CSR

HSuke

**Traditional PKI (Public Key Infrastructure)** relies on a centralized system of certificate authorities that provide certificates and allow sysadmins to renew them. Browsers and applications and whitelist, blocklist, and store certificates. Whenever I sign a CSR to renew a certificate, it takes over the previous registration, and the previous is lost. What PKI doesn't do is track history for individual objects or track history for certificates. There is no database for objects tracked by it. If you want this information stored permanently and in a decentralized database, you need a blockchain. Code signing, commit histories, and storing hashes is also done by tools such as git and version control. But those are also stored in centralized repositories like github or private git/subversion servers. If you want a permanent public storage, you need a blockchain.

sublimeload420

Good guess, and frankly most times you would be correct. However I worked customer service all my life and was nice to this guy. I got assertive when he said he tried to ping a supervisor and he's busy so maybe he'll email or something, idk I've got to take other calls. He painted a picture of not giving a shit about the situation. I asked at the beginning of the call to speak to a supervisor because I believed there were limited powers in what the CSR had in order to remedy the situation.

Bubbly_Friendship_22

Their CSR worked hard that day.

diomediocre

Hey everyone, this is the depths of the bear market and the new, shiny L1 trade has been played out to oblivion but a cool new one did just launch recently. Archway allows for dApps to code in their own fee for txs. This seems odd at first but it directly incentivizes developers to attract users and txs while still needing to remain competitive with how much they charge and fees will be very visible. Other L1s like Canto have experimented with similar models like CSR but this one is focused on appealing to developers and ecosystem expansion for the chain and space. It's part of the Cosmos/ATOM ecosystem and just did an airdrop so I wouldn't expect positive price action anytime soon to be frank but I think this is a really meaningful experiment for smart contract devs and getting more people building.

Future-Tomorrow

>sad thing is seems all banks could be heading that way..mine lets us buy crypto..for now.. All banks are heading this way. 1. Months ago, a user here who used to work in a bank's fraud dept (I might have the dept wrong...but he worked in a bank) shared with us a few stories with us of an increase in crypto scams. 2. Due to Perogi's work, the FBI, and many many others, large sums of money being withdrawn now draw greater scrutiny. 3. OP failed to realize the gravity of the situation. I'm not defending banks but if you go to a bank in today's climate it's probably best not to "joke" or make light of questions when withdrawing large sums of money. Especially if you're in a country that has passed recent laws regarding large withdrawals. I had an incident about 3 months ago where a TD Bank CSR laughed at the fact they had locked inactive accounts and my money was being held "hostage". These accounts were inactive for a period of 6 months, 1 week, and 3 days. "Hostage" was the word I used and she said "yeah, pretty much", and then laughed. The bank failures and greater scrutiny over scams and whatever other reasons shouldn't be the only reasons we don't keep large amounts of cash in the bank like before. **I've had wallets that were inactive for over 3 yrs and when I opened them no one had my crypto hostage or asked me any questions. There was also no one to ask questions about why I was moving X amt of crypto.**

Eggnw

People recruited as CSR. Basically scammed with fake jobs and bad employment terms (have to pay hefty fine to resign, will be threatened etc)

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Bitget has announced the launch of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) project called 'Blockchain4Youth'. The project aims to empower and inspire younger generations to use Web3 and crypto tools to create and engage in a decentralized space. Bitget plans to invest $10 million in the initiative over the next 5 years. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

Main_Sergeant_40

Idk man. I’d try reaching out to another CSR

BenDover___

I still think they suck. Sent money and never got deposited and CSR was useless.

Visible-Ad743

Just a centralized exchange with a coin trying to make an extra buck. Cro has little use case outside the app. CDC is fine. A little spendy and over the top app features but it serves a purpose and a market share. They are legit and have gr8 CSR.

Antana18

It all started with the bullshit conviction by many corporations to follow CSR - Corporate Social Responsibility, which on paper sounds good but makes corporations increasingly to governmental vicarious agents and echo chambers!

MrSuepruh

I have a Gemini card. AI fraud system. Some of the most random purchases will be declined for no reason. I spoke with CSR and they stated that they cannot approve it as it’s AI and that there is not an option for me to approve it, yet. So I must swipe several times. Also the processing of payments takes 3-5 days. A little long for me.

jesuswasagamblingman

Just reporting this happen to me too. Coinbase requested autism verification. Delayed response. CSR played stupid, it was escalated. New rep, "please verify identity" Good luck

tgi_

I just linked my CSR to PayPal bill pay. It appears to be working fine. What sort of issue are you having? If I couldn't link Chase, it would have been a deal breaker for me.

