RWA

AutoModerator

Post is by: Still-Energy-833 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wdzyp4/stablecoin_season/ I think the one thing that most people have missed in the crypto cycle is the stablecoin season. I know we have never had one before, and most of us don't really care about stablecoins as an investment because they are just a utility or convenience with some gains attached, but they have had their first season which put the 4 year cycle into a 5 year cycle. RWA being put on a blockchain is a whole new season that will only intensify in 5 years' time when the cycle repeats *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

billybobbybrownbaby

took a huge position SECZ. hoping with the RWA narrative it captures a lot of upside. recently broke out into the mid 8s

GlobalGweiPro

Yeah, that’s pretty much how I see it. The RWA volume is impressive, but volume alone doesn’t tell us how much value reaches ETH. It depends on where the trades settle, how much activity happens on Ethereum or its L2s, and how much revenue the platforms keep. The platforms probably capture the clearest benefit for now

qzvxyr

Lender terms decide this way more than token choice. PAXG and XAUT both track spot close enough that it's noise. What actually matters is whether the platform does independent custody attestations, how their liquidation logic works (hard threshold vs some cushion), and what LTV band they'll actually give you on a gold-backed token vs BTC/ETH, since a lot of platforms quietly cap it lower for RWA collateral

billybobbybrownbaby

SECZ for a RWA play. just broke out above 8 bucks. long shares and calls for march.

Azra_Meer21

I think the interesting question is whether the practical benefits of Hyperliquid’s model outweigh the trade-off in decentralization. Would be interested to hear how you think RWA perps could work while staying more aligned with decentralization?

Azra_Meer21

Interesting point. I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on where RWA perps are heading, especially the impact on ETH. Feel free to DM me. I’d be happy to discuss it further.

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wabq5v/title_solana_sentiment_right_now_fomo_is_running/ That said, FUD hasn't disappeared - 15% of the chatter is still about risk and potential pullbacks, so it's not like everyone's ignoring downside talk. It just means the bullish narrative is currently drowning it out numerically. What's more interesting to you here: the meme/momentum side of Solana's activity, or the RWA and institutional angle? Curious if people think one of these narratives has more staying power than the other."} *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wa9sct/binance_sentiment_data_fomo_is_running_2x_higher/ Been looking at how the Binance conversation is shaping up lately and the split stood out to me: FOMO sits at 20% versus FUD at just 10%, so bullish-leaning chatter is outpacing skeptical chatter by 2 to 1 in the current sample. What's actually driving the FOMO side isn't the usual "number go up" talk, it's centered on Binance positioning itself at the intersection of TradFi and crypto, specifically tokenized stocks, real-world assets (RWAs), and AI-driven on-chain apps. A lot of the conversation frames Binance as a leader in tokenized asset infrastructure, which is a pretty different narrative than the exchange-volume-and-listings stuff that usually dominates. The FUD, while smaller in share, is worth noting too: it's mostly people questioning whether the volume behind these tokenized asset and RWA narratives is actually organic, plus general wariness about potential negative headlines down the line. So you've got genuine enthusiasm about the RWA/tokenization angle, but it's not going unchallenged. Does the tokenized stocks and RWA narrative feel like a real structural shift for Binance, or is this more hype-driven momentum that fades once the next news cycle hits? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wa96nm/binance_sentiment_data_fomo_is_running_10_points/ Been looking at the sentiment split on Binance-related conversation lately and the FOMO/FUD gap stood out to me: 25% FOMO versus 15% FUD. That's a decent lean toward optimism, but what's more interesting is *what's* actually driving it. It's not the usual pump talk. The bulk of the enthusiasm seems tied to Binance pushing further into TradFi-adjacent territory: tokenized equities, Pre-IPO access, real-world-asset (RWA) products, and AI-driven on-chain agents running on BNB Chain. So the FOMO side of the conversation reads more like people reacting to a string of product launches and partnership announcements than to any price action. There's a mix of big-picture narrative (Binance as a bridge between TradFi and crypto) and people pointing to concrete deployment updates as proof it's actually happening, not just talk. On the FUD side, the concerns are narrower and more technical, mainly around liquidity dynamics tied to large outflows, which is worth noting since that's a fairly specific worry rather than generic bearishness. There's also a chunk of discourse around coordinated campaigns and Moonshot listing vote activity, which suggests some of this sentiment is being actively shaped by organized community participation rather than purely organic reaction. What's everyone's take here, does the TradFi pivot (tokenized stocks, RWAs, Pre-IPO stuff) feel like a real structural shift for Binance, or is this more narrative-driven hype that fades once the announcements slow down? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wa7bs2/binancebnb_chain_sentiment_data_shows_fomo_nearly/ Been looking at recent sentiment breakdowns for Binance and BNB Chain, and something stood out: FOMO is sitting at 10% versus FUD at just 5%, so positive sentiment is roughly double the negative. That alone isn't shocking for a bull-leaning ecosystem, but what's more interesting is where that FOMO is coming from. Instead of one dominant narrative driving the excitement, the conversation is split across a bunch of different threads at once: AI agent projects launching on BNB Chain, RWA (real-world asset) tokenization efforts, new exchange listings, governance votes, and even open hiring roles at the ecosystem level. Normally when FOMO spikes, you can point to a single catalyst (a listing, a partnership, a price pump). Here it looks more like general background enthusiasm spread thin across many smaller developments happening simultaneously. That kind of diffuse attention can actually be a signal in itself. It suggests the community isn't rallying around one hype event but is engaged with the ecosystem broadly, which historically tends to reflect sustained interest rather than a short-lived pump-and-dump narrative. Low FUD (5%) also implies there's not much active criticism or concern circulating right now, at least relative to the positive chatter. What do you think is actually driving this broader engagement with BNB Chain right now, is it the AI agent narrative, the RWA push, or just general governance activity pulling people in? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wa66h2/solana_sentiment_right_now_is_40_fomo_vs_just_10/ Been digging through the recent Solana chatter and the split is pretty stark: about 40% of the conversation reads as FOMO while only 10% reads as FUD. That's a 4-to-1 ratio, which is a wide gap for any coin's social sentiment. The driver isn't some fundamental catalyst, it's "Solana Summer" memecoin activity, Moonshot voting incentives, and a decent amount of AI/RWA-on-Solana talk mixed in. A lot of the bullish volume looks like coordinated promotional posting rather than organic conviction, which tracks with why FOMO is so dominant while genuine skepticism stays quiet. The FUD that does exist is smaller in volume but noticeably sharper, mostly people questioning whether the memecoin/voting incentive stuff is sustainable long term. What stands out to me is the imbalance itself. When FOMO outweighs FUD by that much, it usually means the loud voices are aligned but the skeptics haven't fully shown up yet, or they're just getting drowned out. Worth watching whether that 10% FUD number grows as the hype-driven narratives get tested. Anyone else noticing how much of the current Solana hype seems tied to promotional/incentive-driven posting versus actual organic interest? Curious what's separating the signal from the noise for you. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wa28io/title_ethereum_sentiment_data_shows_fomo_25/ This kind of mixed, low-intensity sentiment (FOMO only slightly ahead of FUD, no single dominant theme) is actually a pretty different pattern than what you see during a clear hype cycle or a clear capitulation phase. It suggests the market is still digesting a bunch of separate catalysts (RWA adoption, ETF flows, regulation) rather than reacting emotionally to one big event. Curious what others are seeing here, does the RWA/tokenization narrative feel like it's actually gaining traction with real capital, or is it still mostly talk at this point?"} *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1wa1y1t/binancebnb_chain_sentiment_is_oddly_balanced/ Been looking at the chatter around BNB Chain lately and what stands out isn't hype or panic, it's how evenly split the mood is. FOMO sits at 10% and FUD sits at 10%, which is a pretty rare dead-even reading compared to the usual lopsided sentiment swings you see with most coins. The actual content driving conversation is mostly about tokenized real-world assets and new integrations landing on BNB Chain, plus milestone posts from projects building on it. But right alongside that celebration, there's a steady undercurrent of skepticism about whether any of this translates into near-term price movement. Whale activity and cross-chain adoption keep coming up too, which suggests people are watching flows and infrastructure growth more than they're reacting emotionally to price action. What's interesting is that this kind of balanced sentiment usually shows up during periods where a project has genuine fundamental developments (in this case, RWA tokenization) but the market hasn't decided yet whether to price that in. It's less a story of hype or fear and more a story of people waiting to see if the narrative sticks. Does anyone else think the RWA tokenization angle on BNB Chain is actually gaining real traction, or is this just another cycle of milestone announcements that fade once attention moves elsewhere? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1w9z3we/solana_sentiment_right_now_60_fomo_vs_just_15_fud/ Looked at Solana-related tweets from the past six hours and the split is pretty lopsided: 60% FOMO-driven sentiment versus only 15% FUD. That's a 4-to-1 ratio of hype to skepticism, which is a pretty extreme tilt for a single 6-hour window. What's interesting isn't just the raw split though, it's what's inside the FOMO bucket. A lot of it is centered on meme coins and RWA (real-world asset) narratives on Solana, with people pushing the "get in early" framing. But even within that overwhelmingly bullish crowd, there's a recurring undercurrent of people flagging liquidity risk and questioning whether the current pace of pumps is sustainable. So the FUD number looks small, but the caution isn't absent, it's just embedded inside the hype conversation instead of being its own separate camp. This kind of pattern (crowd-driven optimism with sustainability warnings mixed in) tends to show up when a narrative is moving fast and attracting a lot of new attention at once. Doesn't tell you what happens next, but it's a useful snapshot of crowd psychology in real time. Anyone else noticing this mix of hype and "wait, is this too fast" commentary happening simultaneously in Solana discussions, or does this kind of split seem normal for how the ecosystem's socials usually behave? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

