HR

Cav829

Every response he gave reeked of the smarmy dick following the HR handbook about how to be non-confrontational, yet incredibly demeaning as you tell everyone why we're doing everything to support big corpa.

captain_casino

He has the vibe of an HR rep for a toothpaste company and it makes me uncomfortable

Weak_Emu3659

Everyone is nice Not much going on 2 weeks later HR calls you in Laid off Unemployed.

Deeznutzsgotcha

HR would enjoy that, do it!

Pugs_in_Space

I am not an attorney but recently went through something similar. 1.) You need to contact the court in the county he was from and ask if there was a probate started for him. Get a copy of his death certificate, but do NOT open a Probate case until you have made your first call to Northrup Grumman. 1. A) If a Probate was opened: ask for copies of the documents that have been filed and find out who the Executor/Administrator was. You may need to contact them, because if there were no beneficiaries listed, these funds/stocks should be part of the Estate. It may have been cashed and previously distributed as part of the estate, there should be an inventory listing any income/distribution of funds. You may need to open a Probate case. Do NOT open a Probate case until you have made your first call to Northrup Grumman. 1. B) If Probate was not opened: contact Northrup Grumman HR departent and tell them you are notifying them of the death of a former employee. They will get you in touch with the appropriate benefits department(s). There may be more than one contact if he had stock, a pension, a 401k, etc. When you get in touch with benefits, they will be able to tell you if there were designated beneficiaries and if the money was dispersed, but they probably won't give that information to you unless you are either a beneficiary (they will discuss your portion), or the Executor/Administrator of the Estate. If there were no beneficiaries listed, you need to contact the Executor/Administrator or start a Probate case and ask to be the Administrator/Executor in order to have the funds distributed. When you contact Northrup Grumman you will need the following: For the deceased Date of Birth Date of death Social Security number (this should be available online) For yourself ID Social Security Relationship to deceased Maybe Appointment Letter as Executor/Administrator (see number 1) Eventually, someone will need to email the death certificate to Northrup Grumman. Other possibilities You may need to open a bank account for the Estate and to do that you need an EIN number 3) If you are the first to call about this, be prepared to make a lot of phone calls and emails and be transferred to several different departments. Good luck!

Moepenmoes

...a what? Will I get in trouble with HR for googling this on my work pc?

llasar17

Send the HR lady one thing on Instagram about titties and suddenly I got a meeting tomorrow

Conscious-Move9662

Pete CrowArmstrong just hit a cycle. Won me $50 when he got past 3 hits. Need the Cubs to hit a HR right now.

MrNo_Balls

yeah... do you want to give that money to your W-2 job at the end of the year, so the whole HR department knows you're loaded? sounds like a dangerous game to play. yes I do understand you get to play with the money longer

Salt_Scarcity_9027

Good research that lines up with how those performance based incentives are usually structured. The business still has solid recurring cash flow, so it’s more of a turnaround/execution story than a survival one. On AI, I actually think that’s one of the bigger underappreciated angles here a lot of their model is admin heavy (benefits, HR workflows, call centers, data processing), so AI can realistically help cut costs through automation, faster case resolution, and self-service tools for employees. Even small efficiency gains there can flow straight into margin expansion because of their scale. I’d still be careful with the 6 to18 month timeline though turnarounds like this usually take longer to fully show up in fundamentals. At the end of the day it comes down to execution: improving margins, stabilizing growth, and sustaining that cash flow.

Ahamadrayasbaboon

You’re gonna have so many HR and safety slides memorized

Jealous-Register4235

Thanks. my opinion is Nasrat is the issue. he overpromises with hype. it’s odd to see a stock drop 95% of the time after a CC. his supervisor of HR says it’s sell the news. I say it’s sell because there is no news

HighwayExotic2808

Worst part of the World Cup is all your boomer repeating the same three “jokes” they saw on Facebook and being unable to tell them to fuck off without risking another fun HR meeting

