Reddit Posts
It’s 2024, how are you guys planning on taking advantage the “AI Craze”?
Rocket Lab Makes its Defense Prime Debut with $0.5 Billion Contract to Design and Build Satellite Constellation for Space Development Agency
Jim Cramer Recommended Selling These 12 Stocks
Whats your "this could be the next tsla or aapl" in terms of what they returned in the last 10 years
Rocket Lab USA stock jumps on government contract for 18 vehicles
🚀🚀 40k play: Rocket Lab to the moon 🚀🚀
RKLB Mystery Mega Constellation Customer Revealed?
$RKLB Rocket Lab stock drops after first satellite launch failure in more than two years
RKLB executive sells stock, second time in a week
Don’t sleep on these 3 penny stocks that will mint millionaires.
Rocket Labs (RKLB) get another contract with NASA
Will Neutron Propel $RKLB to Profitability In 2025?🚀
Cramer’s Lightning Round: Move on from Rocket Lab [Should I go jacked to the tits on RKLB calls?]
PLTR & RKLB Before August ER?
Why can't we get real time data on short selling?
RKLB is 🚀 after a great launch mission yesterday! Up $8,000 so far.
$RKLB Rocket Lab - D.O.D hypersonic testing to AI swarm satellites 🛰
What are some upcoming events you’re looking forward to?
So is SmartKuz playing us or not?
$RKLB millionaire grindset 😈
First was $SAVE, then $PENN. for my final act, I give you $RKLB
Gave you $SAVE, then $PENN. For my final act, I present $RKLB.
$RKLB Analysis -- Shares or Options? Which would you do?
Does anyone know any sub-$10 billion market cap companies that have a future.
🚀🌕RKLB: The YOLO Moonshot We've Been Waiting For🌕🚀 - The Secret's Out, Bezos!
RKLB has already gone to the moon - literally.
The Space Race – Time to Buy RKLB AND SPCE?
The Space Race – Time to Buy RKLB and SPCE?
Rocketlab ($RKLB) confirmed deal with Amazon ($AMZN) Final Part, Confirmed as of four hours ago.
SpaceX receives FAA approval for Starship launch – Monday, April 17 launch date
SpaceX receives FAA approval for Starship launch – Monday, April 17 Launch Date
Who is your Biggest loser, how much, and why are you still hodling, and what's your plan? I'll go first:
What is happening to IPOs and tech stocks that are not massive blue chip companies?
Have become extremely interested in Rocket Lab USA lately here my reasons RKLB
If you want to see if a company has covered their exposure to the bank failure, check their financial statement footnotes.
$RKLB Hidden message in PR: Part 2. $AMZN & $RKLB Likely billion dollar deal to be annouced
$RKLB will likely receive billions in launch contracts from the US government
Something something RKLB to the moon🚀 idk my parents loved me as a child
$RKLB Hidden message in new PR, Big announcement coming soon. $AMZN Holders read this.
RKLB Is building a rocket ship an we are going to low earth orbit
Massive News for Rocketlab, Under the radar for non space nerds $RKLB
2023-01-20 Wrinkle-brain Plays (Mathematically derived options plays)
My First Two Weeks Of Options Trading
Mentions
I would have made way more money if I just sat in my original $RKLB position. Would have been 5 times richer.
How was ASTS not in the top 10, i'm sure it was mentioned more than RKLB
Full port for PLTR. It was one of the few good decisions I made in my life. I sell CCs and buy a share every now and then to add more. What's crazy is seeing other companies do similar things, like HOOD and RKLB having huge returns. Even CVNA. It's crazy because I'm a Millennial and I hear all the time that my generation has no opportunities, but if you could get like 10K and throw it on any of those names you'd have huge returns right now. And there will be more in 2026, and thereafter. But for me, I'm just DCAing into PLTR.
RKLB is a **proven** launch and satellite company. ASTS, on the other hand, is a **disruptive** play for satellite to-phone connectivity, so its **upside** is on another level
Because some RKLB share holders think you can only pick one space stock. Both are winners but ASTS has a much much higher ceiling than rklb
RKLB and ASTS are winners
Close. My American dream is to get hit by a city bus and then put it into the market. Unfortunately my version wouldn't be RKLB at $9 and it would end behind a Wendy's dumpster.
