LIST

reed5point0

[Ouch!](https://i.imgur.com/jEljMMb.png) Stumbled upon this checking floor prices of my jpegs manually since that one site is broken. This hurts to see b/c I have been there when life gets hard suddenly. It legit hit me in the feels. Wish they had ENS so I could donate moons, or some of this weeks IBC staking rewards to their ramen fund so it doesn't have to be this way. I can't imagine the despair when they are booming again after taking that loss. I had a hard time wanting to even LIST my Stuttervoid when it was peaking around 1ETH, IDK if I even could list it at all now that I own one of their limited digital paintings that goes alongside two of their Halloween Snoovatars. I love that they are tying their Reddit work with their personal creations more than anything. I was happy AF to see TFoust doing limited collaborations with Rojom and others now too. Maybe I believe in the art over the hype long term, but I'll be holding my Reddit JPEGS and such. When I see someone like above, it hurts more than simply paper-handing tokens at that big of an L. To see that loss in faith...in art even. I already suffer from imposter syndrome with my own art, seeing that happen with my work would have me shook even more too even knowing it's likely not "me". Sorry to get sappy, but that one got me.

vociferousgirl

We all know this was a scam now, but, I'm sorry, WHAT?! " FTX Group did not maintain centralized control of its cash. Cash management procedural failures included the absence of an accurate list of bank accounts." Not to mention, "the Debtors have been unable to prepare a complete list of who worked for the FTX Group as of the Petition Date, or the terms of their employment. Repeated attempts to locate certain presumed employees to confirm their status have been unsuccessful to date." **HOW DO YOU NOT HAVE A LIST OF BANK ACCOUNTS AND EMPLOYEES?????**

-ShaunSparks-

No... They Captured Santa A decade back and Keep him locked away in a secure bunker just so they can ask him to check if your on the NAUGHTY LIST!!!!

TheWildJarvi

at first i was like, lol wonder whos at the bottom now im like.... ERGO MADE THE LIST

TypicalPlantiff

its also a significant misinformation. Citizens United is not about "corporations". Citizens United, an activist group made a movie critical of Hillary Clinton who was then running in an election and released it close to the election line. The FEC came down hard on them. The case reached the SC who examined the constitutionality of such laws and rightfulyl determined that the governmetn cant censor speech of any kind just because its close to elections. Just think of the bar this sets: The government held that there is an arbitrary line of spending that if passed close to election gets the government to censor you or your company. The court decided that was unconstitutional completely rightfully. The court then examined if the government can differentiate between private spending or combined spending through a business and discriminate then. And the court established that the first amendment also covered that. Imagine if the gov can go after big media corporations just because the yreport something critical close to an election that can be considered campaign donation (like an ad). what this did is it effectively allowed the rise of PACs. Direct donations to campaigns still ahve to follow federal law and are capped (which is ridiculous imo). But because political action campaigns dont have the same limitations they can effectively gather unlimited amount of funds from whoever and use them to 'campaign' on anybodys behalf as long as they are not directly controlled by the campaign. Because of CU they are allowed to do it even up to election day. Which is the right constitutional opinion. There is no instrumetn available to the government that can curb political speech. What is the difference if you decide to post a political opinion or if you and 10 other friends gather 100k and make a movie about the candidate you dislike and publish it? Its literally the same. Ofc money buys you more outreach. that has alwasy been the case. But rich people also have the right to the 1st am and can spend their money on political ads too... The Dark money issue is a demcorat framing. Dark money is the money given to super PACs by donors. There are a lot of regualtions on PAC funding but it is technically possible for a rich to donate anonymously to a super PAC and have the pact post ads with those money. This is allll that it means. They cant accept "foregin funding from the Rassians"... https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/taking-receipts-pac/contributions-to-super-pacs-and-hybrid-pacs/ >They may not accept contributions from foreign nationals, federal contractors, national banks or federally chartered corporations super PACS are very tightly regulated. What democrats wanted is to get a public LIST of everybody who donates to any super pac so they can shame people. For example the list of political donations to campaigns is public too. But the democrat sbeing the hypocrites that they are explicitly allowed Unions to not disclose donation lists even if they campaign like a super PAC... its a ridiculous billl **And I still dont get what this has to do with god damn Crypto**

