Binance and their Number 4 crypto by marketcap is likely an exchange ponzi scam. They are paying high yields on all deposits of every crypto just like every exchange that collapsed due to fractional reserves. Customers ARE the yield. RED FLAGS EVERYWHERE.
Satoshi created Bitcoin network to eliminate the need for trusted 3rd parties while in the recent years we gave BTC to "trusted" 3rd parties so that they can steal our BTC! EDUCATIONAL POST ON CEXes, INFLUENCERS, CHEATING and RED FLAGS! Buckle up moonbois, here's free schooling on recent events !
In the transaction section they are showing as two distinct deposits and they are equal to the values showing in the asset tab. I've read a lot about the transfer fees, but don't fully get it. When clicking on one of the assets (they both show separately, not combined) the SELL button is greyed out, however the transfer button is available. When I click transfer an error appears in RED, saying that ETH is required to transfer to another wallet. I'm a bit out of my depth also at this stage, but no where else to turn for advice without the fear of losing her more money.
I was going over the list of [bitcoin-only.com](https://bitcoin-only.com) checking the Buy options, the second one I clicked was GiveBitcoin from the USA and i got this RED screen from Norton saying: "Dangerous Webpage Blocked You attempted to access: https://givebitcoin.io/This is a known dangerous webpage. It is highly recommended that you do NOT visit this page. " for me that message and my money don't go well together, i need something i can trust 100% , is there another way to do it ?
>Yet they have the audacity to talk about decentralization and community. They probably just use those shiny words to allure retail investors who don't check the tokenomics/project. ​ >17% - Starkware Investors 32.9% - Core Contributors (employees) 50.1% - Starkware Foundation (of which maybe 9% will actually go to retail) This is already a BIG RED FLAG that I can't even understand if people will still fall for this BS. The Starkware Investors and Core Contributors are almost even enough to have power over their community if they wish. Thanks for this OP, hope everyone reads this carefully and check for themselves.
Positive post. Buy in fear at 15-20, sell in greed 60-75. You only need one chart that shows what is happening in this 90% emotional market. For the time being it is emotions, not utility, but that might obviously change at some point. I think it will get brutal and depressed as hell for 2023 after some bullcrap rallies in the next 3-4 months, you tubers looking to pump there bags, influencers and big money also, a quick get in GET out. Super pessimistic about the next 12-15 months, but hopefully great buying opportunities ahead for RED DCA days.
We are creeping up the index today to 33, yellow zone. If its not RED in the 20s, I am not buying, period. If it is not green in the 60-80s I am not selling, period. It really isn't some rocket science with waves, squiggles, and predictions....it is dopey ass fear and dopey ass fear. It is 90% human emotions and sentiment, and about 10% actual utility driven pumps. AND it always crashes back down, AND it has always gone back up.
I gave it a test on a burner account. **Permission 1**: > See address, account balance, activity and suggest transactions to approve That's nothing suspicious. **Permission 2**: Click to sign in. Next you will be asked to sign the message to accept new terms. This requests will not trigger a blockchain transaction or cost any gas fees. Your authentication status will reset after 24 hours. Permission 2 is extremely suspicious since you really don't know what you're signing. Even Metamask warns you in RED LETTERS: > Signing this message can be dangerous. This signature could potentially perform any operation on your account's behalf, including granting complete control of your account and all of its assets to the requesting site. Only sign this message if you know what you're doing or completely trust the requesting site. My guess is that it's either a *transfer* or *approval* transaction. Whatever the case, the website can detect our balances and knows we own nothing, so it doesn't even bother making a transaction. That's why you don't see any on-chain transactions. ----- In any case, you just need to remove the app from your Connected Sites (not the same as revoke). Then create a new account in case the scammer publishes the transaction in the future. Never touch your old account again.
Get ready for another RED candle week after fed rate hike coming up. > The annual core inflation rate in the US accelerated to 6.6% in September of 2022, the highest since 1982 from 6.3% in the previous month and above market forecasts of 6.5%. On a monthly basis, underlying prices excluding energy and food prices rose 0.6%, the same as in the previous month, and above market expectations of a 0.5% rise. The indexes for shelter, medical care, motor vehicle insurance, new vehicles, household furnishings and operations, and education were among those that increased over the month. There were some indexes that declined in September, including those for used cars and trucks, apparel, and communication. source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Lmao thank you. This person has no idea what they are talking about. When you rent an apartment you are not getting equity in an asset and therefore there is no investment. You don't get ownership of anything in return for your rent. Hard to swallow pill: MOST new L1s are basically securities. Like right on fence. Why? Because they are not remotely decentralized enough as 90% or more nodes are run by a single entity. And that entity sold a coin that it entirely controls while also hyping up roadmaps and future plans which gives investors the expectation of future returns. It is not a stretch to say that buying a coin like this is akin to buying equity in a company. Pro tip: learn how to analyze a Blockchain and determine if is actually decentralized. The binance smart chain has 21 nodes. All of which are pre-authorized by Binance itself. Luna had 130. MAJOR RED FLAGS. Why either of them made it as far as they have is a testament to how virtually no retail investors have a fucking clue what they are buying. It's legitimately sad.
