Reddit Posts
WBUY and MLGO: Exhibits #1,001 and #1,002 on why you stay away from shitty Asian small cap IPOs
Mentions
https://www.stocktitan.net/news/WTO/u-time-subsidiary-lands-us-50-million-smart-server-intent-agreement-070t59njqfei.html
The rest of the world is a lot stupider and willing to accept highly unfavorable trade conditions than many people would like to admit. When China was trying to join the WTO, the world knew it is not really a free economy or fair market competition. So it set up some deals to hopefully offset the imbalance and exploitations. These measures largely failed and turned into massive trade deficits for the rest of the world, which just exceeded a trillion last year. Now you can't even unplug from trading with China easily, and can only suck up many trade practices infringing the WTO rules. If China pushes for Yuan as the world reserve currency, it will probably end up like the WTO scenario. Most of the world will mistakenly think it is a good thing, or the cheating can be offset by some "measures", but end up being massively exploited.
Analysis: What is "Wrong" with the Statement? This post (from January 2026) conflates trade policy with aviation safety regulations. From a legal, technical, and logistical standpoint, the statement contains several significant errors and misrepresentations of how international aviation works. 1. Presidential Authority vs. Regulatory Process (The "Decertification" Threat) • The Error: The President cannot unilaterally "decertify" an aircraft type via a social media post or executive order. • The Reality: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the regulatory body responsible for certifying aircraft. Decertification (revoking a Type Certificate) is a rigorous legal process that requires proof that an aircraft is unsafe or unairworthy. • Why it matters: Attempting to decertify a safe aircraft (like the Bombardier Global Express) purely for political leverage would likely be overturned by US courts as "arbitrary and capricious" and violates the FAA's statutory mandate to prioritize safety over politics. 2. The "Illegal" Refusal Claim • The Error: The claim that Canada has "illegally" refused to certify Gulfstream jets is factually incorrect regarding international law. • The Reality: Under the Chicago Convention (ICAO), every sovereign nation has the right to validate foreign aircraft certifications to ensure they meet their own safety standards. Transport Canada (TCCA) has historically delayed certification for the Gulfstream G500/G600 due to specific technical disagreements regarding the "stick pusher" (a stall protection system) and flight control software. • Context: Canada argued the system didn't meet their safety requirements for pilot situational awareness. While frustrating for Gulfstream, this is a standard regulatory dispute, not an "illegal" act. 3. The Logistical Impossibility ("All Aircraft Made in Canada") • The Error: The threat to decertify "all Aircraft made in Canada" overlooks the composition of the US commercial fleet. • The Reality: "Aircraft made in Canada" includes the Bombardier CRJ Series (CRJ-200, 700, 900) and the De Havilland Dash 8. These planes form the backbone of US regional aviation (operating as United Express, Delta Connection, and American Eagle). • Consequence: If the US actually decertified these planes, thousands of daily domestic flights within the US would be grounded immediately, crippling the US travel network and harming American travelers more than Canada. 4. Violation of Trade Agreements (USMCA/CUSMA) • The Error: Imposing a punitive 50% tariff and using safety certification as a trade weapon violates the spirit and likely the letter of the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement). • The Reality: While the President has broad powers to impose tariffs (often citing national security), using safety certification as a retaliatory trade barrier is a violation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. It suggests the US is corrupting its safety protocols for economic leverage, which damages the FAA's global reputation. 5. Technical Imprecision • The Models: The post refers to "Gulfstream 500, 600..." The correct nomenclature is G500, G600, G700, and G800. • Certification Status: The G800 was only certified by the FAA in April 2025. Validation by foreign authorities (like Canada) typically takes months or years after the primary certification. Accusing Canada of "refusing" a plane that was only just finished is a distortion of the standard timeline. Summary The statement attempts to use aviation safety certification—which is supposed to be a neutral, data-driven technical process—as a political bargaining chip. Carrying out the threat would be legally questionable, would violate international treaties, and would cause catastrophic disruption to the US domestic airline industry.
