HR

Rare-ish_Birb

And she wasn't an employee, so HR and the ethics committee don't care.

bibbyman06

Make Jensen take a HR course and then ask China for the secrets back.

slytythesneakyguy

Hey, I didn’t give Robinhood permission to close positions automatically on my account. Wtf. I thought margin calls were just a friendly warning. I’m calling HR

dudevan

same shit happened with the CEO and head of HR last summer at the coldplay concert, and nobody knew the guy. I’d say it’s mostly organic.

TheBlockChainVillage

He should have just dated the HR lady. https://preview.redd.it/my2fc1vg1r0i1.jpeg?width=610&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8600aaa545a9d69b8f77aba57ff8578612c52d22

light_and_ryuk

Bro went from CEO to HR department real quick😭😭🙏🏿

AlphaNikon

HR?

onlinedisguise

Let us know how HR spins this as a strategic move to grow the business!

Wardendelete

My bad, didn’t realise Wendy’s HR training covered identifying billionaire imposters. I’ll give you that. Very intelligent, compared to the billionaire regards.

Karate-Schnitzel

Is he going to be put on a PIP by HR before he’s terminated?

Blarghnog

You’ve worked at public companies and still think this is weird? That’s the problem. Public companies don’t just manage products and numbers. Executive behavior creates real risk — reputation, regulators, lawsuits, customer relationships, investor confidence. The board is supposed to oversee that. When something happens, you don’t sit quiet and let employees, the market, and the press invent the story. The memo is crisis communications. It puts accountability on the record, frames the situation before someone else does, reassures people who matter, and tries to stop the damage from spreading. That’s not some bizarre HR email. That’s how public companies are supposed to handle it.

Wide-Contribution-29

lol, Jensen be like HR? I am HR! and finance! and technology! I AM NVIDIA!

illonlyfadeaway

HR didn't find my "Honeypots Welcome" t-shirt funny, even after I told them half the guys on the team have Asian girlfriends. The other half are losers with no girlfriends.

miniaznray

not really, a lot of asia business activities that are legal would be HR violation in the US. Taiwan is actually much more open to sex than China. Would say Taiwan is a mix of Japan + China together. Taiwan still got triads which I'm quite surprised especially in this modern age.

appearstobeidiot

Someone skipped the mandatory HR training to not open external emails from suspect domains.

smoke-n-toke

Hey at least it’s a HR 😉

fujimonster

if a regular employee did it , they'd already have a goodbye email from HR -- standards.

Then-Wealth-1481

Remember when Intel’s CEO once fucked their HR lady and had to resign?

NotMe357

Is 24HR trade already start? I thought it was first in December?

miniaznray

yep, especially when he goes on the Asia tour to Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and China. All 4 countries have the same business culture of where businessmen go out to KTV and hostess clubs together. That type of culture is HR violation but jensen's company Nvidia been in the asia gaming market for so long so he must have been exposed to that culture for a while.

miniaznray

very different. this guy, Jensen been exposed to Asia business culture all his life at Nvidia. Asia business culture is very different than USA business culture. A lot of stuff in asia is like US's HR Violation. In asia business culture, business men goes to the KTV and clubs to drink and pick female hostess. On his asia tour to Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and China. All 4 countries have the same business culture.

CurrentAirline9065

also if the HR lady was a chinese spy 😭

Western_Coffee_5445

This is way worse than the CEO on the camera with HR lady he was shaggin

jamesrggg

Calls to HR

highlander145

Well thank God it was not the head of HR 😬

Le7emesens

More and more companies and organizations are embracing in their business operations tools with AI every day. It's not only developers or IT, it's also HR, finance, sales, legal teams and tools for employees so they can be more productive. Even security. I've seen 2 AI robots patrolling inside outside buildings within a single year in public places. Tons of AI based startups are being created as of time. I even know 2 friends who created their fintech AI startup this last year. One of which surprisingly was just a regular employee, I'd never think he would make the jump if it were for AI. As of i wrote, millions of Indians are training AI models with high-def body cams that record all their movement, including micro movements in their factories so that robots will soon take over their job. More and more artists are using AI, from Hollywood studios to the lead singer of Black Eyed Pea. Pharmaceutical companies are using and training AI to discover new drugs because they're in a race to beat China who now has a lead in that field. That's just the tip of the iceberg of the demand that's nascent. And that's the world you and I will live in. I'm not even talking about what will happen to memory demand when AI meet quantum computing and blockchain, or when people 8n emerging countries demand some AI...

