EU

Rexultdis

The US stock market falls and EU ends almost flat or green like yest and many other days in past 3-4 months since EU funds started slowly dumping US after Greenland comments (maybe idk)

Taehoon

If you view S&P as too unpredictable (which may be a fair claim depending on your circumstances) then there isn't going to be that many other stock market options. I second the other poster suggesting an all-world ETF, especially those focusing on developed markets (but in which case, they will be US-heavy nonetheless). I would argue 10 years is long enough to potentially de-risk, whereas two years is fairly short. You could buy your shares and the next month the market dips -15% and does not recover until said two years. Chances are slim but you have to be ready that this may happen and it'll help you sleep better. Alternatively, you can DCA and invest e.g. 1k every month - this may or may not lower your return rate, but also your loss rate. I would explore bonds and see where that takes you (I am from the EU so not sure how treasuries are looking like in the US).

Taraih

He talked to every single company and state owned institution. He has the knowledge and data. Also EU are the smartest people around. They can build and find a substitute for all these products in no time. Thats why EU is so ahead economically right now. Christ im EU but these EU cucks are cringe af. EU is a disaster with no ends in sight.

AppropriateBad503

Honest question. Are you another naive untravelled messianic-cult-of-america type who actually believes after the usas behavior since WW2 and especially the past decade that it will even be a member of western civilization in 10 years, let alone sticking its militism in energy corridors we depend on for a bit of coercion while calling it policing?  There is no bretton woods 3.  We all learnt from bretton woods 2.  You don't think we are letting you run ponzi as a militant messianic cult again do you?  You are out kids.  Totally out.  You are out of Europe, the Commonwealth, all of it.  And the EU alternative energy build out is exploding because they will never let you coerce them on resources or security again.  The hand is played.  You are gone.  Your bases, your monopolies, your operating licenses, your IP, and your people.  It's a hard divorce.  America has an ideology that is incompatible with western civilization. The posing is over.  You are out.  

Bifetuga

I'd prefer the EU buy oil from Canada or anywhere else. I refuse to pay a toll to the muricans that started this in the first place. What a murican con... same applies to Venezuela... murican con artists stealing and f the markets trying to force everyone to buy their low quality oil. Fucking scam!

ThinkingOfTheOldDays

both had positive price momentum on their side, and now the former has meta & others selling compute rental on top of them (plus EU fuckery, plus the unfortunate Netherlands unrealized cap gains headwind), and ASTS or other space stocks seem like also rans vs the existing monopoly and fundraising ability of spaceX. it's reasonable to avoid both.

slothropdroptop

Big time IRGC sympathizer. Nice personal attacks. I’ll bite once, but if you continue like a raging redditor with a stinky neckbeard and about 1 real life friend I’m out. I clearly stated I don’t think starting the war was justified and the situation is now insane, but the IRGC clearly entered the MOU and then continued firing at third-party commercial ships. If they continue to do this to ensure they get their post-war exorbitant fees, and the US is the only country who intervenes to reduce the IRGC’s capacity to terrorize the strait, at what point should the western nations and asia, who benefit more from oil from the strait, subsidize this intervention? Or just let the IRGC continue to do so and pull out completely? Leave at as the EU and Japan and Korea and Australia’s problem? The IRGC are theocratic psychos that realize they now have massive leverage on the global economy and now we just want to let them do so? Not sure two wrongs will make a right for the global economy.