Post is by: coinsocialbase and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1w9wglb/ethereum_sentiment_check_fomo_is_running_5x/ Been going through the last six hours of ETH-related chatter and the split between FOMO and FUD stood out: 25% FOMO versus only 5% FUD. That's a pretty lopsided ratio for a coin that usually gets a lot of mixed reactions. What's interesting is the FOMO isn't just "number go up" energy. The recurring themes are tokenization, real-world asset (RWA) use cases, and new infrastructure being built on Ethereum. Those are more substantive narratives than pure price speculation, which is probably why the FUD side is so thin right now. That said, people aren't ignoring the near-term stuff either. There's still plenty of talk about resistance levels and expected volatility, so this isn't a case of everyone assuming a straight line up. So the overall picture is short-term caution mixed with longer-term conviction, which is a pretty normal setup but the FOMO/FUD gap is wider than you'd expect given all the volatility talk. Feels like people are separating the trading noise from the infrastructure story. Is the RWA/tokenization narrative actually driving fresh interest in ETH for you, or does it feel more like recycled talking points from previous cycles? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Vydrah

I have not looked into it a lot (yet)… but on Twitter aave had often been mentionend with RWA‘s. Maybe someone with more insight could explain why.

Unable_Beat_3194

Are you actually trying to learn or just affirm things that you’ve heard. Some good use cases is stablecoin yields which is an alternative to money market funds and bond yields. Depository yields from major banks is very low the default yield on a stablecoin through LPs is 10-15x higher than a standard savings account. RWA hedging is another major use case, being able to access SP500 outside of market hours and buying stocks outside of NYSE hours is a huge advantage when markets are so reactive after hours especially during an earnings call after market closes. Remittance markets has been a primary use case for a long time, sending money to family overseas without delays and high fees. Bitcoin in general acts as another low inflationary instrument outside of traditional metals as an instrument against fiat debasement especially in 3rd world countries. These are just a few topics you can do some more research on. One of the main technological breakthroughs is the ability to prove ownership on a public ledger which is what so many firms are building use cases for.

