HKD

New_Ant4500

HKD went from 8-34-13-76-37-2555. SGBX's 2-9-3 doesn't really look that bad. Same tiny tradable float, low short share availability, high borrow cost, no options. Not financial advice but it looks like a good dip to buy to me.

JeepersCreepers7

OP, you compared it to HKD. What do you think the odds are we actually get a HKD sized pump out of this and see price in the thousands?

Top-Organization7499

Price (USD) 130 ┤ Extreme scenario (HKD-style) 60 ┤ Moderate scenario (GME-style) 20 ┤ Conservative scenario (BYND-style) 7 ┤────────── Intraday resistance / recent pre-market high (\~$7.50) 6 ┤─● Current price \~6.20 USD (pre-market) 5 ┤────────── Immediate support zone / dark pool breakout 4.90–5.10 USD 4 ┤────────── Secondary support / historical accumulation 3.40–3.60 USD **Details & Interpretation** **Current Price (\~6.20 USD)** Still above critical support → squeeze is active Intraday trends may respect supports, but spikes and pullbacks are normal **Key Resistance:** $6.50–$7.50 → recent intraday highs and pre-market top Shorts may face maximum pressure here, triggering forced covering **Critical Supports:** $4.90–$5.10 → recent absorption zone; holding above keeps the squeeze alive $3.40–$3.60 → dark pool / historical accumulation; below this the squeeze could weaken **Squeeze Scenarios:** **Conservative:** $15–$20 → BYND-style, ultra-low float + extreme SI **Moderate:** $40–$60 → GME-style, minimal float + extreme SI → likely if forced covering continues **Extreme:** $100–$120 → HKD-style, microcap + multiple layers of short exposure & synthetic pressure **Forced Covering / Borrow Scarcity Zones:** Any move above $6.50–$7.50 can trigger **forced buy-ins**, accelerating the move Borrow cost 400–500% and near-zero availability → high risk of vertical moves **Volume vs Float:** Daily volume 5–15M shares → 10–30× float → intraday spikes expected Low liquidity → violent moves, potential for large gaps

Top-Organization7499

Price (USD) 130 ┤ Extreme scenario (HKD-style) 60 ┤ Moderate scenario (GME-style) 20 ┤ Conservative scenario (BYND-style) 7 ┤────────── Intraday resistance / recent pre-market high (\~$7.50) 6 ┤─● Current price \~6.20 USD (pre-market) 5 ┤────────── Immediate support zone / dark pool breakout 4.90–5.10 USD 4 ┤────────── Secondary support / historical accumulation 3.40–3.60 USD **Details & Interpretation** **Current Price (\~6.20 USD)** Still above critical support → squeeze is active Intraday trends may respect supports, but spikes and pullbacks are normal **Key Resistance:** $6.50–$7.50 → recent intraday highs and pre-market top Shorts may face maximum pressure here, triggering forced covering **Critical Supports:** $4.90–$5.10 → recent absorption zone; holding above keeps the squeeze alive $3.40–$3.60 → dark pool / historical accumulation; below this the squeeze could weaken **Squeeze Scenarios:** **Conservative:** $15–$20 → BYND-style, ultra-low float + extreme SI **Moderate:** $40–$60 → GME-style, minimal float + extreme SI → likely if forced covering continues **Extreme:** $100–$120 → HKD-style, microcap + multiple layers of short exposure & synthetic pressure **Forced Covering / Borrow Scarcity Zones:** Any move above $6.50–$7.50 can trigger **forced buy-ins**, accelerating the move Borrow cost 400–500% and near-zero availability → high risk of vertical moves **Volume vs Float:** Daily volume 5–15M shares → 10–30× float → intraday spikes expected Low liquidity → violent moves, potential for large gaps

ThePatientPeregrine

We have another HKD on our hands potentially

Flex_Trading187

This one’s the HKD of 2026

Difficult_Winner_777

One thing HKD taught a lot of people was how much broker settings can shape a microfloat’s early price action. Stop-loss triggers fed volatility, and automatic share-lending provided shorts with borrow supply for longer than most expected. Not saying what anyone should do.... but if someone is curious how their own broker handles stop-loss orders or share-lending by default, the info is usually in the broker’s settings page. HKD was a perfect example of how understanding mechanics can matter as much as understanding filings.

gpu-dude

eyeing off comparisons between BYND and HKD metrics for this one, so far so good

Dianna1B

HKD had 95% insider ownership. The float was very tiny 20k-200k shares. Same with RGC stock which went from $4 to $700 in 2 wks.

HofT

I'm not understanding why people think this is a short squeeze? As of Nov 12, 2025, shares outstanding = 5,688,555 per the company's own 10-Q. That completely destroys the “micro-float under 500k” storyline people keep repeating. The entire squeeze thesis they're pushing is based on outdated pre-October numbers. Once the company issued almost 5 million new shares through note and preferred conversions in October, the float and outstanding share structure fundamentally changed. You can't run HKD-style math on a stock that has diluted by 700% in one month.

