GME

xSidewinderxArt

There’s no misinformation here. You’re totally not ‘tarded, the current stock market/market cap/and current US economy is totally on the up and up, GME is a great buy, reddit sentiment is reflective of the overall US opinion, politicians who beat the market by upwards of 3-4x are just good traders. Not sure what you’re arguing about here

DeadSol

Crypto/GME/AMC is my guess.

dntcarebouturfeelins

You would have never survived GME pump... retail made billions and you would have been telling everyone to short at $10...

Pretty_Ad_7885

you sound like the hedge funds when they got fucked by GME. It doesn't have to make sense that is the point of the stock

SJSquishmeister

I have some GME if you'd like.

zxc123zxc123

Clock broken is right twice a day. Dr Burry right every few years. Dude wasn't just a bear the whole time but his bearish calls get highlighted by media so he sounds like a gigabear. Dude bought into GME before Roaring Kitty did (sold out early like a paper handed bitch though), shorted then went long China at the right times, went short TLT after Fed rate hikes, etcetcetc. Still. I think Burry is probably wrong and early. The market has so much dumber crap working that shorting AI is like the dumb af. Carvana is worth $100B. That's more than Carmax (6), Honda motors (40), Pinterest (17), Zillow (17), MGM resorts (10), and BiliBili (9.9) COMBINED. Then there are the quantum hype stocks like Riggetti computing. Plus the entire crypto space looks scammy AF plus BTC still has no real use case after 15years. MSTR out here stacking BTC while shorting itself. PE looking for suckers to hold their bags like a fent addict looking for their next fix. And more.

WOW_SUCH_KARMA

For sure, I'm not disputing the reason, but the reason now is the same as it was at 2pm et and at 11am and at 9am when the same whiny question was asked 4 different times today alone. It's obnoxious and we all know it's just "I want Elon to go broke" bullshit. Many years ago before the GME craze, there were actual rules around what could and could not be posted but it seems like the rules just don't exist anymore.

Ok_Guidance4571

Yes I did go with Higher volatile companies. I do think GME at 22 a share when they have warrants out there for $32 dollars next October makes i a little safer. And I am on the call side so I am selling the covered calls if they get exercised im good with it. I do Believe that BBAI is going places probably in the 10-15 dollar range in the next year or 2(pending how they handle dilution, and if the get government contracts while the Department of War is in office hehe). AMC yes I have a cost basis of 3.40 so getting hammered on that one. And I do have other accounts that are stable. goal for me here is to be able to start spending some of my gains...

SeriuoslyCasual

It may have meme aspects but it isn’t GME and that sort of nonsense. Major serious investors and institutional money involved. That alone takes it out of meme land. Some Redditors who hate Tesla and Trump don’t get to make all the definitions of meme stocks, as they try to justify their failure to double their money in 9 months like I just did.

Soft_Lavishness_8925

You have no room to talk, you're in on GME lmao

Head_Chocolate_4458

GME bag holders went from funny to sad like 3 years ago, people are still in that shit?

lupindub

You do realize WeBull also halted trading of GME during the 2021 squeeze, right? Both RH and webull shared the same clearing firm (Apex) during that time so you should probably get your facts straight before making such a garbage post

SPorterBridges

> There's a guy in here who just learned what a PE ratio is. You reminded me again of the guy in here who asked what ER means and got 80 some odd upvotes. Investing subreddits have gotten so shite since political astroturfers convinced Redditors they were sticking it to the man by investing in GME.

TheMightySet69

Come on GME calls, print for daddy! 

MarginCalledManager

The old WSB was well before COVID and GME.