AutoModerator

Post is by: DeFiNomad and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1w7bfme/is_tokenized_gold_finally_becoming_productive/ I’ve been looking into PAXG/XAUT lately and I think the interesting part isn’t just owning gold onchain, it’s being able to actually use it. Aave and Morpho already let people use tokenized gold across DeFi, and Arch recently added PAXG/XAUT as collateral for loans. So instead of selling your gold when you need liquidity, you can borrow against it and keep the exposure Obviously you’re adding liquidation and platform risk, but this feels like a much more interesting RWA use case than simply tokenizing gold so it can be traded. Anyone here actually borrowing against PAXG/XAUT? What platform are you using? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

sakata32

It seems the main narrative of this cycle will be RWA and robinhood. What's the best way to get exposed to RWA and robinhood? Just buy link?

Old-Director-6727

Too risky There are two kind of people in crypto one who invest long term and One who relies on short term there is no in between until and unless you are whale and have crazy discipline you will go crazy as you see cascades in the run I would suggest if you don't have much information I say you use the portfolio rebalancing stratergy you decide three coins and decide a ratio between them maybe 1:1:1 and now you investing according to that now dont invest whole amount rather invest parts in every month and at the end of month you do one more thing you rebalance the ratio between the coins for example eth is down so you invest in eth more like that you should see this stratergy on youtube if you trying to invest short term i dont think uniswap is good its not a defi meta currently RWA and hyperliquid and robinhood are in the real trend

AutoModerator

Post is by: Cloudy_Day912 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1w44gif/how_realworld_trade_data_is_quietly_starting_to/ Been thinking a lot lately about how disconnected a lot of DeFi still feels from actual economic activity on the ground. Most lending protocols rely on crypto collateral, over-collateralization, and price feeds. That works until you start wondering what a more mature version looks like — one that incorporates real economic signals. Lately I’ve been digging into how import/export records, shipping volumes, and supplier-buyer relationships (all publicly available through customs data in many countries) are being used by some projects as alternative data for credit scoring and invoice financing. Instead of just looking at wallet history or token holdings, you can see whether a business has consistent trade flows, established counterparties, and healthy shipment patterns over multiple years. It feels like a bridge between traditional trade finance and on-chain capital. The interesting part is the shift in risk assessment. A company with steady export records to multiple regions might get better terms than one relying purely on volatile crypto collateral. We’re still early, but the combination of oracles feeding this kind of off-chain data into smart contracts could open up DeFi to small and medium businesses that don’t hold large crypto bags. Curious where others see this heading. Have you come across any protocols or experiments that are using real-world trade or supply chain data to improve lending, factoring, or RWA plays? Or do you think on-chain purity will always win out? If you want to keep thinking through the mechanics of this specifically, how supplier patterns, shipment consistency, and trade-flow verification could feed into lending models without the usual noise, I have been putting longer breakdowns and some experiments in a small corner subreddit called [reddit.com/r/fortisx\_\_\_fi](http://reddit.com/r/fortisx___fi) It is quieter by design, which tends to help when you are trying to work out details rather than just post headlines. No pressure at all if it is not for you, just mentioning it because this is exactly the kind of thing I do not have enough space to unpack here. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

The-great-phoenix

This is a complex situation: Macroeconomy is bad so it will put a medium downward pressure on crypto market Tokenization of RWA is progressing and will expand the size of crypto market with a large upward pressure Prediction markets and perpetual contract are adding volatility so the price could go wild because of massive liquidation either up or down. The individuals and institutional interest regarding crypto is growing so there are more ETF and wallets opening that are channeling more money so upward pressure on cryptos Finally inflation will drive price of token up especially the ones that are deflationary or with max supply released Globally I would say that price has most chance to go up in the near future unless we enter into a depp recession

AutoModerator

Post is by: cryx-Advertising1471 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1vzxsl4/etransport_an_interesting_approach_to_realworld/ E-Transport: Bringing Real-World Electric Mobility On-Chain The conversation around digital assets often focuses on things that exist entirely online. E-Transport is taking a different approach by connecting digital participation with physical electric mobility assets. @E\_Transport\_\_ focuses on electric scooters and e-bikes used for rental services across more than 20 cities. According to its official platform, the model covers locations including Miami, Las Vegas, Barcelona, Dubai and Phuket. Turning Mobility Into a Managed Asset One of the interesting parts of E-Transport is that participants are not expected to handle the operational side themselves. The platform says it manages procurement, logistics, city permits, GPS tracking, charging and servicing of the equipment. The transport assets can generate revenue through several use cases: \- B2C: short-term scooter and e-bike rentals for tourists and everyday users. \- B2B: longer-term mobility arrangements for companies and business parks. \- Residential communities: electric transportation integrated into private residential infrastructure. This creates a model where the underlying activity is tied to something people actually use: urban transportation. Why the Operational Layer Matters Owning or participating in a physical mobility asset is only one part of the equation. Keeping that asset available, charged, tracked and serviced is what allows it to generate rental activity. E-Transport says its system uses GPS tracking for individual units and remote motor-locking capabilities. It also describes a reserve fund and insurance coverage as part of its stated protection mechanisms. Another notable feature is portfolio management through Telegram. The platform says users can monitor their portfolio, purchase equipment shares, review history and make USDT withdrawals through its Telegram-based interface. A Different Take on Real-World Assets The broader idea is straightforward: instead of representing an entirely abstract digital asset, E-Transport is attempting to connect digital ownership and management with physical transportation infrastructure. Whether this model can scale sustainably will ultimately depend on real-world factors such as fleet utilization, operating costs, maintenance, regulation and demand in each market. That is what makes E-Transport an interesting project to watch — it is trying to bring digital finance closer to an everyday physical service: getting people around cities. \#ETransport #ElectricMobility #RWA #UrbanMobility *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

jekpopulous2

Stop looking at L1s with no DeFi infrastructure and start looking for protocols that could turn all that RWA liquidity into real yield for users.

