Reddit Posts
BWX Technologies Inc. Upgraded To 'BB+' Following Strategic Expansion, Outlook Stable, commercial side benefits from reactor life-extension
Long-term Bet on BlackBerry Due to QNX
BlackBerry (BB): The Market is Getting this One Wrong
Meta fights soaring hardware costs by reusing old DDR4 server memory in new DDR5-only servers
Hey Reddit outside of MU and the storage names, what's your highest conviction pick for the year ahead?
Full port 270k BB blackberry I let AI write my DD
For Those of you That Consistently Run IC's as a Bread and Butter
Yes, You CAN "Time The Market." And I'm Going to Prove It, Again.
Yes, You CAN "Time The Market." And I'm Going to Prove It, Again.
AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) successfully launches BB8-9-10 satellites on SpaceX Falcon 9. BB11-12-13 in final preparation for shipment.
Is Blackberry Primed For a Comeback?
Is Blackberry Primed For a Comeback?
How do you guys reposition on somewhat speculative stocks with decent long term potential like BB and NOK after a massive downturn?
Spinning the wheel with $250K. 1/2 BB 1/2 NOW
All in BB & NOW... Riding both to $0.00 or Valhalla
HPE, DELL, BB, NOK, CSCO… got a hot scoop on the next one
Sam Altman’s OpenAI just made robotics its next frontier and it’s hiring to prove it
PLTR Case Study follow-up: Using Bollinger Bands and Keltner Channels to scan stocks primed for move to the upside or downside
Bought these calls sometime ago, now not sure what my best option is. Sell, roll, hold?
Bought these few calls a while ago, not sure what I should do with them at this point? Sell, roll, hold?
NOK & BB might be the most misunderstood AI plays on the market right now
NOK & BB might be the most misunderstood AI plays on the market right now
Load up on $BB before they pop 20 dollars
BB - multi bagger without the drama
Posted $BB weeks ago, congrats and let's fly together!
Bears when we open the casino nextweek 📈📈📈
They thought I was crazy - BB to the moon
Why Blackberry ($BB) is the next big thing
Eugene's back in the game with a high conviction bet: KEEL
Up 250k in the last month from 17k initial… INTC AMD 90% of what I played.
Started a position in Blackberry(BB) few days ago.
Started a position in Blackberry(BB) stock
Started BB position and posted here few days ago
I just started a BB position, the company declared turnaround complete
Adding 1000 shares of $BB at this price turnaround
Blackberry (BB) future cyber event meme coupling as strategic value extraction for slow sovereign deployments
FCC grants AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) full approval for the planned 248 satellite constellation
Rocket launch went fine ASTS stock drop seems driven by panic
What was the pump with Blackberry today?
BlackBerry completes transformation just as demand grows for secure, sovereign defence communications
BB might warn you of a possible entry beforehand
Paramount (PSKY) Debt Downgraded to Junk Following Warner Bros. (WBD) Deal
Is the market overlooking ВlackBerry’s shift from brand nostalgia to infrastructure relevance?
Is BlackBerry quietly positioning itself inside the connected vehicle software stack?
Is BlackBerry becoming a quiet infrastructure software play while the market still treats it like a legacy brand?
Is BlackBerry becoming a quiet infrastructure software play while the market still treats it like a legacy brand?
Is BlackBerry becoming a quiet infrastructure software play while the market still treats it like a legacy brand?
Is BlackBerry turning into a hidden infrastructure software play at sub-$5 levels?
Mentions
Deep in you’re heart you know its BB. - “BB bagholder”
This is true, but today we cannot expect AI related stocks to go up. And BB is consolidating well instead of just getting destroyed
Am i regarded or BB is strong af?
**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **BB** | $10.75 (above) | $10.57 | +1.7% | Jul 15, 2:23 PM |
L is an ethnicity BB is a Protected Characteristic and I am here for it 🥰
No fucking way, BB won't lie to keep U.S. involved in the Middle East...
US officials say BB’s intelligence of Iranian plot to kill 🥭 "was deemed not to be entirely credible," WSJ reports.
Definitely bullish on BB. Do your DD.
Might throw in 5-10k into BB. Its market cap seems freakishly low considering how well positioned they are.
Clearly people have not been following BB and are bot aware of what and how the company has been doing.
Not exactly, their secure comms business is actually earning them a decent amount of money. I'm pretty sure a similar amount to QNX at this point. Not to mention Canada just signed a deal with the Saudis where they'll be using $BB secure comms.
