HR

Regicidiator

Due to a technical malfunction at HR, I was unable to receive my pay in time for the pump

_Romp

**$NOW** The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ **key levels to watch 136, 141 (200MA), 160, 190 here 📈** **DYOD and not financial advice just sharing** 

_Romp

**$NOW** The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ **key levels to watch 136, 141 (200MA), 160, 190 here 📈** **DYOD and not financial advice just sharing** 

_Romp

**$NOW** The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ **key levels to watch 136, 141 (200MA), 160, 190 here 📈** **DYOD and not financial advice just sharing** 

QuantumStrix

The SAP bull case is pretty simple: everyone is chasing AI models, but SAP owns the actual business data. As Europe pushes for cloud migration and AI sovereignty, SAP is becoming the default platform where AI gets deployed inside real enterprise workflows. If Mistral becomes Europe’s answer to OpenAI and European corporates increasingly want local AI solutions, SAP is sitting in the perfect spot as the operating system connecting all that AI to finance, supply chains, procurement, and HR. The market still sees SAP as an ERP company; the upside comes if investors start valuing it as Europe’s enterprise AI monopoly. In, for a much smaller position than you, but in!

_Romp

$NOW The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ 1.03 bil shares outstanding,, 87% of which are owned by institutions and insiders ✅ ps DYOD, not financial advice

_Romp

The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and $NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ ps DYOD, not financial advice

_Romp

The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅

_Romp

The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅

_Romp

dont miss out on $NOW it might be the DELL for this month chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO

_Romp

dont miss out on $NOW it might be the DELL for this month chart looks super bullish testing the 200MA (\~141) with 2x daily average volume, this thing has been beaten up so much it could really run if it manages to break out there with IGV breaking above 200MA ✅ 🌮 bought 5mil worth of shares late feb ✅ Jensen Huang : “I think the markets got it wrong. These agents have to be experts in what they do, and nobody’s going to understand customer service better than ServiceNow.” ✅ Anthropic and openAI integrating it ✅ CEO recently bought 3mil worth of shares ✅ Congress insiders (Byron Donalds, Tony Wied, Ro Khanna, Charles Fleischmann, Josh Gottheimer, Michael McCaul) are buying ✅ May 30th 2026, Norges Bank disclosed a new stake in ServiceNOW buying 13.9million shares valued just over $2billlion ✅ The market is starting to understand the opportunity in Agentic AI. ServiceNow isn’t just adding AI features it’s building AI agents that can automate entire business workflows across IT, HR, customer service, security, and more. Every large enterprise wants to do more with fewer people. Agentic AI is the next wave of software, and NOW is positioning itself right at the center of it imo still looks early dont miss out with the obvious telltale signs The SAASpocalypse is bullshit. No company wants to completely move software in-house because they’d have to maintain it and expand their engineer payroll and if shit goes south they’d have nobody to sue. NOW is still below ATH by a healthy amount; think there’s a lot of room to run here IMO

m0nk37

AI is going to be more expensive than hiring employees but they work 24/7, 100x faster, and do exactly what you want them to do without any HR getting involved. Thats why companies are adopting it, its a better deal to them. They dont care about the people, they dont care about you. Only your money.

AliceFireStorm

Yes, it can be some very good news that we have reached by induction. But it does not tell anything about the TPC having found a new drug and suddenly performing like a miracle in 6th line, very unlikely but not dismissable. Also in practical terms it only tells us if the patients are responding to the treatment and living longer, it would be foolish and almost impossible to determine with any degree of certainty the HR of the current population using this metrics. But the FDA agreed that the primary endpoint is survival, so if they are replicating the phase 2 data it's a likely win for phase 3. We recommend watching the Q&A of the last Renmark virtual non-deal roadshow where Williams talks for the 1st time about a stop for efficacy, a stupid major WIN. Then you have them being feature in Nature Medicine, no amount of money gets you in that journal, more of a scientific validation. Still a practical coin flip / lotto ticket.

