IBM
International Business Machines
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
I’m an “newer” autist. What is the potential for these in the coming 2 days after the $IBM blow out?
The Coming Analog Age: Bullish Scenario For Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, Qualcomm, Tower Semiconductor, IBM?
YOLO Alert: Boeing on the Brink – Why WSB Traders Should Short the Skies
Twitter-backer knocks billions off its value after Musk’s ‘go f--- yourself’ outburst
Twitter-backer knocks billions off its value after Musk’s ‘go f--- yourself’ outburst
Ken Griffin Now Makes Surprising Claims Confirming Illegal Manipulation
Cyberwarfare is The Weapon of Choice for Current Global Conflicts
Thoughts on IBM switching from 401k's to Pensions?
I am new to stocks and created my first portfolio - what are your thoughts and inputs?
Cyberwarfare is The Weapon of Choice for Current Global Conflicts
Remark Holdings' customers include the Las Vegas Raiders and the Las Vegas Police
Remark Holdings' customers include the Las Vegas Raiders and the Las Vegas Police
Integrated Cyber (ICS:CSE) takes steps to reduce the Growing Impact and Cost of Ransomware and Data Breaches
Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Hits Record $157 Billion Cash
Integrated Cyber (ICS:CSE) takes steps to reduce the Growing Impact and Cost of Ransomware and Data Breaches
Data Provider for Adjusted Historical Prices with Last Data Updated in the Middle of Trading Day?
I wanted to try to invest in 10 completely random stocks to see if this beats the market in 1 year, so I asked ChatGTP...
FWIW: AAPL market cap 18x that of IBM
POTENTIAL RUNNER! New IPO W/$8 Billion Valuation - Sept 13 Run Down🔥
The next stock I am researching: $ASPI
ASP Isotopes ($ASPI) looking to get into quantum computing
IBM rolls out new generative AI features and models | TechCrunch
9/5 Pre-market TMT Breakout: $PINS better metrics, $AAPL neg impact from Huawei phone/new $IBM?, $DIS Bull case, $NTAP upgrade, $ORCL upgrad
Pre-market TMT Breakout - $PINS better metrics, $AAPL neg impact from Huawei phone/new $IBM?, $DIS Bull case, $NTAP upgrade, $ORCL upgrade on better runway growth, $ABNB to join SP500
$WHSI joins Next Realm AI Research Lab, an IBM Business partner, for Wearable Health Data
WHSI joins Next Realm AI Research Lab for Wearable Health Data
Butterflies & Iron Condors: Assignment Risk vs. Duration & Stock Selection
GBT Segmental Update: Magic2 a Suite of Eight AI Driven EDA Tools Assisting Engineers with Faster Semiconductor Design
LK-99 - The Potential Revolutionary Room-Temperature Superconductor
Asked ChatGPT what the market impact would be if it was confirmed that aliens exist
My AI momentum trading journey just started. Dumping $3k into an automated trading strategy guided by ChatGPT. Am I gonna make it
The AI trading journey begins. Throwing $3k into automated trading strategies. Will I eat a bag of dicks? Roast me if you must
Integrated Cyber, An Upcoming AI Cybersecurity IPO To Take Notice Of
Investment plan for about 85 000$ USD over the coming year
Investment plan for about 85 000$ USD over the coming year
Integrated Cyber, An Upcoming AI Cybersecurity IPO To Take Notice Of
Opened my paper trading account and made some options!
Potential Pennystock of the Year: $OSS - One Stop Systems
Potential Pennystock of the Year: $OSS - One Stop Systems
Potential Pennystock of the Year: $OSS - One Stop Systems
Nearly half of Warren Buffett's $366 Billion Portfolio is invested in only 1 stock
Who can strengthen cyber security?
This isn’t a bubble it’s a revolution, like the industrial revolution, just on a grand scale.
The AI hype is not what investors say it is, heres why im shorting the AI bubble
Profiting off the potential power grid failure. Overall thoughts and discussion.
I asked ChatGPT how to profit off of a power grid failure.
Unleashing the Hybrid Cloud AI Revolution: Nvidia's DGX, IBM's Ansible, and the Perfect Storm
Unleashing the Hybrid Cloud AI Revolution: Nvidia's DGX, IBM's Ansible, and the Perfect Storm
Unleashing the Hybrid Cloud AI Revolution: Nvidia's DGX, IBM's Ansible, and the Perfect Storm
IBM: Not Your Grandma's Boyfriend’s Favorite Tech Giant Anymore, Pioneering the AI Revolution Like a Boss
IBM Will Launch Partnership with Global Universities to Develop a 100,000-Qubit Quantum-Centric Supercomputer
Shopify ($SHOP) delivers impressive earnings, enticing investors to consider buying the stock.