LivelyPants

It's official. In addition, the United Kingdom is currently reviewing the bid, posing several hurdles for the merger. Here is the timeline: * **July 14, 2026 (Foreign Subsidies Regulation):** The European Commission is independently auditing the **$24 billion** in Middle Eastern funding (including Saudi Arabia's PIF and the Qatar Investment Authority) backing David Ellison’s bid. If Paramount does not adequately restructure or transparently clear this cash track by July 14, the EU will legally trigger a **90-working-day Phase 2 freeze**. \[[1](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/paramount-to-exit-uip-to-win-eu-approval-for-warner-merger-1236634547/), [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/MediaMergers/comments/1ueb6o8/eu_set_to_clear_paramounts_111bn_takeover_of/)\] * **July 22, 2026 (Antitrust Decision):** The provisional antitrust deadline was extended from July 7 to July 22 to give regulators time to evaluate formal concessions submitted by Paramount. \[[1](https://www.reuters.com/world/paramount-offers-remedies-warner-deal-making-eu-approval-likely-2026-07-01/), [2](https://finance.yahoo.com/media-advertising/articles/paramounts-110-billion-warner-deal-181530807.html)\] * **September 30, 2026 (The Financial Red Line):** If the deal fails to close by this date, a daily "ticking fee" of **$0.25 per share** kicks in, costing Paramount roughly **$600 million to $650 million per quarter** in penalties paid directly to WBD shareholders. \[[1](https://www.techtimes.com/articles/320257/20260712/state-ags-aim-block-paramount-wbd-despite-doj-approval-eu-clock-ticking.htm), [2](https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2026/07/paramount-wbd-deal-reportedly-not-close-july-22/)\]

StCreed

I thought this was created with AI. The acronym, the 20%... Whelp, there goes the oil price again. But the EU and China will have to send ships now. It will be a combined operation to guarantee free passage against the US pirates. "Enduring liberty" sounds like a good name for it.

PovasTheOne

🍊 saw EU pussies talk about paying Iran to let their shit through and 🍊 said good idea. Except yall will pay the toll to US instead of Iran.

PovasTheOne

He saw EU pussy ass bitches talk about ‘paying Iran to let their shit through’ and he said good idea, except yall pay to USA instead of Iran 😂

Rexultdis

When EU responds to him it won’t be good

1stFunestist

Misleading. Most of his commercial launches are of his own Starlink constellation. EU, China and India do their own thing. It is all bla bla for press and potential "investors" (victims).