Quiet-Custard-Roll

Next on the HYPE LIST ETH. Enjoy the Pump Watch out for the Dump BTC 2K

no6969el

lol yeah right. You got to be joking? They have a LIST of words that will get your comment autodeleted. I use reveddit to always know when they "hide" comments without you knowing. It is crazy.

homrqt

Coinbase...... LIST ERGO

symmetric69

So here's a quick, not very elaborate, criticism of the most shilled stuff around, I'm by no means a buttcoiner, just deeply skeptical over the thousands of jaw dropping scams running around: *** ## PoS No pure proof of stake coin will ever be decentralized, and this means that each bank in the world will/can come up with the exact same security model for their crypto, and banks work by multiplying deposits to lend money (aka debt creation aka money printing), so public blockchains + limited supply pure PoS is a total illusion. We will likely have hundreds of private moneys held by banks which will boil down to a dozen major ones. And the proof is in the pudim, just take a look at who runs the nodes for EACH and EVERY PoS coin, it is always the "foundation" or whatever like that. Especially, don't let them gaslight you with diplomas, code and technobabble thinking that you are so dumb as to not understand this basic fact (well most of you are but a lot aren't). I'm not a PoW maximalist, not a BTC maxi at all, but it so happens that it is the only potentially decentralized consensus people came up with so far. ## DAG Another thing I might add here is that all the DAG hype is just that, hype. the fact that DAGs like Avalanche/Nano, etc never fail (well some devs manage to make them fail like IdOTA) means ONLY that they are being validated in a PoS centralized setup. Totally useless, why not just have a NEO-like DPoS consensus? Just pin-pong block validation among your whitelisted nodes. The simpler the better if you are to run a centralized consensus mechanism because you want speed. ## NFT All the hype with NFT is unbelievable to me. NFT is a big unabashed scam. Just think for two seconds and realize that if you can freely download the media, who gives a shit about who holds the first displayed hash of that? But the idea is not totally useless, exactly because blockchains are good for notary services, proof of existence. You WANT that the files you hashed be infinitely reproducible because you want to prove that you hold the first occurrence of that file in your utxo, so you want to prove that you invented that thing, say, for a patent application. Needless to say that here you are totally dependent on governmental institutions to actually acquiesce and utilize that system in order to *legally* to give you prior art. And, again, what is the use of selling that hash to another person? It is nothing but a digital beanie baby collectible. ## DEFi The only usage of DEFi is decentralized exchange. But the whole idea of tokens themselves is also problematic. A business has no use for a token they cannot control, because they can just use a fucking website and control the issuance, burn and transactions anyway. They WANT TO be centralized. Why wouldn't they? The whole underlying value of the token is THE BUSINESS, NOT the blockchain where the tokens are. So if tokens are problematic, a DEX is also not that big of a thing you think it is. But hold on a second, you will now call me out and say "bullshit, we have stable coins like tether and they are very useful because we can hold them, send them to multiple exchanges and exchange one for another, like RUB/Dollar/Yuan etc both in the exchanges AND in DEXes". And you are damn right, this is for sure a very clear usage of DEX and tokens, but what is the underlying peg of that? Some algorithm bullshit that runs on centralized side-chains like a pyramid retro-feeding scam that blows up once a korean dude exit scams the treasury? Or the fact that the market BELIEVES they hold value and exchanges LIST THEM and scalp them to keep that value? This here is a kind of chicken/egg problem and I won't pretend to know more than you know about this, the DEX in this example does give some underlying value to that peg, it makes it very attractive that you can hold a fiat-peg in a decentralized chain and that adds to your belief in its peg, but that is also because exchanges do use them (and used them prior to DEXes and whatnot) and people trade on them there. So I'm not completely sure here, but in sum, I think DEFi main case is for stable coins arbitrage, because the token themselves, the stable coins, are fiat, they depend on belief. DEXes will never replace exchanges because you whatever "wrapped" coins are obviously not the real coins. ## Wrapped Coins LMFAO seriously, this is such a scam it hurts. Wrapped coins are very dangerous and they are a way for exchanges to inflate the supply of coins to sell IOUs of coins they do not hold in full and profit out of it. That is, wrapped coins are tokenized IOUs. You will be in a serious world of pain if the exchange simply refuses to continue to accept the wrapped coin, OR if the wrapped coin token goes to shit in the DEXes. We should all ask exchanges to stop this blatant fractional reserve scam. ## Yield farming I get that some of you cool kids got rich with yield farming pyramids, but they are just that, pyramids. Once the influx of capital falls down the curve threshold you are absolutely fucked. So always trade those with a small portion of your capital and don't be too greedy because the rug pulls are absolute savagery.