LUNR - p/e ratio compared to RKLB/ATST is way lower, upcoming Lanteris acquisition will make them profitable overnight / make them ebitda positive, catalysts over 2026 look unreal and think they'll be in a very different position by EOY 2026. ex NASA Director who understands the bureaucracy but lacks the charisma / salesman hype factor of Sir Beck means these guys will fly under the radar until institutional buyers flock in after the Lanteris acquisition goes through and retail inevitably fomos. Like buying rklb at $10 imo (except p/e ratio is better in lunr than rklb was even at $10)
Not fusion. For nuclear I like the small modular reactor concept. OKLO and SMR are long term plays of mine. I've been out of OKLO for a bit as they've run up too far too fast for me. Was also out of SMR for a while until they dipped down to $16 recently. For space besides RKLB, ASTS bigly.
Looking at $RKLB too! Any specific catalysts you see?
Sued a guy that hit me when I was on my bike, dumped the settlement into RKLB. 15K shares at $9. Tempted to swing trade but I have no idea what I’m doing. Holding till 2030.
almost of my port and gains came from RKLB the last two years. I’m now trying to load up on PL as much I can with hope for similar returns.
I got in RKLB below $4.00 and taking about the truth and why I think investing in RDDT is a bad idea isn’t whining. Does reading different opinions upset you?
PLTR. It's my only stock. I did own RKLB for some time, but sold at 21 as I did t like how everyone was comparing it to SpaceX. Like, it seemed RKLB only had value because people were saying SpaceX was worth some figure. But RKLB is slowly approaching profitablity, so I was probably wrong to sell my shares. I just don't understand enough of that space nonsense to hold long term. Good luck this year. I mean next year. Not this year because it's over. You know what I mean.
Obviously you haven't read my post or my other comments. I fully understand what RKLB and ASTS do and offer. I outlined in the post and many comments that 75-80% of RKLB business comes from their space systems and not launch, maybe you missed it. However, to say ASTS is not the same business as SpaceX shows a level of ignorance because Starlink is part of SpaceX and ASTS is trying to compete with Starlink in the Direct to Device market.
So many angry precious metal bears lmao I've never seen anyone mad about ASTS RKLB NVDA GOOG or anything else having a great year. Yall OK?
For those of you who don’t like my play on silver, APLD is a really good buy here imo. Also RKLB once it dips back to the high 50s low 60s
All-in on RKLB. Once Neutron takes flight most likely in Q2, the whole world will take notice🚀
$RKLB & $NBIS high risk
RKLB leaps at 80 delta for ‘28 will print you money I believe. Been buying those up at different strikes each week and looking very good.
In no particular order, ENPH, TSLA, and RKLB. (I just got back into ENPH after getting out at $310.)
Any idea on RKLB guys. I’ve got april calls otm.
I think they’re both 10x from here but not next year. ASTS will just be starting out service. I could see it climbing 2x-3x if the market is still pumping but 10x from current will be a while. RKLB has no chance of 10x next year as well. Even if Neutron is 100% successful in first launch and SpaceX IPO’s for $1.5t making RKLB look like a bargain I can’t possibly see them doing more than a 2x-3x as well unless they unveil some insane Space Systems play
Throw all your money into RDDT. I don’t care. I wouldn’t invest in this not based on emotion but based on the product itself. If you’re extreme left you love it here and so you think everyone will eventually see things the way you do. Reality is different. I invested in RKLB between $4- $5 I am in HOVR now. Reddit will fade out like all social media does. It produces nothing. People and bots do the work here and when something new comes along in the next few years the mob will dwindle. They build nothing.
~10+% equity stake by Google, renewed partnership with Google via Project Suncatcher, 30mm sats going up *now* which enable license plate level accuracy, potential to partner with RKLB in the future for satellite launches. This one is very complimentary to the other space players & de-spac'ed this year so is still relatively cheap.
