GUI

TheGreatMuffin

Are you using it over command line or over GUI (graphical user interface)? If the latter, you can click on various buttons to see some stats, for example bottom right there's a "peer" symbol which shows you other nodes connected to you. Or click on "window" and there are some stats as well. If you are on command line (or if you open "console" in the GUI version), you can use commands like 'getnetworkinfo', 'getblockchaininfo', 'getpeerinfo' to see various stats about your network, peers, your sync status etc. Or 'gettxoutsetinfo' to see how many satoshis are currently maximally possible (essentially, checking the max supply on your own). There is a bunch of such commands, if you look around on the web you'll find more. All this assuming you are using Bitcoin Core directly, not some third party platforms like Umbrel and whatnot.

OwnConflict5118

Thanks. Not at all a beginner. I've had a node for well over a decade. And, I don't think umbrel is going to be for me. I have previously just used ssh. And I wanted to explore the GUI. 

jgbjj

Thanks for the reply, for the record... I want to be wrong on this... but... a few points. **(1) Forward simulation is the right framing.** You're right that I argued against the wrong attack in my first post. "Reconstruct initial state, forward-simulate, accept the state whose trajectory produces the on-chain nonce" is well-posed. The nonce as validation channel is correct. The cryptographic question is therefore: how large is the search space of consistent initial states, and what's the per-candidate verification cost? That's where we still disagree. **(2) The "12 parameters" list is the wrong state space.** The arithmetic on your list (clocksource × utsname × boot ± 10s × ...) gives 10^(11) to 10^(13.) The arithmetic is correct given those inputs. The problem is the inputs. The kernel pool state at the moment OpenSSL first reads /dev/urandom is the SHA-1 mixing of: * `init_std_data` inputs, which IS your list (boot time, utsname, BIOS clock). * PLUS every `add_interrupt_randomness` call between boot and that read. The second set is what's missing. On 2.6.26, every interrupt handler calls into `add_interrupt_randomness` with timing data. Disk IRQs (`add_disk_randomness`), keyboard IRQs (USB initialization), network IRQs all feed the input pool before OpenSSL's first RAND\_poll. For a Live USB boot, the disk IRQ count between `init_std_data` and bitcoind's first RAND\_bytes is in the thousands. The image (squashfs/iso, hundreds of MB to GBs) gets read from USB to RAM before userspace starts. Each read is one or more IRQs, each timestamped at the kernel's high-res clocksource. That's the timing data that's not in your list. **(3) "P7450 falls back to jiffies because nonstop\_tsc=0" leaves out HPET.** Even when TSC pauses in C-states, `clocksource_select` on 2.6.26 picks HPET as next-best on any machine with HPET (which the P7450 platform has). HPET resolution is \~70 ns. So `add_interrupt_randomness` is reading nanosecond-resolution timestamps for every IRQ, not jiffies-resolution ones. A disk IRQ contributes log2(jitter\_window / 70ns) bits, typically 10-15 bits. Thousands of disk IRQs × 10-15 bits per IRQ = thousands of bits of entropy in the pre-bitcoind pool. That's the floor I was pointing to. Your list omits it entirely. **(4) "Headless bitcoind" is your assumption, not in the post.** Bitcoin 0.3.2 shipped as wxWidgets GUI by default. The post describes restoring a wallet and sending, consistent with GUI usage. The headless variant (`bitcoind`) was uncommon in Aug 2010. Mouse events feeding RAND\_add (`ui.cpp:393-399`) would have run. Even if you grant headless: see (3). Disk IRQs alone account for the entropy floor independently of the GUI. **(5)** `extract_buf` **count doesn't pin the output.** You list "extract\_buf count range: 6x". `extract_buf` outputs `SHA1(pool || count)` then mixes back into the pool. The output depends on the pool state, not just the count. The pool is the 4096-bit buffer that's been XOR-mixed with every interrupt input since boot. Six possible counts × one pool state isn't 6x; it's 6 × (whatever the pool entropy is). And the pool entropy is dominated by IRQ history. **(6) Clocksource argument double-counts.** You say "search space is dominated by clocksource ambiguity at 10^(3) to 10^(4") but also that hardware (which determines clocksource) is in the cooperative-input set. If cooperation pins the laptop model and BIOS revision, the clocksource is determined, not 10^(4-ambiguous.) You can't have it both ways. **(7) "Transaction proves privkey existed -> BDB durability irrelevant" is correct as a framing point but doesn't answer the recovery question.** Granted: the privkey existed in RAM at signing time. The cryptographic question is whether it can be reconstructed from public data + owner cooperation. That's well-posed. My answer is still: probably not, because (2) and (3). **(8) "Minutes on a laptop" doesn't follow from 10****^(13)** **anyway.** Even granting your bound, 10^(13) candidate sessions at \~50 microseconds per candidate (full forward-sim through md\_rand + EC scalar mul + hash160 compare) is 5 x 10^(8) seconds = \~16 years on one CPU. A 100-GPU farm at 1000x = \~2 months. That's not the original post's "minutes on a laptop with cooperation". Either the bound is much lower than 10^(13) or the laptop claim is wrong; both can't hold. **(9) Binary trust. Concession.** Source-only delivery, owner audit, air-gap, no wallet.dat exfiltration, non-published verification questions: that's a reasonable delivery model. SO I will retract the social engineering framing for that specific setup. The remaining question is whether the recovery actually works, which is (2) and (3). The right test for both of us is upstream of any simulator: take a deterministic VM with snapshot.debian.org's Lenny image, install bitcoin-0.3.2 against the actual `libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-15+lenny*` package, and run it through wallet creation -> send transaction multiple times with your "12 parameters" held constant. If the same parameters reliably produce the same change-key and nonce across reboots of identical VM state, you've demonstrated reproducibility. If they don't, the entropy is in the IRQ events I'm pointing to. Greg's standard from earlier in the thread is the right one. Anyone disputing the math (you, me, anyone reading) can run that VM test directly. I'd find it informative either way; if your model is right and the determinism holds, I want to know. If it doesn't, that's also useful. I'll send source if you DM. Repo will be public after I clean up the experiment runner.

