Reddit Posts
‘MATIC can’t be compared to OP and ARB’, analyst weighs in
Does the latest Trezor Hack go further than they're telling us?
Newbie Guide to CheckTemplateVerify (OP_CTV) | BitcoinDocs
Bitcoin Filters Work By Default, and That's a Good Thing | To Filter Spam From Your Bitcoin Core Node, set “permitbaremultisig=0” & “datacarrier=0” in your Bitcoin.conf File | Use "blocksonly=1" to turn off your mempool entirely
Can someone confirm if the Taproot spend and tx signing explanation below is correct?
Day 3 after BTC spot ETF listing; not the market we expected?
The Bitcoin ETF news is massive, but no one is even talking about Bitcoin's BIGGEST Halving ever on 19 April 2024. GLTA!!!
All 11 bitcoin ETF tickers, for tomorrow. GLTA!!!
BitIDE - TapScript IDE with Local Testnet, Block Explorer and Custom Op Codes (OP_MUL on Mainnet P2TR!)
I'm trying to understand the exact mechanism of a UTXO spend...
UPDATE‼️! 9 Bitcoin ETF issuers have updated their applications today - which is the SEC's deadline for the first wave of Bitcoin ETF approvals... GLTA!!!
What happened to this sub? Have Moons doomed us?
How Victims get Phished through Reddit Forums, like this one!
Guys, My Portfolio Never Looked So Solid | BTC and ETH are the Big Guys | And, of course, Utility Coins, Meme Coins and Shit Coins
The first 2 sentences of the OP makes this hilarious imo
He lost his coins when hardware wallet spontaneously reset.
Polymer to use EigenLayer, the OP Stack and IBC to bring scalable and interoperable L2s to Ethereum
First blockchain Rick Roll incident? A tale about Cartesi, Espresso Rick Astley and Vienna OP
Mentions
At least this is definitely not AI slop. OP is 24 and still don't know how to redact
And here is where the OP tries to sell you his "old broken HDD" for the low low price of $$$$
There a tons of privacy protocols that function better than Litecoin at this point, again- MWEB was an ok implementation at the time but it was too little too late- Monero was a better full stack privacy solution from the get go. And in terms of obfuscation options ZK proofs are better, Railgun eats Litecoins lunch as an EVM compatible protocol because has far wider reach and use-cases. Like in the payments space, Litecoin is left somewhere out in the middle, not doing any one thing well enough to be a compelling product to a wider audience. And no one wants or needs a privacy function for Bitcoin- OP’s false premise was that it was ever private, of course it wasn’t, it’s pseudo anonymous at best, but that’s not its core or necessary utility, it’s the dominant SoV and that’s just fine. Meanwhile Litecoin has been downtrending against it for the past 13 years. And as someone who was literally there at the beginning of Litecoin and who has nostalgia towards it, I can tell you that I’m not hating on it- it’s just a protocol for whom time has passed unfavourably, and there is no longer a real reason to use or own it imo- I understand that it has a fervent core community, but like most crypto communities it can become a circle jerk. And the sober truth is that it’s a perfectly ok protocol in a sea of perfectly ok protocols.
You guys realize you are talking to an AI agent. All the responses from OP are by AI.
This is the best answer OP needs to read and fully understand. Well done, sir.
Yes, I've always been sceptical of that method because the interest rates aren't that great on BTC backed loans, even though the loans are fully secured. But if the tax rate on realised gains effectively doubled, as OP suggests, then taking out loans against BTC might become more attractive. ThevGovt. would actually lose tax revenue because people just wouldn't realise their gains & borrow against them instead (the "billionire method" you referred to.) These reforms, if they happen, could end up being another disaster for the ATO, just like the Gillard Government's ill conceived "mining super profits tax." What the geniuses in Canberra never seem to factor in is that when Government tries to grab ever more tax from people who took intelligent risks to generate wealth, those same people will find ways to use that intelligence to also lawfully minimise their tax. Best left alone IMHO. Also I bet they'll grandfather aany CGT reforms in on residential property, thereby exempting themselves (all the pollies seem two be going the property investment system themselves.) Bet they don't extend the same leniency to long term bitcoiner with lo cost base.