ASTS and RKLB already 10x since last year. Are you saying they're going to 100X in a a 6 year year period? That's crazy talk.
Low key pumping ASTS and RKLB I see? Rightfully so :D
RKLB looks like a boom or bust stock, and therefore not fit for long-term investing.
RKLB is a meme stock so regards like to pretend that it’s as good as space x and when space x IPOs it will drag RKLB up with it.
It will create fomo in the sector and funds will flow into the next best thing. We saw an example of this with minerals this year. Many went parabolic on the news of one being 10% purchased by the govt. RKLB and ASTS also spiked high on the news of a potential SpaceX ipo in 2026, once it actually happens it could spike again. All speculation of course and execution will matter more.
My PLTR was called away I invested in RKLB because of Peter Beck, and because space is the biggest potential I know of people are sleeping on
I see that most people haven’t gone very deep on ASTS yet, it’s taken me a year of following and learning to understand just how far ahead of Starlink technology they are. This is a good sign that it is still underestimated, undervalued, and misunderstood in my opinion. I’d encourage anyone curious to check @thekookreport on X for an amazing and recently updated due diligence doc. But that requires work right? So here’s some pumps I mean points: ASTS has already purchased or secured via MVNO partnerships the multi level bands of spectrum needed for worldwide direct to device. Starlink does not currently work on the lower spectrum needed, yes they acquired some for the US, but Elon’s twitter fingers ruffled some Euro feathers in those markets already. Starlink = thousands of satellites needed with around 60 sats “deorbiting” aka burning up monthly, but yeah they do have the Space X fast cheap hook up. Asts = 60 bluebirds needed. 6 currently up, factory production is full ramped and they have 60 scheduled be up by 2027. Asts is NOT limited to just Space X for launch. Multiple launch partners now exist and worldwide launch capacity is growing, getting more competitive, and cost effective. Predicted operating margins start at 50 percent, with network efficiencies pushing it higher. Full Disclosure I own TSLA, RKLB, ASTS, and don’t really know what I’m talking about.
People around here hate to hear me say it, but ASTS is going to be dead money until at least Q3 2026 when they start providing service. RKLB is very tempting but I'm waiting for a dip in Q1 when people realize there is no news until March launch. I'm also opening positions in LUNR, RDW, KTOS, and MPTI
Black sky isn’t just the newest in the game. They aren’t remotely the best or have a competitive network. That would be GlobalEye/Maxar/Lanteris, which was bought out by LUNR in November; and Capella, which was bought out by IONQ in July. Capella is hard to value though. All of their federal contracts are black budget and classified. Lanteris has significant unclassified contracts, but as a bus supplier of intelligence satellites, a huge amount of their work and income is classified as well. That being said; both have been the poster children of emerging US satellite intelligence sector businesses, and no one is remotely close to being competitive with either. Unlike RKLB or BKSY now, both LUNR and IONQ now have access to secure classified manufacturing facilities that satisfy the requirements for working on TS/SCI systems. Also a massive point for anyone drooling over BKSY’s promises of resolution: resolution is considered a controlled material in the US. The easiest way to tell an imagery company is failing at finding federal contracts with organizations like the NRO and NGA - is if they publish their imagery metadata. In most cases, if under an IDIQ, that information is *highly* classified.
A lot of comments on RKLB, Space X, and ASTS. What about voyager (VOYG)?
Man how much did you lose on RKLB puts to be so upset about it? It’s up $400% this year, ain’t nobody worried about the day to day swings if they’re holding. Thank god you showed up and protected all Of us from ourselves lol.
I’m going to buy long term shares of RKLB so the top is in everybody get out while you can
This is a content farm accounts/ rklb shill account. Total bs. Don’t follow these guys and do not buy RKLB.
This is a content farm accounts/ rklb shill account. Total bs. Don’t follow these guys and do not buy RKLB.
To all you dumbasses who read these content farm accounts for RKLB paid for by somebody with a better plan than you and bought this turd of a stock on Thursday, how does it feel to be down 9% Friday? That’s sucks man. Hope you weren’t holding any calls either, those got slaughtered. Don’t worry though guys with enough hope and vibes this stock is going to the moon!