Jenn2895

Ignore DMs. Anyone trying to talk to you privately about crypto or investing in general is trying to scam you. I would stick with blue chips with strong fundamentals & utility. Like Chainlink, Ethereum, etc. Especially w/ the RWA narrative. Will be easy to 2-3x your investment, or more.

Express_Ad2791

I think you're both kind of arguing different definitions of alt season. There will absolutely be another rotation where some narrative does 5-10x and everyone suddenly becomes an RWA expert for three months lol. But that's different from the old "throw a dart at the top 100 and outperform BTC" alt season. The game didn't disappear, it just got way more selective.

jekpopulous2

The narrative two cycles ago was alt L1s and they went up like 1000%. Then crashed. The narrative last cycle was DeFi and those tokens went up like 1000%. Then crashed. The narrative this cycle is ETH and RWAs. I’m already up 45% on ENA today because I understand that if Bitcoin continues to push upward RWA tokens will climb like 1000%. Then crash. We have an alt season every single cycle you’re just not following the trends.

UlysApp

Basically, tokenized stocks put assets like Apple, Nvidia or Tesla onto blockchain rails. That means instead of stocks only living inside a brokerage and trading during market hours, they can potentially be held in a crypto wallet, traded 24/7, swapped directly into BTC/ETH/stablecoins, or even used as collateral in DeFi. The bigger idea is that crypto stops being a separate little financial world. If stocks, treasuries and other real-world assets start moving onchain, you’re bringing a massive amount of new money and liquidity into the same ecosystem crypto already uses. It just makes a lot of sense and the RWA/tokenized stock volume on robinhood chain, hyperliquid, etc..is already booming with little users compared to traditional markets. There's even people launching memecoins and pairing them with stocks so the token is memecoin/NVDA instead of memecoin/ETH for example. And you earn NVDA for holding the coin. It's pretty incredible.

Fantastic-Phone4499

Cause they sold and are looking for lower entry or they want to fud retail out of their bags while they continue to accumulate so retail buys higher. Once we hit 100k they will say is going to $350-$500 but will be selling from 150k to 300k. If BTC even hits 300k at that point they tell you top is in and need to sell. Top influencers are always wrong. I been expecting the pump since February. Crypto supercycle is coming. Alts will out perform BTC this time. AI, RWA, and Privacy are the sectors to watch.

MinimalGravitas

When was that published... because both RWA and stablecoin TVLs have dropped quite a bit since then (-15% and -9% respectively). Also that 'fees collected' is really quite funny, why would they post that publicly... $67.5k in 3 months... so $750 per day? I'm pretty sure there are kids with lemonade stands generating more revenue!

MinimalGravitas

Yes it is... * The network has barely 3 TPS: https://www.hederatxns.com/ * The token price is not just lower today than when it launched, it is also lower than during the pre-launch SAFT 3 investment rounds: https://www.coinlore.com/coin/hedera-hashgraph/historical-data * It has basically zero stablecoin adoption, in 51st place ($35M vs $147**B** for the market leader): https://defillama.com/stablecoins/chains * It has basically zero RWA adoption, in 17th place ($76M vs $17.3**B** for the market leader): https://app.rwa.xyz/networks * It has basically zero DeFi adoption, in 53rd place ($20.7M vs $41.3**B** for the market leader): https://defillama.com/chains The only real use case was when they gave Atma free transactions, and even then they still abandoned the network. They try to play up the big names on their 'Governing Council', but none of them actually use the network, as an example one of council members 'LG' has recently decided to deploy a crypto project, and so built an Ethereum rollup rather than using Hedera. It is dead.

Dablicku

I think you're forgetting that a lot of companies are doing this already through RWA tokenisation + liquidity companies that back them up like Steakhouse, Sentora, RockawayX, etc. Most of which is done on the SOL and ETH chain because there is absolutely no use case for XRP when it has been done a 1000x successfully.

Jenn2895

I hear your concerns w/ Eth & also managed a Btc average last cycle of $20k. Did the bulk of buying after FTX crash & Xmas 2022. Sold it all when I 5x’d. Which is great in the markets in general, but not so much for crypto. To be honest I’m not too excited about Btc or Eth this cycle. Simply due to their high market caps. They are definitely safer bets now. Which is great risk wise, not so much return wise. But I think box will pull off at least a 3x. Probably higher for Eth b/c of RWA, Ai agents, global finance moving on chain, & supply squeeze since 1/3rd is already locked up in staking. Decided to go heavier into $Link now. Market cap is lower, $7B. They also have a lot of partnerships, patents & basically positioned themselves to be critical infrastructure for Web3, Defi, Global Finance, etc. Think Chainlink will easily 10x this cycle. Possibly much higher, but 10x easy. Been trying to find some small caps w/ strong fundamentals & utility. So if you got any leads I’ll def take a look. Last cycle I threw some $ on SwftC just b/c they had a micro cap, $5M, were already available on a major exchange & had utility. It’s so much easier to get over a quick 10x when the market cap is so low. I avoid memes though. I have 1 & it’s literally just for the meme b/c I like paying or gifting people “magic internet money” 🤣.

casiocoin

NFT’s are far from dead, that’s the blueprint as to how we tokenize RWA’s in the short future. I think the old ones will come back when the use case is there for real RWA’s. I’m not heavy into them, just mostly BTC, ETH, some select memes, but I see the potential of individually serialized tokens on a blockchain interfacing with individually serialized assets, I.e. vehicles, real estate, Pokémon graded cards etc. all of those are individually serialized RWA’s that will eventually have a 1:1 NFT proving digital and physical ownership. Want to sell a car, house, sports card? Just receive payment over a blockchain network and transfer the digital RWA (NFT) through defi or exchange, it doesn’t matter. No more 3rd party, DMV, govt land office, probate, estate disputes, NFT’s are now sales contracts for anything, irreversible, timestamped, and can contain additional digital information.

