WWW

Al-phabitz89

The prez is fake and has dementia and WWW3 and historic inflation probably. Take your pick 🥱

beenalegend

try $WWW for boots and $ARMK for bdus or whatever they're called these days

Harryhodl

Shits literally going to go WWW3 nuclear and I’m still stressing about whether Elons August announcement will make my stock go up. I might be melted by then…

Perryswoman

WWW3 was not on my bingo card today

GordoKnowsWineToo

OP you do know you can pretty much answer any of your own questions by doing a simple search of the WWW(yeah I thought I'd go Old School There) right? Any way, here you go as none of us have an idea what you think is a well known private compnay https://spactrack.io/active/

IllustriousMoose603

CGC is a big WWW

Peppper

WWW3

Surly_Cynic

I bought some shares of WWW earlier this year and it went up after earnings and is still doing well. Not that that will have any bearings on NKE earnings but just wanted to chime in with my anecdote about a shoe company that’s done okay recently.

circle1987

Puts on WWW

crazyyimmy

Oh shit, WWW3 start for real with that port

CDN_Shadow

No way, REALLY? WWW

Surly_Cynic

Wolverines! WWW.pop

YoghurtDelicious6669

It’s like asking what’s the right way to swing a baseball bat. A lot of factors slugger. Learn basics on the WWW and ask legit questions or bring a play to the Apes. Lurking from the shadows you should see what legit Ape questions look like

Surly_Cynic

Wolverines! WWW.pop.

SlaynArsehole

Scalping these tops and bottoms all day WWW

bigfellasteve69

WWW

LookAtMeImInAGang

We only made it to WWW 2.9

Affectionate-Idea690

true ball of steel here, that shit is radioactive proof, it will fly even if WWW4 starts

Affectionate-Idea690

Iran And Pakistan In Talks To End Deadly Border Clashes---so no WWW3 for now...

sexyshadyshadowbeard

No, I was actually a part of those surveys... and I suggested only a certain risk level (high) investor and no retirement accounts for crypto. Ya'll can downvote all you want because I said crypto is shite. It is. There's limited future for it as a decentralized currency and WWW3 is a pipe dream.

sexyshadyshadowbeard

No, I was actually a part of those surveys... and I suggested only a certain risk level (high) investor and no retirement accounts for crypto. Ya'll can downvote all you want because I said crypto is shite. It is. There's limited future for it as a decentralized currency and WWW3 is a pipe dream.

jeopardy_loser

does Wolverine (WWW) mooning mean I should bet on Michigan tonight?

Hacking_the_Gibson

> As for #2, it is naive to think Apple isn’t investing in AI. It just won’t be in the form of a standalone product. Rather it will be integrated into currently existing products/services such as Siri, Home, Spotlight, Apple TV, Maps, Camera/Photos, etc, in a way that simply makes them easier or more useful, but without most people even realizing AI is being used. Applied AI essentially. LOL, what the heck do you think has been powering your Google searches for like a decade? There is a reason that the PageRank algorithm has been de-prioritizing backlinks in their SEO tabulation, and it isn't for their health. The Google Spider is essentially a human at this stage. It can read any unstructured piece of information on the WWW and connect it across many different dimensions to respond to a user's query. Hell, their TPUs are now on version 5. Those chips are what have been driving Google searches for a long time now. Meanwhile, Microsoft announces their first version and everyone goes apeshit? Not to put too fine a point on it, but Google has been mopping the floor with the competition in AI research and publishing since Sam Altman was burning tens of millions at Loopt.

cryptoguy66

WWW111? Dame, you think mankind will make it that far?

pinnr

>Bitcoin is not crypto. I didn't say it was. > Fiat currency is still far more useful for fraud than bitcoin. Besides my point. What I'm concerned about is the non-fraud uses, which is where Bitcoin and other crypto falls short. > Oh but you can. You can use it to purchase from any store very easily. In fact, even services like PayPal have bitcoin integrated for easy transactions anywhere Paypal is accepted. Not in the US. I can't use crypto at Target or Walmart or the grocery or even Amazon. > Segwit is low in fees and nearly instantaneous. Strike is also focused on fast tracking lightning network development. I don't know what these are and I don't want to need to know to make simple transactions. TradFi just works. > Losing your keys is not "easy to do" History and the amount of locked addresses disagrees with you. > The internet was absolutely not easy to use immediately I didn't say it was "easy" I said it was useful. WWW was developed before internet was even publicly available through ISPs and was immediately useful. e-commerce began just a few years after the internet was available to consumers through ISPs. Amazon, Google, Yahoo, Ebay, and many others were all operating useful products in less than a decade after the internet became available to consumers. Smartphones went from 0 to near 100% market saturation in developed countries within 10 years. Crypto adoption is glacial in comparison. If it was actually useful for something people would be using it by now.

