Reddit Posts
Do NOT get into pumps and dumps. They are bad and damaging not only to idiots like me, but to the community in general. They are not OK, please do not support them.
24,4% of ICO projects are dead for good
24,4% of ICO projects are dead for good
How do you fund your FIAT to Crypto?
When trading, learn to manage your expectations
Vast Bank- A Tulsa, OK bank that lets people manage their traditional bank accounts and cryptocurrency side by side. Pretty cool. Sounds like adoption to me.
Security : An easy guide on how to remain secure from theft/scam as you trade crypto.
Can we stop making fun of People who used their Crypto to buy something? Like the Pizza Guy? It's OK to take Profits!
Mentions
This post is getting annoying.. Guys, all you need is one apartment in NYC in the 1800s and wait. OK?
OK, so you still think you are arguing with me but you brought zero to the table to refuit anything.
That's if your OK living a quiet life in a midwestern suburb until you die. We make more than that and live on a fucking quarter acre 45 minutes away from the city. I certainly wouldn't want to live here my entire life.
Yup. And the fact it's EVM-compatible means it might actually get traction. Most L1s launch in a vacuum while this one already has 700M+ reach via partners like OK Cashbag and One Football. That’s a serious user base.
I came here to say this. If your retirement is already diversified and this is only a small portion then 2 BTC is probably OK. If this is most of your investment strategy, then its risky (high risk high reward). Diversification mitigates risk.
People were thinking : "OK, it's dumping, let's go to hyperliquid and short this MoFo 50x" But the reptile people said, no no no... And liquidated them.
Ember is OK but a high withdrawal. UZBD wallet earns SAT every day with daily check-in and you can play all kinds of cool games and take surveys just like EMBER but more reputable than around longer and no minimum withdrawal fee. It is an actual lightning wallet with games and surveys.
Its though a pretty big exchange so I think I will be OK
OK you got me. This one made me chuckle
Most advisors that are somewhat OK with bitcoin (most still are not!) will advocate for 3-5% max. But I guess we all have to start somewhere!
Even then 20 year period is a major risk though. Usually investment is supposed to be more fluid and people make more profit by moving the money to different tools at different times. It is OK to keep some Bitcoin for many years to see how it goes, but only as someone’s third or fourth investment tool. “Main investment” source should be something that will allow you to make profit in less than a few years.
Yes because my bank then said ''hey, it was a mistake. everything is cool'' and Kraken said ''OK. We're still gonna close your account''.
OK I got it. My purpose is not actually speculative things just focusing on Debian live cd but when someone asked me why I am especially looking for this versions of it I wanted to explain the reason why I am looking for it. I will be careful not share any speculative posts again. Thank you for the information. Regards
https://g.co/gemini/share/a012e70d8d3e OK, what is that you think people don’t know?
Could also be during a hard fork... The ETF fund manager decides this is "the real" bitcoin and sells off the "other coin" but the market chooses the "other coin". Your ETF is now worthless. It's a possibility outlined in their disclosures. OK could you explain this better? why would the ETF manager greedy wall street guy do the opposite of what the free market wants. these are people who literally bought BTC because people want BTC. why would they choose something the market does NOT want?
