that's why people talk about legacy coins being vulnerable.
It’s funny because PSA sounds like they’re trying to sound older… no offense OP but read a book lol
Such a pathetic post. I feel shame for you OP
OP you have unit bias, $10 and under is not an important factor at all. Read up on it before you invest in anything. After that buy whatever amount of Bitcoin you can.
Any node that does confiscation is, by definition, not Bitcoin (axiom of resistance in Crypto dynamics). OP is wrong. And if you're looking for DINO better look at Etherium or Sqlana.