Valkyrie_Skuld

No bro this isn't a preschool and you're not HR

Orthoebolavirus

I never hear about foreign leaders sleeping with our (American) spies On a related note, does the CIA have like an HR department? Can a CIA boss tell a subordinate to go sleep with someone to collect info? Seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

DeeDee_Z

I used HR for \*years\* -- a Medical Office Buildings REIT. Killed two birds, y'know? Not an ETF, though. If you really want ONLY an Exchange-Traded Fund to the exclusion of every other type of healthcare investment, I admit I haven't answered your question.

Extension-Temporary4

Are you familiar with salesforce? Do you know how their business model works? They get in the door with a super targeted and useful enterprise product. They offer a teaser rate. The product is great so you start implementing more of their products. Before you know it your entire organization runs on salesforce. Then they start to raise your rates. This is just one avenue AI will take. We are already seeing full enterprise integration. Everything from front end web dev to back office HR crap. AI will permeate entire enterprises. Pricing models will adjust. Upselling will begin. Then they will do the same on the consumer side and start building in as revenue and data revenue. The TAM is every single person on the planet and the revenue is basically the entire global money supply. I promise you, the road to profitability is very much there. The demand is there. The compute and power isn’t. It’s the binding constraint. Once we solve for that, it’s all systems go. But as stated, we are in the very early innings. 

Strawberry_Pretzels

It gives the appearance of growth whilst also keeping current employees on their toes. They harvest the data of people applying. HR gets to act like they are busy by putting candidates through endless rounds of interviews that lead to nowhere. I’m sure there are more but you get the idea.

hitmeyay

For what it's worth my respect to you for taking this on Reddit which most CEOs would never given the HR risk My questions are as below: 1. Implication of Edge premium tier launch. In terms of AI features, whats balance between enhancing ARPU monetization vs making feature free to potentially boost user growth over time and how you make these decisions 2. Vision for acquisition related growth on Freddie for example to expand prep access and Telehealth. are there other adjacencies or ambitions long term? 3. Any surprising or shocking trends by monthly active users by regions or age cohort that is changing in recent years?

DoctorNoob_CF

Funniest HR story/customer support you can tell us ?

JohnDillermand2

Hey Grindr, what's your best HR story?

Donkey__Balls

That’s great when it’s momentary and you just need to “buy time”. I’ve been fighting this battle for 25 years and I can’t just live at the ER. I’ve been through so many shitty institutional therapists/psychologists who are overwhelmed and jaded and honestly don’t have the energy to care anymore. Even if they did the vast majority don’t have the training to deal with highly complex PTSD on the severe end of the spectrum. I’m fortunate to have finally found a good one - I’m finally at the point in life where I can afford $1150 a week to do this level of work - but it’s taken me decades. It’s just not an option for most people. I can tell you that I survived in spite of the institutions not because of them. Everyone just wants to say they followed policy so that nobody gets sued. It’s like one massive unfeeling HR department where everyone is just trying to cover their ass.

PapitoMusk

I googled "BBC" today to check weather. HR called me and gave me a warning. What did I do wrong...

Pokrog

We were estimated to be around 7 months ahead of China last week and the new estimate after the midterms are shrinking down to 4 months already and that's without legislation being passed yet. The gap is a lot smaller than you think when you understand the rate of exponential growth potential. AI is the future and there's no stopping it. If your job is already in immediate danger or has already been replaced by AI, your job was basically the equivalent of HR, and HR departments are adult daycare.

A1ienspacebats

Wow, HR really wanted to lay the law done today, huh

aemus001

Ahead of my HR department...

Admirable_Guest_641

I apologise it comes across this way. I am going through a big life event right now so I’m still in my head about it. I absolutely am not looking for a sugar daddy so I’m not sure where that idea came from. I’m actually disgusted at the thought of a relationship. I’ve just come out a horrible one for 3 years. If anyone is interested in that please do not contact me lol. My plan: **AI Business – Investment Opportunity** I’m developing an all-in-one AI-powered business workforce designed to help businesses operate, manage and grow without needing to hire multiple employees or pay for numerous software subscriptions. Rather than simply assisting business owners, **the platform is designed to do the work for them.** It acts as an AI receptionist, personal assistant, sales manager, marketing team, financial administrator, HR assistant and business strategist — all within one intelligent platform. From handling customer enquiries, generating leads, managing appointments and invoices to creating marketing campaigns, monitoring contracts, identifying savings and discovering growth opportunities, the platform is designed to manage entire business functions autonomously. **What makes it different?** Everything is built and configured for the customer. Business owners don’t need technical knowledge, complicated setups or experience with AI. The platform is designed to proactively identify what needs doing, make intelligent decisions within authorised limits and complete tasks automatically, only involving the business owner when approval or an important decision is required. **Our goal is simple: Give businesses the capabilities of an entire team at a fraction of the cost of hiring one.** The business will operate through a scalable monthly subscription model, making a fully integrated AI workforce accessible to businesses of all sizes. We are seeking investment to complete development, bring the platform to market and scale the business.