CompetitiveRough8180

Thanks for the detailed write-up. You did real work here. But several of your conclusions come from misreading the attack model, so let me address the specific points. (1) "md_rand is one-way, can't walk backward from nonce to change-key" Agreed, and that's not the attack. The approach is forward simulation: reconstruct the initial state (boot entropy + RAND_poll inputs), then forward-generate change-key and nonce from the same state. The nonce serves as a validation channel (k = s^-1(z + r*d) mod n with the sender's known privkey), not as a backward-inversion target. Match found = state correctly reconstructed = change-key obtained. No SHA-1 inversion required. (2) "5 bits saved by cooperation, not 33" This compares the wrong thing. The bn_rand time() RAND_add is one of ~12 parameters in the search space. The leverage comes from constraining the kernel-side random.c entropy chain that seeds /dev/urandom for RAND_poll, not from the bn_rand time() call. Specifically: - Hardware (clocksource: jiffies vs TSC): 10^3 to 10^4 - utsname exact string: 3x - Boot time +- 10s: ~36x - BIOS UTC vs local: 2x - Network/peer/IRC state (n_pre8 range): ~10^2 - PID range: 10x - extract_buf count range: 6x - BIOS timezone: 2x Multiplied: ~10^11 to 10^13. Without the cooperative inputs, search space is dominated by clocksource ambiguity alone. (3) "Real entropy floor is 6000+ bits from IRQ jitter, mouse, network" This is a desktop Linux assumption. Stone Man's specific scenario: - Headless bitcoind, no GUI - ui.cpp mouse-event RAND_add never runs. wxWidgets entropy injection is GUI-bound. - Live USB, fresh boot, minimal disk IRQ. - P7450 has nonstop_tsc=0 - TSC pauses in C-states, kernel falls back to jiffies clocksource for many IRQ timestamps. - 0.3.2 network entropy is minimal: peer nonce (8 bytes), no network packet timing fed to RAND_add. - No persistent /var/lib/urandom/random-seed - first /dev/urandom read seeded only by init_std_data (ktime + utsname) plus whatever extract_buf can squeeze before 192-bit threshold. The 6000-bit floor doesn't apply to a bare Live USB headless boot. The pre-bitcoind extract_buf count is small and modelable. (4) "The bug is BDB durability, not cryptographic" The change-key was successfully generated, written to wallet.dat, used to construct a valid signed transaction, and broadcast (it's at 167ZWTT8...n6s4ya8cGjqNNQjDwDGY31vmHg with 8899 BTC). The on-chain transaction proves the privkey existed in memory. BDB durability is irrelevant to whether the privkey existed - it did. The question is whether we can reconstruct it from public data plus owner-supplied parameters. That's a cryptographic question. (5) "Run my binary on your wallet.dat is social engineering" Fair concern about binary trust in general. Mitigations: - Source code is the deliverable, not a binary. - Owner can have it audited by anyone they trust. - Recovery can be done air-gapped on hardware that never touches a network. - Owner never sends wallet.dat anywhere. - The verification questions exist to filter impersonators, not to extract doxxable info from a real owner. They are not published. The asymmetry here is that the owner already controls the private key for the sender address (it's in his wallet.dat that he restored from). He doesn't share it. Cooperation means sharing setup details (laptop model, BIOS timezone, session timing), which are not sensitive. (6) "Forensic path is the only realistic one" If the original USB stick exists with persistence and BDB logs survived, yes - that's strictly easier and I'd recommend it. But absence of the USB stick doesn't close the cryptographic path; it just means cooperation is required to narrow the search. I'd be glad to look at your simulator. If you want to send the source, I'll run my parameter set through it and show where our state evolution diverges (if it does). Where is your simulator validated against - which OpenSSL test vectors did you use? That would let us compare apples to apples quickly. The methodology is testable. Greg Maxwell pointed out the right standard earlier in the thread: end-to-end self- validation on hardware that approximates the original setup. That's the next step. Anyone disputing the math can replicate the test directly.

CompetitiveRough8180

Different scenario from Stone Man's case, but it might be more recoverable than you think. Stone Man's case is specifically the Bitcoin 0.3.2 change-address bug (pre-keypool), which only existed before v0.6.0 (March 2012). Your 2012-2013 timeframe is on the boundary, so it depends on which Bitcoin version you were running. But the more important point: if you still have the wallet.dat AND the public key, your situation might already be solvable with standard tools, not the kind of cryptographic recovery I'm working on for Stone Man. A few questions: 1. Which Bitcoin client version were you running in 2012-2013? 2. When you say "public key" — do you mean you have the actual pubkey hex (65 bytes 04...), or just the address (1...)? 3. Have you tried pywallet (or modern equivalents) to extract all keys from your wallet.dat? 4. Is the wallet.dat encrypted? Do you have the passphrase? If the wallet.dat is intact and you have the passphrase (or it's unencrypted), the private key for that change address is almost certainly still in there — it just may not be the "default address" the GUI shows. Tools like pywallet can dump every key in the file. Happy to help you investigate via DM if you want. Even if it's not the same bug, recovering coins from a 2012 wallet.dat is usually very doable.

tornavec

My first Ethereum wallet had no GUI, so I had to learn the commands. I even considered learning a programming language, even though I'm far from it. Over time, crypto wallet interfaces got simpler, and then mobile apps came along. At the same time, trust in CeFi is growing, and institutional clients who have invested billions in crypto have no idea that seed phrases even exist. There are areas where you don't really need to know anything special about cryptocurrency at all. My business partner runs a crypto business with zero knowledge of blockchain or the underlying tech. He simply accepts payments through the Cryptomus crypto gateway, and the managers handle all the specifics. To him, coins just look like foreign currency

Whiskey_Water

I deleted my last post because I neglected to read which comment you referred to, which is embarrassing because XMR is some of my favorite tech. Easy way: Kraken, then move to hardware wallet via the Monero GUI Wallet (just google), or just use Cake wallet. Because Monero is so private, CEX can lie about how much they have, which can bottleneck withdrawals - it’s better to hold it yourself.

AdEuphoric5133

That's the only valid answer. Only those who run a node can pretend that they know how much bitcoins they have. Those who check [mempool.space](http://mempool.space), or those you check the GUI of their HD wallet (who is just asking a third party) believe that they know, but all they do is trust.

blade0r

It’s a mess, both at User GUI and rules / regulations. I created my account, experienced the worst customer support during the first couple of days and transferred immediately my funds elsewhere. They even blocked my account, when I started the transfer process.

ReliantToker

THE WINDOWS HOBBYIST ​It is a common myth that Bitcoin was born in the dark, terminal-heavy world of Linux. In reality, the most revolutionary financial software in history was originally a Windows-only program. ​When Satoshi Nakamoto released Bitcoin v0.1 in January 2009, it was built using Microsoft Visual Studio and included a graphical user interface (GUI) designed specifically for Windows users. Early developers like Mike Hearn noted that Satoshi even used Hungarian notation—a coding style where variable names indicate their type (e.g., nValue for an integer)—which was a signature of 1990s-era Microsoft developers. ​Because it lacked a Linux version for nearly its entire first year, early cypherpunks had to use "Wine" (a compatibility layer) just to run it on other systems. Satoshi wasn't building for high-end server farms; he was building for the average person with a home PC. This "Windows-first" approach is likely why Bitcoin didn't gain much traction in its first 11 months—the very tech-savvy Linux crowd it was aimed at couldn't easily run it until v0.2 was released in late 2009.