Illustrious-Option-9

Since the inception of WWW.

Wsbgal

#You Are Not Replaceable ❤️ Your risk tolerance is wild enough for you to be here. You will get through this. Take a break and come back fresh. Don’t chase your losses. Talk to some comrades here about how dumb your plays were. If you still feel like you can’t handle life; check out the resources below. There’s no shame in reaching out. My inbox is always open as well, though response time may vary. Worst case, there’s always bankruptcy, and even that isn’t the end of the world. **24/7 Crisis Hotline:** 1-800-273-TALK (8255) (Veterans, press 1) **Crisis Text Line:** Text “HOME” to 741-741 **Veterans Crisis Line:** Send a text to 838255 **SAMHSA Treatment Referral Hotline (Substance Abuse)** 1-800-662-HELP (4357) **The National Problem Gambling Helpline:** Call: 1-800-522-4700 Text: 800-522-4700 Chat: WWW.NCPGAMBLING.ORG/CHAT —— **Jam Cramer’s OnlyFans Hotline: 1-800-743-2622**

Icy_Raisin6471

Yeah that's why it will take some time. Right now the LLMs are basically like geocities WWW.

991GT2RS

WWW1G1LGBT111 PATRIOTS ARE IN CONTROL BRACE FOR IMPACT. ARM YOURSELVES. BUY SILVER NOW. ​ https://preview.redd.it/1jvdhovbfnyb1.jpeg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=90b2c80ba06e96c8f89008a4c70b29ace393f72a

lotus_bubo

If students can have their debts forgiven, why not bears? #RefundOurPuts The 1% can’t keep getting away with this. Join us. WWW.REFUNDOURPUTS.ORG It’s not a movement, it’s a revolution.

FoolHooligan

[https://akash.network/](https://akash.network/) The Akash network is an upcoming competitor to AWS, they do the same thing as AWS but it's decentralized across the WWW instead of concentrated in datacenters. It's still got a ways to go before it will be as feature rich as AWS, but adoption should grow. Might be of interest to you.

colt1210

If WWW3 comes there will be no Wall Street

Rhynoster

It's always been about Inflation and the fed. WWW3 is just icing on the shit cake

canarddigerateur1

Was planning to buy IWM friday but someone here made my doubt myself because "YoU CrAZy To HolD oVer THe WE, WWW3 blablabla".

ivegotwonderfulnews

I love me some junk bonds and I've been watching the retail junk and junk ish bonds for a while now. They haven't been trading much lately but today they are trading like crazy. Bonds: TRP (7.5%) , VSCO (11.6%) VFC (7.3%) and WWW (9.8%) to name a few. Maturities between '29 and '32. Someone/something is on the move

gronaninjan

Well fuck WWW3 I guess

iBoMbY

Meta has no idea what a Metaverse should look like. They build a walled garden with safe space bubbles, and called it a Metaverse. I call that total BS. A Metaverse can only be a Metaverse if it is open like the WWW, and everyone can do their own stuff with their own rules.

Fenderstratguy

The IUL is the LAST thing you want to prioritize after a Roth IRA, 401K, emergency fund etc. Also, it is really worth reading everything you can at WWW.WHITECOATINVESTOR.COM. These links are regarding whole life insurance - but you get the idea. The site is very helpful for high income health care workers - https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-whole-life-insurance/ - https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/debunking-the-myths-of-whole-life-insurance/

provoko

Some more info on [meme stocks.](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/wiki/meme-stocks-warning) If anyone is reading this and think they have a problem gambling: Call/Text: 1-800-522-4700 or [chat online now.](https://WWW.NCPGAMBLING.ORG/CHAT)

teejay818

WeWork, Wachovia and Washington Mutual have entered the chat. The WWW of wealth destruction.

