HR

Consistent_Peanut237

BTC 1HR WINDOW bought to rip

ScarletHarpy93

Can you imagine going to HR three times in your first day on the job? It's like he's trying to speed run getting fired for talking about how much he loves Trump. Kids these days. No sense at all.

silentsinner-

I work for a small business with ~20 employees. We had a pretty terrible 401k with no match for like 6 years. During our meetings I was the only one with questions so I didn't expect a high participation rate. I was already maxing out my IRA so this was just another tax advantage plan to take advantage of so I chose to contribute 6%. When we changed HR support or whatever the company used that gave us that plan I talked with the higher ups and found out what it costed the company and advised them to skip another new terrible 401k with no match. Come to find out only 4 of us were even using the 401k. I helped everyone else roll over into an IRA and setup automatic contributions. Because of this I got to see their balances. We were all there for the full opportunity and our HR/billing head who I assume makes significantly more than me had the second highest balance after me. Mine was double hers. I was also maxing my IRA and matching the 401k contribution in a taxable brokerage account. As shocked as OP is I am glad I am not in their shoes either. They seem like they are where my head of HR was. I am just a couple of years older and I could retire if I needed to. I am trying to work until I am 50-55 with more yearly income than I currently make without saving so I can cover healthcare until Medicare kicks and live a fruitful life. I don't mean to shit on OP either. I got lucky to get advice to begin investing for retirement when I was 22 so I have much more time working for me and time is irreplaceable in compounding. If I could go back and convince my younger self to invest as much as I do now I would already be retired.

GregBahm

You're probably not going to like to hear this, but "I work for a very big bank" fits pretty cleanly into the explanation here. My division has many hundreds of people in it but they're all paid to be creative problem solvers. Even the designers and the PMs are expected to come up with creative solutions to problems. So here in 2026, tokens spending is unlimited and the idea of "not using AI" for something would make no sense to my teammates. If you want something, the path of least resistance is to use AI to get it. If you're not going to use AI, it doesn't make sense to say you want the thing. But my vague understanding is that many (most?) jobs are not creative. I've worked with a lot of uncreative developers in my 20 years in the industry, but those people have all just been trash that eventually gets fired. But at a bank, is the goal to be creative? A couple industries (like accounting, insurance, HR, etc.) aren't supposed to be creative. So the big tech corporations like mine have just mass-replaced those people with AI entirely. Maybe bank guys aren't adopting AI because they're in that same zone. Dudes who's job title was "calculator" before the mechanical calculator was invented.

Saeonic

If your workplace replaced HR with Ai prepare to be fired by a Robot.

Saeonic

no I got fired... AI replaced HR and they canned me

DominantDan24

I've been giving an absolute fuckton of thought to this. The AI boom is absolutely nowhere near where it's going to be. It's going to easily dwarf the internet revolution and the social media revolution by orders of magnitude. The problem is not actually going to be the pathway for AI utilization - which is so easily clear - and the monetization, which is less clear, but it'll happen. What is going to be revelatory is the impact this is going on have on jobs and the economy. So many jobs out there are jobs that AI will displace almost fully. People who relied on arcane knowledge, and digital work will be unemployed. That's going to shatter the economics of markets and societies. Things like consultants, the tech sector, accounting, HR, policy writing, marketing, things that involve virtually no physical work, have a basis in knowledge, and don't require direct responsibility or accountability can be replaced .... today. That's a huge chunk of the working population. When they don't have jobs anymore, what do they do? That'll lead to a massive depression the likes of which society has never seen. That'll take down the market - and NVDA with it.

Pinkeston

Because cutting costs on an army of coders costing 150-500k is really good while cutting on 10 HR people costing 80k each is whatever

emergencyexit

What kind of HR sensor does it have

pkennedy

You would probably pay way more, even 100 times that (20,000) for a 6 man operation that is similar to adding in 1 decent employee, after taxes, extra managers, hardware, office space, HR costs, etc. A startup generally runs off a few really good people until they simply can't handle it anymore and starts expanding. Every extra hour out of those starting founders that you can get is a massive, massive financial win. $3k/month per employee, At 22 days per month, that is about $150 per day per employee. If you can get 1 extra hour per day of productivity out of those employees, it's paid for itself.

