Reddit Posts
Mentions
Eth will survive, tokenization of stocks, metals and RWA will be huge trilions will flow to them from countries where is very difficult to access these investments. But ETH will collect only breadcrumbs the real money will go somewhere else not to crypto. So with ETH inflation it could go a little bit up or down impossible to say but IMO it will not die, it could also flip btc in 10/15 years but it will be very sad
Like NFTS, web3, RWA,, AI compute, all the buzz words that that the crypto bros try to imsert a useless blockchain into... so mich value!
How can we leverage Stellar’s RWA capabilities to tokenize **reforestation efforts** aimed at protecting freshwater basins in Argentina? Our project, **Water Forests**, has 5 years of field experience. We are looking to move to the next stage by using Soroban smart contracts to transparently track and fund reforestation that directly impacts ecosystem health. What is the best way to structure these environmental assets on-chain to attract global supporters?" Our work on the field: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODRdKeAhoS0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODRdKeAhoS0) **Project Link:**[https://bosquesdeagua.ar/](https://bosquesdeagua.ar/)
How can we leverage Stellar’s RWA capabilities to tokenize **reforestation efforts** aimed at protecting freshwater basins in Argentina? Our project, **Water Forests**, has 5 years of field experience. We are looking to move to the next stage by using Soroban smart contracts to transparently track and fund reforestation that directly impacts ecosystem health. What is the best way to structure these environmental assets on-chain to attract global supporters?" Our work on the field: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODRdKeAhoS0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODRdKeAhoS0) **Project Link:**[https://bosquesdeagua.ar/](https://bosquesdeagua.ar/)
There was no $3B TVL goal. The $3B figure referred specifically to onchain RWAs, not total network TVL. On RWAs, progress has been strong. Total onchain RWA supply reached $1B by Q4, up from $466M at the end of 2024 — roughly 115% year-over-year growth. Q4 alone added $194M, reflecting sustained momentum. RWAs require regulated issuance and long-term partners. The focus has been on building durable, compliant supply. The data shows that approach is working.
\- We missed the RWA $3B mark. In hindsight it wasn't realistic. TBH still learning how to measure success. But if you look at where Stellar is at [rwa.xyz](http://rwa.xyz) we're doing ... really good. \- [Stellar.expert](http://Stellar.expert) is one of the best blockchain explorers in crypto and it's creator, Orbit Lens, is a top notch Stellar builder. The bug Stellar had last year created havoc in his system and re-ingesting data took some time which led to a subpar use experience. Orbit has debriefed and improved a lot - if you're still experiencing issues please report on github. Our partnerships team is also working on bringing more block explorers to the ecosystem so that there is more redundancy - stay tuned. \- Can't share any further information right now
Super excited about the growth in RWA. There are always short term moves in market cap, and stablecoins on Stellar grew about 50% in 2025, and also very excited to see new assets like USDY and PYUSD starting to grow on the network. Local currency denominated stables will be a great area of growth for the ecosystem going forward, looking forward to seeing those assets grow too
We believe non-custodial fintech applications are a superior way to build neobank style applications, we have spent years working with our ecosystem to build the technology and standards to make them easier to build, maintain and deploy globally. We have reached the point where many of these applications offer UX/UI which is indistinguishable from a web2 or custodial fintech application. That is table stakes though, mass adoption of new technology in fintech like all markets is driven by who offers the best product at the best prices. The majority of users are looking for the best tool for the job not the coolest or newest technology to do the job. We are seeing the early stages of mass adoption globally on Stellar because the fintech applications building on Stellar offer as good or better product experiences, and because they are non-custodial they are able to embed and integrate a rapidly growing number yield bearing assets and defi products and services into those product experiences. This is enabling them to offer yield, credit, FX instruments and locally denominated assets at the lowest costs / highest returns in the markets they are competing in. This is the very beginning of a virtuous cycle for the entire ecosystem, these applications are acting as distribution for the assets and protocols on the network by recruiting new users to the network at a rapid pace. They are outcompeting other applications in those markets, whether built on other chains or on traditional infrastructure. This is attracting new builders to start on Stellar and existing ones to migrate if they want to compete. This in turn drives up protocol TVL, RWA asset values and over all payments volume, which attracts more builders and issuers. Bottom line is that what is driving our mass adoption is enabling builders to win in their markets via low cost ubiquitous access via our ramps, and the right building blocks to build for their customers needs via protocols and assets wrapped in the best user experience which make the technology its built on disappear into the background, where it belongs.
Hi there - for RWAs to become more consumer friendly we need to make sure that the infrastructure fades into the background. Friendly UX is a big unlock to be able to get massive distribution. Very excited to see what some folks in the ecosystem are doing in terms of composability, and wrapping up RWA and DeFi experiences in a way that is easy to understand for non-expert users.
On the first part of the question: we're very confident that Stellar is positioned to grow substantially the volume of RWAs on the network by the end of 2026. It is different to point to an specific number as many factors would influence that, and we are focused on growth thorugh rollout of new markets with high-quality and low-cost on and off-ramps. Capillarity and connectivity between fiat and onchain rails is a big topic for us this year We are focusing on three main matters: 1: Local currency-denominated stable assets – Supporting locally denominated stablecoins backed by tokenized short-term government debt, giving users trusted, regionally relevant digital assets. 2: Real DeFi utility – Expanding how RWAs are used by integrating them into DeFi protocols on Stellar for lending, liquidity, and payments. 3: Builder incubation – Backing teams building apps that connect local market access with global protocols and assets on Stellar. Stronger rails, useful assets, and real applications create a growth flywheel - that's what underpins our confidence in sustained RWA and TVL growth this year.
Even if it was a partnership, Google Cloud has a bazillion crypto partnerships at this point: Google Cloud serves as a validator or infrastructure provider for several major Layer 1 and Layer 2 protocols: Aptos: Supports validator nodes and provides infrastructure for the Aptos network. BNB Chain: Provides foundational infrastructure and technical support for dApps in the BNB ecosystem. Celo: Joined the Celo network as a validator to help secure the mobile-first blockchain. Flare Network: Serves as an infrastructure provider and validator, integrating Flare's data portal into the Google Cloud Marketplace. Hedera: Operates a Hedera network node and provides ledger data for public analysis. MANTRA: Acts as a primary validator and infrastructure provider for the RWA (Real-World Asset) focused chain. Near Protocol: Provides technical support and infrastructure for Near developers and grant recipients. Polygon: Collaborates on infrastructure and developer tooling; Polygon is also available on Google’s Blockchain Node Engine. Solana: Integrated into the Blockchain Node Engine to allow easy deployment of Solana nodes. Tezos: Acts as a "baker" (validator) to allow corporate clients to build Web3 applications on the network. Theta Labs: Collaborates on video delivery infrastructure and serves as an external enterprise validator. ZetaChain: Acts as a validator for ZetaChain's universal blockchain. --- Exchanges & Infrastructure Partners Coinbase: A primary strategic partner. Coinbase uses Google Cloud for data services, and Google Cloud enables customers to pay for services using crypto via Coinbase Commerce. Chainlink: Collaborates on "oracle" services to connect Google Cloud’s data (like weather or flight info) to smart contracts. Fireblocks: Integrated with Google Cloud’s Confidential Space to enhance security for digital asset custody. Nansen: Leverages Google Cloud for real-time blockchain data intelligence and analytics. Alchemy: Provides node infrastructure and developer tools as part of Google’s Web3 startup program. --- BigQuery Public Datasets Google Cloud hosts the full transaction histories of several blockchains for public analysis, including: Bitcoin (and Bitcoin Cash) Ethereum (including Goerli and Arbitrum/Optimism datasets) Dogecoin Litecoin Tron Avalanche Fantom --- Gaming & Web3 Projects Sky Mavis (Axie Infinity): Supports the Ronin network's security and validator infrastructure. Dapper Labs (Flow): Collaborates on infrastructure for the Flow blockchain to support NFT and gaming scalability. Horizon Blockchain Games: Uses GCP for backend infrastructure for Web3 gaming titles like Skyweaver.
Hi lovely SDF team, Thank you for taking the time. 1. Congrats to you and us for the 1B+ RWAs on-chain. While the overall RWA value on Stellar is heavily increasing, we see the stablecoin value decreasing. In your opinion, what is the reason for that and what are the plans to change that? 2. Do you see rapidly rising demand for the core security-and-fees resource acting as a major driver of sustainable network expansion and on-chain activity? Especially for attracting/helping developers/builders? 3. What is the next missing piece for the network (after privacy building tools and actually builders using it)? 4. If there is any missing piece, when can we approx. expect it? (A roadmap for 2026 would be lovely) 5. There are so many super simple, bank-like non-custodial wallets on Stellar like Beans or Decaf and many more with great UIs where there is no hint to „crypto“. What do you think will be the catalyst for these kind of apps to attract millions or even billions of users? Thank you for answering my questions, I appreaciate it.
