HR

peterpeer9

I think for this April's Fools Day I'm going to tell everyone at work I quit and they'll be like "lol good one" and then I stop showing up and finally HR calls me asking what's going on and I tell them "I was being serious. I'm done." and then years go by and I'm sitting in a retirement home and I finally hop back into Teams and tell them "April fools! got you" and ask for my 20 years of backpay.

Comfortable_Yam_9391

Sham Altman still has more money burning to do before microslop is a buy IMO. I also think execs are going to have sticker shock when their microslop bill doubles when openAI has to turn a profit, and they just spent the last year giving everyone openAI access through Azure so Carrie from HR can ask it what type of donuts she should order for the Friday wageslave party.

Fragrant_Rooster_763

No. I spent 12 years there. The company is a shell of its former self and Satya is quickly destroying what’s left of the morale. I’ve not been gone a year so know tons of employees still there who are basically disillusioned and say it’s simply a pay check at this point. I also know plenty who were forced out through bullshit performance ratings or forced to retire. Bad directors and leaders pay no price for their poor decisions but let the engineers and managers fall on the sword. Plus, you’d be amazed to know how many vendors are writing this software, supporting this software, etc. There’s a reason the US Gov called Microsoft’s cloud a giant pile of shit. I, unfortunately, or fortunately I guess, have tons of this shit stock. And the getting was crazy good for a long time so I won’t complain as it clearly won for me, but I don’t see any real future for this company beyond more monopolistic bullshit (which the gov won’t stop) and dying gasps on trying to make AI work. The board needs to fire Satya, Amy, and the new HR person they hired… along with every vp that’s come from Amazon or GE… maybe then it’ll be decent. Not to mention the offshoring of the entire company on shore… as in they keep laying off workers to either off shore to India and Costa Rica, or to H1B them to America to take our jobs while claiming they’re skills that can’t be found here (yes they absolutely can).

ShillinTheVillain

*Meeting with HR pops up at 8:30*

Oneok-Field

Wow she's racist AF, report her to HR for redskin

Confident-Web-7118

It's the exact opposite. The margin of safety is gigantic for the REGAL. In years and years of deep value investing, it is the most asymmetric opportunity I have ever come across with an enormous margin of safety. Every ML model any of those 6 people built, got 97% chances for a cure fraction above 35%. I then did further discovery to try to get to a more precise range for what the cure fraction is, as the unconstrained grid search predicted 62% to 68%. The cure fraction for sure is above 35%, it is even above 50% for sure. If you look here, when I did the same comparison of the each of the mixed-cure ML model with pure exponential constrained to the events, with a cap of 35% for cure fraction, you can see the GPS uncured mOS numbers become Illogical. At a 35% cure fraction cap stress test, with 12 BAT mOS, uncured mOS (GPS non-responders and responders that relapse and die) is 38m. That doesn't biologically make sense to occur in reality, because with the cure fraction cap of 35%, at 12 BAT mOS, that would mean 19 GPS dead at 72 events, and if you take 75% of 62 for non-responders, that is 14 Non-Responders and 5 Responders, the non-responders are not living that long to pull the uncured mOS that high, they may living on par or close to BAT The numbers from the unconstrained grid search of the cure fraction of 68% is what actually lines up with biological reality. The HR is groundbreaking right now, 99.99% chances topline HR is .31-.5 Also, this is covered in the post, but the mixed-cure model can't overfit. Here is what I covered in the post above: It is a mixture cure-fraction model with exactly 3 parameters (cure fraction, uncured median OS, and the mixing proportion) constrained by 2 hard data points: 60 confirmed deaths at month 46, and 72 confirmed deaths at month 58, out of 126 randomized patients. Three parameters minus two constraints equals 1 free parameter. There is literally no room to overfit. The constraint residual is below 10\^-10 -- machine precision. At the biological identity point -- where the uncured mOS equals the BAT mOS exactly, which is the only solution with 0 degrees of freedom -- the model produces BAT mOS = 11.4 months. The full Bayesian posterior, incorporating 7 published literature sources as priors, gives a MAP of 11.1 months, mean of 11.6 months, median of 11.5 months. All three estimators agree to within 0.5 months. The GPS model has 5 independent evidence streams all converging on the same answer: * The published literature prior (7 sources): weighted center 8-10 months * The hard event constraints: 60 events at mo46, 72 at mo58 * The IDMC decisions: trial continued without modification at both planned interim analyses, with arms visibly separated * Biological plausibility: cure fraction of 60-70% is consistent with the Phase 2 immune response rate of 64% https://preview.redd.it/7ug8jpjdgurg1.png?width=2941&format=png&auto=webp&s=ea11e0ed3b2ecd42403805c8be6cbe78dce74bb9 * The biological identity point: 0 degrees of freedom, BAT = 11.4 months

Adventurous_Junket19

Three fresh codes just generated now . 52H9HR LFUN66 BZKT8T CCXVQK Hi, If you join me at Chase UK, we could both earn £50. Here’s how: 1. ⁠Copy one of the codes above 2. ⁠If you haven’t done so yet, download the Chase UK app and open an account 3. ⁠Activate the code in the Chase app 4. ⁠Pay in a total of £1,000 or more to your Chase account within your first 30 days For more info, please visit the Chase website: https://chase.co.uk/raf

orsomeshitidk

Anyway it’s my Friday WFH tradition to have a Modelo chelada lime y sal at lunch so I’m gonna get to it. Don’t tell that bitch Tammy in HR about my ritual bro, pls

GreenDaemon

They do that because Karen in HR saves every important spreadsheet to her Desktop, and last time her machine crashed it took 3-months worth of review data with it. Its a dumb fix, yes, but it cuts down on so many silly tickets from users & middle managers.