Jenn2895

Ya, that’s all true. 😆 But it’s a bear market, people gotta find a way to laugh… it’s better than having to post the suicide hotline #. Highly doubt Btc goes to $30k. I mean I would love it if it did since I play the cycles & sold all my btc last year. I think max pain *could* be $45k-$55k. But we could already be at the bottom. I started my dca already for this cycle. As far as your question regarding Sol. I have a little staked but not going heavy into it. Mainly b/c market cap is 43B already & they had some issues w/ down time. Also, seems most of their usage is meme coins/gambling. Think this cycle is going to lean towards RWA, Ai, actual utility.

Zaytion_

Just look into what is going on with RWA, tokenization, etc. Lots going on.

Jenn2895

Zero utility, just a meme. This cycle is RWA & Ai. I mean gamble a little if that’s what you’re into. I’m going to pass. The only meme coin I hodl is $MIM. Just b/c I get a kick out of asking people if I can pay them with Magic Internet money. lol

Saffuran

**BTC** and **ETH** are solid, I have no faith in ADA but you do you. **SOL** is still solid. Outside of those three mostly only dabble smaller positions in **ZEC** (privacycoin), **HYPE** (good growth map and tokenomics), **ONDO** (traditional markets moving into crypto with a potential inevitability of 24/7 stock trading using blockchain -- general RWA exposure.)

hoppeeness

I mean link isn’t going to tokenize anything but yes I get it as important infrastructure. BTC is going to be dead once RWA’s are tokenized. It won’t be able to hold enough value for people to use as a store of value.

The-great-phoenix

The crypto market asset class as a whole is about 2.2 trillion and it is poised to raise thanks to clarity act and financial institution who are already prepared to tokenize RWA massively, we already have a lot off stocks that are already tokenized and on chain settlement coming among other things, so DEFI growth into crypto is going to happen soon, explosion maybe around mid 2027 Not all cryptos will benefit from it the same way though, now is the right time to assess which project will get the most utility/traction when it happens and get positioned

MinimalGravitas

I've given you quotes from heads of 3 of literally the biggest institutions in traditional finance and lists of the projects they have built... don't they seem pretty appropriate sources when discussing adoption by the financial institutions? We can of course keep going if you like, here's a list of links to RWA tokenization projects built by JP Morgan (the biggest public bank by market capitalization) - the most recent was just 3 months ago: https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum?view=byEntity#entity-jpmorgan

TheVeloRebel

Crypto Agility, QC/PQC, RWA and institutional usecases.

Jenn2895

Chainlink, Ethereum, Bitcoin: Stacking in that order. Eth & Link have actual utility. Both are critical infrastructure for RWA & Ai. The transition, although slow, has already begun. Chainlink has the lowest market cap of the 3 which provides room for highest ROI. Which is why my Link bags are heavier than Eth & Btc.

BakingBreadBB2

RWA and tokenized stocks will probably take over, but let's not forget that crypto made both of those possible

Freudarian

Looking back 16yrs the original idea was to send value over a decentralized network. Nowhere in the whitepaper was mentioned HODL, moon, gold, or anything. Bitcoin has done what it came to do: renew the banking sector, compete with the lazy establishment, and create new markets and jobs. Just like torrents are used to distribute data efficiently through networks, and it doesnt have much to do with Piratebay anymore. I think you are wayyyy early, but in the end, compounding life savings is not what crypto is for. The hoax about the new dig gold narrative was a bulltrap for VC's from the beginning and boy they didnt hold back. Now we have so many new applications that we couldnt dream of. In 2010 using a platform was expensive complicated, now there is thousands of them. Fueled with AI im sure they'll be around for some time. The markets wont dissappear and RWA is going to be real. I was tired of the restrictions I had dealing with stocks. I want 24/7 realtime trading and I dont want befor and after trading where I cant compete. Thats BS. But, I agree the bullrun will be a diminishing return until the money is so concentrated that it will be only used as leverage for assets and valuta. Untill something will spark a bankrun in 10 / 15 yrs

Proper-Stay-9995

I like RWA focused projects

Mission_Ad_5348

Wrong, BCH is the real Bitcoin for adoption, including alts such as CKB Nervos Network, ( long term its projected to dethrone Ethereum because of account vs Cell model ( a superb version of UTXO or rather evolved version ) Zilliqa 2.0 as the better solana transaction scaling for stable offloads and regulatory framework and IDENTITY proof for institutions especially now with LTIN, vLel stuff. And COMPound for RWA since its a more secure DEFI than aave. Overall crypto is in a good road. Btc is not same with eth. Small blocks will die same as ethereums evergrowing state data that will only consume validators and end up handicap them when the data is too large causing clog fest and centralization due to technology's limitations. 

AlbiBambi

When it comes to RWA I guess clear and full regulation will be a must. No serious institution will want to do business otherwise

AlbiBambi

When it comes to RWA I guess clear and full regulation will be a must. No serious institution will want to do business otherwise

eggZeppelin

Look up stablecoin transaction volume for 2026 for international remittance and large B2B transfers. Look up RWA tokenization from firms like DTCC.

Mattie_Kadlec

Not just this year. RWA gonna be a huge part of crypto from now on IMO because we are just starting to see major tokenizations happen. So much more is yet to come

Mattie_Kadlec

Yeah, they will all want maximum certainty when it comes to RWA

AlbiBambi

Everyone is laser-focused on the TradFi and RWA aspects, but I think the machine-to-machine economy stuff is flying under the radar here. If we are genuinely moving toward a future where AI agents are autonomously executing yield strategies and paying for API calls, unpredictable gas fees on legacy L1s are going to be a massive bottleneck.