helloworldalien

Shoutout to the person who brought WWW to my attention! Still more upside now that they are offloading some poorly performing leather departments, and focusing on the better performing brands. The new CEO seems like he actually has a plan. I already own a few pairs of saucony, merril, and sperrys so I know they do a decent job making shoes. Anyways, WWW could be a nice short term play as they realign strategies heading into holidays. I see $10-12 a share as a nice goal by end of year.

warrens-buffet

You guys think WWW could have a chance? Nike been doing way better but perhaps if roaring kitty buys Saucony it can help put things on the right path

ivegotwonderfulnews

footwear is a very challenged industry right now. WWW said discounting through the end of the year just the other day. Onon said there was a ton of discounting out there. I think folks are concerned about the entire space not just crox.

malibul0ver

looks like WWW today - no L no D nothing no V no fucking nothing

ivegotwonderfulnews

anyone looking at $WWW right now? They have a bunch of shoe brands ( Merrill, saucony ....) They got crushed yesterday and are pretty cheap now. Def not a big grower but a value play. Interestingly their bonds also got crushed and now have a ytm of 10% through 2029! In junk territory but their brands have real value and and doubt there is really a bankruptcy risk in the near future

ghostofwhiskey

Market be like WWWW\___/WWW\___/

prince_8814

MMM will WWW

SkyBright9904

First prediction in 1998 was not only obviously totally wrong, but it was also not very perspicacious. In 1998 I was a company owner. I used Netscape and Alta Vista a lot. I was convinced that the internet with WWW was going to turn the world on its head. The second prediction is closer to the mark. We have had chatbots since Weizenbaum's Eliza around 1965. Since then AI has progressed slowly but significantly. But don't expect any landslides in the next decade or so. ChatGPT is pretty much state of the art today but AI is not on the threshold of some huge breakthrough.

MichaelS10

Got that WWW day I guess

BrainsNotBrawndo

Thanks for that. Gotta say, I find the Sotheby's [jpeg of the Tim-Berner's Lee source code of the first WWW implementation](https://sothebys-com.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/2d78f8d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/9933x14043+0+0/resize/9933x14043!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsothebys-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fdotcom%2Fd2%2Faf%2F53f5b0b8427292d117a7fa160ecc%2Fposter-autographed-vector-signature.png) to be more interesting to look at than a bored ape

O_Nikolakis

This is not V, this is WWW

Ready2gambleboomer

There will be....just not where you might suspect. It'll happen in the US before WWW3.....

Quito8a

AI is as big as when the WWW got started. It’s a game changer!

Independent_Tie_4984

Hadn't heard that. Serious geopolitical chess move. WWW III is definitely on the table if it happens. This is what we get for keeping Cuba isolated.

RGR111

How many WWW you got 

International_Ad27

Hoping for a short period of time it looks like WWW3 is about to break out and a secret camera is found in all Teslas to look up drivers skirts while at the same time a fucking meteor slams next to TSLA main production plant and no one knows if he was there , if everything is destroyed with hundreds of burning bodies. That would be great, I could dump all of my puts and buy some calls before everything returns to normal. What do you guys think my chances are?

MatthewJackson3

The computer and the WWW were both invented by a British person. Also why are so many Americans taking credit for things when they probably live in a trailer $20,000 trailer in Idaho 😂😂

hawkxp71

No. The WWW was invented by a brit, ie a software protocol. The hardware that connected the machines was created by funding from DARPA and it was originally called DARPAnet

pedropky1

[P!NK Panther](https://WWW.PinkPantherEth.com)

Unitedtendies

WWW

AltruisticDetail6266

>the WWW has been fucking our planet since it’s > >inception. maybe get off then behind a Wendy's, due to penetration

Sudden-Shock-199

How did APPLE obtain its music library?? Or Spotify? The internet is the BEAST my niqqa SNOOP D oh double G. I AGREE, it’s fucked up. the WWW has been fucking our planet since it’s inception. The day the payday for music died was the day WWW was released on the populace

computery_stuff

they should call it the WWW

InfamousMB

Elon hates BBC because he has Wittle White Weiner = WWW for short

FeralHat

I just hope it isn't WWW3 that brings us down.

haywardUNL

It came up in an e-mail; I thought about it seriously as I do make a living as a web developer and systems administrator. I read the e-mail on Wix, and thought about conversations I have had with colleagues about content management system (CMS) managed websites. In those conversations, nobody mentions Wix, Webflow or Weebly (also known as "WWW" which is ironically an antithesis of "world wide web" based on WWW co's terrible performance lol) Heck, hardly any mention of Squarespace - they seem to be doing well. Everyone mentions WordPress as the be-all, end-all CMS for web development.