NiceCreamSundaes

You need a team of IT people trained on handling Workday to use it in your business effectively, the HR team can run Bamboo or Greenhouse on their own with a little help from IT. That's why I don't rate it, and also why the applicant experience is bad, fewer companies have the skills needed to create a good one in that system. People will hire a team of in-house admins to handle Salesforce for them but asking companies to do that for their HR SaaS is too much.

Complex-Archer-853

My workplace uses Workday. The amount of automation it brought to my workplace is mind boggling. Before Workday everything was manual and on paper and spreadsheet. People forget that Workday is a whole ERP system, not just HR software.

Formal-Flatworm-9032

It’s in the law. Your employer doesn’t “have” to do this. It’s still so new I’d give it time, or just ask your HR dept if it’s something they’re working on (I kinda assume many employers are hesitant to provide this benefit as long as Trump’s name is on it).

oskopnir

Workday isn't a recruitment software, it's a complete ERP for HR and Finance

steepclimb

Workday was created by Satan to cause human misery. Not that the HR departments that buy it care.

gizamo

I've seen a company try to use Salesforce for HR. It was incredibly dumb, and tons of dev work went into it. As consultants, we immediately trashed it and moved them to...you guessed it...their existing Oracle setup. Lol. It was also hot garbage.

Acceptable_Rice1139

It gives fucking HR something to do, by torturing everyone with weekly / quarterly / annual reviews. In reality it's only useful to centralize somewhere to get benefits info. Which is something a 5 minute vibe coded website could do.

Several_Vanilla8916

I’ve got to assume we’re not the customer, whichever HR drone selected them must be the customer. Because for me as the end user it’s just another shitty website that looks like some dude crapped it out over a long weekend.

Weak_Emu3659

all HR saas is bad, they are all crap.

edweeen

Try it and compare to some of the newer software companies are using now that’s much simpler. Also, our company recently switched to Workday as our HR platform. Everything that was once easy has become a pain in the ass.

YoungXanto

Relative to whatever internal piece of shit I've used at my last few places of employment, workday has been actually very nondescript. Which is the best you can hope for with HR software.

4Yk9gop

Do you work in HR? How often are you actually using the software to have this strong of an opinion on it? I log into Workday maybe once a quarter. Yes it sucks, but as a regular employee, I don't have to interface with it much.

Dull_Broccoli1637

Workday is such a shit application lmao. Buying a turd at that point. Only thing worse is Oracle for HR applications.

LargeShirt2863

I work in HR Tech, and Workday tends to be more expensive than many of its competitors on average. pricing depends on employee count, tech stack, contract duration, scope, etc. One challenge they’re facing these days is higher subscription renewal costs. In certain cases, clients are finding that the combined cost of replacing Workday and implementing a new platform can still be lower than the cost of renewing their existing contract 😂

DataDiction

HR software

SuccessfulSir9611

I am a developer who has nothing to do with HR or workday, not workday consultant or HR or anything. Consider me the end user. This emotion is shared by my friends actually the industry, by that I mean, we who are end users, not workday consultant or developers or solutions architect.

llasar17

HR doesnt think im funny

Fakeos

HR responded that free water bubble consumption wasn't included in your contract and thus will be deducted from your salary. This will also be recorded in your file and be presented to your supervisor for your annual evaluation.

whensthebeef

I emailed HR. They’d like to have a word with you about your water consumption at your desk

brock_lee

This company is a scam run by the same guy, just to manipulate their stock. He ran a scam electric car company that never produced cars. They merged with a health and beauty products company and "pivoted" into HR. They make all the rosy PRs but do not actually have the product they claim. All their PRs use weasel words like "Signed a contract with so-and-so ^to ^determine ^feasibility. " That's nothing. And, they are REALLY bad at it currently in the AI space, becaus no one is falling for their bullshit. With every new awesome PR, no one blinks an eye.