That’s not correct. What you seeing as a single user test is the marketing material. A telecom company employee calling from isolated location back to head office. This is marketing for standard person to understand. The MNO’s have been testing, improving and developing network connectivity on Bluebirds for 2 years. BB1-5 with BW3 is providing 120 minutes a day of testing time. Last year fairwinds technology tested ASTS sats for warfighter, military communication over secure channels. The military tests passed. This would not be a single user being tested for US army and Navy. This would be a complex military communication test scenario.
Physical AI’s infrastructure is just beginning to boom. BB, OUST, INDI
Hey BB long time no see! Weekend is here.
Peace Deal already signed and sealed , New bombings when? I wonder this weekend BB is the one who's gonna fack so bad.
BB and NOK are two sides of the same dogshit
if you haven't learned how to baghold you'll never succeed in this business. DB reverse curls to failure x3 DB shrugs to failure x4 BB RDL 10x3
mortgage debt more than doubled 2000-2006. wages didn't, and what wage rises we did get were dependent on mortgage debt taken https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1X2BB
The odds improve and very good gains can be achieved with Long Dated Options (AKA LEAPS) There are certain members of Congress (quite a few, actually) who buy deep in the money long term options [members of Congress have a clearly identifiable "meaningful edge"] With this strategy, you can still achieve ~3 to 5 times the percent gain versus buying the stock outright (but conversely, if the stock tanks you will suffer that sort of loss proportionately) INTC would be an example where stellar gains were achieved if purchased in '25 or early '26...MU, NOK, BB have also done well The current market offers many opportunities, but also quite a bit of 'chatter' and 'noise' If held for over 365 days, options are taxed as Long Term Gains, so that can help too (Be aware that if you exercise the options to buy the stock, your acquiring date resets to the time that you do so) NFA Just basic info to help make some decisions
Goodluck sir Am loaded to the tits with BB
Usual crap BB, NVDA, SLS….I am also using my sister money to buy that 💩
If BB hits 50 ill donate 1000 to charity
I’m not a greedy person all I want is: Micron at 2000 SNDK at 4000 BB at 50
$BB or $SOFI. You can only choose one.
What are the other 4? Guessing AMC, GME, BB, LULU?
The spread on BB’s options this morning was just silly
I have a good feeling about BB today
Nothing is better (worse!!) than the AMC or BB ones… holy copium, Batman!!!
I never learn the lesson with BB I keep holding even when is dumped 🤲
no I meant all r leveraged ETFs and Dram is etf so why BB is there lol
I have a healthy and diversified portfolio: DRAM MUU SNXX RAM BB
First ones free. Probably should have sold half. Since I didn't but BB calls. Its probably going to 50 bucks tomorrow. (Not financial advice)
Who's your supreme leader? BB? Kek
Lol patience is going to pay off with doge, Amc, GME , Spce, wen, BB, bynb. What else 🤣🤣🤣🤣
BB chart literally forming a wave
Wonder how likely it is BB convinces TACO to go all in this time? Or drags him kicking and screaming by pushing things.
Pump BB you fucking piece of shit my calls have been gushing blood for days idgaf anymore they expire Friday praying for one more parabolic pump
BB having the last laugh
Lmao and BB. Is that the regard trifecta?
Being a very smart individual, i will wait for the next 30+% pullback ob BB to buy. You see, buying at the top would be foolish.
What strike on BB? I need to do the same :)
Gonna sit on some BB and QBTS and sell the same calls over and over till it makes sense to exit And maybe buy a put on SPCX
If BB could turn green, I’d least have one stock green
Ok so can BB actually 10x? It feels crazy low at current market cap considering how many industry connections it has build up over decades that now seem to compound together.
Counterargument is my cost basis is low so i’n fine with BB dropping
We don't need semis anymore yet BB will be in infinite need?
BB & SLS saving my port lmao semi fucking me in the anoos
BB down 4%, DRAM down 9% and SPY down 1%
If BB pumps for no reason im gonna b so pissed
I keep forgetting to buy BB and it keeps going up. Semis will go to 0 while BB becomes a trillion dollar company.
BB I am still holding you…if not the moon please reach at least my balcony 🙏
Time for another “BB to the moon!!”
I am still holding BB….Be Belgium
LMAO B..BB.But the supply shortage
Any moves are in air conditioning for me, with Wen BB
Better to mention BB, although it's technically Canadian
The day i buy BB the bubble will pop. BB is the ultimate forbidden fruit.