Today, Dallas, Texas was disrupted by a large cyberattack impacting multiple services and important computer systems, emphasizing the need for cybersecurity investment for all sizes of businesses - CyberCatch's (CYBE.v) patented AI-enabled platform solves the root cause of these attacks.
IBM will lay off thousands of employees. Their work will be taken over by artificial intelligence
Capitalizing on the AI Boom: Companies Poised to Benefit from Artificial Intelligence Adoption
U.S. stocks trade lower as traders eye earnings from Morgan Stanley, IBM
IBM, TSM, NOK rocket 🚀 🤣
Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: Tesla, Las Vegas Sands, IBM and more
IBM misses first-quarter revenue estimates as corporate IT spending shrinks
Weekly Earnings Digest for Options Traders: NFLX, TSLA, IBM, GS, T, SCHW and more!
Expected Moves: Low IV Trading and Earnings from Netflix, Tesla, Goldman, IBM and more.
AI Stocks: 5 Companies Leading the AI Revolution
Debunking Kerrisdale Capital's Bearish Take on C3.ai
VERSES AI ($VRSSF) The ONLY pure horizontal AI play
dividend stocks - what are your favourites and why ?
NVDA still overvalued and AI wont change the world because its been around a long time. Just another boom bust Cycle.
Mentions
The main difference between IBM/GOOG and the rest of the quantum stocks is that IBM and Google have commercially viable business plans for right now and can afford to lose out if quantum truly is 5 to 30 years away. The same can't be said of the others. They will just dilute and dilute to stay afloat.
If you want to profit from quantum computing, buy IBM/Alphabet and chill.
I agree with software productivity being the best next ten year play. Because of that my picks would be Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, Salesforce and any other similar large enterprise cloud solutions. These have the best chance of actually driving meaningful cost efficiencies from AI, as opposed to yet another LLM that’s smart but unmonetizeable.
Someone is going to realize the IBM is the true quantum computing OG.
I only checked the top 3 from your list (IBM, GE, XOM), but all 3 have underperformed the S&P500 since Jan 1990. So your bar is actually for them to achieve below the market.
In 1990, the Top 5 companies by market cap in the S&P 500 made up 12.2% of the index. IBM: 2.9% Exxon Mobil: 2.9% General Electric: 2.3% Philip Morris: 2.2% Royal Dutch Shell: 1.9% Today, the Top 5 companies by market cap in the S&P 500 make up 25.6% of the index. Microsoft: 6.31% Nvidia: 6.22% Apple Inc.: 5.34% Amazon: 3.97% Alphabet Inc. (Class C): 3.77% The valuation of the index is extremely top heavy, and concentrated in companies traded at high PE ratios historically speaking.
22x is pretty reasonable when you look at where most of those earnings are coming from. Decades ago we didn't have all these high-quality, big tech cash flow machines with global presence and scalability. Go back to 1990 and the top companies by market cap were: Exxon, GE, IBM, AT&T, Philip Morris, Merck, Bristol Myers, and Dupont. Lots of low margin, cyclical, capital intensive business operations in that list. Should an index anchored by Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Broadcom trade at a premium to the index of the past?
And in the 1989s those would have been the rotting carcasses of Ford and IBM instead.
I'm looking at AMD up 125% in the last 5 years and IBM up ... 141%.