WildConsideration376

Spy theta cuckold grab that chair before HR walks in

Numerous_Put4717

you get butt fucked at work?  Have you spoken with HR?

DFW_BjornFree

Pink hair fatigue. Some guy in my office wears tight booty shorts to work. It's against policy but obviously he's a protected class so HR won't do anything about it. Kinda tempted to put some melted chocolate on his chair

orsomeshitidk

I wonder if the HR lady has any spare meth she’d let me take. I’m sleepy

Slabbed1738

Lol factory jobs were not $30 an hour with generous benefits for boomers. Average earnings was a huge $10/HR in the 80s in manufacturing. Have you worked in manufacturing? It sucks, I'm happy to be out

orsomeshitidk

That bitch Tammy in HR hates it when people wear jeans to the office so I wear black or tan jeans all the time to piss her off but still sort of ride the proverbial line. Black jeans today. It makes the weeks a little more fun.

GeorgFestrunk

HR=human remains

cance03

Sta per fare il botto verso la luna il CEO l'altro giorno ha affermato che gli eventi sono ancora fermi 72 e si stanno preparando vedi i movimenti degli ultimi giorni alla distribuzione del farmaco non appena avranno i risultati degli studi possibilita di successo 85% con HR 0.5

NotMe357

Anyone know how many hours left for the 48HR warning deadline?

Confident-Web-7118

Thank you, glad the due diligence is helpful and insightful. And Yes, everything mentioned in the October 29th R&D call and what you mentioned about MM and other indications is incredibly important. With the fraction we are seeing from unlimited dosing, and the WT1 targeting, it's incredibly exciting the impact this will have in other indications such as MM. The cure fraction data (and the long term relapse free survival and post relapse survival, if there are any relapses) is paramount for this, as it shows the value of the platform to strategic acquirers. As for the machine learning models, each one and the ensemble, the mixture cure-fraction model with exactly 3 parameters (cure fraction, uncured median OS, and the mixing proportion) constrained by 2 hard data points: 60 confirmed deaths at month 46, and 72 confirmed deaths at month 58, out of 126 randomized patients. Three parameters minus two constraints equals 1 free parameter. There is literally no room to overfit. The constraint residual is below 10\^-10 -- machine precision. At the biological identity point -- where the uncured mOS equals the BAT mOS exactly, which is the only solution with 0 degrees of freedom -- the model produces BAT mOS = 11.4 months. The full Bayesian posterior, incorporating 7 published literature sources as priors, gives a MAP of 11.1 months, mean of 11.6 months, median of 11.5 months. All three estimators agree to within 0.5 months. For the REGAL trial to fail, one of three things would need to be true: 1. BAT mOS exceeds 23 months. No CR2 AML population has ever come close. Historical: 6-8 months. Venetoclax+Aza-era optimistic: 10-12 months. 2. The 60/72 event counts reported by the IDMC are fabricated. That is SEC fraud. 3. Survival curves can decelerate from 12 deaths in 12 months (from 66 at risk) without a cure fraction. That is mathematically impossible under any standard parametric survival distribution. Death is the endpoint. Not progression. Not response rate. Not a subjective RECIST read. Death certificates are definitive -- there is zero measurement ambiguity. 72 deaths out of 126 patients means 57.1% event maturity, past the pooled median. When you have this much event data this close to the end of a survival trial, the cure-fraction model is constrained so tightly that the answer is effectively determined. The math does not leave room for a different conclusion. This is a stars-have-to-align situation for machine learning, and is why I believe that not having a sizeable position in SLS will be a life regret.  There are 99.99% statistical chances of success and topline HR being .31 to .5, with possibility of less than .3. There is no other trial I am aware of where ML can be applied with this degree of structural precision. The combination of: (a) death as an unambiguous binary endpoint, (b) hard event counts from IDMC press releases at two time points, (c) the deceleration signature in the event rate that uniquely identifies a cure fraction, (d) a disease setting (AML CR2, non-transplant eligible) with extensive published survival data to calibrate priors, and (e) a trial that is 80%+ complete by events -- that combination does not exist anywhere else in oncology right now. Not for SLS-009, not for any other trial I have looked at. At unblinding, we will be able to see the relapse-free survival data and post-relapse survival data, if there are any relapses, and see which of the realities on the right graph attached is closest. https://preview.redd.it/k53wln093oqg1.png?width=3179&format=png&auto=webp&s=8ab5a6a525ab1fe8e35422c97ae74a8aa56a95c8

xploeris

> I don’t fully understand if I’m in a Roth IRA, 401k, or what the difference even is in practical terms. If only there was a vast store of knowledge THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW, plus your employer's HR department or benefits site. > If you were starting at 27 with this setup, what would you focus on first? Gosh, I don't know. Physically, your brain is fully developed after 25, but... Maybe it's just like a weak muscle that you have to start using more. Hopefully so, for your sake.

