Reddit Posts
Mentions
Bears and Buttcoiners: **OUT IN FULL FORCE AFTER EVERY PULLBACK**
My angle is simply historic happenings through various market cycles. Re assurance at this stage seems crazy to me. What is there to re assure? That btc isn't going to have a somewhat similiar bull run to ***EVERY SINGLE ONE IT HAS EVER HAD EVER?????*** Short to short-medium term I don't care what happens. Like I said come back in 12-18 months time and I would like to hope that the price will have gone up from where we are now. Or maybe this is the first ever prophesied *different cycle.* As far as not seeing the panicking posts, nearly every comment in this thread and the r/CryptoCurrency daily thread has been complete and utter fear mongering that btc is done for, for about 2 weeks now I'd say. Maybe I'm wrong and the bull run is over and this is a different cycle and if so then there will be re assurance posts from me delaying the inevitable but I don't know how at this point in the market cycle people can claim btc is done for.
My god your fkn article is about the fact that hardware wallets aren't really air-gapped. > Air-gapped cryptocurrency wallets are believed to hold private keys stored in them secure, but an Israeli researcher has demonstrated that attackers can leak the keys from such wallets in a matter of seconds. Quit with the google searches ffs. I have already covered this: https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1cfej47/how_do_i_go_about_getting_a_hard_wallet/l1qkbtu/?context=3 > You don't know what an injection attack is. You would see that on an SD card as a file. In order for that vulnerability to be possible, the OS of the network connected computer would need to be compromised, the SD card would need to be compomised, the SD-card ports on both the network connected computer AND the hardware device would need to be compromised. ALL of that would need to be done in person, short of infecting EVERY SD Card and SD Card reader. > And none of that drivel has anything to do with the vulnerability of connecting a device to a network connected computer. You know the only thing that would need to be compromised? The USB cable, or the hardware device which you have no way of validating, or the network connected computer. Because the keys are connected to a network. Which is the vulnerability that cold storage mitigates. You don't know what the fk you're talking about.
Quit with the google searches ffs. I have already covered this: https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1cfej47/how_do_i_go_about_getting_a_hard_wallet/l1qkbtu/?context=3 > You don't know what an injection attack is. You would see that on an SD card as a file. In order for that vulnerability to be possible, the OS of the network connected computer would need to be compromised, the SD card would need to be compomised, the SD-card ports on both the network connected computer AND the hardware device would need to be compromised. ALL of that would need to be done in person, short of infecting EVERY SD Card and SD Card reader. > And none of that drivel has anything to do with the vulnerability of connecting a device to a network connected computer. You know the only thing that would need to be compromised? The USB cable, or the hardware device which you have no way of validating, or the network connected computer. Because the keys are connected to a network. Which is the vulnerability that cold storage mitigates.
#Algorand Con-Arguments Below is a Algorand con-argument written by a deleted user. > ####**Smart contracts are not yet trustless** > > EVM blockchain explorers (like EtherScan) allow smart contract creators to publish and verify their smart contract code. This allows users to trustlessly audit them and interact with them in a safe and decentralized way. > > In contrast, Algorand's blockchain explorers do not show verified code. At most, they only show [decompiled code](https://algoexplorer.io/application/971388781), through which you can only guess how the smart contract works. And there's no method to interact with them trustlessly. You have to trust the developer's app. > > ####**Small dApp community** > > Algorand TVL is [currently only $240M](https://defillama.com/chains). Even an L2 rollup like Arbitrum has 4x its TVL, and Ethereum is 340x times larger. > > Algorand only generates [$100k of revenue from transactions fees annually](https://tokenterminal.com/terminal/projects/algorand). That's enough to pay for 1 engineer's salary. > > It also doesn't help that Algorand's smart contract interpreter, AVM is very different than Ethereum's EVM, so there's a barrier to switch from Solidity to PyTeal. > > ####**Algorand CEO Staci Warden has a history of immature tweets** > > * That mysterious [NIKE](https://u.today/algorand-ceo-debunks-nike-partnership-details) tweet which turned out to be nothing > * [Tweeting like a teen with bad grammar](https://twitter.com/StaciW_DC/status/1568607639717957634) about losing USDC on Hodlnaut. And why are they even storing important Foundation funds on a CeFi platform in the first place? > > ####**Low Decentralization** > > Algorand has 2500 participation nodes, but there are several other metrics that tell a different story. > > * **Very few nodes actually participate in consensus**: Over the past 7 days (~150k blocks), only [190 voters participated in consensus](https://metrics.algorand.org/#/decentralization/). Unlike Ethereum, in which EVERY staking validator participates in Casper FFG consensus, Algorand [picks voters based on their