Reddit Posts
Mentions
Check code 6 on x. They are launching next month. An RWA token.
Here’s the reality. It costs millions, if not tens of millions, to get all of the regulatory licenses, authority fees, employee infra, etc., to get a legit RWA platform. So far I’ve seen a a few well funded ones like BackedFi. They don’t have a token just RWA tokens on chain like SPY etc. pretty cool. Personally, I’m not using any RWA anything until I see a few years of a protocols success with billions TVL
Some real projects mixed in there - check out LTO network; land registry project with the UN, advanced RWA project, DID, NFT (including music - incoming) and anchoring with public and private layer (GDPR compliant). Sure to take off shortly but time to get in cheap is likely running out.
Great question! I would say that this is indeed one of the biggest challenges in RWA adoption. Yes, you do have to trust the entity that tokenizes the asset. That’s why regulation and transparency matter so much here. In the case of STBU (Stobox), for example, they’re a licensed provider that works directly with asset owners (like real estate or equity) and handles the compliance, KYC, and legal backing of the tokens. The blockchain part ensures transferability, fractional ownership, and global access. But yeah, the trust layer still comes from regulated intermediaries. You’re not removing trust entirely, but you’re minimizing friction, improving liquidity, and opening up new access models. It’s not as “pure” as DeFi, but it’s where real-world value can start to move on-chain in a legal and scalable way.
Meme again? Like Trump and Melanie? 🙂↔️ No... I'd rather go with RWA tokens. TradFi to DeFi is the new play this year. 😎
Licenses from top financial regulatory authorities are key. Chintai Networks (CHEX) has two from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (the #1 global financial regulator): Issuance and trading. It took them two years to obtain it. The ordinary degen might not care or even understand the importance of these licenses and the difference between the different jurisdictions, but the TradFi institutions moving trillions of their $$$ on chain do. The whole crypto market now is $3 Trillion. That is completely dwarfed by traditional assets (stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities) that are valued in the $100's of trillions of dollars. Tokenized RWA on regulated chains is where the $$$ are going.
If I had to pick only one, leaving BTC and ETH aside, I’d go with STBU (Stobox Utility Token). Why? It’s a tiny under-the-radar real-world asset (RWA) play. They’re building actual tokenization infrastructure for businesses, not just hype. They offer licensed services, have partnered with Plume (which is pushing RWA adoption hard), and are expanding into the U.S. market. Also, their Stobox 4 platform is launching soon (June), which should drive organic demand. It’s super early, sub-$3M market cap, so yeah, high risk, but potentially huge upside if RWAs actually take off this cycle. Not financial advice of course, but in this magical one-pick scenario, I’m betting on utility over memes.
I agree with you but for a different reason. Too many major institutions are getting involved in RWA tokenization. The pieces are falling into place for ETH and RWA by 2030 with low end bear estimates of $3 trillion net new inflows due to RWA by 2030
I know RWA tokenisation isn't worth 2 quadrillion that's for sure and anyone claiming that clearly has no idea what they are talking about.
Oh East Day, why do you always lie so much? Here's the title you posted: > **DTCC patent shows XRP and Hbar for RWA tokenization** estimated to be worth 2 Quadrillion dollars Are you just hoping that no one will actually read the patent? Because anyone who does will realize that it doesn't specifically mention "XRP" or "Hbar". Or Hedera... the closest I can see is section [0232] - which mentions 'hashgraph' in a list of different types of distributed ledger, stating: > ***Implementations of distributed ledger and/or blockchain technology including, but not limited to, BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, HASHGRAPH, BINANCE, FLOW, TRON, TEZOS, COSMOS, and/or RIPPLE are compatible with the present invention.*** So they aren't saying they are going to use XRP and Hbar, they only mention them in a list of different crypto technologies. And if you think that list is what they are going to use, then why did you just pick out two and not mention Tron, Tezos etc... or the network that currently supports almost the entire tokenized RWA ecosystem. Do you have no shame about so blatantly trying to mislead and manipulate people?
The real coins that will survive are the ones that have true decentralization. You can go figure what those coins are but Ethereum is one of the biggest of them, with BTC becoming increasingly centralized on fewer hands. Also the next big thing in crypto is going to be RWA tokenization on the blockchain, and the best candidate for that today, with the most advanced smart contracts and support for such functionality, is Ethereum. So add those two things together and you have a pretty good chance that ETH will stay relatively strong for the coming years, no matter what the FED rates will be.
EVM chains are going to beat Solana. Ethereum had a big update recently, zk roll ups and AggLayerd will bring more liquidity as money will flow inexpensivly from one evm chain to other. RWA are happening on L2's. What does Solana have? Memecoins? Lies? Influencers and paid articles on newsletters? You can always expeculat & "trade", but if you wanna INVEST there is not other way to go than Ethereum and L2's like Polygon.
naah real RWA project that legit already is performing transactions for a few years now is ALGORAND
Same here. After doing my own digging and following REM’s progress, I felt confident enough to invest too. What really stood out to me was how open and transparent the team has been — not just hyping the token, but actually showing what they’re building and who’s behind it. Feels like one of the few projects in the RWA space that’s putting in the real work, not just riding the trend. Let’s see where it goes — cautiously optimistic but definitely rooting for them.
Totally get where you’re coming from — a lot of RWA projects sound great on paper but hit serious walls when it comes to regulation and execution. The legal side is no joke, especially when you’re dealing with real property or services. That said, I’ve been following one called REM that’s trying to navigate that space more carefully. They’re working with legal partners upfront and already have some property-focused infrastructure going, especially in emerging markets where access to capital is limited but demand is real. It’s early, so I’m keeping expectations grounded, but they seem more focused on building than hype. Definitely agree most projects will struggle unless they take regulation seriously from day one. Curious if that one you mentioned is doing anything similar under the radar?
Keeta. It will be the future of RWA and on chain finance monetary payments.
One that’s flown under the radar for me is **REM** — it’s an RWA project but not doing the typical bonds or property tokenization. They’re focused on **real-world services and infrastructure** in emerging markets, which is a refreshing angle. Listed on MEXC, and the team is fully doxed. What stood out to me is they’re trying to make it possible for everyday users to own a slice of things like logistics or local projects — not just passive income plays for institutions. Might not be for everyone, but if you're into the utility-first RWA narrative, it’s worth watching. Their site has more if you're curious: [https://www.remmeta.ai](https://www.remmeta.ai)
If I had to pick only one, leaving BTC and ETH aside, I’d go with STBU (Stobox Utility Token). Why? It’s a tiny under-the-radar real-world asset (RWA) play. They’re building actual tokenization infrastructure for businesses, not just hype. They offer licensed services, have partnered with Plume (which is pushing RWA adoption hard), and are expanding into the U.S. market. Also, their Stobox 4 platform is launching soon (June), which should drive organic demand. It’s super early, sub-$3M market cap, so yeah, high risk, but potentially huge upside if RWAs actually take off this cycle. Not financial advice of course, but in this magical one-pick scenario, I’m betting on utility over memes.