BB holding strong unlike most other tech junk 😂
The newer seasons still also came to Netflix a full season at a time, and still got increasingly larger viewership though. More people saw BB on Netflix than on AMC, even in the later seasons.
Guys I am dead serious I need some crazy openers to recover the 2 last weeks trading bleedings QQQ 730-735 SNDK 2100 NBIS 245 RDDT 210 BB 14.5
BB and BULL will continue to pump…. After dumping
Boo, I need BULL & BB to pump
Im going with an easy and chill ford, BULL, and BB put
Your thesis just tells me you just got lucky. I bought these calls as BB wasn't a phone company and a vehicle software company instead. https://preview.redd.it/8rfs1ww0eebh1.png?width=661&format=png&auto=webp&s=f2650eb8a4b4981a43a9571979eb777e5cbf6957
$WEN does look very compelling. Same with $BB in my opinion.
**1.** “No broadband, the average user gets 0.1 to 1 Mbps.” Rigged denominator. You divide beam capacity by concurrently active users, not every possible user. DTC is intermittent supplemental coverage, someone in a dead zone making a call, not tens of thousands streaming at once in one beam. Every terrestrial network on Earth looks terrible under a simultaneous-worst-case denominator too. That scenario isn’t the service. The physics: throughput is Shannon-bound, and the driver is antenna gain. AST flies the largest commercial phased arrays ever built specifically to maximize gain to unmodified phones, which is why it closes a broadband link where small payloads close only a messaging link. And the proof is already public: \~98.9 Mbps demonstrated to an ordinary phone, plus voice and video calls across Rakuten, Vodafone, AT&T, and Verizon. The bear’s own worst case, one user in a beam, is exactly where AST shows broadband speed. **2.** “SpaceX targets 150 Mbps per user vs AST’s 200 per cell.” Three mismatches, each flattering SpaceX. Per-user vs per-cell manufactures a 1000x gap from mismatched units. Target vs demonstrated: 150 is a goal, not a result. MIMO vs non-MIMO: the 150 is a MIMO figure, while Starlink’s real-world DTC is non-MIMO at 2 to 3 Mbps (Musk claims \~5), and AST’s 98.9 is also non-MIMO. Match them, non-MIMO demonstrated to non-MIMO demonstrated, and it’s 98.9 versus 2 to 3, with MIMO headroom still in reserve. Correct all three and the conclusion flips. The strategy claim also misreads the model. AST sells through carriers, not to consumers against Starlink. Nobody picks “AST vs SpaceX,” they get satellite fill-in on their existing plan from whoever their carrier chose. And J-LEO just settled the sovereignty question where it counts: a G7 government picked AST over Starlink on exactly those grounds. Carriers and governments vote here, not shoppers. Same aperture physics, two consequences. Spectrum first. Low-band, sub-1 GHz, is the valuable stuff because long wavelengths penetrate buildings, terrain, and foliage where high bands get blocked. Serving it from orbit means forming tight, separated beams at low frequency, and beamwidth is set by aperture in wavelengths. At sub-1 GHz the wavelengths are long, so you need an enormous array to keep beams tight and non-interfering. SpaceX’s small payloads can’t: at low frequency their beams go broad and overlap, which locks them out of low-band and pushes them to higher bands that penetrate poorly. AST’s arrays are large enough to do it. Power second. Those same loose beams spill energy off-target, raising interference into terrestrial networks, and regulators cap interference. So SpaceX has to run reduced power to stay under the limit, which cuts throughput and coverage. It’s in the record: they petitioned the FCC for higher interference allowances and got a partial waiver, more than baseline but well short of what they asked for, and they operate under that ceiling. AST’s tight beams concentrate energy on target, so it runs full power without breaching the limit. So the aperture “cost” is actually two structural advantages a small-sat design can’t copy: AST uses the penetrating spectrum SpaceX can’t, and runs full power where SpaceX throttles. This isn’t abstract. J-LEO is a 700 MHz low-band program, which is why it fits AST and not Starlink. The low-band physics and the sovereignty win are the same fact. **4.** “They keep delaying, a delay is a delay.” Conceded: guidance has slipped about half a year, and that’s a fair knock at this market cap. But the cause decides the meaning. The delays are launch-driven, and the Blue Origin New Glenn failure is a launch-provider problem, not AST failing to build. Production is at BB37. The bottleneck is orbit access, not manufacturing, which is a very different thing from “the tech doesn’t work.” And the standard is applied selectively. SpaceX’s next-gen DTC has slipped hard and depends on Starship, which has its own public failures, so AST is arguably less exposed to an unproven vehicle than its main rival. RKLB’s Neutron has slipped repeatedly and takes none of this heat. Applied evenly, “no excuses” hits both harder than AST. And near-term it barely matters: upper-hemisphere coverage needs 45 to 60 satellites, production is at BB37, so that milestone lands even on the slipped timeline with years of room before J-LEO’s 2029 deadline. The delays hit the global ramp, not the coverage milestone the J-LEO award rests on. **5.