Reddit Posts
Framing the Cerebras Hype Cycle a Little More Responsibly
Framing the Cerebras Hype Cycle a Little More Responsibly
We may build too many data centers, from a computer nerd's point of view.
dead shoemaker (BIRD) +582% pivoting to AI GPUs. long post on why this is funnier than it looks and what it says about AI funding
What company have you held in your portfolio for a long time that you never hear mentioned on Reddit?
Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI
$OSS - Nvidia Special Access Partner. Gaining momentum
An Analysis of One Stop Systems (OSS): The Overlooked Hardware Layer of the AI Defense Boom
One Stop Systems (OSS): The Overlooked Edge AI Defense Stock Powering Palantir’s (PLTR) Battlefield A
The Future of Military Computing - $OSS - an Underrated A.I. Edge Computing OEM
Potential Pennystock of the Year: $OSS - One Stop Systems
Potential Pennystock of the Year: $OSS - One Stop Systems
Potential Pennystock of the Year: $OSS - One Stop Systems
$OSS - Highly underrated penny play. Just won another military contract win, many more to come.
$OSS flagging after military contract news came out. Wonder if they will have another earnings improvement YoY
Original Short Squeeze OSS The one and only AMC
Red Light Holland to Acquire Two Wellness Shops in the Netherlands: SmartShop Utrecht and SmartShop OSS
What do you think of my beginning portfolio.
BlackBerry Strengthens Software Supply Chain with Corporate-Wide OpenChain ISO/IEC 5230:2020 Conformance
$OSS - My favorite small cap swing. I have been adding at the $6 mark. A positive cash flow, edge-computing sleeper company, trading with a market cap of just 100 million.
GME is never going to the moon, and I know why (long post)
Mentions
The alternatives are all dead or long defeated XD, Sketch and some OSS Again though, it’s niche software already used by the majority of people who would ever use it
By next year: \- OSS models will dominate \- ROI will be more difficult to show
I liked it better when the mag 7 led the market and not what ever the fuck this OSS
I take your point about the AI backlog, that could send the stock downwards massively. I’m quite convinced it wouldn’t impact the clouds’ ability to grow their profits nonetheless though. Point two may have been a factor 3 years ago, but nowadays OAI runs on AWS, Copilot features Claude and you can deploy Anthropic models in Azure AI Foundry - everyone runs everything because at least big Enterprises have long running commitments and usually don’t switch cloud providers because of a single feature/model. It’s a bit like people saying Windows is dead while half of Azure is Linux VMs and Microsoft earns money anyway. Or SQL Server is a Microsoft moat, yet AWS and GCP run it quite well, too. Point three falls apart if low cost OSS models win. I doubt there’ll ever be a single model to rule them all - but if it was the case clouds could just start selling capacity they don’t need for research if they “lost”. And as I said before, there’s massive demand and any idle compute would easily be taken by paying customers for inference. Local models won’t be a big challenger for the near future - hardware is way to expensive for devs to run these things at scale. Definitely an interesting one in the medium term. But a) you can bet your ass if you want enterprise support you’ll pay for that anyway and b) they’ll monetise on the hardware too. MS already presented their first Surface with NVIDIA AI Chip in May - they’ll happily sell you a 5K laptop. Curious to see where this goes, perhaps I’m just wrong lol.
I don't think it's that simple. There's always the floor of the Chinese OSS models. They're getting pretty good. The API inference on them is dirt cheap. Now, people and companies are willing to pay for better performance, up to a limit - they're not going to pay 100 times as much.
$OSS holders and probably most crack dealers
What about my 2 shares of one stop systems (Ticker: OSS)??? :D
I have already OSS and ONDS but i think kraken would be a nice add to it
OSS just getting started
Buying OSS here, my first small cap play. Zacks has a strong buy rating so that means something right?
Seeing a lot of hype around OSS on X after earnings. Bought 10 shares lets see if its better than POET
I don´t buy OSS since it merged into CIA.
$OSS gaining a lot of traction after earnings, throw in a few bucks. Might be a better plat than $POET
Where my $OSS homies at? Great day!!!!
OSS smash earnings https://preview.redd.it/lj84gfyemjzg1.jpeg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2d45681637eb73632e1644abc23b85b0ea4f328d
$OSS smashed earnings! Buy more
I look forward to seeing your loss porn on $OSS by Friday.
