PN
Skycorp Solar Group Limited Ordinary Shares
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
Should I sell PN? I put $2000 in it with a 1.50 average :(
I’m still holding PN at 1.50, am I cooked?
Thank god for PN just saved my ass from a big red day
Who's in PN careful when it get near 2
What is happening with PN?! Looks like it's just up because it's up??
So mad trading PN is restricted for me...
I lurk in this sub and talk shit because I love the culture and sometimes the stupidity too send me a PN I can go into depth and explain how it actually works as I didn’t do it fully in the comments
You have no idea what you are talking about 
Watch out now [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai-PN4cJKzc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai-PN4cJKzc)
📰 Key Recent Developments 1. Dual-CEO Structure Implemented As of October 1, 2025, Nuburu adopted a dual-CEO model. Alessandro Zamboni remains Executive Chairman and Co-CEO, overseeing strategy, financing, investor relations, etc. Dario Barisoni was named Co-CEO with responsibility for operations, acquisitions, and execution, particularly in the defense segment.  2. Quarterly Strategic Update & Defense Focus On September 29, Nuburu released a strategic update announcing its pivot toward defense & security. Among highlights: • Raised $12 million via a public offering to support acquisitions.  • Current cash on hand is ~USD 6 million, which will support its transformation and acquisitions.  • Creation of Nuburu Defense LLC to house defense & security operations.  • Partnership with Tekne S.p.A., helping deliver a $6.6 million contract in Bangladesh, and plans for further collaboration.  • Plans to acquire a controlling interest in Orbit S.r.l., a SaaS platform specializing in operational resilience, by end of October 2025.  • Projected billings of ~$500,000 in Q4 2025 as initial traction in defense.  3. $12M Public Offering Closed On September 16, Nuburu closed a $12 million public offering. It issued ordinary shares, pre-funded warrants, and common warrants (exercisable over 5 years). The proceeds are earmarked mainly for its phased acquisition strategy, especially in defense & blue‐laser sectors.  4. Acquisition Framework Agreement On September 23, Nuburu signed a framework agreement with a strategic (undisclosed) partner to explore acquiring a controlling interest in that partner. The goal: to bring in existing R&D, production capacity, and client base to accelerate its expansion in defense applications of blue laser tech.  5. $100M Standby Equity Purchase Agreement Back in June 2025, Nuburu entered into a standby equity purchase agreement with YA II PN, Ltd., giving it the option (through May 30, 2028) to sell up to $100 million in shares (subject to conditions) to fund growth.
Strong research, thank you. Pg 2 of the S-1 shows their doing business with YA II PN, Ltd. I've seen them many times before. From Copilot: # "Why It’s Considered “Toxic Financing” YA II PN, Ltd., operated by **Yorkville Advisors**, specializes in: * **Standby Equity Purchase Agreements (SEPA)** and **convertible debt** structures * Targeting **cash-strapped microcaps** with low share prices and urgent liquidity needs * Structuring deals that allow them to **convert debt into equity at deep discounts**, often tied to VWAP floors"
BURU has the right to sell up to 100M shares to YA II PN LTD under SEPA. Although it’s not obligated. 20M registered for resale, SEC Form S1. The price is 97% of the lowest daily Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of the stock over the three consecutive trading days following the advance notice. Also, there are 38,276,895 convertible notes. My understanding is…if all notes are converted , that means then 38,276,895 new shares of the company's common stock would be issued I have no shares. Just some info from SEC to share
I've looked in to this and see that this situation is potentially background noise to Rezolve's overall success. Yorkville/JBAAM who were coinvestors have filed to stop investing in Rezolve under the SEPA plan. This is more than likely due to a claim for Material Adverse Affect, the most common reason in this situation. This basically claims that Rezolve is in a long term financially detrimental situation. And although there is obviously no basis for this, as we can tell by the record high earnings estimate, and the increase in private investment $100 million this year alone (other than Yorkville/JBAAM), it is very likely specifically designed to put pressure on Rezolve to retract on the contract out of court so Yorkvillle/JBAAM can be relinquished from the 250million they promised to invest. There is only one reason I can think of that these coinvestors have had a change of heart, and chose this method of trying to change their contractual investment, and that is Rezolve's commitment to invest in Bitcoin. Their claim came just after Rezolve's announcement to invest more in July. So it seems their ideas dont allign. Rezolve has already made $26million this year from Bitcoin and many people see this as a good investment, but that doesnt take away how some people are risk averse to Bitcoin. And it may have come to a surprise to these companies who have already invested alot. If true as I suspect and even though there would be no basis for Rezolve to lose in this situation, it's very common to go to court with the hopes of a settlement as it creates pressure. Even though in this situation Rezolve wouldnt have done anything wrong they would want to avoid the claim going public to save their reputation. It could be that Yorkville/JBAAM want to offer finance under new deals, for example, where Bitcoin is given only partial investment. Afterall I can understand if they want more investment in Rezolve's Ai platforms if thats the angle they came from