SB

SoftPenguins

First SBF fraud then SVB. Think I’m gonna stay away from anything SB related for a while.

therealcpain

Well considering it was just announced that [US government will rescue SVB deposits](https://stocks.apple.com/AhMVbRqT1SB2VOOLcG1tBOQ)… It’s a really sticky situation as the reason these banks are suffering because they held long term low yield government bonds

FU_Pagame

Fun fact if you had inverses Jim Cramers bets on SBV, FRB, and SB you’d be a millionaire right now

DukeThom

Coinbase honestly kills it with their marketing.. loved their SB ad from two years ago with the QR code too

Kiss_It_Goodbyeee

Never heard of it. Am from The Europe. It's tiny with [turnover](https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/document-api-images-live.ch.gov.uk/docs/tLP9RZBcmRojTGGwPU-o90quSakdhTvNUjQ_ATLNKoE/application-pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAWRGBDBV3ECBXPUU4%2F20230306%2Feu-west-2%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20230306T212043Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEGIaCWV1LXdlc3QtMiJGMEQCIC5U%2FcEVzmYYSA5i2C3Ilf4QqmxLOB9C3VF5al%2BAdZK0AiBTgMvy97QjAo%2FhWtw5fm2qnmGbVakMYN6lcedulj%2Bmsyq7BQgbEAQaDDQ0OTIyOTAzMjgyMiIMZP8MdYIBrmP6lw2eKpgF94jMDZzOK2vgDBFre03e6K837RAARp%2BQzxLYmzuPvX%2B%2B4bWBHlOn3vqiILKCQHpTIm%2B8FYJ1%2BgQ5bPKfDXLeXe%2FHQ56xCDsUsmCawPXc9MEOpcAGMAUBCjotI5aIvRJnQxFY4s9Ig4qlSn9WgJBiv1bUHadqYjgiaeJqtcHJPQc2Br%2BKzfTMZ926am%2BNNHSs6YFUzj0fm567TDTHdWL4inKM8L18iJwD1kjpVvLaLN4kTZ3VCMcXUzKvmBR1wcQs3stmKxE8oW6lL2MZCO5PaU38FmsIqWMWZK9kRAuOpT1HSyv%2BOKw4WYL01hXPqWZsbRWMycfA77WgwI6fqgfLjK1%2FR4Y0NVk5XtWvNWjj00xhTh5u6fy2zGVkhA6PIS%2B4ePDrTATkJy%2F9pUMYaSNVi5hJXFZLYFxym3t5lavcSpoCAJ1I3jZj0zCoqh6p8gzimrhWCbuYVGgzUrTs1M1F7DMe8LFkni7pilCpM7sFaKt8W05qPbpLBP7YMBq42%2FuuSpFwrbWKeVxekZpQcLJu2%2BCl%2FtxTrKVnPH3PmHg8rtYunbZDxS8%2BMRoFAs0BHVmz%2FuZ8mishf6USFnxIKmuORw1Y8RSf9pPIeFrqaulad9cduY14EN%2FtQklEIEzleRe5s0NpuhQMkrZf1CA9nFN%2B%2BA3VjHslOL%2FMP8azQf2b0W2%2FL2ac8Bv8El12vQp5AdfPQtL2q1IzimFH%2FOVyNg21%2BMEM9wEycYgh%2BUn6mD5nZIDx59IEhMqQt0Pk%2Bv2Jrd4tC3TFvYfJpbL0k8ThjbBYPhnH62qFo3HF%2BwpVoSqHAFfVIPnpBGTaTpZnnFLawIKfwO76oa%2BnaWfCH%2Bfx5koXYZvpSaUHZziOEqHnjAcqT6x5OeCg4SB8HTCgz5igBjqyAfEmE5EuZwiC%2BE2Jq1Oc4lbu%2F%2FbqmkFJj50h4JqYmgDAuAe9QWSyazokgRAReqC6tHI1LE3t6o%2FrLumJgXQ7OnUk0PDKuE2OFHT2tQ2ClEgoULSSmSQGRrhBsVyulHJn2Bvq1V%2Fw%2FNOdjDT3TvyMmUpv02EsgD9jcbSPLb0ClXwrqBLtwiX0OQgnX%2BMevaRGEYJJ%2F8VkkgiSkw8chboxFi7uQ%2BQgWndtsJ7FzpcyHNSMz4o%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&response-content-disposition=inline%3Bfilename%3D%2208491211_aa_2022-10-31.pdf%22&X-Amz-Signature=4c6b53ea011bcd83fa65a0c943a1650121242717355ed5928e038d0f7501d666) of only £3.6m last year.