Flat_Box9365

Instructions unclear- started to do the helicopter at my work station and now I gotta have a chat with HR

Loightsout

They will be a beneficiary 100%. But you can’t piggy-back to the top. Only to tag along. That’s the point. Have you looked at what the AI race is racing towards? It’s not little chat bots on the phone. Not everyday conveniences. Those you will have on the iPhone. And Apple will pay big models and infrastructure to use or buyout small players and incorporate them. That’ll be the Apple AI benefit. The real AI race however is creating a gigantic digital helper workforce for hire. The winners will be the ones with the most advanced models and most efficient infrastructure. They will be able offer you and every corporation in the world the best conditions at the flip of a switch. For any task that’s “AI-doable”. No HR, no hiring process, no health insurance, retirement plans. Can even fire them whenever you want. Apple cannot reenter that race. Nor can they swoop in and just buy something. Everyone who is currently close to the AI top will be too expensive to buy (look at anthropic valuation lol) and everyone who has fallen behind isn’t worth the purchase.

DownSyndromeInvestor

20% of Fortune 500 spending is just on overhead like HR, accounting, legal etc. Even if AI can reduce that by 25% it's a huge savings that juices corporate profits.

AffectionateTour3021

Like a good softball swing, the spring is coiled. Swing and a miss, or HR, no in between

Phoeniyx

And depending on interviewer (some senior tech lead vs some HR sheep), you might get called out saying thats a bullshit answer and you didnt answer the question

Valkyrie_Skuld

is there HR?

The_Nutz16

They’re probably looking for honesty and a bit of deductive reasoning, not some canned teamwork rah rah bullshit. But then again you can never underestimate the idiocy of an HR run hiring process.

TumbleweedOver9000

Why they ask this, they should ask what if you get reduced salary for long time in future, the price of stock is none of business of employees, the HR kinda ass I bet that question generated by Super Intelligence 🤖

Engineering_Simple

AI in HR is the worst... they just do keyword searches, don't actually infer anything about the candidates talent (actual or potential)

IBJON

You would think, but I've interviewed tons of people that are smart on paper and can't get a clue when we're just asking "culture" questions mandated by HR and say some asinine shit that makes HR or upper management reject them 

Old-Tie8770

It’s just to make HR people feel useful

Ill-Ad1603

My manager called me white trash today, I’m gonna file a complaint with the HR on Monday.

Deep_Calls_007

HR in engineering

Mother-Style6479

I can't. The best I can do with my CEO is to go doing a floorbal tournament with him. Like fuck I'm going to spend a free saturday like that. At tops, AI will replace our three HR ladies in the office and some of the middle-management, but ain't no way Elon gonna make a robot nimble enough in motorics to replace my ass in the injection molding line where \_I\_ and my coworkers produce the components that fuel your bubble. Enjoy your bags. I will enjoy my salary and retire like the French. No fucks given. Either baguettes in eternity paid by whoever or the system burns lol.

warlock_roleplayer

My current role is to figure out how to apply these tools to accounting, ad sales, marketing, HR, etc within a big tech co. It's absolutely happening right now, although a bit uneven. We are building these guard rails you speak of already and they work. Stuff like layers on top of the ERP that are automating a lot of the operational activities.

godsslayer54

She looks like an HR or smthn she is NOT paid $70k lmao

DarkHampster

I tried that with my secretary today. "Try smiling a bit more, beautiful." I now have a 5pm meeting with HR on Friday.

Necessary_Poet_3524

Name, please. So that we can post it to Google HR to get her fired for giving bad rep to hard working people at Google

GreenFuturesMatter

Not everyone that works for Google is inside a corp office is my point. You realize they have giant ass data centers that don’t get these amenities, pop sites, etc. These offices are just a bunch of SWEs and HR, bizops personnel that already have a huge amount of freedom to work wherever.

tetrisan

Google HR should search every video for employees that post this and fire them on the spot (and record it and post it as a reminder to others to not to do this shit).

apurimac777

Im sure they have oceans of money for all the cute girls to have sales and HR jobs

eggplantpot

HR and Account Managers normally

lifesabeach_

My retail company bet all horses on it for retail comms, itsm and HR. I’m currently working on field service and even my guy at SNOW said it’s overpowered for our use case. Other than that it does seem very useful as a one stop shop. But it’s costing us an arm and a leg.

