FT

Forward-Ad5608

I subscribe to bloomberg and would recommend. It's less expensive than others (FT) and has a lot of good articles / reasonable fast live updates. Failing that I'd recommend watching the bloomberg surveillance show which is free on youtube. They go quite deep with their discussions, you get up to date thoughts from big fish in the market, and the hosts are good its actually pretty entertaining.

limitbreakse

Go to the FT and Bloomberg and check out some headlines. All for #engagement. People trust these outlets (especially the FT) and don’t like what they’re hearing.

2020isgreat

Trump threatened to stop weapons for Ukraine unless Europe joined the Hormuz coalition - FT

Fit-Guard-5063

Amazon’s cloud business in Bahrain damaged in Iran strike - FT $AMZN

Walking72

*US Defense Secretary Hegseth's broker looked to buy defense fund before Iran attack, FT reports* --- Move along. Nothing to see here.

Putaineska

At least put sources OP. FT version: https://www.ft.com/content/744ea8dc-6d93-4fe9-a5e3 -36de4f5d06db?shareType=nongift. Reuters version: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/us-defense-secretary -hegseths-broker-looked-buy-defense-fund-before-iran-attack-2026 -03-30 Hegseth comes across as a dumb individual so it wouldn't surprise me if he was the only one who managed to lose money despite having inside information. >The Nasdaq-listed IDEF fund has risen 28 per cent over the past year, but has not risen on the Middle East war, falling almost 13 per cent in the past month.

ccblr06

According to the FT report, the investment discussed by Hegseth’s broker did not ultimately go ahead as ​the fund, which launched in May last year, was not ​yet available for Morgan Stanley clients to buy. The FT report did not say ‌how ⁠much discretion the broker had to make investments on Hegseth's behalf, or whether Hegseth knew what the broker was doing. "Neither Secretary Hegseth nor any of his representatives approached BlackRock about any ​such investment," Parnell ​said

jonneh

> (FT) — A broker for Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, attempted to make a big investment in major defence companies in the weeks leading up to the US-Israeli attack on Iran, according to three people familiar with the matter. > > Hegseth’s broker at Morgan Stanley contacted BlackRock in February about making a multimillion-dollar investment in the asset manager’s Defense Industrials Active ETF, the people said, shortly before the US launched military action against Tehran.

jetbridgejesus

they do suck. bloomberg is much better. FT

ApeAppreciation

Remember Muppets do not matter. “According to the FT report, the investment discussed by Hegseth’s broker did not ultimately go ahead as ​the fund, which launched in May last year, was not ​yet available for Morgan Stanley clients to buy.”

prana_fish

> US Defense Secretary Hegseth's broker looked to buy defense fund before Iran attack, FT reports Yeah, the FT is a shit publication, but Blackrock looks to have flagged it as well. The levels of corruption in this administration know no bounds.

981flacht6

FT is a financial tabloid. They are utter trash. Second, defense stocks are actually not doing well after this war began. They're all down.

PolyglotGeologist

Do you realize that’s like hundreds of stocks, and that the stocks get swapped out periodically? I already work FT 💀 Now I’m curious of the ppl that do individual equities, how much they hold in their portfolio!

ignatious__reilly

He also literally just said this to the Financial times “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” he said. “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump told the FT. “It would also mean we had to be there [in Kharg Island] for a while.” When asked about the state of Iranian defence on Kharg Island he said: “I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.”

ignatious__reilly

He’s lying. He literally just said this to the Financial times “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” he said. “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump told the FT. “It would also mean we had to be there [in Kharg Island] for a while.” When asked about the state of Iranian defence on Kharg Island he said: “I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.”

jetbridgejesus

he literally said it w FT

jetbridgejesus

🌮 said he wanted to “take the oil” in Iran, possibly seizing the export hub of Kharg Island, the Financial Times reported. 🌮 interview with the FT comes as thousands of US troops massed in the Persian Gulf region, including an amphibious assault team that arrived on Saturday. Portions of the 82nd Airborne is also on its way. 🌮 told the Financial Times on Sunday that “his preference would be to take the oil.” He compared the effort to the operation in Venezuela in January, when the US captured the South American country’s leader, Nicolas Mad-uro, and plans to control its oil industry. LMAO just setup iran for 100s of FPV drone deaths of marines. cant make this up lol

Wonderful-Process792

Here is more of the quote from the article: "Trump said: “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people.” “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump told the FT. “It would also mean we had to be there \[in Kharg Island\] for a while.”

