Reddit Posts
$Beast microcap token with mastermind dev and huge potential
Beast - a real microcap project with doxxed dev and potential for moonshot
Beast token low mcap ready to moon from rainmaker team
HEX is up 420% in 2023, LET ME EXPLAIN WHY.
Robots can only do what they are told to do – they can’t improvise--TRANSHUMANISM
The ideal is that the end state of L2s will have them fully inheriting Ethereums security and decentralization. But, right now none are as secure or decentralized as Ethereum L1. There are 26x different L2s all competing for market share. I remain highly skeptical L2s are a sound scaling solution.
Was Bitcoin attacked through Sam Bankman Fried (FTX)...?
PUBLICAE deploys the world's first politically neutral social media platform driven by POLITICOIN (PBPLC) Ad-Tech which rewards citizens with New World Order(STATE) "tokens" of appreciation for their valuable attention.
Elons Newest Acquisition - What does it mean for Twitters Future?
Texas State Securities Board - Voyager Investigation
Can we just cleanse once and for all the fallacy rampant in crypto that ‘future results WILL equal past performance’!?
Full English Translation of the Central African Republic Cryptocurrency Law
Play-To-Earn: Medieval turn-based fighting browser game on TON blockchain
I know staking rewards are counted as income on a federal tax return, but what about a STATE tax return?
Accredited Investor Status – Part Two: If you were recently cut off from a Cefi Earn program here’s how to take action
Should crypto sales be included on STATE tax returns, or just federal?
STATE Staking Contract is counting to go live
Democratic State Senators are introducing bills favorable to Crypto across the Country. This is the latest one from California trying to make Crypto legal tender:
Democratic State Senators are introducing bills favorable to Bitcoin across the Country. This is the latest one from California trying to make Bitcoin legal tender:
Mentions
Uh yea I know, I mentioned no STATE capital gains... No true... I just moved bitcoin into a Roth. Puerto rico is complete tax free on all capital gains...as well as El Salvador and many other countries.
You're a business. You should already know this shit, dude. If you don't know this but are advertising it anyway, you're a snake oil salesman. It's wild that you think you deserve any money from anyone. And good luck getting anyone here to believe you when you shut down upon receiving actual criticism. I'm fucking pissed that people like you exist in this world and take advantage of hard working people with big fake promises. Despite that justifiable emotion, I've offered quality criticism and you just shut it all down. If you can't handle this kind of heat when you're offering vague bullshit, you are in no position to be running any kind of company. Answer the goddamn questions. All of them. If you're so right and I'm so wrong, then I'll get downvoted for being a prick and you'll be upvoted for being the levelheaded victim of my bullshit. Why are you so unbelievably unversed in the basic nuance of substance distribution that ChatGPT could've explained to you? You obviously have no experience running a substance company. Or a game studio for that matter. But you somehow believe your one software dev will be able to build you both products? Where's the fucking business plan that isn't just one infographic? Who are your lawyers that will get you through the process, PER STATE? You won't have answers to this because you are not even remotely qualified to run a business of this type.
yup! Victimless crime to inflate your real estate and secure fraudulent loan terms; apply for food stamps while deflating your income, ENEMY OF THE STATE
"ARIZONA STATE SENATE CONSIDERING ADDING BITCOIN ETFS TO RETIREMENT PORTFOLIOS" Saved you a click
"the currency hasn't collapsed because the STATE won't let it" see now your getting it buddy very simple 👏🎉👏, Do you remember the great depression which was an even worse economic disaster? Why did the gold standard not stop that?
The are COMMUNISTS and Eu turns to POLICE STATE - very simmilar to Russia.
Brother that is not how logistics work. I'm not going to explain to you why people need to be identified in order for a government entity to properly utilize the resources they have available. That should be common sense. Without know who is living in an area how the hell is their government supposed to do anything for those people if they don't even know WHO THEY ARE. How can you feed people if you don't know how many are starving? See the point?? Again I live in the US. MY STATE GOVERMENT is offering $25 gift cards for any citizen to complete a survey on the qaulity of service in Healthcare. There is nothing diabolical about it. There's no evil plot. It's a basic strategy that's been used for decades now. World coin is attempting to establish UBI and a globally valid form of identification.
Right in its CURRENT STATE it can only do basic math. But soon it will be able to do math better than the smartest people and on and on in an exponential fashion. This could potentially reverse engineer SHA256 is all I'm saying.