- In **2017**, the total **Alt Marketcap was 65% higher than BTC**. In **2026, BTC marketcap** is higher than **90% higher than the total Alt Marketcap.** - The Alt Marketcap has shrunk -40% since 2021 - Crypto growth for the last 4+ years has been mostly BTC and Stablecoins **Web3, DeFi, RWA, Hocus Pocus Oracles, Nostro/Vostro Banks, etc are just meme narratives to bamboozle investors with the idea that crypto projects have some kind of fundamental value.** They do not. BTC is a speculative asset and Alts are double speculative that generally rely on BTC price appreciation to gain value because they don't have any value in and of themselves. | | Jun. 2017 | Nov. 2021 | January. 2026 |:-----------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:| | BTC | $40.4 Billion | $1.23 Trillion | $1.749 Trillion | Stablecoins | $0.13 Billion| $0.11 Trillion | $0.32 Trillion | Alt. Marketcap | $66.6 Billion |$1.52 Trillion | $0.911 Trillion | Total Crypto | $107.13 Billion |$2.86 Trillion | $2.98 Trillion | **BTC Dominance** | **37.8%** | **44.7%** | **65.75%** **BTC Dominance excludes stablecoins*
Isn't every RWA they're putting on chain right now based on NFT tech?
I suppose I should have said it *was* over-hyped. The hype for it died out, like many chains from the 2021 crypto boom. Just a lot of promises (scalability, Chainlink, Input Endorsers, rollups, BTC DeFi, USDC, Mamba, major Hydra applications...I could go on)/ Now, it has low usage, TVL, stables, fees/revenue, less dApps, virtually no RWA, etc.
Meanwhile, back in reality... XRP is in 11th place in terms of tokenization, between two Ethereum L2s, zkSync and Mantle: https://app.rwa.xyz/networks For a project that claims such big partnerships and great design for institutions, why do you think they have captured such a tiny fraction of the RWA value (less than 1%)? > I’m honestly shocked and people’s insistence that XRPL is not to be taken seriously. I obviously can't speak for all 'people', but personally it seems like XRPL is all hype and marketing... particularly targeted at easily manipulated/vulnerable people. Go and do a search for 'XRP' in the 'Q-anon' survivor subs and you will see lots of stories of how it is promoted... no other crypto is mentioned anywhere near as much.
I see a push for better interoperability between chains and a cluster of chains and the protocols that connect them being collectively known as "the Blockchain" by most people who use it. Each chain has it's own set of competitive advantages. It's hard to imagine a scenario where "just one" is selected for the tokenization of RWA. I will be interested to see if there is a full transcript somewhere with more context. He is right on it being more efficient to use a single chain. But based on what he has said in the past about public chains, the conversation could have been more exploratory. My mind goes to thinking about how to unify the existing infrastructure so it feels like you are transacting on one chain, without sacrificing the decentralized advantages of public Blockchains. Most people don't understand the underlying configurations that power the tech they use now. I don't think they will know this for the blockchain apps they use either once more real world adoption happens.
If the chain ever has a real failure you don’t lose the RWA, you pause transfers and reconcile off-chain like every regulated market already does. the issuer/transfer agent reconciles and reopens or handles redemptions off-chain. One blockchain is about one shared settlement standard so liquidity and compliance aren’t split across 15 half empty chains, it doesn't mean no backups or no contingency plan.
Ethereum’s high percentage of RWA value today doesn’t prove it’s inherently better. Algorand’s protocol has native asset issuance (ASA) with on-chain compliance and permissioning, near-zero predictable fees, and immediate finality — all of which are stronger primitives for real-world asset settlement than Ethereum’s complex smart contract stacks. https://algorand.co/ecosystem/tokenization
I just focus on Coins that stakes which is 70%, 20% Utility Coins for RWA, and 10% Stable coins https://preview.redd.it/awze7qtye8fg1.png?width=278&format=png&auto=webp&s=5cc91cf0ccedff29b01167b4351bfef345c9cd07
tldr; BlackRock's 2026 Thematic Outlook highlights Ethereum as a central platform for tokenization, with over 65% of tokenized assets currently on the network. However, Ethereum's market share is under pressure as tokenized real-world assets (RWA) expand to other blockchains. BlackRock's 'toll road' model envisions Ethereum as a base layer for tokenized assets, but competition from rollups and multi-chain solutions could dilute its role. The evolving landscape raises questions about Ethereum's ability to maintain dominance in the tokenization sector. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
> All the Monero fans that invaded this subreddit are super quiet now...on the pump they were in full force, every other post it felt was about XMR Should they be more like insufferable ETH Maxis who keep spouting bullshit narratives like Triple Halving, Supply Crunch, Ultra-Sound Monies, ScamFi, RWA memes and won't shut up while underperforming XMR long term? **From June 2017, middle of the the 2017 bullrun, when Crypto reached large marketcap multi-billion dollar assets* | Crypto | Price Change | |--------|--------------| | ETH | ⬆️ +718.49% | | XMR | ⬆️ +1002.05% | **From June 2021, middle of the 2021 bullrun, when crypto reached trillion dollar marketcap* | Crypto | Price Change | |--------|--------------| | ETH | ⬆️ +15.95% | | XMR | ⬆️ +81.46% |
I get where you're coming from but I think you're missing what's actually been building over the past year or so. The whole "RippleNet doesn't need XRP" argument was valid like 3-4 years ago. But things have changed. Ripple Payments (the ODL stuff) does use XRP as bridge currency in 20+ countries now. Is it as big as Ripple's marketing makes it sound? Probably not. But it's not nothing either. The part most people sleep on is that "XRP" has its own ecosystem now that has nothing to do with Ripple the company. The native AMM went live in 2024 and there's currently about 11.6 million XRP sitting in liquidity pools, with over 25k active pools. That's actual onchain activity. RLUSD (Ripple's stablecoin) has like $400m+ market cap on the ledger. You've got RWA stuff happening with OpenEden and Ondo. Total DeFi TVL on XRPL is sitting around $67m right now per DefiLlama. Is that small compared to Ethereum ($70b) or Solana ($8.5b)? Obviously yes. But it's growing and it's real utility, not just speculation. If you want to actually DO something with your XRP in DeFi, Flare has been building some great XRP DeFi products(/ecosystem). They've got this thing called FXRP (check xrpfi.flare.network) where you can bridge your XRP over in a non-custodial way and actually use it in DeFi protocols. Flare's ecosystem has like $188m TVL now with lending protocols, DEXs, liquid staking etc. The cool thing about FXRP vs other wrapped versions is that it's non-custodial -- you're not trusting some centralized entity with your XRP. There's a learning curve to figure out the Flare ecosystem but once you get it, there's actual yield opportunities that didn't exist before. is XRP's current market cap justified by today's utility? I don't know. But saying it has "zero value" ignores what's actually being built. The infrastructure is there, adoption is growing and there are now ways to put your XRP to work that didn't exist 2 years ago.
There are 657 examples of tokenized traditional financial assets on Ethereum you can see them all at the RWA dashboard: https://app.rwa.xyz/networks/ethereum
I did a little bit more digging and here’s what I found I think it’s okay so far but it’s got a lot of hurdles to jump through though. Competition is high and the main competitors seem to be doing a better job. The CMC backing it up is a plus because if STRXs app rolls out then it should find a good user base with CMC users. The whole goal is the RWA narrative which turns real world assets into tradable tokens, which is a really popular narrative rn but there’s a lot of dominant players and strike X is fighting for the scraps UNLESS the Super App is a big catalyst that draws attention to it. Institutions and banks like BlackRock already back other tokens like $ONDO It’s a asymmetric bet, it could explode but it’s gonna be tough, I still have a lot further to dig
sounds like pure hype ngl. RWA stuff is interesting but most oil tokens never deliver, id rather just hold SEI or SOL
Post is by: DuraDuraBanana and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1qhwmjy/has_anyone_heard_of_usor/ Just saw some buzz on X about this Solana token called USOR (U.S. Oil Reserve or something). Claims to give on-chain exposure to U.S. oil reserves, tied to all the geopolitical stuff with Venezuela and oil prices pumping. Market cap is around 17-18M last I checked, price up big in the last day. Is this legit RWA play or just another meme pump? Anyone holding or traded it? DYOR obviously, but curious if it's listed anywhere easy or if it's pure DEX chaos. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I just read you want you want to move to AI. Ask her for the front runners in AI for the Bull when you chat. She will give you a strategy based on what you pick. I have some diversified there too. SMARTEST move right now besides RWA.