God damn just noticed OSS. All it took was one day to make me finally go up.
Not to bust your doubt, but some enterprise with the means and an army of developers have already started to do that. And don’t underestimate the open source community. Vibe coding tools are being used in OSS too. It’s only a matter of time when we’d have a plethora of open source alternatives to these SaaS products.
You really just haven’t thought all the way through this I think. Also, you shouldn’t say things are dumb, that’s just rude and not something we do here on wsb; also, your take is dumb. The French government is basically going to take on building their own OS and enterprise tools which will be worse performing, less secure, and more expensive than Microsoft’s and here’s why: Migrations take a long time and cost a lot of money, a lot of which is training and cost associated with lost productivity during the switch. At least macOS still has Office and an easy interface that millions are familiar with; Linux distros do not. Even macOS though would be a massive undertaking because windows applications generally only run on windows unless you build compatibility layers for all of them. You’re saying the French government is going to be ok with either maintaining compatibility layers for the likely thousands of windows specific applications used in government or building their own. If you pick some windows lookalike distribution, well now you are going to have to fork and maintain it because otherwise, it’s not secured or compliant for a government org. The French government will have to contract this out or hire in and maintain it on their own, it won’t bring any revenue and will cost a lot to maintain with constant risk of breach. That’s expensive. There’s also no enterprise management solution as good or as easy as what is available in windows and finding enough IT pros trained in whatever solution is also going to be difficult. So again, contract this out or make your own that’s secure. I wouldn’t want anything based on OSS for government right now after the Glasswing thing. This is going to be incredibly expensive and will likely fail or get abandoned in part or whole.
Opened Today - Calls: OSS • OKLO - Puts: LULU • WSM • DOCU • SAIL *Disclaimer: not advice or recommendations or anything else*
Maybe for today: - Calls: OSS • JBL • OKLO • M • HTHT - Puts: LULU • DRVN • DOCU • SAIL *Disclaimer: not advice, not recommendations, subject to change, nothing to see here....*
Because "death to america" is about not wanting *the* world power to be freely allowed to commit regime change and warfare both on the ground and psychological against any country who didn't fall in line with the goals of their intelligence services. The CIA was basically created out of the OSS to be the foreign policy wing of government getting shit done outside of direct front facing military intervention. Any "communist" regime that wants to be a self sustaining country away from the central banks has a target put on their back. And boy, did they get to supporting and enabling regime change right quick. By the time of the Iranian Revolution, they had already done it multiple times. A sentiment born during the revolution climaxing with the seizure of a US embassy is kind of emblematic about that. Obviously any nuance or subtext was going to be lost in the propaganda machine in the 70's and 80's, look at how it works now. re: Saddam - former CIA guy John Kiriokou just told a great story on Julian Dorey about David Rockefeller accepting some art award in the middle east. After hob knobbing with whatever royal family accepting the award, they had him on a military transport the next morning to go tell Saddam to knock it off or he'd have a bomb shoved up his ass. John was aloof until the next morning when he asked why a guy at the end of his life flew all the way around the world for an award, not realizing it was his cover. The Saddam regime and relations with the US (and thereby relations with the middle east) are a lot more complicated then "he bombed terrorists so they stopped". And no, obviously take out actual threats with the means to be one. The problem is a state(s) deciding who is and isn't bad, deciphering who the good guys even are when everybody has to play dirty, and the surrounding reasons for why any particular regime or methodology is in play in any specific region.