LewyH91

GME money

MtGloomy0420

There is a joke in here somewhere if we can just add a Y… $MIST alter ego is $MIST-y? Not as good as a $GME joke I guess.

bonerinho_

You forgot to forget GME. ;)

Weikoko

Ever since GME, everyone is talking about short squeeze

Difficult_Winner_777

People keep forcing SGBX into random comps like GME or whatever, but the mechanics here still rhyme more with HKD style micro supply setups than an options driven meme run. The Dec 9 PRER14A literally sets Dec 29 as the gate for the big corporate actions and share authorization changes, so the “millions of new tradable shares” narrative is not something that just appears before that meeting. At the same time, borrow is still triple digit and locates keep printing tight, with short volume staying heavy on the tape. I am not calling an outcome. I am saying the structure people are trading around still looks supply constrained.

xsairon

ye honestly thankful investing 700 bucks in GME at 18, and then investing in HIMS let me feel those 50%+ drops real nicely early on. Currently down YTD because of NBIS/IREN drop yet pretty chill about it. you just gotta get used to becoming a community member while holding bags if nothing has changed but price

WinkN-Sparkle

Man, idk what those old-school Wall Street fat cats say but the $GME squeeze was God tier.

ajarbyurns1

All these yen carry trade thingies remind me of the GME short squeeze talks

Toothlesskinch

So many bots pushing negative sentiment tonight. Someone's looking to buy. Fucking GME brought way too much attention to this place.

Throwawayhelper420

Bullshit. That is what you wish but you are lying. The first time you ever mentioned GME in your entire life was January 27 2021 and it’s in your history, it was the very first stock you ever bought… and on Robin Hood! What you were actually talking about in 2020 was stealing WiiU games!!

PsychologicalNote926

Nah fucking that GME shit lol. I’m still not wrong

mechanicalcontrols

Question. How much did you lose on GME, AMC and/or BBBY?

jfremmy

Man who else thought this was the $GME chart 😆

NonimiJewelry

How many etfs are made around GME, do you know what’s in those ETFs? Fake shares of it, just one example. How many FTDS went to 90 day plus? Check superstonk and sort by FTD.

NonimiJewelry

How many etfs are made around GME, do you know what’s in those ETFs? Fake shares of it, just one example. How many FTDS went to 90 day plus? Check r/superstonk and sort by FTD.

modernknightly

Just because a rescheduling announcement didn't happen today as multiple outlets reported "could be announced as early as Monday" doesn't mean it won't happen tomorrow or next week. I mulled puts on TLRY all Sunday long and I kept coming back to that potential reversal on my puts. It wasn't just meme news, it's potentially an industry changing announcement. Don't do it. There are so many other plays. In particular, I'm playing puts on GME post-the social activity and tiktok influencer commercial on Friday. I'm betting that the volume dries up after retail piled in today after the weekend finished.

NonimiJewelry

They can FTD forever the fine is only $5million a month. Same situation with GME they let it spike a little and keep shorting and borrowing for a fine.

OutlandishnessUsed24

**On the AI accusation:** I work in supply chain. Statistical analysis and supply vs demand literally my job. Take it as a compliment. And for 100000000000 time, yes I am using AI to reference my 50+ page thesis to respond ESPECIALLY to genius's like you that I never could do without Claude's help :) **On GME:** I said "turnaround is speculative" - meaning unproven, not impossible. Cohen raising $9B to sit in cash isn't a turnaround yet. It's optionality. FLWS already has the revenue. All in my 50+ page thesis my friend. **On "AI for flowers":** Their AI play isn't chatbots for customer service. It's leveraging 30 years of first-party purchase data for predictive marketing. Birthdays, anniversaries, life events. That data existed before cookies, before Meta, before Google. In a privacy-first world, that's gold. Again, I am in supply chain, I know what this data is worth. **On "market manipulation":** Sharing publicly available SEC filings, FINRA data, and statistical analysis on a public forum isn't manipulation. It's due diligence. If discussing stocks online is manipulation, delete the subreddit. **Meanwhile:** Stock closed +10%, now +20% after hours, FTD settlement starts tomorrow. I've provided data, sources, and citations. You've provided insults. We're done here.

WendigoBroncos

okay you're using ai at this point these are a bit long winded for like 5 minutes. **if not you're obsessed dude and need to go touch some grass.** your lack of knowledge regarding the tickers you're using as examples **is laughable.** **GME a dying retailer...?** you're watching too much mainstream news. cohen took a 200m market cap and raised **9** **BILLION DOLLARS.** which will ensure no bankruptcy for something like 20 years if they do absolute jack shit with the company and money. lets see FLWS pull that kind of capital. and dude... AI? for **fucking flowers**. all that means is shitty customer service, a fuck-the-workers approach and really, really bad ads. haven't you seen the nose-dives retailers are suffering when going heavy into ai thinking replacing their labor costs will work? AGAIN FUCKING LOL AI IS WHAT YOU THINK WILL MAKE THEM MONEY. relying on a squeeze and imo, market manipulation via social media.