Dan4tw

For the most part they are great. What worries me is the amount of people you see claiming that they have been locked out of their accounts, it's not regulated so they can do whatever they deem is right. Hopefully they don't become FTX 2.0 and CZ becomes best friends with SB in the court yard.

OceanSlim

Source: https://legiscan.com/IL/text/SB1887/id/2692354 Page 4 Line 13.

Appropriate_Bug7466

If you live in Illinois I urge you to contact your house representative on this matter. You can find your representative by your address at: Illinoispolicy.org/maps/illinois-house/# After looking that up you can also look up more contact details at: Ilga.gov/house/ I just left voice messages and an email urging my representative to oppose SB1887 in its current form as it is unworkable and would drive talent, innovation, and business in the crypto industry out of state.

pyxploiter

And SB in SBF stands for Still on Bail

DukeThom

Truth - they’ve always been slick wit it. I liked their SB commercial from a year ago too

Equal-Bill7504

[sloth](https://media.tenor.com/SB66UNkGc0gAAAAM/sloth-slow.gif) Did you hear do kwon stole monies?

zoomercoomer9000

If anyone here is from Illinois, please consider contacting your representative. Look at this recently proposed bill: > (b) A blockchain network shall process a court-ordered blockchain transaction without the need for the private key associated with the digital property or smart contract. Each blockchain operator that has mined, validated, or otherwise participated in processing a blockchain transaction is liable to this State for a violation of subsection (b). The court shall assess a civil penalty of between $5,000 and $10,000 for each day that the blockchain network fails to comply with the order. https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=&SessionId=112&GA=103&DocTypeId=SB&DocNum=1887&GAID=17&LegID=146730&SpecSess=&Session=

IdTapThat88

https://youtu.be/SB_oU68Q9zA

MyKingdomForADram

Wait, was the Charles/Cardano SB ad real? What the fuck?

TrifBoi

No, I'd feel way better about an exchange using the money to just work the way it's intended rather then throw it through the window on some SB ad. Also, vast majority of world knows about crypto, so it wouldn't bring THAT many new people I'd say

AJoyfulProcess

I like that they had neutral options for the SB avatars. I like football, and I like free NFTs...but I'll be d@mned if I'm going to sport any chiefs or eagles schwag.

sjshady0169

Chiefs, and confirmed no ads for SB.

TheDalesReport_

It kinda wasn't his fault because he doesn't have a fiduciary responsibility to anyone to conduct a thorough due diligence on the company. But last year, Tom Brady said: “FTX is the safest and easiest way to buy crypto” in a SB 56 ad. I guess the NFL want to avoid this kind of stuff under the smoke clears.

DukeThom

I don’t think so either, but my bet would be Coinbase if there is a crypto SB ad.

DukeThom

Coinbase should put out one that says: SB minus the F.

pietime406

Does anyone still have enough money to money to advertise during the SB?

Lou_Villian

I actually never like NFT’s until the Reddit series started dropping. Love the 11 I have. Sucks I blanked and missed the Halloween drop. Did well on the series 1 so I’m digging the SB stuff

Skeetism

Wish there were better teams in the SB for these avatars

KAX1107

[Here](https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/56leg/1R/bills/SB1235P.htm) is the bill

SiriusTantriqa-405

SB Fraud: Trust me, I am safekeeping them for your future generations

JERMYNC

"He wished prison staff ‘Merry Christmas’ before heading out". So polite - Source Bloomberg, according to them he also had AC (Spared sub another post about SB.)

Pradiis

Hope you all got justice as SB-Fraud got arrested

EffenNuts

SB-F should be given a medal for exposing the greedy losers that can't see a scam when it's wrapped in bells & whistles called crypto, when some of us did. Losers feel free to post your losses. Bet there are more losers than winners. Thoughts & prayers! 'You can't always get what you want but sometimes you get what you deserve.' I didn't lose one cent of my $4.00 wealth. Ha! Ha! Ha! My sides are splitting.