OTMallthetime

This could be a business idea.  Make a PowerPoint presentation of literally just accusing people of white supremacy with an image of a successful investor of said color on each page (ask chatgpt if you don't know how) Give speaking "anti-racist " tours at financial institutions that support DEI policies. Charge 25,000 per session, pitch the idea to the most obnoxious looking white women in HR that you meet. Plagiarize a PhD thesis on some meaningless subject in liberal arts. Mention a doctorate on your resume during the speaking tour. Print business cards with Dr. on them and your venmo/cashapp on the back.  Do it quick, the fatigue is starting to set in. You're already seeing the last hooras of the formally lucrative hustle. Don't miss your chance to get rich off of white guilt.

llasar17

thats not what HR said

WetPinkMarshmallow

Nah their best friend. Would of "effected his promotion" and cameras conveniently lost the footage and HR obviously protects the company. Sad thing is the GM is female and labled as an advocate for women too.

Accurate_Ad5364

As someone who does MedTech Research with (PhD work involved using CNNs to upscale MRI Resolution), I hope you don't have a significant amount of money invested in this company. >*Am I wrong to think that classifying burns and wounds more correctly would end up saving the money?* You're assumption is correct IF the classifications were highly accurate. Hospitals save money by reducing Patient Turnaround Time (PTAT) and reducing malpractice claims. If the tool is inaccurate, then this would cost the hospitals more (malpractice claims). Furthermore, every time C-Suite Execs try and implement some new "time-saving technology" they only increase Doctor workloads which would provide an additional malpractice liability from patients who were just churned through the hospital. >*It looks like they've achieved 95% accuracy when assessing burn wounds:* This claim is extremely misleading. For one, they evaluated "pixels of the image captured" rather than the "# of wound sites." If you look at the Fig. 3 in the paper linked most of the False Positives (Incorrectly says the tissue can't heal) and False negatives (Incorrectly says the tissue can heal) occur at the border of the burn. **The border is the most important part because skin-cells migrate inward to close the wound.** By counting pixels their being extremely generous about their "Accuracy" since the border of a burn (The part that matters the most) \~<5% of the image pixels where the remaining 95% of pixels is dead-tissue a doctor could've predicted from visual inspection. **It's probably why Fig. 1, next their time to heal prediction, the image of the actual burn site is in black and white since any doctor could tell the same thing based on how pink the burn looks.** Even with their dubious pixel-counting metric, even more misleading is their communication of their provided evaluation metrics. Saying "Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy" instead of the standard Machine Learning Evaluation Metrics Precision, Recall, Accuracy, allows them to avoid providing an F1 score. However, lets go ahead and calculate that for them ***S :*** Sensitivity = Precision = .807 ***R:*** Recall = Specificity = .955 **F1 Score = ( S x R) / (S + R) = 0.437** I'll let you search up the significance of a 0.437 F1 score, but its pretty clear why they didn't want to include it. Additionally remember that the lower end of the software's sensitivity was 51.8% which in that case, yields an F1 score of \~0.33. Either way, their VC money is not waging a war on retail investors, VCs trying to use the hype of "FDA **Clearance**" to exit their position. They recognize the underlying software is bullshit, and they're trying recoup some of their initial capital since 40cents on the dollar is better that $0 . Personally, I believe this was a bs endeavor from the start. Their Multi-Spectral Lasers are just different frequencies of visible light. Already Light is too finnicky for sensors in medical devices, ESPECIALLY when skin is involved (Search up HR sensors melanin to see why).

MtGloomy0420

So then you are implying, based on your previous commentary and then “No.” you are an institutional trader. If that’s really the case, do you often bet against $BRK 13F-HR filings? https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000119312526226661/xslForm13F\_X02/53405.xml Okay, let’s assume you do have that much shortsightedness…then do you actually understand anything about hyperscalers, building services in the cloud, Moore’s Law and the actual age of all of $GOOG current infrastructure?