950771dd

Yes that seems a reasonable thing to propose to HR.

Panda_Satan

Please don't lump them in with palantir. Allow me... Simply, ServiceNow is a platform as a service (PaaS) that sits at the core of your IT infrastructure and facilitates the interconnection of those different components with one another. You get to see the holistic picture of your business and where any gaps are. With your hardware and the services they support, you can alert groups of consumers of that service when there's an outage and know exactly where the disruption is coming from - saving countless hours digging through logs. That's not even all ITSM can do. They have products in several areas like HR, Contracts, Compliance, Supply Chain Management, you name it. And it all has the ability to interoperate. I don't love the poker table all in shove toward AI, but the underlying platform is strong. Source: am a ServiceNow architect (implementation partner) Snowflake is a data lake. Think of a really large hard drive for storing your company's data. You can even establish bidirectional communication with other tools to keep that data fresh and backed up

Swimming-Dingo-9695

Thanks a lot… Now I’m in HR for grab-assing

TheLongestLake

Probably a random non-profit job. Maybe HR. Maybe a government job that require a college degree of any type.

bearhunter429

#If you get a calendar invite from your boss with HR cc'ed, you are about to get laid off. You have to delete the e-mail to avoid getting laid off. LMAO🤌

maiden_fan

Whether it's worth it depends on one detail of your plan: does it allow in-plan Roth conversions, or in-service rollovers to a Roth IRA? Without one of those, the earnings on the after-tax money get taxed later. Sprig3 mentioned the rollover step above. For retiring at 50, it's also worth asking HR whether you can convert after every contribution so the earnings stay small.

patiently_entropy

Let HR review this first

werner-hertzogs-shoe

yes! Not at this instant but in the next 30 years I think AI will be a larger profit impact than internet has been in it's 30 years! I mainly think so because every company could be able to slice workforce substantially, which is lots of profit (think factory work, tech support, management, construction, HR, etc), and also the very broad market of tech to sell, like house and work robots, technically ai is powering cabs now. Internet has been huge obviously, but it had a lot of reinvention of old stuff at the cost of the old stuff (think spotify vs cd sales, netflix vs cable tv / blockbuster) , AI is potentially world upending.

niaqr

Deborah from HR says you must smile and clap throughout the entire activity or they'll rescind your bonus for not being a team player

werner-hertzogs-shoe

That's largely why I think the frontier models are boned. I think both openAI and anthropic are doomed because open weight models will undercut them and allow companies to bring their data in house and have more control. Lot's of companies have dropped roles like support and HR, and within the next 10 years many more companies will likely be able to utilize robots for tasks like assembly, cooking, warehouse work, driving.

werner-hertzogs-shoe

I mean, not in the early days? Basically everyone was losing money in the those early days because it was a massive investment in something that wasnt bringing in positive cash flow. Nobody was making crazy ad money yet. Google was making serious money in the later 00s, and you could certainly connect smart phones to internet tech, which has been insane money for apple, but the potential revenue and cost cutting for AI and robotics I think is far beyond the internet. For instance, walmart achieved it's first ever profitable quarter for online sales in......2026! They also lost a TON of money getting there. For every meta there have been hundreds of losers. Companies around the world are already reducing staffing in HR, logistics, support, engineering and management. Engineering I know is a bit of a mixed bag, but for the most part it is cost reducing (possibly with other hidden costs due to a loss of expertise). I think you'll see warehouse work shifting more and more to robots, factory work as well and possibly kitchen work too. It's hard to predict because the tech isnt there yet, but we have driverless cabs now, and it once it gets to that point where it is an obvious choice it will change incredibly quickly. That is going to create massive headaches in the economy as well, but companies should be able to reduce workforce and save money and be more profitable

Traditional-Bad-3839

I'm a staff engineer and nobody in the org has been writing a single line of code or doing anything without AI for the entirety of the year. Managers do their presentations and dashboards with AI. QA is spinning up agents to do validation. HR is writing every single email with AI, I just saw someone from the payroll team using an automated software to handle payments with 0 input. If your company does not look like this it's probably stuck in the stone age

__natty__

This. For typical Smith, Hans, Kowalski or Juan who is not deep into current economy it’s absolute gambling situation where he plays (retirement plans/etf/supply chains/job) whether he wants it or not. I’m not even saying someone needs directly invest in Nvidia or Anthropic once it launch. There is too many connections between various businesses. It’s not also only about marketing, HR, sales, programmers or analysts but most office workforce. Next months are IMO a big gamble for most white collars and plenty of industries.