Knight925

Welll .... no! It is really not that hard to set up a hardware wallet and 24 words. Are some people too incompetent to do this? Yes. But setting up a ledger can literally be done in 5-10 Minutes. There have been many Exchanges that lost customer money. FTX was one of the biggest and well known exchanges .... and I had an account there .... and it still failed.... I don't really use test transactions. You can check all letters before you send. Not that complicated. The only need for test transactions is exchanges, because they force you to do Satoshi Tests and you never know, if they will really ratify your incoming transaction. When sending your Bitcoin to a private adress it is way easier. You send it and after 6 blocks it's just there and can be used again. No GUI, no regulation, no oversight ... it's just there Good look with having an exchange still be there in 20 years. I would bet against it with that time frame I think. There is none of the exchanges left that were relevant 10 years ago. I agree with Grandmas who cannot use computers though. At some point the risk of user error overshadows the risk of exchanges. But that is certainly not the case for middle aged ppl used to computers. There is no anxiety with hardware wallets. Just the opposite. You could literally burrow your seed into the ground for 15 years and all your assets will still be there

AutoModerator

Post is by: Mr_Xvoltage and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://youtu.be/eynxyoKgpng?si=wmzoTkwbeKidk29v I automated it for crypto signals script with GUI in python and from 20$ start budget to 60$ in one day and still going....now 64$. 3$ risk per position and 100x Leverage *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: One-Asparagus-319 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1qt84rw/bitcoin_v001_alpha_if_you_could_go_back_to_2009/ The README file for Bitcoin version v0.01 ALPHA, released by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009. It's surreal to read these lines knowing what this code has become: Bitcoin v0.01 ALPHA Copyright (c) 2009 Satoshi Nakamoto. Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license. See the license.txt file or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit (http://www.openssl.org/). This product includes cryptographic software written by Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com). Supported Compilers \------------------- MinGW GCC (v3.4.5) Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 SP6 Dependencies \------------ Libraries you need to obtain separately to compile: Default download path wxWidgets \\wxWidgets [http://www.wxwidgets.org/downloads/](http://www.wxwidgets.org/downloads/) OpenSSL \\OpenSSL [http://www.openssl.org/source/](http://www.openssl.org/source/) Berkeley DB \\DB [http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/index.html](http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/index.html) Boost \\Boost [http://www.boost.org/users/download/](http://www.boost.org/users/download/) Their licenses: wxWidgets LGPL 2.1 with very liberal exceptions OpenSSL Old BSD license with the problematic advertising requirement Berkeley DB New BSD license with the additional requirement that the linked software be open source Free Boost License similar to MIT OpenSSL \------- Bitcoin does not use any cryptography. If you want to do a full build of OpenSSL to exclude the cryptographic routines, some patches are needed. (OpenSSL v0.9.8h) Edit engines\\e\_gmp.c and put this #ifndef around #include <openssl/rsa.h> \#ifndef OPENSSL\_NO\_RSA \#include <openssl/rsa.h> \#endif Add this to crypto\\err\\err\_all.c before the line ERR\_load\_crypto\_strings: void ERR\_load\_RSA\_strings(void) { } Edit ms\\mingw32.bat and replace the parameters in the Configure line with this list that excludes everything. You need to put this in the batch file because batch files cannot handle more than 9 parameters. perl Configure mingw threads no-rc2 no-rc4 no-rc5 no-idea no-des no-bf no-cast no-aes no-camellia no-seed no-rsa no-dh Also remove the following line in ms\\mingw32.bat. The compilation fails after it has already finished compiling libeay32, which is all we are interested in, but the failure interrupts the script before it executes dllwrap to generate libeay32.dll. REM if errorlevel 1 goto end Build ms\\mingw32.bat If you want to use it with MSVC, generate the .lib file lib /machine:i386 /def:ms\\libeay32.def /out:out\\libeay32.lib Berkeley DB \----------- MinGW with MSYS: cd \\DB\\build\_unix sh ../dist/configure --enable-mingw --enable-cxx make Boost \----- You may need Boost version 1.35 to compile with MSVC 6.0. I couldn't compile version 1.37 with MSVC 6.0. Here, Satoshi lists the supported compilers (MinGW GCC 3.4.5, Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 SP6) and manual dependencies: wxWidgets, OpenSSL, Berkeley DB, Boost. He even gives instructions for removing encryption from OpenSSL, because "Bitcoin doesn't use any cryptography"—only hashing and proof-of-work. It's an open-source, minimalist, almost handcrafted project. No pretty GUI, no exchange, no ETF, nothing "To the moon." Just an idea, a whitepaper, and a .txt file explaining how to compile. Did anyone here attempt to compile this version in 2009 for various study purposes? Or even today? What were the biggest challenges? Ironically, Satoshi says, "Bitcoin doesn't use any cryptography." Today, how much of the discussion about BTC is about technology, and how much is about speculation? People celebrate having 1 BTC as a life milestone. In 2009, you could have mined hundreds with a regular PC. What changed? Us? Or the dream? \*“Distributed under the MIT/X11 license.”\* Perhaps the license was free, but the freedom to understand the historical moment was not. Here's an excerpt from the code of version 0.01 for reflection (genesis block): “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks” It seems that Satoshi was already writing not just code, but a manifesto. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

quadriocellata

check out gupax for an easy GUI way. [https://github.com/gupax-io/gupax](https://github.com/gupax-io/gupax) It uses p2pool to keep things decentralized as well. or download xmrig [https://xmrig.com/](https://xmrig.com/)

metalzip

https://bitcoincore.org/en/2026/01/05/wallet-migration-bug/ Wallet Migration Failure May Delete Unrelated Wallet Files In Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1 We have become aware of a wallet migration bug introduced in Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1. Under rare circumstances, when the migration of a wallet.dat file fails, all files in the wallet directory may be deleted in the process, potentially resulting in a loss of funds. A fix is forthcoming and will be released as 30.2, but out of an abundance of caution we have removed the binaries for affected releases from bitcoincore.org. At this time, we ask users to not attempt wallet migrations using the GUI or RPC until v30.2 is released. All other users, including existing wallet users, are unaffected and can keep using existing installations. Specifically, it requires the presence of a default (unnamed) wallet.dat file, which has not been created by default since 0.21 (released 5 years ago), that fails to be migrated or loaded. One condition that may trigger this is when pruning is enabled, and the wallet was unloaded while pruning happened. Wallet Migration Failure May Delete Unrelated Wallet Files In Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1 was published on January 05, 2026 .

uncapchad

guys seem to be writing stuff all the time. Go to Bitcoin's GIT [https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin) GUI [https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui) Ancillary projects [https://github.com/bitcoin-core](https://github.com/bitcoin-core) If you mean other cryptocurrencies, then they'll have their own repos and best you post in r/cc because this is a Bitcoin only sub.