I've been stacking for a little longer than you. When I started, I lumped in everything I had to spare, and then some, and it proceeded to lose 85% of its value in just a couple of months. To say that I was scared would be an understatement. I came *this close* to taking my losses and selling to salvage a sliver of safety so I wouldn't be living hand-to-mouth, several times. Weeks spent hand-wringing turned into months. But I didn't. I hung in there and kept adding as I could. Then it started slowly recovering, and to avoid losing my mind over my beginning losses, I *invented* DCA, (and then read about it a year later and felt very clever,) which restored a little of my sanity. Today, I have several sats, and DCA in whenever I can. I am both happy and sad every time it goes up, and every time it goes down. I get antsy when it crabs. But one thing I do not do is try to time the market too much. I just buy a little when I have money, preferably on the way down, but with time-limits to just do market orders, and this has worked out OK. Most technical analysis predictions are unrepentant bullshit, but having a rule you follow, even if it's a silly rule, like the ones with shapes, is better than just watching and pulling the trigger when you *think* the time is right. Any regularized method that muzzles your instinct will save you from selling low and buying high, and that's all you really need. It sounds easy - as easy as just selling the top. It isn't. It takes discipline, and the whole point of discipline is that it's not easy. So yeah: stay focused and muster up all the discipline you can. When you do that, others will look at you and say: *That looks easy...*
It's actually relying on number staying the same based on its purchasing power (again, in a scenario of wide adoption where volatility is no longer at play). >Prioritizing transactions based on largest holders seems way more unfair than who’s willing to pay the most. Well it works better; everyone gets to transact without a fee, and it's not like anyone is waiting particularly long anyway >Seems like it works fine as a transactional tool but as such, won’t accrue value If it's moving value then by very definition the token itself will be valuable >History is agreeing with me Not really, crypto's aren't used widely in daily transactions. If they were, that would provide a lot of value to the network >You speculate on whether it will succeed and use a low amount of capital at low prices to effectively own the chain in the future OK and then everyone would see that its compromised and not use it... so you've traded good money for a now worthless money that you've killed. What's the point? >Again. No need for it to be a high transaction currency. For a currency, yes there is a need. Quick sanity test question: do you think bitcoin's current TPS and fees would benefit from: a) becoming more like nano b) staying exactly the same c) becoming slower and more expensive -- because surely by your argument, if bitcoin is "digital gold", we should make it even more cumbersome to really go all in on this "feature" >Bitcoin is a commodity A commodity is a tangible good, bitcoin is intangible >and is the commodity with the best properties of money Except nano is demonstrably superior -- your only claim that proof of work is better due to this self-destructing billionaire hypothetical, why can't we make the same argument of someone buying 100% of bitcoin -- (tbh this hypothetical is getting worn out now so I'd prefer to not even explore that question, it's just a nonsense scenario) >U.S. government defined it as a commodity. Well, I disagree with them. Perhaps that ruling gives it regulatory clarity, but commodities are tangible, currencies can not be commodities. The inventor described it as cash; anything else is narrative
OK and there are people that say that spam is now impossible. Again it's on them (and you) to explain how the bucketing system wouldn't eliminate the spam for ordinary users using the network. It's supply and demand, if someone is buying 50% of a finite supply, the price will go up extremely high. How high, who knows, it's a totally insane scenario. Congesting a network stalls it for ordinary users who aren't willing to pay exorbitant fees. This is just common sense. The network becomes unuseable for them until the congestion stops
OK, Saylor has confirmed a buy. Doesn't look like a massive amount. We'll see by tomorrow
There is no phrasing in my question , It's just general OK , how about Saylor words https://x.com/saylor/status/1492325453499183107?t=_wcTRkq7EwUG5ycN1XcW_w&s=19
Thats OK so you lost $23.50 USD. Stay strong my man.
its explained well in the video, and anyone with a genuine interest would be able to get it then there is those who want to do not work by themselves but still role play dictators on the internet and you wouldn't bother even if you were spoon fed, you jump on once ideas have taken off and already succeeded and you then slander the person behind it, like you all did with Satoshi, and that is OK peace
OK but its biggest proponents seem comfortable advocating for it not being cash. Were it to compete as cash, it would fail epicly
OK so I offer up nano as a competitor, it is similiarly secure (neither bitcoin or nano has been hacked), it is more decentralised (higher Nakamoto coefficient) and it settles for no fees at 350ms. Surely nano just wins across all aspects, and achieves what bitcoin set out to do?
>It changes how we handle it because it allows for superior alternatives that we can switch to, BTC. OK so why not switch to a superior alternative to BTC, that is actually functional as money and currency (e.g. the feeless 350ms settlement coin)
I've FBTC and IBIT. OK right?
> The Mainlayer has to be stable and safe! OK but there are alternatives that have a stable layer 1 that can also handle 350ms feeless transactions without falling back on middlemen
>Those take multiple days to settle It's instant in the UK but OK. I agree that lower forms of money (such as bitcoin) do exist though
When you said "no matter what percentage they offer" I assumed you are talking about liquidity pools. This was more about the percentages offered, I noticed its a marking tool now to sell coins. Some are offering 30% per year staking returns. But even if they offer 100% per year. At the end you would have less money than when you started. But your outline seems interesting. They do something similar for stocks. Lending your positions to your brokerage so they can sell them to short sellers. I am not sure this works out either. Usually the shares you lend are on a stock that's probably going down. Unless you love the company and expect a turn around you make percentages but loose in the long run, I am unclear if this true for liquidity pools ?? If you could lend ETH you should be OK but if your lending a Alt coin, it might be like staking an Alt coin, you make a percentage but loose in the long run. Who runs the pools ? Where do I learn more ? Website. Maybe its a good place to offload some losers to make some money ??