stake](https://developer.algorand.org/docs/get-details/algorand_consensus/#the-algorand-consensus-protocol), and only a few are included in their leader and voting committees. > * **Relay Nodes**: Algorand Foundation manages a secret list of relay nodes responsible for forwarding transactions to the participation nodes. It's fine as long as there are a few honest relay nodes not censoring blocks. What's concerning is that the Algorand Foundation [used to publish a number of 100-120 relay nodes](https://np.reddit.com/r/AlgorandOfficial/comments/ku4brb/algorand_relay_nodes_public_data/), but they have since scrubbed all information about the number and identity those relay nodes. > > **Governance is for unimportant decisions on reward distributions, not for protocol updates** > > Algorand often markets that it has governance. But [the elections have only been used to vote on community rewards distribution](https://governance.algorand.foundation/), and they're very minor changes. Governance is also coordinated entirely the Algorand Foundation. > > I have never found any information voting being used for Algorand updates, which suggests that there is no public vote for protocol-level decisions. > > ####**Questionable long-term economic sustainability of its security model** > > **Constantly-changing plans** > > As much as I like Algorand's technology, its tokenomics suck. The more I study Algorand's tokenomics, the more I feel that it's a decade-long rug pull. > > First, the Algorand Foundation keeps changing the rewards system and tokenomics model: > > * They attracted node runners (early relay nodes) with billions of dollars of rewards, set to last until 2024. > * They attracted stakers and participation nodes with rewards to last until 2022. > * They then attracted community participation with Governance rewards starting in late 2021 that is currently scheduled to run out in 2030. > * At one point, there were discussions about re-introducing rewards for community relay nodes after community complaints. > > I compare their documentation with [my previous notes](https://np.reddit.com/r/MPlankton/comments/v16v7v/algorand_research_may_2022_draft/) from mid 2022, and many of the links they originally published have been replaced. Their notorious "Long Term Algo Dynamics" page, referenced as the "[New, Longer Term Algo Dynamics Model](https://www.algorand.foundation/news/new-algo-dynamics-overview)" is now old. It redirects to [a new, new model](https://www.algorand.foundation/tokenomics) which still doesn't fix their tokenomics. They seem to be changing decisions on a whim, chasing after whatever gets the most bad publicity at the time. > > **No Plans after 2030** > > Algorand Foundation's plans for [long-term economic sustainability](https://forum.algorand.org/t/serious-lack-of-transparency-and-engagement-of-algorand-foundation/2385/10) have been put off until 2030. It originally designed for Algo's 10B supply to be distributed over 6 years, with relay nodes being rewarded until 2022. That plan was scrapped and remade in Dec 2020 to extend the deadline to 2030 with rewards for relay nodes to last until 2024. There are no plans for sustainable rewards past 2030, and Algorand's tokenomics is a ticking time bomb. > > **High Inflation** > > Algorand's circulating supply has uneven inflation due to an accelerated vesting schedule. The actual circulating supply inflation was 141% in 2020, an insanely-high 433% in 2021, and 12.7% in 2022 [source](https://messari.io/asset/algorand/chart/sply-circ). The silver lining is that accelerated vesting is now over, so inflation will be [~5% over the period of 2023-2029](https://assets-global.website-files.com/62835f42aef969049eba0806/62cc37d101a3d91afc30efca_December%202020%20Algo%20Dynamics.pdf), assuming the 10B max supply holds. > > ####**Revenue too low to sustain security** > > Algorand only produces [~$100K annually from transaction fees](https://tokenterminal.com/terminal/projects/algorand), which isn't enough to cover the annual salary of single engineer. If they want to support their current 100 relay nodes, they'll likely need 100x the current fees unless everyone is super nice and **working for free**. > > **Relay Nodes** are maintained by a consortium of early investors, VCs, Universities, and other non-profits until 2024. These are being paid for through multiple rounds of massive grants totaling at least 2.5B Algo (worth billions of USD). Algorand is still the covering costs for future decentralized Relay Nodes through its [Community Relay Node Program](https://www.algorand.foundation/news/community-relay-node-program). > > It currently costs [$5-10K/year to run a cost-effective relay node on AWS](https://np.reddit.com/r/AlgorandOfficial/comments/o4on6e/run_a_relay_node_on_aws_cost_estimation/). Algorand's $100K in annual revenue from transaction fees is enough to cover a single relay node with 1 engineer. It's unsustainable. Do they think that relay node providers, each currently paid $5M annually on average, are going to stick around when they're suddenly no longer getting paid? > > **Participation nodes** are responsible for consensus and don't get paid anything. They have moderately-high [hardware requirements](https://developer.algorand.org/docs/run-a-node/setup/install/): 16GB memory, 100GB NVMe SSD, 1 Gbps dedicated Internet. > > They don't get paid any rewards, and I'm skeptical how reliable that can be with their hardware, energy, and personnel costs. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Algorand) to find submissions for other topics.