Jupitersd2017

Lmfao HR might have a word with you about your hire

buyatollah_kuminamy

Hoping to hear back from Wendys HR today

Mrsir300

Due to the fact that my wife wants me to pay the mortgage next month, and I want a new set of golf clubs, I will not be quitting my job this evening. Everyone but HR and my boss have approved my requested raise and 86 day PTO package. Details of when and where I sign to be announced soon. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

luka_b412

Don't worry, you'll get a job behind Wendy's, you'll even skip HR

Interesting_Fox5311

Don't overestimate CRM is sticky but not that much, core finance or HR is way more

Midas_Ag

I feel like I am going to say this joke sometime in the next few days, and have my own meeting with HR...

tabrizzi

The White House just awarded Oracle a contract to provide HR services to the govt. That has the potential to lift the stock up tomorrow. Even when you win, it's not enough.

Sandvicheater

Black co worker asked where the color printer was. Sam our new Gen Z hire said its 2026 bro you can use whatever printer you want. Now I got mandatory meeting with Sam the regard and HR tomorrow

oknBagholding

I just asked Gemini and it said its true they got 400m to move the govs HR systems into a cloud platform 

Short-Dependent7676

Breaking: The Trump administration awarded Oracle ​$ORCL a contract to provide a government-wide HR ‌platform - Reuters

JohanLiebert92

[$ORCL](https://x.com/search?q=%24ORCL&src=cashtag_click) was just awarded a U.S. government contract to provide HR software. [https://x.com/stocksavvyshay/status/2064780586238288138?s=12](https://x.com/stocksavvyshay/status/2064780586238288138?s=12)

Weak-Scar-5555

small BC explorer adds a veteran and suddenly the comments turn into mining HR analysis

Overflow0X

Not yet clear. Awaiting talks with HR. Gonna try to push for more obviously, especially that a promotion was on horizon right before they pulled the rug.

Visible-Plankton-806

Yeah except this time there’s a chance Congress just says fuck the masses. They’ve been bought by billionaires and the masses are so hopped up on hate and pumped full of propaganda they may keep voting for the people who are taking their social security, as long as they are doing some ethnic cleansing and shutting up women. Vote for us, no HR ladies! Vote for us, no brown people taking your job! Vote for us, you can say all the slurs again! I said no more foreign doctors, now you have no doctors, what are you complaining about? I said no illegals get government money for food, now no one does, aren’t you happy? I said no illegals in our schools, now all the school money goes to religious schools for rich kids, be grateful! I said no more taco trucks, your local taco truck run by your kid’s friend’s dad is gone, the kid is in a concentration camp with bad food and we took away the crayons, and no one knows where the dad is, what are you complaining about? “If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.” Lyndon B. Johnson

someoneinsignificant

I thought it was a joke at first during my HR onboarding seminar. Like yeah, I knew about the backdoor roth. You're telling me there's a MEGA backdoor roth now? Like that's the actual corporate name? They couldn't come up with a more normal name, they had to make it a MEGA?

LasyKuuga

Still my current HR manager didn’t switch jobs in the end

Valkorion335786

The shitty board is reporting to your old HR manager for a chat

alex206

I posted this meme in my company slack channel before our monthly "all hands" and immediately got canned. HR couldn't even tell me why this meme was offensive

AdCritical5383

*“I hope your HR situation has resolved itself.”*

neotechnooptimist

Has more side effects than zepbound and most people would not really need this. Increasing resting HR is one of the major side effects imo.

Photononic

My former employer set me up with an e\*trade account and awarded me 700 RSU’s At the end of March. As soon as the first 150 vested (September), I sold them, and took my wife on a nice holiday. Twelve more vested each quarter. I got my tax statement in February, and pooped a brick! I immediately contacted HR and asked them to take the remainder back, and flag my account to NEVER pull that crap again. I paid the taxes, and cut my ties with e\*trade. They left twelve in my account at e\*trade, because HR said they could not take back when had already vested. I resigned two years later in 2018, and returned to the USA. I abandon the account and never updated my email, or address. I tossed the paperwork, and did not bother to remember the password. The 12 shares were potentially worth $200 or so, at the time, but I was expected to pay the taxes, take out social security, and pay the fees to e\*trade. I don know what E\*trade does with abandon RSU’s. I forgot About it until I stumbled across your post. I checked. They would be worth only about $20 today and that would not even cover the cost of selling them

Beneficial-Age-9293

This was a shit day but there's still time left in it for HR to call you in for a late Friday firing.