jonneh

No way bro announces to the FT “yaaa we’re gonna take Kharg island” and does it

Automatic-Unit-8307

No movement in futures market despite Trump just confirming he is sending in Troop to get that oil. Down 3 percent tomorrow? Trump says he wants to ‘take the oil in Iran’ US President Donald Trump has told the Financial Times newspaper that he wants to “take the oil” in Iran and said Washington could capture the Iranian export hub on Kharg island. Trump compared the potential move to the US approach in Venezuela, where he noted Washington’s intention to control the oil industry “indefinitely” following the abduction of President Nicolas Maduro in January. “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” he said. “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump told the FT. “It would also mean we had to be there [in Kharg Island] for a while.” When asked about the state of Iranian defence on Kharg Island he said: “I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.”

Odd-Spray5046

“Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump told the FT. “It would also mean we had to be there [in Kharg Island] for a while.” Did he just say he’s going to invade?

AegonTheMeh

> The US president told the FT in an interview on Sunday that his “preference would be to take the oil”, comparing the potential move to Venezuela where the US intends to control the oil industry “indefinitely” following its capture of strongman leader Nicolás Maduro in January > Trump said: “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people. https://www.ft.com/content/3bd9fb6c-2985-4d24-b86b-23b7884031f5’

AegonTheMeh

> The US president told the FT in an interview on Sunday that his “preference would be to take the oil”, comparing the potential move to Venezuela where the US intends to control the oil industry “indefinitely” following its capture of strongman leader Nicolás Maduro in January > Trump said: “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people. https://www.ft.com/content/3bd9fb6c-2985-4d24-b86b-23b7884031f5’

Derpy_Mc_Burpy

**BREAKING NEWS** Trump says he wants to ‘take the oil in Iran’ US President Donald Trump has told the Financial Times newspaper that he wants to “take the oil” in Iran and said Washington could capture the Iranian export hub on Kharg island. Trump compared the potential move to the US approach in Venezuela, where he noted Washington’s intention to control the oil industry “indefinitely” following the abduction of President Nicolas Maduro in January. “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” he said. “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump told the FT. “It would also mean we had to be there \[in Kharg Island\] for a while.” When asked about the state of Iranian defence on Kharg Island he said: “I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.” \- Al Jareeza We're so fucked bros

Derpy_Mc_Burpy

**BREAKING NEWS** Trump says he wants to ‘take the oil in Iran’ US President Donald Trump has told the Financial Times newspaper that he wants to “take the oil” in Iran and said Washington could capture the Iranian export hub on Kharg island. Trump compared the potential move to the US approach in Venezuela, where he noted Washington’s intention to control the oil industry “indefinitely” following the abduction of President Nicolas Maduro in January. “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” he said. “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump told the FT. “It would also mean we had to be there \[in Kharg Island\] for a while.” When asked about the state of Iranian defence on Kharg Island he said: “I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.” \- Al Jareeza We're so fucked bros

ajibtunes

🥭to FT: — He wants to seize Iran’s oil: “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran.” — Specifically considering taking Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub — Compares it to Venezuela, saying the U.S. could control oil there “indefinitely” — claims Iran has no real defense there: “I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.” — Acknowledges it would require occupation: “It would also mean we had to be there for a while.”

sun_tzu29

From the FT: > Donald Trump has said he wants to “take the oil in Iran” and could seize the export hub of Kharg Island, as the US sends thousands of troops to the Middle East.

CUbuffGuy

Lol the FT and WSJ hit pieces right before global options open is hilarious. Little telegraphed there. Probably got a nice exit in before the little liquidity bump here.

thonda27

Stopped looking 2 weeks ago, depressing, but still buying. Was able to find a fun PT job that can go around my FT job. So now actually I’ll be adding $100 more weekly to about 645 weekly. Hopefully will rebound later on.

sundaypleas

This is my first bear market since going FT trading and ouch. I was 50% up, all time high in mid-October, now I'm 50% down. I did sell a lot ATH, but came back in too soon and kept telling myself the cat was done bouncing around. My head went to a shitty place because I fell in love with my Russell index stocks and didn't want to accept they weren't done falling. So now, I'm leaving my port alone, and am slowly but finally getting cash infusions from puts. I'm not thinking about trying to average down while there's someone in DC trying to push everyone's buttons.