Confident-Web-7118

Thank you, and SLS is the only position I've been adding to with new money every week for months now. I just haven't done the thousand hours of DD elsewhere, so I can't speak to any others. REGAL is successful up to a BAT mOS of 20 and the biological cap in this patient population, AML CR2 (not eligible for transplant) is 6 to 12 mOS. The 99.99% statistical probability of success for REGAL success is real and genuine. The upside from $6 is 7.5X to 29X, the real, genuine, upside from REGAL final analysis and readout. This is why it is all I've been adding too. This is the first biotech I've owned and I've been a deep value investors for years and this is the most asymmetric opportunity with a gigantic margin of safety that I have ever come across in my life. In addition, this is a stars-have-align opportunity for machine learning. I shared this in the SLS-009 Phase 2B Deep DD post, but for REGAL: The mixture cure-fraction model with exactly 3 parameters (cure fraction, uncured median OS, and the mixing proportion) constrained by 2 hard data points: 60 confirmed deaths at month 46, and 72 confirmed deaths at month 58, out of 126 randomized patients. Three parameters minus two constraints equals 1 free parameter. There is literally no room to overfit. The constraint residual is below 10\^-10 -- machine precision. At the biological identity point -- where the uncured mOS equals the BAT mOS exactly, which is the only solution with 0 degrees of freedom -- the model produces BAT mOS = 11.4 months. The full Bayesian posterior, incorporating 7 published literature sources as priors, gives a MAP of 11.1 months, mean of 11.6 months, median of 11.5 months. All three estimators agree to within 0.5 months. For the REGAL trial to fail, one of three things would need to be true: 1. BAT mOS exceeds 23 months. No CR2 AML population has ever come close. Historical: 6-8 months. Venetoclax+Aza-era optimistic: 10-12 months. 2. The 60/72 event counts reported by the IDMC are fabricated. That is SEC fraud. 3. Survival curves can decelerate from 12 deaths in 12 months (from 66 at risk) without a cure fraction. That is mathematically impossible under any standard parametric survival distribution. Death is the endpoint. Not progression. Not response rate. Not a subjective RECIST read. Death certificates are definitive -- there is zero measurement ambiguity. 72 deaths out of 126 patients means 57.1% event maturity, past the pooled median. When you have this much event data this close to the end of a survival trial, the cure-fraction model is constrained so tightly that the answer is effectively determined. The math does not leave room for a different conclusion. This is a stars-have-to-align situation for machine learning, and is why I believe that not having a sizeable position in SLS will be a life regret.  There are 99.99% statistical chances of success and topline HR being .31 to .5, with possibility of less than .3. There is no other trial I am aware of where ML can be applied with this degree of structural precision. The combination of: (a) death as an unambiguous binary endpoint, (b) hard event counts from IDMC press releases at two time points, (c) the deceleration signature in the event rate that uniquely identifies a cure fraction, (d) a disease setting (AML CR2, non-transplant eligible) with extensive published survival data to calibrate priors, and (e) a trial that is 80%+ complete by events -- that combination does not exist anywhere else in oncology right now. Not for SLS-009, not for any other trial I have looked at.

Valkorion335786

I had 4 rounds of interviews at McKesson and I disqualified myself in the last round and told them if they couldn’t figure it out by the third round and 2 presentations then they needed a new HR

orsomeshitidk

I haven’t done fuck all at work today and I’m gonna head out an hour and 15 early. Don’t tell that bitch Tammy in HR.

qwertyalguien

We here are team players, and your attitude isn't really in line with company values. I'm afraid I'll have to patch this to HR if your behaviour continues.

WSB-mods-are-

Oh boy a meeting with my boss and the HR manager in 30 mins. I wonder if it's a promotion.

Glock7enteen

So apparently if you google Charli damelio backshots/twerk compilation on the company computer HR schedules a meeting with you

Confident-Web-7118

There is not, the HR is already in groundbreaking territory and has been since about the end of summer of 2025 since the flattening of the cure/cure fraction occurred. Two things could happen: Either a halt by the IDMC or continuing to the 80th. I would go under the assumption that we'll be continuing to the 80th, that's my natural inclination as a deep value investor, so just assume that scenario for the timeline. Anything can happen though in regards to a halt, and it's too much of a risk to not be holding a sizeable position at all times here due to that.

Ok_Cartoonist6749

I need it lost 150K during covid. Work at dominoes make 12 to 15/HR

D1finalboss

send this to HR they love these memos

gavbot_1213

Think about the random lifer HR or administrative person at NVIDIA who just chose a random job and then accidentally became a millionaire because of it

anonymoose_baker

🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: NEW CANNABIS UPLISTING BILL, HR 7987, HAS BEEN FILED! The bill intends to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and allow the listing of securities for cannabis-related legitimate businesses $MSOS https://x.com/thedankinformer/status/2034612417896796509?s=46