Capital-Pineapple961

Welcome to EU

xghtai737

> The problem is for how "wealthy" you argue we supposedly are the commons universally agree inflation is rampant, pay is stagnant, and overall their work is not valued as evidenced by the furor of the so-called Rust Belt. Would you destroy the economic well being of 90% of the country because the remaining 10% is too stupid to train themselves for a new job? > Harris got crucified in her election for arguing the economy was great and Trump won on the argument that we are getting milked dry. We are not wealthy, at least not by measures accepted by the common American. We are wealthy by any reasonable standard. Trump lied and rubes believed him. I gave you a data source. You are giving me feelings. Politicians can get elected on feelings, but that isn't going to help you, here. > Funny you say Russians are delusional, because I sincerely think Americans who truly believe we are the most powerful military force on the planet are the absolute epitome of delusional. A gold medal in mental gymnastics can't reconcile "most powerful" with "lose every single war". Didn't I *just explain to you* that you are confusing military accomplishments with political goals? How are you still confused about this? The US doesn't lose wars militarily. It fails to achieve political goals. > You want my honest, brutal answer? > China. > We can "make" literally nothing if China elects to embargo exports of rare earths and other materials necessary for all those high end commodities. Who do you think makes the batteries in those Teslas? BYD. Where do you think all that lithium is mined from? China. ... There is a reason the US folded literally overnight once China fired back with trade embargoes in our shortlived tariff trade war. So, you went from "the US manufactures nothing" to "the US might manufacture those things, but it couldn't do it without importing raw materials from other countries." And yet, you are here supporting the guy who starts trade wars. You apparently are a supporter of Autarky. Autarky is the most detrimental economic system ever developed. It is actually worse than communism. If Autarky worked North Korea would be the wealthiest country in the world. > As Trump once told Zelensky: YouWe don't hold the cards. Yeah, Trump lied then, too. The US stopped sending aid to Ukraine the day Trump took office. He tried his best to pressure Ukraine to surrender so that he could fulfill his campaign promise of ending the Ukraine war the day after he won the election. His supporters just kind forgot about that. Meanwhile, Ukraine is still doing fine. I guess they held a few cards after all. > You're right, and we should have taken equity in return. It's too late to do that for them now, but going forward we can and should take equity for every single tax dollar that is spent in the private sector. > I absolutely agree. Our budget is broken, slashing the expenses must include terminating all manners of tax dollars currently being funneled to businesses, universities Make up your mind: take equity stakes in businesses or stop giving businesses tax dollars? Those equity stakes aren't free. The big ticket items are Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the military, and interest on the debt. That's 80% of the federal budget. Nothing else is going to move the needle. > They did have wars and yes we've made them worse. We should not forget that Iran is the way they are now thanks to the CIA. 9/11 happened ... The CIA has caused problems in the past, but the Middle East is, and forever will be a basket case because of the way the British drew the map and because the Muslims couldn't agree on Mohamed's successor. They are going to be fighting each other regardless of what we do. 9/11 was a consequence of the US putting a military base in Saudi Arabia which offended the radical Muslims. The military base was put there to contain Saddam Hussein, who was attempting to build an oil empire, first attacking Iran, then Kuwait. We were afraid Saudi Arabia was next and didn't want him destabilizing global oil markets. So, yes, we could have refrained from putting a military base in Saudi Arabia, and that might have prevented 9/11, but it also might have led to an Iraqi invasion of Saudi Arabia and his continued hold on Kuwait, which might have thrown the global economy into chaos. The latter outcome was more certain than the former. > We absolutely had a part in Putin invading Ukraine. We toppled a pro-Russia government in Ukraine and made Ukraine a non-nuclear state. Both things contributed to Putin choosing to warmonger and we must and will pay our part of the bill when it comes due. Neither of those things are accurate. The pro-Russia government in Ukraine was toppled because the Ukrainian citizens were tired of living in poverty and wanted closer economic ties to the EU. That goal was progressing, the pro-Russian president blocked it, then the Ukranians got mad and ousted him. The only thing the US had to do with that was, after it was in progress, some US politicians went there for a photo op, passed around a plate of cookies, and expressed a preference for who would be the next leader. The US didn't start it and didn't participate in it in any other way. Putin accused the US of interfering as part of his very weak excuse to invade in 2014. There are no facts to support his claim. While Ukraine had physical possession of the nukes after the collapse of the USSR, it did not have the ability to launch them. Russia retained control of the encrypted launch codes. There was no point in Ukraine keeping them. It just would have been a massive expense to maintain them without any deterrent benefit. > Illegal aliens literally do not have a right to and should not be present in the country at all, they absolutely induce negative pressures on society that would not exist otherwise. The extent you go to try and justify modern day slavery is appalling. You have a very strange, and perhaps entirely unique definition of slavery which is characterized by working voluntarily, getting paid, and having the ability to leave whenever one wishes. It kind of reminds me the "wage slavery" that socialists are always whining about. > An individual's right to freedom does not preclude a sovereign right to restrict their entry. Much like you have the right to refuse an individual from entering your property. Illegally crossing the border is akin to breaking into a house, it is not acceptable. Your premise relies on the government "owning" the country as an individual owns property. It does not. The government's job is to enforce the rights of the individuals in the country. Individual people own the country, not the government. If someone breaks into my house, they have violated my property rights. No individual's rights are violated when someone walks down a public road. And since no individual's rights were violated, the government, representing the collective individuals, has no right to stop someone from traveling down a public road (assuming the person is traveling in a safe and orderly manner). The government has the power to do so, but it does not have the right. > You do not know what sovereign rights even are. Unless you are arguing for a return to monarchy, you don't know the purpose of a state. > Illegal entry is not part of the game, cheating is never acceptable. Would you be equally outraged in 1850 at the gall of a slave to escape to a free state? That was also against the law. > All states are at least required to not inhibit enforcement of federal laws No federal officer was inhibited by local law enforcement. > Congress dictates how federal dollars will be spent, the President is tasked with spending. Trump has proven the President can choose to not spend as directed because Congress can't force that particular issue outside of impeaching, and may the court enforce itself as Andrew Jackson once said. Like it or not and for better or worse, the Executive Branch holds the sole power to execute. It is true that the sycophant Republicans in Congress will permit Trump to do whatever he wants. Careful what you are arguing for - dictatorship. > Except you are. I have not been arguing for anarchy. The laws are not as expansive as you seem to want. > If we are a country following the principle of rule of law that includes enforcing federal immigration laws as they stand right now. Now scroll up two comments, where you said "Trump has proven the President can choose to not spend as directed because Congress can't force that particular issue outside of impeaching, and may the court enforce itself as Andrew Jackson once said. Like it or not and for better or worse, the Executive Branch holds the sole power to execute." You want everyone opposed to you to follow the law, while you want Trump to be above the law. > federal law enforcement like the FBI are tasked with enforcing federal immigration laws. Refusing to cooperate is at best belligerent and resisting as was the case in Minnesota is a straight rejection of rule of law. Which law enforcement officer in Minnesota resisted? Not cooperating is perfectly legal and not the same as resisting. Do you want to end the federalist system of government with checks and balances?