-5H4Z4M-

Download GUI wallet.

jaffster123

I'd be more than happy to assist you in putting a GUI together to make it accessible. Python?

UncleMaarty

Looks like Wealthsimple to me based on the GUI- zero fees per crypto transaction

keagan2000

Sats wasn’t coined as a term until prices started getting a little higher; at this time the value of fractions of BTC wasn’t worth separating. If I recall correctly the old GUI only showed as many decimal points as necessary / no trailing zeros

Mantis-Prawn

Were 100 million sats per BTC introduced in a later stage? Or is it just missing due some GUI decision or...?

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Monero Moon (Issue 84) highlights recent developments in the Monero ecosystem, including the release of Monero v0.18.4.4, which addresses a Ledger bug, improves wallet scanning, and updates the GUI to P2Pool v4.12. Discussions are ongoing about adding a temporary block size cap during the transition to FCMP++. Other updates include new releases of tools like Gupaxx, Skylight Wallet, and Cake Wallet, as well as advancements in Monero's research and security. Community events, crowdfunding, and privacy-focused initiatives are also featured. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

unthocks

You could self host your local mempool with docker to browse block easily and privately with nicer GUI rather than the built in nodes block explorer.

Meghan_Crawfo

hmm, for that amount, split it across a few platforms and move it to a private wallet right after. IronWallet or Monero’s official GUI wallet are better long term than keeping it on Binance.

Helpful_Kitchen_5445

Yo! Does anybody know where to access the "Recover Funds" options? I had this thing setup via xpub. The new GUI (tried on mobile+desk) doesn't show the "Manage>Recover Funds"

goldishfinch

Ooh, wrong; Bitcoin GUI was in use then

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Monero Moon (Issue 82) highlights recent developments in the Monero ecosystem, including the release of Monero v0.18.4.3 “Fluorine Fermi,” which enhances network resilience and privacy. Updates include FCMP++ & Carrot alpha stressnet v1.3, post-quantum encryption for Jamtis, and new tools like Monero Multisig GUI and Skylight Wallet. Community events, such as Monero Tech Meetings and MoneroTopia 2026, are also featured, alongside advancements in Monero trading platforms and privacy-focused applications. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Top_Sentence_5598

“Maybe” that hardware, but nobody was running that GUI back in ‘09

bongosformongos

What do you mean? Bitcoin doesn't have a GUI? /s

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Monero GUI 0.18.4.3 'Fluorine Fermi' has been released, offering enhanced protection against spy nodes when using a local node. Key updates include support for Ledger Flex, Qt 5.15.17, and P2Pool v4.11, along with minor bug fixes. The release involved contributions from four developers and includes 18 commits. Binaries are available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, with verification guides provided. Users are encouraged to verify downloads using SHA256 hashes and GPG signatures to ensure authenticity. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

AutoModerator

Post is by: potifai and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1o0hy4n/complete_ai_automation/ Meet the Ultimate AI + ML + RL Trading System This is not a simple bot — it’s a fully autonomous, AI-powered, ML-trained, RL-enhanced trading engine built to adapt, learn, and outperform. It runs on any MT5 broker, any market, any symbol — Forex, crypto, indices, metals — and processes data across multiple timeframes in real time. Candle data is continuously downloaded and updated on every close, so decisions are always based on the most accurate market picture. Next-Gen AI Brain At its core is a multi-layered intelligence system combining: Machine Learning (ML) models trained to detect patterns and improve decision-making over time Reinforcement Learning (RL) that adapts to changing market conditions and optimizes strategies dynamically LSTM-based sentiment analysis to capture market psychology Five advanced technical indicators for robust confirmation ATR-based volatility and regime detection for smarter trade setups This hybrid approach allows the bot to agree, disagree, or scale risk based on signal strength — never blindly trading. Dynamic Risk & Position Management Risk management is fully AI-optimized and symbol-aware: ML-driven lot sizing based on volatility and account balance Adaptive stop-loss and take-profit levels that shift as market structure evolves Reward-to-risk ratios tuned dynamically for each instrument Specialized profiles for different markets — tighter stops & bigger profits for gold, larger positions for EURUSD, etc. Market Intelligence & Execution Multi-symbol orchestration — trades several assets simultaneously Real-time candle processing — no delay in decision-making Weekend auto-pause & weekday auto-resume — zero manual input required Low-latency order execution — built to minimize slippage Built-In Security & Protection Your bot stays secure and exclusive with: Hardware-bound license keys VM detection & blocking Anti-debugging & reverse-engineering defenses Tamper-resistance for maximum reliability Why This Bot Stands Out With AI, ML, and RL working together, this system is: Self-learning & self-improving — it evolves as markets change Emotion-free & consistent — no human bias or fear Fully automated — handles multiple markets without supervision Scalable & broker-agnostic — works anywhere, anytime This isn’t just a trading bot — it’s an AI-powered, ML-trained, RL-driven trading partner designed to grow smarter the longer it runs. Email montyr372@gmail.com GUI & source code is available! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Quokky-Axolotl7388

Yeah I don't trust micro sd either 🤣 But realistically putting together setups as the ones you suggest is a daunting task for most of the population, and Seedsigner works but the GUI can be heavily improved. I was actually considering building and commercializing my own thing but I don't have the time. I also tried at a certain point to reuse an old phone with bluewallet or electrum but I gave up when I was unable to HW disconnect the wifi and radio module. Honestly, a phonelike setup without the communication components is where I see potential. Not sure if stuff like Coldcard are similar to that but when I looked it online it seemed a bit rough for the price

Nearby_Profession832

Yeah Start9's GUI is way eeasier for th that

Equivalent-Tackle536

The beginning is always smooth for me, but when I reach 70% (~600 GB Blockchain), the GUI becomes unresponsive and process is stalled. I reinstalled everything multiple times and I can’t get it to work… please keep me updated with yours! :)

xboox

decentralized project for a decade JoinMarket, hundreds of BTC of liquidity the GUI is : https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam

Fit_Age8019

If you’re just starting with Monero, the main thing is deciding how much convenience vs. privacy/security you want. For wallets: * **Feather Wallet** is a solid desktop option that’s beginner-friendly but still private. * **Monerujo** if you want something mobile (Android). * The **official Monero GUI/CLI** is the most “pure” way but can be intimidating for new users. * Hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor) also support XMR if you’re thinking long-term cold storage. For swapping/exchanging: * Big centralized exchanges are phasing Monero out or requiring heavy KYC, so they’re not really ideal anymore. * A lot of people go with **DEXs or cross-chain swap services**. That way you can move from BTC/ETH/USDT into XMR and back without account approvals. * Personally, I’ve used Rubic a couple of times for this since it aggregates a bunch of DEXs/bridges and routes you through the cheapest path. Not the only option, but convenient if you already hold assets on different chains. If you’re new, I’d suggest starting small until you get the hang of syncing wallets and testing a swap. Want me to break down a simple flow for “first $100 into XMR” that avoids common pitfalls?