** “Dilution is imminent, could reverse to sub-$20.” The balance sheet kills the framing. Cash north of $3 billion (about $3.5B at the last call, $3B being conservative), plus roughly $1 billion incoming from RAST to offset build costs. That’s not a company forced into an emergency raise, and the subsidy cuts net capex, so it means less dilution to build, not more. Conceded narrowly: capital-heavy firms raise over a long build, and some dilution should be modeled. But “imminent dilution, could crater to $20” describes a distressed, runway-short company, and $3B-plus in cash with $1B of subsidy incoming is the opposite. Dilution to fund a government-co-funded revenue asset from that position is not a desperate raise. And “a seller held it down for months” is just Rakuten’s orderly, pre-planned 10b5-1 sale, disclosed mechanical overhang, not proof the stock is controllable or the business weak. Volatility and a retail base are real. “Drops for no reason” is a claim about sentiment, not value. **6.** “Maxed-out satellites, one-trick pony, can’t improve.” Wrong on the facts. Block 2 BlueBirds are explicitly larger and higher-capacity, so the size ceiling is wrong for the roadmap. And improvement was never only about size: array design, beamforming, and spectrum efficiency all scale capacity, and AST’s onboard-processing roadmap targets roughly 2x spectral efficiency with no size change. “One-trick pony” cuts less than it sounds. AST is concentrated on the largest addressable market in wireless, direct-to-device for billions of existing phones, and focus on a huge TAM is a strategy, not a flaw. It’s also not single-product: the same constellation feeds defense and dual-use, IoT, and first-responder verticals. RKLB’s rockets and panels are real diversification, into smaller-TAM, different-margin businesses, so “diversified vs not” isn’t automatically a verdict either way. Different bets. **7.** The point the whole case misses: AST lets carriers kill money-losing towers. The “but can it stream video” framing misreads why carriers want AST. In many markets, operators are required to keep coverage in unprofitable rural and remote areas, running loss-making towers to meet the obligation. AST lets them meet it from space and retire the tower, turning a cost center into a satellite-served zone. That’s an opex and capex cut on top of new revenue, and it has nothing to do with per-user speed. It’s a core reason carriers sign, and part of why AST has demonstrated across Rakuten, Vodafone, AT&T, and Verizon. The bear grades AST as a consumer ISP. Its real customer is the carrier’s balance sheet. Bottom line. Points 4 and 5 are real risks worth modeling: execution timing and eventual dilution. The rest is the misinformation, the per-cell denominator trick, a SpaceX comparison that inverts once you match units, targets, and MIMO, the low-band and interference physics the bear skips, and roadmap errors. And the whole “must win consumer broadband or die” premise ignores that AST’s actual business, carrier obligation relief plus sovereign infrastructure like J-LEO, never depended on winning a streaming contest.
GOOGL RR ASTS / NOK (both even) Kioxia was my biggest but trimmed as it ran up way too fast so I could feel a correction was coming. Recently dumped my BB for NOK earnings play, will hopefully not tank & I'll rotate profits into building more Kioxia / ASTS
Same kind of comments I got coming on here talking about POET and BB when they were half the MC they are now.
People made fun of me buying POET and BB in the $5-6 zone. We'll see how this one works out over the next few months.
BB…has been on a run. Might give them a look.
We used to use the Blackberry app suite at the company I work for. It was the worst software ever. Wasted so much time. Finally switched to all Microsoft and it is 100 times better. Assume other companies are doing this as well. Not good for BB revenue. Honestly cant believe BB is still alive as a company, they had keyboard phones for email in early 2000s and have been going downhill ever since. Probably one of the worst stocks you could buy right now. They will have zero relevance in AI and this attempt to squeeze some juice out of AI hype is pathetic.
Lately BB carrying my port: I’m tired grandpa
BB next 10 bagger, join us fellas
Why is BB going this retarded?
I want to buy more BB calls, but I’m not finding any pullbacks lol
BB is up. Easy money