EU

Imaginary-Writer-125

Tariffs being challenged, of course that would mean that NVO, EU largest GLP manufacturer would crash

CRAZYJOEDAVOLA90

Can I get my job back then? These tariffs cost me my job in EU

Rude_Judgment7928

Bonds gonna go crazy. Tariffs while regarded were actually providing revenue to the revenueless country. Best part is the damage is done. International boycotts are ramping. Canada/EU working to limit US exposure. And now we don't have the tariff revenue.

Rude_Judgment7928

Bonds gonna go crazy. Tariffs while regarded were actually providing revenue to the revenueless country. Best part is the damage is done. International boycotts are ramping. Canada/EU working to limit US exposure. And now we don't have the tariff revenue.

NotYourDad_Miss

EU ARE COUNTRIES, not us of a A. Baltics, Poland, Scandinavian. Finland, Portugal and Spain (just to name few) grew 2x or 3x more than US of A last year. And with inflation bellow 2%. NEXT

GoudaBenHur

Inflation is at its lowest point in 4 years, unemployment is at in its usual 20 year average range, and our growth is in line with the EU. You have no clue what you are talking about

Kamay1770

I don't think Trump or his cult care about pissing off loyal allies... Canada, EU, UK... We all already have been pissed off by him

12345623567

Klarna (in the EU at least) is a payment processor first and foremost. Like Venmo. I don't know anyone who would be stupid enough to use it as a micro-loan service.

Fangslash

Others have already mentioned that delta is N(d1) while risk-neutral probability at expiry is N(d2). Specifically, the two converges at expiration, which is why it is sometimes used to estimate probability. You are right on point 1, but that makes point 5 wrong since the two contradicts, since act (or the lack) of hedging generally do not affect what the model predicts. On a side note, longer dated options also have higher IV (due to IV>RV) point 4 is somewhat irrelevant here since US vs EU option style have similar prices (due to loss of extrinsic value on early exercise) and we're not trying to find arbitrage of US vs EU options I agree with point 3, which is why I have problem with your point 2. Since no one has a crystal ball, you can only estimate real-world probability with models and assumptions. At that point you are just giving up on trading

awetfartruinedmylife

Morning EU

I_am_Nerman

The IRGC being officially labeled as terrorists by the EU means game on. I'm not surprised after they slaughtered over 20k of their own people. This evil regime can't be gone soon enough.

ThisIsMyRedditAcct20

Credit checks are coming in the EU/UK btw, their main market

Confident-Web-7118

That is not correct. What I've been mentioning is that SELLAS didn't wait until the recent 2024/2025 interim analysis to add continuous dosing. They added it following the November 2022 blinded data review. In late 2022, SELLAS saw that patients were living much longer than expected and were going to outlive the original 1 year (15-dose) limit. They filed the protocol amendment with the FDA at that time, ensuring that patients could receive the vaccine ad infinitum until disease relapse. The April 2024 signature on an EU document you linked above is just a local harmonization step for late-joining European sites. The US cohort, which drives the bulk of this trial, has been under the amended continuous protocol for over two years.

EvolvingDior

Headline: >Trump secured over $5 trillion in investment pledges from allies, including EU, Japan, and South Korea, despite fuzzy math. Yeah, he also secured a FIFA Peace Prize.

Confident-Web-7118

What you're sharing is not correct. You are citing an April 2024 signature on the EU Clinical Trials site. In global registrational trials, European implementation often lags the US because sponsors must secure separate approvals from the National Competent Authorities and local ethics committees for each individual European country. A signature on an EU portal in April 2024 just marks a local European administrative step, a registry update, or harmonization for late-joining EU sites. It does NOT mean the US patients were denied continuous dosing for a year and a half. As mentioned, SELLAS filed this protocol amendment with the FDA in November 2022. Once cleared and approved by US institutional review boards, the US clinical sites (which drive the bulk of the trial) adopted the ad-infinitum/continuous dosing. SELLAS is a US-based company, and the FDA is their primary regulatory body. When a protocol amendment is filed with the FDA (which happened in late 2022) and cleared by institutional review boards, it is rolled out to US clinical sites.

Scary_Resident4982

Ad infinitum dosing was not until April 2024. Your claim of ad infinitum dosing modification in October 2022, technically October 14 when they filed with the FDA, is flat out wrong. However, I see my previous comment and your rebuke of my comment called it "false" with zero backup was deleted. April 2024 EU Clinical Trails site has the signed "ad infinitum" dosing change by Dr. Cicic on April 19, 2024. It's in black and white for you.