Confident-Web-7118

https://preview.redd.it/23wlry8mhupg1.png?width=2941&format=png&auto=webp&s=ce142f3f59791e810a504e41bf9d5cb89debaebb Thank you, and I've verified/QA'd/compared at least for REGAL (not yet for SLS-009 Phase 2B) the results with 6 other machine learning engineers now, who all got the similar/same approaches. If you look across the other posts within the Q/A in the comments, there is a lot of helpful insight there from those discussions with other machine learning experienced people/engineers/statisticians in comparing results. Every ML model any of those 6 people built, got 97% chances for a cure fraction above 35%. I then did further discovery to try to get to a more precise range for what the cure fraction is, as the unconstrained grid search predicted 62% to 68%. The cure fraction for sure is above 35%, it is even above 50% for sure. If you look here, when I did the same comparison of the each of the mixed-cure ML model with pure exponential constrained to the events, with a cap of 35% for cure fraction, you can see the GPS uncured mOS numbers become Illogical. At a 35% cure fraction cap stress test, with 12 BAT mOS, uncured mOS (GPS non-responders and responders that relapse and die) is 38m. That doesn't biologically make sense to occur in reality, because with the cure fraction cap of 35%, at 12 BAT mOS, that would mean 19 GPS dead at 72 events, and if you take 75% of 62 for non-responders, that is 14 Non-Responders and 5 Responders, the non-responders are not living that long to pull the uncured mOS that high, they may living on par or close to BAT The numbers from the unconstrained grid search of the cure fraction of 68% is what actually lines up with biological reality. The HR is groundbreaking right now, 99.99% chances topline HR is .31-.5 Also, this is covered in the post, but the mixed-cure model can't overfit. Here is what I covered in the post above: It is a mixture cure-fraction model with exactly 3 parameters (cure fraction, uncured median OS, and the mixing proportion) constrained by 2 hard data points: 60 confirmed deaths at month 46, and 72 confirmed deaths at month 58, out of 126 randomized patients. Three parameters minus two constraints equals 1 free parameter. There is literally no room to overfit. The constraint residual is below 10\^-10 -- machine precision. At the biological identity point -- where the uncured mOS equals the BAT mOS exactly, which is the only solution with 0 degrees of freedom -- the model produces BAT mOS = 11.4 months. The full Bayesian posterior, incorporating 7 published literature sources as priors, gives a MAP of 11.1 months, mean of 11.6 months, median of 11.5 months. All three estimators agree to within 0.5 months. The GPS model has 5 independent evidence streams all converging on the same answer: * The published literature prior (7 sources): weighted center 8-10 months * The hard event constraints: 60 events at mo46, 72 at mo58 * The IDMC decisions: trial continued without modification at both planned interim analyses, with arms visibly separated * Biological plausibility: cure fraction of 40-70% is consistent with the Phase 2 immune response rate of 64% * The biological identity point: 0 degrees of freedom, BAT = 11.4 months

orsomeshitidk

My office HR lady gets bent out of shape about jeans so I wear black or brown ones just to piss her off lol

Ok_Share2131

**IBRX jumped above $9 after NCCN Category 2A listing — then closed red. If you’re worried, read this. If you’ve seen this before, you already know what comes next.** --- ## The pattern that repeats in every heavily shorted stock There’s a playbook short sellers use on catalyst days. It works like this: News drops. Retail buys the breakout. Short sellers aggressively sell into the momentum — not because they think the news is bad, but because they *have to* prevent a sustained breakout. A sustained move triggers margin calls. Margin calls trigger forced covering. Forced covering triggers a cascade. So on catalyst days, they throw everything they have at the stock to keep it down. The stock drops. Retail sees red and panics. “Not even good news could move it.” Short sellers win the day. But the catalyst doesn’t end at market close. Revenue grows. The next catalyst loads. And eventually, short sellers run out of ammo. --- ## Tesla. June 2019. Record deliveries reported. Stock drops 1.5%. Shorts celebrate. Tesla sits at $178. Deliveries keep rising. Revenue keeps growing. Twelve months later: $2,213. Every catalyst day between $178 and $2,213 followed the same pattern — spike, pullback, sometimes red. Shorts sold every single one. They lost $40B. --- ## GameStop. January 13, 2021. Ryan Cohen joins the board. Stock spikes to $31, closes at $19.94. Red day — despite a major catalyst. Short sellers increase positions. Two weeks later: $483. Melvin Capital loses 53% in a month and shuts down permanently. --- ## Volkswagen. October 2008. Porsche reveals 74% ownership. Stock *falls* 6% the next morning as shorts pile in. Then it goes from €210 to €1,005 in 48 hours. $30B in short losses. --- ## ImmunityBio. February 18, 2026. EU approves ANKTIVA across 30 countries. Stock drops 42%. Then continues to pull back. What happened next? * Lung shipment approval to Saudi Arabia * EAU26 shows HR 0.4 * NCCN lists papillary cancer as Category 2A Every drop after each catalyst was shorts buying time they don’t have. --- ## What actually happened yesterday NCCN gave ANKTIVA a **Category 2A** rating for papillary bladder cancer. This is their highest level of recommendation — uniform consensus that the treatment is appropriate. This is the indication the FDA refused to review. NCCN reviewed the same data and gave a unanimous recommendation. Starting now — permanently — every urologist in the U.S. can prescribe ANKTIVA for papillary disease with full NCCN backing. All major insurers and Medicare use NCCN Category 2A as the standard for reimbursement decisions. Every new patient = revenue that didn’t exist last week. This doesn’t stop at 4PM. It compounds. --- ## The math short sellers can’t escape 132M shares short vs ~160M float. NCCN just expanded the prescribing base. * sBLA resubmitted March 9 * BLA for BCG-naive patients targets Dec 28 * Saudi Arabia ramping * Europe just launched * Six new catalysts loaded Every catalyst increases prescriptions. Every new patient increases revenue. Every revenue beat weakens the short thesis. A weaker thesis makes shares harder to borrow. Harder borrow = higher cost. The math turns against them — just like it did with Tesla. --- ## Daily price doesn’t matter. The trend does. Red days after catalysts are oxygen for shorts. Catalysts are the fire. Eventually, the oxygen runs out. The stock closed red yesterday. The NCCN Category 2A listing is permanent. The question isn’t today’s candle. It’s how many red days shorts have left before the math catches up. **The trap is tightening.** 💯🚀🚀🚀