OutlandishnessUsed24

One more thing on "hardly GME working a turnaround": **You're right - this ISN'T a meme with no fundamentals. That's the point.** FLWS has 30+ years of customer purchase data going back to the 1-800 phone order days. Birthdays, anniversaries, Mother's Days, sympathy occasions - decades of purchase patterns tied to life events. **That data alone is arguably worth the current market cap (\~$275M).** They're not a dying retailer hoping to pivot. They're a $1.9B revenue company with: * Exposed first-party customer data from before the internet existed * Recent AI transformation (new CIO Alex Zelikovsky announced) * Predictable recurring revenue tied to calendar events * Multi-brand portfolio (Harry & David, Cheryl's Cookies, Shari's Berries) **The squeeze is the asymmetric upside. The floor is fundamental value.** If the squeeze thesis is wrong? I own a profitable company trading at a discount to its data asset value during an AI boom where first-party data is gold. GME's turnaround is speculative. FLWS already HAS the revenue, the data, and the recurring customer base. Worst case: I own a cheap stock. Best case: Squeeze + AI catalyst repricing. That's not "relying purely on squeeze." That's asymmetric risk/reward.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Let me be very direct here: **"Different hedge funds / cannibalistic"** Good. Multiple funds competing for 600K available shares to cover 527K in FTDs = bidding war. That helps, not hurts. **"Can't trade faster than systems"** Speed doesn't matter when the constraint is PHYSICAL SHARES. HFTs can't algo their way into shares that don't exist. This isn't a momentum play - it's a delivery obligation. **"Moonshots get shot down"** HOW did they get shot down? I'll tell you: * GME: Company diluted via S-3 * AMC: Company issued 400M+ shares * BYND: Bondholders converted $202M **Every single "shot down" had a MECHANISM.** FLWS has no S-3, no ATM, no convertible bonds. What's the mechanism here? **"Crime" / "spewing a lot"** To be clear: I'm sharing publicly available SEC filings, FINRA data, and statistical analysis. All sources cited. All verifiable. That's not "spewing" - that's due diligence. If you're suggesting hedge funds will commit crime to escape - name the specific mechanism. "Crime" as a vague concept doesn't settle FTDs. **"Bigger fish already cashed in"** Then why is short interest STILL 104% of float? If they cashed in, where's the exit? I've cited filings and data. You've cited vibes. Read the DD.

WendigoBroncos

it's not always the same hedge fund buddy. these squeezes have become a cannibalistic source of cash for huge institutions. you can't trade faster than the systems harvesting profit on every uptick. FTD forced purchases definitely drive price when large enough. but moonshots are literally shot down in progress these days. here's hopin pal. but you're spewing a lot here that doesn't count for all the you know.. **crime**. FLWS been on my radar for a minute, but it's hardly GME working a hugely profitable turnaround. you're relying purely on squeeze that other, bigger fish already know about and cashed in on.

Thes_dryn

GME, not because I made a ton of money (only a few hundred in profit) but because it was my entrance into investing as a whole.