StrikeX The company has just been majority bought by CMC Markets (a FTSE250 company) as the future of their RWA/tokenisation plan.
Ondo. Real use case. RWA. Institutional interest. High enough MC that it’s established. Low enough for exponential gains. ; )
tldr; The Arbitrum DAO has approved a $11.6 million allocation of 35 million ARB to tokenized U.S. Treasurys through Franklin Templeton, Spiko, and WisdomTree as part of its Stable Treasury Endowment Program (STEP). This initiative aims to diversify its treasury with real-world assets (RWAs) and deepen institutional involvement. Nearly 89% of participants voted in favor of the allocation, which is seen as a strategic move to position Arbitrum as a leading RWA platform and foster TradFi collaboration within the crypto ecosystem. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
/r/cc has been spammed by barrage of ETH Maxi posts like the current one and Triple Halving, Supply Crunch, Ultra Sound Money, DeFi, RWA all scam narratives that will drive ETH to $10K, $20K, etc and why it'll overtake BTC which ultimatley lead you off a cliff of loses or at best a massive missed opportunity cost of holding and making money on BTC. > The Ethereum triple halving and why ETH will easily overtake BTC in marketcap https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/p5m9eq/the_ethereum_triple_halving_and_why_eth_will/ > You've probably seen many ETH price predictions usually ranging from $10,000 to $20,000...but it would thus be erroneous to use BTC price predictions and apply them to ETH as it is almost always done with ETH price predictions. EIP-1559 and PoS will account for a reduction in ~90% in sell pressure due to the deflationary tokenomics and huge monetary incentive to stake ETH which in turn gives more illiquidity, implies the price of ETH could reach up to $150,000 in a best case scenario. https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/pen9od/the_ethereum_triple_halving_part_2/ > Let's clear up the facts around EIP-1559, the merge/triple halving and ЕТН becoming a deflationary asset...For over a decade now the crypto market cycles have revolved around the Bitcoin halvings when the supply of new coins going to miners halves. This is important because miners are majority sellers. They have electricity bills to pay https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/ofcxrn/lets_clear_up_the_facts_around_eip1559_the/ > Here are some simple calculations implications of POS' triple halving. ...ETH issuance goes down from 4% to 0.5% IMMEDIATELY. What took BTC 12 years to achieve, ETH is gonna do it in 1 block length! https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/oz5hkm/eth_has_managed_to_burn_4600_eth_24_hours_after/
> my thesis Hopium is not an investment thesis. Inversing /r/cc is not an investment thesis. You continue to be WRONG and COPE > ETH gains are back on the menu boys (Nov. 27, 2024) $3,600 https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1h1ge42/ethereum_price_breaks_3600_flashes_signal_that/lzbdr3b/ > ETH fudders in fucking shambles (Nov. 27, 2024) https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1h1ge42/ethereum_price_breaks_3600_flashes_signal_that/lzbe29o/ Every ETH Maxi thinks ETH will go to $10K but NOT one single ETH Maxi has been able to adequately answer 1 simple question I've been asking for months > **Who is buying ETH for $3,000+? That is insanely expensive.** Plus, insiders, developers, VCs got a ton of the supply for essentially free and have oligarchical privilege to print their own ETH for free and dump until perpetuity. And what does ETH even do? It's only a token in a digital casino and there are plenty of alternatives including subsidiary L2s and other cheaper casinos. > ETH maxis might call BTC a pet rock but that pet rock has established itself as digital gold. Institutions like Blackrock, Fidelity, publicly traded companies like Tesla, Microstrategy, Block, insurance giants like MassMutual, diverse secularized funds like Guggenheim Macro Fund, and billionaires Peter Thiel, Paul Tudor Jones, Stanley Druckenmiller, Bill Miller, not to mention nation states all hold and/or are buying huge amounts of BTC either for themselves on on the behalf of their investors. > **Who is buying ETH at $3K to make significant moves to a $400 Billion marketcap asset?** > https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1gujmk1/daily_crypto_discussion_november_19_2024_gmt0/lxzks6h/ Historically, BTC is what gave ETH value. BTC is what brought ETH capital, if you're new to crypto you've got to grasp this fact instead of cheerleading a failing investment > *"Bitcoin, because to me it seems like it's nothing more than a pet rock."* > That pet rock is what gives ETH and Alts value. ETH doesn't attract money and appreciate on its like all Alts; ETH ONLY appreciate and attract capital after money flows into BTC and flows out seeking more profit. > - Summer 2017, ETH hits ATH of $400 after BTC hits local top of $3,000 > - January 2018, ETH hits ATH of $1,400 after BTC hits cycle top of $20K > - May 2021, ETH hits ATH after BTC tops out in April 2021 > - Nov 2021. ETH hits ATH in December after BTC tops out in November 2021 > It's always BTC parabolic gains seeking profits and attracting attention and capital to the crypto space is the cause of appreciation. ETH is a Network Utility Token. That is all ETH is. It's competing with a many competing network utility tokens and many networks and L2s. These networks are increasingly going to be rails for stablecoins and such (97% of RWA are just stablecoins) and in order for the network to remain competitive they need to remain cheap. ETH is utility of being a rail for tokenized assets doesn't give it a $500 Billion marketcap -- ETHs value is derived from the money and investors that the pet rock brings. > https://np.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1gq6ahm/daily_general_discussion_november_13_2024/lwyql0m/ Now that BTC money flow to Alts has gone to a trickle......so how is ETH going to attract money? > The market is changing: ETFs, MSTR, etc account for a lot of the inflows. This money is not going to leave BTC seeking greater return on Alts (Nov. 13, 2024) https://np.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1gq6ahm/daily_general_discussion_november_13_2024/lwymxl9/ > Be careful of people telling you this cycle is playing out exactly the same. ETFs, institutional and mainstream involvement, memecoins, L2 options and ETH competitors, it's very different (Nov. 19, 2024) https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1gujmk1/daily_crypto_discussion_november_19_2024_gmt0/lxyt5pw/
I personally don't like Dot 👎🏽 💢Parachains are useless and there's a lot of supply to unlock!💢 I wouldn't buy BTC at 90, but I would diversify my portfolio with altcoins by doing DCA and different niches: memes, AI, utility, RWA. That's my advice! 😉🤙🏽
> they stopped using it because DLT is a meme. ETH network is not exempt from this That's an interesting claim, but then how do you explain: - Visa's 'Real World Asset' tokenization platform; - Blackrock's tokenized securities platform; - UBS's tokenized investment platform; - Wisdom Tree's RWA tokenization platform; - Deutsche Bank's L2; - Sony/Samsung's L2; - Paypal's stablecoin business payment system; etc etc... Why would those companies build their financial applications on 'a meme'?