ReturnOfBigChungus

> How are YOU using it daily in your job? I'll give you 2 examples of things my team has built - one is a GPT that assesses integration potential to various source systems that our customers ask for integrations to. It looks at internal company documentation of our integration tools, it looks at historical services projects for previous customers to see if we've done the integration before and reads notes captured on those projects, and it reads documentation for the source system's APIs, and spits out a recommendation and any red flags. Is that useful? Absolutely. It turns 30-60 minutes of research into a 5 minute chat session. Another example, we're using a custom GPT to automate part of the process for creating statement of works first drafts for services projects for customers. It pulls transcripts of recorded calls, references internal documentation like above, and gives a nice summary of challenges and objectives. We still have to proofread and sanity check because there are often error and nonsense statements, but it again takes a ~30-60 minute task and turns it into a 10-15 minute task. So, yes absolutely it is helpful, but we're not considering laying anyone off, and we're not adjusting our future hiring plans on the basis of this. Maybe if the team was 50+ people and we had people working exclusively on those tasks, but that's just not our situation. This is a small but meaningful piece of people's day to day work that is now a little easier and faster. >The newest models are less than two weeks old and you're citing studies that are radically out of date Maybe, if the only angle you're considering here is "what can the tech do, in theory, in a low stakes science-project setting", but that's not the actual decision framework for investing in these tools. Candidly if you think that studies produced within the last year or 2 are going to be considered "radically out of date" for executive decision makers, I can only conclude that you're nowhere near a decision making level, because I can absolutely tell you that execs who were in the cohort of the 90%+ of people whose projects failed, it is not going to make one bit of difference if you come to them touting the benefits of the latest model. They've already been burned on what was likely a fairly expensive test, they've burned political and reputational capital sponsoring those projects, and their propensity to sign off on a new project has dropped dramatically. Again, I'm not taking the angle of up-to-the-minute tech capabilities, I'm talking about the actual likelihood that enterprise spending continues the way it has been over the last couple of years. >I cannot code but I'm building reliable work apps now. I would bet good money that your vibe-coded work apps are also massively insecure and riddled with vulnerabilities that would preclude ever even considering them for any critical or sensitive applications at scale. Personal assistants are great (see my examples above), but that is emphatically not the scale of usage that is needed to make this machine run in terms of supporting the multiples and valuations of companies providing these tools. Not even close. And that's not even considering the legislation that's coming into place around explainability/transparency that's going to affect all major LLM providers this year (California AB-2013 and EU AI Act), or things like the massive security vulnerability that was discovered in OpenClaw for example (CVE-2026-25253). You really think big companies are going to roll this stuff out at scale willy-nilly when they're apt to see in the news one day that the scaffolding for their agents has MASSIVE security vulnerabilities that could grind the whole system worldwide to a halt on a dime? Yeah, again, if you think that's not front of mind for CISOs and security teams you're out of your mind. For a long time this stuff didn't seem to matter, but now it's very clear that it DOES matter.

Logicalraisan

And they will likely come back because those cloud providers are not nearly as good as GCP, Azure, AWS. And these companies follow all EU laws and have for years. That doesn't change with this administration. These are global companies not US only, and they operate as such.

Automatic_Bison_3093

Ok that makes more sense, still the valuations are crazy. Company like SAP that has the whole EU business landscape by balls is valuated at 200B.

SignificanceLate7002

IBRX Headline ImmunityBio Expands Access to ANKTIVA® in EU with New Distribution Partnership and Opens Irish Subsidiary to Support European Launch https://www.stocktitan.net/news/IBRX/immunity-bio-expands-access-to-anktiva-in-eu-with-new-distribution-p2aifsa7ztrn.html

azurestrike

Assuming a stagnant market is $80b / 10 years. I was actually giving them quite a bit of growth when I compared them with Apple ($110b / yr). I am also assuming: \- xai and twitter isn't eating into their profits (which they will be, they are losing $1b / month) \- there is no competition (there likely will be, if revenues increase drastically) \- the world will still default to SpaceX (they might not, EU - US relations are not great, China likely won't be using them if they want to enter the sector. their market will likely mostly be America only, similar to Tesla). I think in an alternate timeline where US was still the global dominant soft power, a stand-alone SpaceX would be a great company to invest in. Maybe not $1T but still great. In the current climate and with xAI / Twitter tacked on, not so much.

kaapooj

EU != Europe

Panthera__Tigris

Not for long. EU and India dumping today and China is closed.