OutlandishnessUsed24

You're actually describing HOW we got here, not why it doesn't matter. **Naked shorting and rehypothecation create FTDs.** That's not a counterargument - that's literally the thesis. They DID rehypothecate. They DID naked short. And now 527K of those chickens come home to roost this week via T+35 settlement. **Those FTDs are LOCKED:** * Nov 11 fail → Dec 16 due * Nov 12 fail → Dec 17 due * Nov 13 fail → Dec 18 due Can they naked short MORE today? Sure. But that creates JANUARY FTDs. It doesn't change what's due THIS WEEK. The T+35 calendar is set. **"Where's the lock and key?"** It's the ESCAPE ROUTES: * GME escaped via S-3 dilution → **FLWS has no S-3** * AMC escaped via share issuance → **FLWS has no ATM program** * BYND escaped via bondholder conversion → **FLWS has zero convertible bonds** * All three had insider lending → **McCann Class B auto-converts if transferred** * Options rollover trick? **Used Oct 23. OI is tapped.** Yes, I followed those tickers. I watched the escapes. **That's why I'm here** \- because the escapes don't exist. Dig the hole deeper for January? Sure. Escape December? No mechanism exists.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Respectfully, you're thinking about this wrong - and this is all in my DD if you'd read it. **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Appreciate the detailed response - you clearly know mechanics. Let me address this in the context of THIS specific setup: **1-2. Gamma initiates, but what sustains it?** Agreed gamma drives price discovery. But in GME/AMC, supply eventually arrived (dilution). In FLWS: no S-3 filed, no convertible bonds, McCanns can't lend without losing voting control. Gamma gets price there. Blocked exits keep it there. **3-4. "FTDs are back-office, gamma comes first"** Usually true. But FLWS has 527K shares due THIS WEEK with 600K available. Coverage ratio: 0.87x. This isn't theoretical future stress - it's 48 hours away. Gamma would accelerate something already in motion. **5-6. "High IV doesn't reduce delta/gamma"** Technically correct for dealer mechanics. But at 200% IV, retail's $1,000 buys fewer contracts = less TOTAL gamma retail can bring. And on shares having "no follow-through" - in a normal float, agreed. In a float where 94% is short and 527K must be delivered from 600K available? Every share removed IS follow-through. **7. "Options initiate, shares sustain"** This is where we AGREE. You said it yourself. My actual strategy: * Buy calls on dips * Sell calls when IV spikes * Convert premium to shares * Never sell the shares Options = initiation leverage Shares = sustained scarcity **The synthesis:** Gamma INITIATES (you're right). FTDs FORCE buying regardless (unique here). Blocked exits SUSTAIN it (no dilution). Shares COMPOUND it (constrained float). We're saying the same thing from different angles. You're focused on how squeezes start. I'm focused on why THIS one can't be unwound. Both matter :)

OutlandishnessUsed24

They're **partially correct** on mechanics, but **missing key context** for THIS specific situation. Here's my take: **Where they're RIGHT:** * Delta hedging mechanics are accurate * Gamma does amplify buying pressure as price rises * MMs hedge price risk first, not borrow availability * Near-dated ATM calls do have high gamma * This IS how GME's gamma squeeze worked **Where they're WRONG or incomplete for FLWS specifically:** **1. IV makes the math different here** IV is 170-200%+. That $1,000 doesn't buy what it normally would. Normal IV stock: $1,000 = maybe 10 ATM contracts FLWS right now: $1,000 = maybe 3-4 ATM contracts The leverage advantage they're describing is **already priced in.** You're paying a massive premium for that gamma exposure. **2. Theta is brutal at this IV** Someone in another thread: "Up 221% today, still down 65% overall." If the squeeze doesn't happen THIS WEEK, those calls go to zero. Shares don't have an expiration date. You can be early and still win with shares. Be early with weekly options and you lose everything. **3. Options create TEMPORARY pressure. Shares create PERMANENT scarcity.** When your call expires or you sell it, the MM unwinds the hedge. That buying pressure disappears. Shares you hold = shares shorts can't use to deliver. Ever. Until YOU decide to sell. For the FTD settlement thesis, shorts need ACTUAL shares to deliver. Not synthetic hedges. SEC Rule 204 requires real delivery. **4. This thesis is FTD-driven, not purely gamma-driven** GME was gamma-driven - retail piled into calls, MMs hedged, price exploded. FLWS has that dynamic PLUS mandatory FTD settlement. 527K shares MUST be delivered this week regardless of options activity. That's regulatory, not optional. Gamma is additive here. But the base case works on FTD mechanics alone. **5. The specific recommendation is risky** "Buy this week's $5 and $6 calls for maximum pressure" The $5s are barely ATM. The $6s are OTM. Both expire in 4 days. If the squeeze is Wednesday/Thursday, great. If it's delayed to next week, **those go to zero.** **6. For the NUCLEAR scenario specifically** The post above this was about the infinity squeeze - what happens if shorts literally cannot find shares. That requires SHARE SCARCITY, not hedging flows. MMs can hedge synthetically. But shorts can't deliver synthetic shares to satisfy FTDs.