HofT

I'm not understanding why people think this is a short squeeze? As of Nov 12, 2025, shares outstanding = 5,688,555 per the company's own 10-Q. That completely destroys the “micro-float under 500k” storyline people keep repeating. The entire squeeze thesis they're pushing is based on outdated pre-October numbers. Once the company issued almost 5 million new shares through note and preferred conversions in October, the float and outstanding share structure fundamentally changed. You can't run HKD-style math on a stock that has diluted by 700% in one month.

Tastee_Stuff

TL:DR. Just bought 1000 shares. you sold me at $HKD

hexafenix

Why I’m all in on SGBX. AI is now comparing SGBX to several famous historic short squeezes like BBBY, HKD, GME, and VW. With a 35% chance of squeezing, and that number going up with increased buying pressure. Most likely right now is $9-$30, but can go as high as $120. Stop listening to FUD, and do a little bit of research on your own, instead of taking Redditors opinions for truth. This IS a very real textbook short squeeze situation, and the only thing needed is buying pressure. So get outside of Reddit and figure it out on your own, so that you can stop being emotionally affected by the FUD in the comments. You can’t see the woods for all the trees, so zoom out. This is reality, find the answers yourself and grow a pair of Diamond Hands. There is NOTHING that can convince me that this play is bogus. I am all in at 3000 shares. Might be early, but not wrong.

hexafenix

Why I’m all in on SGBX. AI is now comparing SGBX to several famous historic short squeezes like BBBY, HKD, GME, and VW. With a 35% chance of squeezing, and that number going up with increased buying pressure. Most likely right now is $9-$30, but can go as high as $120. Stop listening to FUD, and do a little bit of research on your own, instead of taking Redditors opinions for truth. This IS a very real textbook short squeeze situation, and the only thing needed is buying pressure. So get outside of Reddit and figure it out on your own, so that you can stop being emotionally affected by the FUD in the comments. You can’t see the woods for all the trees, so zoom out. This is reality, find the answers yourself and grow a pair of Diamond Hands. There is NOTHING that can convince me that this play is bogus. I am all in at 3000 shares. Might be early, but not wrong.

Difficult_Winner_777

Ladies and gentlemen. Look at fintel https://fintel.io/ss/us/sgbx Look at this crazy chart. Thats short panic in real time. Borrow is cycling, float is choking, and price is moving on almost no volume. This is the same setup HKD showed before the volatility broke. Shorts are burning liquidity to hold this level and it is not working.

hexafenix

Why I’m all in on SGBX. AI is now comparing SGBX to several famous historic short squeezes like BBBY, HKD, GME, and VW. With a 35% chance of squeezing, and that number going up with increased buying pressure. Most likely right now is $9-$30, but can go as high as $120. Stop listening to FUD, and do a little bit of research on your own, instead of taking Redditors opinions for truth. This IS a very real textbook short squeeze situation, and the only thing needed is buying pressure. So get outside of Reddit and figure it out on your own, so that you can stop being emotionally affected by the FUD in the comments. You can’t see the woods for all the trees, so zoom out. This is reality, find the answers yourself and grow a pair of Diamond Hands. There is NOTHING that can convince me that this play is bogus. I am all in at 3000 shares. Might be early, but not wrong.

hexafenix

Why I’m all in on SGBX. AI is now comparing SGBX to several famous historic short squeezes like BBBY, HKD, GME, and VW. With a 35% chance of squeezing, and that number going up with increased buying pressure. Most likely right now is $9-$30, but can go as high as $120. Stop listening to FUD, and do a little bit of research on your own, instead of taking Redditors opinions for truth. This IS a very real textbook short squeeze situation, and the only thing needed is buying pressure. So get outside of Reddit and figure it out on your own, so that you can stop being emotionally affected by the FUD in the comments. You can’t see the woods for all the trees, so zoom out. This is reality, find the answers yourself and grow a pair of Diamond Hands. There is NOTHING that can convince me that this play is bogus. I am all in at 3000 shares. Might be early, but not wrong.

hexafenix

Why I’m all in on SGBX. AI is now comparing SGBX to several famous historic short squeezes like BBBY, HKD, GME, and VW. With a 35% chance of squeezing, and that number going up with increased buying pressure. Most likely right now is $9-$30, but can go as high as $120. Stop listening to FUD, and do a little bit of research on your own, instead of taking Redditors opinions for truth. This IS a very real textbook short squeeze situation, and the only thing needed is buying pressure. So get outside of Reddit and figure it out on your own, so that you can stop being emotionally affected by the FUD in the comments. You can’t see the woods for all the trees, so zoom out. This is reality, find the answers yourself and grow a pair of Diamond Hands. There is NOTHING that can convince me that this play is bogus. I am all in at 3000 shares. Might be early, but not wrong.

Difficult_Winner_777

Yep. Chart activity confirms this is the HKD setup. Oh boy this is gunna be one hell of a long month lol

Difficult_Winner_777

Shorts are taping this thing together with duct tape and borrowed shares they do not even have. The borrow pool is bone-dry, the fee is criminal, the dilution valve is locked until Dec 29, and every candle is synthetic. When the algo flinches, it is HKD all over again.