Odysseus_Lannister

SB, here’s your F

bitrequest

Just brain farting and thinking out of the box, not much to do with SB Fraudman…

olledasarretj

There were at least 8 investigations by the SEC over a 16 year period among other things (according [here](https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123111743915052731)) so I’d argue that’s misleading, in that from a prosecutor’s perspective there was years of work to start building a case off of by the time he was charged. (Note, I’m not in any way an expert, I’m just pretty skeptical of the widespread cynicism that has already concluded he will face no consequences due to his political donation history)

Deminero30

Yea right, Mr. SB fraud.

Outrageous-Yams

This is a test to seee if I may be SB

Blueberry_Dependent

Everything will be fine when people STOP following/listening people like Elon, CZ, SB etc. I would say that most of the problems (bad name on crypto/scams) comes from popular people and celebrities promoting their bags of coins. Realistically 15% is nothing compared to how low everything is now from ATH.

Feisty_Factor_2694

Is this guy saying that the only thing that SB-F did wrong was get caught. So what is that guy in charge of again? Because those counts will be OFF!

SleepCom

I am illegitimate. That is why I quoted my IQ. I have no other qualifications or degrees, and I claim no special honors other than those given by the SB-V and WAIS IQ tests. I told you my advantage. Now you are making a bet that your intelligence, experience, and understanding of bitcoin is superior to mine. I accept that challenge and call your bluff. I would listen to Andrea Antonopoulos. I think he is one of the voices of authority and a most level headed speaker for bitcoin. I think everyone who is an experienced user of bitcoin will agree with me that Andrea Antonopoulos is held in the highest esteem.

KatanaSw0rd

Breaking news: Hackers name starts with SB and ends in F. FBI still scratching their head..

JarJarCapital

SB Fraud

Tchellie

Indeed, but the SB was also rumoured that it was going to be a mass adoption event. WC maybe, but the economy now is just to worse for mass adoption.

seaweeedz

What meant was, it the Super Bowl didn’t do much, if not anything for crypto, I think World Cup will be similar. You are correct, WC is much much bigger than the SB, I should have clarified my comment.

SleepCom

SB-V 143, WAIS 133. What's your scores?

Lmessfuf

Because he's SB Fried!

MichaelAischmann

SB just shilled them in a comment about Credit Suisse. Maybe that's why.

himsenior

OP, I think you will get a kick out of this [WSJ article](https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB107264800696941100) from 2003 trying to dunk on VOIP : > You know an industry is in trouble when its success hinges on something that hasn't been invented yet. sound familiar? VOIP is a solution without a problem! What are the use cases ? > I wish they could tell me what those services will be. Believe me, I've asked. But the truth is that they don't have much beyond lip-service paid to "multimedia," "security" and "the next Napster." Fast forward 20 years and people have replaced cell plans with FaceTime, Skype, WhatsApp, Google voice, etc. Thanks to VoIP. I do think there is a morality tale in here as well. Many telecom companies like Nortel used debt to finance over investment in digital, which became a pump and dump scheme that tanked the company. In the age of crypto that too sounds familiar.

sakattack360

I recently redeemed SB for $30 btc crypto voucher. Received $26 in btc. Still fine for a months worth of point collection.

oachkatzalschwoaf

As Doofus Rick would say: >You know u/Polynomialrootx , I'm not gonna tell you that this NFT will increase in value, or even hold its current value. The truth is, you got it cuz you like it. It has value to you. That's what matters. \- [https://youtu.be/SB\_oU68Q9zA](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB_oU68Q9zA)

ShinAlastor

Too bad I don't like SB.