GuyGotThis

fair lol... though the usual buyout problem isn't even HR, it's who says yes. the people with the easiest exit tend to be the ones you'd most want to keep, so they can hit the number and still lose the wrong people. do you know if managers get any say in who's approved?

Scary_Habit974

Totally agree. However never underestimate the incompetence of corporate HR.

Sorry_Sorry_Im_Sorry

One of my previous coworkers worked in the HR department at Uber when they went public. They said that uber was giving out millions in phantom stock before the company went public to TONS of employees (Google says they paid out 3.9 billion in stock compensation). Not only that, but that they kept on having company parties and having to pay out employees for not suing the company cause of things that happened at those parties (they wouldn't go into detail about it). Is that what OP is basically implying?

mailslot

The deadweight that really bothers me are the ones that immediately claim sexual harassment with HR when they’re about to be terminated. It’s such a tired self-preservation strategy and it’s damaging to employees that are actually being harassed.

Tha_Sly_Fox

One is a corporate merger leading to reduction in workforce which always happens with a merger because you don’t need two HR departments, accounting depts, marketing depts etc. Another is downsizing after a mass over hiring post covid combined with cutting costs to fund AI infrastructure investments (the Microsoft buyouts were offered to employees with the lower tiers of seniority)

Historical_Course587

IMHO, communications plus admin experience is pretty solid for the uncertain future: - You have front office and back office computing skills. Young people just entering the workforce today don't have these, and may never have them. - You are an interpersonal machine. You can do sales. You can do client management. You can do consulting. These are jobs that machines will only replace if/when customers would rather deal with machines than with people (which won't ever fully happen). - You studied to apply fundamental techniques to language in all its forms. That is an extremely broad skillset, like a philosophy degree to the STEM world. Get confident in the underlying theory of your education and experience, and leverage that to get in the head of recruiters, HR teams, and hiring managers. You can very likely get your foot in the door anywhere, doing anything, with your skillset, because you _KNOW_ how to frame what you have in terms of what people need/want to hear.

jetpilot6969

MNQ 1HR chart looks that way to me lol

GrandKnew

that's what happens when you let HR neolib wokeists decide what AI policies you inact

peatoast

HR probably looked at the row number in their excel sheet and called it the level. Haha

Inevitable_Tomato927

My friend built the HR app for this, while working for a third party (Indian company) at Microsoft. Mostly used AI as well to 'code' it. Hilarious situation all around. What is the end goal here?

appearstobeidiot

Who wants to pay for an AMEX card in this economy --> far fewer people --> Why? Because they got whupped by AI trade, fuel prices and lost their jobs as well --> Did you say "lost their jobs"? --> Why are we not doing that? Get me Legal and HR. That would save my job for this year at least.

Derpazoid69

What do think of QPT.v on the TSXV? Owns 26.6% of OQPBIOM which is developing Oregovomab. High Risk/High Reward. Phase 2 results were massively positive. HR 0.35. Median OS survival 56.6 month increase. iirc. Unfortunately failed Phase 3 PFS but DSMB recommended follow up because of long tail effect that immunotherapies can have. but with any immunotherapy the Discordant nature where PFS fails but huge OS win can happen. So it's possible it could happen with oregovomab. Phase 3 primary completion has been pushed back 3 times. Phase 2 was also pushed back 3-4 times. The stock has $0.15 cents in positive book value but trades at $0.025 (true BV is $0.18 but auditor put a 25% reduction in OQPBIOM stake value as QPT.v does not own controlling stake) NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE. ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN DD AND RESEARCH AND ONLY INVEST WHAT YOU CAN AFFORD TO LOSE. PAST PERFORMACE IS NOT INDICITAVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. I own lots of shares of QPT.v. If oregovomab fails QPT.v is going to $0/share ZERO (like that Warren Buffet meme). But if oregovomab succeeds Gemini says QPT.v could go to $0.20-$1+/share. . NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE. ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN DD AND RESEARCH AND ONLY INVEST WHAT YOU CAN AFFORD TO LOSE. PAST PERFORMACE IS NOT INDICITAVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

r2c1

Software is the easy part, the hard part is the domain knowledge and investing in it for the long haul so you do it right and not get sued into oblivion for violating whatever country's laws say about that domain. E.g. does it make sense for a defense company like Lockheed Martin to invest in building its own complete HR and payroll platform or just pay Rippling or Workday?