Inevitable_Zebra_0

\> Yea, it writes code. And at the same time introducing two major problems that the tech industry is already encountering from inside, but the stock market hasn't realized yet - 1. expensive tokens to the point that orgs have started to realize they can't just burn them infinitely and have to ration then somehow (there's no 20$ per month subscriptions like individual users pay - for corp usage it's billed per token, a couple million $ bill per month for a midsize company is very real) (and that's also considering that even at these prices the AI model providers operate with deep losses, which means the bills will eventually be getting higher), and 2. productivity illusion - there's no 10x acceleration in coding like their CEOs are trying to convince us. Investors seem to be convinced so far that this is the case, but I can say it's good to also be in this field - you can see on the ground what is the actual case and what isn't. For middle and senior devs, assistants offer maybe 20% productivity boost in the best case scenarios, no more than that, the reason being that actual code typing was never the bottleneck in dev work. I can't judge how much productivity boost AI tools gave to managerial, sales, HR etc. roles, but I don't see their workload getting less so far, and it's been more or less the same feedback from other companies.

WOTEugene

I think you gotta be more selective… I would not be holding wday- no matter which way you slide it, AI workforce replacement = bad for HR software… others at least have some hypothetical revenue replacement strategies with their own AI offering.

Retired-Programmer

I have had some related questions (not exactly what the OP is asking but on a similar subject) on for years and never gotten a clear answer. So my questions are: 1. Does any brokerage track this and reflect it on your 1099s. 2. Does any software (HR Block, Turbo Tax) apply this. 3. Does anyone actually reflect this in their taxes when it occurs when they sell their shares. 4, IF you were to give your taxes to some profession CPA tax guy to do your taxes would he apply those rules. 5. Does anyone know of a case where the IRS has done an audit and changed their taxes due to this. From what I have seen the answer is no to the first 4. And on the 5th one and I have read from some Tax related site (IOW, not an individual making a comment, but a site dedicated to tax related issues) that the IRS will not audit your tax return because of this, but they might catch it/apply it if you were audited for something else. I have many times in a covered call bought the short call back for a loss and sold a new one Deep ITM, later bought it back again for another loss and with those same rules I need to defer that 2nd loss until I sell the shares. But the 1099 does not reflect this, HR Block and Turbo Tax do not reflect this and I have never had a problem. Very curious as to others experiences.

321654987321654987

I'm really skeptical that companies would move away from business process SaaS. It involves so much legal, HR, and accounting risk. The cost is worth the risk reduction (or risk offloading). I just think this is an area where the cost saving is not worth it.

GrandKnew

Gemini is literally a braindead homunculi obsessed with regurgitating it's pre-approved HR script

AgileHornet5960

A retrace to a 4 HR/daily FVG. Get back to the drawing board. Don’t ask this question again.

Ok-Parfait-9856

What do you use AI for? Especially so much usage in the lab. I work in drug development in pharma and there’s a push for AI but I haven’t seen much adoption except for HR/IT/etc. It’s just not reliable enough, AI will always hallucinate to some degree because the algorithm doesn’t actually know if it’s right or not. In settings where everything has to be controlled with no room for error, AI falls short. I can see it being useful for screening molecules and predicting best possible ligands for a given receptor but data science and algorithms already did that. It feels like a lot of AI is taking pre existing algorithms and slapping a new coat of paint on it. Eli Lily is putting lots of money into AI drug discovery, so we’ll see if it’s fruitful.

SirGlass

You need to contribute 4% to get the FULL match. You can contribute 2% but not get the full match and leave money on the table If you contribute 5% you will still get the full match , just the amount above 4% won't be matched But probably ask your employer HR or benefit team

Loose_Hornet4126

They outsized HR to another HR-type company. Just a headline

Money_Term8366

Saw a company fire its whole HR department. Shits gonna 100x by next Friday 

Ninjavitis_

It’s not meant to replace a sleep study. However if you did have sleep apnea then theoretically it should show something on the HR and O2 sat of the   ring. Also its comfortable to sleep with so less confounding variables 

sharpman2021

Most people still see NOW as an IT ticketing company. I see it as the workflow engine connecting HR, IT, finance, security and customer operations. The deeper it gets embedded, the harder it is to replace. High switching costs, recurring revenue, strong execution and AI making an already very sticky platform even more valuable. That's where my conviction comes from.

jtsa5

Been using HR Block since the Intuit shenanigans with TT. No problems so far.