Where I work, the lowest payed highschool DROP OUT makes about $35-$40k. Everyone I know who works in skilled trades (mostly people with just a HS diploma or GED) making the same as most median college grads too, about $60-$80k. Very experienced skilled trades and big rig truckers make well over 6 figures, about the same as most people WITH PROFESSIONAL DEGREES. Don’t be suckered by the boomer propaganda. Go look up the numbers yourself at BLS . Gov or OPENPAYROLLS . Com website. Example. HIGH RISE CRAIN OPERATOR IN THE STATE OF GEORGIA MAKES THE SAME AS A STATE JUDGE AND THE SAME AS AN MEDIAN PAY PEDIATRICIAN! All your models on education are out of date and out of touch with the real numbers.
Suuure pal. Those stats are only viable when you compare college graduates to HIGHSCHOOL DROP OUTS. Highschool graduates with skilled trades earn ON AVERAGE THE SAME AS AN AVERAGE COLLEGE GRADUATE. This is not speculation, IT IS A FACT! Go look up the salaries and wages for yourself on the BEURO OF LABOR STATISTICS. Gov website. Also, websites like open payrolls . com also has the public payrolls of government workers. A GEORGIA STATE CRAIN OPERATOR MAKES THE SAME AS AN GEORGIA STATE JUDGE !!!! About $130-$150,000. About the same as an average primary care physician according to BLS data in Atlanta. Y’all just regurgitating boomer propaganda from these garbage public schools. These government school teachers that sold you these lies only earn like 1/2 as much as a “dumb uneducated” truck driver working for Walmart. Some newly hired government school teachers with their newly printed degrees only earn the same AS THE LOCAL GARBAGE MAN. About $45,000 around my county… that’s embarrassing. Our current system has NOTHING TO DO WITH EDUCATION and everything to do with indoctrination, and indebtedness. It’s disgusting and parasitic.
Imo they are just paid advertisements, nothing wrong with it as long as they CLEARLY STATE IT (And they don't actively participate in the scamming).
1. THE DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING AND ENFORCING THE SECURITIES LAWS OF THE STATE OF IOWA AND IS AUTHORIZED TO INVESTIGATE SECURITIES ACTIVITIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH IOWA LAW AND ISSUE ORDERS IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTIES AND REMEDIAL ACTIONS PURSUANT TO IOWA CODE §§ 502.101-502.810 2. PURSUANT TO IOWA CODE §502.412(4)(I) AND IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE §191-50.17(3), IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE ACT FOR A BROKER DEALER FIRM TO FAIL TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM THAT IS REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 3. BY FAILING TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF ITS TRADING TECHNOLOGY RESULTING IN SIGNIFICANT PLATFORM OUTAGES DURING TIMES OF HISTORIC MARKET VOLATILITY, AS WELL AS SIGNIFICANT PERIODIC OUTAGES, ROBINHOOD HARMED ITS IOWA CUSTOMERS. ROBINHOOD'S FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS FOR ITS TECHNOLOGY VIOLATED IOWA CODE §502.412(4)(I) AND IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE §191-50.17(3). 4. WHILE EXPERIENCING PLATFORM OUTAGES, ROBINHOOD FAILED TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE CUSTOMER RESPONSE SYSTEM. THEREFORE, ROBINHOOD VIOLATED IOWA CODE §502.412(4)(I) AND IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE §191-50.17(3). 5. ROBINHOOD FAILED TO MAINTAIN AND IMPLEMENT ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS FOR ITS TECHNOLOGY AND FAILED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE IN ASCERTAINING ESSENTIAL FACTS ABOUT IOWA CUSTOMERS' QUALIFICATIONS FOR OPTIONS AND MARGIN TRADING. ROBINHOOD ALSO NEGLIGENTLY MISREPRESENTED RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTI-LEG SPREAD OPTIONS. THEREFORE, ROBINHOOD VIOLATED IOWA CODE §502.412(4)(I) AND IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE §191-50.17(3). 6. BY FAILING TO REPORT "TENS OF THOUSANDS" OF COMPLAINTS TO FINRA, ROBINHOOD VIOLATED IOWA CODE §502.412(4)(I) AND IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE §191-50.17(3), WHICH REQUIRE EVERY DEALER TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE WRITTEN PROCEDURES TO SET FORTH THE PROMPT REVIEW AND WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE HANDLING OF CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. 7. BY FAILING TO PROVIDE REASONABLE CUSTOMER SUPPORT, ROBINHOOD FAILED TO MAINTAIN AND IMPLEMENT ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS OVER ITS CUSTOMER SUPPORT. >Initiated By: IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION interesting. who else fined them for the same issue? >Initiated By: CONNECTICUT >Initiated By: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT >Initiated By: COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES STATE OF GEORGIA >Initiated By: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES >Initiated By: STATE OF NEBRASKA, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE >Initiated By: THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO >Initiated By: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA >Initiated By: STATE OF INDIANA, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION >Initiated By: ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT >Initiated By: STATE OF MISSOURI, OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION >Initiated By: STATE OF ILLINOIS, SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT >Initiated By: STATE OF MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES >Initiated By: PENNSYLVANIA CONTACT: COUNSEL SEAMUS DUBBS >Initiated By: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES, BUREAU OF SECURITIES >Initiated By: STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU >Initiated By: NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES >Initiated By: TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD >Initiated By: COLORADO DIVISION OF SECURITIES >Initiated By: DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INVESTOR PROTECTION UNIT >Initiated By: SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION >Initiated By: ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION >Initiated By: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Kraken has no access in NEW YORK STATE. 🤦🏻♂️
Currency is STATE owned money. For me personally, Currency is what I use to transact in a given jurisdiction, it's NOT money. Bitcoin is Money, NOT a currency. People in the future will continue to exchange Bitcoin for the local currency and vice versa.