9_toes_3_balls

Michael from HR who lost his job in a climate controlled office is not gonna be able to handle standing 15 feet underground in a trench fixing a water main so I think we’ll be fine.

poorat8686

They divide a man by 3 and HR is silent but a few minutes of running around with my dick out and it’s the end of the world

RNS-Watch

SAP’s biggest advantage is probably the same reason many investors overlook it - it’s not exciting. Once SAP is embedded into finance, procurement, supply chain and HR systems, replacing it can become a multi-year project with significant cost and risk. The more interesting question isn’t whether SAP can reclaim the #1 spot, but whether cloud migration and AI features can accelerate revenue growth enough to justify a higher valuation multiple. I think the moat is stronger than many software companies, but the market still wants evidence that growth can reaccelerate.

pineapplekiwipen

the only heidi i know is heidi from HR and i hate that bitch

AverageUnited3237

Ah my bad you say 80% - equally this as an ass pull and a pure vibes based estimate… HR above .636 has a 0 probability in the real world transplant ineligible aml cr2 patients have essentially a 0% 2/3 year OS… that is until GPS came along

YouCantMissTheBear

HR would like to remind you to avoid insider trading 

Fit-Employ3623

Sent dick pic in resume. HR chicks are ezz

Super-Activity-4675

Everyone alive in the BAT arm today would be in the 3rd or 4th quartiles. I'm not saying they will have a survival rate less than the mOS. I'm assuming that the BAT group had more than 32 deaths in Dec of 24, because if they didn't then the trial would have ended. This is why the interim analysis was done. Instead, the determination was that it was on pace to meet its endpoint. BAT had to have achieved an observed mOS and at that point, the number could only drop, unless of course the mOS for BAT was less than 8 months at the IA. In that scenario, mOS would be set in stone. Median is nothing more than the midpoint between the 2nd and 3rd quartile and it's a known value based on the 32 fastest deaths in the arm. The trial stopped taking patients in the spring of 24, which is more than 2 years ago. At this point, every remaining person (48 patients as of last month) in the trial have survived 2+ years. Going back to the example above, if the observed mOS was 14 months after 35 deaths in Dec of 24, none of the BAT patients alive today would have an impact on the mOS because all remaining BAT patients are in the right tail of the curve, not the left. With that said, the primary endpoint is the hazard ratio, which is the overall survivability of the treatment arm divided by the overall survivability of the control arm. For the study to be successful, the HR needs to around .67 I believe (I don't know the exact number off the top of my head, but it is close to that). The lower that number, the better. Anything below .5 would be an amazing top line readout. An HR higher will result in failure. A BAT patient that enrolled in 2021 and is still alive today would work against the hazard ratio, but they cannot at this point change the mOS.

Icy-Break1323

Honestly yeah, I’m starting to see it. Random coworkers that couldn’t spell “ETF” last year are now lecturing me about their “AI options strategy” and asking which small caps will be the next NVDA. When the dude in HR is talking about “rotating into semis” on his smoke break, that’s my personal canary in the coal mine 😂

Future_Light_8571

My resting HR has an inverse relationship with my port performance

webbrowser90

Hi Connor, HR wants a word with you.

Diligent_Fly_2938

I really appreciated the staggered enrollment history chart, thank you! It really helps to understand how unlikely it would be for the non-GPs arm to have many current survivors based on that timeline. If you make some assumptions about when the remaining 48 (126-78) living patients enrolled in the study and as you show a linear enrollment if the 48 remaining are all GPs arm we get a range of January 2023 (96 total patients at 50% each arm) through April 2024 enrollment or a current months of survival of 42-30 months. If we take just the last 48 patients enrolled are the survivors we get approx July 2023 through April 2024 (interpolating from your chart) or 36-30 months of survival for the living patients (this is if the current survivors are 50% each arm). It also becomes more clear that the GPs median Overall Survival could be just a >X months since it is possible that we will have not hit the 50% mark on the GPs arm unless we have more than 14 survivors on the BAT arm at study completion and if that is the case the GPs arm will be pushing 36+ mOS. Based on my understanding of BAT median Overall survival of 6-8 months it clearly shows that something truly great is happening here. A picture is worth a thousand words. Thanks! I have not calculated the HR but it would have to be good. Also one other comment, if the GPs HR is higher than 0.636 limit (say 0.75), but it is less toxic and has less side effects would they still approve GPs. I think there is a legitimate arguement there.