Plus-Leave-1587

Hello. I can’t really find any conversations on Reddit for Bria cell. So I wanted to ask you, what do you think about today’s news for the asco conference? I was hoping for more encouraging words and that there was improvements in survival rates but I didn’t hear anything that sounded encouraging that we are likely to hit a HR of .65

Technical-Emu-32

Get back to work before I call our HR

CornMonkey-Original

ask your boss & cc HR. . . they can clarify.

ILoveWesternCenter

SLS phase 3 trial looking promising 78/80 events and <1 HR.......either it moons and gets acquired by big pharma or bankrupt lol

DeezSpicyNuts

I told the HR lady at work I was going to give her a pearl necklace and they escorted me off the property wtf, I was going to do something nice because her dad was in Al Qaeda 

Ok_Common_5631

vs HR block?

BreakfastSea834

 As long as they are a barrier of liability between me and the government.  Cant be worse than some of the “Tax Masters” at HR Block.

StellarDiscord

HR block does both free

somanyvegetables

The amount of work that would go into that is nowhere near the 50-100 bucks it costs to just have INTU do it. And nobody in HR ever lost their job for picking quickbooks.

InvestingNerd2020

Helpful tips: \- Invest into a Target Date fund in your company 401k/403B up to the employer match. Example: The company says they will match 3% of your salary contribution, you invest 3% of your salary pre-taxes. Talk with HR about this. \- Next build emergency savings up to 3 months of your routine monthly spending. This helps you from selling your stock investments when an emergency shows up that need's money. Use a high yield savings account of 2% to 5% depending on the savings market. Capital One is the easiest to start. \- Open a Roth IRA with Fidelity if you are working a blue-collar job after building up your emergency savings. Easiest access and the lowest fees. Invest into FZROX. It is a Total USA index mutual fund with zero expense ratio. They also have good customer service with 24/hours call center. \- Learn about Actively managed mutual funds, Index mutual funds, Index Exchange Traded funds (normal ETFs), and actively managed Exchange Traded funds (Actively managed ETFs). You can read about it on Investopedia. [Index Funds Explained: How They Mirror Market Benchmarks](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/indexfund.asp) [ETFs](https://www.investopedia.com/etfs-4427784) Also, avoid day trading. Even people with a master's degree in business and work on this 50 hours per week can't beat a diverse index like the S&P 500 and Total USA market 90% of the time.

CodeName_Henry

Well, HR just verbally admitted to me my offer letter saying “Common Shares” was a mistake and that its options. Unsure of how to handle it at this point.

StationImmediate530

Lul! He owns the HR department…

SeemoarAlpha

Bold of you to assume that he is incapable of going full tard. I mean if I showed up to work in a suit like that I'd be drowning in side-eyes and there would be calls to HR for a wellness check.

CovTaude588

the language matters a lot here. 'common shares' usually means actual shares being granted (RSUs vest into common shares), while 'options' (specifically ISOs or NSOs) give you the right to buy shares at the strike price. the fact that a strike price will be decided at the next board meeting strongly suggests these are stock options, not RSUs. ask your HR or finance team specifically: are these ISOs, NSOs, or RSUs, and what is my vesting schedule. those three categories have completely different tax treatment, exercise mechanics, and outcomes if the company gets acquired. don't sign anything else until you have that in writing

Mitoni

surprised to see the Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow on there. With so much being offset with Ai now, the HR management software sector hasn't done too well.

CD274

I think HR Block is winning this one atm

Token-Gringo

Honestly not a bad thought. Vought will save him. Workday will be the HR platform for the govt….

Spok3nTruth

Tech/app/payments Supply chain & shipping Coffee roasting/manufacturing Real estate/store construction Marketing HR/legal/finance Product development Corporate management At Starbucks’ size, it’s basically a giant logistics + tech + real estate company that also sells coffee.