I11IIlll1IIllIlIlll1

EU is doing fine. Just don't be crazzzzzzy American...

-mini-kuma

Raspberry Pie - the UK chip stock is down 5%! Otherwise, praise our UK/EU friends; boring and ignoring the Asian turmoil for now.

SnooHedgehogs5162

EU is green because EU does not have tech stocks. Its other stocks.

BroadBlueberry7777

EU is green now, america turn next, RIP bers

Crazy_Donkies

I can't believe people like you exist. America: $1t per year. Japan's new announcement: $1.6t over a decade. Korean recent $1t announcement. June 29. EU $200b over a decade. UAE $3.6t. Just because macro is hurting AI trade right now doesn't change the thesis. Nothing has changed.

Due-Lingonberry-4631

Holding shares and long calls, think with the EU upping it's defence spending it could help in the long term

Taraih

They will come back eventually once they realize they cant even get close to what the MSFT ecosystem provides. Munich tested this for over a decade i believe and reverted now cause it failed. Its EU cope (im from EU) they think themselves morally and skillwise superior but are a complete failure in many ways.

Rubsy

South east EU country

ReasonableBrother448

No they are not if you account for the relative technological starting point. It can be done and it will be done, but most likely scenario is that US loses their control completely of EU markets and ASML starts to expand their business into China.

yapyoba

EU doesn't buy Russian oil and gas so they buy US. Same for Asia if they cant get oil out of the middle east. everything is going to plan.

Cav829

Zuck said they were going to sell cloud compute and chips in spite of their AI morels lagging, them trying to enter a very crowded cloud compute space, and there not really being a shortage of chips, but a shortage of RAM, hard drives, and power. But as usual, it got Wall St to buy in even ad they were aldo getting huge fines put on them by the EU.

Complex-Sale-7939

I read somewhere EU is considering "supertariffs" or something.

padetn

To be fair their charging infrastructure is not as good as the EU’s or China’s.

Embarrassed_fly09

No, there is way more value in the EU market don't invest in overvalued s&p

kinetic_honda

It might be, but this is reddit and people are allergic to searching. Also, there's the whole anti US sentiment flying around here with people talking about shifting away from US index funds, etc. I'm not sure if you recollect the great "I'm divesting from US funds and moving entirely to EU funds" comments after Trump won his seconds term

Remarkable_Tap_34

Yes (i’m European too) EU (and more generally, European) ETF just can’t compete with US ETF.

Combat_Proctologist

Ok, to be fair, I'm mostly talking about western europe, but they tend to control the purse strings in the EU. I'm willing to listen to counter examples though. Can you provide an example where they took a risky course of action without US backing/prodding?