But it's OK to buy coke, strippers and go to bookies they are stopping you getting scammed with crypto. (Barclays)
I think the idea of hold hodl has 2 used. First it’s to ensure that the new user doesn’t fold and sell when price dips out of fear. 2nd it is to ensure you hold bitcoin and not the dollar.. by this we mean when bitcoin appreciates in clownworld bucks (USD) you don’t sell it for that clown money because bitcoin is a better money. So using bitcoin as a money.. it’s intended purpose.. you save in it, you measure the world in it, you exchange goods for it.. is OK To use bitcoin as a way to amass fiat wealth then when it reaches a fiat number, converting that for fiat is what we on the subreddit are advising against. Cause when you exchanged your 1 btc for 107k USD.. now what will you do with the USD.. hold it? Hold the currency devaluing? That can be inflated away? Nope. This is not financial advice. Just my friendly observation
> Why compute the hashes and not just delete the transactions? In case you need to validate the blockchain, even locally. After all, it's a full node minus spam. It's fair to think that we don't need them and we could just drop them. But my approach is to have minimal damage and to limit the damage from removing these transactions; if it then proved to be OK to remove them, then sure. I'm sorry, I don't understand why you think a soft fork is needed. Worst case scenario, like I said earlier, you can create a new p2p message type that doesn't contain the whole block, but contains select transactions in a block. This doesn't require a fork, because consensus is never changed. Communication protocol doesn't require forks. Now again, if you have the partial block with removed spam and you follow the recipe I mentioned, you can recalculate the hash of the block (down to the transactions through the merkle tree), and validate that the block is valid.
Define "better". Pruned mode is very bad and very impractical for any server/clients mode. > Reducing the UTXO set through censorship I don't care what it's called. I don't want to store jpegs for free on my servers. > We have OP_RETURN as an opt-out-of-UTXO solution 1. I don't want to store jpegs, whether in OP_RETURN or not, I'm OK with small data 2. Tell that to spammers who use the 4 MB with discount from segwit/taproot. Also please explain to me what a spammer would prefer to use your OP_RETURN instead of the 4x cheaper witness storage.
its alright. as they go, it's reasonable. if you invest much, you may want to withdraw to a cold wallet, but small amounts are OK. Cash app is cool :) good luck!
>Bitcoin maxis still obsess over premine from a decade ago. That it happened a decade ago doesn't make it OK. There's no statute of limitations here. >that expand on Satoshi's vision Satoshi's "vision" didn't include alt coins.
meanwhile, Pelosi buying $NVDA options while literally writing the CHIPS Act is A-OK in his book
Bitcoin would be OK. Crypto sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.
Why do these bitcoin types insist on completely meaningless analogies? Yeah, its just like a phase change from liquid to gas. Err, OK. What has that got to do with the fact that returns on bitcoin must inevitably diminish? Just horseshit.
15 years ago is OK, but now I dont think so.
OK thank you. So house stays house asset, bitcoin stays bitcoin asset . Don't mix the two? Correct?
Probably if you are buying a house or having a kid and you need some capital on hand. Some big planned life event. It's easy to say never sell, hodl. Live the memes bla bla. But I've seen a few people on this subbreddit say "its OK to sell for something that makes your life better". And I respect that. We still gotta live this life. Maybe buying a business, or dream car. 2nd home in vacation land. Only you know. But I think most would agree, never sell your whole bag.
OK well I don't matter, so I guess I don't have to care about your opinions. Solana is and always has been a corporate shitcoin. It's premined. The lion's share of the coins were g(r)ifted to VCs who chipped in hundreds of millions. The SOL validation network goes down. Not just once, more than 10x. Price is rigged by billions in daily wash trading. Shitcoins and tokens are launched on SOL more than any other network. 14yo scammers operate out of their moms' basements using SOL and pump.fun. Transactions can be censored and coins can be seized anytime. It's not a cryptocurrency. Any questions? Trump said that the US crypto reserve would include BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL, and ADA. Who do you think made this determination?