>Bad actors are the disease among the human race. ALL humans are corruptible. Incentives drive human behavior. Using the LotR analogy, when a human has access to the OneRing, they ***become*** corrupt, precisely ***because*** they have ultimate power, and ultimate power corrupts ultimately. The monopoly on violence is ultimate power. It is consentless. It cannot be shut off by the individual. "*A man is no less a slave just because he is allowed to choose a new master ever term of years*" - Lysander Spooner I'm not suggesting you can eliminate all bad actions. I'm simply saying, observing incentives and structuring incentives properly are KEY to minimizing bad actions. This means 1) acknowledging that the MoV creates perverse incentives, which can only result in bad behaviors, and 2) organizing society (if that is your intent) via peaceful voluntary means, which allows consent mechanisms (or the threat of withdrawn consent) to provide the proper incentive to shape good behaviors. But first and foremost, diagnosis of THE problem needs to be correct. Bad money is a symptom of the disease, not the disease itself. The disease is that any human CAN become corrupt, ultimate power corrupts ultimately, and THE STATE (The MoV) is ultimate power.
ahh the international ban fud, aint 2021 anymore, notherfucking china tried banning both trading and mining yet still 20% hash comes from MOTHERCUKING CHINA A FREAKING CONTROL STATE
If you buy a bank you can still can't operate whit crypto if the state where is the bank don't want you use crypto...NEW MISSION,BECAME A STATE. Binancenation
>Absolutely bullshit. Technology did that, not capitalism. When Henry Ford create the tractor, which improved agricultural production and resulted in abundant production of food, was that not capitalism? Capitalists developed and/or use existing technologies, because they have an incentive (profit motive) to serve people. When we convert THE LAW into a weaponized system of plunder, the capitalists incentives change, because its easier to use THE STATE to plunder you than it is to compete amongst other capitalists to serve you.
>Read Smedley Butlers book War is a Racket. Great book. Pretty much describes how capitalists USE THE STATE (at your expense) to plunder the resources of other nations, iirc. Again, if THE LAW was restricted by the 'fundamental principles' referred to by George Mason, capitalists couldn't use THE LAW to plunder other nations and peoples, let alone those of their own country. The capitalist would have to compete with others to serve you best, rather than use THE LAW to plunder you.
Communism can't exist without a monopoly on violence (i.e. The STATE) The idea that you can use the STATE to organize society along the lines of communist ideology, then have state shrink into nothing, is also an absurdity. People would go right back to 'personal self-interest', profit motive, and private property because that's how humans are hard wired. We're not the Borg. We're humans, as flawed as we are. I see you don't understand the NAP either, or the concept of initiation of violence versus the retaliatory use of violence in restoration of justice only when life, liberty, or property has been violated.
>Capitalism has put more in poverty than it has lifted out. Absurdity on stilts! The food you eat, the shelter you live in, the computer/phone your typing on, the Reddit we're communicating on, all of it is a product of capitalisms. It sure is a luxury for you HATE the people and system of freedom that provides the standard of living you have. “***It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest.*** We address ourselves not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities, but of their advantages” - Adam Smith The reason communism kills millions is that when you remove the personal incentive (profit motive) of the butcher, the brewer, and the baker, the meat/beer/bread don't get produced in any quantities reflective of market demand. Further, remove/suppress the price mechanism and you remove the signal the market uses to identify what goods the market demands more or less of. Nothing removes personal incentive like the elimination of private property, which is one of the primary tenant of Communism. Show us ONE ruthless entrepreneur that didn't use THE STATE to restrict competition or subsidize their endeavor. Just ONE. The STATE should prevent the ruthless entrepreneur from violating your life, liberty or property. Not aid and abet them in plundering you. But so long as it is admitted that THE LAW may plunder you, capitalists will use THE LAW to plunder you as well. If they couldn't use THE LAW to plunder you, they'd have to serve you better than any of their competition. And THAT competition between entrepreneurs to serve you has lifted billions out of grinding poverty, despite the fact you don't see it.