octopus4488

I sent that "Gepard Retardieu" pic to a colleague today and I just got a meeting request with HR! :D

Beginning-Fig-9089

well since i cant reschedule power hour, ill just reschedule my meeting with HR and the Managing Director

the_cnidarian

WIX laid off 20% of their global staff last week. Prior to this, the developers that were laid off built a proprietary system to do their jobs. Will it work long term? Tbd. Biotech, is about to be hit as well, these people have been working for around two years behind the scenes and are just now talking about it within the companies IT, HR, and chemists in particular are on the block. This is speculation by me, but not without some info of the situation.

Super-Activity-4675

I've made my case in the SLS sub. Bottom line is that it will come down to how the events are distributed with the final 20 events. If BAT continues to deteriorate as expected then it will succeed. If it doesn't, it may fail. You don't know. If the remaining 20 couldn't change things, then the trial would have been halted for efficacy. There needs to be enough BAT patients in the final 20 to get the HR ratio needed for the study to succeed. Phase 3 trials fail more than they succeed. Confident web (poster on the SLS sub who is predicting 99%+ chance of success) uses an assumed leakage when he runs his numbers, and you can't assume the leak. It's derisked by an interim analysis that said the study was on track at 60 events. However, 80 events is the target end, and those last 20 matter.

judechrist4444

I don't doubt your story. But what drives stocks is sentiment and narrative. Google has a great narrative and they have more than enough capital to fix up the HR mess you describe. The other players have fundamental structural issues much more severe than Google.

allgravy99

You have to hedge your bets. Too many WSB regards at Wendy's inflating their HR department with applications. Look at their competitors for value positions.

SlartibartfastMcGee

Especially when you read into what the models are saying - I’ve spoken to multiple people who say their model data has better fits on lower IA HR scenarios but they discard those because it would have been an early halt. If everything lines up better but you are discarding scenarios based on an SAP footnote that’s completely unavailable to the public, then maybe it is better to reevaluate the assumptions about the SAP and early halt parameters. I say listen to the biology, listen to the KOL’s and physicians, and listen to the CEO who are all telling us that the mOS for BAT is 8-10 months.

uhguy85

This. Early halt filter is at best a weak filter. I think it should be removed and the universe of possible outcomes w/ a quite low IA HR are allowed.

Fit-Employ3623

HR will discuss with you after 7 rounds of interview.

Regicidiator

Due to a technical malfunction at HR, I was unable to receive my pay in time for the pump

_Romp

**$NOW** The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ **key levels to watch 136, 141 (200MA), 160, 190 here 📈** **DYOD and not financial advice just sharing** 

_Romp

**$NOW** The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ **key levels to watch 136, 141 (200MA), 160, 190 here 📈** **DYOD and not financial advice just sharing** 

_Romp

**$NOW** The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ **key levels to watch 136, 141 (200MA), 160, 190 here 📈** **DYOD and not financial advice just sharing** 

QuantumStrix

The SAP bull case is pretty simple: everyone is chasing AI models, but SAP owns the actual business data. As Europe pushes for cloud migration and AI sovereignty, SAP is becoming the default platform where AI gets deployed inside real enterprise workflows. If Mistral becomes Europe’s answer to OpenAI and European corporates increasingly want local AI solutions, SAP is sitting in the perfect spot as the operating system connecting all that AI to finance, supply chains, procurement, and HR. The market still sees SAP as an ERP company; the upside comes if investors start valuing it as Europe’s enterprise AI monopoly. In, for a much smaller position than you, but in!