Difficult_Winner_777

Anyone watching the chart rn. Yeah. Thats synthetic suppression, exactly like the coiling in HKD, not fundamentals.

Difficult_Winner_777

Until Dec 29: • dilution valve is closed • Series B can’t hit the market • short sellers are trapped recycling the same tiny float • borrow fee stays extreme • any slip in suppression causes violent upside After Dec 29: • if Proposal 8 passes and the Certificate of Amendment is filed, the company can expand authorized shares • dilution becomes possible again • short pressure can unwind if new supply hits That’s why the window before the vote is mechanically identical to HKD’s setup: trapped shorts, no dilution valve, microfloat, and a countdown clock. NFA.

Difficult_Winner_777

Because you can’t “just buy out the whole float” when the float is tiny and heavily shorted. Every share you try to buy isn’t coming from a real seller it’s coming from shorts recycling the same shares back and forth to defend their position. That’s why the volume looks big but the price doesn’t move. You’re not buying new supply, you’re buying the same borrowed share 20 times an hour. If someone actually tried to take size off the book, the ask would vanish instantly and you’d see HKD-style vertical candles. The only thing keeping the lid on is shorts churning. The second that stops, the buyout math becomes very different.

Difficult_Winner_777

DTC only needs to be 7+ on big-float plays like GME. On microfloat plays, it does the opposite it collapses toward zero because shorts are recycling the same tiny supply all day just to stay alive. HKD’s real DTC was basically zero before it nuked upward. SGBX at 0.12 isn’t safety. It’s the same microfloat choke-point forming.

Difficult_Winner_777

If you look at it in pure math terms, DTC collapsing is exactly what you expect in a microfloat squeeze, whether it was HKD in 2022 or SGBX now. DTC is just: Days to cover = Short interest ÷ Average daily volume For SGBX right now, rough numbers are: Short interest ≈ 1.4M Volume on the big days ≈ 10 to 12M So: 1.4M ÷ 12M ≈ 0.12 days to cover That does not mean shorts are safe. It means they’re churning volume like crazy. You can hit 0.12 DTC in two ways: 1. Shorts actually close into real liquidity (SI drops, CTB drops, borrow refills). 2. Shorts recycle the same float back and forth all day to keep price pinned (SI stays high, CTB stays insane, borrow stays at 0). What we see in SGBX is case 2: CTB ~500%, borrowable shares stuck at 0, FINRA short volume 40–60%. That’s not shorts “easily covering,” that’s shorts spinning the wheels on a tiny float. With HKD there isn’t clean public DTC data from the blow-off period, but mechanically it was the same pattern: float was microscopic, volume went vertical, and any attempt to cover size in a low-float book sent it straight from 13 to 2555. Near-zero DTC is just the math version of that same situation.

Difficult_Winner_777

Nobody has reliable official “DTC right before liftoff” numbers for HKD. Most services only show current data or backward-looking estimates, and Markit was reporting HKD’s short interest as less than 0.1% of OS during the run, which was obviously nonsense given how it traded. What we do know is that HKD’s float was microscopic, volume went vertical, and any attempt to cover in size sent it straight up in other words, the effective days-to-cover was basically zero. SGBX showing 0.12 DTC now is the same mechanical signal: shorts are sitting on a tiny float and can only survive by churning intraday volume. So we cannot say “HKD had exactly 0.12 DTC,” but we can say that this kind of near-zero DTC is exactly what you see right before a microfloat squeeze blows up.

Difficult_Winner_777

Brother you trusted ChatGPT over me, and ChatGPT’s own second pass ended up proving every part of my DD right. You basically hired a lawyer, ignored his brief, then bragged when he corrected you instead. I don’t need to post my positions when the SEC filings already posted the truth. Anyone can use chatgpt. If anyone here wants to try. Grab the SGBX SEC filings from oct and November https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/sgbx/sec-filings Grab the financial data from fintel which pulls from nasdaq https://fintel.io/ss/us/sgbx Grab my dd about it matching HKD https://www.reddit.com/r/WallStreetbetsELITE/s/R4xifYQrj5 Feed it to chatgpt and see what it says.