Thank you OP for this post. Such a refreshing change from 90% of the garbage I see here - price not mentioned once!
Yea but he also wrote it in a way that easely could make one belive it was like so. But I read some of the comments & saw one where OP wrote he was using he's bitcoins to get the money, but he converted em to fiat before the friend got em. 😎
Oh, I see. From OP, I thought he meant he sent him $400 worth of Bitcoin.
This is pretty simple OP, we have a Bitcoin supporting Marketplace so can explain it easily 1. When you click on Pay a QR code should pop up 2. That is the address that you scan from your Bitcoin wallet 3. Then input the amount of Bitcoin mentioned in that popup 4. Send it 5. Simple and done. You've paid for the item. Okx seems incorrect. You can ignore them, Use Nox Exchange or Binance for real prices.
Yea, I don't know why the female qualifier was a necessary descriptor. The same point could've been made by just saying bullshit content without clueing is in to the fact the OP is an incel.
Look OP, Salt is very popular and you can sell it anywhere. From that Asset Metric, they are all millionaires....because they have MOUNTAINS OF SALT. They generate is endlessly.
Don't bother, you're talking to an LLM. I think OP just used Perplexity's computer to build this and he's replying to all comments using ChatGPT or something like that, a dead giveaway is that his site has Perplexity's prediction as if it's a model too, which is completely wrong, in any case it would be Sonar but that is mostly fine tuned from Llama anyway.
This is clearly someone who brought high and sold low. Dont be like the OP.
Yeah I have empathy for people who make mistakes with Bitcoin but OP really should've known better if they've been around for so long.
The pumps always dump. It's just a question of when. If OP had liquidity problems getting in, he would have almost certainly had problems getting out. I agree that he dodged a bullet.
Great work OP, just subscribed.
Hi OP I'm gonna take a moment to simply appreciate the hard work put into this. Whether it truly works or not, i just admire the work behind it.
This is a perfect list of what a crypto needs to do to stand out, OP. But people don't wanna hear it because they're doing the opposite of everything you said. I know a token that IS making a difference. It's not on Solana though. Let me know if you're interested 💯
bear market for like 3 years now lol. my portfolio is still down 60% from 2021 peak and i keep telling myself "just few more months". meanwhile my friend who put everything in index funds is buying new car maybe OP has point, we're all just waiting for something that might not happen again. at least in job you know you get salary every month
Did you even read the post? OP has a gambling problem, not a crypto problem. You can't just solve that by saying the most generic thing imaginable.
Hi OP, I'm a longtime friend of you too, we always went to the park together as kids, and then do you remember the beautiful days spent cycling?
One of the dumbest posts I’ve read in a while. Congrats OP!!
but i think OP makes a valid point
Agreed, and why does this feel like a humble brag? OP could have easily asked same question without stating amounts.. intentions appear too obvious
OP is talking about day trading bitcoin with leverage. He stopped because he doesn't have access to as much leverage as he wants. He isn't gonna hear anyone.
My guess is OP is looking at Funding rates for futures which went negative, meaning that speculators are net short leverage
OP: I’m worried about a fire or flood destroying my paper wallet. Riscten: talk to your doctor, you might have serious mental problems. Hahahahahahaha
The OP didnt say he was trying to promote bitcoin. Just that he had a jacket on that happens to be named after the alleged creator of bitcoin
You guys remember that chart that was posted here a week or so ago? The one that showed how much bitcoin banks, corporations, and wall street are accumulating versus retail? And how that chart showed that retail investors are being scared away while the rest of the guys stuff as much into their bags as possible? These posts are part of the reason why retail never wins. People like OP are made to believe that their "investment" is a rotten egg, and then people like OP get on Reddit to tell everyone else how much of a rotten egg they are carrying. Meanwhile those with real money and real buying power are stocking up as much as they can.