Geknapper

Up somewhere between 6-7%. I moved everything to international stocks last fall once I realized how AI was basically the entire S&P. So I missed out on the S&P flattering before Iran. I'm in bonds now. I don't see Iran ending this any time between now and November. Especially since Russia is providing them Drones. Fertilizer and Oil shock is going to make 2022 inflation look lovely by the time it's done with us. The FT had an article yesterday that said ~50% of the worlds N and P fertilizer goes through the Strait. The article had a MN farm state that their fertilizer bill when up $10k this year. November is going to be a blood bath for the GOP because of this idiot.

Possible_Cheek_4114

RCKT come on rocket its good meme lol 😆 

NotMe357

"The United Arab Emirates, which has a relatively small but modern navy, is trying to push dozens of countries to form a coalition to ensure shipping is able to pass through the vital Gulf waterway, per FT"

Strong-Comment-7279

Irrespective, (I'm not the person you responded to), they mean SPX. SPY doesn't move 30-35 in a day. SPX does. In the last two weeks, the narrowest was maybe 39. In a healthy trading environment, it is at least 100. The last few days have been trending above that, or at least today did. I hate spy. I much prefer SPXW, but I'm a FT private trader. I do not have financial advice or guidance. I will say that on Jan 2 '26 I bought a single SPXW call for 0.80, and sold it for 15.00. I do not know what the SPY equivalencies were for that trade - they could be greater or less. My bet is on less - it was a Friday, and the first trading day of 2026, but I also think Monday kept going. Whatever. No FOMO, only historical examination.

Happy_Row512

I'll be excited to see EONR ripping by then 

2020isgreat

OpenAI puts erotic chatbot plans on hold ‘indefinitely," per FT this is the real short thesis[](https://x.com/FirstSquawk/status/2037172486727753949)

Fit_Combination6988

Scientists to attach sensors to MSFT to probe element distribution at and around the core of the earth -FT

ajibtunes

OpenAI puts erotic chatbot plans on hold ‘indefinitely’ - FT

Logical-Clerk-1571

OpenAI indefinitely pauses plans to release erotic chatbot - FT

tinydisaster

FT : russia is sending FPV drones to Iran.

extrabigbrain

Anyone notice this phenomenon were you will brainstorm, inquire, or theorize about current events with AI. Then a few days later you see a piece in the WSJ or FT will the exact same content and intel you researched. And then you hear some Shmoe yapping the same theory making himself out to be some wizard or Nostradamus. I think we have reached singularity.

jonneh

**FT** # > Russia is close to completing a phased shipment of drones, medicine and food to Iran, according to western intelligence reports that detail Moscow’s efforts to keep its embattled partner fighting.

NotMe357

"Volkswagen is considering plans to convert one of its German car factories into a production hub for Israel’s missile defence systems, per the FT" Sounds like people around the world is preparing for WW4 now.

2020isgreat

Brussels plans carbon price brake as Iran war squeezes industry - FT. lmao[](https://x.com/financialjuice/status/2036812330122510563)

moorhound

>FT: US to deploy more troops even as Trump praises Iran talks Come on bro just one more negotiation bro don't mind those soldiers bro the 82nd airborne is just here for the steak and lobster bro please bro just negotiate and don't shoot oil infrastructure bro we're not gonna attack you again bro just let a couple of tankers through bro

Dirty_Entendre

If FT Knox's reserves were held at [market value](https://www.barrons.com/articles/gold-fort-knox-price-trump-194ae820?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqfbI9WRkZXMgJnL-BcYGtFT5LBJcaZ5Racs0T0u25QRLJ4IGDH0uXw0AdwcN5I%3D&gaa_ts=69c2f853&gaa_sig=BaeST9rHY3r3m4eRlT1uCYfRtgW5Xv2Fo-WnPUzAac7TGRRa0BT2lXc1YA7ZiDWomvcTbD4CXtJYTZN33DwS-w%3D%3D) value at a 300 Billion gain we still don't get out of the hole.

ConstantAd1

>TEHRAN STATED IN ITS LETTER THAT SHIPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE US, ISRAEL, OR OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE CONFLICT WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS HAVING “INNOCENT” OR “NON-HOSTILE” PASSAGE - FT isn't this the same thing they've been saying for weeks

2020isgreat

Iran: ‘Non-hostile’ ships can transit the Strait of Hormuz - FT. we're rallying on this shit again? this is the 7th time this has been reported [](https://x.com/financialjuice/status/2036518249714659364)

Walking72

OpenAI plans to nearly double its workforce to 8,000 employees by end of 2026 as it ramps up its push to close the gap with rival Anthropic, per FT.