_Romp

$NOW The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ ps DYOD, not financial advice

_Romp

The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ ps DYOD, not financial advice

_Romp

The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅

_Romp

The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅

_Romp

dont miss out on $NOW it might be the DELL for this month chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO

_Romp

dont miss out on $NOW it might be the DELL for this month chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO

m0nk37

AI is going to be more expensive than hiring employees but they work 24/7, 100x faster, and do exactly what you want them to do without any HR getting involved. Thats why companies are adopting it, its a better deal to them. They dont care about the people, they dont care about you. Only your money.

AliceFireStorm

Yes, it can be some very good news that we have reached by induction. But it does not tell anything about the TPC having found a new drug and suddenly performing like a miracle in 6th line, very unlikely but not dismissable. Also in practical terms it only tells us if the patients are responding to the treatment and living longer, it would be foolish and almost impossible to determine with any degree of certainty the HR of the current population using this metrics. But the FDA agreed that the primary endpoint is survival, so if they are replicating the phase 2 data it's a likely win for phase 3. We recommend watching the Q&A of the last Renmark virtual non-deal roadshow where Williams talks for the 1st time about a stop for efficacy, a stupid major WIN. Then you have them being feature in Nature Medicine, no amount of money gets you in that journal, more of a scientific validation. Still a practical coin flip / lotto ticket.

OTMallthetime

This could be a business idea.  Make a PowerPoint presentation of literally just accusing people of white supremacy with an image of a successful investor of said color on each page (ask chatgpt if you don't know how) Give speaking "anti-racist " tours at financial institutions that support DEI policies. Charge 25,000 per session, pitch the idea to the most obnoxious looking white women in HR that you meet. Plagiarize a PhD thesis on some meaningless subject in liberal arts. Mention a doctorate on your resume during the speaking tour. Print business cards with Dr. on them and your venmo/cashapp on the back.  Do it quick, the fatigue is starting to set in. You're already seeing the last hooras of the formally lucrative hustle. Don't miss your chance to get rich off of white guilt.

llasar17

thats not what HR said

WetPinkMarshmallow

Nah their best friend. Would of "effected his promotion" and cameras conveniently lost the footage and HR obviously protects the company. Sad thing is the GM is female and labled as an advocate for women too.

Accurate_Ad5364

As someone who does MedTech Research with (PhD work involved using CNNs to upscale MRI Resolution), I hope you don't have a significant amount of money invested in this company. >*Am I wrong to think that classifying burns and wounds more correctly would end up saving the money?* You're assumption is correct IF the classifications were highly accurate. Hospitals save money by reducing Patient Turnaround Time (PTAT) and reducing malpractice claims. If the tool is inaccurate, then this would cost the hospitals more (malpractice claims). Furthermore, every time C-Suite Execs try and implement some new "time-saving technology" they only increase Doctor workloads which would provide an additional malpractice liability from patients who were just churned through the hospital. >*It looks like they've achieved 95% accuracy when assessing burn wounds:* This claim is extremely misleading. For one, they evaluated "pixels of the image captured" rather than the "# of wound sites." If you look at the Fig. 3 in the paper linked most of the False Positives (Incorrectly says the tissue can't heal) and False negatives (Incorrectly says the tissue can heal) occur at the border of the burn. **The border is the most important part because skin-cells migrate inward to close the wound.** By counting pixels their being extremely generous about their "Accuracy" since the border of a burn (The part that matters the most) \~<5% of the image pixels where the remaining 95% of pixels is dead-tissue a doctor could've predicted from visual inspection. **It's probably why Fig. 1, next their time to heal prediction, the image of the actual burn site is in black and white since any doctor could tell the same thing based on how pink the burn looks.** Even with their dubious pixel-counting metric, even more misleading is their communication of their provided evaluation metrics. Saying "Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy" instead of the standard Machine Learning Evaluation Metrics Precision, Recall, Accuracy, allows them to avoid providing an F1 score. However, lets go ahead and calculate that for them ***S :*** Sensitivity = Precision = .807 ***R:*** Recall = Specificity = .955 **F1 Score = ( S x R) / (S + R) = 0.437** I'll let you search up the significance of a 0.437 F1 score, but its pretty clear why they didn't want to include it. Additionally remember that the lower end of the software's sensitivity was 51.8% which in that case, yields an F1 score of \~0.33. Either way, their VC money is not waging a war on retail investors, VCs trying to use the hype of "FDA **Clearance**" to exit their position. They recognize the underlying software is bullshit, and they're trying recoup some of their initial capital since 40cents on the dollar is better that $0 . Personally, I believe this was a bs endeavor from the start. Their Multi-Spectral Lasers are just different frequencies of visible light. Already Light is too finnicky for sensors in medical devices, ESPECIALLY when skin is involved (Search up HR sensors melanin to see why).

