DEA

Rrrrandle

He can't reschedule anything by executive order. That's not how it works. The DEA started the process for changing the regulations to reschedule under Biden. There's a process that they have to follow to change federal regulations. The only other way to reschedule without going through the rulemaking process is for Congress to do it.

greatthebob38

Schedule 3 still means it still needs a prescription. You can mass produce it sure but under DEA guidelines and documentation. Therefore, police can still jail people for "abusing" it without a prescription. Decriminalizing and legalizing gets rid of any guidelines or restrictions.

GeoLogic23

He can't change a drug schedule through an Executive Order. This Executive Order would just be directing the DEA to finalize the HHS review. If they didn't already have an HHS recommendation on their desk, he couldn't be doing an Executive Order to make cannabis Schedule 3. Executive Orders are just directives to take certain actions. You can't direct them to take actions they don't have the ability to do.

Cool_Ad_5101

Old yeller style. I am obviously ecstatic that s3 is coming but it’s sickening to me what the DEA did to obstruct, what desantis did to obstruct and all the other big money did to obstruct. I hope they all get charged 

Fergizzo

I actually had this tlhougt recently too. Maybe it keeps the DEA happy if they replace the budget for weed related stuff to something else like fent instead of just eliminating those jobs/budget entirely

Business_Knee6165

I'm not an expert on the matter, but I think that all an EO can do is instruct other parties (DEA/DOJ) to finalize this. So, even at best case scenario, if there is an EO, I think that's all it's going to be; telling someone else to get it done, whether it's congress or some other entity. I hope I'm wrong and what is said or signed will have explicit instruction on what is going to happen and how, but that's not what I'm expecting.

ivigilanteblog

> I could very much see a scenario where the EO is “I’m forcing congress to look at this”  He can't *force* Congress to do much of anything, but this is sort of what I'm hoping for. Our best-case scenario, which is incredibly unrealistic IMO, is just a direct order to the AG to deschedule cannabis, permitting time for Congress to update related laws and the FDA to issue regulations. The stocks will go absolutely nuts if this happens, because nobody expects it. Our best-case *realistic* scenario is basically what you said: an executive order to reschedule to S3 and a statement that he either wants Congress to look into descheduling/legalizing, or a statement that he is forming a descheduling commission of sorts to propose rules for that purpose. I give this decent odds, but I'm not confident he'll take it this far. Our most realistic scenario is that he will just order the AG to continue the process of rescheduling to S3, bypassing the DEA process (which is *not* mandatory, since Congress delegated the authority to schedule drugs to the AG; they have just traditionally deferred to DEA and, more recently, the combined recommendations of HHS and DEA). Our worst-case scenario, other than absolutely nothing occurring, is an order that does something like reschedule to S2. We'd likely crash as a result.

ripandtear4444

I don't think anyone disagrees that Trump or other politicians can get something passed or started with "a nod" to the people they've hired for certain positions. I'd be willing to bet Trump could get things rolling without an executive order. Also, it's not a matter of criminality (to the criminal) per se. It's about rescheduling allowing weed companies to access banking, massively reduce thier effective tax rate, and uplist to major exchanges. This simple rescheduling would allow all of those things, which would undoubtedly spur massive growth. The only trap would be if it never happens. It could be in 1 year, it could be in 5 years. The DEA has rescheduled drugs many times, without any executive order.

IllCamel5907

This makes the democrats look so impotent. Letting the DEA (with SAM's help) intentionally bog down the rescheduling process was so fucking pathetic. Trump is obviously (to me at least) a corrupt, piece of shit person, but (right or wrong) the guy gets shit done, makes things happen. I can understand that is part of the appeal of the guy with his supporters. Can our next president also be a man of action, but without the embarrassing and obviously corrupt behavior? Please?

GeoLogic23

Dude, Trump is just signing off on Biden's HHS review that started in late 2022. So it did happen three years ago. The only reason what Trump is doing is possible is because of what Biden already did during the second half of his term. If Biden hadn't already done the review we wouldn't be talking about Schedule 3 at all. We'd have no idea what Schedule. But since his administration put in the work we have an HHS recommendation for Schedule 3 sitting on the DEA desk. Trump is just saying "hey sign off on that". Could Biden have forced the DEA to sign off on it immediately? Probably. Though that's a terrible idea to have the President do that. Who knows if we could get a President that is for prohibition. This is all Executive Branch stuff though. The issues in Congress are a separate discussion. But Biden, for all his faults, is literally the only person to have taken concrete action on cannabis by getting us the Schedule 3 recommendation. Credit to Trump if he signs off on it, but he's taking credit for the Biden admin's work.

UsedState7381

No. Not at all here. Democrats completely fuck themselves up (again) by not pressing the DEA to get this done under Biden, and Biden/Kamala are to be blamed.

No_Love_Gained

>If he had never won last November, we wouldn't have dumped so hard, and probably half a dozen companies would still be alive today. Ideally, Biden should have gotten his administration to get this over the finish line before the election. His DEA chief played hard ball in collusion with prohibisionts and let this slide. So Dems had their chance and failed due to pandering. Note- I am not a Trump supporter.

BridgeShoddy

Theres still more to that process, youre right u can ask gpt timing and process. DEA issues final rule announcing Schedule III placement. Effective date is usually specified 30–90 days after the final rule’s publication. Realistically, from order to legal change could take several months to a year or more. Administrative rulemaking isn’t instantaneous even when agencies are directed to act.

youngbutgood

Because you have to put pressure on the DEA, otherwise they won't act against their own self interest. Fire Anne and make something happen rather than sit back like a 82 year old corpse. Trump might be a boisterous buffoon but at least people follow his orders because they know there will be consequences

SixSmegmaGoonBelt

He's going to direct the DEA to move on medical MMJ. Puts.

SwordfishOk504

Yep. People seem to think he's going to issue an EO to reschedule, but what has been said is he's considering an EO to push the DEA to hurry up and make a decision.

SwordfishOk504

The key difference is Schumer never had the votes to get SAFE passed. His promise was idiotic because he knew he didn't have the leverage to make it happen. And while Trump could be lying, he isn't constrained by the same hurdles because he's not trying to pass legislation in Congress. He's just talking about (maybe) issuing an executive order to kick the DEA's rescheduling review in the butt a bit.

ok_computer

The US military, CIA and DEA bomb with impunity. I do not think the active duty people carrying out the orders will need to answer to them. And I personally disagree with these actions but think the onus should lie with the most senior person giving the order.