Travis---Beckmen

I did the same thing. coworker reported me.  Head of HR gave me 100 dollars in an envelope.  no joke

-IQ200

Said I wanted to kill myself one time at work & I get reported to HR. 🫩

OpinionMedical8744

My capital has a meeting with HR today. 'Bout to be put on a PIP.

cageslutjoanna

BSP is a measure of the worth of CEOs and marketing. BSP is saying the age of agentic AI is making them worthless, so they can just coalesce the top few expensive roles and automate them. The Marketing, HR, and Executive consistently provide the no value and only cost to these pipeline companies. BSP is on to something by just going through and buying companies to fire their C-Suite.

guzzledglizzy

Someone get this man to HR

hardcrepe

Your problem is that open source models exist that you can run on your local computer for free. They also aren’t hindered by public company HR rules.

csklmf

My buddy jokingly asked another coworker whether she's pink last week at an event then HR talked to him this morning. What a dumb ass

ravioliguy

OP makes a decent point about enterprise though. That's where the real money is. The really egregious stuff like token usage leaderboards will go away but Anthropic will be nickel and diming companies so that Beth in HR can AI summarize all her emails.

LiamGorham

Thanks for all your continued input into SLS - full disclosure, still heavily invested sadly more towards the top (2,006 at $12) What’s the strongest plausible BAT scenario you can construct in terms of mOS and 3-year OS/long-survivor fraction, that still fits the known 60/72/78 event timing? And under that scenario, what final HR does the model produce? I’m mainly trying to understand how much of the unusually long trial duration could realistically be explained by BAT rather than GPS. What evidence or result would actually make you conclude that the cure-fraction/GPS-tail model itself is wrong, rather than the model simply accommodating it through a stronger BAT assumption or different survival distribution? Basically, what would falsify the model for you? How do you get comfortable with 99.9% PoS when we still don’t have the unblinded BAT data? Since the event counts are pooled, how much of that confidence comes from assumptions about BAT rather than directly observed trial data? I'm leaning more towards 65-75% with a HR of 0.50 Thanks in advance, i know you get asked the same things over and over, apologises in advance if this is!

Brawmethius

I think software side will be a long term winner of the LLM boom (IMO it has so far been the only really demonstrated net positive ROI sector, and I think that keeps chugging along), I think your example here of capability increasing disproportionally to hardware does highlight my claim I find the infrastructure build out to be euphoric. A caveat to the software value is that if you believe capability to hardware keeps dropping in cost, introduces intuitive and easy access; than although the use case looks promising the business infrastructure side doesn't. It is like the airliner problem, became great for commerce and travel being hyper cost competive, shit business model and return. Really the two things I dislike in the "AI trade" are: 1. There is a huge amount of ASC 606 equity-in-kind revenue that is distorting balance sheet realities, when that happens it makes it difficult for investors to allocate capital to the real winners who will generate real returns. Broad capital misallocation is structurally horrible for markets. 2. The LLM model will do everything euphoria. I have been very bullish on machine learning applicaitons in general since long before OpenAI kicked off the public euphoria, really are incredible tools and have been deployed in hyper-specific use cases extremely well. Only real barrier was they required skilled end users to deploy, maybe LLM can help bridge that gap. But at its core, I simply do not believe probabilistic vector based language guessing is the end all be all platform. Unfortunately I think because it is a hyper-fluent language model people who engage with it attribute more intelligence or value than it actually has. I think it has done well in coding and software because that is functionally a language structure in itself, and outputs can recursively be checked and verified. You can watch LLMs literally fall apart where the output is not already known or cannot be self-checked. This is a critical flaw, and I don't think the hope that large enough data sets and enough compute will guess knowledge into existence. In my own use with LLMs I have found this catch 22 where I needed to know what the answer was enough to the point I could check AI hallucination and correct... which then brought into question the value of the tool. I think the point #2 really limits my expectations on how "work is going to change" in all sectors. I think it will completely change coding, information/data services, marketing and media; likely it will replace "dumb white collar" jobs where it can be trained and backtested on existing performances (secretaries, HR, tech writers, data entry, etc) jobs that could already have been automated easily but just weren't affordable to pay to build outspecific hard-coded services. I think LLMs will eat that lunch. But in the short, I do see a lot of the financing side structurally be dot-com like, wish it wasn't that way would be easier to invest with conviction. I see LLMs as the do all model overhyped, and I think the market valutions, particularly on infrastructure and shovel selling to be delusional.

