FUD

TheVeloRebel

How will they stand out and attract demand? By clearly being the only chains that can make it possible. That's where 'Crypto agility' comes through IMO Only a few projects are built for that kind of witchcraft. 'The battle of the flexi chains' will come out as a narrative, mark my words!! Crypto agility is the actual differentiator in this dude, not just “we will support post-quantum someday. and the chickens won't come home to roost” Most major chains will hard-code signatures into consensus rules. Most of this shit requires soft/hard forks, multi-year coordination and arguments, wallet/exchange/custodian upgrades, and political fights over lost or abandoned coins. BTC has never been shy of a political uproar, neither will be others. That be the friction Bitcoin is navigating now with BIP-360, Coinbase and others are publicly prioritising flexi designs precisely cause rigid systems will fuck up migration. Complete nightmares if you just want to change something. Bitcoin will however succeed because its the biggest and only project with the most to lose IMO It affects the whole market. Google’s Cloud KMS work makes the same point outside crypto: they are shipping ML-DSA, SLH-DSA, ML-KEM (and hybrids), emphasising 'cryptographic agility' as the bedrock, targeting internal readiness milestones around 2028–2029. They are treating algorithm swaps as an engineering capability rather than a one-time protocol event. Projects that baked crypto agility in from the start that can treat new signature schemes as deployable bytecode/scripts rather than consensus changes. Or projects with audited SPHINCS+ (SLH-DSA family / FIPS 205) lock scripts on mainnet, with self-custodial wallets supporting (Quantum Purses) supporting it will bring this FUD to close....for now!! lol Even AI throws up a top 5 of Algorand, Nervos CKB, Quantum resistent Ledger, Sui and NEAR. SO I think people will be racing to get in that top 5 or crash and burn. PoW hashing itself is already outside the quantum threat model for signatures so It'll be wayyyy easier for those types of projects to adjust. Providing they jump the consensus hoops.

brows1ng

lol what? No, actually, I don’t work for them…I also don’t invest in them. I don’t even have an exchange account because I never made another one after they kicked all US people to Binance US. They’re one of the few reliable crypto exchanges - whether you like that fact or not. Most exchanges, if not every other one, would be bankrupt. Lmao damage control. I can give a shit what happens to crypto prices. Actually, I look forward to a black swan event or a market dip for a good buying opportunity. If that’s my POV, why would I try to damage control? If anything, I should be FUD’ing the hell out of Binance. They’ve just proven time and time again that they operate pretty damn well.

Impetusin

Oh my GOD the FUD comes out hard after these things. Bitcoin can survive anything that happens to a company or people using that company’s platform. Honey Badger don’t care baby.

polytech08

I was planning to buy at 40k, lets FUD down to 20k with this.

RastaBooties

My Money is safe, stop spreading FUD. https://preview.redd.it/fcex98t8hvyh1.png?width=335&format=png&auto=webp&s=fa49954a2b465887e59ffadb939684fb1bf3b3d9

AcostaJA

Just another brutal FUD campaign by known fear Harvesters, always it's the dip, DCA it's the way.

FnAardvark

They will post proof of reserves Monday, this is likely just FUD

FollowAstacio

FUD

Festel2

Its called spreading FUD to keep the average person from buying for as long as possible. They want to buy as much as possible for as cheap as possible.

tenor_tymir

Exactly. The FUD is real and it’ll blow over. No need to panic sell. Let is go past us in due time, keep stacking.

Botlenose

This all feels so reminiscent of the Y2K fears from 1999. I’m not completely dismissing the fears of AI, quantum and bitcoin.. I just think the odds of Bitcoin being cracked are lower than the FUD suggests. And I’ll circle back, if Bitcoin could be cracked, then really nothing is safe anymore.

Marsyards_slimy

I like this. There always seems to be some crazy FUD in crypto during the bull run that causes Bitcoin to drop a relatively substantial amount. It’s a good time to buy

zante2033

Apparently FUD is billions wiped out and exchange insurance premiums about to render the entire model unviable.