The basis of your argument is flawed, relying heavily on hindsight bias. You're saying just because we know the inner workings of USSR near the point of collapse, that all policies implemented prior were fluff. Which is blatantly false. I don't even know what your objective is. But lets go over what you are saying. >What do you call a punching bag that started the Yom Kippur War over a false flag operation by killing innocents in Egypt, struck the USS Liberty, and actively funds a superPAC that is anti-American at heart? My argument is that Israel doesn't control us. We don't do anything we dont want to do. You say they are terrorists, which isn't relevant to my argument because I never said they weren't. This designation of good and bad is immature. We worked with Soviets as allies right before they became our mortal enemy in the cold war. We have objectives in the region and we use resources to best accomplish those objectives. >We were never involved in the Middle East until the Yom Kippur War and they & Great Britain begged and pleaded for Americans to help them. The fact that we did and continue to do so out of "obligation" is a massive mistake. The communist argument was a facade, Israel wanted Jordanian land and control of the Nile. We have been involved in the middle east officially since we voted on the resolution. Period. Light involvement existed earlier, but the U.S. became a real Middle East power in the mid-1940s, and fully committed by 1947–1957. Everything else afterwards was a primary influence of deterring communism with our vested interest in maintaining Israel against mutual enemies and a base in the middle east. >Yeah, the communist scare was a joke. The USSR was a paper tiger. Poorly managed, their entire economy was contingent on essentially feudal labor and too inflexible to provide for the needs of both the state and its peoples. They could never realistically survive an all out conflict- look what happened in Afghanistan in the 1980s. They were a complete joke militarily, and still are (also, they literally almost lost to the Finns before WWII in the Winter War. How do you almost lose to townies on skis?) Through our official policies, funding and military commitments and lives lost, whether or not communists were pretending to be bigger than they were is irrelevant, fact is WE thought they were and our polices reflected that. You can argue that it was a mistake to continue to assist, though that is countered by every uncertainty during that time that Soviets were rational actors. You wouldn't be able to go back in time to play out that reality so its really groundless on whether it was a mistake. You cant control what other nations do but you can control the resources at your disposal. The positioning to obtain greater US resources has been a major philosophy of every clandestine operation since OSS. But the real fact is USSR was not a joke in the sense of being harmless or fake. It was a real superpower with a huge military, a massive nuclear arsenal, and enough power to threaten the United States and dominate Eastern Europe for decades. U.S. historical assessments in the 1950s described the USSR as heavily armed and capable of inflicting serious damage on the U.S., including atomic attack. But I suppose you know more than the experts. [https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54v02p1/d18](https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54v02p1/d18) >Don't forget the entirety of the Mossad-Epstein ring goes all the way back to the Contras... Even if we didn't want to help them if their aims hurt ours, our politicians are blackmailed into going along with it Also: [https://www.commondreams.org/news/2010/07/18/netanyahu-us-easily-manipulated](https://www.commondreams.org/news/2010/07/18/netanyahu-us-easily-manipulated) Bibi said it himself, and in 2010! "Don't forget". What Mossad-Epstein ring? What blackmail? The link you put doesn't speak to any of that. This is just tin foil hat speculations with no ground. Your argument here is that we are engaged due to blackmailing of political officials and we would continue to be engaged even if it hurts our interests, largely pointing to covert Israeli cabal influence at the highest levels. There is no evidence of this which negates the overwhelming reason for the cold war and involvement in the middle east. All this stemming from your hindsight bias that Soviets were never a threat? You are all over the place. Again, just because our interests align doesn't mean there's some secret Israeli black ops mind controlling our politicians. >Korea and Vietnam accomplished reducing international support for American actions so Israel and the US could be more isolated internationally, and thus the US could be beholden to proIsraeli goals instead of global unity. Your attempt to frame every US policy and action on an Israeli focused ground is nothing but propaganda and brainwashing. You do know the world doesnt revolve around this right? You do understand that these types of conflicts were occurring before Israel became a state. The immediate reason for the Korean War was that North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25, 1950, and the U.S. intervened under a **United Nations mandate** to help repel that attack. The bigger reason was the Cold War. U.S. leaders believed that letting South Korea fall would strengthen Communist expansion in Asia and weaken U.S. credibility with allies. State Department history describes the war as the point where the Cold War turned into open armed conflict, and later U.S. policy documents explicitly framed Korea as part of resisting further Communist expansion in the Far East. [https://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/short-history/koreanwar](https://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/short-history/koreanwar) [https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/EOP/OVP/speeches/KoreanWarAnniversary](https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/EOP/OVP/speeches/KoreanWarAnniversary) The