ReasonableBrother448

Data center buildout most likely eats its own tail. Margin collapse and long term stagnation afterwards. Ie. cycle. Just purely from geopolitical perspective you are going to see an influx of chip production. At first it comes from China because they are so far ahead in this space, hitting the ground running. But India, Japan, EU, US. Everybody has to have their geographical chips. Algorithms will probably just start operating with highly specialized, but not so low yield lithography. They start divesting and competing. Competition is a nasty beast for high margin players. It will melt trough the whole supply chain and seek out lower margins. Margin reduction will be found from places that you would never believe existed.

BDObadguy

I think we might be able to benefit from such models as individuals, but I also think that corporations are going to run into big compliance issues that will force them to use only models that are approved and licensed by regulators. Giving some Chinese AI access to the personal data of your customers and employees will not be allowed in the US or EU. You're a trucking company and you want to fire your drivers and use AI instead? Better pay for the AI with the driving license. The issue of liability when AI causes some sort of damage is going to be interesting to sort out for businesses.

Vlisa

I just played a bunch of EU4

SteakEater137

META - Just doing random shit, throwing everything at the wall and waits to see what sticks. Also being fined by the EU and multiple states in the trillions for the purposefully addictive nature of their products. Market - I love this. Have an 11% week even though I've been dumping you for 3 months before this. I didn't like how much CapEx you were spending, but now that you're spending even more, I really like it.

Rock_or_Rol

Don’t listen to the analysts.. AVAV They have a UAE relationship (we just loosened defensive sale restrictions on them today), they have a foothold in Germany (EU + nato spending), and Congress is on the verge of passing the NDAA after a litany of good news. Drones, drone defense, interceptors, automated weapons and aerospace. Hot knife, but there are some juicy catalysts ahead. Check out the insider buys

SteakEater137

Was curious why META was pumping so much more than almost everything in the SPY today, so looked through anything that could account for it since yesterday's market close. # [EU threatens Meta with fines over addictive features on Facebook and Instagram](https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/10/eu-threatens-meta-with-fines-over-addictive-features-on-facebook-and-instagram/) Uh. B...Bullish?

Excellent-Bag135

EU SKH just crashed to 145 usd per 0.1 share kek

SnooHedgehogs5162

Because Europeans sold at loss SK Hynix in EU market. But on Monday, ADR will be added together with Korea and EU stocks. Then KORU should be green.

Professional-Tap2052

If you listened to the EU statement today calling META an evil company for promotion addiction among teens, you would made good money.

Pin_ups

This is just how much China are spending on research but that doesn't make clear answers how many of those research are improved for actual applications. US and EU doesn't need that much to spend on R&D because this was done decades ago with Apollo program, and Artemis missions are the restart. I still prefer privatisation over central planner due to bottlenecks. China will need another decade or so to make their rockets more efficient and enough to carry the payloads. Note that NASA spaceship project is almost there, and next phase is nuclear propulsion.

Excellent-Bag135

US listed SK Hynix is over 1700 usd per full korean share (x10 of ADR) and EU listed SK Hynix is 1500 USD per korean share.

Excellent-Bag135

SHynix GDR in EU is ~150 usd kek

Jerikolol

EU = ghey. USA = strong. Thats why

SteakEater137

I love how META is up almost 6% on threats that the EU will fine them 6% of their revenue, beating everyone else in the top 200 today. It confirms my theory that the market will reflexively do whatever is the most illogical action possible.

Cav829

He realized saying you'll build chips gets you a free 10% stock pop and did it right before this EU ruling that is going to seriously fuck them over. He's a terrible businessman, but he's at least a good conman.

SnooHedgehogs5162

From EU market i can see that SK Hynix stock is 5% above 149 dollar price. So minimum opening is 5%.

-mini-kuma

EU SKHynix HY9H and KIOXIA KI5 trading delayed/halted, SKHY US going to moon...

trust_it_bb

No one is sending proprietary tech half way around the world and giving it to the chinese. Literally bullish because NA/EU now have to spend more gov money on space stocks.