CryptoMaximalist

That's all slippery slope fallacy. Sometimes specific regulations have a place (don't dump chemicals in the water), but in this case I much prefer a carbon tax as a corrective measure. This gets you out of trying to granularity police specific usages and lets economics course correct you. A carbon tax should be acceptable to both sides because it is fixing a problem with the free market, namely the externality of pollution. This was implemented in Canada and most people profited from it https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/oct/26/canada-passed-a-carbon-tax-that-will-give-most-canadians-more-money Here's some copypasta with more info: As the IPCC report made clear, [pricing carbon is **necessary** if we want to meet our 1.5 ºC target](https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2018/12/SR15_TS_High_Res.pdf). The consensus among [scientists](http://bush.tamu.edu/istpp/scholarship/journals/ClimateScientistsPerspectives_ClimaticChange.pdf) and [economists](http://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/ExpertConsensusReport.pdf) on [carbon pricing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_price)^§ to mitigate climate change is similar to [the consensus among climatologists](http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/) that human activity is responsible for global warming. Putting the price [upstream](https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323611604578396401965799658) where the fossil fuels enter the market makes it simple, easily enforceable, and bureaucratically lean. Returning the revenue as an equitable dividend [offsets the regressive effects of the tax](http://www.nber.org/papers/w9152.pdf) (in fact, [~60% of the public would receive more in dividend than they paid in taxes](http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0081648#s7)). Enacting a [border tax](http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2026879) would protect domestic businesses from foreign producers not saddled with similar pollution taxes, and also [incentivize those countries](http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/205761) to enact their own. [Conservative estimates](http://rdcu.be/cLYO) are that failing to mitigate climate change will cost us 10% of GDP over 50 years, [starting about now](http://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/ExpertConsensusReport.pdf). In contrast, carbon taxes may actually *boost* GDP, if the revenue is [returned as an equitable dividend to households](http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/jun/13/how-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax-creates-jobs-grows-economy) (the [poor tend to spend money when they've got it](http://www.econ2.jhu.edu/people/ccarroll/papers/cstwMPC.pdf), which [boosts economic growth](https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1513.pdf)). Taxing carbon [is in each nation's own best interest](http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp15105.pdf), and [many nations have already started](https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/29687/9781464812927.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y). We [won’t wean ourselves off fossil fuels without a carbon tax](http://news.mit.edu/2016/carbon-tax-stop-using-fossil-fuels-0224), the [longer we wait to take action the more expensive it will be](http://rdcu.be/cZjG). Each year we delay costs [~$900 billion](https://cla.umn.edu/heller-hurwicz/news-events/news/policy-brief-calibrating-price-climate-risk). [It's the smart thing to do](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069698910580). The U.S. [could induce other nations to enact mitigation policies if we would enact one of our own](http://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/ExpertConsensusReport.pdf). [Contrary to popular belief](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluralistic_ignorance#Examples) the main barrier isn't lack of public support; in fact, a majority in [every congressional district](http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us-2018/?est=reducetax&type=value&geo=cd) and [each political party](http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Global-Warming-Policy-Politics-March-2018.pdf) supports a carbon tax, which [does actually help our chances of passing meaningful legislation](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644016.2016.1116651). But [we can't keep hoping others will solve this problem for us](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_responsibility). *[We](https://i.redd.it/tomv8cnadxa11.jpg)* need to take the necessary steps to make this dream a reality: 1. [**Vote**](https://www.environmentalvoter.org/sign-the-pledge). People who prioritize climate change and the environment [have historically not been very good at voting, which explains much of the lackadaisical response of lawmakers in recent years](https://www.environmentalvoter.org/news/millions-environmentalists-are-registered-vote-us-dont-what-if-they-did), and many Americans don't realize there are (on average) likely [3-4 elections per year they should be voting in](https://www.environmentalvoter.org/news/millions-environmentalists-are-registered-vote-us-dont-what-if-they-did). In 2018 in the U.S., [the percentage of voters prioritizing the environment more than tripled](https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/green/A-Green-Wave-Signs-Point-to-Voters-Demanding-Action-on-Climate-Change-502796391.html), and now [climate change is a priority issue for lawmakers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_New_Deal). Even if you don't like any of the candidates or live in a 'safe' district, [**whether or not you vote is a matter of public record**](https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/april-may-june-2018/planet-earth-gets-a-ground-game/), and [**it's fairly easy to figure out if you care about the environment or climate change**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCL1luiOM7U&t=2m53s). Politicians [use this information to decide what's important](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00357.x). Voting in every election, even the minor ones you may not know are happening, [will raise the profile and power of environmentalism](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCL1luiOM7U&t=2m53s). If you don't vote, you and your values can safely be ignored. 2. [**Lobby**](https://citizensclimatelobby.org/join-citizens-climate-lobby/). [Lobbying works](https://sociology.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/friends_or_foes-how_social_movement_allies_affect_the_passage_of_legislation_in_the_u._s._congress.pdf), and [you don't need a lot of money to be effective](https://www.jstor.org/stable/41759323?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents) (though it does help to [educate yourself on effective tactics](http://www.congressfoundation.org/storage/documents/CMF_Pubs/cmf-citizen-centric-advocacy.pdf)). If you're too busy to go through the [free training](https://citizensclimatelobby.org/new-member/#climateadvocatetraining), sign up for [text alerts](https://citizensclimatelobby.org/text/) to join coordinated call-in days ([it works](http://www.congressfoundation.org/storage/documents/CMF_Pubs/cmf-citizen-centric-advocacy.pdf)) or set yourself a monthly reminder to [write a letter to your elected officials](https://www.ted.com/talks/omar_ahmad_political_change_with_pen_and_paper?language=en). 3. [**Recruit**](https://community.citizensclimatelobby.org/learn/communications/). Most people are [either alarmed or concerned about climate change](http://www.climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Six-Americas-2018-Mar.png), yet most aren't taking [the necessary steps](http://www.congressfoundation.org/storage/documents/CMF_Pubs/cmf-citizen-centric-advocacy.pdf) to solve the problem -- [the most common reason is that no one asked them to](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6DoiQM_-is). [29% of Americans are alarmed about climate change](http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/americans-are-increasingly-alarmed-about-global-warming/), and if we all organized we would be 17x more powerful than the NRA. According to [Yale data](http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Global-Warming-Policy-Politics-May-2017.pdf), many of your friends and family would welcome the opportunity to get involved if you just asked. So please [volunteer](https://www.environmentalvoter.org/get-involved) or [donate](https://www.environmentalvoter.org/donate) to turn out environmental voters, and [invite your friends and family to lobby Congress with you](https://citizensclimatelobby.org/join-citizens-climate-lobby/).