These f’rs are lucky I’m back on the couch tonight and ready to shit all over these RKLB shills some more!!!!
I wasn’t trying to be snarky. Gotta take risks sometimes. They have plenty of cash on hand, and like I said in another comment, there’s room for more than one player in the space. I’m heavy space stocks for 2026. If Starlink ipo’s, I’ll more than likely grab some shares. If ASTS doesn’t perform the way I think it should, I’ll trim. As it stands, ASTS was the best performing stock in my portfolio for 2025. RKLB being the second.
Yup RKLB just one big pump n dump
(1) ASTS’ technology is way ahead of Starlink. What does using SpaceX rockets to launch its satellites have to do with anything? (2) Over half of RKLB’s revenue comes from space tech, not rocket launches. Do your research before coming on here just to shill SpaceX and be completely wrong about these companies.
So RKLB puts was the play today…☹️
Lmao I’m not the one begging for advice on WSB after buying at the top of the rally that got RKLB to its ATH and bleeding out of my portfolio 😂😂
Why would you buy RKLB at its literal ATH when it went parabolic and went up 100% in the last 30 days. Full regard move
First year I’ve made 6 figures health >>> wealth Thank you to the following: ONDS, SLV, GLD, COPX, GOOG, LMT, RTX, EUAD, VYMI, RKLB
RKLB, ASTS and rest are about *low earth orbit*, where are you gonna go in your spaceship? it's just vacuum mate, there's nothing out there.
Wondering if RKLB has another few down days left before it goes back up. Thinking monday will open red and start its reversal mid day
I aim to please. Hold up I gotta take a call from the RKLB CEO.
Time to buy RKLB and LUNR again
The "old man PE RATIOS" is classic for a kid who has never been through a 30%+ correction that stays down and not back to even for 9/10 YEARS. They happen, but most younger investors have only known the up market from 2009 forward with a few bumps the FEDS ran in and saved. BTW it took 9 years to get even from the 2009 bottom if you rode it down from 2007 and never sold. RKLB is just chasing the valuation rumors of SpaceX going public next year, not on what they are as a company. That's hype not investing.
RKLB and ASTS are either going to dump hard or rally by EOD 😬
RocketLab has blown past SpaceX when it comes to cubesats. They are vertically integrated so a customer can come to RKLB with specs and then have RKLB build, launch and operate the satellite. This is compounded by the fact you can get into space on Electron faster compared to waiting for a Transporter mission
MSFT They literally have a monopoly position in software/system integration for decades already, no competition yet and no competition in sight. Even if a new competitor appears some day, Microsoft is so much ahead that it would take decades to even just catch up with them. Literally everything digital on the entire planet relies on them in one way or another. They don't even need AI to remain profitable, their cloud profits will carry them for many years to come, AI is just extra profit for them, but not in any way a risk for them. Their existence is almost a necessary staple product like water, bread and electricity. Maybe not as exciting as GOOG or RKLB, but pretty much a guaranteed growth beating SPY YoY. They're almost such a safe heaven that I'd blindly put in all my savings into them without checking it more than once a year.
Heard the same thing last year about space stocks this year & then RKLB makes a new ATH lmao
RKLB gonna bleed to 60 cause I bought in
Bought RKLB and it goes down 10% right away
I invest est. 12.5% of my wages after tax. Steadily building a portfolio, the majority of which is in an index fund (VUAG) which makes up 40%. Another 30% into AI, robotics, and automation. 15% into a mix of space stocks (primarily RKLB), and the remaining other 15% into some American multinational companies which is primarily financial and consumer focused stocks. I'm taking some risk in the hopes it may pay off for an earlier retirement, but I do also pay into a pension plan which is also paid into by my employer. I live in the UK and companies here by law have to offer pension plans to their employees.
