Reddit Posts
Mentions
Where can I see what the current "hot" "pumping" stocks are? Your NBIS, IREN, OKLO, MU, IONQ etc... not looking for quality stocks, just the current most popular high beta ones. I could look at most mentioned on Reddit stocks... Is there anywhere else?
OKLO, at a good discount rn
$RYCEY actually has a working small modular nuclear reactor and a great Aviation portfolio. OKLO has an idea.
Unlike OKLO who only has an idea, they actually have a working small modular reactor. Also their Aviation propulsion business is doing very well.
I bought $CCCX and $IONQ (among other stocks) during recent market drop. Previously, I bought $OKLO, $HOOD, $UUUU, etc., during April dip and they did 3x-5x.
CCCX is merging with Infleqtion, NVDA partnered quantum compute + sensing leader. Selling Quantum RF sensors, inertia/gravity sensors, and atomic timers to the US DoD, NASA, Japan, UK, etc. Infleqtion’s revenue is second only to IONQ, at 1/5 the valuation. They also sell quantum computers, and set the commercial record for physical qubits at 1600. The world record being 6400 set by Cal Tech using Infleqtion’s neutral atom glass core. Same seed investors as Palantir and Anduril, while playing a big role in national security. We need to stay competitive with china on quantum sensing——Palantir of quantum anyone?? Same guy that did OKLO merger, and that stock 15x’d with zero revenue. As a founding partner of NVDA NVQLink, Jenson Huang has said himself that Infleqtion’s QPUs will layer on top of the GPU CPU AI datacenter architecture. Sundar Pichai has just said that quantum is accelerating on the same level as AI 5 years ago. When the merger finalizes the CCCX ticker will change to INFQ, and I think this stock will be $100+ easy. It could even surpass IONQ when people realize trapped ions may not scale as well as IONQ’s CEO promises. Neutral Atoms are extremely promising and will dominate quantum sensing, and potentially quantum computing as well. CCCX to $100+
I am torn with Oklos valuation what it is…. But what got me to buy stock is Sam Altman being associated with OKLO.
SMR, NNE, OKLO - energy demand isn't slowing and Nuclear is the future
Anyone believe in any of the nuclear gen companies like OKLO?
OKLO going to rip next week
Here’s some DD for you regard bitches: CCCX is merging with Infleqtion. Quantum sensing + compute leader. Quantum RF receivers, quantum inertia gravity sensors, quantum atomic timing, and quantum computers with 1600 physical qubits, a commercial record. Cal tech achieved the world record 6400 physical qubits using Infleqtion’s glass cores. Neutral atoms is the most scalable modality of quantum computing, and is a serious contender in the quantum race. Second most revenue in quantum behind only IONQ. They sell quantum hardware and sensors to the US DoD, NASA, Japan, UK, and more. Partnered with NVDA as a founding partner of NVDA NVQLink. As Jenson Huang revealed at NVDA GTC, Infleqtion QPUs will be layered on top of the GPU-CPU AI datacenter stack to solve the most complex problems that exist. Backed by same seed investor as Palantir and Anduril. Same person that did the spac merger for OKLO. When the merger is complete, the CCCX ticker will change to INFQ. Once that happens INFQ will be on par with IONQ IMO. Right now it is valued less than half of Rigetti (lmao). It is undervalued currently due to the pre merger status.
OKLO going to the moon whether you like it or not
I’ll have uhhh, one OKLO legion of doom pump with a side of crime
OKLO new ATH (2X) by mid-Jan
I first bought into OKLO at $6 and when I bought at $9... I thought I was being a dumbass buying an overpriced stock. I was, but it worked out anyways.
OKLO to the absolute moon please
OKLO is $89- remember that come mid-Jan
Do you guys buy any nuclear energy stocks- OKLO?
Bruh if you say OKLO is a growth stock, this conversation is pointless 😆
SMR in the past month’s nuking Should’ve bought CEG, or CCJ, or hell even OKLO.
Look at market cap and then look to see if they actually have a product or are doing anything... For starters. OKLO was worth 28 BILLION dollars and they will not be building any reactors for years at best...
OKLO setup looking interesting
Fintel shows OKLO short interest at ATH… 18.6M shares
OKLO ATH by mid-Jan, high beta rebound
Once OKLO goes to 83 I can finally add some truffle to my pasta
Surely OKLO will go back to 193.