MtGloomy0420

Check out $TCRX, $BRNS, and $GUTS - three former $GOOG 13-HR holdings that they’ve sold out of. They’ve also sold out of $VERV, $ALEC and Metsera, if you want to look at what happened to their price action. ;)

Valkorion335786

On my first day at Deloitte, HR asked me how I was feeling and I said I felt “Deloitte-ful” and long story short, I was thrown off the 12th floor

MtGloomy0420

Man, I 💟 you too! That’s so sweet you remembered my passion for the $SLS storm. It did seem to calm down all the people who were thinking it was going to $7.50. Oh wait. 🤣 I am an idiot more often than I’m not. Thank you for the public service. I did upvote you too. ;) Oh, psst… $GOOG exited $GUTS, $TCRX, and $FHTX over the past couple/few 13-HR filings. You might want to dig into it.

LasyKuuga

HR meeting? The one where my boss talked to me? Nah I’m good but I got scared and got a new job like the day after. Lowkey I don’t even want it now 😭

Valkorion335786

How was the HR meeting? Did you get promoted to 'valued customer'?

SueNYC1966

I am sorry. I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about the attorneys they hired as the third party to investigate this. I am trying to explain how this shit works to people who have never been involved with it. They think just because a third party had been brought in, and JP Morgan lays the bill, they lied. Often your HR department has to step away and this is who is brought into it. But people thinking a million dollars is a small fortune to these companies is too funny. It really isn’t.

Muted-South4737

And now I have two meetings. You, me. HR. I'll see you there.

ryana8

Let me say. I started a “vibe coding” product. Or as we call it - AI app builder for internal tooling. We raised around $100m. We’ve talked to thousands. THOUSANDS of CIOs, CTOs, CSIOs etc. The reality is - not a soul is going to be ripping out 3rd party SaaS if it’s core to their business. Where ai fits in is light internal tooling for automating workflows. If a business is looking to replace Okta or salesforce or datadog, etc - we’ll gladly take their money but it’s a sign their business isn’t going to go anywhere. The smart companies know the ROI on vibe coding a product with Claude and paying some agency to do it, or ripping your engineers off of building your revenue generating products is simply not there. As Jeff Lawson says - build or die. You ever talk to someone on Wall Street? Ask them to describe what the cloud is. Ask them what containers are for. They have no idea how software works, why it works, and the role AI will play. If you’re in software, the writing is on the wall. Agents will be deployed with enterprise guardrails. Meaning safely in a VPC with strict permissions and access inside of snowflake or databricks or whatever else is in a stack. Mary from HR will not be building some random payroll solution that exposes what they’re paying all of their employees. The CIO will just continue to pay workday or justworks or SAP. And those companies will offer agentic workflows. SaaS is becoming more and more of a fire sale.

H6UEF4WU8X

The HR office?

HerezahTip

HR lady at my company has face tattoos and the perkiest titties, we don’t discriminate

sonofalando

When you launch your 1-1 with your manager and Jan from HR appears on the zoom 💀

Bonemeal87

4 HR and Day chart...need I ng some insight to what yall see happening here https://preview.redd.it/vblhf7vjut0h1.jpeg?width=1060&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7edbe6e8bbd3a88b3e36200507faee00bf15d1de

SuspiciousStable9649

Question. How obscene is ‘holy fuck there’s no way this is AI’ obscene? Asking for future HR.

Thebaxxxx

Im going to start setting in motion a path towards founding a tech company leading to an ipo. I have studied the markets extensively. My priority isnt to make money, but to look good, sound good, and talk good. Im going to hire an unemployed phd with a decent resume and an "old" look and appoint him as CEO. Next ill hire some b-tier writers and web designers from the bay area and grab some foreclosure-bound commercial real estate. Ill travel the country and visit conventions where college students present their science project and hire the first one whos idea has plausability, but ill hire a washed up unemployed engineer to be the face of it. The rest ill pick up from the local wendys and give them amazing job titles like HR director and legal counsul, theyll all be equipped with the latest version of GROK ai. Then ill pull a thaniel and sell all my shares as soon as the company IPO's and write a billion in warrants to the first person who asks.

peanuts-in-my-jelly

Microsoft HR Department is a bunch of Chads

GrouchyResearcher392

Which is the big deal. Cool it can do things we havnt bothered doing. But that doesn’t make MONEY. Fortunately the market is much more irrational now, or this bubble would have popped long ago. It’s been 5 years now and there’s still been absolutely 0 functional use for AI outside of downsizing HR and CSR’s.