1_FCKTRD

As the leader of the U.S. federal government's executive branch, President Trump controls the branch's narrative surrounding marijuana rescheduling through his appointments to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). I understand that everyone, myself included, suffers from PTSD when it comes to any type of marijuana legislation. Ten years is a long time to wait for common-sense legislation. The following timeline details the executive branch's involvement in the reclassification of marijuana. On October 6, 2022, President Biden directed federal agencies to "expedite the review" of marijuana's classification. On August 29, 2023, the director of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) made a formal recommendation to reclassify marijuana. On March 15, 2024, Vice President Kamala Harris hosted a White House roundtable discussion on marijuana with Fat Joe, during which she questioned why the DEA Director was taking so long to publish. On May 21, 2024, the Department of Justice published the proposed rule in the Federal Register, opening a public comment period that ended in July 2024. On December 2, 2024, the preliminary administrative hearing for the proposed rescheduling of marijuana was held. On January 21, 2025, the evidentiary hearings were canceled pending an interlocutory appeal. The appeal arose from allegations that the DEA was biased and communicated improperly with those opposed to rescheduling. On August 1, 2025, Judge Mulroney retired, leaving the DEA without an administrative law judge to preside over the case. On August 11, 2025, President Trump said his administration was looking into the matter and would have an update in a few weeks. On September 28, 2025, President Trump posted a video declaring CBD a "game-changer" that could revolutionize senior healthcare by alleviating pain, promoting better sleep, and reducing stress. On December 15, 2025, President Trump announced that he was strongly considering rescheduling marijuana. On ........... you fill in the blanks.

GeoLogic23

Democrats are the only reason there is anything for Trump to direct the DEA to finalize... Trump would just be directing them to sign off on the work done by Biden's HHS because of Biden's executive order. Trump again doing no work, and taking the credit. With comments like yours helping his PR. We have more than just Schedule 3 we need. We need Congress to do several things. Ignoring who has gotten us to where we are will just set us up to be taken advantage of in the future. Congressional Republicans have been openly hostile to high dose cannabis products.

AssistanceChance5454

Remember about a year ago when there were actual DEA court proceedings happening that stalled? Remember back in August when Trump came out and said there would be a Schedule 3 decision “in the next few weeks”? Be prepared for whatever but temper expectations. You see some wild stuff posted around here during hype cycles.

Cool_Ad_5101

True but they can make the argument that it should have been terminated on her recommendation and because the DEA we’re corrupt ass hate they delayed the process with Ill intentions to actually stop it 

Cool_Ad_5101

That’s why I am here for. Not interested in break even. The opportunity cost has been a wealth destroying factor here. The political and DEA shenanigans have been Strong. The anti movement is fighting tooth and nail to stop thisS it’s frigging exhausting. They need to be taken out to the wood shed  

Gambelero

Not sure there will be an executive order. All he needs to say is “I directed the DOJ and DEA to restart the process of moving cannabis to schedule III.” He can do that with a post on Truth Social, announce it during a briefing, or even just say it during one of the daily press gaggles.

BasedBasophil

Yeah it’s irritating and honestly corrupt, par for the course with Trump- use power to grift and make money. Clearly weed should be schedule III, that ruling has been delayed by the DEA for some time now. All they have to do is leak news that the ruling is coming- big spike up by insider buying while retail can’t do anything. Then they just hold off on giving the official word, and a sell off happens. But only they know when the actual verdict is coming. As opposed to just making the shit happen, official schedule III, companies taxed fairly, uplisting to exchanges. Then we could invest based on more predictable long term fundamentals rather than being at the whims of a pump and dump. It’s rigged.

ProjectMagnet

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, shame on Todd Harrison. Fool me four times, shame on Dan Ahrens. Fool me five times, shame on Jason Spatafora. Fool me six times shame on Bruiser. Fool me seven times, shame on Motley Fool. Fool me eight times, shame on Schumer. Fool me nine times, shame on the perennial NDAA rumours. Fool me ten times, shame on Booker laying himself down. Fool me eleven times, shame on Mitch McConnell. Fool me twelve times, shame on Greasy Kevin Sabet. Fool me thirteen times, shame on Snead's Linkedin Posts. Fool me fourteen times, shame on Biden. Fool me fifteen times, shame on Harris. Fool me sixteen times, shame on the DEA. Fool me seventeen times, shame on TDR and old youtube videos. Fool me eighteen times, shame on Doug Kass. Fool me nineteen times, shame on the Orange One. Fool me twenty times, shame on me.

UnclePsilocybe

Some of them pay an upwards of 70% in taxes. They also can't write off hardly any business expenses. Profitability would be immensely helped by S3 and removal of 280E. Pam Bondi has the authority as US AG to reschedule. Historically the AG deferred the decision to the DEA, who said no. I'm interested in the language of the EO. If Trump directs the AG to reschedule then I think it has a good shot. If I read some BS like, "Begin the process of evaluating S3 status" then it ain't going nowhere. 