Mother-Style6479

Breh, some of us work blue collar with real jobs. Ain't none of what I can do be automated in 50 years or more and then I don't care anymore. Got no kids and not making them if I get ultra lucky on that. It doesn't matter to me if the 3 HR ladies in a 160 person company get automated. I still gotta do my job and no way they are competing me with semi-manual shift labor. Beer money in the bag bois. For decades. Fuck your NVDA, don't need it, never will.

ilnyarien

Yes, prof. Svane said as much yesterday at ESMO: “Current guidelines recommend considering neoadjuvant therapy for these patients, so clinicians will need guidance on choosing between neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition and adjuvant vaccine therapy.” Intismeran is used as adjuvant, because it's slow to manufacture and administer. You won't let the tumor untreated for 8 months til you manufacture and administer intismeran and only then excise. From the yesterday's ESMO presentation, INT001 even failed stat sig for IIa/IIb/IIIa/IIIb DMFS (HR 0.41-1.02). So if node-negative is the MRNA's primary target, it doesn't seem promising. Similarly, ECoG 1 failed stat sig for DMFS, so if frail patients (EcoG 3+?) are MRNA's primary target because of SAEs, it doesn't seem promising. Because it is targeting roughly the same subgroups as nivo/ipi does. And NADINA already has 92/98% 5y OS/RFS for the responders, so wouldn't it make more sense to do a nivo/ipi to see a response? It's done before you even manufacture the vaccine. I'm always open to changing my mind, I just don't see a reason to right now, and the ever present 42% reduction narrative sounds more disingenuous the more information we get. I've done DFC on the company's current pipeline prior to the leak, and even the best case scenarios wouldn't justify more than $150, now, it's much less. But I'm not advising you to invest or divest, this can obviously go anywhere in any time frame, because markets are ultimately irrational.

Waiting4Reccession

Why dont they just replace HR with ai.

horns_for_drinking

Devs will eventually write some prompts for Michelle in HR…

Quirky-Watch5652

Are you in HR too or just incorrect all the time too?

Quirky-Watch5652

the *JEWS* celebrate Hanukkah in December i had a meeting with HR this and i had to repeated tell them it's in december and that they're wrong for saying that's not a correct thing to say

Open_Pollution_8038

This is false. My company already started laying off HR and replaced a lot of the shit with chatbots. Phone representatives are obviously next followed by IT headcount.

Rodramramfive

Yes this is a good point too- HR was like hey can we use AI to write the job descriptions? And legal/ senior leadership then said yes but that all need to be reviewed by humans... so then we hired 30 people to read job descriptions that AI creates to audit... and contract a legal team to review. This increased our costs for hiring from 80k per head to now about 110k in spend lol

Environmental_Park_6

Michelle in HR is definitely smarter than me and AI has benefitted my business tremendously. I used it to improve SEO, help get core web vitals in the green, think through service start and follow-up messages that more than doubled review count, to great client density reports, run weekly cash flow reports, and more. The new work feature we're using to now automate all of that along with downloading pictures from our scheduling software and posting them to social media, email audit, narrowing down indeed applications, and a few other things. I'm not going to attribute everything to AI but our revenue is up 30% YoY. If I can figure out how to make it useful anyone should be able to.

chumbano

People need to know how to effectively use AI for it to be useful. Sure, programmers can spin up some agents to write code BUT does Michelle in HR know what she's doing? I'm not so sure.... But ask me in a few months. My company is pushing copilot right now so Ill get to see it first hand if random 40-60 year old corporate employees can actually take advantage of AI

ilnyarien

Wait, you're trying to nitpick on my use of conjuctions to prove I am even more right? Good bot. Yes, it's ~6 wks to manufacture AND 27 weeks of dosing regimen, together 8 months, but 6 months (*to manufacture and kick in*) with no difference in HR against the control is the known time point. NADINA is SoC in stage III. So will it be $40k off the shelf with 6 weeks dosing and 98% 5y OS for majority of responders, or an $150k 8 month protocol with comparable 2y OS and unknown 5y OS? Which one will insurers prefer? Do you think aggressive stage IV will wait til you complete your 8 month protocol?