DVP
Decentralized Vulnerability Platform
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Fed's Chris Waller on advantage of Tokenization: "Atomic settlement is useful because it can mitigate settlement and counterparty credit risks: it ensures that the buyer will not pay if the seller does not deliver; and conversely, that the seller will not deliver if the buyer does not pay."
Rocket Global – A Next-Gen Hybrid Crypto Exchange
Mentions
Would you rather have one ATM or one DVP?
https://www.bullionstar.com/blogs/ronan-manly/dawn-of-bitcoin-price-discovery-2009-2011-the-very-early-bitcoin-exchanges/ With the early transactions payments (both BTC and fiat) were sent manually with one side going first. There was no DVP mechanic.
With an ETF, Coinbase is the custodian, Blackrock is the advisor/manager and you are the owner of the Bitcoin. If you buy a share of the ETF, the manager creates a share for you, and Coinbase buys the BTC to back it and yout cash goes to Blackrock. If you sell it, the advisor destroys a share Coinbase sells the BTC backing it, and you get cash from BlackRock. Witha tons of money you can create and destroy shares daily and move the price around if you want. But you have to do your trades through a prime broker, and they won't let you break any rules or they will be hauled into Federal Court with you, so you would have to be very clever about your manipulations, using multiple prime brokers on a DVP basis. But, you will be caught eventually and barred from the market. So, yes price manipulation is possible, but unlikely. What's far more likely is sentiment manipulation, manipulation of you, not the price. Basically using buys and sells to exaggerate your natural bullishness and bearishness into euphoric greed and abject terror causing you to make bad decisions that big players can profit from if done at scale.
>Smart contracts may allow for what is called "atomic settlement." Rather than relying on each party to separately carry out its leg of the transaction, smart contracts can effectively combine two or more legs of a transaction into a single unified "atomic" act that is executed by the smart contract. This could be a robust way to achieve delivery-versus-payment (DVP) and payment-versus-payment (PVP) functionality, such that one leg of a transaction settles if and only if the other leg settles as well. Uh, what? Can someone eli5 this for me please? I am so confused right now
 Morning dude ☕️
TLDR: * Smart contracts may allow for what is called "atomic settlement." * Rather than relying on each party to separately carry out its leg of the transaction, smart contracts can effectively combine the two, or more, legs of the transaction into a single unified "atomic" act that is executed by the smart contract. * This may be an additional robust way to achieve delivery-versus-payment ("DVP") and payment-versus-payment ("PVP") functionality, such that one leg of a transaction settles if and only if the other leg settles as well. * Atomic settlement is useful because it can mitigate settlement and counterparty credit risks: it ensures that the buyer will not pay if the seller does not deliver; and conversely, that the seller will not deliver if the buyer does not pay. * Parties to these transactions may have more flexibility as to when the transactions settle, which in turn has the potential to create additional capital and liquidity efficiency. * And blockchain's atomic settlement functionality may serve as another way to achieve an important risk mitigant: using repurchase agreements as an example, the repo "seller" can have confidence that it will receive the specified loan amount in exchange for the collateral it conveys; while the repo "buyer" knows it will receive the specified collateral. While he says the 'right' thing on smart contacts, he says this as well: >"I will note, of course, that these benefits are not unique to blockchains." "The Federal Reserve's FedNow service, which is set to begin operations in July, does not rely on blockchain; and it will provide safe and efficient instant payment services in real time, around the clock, every day of the year." Boo!
* Smart contracts may allow for what is called "atomic settlement." * Rather than relying on each party to separately carry out its leg of the transaction, smart contracts can effectively combine the two, or more, legs of the transaction into a single unified "atomic" act that is executed by the smart contract. * This may be an additional robust way to achieve delivery-versus-payment ("DVP") and payment-versus-payment ("PVP") functionality, such that one leg of a transaction settles if and only if the other leg settles as well. * Atomic settlement is useful because it can mitigate settlement and counterparty credit risks: it ensures that the buyer will not pay if the seller does not deliver; and conversely, that the seller will not deliver if the buyer does not pay. * Parties to these transactions may have more flexibility as to when the transactions settle, which in turn has the potential to create additional capital and liquidity efficiency. * And blockchain's atomic settlement functionality may serve as another way to achieve an important risk mitigant: using repurchase agreements as an example, the repo "seller" can have confidence that it will receive the specified loan amount in exchange for the collateral it conveys; while the repo "buyer" knows it will receive the specified collateral. While he says the 'right' thing on smart contacts, he says this as well: >"I will note, of course, that these benefits are not unique to blockchains." "The Federal Reserve's FedNow service, which is set to begin operations in July, does not rely on blockchain; and it will provide safe and efficient instant payment services in real time, around the clock, every day of the year." Boo!
I mean this is great and everything, but why isn’t mentioning really interesting things like cross border DVP settlements using ibc, USA testing a stablecoin built on cosmos sdk, or BSN integration?
No they are not. Source: worked in a stock exchange for four years. Just because there exists the scenario that one bank has nothing else going on than holding that one stock and the other has no credit problems and both are sitting in the same, very developed country and have no other businesses going on, yes that could be instant. In all other cases, no. DVP is quite a lot more difficult in large organisations.
So you're a nazi participating in the blockade by your logic? I drive every Monday to Friday from Stevenson rd to The DVP and back. I've seen 0 propaganda, nothing but support from people, I work downtown across from Nathan Philips Square, I see no hate or anything your claiming. My claim from being in the area isn't false how about you? In previous comments you've posted on other subs you've spoken abou America politics. What would a Canadian know about American politics, you can't even participate in the vote.
All $DVP social links: [https://dxco.in/0x43bFf6EAB0903cD0DA8D7c57C25e17314E51da54](https://dxco.in/0x43bFf6EAB0903cD0DA8D7c57C25e17314E51da54) * Discord ✅ * Telegram ✅ * Twitter ✅ * Reddit ✅ * Website ✅
Could it be a green Thursday? 