BambaiyyaLadki

And it's only a matter of time before China (or EU, if I'm being super optimistic) will have their own SpaceX clones of some sort. That's not to say you can't make a decent profit out of it in the next 5-10 years though.

aaapod

i can't wait to get my EU passport and get the fuck out of here LOL

Confident-Web-7118

So, it's three things, the barrier to entry, the actual patent life, and the orphan drug designation. I should have mentioned all three in my first comment. GPS is absolutely not losing its license or patent anytime soon. The drug is exclusively licensed from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The core "composition of matter" patents covering the WT1-targeting peptides in GPS extend to at least 2033 in the United States. SELLAS also has secured additional patents (like using GPS in combination with checkpoint inhibitors) which have terms extending to at least 2036. On top of the standard patents, GPS has received orphan drug designation from both the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency for AML. This designation guarantees 7 years of market exclusivity in the US and 10 years in the EU from the exact date of approval. This creates an impenetrable regulatory moat that blocks competitors even if they tried to challenge the patents. All three are way they will have a monopoly in AML CR2 (not eligible for transplant).

snipsnaps1_9

I've kept an eye on it for years but never did too much DD on it. If I recall growth had stagnated in the US and EU and churn rate was high which is problematic since there is no guarantee they will be able to replenish with each new generation. What value do you see and do you know anything about what use looks like outside of US and Europe? It appears that's where most of the growth has been in the last couple of years.

303uru

I’m moving more and more ex-US. Unless policy changes drastically, I think the US is essentially giving the future economy away to China and the EU.

Desperate-Ring12

Can't have better news than today. EU approval means 33 countries have access now!!!! Insane

alf0282

Go ahead and vote for the far right at the next election and then find out what a real wannabe dictator will do to the country. And then it will be too late. If you’re not a bot, you are stuck in your own radicalised bubble and don’t realise the difference between this French president and someone who will act against French interests because they will have been in part paid by enemies of the EU (yes, Russia).

Desperate-Ring12

Will never be against profits HOWEVER, I'd watch out here. Look at this jump for bladder cancer treatment approval in EU only. If you follow Dr Pat on X, he's been sharing promising data on ANKTIVA results with lymphoma.....

ShittyUsernane1222

EU tacitly supporting 🥭 despite 🥭 absolutely fucking despising them never cease to amaze me. "No, the Leopard will totally not eat MY face" -EU

ShittyUsernane1222

An war with Iran will destabilize: \-The US due to anti war protests and already rapidly increasing civil unrest \-The EU due to breakdown in trade in strait of hormuz and oil price spike hitting Industries. \-Iran due to power vacuum \-Israel due to suddenly lacking a boogeyman to unite against It is the most elaborate way to shoot oneself in the foot yet Israel keeps edging the United States for such a stupid war which goes against its self interests.

InvestIntrest

The idea of compartmentalizing the internet like that smacks of Communist China or Putin's Russia. If I want to communicate with someone in Europe or vice versa, I should be able to. If it's offensive, oh well. Macaroon is proposing a great EU firewall so he can decide what speech is acceptable. That's not acceptable.

CivenAL

Gogo IBRX! Well deserved approval in EU. Upcoming Saudi investment money and then also US FDA approval for non muscle invasive bladder cancer.

InvestIntrest

So the EU has a right to be as oppressive to its citizens as it likes? That's a very nihilistic pov. What Macaroon is really saying is that the European people having too much freedom of speech is threatening to his political ideology. That's why he's scared.

According-Page8618

No one uses Venmo in EU, everyone uses Paypal.

Salami4YourMommy

IBRX to the moon today! EU approved bladder cancer treatment! Boom!

apegen

The EU has the right to define terms and conditions of the social media platforms available in the EU. They don't share the constitution with the US, they have their own rules!

barryboy007

Ibrx with EU approval🚀🚀🚀

dantesinfernoracket1

Ibrx is going to run crazy today with the EU approval. Get in now, boys and girls.

analbuttlick

I prefer having everything in one. But I’m in Norway and can only invest in EU companies on my tax free account. So i just use my bank for that. For US, China and others i use Interaktive Brokers, because the fees are much lower than what my bank currently offers

SignificanceLate7002

IBRX got EU approval

throwawaydonaldinho

Fucking Ameridumbs waking up and selling what EU worked so hard to pump…

Raskolnikow47

They pivoted back To EU and Apac and just wait till Orange President is gone. Usa only peanuts for them. Eu is where the money is. Look up north sea summit

CitizenLohaRune

Canada is choosing the EU as well. And yes, china is taking advantage of Americas stupidity, and making more friends.