They almost are. Just NO REGULATION, if you were scammed out. It is ONLY your guilty, the main definition of crypto says. And that is conceptually right. The good side of that assertion is NO STATE AUTHORITY CAN TECHNICALLY BAN YOUR FUNDS. In a good crypto like Monero or ZCash after Halo2 (no trusted setup required), NO STATE AUTHORITY CAN EVEN DETECT YOU HAVE FUNDS.
[NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST CLAIM NORTH KOREA IS USING CRYPTO TO FUND SOCIALISM THROUGH CYBER TERRORISM AND SCAMS!!!! WHAT ABOUT OBAMNA? WHAT ABOUT THE SEC? WHAT ABOUT GENSLER? WHAT ABOUT WARREN? WHAT ABOUT AOC? WHAT ABOUT DESANTIS? WHAT ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS? WHAT ABOUT THE ILLUMINATI THEY WANT TO CONTROL ALL YOUR MONEY THROUGH CBDCS WE HAVE TO STOP THE STATE FROM CONTROLING WHAT YOU CAN SPEND YOUR MONEY ON WE HAVE TO VOTE THE NON-CRYPTO BROS OUT OR THE...](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/596/729/a8c.jpeg)
CALL YOUR STATE SENATOR AND LET THEM HOW YOU FEEL. NO TO Senate Bill 686. [Here’s a link to lookup your state representative. CALL NOW YOUR VOICE MATTERS.](https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm)
BREAKING NEWS SAUDI ARAMCO, THE LARGEST ENERGY COMPANY IN THE WORLD, HAS FORGED AGREEMENTS WITH CHINESE PARTNERS TO BUILD A STATE-OF-THE-ART REFINING COMPLEX IN THE NORTHEAST REGION OF THE ASIAN NATION. Significant news that could give a big hit to the petro dollar.
The key is to let certain things die without letting the entire economy collapse. I wouldn’t want to be the FED making these decisions. Crypto seems to have benefitted thus far from the banking crisis but we’ve seen lots of shorts liquidated in this run up to the point where I’m not convinced this isn’t just whale games. Yes, crypto was created in response to the 2007-2008 financial crisis but crypto is incapable of taking on massive amounts of users and being an alternative payment form **IN ITS CURRENT STATE** as opposed to banks. Many basic needs of daily living are unable to be paid for in cryptocurrency and it’s still more difficult/perilous to use than traditional banks by orders of magnitude for a large amount of people. In a perfect world, im hoping this crisis actually leads people away from banks and into crypto for use, not just to make $$ as an investment. I hope that cryptocurrency responds by simplifying UI and playing ball with regulators to help ease mass adoption and hold bad actors accountable because the space is utterly rife with scammers and frauds (yes I know tradFi is too, but there is the FDIC and customer support for banking systems).
When we thing that case have no more options to continue then we get "DEEP STATE" what ever this means. A never ending lawsuit.
Here is a sample script that’s preloaded - *Hi, my name is [YOUR NAME], and I live in [TOWN, STATE]. As your constituent and an active cryptocurrency investor, I want you to be a leader in establishing clear regulations for the cryptocurrency sector that balance consumer protections with economic innovation and growth. Cryptocurrencies and decentralized technology can change the financial playing field and allow people like myself to take control of our financial futures. We must ensure that all Americans can access this valuable revolutionary technology. Right now, the SEC is actively undermining my investments by not issuing clear guidance on what is and isn’t allowed. In fact, consumers like me are being harmed by the SEC’s inaction before the fact and their overreaction after the fact. The sector needs better oversight than what the SEC has provided thus far. Thank you for your kind attention to my views on this issue!*
DEFUND THE STATE: BITCOIN. Keep it simple, stupid (atheist).
bruh this subreddit is full of 10 year olds I swear money is valuable for the EXACT reason he said, that it's someone else's liability (in this case the US government). It has value because they STATE it has value and will exchange your goods for other services. Very different from crypto.