If you really need funds and it's affecting your life, you may want to consider selling. If you can minimize expenses and still get by OK then I would conveniently forget my BTC exists
whatever it costs you a year to live on now, it will be roughly double in 5 years time and keep doubling for approximately every 5-7yrs you plan to remain alive. Although price predictions are running amok, nobody can say what BTC will be worth in 5 - 30 years time, what your country's economy will look like in 5 -30 years time etc. The short answer is to keep saving as much as you possibly can. This year for many close to retirement or retiring this year, an OK retirement plan was severely dented when a President rode into town with tariffs and other crap. You never can tell from whence the rug pull will come
We're nearly at 10m members. We got to celebrate people. OK hand up who's the richest member here and where you live we're gonna party at your place. I'll bring the dips.
Daily is still OK but 15m/1h/4h all rejected at 2.03 for XRP... possible it retraces back below 2 by 11pm
Jesu, I have to educate the freaking ignorant... OK... let's do this bud. Previous cycles were SOLELY retail driven, extremely limited institutional involvement if any. GBTC did it's thing in 2017, but in 2021 there was no institutional buying and the cycle underperformed because the inability of the Trump administration to effectively deal with Covid-19 pandemic left the economy crippled. During 2021 we had the highest inflation rates with real inflation being over 10% (if you bring up CPI, you're more ignorant than I thought), the interest rates started climbing up and the world really didn't know what the future was going to look like. Uncertainty kills markets and that was the first sign that Trump's incompetence was going to kill economic progress. Now let's look at the current state of crypto. Since ETFs were approved we've had tens of billions in investments flow into Blackrock, Fidelity, and Strategy has been buying up $60 billion of bitcoin to date... so the amount of inflow doesn't corelate to the amount of growth. We've gone from a MCM of 20+ to less than 10 since Trump took office and that is a much bigger metric to show an impact than just number go up... and if you don't understand the concept of Market Cap Multiplier then you really don't belong in this conversation.
It's just low effort and looks kind of ugly with the same yellow hue. So about that whole nuclear family thing...you OK?
No, because it's painfully AI...you OK?
Omfg IM CUMMING hyrumppffffff ****bites lip***** ohhhhhhhh mmmmmmmm dont touch me! Don't touch me! DON'T TOUCH MEEEE! OK OK OK punch me in the fucking face!
OK. I would keep in mind that we moved up Big after action because we are now in pro crypto environment… The trial is just about over… I think a lot of people’s perception is still clouded by the trial and all those years of nothing happening. Even though we got legal Clarity from already… But we will see! Good luck. Good price to get in at for sure.
I'm in the UK and signed on now to check for you. All OK my side. I use pro.kraken I use web though, not an app. have you been to their sub to see if anyone else is having issues? r/KrakenSupport If you are on an app try clear app cache, force stop, check for updates
I’m not a college psychology professor, but if I was, I think Buttcoin would be my #1 source of case-study material. “OK class, let’s do a deep dive into what this person must be feeling to make a post like this”. Hahaha
OK I'll pay this dumbass in freaking acorns then
It looks like an inverse camel scrotum formation to me, so we should be OK.
As significant as owning 1 BTC in 2017. An OK milestone.
No, but I don't think there is going to be a Alt bull run. Alts are too spread out now. Too many of them. Trillions tied up all over the place. Will you do good day trading them, maybe. Long term holds, Probably not Top 10 might be OK
There's always an insane buying opportunity you're missing. You can always look back and find some amazing early deal that you didn't capitalize on. This is not unique to btc. It's OK.
I wouldn't use the word India and leader in digital payments in the same sentence. There are extremely tight and onerous restrictions on self custody of BTC in the country. They're not the leader of anything. It's harder to buy Bitcoin there than it is in some totalitarian regimes. It's not even legal to sell person a person. India is between actively hostile and hostile OK the spectrum of digital payments.