Ain’t no way I’m sleeping on this. $WHITE on XRPL feels like one of those plays people regret missing. RWA on-chain just makes too much sense, fr.
For me too. Holding Tsuki and RWA feels like being pre rich. community is super awesome. a good community is the pillar for a successful coin in crypo. check. now time will tell when this will send
Most people think bitcoin represents all of crypto which is false. Layer 1 blockchains like Hedera are the foundation for the next internet (Web3) and will be used to create secure, decentralized trust as well as DeFi, RWA, tokenization, and thousands of other business use cases. Bitcoin will also be used but it’s not limited to BTC.
No question about that. RWA is setting up to be the biggest new narrative in crypto
Diversify your cryptos into different classifications and wallets: Risky/Less risky and different niches: memes, RWA... Consider taking more risks and having multiple wallets! 💯 With more risks, you can have more profits. Just use a small percentage that you're willing to lose✨ Good luck! 😉🍀
I love it, I'm living the foundations of the new #RWA tokenization revolution, this is historic! 💯🔥
The new #RWA trend is evident! 🤯 The good times are about to begin, so much money is coming in🚀 Get ready for the best! 📈🔥
And people ask me, why are you constantly posting anti-ETH stuff? I didn't until the past few of years when mETH Heads started constantly scamming people with this Triple Halving, DeFI, RWA trash narratives while attacking BTC as a Pet Rock and security budget that is about to doom it. > Bitcoin has another security budget problem not related to halving https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1ce7i0x/bitcoin_has_another_security_budget_problem_not/ > Why Proof of Work does not provide enough security for Bitcoin to become digital gold at the sovereign level https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/13rj84h/why_proof_of_work_does_not_provide_enough/
Yet the RWA sector keeps growing, with recent estimations hinting at even further growth, as platforms like Vaulta get positioned as key foundational layers that'll contribute to unlock liquidity across every facet, be it real estate, commodities, or arts RWA potential is apparent, you just have to hold the right assets
given OP's post and how far they are from the realities of RWA and it's position in the future of finance, i wouldn't waste your energy attempting to explain lol
Most listed coins in Binance only have hype and no real utility....idk why most with utility and volume like WhiteRock ( tokenizes RWA) are undervalued
**RWA tokens are getting more interesting! Which protocols do you see as promising?**
Diversification is a good idea ACROSS asset classes. In theory, it helps reduce risk. Stocks, real estate, cash/cash equivalents, bonds… etc. help prevent you from going belly up in the event of a negative event by balancing risk. Cryptocurrencies as an asset classes are concentrated risk already, non-BTC crypto is hyper-concentrated risk. Diversification within the crypto asset classes is a bad idea. That said, I have a little bit outside BTC in the hopes of getting lucky in RWA for example.
Both assets are still relevant, in my opinion. XRP needs no introduction at this point, neither does EOS tbh, as its network stays essential, being a key infrastructure layer for RWA, and a driving force behind the creation of a more inclusive financial ecosystem through web3 banking Make necessary findings, and get yourselves up to date
Right now it doesn't. Because you need to be able to execute smart contracts on chain and Bitcoin refused (and likely will continue to refuse) extending block size to accommodate for that. Now, can this change? Maybe. But as of today Bitcoin cannot join in the fun of RWA. Chainlink is mainly built on Ethereum and can cross chain with anything that has an EVM or similar.
One year holding, and conviction is 1000% $TSUKI $RWA
idk, the metrics with backrock and their buidl fund point toward ethereum being the institutional preference: [https://app.rwa.xyz/assets/BUIDL](https://app.rwa.xyz/assets/BUIDL) over 93% of all RWA's are on ethereum mainnet (not even including layer2's). right now that's over $2.7B in assets tokenized and managed by the world's biggest money manager all on ethereum mainnet alone. in comparison you have a little over $20 million for the same fund with solana. I think it's clear that retail likes to use solana for trading meme coins and little casino activities - but if you want to see real liquidity and tvl, you look toward ethereum (not including the fact most layer2's already compete with solana - with arbitrum actually being faster/cheaper already). solana can compete with layer2's perhaps, but there isn't a comparison with ethereum if you really want to look at real world utility (RWA's) and defi (ethereum defi is roughly 8x the closest competitor solana - info here: https://defillama.com/chains) solana doesn't even come close.
I see no one's answering you, and I want to make a contribution! 💯 I advise you to do your research before investing your money anywhere. Diversify into several projects. From different niches/networks. Create more than one wallet, and among them, create one that's lower risk and secure (e.g., RWA Projects) and another that's higher risk (e.g., memes). If you have any questions, I'll read you here. Good luck on your crypto adventure! 🤙🏽
Love the cultural energy around $HOUSE, and no doubt the housing crisis angle resonates with a lot of people. That said, I sometimes wonder why so much capital flows into meme-driven RWAs when we have real utility tokens like $STBU (Stobox) quietly building in the background. STBU has an accredited platform, licensed to tokenize real assets, and claims $500M+ AUM with a market cap of only ~3 million, but barely anyone’s paying attention because it doesn’t have the meme hype or viral marketing. If you ask me, that's the real gem! I get the appeal of the movement and the memes, but part of me thinks we’re overlooking serious utility plays that are already delivering on the RWA narrative.
$CREDI Great RWA project which continue to build from Bear market 2021
Totally agree — it’s wild how short-term everyone’s thinking has become. The whole “flip for quick gains” mindset feels more like gambling than investing. People forget that even solid projects need time to mature, especially in spaces like RWA or infrastructure tokens that aren’t built on hype alone. I’ve been leaning more into the idea of holding positions that actually align with longer-term shifts — like the real-world asset narrative that’s just getting started. There are a few early-stage tokens (like REM on MEXC, for example) that aren’t flashy but seem to be building for real-world use. Not saying it’s guaranteed gold, but it’s the kind of thing I’d rather hold and watch unfold instead of jumping ship for the next meme pump. In the end, patience isn’t just a virtue — it’s an edge. Most people trade their edge away because they get bored too fast.