MoonManBigFish

Our Father, Hail Mary, and Glory Be TLRY, VFF, CGC Short squeeze of a lifetime! Trump to sign executive order as soon as Monday to change cannabis from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3 Relief from Federal Tax Burden (IRC Section 280E) This is one of the most immediate and significant changes for state-legal cannabis businesses: • Tax Deduction: Moving to Schedule III would lift Internal Revenue Code Section 280E, which currently prevents businesses dealing in Schedule I or II substances from deducting standard operating expenses (like rent, payroll, and utilities) on their federal taxes.  • Financial Benefit: This change would dramatically lower the effective federal tax rate for many cannabis operators, potentially increasing their profit margins by a substantial amount (some estimates suggest a 70-90% increase in the bottom line). This relief could help state-legal businesses better compete with the illicit market.  2. Boost to Medical Research Rescheduling would likely simplify and encourage scientific study of cannabis:  • Reduced Requirements: Research on Schedule III substances is generally subject to less burdensome requirements from the DEA compared to Schedule I substances, making it easier for scientists to obtain and study cannabis.  • Medical Acceptance: The move officially acknowledges that cannabis has a currently accepted medical use and is less dangerous than Schedule I substances (which include heroin and LSD).  3. Impact on Healthcare and Stigma • Prescribing: While rescheduling doesn't automatically approve cannabis as a federal medicine, it could make it more practical for mainstream physicians to prescribe cannabis products, especially in states with medical marijuana programs.  • Reduced Stigma: It could help reduce the stigma faced by medical cannabis patients in areas like child custody cases, employment, and access to housing or medical treatments.  4. Criminal Justice and Legal Status (Limited Change) It is crucial to understand what the change would not do: • Still Federally Illegal: Reclassification would not federally legalize cannabis for recreational or general medical use. Cannabis would remain a federally controlled substance, meaning its unauthorized manufacture, distribution, and possession would still be illegal under the Controlled Substances Act.  • Federal Prosecution: Federal criminal penalties for Schedule III substances can be less severe than for Schedule I, but the core issue of state-legal cannabis businesses violating federal law remains. State and local marijuana laws would not be preempted.  5. Potential Industry Changes • Banking Access: While not a complete fix, the shift could encourage more banks and financial institutions to work with cannabis businesses, potentially improving access to financial services.

SwordfishOk504

I think people expecting it this coming week may be disappointed. While CNBC ran an article that said "as soon as Monday", the original WaPo article gave no indication of timeline and Axios reported it would be sometime next year. Also worth remember: The president cannot just wave his magical wand and make it rescheduled (or legal). What he is expected to do (and all he can do) is issue an executive order that directs federal agencies to pursue reclassification. This would be aimed at the DEA which is the agency that has been holding this process up since 2023 after HHS already approved it. If he issues this EO this would be huge news but would not actually change anything until if and when the DEA follows said order. So while markets will rally at said news, it won't actually benefit the sector for some times after. Which means, imo, that the time to take profits would be fairly soon (days) after that news while all the normies else jumps in after the news.

DeltaTule

I disagree. They have previously supplied DEA. DEA will have to approve S3 research companies and their vendors. TLRY is the clear choice. They also own a shit ton of beverage companies in the US amongst other companies in the US. Their reverse split has really made their float minuscule though and the timing couldn’t have been better. It will rocket

Cool_Ad_5101

The DEA was stalling and we found out illegally delaying the rescheduling. Biden at that point could have stated go to a final rule NOW. He didn’t do that. It was a mistake and the democrats are going to get the issue stolen away from them. Rightfully or wrongly not everyone is as educated about cannabis as people on this board. They will see it as a republican win 

Many_Easy

**A PROMISE RING TOMORROW** We’re at the hint (rumour) stage expecting a promise ring (EO) on Monday per some media reports. We want to get to the marriage (S3 finalized). Only then can we take that fancy honeymoon. The ring arrived in a velvet box, soft and impressive, catching the light just enough to make everyone lean in. When the President held it up, cameras flashed. “This,” he said as he slid it onto the finger of the nation, “is a promise.” It was a beautiful ring. Inside were careful words like intent, direction, and hope. It did not change anyone’s last name. It did not move any furniture or unlock new doors. But it meant something. It said, “I’m serious about where this is going.” That ring was the EO to reschedule cannabis. But long before the ring showed up, there were hints. There were longer conversations than usual. Questions that felt a little more personal. And then, almost casually, plans for a vacation to Paris. Paris was not the wedding. Everyone understood that. But Paris was romantic. It was symbolic. It was the kind of place you plan to go when you are thinking about a future together. Friends heard about the trip and started whispering, “Something is coming.” Those vacation plans felt a lot like the early signals. Requests for agencies to take another look. Public statements about fairness. Acknowledgments that maybe the stigma and old labels no longer fit. Nothing official. Nothing binding. Just enough to suggest intention. People said, “You do not plan a trip to Paris unless you are thinking about a ring.” There were prior trips with hints, but no promise ring. And then the promise ring arrived. For decades, cannabis had been treated like an unsuitable partner. Kept at a distance. Talked about in hushed tones. Locked out of respectable spaces and opposed by the GOP. Scientists said they could not properly study it. Businesses said they believed in it but could not fully commit. Veterans and patients said it helped them, yet the law refused to listen. So when the ring appeared, people celebrated. Some cried. Some announced it like an engagement. “This is it,” they said. “Things are finally changing.” And in a way, they were. The ring told everyone to start preparing. Agencies were asked to take the issue seriously. The conversation shifted from if to when. Family members who once refused to acknowledge the relationship began to tolerate it, even if they were not fully comfortable yet. But everyday life mostly stayed the same. Cannabis was still treated cautiously. Banks still hesitated. Researchers still needed extra permission. People were still arrested under old rules and judged by old assumptions. Private prison stocks continued to soar. Because a promise ring, no matter how meaningful, is not an engagement ring or a wedding. The real marriage would only happen when the people with the legal authority, the DEA or Congress, stood up and said the words that actually change lives. **“This is official.”** That moment would not come with romance. It would come with paperwork and technical language. But suddenly everything would be different. Doors would open. Restrictions would ease. Cannabis would no longer be treated like a dangerous secret, but like a recognized part of society. Until then, the ring stayed on the finger. Visible. Symbolic. Encouraging, but incomplete. It was a reminder that intention is not the same as transformation. Planning a trip to Paris is not a proposal. A promise ring is not a marriage. And while the EO said, “I want a future with you,” only real rescheduling by the DEA or Congress could finally say, “You belong here.”