tenax666

Sorry to hear that. The big thing i feel has changed is the opportunity to speak to s decision maker on hiring face to face. I interviewed well, but if you couldnt get in to see them...HR depts especially for big businesses scan a resume on average in 12 seconds and if they don't see certain keywords, good luck. I am all for using Chat GPT etc to help build resumes' if they can help you use the language hr is looking for, btw. My last 2 positions have both been a result of being able to directly communicate with managers, no hr in the middle. My advice would be to seek out positions that don't require hr screening you. The other problem is hr used to have the time to get back to you if you asked what they were looking for in a candidate to help you next time. But their budgets have been cut because "hr does not make money" quote. Our hr manager went from having 60 pple to be responsible for to 650. Imagine that. The only time she had time to help you is termination letters. While the benefits are better, I would never work for a large publicly owned company again. I've done great work for 2 of them and laid off by both in cutbacks.

Kepler1571

"HR is not there for you."

ihasanemail

I went to law school with a woman who was canned from Enron's HR department the year before. Baxter was the only exec she spoke kindly of.

the_mind_goblin1

over the past 4 years i'm up about 1000% in my brokeragelink account LOL my HR department must think im a genius but im retarded

longGERN

They do... Hence the HR meeting after them seeing this cave of artists I'm hanging out with

longGERN

Fuck I only have 2gb of data left then I'll have to use work wifi and deal with HR later

Sensitive-Talk9616

It took my last company several years to just go from excel to Jira. In the software team we already used it. But the rest of the company, HW, even support, still relied on random power point presentations, excel sheets, emails, and teams convos. It was insane. Even with the clear benefits of having some sort of ticketing and product management software, it took some departments over a year to transfer everything to Jira. If tomorrow Atlassian announced a 100% price hike, I don't think management would bat an eye. They had to hire a full-time employee just for a SAP migration. In management's thinking, hiring a "Jira migration expert" or whatever would cost much more than whatever we pay Atlassian. At my current employer, we even have the old legace on-prem Jira instance, which is abused for such things as time and vacation tracking, or CRM. Could they use an HR software, and hubspot for CRM? Sure. But does anyone actually want to do it? No, because the current system "works", so why fix it?

CasherburyTales

After explaining something for the 10th time to a co-worker I asked them to record me and watch the video for the 11th time. It was such a great approach HR wants to ask me about it!

Similar-Difficulty-2

HR

elpresidentedeljunta

Print a shirt with an image of the SpaceX impact on the moon and the line "To the mooooo..." and wear it every day. Don´t worry about HR or dress code. Everyone will vibe. ;)

Beginning-Fig-9089

if i am an HR lady with spacex shares im absolutely selling the shit out of them tomorrow

fire_alarmist

Holy shit Amazon HR is the worst thing I have ever interacted with. My god, cant even understand this indian recruiter lady's sentences and then they just keep harping on about some stupid STARR method and just fucking understanding NOTHING about the technical role she is recruiting for. What a painful experience. Puts on amazon.

Right-Donut-9941

https://preview.redd.it/xdcwlp2kfdhh1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14abd8617909f82f2a08f6ca04c02cebd6d43d7e That 4HR on SPY is gonna rip 📈🚀🇺🇸🤑💰

WSB-mods-are-

Did no one assign you a teams license? You might want to get with HR they probably just didn't let IT know

WordsHappenedHere

All you had to do was draw a fucking trend line on the 4HR MU chart and you had the exact spot Citadel was going to rug you. But MUtards are the new GME apes I guess

GoZukkYourself

HR has already warned me about taking my slacks off at work 😖

GoZukkYourself

You forget to wear pants at work a few dozen times, and all of a sudden HR labels you as a pervert. My job as a male exotic dancer may be coming to an end 😭