bartturner

> Ngl I think you have a misunderstanding on how these monopolistic companies actually extract value I am old and been involved with the Internet since 1986. So think I am pretty familiar with how it works. I do NOT think you get why browsers are so valuable. You are looking at things way too simply. Browsers are all about protecting the things accessed through browsers. That is why they are so valuable and why Google winning the browser space was so important to them. They wanted a level playing field. > Microsoft makes money on licensing the operating system on computer that run on an architecture called x86. This is a really bizarre statement. First, Windows is NOT limited to X86. It also runs on ARM and there was even implementations on MIPS. But the architecture makes ZERO difference. It could run on the architecture the architect grew up on, VAX, and it would make no different for this conversation. So why even include? > That protocol is call RISC a Jimmy Crickets! RISC is NOT a protocol. It is a type of architecture. It is where instructions are fixed length so it is a lot easier to design pipelines such that you execute multiple instructions in parallel. But it is also an architecture that has been mostly adopted by Intel for X86 with a layer put on top of microcode that ties the reduced set of instructions together. But against this has NOTHING to do with the discussion at hand. This entire post is kind of bizarre. > You think google makes money on chrome? Google makes a fortune because of Chrome. It was so smart on them to do it. I loved it. Because at the time NOBODY thought there was an opportunity for a new browser. I am old. I built a white hardware Next machine just so I could use WorldWideWeb (WWW). Used Lynx on my Vax station as could not run Next. I know this is going to be very confusing to you. Because of the name of the first browser overlapping with what the web was called. I then moved to NCSA when it was in beta. Then Netscape, .... > No, they actually make the vast majority of revenue from from online advertising infrastructure. Google would have far greater expensive if they did not have Chrome. So yes Chrome makes them money. A lot of money. As does Android. > Therefore enabling all kinds of self dealing and anti-competitive practices. We finally got to something in your post that gets to the issue at hand. Please name these "anti-competitive practices"? You do realize the biggest source of income from Google they do NOT set the price or have anything to do with the price paid for the ad? Maybe this will help with your education. https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/6366577?hl=en So if there were 10 providers of search and they all used an auction then it would be the same price.

JusticeServedBRACIST

yea tucked away for situations just like these. ​ This is verbatim from the FEDS world wide web website, aka WWW.

Heap_Good_Firewater

I am among the least cool people ever (software engineers), but what's so cool about coming late to a speculative asset? The internet exploded in popularity after the WWW was introduced. It changed almost everything about society and the economy. Bitcoin has made some early adopters and whales very rich. Since then it has been used for scams, buying OxyContin and paying ransom. It's been 14 years. That's an *eternity* in technology. What action is left in crypto/Web3 is mostly centered on Ethereum and other newer chains. Bitcoin is outdated and slow. [https://towardsdatascience.com/the-blockchain-scalability-problem-the-race-for-visa-like-transaction-speed-5cce48f9d44](https://towardsdatascience.com/the-blockchain-scalability-problem-the-race-for-visa-like-transaction-speed-5cce48f9d44)

pilesofpilesofpiles

WWW3

Rustykilo

Let's just get it on shall we. WWW3. So if I survived I can be one those old man with the vet hat talking about the war in local dinner.

Unfair_Reception9549

I took about 2 days of time to rebalance and reset my portfolio by hand picking and creating two stock baskets. One replicates a blue chip ETF which have typically returned 14-17% CAGR over the past 10 years. The other is a mid cap to smaller large cap company basket with 39 hand picked stocks which averaged 13-15% CAGR over the past 10 years. I sold two of my allocations KO, and Danahar and traded them out for some more experimental and riskier stocks BBAR and WWW which is a different type of investing that takes more effort. Thanks tho

Marketbeez

Call option $WWW trust in Michael Burry!

Marketbeez

Micheal burry loaded up on $WWW

tachyonvelocity

"SELL" but also buy BABA, JD, MGM, COHR, WWW, and SKYW? 2 China, 2 discretionary, 1 semi, 1 regional airline. Doesn't seem like he his too bearish on some consumers at least.