Methodill

The image you sent appears to be a screenshot of a Reddit post, likely from the r/pennystocks subreddit, discussing a potential executive order (EO) related to marijuana rescheduling and CBD coverage, speculating on its impact on the "Cannabis-Industrial Complex." As of today, December 14, 2025, here is an assessment of the key claims mentioned in the post: 🔍 Marijuana Rescheduling Status The claim that "Trump marijuana rescheduling" is expected "Monday" or that he will "sign this EO" is highly speculative and based on rumors unless a specific official announcement has been made very recently, which is not confirmed as a fact. * The Process: Marijuana rescheduling is a complex, multi-agency process, not typically decided by a single Executive Order (EO) from the President alone. * In 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recommended that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). * The DEA is the final authority to decide whether to reschedule the drug after reviewing the HHS recommendation and conducting its own scientific and legal review. This process is time-consuming and its exact timeline is unknown. * The Claim: A post suggesting a market-moving event like this is set to happen on a specific "Monday" without citing a reliable source should be treated as speculation, especially when posted on a penny stock forum, which is known for hype. 🌿 CBD Coverage The post also mentions "CBD coverage." * CBD Status: Cannabidiol (CBD) derived from hemp (cannabis with less than 0.3\% THC) was federally legalized under the 2018 Farm Bill. * Coverage: However, there is still significant regulatory uncertainty regarding CBD's use in food, beverages, and dietary supplements, as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not fully established a clear regulatory pathway. "Coverage" (likely referring to insurance or broader market acceptance) would be indirectly affected by the FDA's eventual actions, which are separate from the DEA's rescheduling process. 💼 Impact on the Cannabis Industry The post claims this action would "set in motion a cascade of follow-on catalysts." * Rescheduling Impact: Moving marijuana to Schedule III would be a massive change. * It would mainly impact taxation, making cannabis businesses eligible for normal business tax deductions (as they would no longer be subject to the IRS's Section 280E rule). This would significantly boost profitability. * It would also reduce some federal penalties and potentially open the door for more scientific research. * Profitability Barrier: The post correctly identifies that legislative/regulatory uncertainty (especially regarding interstate commerce, banking, and 280E taxation) has been a primary barrier to industry profitability. Rescheduling to Schedule III would solve the tax issue, which is a major profitability hurdle. 🎯 Conclusion The core claim that marijuana rescheduling would be a "HUGE symbolic effect" that addresses the industry's "primary barrier to growth and profitability" (280E taxes) is analytically sound. However, the specific timeframe and the notion of a President signing a definitive "EO" to complete the rescheduling on a given day are unverified and highly suspect hype. In summary, treat the post as: * True on the premise: Rescheduling to Schedule III would be a massive positive catalyst for the industry. * False/Unverified on the specifics: There is no confirmed, reliable information that a final rescheduling EO will be signed on "Monday" or that the process is complete. Would you like me to look up any official statements or news from the DEA regarding the status of marijuana rescheduling?

Ok-Replacement9595

I said DEA director can make the final rule, or the AG. Then by statute the recvomendation heads to congress for hearings (but honestly i havent read the statutes for years). The president, in any rational administration has no role. But half the country assumes this is a monarchy and long for tyrannical retribution on the rest of us for their idiocy.

Cool_Ad_5101

He’s definitely going to steal it from the dems. And if he tells the DEA to go to final rule. Many People are going to say why the duck couldn’t the dems do that. Another poster put because Bidens handles or big money whatever didn’t want it to happen. Shame on the dems for allowing the republicans to steal the issue. That 11th hour Kamala elect me and I will legalize cannabis was too late

Otherwise_Answer_146

That is incorrect. DEA has the authority to reschedule. Those little ladies bow down to Trump. We are literally at the whim of the Grifter in Chief. My money is on reschedule via the will of President DumDum.

MatrixOrigin

Absolute shit show. Abolish the DEA ffs!

Ok-Replacement9595

Unfortunately congress is needed for rescheduling. They need to be on board at least. The CSA is law, and only congress can change law. The DEA can make their final rule, but if the evangelicals in congress have an aneurysm, they have the ability to bar action, to slow the process with congressional hearings (as per the wording of the CSA).

four_twenty_4_20

Biden allowed the corrupt DEA to stall until the election hoping Republicans would cancel it.

Unlucky-Reporter-709

It's so frustrating, and tons of MAGAtards are going to come out and say ""See?? Trump did it and Biden lied and failed!" Despite the fact that Biden started this process, the DEA dragged its feet on the process, and then Trump came in and further delayed the process and now, is finally going to issue an order for it to be done? Even though the President isn't even supposed to direct these agencies to act, only recommend actions like Biden did.

randomusername0000

EO can instruct the DEA to finish the job. So basically can do it indirectly with an EO. Hoping for the sprinkles on the ice cream as well though.

Tiaan

What is the warning sign exactly? Do you really believe this is at all similar to what happened under Biden, where the DEA ran the show independently? You really think Trump will allow his DEA head or Attorney General to go against his directive? The people in these positions are Trump sycophants. I don't know if the executive order will come next week, but it sounds like it will happen before the end of January.

yea-uhuh

"good for Mom & Pop farming" narrative needs to stop. Ma & Pa can't even get a state license to grow. Ma & Pa wont be applying for FDA approvals, nor opening a DEA-compliant mail-order weed pharmacy.

rockum

An EO isn't needed to order the DEA head and AG to issue a final rule. Whats weird is that the meeting he had on Wednesday didn't include the DEA or AG. From the newsweek article: > Per the outlet, Trump discussed the plan on Wednesday with House Speaker Mike Johnson, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services chief Mehmet Oz, as well as marijuana industry leaders, over the phone from the Oval Office. This whole thing is kinda weird which is one reason I've been skeptical.

GeoLogic23

No he can't. This would just be directing the DEA to sign off on the HHS review. Trump can't just sign an EO and change the the schedule of a drug to whatever he wants. Why bother having Congress deal with Fentanyl scheduling if Trump could have just signed an EO and taken the credit?

GeoLogic23

This would just be directing the DEA to sign off on the long process that was completed forever ago. Trump can't just reschedule a drug by executive order. If Biden hadn't had them do the work already, Trump would only be able to direct them to start the process.

Tiaan

If Trump issues the EO Monday ordering his DEA head and AG to issue the final rule, it will confirm that the intentions of his administration are to reschedule cannabis. That in itself will dispel a lot of the FUD surrounding this issue imo The question would then become "when do DOJ/DEA actually issue the final rule?" IMO this part could happen months later, likely by summer 2026. I'd expect we retrace some in between the EO and the final rule actually getting issued

SwordfishOk504

not a fact at all lol. The Biden administration began the formal administrative process to potentially reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in October 2022. That process is not something the WH controls. It was with the DEA. Cry all you want, *those* are the facts. Your dumb partisan games have no bearing on the realities of the market.

Many_Easy

You’re likely correct. Also remember that most of us thought (as in fact) that an HHS recommendation meant a quick rubber stamp by the DEA according to existing laws.

four_twenty_4_20

I expect it's going to be an EO that's for show, where he directs the DEA or whoever to move it from S1 to S3.