Areshian

Ok, now the lengthy explanation. First, let me start by saying I know a thing or two about public key cryptography, including the system used on our ID cards and I can guarantee you it is x509 complaint. The reason we do not use the private key present in our cards to decrypt is not because it is not a true public key system, it’s just there has been no need for it. The ID cards contain fully complaint x509 certificates. Now, to the core of the problem, personal records on a blockchain. I agree with you, it’s a horrible idea. It’s bonkers. It’s like saying if you can walk on your hands. I’m not saying it’s impossible, but why? Now, if you were to do it, the way for this to happen is for a symmetric encryption to be used for encrypting your records in the blockchain. This symmetric key is unique for each document. Then, that symmetric key is encrypted with another symmetric key, your master symmetric key, which is unique for each user. When your new ID card is issued, you generate a CSR for the government to sign. Upon signing, the government pushes a copy of your master encryption key to the blockchain encrypted with the public key of your current card. When you want to grant access to a document to an entity, you go to the blockchain where your card was issued, decrypt the master key, use it to decrypt the document unique key and disclose that one. This gives access only to that version of the document and it is guaranteed the document is the one issued on that date, proving it has not been tampered. Now, does this make any sense? Not at all. Most of the times we do want to alter documents, and we do trust the government with that data. Sure, there can be exceptions, people bribing for falsifications of documents. There was suspicion that Djokovic had some covid test results altered after the fact. With this system, this wouldn’t happen. His results would be encrypted on the blockchain and he would be free to disclose the key to make them public, but he wouldn’t be able to alter them. Same with other record, like my university calcifications. I can use a system like this to prove I haven’t bribed someone to alter the official records. The problem is the system is overly complex. It is inefficient and it doesn’t scale. Allowing other entities besides the government to write documents linked for you can be done (doing a Diffie Hellman partly derived from your master key), but adds even more complexity. I’m unable to think of a single situation in my life on which having my records in a blockchain would have been an advantage. Oh, and of course, all this data being written… you really wish there is no error in your público key implementation and you disclose the master encryption key (opsie, guess no more privacy fir you). Not to mention if a quantum computer arrives, tons of PII free for the taking. So although I don’t consider it impossible, the question is why. Why would someone want this, really.

Floodgatassist

while many of your arguments hold some truth and the current sentiment is pretty clear, i find it quite amusing how someone who only experienced GU for about two months appears to be experienced enough to permanently post negative stuff in the sub and even write these reviews. You literally haven't seen 36/38 of its development, only the currently skewed state. I won't whiteknight the dev team, they've made a bunch of very questionable decisions in the recent past, but i'd still like to add my personal view to some of the issues. - bugs: there's no denying the client is clunky, some cards are broken and some bugs haven't been a priority for a long while. I still don't understand the scale at which people are complaining. I've been playing for almost two years and gamebreaking stuff happens maybe in 1/100 matches, minor annoyances are more frequent. From a business perspective it makes sense to focus on both Mobile Version & Thin Client instead of delegating too many ressources to fix bugs in a soon-to-be obolete client. - devs: i believe many players found themselves blinded by unrealistic expectations and now that the hype phase (for both GU and crypto as a whole) died down it's easier to blame the devs. Card prices were heavily inflated throughout 2021 and the devs repatedly (way before that) made it clear that their longterm goal is to create a f2p-friendly ecosystem. They quite literally achieved that - DO and MJ cards are cheap and can easily bought with earned tokens. Tokenomics and staking plans have been clear long before the token launched, it's just due to hype noone wanted to accept $GODS first and foremost is an inflationary utility token and by design bound to lose value. We early 'investors' got compensated heavily via airdrops, so whoever held all the way down and refused to sell cards while they were hot while also ignoring the facts shouldn't complain now. -powercreep: after CSR and MJ balance went downhill, i agree. Lots of silly or outright unfun stuff got introduced and every attempt at restoring balance instead led to even more broken decks going rampant for 1-2 weeks each. While balance actually looks pretty good again, the game became a lot more fast-paced and imo less interactive. Nothing to argue, that's the single most glaring problem right now. -lack of communication: i disagree wholeheartedly. Squishy and Eclipse are permanently answering questions here and on Discord, the blog became more detailed and professional over time, Yawg and Videojames read and answer balance channel on a daily basis, the trello page for bugs is going through an overhaul and overall i haven't had a single issue that their support wouldn't solve within a couple of days. Individual experiences vary, ofc. To also come to a conclusion i'm not overly euphoric for GU, but IF(!) they manage to reestablish balance as it was before CSR, deal with some inherent flaws (first turn advantage/sanctum snowballing/some gods just lacking answers to multiple meta decks) and finally push thin client/mobile plus the overhauled p2e model i can still see the game succeed big time. I wouldn't write it off yet.

superphly

Recession? That's all but inevitable... I'm preparing for a full on depression. I don't think folks realize how fucked this globalization thing is and how badly it's going to crash. 100 year old feedback loops are about to go tits up. A $3,500 Apple Laptop is on back order 9 weeks and the CSR told me it's probably going to be at 12 week delay (3 months) soon. Look at maritime insurance pricing. Look at wheat futures. Look at fertilizer exports. This system is not going to work moving forward and... god this makes me depressed. 2019 was probably as good as we'll have it for a very long time. This process won't smooth out for at least 8-10 years.