A STATE declaring that they will accept a different currency than the federal government, applying to every business and person in the entire state, is FAR different than a mom and pop weed shop selling locally grown weed. Come on, man, how are you even asking these questions??
2019? I’m still processing 2005 when my varsity soccer coach benched his starting lineup that took him to states because we were all juniors. The parents of the seniors complained that their kids weren’t playing enough? Well guess what coach! We LOST STATE!
My favorite is $STATE -the one building towards true #decentralization. We need the real decentralization because centralization failed us! \#STATE #NewWorldOrder #NWO #NWOSTATE #STATEDAO #STATEtoken #PUBLICAE #PBLC #PBLCNFT #STATEapp #BLACKPAPER #STATEethics $STATE #CiprianPater #PBLCNFTRewards #NWOSocial #STATENFT #NWOCOMMUNITY #NWOArmy #NWOWeb3 #Crypto #DeFi #NFTs
You want a Doxxed Project & transparency? $STATE by u/PublicaeOrg is the Gem! PUBLICAE deploys the world's first politically neutral social media platform driven by POLITICOIN (PBPLC) Ad-Tech which rewards citizens with New World Order(STATE) "tokens" of appreciation for their valuable attention. ✅Doxxed ✅KYC’d ✅Audited Key Features: ✅NFT and crypto wallet ✅NFT staking ✅Social media platform ✅AR Camera features ✅Gamification through geolocation ✅(P2P) offline communication \#STATE #NewWorldOrder #NWO #NWOSTATE #STATEDAO #STATEtoken #PUBLICAE #PBLC #PBLCNFT #STATEapp #BLACKPAPER #STATEethics $STATE #CiprianPater #PBLCNFTRewards #NWOSocial #STATENFT #NWOCOMMUNITY #NWOArmy #NWOWeb3 #Crypto #DeFi Download the app now!
"rich people" wow that is so misdirected. These people are POLITICAL DEEP STATE and I can show u direct connections to Gensler as well as the WEF group.. Stop blaming capitalists for what this criminal cabal does.
DEEP STATE BANKER CABAL and 2nd largest doner to the Biden clone or whatever that is.
It is a private company. Built and sold by Elon mind you. But again. Free speech is from the government. The STATE cannot silence you. a private company can do whatever they want with their product. It’s called capitalism.
Wait. You realize that MOST of the actions of a STATE TREASURER goes unreported by the media. It's not big news. It's state level politics. Interesting to mainly those in that one state. So, don't try to make this some "mainstream media" BS rant.
That new party always feels like a breath of fresh air, manages to enamour the people. Then they win, discover the money printer and get corrupted beyond redemption. Rinse and repeat. Humans can't be trusted with managing money. SEPARATE MONEY AND STATE
I think for an app to read clipboard contents, it would need android.permission.READ_CLIPBOARD, and to read IMEI and deviceId it would need android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE.
So you’re trying to act intelligent off a technicality, which isn’t even correct. When you say water, you’re talking about the conventional colorless, transparent, odorless, LIQUID. Gasses are not liquids, which is why water vapor is not a liquid, which is why in conventional definition, you don’t call water vapor water. Just because something is made up of another thing, you don’t call it that. Ice is not an incompressible liquid, meaning it is not the conventional word for water. Water has no regular arrangement of its molecules, whereas ice does. Ice is a STATE of water. Ice is water, water is not ice: when talking convention, ice melts INTO water because in convention, water is a liquid. This is why we separate ice, water, and water vapor. Otherwise we would call all three water and you would be more confused than you are right now. Jfc you’re an ass
I CANT LIVE IN A VIRTUAL REAL STATE. I CANT COOK IN A VIRTUAL REAL STATE. I CANT SLEEP IN A VIRTUAL REAL STATE. Why the fuck do I want a IRL micropayment scam version of the sims?