Just looked at Fintel, noticed that OKLO short interest is at an ATH of 18.6M
Just looked at Fintel, noticed that OKLO short interest is at an ATH of 18.6M shares
Are my OKLO calls safe?
If you ever feel stoopid just remember, I, yes me. Full ported OKLO when it was $190…
OKLO short interest at an ATH right now- 18.6M according to Fintel
OKLO easy 2X by mid-January
OKLO short interest at ATH- 18.6M
From what I've read that won't lead to meaningful revenue, but I'm certainly no expert on nuclear. If OKLO reasserts its leadership I'll be considering an investment.
Interested in the meme stock thesis for NBIS? CRWV is absolutely saddled with debt and has little to no cash on hand, OKLO make literally no revenue and is the highest form of speculation but NBIS ARR for 2026 is 7-9Bill and has 20 billion in contracts for the next five years? Don’t buy the tops for sure but it’s a screaming buy atm. Just the nature of high beta stocks during their big breakout moments. I don’t know enough about ASTS but they also have genuine revenue no?
Don't invest in meme-stocks. OKLO? NBIS? CRWV? ASTS? Pieces of shit like that are the canary in the coal mine, my brother.
If OKLO has ever been in your portfolio, stick to SGOV and VTI.
I sold OKLO a couple months ago for huge gains, I wouldn't say they have no future, it's just that their future is like, WAAAAAY into the future
UUUU is legit, OKLO is ridiculous
I been buying meme stocks without even realizing they were memes.... UUUU, OKLO,
Dude, I am a noob in this but even I know that OKLO or small modular reactors have no future.
nasdaq will be lagging behind small caps in the year end rally. there are simply way too many shorted small caps with low valuation/forward PE yet have legitimate revenue unlike hype stocks (OKLO, RGTI, MP etc) ANF and KSS is a perfect example of what happens every single restaurant stock surged just as much, look at CMG +7% hunt for good small caps for more gains, there is not much room for tech to pump
Yeah I’ll be more specific too - right now OKLO says they have power plants that produce up to 75 MW/hr. In 2023, data centers used approximately 176 TWh of electricity. That was 4.5% of all electricity in the US at the time. OKLO would need to build and install over 2 million 75 MWh units to meet just the data center demand from 2 years ago. But OKLO has not actually turned on a single reactor yet. So the story that they will power all these data centers is pure hype. They literally don’t have any commercial revenue and yet their valuation is $13 billion. I hope they do well and I hope the company grows to $1 trillion market cap, but until the valuation makes more sense I’m not going to invest. Maybe OKLO will win, maybe one of the other 80+ public and private SMR companies will win. Really no way to know right now. It’s all storytelling and hype at the present moment.
Anyone grabbing any shares of stocks from the recent dips? Looking at grabbing more NBIS and OKLO
They will *begin* mass production at the *end* of this decade. So again … OKLO will not corner the data center energy market this decade
They’re going to turn on one reactor in a pilot program to demonstrate criticality. Which is basically step one in a proof that the design works. I’ll reiterate, OKLO will not corner the data center energy market this decade
OKLO new ATH by Jan 23rd
Yeah OKLO is trash, I sold all mine well before October for a huge gains. I got dogged on their sub for predicting a 60% crash lol Do you think the speculative stocks that recover a little bit first are the ones to buy?
Thanks for the list. I’m actually eyeing several of these stocks. The ones that fell the least are typically the ones that gain the most in the next rally. However, stocks like OKLO that are years away from any real product and revenue might never again command such a crazy valuation, unless as you say, the government invests. That said, I’m looking for strong stocks that held up in this pullback and are not part of the last wave of momentum. Pullbacks tend to usher in new leaders.
Pretty much everything you listed is a speculative stock with negative net income. Some of those losses are also growing Q/Q. Their stock prices are 100% driven by hype and eventually there is a point where there is not enough hype to keep driving these prices up. Even with executive orders and government contracts, we need to be realistic. ACHR is not going to disrupt the entire transportation market tomorrow. OKLO is not going to corner the data center market this year, or even this decade.
Yeah I wouldn't call that a head and shoulders. If you want to see a textbook head and shoulders look at OKLO on the daily.
