IA
Innovative Aerosystems, Inc.
Mentions (24Hr)
100.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
La IA no puede hacer nada contra la mimeria de btc ya q un bloque sale cada 10 minutos pase lo q pase osea va a seguir con sus tiempos y vida programada
Si el tipo se esforzara y le pidiera a la IA que le haga un análisis de 5 páginas también lo estarían criticando, "no quiero leer a ChatGPT" y todo eso.
Oh my god was literally thinking about AXTI just a few hours ago, insane timing. I really don't know enough about the engineering wise stuff here (wish IA had article here lol), but I can't see them paying off current valuation. Would've liked to see some insane price hikes already tbh... If optics / AI becomes waaaay more important in the future, China has a great negotiating lever like we used with ASML exports to just shut of GaN and InP exports out of china. Don't see why they don't use it tbh, at least to get HBM supply
CA governor debate just happened and here’s my investment thesis: Predictions markets are overestimating the GOP’s senate chances. Mark my word, but NE and IA and KS are gonna flip (maybe they’re intentionally overestimating because now they’re cozy with mango and will just let him make big returns betting on dems chances). CONVERSELY, I sincerely think that the gop will win the CA governor race, why because there’s hot greek life people in their 20s in socal and most of them came of age during Covid and went anti woke and those types of voters didn’t exist in 2018 and being hot typically used to mean you lean left but now it means you lean right and I think that they’re gonna vote for Steve Hilton in droves. Why did I say the other states will go blue? Because they DON’T have hot people (and all the IG models are MAGA anyways, EXCEPT for the fact that MAGA put in place the now former presssec who is an incredibly ugly and deranged individual with zero moral compass). Nevertheless I feel im right and my returns from this will be MASSIVE. Except for the edge case I gave, I feel that how hot you are strongly correlates with which party you support and if im right (which I probably am) im gonna make A LOT of money… I would SERIOUSLY consider moving back to the state if it happens (and I’m socially lefty while economically probably even more right than MAGA).
IA company pay multiples dollars to bill one. Imagine if you sold a lemonade that cost 4 bucks to make for $1. Things cannot end well. For now, big shot like Amazon or Microsoft are the one burning billions to keep the IA companies running. And with a neat trick, those two write the burning cash as profit in the books.
Buy IA, buy UBER, buy O DCA them.
I wrote my own thoughts and then had IA rephrase it because I didn't feel like going to the effort of crafting a well written couple of paragraphs. The idea represents my thoughts/intentions though.
Es una estimación. Es muy probable que antes de 6 meses veamos algún hito, ya sea como pago de regalías en 10-Q como de algún comunicado conjunto. El ritmo de descubrimiento se ha adelantado con la IA en sus modelos
Predictions markets are overestimating the GOP’s senate chances. Mark my word, but NE and IA and KS are gonna flip (maybe they’re intentionally overestimating because now they’re cozy with mango and will just let him make big returns betting on dems chances). CONVERSELY, I sincerely think that the gop will win the CA governor race, why because there’s hot people in socal and most of them came of age during Covid and went anti woke and couldn’t vote in 2018 but being hot typically means you lean right and I think that they’re gonna vote for Steve Hilton in droves. Why did I say the other states will go blue? Because they DON’T have hot people (and all the IG models are MAGA anyways, EXCEPT for the fact that MAGA put in place the now former presssec who is an incredibly ugly and deranged individual with zero moral compass). Nevertheless I feel im right and my returns from this will be MASSIVE. Except for the edge case I gave, I feel that how hot you are strongly correlates with which party you support and if im right (which I probably am) im gonna make A LOT of money…
#Yo bro I drive the same car from college (2016 Scion IA), I've never cleaned it, and I have a date on Saturday. Can one of ya'll come over and clean it? Thanks! 😬
Compré a 5$ y a 2'8$ creo que la empresa va a subir en cuanto termine su reorganización, ahora van a por chips de alimentación más orientados a la IA. El negocio de las pantallas oled está quemado...
Goverment will continue to put money to dominate in IA.
How about IA - Intelligence of America
Worth separating the two rulings, because they're different animals. The 4th was the merits — 7-0, Funke writing, the petition-fraud challenge to 437 and 438 rejected outright. The 11th was Kuehn's federal-preemption case, and that one went out on standing, dismissed without prejudice. Nothing was actually decided about preemption; the door stays open for anyone who turns up with a better standing story. The seven-customers joke is closer to the real constraint than it reads, except the cap isn't demand, it's licences. The commission's final regulations allow 12 dispensaries, four cultivators and four manufacturers, allocated by judicial district — Douglas, Lancaster, Sarpy/Cass, Buffalo/Hall. And as of the July coverage of those regs the commission still hadn't named a date for the first in-state dispensary licence, so any December sales date you see quoted is someone extrapolating. Who loses is the more interesting question. Disclosure: I run Budpedia, a dispensary directory. We carry five storefronts filed under Nebraska and every one of those five ZIPs resolves out of state — Council Bluffs IA, Rock Port MO, and three up at Pine Ridge SD. That demand is being served entirely by border retail right now. Twelve in-state doors don't create a market here, they repatriate one.