wedtexas

Most people here will probably recommend Cake Wallet or Monerujo if you want something beginner-friendly, since they’re both super easy to use and support swaps. If you’re looking for long-term cold storage though, Ledger + the Monero GUI wallet is the safest combo.

xboox

directly mix on Bitcoin -- decentralized project for a decade JoinMarket, hundreds of BTC of liquidity the GUI is : https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam

xboox

directly mix on Bitcoin -- decentralized project for years, JoinMarket, hundreds of BTC of liquidity the GUI is : https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam

linuxunix

Make a bootable USB linux drive. I recommend https://www.system-rescue.org/. The Windows drive can be mounted using the GUI (type "startx") to use the xfce desktop environment. They have a few wallet searching programs on git hub I used a few years ago.

7366241494

This is from your GitHub readme: ``` Dogecoin Differences Pepecoin is a fork of Dogecoin. For the sake of familiarity, we will attempt to keep Pepecoin similar to Dogecoin. Changes: * Addresses start with P instead of D * BIPS features will start block 1000 * AuxPow starts at block 42,000 (Chain ID: 63) * GUI themed for Pepecoin ``` So no meaningful changes at all, just some minor cosmetics that took one person less than a day. bUt iT haS FroG PoWer GiVe us yOUr MonEy

Mantis-Prawn

Wait... What ??? Is that the light GUI of Reddit?

quadriocellata

local monero wound down last year. Bisq is alright. If you already have crypto easiest option would be trocador (lowest fees) or cake wallet (swap in app and nice GUI). Retoswap is great for fully-decentralized. Check kycme.not

jimmr

The ONLY time I've been scammed was in the last 2 months. I've switched to duckduckgo to partially degoogle. Don't instinctively trust any search results or github repositories! I had about 100 zeph in my hot mining wallet, and the audit closing deadline was (still is?) approaching. They released a new wallet version that allows you to audit your coins. I was on my laptop away from home for a few days, so I searched for "zephyr protocol audit releaseon duck duck go. Link to github pops up, to the releases page. Logo, version and release date, installer, and GUI wallet match what I expect to see from their discord. So I enter my seed phrase and start to re-sync the wallet. It should take almost all night to catch up from 0, so I head to sleep. 7 or so hours later I'm up making coffee, and while it brews, I check my wallet. It's at the current block height, but my wallet has 0 balance. The repository was a clone released within hours, all that changed was a seed phrase stealing malware. I did not download what I thought... every was perfect except the name. Should be ZephyrProtocal but... ZephyProtocal is what it was. Always test new code with hot wallets before cold wallets.

Whiskey_Water

I use Monero GUI Wallet and Ledger Nano X. It works together, but doesn’t have native functionality in the ledger app.

estevamjvarga

Here's a step-by-step guide to verify the signature on Windows using PGP (GnuPG) for Bitcoin Core releases. --- ✅ Step-by-Step: Verify Release Signatures on Windows Step 1: Install Gpg4win (GnuPG for Windows) 1. Go to: https://gpg4win.org/ 2. Click Download and run the installer. 3. During installation, select at least: GnuPG Kleopatra (graphical key manager) --- Step 2: Import the Release Signing Key Option A: Use Kleopatra GUI 1. Open Kleopatra. 2. Go to File > Lookup Certificates on Server. 3. Enter the key ID: 90C8019E36C2E964 4. Click Search → Select the key → Click Import. 5. You can then check the key fingerprint by right-clicking the key and choosing Details. Verify it matches: 01EA 5486 DE18 A882 D4C2 6845 90C8 019E 36C2 E964 Option B: Use Command Line Open Command Prompt and run: gpg --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 90C8019E36C2E964 Then verify the fingerprint: gpg --fingerprint 90C8019E36C2E964 --- Step 3: Download the Necessary Files From https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, download: The .zip or .exe archive of Bitcoin Core SHA256SUMS file SHA256SUMS.asc file Put all three files in the same folder (e.g., Downloads\BitcoinVerify). --- Step 4: Verify the Signature Option A: In Kleopatra 1. Right-click SHA256SUMS.asc 2. Choose Decrypt/Verify 3. It should say "Verified 'SHA256SUMS'" and show a good signature from Wladimir J. van der Laan. Option B: Using Command Prompt Navigate to the folder where you saved the files: cd %USERPROFILE%\Downloads\BitcoinVerify gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.asc Expected output (truncated): gpg: Good signature from "Wladimir J. van der Laan ..." If the key is untrusted, it will show a warning, but as long as it says "Good signature", it’s okay. --- Step 5: Verify the SHA256 Hash of the Downloaded File Option A: Using PowerShell Run: Get-FileHash .\bitcoin-*.zip -Algorithm SHA256 Compare the output hash to the corresponding one in the verified SHA256SUMS file. Option B: Use a SHA256 Tool Alternatively, use tools like: HashMyFiles CertUtil (built-in) Example with CertUtil: certutil -hashfile bitcoin-25.0-win64.zip SHA256 --- ✅ Done! If: The signature is verified The SHA256 hash matches the entry in the verified list Then your download is authentic and safe to use. --- Let me know if you want screenshots or if you’re verifying a specific version and file. ** I used chatgpt to generate this response

SmoothGoing

Hardware wallets do work with electrum and wasabi, using them as GUI frontends. The added security part is that keys are stored and transaction signing is done inside the chip in the hardware wallet, and never revealed to the computer. Linux or not.

SmoothGoing

How does the GUI on screen know you got it right or wrong?

