Reddit Posts
I made a descriptive post of every item that you can purchase using candies from Coingecko so you do not have to look
Any info about Filmo? I think they use crypto for some type of Film promotion. The app pay you in USDT.
12 years ago, The New York Times newspapers called Bitcoin a “bubble“ and implied that it may not survive. The price back then was at $9…
Hi there , am selling Private accounts freshly obtained by me. Only 1 Time Payment with a Lifetime warranty, bu Including best costumers services for more than 6000 orders.
$COOKIE Monster is Now trading LIVE on ERC-20 Network. Secure Your Spot!
Cryptocurrencies II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Cryptocurrencies II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Cryptocurrencies II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
[New] Cryptocurrencies II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Cheapest Full Access Store ⭐ 1$ Global Fixed Price ⭐ More Than 85 Products Available
Panic: The Untold Story of the 2008 Financial Crisis | Full VICE Special Report | HBO
These past 72 Hours were like a finale of Silicon Valley
Jamie Dimon & J.P. Morgan Lies and Backpedals On Bitcoin and Crypto
Cardano ranks #26 overall in the 2022 Brand Intimacy rankings - beating BMW, Nestle, HBO, ESPN, Bitcoin and Ethereum
house of the dragon token ($hdt) | nfts and play to earn game | no tax | liquidity locked 100 years | stealth launched on pancakeswap august 24, 1500 utc | safu project & experienced team| contract renounced | coinmarketcap & coingecko soon
House or Dragons Launches Tonight 7PM UTC on PANCAKESWAP !
Feds Seize $34 Million in Crypto From Unidentified Florida Man Who Sells Online Account Information Tied to People’s Netflix, HBO, and Uber accounts on The Dark Web
NFT's are much more than jpegs - All the tickets you buy will eventually be NFT's
NFT's are much more than jpegs - All the tickets you buy will eventually be NFT's
Watching Gaming Wall St on HBO Max is simply proof that we need cryptocurrency to succeed to as the rightful replacement of the traditional financial system.
Help me out cryptonauts… Why is Bill Maher against Crypto? Is HBO censoring benefits of crypto?
HBO is releasing a segment on Bitcoin Beach and El Salvador President
Remember to watch HBO's Real Sports on Tuesday evening. The episode is titled: "Bitcoin Beach: A Crypto Revolution".
Can someone explain to me how crypto isn't this generation's beanie babies?
No matter what anyone says, I don’t think Google will ever tokenize.
Learn about the crypto that's already being used by Disney (Marvel), HBO, Unity - RenderToken
Mentions
Oh god, were gonna turn finance/money into a subscription service like with Netflix, HBO max, Disney+ etc. Please God, send another flood. We've strayed too far again.
Off topic but is anyone else very excited about the new HBO Harry Potter series?
Is he the new Time Lord on HBO?
The chances spiked right around the time that Bitcoin doc was released on HBO
You may be interested in the HBO special Electric Money. It’s isn’t amazing, but not bad either. It asks this question loosely.
Reminds me of HBO Satoshi documentary. Just attention.
Chain of events as far as I know. * Coinbase purchased equity in Circle and gave USDC special treatment on USDC in the form of fee-free trading, free withdrawals on pretty much everything but ETH L1, and handing over a lot of the treasury yield. * Coinbase launches their own L2. USDC is popular on it. Coinbase does no revenue share back * Circle buys back their equity from Coinbase. * Circle announces they're going to make their own L2. * Coinbase now announces a special partnership with PayPal to treat their token like USDC. The HBO dramatized version of this should be a fun watch.
Sadly how I gain my info sometimes. He is an outcome from what the super PAC decides. Watched like two minutes of an HBO special and just made me sick. If you focus on the head of the snake you'll lose. It will grow back.