Yes I think OKLO is a short - total joke almost no revenue only hype and Nuke will be so regulated - by the time it comes out - tech will hv lowered chip power consumption
Most people know close to nothing about the nuclear power industry in the United States and this is far and away mostly hype. I can’t fit an entire analysis of the current state of the nuclear power industry in the U.S. in one comment but here’s my take on what the current climate is and why SMR’s haven’t gotten to be a popular focus. 1.) The U.S. nuclear industry at this point is essentially a life support system centered around operating legacy reactors. We have had 3 new reactors come online in the last 30 years (2 at Vogtle & 1 at Watts Bar). The reasons for this lack of new reactors are plentiful but in my opinion is mostly explained by cheap natural gas coming online in the 2000’s and the nuclear taboo making new nuclear politically unpopular. 1b) By many accounts the new Vogtle reactors were a failure due to their cost overruns and nearly 15 year construction timeline. This is coupled with the objective failure at the Virgil Summer plant where they actually started building two AP1000 reactors and abandoned the project mid-construction. The reasons for these failures are hotly debated but come down to 2 main factors in my opinion: 1) The implementation of a new reactor design (AP1000) comes with major pains for the first builders. Construction began before the plans were finalized, and the old adage about the last 1% of a project takes 50% of the time applied all to well here. 2) Perhaps more relevant for future reactors is that the U.S. does not have a robust professional workforce trained in nuclear construction. This cannot be understated enough. The construction of a new power plant requires highly specialized workers across every industry (electricians, welders, etc). New construction essentially requires a ton of training in addition to cost overruns due to failed inspections of materials. 2) The failure of the AP1000 created an environment that makes SMR’s very attractive from a financing perspective. With a few AP1000’s you might go $15 billion over budget and your whole utility could go bankrupt from one project. SMR’s deliver nuclear power with a fraction of the upfront cost. 2b) I believe the claims of SMR proponents are a little over-optimistic about their future scale. The primary problem in my opinion is that SMR’s (at least the ones that have shown serious technical viability) operate at far lower power outputs but at marginally lower civil footprints. Nuclear energy is already expensive at a large scale and it is even more expensive at a small scale. You have to do a similar civil footprint, environmental reviews, storage requirements, etc and you have less scale to offset these costs. 3.) Will AI change the cost/benefit for SMR’s? I don’t really believe so and most of the claims being made are being extremely generous if not outright misleading. For a deeper dive into this please check out this great summary of OKLO’s actual position vs what they are claiming to investors. https://youtu.be/IvqORMySD6s?si=faBz9Y9HeH8wuDiz
Chat what do you think the bottom is for OKLO?
price targets raising on OKLO but stock still falling. bought some off vibes
Putting NBIS and ASTS in the same basket as OKLO is crazy
Been in OKLO since $25/30, sure its not a 20b company right now, but long term I do see potential. I think $60/70 is a great entry point long term.
oh that bastard... 😜 risky assets getting whipped by shorts & sentiment. this month for some other de-spacs... NKLR -50%, IMSR -60%, PEW -30%, BULL-25%, IONQ -25%, OKLO -40%. KDK PIPE & largest diluted shareholder is Alyeska ($30b~ AUM). Their preferreds convert @ $12, but pricing protection at 6/9 months intervals can reprice it to $8/$6. The other PIPE is Soros, with 10mm~ shares, and ARKQ is holding over a million shares. I think they're all currently down. Prospectus was recently amended & made effective, allowing a lot of dilution + selling, but trading volume hasn't increased beyond algos trading back/forth, running stock price down. Later today we'll see new short-interest numbers. Currently still almost no shares available to borrow, and 40%~ borrow rate. Shorts need a few million shares to get dumped from this recent registration, or they'll have no easy way out. Especially once ETFs start buying. I still like the play longer-term.
Buying more OKLO- Black Friday sale
im bearish since 14 Oct, how is a bear more calm than bulls? there's going to be consolidation, just ride the relief rally and stop panicking. short interest at all time high (almost 30% more than apr dump btw), the market wont dump until late jan feb. junk tickers like OKLO, MP, RGTI, QBTS, FLNC, ORCL, IBIT need a relief rally to get people to buy in, this will take a few weeks of trading so the next wave of liquidation can begin. so many plebs here do not know how it works, have u seen the exact same mania in 2021? go look at UPST at $400 or AFRM at $170 or HOOD at $50
OKLO is one of those stocks that majority of investors completely writes off for completely valid reasons but still gets left with FOMO. That’s why you see wild swings that take it to higher highs every time. It’s a tech that’s basically needed for national security at this point. No revenue today doesn’t mean it’s not a guarantee that they get shitloads of cash in a couple years. The market is forward looking now.