HandsomeTod11

New calendar invite with boss, HR, and boss’s boss…I’m getting fired aren’t I

platinumarks

My life's so pitiful that my wife won't have sex with me, my secretary turned me into HR for sexting her late at night, my boyfriend broke up with me, and the guy behind the Wendy's dumpster has started demanding cash up front after the last time I stiffed him because I didn't have any money in my wallet. The only solace I now have in life is getting drunk on Miller High Life, trading futures all night and 0dte's all day until my wife sees how I lost everything in our retirement and savings accounts and divorces me, taking half of my IKBR login.

Waiting4Reccession

These Ai interviews are going to kill some of these HR/recruiter jobs.

orsomeshitidk

Yall think them bitches from HR always pushing back on hybrid and remote work because people jork it at home

orsomeshitidk

Put green food coloring in it an tell HR they can’t discriminate based on religious practices

Moonbeamdesigns

It's gone a little more corporate since going public, but that's to be expected. Budgets and HR and all that.  It's still the best job I've ever had. I plan on staying here till I retire. 

xeen313

Yes had a talk on Friday where the guy told me the same. He works in Tech/HR realm.

Kemilio

Seems a bit hopium fueled for me, I’ll stick to my SATL play for HR/HR. Thanks for the DD

Secret-Temperature71

Because the reasonable means for showing citizenship are met by other means prohibited in the SAVE ACT. When you hire someone they meed to show proof of citizenship TO THE EMPLOYER. So here I am, hiring some person, and I am no allowed by law to ask for proof of citizenship BEFORE HIRING. Then when they walk in on day one I have to ask them for their proof of citizenship. I, not my stupid HR department. I was never trained to do this, I had to a go to a government and get instructions. I don’t recall details but I assure you they were lower than SAVE. And reasonable.

Neel_Crashkari

RIP Thelma from HR

ThetaFarmingRegard

today is day 7 no Zyn. anxiety gone and HR is lower, feel kinda bored tbh

orsomeshitidk

Having a Modelo Chelada lime y sol for lunch, don’t tell my boss or that bitch Tammy in HR

arbitraryBlue

HR sent me an email saying they want to talk to me about some confidential investigation, that I might have some critical information. Buuuttt I never saw anything, I didn't hear anything, in fact I don't even know my manager's name

elmorepalmer

Have you driven a BYD? They are pretty good cars lol, Europe and South America seem to be doing fine with them. Agree there are many blatant HR violations going on, but lets not pretend that's why or that the US cares

Own_Proposal_4931

the 1m chart looks like a HR monitor

dieS3mm3l

HR will never put down the Job offer..

Kilomike8993

HR from JP Morgan is looking for you man

chainer3000

I saw one dude who was recently hired to be head of HR, legal, tech, and some other unrelated department. That’s why I’ve stayed away. If you were in graf sub even a month ago people were agreeing 4-5$ was high given their current contracts (literally just pipeline, they have none) and low production capacity. It’s basically meme stock levels at the current price I think, at least until they land some actual contracts.

Crazy_Donkies

Look for one from HR in the next 48 hours. 

kktvMIN

As with most business decisions, there is no shortcut. Quality reliable outsourced IT is probably comes with a higher price tag. As a business owner you really need to get a handle on what's going on with the IT side of your operations. What it does what can be cut what the risks are. If not how are you going to find a suitable IT service? Going through several ones? I don't usually consider outsourcing to be an investment. Why don't you invest in HR so that employees have reasons to stay for the long run or invest in gaining more knowledge about IT?

88Babies

I wish the stock market had an HR department so I can complain about financial abuse and harrisment to get somebody fired to make me feel good about myself 😒

Important_Cucumber

C-HR is a little rocket

pootenanner

From Walter Bloomberg on twitter (usually credible, markets have reacted to his tweets multiple times) WRIGHT: A LARGE TANKER WENT THRU STRAIT OF HORMUZ 24HR AGO *WRIGHT: NOT TOO LONG AWAY BEFORE REGULAR SHIP TRAFFIC RESUMING

throwa91

*WRIGHT: A LARGE TANKER WENT THRU STRAIT OF HORMUZ 24HR AGO *WRIGHT: NOT TOO LONG AWAY BEFORE REGULAR SHIP TRAFFIC RESUMING Oil bros in shambles tmrw