BLOOD SHALL SPEW FROM EVERY ORIFICE! Uhm, i dunno. maybe a few more weeks?
Or shit on EVERY OTHER COIN...aka max kaiser
I lost all my btc back in early adoption when I threw my hard drive away. Been searching my local dump everyday since.... oh wait, I just read this story... around EVERY halving and many times in-between 😬
EVERY SAT MATTRESS No matter how much you have 1 BTC = 1 BTC But for real your response is very unique and I appreciate that.
I do blockchain education in the same area this is in (Phoenix). My career before bitcoin was in the real estate industry so I've done quite a bit of crossover education for real estate offices & title companies. Most of the time they invite me in because they've been getting questions from home buyers & sellers about crypto. Currently most realtors & title companies have no idea how to answer these questions as they pertain to the industry. This Paradise Valley homeowner from the article is willing to accept bitcoin from the buyer for the purchase. However, what I tell the offices is that that type of "coincidence of wants" is quite rare and they're unlikely to encounter it (for now). So long as they can procure an exchanger, the buyer can use bitcoin even if the seller doesn't want to accept it. Alternatively, the seller can receive bitcoin even if the buyer uses fiat. In fact, I tell them that sellers receiving bitcoin from the proceeds is the aspect of "crypto in real estate" that they are definitely overlooking. Think about it. If Realtors want to advertise to clients that they can facilitate crypto transactions, then what's their potential customer base? If you look at buyers, the market is limited to people who already have crypto & want to use it. But if you look at sellers, the market is literally EVERY home seller. I tell them the whole mantra in crypto is "stack & hodl". Who wants to SELL their crypto? Everyone wants to ACQUIRE, and acquiring can often be intimidating & complex, especially in large sums. Imagine being able to advertise to every seller that they can receive bitcoin/crypto as part or all of the proceeds from the sale of their home?! I believe that is the real play here for the industry. This was a business idea I had floating around in my mind for a while, to be an exchanger focusing on the real estate industry. With an exchanger involved, buyers and sellers don't have to be on the same page as far as accepting bitcoin/crypto for the sale of the home. Buyer could use bitcoin & seller could receive fiat, or conversely buyer could use fiat & seller could receive bitcoin. I started the initial research to see what it would take to bring a service like this to market but I abandoned it when I discovered that Bitpay is already quietly offering this service, and that a crypto project called Propy has already launched a title company that offers this service. I don't know for sure but I believe Propy is using Bitpay on the backend to facilitate this anyway. This was 2 years ago. Either way, had I been just a little earlier I might have pursued it.
You can't time it. Last bear market when it diped I didn't even thing on selling. If I sell for 40k and then it pumps to 45k I will buy back 1000% "what if it doesn't dip more?" Everything is soo obvious when you look it from the future. In the present moment it is not. So I just hodl. I am not a trader not even want to be. This is the reason why the guy who posted first the "hodl" and where the meme was born, here is a copy-paste from this post: " (1), Nestade (1), euhctcyn (1), chipi48 (1), Fitzy (1) #1 I type d that tyitle twice because I knew it was wrong the first time. Still wrong. w/e. GF's out at a lesbian bar, BTC crashing WHY AM I HOLDING? I'LL TELL YOU WHY. It's because I'm a bad trader and I KNOW I'M A BAD TRADER. Yeah you good traders can spot the highs and the lows pit pat piffy wing wong wang just like that and make a millino bucks sure no problem bro. Likewise the weak hands are like OH NO IT'S GOING DOWN I'M GONNA SELL he he he and then they're like OH GOD MY ASSHOLE when the SMART traders who KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY'RE DOING buy back in but you know what? I'm not part of that group. When the traders buy back in I'm already part of the market capital so GUESS WHO YOU'RE CHEATING day traders NOT ME~! Those taunt threads saying "OHH YOU SHOULD HAVE SOLD" YEAH NO SHIT. NO SHIT I SHOULD HAVE SOLD. I SHOULD HAVE SOLD MOMENTS BEFORE EVERY SELL AND BOUGHT MOMENTS BEFORE EVERY BUY BUT YOU KNOW WHAT NOT EVERYBODY IS AS COOL AS YOU. You only sell in a bear market if you are a good day trader or an illusioned noob. The people inbetween hold. In a zero-sum game such as this, traders can only take your money if you sell. so i've had some whiskey actually on the bottle it's spelled whisky w/e sue me (but only if it's payable in BTC)" Thank you GameKyuubi. You were on of the first to arrive the cithadel
That isn't true. The only way to verify EVERY transaction in the blockchain is with your own node. You can verify every transaction you make without that.