Rocket Lab (RKLB) and Black Sky Technology (BKSY) are already being paid by us and foreign governments via huge eight and nine-figure contracts. Rocket Lab received the same missile warning, missile tracking, and missile defense contract for 18 satellites, worth $816 million, as Lockheed Martin. Black Sky is the only option for near real-time earth observation in key geopolitical areas and only takes weeks (verified with Gen 3 launch) to be operational, i.e., making money. Rocket Lab launches Black Sky's satellites and supplies other components to other primes. The more launches they conduct with their current track record, the more they'll continue to be primes in the future. Both have huge tailwinds this coming year. Rocket Lab had a 100% success rate this year. Space is hard, so that means something. Even if they dip, the books and backlog don't change.
Agreed on BE; I’m looking at ASTS and RKLB
Alot of people don’t know RKLB has neutron that will expand their cash flow in Q1. Idiots
RKLB has approximately $560 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand, annual revenue of about $500 million, and free cash flow of –$205 million. The company also has $1 billion in backlog, with a goal of converting roughly 54% into revenue over the next 12–18 months. Additionally they just won the SDA Tranche 3 contract worth upwards of $1 billion, and were awaiting the announcement for the Mars Telecommunications Orbiter that’s worth an additional $700 million. So they should be okay without needing to dilute in the near term unless they plan to make additional acquisitions.
I’m at work so can’t do a big response atm. But I was seeing SpaceX 2025 revenue around $15.5B so at $800m that’s 50x sales and where I got the 100x for the $1.5T target. Also should note their revenue in 2024 was over $13B so they had 10% growth. RKLB is like 50%. I also meant to specify that RKLB is for sure overvalued. Not trying to say it’s a value stock or even a buy at these prices. Rather that I think it’s a better buy with less risk than SpaceX IF they ipo at $1.5T. You may be right and 2026 sucks, but long term the price today isn’t gonna matter at their growth rate. To the r&d cost thing, RKLB should be FCF positive by the end of 2026 into 2027. They have enough cash on hand to maintain their level of spending for over 2 years (not counting the reduced cost once neutron is finished). So dilution really isn’t an issue, unless they want to make an acquisition but they’ve proven to make good acquisitions that benefit shareholders. The point is they don’t *have* to dilute shares to keep operations and r&d going. Ofc SpaceX is in a better financial position and are FCF positive since they’re a more mature company with an unlimited budget. Lastly, is neutron works out as planned their ability to scale should be insane since they’re can 3D print the majority of the rocket and engines. The margins with reduced labor costs will likely be the best in the industry once they scale neutron. Outside neutron, electron will have about 30-35% gross margins next year (once they hit 24+ launches a year) and the space systems (core business) already has something like 40% gross margins with long term goal of 45%. Yeah I know net margins are sorta more important but there can be some accounting. Long term you’re right margins won’t reach tech levels but they should be pretty high.
This is a very reasonable take. You’re getting downvoted for being skeptical of valuation. If you’re not a perma bull you’re the enemy apparently. RKLB is a great company but the stock price has gotten ahead of itself. I expect the stock to be back under $50 in 2026. I’d consider adding to my position at those levels.
Got RKLB and ASTS at my desired price. Dump is cancelled
Thanks for taking the time to respond to my points one by one. Let's start with SpaceX IPO. They recently sold at valuation of $800 billion so with $25 billion in revenue, that's a P/S of 32. Even if they do reach the $1.5 trillion circulated by some media outlet, that's still a P/S of 60. I will be the first to admit if I am wrong if it IPO's above $1 trillion. RKLB is still more expensive today that what SpaceX will IPO at in 2026. 1. You proved my point, they need to continue to raise money just to stay relevant whether to invest in R&D or acquire new tech/companies. 2. R&D will continue to be high, even after Neutron, just to keep pace. And until robots and AI can build space systems faster and more efficiently, the labor costs associated with building space systems and rockets will continue to eat at the margin. 3. Thank you. Yet they're trading with absolutely zero risk. Even TSM is trading at a discount because of its geopolitical risk. 4. The difference in the cost of Falcon9 (\~$65-$70 million) and Neutron (\~55 million) is not that wide for most companies when SpaceX can launch almost 200 times a year now from both coasts, and they're likely to drive launch costs lower and lower in the next few years. Can RKLB afford to compete head to head on cost alone, or availability? 5. ASTS can't afford to wait for RKLB (that's if Neutron is suitable for the 6500 kg satellites) and as far as New Glenn, Amazon and Blue Origin have more immediate plans for Kuiper. 6. I disagree, it may bring up more investors leading up to the IPO but most will flee once the real numbers behind SpaceX and Starlink, it won't make sense to own second fiddles, almost exactly like TSLA vs. RIVN/LCID.