They just need to ask the IA how to switch their bank account money number decoder from reading signed float to unsigned float to unlock infinite money.
Estos tres tipos publicaron en X que quieren parar la inversión en IA.
For it to happen it's not that the Dems need 66. The Dems need to win enough that the GOP sees Trump is an anchor and jettisons him to save their skins I think if the Dems won 60 seats (which is extraordinarily unlikely) you would see 6 of the GOP members abandon him to save their skins To accomplish this Dems would need * Every single toss up or slight lean race gets them to 53 - including TX, IA, ME, MI, OH and AK * Both "there's a chance but it's not a *good* chance" seats in Kansas and Nebraska * 5 seats in "safe red" areas - the least impossible (but still very unlikely) candidates probably are SC, KY, WV, MT, and one shocker
Lets see morning your IA MATH MIND 🤣🤌🏻
Can IA see a reflection on a mirror and know its a reflection on a mirror?
Yea, i was so done with all of these IA stuff then i read about SLS. Im so glad, good company. U should read about em and give it a try
FAANG already fucked up their cash flow, now they are balls deep in IA investment, but I think not allá of them Will win from that bet. Excuse My English i'm from Chile
>I use IA all the time at work, I'd say that 30% of my time, I'm waiting for a ChatGPT or claude output, while doing something else. It's impressive how much of a different opinion can 2 people using the same tools have. maybe use that time to check the output from a previous prompt for errors? because really AI fucks up a lot more. >I use it for absolutely everything, complex emails, prepare presentations, generate technical documentation, do bibliographic research, generate software to automate tasks... In your head that sounds impressive, but really all I'm hearing is your job is very replaceable. Sorry not sorry. You know how many AI pilot programs fail in companies? 95% fails to produce a measurable impact. Look it up. There's actually a study on this. Do you know why? because everything you use AI for isn't actually mission critical. You can just take the piss. Nobody will notice. You think people read your complex emails? or your presentations? I highly doubt AI can make technical documentation without hallucinating. The actual application where AI should've been used for like medicine didn't need all the data centers or investment and AI there are always corrected by researchers. That is why AI pilot programs fail in the real world. It's because it costs so much yet people use it to do meaningless shit. Remember Tokenmaxxing?
I use IA all the time at work, I'd say that 30% of my time, I'm waiting for a ChatGPT or claude output, while doing something else. It's impressive how much of a different opinion can 2 people using the same tools have. I use it for absolutely everything, complex emails, prepare presentations, generate technical documentation, do bibliographic research, generate software to automate tasks... My feeling is that the recently released models (gpt sol and claude 4.8/5) feel like a categorically different product, I can't believe how much better they are compared to their predecessors. Basically 0 hallucination and completing very long tasks that require multiple chained steps... The change is so huge that I basically changed my mind, like op. I do think there is a bubble, but since these models keep improving so much, I don't think it will pop in the next months.
Real ask. Donyou Belive IA Bubble is real like what happend in the dot com?
Imagine believing in this AI grift. Next year at this time you won't hear anyone talking about IA.
We know 60 at IA with pooled OS tracking 13 months and 66 left study in March 2024. We know the criteria at that point left study was done after initial dosage takes 13 months completed, deaths in both arms and drop outs in either arm. It’s not rocket science to understand how well GPS has been performing.
Mas se eventualmente o mercado das ações "colapsar" toda a narrativa dos EUA em torno da IA nao acaba também por colapsar?
Didn’t BCTX P2 only showed 2-4 months higher mOS than best alternative therapy (TPC), which in below report shows 9-13 months? https://www.theinvestmentlog.com/posts/bctx/2026-03-10 I have very low confidence interim analysis will show a HR <= 0.70. If it had high confidence of beating the HR at IA, price would have been $10+ already.
Didn’t BCTX P2 only showed 2-4 months higher mOS than best alternative therapy (TPC), which in below report shows 9-13 months? https://www.theinvestmentlog.com/posts/bctx/2026-03-10 I have very low confidence interim analysis will show a HR <= 0.70. If it had high confidence of beating the HR at IA, price would have been $10+ already.
The issue is more so with the business model most American IA company have taken, which is growing uncontrollably in the hope to reach AGI and solve all of humanity's problem. And while IA sure has come a long way from how it was like 4 years ago. Could it reach AGI potential? Honestly I'm really doubtful. Especially considering the amount of money they should generate in order to become solvable after the amount of investment that was spent. Honestly I don't see how this could lead to anything other than a market crash. Even if we got AGI tomorrow, it would still need to be financially interesting for the users. But when considering the projected price in case of full adoption, it's just not realistic even in the best case scenario. Not saying IA will disappear because it's here to stay. But the closed source reckless investment strategy that the US has chosen is bound to fail. Most likely more open source and low cost approach are going to be the norm after this initial rush to AGI. And the real breakthrough will come in making IA more energy efficient, not making it bigger.