Centrifuge has been the most innovative tokenized RWA platform since 2021. But it was a disappointment when they moved from real companies to treasuries pools, still useful but way less innovative.
I have been DCAing twice a month since early 2021. Now institutions are looking to tokenize trillions of dollars in RWA assets, I have a hard time convincing myself to sell.
meanwhile ethereum mainnet's activity is at ATH with lowest fees, and it has highest RWA and DeFi TVL by magnitudes. stablecoins have consistently been climbing as well (see ***DeFiLlama*** and ***RWA.xyz***). feels more like OP is just some upset guy who topblasted in 2021 around $4k and has never heard of DCA'ing down
RWA likely leads, AI adds upside, privacy hedges, and memes stay sentiment driven
Bud, I've been here since 2014 and I can't tell you how many times I've heard your exact same argument. "Ethereum is playing the long game! Scaling and cheap to get users! *Then* we charge them later!!" You are literally just describing price skimming- essentially baiting users into using your product, and then charging them higher fees later on once you "have them" (or in other words, once the user is "sticky enough") What you don't understand is that crypto, by it's nature of being open, cheap, and decentralized, is inherently NOT STICKY. It is not remotely similar to a company where I buy their product and am essentially locked into using it (ex: buying an iphone, a netflix subscription, etc.) I'm not going to buy a new phone or change subscriptions immediately after my purchase. If I want to trade a coin, RWA, or whatever in defi, I can very easily route through the cheapest chain due to interoperability. There is no need for me to stay solely on Ethereum. But you know what, I will play along and assume that users *are* sticky on Ethereum. In fact, Ethereum metrics are all way, way up. TVL, transactions, apps, developers, etc. Yet ETH/BTC is still on a long term down trend since it's ATH in June of **2017**, and price has performed pretty average against USD when accounting for the risk involved in holding ETH (aka, a terrible Sharpe ratio). The reason for this all comes down to one simple fact: ETH, the token, has no meaningful direct value accrual- or in other words, **no buybacks, and negligible burn**. You can look at the burn yourself to see how little it is: [https://ultrasound.money/](https://ultrasound.money/) Eth is very clearly is not money, so there is no monetary premium like with BTC. It is literally just a gas token used in the backend. Sure, bagholders can believe it's "money", hell, I can believe seashells are money- but that doesn't make it so. The reality is that success of the Ethereum network =/= price growth of ETH. This is coming from someone who held ETH for years until I realized I was getting married to the bag. Dumped the majority of my stack at .05-.07 ratio back in 2022 and I can tell you that I sleep MUCH better at night. Good luck to you sir.
Yes, 5% in the top crypto is pretty fair, store it in a hardware wallet (Ledger nana S+ good starter cold wallet.) and forget about it. Most would say 60% BTC, 30% Eth 10% in a punt RWA/Privacy/Utility coins... Memes pump and dump, so much less secure. DYOR, and know the risks. All crypto is stored on the Blockchain, locked with encryption linked to a seed phrase (keys) Crypto held on an Exchanges, then the exch holds the keys. (Risk if the exchange goes bust) Wallets are only interfaces to the Blockchain. Hot wallets (Trust Wallet, Meta Mask, coinbase wallet, etc, etc, have the keys stored in the software and they are exposed to the internet, hence can be hacked. Hardware or cold wallet, keys stored on a device and never exposed to the internet, hence safer and cannot be hacked. 👍
It won’t die off. It’s just not a hot commodity any more. Everyone can access it easily so it doesn’t feel as exclusive anymore. I do believe there will be projects that implement RWA. That’s what I would watch for
tldr; Tokenized stocks, blockchain tokens representing equity positions, have reached a market cap of $1.59 billion as of January 2026, according to RWA.xyz. These stocks offer 24/7 transferability and smaller ticket sizes but face regulatory scrutiny regarding securities rules, custody, and investor protections. Ethereum and Solana lead in tokenized stock value. The market's growth depends on compliance, issuer transparency, and broader acceptance as collateral in trading and lending. Key challenges include jurisdictional approval and long-term regulatory frameworks. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
"Bitcoin clone". Unlike Bitcoin forks (LTC, BCH, BSV), which share the same slow, energy-intensive architecture. Bitcoin rarely moves because transaction fees and 10-minute block times make it impractical for daily use. Bitcoin’s script is intentionally limited. It can't natively handle complex "If/Then" logic (smart contracts) without clunky, centralized Layer 2s. It’s a "dumb" vault of gold. While Bitcoin is stuck with a 15-year-old legacy script, Algorand lets developers build complex apps in Python and TypeScript. This is why it’s the go-to for Real World Assets (RWA). Like Bitcoin, Algorand has a fixed supply of 10 billion tokens. There will never be a 10,000,000,001 ALGO. To even start mining Bitcoin effectively in 2026, you need professional ASIC hardware that costs between $2,000 and $20,000. You also need industrial-grade cooling and dirt-cheap electricity. On Algorand, you can secure the network with a Raspberry Pi or an old laptop. Algorand can bundle multiple transactions—like swapping a house deed for USDC—and ensure they either all happen or none happen. This is native, "Layer 1" programmability that Bitcoin clones can't dream of. Algorand was built from scratch with a completely different foundation. 'network effect' doesn't save outdated tech once the world needs high-speed, scalable infrastructure. I can use my 'scarce asset' to power smart contracts, settle global payments in 3.5 seconds, and secure a network with a Nakamoto Coefficient 6x higher than Bitcoin’s. While Bitcoin users are paying $10 in fees to wait an hour for a 'maybe' confirmation, Algorand is settling 10,000+ transactions per second for $0.0002 with 100% finality. Bitcoin is a digital vault where you pay high fees to let your 'gold' sit. Algorand is a programmable engine that settles 1 million+ real-world tickets (TravelX) for $0.0002.
You argue that Ethereum's $125 billion TVL makes Algorand’s $53 million insignificant. However, a high TVL often reflects "stagnant" wealth rather than active utility. Barriers to Entry: To become a validator on Ethereum, you need 32 ETH (roughly $105,000 at a $3.3k price). On Algorand, the barrier is just 1 ALGO. This makes Algorand’s ecosystem far more inclusive for the "average" person rather than just whales. Network Activity: While Ethereum has more "locked" value, Algorand is built for high-velocity transactions, currently processing roughly 1,200 Transactions Per Second (TPS) with near-instant finality.The user paints Ethereum as the only viable option, but Ethereum still relies heavily on complex Layer-2 solutions (like Arbitrum or zkSync) to be usable. No Forking & Instant Finality: Algorand offers instant finality, meaning once a transaction is confirmed (in about 4 seconds), it cannot be reversed or "forked". On Ethereum, you often have to wait for multiple block confirmations to be certain a transaction is final. Pure Proof of Stake (PPoS): Algorand’s PPoS mechanism randomly and secretly selects validators, which prevents the centralization risks seen in other networks where a few large staking pools hold most of the power.The most common "Ethereum-killer" argument remains the cost of participation. Flat Fees: Algorand has a fixed, predictable fee of $0.001 per transaction. Gas Fee Volatility: Even after upgrades, Ethereum gas fees can fluctuate wildly, often reaching $0.50 to $50+ depending on network congestion. For decentralized finance (DeFi) to be truly global, it cannot cost $5 to send $10.While Ethereum dominates speculative DeFi, Algorand is winning in Real World Assets (RWA) and institutional adoption. Institutional Focus: Algorand is being used for central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots, bond issuances, and tokenizing traditional assets like real estate and equities. Sustainability: Algorand is carbon-negative by design, making it the preferred choice for enterprises with strict ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) requirements.
No wonder why meme coins are no longer a trend. And looks like it will take awhile before we see it back. I mean, it's now easier to launch a token, create a liquidity pool, then dump. In the meantime, you may want to consider RWA tokenization. r/Tessera_PE is a platform that allows users to buy pre-IPO shares, gives us retail investors 100% of the cash upside of the equity.
At Future CX, RWA isn’t some wild NFT meme coin, derivative or futures trading scheme designed to trick you into giving up your crypto tokens. Instead, we’re offering a genuine application of tokenised blockchain technology. Our ZKP (Zero Knowledge Proofed) Storage allows users to secure and store their data using ZKP, making it hack and malware-proof. Importantly, no identifying information is stored with your data, yet you retain complete control and access. This is cybersecurity built on blockchain, taking things to the next level. It’s suitable for retail, business and government use. You can pay for our service using either crypto or fiat. We’re the pioneers in bringing this to market and are now competing with giants like Microsoft Azure, Google and Amazon. Our product integrates seamlessly into your device for easy use, and our commercial version will transform vulnerable web2 storage into secure web3 storage. As a node-based system with smart contracts on our blockchain, we also have built-in disaster recovery that automatically self-heals, rendering hacking and malware attempts ineffective. Try it out for free on iOS and Android by searching “ZKP storage” or “Bethel ZKP storage”. The PC version will be released next week.
tldr; Two major crypto events, NFT Paris and RWA Paris 2026, were canceled due to a market downturn and concerns over safety following a series of violent attacks targeting crypto holders in France. Organizers cited financial challenges, but the rise in kidnappings and home invasions linked to crypto wealth has created a climate of fear, impacting public participation in such events. The cancellations highlight the intersection of market struggles and security risks in the crypto community. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Cope. The majority of your recent post history is shilling a shitcoin that isn’t even out of seed funding stage yet. If you want a proper infrastructure play you’d at least align with Ethereum where various RWA’s have existed for years.