CanaryUmbrella

'"The White House does not tolerate any administration official illegally profiteering off of insider knowledge, and any implication that officials are engaged in such activity without evidence is baseless and irresponsible reporting," Kush Desai told FT.' lol

YongeBlood

FT always using notional value in headlines to make it sound bigger. My 33,000 NVDA 0DTE 500Cs also have a notional value of $580mn. Will cost me about tree fiddy though.

JMWTurnerAppreciator

FT literally just ran a story about a week about how private credit lenders are happy about the war in Iran because it takes some eyes off of what's going on with private credit lol

jonneh

> (FT) –– Israel’s military chief said the war was at its “halfway point” and suggested the conflict would continue at least until early April, while defence minister Israel Katz said the “intensity” of attacks on Iran would increase in the coming week. # It might be time to hit that EJECTO SEATO ⏏️

NotMe357

"The Iran war has caused the gravest energy shock of all time, the head of the International Energy Agency warned, adding that it could take six months or longer to fully restore oil and gas flows from the Gulf, per FT"

manthanpa1997

And I agree completely! I copied what FT said on their headline.

exhibit304

What's current price of oil? Market looks closed but FT says oil drops so how do we see it ?

manthanpa1997

Tbh when I saw the price I was confused too. Don’t know what FT guys are smoking over there!

jrex035

"Iran war is the greatest threat to global energy ‘in history’, warns IEA" >The Iran war is the gravest energy crunch ever, the head of the International Energy Agency warned, adding that it could take six months or longer to restore oil and gas flows from the Gulf. >He said more oil had been cut off now than during the shocks of the 1970s, and twice as much gas was now offline than the amount Europe cut off from Russia in 2022. >But Birol said that politicians and markets were underestimating the scale of the disruption in the Middle East, with roughly a fifth of global oil and gas supplies stranded in the region. >“People understand that this is a major challenge, but I am not sure that the depth and the consequences of the situation are well understood,” he said in an interview with the FT. >He added that “vital arteries have come to a halt”, hitting the world’s supply of fertilisers for crops, petrochemicals for plastics, clothes and manufacturing, as well as sulphur and helium. “These are vital commodities for the global economy,” he said. >***Even if the war ends soon, “it will take a long time to have oil and gas rehabilitated. It will be six months for some [sites] to be operational, others much longer,” he said.*** And the worst part? The war isn't going to end soon and the administration *still* has no plan to reopen the Strait. Plan accordingly, the market is still priced as if this will be a temporary problem with minimal lasting impact. https://www.ft.com/content/09524a74-db3c-4aef-b4f7-51eda3068320?syn-25a6b1a6=1

McKoijion

> US LAWMAKERS URGE SEC TO REVIEW AND POTENTIALLY RESTRICT CHINESE COMPANIES’ ACCESS TO US MARKETS AND LISTINGS - FT Anyone remember when the CCP used to restrict Chinese people from investing in American stocks? How the turn tables.

JMWTurnerAppreciator

Private credit is also a blackhole that legally doesn't have to disclose what's going on with the money and has been heavily tightening the past few months. FT literally ran a story a few days ago about how the guys in private credit are glad about the war in Iran because it takes the focus off what's going on over there lol

leeuwvanvlaanderen

Like not even 6 months ago the US ambassador to the EU was writing guest essays for the FT about how the US is the EU’s most reliable energy partner, fucking lol

2020isgreat

US EXPLORED TYING NAVAL ESCORTS IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ TO GOVERNMENT INSURANCE-FT lmao[](https://x.com/FirstSquawk/status/2034495496149168347)

Geknapper

To expand on this. The FT had an article today that claimed repairing these facilities will take years. Even if the war stops now.

Geknapper

It's the later. The FT just had an article about this. It's basically the worst case target Iran could have hit. Supposedly it will take years to repair those facilities.

Touuqe

If you are new to trading it's probably best you avoid leveraged positions. I see you posted on the freetrade sub too, FT has a massive warning about those kinds of investments for a reason. It's definitely worth contacting freetrade to see if they can provide any further support.

SOROKAMOKA

Funny thing, FT reported that special types of oil, I think it was light crude or something, are already selling for 150 a barrel.