OKLO and PWR. All these TPUs and GPUs need more electricity than the grid can offer. The bottleneck will be fixed with federal subsidies. This is free alpha.
Don't let corky bother you Darkstar. There are plenty of pre-revenue companies that have traded at billion $ valuations. They tap the public markets to fund/complete R&D/achieve licensing. He*l, Moderna had a $68Billion market cap before commercial sales of its drugs. Valuations are based on the perceived future potential of a company's sales pipeline, intellectual property, R&D/trial results, and the potential market size of their proposed sales. Average price target of the latest 6 Analysts within the past few weeks place OKLO with a $134 price, or approx 47%above its current after-hours price of $91). Each one of those six analysts ran their models and disagree with the simpleton trying to get your goat.
Wow just checked and OKLO’s down almost 50% from its highs a few months ago
The opportunity is real but the timeline is longer than headlines suggest. Here’s where the money will actually flow: **Near-term plays (2025-2028):** 1. **Constellation Energy (CEG)** \- owns the plants Big Tech is restarting. They signed Microsoft's 20-year, 837MW TMI-1 deal and Meta's 1,121MW agreement. With 24 reactors up for renewal before 2035, they're the incumbent that actually has operating assets. Stock already up on these deals, but more renewals coming. 2. **Uranium miners** \- Cameco, Kazatomprom. The supply chain is constrained and SMRs need fuel. No new major uranium mines have opened in a decade. If SMRs scale, uranium goes into structural deficit by 2027-2028. This is your commodity leverage without picking an SMR winner. 3. **Regulatory consulting firms** \- The bottleneck isn't technology, it's NRC approval. SMRs need site-specific licenses and Big Tech doesn't know how to navigate this. Firms like **Lightbridge (LTBR)** that specialize in regulatory strategy and nuclear fuel consulting are quietly essential. **Mid-term (2028-2035):** 4. **SMR manufacturers** \- **NuScale (SMR)** is furthest along, first US SMR approved by NRC in 2020. Problem: their first customer (Utah) canceled the project. But now they have Amazon's $500M commitment for Washington state. Still risky - no commercial deployment yet. **Oklo (OKLO)** is Sam Altman-backed and pursuing fast reactors; riskier, but if they land more deals like Meta's, it's a 10x play. 1. **Modular construction/fabrication** \- SMRs are factory-built. Companies that can mass-produce containment vessels and reactor modules will be critical. Look at **Doosan** (Korean, partnered with NuScale) and **BWX Technologies (BWXT)** \- they build naval reactors, similar tech, already scaling. **The actual bottleneck (and opportunity):** 6. **Grid transmission companies** \- SMRs need to be sited near data centers, but the grid in between is maxed out. **NextEra (NEE)** and other utilities building transmission lines to industrial clusters (Virginia, Ohio, Texas) will capture the "last mile" value. **What to avoid:** * **Pure-play SMR startups without signed PPAs.** The Google-Kairos deal is promising, but Kairos hasn't built a reactor yet. Same for TerraPower's Wyoming project (backing from Gates/DOE, but construction just started). Valuations are frothy on *announcements*, not revenue. * **"AI-powered nuclear safety" startups** \- regulatory bodies won't trust black-box AI for nuclear safety. Hype without a pathway to adoption. **Timeline reality check:** The first SMR units will come online around 2030 (Google's Kairos deal). Until then, Big Tech is mainly buying *existing* nuclear output (TMI, Clinton plant). The real SMR boom is a 2030s story, not a 2025 one. Bottom line: **Constellation Energy is your safe bet** (they have the plants, the PPAs, and no execution risk). Uranium miners are your leverage. SMR manufacturers are your moonshots - allocate accordingly.
Yeah, and OKLO isn’t actively building a larger replica of a reactor that ran for thirty years continuously (1964-1994, EBR-II) at the exact same build site, with the same fuel.
Rode OKLO from 30 to 140, got back in at 89 this morning. Let’s make some $$$$
OKLO looking like a 2X through EOY
OKLO through the roof after hours LFG
OKLO about to pump. Why? Who the hell knows! That’s the exciting part.
OKLO about to pump. Why? Your guess is as good as mine.