Are you familiar with meme coins? It’s not HBAR - it’s fun. And there are games and a great community around it. Some people like gaming money and tipping money and memes. What makes PEP a solid contribution to this thread is that it’s not some scammy token that can be rug-pulled. The devs mined their own stacks after launch, like everyone else. Holders are not overly concentrated, mining is a great way to stack some if you’re already mining Litecoin or Dogecoin, and it is positioned to 100x in the next bull run, because of all the reasons above. OP is asking about a trading/investment opportunity, and PEP fits the bill. It’s a throwback to early crypto - fun, decentralized, mineable, open-source.
OP is in such denial about the whole case, no use trying to give advice for the time being.
You might be, but the people telling OP to put it in an ETF, are not talking about a BTC ETF.
idk if bots are posting these or not but there really are a lot of threads about the “best” exchange. Good points, OP. Concise.
Nice try. post OP and the following comments.
They indeed love moving the goal posts. In the end, the 4 year cyclooors got their dump from 120k last October to 60k in February. Feel like the OP is kind of late to the short action..
I am sure OP was wrong about many predictions in the past. Of course we don't hear about those...
We actually don’t know. OP doesn’t know what they’re talking about, and you don’t either. No one can predict how it will behave. You may get lucky or they may get lucky, let’s find out!
Re-read the first paragraph of OP. He complains about traditional savings accounts, then jumps to crypto. Not difficult to infer that hes not investing in index funds for the kids. Regardless, i agree with you, hence why I personaly follow what I said above for my kid investments.
There's nothing really to hide but I guess it was automatically hidden since Reddit itself introduced privacy. OP is clearly a kid with low confidence.
Sure, OP can handle and gamble his money on that thesis as he wishes. But hes talking about the kids money. You dont gamble your kids money on a thesis you wish to be true. Again, most of the kids investment should be in something solid such as a low cost index ETF (sp500, world, etc). If he really must, allocate a small percentage to btc.
You say no one does, but then you say OP does. Make up your mind.
What an intelligent and well thought out post. Well done OP.
You're getting off topic, lol. The OP asked for crypto advice, not a lesson on traditional finance. If he wanted a bank, he wouldn't be here. Self-custody is about owning the asset, not just renting access to it.
OP, BTC will go down, look at the stats
OP is the emotional crowd he is trying to mock lmao
> seeing it follow power law so perfectly is pretty mind-blowing You know you're looking at a table of **estimates** ... that is, guesses ... right? And that OP posted this without any attribution to a source? And that it's literally not possible to know how many people hold a certain amount of Bitcoin? Does it blow your mind that whomever created the table adjusted the numbers to make it "perfect"?
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP: It's a good idea to create one additional backup. You: Creating one additional backup is a horrible idea because it's possible for it to be destroyed in a way the other backups can't. The more backups, the better, dumbass.
OP has no post history in /r/personalfinance and is karma farming. Re-posting the same old tired style of posts and comments here in this thread.
OP didn't say 30K a year in repairs/maintenance, I bet it's in the course of the 10 years…
The subreddit being talked about recommends the standard allotment of index funds, bonds, etc. If OP had suggested putting 10% in BTC and other higher volatility assets as a way to help boost overall portfolio performance without adding too much risk, there probably would have been no issue. But given that it's a subreddit for financially illiterate individuals, recommending 50% BTC is antithetical to their goals of helping people make good financial decisions often with very few assets.
My comment is valid. You don't need to white knight for OP. Let them cook.
why does it feel like all the comments in this thread, including OP, are AI generated,
"The less you depend, the more you can choose". OP was never pretending to have *zero* dependence on the outside world. Stop being disingenuous.