At 18 start a diversified portfolio gradually or invest in broad fund ETFs. A combination of broad market ETFs, growth and value stocks. The advice you got above is greatly deficient. Walmart s a growth stock and also pays a modest dividend. You’re getting stereotypical inexperienced investor advice. Early investors think high risk is good because you’re not near retirement. False! Always moderate any risk with stability in your portfolio. You can take a few risks but first you want to get a sound start to your investment journey. Typical blue chip stocks of yesteryear are good if you go with individual equity purchases. They need not be dead money. IBM for example is a blue chip stock with a big role in AI infrastructure. However, if I were starting out today, I’d begin with broad market ETFs (most of which had not even been thought of when I started). You can afford to take a little more risk and put some money away in a moderately leveraged S&P fund like ProShares Ultra S&P 500, $SSO. Definitely a bullish growth fund. If you bought it in 2008 at $2.75, every share would be $92.30 today. Not a bad return for a broad based fund. Some people like VOO or SCHG or VT (all popular on Reddit). At 18, use a moderately leveraged S&P fund like SSO and just stash a little away every month. Don’t think about it and one day you’ll have a nice big stash worth a lot of money. Want more risk? Throw a little spare change into a few small f the quantum computer companies. D-Wave, $QBTS, looks close to transforming into a profitable outfit. Quantum Computing is hot but their stock has recently skyrocketed. Any evolving technology will be very volatile. Never hurts to wait for a pullback in price. Those aren’t the starting point though. Investing into the US growth economy means a broad approach first, whether it’s an S&P fund, a NASDAQ fund or an even broader DOW fund, depends on a little bit of what you think the future holds and a little bit of discipline. Some months you’ll think the fund is expensive and be tempted to hold off. Trust me, next month it stands the same chance of being much more expensive as it does a little less. Don’t try to time the market. It will burn you! Consistent, discipline investing is the key. The difference between investing and gambling is controlling those emotional urges. If you can discipline yourself to “invest” steadily and with discipline, you’ll win.
dude IBM has been quietly pumping away and no one has said shit. I'm all in tomorrow.
Hopefully IBM buys IONQ. Otherwise, it prolly goes back to low $20s…
No such thing as too big to fail although there are some good bets such as Apple who failed to impress and quickly saw price drop. ETFs are literally fail proof because they exile that in distress before collapse and move allocations along with take next available depending on make up. DOW replacing Intel or IBM (don’t recall) with NVDIA perfect example. If not risk is investing in an ETF whose sector might go obsolete such perhaps owning companies that msn toll plaza. No clue if that even exists but the point being there’s still a risk.
IBM is the most promising since they've been trying for decades. Unfortunately they'll find a way to fuck it up like AI.
I’m going all in on IBM tomorrow
Can we put tariffs on IBM so that they use American workers? /s
IBM has gain potential from quantum hype without the risk of blowing up -90% like the small boys
seething rn cause im still missing out on the IBM pump
Apple is the next IBM. You heard it here first
Why is everyone so obsessed with the small no named companies? The ones that haven't produced anything useful in years. If you are trying for a quantum play you should focus on the big names. IBM, Google, Microsoft etc
IBM hyping quantum plans is bearish for the stock. Attempt to extend investors' time horizon usually means bad earnings report incoming. Bought puts before close.
Robotaxi talk reminds me of the old story I heard where, on his wedding night, the IBM sales guy sits on the side of the bed and keeps telling his bride how great it’s going to be.
IBM == sleeper? Look at them gains
just got some QUBT puts. Wallsteet will be moving all their money into IBM or GOOG, out of these shitty imposter quantom stocks.
Quantum computing will have a hard time finding a market for consumers. The average person will not need a quantum computer. Plus, IONQ has to compete against big players like IBM, GOOG, and MSFT. It's going to take a huge stroke of luck for IONQ to beat those giants in a race for quantum computing. Them getting brought out is more likely. Plus, Jenson didn't even know about quantum stocks at the start of this year. He gave them attention because he probably felt bad dissing them a couple of days prior.
IBM is doing real things. Not great for all the fake quantum stocks
They said GOOG is the new IBM. Haha
Betting on a small quantum group versus Google or IBM is insane. The only play here is they somehow get bought out. Google and IBM can pump a few hundred billion into quantum and not blink an eye. The second it's showing promise they can easily scale and take it market.
>IonQ now has a scalable path to fault-tolerant quantum machines while rivals like IBM and Quantinuum are stuck optimizing yesterday’s tech IBM released a statement today they are building a fault tolerant solution targeted for 2029.
IBM, Google Rigetti and others are also going all in on quantum computing, and IONQ isn't the only player
Don’t think they have any deal with AWS or IBM Cloud Only Microsoft and Oracle until today
I've been trying to tell everyone, IBM is the quantum play.
It could only run on a IBM deep blue supercomputer.
IBM has the right stuff. They are moving to quanum AI and then we are all fooked.
IBM just took a 'significant' step toward useful quantum computing [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-just-took-a-significant-step-toward-useful-quantum-computing-100048784.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-just-took-a-significant-step-toward-useful-quantum-computing-100048784.html)
IBM ….. has been on a generational run the last year. Never seen it mentioned. Now they’re leading the quantum computing race.