Great news for everyone except for the people running ponzi schemes!!! This means we will see more crypto currency directly offered at your local banks or investment firm. More business will accept crypto as payment too. BUY IN RED, NOT IN GREEN. WE PARTY IN GREEN.
Yep. There used to be one that ran on “cloud” and actually rewarded. Not like the one you can find that “claims” to mine cloud mine but yo withdraw you must deposit $BTC RED FLAG . Those were the days back then I wish I was not skateboarding and being a normal teenager and was on pc every day not for games but for crypto lol
I already know what you're saying, but it's wrong. >You can make the argument “it” happened to the “best” person. Meaning the person who was most deserving of what happened. No you can't, because the statement is 100% clear that the "best/better" is NOT referring to the "it". That's why my example proves you wrong. Because if you were correct, then you should be able to replace "better" with any word and you should still interpret the opposite meaning of it. And yet you don't! Put "smarter" there, and you never think it means "stupider". You're only making this mistake because you're reading the sentence completely wrong. Here, look. https://i.imgur.com/ywWlGPO.jpg look at the structure: Event ("IT HAPPENED" blue), adjective ("BETTER" red), subject ("PERSON" red). The statement is perfectly clear that RED adjective refers to GREEN person, and **NOT** to BLUE event. BETTER refers to the PERSON, not the event. The BLUE is clearly separate from the rest. but somehow in your interpretation, you erroneously assign it to the BLUE for no reason, magically jamming it between the red and green in your so-called "interpretation". Why? You just did that randomly. It makes zero sense and you're just wrong to do it.
EXPLANATION of the issue You can see the top left shows in RED it is a short trade that I had made at the 1728 entry price and a liquidation price of 1746 - and the market price was 1708 so this should have been a profitable trade. Instead - it shows that it is losing money - then disappears and reappears as a long trade, which gets liquidated and I lose everything. KuCoin says I closed the short for a loss (how is that possible?) and then I opened the long position right up again - so that I could liquidate myself the next minute. The most insulting part is being told that I really need to gain more trading experience before trading crypto. They have never once mentioned anything that would be their fault or being buggy. In fact I usually start out the ticket saying there is an tech issue which gets ignored and support drags out until they mark as resolved after you don’t reply within 24hrs.
When you first got the device, you generated a new 24 word seed phrase from the device itself right (using the buttons and little screen) ?? From your phrasing it sounds like you got your ledger and it was already set up so that you just needed a PIN code. If thats truly the case, then its a huge RED FLAG. Your device should NOT come pre-configured with a 24 word seed phrase.
I'm not too sure about that. Waiting for more info on the marketplace. I agree, would be great if they accepted moons. HOWEVER, would be unfair to take payment from 1 or 2 subs. They may need to create a custom token for each SUB or 1 standardized token for Reddit in general? Maybe Moons will become RED tokens? Just a thought!
Let me quote from the very tweet you linked to: "I was prepared to put the extra in, but the Commissioner of OCIF told me I did not have to as the deficiency would be cured per the terms of the sale." I mean, that says to me, his bank is solvent. As in, sufficiently capitalized or otherwise able to obtain needed capital. Again - this was a RED TAPE BUREACRATIC rule. They missed it. Whoopty do. So...deny the sale (because of political reasons) and shut the bank down??? Really? This should outrage every freedom-loving American. I know that I'm outraged over it. It's the government of PR picking winners and losers, based on politics.
Forget you "previous cycle high" bullshit. This is the first time for Crypto that inflation is so high and RED pumps interest rates - people have no more money to take load to buy crypto. I would not rely on "previous cycle high" anymore...
I started buying Crypto in February of 2021. I saw great gains until the fall in mid April. I have been doing DCA since then. Only HODL. Every cent I have invested is in the RED. But here I am..still DCAing.. Still holding..still hoping. This is the way.
I mean... in short term they made rash decisions in a row. So now they either surprised and realised they fucked up AND THATS A RED FLAG cos cdc is not a small company or they did it as a plan what is ALSO A RED FLAG How can you trust a company to lock your 3500 - 35000 - 350000 euro for 180 days when they can make another rash decision in a month later like... "Changed our mind no rates, 1% cashback sorry, no sorry" I dont know if it was a rash decision or a planned one... But they went back and forth with the earn rates like how the wind blew and now they are changing their minds every other day regarding the card rates... And all they ask you to lock your money in a 180 day prison Seems okay