PinPsychological82

This is a fair point that has been somewhat diluted over the past couple of years. 1. Apple’s ATT was never about privacy. It was about fucking Google and Facebook and getting them off their system. 2. If Apple’s ATT was about privacy and they truly cared about privacy, they would have shut down AppLovin by now 3. Apple is under antitrust scrutiny by the EU for what they did with ATT. Their hands are tied and they can’t afford to shake up the entire ecosystem again by their moves

light_to_shaddow

The EU Who happen to also be choosing China.

Talkinguitar

You don’t have to get everyone on board. For countries like Ukraine, strongly tied to EU’s economy, it’s an advantage to get paid in euro which is a stable currency they have actual good use cases for.

mikehamp

so everyone will leave Netherlands, great policy..EU has tons of zero capital gains countries why would anyone with capital stay in Netherlands?

AdImmediate9569

That could be said about dozens of countries that USA and EU don’t consider enemies. What makes china different?

Right-Mousse-7781

Given that law spreads to all EU countries. How will that then affect the market? Will everyone like sell on 31st of Dec just to have cash for their taxes? And that would trigger a massive 30%? drawdown each year when big institutional buyers would absorb all the liquidity buying the discounted stocks?

Rock_or_Rol

I’m amazed NVIDIA is barely moving. Their earnings and guidance next week will be freaking huge. EU is probably going to give it a boost too…

Dull_Suggestion_1682

Can anyone explain why the Dutch government have chosen to go this route when their budget deficit is bellow the EU average and about half that of the US? Is there another angle to this story?

AnonymousLoner1

> And the EU is much looser on restrictions that can have a negative effect on individuals The stronger unions and worker rights in Europe that you types always complain about say otherwise, so keep deflecting.

Sea_Cucumber_69_

Europe isnt a country and the continents stock market is a quarter the size of America's market cap. And the EU is much looser on restrictions that can have a negative effect on individuals, and really only looks for ways to tax its citizens.

ricincali

Sell those calls. It isn’t cheap at $75. It isn’t like the “clues” aren’t there. You use the platform and know it is AI, heavily skewed leftist disinformation, loaded with DNC basement dweller hit teams and bot farms, ineffective ads fed to very few real people, fake accounts with hidden post histories are rampant, EU censorship on US users and more. You KNOW this is a ponzi.

Competitive_Ride

Where is all the money Japan, Korea, and EU promised to give mango to invest. 😡

stiveooo

Lower dollar makes money rotate to Japan EU and Korea. And it did. 

izCS

The only real market session is asia session. EU and US are both fraud and fake.

Gollomor

And I bet you make a lot of money, in the EU nobody makes over a 100k (less than 0.5%) in the US almost 18% make 100k or more a year. In the EU way more people with a regular fulltime income have to pay half of their income.

twitterfluechtling

I hope their EU business will tank. Business in the US will probably depend on next elections, but I doubt it will increase much? Could be I'm too optimistic, though.

corndog_messiah

EU banned red days

DMT1703

Seem like nearly all eu market indicies is rising today. So far my "woke" investment still rising high enough to ignore. With the new "Make with EU/Make in EU" deal it might exceling this investment.

kaapooj

the sub is very weird it is also openly racist and agressive towards non-EU Europe

extrak12

I saw some post in the IBRX subreddit about this meaning its approved in EU. This just means the document exists, not that its been approved in any way

AcceptableElkie

Everyone agree's the US is better to live in, if you got money, and EU is better to live in if you dont have money. The trade is. the US pays better, but life objcetively is just worse till you reach a certain income. Its the opposite way in EU. its better if you're poor, till a certain income, then it becomes the same. FIRE is way, way easier to accomplish in the states. But you loose work life balance.

a_fitz586

Ah actually not 100% sure now hahah. Seeing a bunch of back and forth on stocktwits regarding the EU approval, having a hard time fully verifying. My bad amigos🤷🏼‍♂️

Miserable-Pilot8841

There isn’t any. Stockwitz is raving about EU approval but there’s 0 news to support that. It is trending #1 though

kaapooj

ty canada too I am very conflicted on this topic, what I see ok X is not pretty but obviously e.g. EU is across the board pushing for curbs on certain rights and more surveillance

kaapooj

bearish on meta, rddt, snap germany discussing an opt-out model for algorithmic reccomandations germany, spain, uk. france, india discussing social media bans for teens intensified EU probes around Meta, X