Wait who said there would be lambos? Almost EVERY *legitmate* source of bitcoin information said this event, like the previous 3 events, would be anti climatic.
IMO, the halving is exactly what is driving the current value. Wall Street hates Bitcoin, because it threatens them personally by removing control from them. The same with Government. I'm no expert, andvyet I'm banking more on Bitcoin than any Government monetary structure. Look at how our dollar continues to shrink with EVERY Administration here in the US.
The fappening is starting. LETS GO EVERY 10 minutes till halving happens.
GF's out at a lesbian bar, BTC crashing WHY AM I HOLDING? I'LL TELL YOU WHY. It's because I'm a bad trader and I KNOW I'M A BAD TRADER. Yeah you good traders can spot the highs and the lows pit pat piffy wing wong wang just like that and make a millino bucks sure no problem bro. Likewise the weak hands are like OH NO IT'S GOING DOWN I'M GONNA SELL he he he and then they're like OH GOD MY ASSHOLE when the SMART traders who KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY'RE DOING buy back in but you know what? I'm not part of that group. When the traders buy back in I'm already part of the market capital so GUESS WHO YOU'RE CHEATING day traders NOT ME\~! Those taunt threads saying "OHH YOU SHOULD HAVE SOLD" YEAH NO SHIT. NO SHIT I SHOULD HAVE SOLD. I SHOULD HAVE SOLD MOMENTS BEFORE EVERY SELL AND BOUGHT MOMENTS BEFORE EVERY BUY BUT YOU KNOW WHAT NOT EVERYBODY IS AS COOL AS YOU. You only sell in a bear market if you are a good day trader or an illusioned noob. The people inbetween hold. In a zero-sum game such as this, traders can only take your money if you sell. so i've had some whiskey actually on the bottle it's spelled whisky w/e sue me (but only if it's payable in BTC)
I reached out to my cousin to help me buy Bitcoin when it was 45K. I didn't know how to go about it safely. He said,"I don't think there's any rush." I struggled to get things set up and working properly through Coinbase. I asked him,"Can I just give you cash and you buy it through your account, then transfer it to a wallet for me?" He kept saying,"I'll think about it..." Days would go by and I watched as it went to 50K, then 53K. I had a bank account verification lock thing happen, where I couldn't add the bank account for 7 days or something. I watched as the price jumped up to 57, then 61K. I got discouraged and shelved the idea. I watched it go to 65, 66, 67, 68. Then I started thinking I should just buy some because I believe it will go much higher in time. My goal is the long term gains. So, after the 7 days, I finally bought some at about 68k. It was between gold and bitcoin for me. I would have gone with gold, but gold prices really stagnated over the years, so I bought bitcoin. Now I see gold rising in price after I bought bitcoin, and I see bitcoin starting to drop. Ya gotta just laugh at life for screwing you at every turn. You can predict it because it happens EVERY time, but doing nothing at all does nothing for you and thus you're screwed anyway. Rock and a hard place.
It's so crazy to me how EVERY workplace has the same kinds of people. The crazy one, the one who makes up stuff all the time (like the dude in your story), the lazy one, the 'bootlicker' and then a bunch of nice people who can easily become your friends. It's like companies have to tick a few boxes when they try to hire new people 😂.
And you're telling me this because you want me to feel sorry for you? Go find sympathy elsewhere. This is my last response because you have nothing else to say other than talk about mental illness. A random Internet pleb that is probably on pay check to pay check can tell me nothing because I am better than him in EVERY single way.