U.S. fought in Vietnam because it wanted to prevent North Vietnam and the Viet Cong from defeating South Vietnam, and it saw that as part of stopping communist expansion during the Cold War. The war escalated dramatically after the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964. [https://history.state.gov/milestones/1961-1968/gulf-of-tonkin](https://history.state.gov/milestones/1961-1968/gulf-of-tonkin) [https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v05/d177](https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v05/d177) You want to know what all these have in common? No relation to Israel other than it all being under the same umbrella with the primary objective in the cold war which is to contain Soviet expansion without triggering a direct nuclear war. NSC-68 and related U.S. history sources frame that as deterrence, military buildup, and resistance to further Soviet gains. [https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/NSC68](https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/NSC68) >Why the fuck did we veto UN propositions that literally everyone else in the world vehemently disagreed with, except Israel? Why do we shield UN? Easy because their position is to our benefit in the region. >Why do we actively disparage the institutions we built after WWII for global unity? Take it up with the charter and formation legalities of the UN. Any permanent member back block action with a veto. This is not a special reserved US power. >Israel wants everything for itself and cannot imagine a non Jewish world they cannot "inherit". It's literally the Haredi point of view, which is the fastest growing sect of Judaism: [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9734595/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9734595/) All this run around. Just say you are biased against Jews instead of denying history. The Cuban Missile Crisis was started because the US escalated the situation with our Minutemen in Turkey pointed at Moscow. The Soviets wouldn't have sent their nukes to Cuba if we hadn't placed them there to begin with. Stupid policy blunders like that were entirely self inflicted. First of all the U.S. missiles in Turkey were Jupiter missiles, not Minutemen. Second it was not started because of that. there were multiple motives: deterring another U.S. attempt to overthrow Castro after the Bay of Pigs, countering ongoing U.S. pressure such as Operation Mongoose, improving Soviet strategic position, and also responding to the missile balance that included Turkey. In other words, Turkey was one cause, not the whole cause. This of course is not relevant because it does not provide ground to your "ussr is a joke" statement or your anti israeli bias. It sounds like you grew up watching too much Alex Jones or the like. I wouldn't say you can claim critical thinking either, as all your references have little to no ground. Simply put, you speak out your ass on things you dont know about.
I also have: KRKNF - certified underwater batteries KOPN - military-grade microdisplays for helmets and goggles BEAMMW.B - future chips for 5G, 6G and radars OPTT - part of the marine and underwater autonomous defense ecosystem FTL, RDW, OSS, I just sold, but I will buy again after the drop: PRSO, MOBX
RCAT ONDS pumped . DPRO OSS Low float Drone stocks.
Read it. It’s the GPT-OSS models only The key models from OAI are absolutely not on bedrock
This is the critical part people are missing. 45 was hemmed in on all sides by administration staff who resigned in the worst excesses of the president. 47 has true believers throughout the administration and is replacing people throughout government with more of the same every single day. The chaos of this administration *is* the president. It’s only going to get worse from here on that front because not a single person will actually stand in the way anymore. The SCOTUS tariff ruling is probably the first sign of the barest pushback. It only seems like a big deal because the illegality of war was attempted was so large in the first place. There’s also nothing stopping him from doing it again and dragging the courts through another 6 month long ordeal before returning another “no”. Other countries are starting to recognize that this administration OSS much more interested in *the appearance* of doing something rather than getting into the nitty gritty of actually doing anything or upholding agreements. Half of the “terrible” agreements being renegotiated with 47 were agreements that were made by 45… VXUS
I invested a lot, the stocks in pennystock reddit. Do you know MGOL, SPGC, ... OSS BBAI lot of But the stock is not a problem. The problem is I can not control my dopamine and it cause me something wrong . Whatever i lost my money or earn, It gives me dopamine, but when the stock moves sideways, than it doesn't give me that. So i'm finding Like that Stocks. It broke me down
Unless it's tiny like a 30B or so model, you run a quant. If it's Q8, there is effectively no difference between that and FP16 or BF16. Q6 is pretty much no difference either. Generally Q4 and above and you are good. But I've run as low as 1 bit and for a large model, it's still good. And before you shake your head and quants. Try it. They work so well that many model makers are releasing quants themselves. OpenAI released GPT-OSS as a FP4.
Jeez, you people really should stick to index funds. You gobble up every lazy narrative. “OpenAI models are trash”, says who? You using it to ask it when the mall closes? OpenAI has the 2nd most intelligent model (GPT 5.2 thinking), the fastest model (OSS-120B), and the cheapest model (OSS-120B). Yes, it’s cheaper and faster than DeepSeek or any Chinese model. 5.2 thinking was the most intelligent last week but Anthropic just released Opus 4.6. GPT 5.3 thinking will reclaim the top spot once it’s tested. Source: artificialanalysis.ai It’s okay that you don’t know these things. But you should avoid having strong opinions on things you aren’t informed about.