Richou

this could work only if they manage to make chinese manufacturers fuck off via political bullshit or otherwise which is not unlikely in the US but unlikely for the EU at least when it comes to RAM and SSDs , GPUs is a different story since nvidia is the consumer GPU market (AMD and Intel are rounding errors) and i assume existing third party manufacturers for Nvidia GPUs have standing contracts that dictate whose VRAM to use and cant just pivot to made in china

SavingsDimensions74

If you think the US is going to get favourable trade deals with this administration, I’ve a bridge to sell you. It’s not just about Canada. Or Greenland. Or the EU. Or about dismissing NATO (ISAF) allies fighting and dying in Afghanistan (and the Brits did some fucking hard core fighting in Helmand, moreso than the yanks). It’s a culmination of nations that tried to bend the knee and it didn’t work. Now, the US will pay for its crass and dismissive words and actions. In no current world will the US get even close to the deals they already had. They can’t - because the vast majority of America’s allies now hate them and it will be extremely difficult, domestically, to try to sell any US/<whatever ally> to their domestic population. The US has squandered, undone and frivolously thrown away 80 years of expensive good will. To get a worse deal. This administration is so far beyond moronic it’s hard to fathom.

GneissFrog

he's spamming social media with endorsements at the moment, but how long before he throws his next tantrum about Canada, China, and the EU getting along so well without him?

tropicalia84

Last thing bulls wanted was a gap up - seen it once seen it a thousand times, EU going to be green af and we’ll open up flat. If there’s going to be a reversal it will come from a red open.

Mario-X777

But we already have Starlink. EU and some big countries will launch their alternative, but basically that is it. Once you launch satelites, there is only maybe 10 new launches per year required to keep up the system. Same with satellites, governments will fund launching maybe 50 for various reasons and that is it

1sailingaway

Depends on the state, similar to the EU and each country. My state, Massachusetts, vs Netherlands is 0.5yrs less for life expectancy and healthy lifespan is the same. Purchasing power is much higher in Massachusetts. You are correct, we do work harder and more hours. We do like our big houses, cars, boats, vacation homes, expensive hobbies, gear for each season, etc.

Comfortable_Oil6642

So many news articles about US and EU spending more on drones this weekend. Bullish $ONDS.

crisco000

I’m good on the deindustrialization of this country. Nothing the dems are offering and nothing the EU is offering brings jobs back. Just a continued drip of offshoring until there’s no manufacturing left.

Lopsided_Parfait7127

Spoken like someone who doesn't know anything about banking - have you not seen SEPA? As a payment integrator whose job is connecting to different payment systems, the EU payment system is leaps and bounds ahead with actual consistent addressing across the EU and works fantastically. The difference between that and the absolute garbage salad hodgepodge that is the American payment system is night and day. It's why visa/mastercard are required in the US. Even interac in canada works better than the american payment systems.

Wild_Height_901

Perhaps. But I am glad canada is getting out of its usual complacency. Time to open up trade to more countries. Lift some tariffs. Life interprovincial trade restrictions and start working on more domestically. Canada for far too long has leaned heavily on the US and the EU/UK. The only reason we could afford universal Healthcare.

AllenSmithee59

My portfolio consists of $106,575 invested in two stocks: Immunitybio (IBRX) and Micron (MU), with 73% in IBRX and 27% in MU. Why? There are really only three companies producing memory at the scale needed by AI datacenters, and Micron is one of them. They recently shifted their focus to producing memory for AI, foregoing production for consumers. I've made money already and expect to make more as the price reaches $400-$500. I expect IBRX to rocket from $6 to $24 or more if one or more of the following catalysts occur: * EU EMA approval for its anti-cancer drug Aptivka, expected as soon as this week * a positive earnings report next month that shows increased revenue, increased Saudi Arabian investment, or both * approval from the US FDA to market Aptivka for a second type of bladder cancer

Pvt_Twinkietoes

Well. Anthropics can move their operations to anywhere outside EU.