Difficult_Winner_777

Every claim you made falls apart the moment you compare it to the actual SEC filings instead of assumptions. 1. “If the filing doesn’t say restricted, shares must be unrestricted.” Completely false. In U.S. securities law, shares are restricted by default unless they are issued under a registration statement or qualified exemption. The 10-Q does not reference any registration statement, legal opinion, shelf takedown, or Rule 144 seasoning. You cannot claim unrestricted with zero legal basis. 2. “They can dilute millions before December 29.” Directly contradicted by Nasdaq Rule 5635(d) and every financing agreement SGBX has. They all contain 4.99 percent beneficial-ownership caps and 19.99 percent issuance limits. PRE 14A Proposal 8 explicitly states new authorized shares only exist after shareholder approval and after the Certificate of Amendment is filed. 3. “Float is definitely 5M+ and Fintel is wrong.” If float were 5M+, we would not have 500–600 percent CTB, zero borrow availability, 40–60 percent short-volume ratios, and HKD-style intraday moves. The market behavior contradicts your claim. Float updates slow, but the liquidity profile does not lie. This is microfloat behavior, not multi-million-float behavior. 4. “Short interest % float is meaningless.” It’s meaningless only if float magically expanded. You have provided no evidence that any of the October shares entered float. Again, no registration, no prospectus supplement, no Rule 144 notice. If those shares were truly free trading, lending supply wouldn’t be zero. 5. “Borrow fee doesn’t prove microfloat.” Correct, borrow fee alone doesn’t — but borrow fee + zero availability + high SI + high short-volume + DTC collapse absolutely does. That combination only exists when borrowable supply is tiny. If float were large, CTB would normalize instantly. 6. “HKD comparison is invalid.” HKD comparison is mechanical, not fundamental. HKD ran because supply was locked, float was tiny, and shorts had no exit. SGBX has locked dilution until Dec 29, a microfloat until registration, and SI multiple times the tradable float. The structures are analogous, regardless of jurisdiction. 7. “Conversions are usually free trading.” Not unless they were registered or specifically exempted. You have not cited the registration statement because none exists. The 10-Q does not connect the October conversions to the October prospectus. Your argument is assumption, not evidence. 8. “Shorts can cover intraday.” Only if shares exist to cover with. They don’t. That’s why CTB is 500 percent, availability is zero, and DTC sits near zero. Shorts are recycling volume, not closing positions. Big difference. Bottom line: Your entire rebuttal is built on assumptions that contradict the actual filings, Nasdaq rules, and observable market microstructure. I’m quoting law and SEC text. You’re guessing. Only one of those survives contact with reality. This guy just asked chatgpt to form a rebuttal Is this the best shorts can do? Im fucking bullish to the MAXIMUM NOW

Ambitious_Cress8002

HKD being diluted was the reason it suddently went down?

Master_Xenu

🔍 Detailed Breakdown PART A — Authorized vs Outstanding vs Issued ✔ Correct: Outstanding Shares Went From ~763k → ~5.68M The conversions listed in the 10-Q explain this. ❌ Problem: DD assumes these new shares are restricted The DD repeatedly claims: “No filing states October conversion shares are unrestricted.” Correct — but nothing states they ARE restricted either. In U.S. markets, absence of restriction = unrestricted. Unless the 10-Q specifically said: Rule 144 restricted Lockup Affiliate restrictions Included in a delayed shelf registration …then they are almost certainly free trading. Most financing notes explicitly convert into free-trading shares because lenders want liquidity. ✔ Correct: They cannot issue beyond Nasdaq limits before Dec 29 But this is being exaggerated. They can still issue millions before Dec 29 if: they're issuing under a registered prospectus, or they structure the issuance within 19.99% thresholds of each transaction. Many microcaps dilute aggressively while technically staying under rule thresholds. The DD assumes the company is “blocked.” That is not true. PART B — Float and Short Interest ❌ Fintel float numbers are NOT reliable Float does not update instantly after conversions. Capital IQ often updates: monthly quarterly or when manually refreshed Thus the 0.18M–0.48M float is almost guaranteed stale. ❌ Short Interest % of Float Is Meaningless If Float Is Wrong The claimed “300% short interest” evaporates if float is actually 5M+. ❌ Borrow fee does not prove micro-float Borrow fee ≠ float size. It only measures: how many shares are in lending pools not how many exist in the float If insiders hold shares that aren’t in lending programs, borrow fee stays high even with a big float. PART C — HKD Comparison This is the weakest part of the DD. ❌ HKD was unique HKD squeezed because: 95% insider ownership extremely thin Cayman structure minuscule actual retail float almost no institutional ownership bizarre regulatory oversight gaps zero real borrow availability dozens of violations later identified by FINRA and Nasdaq SGBX is: U.S. issuer microcap with financing agreements actively diluting no significant insider lockups no structural anomaly like HKD They are not comparable. ❌ “HKD ran on 1M volume” is misleading HKD’s free float was estimated around 60k–200k shares at the time — SGBX is nowhere close. 🎯 Key Missing Information The DD never checks the S-3/Prospectus details. This is critical because: Convertible note conversions are usually registered shares. If so, they enter float immediately. You MUST check: whether the October issuances were registered under the October 1 prospectus, or whether they relied on Section 3(a)(9) (which results in free-trading stock) If they were registered, the float is already 5.6M+. If they were 3(a)(9) exchanges, they are also free trading. Thus the central assumption of the DD (micro-float persists) is very likely false. 🎯 Final Verdict ⚠ The DD mixes some real regulatory points with major leaps of logic. What’s solid: Understanding Nasdaq issuance limits Understanding vote timing Understanding that authorized ≠ issued Understanding that conversions increased OS What’s flawed: Assumes new shares are restricted with zero evidence Relies on stale float data Borrow fees misinterpreted HKD comparison is invalid Claims of “shorts trapped” ignore ability for shorts to cover intraday Overestimates how much dilution is actually blocked pre-Dec 29 Most likely reality: Float is already significantly larger than Fintel reports Short interest % is far lower than claimed Shorts are not “trapped” — they have liquidity Company can still dilute meaningfully before Dec 29 This is not structurally similar to HKD

Difficult_Winner_777

HKD printed +20,000 percent with zero warning and no timer. SGBX has the same microfloat math plus a known window where dilution is locked behind a shareholder vote. That is the definition of “no ceiling.” Whether it stops at 100, 400, or goes full HKD depends on how loud the shorts scream on the way up. The float decides, not us.