Litecoin is useless these days. 1. Bitcoin has security 2. Solana has speed 3. Ethereum has DeFi and RWA 4. Zcash has privacy
Agreed ,RWAs feel like one of the few sectors where there’s an actual reason for capital to stay, not just rotate. The interesting part for me is that many of these names tend to respect structure far better than most alts. What I’m watching is how they behave around higher-timeframe support/resistance especially during broader market pullbacks. If an RWA name holds levels while others lose structure, that’s usually my cue to dig deeper. Do you lean more towards holding RWAs long-term, or do you still trade them tactically based on structure and momentum?
RWA coins(Link, ondo, etc.) One of the few altcoin sectors that are likely to stay for a long time
Canton most recently came on my radar. It looks quite promising for RWA adoption.
It is one of only 6 crypto assets in the top 50 that is down in the last month, and is processing just 3 tps. Hedera's marketers are always claiming great news (like Blackrock using their network) but it always ends up being bullshit. At this point the only impressive thing is how people keep falling for the same kinds of dishonesty! Just in the last couple of months their sub has had claims of: - Thousands of hackathon builders in Africa (without mentioning that participants were paid to sign up and that almost no-one did anything other than register and claim the reward); - Hedera leading RWA tokenization (but only if you just count a brigaded poll rather than any onchain metrics); - Hedera having the second highest amount of developers activity (if you only count downloads from a single repo, so ignoring most data from decentralized projects); - An award for the 'Best Crypto Developer Tooling in North America' (neglecting to mention that the 'award' is just a title they claimed themselves from a PR website... you just pick an 'award' category when self-nominating and there are so many that every company who wants a fake accolade will be 'Best' by default, without any other competitors in that section. We could go on, but hopefully you get the idea! Do yourself a favour and be less gullible, I'm not saying that to be mean, but to help you avoid noob-traps like Hedera in the future.
What is their definition of RWA? Are stocks “real world” technically? Isn’t the digital yuan RWA? Or BRICS?
Wait, until Web3, and the associated apps get kickin for SOL, and XRP corners financial settlements. Bitcoin can be considered a store of value, where XRP and SOL are dynamic application based use of crypto that will transform assets (RWA) into the new economy.
tldr; China's financial industry associations have declared real-world asset tokenization (RWA) as an illegal financial activity. The joint notice, co-signed by major financial associations, states that no RWA-related activities have been approved by Chinese regulators. It warns that domestic staff supporting overseas RWA services will face legal consequences. The notice emphasizes risks like fraud and speculative hype, classifying RWA under China's Securities Law and banning related activities. Mainland China has fully rejected RWA, urging businesses to relocate or abandon such projects. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Post is by: InsidersBets and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1q3f88u/solana_microcap_trn_tied_to_a_real_stormwater/ I’ve been scanning low-cap Solana tokens recently, mostly finding the usual quick pumps and fades, but Terrain Token ($TRN) made me stop and look closer. It’s linked to Carolina Terrain, a licensed North Carolina contractor (License CL.1872, site: carolinaterrain.com) that’s been operating since about 2022. They handle actual stormwater and drainage work - things like French drains, erosion control, and grading for properties with runoff issues from clay soil. The X account (@carolinaterrain) posts frequent updates with real job photos mixed in with project teases. They’re aiming for a full-stack ecosystem around the business: • TerrainVision AI: Free tool for uploading photos to get analysis on water flow, erosion risks, and rough repair estimates. • Stormwaterscm.com: Site focused on compliance inspections and maintenance for regulated stormwater systems. • Terrain Guard: Uses ICP for permanent, immutable records of work, warranties, and compliance tracking. • $TRN on Solana: For rewards, premium features, and burns tied to usage. • Planned: Drainage Academy for training and certifications. A founder posted a thorough breakdown on LinkedIn recently:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/unlocking-full-terrain-ecosystem-ai-compliance-blockchain-alex-purdy-30qre Current numbers (early January 2026 - check DexScreener for latest): • MC/FDV around 10K • Liquidity around 10K • Price about 0.00001 • CA: 2L1xfpJ56tjevGzqzDCqxvuAgU4pDZL166hKQSeKpump The angle that interests me is the potential RWA play in a solid niche market - stormwater management is multibillion-dollar in the US, pushed by regulations and increasing flood risks. The integrated flow (diagnose with AI, execute installs, inspect for compliance, track on chain, reward with token) could generate real value if it gains traction beyond their own operations. Downsides are clear: liquidity is tiny, adoption evidence is limited so far, established players own the geospatial space, and blending crypto with a licensed service business carries regulatory risk. Not heavily in it myself, just tracking because the real-world foundation feels rarer these days. Anyone else researched this? See upside in infrastructure-focused RWAs, or think it’s headed nowhere? Links for checking: • Company: carolinaterrain.com • X: @carolinaterrain • DexScreener: Search the CA Open to thoughts - bullish or skeptical? DYOR of course. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
tldr; Alchemy Pay has launched the first fiat-to-real-world-assets (RWA) platform in partnership with Backed, enabling users to invest in tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs using fiat currencies. The platform, set to officially launch in August, will feature 60 tokenized assets, including Apple, Tesla, and Google. This move positions Alchemy Pay as a leader in the growing RWA sector, which is projected to see significant growth by 2030. The company aims to evolve into a global digital finance hub, bridging traditional and digital finance. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
I say kid because your lack of knowledge makes it seem like you're young or dumb. Here's some of the use cases btc cannot perform that XRP can and that's only 1 of the superior assets. 1. Fast/Affordable Cross-Border Payments: Acts as a bridge currency to facilitate near-instant (3–5 seconds) international money transfers, bypassing slow traditional systems like SWIFT. 2. On-Demand Liquidity (ODL): Enables financial institutions to source liquidity for cross-border transactions without pre-funding accounts in destination currencies. 3. Tokenization of Real-World Assets (RWA): The XRPL supports issuing custom tokens, enabling the digital representation of stocks, bonds, and real estate. 4. Decentralized Finance (DeFi) & AMM: Features an Automated 5.Market Maker (AMM) to facilitate decentralized trading and lending. 6. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs): Native support for minting and trading NFTs on the ledger. 7. Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): Used by central banks for piloting and implementing national digital currencies. 8. Micropayments & Streaming Revenue: Low fees enable small-value transactions for content access, tipping, or streaming payments. 9. Gaming and Virtual Asset Economies: Used within metaverse or gaming environments for fast transactions. 10. Interoperability Bridge: Connects different payment networks and fiat currencies. Institutional Trading Collateral: Used by traders for fast, low-fee collateral to manage margin calls and arbitrage across exchanges.
Here is a precaution I would give to Ethereans on pushing TVL metric. Increasingly soon, tokenized RWA will grow TVL numbers for a lot of chains. The catch is, if you normalize RWA TVL in chain valuation metric, you incentivize ppl to game it. RWA can literally mean anything. Imagine all the banks come together and launch a chain with a token. They observe crypto obsession with TVL. Then they just tokenize all their AUM and put them on their chain. In turn, they use the TVL meta to pump and dump their token. If you think it won’t happen, then you aren’t paying attention. Canton Network is showing an inkling of playing this game.
This is being worked on actively right now under the RWA category. Lots of people are trying to tokenize everything right now.