WollopDollop

He'd not be rescheduling via EO, he'd be directing DOJ/DEA to terminate the hearing and move to final rule. At least that's the more appropriate route to go. Then it will be challenged legally (SAM, etc.) as to whether the CSA allows for the hearing to be canceled. That's debatable and there are admin lawyers who think it's OK to do so, especially given the circumstances and record established. I agree while this is challenged there may be enough of a push for Congress to just get it done, though Johnson trying to talk Trump out of it isn't a great signal. Then again, maybe Johnson is privately telling Trump they are war crimin' it up while he publicly supports a second strike on stranded survivors. Politics baby!

nassau_rip

This is not at all accurate. His eo will be directing the ag and head of DEA to do it, which they will. Congress has no part in it

Cool_Ad_5101

The DEA being crooked and slow playing it is real and corrupt. They can make a case on that. This should have been completed decades ago 2023

Tiaan

There's a lot of confusion around this. The president cannot reschedule by EO directly. The people with legal power to reschedule via the administrative rescheduling process are the DEA head and Attorney General. They both work for the president. The EO will be directing the DEA head and AG to issue a final rule for the currently ongoing rescheduling process that began under Biden back in 2022. The only reason why Trump is able to do this now is because Biden started the process and did 95% of the work for him already It is not flimsy, and there will not be an issue of "future presidents issuing EOs to reverse this" as again, they cannot issue an EO to directly change the scheduling. The only way future presidents change change rescheduling is by ordering a new rescheduling process to begin, which would restart the process that took 4+ years under Biden from scratch.

SiriusBlackLives

I’m interpreting it as the EO will be directing the DEA to complete the rescheduling process.

Gambelero

The executive order won’t be rescheduling, itself. It will direct the DEA to.finish the process of making its proposed rule final. I saw early summer as the expected date for the rule to actually take effect. At a minimum it will mean no 280e taxes for 2026.for our stocks. That, in and of itself, will be huge for our stocks and there will be new positive momentum every time another milestone is passed along the way. Uplisting won’t automatically go into effect, but I’ve never thought that mattered much. It’s 280e, not listing issues, that have kept the Canadian companies out of the U.S. Those with U.S. aspirations will delist fron NASDAQ and move ahead with those plans. Outside of VFF and a couple others, I don’t see Canadian companies coming in and outcompeting Trulieve and Green Thumb in the markets they dominate. And no one is making much in the hyper-competitive states.

Ok-Replacement9595

Well. He can order IRS to stop collecting 280e while ordering S3, but there is still work that DEA has to do. And possibly congressional buy in that has yo happen, but this lickspittles will do whatever Trump says.

Tiaan

Well technically the actual rescheduling will have been a 4+ year long administrative process backed by a 252 page HHS report. This EO is just Trump telling his DEA head and AG to issue the final rule and complete the process

scwt

The Controlled Substances Act gives the DEA the power to re-schedule drugs. The DEA is an executive agency. He can't directly re-schedule anything, but he can direct the DEA to.

Tiaan

Allow me to clarify - presidents cannot issue EOs to reschedule a drug directly. Biden started the currently ongoing process to reschedule cannabis from 1->3 when he issued his EO ordering his departments to look into how it was scheduled back in 2022. That same rescheduling process has been slowly working its way through the administrative channels and has since gotten stuck at the DEA who was against rescheduling under Biden. At this point in the process, all that's left to do is for the DEA head or AG to issue a final rule and then rescheduling is finalized. Trump's executive order on this is going to order his DEA head or AG to finalize the rescheduling that has been ongoing and that's why another president can't just come along and issue an EO to reverse it, because they would need to redo the multi-year long rescheduling process to change it after it gets rescheduled

TheoryInttro

Ni, it's because the DEA says their role is negligible.

JLeeSaxon

The person you're replying to is complaining specifically about the risk of the legal status changing or changing back at a moment's notice by executive order. Biden ordering the DEA to begin the studying process of rescheduling via the *proper procedures* has nothing to do with that.

AverageNo130

No S3 heads will roll, imo. The Prez expects results, not endless DEA bs.

AverageNo130

This is an order. I expect the DEA to get off their asses and approve S3, imo.

teaanimesquare

I don't think a EO is going to be used, pretty sure the DEA can if instructed to.

SinStockGuy

Because the DEA needs to justify it's existence.

GeoLogic23

I'm just telling you what someone reading your comment sees. That's the important thing when you post in a public forum. What someone sees in your comment is obvious praise for the President doing the "wrong thing" like it's the only way to get results. And acting like only "old school" people would follow procedures. You are applying motive to my commenting lol I think you understand the process enough to not join in on the mindless "Trump get stuff done!" commenting that we will be seeing tomorrow. If anything even actually happens. The proper thing to do if he wanted to "force" the DEA to act on an obvious policy move would be to do it in background, because it's not something the President should be inserting himself into publicly. I just hate seeing people specifically praising the "wrong way" of doing things, and acting like following proper procedures is "old school". Most of the parts of our government that do still function only do so because of all these "old school" procedures they took decades to put in place. The GOP is doing a lot of work to convince people that a strong authoritarian Executive Branch is the only way to get things done. I don't think you want to contribute to that effort. Have a good night.

no-snoots-unbooped

Biden initiated rescheduling in October 2022. HHS agrees with the Biden administration’s recommendation, and it’s up to the DEA for final approval. The DEA has just say on it since there’s no deadline.

no-snoots-unbooped

Biden initiated it in October of 2022. HHS approved the recommendation to reschedule and sent it to the DEA who has final approval. The DEA has sat on it since.

GeoLogic23

You don't read your comment as a praise for the "wrong way" over the "right way"? Because that's certainly how it reads to me. And you are again praising Trump being willing to do the "wrong thing" by pushing the DEA. Sure I suppose Biden could have ordered them to finish. But Trump's DEA has had this almost as long as Biden's DEA had it. If Trump orders it now it's because he or someone close to him is making money on it. This term has been open and blatant pay-for-play. But besides that, I am not celebrating the President personally ordering a drug through a review process. Whether I agree with this particular drug, whether it helps my wallet, or whether I think the DEA should've already had it done (obviously yes), I absolutely don't think the President should be personally making decisions on what drugs are in what classification. Incoming recreational horse de-wormer! Incoming Schedule 1 women's reproductive medicine! I'm happy to make money off random after-hours announcements of possible executive orders. But the "right way" would be bills working their way through Congress, and us having weeks or months to assess the language and how it impacts our investments before it finally becoming law. I'm so sick of being governed by rumors and tweets and the whims of Trump. If people keep praising him when he does stuff the "wrong way" then Congress will never have any incentive to reclaim their authority. And that is our only chance to have a functioning government again.