Lyristic

1. agentic ai can do this right now, if you are okay with giving it confidential information (you shouldn't be, but it can) 2. ai wouldn't be used for this. this is something that is already handled by companies that care via automated scripts baked into their HR systems 3. this also already exists without ai... there are smart-HVAC systems galore. what you're asking for is what companies are already \*doing\* - putting ai into situations it isn't needed. instead, look towards applications such as pharmaceuticals research, scribing in medical and court environments, EMS data reading for surge predictions regarding flu outbreaks, etc- and that's only in the medical field. there are huge uses in agriculture, in manufacturing, and energy logistics. oh, and software development- code debugging, breakdowns, chambered application development, automatic notation like, the applications for this are \*vast\*. it's not just "turning photos of \[people\] into cartoons" or "adding abs to their torso". ai has many faults rn, and it's absolutely suffering from a huge push similar to (but imo worse than) the .com era of tech, but it's not lacking in useful applications by any means genuinely look into this stuff, it's cool as fuck. try to dive past the murk from people buzzwording it to hell and back.

m0viestar

Its not even tech companies, local car dealership offshores their HR and payroll to the Philippines. 

cleverhobbits

3rd parties. Recruiters. Staffing agencies. HR software companies trying to collect data or test products, Scammers. There are also in-built LI tools that allow premium members to apply for a job with “1-click” this boosting numbers artificially. Companies don’t do that to themselves. I’ve never seen a company rigging their own numbers even though it can help in terms of making them look like an attractive employer that can get lot of talent.

get_da_maney

Stupidass HR meeting with them pushing back on what I tried delegating made me miss my out buying window 😤

HKEY_LOVE_MACHINE

Same goes with managers and most of the HR staff (of which 70% is made of women). Doesn't stop them from repeatedly being involved in sexual relationships with colleagues. Human nature is particularly sexual, only religious cultures try to deny that.

HKEY_LOVE_MACHINE

>What they'll get from this is exactly the same bullshit youre saying: it's fine to sexually harass and bed employees you have power over as long as the money machine goes brrrrr.... Was there _any_ indication that his sexual partner weren't consenting? Adults can have sex you know, it's part of life. I understand the overall HR spiel, to make their job easier by minimizing risks, but if you've been in an office for more than 6 months, you would know sexual relationships between employees (of all levels) are extremely common, so much that all HR can actually enforce is "no intercourse in the office building, do it privately please". That's why I said puritans: they'll fire a person for having sexual relationships with colleagues, for the mere _existence_ of these relationships, but won't fire a person for workplace harassment, with multiple reports and accusations, as long as it's not public knowledge. This is the bullshit that allows predators to flourish and simultaneously shame sexuality between humans.

D1finalboss

she’s a plant HR is going to call you soon

Kickboy21

I think the HR lady i interviewed didnt like me LMAOO 🤣

Kickboy21

I have a HR interview for a position that i feel like im not qualified. Im not even going to try and just wing it

drew-gen-x

It's looking like I might have hit a HR plowing 3 months salary into foreign stocks yesterday. $EWW and $EWJ have rebounded nicely only 1.5% down from Monday's close. $EWY looks like it's about to breakout as well. DXY just needs to stay below 99 for this trade to work. Buy the fear in Asian stocks worse day ever. BTD in ETF/stocks above their 50 DMA works differently than BTD in ETF/stocks below their 50 DMA.

brute-forced

I was in the office earlier and my bosses bosses boss, he is Bitcoin CEO, walked in and told me that I had done a fantastic job these past two years. He then awarded me $100K worth of company stock right there on the spot. He had it pre-approved by HR and everything. Both BTC showed up in my coinbase account right as he said it

Rare-ish_Birb

You can't count the 18 months you were in prison and unemployed in 2012/2013. HR will throw out your resume for not disclosing the break in employment.

the313andme

OHH I love this one becaue I am engaging our HR head to work with our plan sponsor for our 401k to reduce our terrible rates (1.15% on average). Plan sponsors for 401k programs such as Paychex have a fiduciary duty to you the customer to get the the best rates and deals they can offer. My HR head agreed to send an email along to our plan sponsor if I did the research and wrote it for them. This is what I had them send: Hi XXXX,   For our conversation this morning, I've put together a sample draft to send our plan and sponsor. Best as I can tell, our plan sponsor (Paychex) has a fiduciary duty to work in our best interest when we request them to do so. I put together the draft below based on the following points.   1. It’s fiduciary-focused. 2. It avoids overstating specifics. 3. It asks for concrete, actionable items. 4. It stays collaborative. 5. It creates documentation.     Hi \[Plan Sponsor Name\],   I am writing to request a formal review of our current 401(k) plan fees and overall investment structure.   After reviewing the available fund lineup, it appears that many of the investment options carry expense ratios that are on the higher end relative to what is commonly available in today’s market. For plans of our size and structure, it would be prudent to evaluate whether more cost-effective options may be available to participants.   To ensure we are fulfilling our fiduciary responsibility to monitor and maintain reasonable plan fees, I would like to request the following:   1. A review of whether lower-cost institutional or clean share classes are available for our current funds. 2. A proposal for a lower-cost, index-based core investment lineup. 3. A comparison of current pricing versus a clean-share structure with transparent recordkeeping fees. 4. Confirmation of whether a self-directed brokerage window can be added to provide broader investment flexibility. 5. A formal fee benchmark against comparable plans.   Our objective is not necessarily to change providers, but to ensure that participants have access to competitive, cost-effective investment options and that our plan remains aligned with current best practices.   Please let me know the appropriate next steps to initiate this review.   Thank you, XXXX

Icy_Jelly_315

Just got the weirdest email, clearly not meant for me. Forwarded to HR at the company it originated from

brute-forced

I was in the office earlier and my bosses bosses boss, he is CEO, walked in and told me that I had done a fantastic job these past two years. He then awarded me $100K worth of company stock right there on the spot. He had it pre-approved by HR and everything. Both BTC showed up in my coinbase account right as he said it

DepartureAnxious5115

Fucking LOL, cant wait to explain to HR why I was laughing this time!