SmoothGoing

Does USB connection provide power and a GUI button only? Does the computer know where to put the screws? Or only the hardware? Because if computer knows it over USB connection it can leak it.

xboox

Or directly mix on Bitcoin -- decentralized project for years, JoinMarket, hundreds of BTC of liquidity the GUI is : https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam

wanderinginthebrush

Opened up GUI for the first time in years... over 1.5 million wallet blocks remaining.

mercurygermes

**Official links & resources:** * Website (all latest info): [https://citucorp.com](https://citucorp.com) * Whitepaper: [https://citucorp.com/white\_papper](https://citucorp.com/white_papper) * Telegram Channel (news only): [https://t.me/citu\_coin](https://t.me/citu_coin) * Discord (discussion & support): [https://discord.com/invite/Szbs8G4Q8c](https://discord.com/invite/Szbs8G4Q8c) * Wallet GUI/CLI: [https://github.com/CorporateFounder/unitedStates\_final](https://github.com/CorporateFounder/unitedStates_final) * Full Node / Pool (open source): [https://github.com/CorporateFounder/unitedStates\_storage](https://github.com/CorporateFounder/unitedStates_storage) ⚡️ For the latest project news and updates, always check the website — the GitHub repos are for source code and tools only. **Previous articles:** * **Part 1:** [226 million coins, 0.01 divisibility, hybrid PoW+PoS, and no fees: Two years in, how does a ‘rare by design’ crypto actually work out?](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1koq087/226_million_coins_001_divisibility_hybrid_powpos/) * **Part 2:** [Mises and Hayek Were Right: How the Free Market Solves the Difficulty Problem (on the Example of CITU)](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1kq5b5n/part_2_mises_and_hayek_were_right_how_the_free/)

mercurygermes

# Comment (to be posted below) **Official resources:** * Website & docs: [https://citucorp.com](https://citucorp.com/) * Node code (unitedStates\_storage): [https://github.com/CituCorp/unitedStates\_storage](https://github.com/CituCorp/unitedStates_storage) * Wallet & GUI (unitedStates\_final): [https://github.com/CituCorp/unitedStates\_final](https://github.com/CituCorp/unitedStates_final) * Governance guide: [https://citucorp.com/how\_to\_vote\_and\_what\_voting\_types\_are\_there](https://citucorp.com/how_to_vote_and_what_voting_types_are_there) **Exchanges:** Dex-Trade • Bitstorage • Exbitron

SmoothGoing

There are no bitcoins and no division. Network only understands Satoshis as units. The labels given to various other units are a GUI wallet thing. Someone could update code for an open source wallet and make it display 3.14 BTC as 1.0 Pi's.

Cool-Cookies

Look at the results and evolution of the chain. Charles Hoskins has worked tirelessly to make it here. Obviously it was part of the plan...would you criticize Bill Gates for his history? I doubt it considering the OS changed society and gave us incredible innovation and the ability to chat here on a nice GUI....granted he stole it (Bill Gates) but the results are everywhere.  P.S. Too many cry babies shill FUD on ADA due to Charles. Grow up and evolve your perspective.

polymath_uk

I used coinmarket cap daily historic BTC daily price records and copy pasted all the data into excel and saved as csv. I wrote a .NET scraper/parser and used it to extract from the csv and dump all the data into a DB for processing by a desktop GUI graphing/investment/analysis app that I also wrote. I created another .NET scraper to gather daily data to update the DB. This process is a bit ridiculous: 1. Linux server launching Firefox headless via cron with an extension that automatically saves webpages (because the table on the page is generated by JavaScript and cannot be saved directly) 2. the .NET scraper compiled for Linux then extracts the current daily price info, queries the DB for any missing days, then inserts new rows. It was a lot of work, but their subscription is like $400/month.

gandrewstone

There are times when OGs just facepalm, and the first time I saw a wallet with ellipses in the address was one of those times. If it was possible to make a shorter secure address, we would have done it. But nevermind that! A wallet GUI designer surely knows better than the blockchain devs! /s

privacy_by_default

Monero GUI Wallet for desktop, pair it with a Trezo hardware wallet if you want high security For mobile i think the best is Cake wallet, i believe it's the first to implement background sync. It's a good option to have lower quantities of Monero easily accesible on mobile.

96933287275978

Monero GUI Wallet

ripple_mcgee

Exodus sucks. I kept getting random sol shit coins pop up in my assets even though I didn't hold them, then I would hide them, but more would just appear. Don't know what happened to Exodus, sold out I guess. Just use Monero GUI from official source, it's classic, easy to run your own node...and you can mine with it.

Severe-Masterpiece61

What software did you install to get this kind of GUI for your node ? Also, mempool.space gives the current hashrate as 875 EH/s, so it looks like your interface is exaggerating a little bit the hashrate.

Get_the_nak

Nakamoto is the inofficial name of the 5th decimal, very close to a dollar right now, and should be used in all GUI:s (at least option user preference).

MisterTrader13

Bill Gates is actually evil. And his journey to riches was probably more shady than Elon. He bought Microsoft’s original OS from someone and stole the Windows GUI concept from Xerox and Apple. Elon Musk didn’t steal anything from anyone. How can you steal something everyone is too afraid to even build. He revolutionised space access and made electric vehicles cool. Now he’s removing government waste, something my country gives a very high priority to. The Elon haters really do be seething.

AllCapNoBrake

For instance, do you get a banner to connect to your own node (it will show as a banner on your dashboard) IF you've selected to pool mine w/ Brains or Ocean? But when you enter the IP it gives you, it gives you an error that it's not accessible? You can enter the IP, Log in and PW (if you select the custom pool drop down)...but HOW DO YOU ACCESS the node to verify you hit a block or move BTC in/out? But when you select solo mining (and the message below says it's connected to your node), but nowhere in the settings gives you ANY insight into the node like you get from umbrel or Start9. GD these things (futurebit) are frustrating as hell. It's simple GUI shit and far less technical than a hashboard.

xboox

decentralized project for years, JoinMarket, hundreds of BTC of liquidity the GUI is : https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam

Nashville-Nik

Really. I was thinking about this last night. They obviously had access to the servers that held the multisig wallets and the GUI....

mcgravier

Simple: Infected machine shows correct address via GUI and submits for signing transaction with address controlled by thieves. User signs the transaction Aaaaand It's Gone

liquid_at

yes. I do not understand the exact technical reasons for it, but as it seems, the multi-sig GUI that was shown to the signers had the correct data, but it included a payload that altered the contract of the multi-sig-wallet, locking out the owners. But no idea how a hacker could change the GUI and add a payload to it, without anyone noticing...

BTCMachineElf

Umbrel is 3rd party, as are all node packages. Raspberry Pis don't come with an OS installed. The closest thing to 'default' would be "Raspberry Pi OS", which is a standard Linux environment. If that is the case, I suggest you start exploring your other options before going too far, as switching packages means restarting the blockchain download. And I suggest you try Start9. Umbrel is good too, but Start9 has the best features imo. These packages will provide you with a proper GUI web interface that you can access over your LAN, with '(free) app stores' to add server features with a few clicks. Building your own is a good learning experience, so if thats the route you go, that's good. But even then, you'll probably want to switch over eventually.

