Reddit Posts
Mentions
Adam Back as satoshi has already been debunked. I used to be in the camp that thought he was satoshi until he revealed his emails with Satoshi in the COPA vs Craig Wright lawsuit.
tldr; A British High Court issued a restraining order against Craig Wright, barring him from filing further defamation suits. Judge Edward Mellor stated Wright abused the legal system to intimidate critics and falsely claim he was Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. His lawsuits caused significant disruption to the cryptocurrency industry and forced individuals into costly legal battles. The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) initiated the case, citing threats to its members and innovation in the crypto sector. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
You're welcome. I will be interested to know how reading up on the other candidates affects your view. I will preface this by saying that I'm glad all the evidence is circumstantial and we will never truly know, but from everything I've read only 3 of the known Cypherpunks are viable candidates. And since Adam Back released the early Satoshi emails as part of the COPA v Wright case, which were verified as authentic by 2 experts, I really think it's down to 2. Len Sassaman and Nick Szabo. Again though, I am glad we will never truly know.
tldr; Craig Wright, who has falsely claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, received a 12-month suspended jail sentence for contempt of court. The sentence was issued by a London court due to Wright's violation of a court order that barred him from making legal claims about being Bitcoin's creator. The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) sued Wright after he filed a $1.1 trillion lawsuit over Bitcoin-related intellectual property rights, defying a previous court ruling. Wright plans to appeal the verdict. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
tldr; Craig Wright did not attend his contempt of court hearing in London, citing a lack of means for travel. This absence may lead to him being found in contempt, facing possible arrest and imprisonment. The hearing was initiated by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) after Wright allegedly breached court injunctions by filing a lawsuit against Jack Dorsey’s Square Up and BTC Core. COPA offered to cover Wright's travel costs, but he declined, demanding £240,000 instead. Judge Mellor has scheduled a sentencing hearing, which Wright can attend remotely. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
tldr; Craig Wright's appeal in his case against the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) was rejected by a UK court, deemed meritless with no prospect of success. The court found no credible allegations of bias against the judge, dismissing Wright's claims as disagreements with the judge's reasoning. Wright's appeal included falsehoods and reliance on AI-generated content. He faces a contempt of court hearing in December, with potential imprisonment if found guilty. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.