ProfitableCheetah

RWA is taking over crypto and there is no stopping it

Foreign-Back-8676

I think the main issue right now is that RWA tokenization still isn't popular among traditional users (people outside the crypto space) There will still be a lot of development in this area. Right now, accessibility alone isn't enough to attract broader interest. Security is just as important...

JakRenden2

Ngl, the point in the article about TradFi needing deterministic finality is spot on. Institutions aren't going to risk clearing massive RWA settlements on a chain that might re-org just because the network got congested.

Jenn2895

I wouldn’t buy back in. Better off investing in projects with strong fundamentals & utility. Esp around RWA. Chainlink, $Link, is a safe bet. Ethereum, $Eth, should also do well. You can research more to find some high risk/high reward plays.

Old-Committee944

For me its mostly BTC and ETH, then maybe few strong L1 or RWA projects. Trying to catch every new narrative is how you end up with 30 random bags and no idea why you even bought them lol.

ninenulls

Too late. I sold it all. With clarity dying and RWA going to private chains, the only thing you can count on is using USDC at Walmart. Flat dollar coins have a future. Everything else will jump around, more down than up. Look at the monthly chart of bitcoin and tell us you're not concerned

Fluffy-Situation-818

Funny how the memes ended up defining the chain more than the RWA pitch. It will be interesting to see whether robinhood leans into that or tries to steer it back serious

Freudarian

I think its good to rotate and diversify. However, this is what I see: Oil & gas through the roof Stock market overpriced Gold at ATH levels, and other precious metals AI bubble about to burst Housing markets are ATH Credit market is on a stretch Am I missing something? Well, mix it with the fact that a lot of people still have jobs, markets are still performing, so I dont see a market crash happen very soon unless China and US go to war, and drag EU into it. Which at this point seems unlikely, since relationships are at a low, but China seems wise enough not to engage with an idiot. Soooo.. I think a rotation is more likely. In comparison to other markets Crypto has been underperforming so its a very attractive market. I think the biggest obstacle is the Unclarity Act, and a new narrative for novelty, ETF's, RWA, DigiGold, Memes and NFT's are getting old.

jawni

Besides ONDO, which is a pretty straightforward bluechip RWA play, why would you buy any of those?

AccordingFloor7010

Yes, the ones backed by NOTHING other than a hope and a prayer  (just like a fiat government currency) - meaning BTC and the other 20k like it .... as opposed to RWA-backed cryptos & stable coins, such as Tether Gold and other new-ish ones like it, backed by real tangible assets that you can always trade your cryptos in for upon demand - the opposite of fiat.

AccordingFloor7010

All cryptos are rug pulls sooner or later.  Unless they're RWA-backed.

hoppeeness

Bitcoin is too late. It will still go up and down in smaller intervals until it’s just down over the next 5-10 years. But once most of the RWA’s are tokenized the use case for the vast amount of people who were previously investing will be gone. There are plenty physical assets that have scarcity and tokenizing them takes away most of bitcoins use cases.

Imp-Classic17

This is always an easily overlooked aspect of RWA but I don't even know if there are any RWA projects that own and operate the underlying assets themselves. It's all still a blur imo

MinimalGravitas

The chart has quite a few notable omissions... - On May the 6th Fidelity (the 3rd biggest asset manager in the world) launched their first tokenized fund, the USD Digital Liquidity - FILQ. - On May the 8th Blackrock (the biggest asset manager in the world) announced a new $6.1 billion RWA tokenization project - BSTBL. - On May the 12th JP Morgan (the biggest bank in the world by market capitalization) announced their new tokenized money market fund - JLTX. etc etc In my opinion the biggest story of Q2 this year has been the adoption of crypto rails by literally the biggest institutions in the traditional financial world. That seems to me more likely to have long term impact on the ecosystem than Ansem's memecoin or the EdgeX airdrop.

counterboy12

Rust is a horrible dev language. Use Cadence instead, it’s build specifically for secure smart contracts and asset ownership like RWA‘s

mrmogul914

For sure tokenized real estate. Are you familiar with RWA space.

SkyEnvironmental7746

Fassets go look at current XRP on network being used for defi. over 150M. FBTC coming. When that happens price will mature the network. I can’t sit here and explain everything it’s to much. But on top of RWA real world assets and being attached to FBTC and FXRP TVL will shoot Flare above $0.15-$0.30 by 2030

Routine-Can-1678

No, no Ethereum. Ethereum is a DeFi coin. You need people to bring money from a bank in real life into the Ethereum chain for Ethereum to have value. That's why it suddenly underperformed in 2022-2025, because the DeFi craze was over when interest rates at an ordinary bank got high enough. Ethereum requires you to gamble on how much interest rates will be, how much RWA tokenisation will be brought to Ethereum, how much DeFi activity there will be, how much will be cannibalised from its own L2s and copycat EVM protocols. Bitcoin is far better as you can buy it at any price and be sure it'll be more valuable over time. Ethereum, you'd have no idea.

OscarCorterz_20

I think this is where a lot of RWA discussions get oversimplified. Everyone talks about fractional ownership and blockchain, but if the company behind the asset can't actually operate it, the token doesn't magically create value.