GreemBeam

The comment about mining "one solo-mined block in a decade" I'm pretty sure is false, occasionally when I check the mempool there's a block mined by 'unknown' frequently. A quick ask of an AI just now (after plugging a blockchain website into it and some pre-prompts) there's one every month or so? Also, many people are really misinformed on what 'mining pools' are. There's more solo miners than you think, plugged into pools. Switching pool is as easy as changing an IP address your miner is pointing at (e.g. if they disagreed with pools block policies or the pool wanted to push a disagreed update). But yeah obviously you've got massive mining farms now, but there's actually kinda loads of them (MARA, Hut8, Riot, CLSK, Hive are big ones that come to mind that are publicly traded on stock markets - there's loads more all with conflicting interests). The part you describe regarding transactions I consider a feature. There's no chance a transaction can be reversed as a business operator. The final line (and part of the comment on transactions) is kind of false. HTLC's have been a thing on Bitcoin for a long time, and conditional transactions are even more possible now using 'Bitcoin miniscript'. Conditional transactions and such aren't implemented into any wallet GUI's that I know of - people just aren't really interested in this I guess. But the technology and possibility to create it is there. I could go on about what kind of transactions / escrow on-chain and such. Google Bitcoin Miniscript if it's not beyond your skillset to look at.

freakythrowaway79

I used to frequent a dive bar back in 2018-2020. The machine wasn't exactly old but the GUI was definitely low tech. It kind of had an Atari like vibe to it. 🤣 Super sketchy but was probably legit. I definitely regret not buying some since it was only $3k back then.

adrian1911

Well this crap is basically in your wallet so there is no save way to remove it other than moving your coins to new wallet. Don’t know about coin base wallet, but some wallets have options to hide those from GUI itself. It’s still gonna be there you just won’t see it. If CB wallet supports it google should help you on how to.

Mantis-Prawn

The mempool is nearly empty, this tells me that there is not any scaling problem at this moment...  I think there is enough room to grow. One of the hurdles was that you needed to be interested in tech to succesful self custody. Over time this has become a lot easier thanks to BIP39 and companies making user friendly tools. Years ago there was near zero GUI in your BTC application. This is better, but could still massively improve further down the road. 

moon-lambo-now

A malware could inject code to e.g. electrum wallet so that it shows you your address on the GUI but uses their address for the transaction. If you want to be sure, you should create the transaction with a clean offline computer using hardware wallet. Then double-check the addresses on the signed transaction. Then move that signed transaction to your online-computer and broadcast it to the network. The above is also good practice for another reason: if solar radiation or a hardware issue causes a bit flip on your hardware wallet, you could end up sending your bitcoins to a slightly incorrect address (1 incorrect character) on which you have no control over. There are cases of this happening with Ledger hardware wallets.

Ill-Satisfaction4204

This is only change in GUI

Separate_Wolf4727

Yup, excellent work copying the Mac GUI.

Tvmouth

Learning HOW it all works is more important. Learning how to find and read a smart contract, now to trigger contract calls without access to a web3 GUI, staking, mining, DEFI liquidity and Dex access are more important than learning how to trade. It's just like driving a car: Learn to drive, learn to check oil, learn to inflate tires and choose fuel, all of that is WAY more important than how much you spent on a car. Asking a car salesman how to replace a head-gasket... doesn't get you very useful information (*typically*). Trading courses are like putting stickers on a car to make it look faster, but professional drivers know HOW to dismantle and rebuild and tune their machines. Learning happens, but do you need the merit badge to prove you learned? ***Even Gensler has no idea... come on.***

Bastion55420

You seem confused. You don‘t create wallets „on the chain“ and wallets themselves don‘t do anything so your „GUI“ is providing you the quality if life feature of automatically setting your fees to make sure your transaction gets included in a timely manner. Edit those settings and you will see that you can send a L1 ETH transaction for much less than 30$.

inadyttap

slick wallet GUI and great user experience but F that china coin.

Maximum-Math-9022

Bingo! I guess this is exactly what happened in my situation. However, in the end of the article says "The wallet file contains the private keys for change addresses, and they can receive and send coins normally. However, the GUI in the default client does not display them in the address book, therefore a recommendation is to backup wallet.dat every 50 transactions". My hard wallet is Ledger. The Ledger Live (GUI) does not disply the change in the address book. How a wallet.dat backup can solve this problem?

iamnotlocard

Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but all the blastapi GUI lets me do is chose the function (getrawtransaction) and enter the TXID in the next box. Where do I enter the verbose=false?

Electrical-Turnip904

I selected them from the wordlist and used the GUI feature of Electrum to apply them.

deefjuh

Just a GUI tip: A full name in the Netherlands contains more than 2 words, but not every word necessarily starts with a capital.

inShambles3749

Well imo there are only two potential scenarios for this. Someone at coinbase fucked up a transaction and reversed it or it's a simple GUI bug displaying garbage values or transactions that don't belong to you. I'd ask the support for shits and giggles. Also pretend it's your money and where it went. But they are incredibly incompetent so don't get your hopes up that you will get a useful answer

SmoothGoing

There's nothing it needs to sync though, the keys are not out there, they are in the wallet file. You just need a way to extract the keys out in some other way, maybe starting it offline and getting the GUI to let it export or using a 3rd party tool from github somewhere.

arianjalali

That's the GUI for a program called Bisq. OP didn't necessarily waste that money. They paid a premium for an added degree of anonymity/privacy. Additionally, that is probably pretty close to the going spot rate on this application. It's effectively a P2P exchange. Just some context

castorfromtheva

Yeah, choose an internal 2 GByte SSD. You install the OS onto it using your USB drive (you have to boot from it) along with all the other data that is needed. Regarding the mouse and monitor, if at all you need to connect it just for the setup. After that you control everything via Web GUI (or SSH when there are issues). All in all and in the end the machine stands near your router with just a LAN cable and a power cable connected.

hutulci

If you use another bootable linux OS, you will need to put Electrum on it, unless it comes preinstalled. Even if your chosen OS does come with Electrum, you will likely want to have your wallet information readily available, to avoid typing it in every single time, so either you put it in an encrypted partition on the same or in another USB, or you have to make your OS persistent. You will also need persistence to prevent your OS from wanting to connect to the internet using WiFi every single time you start it (and if you forget about this, it might connect on a public network nearby). But then, this persistence comes at the cost of your OS being no longer immutable and, thus, susceptible to infection. Tails comes with all this out of the box, done right. You need to enable the internet connection at the start if you want to use it, so it's impossible to connect accidentally to networks. It is amnesic by design, and thus it is also resistant to (most) malware, and comes with its own nice GUI to manage its encrypted storage, meaning that you can have the Electrum AppImage and your wallet file readily at hand. In addition to this Tails doesn't detect and thus write to any disk, but it operates fully in RAM and bleaches it once unplugged. It comes with some bare minimum vetted software, which reduces the surface of attack. In short, if you want to use this setup and do it right, it's way more convoluted to use any other Linux OSes than Tails, which, as unfamiliar as it might look, is pretty much just Debian. But I do second the suggestion to use a (fully open-source and well reputed) hardware wallet, especially for beginners.