MtGloomy0420

So then you are implying, based on your previous commentary and then “No.” you are an institutional trader. If that’s really the case, do you often bet against $BRK 13F-HR filings? https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000119312526226661/xslForm13F\_X02/53405.xml Okay, let’s assume you do have that much shortsightedness…then do you actually understand anything about hyperscalers, building services in the cloud, Moore’s Law and the actual age of all of $GOOG current infrastructure?

Inevitable_Zebra_0

\> Yea, it writes code. And at the same time introducing two major problems that the tech industry is already encountering from inside, but the stock market hasn't realized yet - 1. expensive tokens to the point that orgs have started to realize they can't just burn them infinitely and have to ration then somehow (there's no 20$ per month subscriptions like individual users pay - for corp usage it's billed per token, a couple million $ bill per month for a midsize company is very real) (and that's also considering that even at these prices the AI model providers operate with deep losses, which means the bills will eventually be getting higher), and 2. productivity illusion - there's no 10x acceleration in coding like their CEOs are trying to convince us. Investors seem to be convinced so far that this is the case, but I can say it's good to also be in this field - you can see on the ground what is the actual case and what isn't. For middle and senior devs, assistants offer maybe 20% productivity boost in the best case scenarios, no more than that, the reason being that actual code typing was never the bottleneck in dev work. I can't judge how much productivity boost AI tools gave to managerial, sales, HR etc. roles, but I don't see their workload getting less so far, and it's been more or less the same feedback from other companies.

WOTEugene

I think you gotta be more selective… I would not be holding wday- no matter which way you slide it, AI workforce replacement = bad for HR software… others at least have some hypothetical revenue replacement strategies with their own AI offering.

Retired-Programmer

I have had some related questions (not exactly what the OP is asking but on a similar subject) on for years and never gotten a clear answer. So my questions are: 1. Does any brokerage track this and reflect it on your 1099s. 2. Does any software (HR Block, Turbo Tax) apply this. 3. Does anyone actually reflect this in their taxes when it occurs when they sell their shares. 4, IF you were to give your taxes to some profession CPA tax guy to do your taxes would he apply those rules. 5. Does anyone know of a case where the IRS has done an audit and changed their taxes due to this. From what I have seen the answer is no to the first 4. And on the 5th one and I have read from some Tax related site (IOW, not an individual making a comment, but a site dedicated to tax related issues) that the IRS will not audit your tax return because of this, but they might catch it/apply it if you were audited for something else. I have many times in a covered call bought the short call back for a loss and sold a new one Deep ITM, later bought it back again for another loss and with those same rules I need to defer that 2nd loss until I sell the shares. But the 1099 does not reflect this, HR Block and Turbo Tax do not reflect this and I have never had a problem. Very curious as to others experiences.

321654987321654987

I'm really skeptical that companies would move away from business process SaaS. It involves so much legal, HR, and accounting risk. The cost is worth the risk reduction (or risk offloading). I just think this is an area where the cost saving is not worth it.

GrandKnew

Gemini is literally a braindead homunculi obsessed with regurgitating it's pre-approved HR script

AgileHornet5960

A retrace to a 4 HR/daily FVG. Get back to the drawing board. Don’t ask this question again.