Old-Director-6727

Yes, stablecoins would definitely become a truly mainstream crypto product, but this is not a good thing; stablecoins are just centralized products with wrapped dlt. It's not a decentralized use case so technicallly its just using one aspect of "crypto product", the same is currently happening with all the on-chain equities, commodities, as well as any other RWA use case (other than hyperliquid)

mrmogul914

This is definitely a step up from the old CFD-style tokens, but I have major questions about how the "real liquidity link" actually holds up during stress. Traditional markets settle in T+2 while blockchain settles in seconds—so who eats the slippage when Nvidia drops 5% in two minutes? More importantly, how do they handle the 4:00 PM to 9:30 AM EST gap when the NYSE is closed? If the token freezes or de-pegs during after-hours earnings while the underlying stock is moving 10%, it defeats the whole purpose. I also worry about the regulatory hot potato: if the SEC decides this RWA issuer is selling unregistered securities, do our wallets get frozen, or do we get a redemption window? To answer your question about other platforms—Binance's old stock tokens tracked fine during market hours but were a nightmare after hours, halting right when you needed to react. The real stress test for Bitget isn't the 0.1% fees or the dividend conversion; it's whether I can sell this token at 2:00 AM during a market crash and actually find a buyer at a fair price. If the order book dries up the second Wall Street closes, then this is just a prettier version of the same old problem. I'm bullish on the *idea*, but I need to see how the peg holds during a black swan before I put real money in. I am working with a Platform that allows me to diversify and invest in RWAS specifically tokenized real estate. Wishing you the best.

MinimalGravitas

The biggest financial institutions in the world have already deployed multiple RWA tokenization projects and all speak of crypto as the future for the financial system: * Biggest bank in the world by market capitalization: [JP Morgan](https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum?view=byEntity#entity-jpmorgan). The head of JP Morgan, Jamie Dimon has said that *“crypto is real, it will be used by all of us.”* * Biggest asset manager in the world: [Blackrock](https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum?view=byEntity#entity-blackrock). Larry Fink, the head of Blackrock, recently said wants the entire financial system on &"one common blockchain",* and referred to Ethereum as the *"toll road to tokenization"*. * Biggest wealth manager and private bank in the world: [UBS](https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum?view=byEntity#entity-ubs). The CEO of UBS, Sergio Ermotti stated recently "Blockchain is the future for traditional banking". * Third biggest asset manager in the world: [Fidelity](https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum?view=byEntity#entity-fidelity). The CEO of Fidelity, Abigail Johnson, said *"the current financial system is the most complicated web of basically reconciliation processes built on primitive technology — and that blockchain will eventually replace it."*

Grouchy_Science1847

Absolutely wild growth — going from $5B to $32B in just over 2 years shows RWA isn’t just hype anymore, it’s the future of bringing real value on-chain. If you want to stay ahead of this shift and trade alongside the action, BYDFi is a great place to be. They’re running their July referral event right now where you can trade and share 7,000 XRP, plus the Green Pitch Finals are live — you can support promising projects and win from a $400,000 prize pool.

Total-Literature447

This and RWA

Old_Network1961

Mostly yes. And considering that we asking for more adoption it makes perfectly sense to see this. Institutional adoption accelerating across RWA sectors. Imo, the workflow layer coordinating settlement, compliance and reconciliation across those stablecoins is the next infrastructure race

sigh_duck

Stables, RWA, perps, Lending/Borrowing, memes, and gambling are so far the biggest volumes for crypto. Lets the people decide what its good for, rather than trying to shove blockchain tech into things where it doesn't need to be.

arturas_rizen

Is it a CLOB? I am a fan of RFQ implementation for anything RWA related. Specifically, I like Carbon Terminal. They have CFD level liquidity in their beta where you can earn dividends off your positions.

jawni

when you say "shit like this", do you mean everyone being duped by a quote taken out of context? Because yeah, when someone posts this and every single comment is just handwringing and pearl-clutching, it does make me a bit bearish. The actual statement made from Vlad? Nah, doesn't make me bearish at all, it was a completely innocent statement. The actual quote from the tweet: >While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too https://x.com/vladtenev/status/2074695821896065360

RWA_Maxi_1

the launch of Robinhood Chain is being billed as the moment that RWA, especially tokenized equities, become “mainstream”, even with Robinhood’s eye-watering user base (27.4 million funded accounts), history shows that simply porting assets on-chain doesn’t guarantee meaningful adoption or composability. look like battle "on-chain" wars will not seize to wage on, despite big ambitions, protocols have rarely broken $1 billion TVL for tokenized treasuries or bonds, and user counts often stagnate in the tens of thousands. will it be different this time?

Educational_Cable405

You can staple an order book onto anything, that part's easy. The problem with RWA is that liquidity only holds as long as the underlying can actually be pulled out fast, and most of these things can't. Add any stress and the token starts trading at whatever discount reflects how slow redemption really is, so the liquidity evaporates at the exact moment you wanted it. I'd flip the framing: liquidity is just a readout of how much people trust the redemption plumbing. Fix that and depth follows, chase depth first and you're renting it from a market maker.

MinimalGravitas

Yes it is... * The network has barely 3 TPS: https://www.hederatxns.com/ * The token price is not just lower today than when it launched, it is also lower than during the pre-launch SAFT 3 investment rounds: https://www.coinlore.com/coin/hedera-hashgraph/historical-data * It has basically zero stablecoin adoption, in 48th place ($48.2M vs $154**B** for the market leader): https://defillama.com/stablecoins/chains * It has basically zero RWA adoption, in 19th place ($90M vs $15.9**B** for the market leader): https://app.rwa.xyz/networks * It has basically zero DeFi adoption, in 39th place ($43M vs $37.3**B** for the market leader): https://defillama.com/chains The only real use case was when they gave Atma free transactions, and even then they still abandoned the network. It is dead.

MinimalGravitas

Yes it is... * The network has barely 3 TPS: https://www.hederatxns.com/ * The token price is not just lower today than when it launched, it is also lower than during the pre-launch SAFT 3 investment rounds: https://www.coinlore.com/coin/hedera-hashgraph/historical-data * It has basically zero stablecoin adoption, in 48th place ($48.2M vs $154**B** for the market leader): https://defillama.com/stablecoins/chains * It has basically zero RWA adoption, in 19th place ($90M vs $15.9**B** for the market leader): https://app.rwa.xyz/networks * It has basically zero DeFi adoption, in 39th place ($43M vs $37.3**B** for the market leader): https://defillama.com/chains The only real use case was when they gave Atma free transactions, and then they still abandoned the network! It is dead.

