LB

0mkar

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPQwGV1aLnTuN6kdNWlElfr2tzigB9Nnj&si=OCt-LB93wLSegC_y Only learn from legends.

RUYYRUYY

>> Due diligence is an obligation of the publisher to ensure they're not publishing illegal or harmful content. This is completely not true. *Last week, a federal court shut down Pinnacle Development Partners and froze its assets after the SEC accused the company of operating a nationwide Ponzi scheme, in which returns are paid with other investors' money. The WSJ did some of the heavy lifting in unearthing this sordid tale. Today, financial-fraud watchers are asking why Newsweek, the WSJ, and others accepted ads from Pinnacle, which raised money through "an extensive national advertising campaign" promoting its investment returns in some 40 publications, according to the SEC. Here's today's story from the WSJ. "The first sign that should put everyone on notice -- investors and newspapers -- is a promise of outlandish returns," says Kelly Bowers, an SEC lawyer. Pinnacle's ads promised returns of 25% in a little as 45 days. The SEC said Pinnacle's advertising itself was illegal, irrespective of any fraud, because Pinnacle hadn't registered with the agency to sell securities. According to the WSJ, publications typically review every ad they accept and flag for further review ones that are potentially libelous, illegal or offensive to readers. What are the legal issues? The WSJ reporter, Zachary Seward, asked a couple of media lawyers: Floyd Abrams, a well-known First Amendment lawyer at Cahill Gordon, says the law generally protects publications from liability for running fraudulent ads. "Society cannot ask, and the courts will not ask, of newspapers that they do the equivalent of investigative journalism to check out the bona fides of their advertisers," he says. Abrams added that publications are hesitant to vet their ads, or at least tell readers they do, because "if they fail to identify the fraudulent ad, they might be in more trouble than if they hadn't started down that road in the first place." Paul Davis, an FTC attorney, says his agency, which regulates business advertising, says obeying securities laws is left to the advertiser, not the publication. Davis tells the WSJ that the FTC has long debated whether action should be taken against publications that run deceptive or misleading ads. "And the answer was simply no," he says, because the ads are protected as free speech.* https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-LB-2588

ironmonger29

You can't simply rob victims like with other forms of property [https://youtu.be/LB12gR3RoNI](https://youtu.be/LB12gR3RoNI)

frooost1337

Yesss i love the trollface!! =) 

bitminetracker

Here a link for River, I've been using them for about a year now. Now fees on recurring buys after the first week. Free withdrawal to hardware wallets over .005BTC [Buy BTC with River](https://river.com/signup?r=556LB2UEF4)

CemreT

$LB stock! Landbridge

Acrobatic-Shift7893

Hello everyone 👋 I’m David from Colombia 🇨🇴. I’m going through a very difficult time right now and I’m reaching out to the amazing crypto community for a little support. I’ve been learning about blockchain and cryptocurrencies, and I truly believe in the generosity and strength of this global community. If anyone feels like helping with even $1–2 in USDT (TRC20), I would be incredibly grateful. Every little bit makes a difference. 💸 USDT Wallet (TRC20): TY1nQS5F4LB6EevwXMFHHwju54fVqsuGru Thank you so much for your time, your kindness, and for reading my message. 🙏 May abundance return to you multiplied 💚

Acrobatic-Shift7893

Hello everyone 👋 I’m David from Colombia 🇨🇴. I’m going through a very difficult time right now and I’m reaching out to the amazing crypto community for a little support. I’ve been learning about blockchain and cryptocurrencies, and I truly believe in the generosity and strength of this global community. If anyone feels like helping with even $1–2 in USDT (TRC20), I would be incredibly grateful. Every little bit makes a difference. 💸 USDT Wallet (TRC20): TY1nQS5F4LB6EevwXMFHHwju54fVqsuGru Thank you so much for your time, your kindness, and for reading my message. 🙏 May abundance return to you multiplied 💚

Acrobatic-Shift7893

Hello everyone 👋 I’m David from Colombia 🇨🇴. I’m going through a very difficult time right now and I’m reaching out to the amazing crypto community for a little support. I’ve been learning about blockchain and cryptocurrencies, and I truly believe in the generosity and strength of this global community. If anyone feels like helping with even $1–2 in USDT (TRC20), I would be incredibly grateful. Every little bit makes a difference. 💸 USDT Wallet (TRC20): TY1nQS5F4LB6EevwXMFHHwju54fVqsuGru Thank you so much for your time, your kindness, and for reading my message. 🙏 May abundance return to you multiplied 💚

overtoke

this just popped up on drudgereport https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GoGlf1jW0AAR0LB?format=jpg&name=small

Hodlbag

Ive been stacking silver lately... sitting at 1 LB so far

observer2025

If they say 2020 is a recession, they why not they argue 2015 and 2022 are also recessions? To be strict, BTC has yet to live thru any huge market downdown like 2000 dotcom and 2008 LB busts to see how well it still follows PlanB chart LOL.

star1s3

My target was 102k and reached after 2 years of bull market. Enough for me. But I don't know man, this cycle is fkd up by wall street boomers investing. We'll see, it could still have gas but I have to follow my levels. Maybe after BTC will range for some time between 70k and 100k. I want a weekly close above 102k for continuation higher. https://i.imgur.com/lrGl9LB.png

DjMteejxo

LB in essence gambled with it's money. When you gamble away all there is nothing left to back you up.. Companies go bankrupt sure. But even when they do, the "something behind them" still keeps it's value and can be used to refund investors like real estate of the company.  And that is the question here, can it go to zero.