It's more complicated than that. Yes, China never should have been given favored nation status or allowed to join the WTO in 2001 without having first fixed their authoritarian problems. That was a failure of western governments. We never would have been truly able to stop an enormous economy like China though, that power vacuum was going to be filled by something. However, until the very recent past the creation of technology and ideas happened in the west because we had societies where people could speak truth to power and forge their own directions, along with a robust bankruptcy system that gave people the opportunity to fail.
I think the applications (and job loss) will accumulate over time. Luke Gromen has talked about how AI productivity 1.0, which was China being allowed to join the WTO, led to 35% of US mfg jobs being shed within 6 years. I think we're looking at something similar
Well, much more, no. Much less, yes. Also, many developed nations put out laughably bad data. The best example of that is Russia, but China, Brazil, India, etc. often pump out blatantly misleading and false data. The US has also been doing it more lately. It's funny that you're pretending there's no benefit from lying about their numbers, tho. Anyway, since China is no longer "primitive" (pretty demeaning word usage, mate), they can drop their "Developing Nation" WTO designation. Let's see how that works out for them.
Anti capitalism ( a lot is still there), opposition to WTO, anarchism movement, a lot of radical egalitarianism, hard focus on identity based hierarchies that was seeping in to business and especially in schools. Critical race theory in schools and general illiberalism on college campuses. Especially for the strong sensorship on certain types of speech.
For the better part of 40 years, since Reganomics and Globalization (eg: NAFTA, WTO, etc), the West open it's markets to the world so that is own companies could off shore jobs and still sell domestically. They sold it to the American public as deregulation, as open trade, as a focus on High Value Add Jobs and in the process export nearly their entire industrial base. The geniuses at Wall St. saw the market RIP to new all time highest, while goods good cheap. The Biggest ROI wasn't in mining or enrichment... it was in Technology. Technology sucked up most of the investment dollars. Just look at your own portfolio, do you own more tech stocks or copper? So today, after Covid and Tariffs we were hit with a reality dose. We don't control the inputs. This is a common paradox in business. At the start of a mega trend (eg: tech) we chase vulue and return, we are rewarded, we double down and win some more. During this process we miss how quickly the world has changed and where the value is now. Eventually we noticed the difference, either slowly via diminished returns or quickly via a Shock.
China would never move any production to Canada that doesn’t align with their interests or how they work. Like 10 years ago during the Obama administration when we trusted China and were going with a globalist movement, China took advantage of that, told US companies to start manufacturing there (with the promise of cheaper production) and then proceeded to commit the largest intellectual property theft in modern history basically stealing all the knowledge and processes from the companies that moved production there, and then running those companies out of China after taking the intellectual property, then basically getting Chinese companies to do it for cheaper (because they pay their people basically nothing) and then beat out the western companies on the international stage. Why in the world would they move production to somewhere where it’s gonna be more expensive like Canada (unless Canada would like to participate in the abusive underpaying conditions of sweatshops)? And I’m not a trump supporter at all but I do think something needs to be done about China and it’s definitely not letting them get any bigger than they are. They are a dirty playing country, the amount of indigenous Chinese people they have killed is disgusting all in the name of “development” and also the fact they still consider themself a developing country with the WTO just to get the benefits that actually developing countries should be getting is ridiculous as well and we’re just letting it happen. Also there is no “new world order” China has always been at the top 😭
My wife is a tariff specialist for DSV (one of the world's largest shipping companies), and the way she explained it to me was: A product bound for the US will have a “Country of Origin” (where it was made/warehoused) and a “Country of Departure” (where it was loaded on the convenience that moves it to the US). Tariffs are based on the Country of Origin. Currently tariff forms do include a section for Country of Origin, but under WTO rules the EU can change these documents to just list “EU Common Customs Area” as the CoO. Then the US will have to decide if they are willing to ignore the agreed WTO rules and refuse entry of the goods at that point. The EU can’t stop them from doing so, but it will (again under WTO) allow the EU to impose countermeasures, most likely triggering a spiraling series of changes. These constantly evolving changes, much more than the actual rates, will cause trade to ground to a halt as companies will not risk their goods being refused at port because the rules changed while they were enroute. The shipping companies will redirect their ships bound for the US to Canadian and Mexican ports, so they can be sure they can get the goods unloaded and cleared in customs and then they will have to be separately exported to the US from there, further increasing prices paid by the US consumer.