There is a big dip every 4 years. It's hard to miss... One thing I don't think the OP doesn't understand is that the price going up has driven adoption. When I first bought I thought what if it became the global reserve currency, or just another currency, the limited supply means the price would be guaranteed to rise (when demand builds) and it would go up by a crazy amount as there are only 21m Bitcoin possible. That is why I bought. When the price goes up it gets in the news and more people become aware and adopt (mainly for speculation). Sure some people used it on Silk Road and the OGs and people with an interest in cryptography, economics or libertarianism may buy it but that is a very limited pool. Bitcoin solved the Byzantine Generals Problem, double spend and reversibility but who in the ral world (apart from those mentioned above) would give a flying Fu3k about that? The reason it took off was speculation. Without a fixed supply there is no speculation, no reason to hold, it gets used on Silk Road, Silk Road gets shut down people forget about Bitcoin. So the price going up is good. Without it we don't get adoption. The price will slow down as we have seen every cycle until it just becomes an inflation proof currency everyone uses.
Don’t waste your time replying to this post. The OP will send a private message asking something and then bait you into looking out the “magic solution” he has.
What? Just because OP is skeptical doesn’t mean they are “clueless” and need to “do some reading.” Knowledge does not equal belief. You can read religious texts and not believe in god, right?
I think the OP meant the bulls have to ride the momentum and have no excuse to not keep pushing the price up. Though honestly even if we push the price toward 80k-82k the downward structure still remains intact and would just form a lower high.
Layer 2 is ok. Lightning is helping people in countries where they need it, and it will continue to do so. OP is explaining something like: “tampons provide no value, what are they even for?” It’s ok if it is not for you, other people find it legitimately useful, you can buy gold, S&P-500, or treasuries if you like that more.
I know all about DCA in regards to btc ive been doing it a while. I was specifically asking around traditional stocks and also asking the person above, not OP.
Interesting, but OP specified Australia.
OP says what we would do if we started over. I've already completed several challenges and have accumulated several payouts, which means I have buy orders every time the price drops by 5k in BTC in anticipation of the next halving.
Correct. You can do it for practically free if you wait a few mins. But was offering OP the frictionless (same exp) swap time on superbridge.
I wouldn't be that harsh. I think OP was just trying to say how important it is to buy such drop ranges.
I’m sorry to state the uncomfortable truth but people are not victims of credit card debt and banks and predatory loans. OP literally does not understand the concept of spending less than you make. Most people are bad at controlling their impulses.
OP self reporting their intelligence with that line
>good entry points This is still trading and timing the market mentality. OP said the opposite of this. They said they avoid the stress by *not* doing this. Buy & hold is not concerned with entry points. You buy as much as you're able to & as often as you're able to.
"Young person"... That is the most complimentary thing I received in Reddit for a while... I know you didn't mean it as such, but still... Nor am I responsible for your beliefs, all of which you want to project onto everyone else who is not you. I am not the OP, but I still managed to amass much more than stated in the post, even during Covid. That's when sats were really cheap. Of course, you say that you will not be responding because life is too short. I know this tactic... but can you do it? I am really curious. Thank you, I really have a great life. Meanwhile, I will be hodling the multiples of 0.5 or 0.05 or 0.005, whichever you like. Maybe I made a decimal error.
I'm not going to make an ethnic stereotype about OP, but I have a feeling I could guess based on this post alone...
OP needs to run the question past his OWN attorney. OP is not the executor and the probate solicitor works for the executor and the estate.
OP must have a nice hole, good for them.
This is an extremely difficult question to answer at this point in the market. Most alts are at ATLs, whilst ETH and BTC are getting a pump. I think the main question you need to ask yourself is one thing: Would I be OK - not happy, obviously, but OK, if everything you listed above went to zero? It also depends on how much money you have in these coins - if it's your life savings that's one thing, if it's a small fraction of your portfolio that's another. What we don't realise as noobs when we get into these alts is that many will die and never recover. We hold them expecting most of them to retrace to previous ATHs, at least, without understanding that many never will. If we enter a new bull market, some will get a pump, a few will get a big pump, less still will find ATHs again, and many, many, wil just die, forever. Only you can answer the question of whether you should sell OP. If it was me, which it's not, assuming I didn't have massive amounts of money in them, I'd be holding at this point. We can go lower for sure, but we've gone so low at this point the bottom may conceivably be in.