Cant wait what that HBO (Head of Burger Office) will say today. Yesterday Japan was in NATO and nobody knows Japan as good as him.
what do you mean with "unelected"? You can change your politicians once every 4 years with elections, and you depend on most people choosing the same as you, or you will suffer the politicians you did not choose and did not want. You can change your electricity provider any day, and your neighbors may choose a different one, without impacting your choice, and your electricity bill. The same applies to other companies and services. 1. Politicians and the government are not really elected, not even by the majority: 1. Trump got fewer votes than Clinton. 1. Nobody voted for Kamala in the primaries. 1. When are EU citizens voting for the European Commission? 1. Do we need to consider China, Russia, Venezuela,...? 1. Even in democratic countries like Italy, one person (Berlusconi) may concentrate mass media control, influencing voters. 1. Corporations are elected. They are easier to trust, precisely because they are easier to replace if they lose that trust. 1. Do you think Netflix is too woke? Try HBO! 1. Do you think Delta Airlines is not taking care of passengers properly? Try a different airline! 1. You do not trust the privacy in Samsung? Try Apple! Do you think Nokia is making the wrong decisions? They will be replaced in the market if so. 1. The less regulated the market, the more companies compete with each other, the more it has improved over the last few decades. Smartphones improved a lot, airplanes not so much.
HBO didn't even reach the right conclusion. DYOR.
by do your own research do you mean watch a single HBO documentary?
Uzumaki is an anime horror manga and now recently turned into an anime that involves a lot of spirals popping up in a town in a lot of very weird ways. I think you can stream it on HBO
They planned on increasing the block size. This was a big debacle in 2017 which caused the huge fork. I recommend watching Money Electric on HBO.
Everyone knows the correct way to succeed in crypto ia to make sure your chain never has any users. Ripple and Cardano are the platonic ideal of all blockchains because you can forever project your fantasies into the future. I think HBO's Silicon Valley covers this when describing how a startup should always be "pre-revenue". People want to but the dream, not the icky reality of scammers turning up on your permissionless blockchain.
Peter Todd =)) didn't you watch Money Electric on HBO? Pretty compelling case, he even admitted :P The exact quote from Peter Todd was that he is “the world’s leading expert on how to sacrifice your bitcoins … I’ve done one such sacrifice and I did it by hand”
> "Samson mow and a lot of other experts" Dying at the idea of Samson fucking Mow being an "expert". Dude just says shit like "Bitcoin $1M in 2025" and people latch onto him as a god because he's telling them exactly what they want to hear. As soon as he popped up in that HBO doc about Bitcoin I knew it was gonna be shit.
Trump loves Crypto. In fact, he's a HUUUUGGGGE fan of the Crypto Keeper and his old show on HBO.
It will end up on HBO Max filmed by the producers of "mystery of blind frog ranch"
Totally not satoshi, he’s not Canadian or British. I think that they got it right on the HBO documentary Money Electric and they make a great case. The problem is Dude isn’t going to come forward because it paints a target 🎯 on their back.
tldr; Peter Todd, a Bitcoin developer, discussed his involvement in an HBO documentary that speculated on the identity of Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. Todd revealed that he was unaware the documentary would focus on Satoshi's identity, suggesting it was a last-minute decision for marketing purposes. He criticized the documentary for advancing unproven theories and noted that HBO did not ask him to refute these claims, despite having evidence that could challenge the documentary's narrative. Todd emphasized the speculative nature of the documentary's claims. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Still a better take than the HBO documentary 😆
Watermarking my shit is what got my name into the HBO documentary 😤https://x.com/RomanReher/status/1844116724007960835
It could be Peter Todd he has to pay security after HBO called him Satoshi whether or not he is, he needs it.
Plot twist: it's Peter Todd after the HBO documentary
those HBO morons, or any "docu" directors should definitely get imprisoned for doing this
tldr; Peter Todd, a Bitcoin Core developer, was recently accused of being Satoshi Nakamoto in an HBO documentary. Despite denying the claims, Todd has taken security measures but insists he is not in hiding. He attended a Bitcoin conference in Switzerland and plans to speak at more events. The documentary director, Cullen Hoback, suggested circumstantial evidence linking Todd to Satoshi, but Todd dismissed these claims as ludicrous. Todd has avoided public recognition by refusing audio/video interviews. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
It would be hilarious if they made it of the person HBO picked in the documentary
tldr; Polymarket, a decentralized predictions market on the Polygon blockchain, has gained significant popularity this year, attracting users to bet on events like the U.S. presidential election and an HBO documentary. Despite its success in user engagement, it's unclear if this will benefit Polygon's token holders, as the tokens have dropped 65% this year. Polymarket has seen nearly $2.4 billion in bets on the presidential election, highlighting its mainstream appeal. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
I hope he sues them. I hope someone makes a movie about how sloppy producing at HBO screwed this guy.