FewUnderstanding2214

FUD? You mean Binance and Cold Card getting hacked?

natekates

“Uptober” was just 4 red weekly Bitcoin candles this year. The jokes just write themselves tbh. I still think somehow BTC $95k before Christmas, -4% today is oddly resilient considering we’re at peak FUD Extreme Fear off the charts

Original-Assistant-8

Crypto space: "So any risk of keys being compromised is the top security concern." Observer: "Companies and governments are updating to post quantum cryptography" Crypto space: "FUD"

Fuzzy_Fudge9889

This certainly feels like FUD propaganda. If I’m wrong, I sincerely apologize. Best wishes to you if this is all true.

dealerdenny

Obvious FUD dip that wouldn't last was obvious (might not be over)

Rieger_not_Banta

Fantastic. I assumed they were aware of the threat. The article I read was loaded with FUD. (Enough to get me to post on Reddit.) Thank you

Odd_Delay4411

Always here. Every FUD opportunity is taken. Current narrative pushed very hard: only ETF is good security!

dealerdenny

yup, this is such an obvious buy situation. Binance getting hacked is short term FUD that wont matter in a week

Bkokane

“Load the North Korea FUD” “Damp it”

Keefryan

Op. Really ? Are you lonely ? Look inside yourself and grow up !! Stop spread FUD. KR

CyanDew

man that FUD dip tastes fuckin incredible. cheers to the hacker for giving us cheaper sats. just in time for Bitcoin’s birthday :) stay humble, stack sats. the thesis hasn’t changed. 0.02 BTC still puts you in the ranks of roughly 0.2% self-custodied humanity. says a lot.

Xennenial

They are insured. Users didn't lose anything. So spreading misleading FUD.

ClearSnakewood

I noticed how bad actors and bots keep trying to steer sentiment away from crypto. Even in the very crypto subs that are supposed to be pro crypto. First by discouraging self custody and now by emphasizing and fueling FUD on these security incidents. And I also wouldn’t be surprised if some of these security incidents are orchestrated by bad actors trying to hurt the industry. We are heavily under attack.

General-Ring2780

Listen to the FUD. Meanwhile we’re at 78k

thoeni

Thats absolutely wild. Its unfathomal to me how one devops engineer can have acces to any of the funds. Let alone 6.5b! Bitcoin beeing a cryptographic protocol and binance beeing a tech-adjacent company should absolutely understand how a secure system is supposed to be designed. Im back in fiat. Ledgers get hacked, exchanges get hacked. Theres no save place for crypto. Traditional banks are saver. Pack it up. Go ahesd and tell me its just FUD. Ill wait until you lost it all

BastiatF

Baseless FUD

Sea-Push5285

The market could continue chopping sideways for a few more weeks, but expecting BTC to make a new low, or even dump all the way down to $60,000, seems quite unlikely. Have you forgotten how much worse sentiment and FUD were back in June compared to now? MSTR was supposedly collapsing in a death spiral, ETFs were seeing continuous outflows for weeks, longs were getting liquidated almost every single day, and pretty much everyone was convinced BTC would crash below $55K. Yet BTC still managed to consolidate around $60K for two months before suddenly pumping to $80K. More importantly, the market structure has already shifted on the weekly timeframe, looking very similar to what we saw in 2023 and 2019. There's always FUD during a bull run. All four previous cycles had it.

Sea-Push5285

I think the current situation looks quite similar to March 6, 2023, when Binance FUD was also driving the market. If the market structure has already shifted bullish on the weekly timeframe, price might be forming a local bottom. Could that be why the market isn't reacting as strongly this time? Binance allegedly got hacked for $6 billion, yet BTC only dropped around 3%. That's nothing compared to some AI stocks, which dumped more than 10% in a single overnight session.

UzItOrLuzIt

Except they already said "you're good, not your problem, it's ours, customer account are unaffected". So STFU unless you're just here to FUD.

abitofcoinOTC

Reads like AI, may be FUD

UzItOrLuzIt

Thank you for this breath of fresh air. Perpetual string of drama through the years and yet my stack continues to grow in value. There will always be FUD, and it will probably always just result in helping me build my stack higher and higher. It's just part of the game, not necessarily a bad thing in the grand scheme of things once you understand how the game works...most serious investment works the same way.

dealerdenny

Lol the FUD full court press on X is hilarious. Picked up some sats at a nice discount tonight.