Most RWA’s are secured on Ethereum and so ETH will provide broad exposure to these More value tokenised onchain requires more economic security
Probably going to get downvoted but $ALGO has tons of #RWA use cases: * Lofty * TravelX * Vesta Equity * Meld Gold * ANote Music * Agrotoken * Asia Broadband * Archax * Koibanx * ClimateTrade * Ctrl Alt * [Book.io](http://Book.io) * AssetBlock * Exodus * Ureca * Wholechain * DUST Identity * Hesabpay Take a look!
Chainlink is a decentralized oracle network that solves a critical problem for smart contracts: they can’t access real-world data on their own. Smart contracts are like vending machines—programmed to act when conditions are met—but without a way to know things like stock prices, weather, or sports results, their use is limited. Chainlink bridges this gap by securely feeding off-chain data (e.g., market prices, IoT events, or bank transactions) to blockchains, enabling smart contracts to power real-world applications. Here’s why I think Chainlink is not just a buzzword but actually set to be widely adopted and thrive: It’s Already Powering Major Industries: Chainlink isn’t theoretical—it’s live and critical to DeFi, NFTs, and beyond. For example, DeFi protocols like Aave and Synthetix use Chainlink’s Price Feeds to secure billions in value, ensuring accurate crypto prices for lending or trading. Outside crypto, SWIFT, the global banking network connecting 11,000+ institutions, uses Chainlink for corporate actions data, like dividend payments. Projects like Backed use Chainlink Proof of Reserve to verify tokenized assets are fully collateralized, building trust in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. These integrations show Chainlink’s tech is battle-tested and trusted by both crypto natives and traditional finance. Smart Contracts Are the Future, and Chainlink Is Essential: Smart contracts are growing fast—think automated insurance payouts, supply chain tracking, or tokenized bonds. McKinsey estimates blockchain-based smart contracts could save businesses $50B annually by 2030 through efficiency gains. But smart contracts are useless without reliable data. Chainlink’s decentralized oracles provide tamper-proof data from multiple sources, unlike centralized oracles that risk single points of failure. For instance, Chainlink’s Verifiable Random Function (VRF) ensures fair NFT minting or gaming outcomes, used by projects like Aavegotchi. As smart contracts become a global standard, Chainlink’s role as the “data backbone” makes it indispensable. Institutional and Cross-Chain Adoption Is Accelerating: Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) is a game-changer, enabling secure data and asset transfers across blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche. This is huge as the blockchain space moves toward interoperability. Major players like Fidelity and Sygnum use Chainlink for net asset value (NAV) data in tokenized funds, while Elixir’s $180M+ TVL protocol uses CCIP for cross-chain deUSD transfers. The Monetary Authority of Singapore’s Project Guardian, involving global banks, leverages Chainlink for tokenized asset use cases. With 18 integrations across 20 chains recently, Chainlink’s network effect is growing, locking in adoption as more projects build on its infrastructure. Economic Incentives and Security Drive Trust: Chainlink’s model incentivizes node operators to provide accurate data by staking LINK tokens, which they lose if they act dishonestly. This cryptoeconomic security, combined with decentralized data aggregation from multiple sources, makes Chainlink more reliable than competitors. Its $8.5T+ in transaction value enabled (TVE) and 1,000+ oracle networks show scale and reliability. Unlike niche oracle solutions, Chainlink’s full-stack platform (data feeds, VRF, CCIP, automation) makes it a one-stop shop, reducing fragmentation and boosting adoption. It Solves Real Problems for Enterprises: Beyond crypto, Chainlink enables enterprises to integrate blockchain without holding crypto directly. For example, Deutsche Telekom runs Chainlink nodes, and Google Cloud integrates with Chainlink for hybrid cloud solutions. Chainlink’s ability to format APIs for smart contracts means any business with data—think weather agencies, logistics firms, or banks—can plug into blockchains. This lowers barriers to entry, making Chainlink a gateway for mainstream blockchain adoption. Why It’ll Flourish: The global smart contract market is projected to grow at a 32% CAGR through 2030, driven by DeFi, RWAs, and enterprise use. Chainlink’s first-mover advantage, extensive partnerships (1,000+ projects), and blockchain-agnostic design position it as the default oracle layer. Competitors exist, but none match Chainlink’s scale, security, or ecosystem. Risks like price volatility or regulatory hurdles remain, but its utility and adoption are hard to ignore. If you’re betting on smart contracts reshaping finance, supply chains, or gaming, Chainlink’s a core piece of that puzzle
You wont profit much risk on low caps no risk no ferari and follow the AI and RWA trend and if you are feeling more riskier go for meme coins
I would suggest that you are witnessing another Sovereign Wealth Fund exercising its move into the “Orange Triangle” Bitcoin-Stable-coin-crypto ecosystem Soon (now) to include RWA, stonks, treasuries and real estate and which has already begun. 🤷🏼♂️
> ETH might pump to 10k in this altseason Only those scammed by the Bankless Scammers and Triple Halving Trolls believe this. $10K ETH is a $1.2 Trillion marketcap. There isn't any corporate, institutional and big money billionaire interest in ETH to reach that marketcap. And dump retail money is capitulating and realizing they got scammed with Triple Halving, Supply Crunch, DeFi and RWA narratives.