Point 5: What good is a technology advancement if not available, Starlink is available now to T-Mobile and other customers and they are not sitting idly by, their next generation satellites are likely to catch and leapfrog whatever ASTS currently has as they struggle to manufacture and launch their satellites. All these talking points about launching 6-8 on New Glenn and having continuous U.S. coverage is purely hopium circulated by their management and few parrotheads on social media. Starlink is already working on Android and Apple devices. Point 6: It's possible that the runn-up to the IPO may indeed raise other valuations, but once people can buy it, see the actual numbers, and compare them to the likes of RKLB and ASTS, those shares will return back to earth. Look for SpaceX to peel off MNO's one by one from ASTS as they struggle to get their service up and running, Verizon already has a foot out of the door. SpaceX also has global spectrum, something ASTS doesn't and has to work with every country to get their service going, not an easy task even if they have the MNOs in their pocket.
It's not only about finding the cheapest ride into space. True there is competition from the rideshare missions, but you get to have full priority on when you launch and where you go into orbit with RKLB. Given that and their stellar launch record, customers are willing to pay a higher price for their services. They are targeting a different customer at the end of the day. Also, if SpaceX does IPO in 2026 they will then be subject to public scrutiny and pressure (i.e. no more Tesla car launches into space for internet points) Again, not saying RKLB isnt overly expensive right now, but yall are being overly pessimistic IMO
Once lunch is over, we take off. Especially RKLB...
You’re immediately wrong in the first sentence, then continue to be wrong with almost every point. To start SpaceX is aiming for an IPO at over 100x sales, so even though RKLB is expensive at 60x sales it’s still significantly cheaper than SpaceX. Also SpaceX is fairly mature and a few years away from the next big sales catalyst where RKLB is growing faster with Neutron coming soon giving it a big boost to sales, lower the valuation. 1. Space is expensive, can’t deny that. Doesn’t mean there will be constant dilution. RKLB is pretty forward about not wanting to dilute, though they did this year because of the valuation. Honestly it’d be dumb for them *not* to dilute at these valuations. But every sale of shares has a plan, like a merger or r&d it isn’t just selling to sell. 2. Yes space requires a lot of r&d but once they get there the expenses aren’t that crazy. RKLB especially, the r&d expense for neutron is about $300m. Neutron will be one of the fastest rockets to launch with the cheapest budget ever. Sure SpaceX has unlimited funding, but it also means they aren’t as thoughtful and careful about their designs. That has a benefit where they can blow shit up and find the fault, but is it really better than just having a good design from the start? 3. Sure this one is valid. Every company has risks but space is pretty damn hard. 4. RKLB is barely competing with SpaceX. SpaceX does heavy launch and eventually mega launch and small to medium more bespoke launches. Sorta like taking a bus vs a private car, SpaceX will get you to space with other customers (unless you pay full price to get it on your own) while RKLB will get YOU where you want to be at a cheaper overall price even tho it’s more expensive/kg. RKLB also is mostly space systems and is a leader there, something like 70-80% of space flights have RKLB systems. ASTS is competing more with SpaceX, but they have their own tech that is patented and deals with telecoms. So it may look like it’s tiny company vs SpaceX but it’s really a tiny company + the majority of telecoms vs a tiny part of SpaceX. 5. ASTS isn’t doing launch, they use SpaceX but don’t need them since RKLB exists. RKLB is a couple years behind SpaceX but the rate of development and launch cadence is significantly faster than SpaceX. In part due to SpaceX clearing the way, but regardless they’re on a better track with a lower budget and less failures. 6. SpaceX ipo will bring more investors into the industry. Currently space isn’t super popular so the more attention it gets the better it is for everyone. Your comparison in EVs isn’t the same, RKLB has a successful and growing business and is the leader in space systems. Rivn was always a shit company with hardly any sales and super expensive product. LCID is a hype company riding Tesla’s coattails. RKLB and asts are established before SpaceX was super popular and before the ipo. Maybe do some research before talking out of your ass
I was a chicken and bought only 1000€ of RKLB at 6$
RKLB just earned Prime contractor status with the government with last 800M contract. that gives them ability to work on the highest level govt contracts. It is also on governments interest to diversify away from musk and spacex. they dont want a monopoly and many in government dont like him. neutron will make them more competitive with spacex.