TheBigLR901

You been listening to way too much FUD

cryptominer83

Dude stop. Is this your first time hearing FUD?

SirBrickALott

What you call utter nonsense FUD article. Binance and Coinbase have vast majority of crypto in cold wallets stored in remote servers nobody will know. They FUD you to sell today so they can pump the market back tomorrow. It's quite shameful for Binance to fabricate a story and fabricate a leak. If a serious hack happened, Binance would completely conceal it and we wouldn't hear about it. The Chinese govt could back them with any lost funds. What a hoax story! Please stop spreading this misinformation campaign.

Grizly2000

Or FUD right

bitusher

> Dont you think that a reorg essentially breaks the fundamentals of Bitcoin? Reorgs are an essential part of how Bitcoin is designed to heal after an attack as written in the original whitepaper. People often cite that Bitcoin is immutable which is has always been false. Bitcoin instead has great transaction finality with the ability to reorg if needed in extreme scenarios. Obviously the threshold would need to be much higher than MtGox were we didn't reorg, but a secret QC threat that was able to move millions of BTC would indeed be that threat >how do we differentiate between a legitimate transaction and a non-legitimate one? We are discussing an extremely unlikely scenario here where someone in secrete had a QC breakthrough and none of it leaked out. The reality is QC simply do not scale well here and if they ever become a threat we will have years of time for fork in new signatures(which are already well tested and developed) and journalists, nocoiners, and altcoin scammers simply are spreading a lot of FUD. So lets assume a worst case scenario where this mysterious mad scientist in secrete very carefully start moving only a few 50 BTC blocks of UTXOs from the first 2 years to enrich themselves and not arise suspicions. Even a few of these early UTXOs moving always brings a ton of attention and if this behavior continues further scrutiny is made by everyone. Thus the fear of a QC mainly has to do with too many UTXOs being stolen all at once and a few being stolen from insecure addresses with exposed pub keys(not your Bitcoin because you are safe because you know to use 1 UTXO per address like most modern wallets default to ) doesn't really amount to much of a systemic fear at all .

blalah

I'm quite bullish. I never have any regrets buying Bitcoin at any price and I'll tell you why! It offers something for everyone. 1. It's a globally-accepted, tradable asset now. Traders love it. They can play with options and swing trade it now. 2. It is an actual store of value, and the first of its kind, as a mathematical trust mechanism. Prior to bitcoin, you needed third parties for everything. We have moved past that, and streamlined trust. 3. It is insanely useful for moving large amounts of money. I'd like to find a bank that would let me move 10 million dollars to someone for the amount that I'd pay in gas on the network. I will keep buying. There's FUD in the news right now that it can be "hacked" but it's all nonsense. AI is simply identifying exploitable software in wallets that some people have chosen to use. The network is SOUND, and it will adapt to quantum resistance if necessary.

omni_wisdumb

It doesn't need to be a physical asset to follow economic principles. And I never said it can't or won't 10x. I said compared to the risk, it's not any more likely to 10x than many great stocks over the next 10 years. I've also been in this space since like 2012 and most likely have more than 99.99% of this sub, so I am not anti-BTC or FUD. The fact is that thinking Bitcoin will have the same price action (or that price discovery isn't a thing) now as it did I 2012-2018 when people you got these "I got rich" stories is nonsensical. Do I think everyone should invest a little in BTC and maybe a little in a few other projects? Absolutely. Telling someone to take a mortgaged back loan of over $100k to buy BTC is beyond stupid.

originalgainster

FUD

Baseic

I find the attitude within the bitcoin community quite baffling, especially for a community which prides itself for its tech affinity. Devs are not wizards that can willy-nilly cast a spell and implement quantum secure (QS) cryptography. The implementation of such an algorithm, due to the size and/or signing constraints of a QS signature, is not trivial and will pose very unpleasant questions regarding block size and client side requirements. Whenever I visit crypto and bitcoin communities on Reddit, these topics are barely discussed, and if they are discussed they are always handwaved away as FUD without considering what QS encryption actually entails. To humour the few readers of this comment: a signature accompanying QS encryption would be so large that for the most ideal algorithm, the amount of transactions per block would be reduced by a factor of 4 - 7 and generating a signature requires some challenging setup.