Difficult_Winner_777

Because in a microfloat squeeze, a 40% drop means absolutely nothing. The float is so tiny (~0.48M) and the short interest so oversized (~1.4M) that one aggressive short algo can shove the entire price down with a few thousand borrowed shares. That is not “selling.” That is suppression. When the float is microscopic, the stock trades like a feather in a hurricane. A single dark-pool liquidity event. A single hedge fund bot defending a level. A single locate batch. Boom. Down 40%. HKD did exactly the same thing on its way from 13 to 2555. Look at the chart. It had multiple 20–60% intraday implosions in the middle of its run because microfloats do not move smoothly. They snap violently up and violently down until shorts lose control. If SGBX’s float were truly “large,” the drop would be impossible. If dilution were active, the drop would be absorbed by new supply. If nobody were short, the CTB wouldn’t be 500%, borrow wouldn’t be zero, and SI wouldn’t be 300%. The 40% flush is not bearish. It is literally the fingerprints of a tiny float being clubbed by an overleveraged short position trying to hold the line. In a microfloat with triple-float short interest, a 40% drop is just Tuesday. The real move starts when they run out of ammo.

Difficult_Winner_777

This is where I can’t give specifics because nobody can predict the exact timing or exact number. What I can talk about is mechanics. When a float is ~0.48M and short interest is ~1.4M, you do not need huge position sizes. Even 2–3K shares in a microfloat is massive relative to the available supply. The entire float can rotate multiple times in minutes when the choke point breaks. The potential comes from the math, not from guessing a number. HKD ran from 13 to 2555 with a float that behaved exactly like this one: tiny tradable supply, heavy short position, no dilution valve, and a known window where shorts had no exit. SGBX has the same structural setup until the Dec 29 vote and the Certificate of Amendment filing. So I can’t give a “PT,” but I can say the upside in this kind of microfloat squeeze is driven by mechanics, not imagination but has technically no ceiling. When supply is locked and short interest exceeds float, the move can be violent. Like there is mechanically no ceiling until dec 29th violent. I personally think over 1k is absolutely achievable with the current math and setup. And i have a personal exit plan of 7,777 a share no matter what. We have a declared timeline in filings. What HKD players WISH they had at the time. If I had to guess timing, maybe a week of coiling? HKD behaved the same way. The swings get nastier as pressure builds. And the upside was over the course of about a month. Not for the feint of heart, it will look like SEC war crimes happening by the minute Nfa

Difficult_Winner_777

DTC being low does not mean shorts can easily exit. It means shorts are relying almost entirely on intraday volume and dark pools to avoid being forced to exit. This exact pattern appeared in HKD before it launched. When the float is tiny and the short interest is larger than the float, the only way shorts survive is by constantly recycling the same borrowed shares. That creates artificial volume. The volume looks big, so DTC drops, but the real borrowable supply never increases. You can see that in SGBX with zero to forty thousand shares available and five hundred percent CTB. In HKD, days to cover fell to almost nothing while the stock was under suppression. Once the recycling loop broke and shorts could no longer hide inside the volume, the price exploded even though the DTC number was low. That is what a collapsing DTC actually means in a microfloat squeeze. It means shorts are using volume as a shield, not that they are safe. If the float is small, the borrow pool is empty, the CTB is extreme, and the dilution valve is closed until a specific date, a low DTC is simply the pressure building before the break.

Difficult_Winner_777

Volume is only part of the story here. In a 0.4M float stock with 1.4M short, 500 percent CTB, and no dilution allowed until after Dec 29, the move won’t come from retail volume it’ll come from the short side losing the ability to suppress. That’s exactly how HKD behaved before it took off.

Difficult_Winner_777

If you actually had a counterpoint, you wouldn’t be hiding behind “brand new account” instead of addressing a single page of the SEC filings I cited above. HKD was a scam for the shorts who didn’t understand that a giant outstanding share count means nothing when the effective float is tiny and locked, which is exactly why it went from 13 to 2555 in a month. You can scream “scam” all day, but unless you can explain why SGBX still has a \~0.48M float, 1.4M short interest, 500 percent CTB, zero borrow availability, and no dilution valve until after the December 29 vote and Certificate of Amendment, you’re just proving you didn’t read anything and you’re terrified to confront the mechanics directly.