> A. Disputes. The terms of this Section shall apply to all Disputes between you and Celsius. For the purposes of this Section, “Dispute” shall mean any dispute, claim, or action between you and Celsius arising under or relating to your Celsius Account, the Celsius platform, these Terms, or any other transaction involving you and Celsius, whether in contract, warranty, misrepresentation, fraud, tort, intentional tort, statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other legal or equitable basis, and shall be interpreted to be given the broadest meaning allowable under law. >B. Binding Arbitration: You and Celsius further agree: (i) to arbitrate all Disputes between the parties pursuant to the provisions in these Terms; (ii) these Terms memorialize a transaction in interstate commerce; (iii) the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq.) governs the interpretation and enforcement of this Section; and (iv) this Section shall survive termination of these Terms. ARBITRATION MEANS THAT YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO A JUDGE OR JURY IN A COURT PROCEEDING AND YOUR GROUNDS FOR APPEALS ARE LIMITED. The arbitrator may award you the same damages and relief as a court sitting in proper jurisdiction could, and may award declaratory or injunctive relief. In addition, in some instances, the costs of arbitration could exceed the costs of litigation and the right to discovery may be more limited in arbitration than in court. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and enforceable by any court with jurisdiction over the parties. >C. Small Claims Court. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may bring an individual action in the small claims court of your state or municipality if the action is within that court’s jurisdiction and is pending only in that court. >D. Dispute Notice. In the event of a Dispute, you or Celsius must first send to the other party a notice of the Dispute that shall include a written statement that sets forth the name, address and contact information of the party giving it, the facts giving rise to the Dispute, and the relief requested (the “Dispute Notice”). The Dispute Notice to Celsius must be addressed to: Celsius Network LLC, 121 River Street, PH05, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA, with a copy to legal@celsius.network, or to the most recent email or mailing address we have on file or otherwise in our records for you (the “Celsius Notice Addresses”). Any Dispute Notice to you shall be delivered by one of the communication channels you have provided Celsius, which may include email or other electronic transmission, and you agree that such a delivery of a Dispute Notice to you shall be sufficient. Should you require to obtain a Dispute Notice by any other communication channel, you must inform Celsius of such a requirement in writing. Following submission and receipt of the Dispute Notice, you and Celsius each agree to act in good faith to seek to resolve the Dispute before commencing arbitration. If Celsius and you do not reach an agreement to resolve the Dispute within sixty (60) days after the Dispute Notice is received, you or Celsius may commence an arbitration proceeding pursuant to this Section. >E. WAIVER OF CLASS ACTIONS AND CLASS ARBITRATIONS. YOU AND CELSIUS AGREE THAT EACH PARTY MAY BRING DISPUTES AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY ONLY IN AN INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION FEDERAL OR STATE CLASS ACTIONS, OR CLASS ARBITRATIONS. ACCORDINGLY, UNDER THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN THIS SECTION, AN ARBITRATOR SHALL NOT COMBINE OR CONSOLIDATE MORE THAN ONE PARTY’S CLAIMS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ALL AFFECTED PARTIES TO AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, YOU AND CELSIUS AGREE THAT NO DISPUTE SHALL PROCEED BY WAY OF CLASS ARBITRATION WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ALL AFFECTED PARTIES.
Grayscale sent me a link that just directly emails the SEC: rule-comments@sec.gov with Subject line as: File No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-90 Then they provided a copy paste response for me: Dear SEC, I’m writing to support the conversion of Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (Symbol: GBTC), currently the world’s largest Bitcoin fund, to the first Spot Bitcoin ETF in the United States. ***[PLEASE WRITE YOUR THOUGHTS IN HERE, INCLUDING WHICH STATE YOU RESIDE IN – THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT]*** Sincerely, *** [YOUR NAME] ***
>UBI is a good thing. and because of moronic statements like this one, you will forever live in slavery to your GOD STATE. Go worship it some more, it will throw you some silver coins for your boot licking.
Post is by: NoirValley and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoCurrency/comments/u56tlx/accredited_investor_status_part_two_if_you_were/ Hi, if you’re a US retail investor you’re probably very upset by recent SEC actions that have caused non-accredited investors to lose access to wealth-building interest-earning programs. High-interest yields are regularly enjoyed by the wealthy and are a principal means for building financial independence. The SEC has decided to use **Accredited Investor (AI)** status as a tool to limit how much access the majority of the population can have to earning in crypto. Less than [10% of the US population](https://www.archerinvestors.com/accredited-investors) presently qualifies for AI status. It appears that the SEC as well as the Treasury Department would like to maintain that limited access. Retail investors (the rest of us) feel strongly otherwise, therefore it’s important that we not be passive. Recently the SEC [made an amendment](https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/amendments-accredited-investor-definition-secg) to