Yes, but ETH investors are a special kind of stupid. They believe that: - BTC is a pet rock - ETH has fundamentals - But ETH will only go up when BTC goes up - $120 Billion in the ETFs have no effect on price > *"ETFs, MSTR, etc account for a lot of the inflows. This money is not going to leave BTC seeking greater return on Alts"* > I argue that the ETFs don't change the price at all. We have seen it for enough months: no price increase the days the ETFs have big inflows (BTC as well as ETH). /u/barthib > It is quite evident from several of your posts that you have absolutely no clue about the asset management industry, eth issuance and how etfs operate under the hood. Please avoid making up stuff until you do some reading on the same. Myself, I work in the asset management industry. /u/aaj094 https://np.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1gq6ahm/daily_general_discussion_november_13_2024/lwymxl9/ > *"Long term Ethereum is overvalued and has to fall below 0.01 BTC where it started because it is an Alt and every single Alt has followed that rule"* > *"Looking back at all most successful Alts:*" > - *"LTC started at 0.03 BTC in early 2013. It pumped and dumped and currently sits at 0.001*" > - *"XRP started at 5594 sats in 2013. It pumped and dumped and currently sits at 959 sats*" > - *"XMR started at 0.003 in 2014. It pumped and dumped and currently sits at 0.003*" > - *"ETH started at 0.01 in 2015. It's pumped to 0.15 and dumped to a current value of 0.04 which is still 4X higher than its initial value*" > Thank you for a good laugh, now please get some psychiatric help. /u/Tricky_Troll > Oops, a kid escaped from the Bitcoin brainwashing school /u/barthib > Wow, so your entire argument is to ignore all revenue fundamentals /u/LogrisTheBard https://np.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1f9ef5k/comment/llmkgtm/ > "I don't own any Bitcoin, because to me it seems like it's nothing more than a **pet rock.** But if they're making new ATH's, soon ETH will too. Soon as in a couple of weeks or months. Ray will crush it. We're all gonna make it. Don't be jealous about a **pet rock** or some unstable centralized coin because of price action." /u/LifelongHODL > *"That pet rock is what gives ETH and Alts value. ETH doesn't attract money and appreciate on its like all Alts; ETH ONLY appreciate and attract capital after money flows into BTC and flows out seeking more profit."* > - *"Summer 2017, ETH hits ATH of $400 after BTC hits local top of $3,000"* > - *"January 2018, ETH hits ATH of $1,400 after BTC hits cycle top of $20K"* > - *"May 2021, ETH hits ATH after BTC tops out in April 2021"* > - *"Nov 2021. ETH hits ATH in December after BTC tops out in November 2021"* > *"It's always BTC parabolic gains seeking profits and attracting attention and capital to the crypto space is the cause of appreciation. ETH is a Network Utility Token. That is all ETH is. It's competing with a many competing network utility tokens and many networks and L2s. These networks are increasingly going to be rails for stablecoins and such (97% of RWA are just stablecoins) and in order for the network to remain competitive they need to remain cheap. ETH is utility of being a rail for tokenized assets doesn't give it a $500 Billion marketcap -- ETHs value is derived from the money and investors that the pet rock brings"* https://np.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1gq6ahm/comment/lwymbri/
Isn't btc the same, apart having the digital gold label? LINK, HBAR, TAO for e.g have their RWA so not sure how they're zero use....
tldr; Ant Digital has launched Jovay, a Layer2 blockchain designed for Real-World Asset (RWA) transactions in overseas markets. Jovay supports 100,000 transactions per second (TPS) and a 100-millisecond response time. It utilizes TEE and zk dual proof systems, enabling seamless integration with Layer1 blockchains like Ethereum. The platform aims to transform global new energy assets into tradable digital assets. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Dextf is a low cap that is working with Deutsche bank on an RWA platform. Highly undervalued.
When I saw TSUKI back then with all its connection I was hooked. Evey single day I open up the Telegram group to see what kind of new clues the community found about TSUKI. Feels like Newspaper behavior 😆 When TSUKI dropped RWA (TheRoaringAi) an AI agent that predicts the future with astonishing accuracy, I couldnt fk*** believe that I invested into one of the smartest projects that exist in crypto space. Most suddenly big influencers started talking about it like Kyle Chasse or Virtual Bacon. It is is just a matter of time..not if, but when more big influencers are catching the train. And we are just 1mil+ MarketCap. Better hop on the train now before it is to late!!
TSUKI x RWA are easily the most undervalued projects in crypto! Don’t miss your opportunity to get in cheap.
I was hella skeptic but figured I would regret atleast not putting 10$ into this IF there was a chance everything that's being said turns out to be true. Here I am almost a year later, turned my 10$ to $1300 thanks to being early in TSUKI & RWA. taken about 300$ in profit (so a 30x from my initial investment) and holding the remaining \~$1000 fully convicted now that it will someday be worth $100000 if not more. and even if it's not, I still made my 30x.
Best memecoin community for sure! Everyone is united and has strong conviction. We're not here for a 2-20x, we're here for the day everyone on CT wants $TSUKI and $RWA!
Tsuki x RWA one of the best projects out there. We've been going strong for about 1 year and our one year anniversary is on 5/11.
are starting to bring RWA on chains like Polygon
TSUKI x RWA almost 1 year going strong, we’ve got history. If you’re reading this, join the Tsuki community and be a part of the Tsuki community’s future. It’s a good community with good people.
no one is going to tokenize RWA on Bitcoin because it's not possible
Q4 2025 and itt will be very short. De-Fi, RWA and AI will prevail. Take your profit as quick as you can, and leave the table. Get back to the 4 year cycle Bitcoin dip and buy. Don't expect the same returns anymore.
Still don't see anything happening until September onwards. A couple of (RWA) things could go on a run in May but not sure how long it would sustain, and by the time you've realised which ones it is, it'll be too late :D
>> Do you really think calling people 'mETH heads' and DeFi a 'shitcoin casino' makes you sound smarter or somehow strengthens your argument? >The DeFi shitcoin narrative has resulted in EVERY single investor falling for the meme losing money on DeFi shitcoins of which EVERY single one is at a loss from 4 years ago. Someone needs to talk common sense instead of /r/cc circlejerking itself to DeFi off a cliff >> stablecoins >Stablecoins are crypto's killer use case and besides BTC, the only other asset that is growing long term. These networks are just rails and not investments >> lending >overcollaterlized loans using volatile crypto as leverage to gamble on shitcoins. Nobody is getting a loan for a car, a mortgage, etc with the DeFi meme >> tokenization >97% just stablecoins. Some niche case pilots for treasuries but shilled to death as RWA are the future and leading people to huge losses >> Billions in real-world value flow through Ethereum daily, enabling financial tools without banks, borders, or gatekeepers. >Besides value moved around in trading as with all cryptos, again rails for stablecoins. Doesn't mean ETH is an investment or has to go up in value. Tron dominates developing countries btw. And it doesn't mean this shitcoin tokens that are being shilled will go up in value. >> Ethereum will have to scale and that has seen the rise of L2/sidechains which results in loss transaction fees and MEV tips essentially stealing value from ETH. This essentially turns Ethereum, Solana, BSC, Tron, L2/Sidechains, etc into competing networks for DeFi casinos and rails for StablecCoin transfers where they have to remain cheap or utility and users will move to competing chains >https://np.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1f9ef5k/daily_general_discussion_september_5_2024/llmkgtm/ Okay so it feels like you’re making up arguments and then answering them yourself, weird but ok. This conversation is not about token prices or investments so I'm not sure what you're trying to do here, I'm not having another "my crypto is better than yours situation". Calling DeFi a “shitcoin casino” or Ethereum a “pure investment vehicle” completely misses the point. We started with “Ethereum is dead,” yet it powers a multibillion dollar DeFi world: stablecoin rails, tokenized assets, permissionless lending ecc... That's not a meme coin casino. Stablecoins as investments? That is like calling roads investments instead of infrastructure. Ethereum is a utility platform powering real economic activity, if you're only after price what's the point to even discuss anything.