symmetric69

## PoS No pure proof of stake coin will ever be decentralized, and this means that each bank in the world will/can come up with the exact same security model for their crypto, and banks work by multiplying deposits to lend money (aka debt creation aka money printing), so public blockchains + limited supply pure PoS is a total illusion. We will likely have hundreds of private moneys held by banks which will boil down to a dozen major ones. And the proof is in the pudim, just take a look at who runs the nodes for EACH and EVERY PoS coin, it is always the "foundation" or whatever like that. Especially, don't let them gaslight you with diplomas, code and technobabble thinking that you are so dumb as to not understand this basic fact (well most of you are but a lot aren't). I'm not a PoW maximalist, not a BTC maxi at all, but it so happens that it is the only potentially decentralized consensus people came up with so far. ## DAG Another thing I might add here is that all the DAG hype is just that, hype. the fact that DAGs like Avalanche/Nano, etc never fail (well some devs manage to make them fail like IdOTA) means ONLY that they are being validated in a PoS centralized setup. Totally useless, why not just have a NEO-like DPoS consensus? Just pin-pong block validation among your whitelisted nodes. The simpler the better if you are to run a centralized consensus mechanism because you want speed. ## NFT All the hype with NFT is unbelievable to me. NFT is a big unabashed scam. Just think for two seconds and realize that if you can freely download the media, who gives a shit about who holds the first displayed hash of that? But the idea is not totally useless, exactly because blockchains are good for notary services, proof of existence. You WANT that the files you hashed be infinitely reproducible because you want to prove that you hold the first occurrence of that file in your utxo, so you want to prove that you invented that thing, say, for a patent application. Needless to say that here you are totally dependent on governmental institutions to actually acquiesce and utilize that system in order to *legally* to give you prior art. And, again, what is the use of selling that hash to another person? It is nothing but a digital beanie baby collectible. ## DEFi The only usage of DEFi is decentralized exchange. But the whole idea of tokens themselves is also problematic. A business has no use for a token they cannot control, because they can just use a fucking website and control the issuance, burn and transactions anyway. They WANT TO be centralized. Why wouldn't they? The whole underlying value of the token is THE BUSINESS, NOT the blockchain where the tokens are. So if tokens are problematic, a DEX is also not that big of a thing you think it is. But hold on a second, you will now call me out and say "bullshit, we have stable coins like tether and they are very useful because we can hold them, send them to multiple exchanges and exchange one for another, like RUB/Dollar/Yuan etc both in the exchanges AND in DEXes". And you are damn right, this is for sure a very clear usage of DEX and tokens, but what is the underlying peg of that? Some algorithm bullshit that runs on centralized side-chains like a pyramid retro-feeding scam that blows up once a korean dude exit scams the treasury? Or the fact that the market BELIEVES they hold value and exchanges LIST THEM and scalp them to keep that value? This here is a kind of chicken/egg problem and I won't pretend to know more than you know about this, the DEX in this example does give some underlying value to that peg, it makes it very attractive that you can hold a fiat-peg in a decentralized chain and that adds to your belief in its peg, but that is also because exchanges do use them (and used them prior to DEXes and whatnot) and people trade on them there. So I'm not completely sure here, but in sum, I think DEFi main case is for stable coins arbitrage, because the token themselves, the stable coins, are fiat, they depend on belief. DEXes will never replace exchanges because you whatever "wrapped" coins are obviously not the real coins. ## Wrapped Coins LMFAO seriously, this is such a scam it hurts. Wrapped coins are very dangerous and they are a way for exchanges to inflate the supply of coins to sell IOUs of coins they do not hold in full and profit out of it. That is, wrapped coins are tokenized IOUs. You will be in a serious world of pain if the exchange simply refuses to continue to accept the wrapped coin, OR if the wrapped coin token goes to shit in the DEXes. We should all ask exchanges to stop this blatant fractional reserve scam. ## Yield farming I get that some of you cool kids got rich with yield farming pyramids, but they are just that, pyramids. Once the influx of capital falls down the curve threshold you are absolutely fucked. So always trade those with a small portion of your capital and don't be too greedy because the rug pulls are absolute savagery.