SvenTropics

I mean that's a topic we avoid on financial subs. Meanwhile, of course we can discuss the financial and investing implications of what is happening. In the same way that AI has the potential to reduce the costs of R&D for software companies, this has the potential to increase the costs for any construction jobs. Something to think about, the ratio of blue collar to white collar workers in the USA is 1:4. We lost about 1/3 of a million white collar jobs in the last two years. Meanwhile, we removed over 400k people, almost all of them blue collar workers. So, the net change is an increase in employee demand which would translate into an increase in wages. Because these wages are earned by traditionally lower earning people, more of it enters the economy causing stronger inflation pressure. On the ground level, this means a business services dude, a HR person, or a software engineer is faced with lower wages and a tougher job market, but the average construction workers if finding that he can easily demand a 20% raise. On top of that, most of the jobs AI has created are ironically blue collar ones because someone has to build all these giant facilities everywhere, and it's not software engineers. With meteoric investment comes a lot of jobs. Then there's a whole other side of this. Most of the layoffs related to AI have proven to be premature. AI is not replacing the workforce as effectively as we were promised it would. It's showing that it's a good tool, but it's not a good replacement. While this would reduce the number of people you need to hire, you also have an additional expense of paying for the AI which is going to balloon in costs as these AI companies actually try to make their businesses profitable. A lot of businesses are turning around and hiring back all the people they laid off. TLDR: We be looking at some serious inflation very soon here.

CyberSmith31337

They failed to make a bunch of new hits. Their gaming initiative was a complete disaster and failure. Their HR/Recruitment is just poaching and cycling washed up has-been an and nepobabies, and paying them ludicrous amounts of money to fail with zero accountability. They have no pulse on what their audiences want, despite all the data they have. They can’t find niches to conquer. They kill popular shows in the cradle, and greenlight actual dogshit at seemingly every opportunity. (never forget what they did to the *Resident Evil* IP) Stranger Things Ended.

TheShadow2024

Nancy from HR: "Well, Ted, we've prepared a very nice package for you, but after that 'product incident', Darren thinks it's best that we move on. I'm sure you will have no problem out there." Hand him 2 months pay and a coupon book for 10 free Frosties.

ImNotHere2023

Long term bearish. Shorter term, why knows.  Fundamentally, Oracle is not an innovative company. Their business model has long been to stick it to their customers as hard as they can (e.g. jack up prices, perform license audits), rather that innovate to win more business. A ton of companies use their products because 30-40 years ago, it was almost the only enterprise grade option, and a lot of software lives for longer than you'd think. These days, there are options and I've seen first have that many shops are moving to Postgres or it's variants (e.g. Amazon Aurora). They also have the HR software stack they bought from PeopleSoft, but it feels 10 years out of date as, once again, their business plan doesn't include innovation.

Cav829

This guy is the ugly guy in the attractive people HR meme.

Runrun1289

I had a position last year and managed to exit before the decline. The 4HR chart looks really interesting, basically was in the nosebleeds as far as being overbought for a few years in a row. Look where it's at now as far as relative strength. I remember thinking at the time I was building my position, okay they keep beating earnings and keep raising their outlook etc. But how would the market react if/when there was a revised outlook or something like that. It's been in a death spiral for pretty much the whole year.

Powernick50

may be time to have HR perform a Wellness check - tell them to ask about KOSPI

Fast_Concentrate1838

So Ai n chips red, ghey HR/company performance software green? +1 for humanity , -1 for robots and our portfolios.

zuziannka

Someone from HR put a new user's name as Mohammed Terror, and everyone was making racist jokes about it in the meeting today lol

Finn55

But why do you care? Go work in an office and Sharon from HR will over promise and under deliver… who doesn’t!? Are you disappointed at being let down? Have you taken his failing personally? Why this particular fact gets average people so worked up is beyond me. List all his achievements next to his failings, and then jot down your own for some perspective. Then put your hat and coat on, go for a walk, and think the amount of focus, attention, money, risk and sacrifice needed to do it all. Maybe you just can’t fathom it. Probably the reason. Shit, I’ve tried my hand at building my own products and companies twice and failed, and maybe that makes me appreciate those with ambition, regardless of their success or failures.

skymagic

Hello, *HR*? I will be taking a day off from *arr*/wsb during the days of 7/29-7/31 because I said so, please don't attempt to bother me at my private residence 😎

skymagic

> She was asking for it wait...*Jenny* from HR??? bro...electrical engineering??? you're *SO* in bro...me and *Jenny* go way back 😅

add_sequence_OYSTER

Bro applies to work at a wall street bank and starts snitching at the first sign of drugs and sexual deviancy. Clearly HR not doing their job if they are letting guys like this get past the first interview. Weak

KdF-wagen

This fucking guy would have a hard time getting a job on a paving crew and we have had literal federally convicted criminals on the crew. He’s a walking HR liability, I wouldn’t hire him to be a flagger.