He went from the hunted to the hunter. HBO should do a show about him.
I'm honestly surprised HBO would just name him unless other people were already aware of his name and would've made a documentary regardless ( like Netflix). Either way it's a scummy move.
The documentary was from HBO: Money electric.
The burden of proof is on HBO to support their claims. You can take anyone to court if you can show damages. If HBO can’t support their claims in court then they are guilty of libel and will have to pay for damages.
What exact premise would you be suing on for an HBO doc saying you're Satoshi Nakamoto wherein you literally say "I am Satoshi Nakamoto 🙂"
Why did he ever agree to the interviews HBO did? I’m sure he got paid too. Or maybe he didn’t think they’d try to narrow it down to him
I would sue the shit out of HBO Basically putting him and his family in grave danger
HBO Todd that he was Satoshi when he was just Peter all along
Sure HBO didn't make him sign a waiver before he voluntarily gave an interview about who Satoshi is where he straight up said he's Satoshi. He made his bed.
I honestly think that a company like HBO has some social responsibility to not just throw random names out and leave people with the remains of their shattered lives.
The documentary was a socially engineered smear campaign against BTC that used Peter as a scapegoat. I found it interesting that HBO did a 4 part series on Q which was excellent and then only gave 90 minute to a fascinating topic like Satoshi and BTC Has no one decided to see the similarity of " John Gault" and Satoshi Nakamoto? If you take this analogy it would have been a much better documentary and actually might have led to more information being discovered about this rabbit hole we all are on.
That HBO producer is a complete pos for pulling that on him. Literally putting Peter’s (and others) life in danger with little to no underlying basis, so that he could make a 3/10 basic YouTube write up over how bitcoin works.
Defamation is making false statements about someone. HBO didn't call him a genius, they claimed he's Satoshi Nakamoto. And while that might be flattery to some, it paints a huge bulls eye on the guys back. Criminals could target him for ransom for example.
And how does he show that HBO made a false claim? Short of producing the real Nakamoto, any defense will be argumentative but not conclusive. I don't like it either. I think HBO should do better. But suing them is easier said then done.
>If Todd had a way to conclusively prove not being Nakamoto, I think he would have done that already. He did. He already provided HBO with pictures of him vacationing and doing activities when Satoshi was posting on BTCtalk. I don't think Satoshi was skiing while posting on the internet. I don't know that that's slam dunk but I'm sure if he digs deeper he can find the proof he needs.
I don't really understand why HBO would think that the most egocentric person on their documentary would be the least selfish person in the world. Bananas.
He only needs to show that HBO made a false claim. It’s on HBO to support their claims.
Peter Todd should sue the satoshi out of HBO
HBO: Peter Todd is Satoshi Nakamoto Petter Todd: I am not Satoshi Nakamoto Journalists: Peter Todd is Satoshi Nakamoto!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HBO did this documentary, not Netflix.
I mean, there is always going to be a legitimate interest in knowing who Satoshi is/was, but the documentary (I've watched it) didn't have a strong case at all. That, in my opinion, is the damning part. Not investigating who Satoshi is -after all if it wasn't HBO it would be someone else- but going ahead in naming Todd without convvincing proofs, knowing what that would mean for him.
I agree. Speaks to HBO's journalistic standards that they published this without conclusive proof. However if Todd wants to sue, the burden of proof is on him.
I‘d bet he will drag HBO in front of a court for this
It was an HBO documentary, oops.
HBO put a target on his back for entertainment.
tldr; Canadian cryptographer Peter Todd has gone into hiding after being named as a potential inventor of Bitcoin in the HBO documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery.” The film, which aired on October 9, explores the identity of “Satoshi Nakamoto” and ends with Todd ambiguously stating, “Well yeah, I’m Satoshi Nakamoto.” Todd denies being Nakamoto and claims the documentary used deceptive material, putting his safety at risk. He emphasizes the dangers of falsely identifying someone as Nakamoto, citing threats like robbery and kidnapping. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Peter Todd is hiding after being "unmasked" as Satoshi Nakamoto in an HBO doc: "The Bitcoin Mystery". He denies it, saying the film took things out of context.