Mmm yeah, your audience is definitely too huge, a lot of them airdrop hunters and just too general. You need to figure out how to narrow it 10 times over. Find other projects that are close to what you're doing or have it as a feature or something like this. You're casting too wide of a net. We were analyzing pendle with dune - they have like 2k unique depositors doing leverage across all networks with 2 BILLION in assets. Look at how many people follow their X. A lot of people talk about crypto and will waste your time, but very few use it and out of them the wealth inequality is brutal. So yeah, you have to go back to the drawing board and figure out how to target users narrowly. I guess since you are doing something investment/small business related check out Zivoe. I dont know the guys nor have I used them, but they do private credit RWA where they give out specialized loans to businesses, whilst investors get yield. Whatever they are doing is probably what you should be doing :)
> MUH RWA ~2 years ago ETH Bagholders were celebrating **Blackrock tokenization** of Money Market Funds for Institutions saying, "Imagine the transactions, this will a rocket for ETH." - ETH price has dropped ~15% since then - ETH fee revenue has dropped -83% since then - *There have been a total of ~10,000 transactions with a little over ~$1K in fees over a ~2 year period.* The bagholder who responded with this comment has deleted it and will probably never touch ETH again. > And it’s right on ETH. **Can you imagine the number of transactions about to go down?** https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1bkm1u1/blackrock_unveils_crypto_fund_first_with_5/kvzup2u/ > Hocus Pocus, CCIP, CCID, VRF, CRE, SWIFT, Magic Oracles will serve you Truths from Golden Data Containers The ChainLink Town Criers didn't fail to shill ChainLink in response to the above comment: - LINK is down -33% since then > BNY Mellon are providing the custody. They use ChainLink CCIP on the backend. > No point in shilling chainlink to these plebs, they don’t understand how this works
Isn't this called RWA (real world assets)?
The legal and logistical friction is the real moat. While the tech is ready, the complexity of physical settlement and real-world custody makes commodities a much harder RWA vertical to scale than digital-first assets like treasuries
How is Solana “Dominating in RWA activity”? At the moment there are $12.3B in RWAs on ETH and only $835M in RWAs on Solana. There are more tokenized assets on Arbitrum than Solana, never mind L1 Ethereum. Also, over 2/3 of SOL validators have left the network over the past 2 years and only 15% of the remaining validators are profitable so more will be leaving. I don’t hate SOL… I actually hold a small position but the network is in pretty bad shape right now.
Post is by: Huge-Aardvark2996 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1px9x7c/anyone_else_researching_plume_feels_like_its/ Not a call to buy, just something I’ve been digging into. I’ve been looking at smaller-cap projects tied to the RWA narrative, and Plume keeps standing out in a way that’s honestly surprising. Not seeing huge hype posts, but there’s consistent development, partnerships, and actual discussion from people *using* or building around it. What caught my attention: * RWA narrative quietly gaining momentum again * Plume seems positioned more as infrastructure, not just a token * Activity/volume picking up without a blow-off move * Still feels like something most people will notice *after* it’s no longer early this is one of the few where I’m still seeing more builders than hype accounts, which is rare lately. Curious what the bear case is here. Anyone else researching this one? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
tldr; Meme coins and AI tokens, despite being dominant crypto narratives in 2025, posted significant negative returns, with average year-to-date losses of -31.6% and -50.2%, respectively. Other sectors like DeFi and DEX tokens also struggled, while real-world assets (RWA) emerged as the top-performing narrative with 185.8% average gains, driven by Keeta Network's rally. Layer 1 tokens also performed well, with 80.3% average gains. Overall, 2025 saw uneven performance across the crypto market. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Last cycle SOL/BTC pair growth started before pump fun. Pump Fun becoming popular marked the top. Worst time to buy. Open the chart. Scalable L1s will always capture the activity of whatever asset class is the flavor of the week. Activity translates to monetization. Pump Fun frenzy a result of good scalable tech. Solana still capturing majority of Web3 activity on a single state and will likely capture majority of next Web3 speculation wave too. Already dominating RWA activity. Solana remains a top experience for issuers and traders. Not subjective. Only newer L1 network competing at this level for issuers or traders is Hyperliquid and they're dominating on the trader side. Insane revenue. Trying to argue "it's just memes" a terrible take. Majority of issuance across all networks is also memes. This sub's group think was wrong last cycle. Usually wrong. Will continue to be wrong until it learns to follow Web3 users over social marketing.
One could be SOL and the others in utility Altcoins, with solid projects based on RWA, AI, Cloud, Cybersecurity, GPU...
tldr; Ethereum's Total Value Locked (TVL) is projected to increase tenfold by 2026, driven by institutional adoption, stablecoin growth, and tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). Key factors include the stablecoin market potentially reaching $500 billion, with 54% of activity on Ethereum, and a $300 billion tokenized RWA sector. Major financial institutions and sovereign wealth funds are expected to accelerate participation, signaling maturing crypto infrastructure. However, ETH price remains volatile, highlighting limited correlation between TVL growth and token valuation. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
> These two areas could be a boom for Ethereum: Stablecoins and Real World Assets (RWA) Bagholder Bingo. The **stablecoin marketcap has gone up 200% and ETH has gone down -40%** in that time frame. | | Nov. 2021 | Oct. 2025 |:-----------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:| | Stablecoins | $0.11 Trillion | $0.32 Trillion | ETH | $4,800 | $2,900 The **RWA Meme** has been around since 2018. **You will NEVER:** - trade AAPL,NVDA,MSFT,etc shares in your Ethereum address by connecting to MetaMask and going over to Uniswap - be able to go to Robinhood and withdraw AAPL,NVDA,MSFT,etc shares to you Ethereum/Solana address - trade NYSE regulated stocks outside the financial system of brokerages, DTCCs, etc and natively on Ethereum/Solana public blockchains > Blackrock already focusing in that direction. *~2 years ago ETH Bagholders were celebrating Blackrock tokenization** of Money Market Funds for Institutions saying, "Imagine the transactions, this will a rocket for ETH." **There have been a total of ~5,000 transactions with under ~$1K in fees over a ~2 year period.** > *"BlackRock unveils crypto fund first with $5 million minimum"* > And it’s right on ETH. **Can you imagine the number of transactions about to go down?** https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1bkm1u1/blackrock_unveils_crypto_fund_first_with_5/kvzup2u/ https://etherscan.io/token/0x7712c34205737192402172409a8F7ccef8aA2AEc > Prices move regardless of fundamentals. We are concentrating upon the infrastructure and capabilities of the network. I operate from the belief that, eventually, price will match the value. It's the end of 2025 and **big dummies still don't realize crypto doesn't have fundamentals.** But for a good laugh, lets look at ETH in a common fundamental metric. **Price-to-Sales (P/S), a Fundamental Valuation Metric** QQQ heavily weighted towards tech companies currently has P/S ratio (marketcap/revenue) of approximately 6.16 and is considered overvalued because it's much higher than it's historical average. NVDIA for perspective has a P/S of 23 because it's priced as a hyper growth tech stock whose revenue has gone from ~$10 Billion in 2020 to $130 Billion today and continues to grow. Using that same metric, compare popular cryptos which collect fee revenue and distribute them to their staking token holders and you see that **ETH is comically overvalued by fundamental metrics.** | Network | Daily Fees | Marketcap. | P/S |:-----------:|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:| | QQQ | -- | --- | 6.16X | TRON | $6.9 Million | $26 Billion | 10.4X | LINK | $164K | $8.9 Billion | 149X | ETH | $330K | $360 Billion | 3,000X ETH is a double speculative asset that historically has a 0.96 correlation coefficient to BTC. *ETH only appreciates when BTC goes on parabolic bullruns.* Otherwise like the rest of crypto, it does nothing relying entirely on BTC for any appreciation of value and then *loses 70% to 90% of its value when BTC goes into a bear market.* - Summer 2017, ETH hits ATH of $400 after BTC hits local top of $3,000 - January 2018, ETH hits ATH of $1,400 after BTC hits cycle top of $20K - May 2021, ETH hits ATH after BTC tops out in April 2021 - Nov 2021. ETH hits ATH in December after BTC tops out in November 2021 - August 2025. ETH briefly touches past 2021 ATH after BTC breaks $120K
I’ve already burned myself once investing in AI tokens, so here’s my take: blockchain technology is not compatible with AI due to performance limitations. On the other hand, RWA projects are already delivering serious returns for me — even during a crypto bear market.
From my perspective, the interesting part isn’t which narrative wins, but why a narrative survives past the hype cycle. RWA, AI, and privacy are all pointing at the same underlying shift: crypto slowly moving from speculation-first to infrastructure that plugs into real-world constraints. RWA feels the most institutionally legible. It maps cleanly to existing financial mental models, compliance frameworks, and balance sheets. That’s why BlackRock and others are comfortable there. The upside is steady adoption; the downside is that a lot of RWA ends up being “blockchain-flavored finance” rather than something crypto-native. AI is different. Most “AI tokens” today are narrative wrappers, not systems. The real value will likely show up where crypto solves coordination, verification, or incentives around AI — provenance of data, model usage accounting, permissionless compute markets. That’s slower and messier than hype cycles suggest, but more durable. Privacy is the quiet one. It rarely wins short-term narratives because it’s adversarial to regulation and hard to explain in simple numbers. But structurally, it keeps coming back because financial systems without privacy don’t scale socially. Even if retail doesn’t demand it explicitly, serious users eventually do. I see privacy more as a layer that gets absorbed into other narratives than a standalone hype sector. As for meme coins — they don’t disappear, because they’re not about tech. They’re about liquidity, coordination, and attention. As long as crypto remains reflexive and narrative-driven, memes will exist. They’re more like a market behavior than a sector. If I had to summarize: 2026 probably isn’t about a single dominant narrative, but about which projects turn narratives into constraints — real usage, real integrations, real tradeoffs. The market may talk in slogans, but it eventually rewards systems that survive contact with reality.