initially. Rezolve's counterclaim is that Yorkville/JBAAM tried to use their financial position to alter Rezolve's business decisions, which they have no right to as they are only financiers. It seems possible given the timing they were setting out to discourage Bitcoin investment, even though that was Rezolve's decision to make as its therir choice how to use their money. Bear in mind too these companies already hold millions in shares in Rezolve and dont want those to go down so they have a vested interest in keeping shares high. So both parties in this case has motive to settle this out of court. If so this may have a muted impact on shares if at all. And at worst Rezolve loses one investor party of many. Rezolve is doing well and with earnings as expected October 1st and all the good news of partnerships forming, new cutting edge software and new institutional investment, this situation you mention is likely to be overshadowed. P.s I just found this under law.com which reports on legal filings... "Case: Rezolve AI plc v. YA II PN, Ltd. Index not Assigned Court: New York Supreme Court, New York County Date Filed: August 29, 2025 Plaintiff: Rezolve AI plc Defendants: Andrew Weksler, Jbaam Special Opportunities Fund II LLC, Ltd. YA II PN, Yorkville Advisors Global, LP According to the filing, Yorkville refused to release funds under the SEPA to pressure Rezolve into conceding terms in an unrelated Bitcoin-linked transaction" https://www.law.com/radar/card/newyork-newyorkcountysc-2504749-rezolve-ai-plc-v-ya-ii-pn-ltd/
As previously reported on its Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K, filed on July 25, 2025, the Company has been notified that a civil complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed against the Company and Daniel Wagner on July 16, 2025 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, by JBAAM Special Opportunities Fund II LLC and YA II PN, Ltd. (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), in connection with the parties’ securities purchase agreement dated February 21, 2025 (the “February SPA”). The Company believes the Complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously defend the matter through all appropriate legal channels, including the potential pursuit of counterclaims. The Company does not consider the litigation to have any bearing on its operational performance, strategic direction, financial liquidity, or other business activities. On August 25, 2025, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County and will vigorously defend its position, including pursuing counterclaims where appropriate. The February SPA contemplated a potential $1 billion financing through convertible notes, the proceeds of which would have been used by a subsidiary to purchase Bitcoin. These transactions did not close, no investor capital was contributed, and no Company shares were issued. 69 The Complaint alleges that the Company breached Sections 4(a) and 4(aa) of the February SPA by (i) not using reasonable best efforts to form the subsidiary to hold Bitcoin and (ii) not holding a shareholder vote to approve resolutions relating to the SPA. These were conditions precedent to closing the transactions contemplated by the SPA. In the Complaint, the Plaintiffs seek damages to be determined at trial, together with interest. While the Complaint includes statements that the alleged harm could be in the hundreds of millions of dollars, the Company believes these claims are without merit given that the SPA transactions never closed, no capital was committed, and no shares were issued. As the transactions under the SPA did not close, the Plaintiffs have not committed capital, and the Company has not issued any shares, the Company therefore does not believe that the Plaintiffs are entitled to any damages. YA II PN, Ltd., one of the Plaintiffs, is a counterparty to the February SPA. It alleges that, as a buyer under that agreement, it was entitled to acquire shares had the SPA closed, and now seeks compensation. The Company does not agree with this position, as the SPA never closed and no such rights were triggered. The litigation discussed above does not involve the Company’s Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (“SEPA”). YA II PN, Ltd., one of the Plaintiffs, is also the lender under the SEPA. The Company has taken the position that YA II PN, Ltd. did not comply with its obligations under the SEPA, and has initiated its own claims in relation to that agreement by filing a complaint against YA II PN, Ltd., Andrew Weksler and JBAAM Special Opportunities Fund II, LLC on August 29, 2025 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. These claims include alleged breaches of the SEPA and interference with the Company’s financing efforts. The Company has diversified its sources of liquidity, including completing a $50 million securities offering in July 2025, and the SEPA is no longer material to the Company’s liquidity
Why do you think court proceedings aren’t going in their favor? Here’s a summary of what the cases are both about, by the way — Retail and e-commerce generative AI company Rezolve AI sued a group of alternative finance and investment defendants including Yorkville Investment Advisors on Aug. 29 in New York Supreme Court for New York County, alleging a bad faith breach of a $250 million equity purchase agreement. The complaint, filed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, claims the defendants deliberately withheld committed funding under the agreement to inflict financial harm and gain leverage in a separate dispute. According to the filing, Yorkville refused to release funds under the SEPA to pressure Rezolve into conceding terms in an unrelated Bitcoin-linked transaction involving a proposed cryptocurrency treasury structure. The case is Rezolve AI plc v. YA II PN, Ltd.