When Canadian developer Peter Todd found out that a new HBO documentary, *Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery,* was set to [identify him as Satoshi Nakamoto](https://www.wired.com/story/unmasking-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-again/), the creator of Bitcoin, he was mostly just pissed. “This was clearly going to be a circus,” Todd told WIRED in an email. The identity of the person—or people—who created Bitcoin has been the subject of speculation since December 2010, when they disappeared from public view. The mystery has proved all the more irresistible for the trove of bitcoin Satoshi is widely believed to have controlled, [suspected to be worth many billions of dollars](https://blog.bitmex.com/satoshis-1-million-bitcoin/) today. When the documentary was released on October 8, Todd joined a long line of alleged Satoshis. Documentary maker Cullen Hoback, who in a previous film claimed to have [identified the individual behind QAnon](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrgFyRrSk8Q), laid out his theory to Todd on camera. The confrontation would become the climactic scene of the documentary. But Todd nonetheless claims he didn’t see it coming; he alleges he was left with the impression the film was about the history of Bitcoin, not the identity of its creator. Since the documentary aired, Todd has repeatedly and categorically denied that he created Bitcoin: “For the record, I am not Satoshi,” he alleges. “I think Cullen made the Satoshi accusation for marketing. He needed a way to get attention for his film.” Read the full story: [https://www.wired.com/story/peter-todd-was-unmasked-as-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-now-hes-in-hiding/](https://www.wired.com/story/peter-todd-was-unmasked-as-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-now-hes-in-hiding/)
Peter Todd of course. Do you even have HBO?
*Haha, Carmen Sandiego? Love it! But hey, don’t be surprised if next season HBO has us all hunting for the real Satoshi on a world tour, solving puzzles along the way. First stop: Mt. Gox, then off to Silk Road, with the grand finale in some bunker filled with cold wallets. Sounds like a hit to me!* 😄
The HBO Satoshi Nakamoto was a FUD!!! movies The mover never proved who is Satoshi and the one oerson Satoshi is Not!! and that Creg Wright the SCAMMER IF Bitcoincash
It’s Peter Todd. HBO documentary figured it out! 13 year old!
This is the guy from the HBO documentary !
Thank God for good people. Did the HBO thing come out with their theory on who designed BTC?
Yesterday I slept watching the HBO documentary. Woke up orange pilled the next morning and bought some more. Asked myself whether there's any importance as to who Satoshi is, the answer is got from myself is it does matter. Did it matter if Pythagoras was a gay? No My only concern is safety of the the people they pointed out without concrete proof. Another concern is it would have been better if Satoshi had burnt their coins and provided a proof if there's a way to do it.
its the freemasons behind btc , its part of there NWO new world order one world currency agenda,thats why they make HBO specials for u to watch to keep u entertained and always wondering if its omeone else but its a group call skull and bones
This is not why. There isn't much new to spin up more theories. A HBO documentary rehashing old info is a memberberry, not some new revelation.
HBO should make this into a documentary or use it as the premise for the next true detective series.
New Video: Satoshi Nakamoto is Not Peter Todd | But Cullen Hoback is a Muckraker for the HBO Gutter Press https://youtu.be/pmL-sgVqjFs
tldr; Nick Szabo, an American cryptographer, is speculated to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous inventor of Bitcoin. Szabo's contributions to the blockchain sector date back to the early 1990s, including the introduction of 'smart contracts' and the proposal of 'Bit Gold,' a precursor to Bitcoin. Despite similarities between Bit Gold and Bitcoin, Szabo has consistently denied being Nakamoto. A new HBO documentary has reignited speculation about Nakamoto's identity, with Szabo being a leading contender. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
HBO just used this topic for promotional uses. You don’t seem to understand Bitcoin at all otherwise you would understand how important Satoshi’s anonymity is. People just love mysteries like D.B Cooper
The show was really disappointing - very superficial and gimmicky. And the “reveal” at the end was really sloppy… they drew on a tiny piece of evidence and confronted Peter Todd at the end in a cringeworthy ending. I expected more from an HBO documentary.