If advanced ai is created, it will be corporations and govs paying for it. Meta is not focused on providing solutions to corporations and govs, outside of allowing them to buy ads on Facebook, Insta, etc. metas key focus is social media . Has Zuck stated he wants meta to be more like msft / openai / IBM etc?
First off let me start by saying I'm not an apple guy. I have a samsung, I use PC's, I don't hate apple I just don't want to be in their ecosystem. That said, I think people are starting to realize that apple has never invented anything. They didn't invent the smartphone, blackberry was there first. They didn't invent portable music, the walkman was there first. What they HAD done in the past was revolutionize products. The iphone was a huge improvement to the blackberry. The ipod was a huge improvement to the walkman/discman. It seems that Apple has become content with their strong app store cash flow that they don't really see the need to revolutionize. Dare I say they have become IBM? I don't think Tim Cook is going to take them to the next level, I think Cook got in where Steve Jobs had a lot of things rolling and gets credit for not screwing it up. But an old rich baby boomer probably doesn't have the exposure to modern life to know what to innovate. TLDR Apple is a great business but is losing growth momentum and likely needs a change at the top to get to the next level.
I guess that depends on your reasons for investing. If you see the investment one is savvy and not only future proofs the business but positions it strongly in growth areas, then they'd be winning the arms race. If they're making fear based decisions because their core business is in danger of becoming irrelevant, well, that reeks of desperation. IBM has invested in plenty of "future growth" plenty of times. Meta reinvented itself as the Metaverse company, which you don't hear as much about anymore and has been criticized by plenty of people for being a desperation move because it's hard to explain how it'll pay off and understand what informed the decision. I'm not saying Meta is desperate, just like I'm not saying it's a brilliant idea. Just wondering if anyone else knows more about it and has a more informed take about what's going on.
IBM stopped making hardware to focus on software, and look how that turned out. And OP seems to think Apple such dump their efforts into software like AI.
Is this what they said about Research in Motion? Or Kodak? Xerox? Compaq? IBM? Apple is so far behind they are desperate now. They have plenty of money but leadership is stuck in the past. Possible Cook needs to go as he as failed too many times
I do see your logic, but I was working for IBM at the time and I saw that EVERYONE was using NVDA chips to train AI, including Tesla for their self driving cars. It just made sense. I totally see your point though!
Who's actually regarded enough to buy IBM at ATH? I'm surprised daily.
IBM ATH, suck my dick Los Angeles
If you want to invest in quantum computing, buy IBM. The recent increase in sales and profits is a one-off event, and D-Wave’s machine doesn’t perform true quantum computing—it uses quantum annealing, which is limited to finding the minimum value of a specific problem. Do thorough research before investing in a 216-employee startup with a 200x price-to-sales ratio. I am not saying the guys in D-Wave are not creating something great. They are. But the company definitely is so inflated in value that it is extremely risky to buy now. QBTS has a market cap of 6billion now and with the miniscule sales and the niche market they represent, imho it is very risky to get into it now.
Still blows my mind that IBM has that PE, and then something like Google is where it's at. This market is pure regardium.
If you think IBM is overvalued you'll lose your mind over the other quantum bubble stocks
I actually see the IBM short as a play. https://preview.redd.it/ipx46shvpu5f1.png?width=1396&format=png&auto=webp&s=52247e509bf03379c9afe52382be458087edb5d6 All-time highs while revenue and net income are declining/stalled.
Actually interesting - but like always timing is key, I actually agree with the takes although I don't know enough about IBM.
IBM still around? That’s news to me
What’s the difference if all the jobs come flooding back to the United States and then get eliminated because of AI. Has anybody seen the news today from IBM?
Goog has both AI and Quantum on lock. IBM No.2 prolly in those two combined categories. I honestly should have a small position in IBM
IBM enshittification that's all this is.
Check out Hedera $HBAR, the leading crypto for mass enterprise adoption. Governed by giants like Google, IBM, Dell https://hederacouncil.org/ https://hedera.com/
Check out Hedera $HBAR, the leading crypto for mass enterprise adoption. Governed by giants like Google, IBM, Dell https://hederacouncil.org/ https://hedera.com/
So were Sears and IBM at one point
You realize one of the largest Linux distros is owned by IBM these days right lol
Let's just fast forward to the point where "IBM is hiring 8000 people to fix the problems A.i. created"
Consider IBM - I like the combo of dividends and their investments in quantum - I have had excellent dividend and growth since owning it
Wonder how many robots and AI servers will buy IBM products. It’s like all these companies have forgotten how the economy works.