PotOfDuality_

Retesting this important fib retracement like it did earlier [sauce](https://ibb.co/s2qk7SB)

No_Scientist_7094

>You are comparing apples to oranges. Im really not. Its a business strategy, that applies to apples and oranges as well. >They don't give customers free stuff without it being able to directly tie to further retention or revenue. >The card does not entice people to use the exchange - at best it entices people to hold cro It does directly tie to further retention, as i will keep using their card, and if i use their card, i might as well use the exchange too. >It does not attract their target customers, which are institutions and market makers. Im not sure if i agree..i dont think they made the SB ads and the matt damon ad for institutions and market makers as they are interested in userbase. Which they get with the ads and the card and other perks. Its a growing company that has to lay the foundations, grow userbase then attract institutions.

dragonch67

You can hate the useless high priced NFT clubs You can't hate them for the potential this will unlock We already see institution adoption in crediting an NFT for some diploma. Mix that with SB token, and in a couple years we can easily saw a QR on each official document tying to a revocable NFT

arthurwolf

A while ago, I had a startup idea, and the startup name was "Paper"/"Paperwork". The pitch deck for anyone curious to see a failed startup pitch that got no traction in any of the places I presented it, until 4 years later, there are now like 50 different startups with that concept: [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1dvAZgRV1TXZrgngzUMBjDRQ5SB42xhJVYXkuuinwbZ0/edit?usp=sharing](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1dvAZgRV1TXZrgngzUMBjDRQ5SB42xhJVYXkuuinwbZ0/edit?usp=sharing)

Snel_Shyl

Once again, same as Celsius - People were shitting on me and Swissborg for SB's low yield rates and migrated their funds to voyager cause of their "safe" 9% apy..... Tables have turned once again..

Snel_Shyl

Hahaha same bro.... The hate for SB was real back then and all of this guys migrated to Celsius shitting on SB sying how it was a scam cause of its low yield rates..... If only i could see their faces now....