tldr; Adam Back, an early Bitcoin developer, refutes claims from HBO's documentary that Peter Todd is Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. Back argues that the true creator is likely unknown and emphasizes the benefits of Bitcoin's decentralized nature without a central figure. He highlights the importance of knowledgeable individuals participating in documentaries to prevent misinformation. The documentary's claim is criticized due to timeline inconsistencies, as Todd became involved with Bitcoin years after its creation. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
**HBO documentary "Money Electric" claims that Canadian Bitcoin Core Dev Peter Todd is Satoshi, but not convincing. Will we ever know who Satoshi Nakamoto is?** [https://peakd.com/hive-121566/@vikisecrets/hbo-documentary-money-electric-claims-that-canadian-bitcoin-core-dev-peter-todd-is-satoshi-but-not-convincing-will-we-ever-know-who-satoshi-nakamoto-is-8zx](https://peakd.com/hive-121566/@vikisecrets/hbo-documentary-money-electric-claims-that-canadian-bitcoin-core-dev-peter-todd-is-satoshi-but-not-convincing-will-we-ever-know-who-satoshi-nakamoto-is-8zx)
HBO investigating Satoshi’s identity? I guess next they'll uncover where Waldo's been hiding too. Just what we needed, more wild guesses about the \*real\* crypto mastermind. At this point, Satoshi is better off staying a legend!
HBO thought they did something there. Hahaha, Todd as Satoshi? Give me a break!
HBO thought they really know who's Satoshi is
Even with just the bits of the chat shown on-screen in the HBO doc, I agree that Peter's comment was likely taken out of context. That said I'm struggling to find the convo in question via the freenode explorer (even though it seems to be the same UI shown on-screen in the doc). Any ideas as to why? I tried searching nick:petertodd but the 900+ messages returned didn't contain the ones in question. (I assume these archives are partial, just a bit confused coz visually it seemed like Cullen was using the same one?)
If anything happens to him, HBO should be held liable.
Poor guy, just minding his own business getting on with life when out of nowhere HBO paints one of the biggest targets in the world on his back, putting him and all his loved ones in danger, all based on a load of bullshit
HBO said Todd did and I said woah Todd did my friend said no Todd did, we Todd did
tldr; HBO's documentary "Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery" speculates that Bitcoin developer Peter Todd could be Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. The film suggests Todd's involvement based on his early contributions to Bitcoin and similarities in writing style. However, the documentary has been criticized for its speculative nature and lack of new evidence. Todd and others in the crypto community have dismissed the claims, with Todd expressing concern over the potential danger such allegations pose to him. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
It was him. There is much much more evidence that somehow HBO didn’t present. 68.164.57.219 Peter Todd was invited to join the Blue Sky list by Hal Finney … in 2000! He wrote on Blue Sky list Sat, 10 Mar 2001 12:35:20 -0500 “ Personally I like the idea of hashcash if, and only if, it’s structured like a real currency as opposed to simply proof of work. In the real world you pay for resources used. In many cases this should also apply to P2P and other computer systems. Of course getting hashcash workable as a real currency is extremely difficult. I’ve thought of a scheme that would work (coins are signed by owner and can only be changed (signed to a different owner) by owner) except you need a decentralized “central” database of all the hashcash that’s been minted. Unworkable. !@#$ spend-twice problem. “ https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/bluesky/2001-03/msg00063.html Finny, Szabo, and Back all communicates for years with the “wizz kid” PT publicly and privately. Todd was a heavy freenet user. They know it’s him or did in case of Hal. There are many ways to prove you aren’t Satoshi. PT won’t be able to do that.
It was him. There is more that HBO didn’t notice.
Most importantly: does it worth my 9.99€ to subscribe to HBO for one month to watch it? Thanks
uh, how so? Neither D&D nor HBO have anything to do with ROP.
HBO playing a losing game. If the real Satoshi wanted their identity to be public, it would’ve been public already. Real one is chilling, probably living their best life. Even if HBO was right, there’s no way he’d admit it😂
>Not a lot of chatter about the HBO doc here Because the real bitcoiners don't care.
Not a lot of chatter about the HBO doc here. I thought it was interesting, but didn't prove Peter Todd was Satoshi anymore than past theories about other individuals. It can't be the first time somebody's scrutinized those early Bitcoin forum posts. It kinda made Samson Mow look like a doofus IMO.
HBO hyped that stupid crap up and really ended it with a **”what if satoshi was all of us, true believers and hodlers!!!”**
HBO is owned by Warner/Discovery. Discovery had their own financial issues in recent history so they crank out crap content to maximize potential views with low level research behind it. TV is only here to brainwash.
This is basically a Discovery documentary with the HBO brand. Discovery is tanking the reputation HBO had.