OkCitizen

Ah yes, the old: ‘WWW’ pattern think I saw this one in the dotcom days

ProcrastinateDoe

I wonder why they're acting like they've got a monopoly on movie streaming services. Look here fella, you've got competitors, and pirates out on them WWW-seas!

venti_cocaine_latte

WWW3?

w033msa

What is the WWW on the top left of his screen?

FortuneAsleep8652

Lol WWW = "sport"

onee_winged_angel

I imagine it will likely be the other way around and Google integrate Lambda into Search before OpenAI manage to index the entire WWW.

attofreak

> once something like ChatGPT becomes even more mainstream in a few years, "mainstream" for what? Do you know what problem ChatGPT solves? Have you bothered solving complex task of any sort on it? Not high school/college assignments, *real* world problems? What is so special about it that somehow it cripples one of the cornerstones of modern WWW, biggest Data Science enterprise in human history, a company that is at the foundation of APIs necessary in advertising, geolocation, data mining, and the most commonly used OS in mobile and platforms beyond PC? Just because you can have a coherent chat with a glorified data aggregator, does not mean it is an "existential threat" to a company that basically paved the way for all this before you even learnt how to use the potty. > Currently, costs for an AI such as GPT-3 are so low that high usage would still only cost a few dollars a month for a single user. *what usage?* What exactly did your brilliant "I-am-another-Burry" autism discover that no one else did? Give Page and Brin a call, they might happily through a few millions worth of change if they lazily shake their pockets. > AIs make finding answers to questions way more efficient. ...do you know what you're talking about? So for people who are too lazy to read Wikipedia articles, they can just go to ChatGPT, write a poorly formed question with their clumsy, cheeto-crusted fingers, and get a generic answer with standard disclaimer of, "there is still lot of research to be done in this particular field." If you had really bothered to spend some time with ChatGPT, it is just a highly complex probability machine, predicting the most likely next word after a series of words have been created in a sentence. There are standard RNNs for that, but they have not sampled the millions of texts that ChatGPT did and then have the interface to be fed a prompt. If you think this barebones infrastructure is somehow "challenging" any industry, then you're no better than those "End is Nigh" junkies running around at Times Square. This isn't some "earth shattering" "A" or even and "I". It's a very fast implementation of standard statistical learning methods. It's really great that it can be done, this was an incremental step in interface design. But if you think that this somehow constitutes an "existential" threat to a behemoth of data science, internet and technology like Alphabet/Google, you really don't know much about tech - just another schmuck who watched way too many movies and now thinks every miniscule increment in technology is, "OH MY GAAWWWWD, THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING" scene from a movie. > These costs are likely to diminish even further as the technology improves and becomes more popular. Uh huh, and through what magic spell does that happen? When [Moore's Law is gradually dying it's slow death](https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/09/do-expensive-nvidia-graphics-cards-foretell-the-death-of-moores-law/), [cost of SRAM increasing](https://www.techspot.com/news/97000-cpu-gpu-sram-caches-not-shrinking-which-could.html), and the [already performance challenges of reaching few-nm node processes](https://www.utmel.com/blog/categories/integrated%20circuit/is-there-a-limit-to-the-chip-process-node), there is no easy scaling happening, "any time in the future" -- it's interesting how it is always something relegated down to that elusive "future", where all problems will magically resolve themselves. > I can go on and on, but essentially I believe that these AIs are still in their hype phase and as they become more mainstream, Google Search will no longer be as popular. You really didn't go on at all, just rubbed two brain cells and blurted out that as a "thought". > However, almost 60% of Alphabet's revenue comes from Google Search. While Alphabet was previously a money printer of a company, this threat makes it no longer one of the safest blue-chip bets. The only reason Alphabet, and every other company, is going to suffer is because of rising interest rates and increasing costs of servicing debt, which will force all companies to mass layoffs and scaling back investments in R&D. Congrats, you just managed to spot the obvious happening for months, but then conveniently managed to miss the mark. The stupidity of people here is really something to wonder. Like monkeys in a zoo, thumping their chest every other second thinking they are the alphas, while still sitting in a cage, screeching and hurling feces.

ThrallDoomhammer

WWW 3 declaration?

ferndogger

Yeah, don’t get too hung up on the shitcoins. Web 3 is supposed to be decentralized…as WWW was. Today all of the data is in the hands of a few and look how well that’s going./s

ferndogger

Web 3 literally means the third evolution of the internet. So…you’re saying the internet isn’t going to catch on. Got it. Jokes aside, I agree that the nascent developments were seeing that call themselves Web 3 won’t likely succeed. Neither did those avatar chat rooms when WWW first came out. The internet will 100% evolve into something better than it is today. Let’s just agree on that. Call it Web3 or whatever you like.