chevalier_92

EU market was on for me. Stagnation was the name of the game thus tomorrow ... a blood bath,

everything_is_polys

Oh, Imy bad, I think I see now. Yea, for SpaceX, I’ve no clue. It is an all-in-one company now so perhaps anticipation of the robots? They look to be behind the curve on that though. Maybe absorbing what’s left of NASA? Musk has the gov by the short hairs so the contracts would basically be his. I don’t see a future with the Grok since they got cut off, or for twitter dince EU is pushing data sovereignty. Could be launch since the bottleneck is really bad, but they’d have to share that path with RocketLab and sovereign agencies like ISRO once those are in full swing. I suppose they’ll still try to go after some of the same things AST is. In ways, they’re fundamentally different though. I never really understood why there was even an attempt to do D2D in the first place when Starlink as broadband service was already perfectly fine and has plenty of room expansion. D2D is a stupid distraction. It’s not like people love Comcast so seems like easy pickings. Heck, maybe through SpaceX, Starlink will pivot and actually go after that market

Competitive-Tea-6141

It's to come to an agreement on bridging EU rules and CPTPP rules (especially around rules of origin). Recall that CPTPP was originally supposed to be TPP under Obama but then in his first term, Trump pulled out. At first everyone assumed it was dead, but the remaining partners struck a new deal with TPP. The UK also joined CPTPP last year

alloutofchewingum

I don't think it's a very good idea actually. Czech has gone from socialism to the highest concentration of wealth in the EU in 30 years. It's basically because the tax system fucks workers and rewards investors. I mean it's cool if you have money obviously.

GainHaunting5680

Try being broke in the US compared to being broke in the EU and get back to me

Organic-Lie4759

Summah y'all are looking at EU markets , and it shows

DrummerCompetitive20

Why a Ban is Unlikely ​While Meta has occasionally "threatened" to leave the EU due to data transfer laws, both sides have too much to lose: ​Economic Impact: Meta’s advertising platform is critical for millions of European small businesses. ​Compliance over Exit: Meta has historically chosen to cave to pressure (like the 2026 ad-tracking changes) rather than lose access to its second-largest market. ​Legal Protections: In February 2026, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruled that Meta has a faster legal route to challenge EU privacy rulings, giving the company more leverage to fight back in court rather than just walking away.

drapper3

Pragmatic comment, EU could get much closer to US landscape for investors without losing the social protection if they ever manage to create a uniform EU capital market and manage waste of govt budgets (as an example in Germany they pay billions per year for infrastructure maintenance way too often, immigration is also costing bn of taxpayer money). Not getting into minimizing government corrupt since this is a global status that will not change).

pinprick58

The EU is set for a record loss of 16,500 high net worth people this year. Soon it will be like California where those that can afford to leave and those that can't afford to will have to pick up the tab.

Stocks_N_Bondage

That's a funny statement, are you in the EU? Tell me about your 2 months of annual holiday....

curious_skeptic

Yeah, OP is conflating one country with the whole EU, and acting like this unratified bill is actually law.

Exciting_couple77

Your paying for all the universal Healthcare and education etc. Americans dont realize the actual cost of these things. Like gas is taxed to the point that its on average 8.00 usd per gallon and people bitch when its over 3 00 in most of America. Not to mention everything OP said or everything else thats insanely over taxed in the EU. For context Im aN American and ive spent 6 1/2 years total living in Europe in my life time plus I just spent 3 weeks and visited 5 countries including the Netherlands last December.

Top-Local-7482

It is another way of thinking about money, EU don't value money the same way as USA, in EU government tend to make the wealth gap btw the richest and the poorest as small as possible. So the society is more equalitarian for all. To go further EU should put a Tobin tax in place too.

twitterfluechtling

Bullshit. 1. States have budgets, no state can afford to just ignore a huge reduction of tax revenue. This is an issue with the Netherlands previous tax system, not the welfare state. 2. Looking at wealth distribution and tax collection, we still have a system where the rich get richer while lower incomes get poorer. The problem is not preventing that, i.e. not taxing the rich enough. (That assessment is not related to the current tax law changes mentioned in this article, but neither was your comment.) 3. Looking at GDP to debt (https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA), it seems the USA is much worse off than the EU countries.

piszczel

I'm European btw The only thing EU does is regulate

Whatevs56

Shipments leaving EU or entering EU?

mneymaker

$ZIM +32.7% on German EU open. WTF i 've never been that lucky. HALT incoming on US Tuesday open? 13% S.I. with 5 days to cover https://preview.redd.it/bgw6cplnktjg1.png?width=761&format=png&auto=webp&s=dfd6280060037a32b11584d8cbdbf3c30c3304b0