360drive69

Sometimes I tell a joke so funny HR wants to hear it

teachingroland

I have an organic and original thought! Academic tone The proliferation of large language models represents a troubling shift from information retrieval to cognition outsourcing. When users substitute synthetic summarization for primary-source engagement, they incur a demonstrable loss in critical reasoning capacity. This phenomenon, analogous to over-reliance on GPS navigation degrading spatial memory, suggests that convenience carries cognitive externalities. Scaled across populations, the aggregate effect is a decline in epistemic resilience. Compounding this is the dual burden of environmental impact and epistemic reliability. Training and inference for frontier models require energy consumption orders of magnitude above traditional search, externalizing climate costs to the public while privatizing the efficiency gains. Simultaneously, the architecture’s propensity to produce hallucinations - factually incorrect outputs delivered with high linguistic confidence - undermines the information ecosystem. Unlike human error, which is typically hedged or contextualized, model error presents as authoritative. The result is a technology that accelerates access to misinformation while accelerating emissions, a combination whose societal costs remain underpriced. Angry tone I’m so sick of pretending this is fine. We built a plagiarism machine that burns a forest every time you ask it to write a birthday card, and we all clap like it’s progress. You’re not “more productive.” You’re just dumber and lazier, and now there’s a server farm in Nevada melting the planet so you don’t have to think for 30 seconds. And the worst part? The damn thing lies to your face and you thank it. It makes up laws, invents studies, gets math wrong, and delivers it all with the confidence of a TED Talk bro. We took the one thing humans were still better at - knowing when we don’t know - and replaced it with a robot that never says “I’m not sure.” That’s not innovation. That’s replacing your brain with a slot machine and calling it efficiency. We deserve the climate crisis and the stupidity epidemic we’re coding into existence. Reddit post tone AI is making us stupid and cooking the planet and nobody cares edit: wow rip inbox. yes I use AI. that’s the point. Look, I use ChatGPT too. It’s useful. But can we be real for a sec? We’re all out here asking it to summarize 3-paragraph emails because reading is hard now. That’s not a tool, that’s a cognitive crutch. My nephew can’t write a paragraph without “help me make this sound better.” We’re gonna have a whole generation that can’t think without autocomplete. And the power usage is insane. One chat = 10 Google searches. We’re literally heating up the planet so Karen from HR can have AI rewrite “per my last email” to sound “more assertive.” Plus it just makes shit up. I asked it for case law and it cited 3 cases that don’t exist. With full quotes. That’s terrifying. We’re replacing “I don’t know” with “here’s a wrong answer delivered confidently.” We swapped critical thinking for convenience and we’re calling it the future. It’s not. It’s a microwave for your brain and the planet is the electric bill. tl;dr: AI makes you dumb, wastes power, and lies. We’re all still gonna use it tho. \--- Want me to lean harder into any of these, or mash them up?

454k30

But not from your work computer. Or absolutely from it if you were hoping to talk to HR anyway.

financiallythriving

I told a joke so funny today that HR wants to hear it at 9am tomorrow morning

Moepenmoes

John is that you? Is it true that HR called you yesterday regarding misbehavior?