CUbuffGuy

Why do people think the US follows Asia and EU… there’s many retarded thoughts here but this one is always amusing lol

SnooHedgehogs5162

It looks like sell the news. Memory stocks down today. Already sold in Asia and EU. Now US market as well.

Professional-Tap2052

The EU said Meta is breaking the law by purposefully insuring teens get addicted to their platforms.

SnooHedgehogs5162

Probably Memory stocks sell off at start, Micron and Sandisk -5% or so. Yesterday memory stocks rallied, today in Asia and EU all semi and memory sold off. US follows.

Affectionate-Idea690

EU is evil 

dpatel211

META found liable of breaching EU laws, starts mooning. God bless America.

TipEmpty8429

If EU market at the moment is any indicator, wouldn’t shock me if SK Hynix is bigger than NVDA one day

LuvSicPt5

SK EU starting to liftoff

Fast_Half4523

I am EU and hold Sk hynix GDR. Its down 8%, so shouldt this get bought up during the day or next week?

Excellent-Bag135

SK Bagnix going to 0 in EU

Godvivec1

Take a deep breath. It will help oxygenate your brain cells. Think about this. **Blue Origin:** makes a hundred flights in the next ten years, many of the early years required to be experimental test flights for their MAIN UNPROVEN ROCKET. They will procure little to no contracts during their experimental flights. By this point they're already 5+ years into finally getting their MAIN UNPROVEN ROCKET stable and good enough to reliably accept payloads and contracts. They are now trying to break into a well established market. Once dominated by.... **Space-X:** makes almost 200 launches a year **currently**. Has dozens of test launches a year as a side project to improve rocket design. Has the lion's share of the market already and is only improving. As the years go on it will only improve rocket cost and reliability, thus offering a better value to literally anyone looking for payload services. Already has multiple different designs already in testing that corner even more space markets. Sorry, but Blue Origin isn't going to be even in the running as competition. China will be light years closer to Space-X, and the EU just need to start throwing money at the problem to try and catch up. Blue Origin is a hobby space program, not a serious market one.

trust_it_bb

You guys can’t even seriously give one reason MSFT should move up. Every part of their business is under crazy threat from others, with EU looking to cut them out entirely. Hell, even American companies like starbucks want to stop paying MSFT for their services and do it in-house using AI.

CD274

EU inflation signs cooling why they dumping

itsme971

EU opens in 1h 20m

SnooHedgehogs5162

EU market opened: Kioxia -5% Sk Hynix -6% Wtf

ozarkabottle

damn when Hynix goes for sale tomorrow on US and EU exchanges, it will be trading 24hours a day

InjuryEmbarrassed532

Young over-emotional Redditor. Try not to be so with your future livelihood and squander it on hopeless EU stocks.

LazyDazyFazy

It's green relative to yesterday's closing Korean price. That doesn't necessarily mean it's green relative to US / EU closing prices. Simple terms: +10% in US session -9% in Korean session = +1% showing in KOSPI

epSos-DE

Take the win. Since last week the capital from funds and rich people is rotating. They will sell stuff ! Buy some low price, profitable companies in the EU or so, they will not go up much, but at least you will get dividends , till you know where to invest your retirement funds next !

Invest0rnoob1

You can invest in other countries also. I bought some Japan and EU ETF.

Riskismyapellido

Brits can'tget their shit together. Left the EU and now they whine and complain, pathetic. They change PM more often than their undies,that should tell u enough

Rock_or_Rol

There’s NATO and EU defense spending and AVAV has a decent German presence, but yeah, NDAA is the big one.. unless maybe the SCAR procurement process makes it clear that AVAV is likely to keep that contract or the class action against them gets dismissed.. which I doubt it will unless those contract good faith stop work clauses are pretty standard for the military, but who knows? Seems like a pretty one sided contract though wtf lol

Competitive-Meet-511

Eh, a lot of EU countries have implemented policies just in the past year to give a pathway to highly educated Americans. There was also a poll recently indicating strong public support for giving refugee status and/or an express route to PR to prominent political dissidents should it come to that, which it looks like it will. But yeah, not many countries are looking to accept planeloads of people from Yeehawland, let alone Europe, which can attract the cream of the crop at the moment, and most countries have tightened citizenship rules for Americans who suddenly remember they're "1/16th Irish" even though they can't locate Ireland on a map and aren't aware that it's an EU country.