No, there are US Customs rules on "Rules of Origin" that require products to still document how their components are sourced. It's not "technically"legal for the US to do so, as it goes against the WTO treaties it's party too, which allows forming economic unified markets and customs zone, but due to it's size the US usually gets away with it, and until now the EU rarely had a reason to really oppose this. The problem for the US is that the EU always retaliates as a bloc. The EU Commission has exclusive competence on trade, so what the US thinks is a wedge to divide EU countries, simply does not operate that way.
Not really, because according to WTO rules they have to report on the country of origin which would ultimately be Denmark.
Not that rules apply anymore, but you technically can't do that under the WTO without justifications (hostile takeover of land probably isn't one of them). You're likely correct that the US will do it anyways so expect hardware to get even more expensive with new tariffs on ASML. >Trade without discrimination >1. Most-favoured-nation (MFN): treating other people equally Under the WTO agreements, countries cannot normally discriminate between their trading partners. Grant someone a special favour (such as a lower customs duty rate for one of their products) and you have to do the same for all other WTO members.
GL timing your re-entry. You can’t exactly tariff individual EU countries for this reason. Likely blocked legally by both US law and WTO law.
WTO is a scam, I don't know why you would throw money into that
why the drops for UAVS, WTO and PRZO?
Possibly WTO huge contract and 207k float
Premarket Watchlist: **$WTO** **$ELUT** **$ALCY** ___ Mid term: **$SRXH** **$DVLT** **$TRAW** : Small float, watching this one for dips. Multiple drugs in pipeline. Ratutrelvir (Covid) & Tivoxavir marboxil (Oral influenza, H5N1), Narazaciclib oncology asset. Company is running low on cash so I’m expecting the run up to be diluted immediately to fund future projects. **Dec - 17** : Interim data (only 37 patients) released (-37%), showed favorable safety profile( lower adverse than Paxlovid(Major established company ), including activity in paxlovid ineligible patients. Followed by a massive sell off : https://finviz.com/news/255922/traws-pharma-reports-positive-interim-clinical-data-with-ratutrelvir-versus-paxlovid-shows-activity-in-paxlovid-ineligible-covid-19-patients Ph2 full release is on schedule in January, with that small cap if PR is solid I see a rally, but will exit most of position if it climbs in anticipation. Discord has full DD.
Imagine , Just imagine putting your hard earned money in EPWK, YYAI, YGMZ, WOK, WTO and other Chyniece piece of sheet.
Premarket Watchlist: **$WTO** **$ELUT** **$ALCY** ___ Mid term: **$SRXH** **$DVLT** **$TRAW** : Small float, watching this one for dips. Multiple drugs in pipeline. Ratutrelvir (Covid) & Tivoxavir marboxil (Oral influenza, H5N1), Narazaciclib oncology asset. Company is running low on cash so I’m expecting the run up to be diluted immediately to fund future projects. **Dec - 17** : Interim data (only 37 patients) released (-37%), showed favorable safety profile( lower adverse than Paxlovid(Major established company ), including activity in paxlovid ineligible patients. Followed by a massive sell off : https://finviz.com/news/255922/traws-pharma-reports-positive-interim-clinical-data-with-ratutrelvir-versus-paxlovid-shows-activity-in-paxlovid-ineligible-covid-19-patients Ph2 full release is on schedule in January, with that small cap if PR is solid I see a rally, but will exit most of position if it climbs in anticipation. Full DD in discord.
WTO for overnight and PM watch this could fly Huge contract and only a 207k float it was running good AH even with the bad timing of new years eve news release..NFA do your own DD just putting it out there might be a play early...
Im watching WTO for overnight and pre market I think its going to go higher..It was the only good news on Wed closing with that huge contract .I made a good profit on it ah wed. Just something to watch NFA...
Check WTO. Though it is a terrible stock with huge dilution, expecting a sharp pump before the dump.