Come for my dispersed stamped metal plates. You’ll go mad hunting that treasure. Unless you’re giving out pretty specific information nobody’s gonna steal your sats. EVERY post about stolen or scammed bitcoin, the victim did something stupid. Besides, the biggest thief has been exchanges and they were supposed to be trustworthy.
There you go shillmaster...work HBAR into EVERY SINGLE comment!
Ive had this conversation with you MULTIPLE times, and MULTIPLE times you just dont respond to my evidence, statements of facts or links. Every single time you repeat this same Copy pasta that is just nonsense. https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/zu6p6i/vitalik_buterin_faults_ripples_decentralization/ The sad truth of the matter is that you at no point have ever had a valid response to my basic sourced evidence which destroys your entire position. You at NO point planned on having an honest discussion in any manner(nor do I think you're even capable of it) You are literally in EVERY thread that mentions XRP/Ripple, copy pasting the same boring disproven nonsense. Feel free to keep posting it, just know I will be there to downvote and copy paste this reply to you every single time from here on out.
Ive had this conversation with you MULTIPLE times, and MULTIPLE times you just dont respond to my evidence, statements of facts or links. Every single time you repeat this same Copy pasta that is just nonsense. https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/14yh1z0/xrp_climbs_to_3rd_place_in_crypto_liquidity/jrttfdw/?context=10000 The sad matter is that you at no point have ever had a valid response to my basic sourced evidence which destroys your entire position. You at NO point planned on having an honest discussion in any manner(nor do I think you're even capable of it) You are literally in EVERY thread that mentions XRP/Ripple, copy pasting the same boring disproven nonsense. Feel free to keep posting it, just know I will be there to downvote and copy paste this reply to you every single time from here on out.
Imagine all the fees that will be generated on ETH from people constantly buying and selling EVERY stock in the stock market. That will be tens of billions in revenue. That goes to stakeholders, which drives up demand, which drives up price.
Yeah, alts have been going up consistently since end of 2023, most are up 5-10x, but compared to 2021? This is nothing, we had multiple periods of EVERY alt doing 100-200% moves within a day, we havent seen nothing yet compared to prior cycles.
Then the other very last thing you want to do is put them up as collateral for a loan. EVERY year during the bull cycle one of the crypto lenders or exchanges goes bankrupt without fail. Its the fastest way to lose your crypto.
Statistical impossibility? How many people do you genuinely know (outside of the anonymous stories we read on Reddit) that have lost Bitcoin, forever? It’s sort of a rhetorical question, although I’m more than open to receiving a response from you; I’m just not usually so skeptical, but I know 7 people who’ve been stacking sats since the AlphaBay days, each of which have orange-pilled a few people, themselves, and NONE of us have EVER lost ANY Bitcoin. I just can’t wrap my mind around considering that something happens EVERY DAY, even though I’ve NEVER ran into it in real life! (Don’t get me wrong; I’ve never met someone who’s been struck by lightning, but just because I’ve never encountered it, doesn’t mean I don’t think it EVER happens; still, I couldn’t POSSIBLY ever claim that I believe it to be a STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY [0% chance] for someone to DEFINITELY go a whole day WITHOUT being struck by lightning!) Perhaps you’re over-embellishing, as I’ve been known to take things quite literally, especially after leaving multiple opportunity for the person to be a bit more accurate with what they’re actually trying to express. Forgive me, as it’s hardly even important; I just wanted to make sure I knew what you meant, and I’m quite sure that I do now!
EVERY coin will be around in 20 years. The question is which ones will be in USE in 20 years!
What makes you say that Bitcoin is lost EVERY day? Is there any pertinent information that I’m missing?
Mod updates: 1. XPR Network burned 60,000 moons to sponsor our banner and giveaway, giving away 500,000 XPR (\~$850) AND sending some XPR to EVERY commenter. No strings attached! https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/s/mE6iDzpv0j 2. Moon Week 47 is on! Make sure you vote in the 3 governance polls. https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/s/xD2ejyrZwz 3. RCP Talk: r/CryptoCurrency x r/ConeHeads x r/EthTrader \- April 7, 08:30 pm (EST) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og3iy24dQ\_I 4. The daily crypto discussion is permanently linked at the top of the sub and in the sidemenu if you’re looking for it.