JoeBucksSafeWord

GME up over 4% with Market down 0.5%. Massive outperformance.

Inevitable_Pin7755

For me GME

braden1066

Fuck these lesbian markets let’s have some fun and pump GME again 👆

Muted_Orchid_7131

Anyone in GME 😈

Venupsb

$GME was better bet😲

Laughingboy14

Everyone on Reddit post-GME has put everything down to manipulation. It's just not. You need to provide evidence of manipulation to claim manipulation rather than randomly asserting it. The high beta risk-on assets sold off at open (quantum stocks, OKLO etc) so it's far more likely that algos that trade BTC in correlation with these high beta stocks shorted BTC at market open. Far more likely than the nefarious manipulation that everyone claims

CultureForsaken3762

GME Ho Lee Fuk

Mighty-HeaIthy

The real mature value plays are finally showing their strength against a falsely inflated market. Undervalued stocks such as TSLA, PLTR, & the power house of business that is GME.

enc-nyc

CVNA, TSLA and GME holding SPY afloat

JoeBucksSafeWord

GME lollllllll. We really doing this again?

TheMightySet69

Taking my gains from today's SPY puts and going full port into GME weekly calls tomorrow

TheMightySet69

Should've bought more GME calls

PeerWeers

GME 👀

CultureForsaken3762

GME generating serious alpha today

RanchHandlher

Short squeeze. MM manipulation. It’s basically reverse GME. Where WSB are the shorts and MM’s are the diamond hands.

CultureForsaken3762

GME tax loss selling almost over. I like the stock heading into 2026.

CultureForsaken3762

GME call options 👀👀👀👀 Michael Burry might be onto something big…

WhoGotDaKeys2MaBeema

Until you need to make a trade and they stop you from doing it like what happened during the GME BS.

assholy_than_thou

Can GME squeeze?

jjlee27

i keep seeing that gamestop goth girl on the socials, is the GME short squeeze back?

assholy_than_thou

No quick money making schemes now or what? Like Chinese shit, GME etc?

orangeyougladiator

I was here for the original reckoning of GME. I will literally never touch that stock

Dolancorp

Buying whatever COST call I can afford. And holding GME x1026 with their respective covered calls.

Starkfault

!Banbet GME -20% 2w

ShermansAngryGhost

He’s talking about GME. People don’t understand that retail investors aren’t the reason that happened though. We were just along for the ride and added some fuel to the fire.

SleazyBroke

Never happening. Once a life time if you weren’t there for GME sucks to sucks

OutlandishnessUsed24

Fair pushback. You're right that 3,268 OI at $5 isn't GME-level gamma. But the chain data as of Friday close shows: $5 strike: 3,268 OI (highest), 176% IV, 550 volume (also highest) $4 strike: 1,963 OI, 119% IV $6 strike: 2,478 OI, 234% IV IV is extremely elevated across the board - the market is pricing in a significant move. The cumulative delta hedge across the chain at $5 is still ~500K shares against 500K available borrow. This isn't a massive gamma squeeze setup, it's a constrained float situation where even moderate options activity creates outsized hedging pressure. Smaller gamma, smaller float. Appreciate the rigor.

bread-for-hands

It’s ok man, way back when I made 25k on GME 53c from 46 to 86, they expired on Friday when it was at $384 or something like that. The cash was obviously great but the knowledge that I missed out was priceless