> Do you really think calling people 'mETH heads' and DeFi a 'shitcoin casino' makes you sound smarter or somehow strengthens your argument? The DeFi shitcoin narrative has resulted in EVERY single investor falling for meme losing money on DeFi shitcoins of which EVERY single one is at a loss from 4 years ago. Someone needs to talk common sense instead of /r/cc circlejerking itself to DeFi off a cliff > stablecoins Stablecoins are crypto's killer use case and besides BTC, the only other asset that is growing long term. These networks are just rails and not investments > lending overcollaterlized loans using volatile crypto as leverage to gamble on shitcoins. Nobody is getting a loan for a car, a mortgage, etc with the DeFi meme > tokenization 97% just stablecoins. Some niche case pilots for treasuries but shilled to death as RWA are the future and leading people to huge losses > Billions in real-world value flow through Ethereum daily, enabling financial tools without banks, borders, or gatekeepers. Besides value moved around in trading as with all cryptos, again rails for stablecoins. Doesn't mean ETH is an investment or has to go up in value. Tron dominates developing countries btw. And it doesn't mean this shitcoin tokens that are being shilled will go up in value. > Ethereum will have to scale and that has seen the rise of L2/sidechains which results in loss transaction fees and MEV tips essentially stealing value from ETH. This essentially turns Ethereum, Solana, BSC, Tron, L2/Sidechains, etc into competing networks for DeFi casinos and rails for StablecCoin transfers where they have to remain cheap or utility and users will move to competing chains https://np.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1f9ef5k/daily_general_discussion_september_5_2024/llmkgtm/
For RWA especially, it seems like there really couldn’t effectively be very many L1s. Unless I’m misunderstanding something?
I agree with your first point. Bitcoin is slow and near ossified. Ethereum gives a space for developers to try out new ideas, rapidly iterating. However I also started thinking that if a good idea does come out, it will most certainly be copied back to Bitcoin. The two will compete, and who will win? Probably the most established network. And you're right, my stance is near fundamentalist. If you want to accuse me of throwing the baby out with the bathwater you may be right. I never want to be that guy in 1890 who wanted to close the patent office because everything had already been invented. So if a successful project does emerge from DeFi I'll eat my words. But one hasn't. It's been 10 years. All the good ideas, like the decentralized Uber, the RWA tokenization, etc have not materialized. Why should they? Why would a title company trust the Ethereum Foundation run by a bunch of young goobers for societies most important assets? None of the smart contract chains are remotely decentralized. I'll believe Ethereum is when they remove the difficulty bomb, set the monetary policy, and don't touch it for 10 years. Unfortunately as of today, they keep introducing new 5 year roadmaps. I think they've succumbed to the human desire to tweak and improve. The Ethereum Foundation is akin to the Federal Reserve, an unelected board of governors who act on their own self interests. So I think we're in agreement all over the place. I also agree Ethereum isn't investable right now. If it *does* become investable, we'll be able to see it coming. People keyed in to the potential of the internet could see Amazon was doing something big, even during its many years of negative profits and 80% drawdowns.
Copium for ETH holders, like me, but this game is too early to call. There's no reason that RWA need to crystallize on one chain.
This question doesn't really make sense, especially without being able to name specific chains. They are important, but the context and specificity matter. If you mean, how much does a chain's implementation of native assets matter, then it does a bit. Both Paypal and one of the institutions tokenizing RWA's (can't remember which one, was either Societe Generale, Standard Chartered, or Franklin Templeton I believe) noted that Solana's token extensions were features that helped them choose Solana. On the flipside, a chain like Cardano has more restrictions on native assets and it has prevented the major stablecoins USDC and USDT from being issued there natively.
ALT narratives projected to do well this cycle include: AI, gaming, and RWA. Layer 1’s tend to be a safe bet as well.
> VRF used by individual players within gaming environments. [https://pentagon.games/](https://pentagon.games/) >[https://ccip.chain.link/](https://ccip.chain.link/) >Operates wallet to wallet on the majority of txs. Only differs when it has taken over things like ronin bridge or whatever. You obviously don't understand what B2B means. All the B2C is the app. Link is the B2B infra powering the app. By your logic, all wholesalers are B2C because their input eventually ends up in a product consumed by the end consumer. > [https://chain.link/education-hub/proof-of-reserves](https://chain.link/education-hub/proof-of-reserves) Exactly like I thought. You thought you could get away with smashing a bunch of buzzwords to pass an argument. The link proves it. You don't even read your own link. Let me quote: > To power the TUSD Proof of Reserve reference feed, Chainlink oracles fetch data from The Network Firm, which performs regular reviews of TrustToken’s escrowed bank accounts. All the auditing is done off-chain. All Link does is feed info provided by the issuer, not verify it. Any oracle can do that. > Read the stablecoin act. Try reading your provided material first. > So you agree, the value capture is not on the L1. It is data and protocol level? How the fuck did you get that from reading what I wrote? Somehow you think vertical integration of protocol and data value capture means there is no value capture at the L1? WTF? The L1 value capture is always at the social level. Without any network effect on the L1, no one gives a fuck about your RWA and other Oracle nonsense, because ppl will just use TradFi platforms for cheaper and easier access to the same asset classes provided by RWA. > Traps you in the chainlink standard, on whatever chain/s you want. LOL. No. Assets are tokenized at the DA and execution layer. ChainLink does neither. The messaging protocol doesn't tokenize an asset. It simply sends messages across chains to mint and burn tokenized assets. You don't even understand the basic modules of a blockchain, and here you are trying to pretend otherwise. Why do you want to embarrass yourself like this? > The value in blockchain is cost savings and freeing up illiquid assets? I don't know what you are talking about. Throughout crypto history, the market has resoundingly said that the value provides a decentralized SoV. Blockchain doesn't cut costs and UX complexity. These trappings come from securing a decentralized SoV and self-sovereign assets. That means everything else is secondary. RWA is not even self-soveriegn by the very design. > Are you trolling me? You don't seem to know a lot about Chainlink, but you are acting as if you do. I am tired of this retarded discussion. You have a very cursory understanding of things. Have no more energy and time left to educate you.