Mod updates: 1. XPR Network burned moons to sponsor a giveaway, giving away 500,000 XPR (~$850) AND sending some XPR to EVERY commenter. No strings attached! https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/s/mE6iDzpv0j 2. Moon Week 47 is on! Make sure you vote in the 3 governance polls. https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/s/xD2ejyrZwz 3. The daily crypto discussion is permanently linked at the top of the sub and in the sidemenu if you’re looking for it.
You’re absolutely right, that countless amounts of bitcoins are absolutely lost, and that it doesn’t take technological incompetence to have lost bitcoin in the past. My point, is that it’s ignorant to assume we can ever estimate how much is lost (versus invested), but people would rather paint bitcoin to be an asset that, as even you just alluded to, is so easily burned forever, as opposed to painting bitcoin to be an asset that’s so obviously hold-able, as made evident by all the dormant addresses. (Also, I wouldn’t say that EVERY day, there’s some bitcoin that’s lost forever, and the number of ANYTHING that’s lost forever will ALWAYS grow, and NEVER shrink. If something that was lost is found, then was it ever really lost to begin with? If so, then I’m wrong, and the number of things that are lost can both grow AND shrink, but that would include bitcoin, as well)
any tangible evidence ? You have plenty of tangible evidence if you actually want to see them (I have severe doubt about that). Just look at defilama [https://defillama.com/chain/Algorand](https://defillama.com/chain/Algorand) : average 30K/50K (messari) adress max the last 3 months, vs avg of 800k to 1m for sol. Algo TVL is LOWER than in beggining of the bull market in T1 2023, price is lower too... Volume was actually higher in T1 2023, it never was more than a few % of SOL volume, and 40x less TVL. Stable coin TVL went from 300M in T1-2023 to 70M today. EVERY coins on the market did better than algo, because REAL usage of algo is actually worse than at the height of bear market. You can send billions of tx to the same node for semi centralized usage like Hedera, it doesn't mean it's battle tested, sorry. You should try to put off rose colored glass and look at the actual datas vs the market.
Bitcoin pretty much always goes up over the course of the 1-1.5 years following the halving. The halving has historically always occurred in April/May, after that prices start to tank after roughly 1-1.5 years of growth and this only the case for bitcoin…you’ll actually see this trend taking place with pretty much EVERY cryptocurrency in the top 100 Some of them start to tank closer to 1 year after the halving (May of the following year), some of them start to tank closer to 1.5 years after the halving (November of the following year), but if you randomly looked at 10 different cryptocurrencies within the top 100 cryptocurrencies, the vast majority of those 10 will follow this trend of experiencing either 1 year or 1.5 years of growth after the halving NOTE: this was the case, time and time again and those markets didn’t have these ETFs & as many large institutional buyers that we have now. With that being said, now that you have to add that to the equation as well, I believe it’s going to be QUITE interesting to say the least…
Bitcoin pretty much always goes up over the course of the 1-1.5 years following the halving. The halving has historically always occurred in April/May, after that prices start to tank after roughly 1-1.5 years of growth and this only the case for bitcoin…you’ll actually see this trend taking place with pretty much EVERY cryptocurrency in the top 100 Some of them start to tank closer to 1 year after the halving (May of the following year), some of them start to tank closer to 1.5 years after the halving (November of the following year), but if you randomly looked at 10 different cryptocurrencies within the top 100 cryptocurrencies, the vast majority of those 10 will follow this trend of experiencing either 1 year or 1.5 years of growth after the halving NOTE: this was the case, time and time again and those markets didn’t have these ETFs & as many large institutional buyers that we have now. With that being said, now that you have to add that to the equation as well, I believe it’s going to be QUITE interesting to say the least…
Bitcoin pretty much always goes up over the course of the 1-1.5 years following the halving. The halving has historically always occurred in April/May, after that prices start to tank after roughly 1-1.5 years of growth and this only the case for bitcoin…you’ll actually see this trend taking place with pretty much EVERY cryptocurrency in the top 100 Some of them start to tank closer to 1 year after the halving (May of the following year), some of them start to tank closer to 1.5 years after the halving (November of the following year), but if you randomly looked at 10 different cryptocurrencies within the top 100 cryptocurrencies, the vast majority of those 10 will follow this trend of experiencing either 1 year or 1.5 years of growth after the halving NOTE: this was the case, time and time again and those markets didn’t have these ETFs & as many large institutional buyers that we have now. With that being said, now that you have to add that to the equation as well, I believe it’s going to be QUITE interesting to say the least…