Let’s see…you started posting about $PN 18days ago… https://preview.redd.it/603e0wh1oejf1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0de98287899c99e6b88109b5e6680f686cbe3bb9 That looks like when it “pumped” to $4.5 then it did indeed DUMP had to $1.17. Curious timing bot 🤖
You are “pumping” the stock by making many posts about it. It’s like a commercial on TV that we don’t want to see. We don’t want to see your posts over and over and over and over about $PN.
How’s the pump and dump of $PN going? Asshat. https://preview.redd.it/y7xkgpddfejf1.jpeg?width=1157&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=eb01e0601bf411980ab953aadf89d6225fbe3afb
How’s pumping $PN going for you?
Shares Registered for Resale: 75,000,000 shares may be issued at Webull’s discretion under a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (SEPA) with YA II PN, LTD. (Yorkville). 159,236 shares already issued as Commitment Shares (a fee for access to the equity line). Mechanism: Webull can sell shares “from time to time” to Yorkville over 36 months (July 2025–July 2028),
Webull Announces $1 Billion Standby Equity Purchase Agreement: This is a significant piece of news released on July 3rd, 2025 (Thursday). This agreement with YA II PN, Ltd. (Yorkville Advisors) provides Webull with access to up to $1 billion in capital. Potential Upside Interpretation: This could be seen as very positive. It gives Webull a strong financial safety net and capital to fund future growth initiatives (product expansion, new asset classes, geographic expansion, exploring technologies like stablecoins and tokenization). This suggests the company is looking to aggressively expand and innovate. Potential Downside (Dilution) Interpretation: 🏳️🌈🐻
Webull Announces $1 Billion Standby Equity Purchase Agreement: This is a significant piece of news released on July 3rd, 2025 (Thursday). This agreement with YA II PN, Ltd. (Yorkville Advisors) provides Webull with access to up to $1 billion in capital. Potential Upside Interpretation: This could be seen as very positive. It gives Webull a strong financial safety net and capital to fund future growth initiatives (product expansion, new asset classes, geographic expansion, exploring technologies like stablecoins and tokenization). This suggests the company is looking to aggressively expand and innovate. Potential Downside (Dilution) Interpretation: 🏳️🌈🐻
Only 30 days posting multiple times a week for archer OP, congrats! Take a look at these and let me know when you sell: https://youtu.be/uvVnFYtW52Q?si=wZBZEAImenD03JkA https://youtu.be/wMz7_JIzXys?si=9LLtm5kWLPbf47PN
“Webull (NASDAQ:BULL) has secured a $1 billion standby equity purchase agreement with Yorkville Advisors' investment fund YA II PN, Ltd. The three-year agreement allows Webull to issue Class A ordinary shares at its discretion, with shares priced at a 2.5% discount to the Market Price during each one-day pricing period.” Lol get fukt
They have a ton of debt, it’s true. But developing out a new energy source isn’t cheap. Ask the oil barons from 100yrs ago! I still hold out hope that $PLUG and $MSFT will announce a more formal relationship. Only based on the $MSFT PR piece they did back a few years ago: https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/sustainability/hydrogen-fuel-cells-could-provide-emission-free-backup-power-at-datacenters-microsoft-says/ Here’s some news on financing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1093691/000110465925039782/tm2513332d1_8k.htm On April 28, 2025, Plug Power Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Secured Debenture Purchase Agreement (the “Secured Debenture Purchase Agreement”) with YA II PN, Ltd., as buyer (the “Buyer”). Under the Secured Debenture Purchase Agreement, the Buyer has committed to purchase an initial tranche of secured debentures in an aggregate principal amount of $210,000,000 (the “Initial Tranche”) for a purchase price (after giving effect to original issue discount) of $200,000,000 and a second tranche of secured debentures in an aggregate principal amount of up to $105,000,000 (the “Second Tranche”) for a purchase price (after giving effect to original issue discount) of up to $100,000,000. The Secured Debenture Purchase Agreement also permits the Company to sell to the Buyer a third uncommitted tranche of secured debentures in an aggregate principal amount of up to $210,000,000 (the “Third Tranche”).