SnooHedgehogs5162

For EU people SpaceX was available. We have human rights here

Budget_Witness_8344

Sorry to shit on your thesis but the probability of amicable long term US-China relations is extremely high. China has a massive state-subsidized industrial over-capacity, and they are 77th in per-capita income. Which means their industrial complex relies entirely on exports rather than domestic consumption. What are the two most crucial markets for China? They are the US and the EU. Do you go to war with your customers if you don't have a domestic consumer base? You do not. You are confusing rhetoric with the actuality of US-China relations. China keeps devaluing the yuan against the USD in order to be able to sell here to negate the tarrif hit. The Chinese need us as we are their customer, and we need them as their cheap goods is how we keep price inflation manageable. We are adversaries in rhetoric and allies in economic relations.

BandOne4513

I get what you saying about the EU approval being conditional, that part makes me little nervous. Conditional means they still need to prove more later, is not full green light yet. But 168% y/y revenue growth on actual product sales is hard to ignore for biotech at this stage. The short float at 40% is wild though, that's squeeze territory if the january pdufa goes clean. You holding through that date or plan to trim before?

That-SoCal-Guy

The point is iOS share is only 27% while Android is the rest, so I don't know what "monopoly" the EU is talking about....

TheKaiserAlpha

The Broadcom deal is a solid multi‑year supply bet, but the EU gatekeeper ruling is an ongoing regulatory risk with real fine exposure. Given Apple’s heavy non‑US revenue, the regulatory overhang probably matters more long‑term, and July 30 earnings will show if this can end up net neutral‑to‑positive.

NotMe357

"BREAKING: EU Parliament advances “Chat Control 1.0,” allowing mass scanning of private communications through 2028." We're fucked.

ElolMusk

I sold SK Hynix this morning (EU) and it went up more. But this is fine because no one ever went broke taking profits.

WickOfDeath

I cant buy it in the EU, I am in an ETF following the SOX, the Philadelphia semiconductor index. If DRAM is a good buy or not I cant say, I would buy dips since those "concerns" are frequently published and that makes the memory makers drop a lot.

pa3xsz

I get ads from products that I cannot even purchase. Hack a few years back, I was bombarded with an Israeli military contractor that was building anti air defense systems... Like, how would I be able to but it??? In the EU... As a civilian??? Anyways, it was a funny half a year (like they targeted me so hard, that the hungarian governments propaganda couldn't even get ad slot at me (every other people got them though).

SallyYoung1

Microsoft has faced the same battles with the EU. They've been at war with the FTC for years too.

Sick0h

Market is less than 10% off from ATH, too risky for EU traders. They gotta sell.

That-SoCal-Guy

which is all BS. Microsoft has had monopoly for decades now. iPhone's market share is only 27%. What monopoly? The EU chase for Apple and Google is a witch hunt.

DsfSebo

Isn't the EU already breathing down Google's neck to allow other AI integrations into android? Not to mention Google just avoided a monopoly suit not long ago, for the sole reason that they basically deemed the AI landscape too new and volatile to judge, and didn't want to unnecessarily disrupt Google. Once the metaphorical AI cloud settles down, there's a chance they'd bring that case up again and actually break Google up/force it to sell some of it's parts. I think you overestimate how much Google'll be able to monopolize and capitalise on AI and android.