Ok-Parfait-9856

What do you use AI for? Especially so much usage in the lab. I work in drug development in pharma and there’s a push for AI but I haven’t seen much adoption except for HR/IT/etc. It’s just not reliable enough, AI will always hallucinate to some degree because the algorithm doesn’t actually know if it’s right or not. In settings where everything has to be controlled with no room for error, AI falls short. I can see it being useful for screening molecules and predicting best possible ligands for a given receptor but data science and algorithms already did that. It feels like a lot of AI is taking pre existing algorithms and slapping a new coat of paint on it. Eli Lily is putting lots of money into AI drug discovery, so we’ll see if it’s fruitful.

SirGlass

You need to contribute 4% to get the FULL match. You can contribute 2% but not get the full match and leave money on the table If you contribute 5% you will still get the full match , just the amount above 4% won't be matched But probably ask your employer HR or benefit team

Loose_Hornet4126

They outsized HR to another HR-type company. Just a headline

Money_Term8366

Saw a company fire its whole HR department. Shits gonna 100x by next Friday 

Ninjavitis_

It’s not meant to replace a sleep study. However if you did have sleep apnea then theoretically it should show something on the HR and O2 sat of the   ring. Also its comfortable to sleep with so less confounding variables 

sharpman2021

Most people still see NOW as an IT ticketing company. I see it as the workflow engine connecting HR, IT, finance, security and customer operations. The deeper it gets embedded, the harder it is to replace. High switching costs, recurring revenue, strong execution and AI making an already very sticky platform even more valuable. That's where my conviction comes from.

jtsa5

Been using HR Block since the Intuit shenanigans with TT. No problems so far.

Plus-Leave-1587

Hello. I can’t really find any conversations on Reddit for Bria cell. So I wanted to ask you, what do you think about today’s news for the asco conference? I was hoping for more encouraging words and that there was improvements in survival rates but I didn’t hear anything that sounded encouraging that we are likely to hit a HR of .65

Technical-Emu-32

Get back to work before I call our HR

CornMonkey-Original

ask your boss & cc HR. . . they can clarify.

ILoveWesternCenter

SLS phase 3 trial looking promising 78/80 events and <1 HR.......either it moons and gets acquired by big pharma or bankrupt lol

DeezSpicyNuts

I told the HR lady at work I was going to give her a pearl necklace and they escorted me off the property wtf, I was going to do something nice because her dad was in Al Qaeda 

Ok_Common_5631

vs HR block?

BreakfastSea834

 As long as they are a barrier of liability between me and the government.  Cant be worse than some of the “Tax Masters” at HR Block.

StellarDiscord

HR block does both free

somanyvegetables

The amount of work that would go into that is nowhere near the 50-100 bucks it costs to just have INTU do it. And nobody in HR ever lost their job for picking quickbooks.

InvestingNerd2020

Helpful tips: \- Invest into a Target Date fund in your company 401k/403B up to the employer match. Example: The company says they will match 3% of your salary contribution, you invest 3% of your salary pre-taxes. Talk with HR about this. \- Next build emergency savings up to 3 months of your routine monthly spending. This helps you from selling your stock investments when an emergency shows up that need's money. Use a high yield savings account of 2% to 5% depending on the savings market. Capital One is the easiest to start. \- Open a Roth IRA with Fidelity if you are working a blue-collar job after building up your emergency savings. Easiest access and the lowest fees. Invest into FZROX. It is a Total USA index mutual fund with zero expense ratio. They also have good customer service with 24/hours call center. \- Learn about Actively managed mutual funds, Index mutual funds, Index Exchange Traded funds (normal ETFs), and actively managed Exchange Traded funds (Actively managed ETFs). You can read about it on Investopedia. [Index Funds Explained: How They Mirror Market Benchmarks](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/indexfund.asp) [ETFs](https://www.investopedia.com/etfs-4427784) Also, avoid day trading. Even people with a master's degree in business and work on this 50 hours per week can't beat a diverse index like the S&P 500 and Total USA market 90% of the time.

CodeName_Henry

Well, HR just verbally admitted to me my offer letter saying “Common Shares” was a mistake and that its options. Unsure of how to handle it at this point.

StationImmediate530

Lul! He owns the HR department…

SeemoarAlpha

Bold of you to assume that he is incapable of going full tard. I mean if I showed up to work in a suit like that I'd be drowning in side-eyes and there would be calls to HR for a wellness check.