ArieJ010

Someone got his positions public on bybit 😬 Btcusdt $2m position with liquidation price at $32.061 Btcusd $10m/300 btc position with a liquidation price at $31.406 https://www.bybit.com/en-US/userprofile/?id=PYg45ejBM2je6Ol7&product=PRODUCT_LINE_INVERSE_PERPETUAL&time=TIME_PERIOD_YEAR&type=LIST_METRIC_PNL&page=1

AutoModerator

Post is by: NoirValley and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoCurrency/comments/u56tlx/accredited_investor_status_part_two_if_you_were/ Hi, if you’re a US retail investor you’re probably very upset by recent SEC actions that have caused non-accredited investors to lose access to wealth-building interest-earning programs. High-interest yields are regularly enjoyed by the wealthy and are a principal means for building financial independence. The SEC has decided to use **Accredited Investor (AI)** status as a tool to limit how much access the majority of the population can have to earning in crypto. Less than [10% of the US population](https://www.archerinvestors.com/accredited-investors) presently qualifies for AI status. It appears that the SEC as well as the Treasury Department would like to maintain that limited access. Retail investors (the rest of us) feel strongly otherwise, therefore it’s important that we not be passive. Recently the SEC [made an amendment](https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/amendments-accredited-investor-definition-secg) to AI rules in a supposed effort to make the rules more inclusive. However, this change does not go far enough. While requiring that individual investors enroll in 60 hours of study and take a test that proves sophistication and readiness to participate in securities investment is not unreasonable – language surrounding that rule goes beyond the pale by also requiring an individual who passes the Series 65 exam start and maintain a financial advisory business, which is ridiculous. After Celsius became the latest Cefi platform to bar US investors from earning yield on crypto, I made a [previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/CelsiusNetwork/comments/u2snx5/what_if_everyone_on_this_sub_and_the_coinbase/) suggesting that anyone who was angry about it focus their energy on taking action that can instigate changes to the present [Accredited Investor rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CelsiusNetwork/a%20period%20when%20millions%20of%20Americans%20were%20suffering%20due%20to%20the%20cascading%20failures%20of%20centralized-government%20watchdogs%20and%20large,%20overly%20powerful%20financial%20entities.). In that spirit, I’ve pulled together some language that can be used to reach out to your state representatives. ​ **When reaching out, what works best? (in order)** * Working with a lobbyist group * Meeting in person * Calling * Sending a letter * Emailing With calling and writing, volume matters: the more people who reach out on a specific issue, the more likely it is to win a congressperson or Senator’s attention. # Midterm elections are coming up in November. I repeat, Midterm elections are coming in November. Now is the perfect time to bring the Accredited Investor issue to your representatives’ attention and let them know that their position on this matter is important enough to impact how you may vote. Yes, you’re angry and impassioned about this subject, however keep in mind, that when you yell at people they're less likely to listen to you. Remain respectful and succinct whether you call or write. Below is a suggested template for calling or sending a letter or email. If you happen to be a business owner mention that in the top of your letter – **contact from businesses is given a bit more attention**. \----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # CALL TEMPLATE (ask to speak with the **Legislative Assistant** or just leave a message). ​ *Hello, my name is (****YOUR NAME****), and I’m calling as a constituent from (****YOUR STATE****) and a concerned (****NAME OF PROFESSION****).* *It’s very important to me that Accredited Investor rules be more inclusive so that more Americans have a fair opportunity to build financial freedom.* *I feel that the Securities Act of 1933 needs to be updated to meet the reality of a more technically sophisticated consumer population. The 2020 amendment to Series 65 License rules was a good start, but an individual should not be required to become a financial advisor or to run a financial advisor business to qualify as an Accredited Investor.* *I urge you to push the SEC to make it clear that passing the Series 65 Exam is rigorous enough for an individual to gain Accredited investor status.* *Thank you and have a good day.* ​ # EMAIL or LETTER TEMPLATE ​ *Hello, my name is (****YOUR NAME****), and I’m a constituent from (****YOUR STATE****) writing to you because I would like to see a change to the rules that decide who can qualify as an Accredited Investor.