AI rules in a supposed effort to make the rules more inclusive. However, this change does not go far enough. While requiring that individual investors enroll in 60 hours of study and take a test that proves sophistication and readiness to participate in securities investment is not unreasonable – language surrounding that rule goes beyond the pale by also requiring an individual who passes the Series 65 exam start and maintain a financial advisory business, which is ridiculous. After Celsius became the latest Cefi platform to bar US investors from earning yield on crypto, I made a [previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/CelsiusNetwork/comments/u2snx5/what_if_everyone_on_this_sub_and_the_coinbase/) suggesting that anyone who was angry about it focus their energy on taking action that can instigate changes to the present [Accredited Investor rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CelsiusNetwork/a%20period%20when%20millions%20of%20Americans%20were%20suffering%20due%20to%20the%20cascading%20failures%20of%20centralized-government%20watchdogs%20and%20large,%20overly%20powerful%20financial%20entities.). In that spirit, I’ve pulled together some language that can be used to reach out to your state representatives. ​ **When reaching out, what works best? (in order)** * Working with a lobbyist group * Meeting in person * Calling * Sending a letter * Emailing With calling and writing, volume matters: the more people who reach out on a specific issue, the more likely it is to win a congressperson or Senator’s attention. # Midterm elections are coming up in November. I repeat, Midterm elections are coming in November. Now is the perfect time to bring the Accredited Investor issue to your representatives’ attention and let them know that their position on this matter is important enough to impact how you may vote. Yes, you’re angry and impassioned about this subject, however keep in mind, that when you yell at people they're less likely to listen to you. Remain respectful and succinct whether you call or write. Below is a suggested template for calling or sending a letter or email. If you happen to be a business owner mention that in the top of your letter – **contact from businesses is given a bit more attention**. \----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # CALL TEMPLATE (ask to speak with the **Legislative Assistant** or just leave a message). ​ *Hello, my name is (****YOUR NAME****), and I’m calling as a constituent from (****YOUR STATE****) and a concerned (****NAME OF PROFESSION****).* *It’s very important to me that Accredited Investor rules be more inclusive so that more Americans have a fair opportunity to build financial freedom.* *I feel that the Securities Act of 1933 needs to be updated to meet the reality of a more technically sophisticated consumer population. The 2020 amendment to Series 65 License rules was a good start, but an individual should not be required to become a financial advisor or to run a financial advisor business to qualify as an Accredited Investor.* *I urge you to push the SEC to make it clear that passing the Series 65 Exam is rigorous enough for an individual to gain Accredited investor status.* *Thank you and have a good day.* ​ # EMAIL or LETTER TEMPLATE ​ *Hello, my name is (****YOUR NAME****), and I’m a constituent from (****YOUR STATE****) writing to you because I would like to see a change to the rules that decide who can qualify as an Accredited Investor.* *As a concerned (****BUSINESS OWNER / MOM / YOUNG ENTREPRENEUR, MINORITY, etc****.) I think it’s very important for more Americans to have a fair opportunity to build financial freedom. The Securities Act of 1933 is outdated and does not take into account the sophistication of the modern investor.* *The SEC has decided to use this rule to allow less than 10% of the population to gain access to certain crypto yield earning programs and other assets deemed to be securities.* *The crypto industry was birthed as a direct result of the Great Recession, a period when millions of Americans were suffering due to the cascading failures of centralized-government watchdogs and large, overly powerful financial entities. Crypto was designed to be inclusive and to grant financial fairness to demographics that have been systematically disenfranchised from participating in financial markets.* *The Securities Act was recently amended to allow individuals to gain Accredited Investor status by taking the Series 65 exam, but this amendment does not go far enough. Its language also requires an individual to register as a financial advisor and to open and operate a financial advisor business. This requirement is highly burdensome to people like me who already have fulfilling work and who simply want to be free to invest their money how they choose. Passing the Series 65 Exam is rigorous enough.* *At present, the limitation on who can and cannot invest causes more harm than good by overstepping individual liberties and by contributing to the widening wealth gap.* *I urge you to push the SEC to make it clear that individuals who pass the Series 65 Exam qualify as Accredited Investors, and that these individuals should not have to change careers to gain access to certain investments.