>Wrong again. CCIP users are the bridging protocols. But that vertical has much more competition, from LayerZero to other intent-based protocols. VRF is again used by apps to generate random outputs. VRF used by individual players within gaming environments. https://pentagon.games/ https://ccip.chain.link/ Operates wallet to wallet on the majority of txs. Only differs when it has taken over things like ronin bridge or whatever. >WTF are you talking about? Proof of reserves is done at the off-chain level, either via some Merkle tree proof or a third party audit. https://chain.link/education-hub/proof-of-reserves The result of proof of reserves is pushed to protocols using the stables. Risk management. Read the stablecoin act. >They want closer integration of value capture across their portfolio. For example, if they own a protocol issuing real estate RWA, they want to make sure the same protocol is using an oracle they own So you agree, the value capture is not on the L1. It is data and protocol level? >The one who owns downstream and upstream supply chains has the market power to decide who owns the middle. If they own the asset issuing base and the customer relationship, then they have the market power to decide on the oracle. >Link doesn't issue assets. Those who issue assets will favor the oracle they own and use it instead. Link has no moat here. You can tokenize assets using Chainlink. Bakes in their cross-chain token standard. Traps you in the chainlink standard, on whatever chain/s you want. https://tokenmanager.chain.link/ Tokenmanager is a beta for CRE(chainlink runtime environment). Which will be pushed out by SWIFT. I suspect it is being used by DTCC based on their previous work together on [NAV data](https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2024/may/16/smart-nav-pilot-report-bringing-trusted-data-to-the-blockchain-ecosystem). >The data is pretty strong in showing where blockchain "yield" happens. It is at the SoV value. You all trying to gaslight ppl into overvaluing basic TradFi stuff at higher premium without justification. The primary attraction is crypto native assets. Off chain assets are secondary in interest and have better Web 2 outlets to provide better UX and exchange fluidity. Isn't the entire aim to bring those assets on chain? The value in blockchain is cost savings and freeing up illiquid assets? Are you trolling me? You don't seem to know a lot about Chainlink, but you are acting as if you do.
> Depends on the product; data streams, VRF, CCIP. Can all be considered a per user basis. > Wrong again. CCIP users are the bridging protocols. But that vertical has much more competition, from LayerZero to other intent-based protocols. VRF is again used by apps to generate random outputs. > Currently the only oracle in town equipped to provide proof of reserves/liability. WTF are you talking about? Proof of reserves is done at the off-chain level, either via some Merkle tree proof or a third party audit. > Which is required via the stablecoin act. You can't audit a stablecoin reserve with an oracle. WTF are you on about? For example, there is no way ChainLink can know if Circle has enough treasury bills unless ChainLink can access Circle's accounting books. Using random buzzwords to faze ppl into a nonsensical argument doesn't work here bud. > They understand where the value lies. They want closer integration of value capture across their portfolio. For example, if they own a protocol issuing real estate RWA, they want to make sure the same protocol is using an oracle they own. It is called ***VERTICAL INTEGRATION*** in business lingo - read it up, bud. > I personally think it is too late for them now. The one who owns downstream and upstream supply chains has the market power to decide who owns the middle. If they own the asset issuing base and the customer relationship, then they have the market power to decide on the oracle. > Settlement will be free. It is low in fees but not interchangeable. Hence, you get a sticky network effect. Interop solutions are being pushed hard to compete at low margins and become more composable. Hence, they will become more substitutable. > Value will only enter public permissionless chains to interact with protocols for yield The data is pretty strong in showing where blockchain "yield" happens. It is at the SoV value. You all trying to gaslight ppl into overvaluing basic TradFi stuff at higher premium without justification. The primary attraction is crypto native assets. Off chain assets are secondary in interest and have better Web 2 outlets to provide better UX and exchange fluidity.
Here hoping that the RWA narrative is still going strong.
Totally fair take—and one a lot of long-time DOT holders are quietly sharing right now. You’re not alone in feeling that Polkadot’s momentum in terms of hype and narrative has cooled off, while Chainlink’s narrative is heating up again, especially around CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol). Here’s a breakdown to help you think it through: ⸻ Polkadot vs. Chainlink: Current Sentiment & Traction Polkadot (DOT) • Strengths: • Solid tech (shared security, parachains). • A dedicated dev community (Substrate framework is still used a lot). • Active in Web3 governance and cross-chain communication (XCM). • Weaknesses: • Sluggish adoption of parachains by killer apps. • Governance changes and the move to Polkadot 2.0 confused many holders. • Lack of hype and media buzz—it’s become more of an “infra” project, not a shiny consumer-facing ecosystem. Chainlink (LINK) • Strengths: • CCIP is gaining real traction—big names like SWIFT, DTCC, and tokenized asset platforms are experimenting or integrating it. • Chainlink’s oracle dominance is unmatched. • Maintains strong partnerships and buzz, especially in the real-world asset (RWA) narrative. • Weaknesses: • Centralization concerns (Oracle committees). • Some argue it’s more enterprise-facing than retail-focused. • Still working on fee/value accrual mechanisms for LINK token holders. ⸻ Community & Hype Shift • LINK’s hype is back, especially among DeFi and TradFi crossover folks. • DOT feels like it’s drifting—some of its original backers have shifted attention to other chains like Cosmos, Near, or modular solutions like Celestia. ⸻ If You’re Considering Rotating DOT into LINK • From a narrative momentum perspective, LINK is arguably in a much better position in 2025. • That said, DOT is probably undervalued on a purely tech basis—if Polkadot 2.0 ever clicks or parachains take off, it could be a sleeper. • If you’re more into momentum and growth narratives, LINK might feel more “alive.” • If you’re still a believer in long-term infrastructure bets, keeping some DOT or rotating only part might make sense. ⸻
Don’t listen to Gullible do some research mate , XDC is well overlooked. They will do big things. They just got a deal with Liqi to tokenise 500mil worth RWA. This is one of many things, they are ticking boxes everywhere. All the ISO coins should do well. This fella saying they are shit coins is obviously a bitcoin maxi, XRP (Jake Claver Lover) or into meme coins.
Guys remember to listen to /r/cc and buy the cheaper, faster coin with smart contracts. Everyone knows that the everyday person cannot live without Smart Contracts, DeFi and RWA even though they've never heard of these things or your shitcoin. > **Would you rather hold 1 BTC or 10 ETH and why? (From 2018)** > 10 ETH. ETH is more usable than BTC. I'm not a fan of BTC after the "store of value" ridiculousness. > ETH definitely. BTC only holds the value it does because of exchanges, and some sites which don't offer alternatives (very few nowadays), the digital gold argument is stupid > ETH it's cheaper so more potential profit. > **If you think BTC is more likely to reach 40,000 than ETH reaching 2,600 you're lying to yourself** > 10ETH. It is faster, cheaper and supports DAP's. It will also eventually switch off mining which I feel will be a step forward for crypto. > https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/83olas/would_you_rather_hold_1_btc_or_10_eth_and_why/
Might as well merge RWA, DePin, DeSci, DesPacito, and all other buzzwords
Here is the catch. Triple Halving, Supply Crunch, Ultra-Sound Money, DeFI, RWA, Oracles, Nostro Vostro, Parachains, Supply Chain, etc are also memes.
got myself a nice position of $PALM on cardano. new RWA coin with a lot going for it.
