EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
I'd suggest EUSA/VEU if you're unsure. We are in a large AI hype bubble.
Aside from shorting, you can buy an equal weight index like EUSA or RSP. Another option is an extended index like VXF
I’m a believer in the equal weight index these days. EUSA and RSP.
You could do an equal weight index like EUSA or RSP. Still exposure but it is limited.
EUSA is also only 9 basis points
If this is a concern to you, you could do an equal weight index like EUSA or RSP
Agree. Leaning towards equal weight SP500 now. EUSA or RSP. But I also add in international funds to the mix to diversify from the US a bit.
Yeah, and one I just heard about that includes a few more companies: EUSA. It has a lower expense ratio than RSP.
EUSA as Defensive ETF? Being that I’m about 3 years from retiring, would like to reduce risk in my portfolio, which is very stock heavy, at 95%, equally spread among FXAIX, SCHD, ITOT and IVV. Not a fan of bond ETFs so looking at “defensive” ETFs like EUSA, QUAL or VPU. Thoughts?
Someone mentioned AVUV: that contains mostly companies smaller than what'd be in the SPY AVUS is a much better balanced, actively managed fund that has a whole range of companies, from what's in AVUV to the mega caps (both tech and not) It's my largest position RSP is SPY equal weighted. Lesser known is equal weighed EUSA: https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239693/ishares-msci-usa-etf
I think you may be right. I did my best to avoid too much overlap (and I included the REIT ETF's because I like the idea of the dividends they pay out), but I've internally debated whether I should get rid of them as well as QCLN and CHGX. Even though the idea of ESG ETF's (like QCLN and CHGX) is attractive from an ethical investing standpoint, most of the ESG ETF's I found had essentially the same top funds invested as VOO, but with higher expense ratios. And while QCLN and CHGX do invest in different stocks, I have my doubts whether investing in Clean Energy will see good pay outs in either the near or medium terms. It may be better to just invest for maximum growth and then donate a share of the proceeds to a cause that matters to me down the road. I'm still likely to keep EUSA, because I really like the idea of investing in the little guys as well as the bigger fish, but I think I'll take your advice and at a minimum sell my shares of QCLN, CHGX, one of the Bond ETF's, and one of the REIT ETF's and some of the individual stocks and put them toward VOO.
SPY and VTI are too overweight to Apple and Microsoft for my liking. They're obviously great companies but I don't like the fact that they're 10 percent of the entire fund due to the mega cap size of the companies. If you want less concentration, look up RSP or EUSA. They are equal weight index funds.
EUSA. An S&P following ETF with each holding being weighted equally instead of 1% accounting for 25% like SPY. I also own SPY.
I read this as \_not\_ a deal where EUSA is paying NSH. What it is a deal there NSH's nano receiver use the signal from EU's (at that time new) GPS satellites to infer atmospheric weather information for the GPS signal's occulation. In other words, NSH signed a deal to use the EU's GPS signal to obtain weather information. In turn, NSH believes that selling this information could be worth as much as $2.5 billion over 25 years. Annnnd if you look at the Investor Presentation forecasts (grain of salt) which is showing almost 1B in 2025, it looks like they will easily exceed that original old number.
iShares EUSA for example. It takes the S&P 500 and weighs them each at around 0.2%. That way one is not overly invested into big tech like the current s&p 500. I think it is a very easy way to get more diversified without having to think too much. Not a financial advisor.