DOVU is the one. Built on Hedera. All tokens in circulation. One of the best staking mechanisms in all of crypto. Tokenising carbon credits. Just signed a $1.1 billion deal with Verra and BCarbon in the States and in talks for another similar one in Australia. RWA at its finest. Happy Christmas.
Your entire response to all of this is based on your own preconceived notion of what crypto does. “Nobody in their right mind” and “nothing burger” is just your way of saying “I don’t understand what this does or why it’s happening” I read the articles and am very knowledgeable beyond what I’d ever take the time to explain in a Reddit comment. You asked for proof so I gave you some. There’s hundreds of other bullish articles and future projects about the industry I could show. I’m not gonna write an essay on every article and why it’s there. Your “research” is just repeating Reddit buzzwords like “nothing burger” Is that really the best argument you can come up with? If you actually read the articles and somehow came to the conclusion that every meaningful crypto transaction will happen on a private blockchain that no one else ever touches then I really can’t help you bro. Nearly every article lists a currently publicly tradable blockchain you can buy today. For example you asked “who’s accepting large payments in crypto” and then immediately dismissed PayPal because it’s using stablecoins that’s literally what people will accept large payments with dummy DOVU is a crypto project built on Hedera by the way. it solves one of the hardest real world problems which is verifiable ecological credits tracked on a blockchain with an immutable audit trail. Europe is literally creating a massive use case needed starting next year https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/alerts/eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-financial-obligations-commence-amid-proposed-scope-expansion-to-include-new-downstream-products Tokenization is the future of the world you and I probably agree that 99 percent of crypto projects are complete shit but the 1 percent that provide real government compliance like MiCA and other legal frameworks will produce actual winners that you’ll see in a few years. Yes some systems will go private but the tokenized RWA industry is projected to grow so large that there will be room for both institutions and public crypto infrastructure like ETH and LINK and Hbar (fixed fraction of a cent transaction fees with next to no energy usage) If you think everything ends up private and isolated you’re missing the scale of what’s being built
RWA probably wins because institutions actually care. AI tokens are overhyped imo, most have no real product. SEI could be interesting for RWA stuff since the speed matters for tokenized assets. memes will pump in bull market regardless
IMO 2026 won’t be about hype-heavy altcoins. If the alt market stays weak or choppy, capital usually rotates to assets people already trust. That’s why tokenized stocks and tokenized gold could quietly become a bigger narrative. RWA is evolving beyond bonds into things like Apple, Nvidia, ETFs, and gold exposure on-chain. When risk appetite is lower, people tend to prefer price exposure to real-world assets over experimental L1s or new meme launches. Tokenized gold also makes sense as a hedge if macro uncertainty continues. AI will still matter, but expectations are higher now. Privacy comes in waves. Memecoins won’t disappear, but liquidity will likely concentrate into fewer names. Some exchanges, like BingX and Kraken, already list these different asset types side by side, which makes this kind of rotation more practical in a mixed market.
>we’re in a strange middle phase. It’s no longer the Wild West, but it’s not fully mainstream either. The infrastructure is improving, the interfaces are cleaner, and the messaging is speaking to everyday users. i think this is not so much about crypto and web3 adoption people have been fantasizing about for years. this is more about how the traditional way of things and web2 have co-opted crypto and web3. that being said, i think when web2 and web3 come together, there is much value to add, for example, to make RWA narrative and prop trading more crypto-friendly. I have two solid use cases in mind. A seminal partnership between [Oasis and SemiLiquid](https://oasis.net/blog/strategic-investment-arm-semiliquid) highlights the next era we might see in the crypto markets - RWA's locked assets being valuable without being unlocked, while the [Oasis and Carrot partnership](https://oasis.net/blog/carrot-verifiable-compute-onchain-trading) highlights on-chain prop trading optimizing its risk engine, where the gap left by third-party opacity is filled by off-chain compute and on-chain verifiability.
It feels like the entire space had a random brain hemorrhage. > And relevance is fragile in a world of L2s, fee compression, and improving tech. ETH made its most significant parabolic pullback when it was a proof-of-work coin. Where the fuck was your "ownership", "equity", "cash flow", then? The reality is, those buyers never indexed on them. This brain hemorrhage started during the last bear with this ultrasound BS. I agree with you on some of these points. It is why it is better to be bullish on network-effect assets and bearish on DeFi tokens, "ICM" tokens, etc. All these ad hoc fixes like "ownership" coins don't fix the core problem - you need meat space laws to enforce ownership on RWA or business contracts with teams.
Never invest more then your willing to lose or that's just Degen behavior. I have a bunch and basically set and forget. The 2032 bull run will have the infrastructure built for use case rather then just speculation with all the New crypto laws going into effect next year. The ETF's inflow will be serious, the derivatives market will bring in Trillions and then RWA's will bring other assets and commodities to the block chain creating Trillions in new inflows. Get real crypto with utility and do t look at the price every day. Amazon took a long time before they became a powerhouse. Uber also was rejected by many markets when they first started. Now they are a mega cap. Ripple is next up, they are building the plumbing. Staking and yield pools are going to lock up a lot of capital into these markets creating scarcity.
> I am bullish on Atom 3 years ago, below was my response to someone who fell for the ATOM and DOT scams. Crypto Bros always falling for bullshit Meme narratives. The current recycled RWA Meme is also looking painful. People forget that Overstock.com had a whole subsidiary and launched Ravecoin, their TZERO platform, etc and people fell hard for this bullshit already. > Bullish people have been scammed with Interoperability, Internet of Blockchains, spin up your own blockchain in minutes and other tech scam bullshit hype memes since 2017/2018. All these projects did was securely facilitate separating fools from their money. Nothing has changed. > 2017/18 Interoperability Money Grab Scams > Kommodo > Blockchain Interoperability: Connecting Isolated Protocols > https://komodoplatform.com/en/blog/blockchain-interoperability/ > Icon > ICON: Network of Networks > https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7tccuu/icon_network_of_networks/ > AION > How AION will become the new Internet of Blockchains with its new superfast and scalable Virtual Machine > https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7zb4xx/how_aion_will_become_the_new_internet_of/ > Wanchain > The Wide Area Network chain, is a decentralised blockchain interoperability solution > https://medium.com/wanchain-foundation/an-introduction-to-wanchain-a2936e25df91 > ARK > ARK: Bridgechains, Smartbridges and Deploy a Blockchain in under a minute without CLI > https://cryptopotato.com/ark-creating-one-ecosystem-of-connected-chains/ > https://medium.com/ark-io/what-is-the-ark-smartbridge-and-how-does-it-work-1dd7fb1e17a0 > https://np.reddit.com/r/ArkEcosystem/comments/ckae1q/ark_bridgechains_solving_scalability_and/ > Blockchain Interoperability Alliance: ICON x Aion x Wanchain > https://medium.com/helloiconworld/blockchain-interoperability-alliance-icon-x-aion-x-wanchain-8aeaafb3ebdd
Reminder **RWA Meme** has been around since 2018. **You will NEVER:** - trade AAPL,NVDA,MSFT,etc shares in your Ethereum address by connecting to MetaMask and going over to Uniswap - be able to go to Robinhood and withdraw AAPL,NVDA,MSFT,etc shares to you Ethereum/Solana address - trade NYSE regulated stocks outside the financial system of brokerages, DTCCs, etc and natively on Ethereum/Solana public blockchains **1. Identity, KYC, and Regulation Make Public Stock Trading Non-Viable** Public blockchains are fundamentally incompatible with how regulated stock markets operate. All participants in U.S. equity markets (NYSE, Nasdaq, etc.) **must be known, verified entities**. This includes: - Identity verification (KYC) - Anti-money laundering (AML) controls - Restrictions on who can buy specific securities - Tracking cost basis and holding periods - Mandatory tax reporting U.S. brokerages are **legally required to report all capital gains and losses to the IRS** using forms like **1099-B**, including: - Purchase price (cost basis) - Sale price - Holding period (short- vs long-term gains) - Wash sale adjustments A **fully public, permissionless blockchain cannot enforce these rules** because: - Wallets are pseudonymous - Anyone can transact without identity checks - There is no native way to restrict who can buy regulated securities - There is no built-in mechanism to enforce tax reporting or compliance To comply, you would have to introduce: - Permissioned blockchains - Private Layer-2 or Layer-3 networks - Whitelisting of approved wallets - Centralized identity enforcement At that point, you’ve **recreated a traditional brokerage and clearing system—just with more complexity and worse performance**. The original purpose of a public blockchain is lost entirely. **2. High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Performance Alone Disqualifies Blockchains.** Roughly **75% of total market trading volume today is algorithmic and dominated by high-frequency trading (HFT)**. These firms: - Compete at **nanosecond speeds** - Use **hollow-core fiber**, microwave relays, and colocation - Optimize every layer of hardware and networking for latency A **nanosecond is one billionth of a second**. Even the fastest centralized systems struggle at this scale—and **blockchains are orders of magnitude slower**. Even without blockchains, traditional trading systems already require: - Extreme horizontal scaling (Kubernetes, microservices) - In-memory databases - Edge locations - Direct exchange colocation - Private fiber networks And despite all this, **brokerages and exchanges still experience outages and lag during volatility**. Using a blockchain as the backbone of stock trading would be like replacing Formula 1 engines with horse-drawn carts.