HeftyBox3580

I like the App and use SOFI daily for my watchlists, but it’s a bank at the end of the day. Stopped trading with them since Apex Clearing corp 1099s don’t convert into HR block at tax time

redditmodsRrussians

*HR has entered the chat*

No_Pomegranate_8826

Because *waves at what is happening*. If he is mentally ill, which I personally believe, this is a simple cost benefit analysis. It’s one thing to be shaken down by a con artist, but if he is in psychosis and left the boardroom, they may have been like dude, he thinks this is real, he will drag this to the bitter end. No matter how much exculpatory evidence they put forth, her reputation will never fully recover. There will always be conspiracy theorists who think evidence was manipulated or he was silenced because of the company involved. People don’t like corporations and they LOVE a corporate takedown. So, it doesn’t matter if he’s proven wrong, because this all still exists. These insane stories will always come up when you google her name. So, what’s a million dollars if it makes someone in full blown psychosis sign NDAs? To prevent all of this? I guarantee they’ve already spent that on the legal, HR and PR teams over the past few weeks. Who knows how many future lawsuits will start coming out by people exposed to him in the company? This is a nightmare for them. And do you think their entire Legal, HR and PR teams actually care about this woman or “covering up” for her? If they knew she was guilty as sin, they would have thrown her to the wolves, jumped ship and rallied behind him as if they were woke saints. They aren’t going to hang themselves to dry over some mid-upper level employee of theirs. They have no reason to destroy their reputation over that. If anything, shanking one of their own to protect another lower level employee in a salacious SA claim may have even been good PR for them amid the Epstein stuff. People and money mean different things to companies like this. They are not personally invested in what is happening, the million was just an attempt to put a plug in the molotov cocktail *in my personal opinion*

LetsGetStonks

Some 401ks now have the ability to do Roth style 401k's, though unless you read every single word in HR emails, you may not know it. Fidelity does it for my employer, and I only realized it months after the change went into effect.

Andrei95

To be fair, professional managers have a lot more overhead and drags to pay for that individuals don't. Every dollar they make has to also go to commercial real estate for their office, HR, marketing, and advertising departments, pay and benefits for all the non trading employs, all sorts of consults, lawyers, and accountants. Plus, you have many fewer opportunities when you are trying to put a instatitnal amout of money to work versus what any individual would have; and you have to worry about moving the market.

AverageUnited3237

Of course I’ve done my own dd. What idiot puts ~2m into a biotech stock based on what someone on Reddit said? There is no failure path here, pushing the HR above .636 is practically impossible with the calendar in May 2026 and 72 events in December 2024… Still have yet to find a coherent argument on how the HR eclipses the failure threshold, the margin of safety is absolutely enormous

pigeon_shit

Sooo corporate HR is cooked but my blue collar job is safe?

Sandvicheater

Got called in HR because one of my Gen Z subordinate username..DealDough69. I just can't deal with these Gen Z kids anymore

Crazy_Donkies

This is the exact answer. Commenting to add one point: I actually like NOW because I think HR is the most obvious, low hanging fruit to be replaced by AI. I also think MSFT should merge with NOW. NOT buying it yet, but may DCA.

AgileHornet5960

Bull flag/falling wedge on SNDK 4HR/1HR. Get in or get left behind.

D1finalboss

sir HR would like a word with you in their office

No_Pomegranate_8826

To prevent what is happening right now. His claims are WILD and truly hard to believe, it is coming to light that it is all baseless, but the damage done to her and the company is irreparable. If you google her name, there are articles of her smoking a cig naked, mid-SA of two men, while calling him brown boy and talking about her cannons? Insanity. And now these insane headlines will be tied to her forever. And the amount of money that their legal, PR and HR teams are speeding through right now have probably already surpassed $1M.

DemandOk5785

Wait till you actually show interest and they report you to HR. Lol

JelliedHam

I'm guessing there's more to it than just pure fabrication. He has some plausible evidence, otherwise he's just be a fart in the wind and dissappear. Was it as absolutely tabloid bonkers as he described it? Probably not. But if he didn't have anything this would be a nothingburger. How much you want to bet he's got some corroborating witnesses, perhaps even people who have been subject to similar. They're still gonna settle. JPM has unlimited money. Anything under 50MM is so small that it's a rounding error to their financials. He would've taken the 1MM if he didn't have a case. Remember, you only need a majority of a jury in a civil case. And punitive damages could be very real if it turns out he made complaints with HR that were ignored or treated improperly. The job of HR is to protect the company from liability. Fucking up repeated sexual harassment claims is something they could throw the book at them for.

donny02

Real funny to see the “believe all women” crew run the Don Draper playbook when the genders He’s lying He’s ugly He’s jealous He just wants money He was bad at his job HR said she didn’t do it Ok the settling is just go away money Also the two witnesses are lying too.