ArtyHobo

My concern for them is that they were so vehemently set on this belief that they may have seriously overexposed themselves to Celsius' issues. I know from highly reputable penetration tests and from audits that SB has at least 2 years of capital to ride the storm, and the way the platform operates ought to generate another years worth of revenue during that 2 year storm. Funds are entirely segregated from company accounts independently locked under Fireblocks MPC wallet tech. Whilst it's not 100% safe and anything can happen, I did try to warn the individual that SB offers are pretty high industry standard of security and that they should possibly think twice about moving everything to Celsius. BTC maxi in cold storage is obviously the pinnacle safety approach but if this isn't conducive to the individual then a 'spread betting' approach is essential, knowing you're likely sacrificing some of your capital for other streams to survive/thrive.

imad-eddine-26

log in may u get a free NFT . https://slingshot.finance/mobile/VML0A8SB6RG4

Harucifer

Good job dude. [You bought them because you like them. they have value to you. Thats all that matters.](https://youtu.be/SB_oU68Q9zA)

Korvacs

The bill hasn't passed and isn't about Cardano or Blockchain in general, here's the bill: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1190

AutoModerator

Post is by: badfishbeefcake and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/cardano/comments/ukthms/california_passes_bill_sb1190_to_use_cardano_for/ California passes bill SB1190 for **Input Output Global** digital Id to be used for California students to show credentials. UK -Canada-Germany-Singapore-New Zealand -Australia to probably follow also. [https://www.loom.com/share/e165eb15f2154666b7dbc22793c200fa](https://www.loom.com/share/e165eb15f2154666b7dbc22793c200fa) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*

ScooterMcWTF

What SB site pays you in BTC?

CharlieTheo-14


hungryforitalianfood

I didn’t say it was unhelpful. I said it’s a manipulative attempt to make *your* exchange look more legitimate than it is, without any disclosure that a) SB is your exchange or b) that it has absolutely no business on this list.

ostracize

Many were complaining about the carbon footprint of PCs and the Internet about 20 years ago and no one doubts their value today: https://www.forbes.com/forbes/1999/0531/6311070a.html?sh=119522b52580 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB968293045516619546

smauryholmes

Newsom has done more to fight homelessness and crime than any gov in the last 30 years; SB9 is the biggest step CA has ever made to address the housing shortages that cause all of this and police budgets keep going up by 10+% in every major city.

SmoothGoing

SB doesn't need an NFT. Nobody is trading their big mac for a coffee.

AnchanarCF

Many were skeptical of the so called backing prices for $FORT and $SB too, but upon closing of the projects we got reimbursed at backing prices (after sell-off at backing prices, I personally made %72,6 profit on FORT and 4,1% on SB)

budman223

The Easter bunny got done dirty by J&SB too

7101334

* **Phase 1**: California passes this bill, increasing adoption of cryptocurrency * **Phase 2**: California passes SB519, legalizing most psychedelics and allowing 'guides' (shamans, faith healers, etc) to accept payment for their time * **Phase 3**: Pay your shaman in cryptocurrency and begin proper 21st century living

simplelifestyle

Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/

s3k2p7s9m8b5

Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/

Degenerate34

Man you guys should go in the r/NFL subreddit right now. The top story is how Pepsi announced they’re no longer sponsoring the SB halftime show. Most of the replies in there are how it’s going to be the Crypto.com halftime show and people are just straight up shitting on crypto in there, with a lot of comments calling crypto a Ponzi scheme. I was kinda surprised but then again most people on Reddit are idiots.