Might watch WTO in pre market friday..It might run better with the news after holiday..
I didn't do anything all day then the news popped for WTO made a quick 500.00 AH HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE HOPE NEXT YEAR IS PROSPEROUS FOR US ALL...
Out of WTO second time 1.17 to 1.30
WTO AH doing good good volume coming in
WTO 295k float with huge contract
Unfortunately, I haven't been following updates much in the last year – I've gotten carried away with my own system for identifying market trends. But try starting with those who collect data: Eurostat, the WTO, the World Bank. They periodically publish data that reveals trends. They don't actually monitor the trends themselves. You can also write to me, and I'll be happy to share any information I have about the trends I'm working with.
I took the L on WTO to go all in on LGHL
>yes Then look up what is defined as dumping per WTO
I commented last week DVLT would dip to the 1.10-1.30 range. Keep on your watchlist. I’m still all in on WTO with a 1.24 avg. NFA
Who let China join the WTO? I forget
The US trade deficit began in the 70s. Europe's trade deficits began after China joined the WTO. Inflation exposed how bad it is. And they're letting BYD build EV assembly plants! lol
International trade law does not define them as selling at a loss but selling below their domestic market value in a foreign market. Sometimes that could be selling at a loss, but it could also mean that they are selling for a smaller margin. Whether something is being dumped needs to go through investigation and WTO review. Just because some random guy claims China is dumping their product does not mean that they are actually dumping their product, especially if its products that foreign market does not make. Dumping is sector specific, but lazy people just claims China dumps everything.
You're just cut and pasting CATO-level shit. Like yes, it is hard to compete with a state-owned enterprise which views full employment and GDP growth as metrics for success. You are not going to compete easily against a provincial governor who has a mandate to move currency around in his province by paying contractors to build shit, even if it's shit that doesn't do anything. They call that "dumping" and it's against WTO rules, but the WTO is a sclerotic organization at the best of times, which is why both Mangosteen and his predecessor both have held up appointments to the WTO so that its basically dead because it took them decades to rule on blatantly bad behavior like this.
WTO keep it on your watchlist. I’ve been commenting BDRX and WTO. BDRX basically did a 2x earlier if you checked my comments. I’m all in WTO now. NFA
WTO dipped. I’m basically all in on this one
PT on WTO and why you like?
Been commenting BDRX and WTO on here. It dipped to the 4s and now almost $8. That’s a 2x basically. Not in anymore but still in WTO. Keep it on your watchlist
Keep WTO and BDRX on your watchlist yall
WTO and BDRX y’all
WTO and BDRX been commenting these two. BDRX dipped to low 4’s and went to the 6 range earlier.
WTO y’all. Been commenting this one……
WTO yall keep it on your watchlist. I’ve been commenting this one.
https://preview.redd.it/ars3n26spz5g1.png?width=1178&format=png&auto=webp&s=23dff833cc78cf75259107c3cac3e01004dfed6d WKHS went to $18 premarket. All in WTO and BDRX now
1. Massive Revenue Windfall. Funding Tax Cuts and Debt Reduction 2. Reviving Industries and Creating Jobs Through Reshoring. (Reshoring will take time as did offshoring) 3. Negotiation Hammer for Fairer Deals 4. Prevents dumping and counters foreign subsidies For the US, tariffs aren’t a crutch. They’re not something we did to be mean. They don’t have “little to no benefit”. Tariffs can be a superpower for the US. They’ve funded growth, rebuilt factories, and rewritten deals no WTO whine could. Further, all large GDP countries use them to protect their interests and sectors that need to be protected against foreign countries. The take I originally replied is stupid. Flat out. This DAY ONE SHIT WE’RE TALKING HERE
Also looking at: KOS OMI ONL WTO Decisions, decisions. I guess the first one to leap, is what I'll go with.
WTO. Been commenting this week it dipped to 1.07 range and it went to 1.20 plus earlier. I’m still holding. Check it out yall
Mate I've seen you shill WTO so much it's starting to look like bot behaviour. I know you're not a bot and I've seen you call out some good trades but this is a place for discussion. At least give some analysis if you want people to jump in.