Fair enough, and agree on RDW’s financials. If you like underpriced with a big runway, check out $OSS - One Stop Systems - it was a retail darling on X but faded. The numbers are ridiculous, the moat is tremendous (they’re bringing AI to the battlefield), and the management team is a procurement dream.
I call that a real PAINPAL in your ass BRO!!! next time choose growth stocks like $TER / $CELH / $CCL ( Safe bet) I see only one opportunity to recover your losses: You can do a risky recovery play on $OSS best regards ! ✌🏼
I’m not in particular bullish or bearish on 🌽, but what makes anyone think this crash OSS different from any others and crypto won’t recover?
Right now the main reason they have the consumer market is because they were the first mover's, not because they have the best product. A lot of power users don't think 5.2 thinking is the most intelligent model in the real world. In artificial analysis, 5.2 think extra high is at the top mainly because it just throws a huge amount of compute (money) at it instead of actually making the base model smarter. And it gets marginal benefits from that despite costing much more. OSS 120B is the cheapest yes, but again it is significantly worse than other cheap models at actual tasks. Why use OSS 120B when Gemini 3 flash is significantly better and already cheap enough to not worry about cost? It's only use case is for privacy Google, anthropic, and ChatGPT can all easily take the most intelligent model or the cheapest model if they want to. The challenge is making it cost effective and intelligent, respectively. OpenAI is not really doing that. I personally don't think OpenAI will survive in their current form. I'd say it's fairly likely they get bought by another company after a while.
Yes that is the current narrative. But you also have to remember that OpenAI has already captured a strong portion of the consumer market. If they can expand on the enterprise side, maybe move into healthcare, robotics, etc. they can have a great consumer and enterprise business. Per Artificial Analysis, OpenAI has the most intelligent model (5.2 thinking), the fastest model (OSS-120B) and the cheapest model (OSS-120B)— even cheaper than the Chinese open source ones. With huge access to capital, strong mind share, a talented team, and industry connections, I think they’ll be just fine.
Small-cap setups: $QS, $EOSE, $CIFR, $MAAS, $ZETA, $ONDS, $RDW, $OSS, $LPTH
the article is a fundamentally stupid premise. Basically that Chinese firms will create open source software to use on their own (worse) chips that software stack would compete with CUDA. That's something anyone could do now above the device driver level. It's also not what Nvidia is making money off, like their software stack is a value add but you can use and redistribute their libraries in your own software. They make money off the hardware, its not like if some OSS stack came out that was better than CUDA they couldn't just either extend their own with the better parts or swap to the OSS stack. whoever wrote this just doesn't seem to understand how any of this works.
How do you choose your stocks? Try OSS & vnet
DRONE MANIA. DPRO has the smallest float. OSS RCAT ONDS
Can OSS continue its run? Or late to the party if I enter today?
Is OSS gonna be the big new hot thing?
What’s up with OSS? Saw news on a new contract last week, but today’s run up is crazy (good)
OSS and TSAT for me. Not financial advise though. Do your own research.
If I may ask, how many shares do you have of OSS? You used to post screenshots of your positions before (like NBIS calls) etc. recently you haven’t posted much. So curious if you will post some details about shares. I know you’re loaded but if you share what % of portfolio or number of shares your buying, it will help for those who follow you!
Great find. Your the best account on FinX. I think OSS is going to do better than VLN this year though so I’m going in to OSS. Will skip this
Take a look at OSS. Looks primed
OSS is my defense play of choice right now. They still need to prove out how scalable they are, but it’s a pretty cheap call option on the sector. Management is also really impressive for a small cap.
OSS - you’ll see what people are noticing
They won't replace anyone because the minute they run out of training data they're DOE. All efforts to bypass needing human training data fail for a reason, despite what the marketers posing as researchers want to convince you of. There is no world where humans aren't writing new frameworks or building OSS just for AI firms to use it, we'll simply stop supporting OSS projects. People really have no idea how fragile tech is. If you think AI is replacing anyone, you don't understand how it's currently being used.
OSS (One Stop Systems) has been on a tear
What have you heard about OSS?
I don’t think OSS AI is what gets deployed at massive scale. Quite the contrary since infra is so expensive only the big guys can afford it and they have their own versions. The rest I agree with mostly.