King_Chron

**📊 280E Tax Relief – Cannabis MSO Estimates (Rescheduling → Schedule III)** Rescheduling could remove 280E, letting companies deduct normal expenses. Analyst research (Zuanic, Water Tower, Whitney) shows potential annual savings: |Company|2025 Revenue|Est. 280E Savings| |:-|:-|:-| |Curaleaf (CURLF)|$1.3–1.5B|$150–200M| |Trulieve (TCNNF)|$1.1–1.3B|$120–180M| |Green Thumb (GTBIF)|$1.0–1.2B|$100–150M| |Verano (VRNOF)|$900–1,000M|$80–120M| |Cresco (CRLBF)|$800–900M|$70–100M| |Jushi (JUSHF)|$250–500M|Up to \~$514M| |Cannabist / Columbia Care|$300–360M|$35–50M| |Planet 13 (PLNHF)|$95–110M|$9–15M| |MariMed (MRMD)|$150–180M|$15–25M| **Takeaways:** * Total U.S. MSO tax savings could reach **$2–3B+ annually**. * Largest absolute beneficiaries: Curaleaf, Trulieve, Green Thumb. * High % upside: Jushi, Planet 13, MariMed. * Retroactive refunds are speculative; cash depends on DEA/HHS action & IRS guidance.

King_Chron

**Trump Cannabis EO Leak (Dec 11, 2025)** WaPo reports Trump is preparing an **executive order directing HHS + DEA to move marijuana to Schedule III**. This would **end 280E**, recognize medical use, and align with Biden’s 2024 rescheduling push. White House says “no final decision yet,” but sources expect announcement soon. **Market / Sentiment:** * X: **#TrumpWeed** trending (500k+ mentions). * $MSOS up **8% after-hours**. * Reddit: 65% positive, heavy hype around **280E tax relief**. * Industry-wide benefit: **$2–3B/yr** in saved taxes. # Big Winners if Schedule III happens (280E gone) **Company | 2025 Rev | Est. Annual 280E Savings | Impact** * **Curaleaf** – $1.4B | $150–200M | Major cash unlock * **Green Thumb** – $1.1B | $100–150M | Margins 25%+ * **Trulieve** – $1.2B | $120–180M | Huge FCF reversal * **Verano** – $950M | $80–120M | Major EBITDA lift * **Cresco** – $850M | $70–100M | Debt relief + expansion * **Jushi** – \~$260M | $25–35M | Big % improvement * **Cannabist (Columbia Care)** – \~$350M | $35–50M | Margin recovery * **Planet 13** – \~$95M | $9–14M | Small cap, high % benefit * **Marimed** – \~$160M | $15–25M | Thin margins → strongest lift **Why it’s huge:** * Current effective tax rates are **60–70%** for many operators. * Schedule III removes 280E → normal 21–30% corporate tax. * Every MSO becomes more profitable **instantly** once the rule is finalized. **Bottom line:** If this EO drops and DEA confirms Schedule III, this becomes the **biggest single catalyst** the industry has ever had. Massive for MSOs and cash-strapped tier-2 players. 🚀

King_Chron

**Trump Cannabis EO Leak (Dec 11, 2025)** WaPo reports Trump is preparing an **executive order directing HHS + DEA to move marijuana to Schedule III**. This would **end 280E**, recognize medical use, and align with Biden’s 2024 rescheduling push. White House says “no final decision yet,” but sources expect announcement soon. **Market / Sentiment:** * X: **#TrumpWeed** trending (500k+ mentions). * $MSOS up **8% after-hours**. * Reddit: 65% positive, heavy hype around **280E tax relief**. * Industry-wide benefit: **$2–3B/yr** in saved taxes. # Big Winners if Schedule III happens (280E gone) **Company | 2025 Rev | Est. Annual 280E Savings | Impact** * **Curaleaf** – $1.4B | $150–200M | Major cash unlock * **Green Thumb** – $1.1B | $100–150M | Margins 25%+ * **Trulieve** – $1.2B | $120–180M | Huge FCF reversal * **Verano** – $950M | $80–120M | Major EBITDA lift * **Cresco** – $850M | $70–100M | Debt relief + expansion * **Jushi** – \~$260M | $25–35M | Big % improvement * **Cannabist (Columbia Care)** – \~$350M | $35–50M | Margin recovery * **Planet 13** – \~$95M | $9–14M | Small cap, high % benefit * **Marimed** – \~$160M | $15–25M | Thin margins → strongest lift **Why it’s huge:** * Current effective tax rates are **60–70%** for many operators. * Schedule III removes 280E → normal 21–30% corporate tax. * Every MSO becomes more profitable **instantly** once the rule is finalized. **Bottom line:** If this EO drops and DEA confirms Schedule III, this becomes the **biggest single catalyst** the industry has ever had. Massive for MSOs and cash-strapped tier-2 players. 🚀

King_Chron

**Trump Cannabis EO Leak (Dec 11, 2025)** WaPo reports Trump is preparing an **executive order directing HHS + DEA to move marijuana to Schedule III**. This would **end 280E**, recognize medical use, and align with Biden’s 2024 rescheduling push. White House says “no final decision yet,” but sources expect announcement soon. **Market / Sentiment:** * X: **#TrumpWeed** trending (500k+ mentions). * $MSOS up **8% after-hours**. * Reddit: 65% positive, heavy hype around **280E tax relief**. * Industry-wide benefit: **$2–3B/yr** in saved taxes. # Big Winners if Schedule III happens (280E gone) **Company | 2025 Rev | Est. Annual 280E Savings | Impact** * **Curaleaf** – $1.4B | $150–200M | Major cash unlock * **Green Thumb** – $1.1B | $100–150M | Margins 25%+ * **Trulieve** – $1.2B | $120–180M | Huge FCF reversal * **Verano** – $950M | $80–120M | Major EBITDA lift * **Cresco** – $850M | $70–100M | Debt relief + expansion * **Jushi** – \~$260M | $25–35M | Big % improvement * **Cannabist (Columbia Care)** – \~$350M | $35–50M | Margin recovery * **Planet 13** – \~$95M | $9–14M | Small cap, high % benefit * **Marimed** – \~$160M | $15–25M | Thin margins → strongest lift **Why it’s huge:** * Current effective tax rates are **60–70%** for many operators. * Schedule III removes 280E → normal 21–30% corporate tax. * Every MSO becomes more profitable **instantly** once the rule is finalized. **Bottom line:** If this EO drops and DEA confirms Schedule III, this becomes the **biggest single catalyst** the industry has ever had. Massive for MSOs and cash-strapped tier-2 players. 🚀