* *As a concerned (****BUSINESS OWNER / MOM / YOUNG ENTREPRENEUR, MINORITY, etc****.) I think it’s very important for more Americans to have a fair opportunity to build financial freedom. The Securities Act of 1933 is outdated and does not take into account the sophistication of the modern investor.* *The SEC has decided to use this rule to allow less than 10% of the population to gain access to certain crypto yield earning programs and other assets deemed to be securities.* *The crypto industry was birthed as a direct result of the Great Recession, a period when millions of Americans were suffering due to the cascading failures of centralized-government watchdogs and large, overly powerful financial entities. Crypto was designed to be inclusive and to grant financial fairness to demographics that have been systematically disenfranchised from participating in financial markets.* *The Securities Act was recently amended to allow individuals to gain Accredited Investor status by taking the Series 65 exam, but this amendment does not go far enough. Its language also requires an individual to register as a financial advisor and to open and operate a financial advisor business. This requirement is highly burdensome to people like me who already have fulfilling work and who simply want to be free to invest their money how they choose. Passing the Series 65 Exam is rigorous enough.* *At present, the limitation on who can and cannot invest causes more harm than good by overstepping individual liberties and by contributing to the widening wealth gap.* *I urge you to push the SEC to make it clear that individuals who pass the Series 65 Exam qualify as Accredited Investors, and that these individuals should not have to change careers to gain access to certain investments.* *Thank you,* (**YOUR NAME**) \----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ​ **TIP:** Make small tweaks to the above templates or use them exactly as is, just remember to always use that first line (representatives will ignore calls, letters, or emails from people who are not in their home state) and refrain from using hyperbolic (emotional) language. # WHO TO CONTACT You will want to get the name of the **LEGISLATIVE AIDE** for your state Congresspersons and Senators. You can call the office for this information. Ask for name and email address. If you are sending a written letter, send it to the Congressperson or Senator’s office addressed to them and C/O (care off) the Legislative Aide, example: Senator’s NameC/O Legislative Aide’s NameUnited States SenateWashington, D.C. 20510 [**Find Your Congressional Representatives**](https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative) [**Find Your Senators**](https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm) ​ # LIST OF ALLIES And I’m adding this to this post because I think it’s important to note who is actively supporting progressive crypto legislation in Washington. **LOBBYISTS** Lobby 3 - Founded by Andrew Yang - [https://www.lobby3.io/](https://www.lobby3.io/) Crypto Council for Innovation: [https://cryptoforinnovation.org/](https://cryptoforinnovation.org/)About the CCI: [https://youtu.be/qCg5ujL9n4g?list=PLeuk9ioi\_Y3U92nCh-U30WzqNsjWk8-vE&t=727](https://youtu.be/qCg5ujL9n4g?list=PLeuk9ioi_Y3U92nCh-U30WzqNsjWk8-vE&t=727) Coin Center - [https://www.coincenter.org/](https://www.coincenter.org/) The Block Association - [https://theblockchainassociation.org/](https://theblockchainassociation.org/) The Bitcoin PAC - [https://www.thebitcoinpac.org/](https://www.thebitcoinpac.org/) The Chamber of Digital Commerce - [https://digitalchamber.org/](https://digitalchamber.org/) ​ **PRO-CRYPTO POLITICIANS** [https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/08/20/the-most-pro-bitcoin-politicians-in-the-us/](https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/08/20/the-most-pro-bitcoin-politicians-in-the-us/) ​ \*Upvote this post if you found it useful.\* And share it with others who may want to take action. (Edit 4/24/2022 to update Lobbyist list.) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*

DynamoDylan

Nice how did you find out about this LIST?

InterestingDay3

1 wallet = 1 vote. You'll have to pay for a vote in LIST tokens which you will have to buy with ETH on Uniswap. We'll have an OG voter. The OG voters (older voters with a proven track record of accuracy and activity) have higher voting power than the new unproven wallets. Same cost, but bigger the 'weight' to the proven voters.

InterestingDay3

If you ask about the token. The LIST (erc20 token of CryptoToday) token will be used as a governance and utility token on the platform and the central operating part of the DAO. It will be used to list projects, reward Users, vote in the DAO decisions, call for revotes, etc. After you earn it with this vote2earn model, you'll be able to sell it. That's the diamond, LIST token.

InterestingDay3

Yes, that's correct. They will earn LIST tokens. Because we are a listing platform, our token name is "LIST"