and none of these adoptions will do anything for a token's price. Ditto for projects with MasterCard, Visa, SWIFT, WesternUnion etc etc etc. Chainlink has been adopted by various organisations, tech consortiums and protocols for a variety of RWA activities. It's no surprise DTCC chose an architecture which integrates into the Chainlink stack. LINK's price is down 58% this year, despite all of these announcements.
Post is by: Weird_Region6162 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1pp5x4j/pyth_price_feeds/ Pyth Network is a leading first-party oracle, delivering institutional-grade price feeds to over 120 blockchains with sub-second updates (often 400ms or faster). Today's market volatility proves exactly why platforms and users need this level of speed and accuracy in price data during high-fluctuation periods. Pyth is building the Bloomberg equivalent for crypto—providing high-fidelity, first-party market data that powers the backend of 700+ dApps and protocols in DeFi, borrow/lend, RWAs, and more. With the ongoing RWA boom, reliable on-chain pricing has never been more critical. I'm extremely bullish on $PYTH because of their sustainable revenue model. The team just announced the PYTH Reserve, a mechanism where one-third of the DAO treasury balance (funded by revenue from Pyth Pro subscriptions, Pyth Core on-chain price feeds, Pyth Entropy randomness, and Pyth Express Relay) will be used for monthly open-market $PYTH buybacks.This creates a true flywheel: as adoption of these products grows, revenue scales → treasury grows → larger monthly buybacks. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
But will it make my T-Rize $RIZE bag 4x so I can break even? Find out in our next 4-year episode of Revolution or Rugpull, only on RCC Network. Memes aside, apparently T-Rize were/are going to tokenize real-estate via this same Canton thing, the first ones I ever heard going for anything "RWA" that was not stocks and bonds.
Hello! Interesting news about the RWA sector. Real Finance has just announced a $29 million private funding round (with $25 million committed by Nimbus Capital and participation from Magnus Capital and Frekaz Group) to develop institutional infrastructure dedicated to the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs). Their goal is to facilitate adoption by banks and regulated managers, with an initial plan to tokenize $500 million in assets (around 2% of the current market for tokenized RWAs). This comes at a time when the sector is growing strongly, especially in tokenized money market funds, and with greater regulatory clarity. It reinforces the trend that RWAs are attracting serious institutional capital in 2025-2026. What do you think? Do you see more movement in the tokenization of traditional assets soon?
Hi! Good question about these classic altcoins from the previous cycle. In 2025, most are still in the top 30 by market cap and maintain active development, although they haven't recovered their 2021 all-time highs: ADA (Cardano): Charles Hoskinson continues to push upgrades (like zk and partner chains), but the hype has died down and it hasn't delivered on all the promises made back then. Solid in research, but slow in mass adoption. VET (VeChain): They just launched the Hayabusa upgrade (new staking and tokenomics), focused on a real supply chain with enterprise partnerships. It's not exploding in price, but it's advancing in practical utility. LINK (Chainlink): It remains the king of oracles, with CCIP growing and a lot of TVS in DeFi/RWA. Strong partnerships (Coinbase, etc.), probably the most "alive" on the list. LTC (Litecoin): Classic for fast/cheap payments, with ETF filings and some index inclusion. Stable, but without major recent innovations. DOT (Polkadot): Upgrades like Polkadot 2.0 and JAM are on the way for better interoperability, but low price and tough competition at layer-0. Ultimately, they have matured more as infrastructure than as "moonshots," and their future depends on real adoption rather than hype.
This is actually a pretty solid signal that RWA tokenization is moving past “proof of concept” and into real infrastructure. Institutions don’t deploy capital like this unless compliance and ops are taken seriously.
The future of these "old-guard" coins like ADA, VET, LINK, LTC, and DOT is determined by whether their continued development and real-world utility can outweigh the market's current hype cycle, which often favors newer narratives. Projects like LINK and DOT are showing strong fundamentals with major infrastructure upgrades (CCIP and Polkadot 2.0/JAM Protocol) and aggressive institutional focus (LINK's RWA data streams, DOT's supply cap), positioning them to remain highly relevant in the Web3 ecosystem despite price volatility.
Great timing for this article. The privacy narrative is clearly accelerating. The line about "confidential smart contracts, not just privacy coins" is crucial. Privacy coins solved one problem (transaction anonymity) but institutions need something different—programmable privacy for complex financial applications. That's what layers like COTI are building with Garbled Circuits on Ethereum. Fast multi-party computation that enables confidential DeFi, private RWA execution, and compliant selective disclosure.
This is an RWA use-case of digital id via blockchain. Not just for algorand, but a good insight into how blockchains will add value in the future.
Yes Ondo is bringing RWA to Solana in 2026 as per their recent announcement. Bullish for Solana in 2026
Ondo has terrible fundamentals! What you talking about? Way too many tokens 3 billion with 7BILLION more coming out to dilute the price. The Tokens are not even needed to settle RWA on the chain. Read Ondo's white paper for proof. You can just use any stable coin to settle all the assets. Ondo is a useless governance token at the end of the day. Ondo is a great company I'd buy their stock if they had one....heck they are bringing all the RWA to SOLANA in 2026 so good on them. But I dunno how this helps Ondo token. They should still pump one day in a bull run because it has 'blackrock' as an investor but many chains have big names tied to them and they do nothing. Look at Hbar. 50 awesome companies attached to it and they all don't use the chain basically. feels almost like they get paid to put there name on it? doesn't it feel that way sometime? haha
Not the end tho .. RWA pioneer in the crypto world
Post is by: Acrobatic_Neck_6774 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1pmxxet/why_not_all_defi_credit_is_the_same_and_where/ A lot of people lump all DeFi credit together, but the risk profiles are very different. In practice, RWA credit usually falls into three buckets: **A) Collateralized loans** Backed by hard assets with clear LTVs and real recovery paths. Risk is tied to collateral value, not borrower behavior. **B) Uncollateralized with capital controls** Funds must stay visible, liquid, often delta-neutral, and cannot be used for operations. Lower risk than pure unsecured credit, but still behavior-dependent. **C) Uncollateralized used for operations** No assets, no enforced liquidity. Funds go directly into a business. When revenue slows, lenders absorb the losses. Most credit blowups come from here. $ynRWAx sits in **Bucket A** backed by real mortgages with conservative LTVs and defined recovery processes, which is why its risk profile is structurally more stable than many DeFi credit products. Happy to discuss or hear counterpoints. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
>That is XRP Tundra, the XRP in the name conveniently omitted by you. You asked how does the XRPL use Chainlink’s oracle, I gave you an example where their oracle is used on the XRPL for XRP Tundra. Yes, 'XRP Tundra' (the company) operates across multiple blockchains, Solana and XRPL. Solana natively consumes Chainlink oracles; XRPL does not. Solana has paid for a chainlink integration, XRPL has not. Whats happening is a separate app like Tundra or Ondo, (Ondo is also not live on XRPL, only the OUSG RWA is issued there, the Ondo app itself runs on other chains) pulls the Chainlink data. That data is then relayed or referenced into an XRPL-based application. XRPL itself is not verifying, securing or enforcing Chainlink data. They are not consuming chainlink services. It is not the same thing lol XRPL consensus does NOT natively consume Chainlink data. XRPL validators do NOT secure Chainlink feeds. Chainlink data is NOT settled or enforced at the XRPL protocol level. Saying “XRPL uses Chainlink oracles” is simply false. That’s not how this works. >I never said XRPL native, you just said that, I specifically stated that any dev can use what oracle they want because the XRPL is oracle native, that is on an application layer, not native. Relaying data from one chain is not the same thing. You really think XRPL can bypass paying for a chainlink integration by getting another chain to relay info? LMAO!!!