* *Thank you,* (**YOUR NAME**) \----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ​ **TIP:** Make small tweaks to the above templates or use them exactly as is, just remember to always use that first line (representatives will ignore calls, letters, or emails from people who are not in their home state) and refrain from using hyperbolic (emotional) language. # WHO TO CONTACT You will want to get the name of the **LEGISLATIVE AIDE** for your state Congresspersons and Senators. You can call the office for this information. Ask for name and email address. If you are sending a written letter, send it to the Congressperson or Senator’s office addressed to them and C/O (care off) the Legislative Aide, example: Senator’s NameC/O Legislative Aide’s NameUnited States SenateWashington, D.C. 20510 [**Find Your Congressional Representatives**](https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative) [**Find Your Senators**](https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm) ​ # LIST OF ALLIES And I’m adding this to this post because I think it’s important to note who is actively supporting progressive crypto legislation in Washington. **LOBBYISTS** Lobby 3 - Founded by Andrew Yang - [https://www.lobby3.io/](https://www.lobby3.io/) Crypto Council for Innovation: [https://cryptoforinnovation.org/](https://cryptoforinnovation.org/)About the CCI: [https://youtu.be/qCg5ujL9n4g?list=PLeuk9ioi\_Y3U92nCh-U30WzqNsjWk8-vE&t=727](https://youtu.be/qCg5ujL9n4g?list=PLeuk9ioi_Y3U92nCh-U30WzqNsjWk8-vE&t=727) Coin Center - [https://www.coincenter.org/](https://www.coincenter.org/) The Block Association - [https://theblockchainassociation.org/](https://theblockchainassociation.org/) The Bitcoin PAC - [https://www.thebitcoinpac.org/](https://www.thebitcoinpac.org/) The Chamber of Digital Commerce - [https://digitalchamber.org/](https://digitalchamber.org/) ​ **PRO-CRYPTO POLITICIANS** [https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/08/20/the-most-pro-bitcoin-politicians-in-the-us/](https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/08/20/the-most-pro-bitcoin-politicians-in-the-us/) ​ \*Upvote this post if you found it useful.\* And share it with others who may want to take action. (Edit 4/24/2022 to update Lobbyist list.) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Was pissed about the Washington Post thing too. As for making a difference on the STATE level. How about just speaking out against the bullshit going on instead of running and hiding from it? Then lying about such. He was getting out because he KNEW his state was having and was going to continue to have problems. Instead of warning people and advocating action towards controlling the predatory corporations that sent the state into a spiral; he ran.
Since Ted Cruz… a senator… that represents Texas on a FEDERAL level, was going to make a massive difference on the STATE agenda. It is us vs them. And it’s amplified by the majority of major media networks being biased toward the left. So the right, in the minority of news media, is to let them keep taking blows like they did unanswered from 2000-2016 using their media majority megaphone. The left won’t stop. They’ll keep doing this trash and answer back with a “yeah well you all do it too”.
Lmao did you ever learn any critical thinking skill or do you even have the ability to understand words and process information? It doesn’t have to type a big red “SURVEILLANCE STATE” to mean it’s aiming to create a surveillance state…Jeez no wonder you support an authoritarian like Warren
we are www.sasquatchpestcontrol.com we work in Whatcom & Skagit County's. WA STATE USA. Is anyone here accepting crypto as payment for their labor work. If so what avenues do you use on ur web site or invoices to receive it. Or is it just not worth doing ATM because of our tax laws?
You HAVE ALWAYS LIVED UNDER A STATE. You drive on the roads it built, use the internet it helped found in the 60’s and 70’s, your protected by a military that answers to a state. I’m sorry, but to me, your the kid who lives with his parents in their basement that loves to go on about how if only things were ‘fair,’ he’d be rich.
We should start considering funds for Russian nationals as well, if they get cut off from SWIFT. We should not let a punishment against a STATE hurt the people who happen to reside under its authority. Unfortunately that's what sanctions are going to do...
RUSSIAN STATE DUMA HAS DECLARED IT PLANS TO CONFISCATE MONEY FROM CITIZENS TO HELP OFFSET SANCTIONS Bitcoin fixes this https://news.ru/economics/v-gosdume-prokommentirovali-vozmozhnuyu-konfiskaciyu-sberezhenij-rossiyan/
Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/
> Your thinking of it in terms of fiat, that isn’t the end game It is ever since people gave up on it being a currency and decided it was a "store of value". People only value crypto as a way of getting fiat, which is why it has no independent purchasing power and is worth only exactly what the fiat exchange rate is. >It’s not about being honest it’s about the fact that it shouldn’t have anything to do with the STATE if decentralization is the whole point of crypto If people in crypto cared about decentralization then the vast majority of trade wouldn't go through centralized exchanges. They also wouldn't support security models designed to increase centralization of power over time.
Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/
Your thinking of it in terms of fiat, that isn’t the end game, if this crypto thing works out, I wouldn’t want to change it over to fiat , the dollar is dead, why would I need to do that . Your dollars are tainted with literal cocaine and blood yet you worry about the Integrity of my digital coin. It’s not about being honest it’s about the fact that it shouldn’t have anything to do with the STATE if decentralization is the whole point of crypto, not just that you can have digital funko pops you can get taxed on.
Read the bill very carefully, they are writing a bill to allow STATE agencies to accept crypto for payment of GOVERNMENTAL services. This is not legal tender. This is the government trying to size crypto assets from stupid people.
Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/
Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/
Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/