Haha no more hujah dh, just throw insults, but I am not even PN supporter😂
Just got invited to a signal group chat called "depression 2025" by someone called HL and PN These guys are pretty funny, one of them is saying he's all in on TSLA puts and the other is buying calls on the hang Seng index
Thanks for doing this, but this still needs some clarification: The values that ChatGPT used for the table are the *simple* averages for the tariffs, where every product (sub-)category with a tariff code is weighted equally. More relevant would have been the *trade weighted* tariffs, i.e., based on goods' share of total imports of the importing economy, by value. Yet more relevant would have been weighting it based on actual trade with the US. It would take some effort to calculated this for every trade partner, but at least for the top trade partners, it's already available on the country/economy's profile page in the WTO's [World Tariff Profiles](https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/world_tariff_profiles24_e.htm). Here's [the relevant bit](https://i.imgur.com/7Eqp5PN.png) from the US profile page, on page 188 (as printed; jump to page 190 in your PDF viewer). If you take the EU (on PDF page 91, printed as "89"), for example, Trump's table says 39%, the simple weighted value from ChatGPT's table is 5%, and the trade weighted one is 2.7%. If you weight by tariffs on the actual products that the EU imports from the US, it's just 1.02% (weighted average of 4.2% on $12.4B worth of agricultural products, and 0.9% on $316.3B non-agricultural). In return, the US has a weighted average of 2.7% on the $31.8B of agricultural products it imports from the EU, and 1.4% on the $483.8B of non-agricultural goods, which makes 1.48% weighted average on the total, i.e., actually a higher tariff than what the EU has on the actual weighted product basket that it imports from the US. (This is all "MFN" tariffs, i.e., normal trade between WTO members, without an FTA.)
Nah, that’s just the commercial number. It might refer to some property of the material, it might not. Depends on the company. If you want to actually know what the material does you need to google the TDS for it - the technical data sheet - and read that. So for the 3M one up there, you have this document: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1809172O/3m-impact-resistant-structural-adhesive-irsa-07333.pdf?&fn=3m-Impact-Resistant-Structural-Adhesive-PN07333-technical-datasheet-english-ceemea.pdf The numbers I’m most concerned with are the T-Peel strength and the lap shear strength. You’ll note that they give different number under different conditions. This is possibly one of the areas that their engineers fucked up - the glue is operating in conditions it’s not meant for, and it couldn’t handle the temperature or humidity or thermal cycling, who knows. Alternatively, since Tesla is kind of infamous for bad quality control, they didn’t do a great job actually applying the adhesive. It’s not as simple as slapping some Elmer’s down and then pasting some pages together. You typically want to clean both bonding surfaces with a solvent like acetone or isopropyl alcohol to remove particles and grease; then you’re going to want to etch the metal with an acid to remove the oxide that builds up with exposure to air. The epoxy itself needs to be applied evenly and without air bubbles, and then you need to stick the two pieces together and apply evenly pressure along the entire bondline until the epoxy sets. On something like a car bumper you probably need a jig of some kind to hold it in place. Doing it by hand will definitely result in thin spots and thick spots in the bondline that introduce weaknesses.