I got like 2 reddit accounts the other one im famous and I like you guys about I will tell you soon there is going to be a short squeeze on tsla today, so those holding puts be careful those in bullish mode positions make moves to b u y it. NVDA is also a good one but INTEL AND then IBM then Microsoft then APPLE then META, companies are exchanging stock certificates today boys! my only good advice is Russells is going to perform very well out of the indexes there is money to be made in small business because of opportunities that are unique innovative and will drive true growth. This flows outward and this is why we are missing a recession, maybe expansion soon end of summer.
I mean what is this, Colonel and Ellus being stocked for the sale of IBM's?
I'm new to options. IBM 167.5 C 0DTE anyone???
Jesus why is IBM stock doing so well? Just checked online and it’s green in every chart. 1d, 5d, 1m, 6m, ytd, 1yr, 5yr, max. Stock is on a ripper
There was a time IBM or Polaroid looked just as dominant as MSFT. AI from a smaller, more nimble competitor is a serious threat. And, people are sick of MSFT desire to get and sell your data. Linux and Open Source are a viable threat to displace Windows/Office
Accenture seems to be trying to become IBM with the amount of offshoring they are doing. Not sure why they would want to given the state of IBM
There isn't any. Any individual company can fall off or go even bankrupt. Think IBM or Nokia.
I thought IBM got rid of all humans in the late 90s
Agreed. I was hoping it would be Intel's year but alas I'll have to do some looking at IBM and Qcom, I haven't looked into them at all really.
rotate to IBM or Qcom.. intc doesn’t have a foreseeable material upside
Better title: IBM fires 8,000 because the tax emotion for tech R&D but they'll use the firings to promote their AI stack
>IBM, one of the most important technology companies in the world, Did...did we time travel back to 1983??
Yeah, I agree with everyone. AI isn't going to replace any jobs, especially not HR jobs. IBM just sucks 🙄
This is about enterprise adoption of AI. IBM adopted it. From the article- Artificial Intelligence (AI) is here to stay, that much we know, but in recent weeks a very frustrating news item has been making the rounds: the catastrophic future in which machines replace humans has arrived. IBM, one of the most important technology companies in the world, has eliminated approximately 8,000 jobs within the Human Resources (HR) Department. Why? You can probably guess: AI has taken over everything. The “repetitive” jobs, reading vacation requests, managing payroll or internal company documentation will now be handled by AI systems, like the AskHR platform. Are we facing the future or a step backward?
TIL IBM had 8,000 pitch deck creators. When your job is creating bullshit, it’s bound to end
IBM is a company that hasn't really been associated with success for some time. In a lot of cases layoffs are meant to salvage a flailing business. If that's the case here, the AI narrative is meant to hide that behind illusory technological progress and business optimization.
Based on personal experiences working with IBM: they gave really bad services because they tend to overwork their consultants from third world countries.
I used to work for IBM. HR was terrible. You often had to do their jobs for them. I hate to say it, but some tasks are probably better left to AI.
Yes anyone that has worked with IBM in the past few years will tell you how much they are struggling and how shit their products are. This is workforce reduction due to being a shit company, nothing to do with ai.
I thought so too. IBM employs around 300,000 people. The average is 1.5 to 4.5 HR personnel for every 100 employees. But larger companies tend to be closer to 1 HR person for every 100 employees. Doing the math, it looks like they had too many HR personnel to begin with.
He’s guessing. It’s absolutely possible he’s right, it’s also possible they’re actually following through with this and replacing HR with AI. IBM cut 8,000 HR jobs. A task that (in theory) could be handled, right now, by AI.
Good for IBM. My HR department has created layers of bloat so I can't email them with a simple question. It goes through a service agent and takes a long time to get answered. Often it just sends me to a link and we play the back and forth game for a few weeks. We finally implemented a LLM across the entire organization and it does a pretty good job of answering questions now and consolidates information from all the websites we have into relevant information. I imagine this IBM move will become more common across HR departments.
It’s IBM. Nothing to fear.
Sure, I’d grant it’s a theory. That said IBM has been more heavily into AI (for decades) than the vast majority of the tech sector. If they were going to move some jobs to AI, HR seems a solid first choice and test case.
'IBM hires 10000 workers overseas, COMPLETELY unrelated we pinky swear'.
Bean counters gonna keep bean counting at IBM until it is just management and AI.