Difficult_Winner_777

If you weren’t trapped, you’d challenge the evidence instead of my account. Calling me a scammer is cute, but it won’t change the fact that you refuse to read the filings because they contradict everything you’re trying to cope with. You’ve replied five times and still haven’t challenged a single fact. That’s exactly how someone talks when the filings wreck their position and all they have left is projection. why dont you show the class what you know so well about HKD so we can all see the info and fact check it :)

skate1243

OP is a brand new account HKD was not a short squeeze. It was a Chinese scam a few years ago Do not listen to OP. He is part of the scam

skate1243

i’m not short although i do wish i took out a big short when i first called this scam at $4. I’m not going to read a paragraph of bs on HKD

skate1243

no, HKD was a chinese scam dumbass

Difficult_Winner_777

Bro, with all due respect, you clearly have no idea how HKD actually worked. HKD was a scam but scammed shorts, not longs. And the funniest part? Retail DIDN’T EVEN KNOW the dilution timeline, because AMTD never gave retail clear guidance on: - insider unlock timing - C Structure Limitations - Issuance rules - Shelf registration status - Float accessibility HKD Exploded because shorts assumed they were shorting a normal float, when the ACTUAL float was basically like a few dudes in a Hong Kong Castle lol it ran from13$ to 2555$ because shorts were trapped inside a float that - they couldnt borrow - couldnt locate - couldnt force dilution into - couldnt hedge out - didnt have authorized expansion available AND had the HIDDEN issuence timeline nobody could clearly decipher Retail didnt know shit about HKD Shorts didnt know shit about HKD HKD traded like the float was a fucking lego Calling this “not a squeeze” because it’s volatile is like saying HKD wasn’t a squeeze because it fell from $2555 to $1 afterward. lmfao No shit HKD fell the squeeze ended. That doesn’t erase the squeeze. Squeeze ≠ permanent uptrend. Squeeze = structural chokehold on supply. SGBX has: - the chokehold - the dilution gate - the microfloat - the oversized short interest - the borrow crisis - the darkpool dependence - AND THE EXPLICIT DEC 29 TIMELINE THAT HKD TRADERS WISH THEY HAD KNOWN BEFORE HAND LMFAO HKD was chaos SGBX is chaos with an SEC-DOCUMENTED timer attached to it. “It dropped 50% in one day” is literally HOW microfloat squeezes behave, genius. because when your entire float is half a million shares and short interest is triple that, one algobot can send it straight to hell in 5 minutes. You think HKD didn’t have 40–60% drawdowns during its run? Go look at the chart: https://stockinvest.us/stock-price/HKD?from=2022-07-01&to=2022-08-31 HKD had red days that looked like SEC crimes. Microfloat squeezes don’t move like normal stocks. They move like a cocaine-addicted hummingbird strapped to a hand grenade. This is the nature of the setup, not proof that it “isn’t a squeeze.” if you're scared, say you're scared. but dont pretend like the mechanics aren't there

skate1243

Because this isn’t a short squeeze, it’s a scam just like HKD, OP is a moron, and yeah, don’t buy this. It dropped 50% from its high in 1 day. It’s not a squeeze

Difficult_Winner_777

The volume on Thursday wasn’t organic buy volume it was almost entirely short-side liquidity. That’s why the stock didn’t behave like a normal high-volume runner. When the float is ~480k and short interest is ~1.4M, the tape gets dominated by recycled borrowed shares, dark pool routing, and synthetic liquidity. Friday’s low volume is actually better proof that dilution didn’t hit because if new shares entered the float, you’d see higher volume and lower borrow rates immediately. Instead, CTB stayed around 500% and availability stayed near zero, which only happens when supply is unchanged. If real buyers step in again, the stock will behave differently from Thursday because shorts can only suppress for so long before locates dry up. So watching Monday’s volume makes sense, just keep in mind that in micro-float squeezes, the breakout usually comes when volume drops and suppression breaks, not when volume spikes. In short: If float stays tight, it only takes one failed suppression attempt for things to get loud. Very.... VERY LOUD. Its not insiders like HKD either. Its terribly cornered shorts. Even better. This thing doesn’t have a theoretical top until the vote hits Dec 29th. If it even gets voted on. Shorts stuck in a room with no exits until then. NFA

Difficult_Winner_777

Its not about monday. Im not calling any specific day. And the up and down is most likely gunna be violent as it rises over the course of a month. If you actually read above. I disproved what that other guy claimed about the sec files. Major didn’t magically “figure out dilution” he sold, panicked, and then started coping by misreading filings he didn’t understand. Dude went from “mother of all short plays” to “diluted garbage” in 24 hours and then deleted every SGBX post he ever made. That’s not DD, that’s exit-liquidity guilt. The actual SEC docs say the opposite of what he claimed. PRE 14A literally states dilution cannot happen until: 1. The Dec 29 shareholder vote, AND 2. The company files the Certificate of Amendment No vote = no amendment = no 3B authorization = no dilution. That’s not opinion, that’s in black-and-white on page 32. If dilution actually happened already, Friday wouldn’t have had zero volume. Borrow fee wouldn’t still be 500%. Float wouldn’t still be 0.48M. Short interest wouldn’t still be 300%. Borrow availability wouldn’t still be 0–40k. Shorts wouldn’t still be stuffing dark pools with 40–60% of all volume. EVERY metric confirms zero new supply. NOTHING confirms dilution. The 70M volume day wasn’t a pump. It was shorts panic-recycling the same microscopic float through dark pools trying not to explode. HKD did the exact same shit before it went straight to Valhalla. Major didn’t find “the truth.” He found the sell button and then made up a story so he didn’t feel stupid. The filings didn’t change. The float didn’t change. Only his bags changed.