ONDO will go up the most of all alt coins when this ultimately gets put in place …..it’s the RWA leader
Post is by: sauro333 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1plspub/mira/ Hi there! 👋 I’m currently mining Lumira Coins for free using the MIRA Network application. ✅Sign up with my referral code to earn +1 Lumira: Sd333 🌐Website: https://miranetwork.io 📈Mira Network is an emerging crypto company based in Switzerland, specialising in tokenizing real-world asset (RWA) businesses. Its unique platform enables community members to become shareholders in tokenized companies. 💰A portion of each company’s profits is allocated to the liquidity pool of Lumira Coins. The more active you are on the app, the more value Lumira Coin can gain. Join us now and earn your share of the future of tokenization. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
> RWA, the whole stock market will be tokenized, ETH will be the plumbing of Wall Street Reminder That Stocks Cannot Trade on Public Blockchains: **1. Identity, KYC, and Regulation Make Public Stock Trading Non-Viable** Public blockchains are fundamentally incompatible with how regulated stock markets operate. All participants in U.S. equity markets (NYSE, Nasdaq, etc.) **must be known, verified entities**. This includes: - Identity verification (KYC) - Anti-money laundering (AML) controls - Restrictions on who can buy specific securities - Tracking cost basis and holding periods - Mandatory tax reporting U.S. brokerages are **legally required to report all capital gains and losses to the IRS** using forms like **1099-B**, including: - Purchase price (cost basis) - Sale price - Holding period (short- vs long-term gains) - Wash sale adjustments A **fully public, permissionless blockchain cannot enforce these rules** because: - Wallets are pseudonymous - Anyone can transact without identity checks - There is no native way to restrict who can buy regulated securities - There is no built-in mechanism to enforce tax reporting or compliance To comply, you would have to introduce: - Permissioned blockchains - Private Layer-2 or Layer-3 networks - Whitelisting of approved wallets - Centralized identity enforcement At that point, you’ve **recreated a traditional brokerage and clearing system—just with more complexity and worse performance**. The original purpose of a public blockchain is lost entirely. **2. High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Performance Alone Disqualifies Blockchains.** Roughly **75% of total market trading volume today is algorithmic and dominated by high-frequency trading (HFT)**. These firms: - Compete at **nanosecond speeds** - Use **hollow-core fiber**, microwave relays, and colocation - Optimize every layer of hardware and networking for latency A **nanosecond is one billionth of a second**. Even the fastest centralized systems struggle at this scale—and **blockchains are orders of magnitude slower**. Even without blockchains, traditional trading systems already require: - Extreme horizontal scaling (Kubernetes, microservices) - In-memory databases - Edge locations - Direct exchange colocation - Private fiber networks And despite all this, **brokerages and exchanges still experience outages and lag during volatility**. Using a blockchain as the backbone of stock trading would be like replacing Formula 1 engines with horse-drawn carts.
> I claim it won’t go to $20 trillion, per my research Common Sense shows ETH won't reach $20 Trillion marketcap. > Ethereum Network Can Grow To A $20 Trillion Valuation ETH reached a 1/2 Trillion marketcap in May 2021, 4 1/2 years ago. **ETH has been unable to hold support over 1/2 Trillion for ~5 years but they will reach a $20 Trillion markecap in 10 years?** > Stablecoin Activity will propel ETH to $20 Trillion **Stablecoins marketcap has grown by 200% since 2021. ETH is down -40% since then.** Stablecoins growth and volume have zero impact on ETH price and marketcap | |Nov. 2021 | Nov. 2025 |:-----------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:| | Stablecoins | $0.11 Trillion | $0.32 Trillion > Invisible Value Behind The Trillion-Dollar Thesis includes transaction FEES **ETH revenue from daily transaction fees have dropped -90% since 2021** with L2s and network upgrades. | Date | Fees | |:-----------:|:------------:| | 12/12/2021 | ~$4.18 Million | | 12/12/2025 | ~$330K | | Δ | -90% | > RWA, the whole stock market will be tokenized, ETH will be the plumbing of Wall Street Stocks Cannot Trade on Public Blockchains: **1. Identity, KYC, and Regulation Make Public Stock Trading Non-Viable** Public blockchains are fundamentally incompatible with how regulated stock markets operate. All participants in U.S. equity markets (NYSE, Nasdaq, etc.) **must be known, verified entities**. This includes: - Identity verification (KYC) - Anti-money laundering (AML) controls - Restrictions on who can buy specific securities - Tracking cost basis and holding periods - Mandatory tax reporting U.S. brokerages are **legally required to report all capital gains and losses to the IRS** using forms like **1099-B**, including: - Purchase price (cost basis) - Sale price - Holding period (short- vs long-term gains) - Wash sale adjustments A **fully public, permissionless blockchain cannot enforce these rules** because: - Wallets are pseudonymous - Anyone can transact without identity checks - There is no native way to restrict who can buy regulated securities - There is no built-in mechanism to enforce tax reporting or compliance To comply, you would have to introduce: - Permissioned blockchains - Private Layer-2 or Layer-3 networks - Whitelisting of approved wallets - Centralized identity enforcement At that point, you’ve **recreated a traditional brokerage and clearing system—just with more complexity and worse performance**. The original purpose of a public blockchain is lost entirely. **2. High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Performance Alone Disqualifies Blockchains.** Roughly **75% of total market trading volume today is algorithmic and dominated by high-frequency trading (HFT)**. These firms: - Compete at **nanosecond speeds** - Use **hollow-core fiber**, microwave relays, and colocation - Optimize every layer of hardware and networking for latency A **nanosecond is one billionth of a second**. Even the fastest centralized systems struggle at this scale—and **blockchains are orders of magnitude slower**. Even without blockchains, traditional trading systems already require: - Extreme horizontal scaling (Kubernetes, microservices) - In-memory databases - Edge locations - Direct exchange colocation - Private fiber networks And despite all this, **brokerages and exchanges still experience outages and lag during volatility**. Using a blockchain as the backbone of stock trading would be like replacing Formula 1 engines with horse-drawn carts.
Wow. Omg. My eyes have been closed for my entire decade in this space....how could I have ignored this!? >Ripple owns, hidden road, metaco, rail, and many other financial institutions. Clearing houses. Lending. Payments. Stable coins. Paxos was one of the first RWA providers and is also providing custody, lending, clearing, so you're wrong. Ethereum and Solana already have >Circle is a one trick pony. Buy t bills and get paid interest. Paxos and fidelity have no innovation, and don’t have their own block chains. >They are literally not competitors in any way Circle is native on 22 blockchains **including the XRPL** and can be traded on the XRPL *without even having to touch XRP*(thankfully for them). If USDT had the ability to be independently audited and become more compliant, they might have a shot, but USDC is the second largest stablecoin by market cap and is compliant with U.S. laws. the head start they have against every other competitor is massively. Incredibly massive. Let me ask you this - if USDC is native on 22 blockchains and can be used on the XRPL **without needing XRP**, why would anybody use RLUSD and how does this help the XRP token? Why wouldn't people use the independently audited familiar stablecoin USDC that can be sent easily to other chains and remain as UDSC and instead use RLUSD? >The XRPL is the ONLY THING that can connect all of those businesses and allow for free and easy transfer of stable coins. XRP can act as a bridge asset for liquidity between stablecoins, you do not have to hold/consume XRP just to transfer a stablecoin like USDC because the instituitions that want to partner with Ripple, don't want to touch XRP because they don't have to, it's dogshit, and would add unnecessary risk. More and more they are making it so they don't need to hold or interact with XRP the transaction sablecoins on the XRPL, because that's literally almost every one of them want. There is very little institutional demand for the XRP token, but there are people that want to explore Ripple's remittance capabilities, just without the XRP token being involved.
It's not that obvious, but you need to read between the lines. 1. Made to be controlled, they can shut it down and bring it back up, reverse transactions etc. This is what a bank does. 2. Super fast and cheap, can support millions of transactions just like VISA etc, at a fraction of the cost. 3. SOL has the largest TVL after ether, means it's being used and creating profit. It's a profitable chain, unlike all these other ghost chains. 4. ETF are coming and doing well 5. High staking rewards. That means that if you have the option of an eth vs a sol etf for income. Sol wins. It has a higher "dividend" while being 4x smaller, so more "room for growth" if you think of it as an investment. 6. JP Morgan is using Solana to issue debt. 7. SOL is the #1 chain for RWA. HSBC and BoA are using it to tokenise bonds. 8. The US president used sol for its tokens, he could have used any other chain. 9. It's US based, with Trump's America first agenda this is huge. I fought buying Solana for so long, because when I started in 20 17 it was all about decentralization and going against the machine. However, now in 2025 it became part of big finance, so like it or not it's going to so very well. I finally gave in and got some, in the meantime I keep staking and growing my stack.