ColdxWinter

FT for the Bismuth, it may be needed more in the future with the cut down of lead and needed in electronics, data centers etcetera. They also just bought a refinery, have us and canada both backing them and bismuth was just added to the 13 critical minerals needed. They seem like the only north american company with bismuth that can even apply for the march 20th funding. The mine is not producing but they have a construction decision by the end of the year and a feasibility study being released soon. Diamond mines are also closing in the area, Agnico is taking stakes in companies nearby so it seems like big players are moving in the area. Do your own research.

Strong-Comment-7279

Really mate? If you trade, you know what a P/D looks like. Pick a lane. Bro, alive made 100% on Florida swamp land - by accident. You're working too hard, and playing with fire. If you're FT, hit me back.

Worried_Quarter469

The head of the International Maritime Organization has said that naval escorts through the Strait of Hormuz will not “100 percent guarantee” the safety of ships attempting to transit the waterway, the Financial Times reports. Military assistance is “not a long-term or sustainable solution” to opening up the strait, Arsenio Dominguez tells FT.

2020isgreat

TRUMP SAYS CHINA, JAPAN, SOUTH KOREA SHOULD BE ‘THANKING’ US FOR STRIKES-FT No one has said thank you yet :([](https://x.com/FirstSquawk/status/2033697963734929580)

Love_Tech

Tbh. I think it’s actually better. I work for a FT 50 and close to the leadership. Most of the leadership just focus on short term profit and growth on the expense on long term initiatives. We have shelved so many long term good projects coz they need investments and time which we never give to the team.

JohanLiebert92

🍊 says Beijing should help the US to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, as 'China gets 90% of its oil' through there, according to FT report. China's getting that shit on discount Donny, they ain't gotta do anything lol

cryptopolymath

BREAKING: My wife has warned that i face a 'very bad future' if my friends do not help me pick up the garage , according to FT report.

sailortyx56

🥭has warned that NATO faces a 'very bad future' if allies do not help the US in Iran, according to FT report

2020isgreat

BREAKING: Trump has warned that NATO faces a 'very bad future' if allies do not help the US in Iran, according to FT report.[](https://x.com/spectatorindex/status/2033320159134568862)

WithPaddlesThisDeep

FTMD (FT) & HPQFF (HPQ). I believe in the mining industry.

2020isgreat

India's Jaishankar tells FT there was no blanket arrangement with Iran for Indian-flagged ships and that every ship movement is an individual happening this is shocking news that no one could've known beforehand definitely not in the original story[](https://x.com/financialjuice/status/2033245906137452622)

_Doomer_Wojack_

EU FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTERS WILL DISCUSS POTENTIALLY A WIDENING OF THE EU ASPIDES NAVAL MISSION TO THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ- FT And as Iran has stated “we are waiting for them”

KingRegardothe2nd

>According to the FT, France and Italy want to to agree privately with Iran on the safety of ships in the Strait of Hormuz. And **Turkey said that Iran had allowed its ship through The Strait of Hormuz.** Interesting..

jonneh

From the FT # > We were being pushed by clients as to who the big seller was,” Skirrow said. > > “The speculation was that it could be from the US Treasury,” he added, noting that the government has previously intervened in other markets, such as currencies.

mithyyyy

god there was that FT article that was done with some anonymous wall street banker raving about the fact that donno's election meant that they can say retard and pussy and not *deal with the DEI woke bullshit.* wonder how that fucker is doing now looool

McKoijion

The FT is reporting that an unknown whale is selling a ton of oil futures and driving down the price (on paper at least.)

isolated-cat

ITALY FOREIGN MINISTRY DENIES FT REPORT OVER NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN TO REOPEN HORMUZ STRAIT TO ITALIAN VESSELS basically none of the reports from any US media sources is credible these days. they used to be bad before, they're even worse now.