Desperate_Property31

GME https://preview.redd.it/a5rx387kx07g1.jpeg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=878e3ede32e130a454c24a105489c4191e4470c2

btoned

Literally me with GME. Had calls the week prior that woulda been over 100k

OutlandishnessUsed24

You built python scripts and screeners to find a stock that someone was able to find on a publicly available fin screener, filtering for unusual volume. \--Incorrect, you have no idea what I and people like me have been able to build in the last 60 days inparticular with VS addins like Cline and the new anthropic models. I can tell by the way youre still stuck in the past on your assumptions here. The last 60 days changes in anthropic models inparticular changes all of this. You then spammed the same ChatGPT produced excerpt several dozen times in several subreddits, and claim that you believe in this stock. \--10000% incorrect. I have spent weeks feeding data and saving very large paraquet files (something I could not do 60 days ago) to build the same quant level analysis that used to be impossible by people like us You can’t believe in a stock if the goal is to pump and dump it. You may have called BYND early, but so did a lot of people, and your posts about “WHOS STILL HOLDING BYND?!” suggests you ended up being a bagholder in that call. \---incorrect, I didnt put a thesis to BYND I just predicted the mechanical short squeeze that went to $7 and i took a lot of that data to feed into my models for FLWS. FWLS is different than BYND, GME, AMC, and whatever other meme stock you want to mention and my thesis mentions this but you have refused to read it by the fact you havent rebuted any of it yet. If you’re still holding onto GME because you called it and believe in it, then you certainly aren’t the person to back for stock picks. \---I'm not holding GME, again, i just used that as my first experience building databases and modeling on what happened there. Especially when your supposed self built python scripts are finding you stocks that have been peddled by bots in this subreddit for nearly a month now. \---u think i built a sentiment scrapper? that is the easiest thing to do, not to mention free already, no need to build that. Just use Chart Exchange below which is ironically caputering us talking about FLWS right now.... my DD is an attempt to show up in other peoples sentiment screeners so they can look deeper here actually..... this is a 4D chess move, with real squeeze mechanics, and real value long term; similar to GME when it was though of as a bankrupt company but still very different. Any challenge to the thesis yet or just my character that is all theoritcal because you dont know me?

PlayerPlayer69

AI is cool. Nothing against it. You built python scripts and screeners to find a stock that someone was able to find on a publicly available fin screener, filtering for unusual volume. You then spammed the same ChatGPT produced excerpt several dozen times in several subreddits, and claim that you believe in this stock. You can’t believe in a stock if the goal is to pump and dump it. You may have called BYND early, but so did a lot of people, and your posts about “WHOS STILL HOLDING BYND?!” suggests you ended up being a bagholder in that call. If you’re still holding onto GME because you called it and believe in it, then you certainly aren’t the person to back for stock picks.

OutlandishnessUsed24

I am doing a lot of copy and pasting this weekend to get my DD out there, I replied to similiar comments already on other posts. It's just easier to copy and paste the same responses since everyone has the same rebutals: I used claude to help build this thesis and put it into non-wendy's working language like I normally speak.... as you can tell by someone who love conspiracy theories, I'm not the most elogant speaker but I am VERY good at pattern recognition and AI has only helped me to put data behind my anecdotal patterns I see. So, no I am not a bot. Yes I could see why you think this is slop because most people use AI to produce slop but i promise all of my premises are researched and my conclusion neccessarly follows. If you have a challenge to my premises then give me one? If your only challenge is I used AI to write the thesis in a post, thats not enough for me to throw out the thesis. Lastly, for spamming in multiple subs. Ive been doing this a long time. Long time creeper, first time poster because I feel strongly about this one. I called BYND, I was there during GME, and I built python scripts with claude to screen for these finds before others do...... maybe you should not be so resistant to AI before people like me run you over by using it correctly while others are producing slope :)

OutlandishnessUsed24

I used claude to help build this thesis and put it into non-wendy's working language like I normally speak.... as you can tell by someone who love conspiracy theories, I'm not the most elogant speaker but I am VERY good at pattern recognition and AI has only helped me to put data behind my anecdotal patterns I see. So, no I am not a bot. Yes I could see why you think this is slop because most people use AI to produce slop but i promise all of my premises are researched and my conclusion neccessarly follows. If you have a challenge to my premises then give me one? If your only challenge is I used AI to write the thesis in a post, thats not enough for me to throw out the thesis. Lastly, for spamming in multiple subs. Ive been doing this a long time. Long time creeper, first time poster because I feel strongly about this one. I called BYND, I was there during GME, and I built python scripts with claude to screen for these finds before others do...... maybe you should not be so resistant to AI before people like me run you over by using it correctly while others are producing slope :)