WTO https://preview.redd.it/8nilt1pmgd5g1.png?width=1178&format=png&auto=webp&s=ae0120f16c75291f34d4a6eca17628ad401855be
WTO has potential check it out yall. NFA
Check out WTO also. SMX was on my watchlist at $4.67 last week and BYND I was researching when it was 0.70 cents. I’m all in WTO now
WTO y’all keep this on your watchlist. It dipped to the 1.07 range earlier this week
WTO y’all keep this on your watchlist im all in basically
you never told us SMX unfortunately, but whats so good about WTO
Yeah no. YYAI WTO INHD PAVS what do they all have in common? Bottomless pit Chinese scam
WTO. I had SMX on my watchlist when it was $4.67 last week and I also was researching BYND when it was around 0.70
Maybe put WTO on your watchlist yall. SMX was on my watchlist last week at $4.67. I’m all in on WTO now. Got out of APLT
WTO y’all all in on this one
WTO y’all check it out if you’d like
WTO and VSME was on my watchlist last week at 0.16
WTO not financial advice
WTO, APLT, CMND. Not financial advice
Bought APLT and WTO. SMX was on my watchlist last week at $4.67. Check it out if you’d like not financial advice
Oh no, the US ignoring the WTO or NATO? That would be crazy... Bro, just a few months ago you bombed the shit out of a sovereign country while the entire EU was begging for a negotiated, diplomatic solution. What are you talking about? And your president gave 0 fucks about your congress when he bombed Iran, a de facto declaration of war, why would he care now?
Implies we'd take the oil, thus cropping oil prices, booming us markets. You'd have to assume anyone outside the executive branch would abide, we'd ignore the WTO, NATO and pretty much the whole world. But, you know.
For sure I’ve been watching closely for years on the British experiment. I know that conservatives are not perfect or anything, but that crappy Boris Johnson was not a conservative and the only chance I feel like a conservative hat at really doing something may or may not have worked out with Liz Truss, but she really was a Margaret Thatcher type. Cutting some of the bureaucracy is necessary and definitely decreasing taxes is just a must to allow for more investment. Industrial manufacturing base in Britain has just gone to zero we’ve gotten really hurt with the WTO and NAFTA here in the states as well, but we do still have some good manufacturing and hopefully someone is coming back.
WTO RS tmrw. Chinese scam but there could be potential to make money here today. Risk it for a biscuit. In at 0.022.
Keep an eye out for the pineapple juice. We're retooling the feature so its streamlined, prioritizing fundamental numbers with quick zesty catalyst potentials. I'm sure WTO will be featured again within the next few days. The next edition is focused on three stocks with mini market caps
Tell me more about WTO, Pineapple man. The hope fuels me 🥲
Ok so how is anyone supposed to believe that WTO is worth investing in when its dropped *~98%* in 6 months???
Saw someone mention this one Earlier WTO. .03 now but sitting on a huge volume. I don't see any news but I'm terrible at finding where to look for it.
WTO... Going up, still .03
Every one has been running to stock wto i was up about 200 percent when I cash out on Friday before the market dropped 300 points . Everyone is saying WTO is the next beyond meat play might want to give it a look
I can't believe people are messing with WTO.....Hopefully tey did not put BIG dollars into it
it's rs soon [https://www.stocktitan.net/news/WTO/u-time-limited-announces-1-for-100-reverse-stock-v9y68tmctqox.html](https://www.stocktitan.net/news/WTO/u-time-limited-announces-1-for-100-reverse-stock-v9y68tmctqox.html)
Anyone think anything about $WTO i just grabbed a few shares just cuz its .02 what can go wrong
Lets pump WTO guys its only .03 so alot of potential everyone makes 💰
Anybody still in WTO after it's run earlier? Thoughts on movement before reverse split?
WTO fixing to make a run today
Got a feeling about $WTO and $RVYL today
EPWK - the stock ive been watching made a recovery move and moving fast. There is a dilution 40-1. Be careful out there boys. WTO small over 100%, seems when little movement in market, these stocks see a frenzy of temp ownership.