CyanDew

i’m very bullish. so bullish in fact, that nothing can FUD me out of my bag anymore… i’ve been swayed by narratives and sentiment for far too long. i know what i hold, i’ve always fxckin known. i was right about Bitcoin but people never understood what i saw, and i let them sway me. i say, enough. it’s either valhalla or zero. Godspeed ladies and gentleman.

AutoModerator

Post is by: sylsau and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://inbitcoinwetrust.substack.com/p/the-quantum-clock-just-jumped-forward **The Quantum Clock Just Jumped Forward—And Nobody’s Talking About It.** 🚨💻 While the public debate over quantum computing "FUD" went to sleep, the mathematics of attacking Bitcoin’s cryptography did something unexpected: It didn’t just creep forward. **It sprinted.** 🏃‍♂️💨 Over the course of 2026, a quiet convergence of frontier cryptography and autonomous AI coding agents has completely slashed the mathematical requirements for breaking `secp256k1` (Bitcoin’s elliptic curve). **Here’s the wild reality of the Quantum vs. Bitcoin race:** 1️⃣ **The Algorithmic Crash:** Modern estimates used to state that breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography would take \~2,300 logical (error-corrected) qubits. Google optimized that to 1,175. In the latest ECDSA(.)fail study by Jieyi Long, AI agents helped push that requirement **below 900 logical qubits**. 📉 2️⃣ **The Hardware Promise:** IonQ’s recent full-stack analysis estimated that breaking a Bitcoin private key would take roughly 20,000 physical qubits. Yet, IonQ’s official roadmap targets 20,000 physical qubits and 1,600 logical qubits by **2028**. 🗓️ *Yes, just two years away.* **Is this the end of Bitcoin? No.** A corporate roadmap is not an active cryptanalytic weapon, and continuous 26-day fault-tolerant runs across 20,000 fragile qubits remain a massive engineering challenge that traditional titans like IBM and Google estimate will take until 2033+. **BUT, we can no longer ignore the speed of the math.** Because upgrading a decentralized, multi-trillion-dollar protocol without causing panic takes 5 to 7 years, the clock is ticking for Bitcoiners to begin preparing. I just broke down: 👉 Why AI and open-source research slashed the math in months. 👉 The "Physical vs. Logical" qubit gap & the real danger of IonQ’s 2028 timeline. 👉 Why modern hashed addresses (`bc1q`) are safe—but 6.9 MILLION BTC are sitting in an exposed bullseye. 👉 The roadmap to a post-quantum Bitcoin (and what you should do with your own keys right now). **Don't panic—get informed.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

mrpotatonutz

Meet the new FUD same as the old FUD “AI hacking BTC” is a ridiculous phrase, it’s just going to “hack BTC” last time it was Quantum computers

ZenaWitch

You're right, the community has had their heads buried in the sand because FUD is bad for price. But that needs to end. As a side, the problem with fiat isn't one person's account being hacked or even one bank being hacked, the system is remarkably resilient to that in a way bitcoin isn't because of its reliance on identity. Of course, identity is likely trivial for AI to fake, but that is another problem. The big problem for fiat is simultaneous hacks, which AI could do, that pull on the interlocking threads of rehypothication and debts. In theory, the entire system could collapse without the possibility of restoration. Much like the internet, fiat is a tangled mess built on decades, if not centuries, of assumptions that didn't anticipate the kinds of coordinated attacks AI may enable. Bitcoin, on the other hand, always had the threat model of the math breaking as a possibility, but never took seriously the possibility of super intelligence creating an environment in which no math can ever be fully trusted because you never know when the next flaw will be discovered by an ever greater intelligence. Creating backups linked to identity isn't a realistic option, but proof of ownership using off chain signatures in another, quantum proof, math scheme could, in theory, allow for backups.

mbraucht

Weekend trading warriors FUD. You're being played. By the dip if you like them to play with the kids.

Lavayo

If they could they would. There just is no reason, except WILD black swans. Everything that happens this year, rate hike, inflation, Iran, coldcard, quantum FUD, mstr delisting + FUD lead to the price we have now. Everyone that wanted to sell did sell, except of new buyers of course. We can go down, even to the 200 wma. But new lows? 40k? Never. Would have happened already, before we saw those agressive upside moves. People still proclaiming 40k as something to be expected are the same people that expected a 250k top last year.