Resi86

Who said I was criticizing Biden for doing things the right way? I liked the vast majority of Biden’s policies, and on the other hand can’t stand almost all of Trump’s policies - and the way he does things. I’m simply stating that Biden was unwilling to push the DEA to get it through to the finish line, whereas Trump is. That is a fact

GeoLogic23

If Biden hadn't already done things the "right way" then Trump would have to ask the HHS to start the rescheduling review process, because that's all he has the power to do. Fortunately for him Biden did already do things the "right way" so Trump's agencies can now do zero work and still take all the credit. You criticizing Biden for doing things the right way is a great example of what is wrong with our current politics. Biden actually following procedures is why this is even possible to be happening. But all people care about is the final headline. Not what it actually takes to create policy in our government. I know the GOP has done a lot of work to de-legitimize regulatory bodies. But most of these strict procedures are there for very important reasons. Many of our regulations are written in the blood of the people who died because they didn't exist. The billionaires in this country will sacrifice the blue collar workers in a heartbeat if it makes them a few extra % gains. This should never even be in the hands of the DEA, but the GOP have refused to do anything whatsoever in Congress. What I really want is for Congress to reclaim their authority. They should have solved this problem years ago. But the GOP have convinced people they are for "small government" when they really mean "small Congress and BIG executive branch".

Tiaan

The EO would be ordering his DEA head and/or Attorney General to finish the rescheduling process that started back under Biden in 2022. Most of the work has already been done and now the process sits with the DEA head and Attorney General, and they both work for Trump.

Tiaan

The EO would be ordering his DEA head and/or Attorney General to finish the rescheduling process that started back under Biden in 2022.

Competitive-Ant2876

You guys realize he can’t sign an executive order to actually reclassify it? The DEA is the only agency that can. He might be able to put pressure on but he can not use an EO to straight up reclassify.

ZealotOfCannabis

The rescheduling process from 1 to 3 started back under Biden in 2022. Most of the work has already been done but it has been held up at the DEA for about a year now. All that Trump needs to do at this stage in the administrative rescheduling process is order his DEA head and/or Attorney General, who both work for him, to complete the process by rescheduling it

Cool_Ad_5101

thanks for this, and reading that last paragraph really pisses me off about the DEA and their corruption.

pop2012

Biden directed them to reconsider the schedule of cannabis. Clearly there was lots of foot dragging from the DEA to try and stall and stop that. The WaPo wording is making this sound like an order to direct the agencies he controls to reschedule. Biden didn't put any pressure on these agencies after his initial request. This seems like the missing pressure.

C_B_Doyle

Lawmakers could force the DEA to remove cannabis from the Schedule-1 list, with a 90-day time limit, to allow the FDA to study it for medical value so insurance companies can help patients obtain it at hospitals and pharmacies such as Walgreens, Costco, or CVS provided by existing multi-state operators such as MRMD (Marimed Inc.)

C_B_Doyle

Lawmakers could force the DEA to remove cannabis from the Schedule-1 list, with a 90-day time limit, to allow the FDA to study it for medical value so insurance companies can help patients obtain it at hospitals and pharmacies such as Walgreens, Costco, or CVS provided by existing multi-state operators such as MRMD (Marimed Inc.), CURLF (Curaleaf), TCNNF (Trulieve) and many other multi-state operators.

C_B_Doyle

The licenses are worth money. The edibles. The weed. Lawmakers could force the DEA to remove cannabis from the Schedule-1 list, with a 90-day time limit, to allow the FDA to study it for medical value so insurance companies can help patients obtain it at hospitals and pharmacies such as Walgreens, Costco, or CVS provided by existing multi-state operators such as MRMD (Marimed Inc.)

dreamgreener

Holy fuck it’s astonishing how corrupt the DEA is It all seems absurd

Intuitive31

I think part of reason might be if Robinhood is waiting for statue of limitations to expire or Feds might have gotten involved since DEA etc are very interested in claiming superseding jurisdiction on drug investigations. And DEA/FBI won’t confirm/deny if they are currently investigating or have investigated the case before. I would file a Federal lawsuit seeking disclosure which may force a response/ subpoena . The basic premise is Robinhood is viewing this not only as frozen assets but also to see if there is any money laundering or any dealings with entities that are sanctioned or part of US embargo as well. As others suggested- FINRA or Securities or compliance attorneys are the ones that can pull any weight . I would reach out to your network to find someone who works at Robinhood and ask him to open an internal ticket to see if it moves faster but most employees won’t put their reputation on the line. Moral of the story - never reveal anything to anyone - your mom, dad, wife etc - it’s basic 101!

HugeDramatic

It’s wild, I wonder how many DEA agents and executives make money under the table by working with the cartels. If guys like Tom Homan can get away with taking $50k bags of cash, what type of greasy stuff happens every day at an opaque agency like the DEA.

nickites

Wake me up when the language says the DEA "shall"...this "could" bullshit ain't gong anywhere.

Imaginary_Rooster622

According to AI: Sara Carter is the nominee for the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), a role known informally as the "drug czar". She has not yet been confirmed by the full Senate. If confirmed, she would be involved in cannabis policy discussions, but the authority to make changes to federal cannabis scheduling rests with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), not the ONDCP Director.

GeoLogic23

The best event to focus on around that time period is the annual DEA Supply Chain conference. It should happen around April, and has been a cannabis catalyst before.