KCEX is currently having a promotional event for new users and was lesser of pain to sign up (for me). All chains and all coins are 0 withdrawal fees (up to 100 transactions I think). I would not keep a lot of coins on any CEX unless you plan on trading frequently FWIW. Overall, I think KCEX is OK for now, and don't expect exchanges to race to lower fees until the US regulations are clearer and competition is high internationally.
If sent to a different address and ALL downstream TXes never mix, then it's OK. But having the discipline to make /sure/ that different TXOs of different origins in the /same wallet/ never get combined at some point down the road is HARD. One tiny moment where you forget to correctly set the right TXOs to spend in the next TX and you've just lost. Much better to keep different origin/status TXOs in entirely different wallets.
Alts,OK Trade Bitcoin for ISO 20022 .Don’t get left behind.RWA Fintech payment and tokenized assets
but hey, only suckers paid him, not the taxpayers. so it's OK in my book.
It's been like that on that sub for years. It was still OK up until about 5 years ago when it got increasingly uptight in there. One of the reason I started to use just this sub. In the past year or two, it got really easy to get banned there. At least here you're still allowed to question any coin, including Bitcoin, and bring up downsides and issues.
OK, so now I’m dreaming because of what you said! I might be able to actually do it someday instead of my 12-year-old Santa Fe although it’s been a very good vehicle not too sexy.
OK you convinced me just bought another $1k
Chaos there. Try enuff stuff hope get lucky some time. My gardening is like that. It maybe improved by learned .. I fig bito 30% PLUSINCREASE IN PRUCE ALL CIMPOUNDED. AT 20,000 BITO SHARES = 8000. / M0. BE OK!!?
Right, 2% less. OK. But the store of value you had and saved throughout last year will be preserved, and actually valued 2% more (assuming prices fell 2%). That's the idea behind store of value. Humans search for any kind of storing value and currently its gold, real estate, art and whatever comes to mind except the salary currency (that keeps melting with each passing day). BTC attempts to fill up the current inefficiencies - if exonomy were perfect we'd never have needed bitcoin. Bitcoin ideal would not be required in siffernt economy. Don't try to assume what-ifs.
He should’ve started stacking the day he first felt regret about selling. And he should still be stacking now. And if he hasn’t started re-stacking yet, he should simply start today. He’ll be OK man. He still believes way harder than most people in this world.
OK, so here is the truth: QC is horseshit FUD. Can't even factor reliably any number greater than 21 (legal drinking age), and it doesn't even do 21 very well. Can't do shit now and won't do shit ever. It's a pipe dream. You should waste zero time worrying about QC. If you do, you are gullible AF. The REAL threat to bitcoins is 'Sustainability'. Bitcoin and other POW chains are at high risk of being shutdown because of climate change. It's gonna be real easy to convince the public that this internet funny money needs to end because it consumes huge massive amounts of electricity.
OK you fuckers its true you can rag on the ETH price being more static then a turtles pecker but lets hear where you're staking your ETH. I have my ETH earning a modest % in two places on Kiln & Lido, reason being it was piss easy to set up and piss easy to administer as in set and forget. I welcome any comments about these providers as a staking platform and appreciate any more comments on whether I should consider other providers. Bitcoin and ETH is my main retirement plan, I will be retiring in my 40's living off the income these will provide. I see the Ethereum platform as having an insane future and right now its in its infancy, it will evolve to what the pc, internet and mobile phone are now.
I’m OK with all of the above bro
Oh, OK. Maybe I'm just dumb. That's how you write 9,988.00 in euros? You use switch the use for the decimal point and the comma?
Yea, that's true, while we might be OK for now, we never know what bullshit Reddit might pull in the future or if they change their team. At least Moons are no longer in the hands of Reddit, and can even be part of any external site. So even if Reddit changes, Moons can still stick around and do their own thing. Only Moon holders are in power, thanks to the DAO.
Saylor has more than 1 product to sell. He pitches it daily through various media, attracting new investors. It's a matter of time when he will pull the plug. Look at the MSTR chart, it's up 1000% in the last 2-3 years. The best you can ask for is 2x from now before he runs out of funds however, he'll be OK, he has Bitcoin. But most of his customers, will have a debt to settle.