Pretend-Quarter2559

Winklevoss Bros "Cypherpunk Technologies CYPH" currently trading at sub 70c. Vanguard filed a 13F-HR form on the 29th Jan 2026 declaring an 84% increase in their holdings, increasin Vanguards stake in the company to nearly three million dollars. Cypherpunk Technologies currently have an anti-cancer drug going through phase 3 trials, but attendant to this are also a crypto currency enterprise that holds nigh on 2% of Z-CASH (ZEC) the anonymous crypto/privacy coin.

hallett21

As long as you say “not to get too political” before you say some off the wall shit you’re in the clear as far as HR is concerned.

Material-Macaroon298

the Spotify and Apple Music analogy is good. There was another tailwind though which is that pirating music is illegal. Sure most people, especially kids, didn’t care, but it did make it a stigma to do it - especially for professional adults. AI generated software at least won’t have the legality hurdle in many cases. Though I would argue for HR systems, payroll systems, systems that contain customer data, there is still a need for professional grade software legally so I expect firms with software in these niches should continue to do ok at the least.

Patton370

He makes around 150k/yr, former military, and is good at his job No idea why he chooses delusion when things don’t fit exactly what he thinks; it’s baffling You can be heavily right leaning and still make sense Thankfully he isn’t one to call HR, so I can get away with calling him stupid to his face lol

SighRamp

Level on the 20D 1HR chart after hours on 2/24

Confident-Web-7118

Respectfully, this is just an AI slop response from an LLM, that doesn't make any sense. I would encourage reading the DD and then coming back with questions. You didn't even provide context on what prompt was sent or what was provided. I would bet everything on what the LLM response said above being wrong. But it's okay, there will always be people that just don't read and don't think rationally and logically about business and due diligence, and just resort to generic LLM responses for decisions. You can bring a horse to the water but you can't make it drink the water. The LLM AI Slop said this: ""The 72-event count pins you to that curve" This is false. Why? Because: * We do NOT know which arm the 72 deaths came from. * We do NOT know arm-level survival curves. * We do NOT know censoring distribution by arm. * We do NOT know time-to-event distribution by arm."" There were extreme censoring stress tests done covered in the post above. And BAT (best available treatment) in AML CR2 (not eligible for transplant) has a biological cap proven study after study with BAT is 6 to 10 BAT mOS in AML CR2 (not eligible for transplant), and you can assume 6 to 12 mOS. The ML model for predicting when BAT median OS was set predicted 94% chances BAT mOS was set in Sept 2024, 99% by Dec 2024 5 ML models along with the mixed-cure model, and verified with 4 different machine learning engineers that all took different approaches, but all arrived at the same/similar results, resulted in BAT mOS being: 91% within 10 to 14, 80% within 10 to 13, and 99.99% within 10 to 13, being 11.4 I did cross validation with 5 different ML approaches for that Random Forest 10.4m \[10.2-10.5\]  Gradient Boosting 10.5m \[10.2-10.5\]  LASSO Regression 11.1m \[10.8-11.3\]  Neural Net Ensemble 10.8m \[10.5-11.0\]  5-Method Consensus 10.7m \[10.4-11.1\]  All 5 ML methods agree BAT mOS is 10-11.3m. None produces an estimate above 11.3-11.4m. The ensemble itself rejects BAT > 12m at >95% confidence. 99% chances BAT mOS was set in 2024, making the upper limit 14.5 for BAT mOS. In the impossible scenario that BAT mOS is 14.5, topline HR would still be 0.35 to 0.50.

IndividualNo7155

I’m afraid I’m going to need the Philips HR3705/10 300W Hand Mixer

tugtugtugtug4

The silicon valley way now is to go to every manager and ask which direct reports are not absolutely essential, then fire everyone on that list, see what breaks and then rehire them or someone else to backfill that position. Large cuts like these also always gut HR because they assume they won't be in a big hiring mode for awhile so a lot of the recruiting and onboarding people aren't needed.

Difficult-Square-689

Pretty sure that was an HR person or something too.

Ok_Cry7572

If companies are shrinking workforce every year: Then these companies will suffer the most Workday – HR systems scale with employee count Paychex – payroll volume falls ADP – fewer employees = lower processing revenue Robert Half – recruiting demand collapses

perculaessss

I will not get tired of pointing it out, people used to share a miriad of memes not so long ago about how middle management HR and half of admin were useless and firms could run with half the workforce, and now that companies actually are trimming the fat, we are pretending it didn't happen.

