Reddit Posts
Mentions
BOME, $NAP, SLERF are r/cc's favourite coins
Lol $NAP is dumping like a mf.
tldr; Over the weekend, Solana's network activity surpassed Ethereum's due to a surge in interest for Solana-based memecoins, leading to a trading volume of $3.52 billion, which was $1.1 billion more than Ethereum's. However, the network struggled with the increased activity, experiencing a 50% transaction failure rate for a period. The frenzy was largely driven by the rapid rise of new memecoins like Book of Meme (BOME) and $NAP, which saw their market caps soar in a matter of hours. Concurrently, Solana's price increased, making it the fourth-largest cryptocurrency by market cap. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
get some $NOS too, new one and can be bought like $NAP
Don’t. It’s done. Do $NAP
Last warning to hop onto $NAP🚂
$NAP on Solana is gonna go crazy guys
Oooh. Well since we're looking at history. Oh! You're an ancap! That makes sense and aligns with your opinions and attitude. I find most ancaps don't feel that the NAP applies to personal attacks, so that tracks.
Most libertarians are specyists. They don't consider the NAP for precursors of steaks and burgers.
Communism can't exist without a monopoly on violence (i.e. The STATE) The idea that you can use the STATE to organize society along the lines of communist ideology, then have state shrink into nothing, is also an absurdity. People would go right back to 'personal self-interest', profit motive, and private property because that's how humans are hard wired. We're not the Borg. We're humans, as flawed as we are. I see you don't understand the NAP either, or the concept of initiation of violence versus the retaliatory use of violence in restoration of justice only when life, liberty, or property has been violated.
The Nancy Pelosi ETF (NAP): sit back, relax, and watch your portfolio beat the S&P 500 by double digits every year, guaranteed.
Financial freedom is pure non-coerced NAP. That's bitcoin. I only support republicans as much as their economic philosophy is correct and that's the important part. You decry "trickle-down-economics" but to suggest otherwise is to ignore 1/2 of every transaction. You see a rich guy. I see a guy who created wealth that people wanted more than the money for in their own pocket so they traded it. They enriched the guy who was doing what they wanted, offering them wealth in the form of goods and services. The rich guy served society. Society chose to enrich him in kind. Government offers no such choice. It only takes and promises value with no consequence for failure. I hired Trump as my president because I knew he'd champion businesses that I can choose to support or not, not government that takes by force. No government can take my bitcoin and no government can counterfeit it to pay bills I would never agree to pay for. No government can grab it to pay for wars. Big government requires confication of wealth because no person would coose it. Now if you say "some people choose to pay taxes because they appreciate government services!" I ask only 2 questions: 1) How much extra taxes did they pay over-and-above the minimum required and 2) If these services are so good, why force people to pay for them? We can discuss roads, the military, police, justice, imprisonment and fire safety as better-done by governments. The rest I would like a free market for including healthcare and education. And bottom line, without the economic activity preceeding government itself then gocernment would have nothing to tax and nothing to defend. The vilification of profits is a cynical election ploy to win over those who have not considered that they choose to enrich the rich meaning the rich traded them trye wealth and prosperity by thier agreement. And, Of course, we aren't discussing crony capitalism as capitalism which is another form of government failure dnd corription.