I don’t smoke sativa, that shit makes you crazy, indicas are OK
That makes no sense. Bitcoin is not a good or a service; therefore, it isn't affected by inflation. You could say that about anything else under the sun that is not purchased as a good or a service. I think I understand our disconnect now. You're having trouble with the "reading comprehension" part of this. I never said that EVERYTHING gets more expensive because that would be incorrect. Bitcoin isn't really any "thing". It has no tangible value or use, it can not be analyzed with any traditional financial analysis method, it doesn't correlate with anything in the economy or markets, it was created by a fictional character, and the leader of the "faith and hope" based movement has little to no understanding of how the financial works (Saylor - the unsuccessful CEO who is putting all of his shareholders in jeopardy and setting himself up for the largest white collar criminal case in history). It's almost as if someone invented a solution to a problem that doesn't exist and then did an amazing amount of propaganda and marketing to attract uninformed and gullible people who are looking for a way to achieve financial success without working for it. Like every other fraud in history, this will blow up and cause an amazing amount of self-inflicted suffering to those who bought into the scheme. Believe it or not, I was trying to help. Out of respect for my time and interest, I'm OK if you don't reply.
OK - So just tell her to withdraw her $600. Then ask her to withdraw another $600 a week later. They'll just end up blocking her. For her coworker flexing 60k, ask her to withdraw it then as a test.
Calm down dude. I just wonder community's thoughts. I use sentimantal data in my trades, so think it's like a research, OK?
OK, that makes sense! I guess you're not from Europe, though. In Germany we pay €0.37 / kWh atm. 😢 I'd have to HODL for a very long time to end up net positive with those prices.
Elon knew that this was going to happen and he was OK with it. Anyway, it doesn't really matter, just another Dip for people to buy more. Even newsportals have started to report now... So I guess anyone should know what's going on right about now.
I am personally OK with ETF not cyrpto native as I am owning a code wallet lol. Diverisfy ways to store
That's like 1.5M. OP is 60, running some actuary tables, the median life expectancy is 20 years. 15% chance he makes it to 90, and 5% chance he makes it to 95. Assuming zero gains in Bitcoin price, that's .5 BTC per year to live off of and be reasonably safe he doesn't run out of money. Definitely tight to live off of in Syracuse, and even more tight if there's any kind of pullback to like 75k. If the price appreciates even modestly on average, you can definitely do OK, but a drawdown early can certainly hurt you a lot because it forces you to sell a significant chunk and then miss out on games if it recovers. And this of course assumes he's not paying the tax man, which will eat a good 20% of your money here if you do it.
39,000% gain in 10 years. Its OK to take some off the table at 5% off all time highs. There is way too much bullish sentiment on Twitter and Reddit, I've seen this story play out at least 4 times before.
No. They used it as a way to take bribes from everyone, including foreign actors. It's OK to be mad about that.
They'll feel like they're getting in late because they are. I had btc at 1k in 2016 sold in 2017 around 2k, thought u did OK as I doubled my money and needed the cash Then saw BTC go to 15k, 45k, 60k, 100k. Lost out on a x100 return, best I can do now is follow the sheep, get in late and maybe get a x5 or x10 in next 10 years.l and pretend I was some early investor.
Way to go OK_Rent! Impressive stuff! I hope to be as fortunate as you. Congrats again.
Ok so I've been reading the comments and there is a lot of confusion in your case so let's break it down. Your crypto is always stored on chain, it's never on Metamask or ledger or whatever, it's on chain (think of the chain as a bank). You access your crypto with the 12/24 words password (think of that as your account number). All metamask or ledger does is offer you a visual interface to interact with your crypto (like a bank app). The difference is in how each interface interacts with the internet, the chain and your computer or mobile. Metamask is a hot wallet, the password it creates for your crypto can be easily hacked, where ledger is known as a cold storage wallet so the password it creates for your crypto is much more secure. After 10 years maybe none of the 2 will exist anymore but that is OK as long as you still have your password because then you can just put that in the latest wallet software (or interface as I said earlier) that exists at that time and you will have access to your crypto.
I shared this conversation with a friend who thinks everyone you meet online is an arsehole as a counter example., hope you are OK with that. We have a bet now for a trivial amount about your reaction to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiWvlpSyzbw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiWvlpSyzbw) Is Sting being an arse in this or not. You are absolutely welcome to ignore us idiots.