LongevitySpinach

Blocks HR got cockblocked

RunesDubloons

the HR manager with 6,000 days of P.T.O, moments before closing TikTok and conducting your interview: "So tell me again why you didnt manage that Wendy's like it was the navy?

b0men

I 180 on this every day. I use agentic AI regularly and I work in big tech. Its really eye opening to use this and makes me think a lot of SaaS is cooked. But on the flipside - you really wouldn't want an in-house SaaS security product (for example). Or an HR software or healthcare software. yes agents could BUILD these things, but one of the main reasons you outsource this is to put liability on a third party vendor. I.e., you dont want to be handling HR PII data, even if you can build that. You want to make it someone elses problem due to the legal and regulatory risks. Same w/ security. You want it to be Palo Alto's and CrowdStrikes liability, not yours. Thats one of the main reasons you buy these SaaS, functionality aside. I dont think most of the market really understands what drives these deals.

ClassicNebula1081

Used to be the once or twice a year when I used my work credit card, I’d get a statement on my desk from HR. I paper clipped the reciept to it, wrote with a pen what it was for it if was unclear at all, signed it, and put it back in interoffice mail. Time: 40 seconds. Then we got Workday. About 15 emails back and forth all together, 1 call to help desk but they have no clue, to submit one freaking receipt. And also have to give my personal bank info despite nothing needing to go in. And also install an app on my phone. Our out of my bank account. Then get in trouble 6 months later because it didn’t save or something, redo, 8 more back and forth emails. Next time I had a work expense I just used my personal credit card, since 3+ hours of my time is worth more than the expense

WhatTheF_scottFitz

agreed. WDAY is already about to go green. Nobody is going to vibe code their entire HR and payroll suite.

Haikoe

Oops, just wrote kind retards to HR

BiteyHorse

Workday is one of the worst platforms/applications ever built. Poorly written, poorly designed, unreliable and as painful as possible for everyone that has to touch the platform in any way. It's only become a goliath because of idiots in HR (truly the hiding place for the least competent people in any organization, where they feel professional without having any professional skill or worth).

brahbocop

If you think Workday HR sucks, imagine using Workday financials, total shit product. Absolute shit product.

Confident-Web-7118

Thank you, and I've attached a few graphs I had on hand from when I checked hazard ratio impact over time from Dec 26th, 2025 after the machine learning model outputs (covered in Part 2 on the reddit DD in the other subreddit, not yet here on this subreddit), Hazard ratio drops over time, but very minimally from where we are now. https://preview.redd.it/pwz0kxk6zjlg1.png?width=2982&format=png&auto=webp&s=fd7c2088d0dfa4fc2356aef01ee30ce9203bc527 [](https://preview.redd.it/sls-deepest-due-diligence-for-regal-trial-from-a-deep-value-v0-h5tnt82h95lg1.png?width=2982&format=png&auto=webp&s=f4634480084b37047284ffb4b0de61f4e249d914) Attached is if BAT mOS is 10m, which it is not, but the same answer still applies for each BAT mOS looked at. This is covered in the Part 2 DD not yet on this subreddit but in the other that I posted it on, and the machine learning model predicted that BAT mOS is 91% within 10 to 14, 80% within 10 to 13, and 99.99% within the 10 to 13, it is 11.4 months. Since about October 2025 or so, we've been at the point where HR is around the same. The drops we are talking are minimal. I can't seem to find any reason for why the trial has not been halted given the results that are occurring. Unless they want to gather data just how much of a "cure" the cure fraction is showing, but clearly GPS being the new standard of care in AML CR2 (not eligible for transplant) is already there. But not much has time has been passed since October, it's only been about 5 months. They spent hundreds of millions for the trial and are at the cusp of revealing groundbreaking results in AML CR2 (not eligible for transplant), and may just be playing it out to be safe, before being acquired, and to not risk further expense from a requested Phase 3B. Given they have the new standard of care hazard ratio already for AML CR2 (not eligible for transplant) since about October, a halt can also happen at any time as well. Either of those two are on the table.

thrownawaydust

Thanks for the information and work you put into this. If you're predicting a HR of .35 to .50, why wouldn't they have stopped this trial already due to superiority or efficacy? Because .35 to .5 would be historic.  Just playing devil's advocate 

Swearwolfofwallst

I work in HR and have used pretty much every major HRIS/HCM, Workday is among the better options for anyone large enough to need complexity/scale they can provide--what do you particularly dislike about it or what platform have you liked more? One of the massive, massive, major issues I see across employers is fucking NO ONE is trained on them. The HR team is often not technical but is the "product owner" in many ways. Accounting gets dragged in because depending on your HR team, analytical/financial knowledge and skills may be lacking. IT often doesn't want to handle "one more system" and I've seen insanely hands-off approaches to this major, critical enterprise software that accounts for half of all spending a company does(employee wages and benefits). Small employers can definitely do better with lighter-weight solutions if their needs aren't complex; the administrative and technical burden to upkeep larger/complex systems is enormous.

browhodouknowhere

Workday is just fancy HR SaaS... Relax

Careless-Maize-8915

Had to login and do some HR bullshit in there today. It’s hot garbage

raisedeyebrow4891

HR also hate workday at least the intelligent ones

Spy008

So many companies use them but they are soo bad. Our internal application was 10x better but HR wanted to act important and decided to “transform” and roll this crap out.