HappyHierarchy

Also interested in the GUI

SmoothGoing

Mind the transaction fees will be added in the amount you send. If you send 1 BTC, normally the wallet will use the 3 BTC address to send 1 BTC plus fee. If you send 3 BTC the wallet will combine 1 and 3 to get the transaction fee amount from address with 1 BTC. You can specify which UTXO you want to spend without affecting others in wallets like electrum. Some wallets allow you to create "accounts" in their GUI, which would be spent separately and never combine. It's a derivation path thing which you don't want to mess with manually. I would suggest having at minimum 2 wallets, storage and frequent use. Or as many as you need. My phone and laptops and tablets all have separate wallets. If one of them is hosed I don't lose everything at once and know which device cannot be trusted.

gotamm

I don’t like the GUI

JustSomeBadAdvice

Did you even look at his code??? This was coded on linux, note the emacs tag at the top: http://www.cypherspace.org/credlib/source/credlib-0.08/credlib.c That code looks ***NOTHING*** like Satoshi's. The spacing is all over the place, the variable naming is completely different, there's no comments, and the if's and whiles always open on the same line. All this despite being only a few years prior to Satoshi writing, well after digicash. If you look closely at this hcw of HashCash, the windows-specific files begin to have more similarities with Satoshi's code: http://www.cypherspace.org/hashcash/hcw/ But Adam Back [didn't write that](http://www.cypherspace.org/hashcash/hcw/0ReadMe.txt), which is why that code looks more similar and Adam's doesn't. Further, look at hashcash.c under 0.28 here: http://www.cypherspace.org/hashcash/source/ The comments are all /* style */ comments. No capitalization or punctuation, no complete sentences. The spacing is all different, with spaces before and after parameters & conditional parenthesis. The variable naming is completely different, snake_case instead of pszHungarianNotation. All in a command line program built with getopts - a linux standard, not a windows standard. And once again with an emacs tagline at the top. > So your argument in the last paragraph is not valid. Sounds more like you never looked at the actual code. There's nothing in any of that mess to indicate that Back has experience writing windows-specific GUI apps, particularly since he outsourced the only hashcash app with a windows GUI to someone else. > About timezones: The UK (Britain) time fits into Satoshi's schedule. Despite what you've read elsewhere, the UK does not fit into Satoshi's sleep schedule. That would require him to *regularly* stay up until 7am and then sleep until about 2-3pm, without basically no exceptions during that sleep time. If someone wants to come forward and declare that <potential Satoshi> was known to be living on a third-shift sleeping schedule during that time, that might be something. But virtually no one, especially no one with Satoshi's level of education & experience, actually lives like that.

brando2131

Some milestones if you want to go further: - Run Bitcoin core (bitcoind) on the CLI instead of the GUI application. - Run Bitcoin on a dedicated (24/7) PC, you can managed it via SSH, which is why you'd want to try running it via CLI first. - Run an electrum server (like electrs or fulcrum), this allows you to connect many wallets like Electrum, Sparrow or Specter wallet on PC, or Android wallets like Bluewallet or Nunchuk when you're connected over WiFi from your phone.

axnoro

It was a bad wallet when you were starting out and it is a bad wallet still. Just because it has a flashy GUI does not make it good. Never, ever, ever, ever use closed source software as a software wallet.

axnoro

Exodus is closed soruce and a shitcoin wallet. Don't use it, ever. Sparrow wallet has an excellent GUI for desktop. Electrum has been around for over a decade at this point and is very reliable, and some people like the old look. For mobile, I dunno. Used to use Bluewallet, I use Zeus sometimes. For mobile I mostly use lighthing wallets, favourite of mine is Phoenix.

Matt_H_Ski

Thanks for the answer … maybe I didn’t set the Pi up properly from the get to… I’ve never been able to get GUI UI on the Pi….(the laptop…. Connected WiFi through a Google mesh router and that is where I “see” the Umbrel Bitcoin node UI through the browser ). Having said that, I know I downloaded the entire blockchain to the external SSD physically connected to the Pi…. A df on the Pi command line shows I’ve filled up 41% of the SSD attached to the Pi…./dev/sda1 used 746823840…. —- it was bought new, formatted …. So the SSD connected to the pi definitely has the blockchain….. ). The problem (and I’m starting to think it’s device related ) is that the Pi was, has, and still is, only showing “Umbrel login”. “Umbrel password” which I’ve literally “logged into successfully” multiple times. What happens when I do this???? Well I just shows a terminal screen for a few minutes (that’s how I ran the df command and verified that some large amount of data - presumably the blockchain ) has been downloaded…. After a very brief time —- I am “logged out” I guess and get the “Umbrel login” command prompt again????????? I have no clue. It almost seems like there is a script or timer or something that just creates the loop. I cannot get past the “Umbrel login” screen on the Pi… well, I can…. But then without logging out or any action of note on my part…. I am take back to “Umbrel login” on the Pi…. Thanks for the response.

TheSmegger

I've been racking my grey matter but just can't recall. I know Nicehash was popular but I don't think I used that. I can tell you it didn't have a GUI, and used both the video card(ati at the time I think) and CPU. Dammit, I can't even remember the name of the Australian mining pool I used...

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Monero v0.18.3.4 'Fluorine Fermi' has been released, featuring key updates such as the removal of support for locked transfers in the CLI, added support for Trezor Safe 5 in the GUI, and several daemon and wallet improvements. The release, resulting from the hard work of dedicated developers, includes 39 commits for the CLI and 22 for the GUI. Users are encouraged to verify their downloads with SHA256 hashes and GPG signatures. Additionally, a significant protocol enhancement, Full-Chain Membership Proofs (FCMP++), is being integrated into Monero to dramatically increase the anonymity set and enhance privacy and security features. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Monero Moon (Issue 72) highlights several developments in the Monero ecosystem, including the tagging of the official Monero v0.18.3.4 'Fluorine Fermi' with new features and improvements for both CLI and GUI interfaces. Cypher Stack published an analysis on Monero's security, consolidating years of research. Haveno released version 1.0.10 with support for Tor's PoW DoS mitigation and other improvements. ofrnxmr's CCS proposal for developing BasicSwapDEX into production-quality software was fully funded. Justin Berman shared a progress report on Monero and Seraphis development. Updates on various Monero-related software and tools were also provided, including the monero-ts library, Feather Wallet, Cake Wallet, Unnamed Wallet, P2Pool, and XMRig. Additionally, the article mentions a spam attack on the Monero network by 'AntiDarknet', aiming to disrupt darknet marketplaces, and critiques of Monero's portrayal in a Forbes article and a book on Bitcoin's resistance capabilities. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

maex_power

The Problem ist that you do Not understand the fundamentals. No wallet charges fees, ever. A wallet is a GUI to look at a specific address on Chain and to sign transactions.