Orangebathroomtowel

And the EU has pretty strict regulations on leverage too, stocks are 5x max and indices up to 20. With an offshore broker you can easily do 100-500x leverage and lose your money even more efficiently 

SnooHedgehogs5162

Every time when EU market opens then suddenly kospi index goes up

Minimum-Reward3264

That’s because EU environmental goals where met by outsourcing diesel production to Russia.

Flanellissimo

Isn't Googles new strategy to replace your abhorrent "skillset" i SEO with their own AI? While I don't entirely disagree with your assessment of Googles capacity, it does hinge solely on the assumption of business as usual, which is a bad assumption to make in general and in specific now that we have growing voices in political assemblies against US dominance in the tech sector and distrust against the US as a trading partner in the west. It's not unthinkable that the EU would curtail Googles reach and capacity, kneecapping its current business model. "Tech" is first and foremost about gaming existing legal frameworks, when laws catch up tech companies either dies or move on to the next malpractice. While I don't particularily look forward to AI hallucinations replacing the works of mankind I do enjoy the vision of SEO "people" being jobless.

Test-NetConnection

I don't know, there is always the possibility he embargos the EU.

SafeNeighborhood3823

Fun fact: Japan & Korea: blue = down, red = up China, HK, Taiwan: green = down, red = up US, EU: red = down, green = up

Sick0h

This must be what WWII was like fighting multiple theaters in the Pacific, Middle East, and eastern EU/Russia.

Appropriate-Town1256

They will lose a third of their revenue and profit, Google valuation will drop by 200 bn. EU can easily find replacements.

-good-squishy-

I looked into European companies working to upgrade the various countries energy infrastructure. I’m talking the actual cables, regardless of the power generation source, many EU countries need to upgrade their grids. I’m watching Nexans (NEXNY). Not really a pick or shovel, but I’m also watching Canon for their Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL), which already works for memory and soon possibly for silicon. If proven, it could benefit from any boom in the hardware sector, not just AI.

Vast-Palpitation-426

In the EU brokers have to tell you on their app that \~75% of people who trade them lose money lol https://preview.redd.it/xsqbm7yrw2ch1.png?width=394&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd25e4b906b681661cb586939026ca2af6f03d63

GeoLogic23

>And there being "no long term safety data" is just really being willfully ignorant. Most studies you have read about are not the type of studies the federal government uses to make decisions on drug safety. The EU literally set a crazy low range for just CBD very recently, because they don't even have long term health data on CBD. Let alone for THC. [https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-food-agency-sets-safe-consumption-level-hemp-derived-cbd-2026-02-09/](https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-food-agency-sets-safe-consumption-level-hemp-derived-cbd-2026-02-09/) >"Uncertainties remain regarding the kinetic behaviour and the effects of long-term consumption of CBD on the liver, neurological functions and the reproductive and immune systems," it noted. And we don't have to even reference any data to know cannabis is one of the most widely abused drugs out there. It's been "abused" for centuries. In this case "abused" means using it to get high, rather than to treat a medical condition. Are you saying most people are not smoking cannabis to get high? That's what abuse is in terms of the drug rescheduling criteria. The amount people are allowed to purchase in a recreational state has nothing to do with whether the federal government thinks people abuse medical cannabis. It's an open secret that many medical programs are essentially backdoor recreational because it's so easy to get a card.

SnooHedgehogs5162

Kioxia (Sandisk) up in 10% in Japan pre-market. You guys seriously think it wont drop? You lose money. Low volume stock in EU market get you hurt

drew-gen-x

BOJ will need to raise rates. But I think when it becomes apparent that KW is just jawboning and the Fed will NOT raise US interest rates the Yen will strength back towards 140-150 Yen/USD. You have to remember part of the reason the Yen is so weak is due to the interest rate spreads b/w Japanese bonds vs US and EU Bonds. That spread is narrowing/shrinking rapidly.

Goonslopenjoyer321

The EU today introduced the new requirement for all new cars registered in Europe to have installed cameras filming the driver’s face. europe is a perma ber country