No one can say what will be around in 40-50 years. We are in very interesting times where we are seeing advances in technology accelerating and rapid iterations across every industry. The best you can do, is keep your ear to the ground and adjust your investments wisely throughout your life. The likes of BTC, Eth, Sol, Ada, etc are all worth watching but realistically they could all go to zero in 10-15 years. The higher up the risk curve you go, the quicker it could happen. You have projects like TAO that could be well position for AI or Chainlink, Ondo Stellar and Algo that may be able to gain market share with RWA being brought onchain. Just like the dot com bubble, there are many opportunities, but only a few companies will manage to snag the market and we won't see strong investment until they cement themselves into the industry.
Those are still centralized in certain aspects, right? You don't own the real estate, you invest in the token of a company that handles things and pays you according to your "ownership". I might be wrong of course. Nonetheless, EQTY by LTO introduces legal contracts that are notarized in the real world embedded in the RWA. And makes this fully decentralized. Eventually, everyone will be able to create a real world asset (get it vetted and notarized) and put it on the market. As I understand it from the sneakpeeks, each RWA will get its own token (supply), which in turn can interact with each other through dexes. It opens up wild possibilities and new forms of liquidity and speculations. Tokenize a racing team and let people share in its winnings. Real estate is just one example and while a huge market, I think a wider structure is more appropriate for a layer-1 like LTO Network.
RWA's are really where the big money for the future of blockchain's is going to be, but this subreddit could care less about that.
When their Blockchain is finalized, I think it's over for the rest of crypto esp RWA tokens
I find the concept behind $WHITE and tokenized RWAs quite compelling especially with real-world utility like the debit card use case you mentioned. If the project maintains regulatory compliance and scales adoption it could gain traction. Personally I would keep an eye on other RWA plays like Ondo $ONDO and Polymesh $POLYX as well for diversification.
$ozk. it's backed by solid investment like Animoca. You can find the information of their whole team on LinkedIn, very transparent, promising L2 solution in the RWA domain.
CHEX, the best RWA play. Give that a read: https://x.com/Trim_Bot/status/1912159952707203155?t=oNUgXTFVLU__w6jE13yn8w&s=19
XRP. It IS decentralized. Ripple is not. People always get that wrong. It’s the future of global trade and finance. Currently number 3 crypto built by bitcoiners. Relationships with 300 institutions, partners with BofA, 7% of South Korea uses it almost daily. Japan lowered taxes on XRP from 50% to 15% and 80% of their banks have been approved to use it. UAE and India just completed an oil deal using it. Candidate for the FedNow system. Possible replacement of the SWIFT system but more likely, SWIFT will integrate XRP to stay relevant. Named first for the US crypto stockpile. Connections with WEF, IMF, and many governments. Likely to surpass ETH and has versatile functionality. 19 ETF’s filed, Tokenization of RWA, cross border payments, NFC’s, DeFi getting there, leveraged trading now available. There’s too much to list. It’s the chosen coin. I have high coinfidance in its future.
May: PECTRA update comes and allows validator staking >2000 eth, making it fantastically easier for whales/institutions June: US fed rates may go lower than the eth staking APY July: ETH ETF staking may be approved and all the etf providers rushing for a form amendament to allow staking. Further things down the line: RWA's coming on-chain( Fidelity, Blackrock, BNY mellon) and stablecoin growth. Scaling the L1 is \*now\* primary focus of vitalik's EF as well as the new EF. - Increase speed, lower fees even more, increase burn. MegaETH is becoming a better Solana than Solana.
$CHEX, the only RWA with multiple licenses
It really isn't but okay. I hold both anyway. Eth crushes in stablecoin stored onchain, TVL, RWA to name a few.
I've been provoked by mETH Heads spam long winded posts with attached 20 page PDF propaganda based on mETH Head napkin math memanomic theory and meme fundamentals like Triple Halving, Supply Crunch, DeFI, RWA leading noobs off a cliff to losses that has been posted here year after year. **Here is Propaganda:** > The Ethereum triple halving and why ETH will easily overtake BTC in marketcap https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/p5m9eq/the_ethereum_triple_halving_and_why_eth_will/ > You've probably seen many ETH price predictions usually ranging from $10,000 to $20,000...but it would thus be erroneous to use BTC price predictions and apply them to ETH as it is almost always done with ETH price predictions. EIP-1559 and PoS will account for a reduction in ~90% in sell pressure due to the deflationary tokenomics and huge monetary incentive to stake ETH which in turn gives more illiquidity, implies the price of ETH could reach up to $150,000 in a best case scenario. https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/pen9od/the_ethereum_triple_halving_part_2/ > Let's clear up the facts around EIP-1559, the merge/triple halving and ЕТН becoming a deflationary asset...For over a decade now the crypto market cycles have revolved around the Bitcoin halvings when the supply of new coins going to miners halves. This is important because miners are majority sellers. They have electricity bills to pay https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/ofcxrn/lets_clear_up_the_facts_around_eip1559_the/ > Here are some simple calculations implications of POS' triple halving. ...ETH issuance goes down from 4% to 0.5% IMMEDIATELY. What took BTC 12 years to achieve, ETH is gonna do it in 1 block length! https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/oz5hkm/eth_has_managed_to_burn_4600_eth_24_hours_after/ If you have been in crypto long enough, you know what happens to the Alt/BTC ratio over the long term: > If you think 0.04 BTC is low, the ETH/BTC ratio is going to feel like getting kicked in the nuts over and over again over the long term as the ratio falls below 0.01 and goes lower and lower. > Long term ALL Alts follow the same trend and fall below the initial BTC value they started at. Pretty much all the older Alts, even the most successful fall below this value. ETH is also trending long term to fall below this value. People talk about historic trends, patterns and cycles but this has been the only 1 undisputed and unbroken pattern for 14 years. https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1fgzm3z/daily_crypto_discussion_september_15_2024_gmt0/ln9jvct/
Invest in RWA tokenizations they give good return jist make wise decisions
I'd go for the more affordable ones, that show potential to yield impressively, of course EOS is my top suggestion in that regard, seeing as the coin recently tested a major low, and has been on the rise since, a move now complemented by its network's positioning as a key infrastructure layer behind RWA, bringing in more recognition and value for the asset.