Difficult_Winner_777

Because the fee isn’t the problem, the shares are. There’s only tens of thousands of borrowable shares left and 1.4 MILLION shorts sitting on them. You can’t “just pay the fee” if your broker can’t find the shares to keep you short. If SGBX rips to $10, every broker on earth starts: • recalling shares • force-covering • shutting down new shorts • margin-killing anyone still holding HKD blew up for the same reason borrow supply collapsed way before dilution day. Shorts don’t get to “wait until Dec 29.” They get to buy in now because the float is microscopic and the supply is gone. Good luck “just eating the fee” when your broker is liquidating you at market.

Difficult_Winner_777

Im gunna write up a post addressing the dilution fud And how this literally has, until dec 29th, the same mechanical setup as HKD Which ran 2.5k in price originally on extremely low volume. Thisbis absolutely WSB level insanity. With a finite window of time. The amount of fud being actively pushed based on the sec filings has me feel like im living in koo koo crazy clown land with bozos Tldr for now. Float is real, nasdaq and fintel would have reflected it. Sec filings prove it. No dilution can happen until dec29th. Moass

Difficult_Winner_777

Which is crazy because if you look at how HKD (what this is literally mimicking a setup for minus the window before legal dilution) ran for about a month all the way up to 2k+ It was insanity. Here's the historical run from July to August and how it plummeted after. Look at these number https://stockinvest.us/stock-price/HKD?from=2022-07-01&to=2022-08-31

Difficult_Winner_777

Is it just me. Or is the short interest 766% and the float shrank check fintel. Its now falling incredibly in line with HKD Even more bullish.

Difficult_Winner_777

The dilution you’re talking about isn’t “hidden,” it’s disclosed But the key detail from the PRE 14A is timing. The new share authorization and expanded equity issuance cannot legally begin until the December 29th special meeting, because shareholders haven’t approved those proposals yet. Until that vote passes, none of the new dilution tools are active. So right now, the only shares in the public float are the ones that were already unrestricted prior to the meeting window. That’s why brokerage feeds still show a tiny ~450–500k float, while Nasdaq still reports ~1.4M shares short. And that’s how the ~300% SI number remains correct for this specific pre-Dec 29 window the float hasn’t expanded yet, even though the future OS will. After the meeting, if the proposals pass, dilution becomes real and SI% will drop. But before Dec 29, the float is still micro, and the math is exactly what it looks like. !!!!!!!! SGBX literally can be the next HKD before Dec 29th. !!!!!!!!! No wonder why fud is being spread so hard. Shorts have insane money on the line.

Difficult_Winner_777

My response to one of ops inner comments deserves a top seat. " You’re mixing registered potential shares with actual dilution. The Oct 10 filing only registered 937,500 Series B underlying shares for possible resale NOT 2M+ active float. The real dilution (the 528,625 + 4,396,496 conversions) didn’t happen until late October, which the new 10-Q confirms. That’s why short interest still ran to 1.415M and Fintel still shows ~300% SI vs float those earlier registered shares weren’t in the float yet. Sgbx is it. Nothing in that oct filing hurt this momentum. Bottom line: Nothing in the Oct 10 filing “killed” the setup. Those shares weren’t float. The real dilution already happened in late October, yet shorts STILL built a massive, expensive position Which is why the squeeze metrics are still extreme right now. BUY AND HOLD IF YOU FUCKIN WANT HKD 2.0 "

Difficult_Winner_777

You’re mixing registered potential shares with actual dilution. The Oct 10 filing only registered 937,500 Series B underlying shares for possible resale — not 2M+ active float. The real dilution (the 528,625 + 4,396,496 conversions) didn’t happen until late October, which the new 10-Q confirms. That’s why short interest still ran to 1.415M and Fintel still shows ~300% SI vs float — those earlier registered shares weren’t in the float yet. Sgbx is it. Nothing in that oct filing hurt this momentum. Bottom line: Nothing in the Oct 10 filing “killed” the setup. Those shares weren’t float. The real dilution already happened in late October, yet shorts STILL built a massive, expensive position — which is why the squeeze metrics are still extreme right now. BUY AND HOLD IF YOU FUCKIN WANT HKD 2.0

TheFreshOne

Fair enough, I get it. I'm in with 1,500 shares @ $3.03. I'd suck many homeless men's dicks for this to reach $2k, but you have to be realistic... chance of this going HKD style is extra extra slim to none.

Difficult_Winner_777

Look at the historical moves of hkd. What this Squeeze setup represents. This could fly to 20. It absolutely could fly to 1k. Literally. People. Look for yourself! https://stockinvest.us/stock-price/HKD?from=2022-07-01&to=2022-08-31 Here is the historical data of hkd run up.

ButterscotchFeeling9

could hit that in HKD

lOo_ol

EUR gained roughly 15% to USD since Jan 1, 2025. HKD is pegged to USD. Exchange rate between USD and JPY is almost unchanged during that period. So no, what you're looking at is not just currency devaluation.