Yee4614

Walk me through your friend’s logic as to why they think a 350M cap is too high for a company with 190M and just completed a successful phase 3 trial.  What about the data gives you pause? The HR 0.44 is strong.  The OS score is pretty easily explainable and highlights the efficacy of the drug.  It can get rejected but the odds should be pretty high it gets approved and if so we are probably looking at a 1B plus market cap. 

wisdompuff

POV: your selection package is under HR review

UnclaimedUsername

They have a help page specifically for backdoor roth that walks you through it. It might be lacking some other features but so far FreeTaxUSA has been good enough for me, and way cheaper than HR Block.

julian_jakobi

A “scam” that just got picked by an industry giant for its PFAS solution, while CEO Dennis Calvert was appointed by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce to the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee advising on U.S. environmental tech exports. If this is a scam, it has a very impressive HR department. Tick tock indeed. BULLISH.

DesignerSea494

Overheard two people debating “corporate punishment” of children. Since when is HR getting involved with toddlers?

PresidentSkro0b

I can't get on board with the narrative that AI will send SaaS to 0. I think people saying this don't fundamentally understand what these SaaS platforms do and are just repeating some nonsense they heard because it sounded edgy. NOW does a lot of things. I've mainly used it for internal case management at large multinationals. Do people think that HR, procurement, finance, and IT tickets won't exist in the future? Or that some AI bot will handle the cases and... What? Not store the actions somewhere? As long as the SaaS companies continue to evolve (many are), there will always be a demand for them because they are needed for compliance.

zen_and_artof_chaos

Which seems to be false. Bro just needed an outlet for his fantasy and decided HR was the best option.

zen_and_artof_chaos

Bro accidentally sent his smut rough draft to HR and it snowballed from there

OTTER887

HAHAHAHA! HR was contrived to let managers shovel people problems somewhere else. Like other business functions, their only loyalty is to higher-ranking officers and the bottom line.

Minimum-Pangolin-487

Interesting take, HR are usually independent to an extent especially if you have hard evidence though

DoctorNezuko

Workday is crap and will be dropped once HR teams finally come to terms with it. Salesforce however is a solid company that benefited massively from the AI boom and is now correcting back towards where they belong. I cannot predict what direction they will be moving in the next year, but I can tell you that they were severly overvalued a couple months back.

RockyFromCollections

make sure to answer the optional HR question about race.

7777777King7777777

Now wait for a c@c@ s_cker HR representative reply to your inquiry.

redditdan911

True - and some plans allow an in-service rollover. I would rollover 401k Roth and after-tax to a Roth IRA, and associated pretax into traditional. All varies based on plan rules which adds to the confusion when discussing. Conversely, some plans allow IRA rollovers INTO a 401k. Why would someone want to do this? Because - if you have multiple traditional IRAs and one or more has a high balance AND you want to do a ROTH conversion. If you ever find yourself in this situation… you may need this. Point of the tangent is you really need to understand what your 401k plan allows you to do. Ask questions of HR (who usually doesn’t know) and/or your plan representative.

Overall_Cheesecake_3

JP morgan has denied the claim. In the article is ridiculous, it says he was getting bad references. JPMC doesn’t give references, only employment verification, and doesn’t allow employees to give references. So, who was giving the bad references, and why was he asking for references since it’s against the Code of Conduct. HR is not going to put up with anything that is going to harm the reputation of the firm. And to protect an ED? Not a chance. ED is not a very senior role in JPMC. There’s a dime a dozen EDs in JPMC. Word on the street is dude was a nut job and looking for a paycheck. Regardless, if this is true, they both have tainted reputations now.