> Mining is similar to inference, not training from what I gather. Mining is compute intensive. Training is compute intensive. Inference, relatively, is not. It's limiter is fundamentally memory bandwidth. Not compute. > You have trained a algorithm, you now need to run that algo for various inputs - that's inference. No. The "algorithm" is the same. What you train for is weights. What you infer from is weights. Whether for training or inferring, that "algorithm" can differ between models. The "algorithm" for OSS is not the same "algorithm" for Qwen. For both training and inferring. > Training needs access to a general purpose hardware.. this is what I gathered talking to some folks. I'm no expert. Then so does inference for the reasons stated above. Regardless, a TPU can't only just use a fixed "algorithm". It performs operations. You program decides with "algorithm" it performs operations on. Which is exaclty the same way general purpose hardware works as well.
Actually, no, the idea is to train the models and then deploy them on local hardware. What use is a robot that shuts down without the internet? The infra is an intermediate step that only accelerates the process. It has been done with smaller setups and distributed computing. There is currently a $600 OSS twin arm helper bot that can be 3d printed that runs on local compute within the bot. If it were being done centrally, you wouldn't be doing it over cloud. It would be with an on-site server that is air gaped from the wider web. Small Language/Action models are coming leaps and bounds and don't require the same huge compute investment. Plus, a single model can be forked into a huge variety of applications. They have overshot the need by a huge amount and will be left with mounds unproductive chips. If all the AI dedicated data centers were to go offline right now and never come back, it wouldn't stop the proliferation. Just slow it down. Think of it like power plants. Massive upfront cost, super slim margins, and huge competition from distributed systems. There will be a need for baseline production, but not the exponential growth like the building suggests.
Just play Q3 earnings. I played OSS and SD and HAE, although I put way less in HAE because stupid AI pushed me to SD more. Look at industries doing well, energy is a great earnings to bet on. I bet on DK today and they blew earnings out of the water.
OSS earning premarket. Betting on beating earnings 🙏
My penny stock graduates (ONDS, BBAI, RZLV, OSS) have been eating shit for weeks now. Something bigger is on the horizon. Hope peeps be careful.
This goes against exactly the comment you responded to. To be clear they are saying OSS not worth putting your emotion first. Make the money. In which millions are being made on $NVDA right now.
I’ve recently purchased some Deep ITM calls for two stocks I’m am going long on for a few years. I like the stocks. OSS is a growth play and HUN is a value play. Here is the strategy:https://youtu.be/_rCiCmx2K0I?si=6E-KdPOvH5DMsiCn
They are and they aren’t. Their Mac’s are industry standard for running models locales due to their integrated memory architecture. Effectively allows you to use RAM as equivalent VRAM, and with the higher memory options you can run some large quantized versions of Deepseek and GPT OSS.
Sorry OSS is not a ticker
It took Netflix and uber ~15 years to become profitable. They are giving their product away for market capture. Some models like OSS and 4o could be profitable today.
The corruption in all administrations has been pretty bad. This one OSS taking it to the extreme. Look at pardons issued for $ over all the past administrations.
Deutsche Telekom has the Open Telekom Cloud. Its based on Open Stack OSS and has regions in Germany, Netherlands and maybe Spain? Did not work with it myself but I know that some larger enterprises have deployed some workloads.
OSS - ai edge computing for the military. Institutional ownership at all time high
On it. Also check out OSS
RZLV, OSS, and ONDS have been very good to me
OSS has gotten by attention from some drone-adjacent news. ~125MM market cap, ~$14MM revenue holding steady over time, growing revenue in AI/defense sectors, solid cash pile compared to burn rate, decent chance at finding profit regularly next year.
Never give up. Stop listening to this sub and dyor. Take your money and invest it in good stocks. ICU SESI SGBX BBAI OSS MDAI RZLV LXRX VOR KSCP.. and the list goes on. Youll see ups and downs but youll be confident and less stressed in holding a bit longer and seeing actual results. Everyone here is waiting for a pump and dump. Get out of the cracked out rat race going on here.. good luck my friend.
Long OSS could get interesting. By long I mean Feb 26 calls.
Hmm still no OSS yet? probably when it hits $20 people will find out
OSS got a couple of nice contracts this week, including a government contract.
BTQ, INVZ, OSS, RR, MDAI, PSTV, Zoomd my pennystocks holdings- not financial advice- do your own research 🧐