TheGodParticle707

Dude the big squeeze was created by just one dude Michael Burry shorting the banks in 2008. If it could happen then it can happen again. GME is far from the only massive short squeeze. HKD among many other stocks had a bigger squeeze.

Unstable302

HKD starting to squeeze again

ANicerPerson

another HKD pump and dump

Klingervon

HKD

teru91

HKD earning are in 💎💎💎 https://www.stocktitan.net/news/HKD/amtd-idea-group-demonstrated-high-growth-performance-for-ytd-with-licyylvp27f7.html

Ru-yi3010

What did HKD DO?! 2555 as in 2K USD sp?

MinimumArmadillo2394

HKD has been mentioned a lot over the last few years and always has done some shenanigans with no news

drwaseem2006

$HKD Told you guys to buy MSAI last week when it was below 1. Same goes for $ASST when it was trading at 0.8. $HKD is going to hit 5 at least.

drwaseem2006

$HKD 5+ on Monday

drwaseem2006

$HKD

Frequent-Constant768

No one cares about that G. This is in & out trade, not a hold.. I’ve been watching these things for decent amount of time. Similar shit happened in 2022 with HKD. Stock went all the way to 2500+ u only need to catch one of such moves to be fukin made! that’s my reasoning behind my comment not to hold…

Frequent-Constant768

Who cares, they got 1.6 bil valuation and 118 mil in cash.. while ipo price is 10/ per share… currently 3 something per share… all 166 million shares are locked until 6 months ++ only 68k shares available to trade now while current market cap is less than 9 million. ALPS market cap not even close to cash value…. I think this will easily pull HKD in 2022 which went from single digits to 2555. Ik it sounds insane but just watch. It’s the type get in, don’t be greedy and gtfo

itsRickster

anyone considering $HKD?

Rickyskeets69

hey anyone here remember HKD? oh the memories

LavishnessTimely7372

HKD doing that thing again

Wannabearock

$HKD was mentioned in this lounge in the early morning before it shot up. I’ve had alerts for $EPWK on my brokerage for the last two weeks since the stock price bounces around a lot. I noticed that $EPWK has a history of hitting highs right after falling below $0.07.

Dawn_Of_Exile

until HKD drops below 3.10 its \*\*technically\*\* still in a daily uptrend, lunch hour about to end, might see some returning strength come power hour, just theorizing

GaiusBonus

HKD rising again :)

redhandman_mjsp

I'm sure that plays a part in it, but as far as I can gather, HKD is a subsidiary of AMTD (ticker) so they should be correlated. TGE is apparently related to those two stocks but I haven't verified that. But I can't trade HKD or TGE on Trading212 so I had to make do with AMTD. Meanwhile, AMTD failed the flag I mentioned, but I'm still holding as there is a longer and looser flag forming. I'm hoping there will be an evening surge like there was in HBIO and GLE yesterday as the setup is similar, but may be less likely on a Friday.

Whole-Signature-4306

catching HKD at the beginning of the day was huge for me +56%

Confident_Project_68

I'm pretty sure it went up because people were thinking they were buying HKD stock lmao.

ReinventAgain

Can I get an opinion on HKD? The earnings are out but not yet reported by main stream outlets.

Baamthe25th

Don't know what came over me to buy into HKD @ 4.80 but so glad I decided to sell at 5.10 before it took a big fat shit

Whole-Signature-4306

Hope no one got stuck in HKD….

Civil_Let8600

TGE and HKD could have a backside pump

Electrical_Ad_828

subsidiary of ATMD (HKD)

B0ngTheG0ng

I remember when HKD went from $5 to $2k in 3 days.

Whole-Signature-4306

In HKD 4.45

Thizziology33

HKD

snowybell

ok done with HKD, next.

Pr333n

What’s upp with HKD?

Whole-Signature-4306

Quick 59%+ on a scalp on HKD

Other-Silver1672

Bought HKD at $1.95 two months back, now I don't know when to sell.

WaltzZealousideal829

HKD this is probably the last week it will stay in penmy stock territory they had 1095% increase in revenuew in 6 months so not even a year yet 🚀

SexyMalasada

Ok now Im seriously pissed I didn't enter HKD at 3.9 smfh

Concretesheep

Thanks HKD, wanted some extra money to have fun this weekend. Gl to the rest of you.

Jealous-Birthday-213

Come on HKD

bknighttt

that chinese stock is gonna do the same thing again? $HKD

Whole-Signature-4306

Looking at the HKD chart how’d it randomly hit $700 4 years ago for like 3 days lol

Sam8872

Jumped into HKD at 3.39 about 15 seconds before the massive 10% green candle, lucky timing!

firenznguyen

HKD $700 2.0? 😂😂😂

DeuceGnarly

wow - HKD, whatever it is, is sustaining a pump... I got in/out premarket, but and now up 50% on a late entry...

Good_Raccoon_4799

AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD) 1085,9% increase in revenue this shiii finna spike

Benerfe

HKD GYNA pump xi bing bong

Whole-Signature-4306

In HKD