BornShook

Yeah but if I don’t time the market right I can be right and still lose money with options. Like 2 months before GME went to $420 a share, I lost $500 on call options that expired worthless. If I just bought and held shares I would’ve been better off. That’s just 1 example. I’ve been burned this way by options countless times to the point i have just given up on them

Dealer_Existing

GME Goth Me Erect 🚀

TheRightEdger

Sorry for the late reply. I did reply a few days ago, but reddit was kicking up internal server errors that day. So, looks like the reply was not posted. As I said in the post, "...Not expecting any significant rally (getting well over 3.00) until the next earnings report which will be in FEB26." Thus, my advice is to write covered calls (above your buy price) on the positions you hold while AMC treads water until the next earnings. Note, there are a couple big names in the meme and short selling space that are going to be active about GME on TwitterX starting on SUN 14DEC25. Some of the GME euphoria may spill over to AMC. So, wait until late MON to commit to any covered calls on AMC.

Adventurous-Day1018

I am actually going to take back all the hate I gave GME. I lost a relatively small YOLO on their earnings and it pissed me off so I sold my ORCL calls before earnings and ended up saving a shit ton of money. GME being a sack of shit saved my port...

Scoiatael

No, GME is dead. They intentionally killed every pump with more stock offerings.

OutlandishnessUsed24

This is ony of the FEW times, LIKE GME where NOT only is it PRIMED for a squeeze but it actually have a turnaround story brewing. I am a high level manager in supply chain for the past 15 years and I live down the streen from the Jericho, NY 1-800 flowers offices with many friends and neighbors who have worked there. It was always the safe easy job close to home for long island family. Go on their linkedin. They are aggressively repositioning for AI, dev ops, and its impact to their supply chain to save them and this is a very common theme in ALL companys right now BUT the highly complex supply chains like flowers, uber eats, and golds/diamonds/and more are going to have amazing improvements to margins in the near future JUST in the last 60 days of AI improvement for dev ops applications that a supply chain professionaly can make in 10 minutes that used to cost 5 figures, an IT project plan wait list, and an application that no one in the business uses. AI is going to change the world for supply chains, 1-800 flowers is struggling, not from demand (sales) but from margin, which is what supply chain improvements fix. This is 100% a turn around story about to happen AND the short squeeze set is INSANE!! [https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1084869/000143774925037662/0001437749-25-037662-index.htm](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1084869/000143774925037662/0001437749-25-037662-index.htm) This insider grant is a bigger deal than people realize. Let me explain. SVP and General Counsel just took 133K shares as compensation. This is the guy who handles all legal/compliance - he sees everything. If he thought this ship was sinking, he'd negotiate for cash. Instead he's going long with us. That tells you something about where insiders think this is headed. this doesnt need any more volme to squeeze. This is just pure math based on FINRA data. If retails picks this up it could be GME style but even if they dont it will be a squeeze to $5+. Just follow these dates, the +35 day rule, and the volume recently. It matches with almost 1:1 correlation.... meaning.... 0 retail buying was the $5 move, that was the 1st FTD cover. There are plenty more and the stock wont drop so its only up from here. https://preview.redd.it/ck6slbxnuu6g1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=9efe400d602320a98d40a5d1f9cef51abdffbea4

OutlandishnessUsed24

https://preview.redd.it/8hrxkfwauu6g1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=5cda0b1c252aedb967f667b499774e141f03c9c2 this doesnt need any more volme to squeeze. This is just pure math based on FINRA data. If retails picks this up it could be GME style but even if they dont it will be a squeeze to $5+. Just follow these dates, the +35 day rule, and the volume recently. It matches with almost 1:1 correlation.... meaning.... 0 retail buying was the $5 move, that was the 1st FTD cover. There are plenty more and the stock wont drop so its only up from here