C_B_Doyle

Lawmakers could force the DEA to remove cannabis from the Schedule-1 list, with a 90-day time limit, to allow the FDA to study it for medical value so insurance companies can help patients obtain it at hospitals and pharmacies such as Walgreens, Costco, or CVS provided by existing multi-state operators such as MRMD (Marimed Inc.), CURLF (Curaleaf), TCNNF (Trulieve) and many other multi-state operators.

ministryofchampagne

The DEA can’t change the legality of marijuana. Congress itself made it schedule 1, only they can undo that.

C_B_Doyle

Congress can pass a simple statutory directive ordering the DEA to remove cannabis from Schedule I within a fixed window, and because scheduling authority ultimately comes from the Controlled Substances Act, lawmakers can override the agency with a single amendment that bypasses the slow administrative process. Once removed from Schedule I, the FDA immediately gains freedom to run full clinical evaluations, allowing cannabis to enter the same medical review pipeline used for any other therapeutic, which reshapes how investors view long-term regulatory clarity. A congressional mandate would also trigger automatic coordination between the DEA, FDA, and HHS, because descheduling forces these agencies into a compliance posture rather than a discretionary one, eliminating the political bottleneck that normally stalls progress. That fast alignment is exactly what markets tend to reward, since it takes the uncertainty premium off U.S. cannabis operators and opens the door for mainstream institutions that have been waiting for a clear federal rule. Once the FDA enters the picture with formal pathways, insurers can legally reimburse cannabis-based treatments through standard medical benefit structures, and hospitals or major retail pharmacies can dispense products sourced from established operators. That shift converts cannabis from a fragmented state-only model into a federal healthcare product, positioning companies like MRMD, CURLF, and TCNNF to plug directly into the national distribution chains they’ve been structurally built for. Congress can also attach descheduling to a broader health or appropriations bill, a tactic used constantly to move policy changes without relying on standalone votes. That approach makes passage much easier, because it folds cannabis into routine legislative cycles, sidestepping headline political fights and letting the reform ride through on a must-pass vehicle—something markets interpret as near-guaranteed execution once language is included. All of this creates a straightforward pathway: congressional directive → DEA compliance → FDA evaluation → insurance coverage → mainstream pharmacy distribution → national scale for operators. For lawmakers, it’s one of the cleanest federal reforms available; for the sector, it’s a regulatory unlock that allows U.S. cannabis stocks to function like normal consumer-health companies instead of siloed state-restricted plays.

Silent-Association41

I mean, idk the fundamentals exactly but I own a counseling and oud treatment facility and we use vsee telehealth platform there. I seen where they have a lot of hospitals contracting with them and just had federal government contracts. The DEA made telehealth permanent this year and due to HIPAA and things you have to have very secure platforms to use and it’s not just the use of “it being confidential” but the actual platform being a virtual waiting room to make it easy for patients to navigate and the employees. Vsee you check in and it says that this patient is in the waiting room, providers can pull them in their room and transfer them, etc. it’s also set up to let people view and e-sign consent/confidentiality/insurance/intake forms, allows you to collect their medical cards and ID easily, etc. There are 2 services that are worth paying for when it comes to a service like this and that’s doxy.me and vsee. Doxy is a private company right now and vsee is the only one you can invest in. I would not underestimate the power of this company. I say that not knowing a lot about their finances, but I work in healthcare and this solved a huge problem in the industry… isn’t that the kind of stocks a person wants In a start up? A company that seen an opening to solve a huge problem for patients and providers and found a way to implement it? We could use a free platform in our offices instead of paying a monthly fee for our clinic and each provider but a single visit takes 30 mins longer to have them log in/out of different providers things, it’s not cohesive, and it can take upwards of hrs for some patients that aren’t good with technology. Imagine a patient having to join a “zoom” meeting for their front desk, then the nurse, then the doctor, then their counselor? Imagine the time and especially if they don’t have tech skills or know how to work even a smart phone bc this is most older patients even some that’s in their 40s. Now imagine a platform that allows them to type in vsee.com/recovery in a browser and that’s all they have to do; the providers pull them in and transfers them on the provider side. No downloads, no tech knowledge, no having to have an email, no remembering different usernames, etc. so look at the efficiency and time. We pay for the service, but it saves us a lot of money in the long run due to patient retention and not having our employees waste time we’re paying them for navigating this and allowing them to do their other jobs. I think investors will not be a problem as far as making it bc any in healthcare would support believe in the concept. This is my experience as a user and buyer of the program.

C_B_Doyle

Lawmakers could force the DEA to remove cannabis from the Schedule-1 list, with a 90-day time limit, to allow the FDA to study it for medical value so insurance companies can help patients obtain it at hospitals and pharmacies such as Walgreens, Costco, or CVS provided by existing multi-state operators such as MRMD (Marimed Inc.), CURLF (Curaleaf), TCNNF (Trulieve) and many other multi-state operators.

jamminstein

The DEA has been stalling and blocking the final ruling throughout the process. There is no way in hell they are ever going to proceed to a final ruling without being forced by POTUS. Even then I would expect push back and certain individuals in leadership resigning in protest. The DEA has it's own motivations and organization to protect. Everyone who has friends or family who work for and have insights into the DEA culture and command structure understand this. I would not put any faith in the DEA to move this forward.

HugeDramatic

Two things to keep an eye on… - will the Supreme Court grant certiorari of the Canna Provisions case on Dec 12. - will the DEA advise if they are committed to a final ruling on Schedule 3 in their next 90 days report to the DEA administrator on Jan 8, 2026. Terrence Cole had advised during his confirmation hearing that cannabis would be a ‘first priority’… if he doesn’t take up the issue again in Jan 2026, it indicates that he isn’t meeting that commitment. The Trump admin stuff is hopium if Trump tries to hijack the narrative or expedite the process so he can take credit for cannabis legislation before midterms. If that’s something they actually intend to do, it will have to happen in Jan or Feb to have any impact.

SwordfishOk504

It's hardly one simply move. Yes, Congress can order the DEA to pull cannabis out of Schedule I, but it would require them passing actual legislation that amends the Controlled Substances Act. Passing just about anything through Congress (house and senate) is far from simple.

four_twenty_4_20

>Congress could require the DEA to move cannabis out of Schedule I within 90 days, They could, but they won't. There's ALWAYS something more important for them to consider (i.e. more bribes have been paid).