AutoModerator

Post is by: GaryChris55 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1ujgvun/can_defi_replace_macro_brokers_in_2026_i_want_to/ Will start with some context first. I've been fully self custodial for a few years now, no CEX accounts, everything sits in my own wallets (after what happened with FTX I just couldn't anymore). I follow geopolitics closely and usually hold strong views I want to capitalise on. I want to print at crucial macro events, gold during rate cycles, Nasdaq around earnings season, dollar around CPI prints… but I can't. The moment I want to act on a view, I have to either open a brokerage account (counterparty risk, KYC, possible account freeze) or go to a CEX, which I won't. So I spent the last month specifically looking for on chain solutions for RWA trading. I just wanted a single trusted perp with exposure to gold, indices, commodities and forex straight from my wallet. But this space is way more crowded than I expected. From the outside it looks like a few protocols are doing this seriously, with real infrastructure to handle out of hours pricing and market open gaps, and I know that's actually hard to get right. Gains Network/gTrade has been doing RWA perps since 2022, Ostium is the newer one that's more RWA focused (gold and metals are a big chunk of their volume), and then Hyperliquid is pushing into equity style perps from the crypto side. Different tradeoffs on each. Some prioritise 24/7 availability, others seem to pause or behave differently around weekends and gaps to keep pricing accurate, which I'd actually want for something like gold. I'm still evaluating the stuff that actually matters: how the LP side economics work in practice (on a lot of these you're effectively trading against the pool, so I want to understand that before sizing up), and whether rollover rates are genuinely transparent or just hidden fees with a nicer name. Has anyone been trading RWA perps on chain for a while? What platform do you use, and which ones are actually transparent with their fee model? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

MinimalGravitas

Is that your theory as to why they keep building projects on Ethereum and it's rollups? https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum?view=byEntity#entity-jpmorgan That's 7 different things (RWA funds, a stablecoin, an interop protocol, etc) in the last 12 months.

cryptocheeta

I will be honest I think its Zigchain RWA

BrisingrReborn

I've seen Canton is one of the top RWA chains. I hadn't really heard much about it until like just a month ago

Phantasmaaa

RWA projects are the play

CopynCat

Everyone’s just gonna say the bullshit they’re invested in. I’m in 5m (used to be 500m) market cap and 2m (used to be 100m) market cap coins because my brain is smooth and I want the big dirty risky gains. Do your own research, buy the hype before its hype. AI and RWA Coins?

ConsistentRub934

LINK is a decent start. I’d look at coins with actual usage and products behind them, not just old ATH charts. NEXO, AVAX, INJ and maybe some RWA names are worth checking among others, but I’d still avoid going all in on one narrative.

Sapodilla101

> Again, hard to divide physically. Again, we have tokenized gold now. > What other blockchains could possibly be better as a final settlement layer? RWA transactions are popping off on Ethereum, its L2s, and Solana.

Sure-Benefit2023

I think alts need to be watched by category, not as one big group. L1s, AI coins, DeFi, gaming, memecoins, RWA, and infra can all behave differently depending on liquidity and narrative rotation. When people say “alts are dead” or “alts are back,” it usually hides a lot of differences. A smaller watchlist with clear categories is probably more useful than trying to track every coin at once.

AutoModerator

Post is by: TheShadowScorp and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/VaultBags/comments/1ufapio/why_im_watching_vault_early_instead_of_chasing/ I’ve been spending more time looking for crypto projects with an actual long-term reason to exist instead of just chasing the next meme pump. One project I’ve been watching closely is VAULT. What caught my attention is that it’s not trying to sell itself as “the next 1000x meme.” The bigger idea seems to be building a token around real world asset exposure and long-term holding incentives rather than pure hype. That’s what stands out to me: * focus on utility over temporary hype * potential exposure to real-world value-backed concepts * a model that seems more aligned with holding and compounding vs constant flipping * community still early enough where people can actually get in before the crowd notices Most of crypto still feels like musical chairs. Projects pump, insiders dump, and communities get wrecked. I’m a lot more interested in projects that are trying to bridge crypto with actual assets, yield, and long-term use cases. Curious if anyone else here has looked into VAULT yet or has thoughts on where RWA-style crypto projects could go over the next cycle. If anyone here is already researching early RWA / RWU focused projects, I’d like to compare notes. NFA & DYOR X: @VaultBags VaultBags X Community = https://x.com/i/communities/2036662368902553754 Thank You. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

NoSleepDad2023

RWA. Tokenizing stocks mainly.  Other than that it’s a casino of meme coins 

hoppeeness

Opposite. Many alts utility is finally being productionalized. It’s BTC that won’t 1000 or even 10x. With tokenized RWA’s BTC’s use cases are very narrow and don’t apply to most people.

SadExtreme8597

the "patchwork" framing is fair for a lot of what's out there right now. most tokenized stock products are just wrappers, like same underlying, different rails, with extra steps. it gets more interesting when tokenization changes the settlement layer. t+0 settlement, fractional ownership that's genuinely programmable, collateral that moves across protocols. that's a different thing from putting a stock ticker on a blockchain and calling it innovation. the RWA space is still very early and a lot of it is still in the "bandage" phase you're describing. but the infrastructure question underneath it is real lol

FollowingFriendly505

Recently started a small position in my portfolio filled with what I believe are some of the cryptos most likely to still be around in 2032-34. Since I expect RWAs to be a regular thing in about 4 years, my take (just as almost everyone) is that altcoins centered around financial bottlenecks will become an international standard for banking and investing infrastructure.As for my current portfolio, my holds are SOL HYPE ONDO LINK VIRTUAL MORPHO Even though HYPE and VIRTUAL won't capture value from direct exposure to broad RWA adoption, they are just too hard to simply overlook.