Yes, RKLB has already won a significant SDA contract just last week and stands to benefit from the new focus on space, however, my contention that it's already ran way too high for a company that will always struggle to generate meaningful profits before 2030; it's already priced at a higher P/S than SpaceX and they don't have an equivalent to Starlink, SpaceX main cash cow.
I see at least one thread a day doubting either of these companies. I just buy and hold RKLB because I think they have a visionary CEO and a fantastic management team making strategic acquisitions to truly become an end to end space company. My timeline is at about 7-8 years on this and I imagine my investment will be even more life changing than it already is.
My bull thesis on RKLB, without going into the numbers, 2026 and beyond catalyst, and breakdown of launch vs space systems (the backbone of the company) is simple: space travel and exploration is only going to become a more and more integral part of our lives as time goes on and Rocket Lab will play a key role in those ventures whether through launch itself or manufacturing. Plus, Rocket Lab has amazing leadership. If I’m (32M) right, I FIRE. Retire in late 40s to early 50s. If I’m wrong, my 401k will be there for me and I retire in my early to mid 60s. I’m willing to live with this risk. Position: 2300 shares at $49.44.
Beyond the comments that are either telling you to screw off or falling you an Elon shill, let's just consider what you said about playing catch up to SpaceX. While that may be true, isn't SpaceX in a slightly different category of launches when compared to Rocketlab? Also, isn't the US DOD also one that hands out contracts to multiple organizations so as to not favor one specific company? So in that case, doesn't Rocketlab stand to get government money anyways? I'm not very knowledgeable about this space, so I'm simply just trying to start a conversation. My current exposure to this industry is simply a small RKLB position that was a birthday gift to myself.
Everybody gonna pick RKLB or ASTS as 2026 pick and will be funny if the biggest champ are again SLV and GLD
for the most part they've shot their wad already. RKLB was a buy under 10, now I wouldn't fuck with it
6% dip on RKLB, ASTD, and LUNR is so fake and ghey
RKLB and Silver were both like 50/55 like 2 weeks ago, now they are 72 and 75 lmfao. What a ridiculous market
Of your three, I'd rank them the same way you did: RKLB - actually has revenue, launches rockets regularly, neutron coming. closest thing to a "real company" in the space sector outside of defense contractors. still risky but there's a business there. SOFI - turned profitable, growing deposits, expanding products. fintech is crowded but they're executing. reasonable 5-year hold if you believe in the platform play. ASTS - highest risk/highest reward. no revenue yet, still pre-launch on their commercial constellation. if it works, massive. if delays or tech issues, could drop 70%+. size accordingly. Worth noting - space names are getting a lift from the SpaceX IPO buzz lately. Good for momentum, but make sure you're buying the company not the hype. For 5+ years outside mag 7, a couple others worth looking at: \- NU (Nubank) - latin america fintech, massive TAM, already profitable \- HIMS - telehealth, controversial but growing fast \- IONQ - if you want quantum exposure, probably the most established pure-play in that category
RKLB Rocketlab to the Moon!!
Disagree. I’ve owned RKLB for over a year and it’s incredibly volatile. Buying right now after it’s ran up 70% in less than a month would be a mistake. It will hit the $40s again within the next 3-4 months.
RKLB is on sale. With SpaceX ipo on the horizon next year, all space stocks will rise.
So RKLB back to 60 apparently?
Looks like people are LUNR, RKLB and PL for tax reasons before ethe end of the year. How low will they go?