OutlandishnessUsed24

This is ony of the FEW times, LIKE GME where NOT only is it PRIMED for a squeeze but it actually have a turnaround story brewing. I am a high level manager in supply chain for the past 15 years and I live down the streen from the Jericho, NY 1-800 flowers offices with many friends and neighbors who have worked there. It was always the safe easy job close to home for long island family. Go on their linkedin. They are aggressively repositioning for AI, dev ops, and its impact to their supply chain to save them and this is a very common theme in ALL companys right now BUT the highly complex supply chains like flowers, uber eats, and golds/diamonds/and more are going to have amazing improvements to margins in the near future JUST in the last 60 days of AI improvement for dev ops applications that a supply chain professionaly can make in 10 minutes that used to cost 5 figures, an IT project plan wait list, and an application that no one in the business uses. AI is going to change the world for supply chains, 1-800 flowers is struggling, not from demand (sales) but from margin, which is what supply chain improvements fix. This is 100% a turn around story about to happen AND the short squeeze set is INSANE!!

OutlandishnessUsed24

$4-$4.5 is 80-90% likely, $5-6 is 50-60% likely, and 7+ is the rest. That being said, this is ony of the FEW times, LIKE GME where NOT only is it PRIMED for a squeeze but it actually have a turnaround story brewing. I am a high level manager in supply chain for the past 15 years and I live down the streen from the Jericho, NY 1-800 flowers offices with many friends and neighbors who have worked there. It was always the safe easy job close to home for long island family. Go on their linkedin. They are aggressively repositioning for AI, dev ops, and its impact to their supply chain to save them and this is a very common theme in ALL companys right now BUT the highly complex supply chains like flowers, uber eats, and golds/diamonds/and more are going to have amazing improvements to margins in the near future JUST in the last 60 days of AI improvement for dev ops applications that a supply chain professionaly can make in 10 minutes that used to cost 5 figures, an IT project plan wait list, and an application that no one in the business uses. AI is going to change the world for supply chains, 1-800 flowers is struggling, not from demand (sales) but from margin, which is what supply chain improvements fix. This is 100% a turn around story about to happen AND the short squeeze set is INSANE!!

OutlandishnessUsed24

this doesnt need any more volme to squeeze. This is just pure math based on FINRA data. If retails picks this up it could be GME style but even if they dont it will be a squeeze to $5+. Just follow these dates, the +35 day rule, and the volume recently. It matches with almost 1:1 correlation.... meaning.... 0 retail buying was the $5 move, that was the 1st FTD cover. There are plenty more and the stock wont drop so its only up from here https://preview.redd.it/wg6tzw2iru6g1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=1dbd6e15c7a68bc1c24b6e52d32839fb6c323f78

magicmikke856

Sold covered calls right before the GME squeeze. Was never so pissed off to make a few thousand bucks.

VampireDoggo

GME short squeeze 2025 edition?

not-trading-advice

GME, just fucking die or rally to 30. Stop this slow burn bullshit.

anewnormal

GME is gonna fly now that I’ve sold my destroyed calls

Party_Shoe104

Do you remember 2021 and the GME/meme fiasco? When they shut off the "buy" button...Connecticut's department of consumer protection suit is just another "slap on the wrist" story. Nothing to see here.....move along.

thesutterking

This time 5 years ago?... GME then AMC then Shiba... id have been a millionaire if i reinvested those three in that order

AdvancedRedditard

Like GME? That did phenomenal. Right??

87th_best_dad

Guy around the corner from me with an Escalade DFV GME

lincoln3

After embarrassing myself with GME calls, ORCL calls, RDDT puts, and CHWY calls, I’m back with the actual one saving grace good play: NTSK calls. Please god.

psyberbird

Is it true that Schwab did the same thing as Robinhood back during the GME craze years ago? I thought with everything everyone was saying that RH was alone, but the articles I looked up all listed Charles Schwab, Robinhood, and TD Ameritrade as the three brokerages that did this (and I think TD was bought by Schwab). If so then why do people recommend Schwab over Fidelity?

Aggravating_Part8610

Yep. It’s not a coincidence. After GME, that is why all the billionaires and PE have piled in to owning all social media or running cheap bot farms. The result is that real information like this is drowned out. GME would have fizzled in this environment.