Cricket_8719

Encryption doesn’t matter if the systems at each end are compromised by ai agents. Even if they find enough private keys lying around it’ll create tons of FUD.

Feisty-Stranger-3776

Again, a guy who thinks he has influence and spreading FUD for his own gains or ego.

SaneLad

I've been stacking since 2017 and have heard enough FUD. That said, the probability is not zero unfortunately.

dou8le8u88le

Famed VC is playing the oldest game in the book. FUD on the asset, crash the price, buy it all.

biggest_guru_in_town

Scams,Exploits, Quantum/AI FUD BS

Romanizer

ASICs can't be use for AI and AI GPUs can't be used for Bitcoin mining (only in theory). You are reading old FUD, network hashrate is going back up.

PsychedelicHypnosis

Plot twist: He’s been buying bitcoin this whole time and used FUD all these years to deter everyone else and have people sell so he can buy more…The world isn’t as it seems gunny.

bitusher

Its already common recommended to use 1 UTXO/transaction per address regardless in Bitcoin which prevents multiple concerns . This has been the case since the whitepaper so is nothing new. Justin Drake has a conflict of interest because he works for a scam altcoin so is spreading FUD and if anything its his altcoin that is far more at risk from AI due to its large attack surface After the cold card incident Bitcoin has teams of Devs all using the latest frontier models to find bugs and exploits before anyone else There is no evidence with any of the recent AI work that ECDSA is at risk If anything the take away you should learn from this is update your software in general quickly during the next few years as AI advancements are effecting all software. The irony is Proof of stake altcoins are more at risk than Proof of work coins like Bitcoin from this threat. Here is a good discussion on the topic from a security expert without bias https://x.com/LindellYehuda/status/2107999859219587309 I wasn’t going to comment since this is a really bad take IMO, but since it’s taken off I feel the need to. To my understanding, there is no evidence whatsoever pointing to a break of decades old hardness assumptions like elliptic curve cryptography. The fact that AI can prove theorems that have been hard does not indicate in any way that problems assumed to be hard are not. Our assumptions on hard problems are not based merely on human fallibility but on a belief that inherent hardness exists. Of course, we can’t prove that EC discrete log is hard, since we haven’t been able to prove P neq NP. But just throwing out - AI is doing amazing math so elliptic curve hardness is in danger has no logical basis whatsoever. Furthermore, if it really would be broken, the ramifications to our digital world including the traditional financial industry would be immense. Once I can break ECC, I can generate fake PKI certificates and impersonate bank websites. Worse, I can generate malicious banking apps and even operating systems and sign them and push them to people phones and computers and completely take them over. But this is fear mongering since there’s zero evidence to this capability existing. And there’s also zero evidence that elliptic curve hardness is more vulnerable than hash function hardness. In fact historically hash functions have been more broken than elliptic curves. So this is also based on conjecture rather than any evidence. In conclusion, making such statements without any evidence is the opposite of responsible behavior. It is the very definition of FUD — it cannot be proven wrong but there’s also no evidence whatsoever of it being true.

TheresNoSecondBest

Just the same FUD for years. Bitcoin has been update hundreds of time. Why do they assume the thousands of people working on the software will be sitting on their hands and do nothing in this magical "quantum age"? We'll gonna upgrade like the rest of the world and the trolls will have to come up with some new FUD.

creative_usr_name

100% FUD. If this happens all encryption used to secure the internet would also be broken. Online banking and shopping would all be just as vulnerable.

Particular-Edge-7666

FUD

carsonthecarsinogen

I’d say it depends on your algo and time/ cycle. Over the years I’ve noticed more and more non maxi here. A couple years ago you’d get downvoted to hell oven mentioning a shit coin. And we’re in a bear, so there’s a lot more FUD and haters here than when it’s a bull. Two tides colliding. In a year or so it’ll be mostly Pro Bitcoin hype talk.

proper_turtle

You've been in this since 2013 so you've seen through all the Bitcoin FUD and BS, but now fall for AI hype and BS? LLMs did not "find" mathematical proofs (not in the way you think), and the quantum stuff is way overhyped too. Regarding mathematical proofs: There haven't been new proofs found by LLMs, and the LLMs are usually used by mathematicians as Tools and closely guided. They have found some novel ways / solutions for already proven mathematical theories, which is cool I guess, but again: This was as part of a usage as a tool (!) by mathematicians.