s3k2p7s9m8b5

Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/

s3k2p7s9m8b5

Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/

s3k2p7s9m8b5

Bill text: > SB 1275, as introduced, Kamlager. State agencies: cryptocurrency. > Existing law establishes state agencies for various purposes, including to provide certain services to the public for which payment is required. > **This bill would authorize a state agency to accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services** > BILL TEXT > THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: > > SECTION 1. Section 11000.3 is added to the Government Code, to read: > 11000.3. **A state agency may accept cryptocurrency as a method of payment for the provision of government services**. > > https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275 Article with more info: > California’s new bill proposes to make Bitcoin a legal tender > FEBRUARY 20, 2022 BY LIPIKA DEKA > > Political advisors in California are working on a new bill that aims to make Bitcoin a legal tender in the state. Former Majority Leader of the California State Assembly who is now a Political advisor Ian C. Calderon tweeted that he is working in collaboration with Bitcoin expert Dennis Porter to draft the new proposal. > > The news comes close on the heels of previously reported Arizona and the Island of Tonga expressing similar intentions to legalize the king coin. Looks like the California bill is set to disrupt the legal tender race once again. > > The U.S state recently hit the headlines when at a Congressional hearing politician Brad Sherman compared crypto to sub-prime mortgages and asked a Treasury Department official if “those of color will be left holding the bag if we see a collapse in cryptocurrency or stablecoins?” > > His comments invited a barrage of tweets including Ryan Selkis of Messari who accused Sherman of making it a racial issue while refusing to debate his pro-crypto primary challenger Aarika Rhodes, who happens to be Black. > > Aarika Rhodes, the U.S. congressional candidate for California’s 32nd District is looking to unseat Congressman Brad Sherman [D-Calif.], who termed bitcoin as “a way for economic justice.” “Do I love the Lightning Network? Absolutely, I think it is the future,” Rhodes said. > With respect to BTC adoption in the state, crypto advocates believe that it would most likely catapult straight into hyperbitcoinization. https://www.tronweekly.com/california-bill-proposes-bitcoin-legal-tender/

AlternativeCase5783

What does this mean!? https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB1275

shin_jury

Pumped a bit before SB, dropped after…all in all it’s trading on the same level as BTC the past week. For a coin that’s up 460% in the past year this is fine by me.

sirflopalot8

You make a big post headline title everyday dude. You're not trying to warn people. You're moon farming and in this case causing FUD. Couple days ago, you said the SB would cause the next bull run. Now you're coming up with another big news title. Relax. If you or anyone knew what would happen to price action, you wouldn't be on here scrounging for moons.

Nadz202119

I agree with you, not sure what the big hype is about with SB. If they spent that money hiring people to find use cases for crypto they would probably be in a better place.... but then again who am I to say, maybe they know something that I don't

AikiYun

Coinbase should've spend less on that SB ad and more on their hamster servers. Ffs.

Dolobene

Soccer World Cup is (still) mostly free to watch on TV, and many nations observe it. ​ Super Bowl has been exclusively pay-to-watch, and centered around US culture. ​ Super Bowl being big is mainly a PR product - think only about the many movie and tv series exports from the US, where SB occasionally becomes part of the story line.

shostakofiev

Ok, your last sentence is just funny. Non-profit is a distinction for tax purposes and has nothing to do with how hard an organization tries to make money. Those numbers need context in any case. The 3.5b number only requires people see at least 1 minute of coverage. So if I'm watch a sports news show and they play a highlight, I'm counted in that number. The 1b number is how many people watched any of the final match, but the average number was 517M. That figure is more comparable to the 100M number cited for the Super Bowl (although the SB number is US only). I'll concede that somewhere between 3x and 5x people watch the WC final, but the reason the Super Bowl is a bigger deal commercially is because it has far more commercials and because the average net-worth of it's viewers is 3x-10x of the average WC viewer.

Cognac_Clinton

American. I’d say it’s mostly tradition. People looked forward to Super bowl adverts since I was a kid and I’m 45 now. There are betting pools in the U.S. just for the ads. Also timing. Except for this year, SB is always the first weekend in FEB. Fresh after Christmas and the new year with a guaranteed 100 to 120 million watchers, name a better time to showcase all your new products.

IFistDikDiks

Oh. My. God. How dare you. Making a post that isn't shitting on a project or talking about moons. Who. Do. You. Think. You. Are? Great post. I don't really watch a lot of sports, especially football, but i do like the superbowl. But the kid was sick, so i didn't get to watch it this year. What I've noticed is that during and after the SB, everything is bleeding red. I kinda feel like it'll either be a couple of weeks before we see any upward movement from it, or it did just the opposite of what a lot of people thought it would do. We will see. Quality post though OP. Informative. I like that. Thank you.

Many_Quick

I talked two people into it at our SB party...told them to check out CB Debit card...showed em my 1,400 free XLM rewards..not sure if they noticed is price..