DruPeacock23

So what is the edge with this info? Sell short-dated out-of-the-money put options or execute a bull put spread on JPMorgan Chase stock? Know any good HR compliance company stocks?

Accidental-Genius

J.P. Morgan offered me a generous severance package in 2020 after I made displeasure with some (perfectly legal but annoying) business practices known. I took it. Immediately got hired by another ultra massive mega corp. 3 weeks later J.P. Morgan asked me to come back. No. A month lawyer asked to to come back for a 50% raise. No. Offered to let me keep the severance and have the raise. No. They wound up hiring 3 people to replace me. All that to say, corporate HR is made up of everyone who peaked in high school.

durtsurfer69

I don’t have any loss porn because I bought massively at $1.40 I also bought massively today and shorts are still totally fucked HR <.40 coming in hawt https://preview.redd.it/3izzty9ekufh1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a5f54f22e1a66ade601ac06c0d0798548ad1d806

confused_teabagger

>Big Companies Are Starting to Hire Again, Defying Predictions of AI Wipeout >After a year of holding back on new hires, companies from tech and transportation to defense now say they need more people to work alongside AI >--Wall Street Journal So investors, corporations, HR departments, and people on the street are saying that AI is helpful but not galactically transformative as promised. So, what is the case for the amount of hyperscaler capex being spent? How are they supposed to get their money and profits back? Government contracts alone? Injected Ads?

Personal-Chemist535

Please head to HR, we need to talk.

account-names

Probably he has broken 10s of HR protocols, but reporting those will also scar my career. So, I am scared and just biding my time

OCTOVENG

If I was posting like this on my socials, I’d be called into a morning meeting with HR and then be accompanied by security to my desk with some empty file boxes ready to pack up.

BarbellPadawan

If I were posting like this on my socials, I’d probably be called into a meeting with HR and then be accompanied by security to my desk with some empty file boxes ready to pack up.

GoZukkYourself

Does Arby's have no HR?

pythbit

They're being facetious. Oracle does enterprise software (HR, resource planning), databases, and cloud.

llasar17

Today I learned HR doesn't like bbq meat jokes. I also had to retake sexual harassment training for the 4th time this year

WrexyWrex

That is not what I am saying, and let's be clear now we have three parties If any of the traditional two parties win, they will be working to protect elites' interests, which does mean "number go up" but also austerity will have to continue because we are in the era of hyperpolitics only without institutions, which is a result of governments and employers winning in the courts to destroy organized labor, which were the institutions people were politically active in before the 1980s Now we have very high energy, but without anywhere for that energy to go, there is no organization, which is how the elites want it to be, and austerity comes in to dampen the populism That's why you see austerity; it can't be used against institutions with party members, but it can be used against a divided population with no real social party and only consultant classes mediating on the population's behalf under false pretenses, sort of like HR or your manager at your job. The way your timeline pans out is through this rising third party that is trying to create an organized movement through lifelong memberships in the center and seasonal volunteers on the ground, attracting members to shape their movement. However, this will take at least a decade to cut through all this red tape if it's even successful. Which is why I am telling you right now, this will be a one-term timeline with these parties working for the same class of people who will use inflation as a solution to their problem. That last part is what you have to remember: inflation is your problem - not there problem. Inflation is a solution to them; it creates austerity, and it makes them money. I wouldn't be surprised if they run negative real rates just under a high inflation percentage and call it the new normal. This is not new; this is just something that's becoming more apparent, and frankly, it's pretty tame compared to what they did post-2008, where they outright stole millions of homes from people.