ComedianCommercial78

The WWW III will happen and 3M US solider die and they run out of men to replace dead and injured persons in the battle field where as china and India can refill their military. ThatS the only scenario US can lose the war. No other way.

Comfortable-Clerk127

WWW3 bitches!!!!

theslickplay

Good timing today on apple with the iphone satellite SOS call in case of Start of WWW3.

Affectionate-Idea690

Relax Bears Putin told me is not done and it only reached the border of a NATO state, no WWW10 happening soon, pump commence Relax Bears Putin told me is not done and it only reached the border of a NATO state, no WWW10 happening soon, pump commences

raulbloodwurth

The most common way to dismiss the internet in the 90’s was to claim that no one would use it. As Nobel prize winner Paul Krugman famously said: “most people have nothing to say to each other!” Secondary claim was that the tools were too difficult to use. IP protocols were invented in the 60s and TCP/IP protocol in the 70s. LANs in the 80s and WWW in the 90s. The internet evolved over nearly 40 years. Protocols like Bitcoin are also evolving—with no central authority or government sponsorship—and arguably much faster than the internet.

attofreak

If you think the entirety of that $1.2 trillion market is just BTC token, then arguing with you is like debating the merits of Web 2.0 (the foundation of current iteration of WWW, btw) with someone who still uses Windows 95 to log on to HTTP websites. [No matter in what detail it is explained to you](https://old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/ysy8ha/bloodbath_in_%C3%A7rypto_a_good_sign_for_the_equity/iw1x2oq/), you'll refuse to learn. That's fine too, people were crying about internet being, "just a fad" back in 90s too.

That-Whereas3367

CERN invented the WWW. I'm sure it is just a coincidence.

boreal_ameoba

Zuck is betting big on all things Metaverse, and at the end of the day, has almost total control over META. I'd consider being long META essentially being long Metaverse/Zuck. Metaverses (metaversae? ii?) may be a paradigm shift like WWW was the internet (Not too many people know about Gopher or the other protocols that were semi popular prior to the modern web). They may be a short-lived fad like Second-Life/Habbo Hotel. I wouldnt touch META unless you're okay with that gamble. Zuck and some other big names are betting the house on it, but it wouldnt be the first time a rich guy's ego and dreams get in the way of reality.

TwitterElon

LCID bringing in WWW's

Hacking_the_Gibson

You know you can make your own dumb web page and say whatever the fuck you want on it and host it on your air fryer from your house, right? It's very simple to set up a web server and start talking shit. The whole point of the WWW was decentralization and you dweebs that never learned how it worked all gravitated towards the walled gardens and then clutch pearls when a business that needs to sell ads to KO can't risk having those beverage banners appearing on the @killAllTheJews feed.

teerre

That's the wrong way to look at it. Selling headsets is just a minor part of it. The true value comes from controlling the main medium for human communication. To get an accurate picture of what Facebook wants, go back 40 years in time, imagine that Facebook already exists and they get to choose how HTTP works, how browsers will be build, how content is displayed, because how the WWW works. Fast forward 40 years and imagine that Facebook got a good portion of all revenue generated by anything related to the web. That's what they are going for. Same impact the internet had in human society, but with Facebook at the center. I truly hope they fail spectacularly, because this sounds terrible for anyone besides Zuck, but implying they are aiming to recover losses by selling headsets is simply wrong.

No-Comfortable9480

Relevant to stonks? Sure it’s another step towards WWW3. But for this week, all market cares about is if Google sold more/less ads to regards than usual

No-Comfortable9480

100% facts. Market only going up until WWW3 officially starts. The only question is when. 2days? 2weeks? 2months?

AdSimple663

BREAKING NEWS: Bob geldof to set up a new Bandaid to feed WSB ... Donations to WWW.WeAreFuckingRetards.com .

nvanderw

Sandier this. The fact that there is a market for these suggest an anticipation of a very low probability of TSLA going literally tits up on tail-risk events, such as WWW III \-Loss of giga-factory in China to CCP due to US-China escallations. \-EU giga-factory nonprofitable due to lack of resources due to EU regulations (rough winter). \-etc. etc. There is a lot of tail risk.