10kpizza

That "influencer" is a shitcoiner whos trying to spread FUD about bitcoin. Quantum is a realistic fear but the bitcoin ecosystem does have a plan. Read the bitcoin developer mailing list. There are a lot of ideas. SHRINCS is an idea for a post-quantum signature scheme that would be appropriate for bitcoin. There is the commit/reveal plan where we can freeze vulnerable coins but allow people to spend them by providing a quantum-resistant proof. P2TRv2 and P2MR are proposals for how post-quantum addresses will work. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/print/the-quantum-issue-to-freeze-coins-or-not

Wildwildworld123

"account suspended" Get your bot ass outta here with your Trezor FUD. The Internet is a cesspool. We know this already. Clicking a bad link doesnt drain your Bitcoin.

lobhater

Yeah exactly! I don't believe it. There have been so many of these posts I think it's a FUD campaign. 8 years experience and makes the 1 mistake every rookie knows not to make 🙄

Global_Project3502

brb sending this to my brother who's still convinced every bitcoin headline is FUD. the popcorn tin detail got me, had to double-check that one was real

Awkward-Green-1653

FUD

TheVeloRebel

Its not FUD just prepoaration for the narative of the 'Crypto Agility' era. Algo, sui, Nervos CKB, NEAR etc they are all getting to the point of looking like they will be less likely to fall. I do actulaly agree that the threat of BTC will propel the Quantum talk more aggressively because obviously it controls the market All these chains suddenly posting “we’re going PQ!!!” because the narrative flipped and they don’t wanna look slow, all the capable ones jumping too. It’s not pure FUD, it’s just the market finally admitting the risk is real enough that governments and big companies are actually prepping. You can’t keep calling it FUD forever when that happens. But most of them are still gonna eat shit on the migration. Hard forks, coordination problems, big signatures, slower everything, users have to move coins, drama. SPHINCS+ adopted chains will be big, those that already have on testnet or mainet . Chains will start bleeding from bad migrations, the ones that can switch clean get the flow. PQ shit bag coins should be positioned for this, BTC will get political soon I should imagine

CreamePie_482

Ive seen this in X, i think its not fake. But i would say its FUD. :)

Generationhodl

quantum is the new tether/climate/mining/hashrate/chinaban/whatever FUD have fun they will always find another new thing to spook off people.

CoinGate_Gift_Cards

Feels less like FUD and more like an infrastructure upgrade the industry will eventually have to absorb. The winners won’t just be ‘quantum-resistant’, they’ll be the ones that implement it without killing UX, speed, or real-world utility.

SpendHefty6066

Raspberry Zero has many use cases beyond SeedSigner. While this is a non-zero chance, it is highly improbable. And it has never happened. What is your point? Sounds like FUD.

BeatenbyJumperCables

https://cointelegraph.com/news/mediamarkt-pulls-ledger-wallet-security-incident Mediamarkt has pulled all ledger devices in all countries in coordination with Ledger. This is not FUD. It’s about product liability that they can no longer ignore.

0x537

FUD - downvote

Leynnox

Pretty sure there were no confirmations about other resellers than CryptoBilis, except some shaddy x posts showing devices pics with no issues. So FUD post again. CryptoBilis is/was an official reseller for Ledger in Asia. This society has been sold, then we seen compromised Ledger being sold by them, that's it.

irkish

Trezor's database did not get hacked. But you want to say that it did. Ok. Spread your FUD.

irkish

And you won't admit you're wrong and spreading FUD.

irkish

I'm not crying about. I'm just pointing out that what you said was wrong. Stop spreading FUD. You know you're wrong and now you're saying who cares. Just acknowledge your mistake and move on.

irkish

You lied about Trezor's database being hacked. I don't care about having fun. Just get your facts straight next time and stop spreading FUD.

irkish

You're technically wrong. "Trezor's database" did not get hacked. That's FUD. You're wrong. Yes it is terrible what happened. But don't lie about what actually happened.

irkish

Yes, that is still terrible. But saying Trezor's database got hacked is not true. Don't spread FUD.