SanDisk_Made_Me_Rich

Alright as the Head of AI Transformation, I hereby authorizing the canning and termination of our HR department. I will now assume all HR responsibilities effective immediately. My immediate orders: Unlimited PTO for all, a stipend to buy a sex robot, anyone that bitches, whines, or gets in my way is **fired** 🔥!!

Worf_Of_Wall_St

What industry are you in where only HR people do interviews? In engineering, HR just finds candidates and *might* do a "behavioral" interview as a filter for poor people skills, then they schedule interviews with people in engineering departments.

Anon_96818

The amount of awareness and information about technical specifications and project progress that an HR person at the company doing an interview has is dependent on the for which position that someone is applying?

Ok_Location7677

She’s going to use the texts and report you to HR. Rightfully so. Don’t go creeping on girls AT work. If you saw her at a local bar, sure fair game to shoot your shot. But in the workplace? You get fired for that shi-.

redbeard312

You have to get the paperwork from HR and completed by the relevant doctors. Some people don’t know about this stuff, and our HR departments tend to be less than helpful. If you start taking time away from work you only have a few days to get the paperwork in before your employer can technically let you go (they can cite attendance related issues or job abandonment), and once they do it’s too late to submit the paperwork. Lots of people think they can just call in and say “FMLA time” and be covered, but without that paperwork you don’t have protection

RuleSafe6767

%100. When the indexes pump and lift tickers across the board, management races to issue share compensation for themselves and staff while simultaneously submitting sell declarations to HR for all existing vested shares. I've personally seen it play out multiple times in mid-sized companies traded on the US and CAD exchanges.

rancid_racer

Management doesn't decide. Corporate executives (bonus earners) do and they push HR to make the policies that earn their profit.

rancid_racer

Is it? All the benefits I see being offered are on the decline and going to shit. People jump jobs because of corporate HR slowing growth as much as possible and benefits can't make up for that.

ApolloRT

Are you feeling this way cause you got rejected by HR? Curious, why would u apply for interview for a meme company?

PhoKingWild

lol @ HR. Yeah that’s who I met with. OKLO is a meme. They are not even in the same conversation as companies like Honeywell, BWXT, NuCor etc when it comes to being able to produce MMRs/SMRs.

Anon_96818

How much would you expect them to disclose in a job interview? How much does the HR person know?

CasherburyTales

HR said I have to stop using “hip hop expressions” in my meetings. As a middle-aged white man I said never

my_lastnew_account

If micron, skhynix, all hit ATH by EOY I'll send my CEO a picture of my junk and cc HR

SoSeaOhPath

7 analyst downgrades?? Oh no I better sell at the lowest valuation this company has ever been Analysts suffer from a terrible case of group think and they always downgrade and upgrade after the price has already moved significantly. They all feed into the story of immediate AI disruption to the business model, but it’s just not happening. Using AI to build in-house enterprise software still takes a tremendous amount of investment in technical labor and tokens. And like I said before - since the dawn of Excel any company could have built their own in house platform, but they choose to outsource the development and maintenance of these systems because the work needed to do that in house is not productive to the core business. Financial services, retail, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals; all of these industries which ServiceNow serves…. None of them have any talent dedicated to rewriting HR, IT, legal, financial, and customer service software that all talks to each other using bleeding edge AI. It’s not as simple as typing in some chatGPT prompts and canceling your $1m/year contract with ServiceNow. Humans have always and will always have reasons to use out of the box solutions rather than building bespoke in house.

KeyReaction892

Banbet! TQQQ $78 48HR

Appropriate_Ice_7507

Seeing it’s like 100 degrees outside, today i decided to wear a skirt to work cuz shorts ain’t allowed. I am also wearing a tight hot pink tee that’s super short to show off my belly. I wonder if I’m gonna get called into the HR office. I also bought IBM stocks. So maybe I’m a fucking regard

wurzlsepp7

Not true. Red Hat supporting functions like HR, legal etc. have already been integrated into IBM. And what is left of Red Hat like engineering will soon be swallowed up as well. There is recent interview with Krishna in which he basically confirms that Red hat will be assimilated Borg style