RemarkableVictory990

ITALY FOREIGN MINISTRY DENIES FT REPORT OVER IRAN-TALKS TO REOPEN HORMUZ STRAIT TO ITALIAN VESSELS[](https://x.com/FirstSquawk/status/2032468889985270037)

Street_Moose1412

The FT quotes some theories that the Treasury is selling oil futures to tamp down the price. What's the deal with that?

otetmarkets

Reports from FT/Reuters say Qatar’s energy minister warned the conflict could force Gulf exporters to halt shipments if it drags on, with big knock-on risks for LNG and oil pricing. Qatar has also declared force majeure after drone attacks on facilities, according to multiple outlets. In practical market terms, the key variable is whether flows through the Strait of Hormuz stay constrained, because that’s the choke point for a huge share of Gulf energy exports.

pussinbuuts

FRANCE AND ITALY OPEN TALKS WITH IRAN IN HOPE OF SECURING SAFE HORMUZ PASSAGE - FT "can you let us pass" "no" "ok"

RemarkableVictory990

FRANCE AND ITALY OPEN TALKS WITH IRAN IN HOPE OF SECURING SAFE HORMUZ PASSAGE - FT [](https://x.com/DeItaone/status/2032438083585507371)

Longjumping_Tree6561

BREAKING: The US has burned through "years" worth of munitions since start of the Iran war, just 13 days ago, per FT. Details include: 1. Concerns are reportedly mounting around rising costs and the US’ ability to replenish stockpiles 2. The rapid depletion of weaponry includes advanced long-range Tomahawk missiles, sources say 3. The Pentagon is set to request $50 billion in additional spending for the military 4. Pentagon officials told Senators that the war had cost more than $11 billion in the first 6 days of strikes Costs of the Iran war are rapidly mounting.

-whis

Not outlier specific, but if you phone it I’m you’ll get caught. I was doing it during college and was making bank - 45/hr on demand for a student is lethal. Needless to say after I got a FT role, my work quality slacked off and got axed. Models have gotten better since their inception so the work has become increasingly more detail oriented. For finance tasks, it used to be questions about quick financial ratios and other easy metrics - nowadays they’re asking you to find the errors in a full DCF. They are hungry for domain expertise so PhD will definitely get you in if you aren’t retarded

RemarkableVictory990

"The speculation was that it could be from the US Treasury" -FT You think?

RemarkableVictory990

CME warns US intervention in oil futures would be a biblical disaster - FT but they already did intervene[](https://x.com/financialjuice/status/2032185497519263916)

NotMe357

"CME warns US intervention in oil futures would be a biblical disaster - FT" I dont think TACO and his friends cares.

saccotac

CME warns US intervention in oil futures would be a biblical disaster - FT

WhoLickedMyDumpling

Bull case had one link from the axios report for 🌮, and a FT report for europe potentially capping natural gas prices. Bears had a giga wall of text with 18 sources pointing to mines, oil prod capacity reduction not able to recover immediately, cyber attack on strykr from iran, SLB first to report downside risk as an sp500 company, war costs ($11.6B in 6 days and counting), WH claiming they have until end of march to end the war (which by all accounts, not happening), and all the other shit wsb bers harp about. Basically, even IF war ends today, oil prices aren't going back to $70. Just like tarriffs, this is just the new norm. The infrastructure damage is done

Electrical_Ad_828

I just read this on Bloomberg news. - Disruption of hormuz strait: 18 million barrels per day - The release of strategic reserves can only supply 2 million barrels per day. I have also seen on FT of the UK government scenario planning where they believe that if the worst case scenario materialises (war lasting until April) that the price of oil will hit $150 and sustain that price for a while. I think we may be underestimating the impact of this war. I have seen hotels/restaurants closed in India due to the war.

2020isgreat

Atlassian cuts 10% of workforce to adapt to AI threat-FT Ayyy buls atleast there's ai benefits

Rich-Badger-7601

Brother all the record games kinda ook like that, I mean hell Bam only shot 3 more FT in the 4th than Kobe did in his 81 point game. I'd feel less bad about the intentional Heat fouls to get the ball back if the Wizards hadn't hard committed to losing by halftime when they started intentionally maxing out the shot clock solely to prevent Bam from going for the record. The 2006 Raptors weren't great but they also weren't engineering one of the aggressive tank jobs we've seen in the modern era either.

stevenryl866

Short the oil!! IEA PROPOSES 400-MILLION-BARREL OIL RESERVE RELEASE - WSJ [*Note: higher-end of prior speculated amounts] **Reminder: Mar 9th, Some US officials believe a joint release in the range of 300-400M barrels would be appropriate (v ~180M released in two tranches after Ukraine war started in 2022) - FT *Note: G7 leaders are convening for a video call today at 10:00 ET (14:00 GMT) to address the escalating impacts of the Third Gulf War. The discussion will focus specifically on the global energy situation and the security of the Strait of Hormuz.

Pretty_Dragonfly_716

But 42 FT counts? lol