Go-brandon-69

Oh look more FUD 😂 quantum computers will hack your bank accounts and everything else before bitcoin.

No-Librarian9605

The bigger concern than 3rd party wallet FUD is miner concentration that is being essentially controlled by 2 main parties Antpool and Foundry. We need to somehow change that centralization otherwise btc can be in trouble.

KyleBr7

Let us artificially reduce the price through all this FUD so that we can continue accumulating sats for cheaper

lobhater

FUD like this is absurd ETFs are for people who don't have the time or the ability to self custody. It's not hard The chances of your hardware wallet being drained are minute if done correctly. Buy directly from the manufacturer, roll your own dice and your 99.999% secure.

av6344

BTC must be ready to make a move. A lot of bitcoin FUD is making rounds.

LongDaysPleasntNites

The powers that be are good at injecting FUD throughout the media. So glad to see this one slowly dying off! Only 99 other things we’ll have to endure 😅

stheodore1974

Just DCA and enjoy the competing narratives along the way. It’s 99.99% just FUD and few know to just enjoy the long and slow ride up

PowerappsDev

I get your point, and I still believe in Bitcoin. I used to have more of a "fuck it, it'll work out" mindset. But with two kids and significally risen costs, my risk tolerance has changed. Even a small chance of losing everything stresses me out too much. I'd rather stick with a world ETF now. Just a personal decision, not wanting to spread FUD

AcostaJA

Saylor (msrt) 'sold' some Bitcoin to get into AI, I won't be surprised if he just sold 10btc and on Monday he announced he bought 4000 Bitcoin more... The always FUD (IA, quantum etc) followed by some "scandalous sell' and traders panic sells, the same Whales buy back their positions and a lot more Bitcoin captured from traders... I'm perplex on how this happens again and again, btw I doesn't affect serious hodlers but says a lot of the market Immaturity.

Datsyuk420

Stop spreading FUD

snek-jazz

It was a once off to prove they could, and it wasn't very much. Fair price to pay to destroy a bunch of FUD? maybe, maybe not.

ywintedsabbage3

Honestly loved his breakdown here. When the charts get noisy, simple conviction videos like this help drown out the short term FUD. Just reminds you why we stack sats in the first place and look at the multi year horizon instead of daily red candles. Solid find, definitely saving this one to show friends who keep asking when to jump in. DCA and chill works every single time.

Suspicious_Depth5545

We just finished a 30%+ move up not even 2 months ago what do you expect a rocket to 200k? There’s something called consolidation you should search it up since I can tell you trade on emotions based on all your FUD. I’m in since 60k I genuinely do not care if we drop to 80, 77, 75 although I know you do with ur $500 shorts

fan_of_hakiksexydays

I mean MSTR is still down 70%. Sure it bounced back a bit from its crash and people who bought the bottom made some good gains. Long terms holders, not so much. Strategy still revealed its cracks in its foundation. MSTR fanboys always said that Saylor would never sell and STRC can peg back easily, and people were just FUDing. But the FUD proved to be true, STRC quickly lost its peg and still hasn't fully pegged back, Saylor had to break his promise and sell BTC and dillute shares of Strategy to keep the boat afloat. His solution for his sinking ship was to basically flood the other compartments and let them sink evenly, to get the ship upright again. But just because a ship is no longer listing doesn't mean it's not still full of water. The bond buyback rally and liquidation rally came just in time to get some of that water out. But is it gonna be enough?

Ark3tech

Lol, you really think private corpo is going to let it go down to a few bucks? That's a 99.99% crash in price. There has never been an insane crash like that in any major market history, so I don't even know where the notion comes from other than a pit of FUD.

Suspicious_Depth5545

Well well well look who’s back Gaston and flabarfin the two chud twins crawling out of moms basement to FUD again, the misery is just radiating from you two chuds

Suspicious_Depth5545

You and gaston44 should suck each other off with all the bearmaxxing you guys do all day. You FUD every day even on weekends, are you really that miserable irl?

MrExCEO

How can that law get passed, that’s just stupid, FUD right, right!!!