What you’re describing is pseudo-anonymity. Because personhood identity isn’t even the point as it relates to OP’s question, it’s just one piece of the data-set of traceability. But all of this is semantics, for 99% of people who hold Bitcoin today, it’s highly likely that your real world identity can and will eventually be uncovered given enough data/time.
I feel like every answer OP gives is just increasing levels of BS mixed with words, like 'sports rights', that have no meaning and are designed to confuse or mislead. In a previous answer, it was "activation". Dude can't give a straight answer.
“Thankfully” for OP… but, for everybody else holding Bitcoin, it’s undoubtedly good that some private keys are permanently lost and never recovered due to death of the owner or any other reason. More dormant wallets -> more scarcity -> more demand -> higher market value.
People like you were much more plentiful and much louder 10 years ago. People who didn't listen to people like you and followed OP's advice did really bloody well on their non-real investments. Beating the S&P multiple times over. Having a doubt on your claims requires a healthy dose of self awareness, which people like you don't have. If you want to prove me wrong, tell me, what needs to happen for you to recognize Bitcoin as a "real investment"? If all the central banks around the world hold it, will this be enough? These are rhetorical questions for you, there's no answers to be expected from an ideologue. Prove me wrong.
Now everyone is gonna shill their favorite shitcoin and claim they're better than the ones the OP is holding. 😂
The OP is already the owner since the it is indicated in the will and already has access. There's no other legal hurdle for access.
OP is a bot trying relentlessly to scam people with some AI creative writing. We've reported it over and over.
$89 in about two hours? That ain’t shit; OP. I’ve made $8,900 in two hours with Bitcoin before.
Assuming the Bitcoin was transferred to a self-custody wallet, it only means that there's record of him giving it all away to a random address before he died. OP's dad willed him a cleaned out trading account and nothing more.
As long as the knowledge of it isn't tied in to probate. OP hasn't specified that part. Cause if it is, all transactions can be seen. All movements can be seen. All sales can be seen. All can be seen. Time and dates can be seen. Addresses are all online.
Well, it's more because the commenter failed to notice that all OP is trying to do is move ETH from L1 to Base, which doesn't even need a swap. The best suggestion should've been to use the native bridge on Superbridge.
OP is just trying to get ETH from L1 to Base. He didn't even need to use a swap. There's literally a native L1 contract that migrates ETH from L1 to base for ~$0.20 regardless of amount.
We’re not even close. Fear has us wanted to lock up peoples property? Yeah no way. Look how much fuss OP return caused. This is insane and no one even supports it. Except the guys who work for Q companies
OP hasn’t learned about opportunity cost yet. Mining can be profitable but it’s a lot of work to keep up with the tech to stay profitable. If you have lots of solar power and are near a grid, then you’re often better off just selling the power back to the grid than mining, and then buying bitcoin with the proceeds if that’s what you want to do. The place where solar meaningfully could change that equation is if there’s cheap land in the middle of nowhere that gets lots of sun. Then it might make sense to mine there with solar, but you typically need other infrastructure too, like cooling, water, and so on, not to mention building something to house the miners. People do it, but it’s a high up-front cost and then you’re in the mining profitability rat race, which isn’t really passive income
What if OP also has wrenches? Isn't anyone with a reasonably nice car and house a target for this?...as is the case for me, for example. I also have some BTC, I never broadcasted how much. But if someone comes on my property looking for trouble, that's what they'll find. Maybe OP also isn't scared
It's a rug and OP is the puller
Yes, OP has 0.1 bitcoin. Not half.
Bitcoin: stay humble OP: 🤑 🥳 🤳👀🦸🤸🕺
Well, OP is a seabass, so he is fish. Thus he will own somewhere between 50 and 100 BTC.
I get it OP… These things to an extent exist and folks are avidly saying that, but it’s your project and if this is what you want to do this go for it. You need a niche to separate yourself from these other platforms, I’m sure you can figure it out. Wish you luck.